Slashdot Mirror


Preview Google's New Search Results Page

ubermiester writes "Ars Technica demonstrates how to copy and paste a bit of JavaScript to preview a facelifted Google. Ars points out that 'the changes are minimal, but they give some insight into Google's plans.'" I thought we already knew those: world domination.

39 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. World Domination? by Eightyford · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently the first step towards world domination is to move the category tabs to the left of the search results. Ooh, I'm scared too.

  2. To be honest... by trogdor8667 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've read the article on the Ars Technica forum, and all the comments there. I'm inclined to think this is a nice change, but honestly, all they did was move the top links to a bar on the left. Its nice, and will probably look slightly better on my widescreen laptop, but its such a small change, I doubt many people will notice once it goes live.

    1. Re:To be honest... by user24 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I doubt many people will notice once it goes live.

      you kidding? this is google we're talking about, GOOGLE!!
      It's a revolutionary new approach to search, it's the next best thing, it's marvellous, it's hip cool and groovy, sheesh.. 'no-one will notice' indeed...
    2. Re:To be honest... by CodeBuster · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot the part where it integrates people centered applications on a collaborative platform with total quality management propagated across the enterprise while simultaneously increasing productivity, lowering costs, and solving world hunger seamlessly.

    3. Re:To be honest... by chrisd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We test interface tweaks all the time to see how people 'like' them. Doesn't mean we will or will not deploy them. So....Nothing (much) to see here, move along :-)

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    4. Re:To be honest... by kleptonin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All words are made up.

    5. Re:To be honest... by mattmatt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Synergy is a perfectly cromulent word.

  3. old news by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ummm, they've been experimenting with this for about two months now. I get a results page in this layout about once a week or so.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  4. not much by carsonc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's good in that you know if it's worth looking at the other categories without clicking on anything.

  5. I, for one... by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new column re-arranging overlords.

  6. How does one go about "discovering" this code? by keilinw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Very interesting... and somewhat disappointing. I was expecting to see a completely new interface, not the addition of a bar on the left side of the screen. Don't get me wrong, this is useful and a bit attractive.

    However, what I'd really be interested in is whether or not someone outside of Google could have come up with this code themselves? Or, is it an inside job? Or perhaps it is an "unofficial" preview release.

    What is the /. communities response to this....I'm dying to know!

    Matthew Wong
    http://www.themindofmatthew.com

    1. Re:How does one go about "discovering" this code? by isometrick · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google beta tests new features on a subset of its regular users, who are identified by cookies. So someone released their cookie which you set with javascript, and voila: the features show up for you.

  7. Changing it back. by soulctcher · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who made the change and want the old way back, it's as simple as clearing the google.com PREF cookie in your browser. If you don't know how to clear a single cookie, then clear all of them and it will be included.

  8. not new (maybe slashdot new; but not new) by amazon10x · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Uh... this isn't that new. Google has been showing up like this on my mom's laptop (widescreen so it's a big benefit) for about 3 or 4 months now.

    I guess google must've detected that it was widescreen and changed the layout so that it i smore efficient in using the viewing window when fullscreened.

    1. Re:not new (maybe slashdot new; but not new) by isometrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not everyone gets these features (so it is news to most), and your mom didn't get the new features because of a wide screen.

      See my other comment for an explanation.

  9. Wow by ElephanTS · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks /. it was amazing to see some of the text move left. Don't forget to keep us posted about other exciting changes such as Google's got a new coke machine or whatever. Us hackers get off on that, it's in our blood.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  10. Re:News for Nerds... by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could go to digg and find out what Steve Jobs had for breakfast.

    I bet it was really cool and trendy, and worked way better than what Bill Gates had for breakfast.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  11. World Domination! by Lord+Gimli · · Score: 2, Funny

    This proves that the real brains behind Google is The Brain

    Pinky's job is to come up with mispellings of words so you get somewhat meaningful "Did You Mean:" suggestions!

    --
    "Mentally confused and prone to wandering."
  12. Re:Er, wow. by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indeed, that's not worth discussing. Han DID shoot first, and anyone who says otherwise is an idiot (including George Lucas).

  13. Old news++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yup, I've seen it many times, too. No Digg.

  14. Still no web standards... by StandardsSchmandards · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder when Google will change their HTML to be compliant with the W3C recommendations? It is amazing that they are so far behind other companies with regard to markup quality.

    1. Re:Still no web standards... by RalphSleigh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC they do this to save bandwidth, all those "'s add up.

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    2. Re:Still no web standards... by AeroIllini · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, I'm sure it's to save bandwidth.

      Some quick math:

      I analyzed the source of the result page for "w3c recommendations". After looking at the page in the validator, I decided the following things were missing:

      Two <img> tag src= attributes. Assuming a three-letter filename, that's (src="xxx.gif")*2 = 26 bytes.

      Three <script> tag type= attributes. That's (type="text/javascript")*3 = 66 bytes.

      Two <style> tag type= attributes. That's (type="text/css")*2 = 30 bytes.

      205 attributes in the header and footer with missing quotes. That's 410 bytes.

      12 attributes in each result with missing quotes. That's 10 results per page = 240 bytes.

      Grand total: 772 bytes per page of results.

      Using the highly non-authoritative figure of 200 million queries a day, that means that Google saves almost 144 GB of data transfer EVERY DAY, just by leaving out the quotation marks. I imagine leaving out all the unnecessary whitespace saves them at least double that.

