Slashdot Mirror


Windows Drivers for Mac Rolling Out

OSXpert writes "Sure, we all know that Windows can now run on intel Apple Computers. Alas, the solution does not include drivers, and until now Mac users could still only hope to be able to use every application available to their Windows counterparts. However, with drivers now working 100% on the Mac Mini and drivers for the MacBook Pro only lacking video (which, by the looks of the 2nd link is only days away), Mac users now have a complete and working Windows solution."

9 of 522 comments (clear)

  1. If you're not part of the Windows Solution by LiftOp · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you're part of the Windows Problem, I guess.

  2. arrrg by Anubis350 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see this comment on every thread dealing with this. Here are the answers:

    1)Why not? It's geeky, it's fun, it's what being a nerd is all about.

    2)Games. What if you want to be productive on OSX but want to reboot to play some win-only games every so often

    3)tax software. This is a big one for this, why bother buying a win machine for something you do once a year when you can just install win on your nice mac.

    4)Some people honestly like apple hardware but need to run windows. Try finding a non-apple box with as small a desk footprint as a mac mini.

    5)Along the same lines, people who do all their work on laptops and dont want to carry 2 laptops around can now just carry a macbook pro.

    6)Quick compatability checks for software. Yes, I realize that for major cross platform dev you might want 2 boxes, but for quick checks (see the laptop comment too) this is invaluable.

    There are more of course, thats off the top of my coffee-depirved head right now.

    ~Anubis

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  3. Re:This says it all really by matgorb · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean this.

  4. Re:Hurray! by Ravenscall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unpimp my Mac?

    MS representing on the Apple tip ya'll.

    --
    You say you want a revolution....
  5. Lord of the... by maillemaker · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Do you know how the orcs came to be? They were elves once." :)

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  6. Re:Don't run your car on railroads.......... by feijai · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So far MAC users were proud of their closed door OS which runs on specific hardware, is bullet proof and user friendly.. Why now MAC user want to even try to run windows on their highly expensive hardware? What happend once average MAC user gets addicted to supereasy but insecure windows? Will MAC loose or increase their marketshare? Interesting question
    Another interesting question: Will Slashdot ever learn that "Mac" isn't an acronym? It's short for "Macintosh".
  7. Re:Counterproductive? by nutznboltz2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For me, this would be the perfect solution. I am the lone hardware tech for a College (not counting student work study). I have to support both Windows and Mac OS. For me, having a laptop that will let me dual boot means I don't have to worry about grabbing the right bag, or having the right software on hand when I head out and make service calls. It also means that support for either OS is just a reboot away.

    Yes, a geeky part of me wants to dual boot just because I can, but in my field, having a dual boot machine just makes sense. I can run the Mac for my day to day stuff, and launch Windows when we need to troubleshoot some odd scientific software package designed for DOS that they are still using (happens a lot more then people realize), or when I need to run specialized software like Datatel locally; as remote desktop has made that need even less of a need.

    It also means that I have trimmed my office computer budget. One Mac Book Pro, although a little pricey, is much cheaper then an iBook and a Windows laptop ($1000 for the iBook, $1300 for the PC laptop we have stanardized on). $2300 total compared to the $1800 for my MBP.

    Honestly, I think there are 3 camps of people.
    1. Geeks who want to try this out
    2. People like me, who could actually benefit from it
    3. People who want the PC games

    Of the above list, I think group 1 will tire of it quickly. Group 2 has the most to gain from this. Group 3 should really wait for DarWine or Qemu, but for the short term, this will work for them.

    Just my $0.02

    --nutz

  8. Tired argument. by ntxb229 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm getting so tired of this argument and I'm not sure why it's been modded funny. There are plenty of reasons putting windows on your mac is worthwhile. For work purposes you may want have to run some windows only applications which won't work under virtualization. For play you may want to boot up some games that are windows only. In academic settings you can buy one machine and tripple boot it (Windows/OSX/Linux). I know my school a lot of the labs already dual boot windows and linux.

  9. Re:Superior hardware? Last I checked it's not... by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 5, Informative
    Uh..what? Apple screamed that it didn't need USB? Last time I checked Apple was the first (or one of the first) manufacturers to ditch legacy ports and go USB-only..back in 1998.

    As for SMP Apple released the dual processor Power Mac 9500 in 1995. They started using PCI around 1996.

    "Well we all know how that turned out..."

    Apparently not.