      So yeah, probably for bandwidth.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  15. Meh. It's ok, but . . . . by dep01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you click on, say, "Images" on the left of the search results, you see the images, but then the sidebar is gone.... You should be able to click on Images, then Groups, then back to Web without it taking away your sidebar. It breaks the paradigm. But perhaps that's due for this being a beta thing.

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  16. I'm not crazy! by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank you for mentioning this. I thought Google was going nuts, but I never saw it again, so I thought I was going nuts.

    At least if I'm going nuts, it's going to manifest itself in some other, more interesting (or at least entertaining) way.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  17. Choices, choices by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Funny

    I finally arrived at the same conclusion, but untila fter hours of soul searching.

    Google or Taliban?
    Google or Taliban?
    Google or Taliban?

    But once I realized the Taliban would shoot me rather than consider moving the tabs, the choice became easy.

  18. Unlimited cookies in google code by saboola · · Score: 3, Funny

    up up down down left right left right B A Try it. It works.

  19. wrong celestial object by mennucc1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    world domination? I think Google is more into moon domination

  20. It's amazing isn't it! by Expert+Determination · · Score: 3, Funny

    The best minds in the world, all of whom have been hire by Google, came up with that new UI. I'm simply blown away by how good it is. It needs to be reported in every single media outlet on the planet because it's so earth shattering. You've really gotta hand it to Google - it makes the efforts of mere mortals look paltry by comparison. I don't know why /. even has news stories about other companies.

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  21. Wow, this is bad news for Yahoo/MS by moochfish · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS and Yahoo better do something equally innovative to catch up. Google's really leading the pack now!

  22. Apparently just a mockup by aniefer · · Score: 3, Informative

    It appears that the green bars beside the other categories don't actually portray the number of search results for the other categories. They remain the same from search to search, even when a given search returns no results.

  23. Some other new google 'features' by Ivo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Earlier today I noticed some other irregularities in google's search results. They seem to be a bit manipulative in the results they present. I've noted them in my blog: http://www.achievo.org/blog/archives/34-Google-sta rting-to-think-for-me.html

  24. The second step is to break globalisation by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google has changed a lot in its interface over the past year. Has anyone else had the following problem?:

    I'm living in one country but want to see results from another (in my case, I'm in Germany but I want to see English results). In the good old days, google had a radiobutton that let you choose between "results from the web" and "results in German" (or, rather, "Deutsche Ergebnisse"). But not anymore. Now, even if I explicitly type "www.google.com" in my address bar (firefox, in English, with locale set to US), the stupid server hands me back a google.de redirect. The radiobutton is gone. So is the point in the preferences where I could, back in the day, decide that I wanted results in all languages. It's been replaced by a list of checkboxes where I can, in principle say I only want results in English. But, heavens, I want results in German AND English. Okay, so I check "English" and "German".

    Guess what I get? A preordered list with all the German results first (since I'm on google.de. What else could I want anyway?), then the English ones. Like, first the result from de.wikipedia.org, while the English one is nowhere to be seen.

    Hey Google! Some people don't live in their homecountries. Yet they fucking want to see results in their own language. It's completely beyond me how a company that has fostered globalisation so much could possibly exclude all ex-pats from their interface.

    I've now changed to yahoo (which still has the "results from the web" button). Let's see how long until they will abandon it, too.

    1. Re:The second step is to break globalisation by comcn · · Score: 2

      Click on "Go to Google.com" or "Google.com in English" on the home page (bottom right)? Otherwise, try going to www.google.com/ncr (where these links go to). You'll need to allow cookies so that Google doesn't redirect you back to your country page again.

      You can also set your preferred language for search results in the Preferences page.

    2. Re:The second step is to break globalisation by shellbeach · · Score: 2

      But not anymore. Now, even if I explicitly type "www.google.com" in my address bar (firefox, in English, with locale set to US), the stupid server hands me back a google.de redirect

      So just block all cookies from google.com - you'll never have any problems again. You should be blocking the cookies anyway - if you don't, google stores your search history on their server, which isn't exactly my idea of privacy ...

  25. Re:Er, wow. by glsunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, Han doesnt shoot first, Han shoots solo.

  26. Re:Okay, very funny by ajdlinux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clear your cookies. In Fx go to Tools - Options, I think, in Fx 1.5 Tools-Clear Private Data.

  27. Spy on your queries by JamMasterJGorilla · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sweet,
    The person whomanages PREF=ID=fb7740f107311e46 can now look at all of the search terms entered by slash dot readers.

    A back door by the Department of Justice to capture Google search queries?

    comp.lang.ja...ogrammer
    microsoft.pu...x.avalon
    microsoft.pu...indowsxp
    alt.personals.spanking
    soc.sexuality.spanking
    aus.comms.mobile
    comp.os.linux.announce
    comp.lang.functional
    comp.editors
    comp.lang.scheme.c

  28. Clusty!!! by codefungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember Turbo10.com? And how much it's useless? Well, there is another search engine that I actually find myself useing. It's called clusty.com. There are 2 really cool features of this search engine. First, it clusters stuff. Like, let's say you are searching linux desktop. You go to google and search, you get all kinds of stuff...pretty useful I agree. However, you search clusty, and the results are broken down by subject...operating system, kernel...desktop. Very cool for research.
    The second cool feature is that in the search result itself, you can preview the page. Just click the magnafying glass.

    Use clusty 20% of the time, it's cool!

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!