Slashdot Mirror


Ballmer Babies Banned From iPods and Google

Valah writes "In a recent Fortune interview with Steve Ballmer, the newer kinder Microsoft CEO is not only ready to take on the videogaming, search, music download and mobile markets - but he's also laying down the law in his own house. Steve says that his kids are not allowed to use Google or have an iPod."

66 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Would a different approach be better? by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    I'd take the other approach - if they choose rival manufacturers then study first hand why they do so.

    First hand experience can tell you a lot more than market research sometimes, and might just give future MS products an edge.

    1. Re:Would a different approach be better? by masklinn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whoa, study? It's Steve Ballmer we're talking about, if he as much as SEEs his kids anywhere near iPods or within 20m of a computer displaying a Google page it'll be Chair Throwing time, he'll Fucking Bury(TM) them. He's done it before and he'll do it again. He's going to Fucking Kill(TM) his children.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:Would a different approach be better? by aborchers · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think this is great. Knowing how kids typically react to this kind of thing fom parents, we can be virtually assured they will rebel against MS as adolescents and grow up to be Linux developers!

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Would a different approach be better? by w3weasel · · Score: 4, Funny
      That is NOT an elephant hiding behind that tree... it's not there.
      -- S. Balmer
      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    4. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Machina+Fortuno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just like all the pastor's kids who became coke dealers, right? Hahaha, I do think this is pretty funny honestly though. But really... with a dad like that, who cares if you have an iPod or not. They could probably twist him arm into getting their own Vista backdoor! :P (hold shift and eat a pretzel during boot, and Vista all Vista code will tranform into a robot ready for your command)

      --
      ...
    5. Re:Would a different approach be better? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Funny
      Whoa, study? It's Steve Ballmer we're talking about, if he as much as SEEs his kids anywhere near iPods or within 20m of a computer displaying a Google page it'll be Chair Throwing time, he'll Fucking Bury(TM) them. He's done it before and he'll do it again. He's going to Fucking Kill(TM) his children.

      Yeaaaarrrgggghh! Honor me, children! HONOR MEEEEE! GIVE IT UP FOR MEEEEEEEEEE yeaaaaaar

      You know what you need? DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU NEED?!
      DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE *cough* DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE
      *hacking paroxysm* DISCi... *pants heavily* its all about the DISCIPLINe children... jesus.... fucking.. dis.. I... I.... *collapses in a puddle of sweat and desperation*

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    6. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you people are being too hard on the guy.

      He's just talking about believing in his product enough to feed his kids his own dog food.

      Wait. That came out wrong...

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Would a different approach be better? by chrismcdirty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pastors' kids don't become coke dealers. Those are cops' children. Pastors' children become whores.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    8. Re:Would a different approach be better? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just like all the pastor's kids who became coke dealers, right?

      Not coke dealers, no, but a good many of them, perhaps even the vast majority, become anti-orginized religion and even; gasp!

      Atheists.

      If you want to get something done:

      1. Do it yourself
      2. Hire someone to do it for you
      3. Forbid your kids to do it

      Children of pastors all sin intentionally at least once or twice, just, well, because. It's called "growing up." Asserting yourself as an individual human being and not just a plaything of your parents.

      One of the key factors in determining whether a child adopts a permanant choice agaisnt their parent's directives is whether or not, as adults, they can perceive that the stricture actually makes sense, or whether their parents were just being assholes.

      If the parents were just being assholes then the likelyhood of the children adopting a contrarian position to "stick it to them" goes up dramatically.

      So the question is, is Steve Ballmer making a stricture that makes sense (i.e., don't be a crack ho), or is he just an asshole?

      I leave this as an exercise for the stundent, but advise you to know where your chair is.

      KFG

    9. Re:Would a different approach be better? by twofidyKidd · · Score: 5, Funny

      (hold shift and eat a pretzel during boot, and Vista all Vista code will tranform into a robot ready for your command)

      For the record, I just tried that with WinXP, and I got the blue screen of death.

      ...just so you know...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    10. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Ruphuz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, given they are Ballmer's offspring, they would not be simply Linux developers, but Linux developers! Linux developers! Linux developers!

      --
      My other post is a First.
    11. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Vengie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Mormons, I love your sexually repressed gay sons.

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    12. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny
      we can be virtually assured they will rebel against MS as adolescents and grow up to be Linux developers!

      That would be the ultimate kick in his gelatinous belly. Almost as bad as:

      One of Ballmer's kids walks in from school, wearing black make-up, trench-coat and hair, with multiple body piercings.

      Steve. Say, why have you come home from school looking like that? I told you, this is a conformist household. No Google, no iPod.

      Kid. Muuuuhh! [Slinks off.]

      Steve. Hey! I'm talking to you, come back here. I don't like you getting involved with all that "goth" business... say, what's that hanging out of your bag?

      Kid. [Shyly] Oh that ... that's nothing. [Kid tries to scamper away, but Steve grabs it by the arm, and takes the object.]

      Steve. [Disappointed] Oh, no. I don't believe this. Didn't your mother and I tell you? I mean... how could you?

      Kid. What? They're just install disks—

      Steve. For FreeBSD 6.0!

      Kid runs away. Steve tries to pick up a dinner chair, but realises it has been bolted to the floor.

    13. Re:Would a different approach be better? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      And, since they're probably going to inheret large bank accounts from dear ol' dad (assume he doesn't fucking kill them first), they'll be RICH linux developers. A bit of an oxymoron don't you think?

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    14. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Skim123 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, seeing how Vista's release date has continually slipped, his kids will probably never use that, either.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    15. Re:Would a different approach be better? by bobdinkel · · Score: 4, Funny

      It made my day to see this modded as informative. Thank you, Slashdot.

      --
      A publicly traded company exists solely to make profits for shareholders.
    16. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hrm. Goth outfit? No. I think jeans and a black turtleneck would go over much worse... :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    17. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Goddamn, that's the funniest thing I've read all day, good use of TM there.

      On another note, how unpopular must Ballmer's kids be at school? No iPods or Google? Might as well tattoo kick me signs on their backs.

      At least when they rebel, it won't be to drugs or promiscuity, it'll be to the Itunes Music Store.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    18. Re:Would a different approach be better? by satanami69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do I care if one of them is gay? I have 20 more to find a few wives.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    19. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      What is the penalty for polygamy



      <answer>Multiple wives<answer>



      I'll be here all week, please try the veal.

    20. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Posting this anonymously because even though I no longer work at Microsoft, I don't want them to know who I am or where I work now.

      Funny you should mention dog food. I'm a former Microsoft employee and "dogfooding" is what Microsoft calls internal betas, and "we eat our own dog food" is a pretty common expression at MSFT.

      Last night, as I was navigating around my new cell phone, I was thinking "This isn't a bad phone, but I liked the interface better on my old one (I didn't get another from that vendor because my old one broke too many times), but you know what? I wish Apple would start making cell phones. The UI would be the best; if they sold them, I'd buy one right now." That must be MSFT's worst nightmare. Or one of them, at least.

      Steve Ballmer makes reference in TFA to convergence devices, and to expect to see announcements from MSFT on that in the next twelve months. OK, maybe. Maybe they'll even succeed. But I think a more likely scenario for success would be Apple selling cell phone-iPod hybrids and eating Windows Mobile's lunch. Microsoft has some good products (sadly, those are usually the ones that get the least attention), but they don't have anything that competes with an Apple product that is as good as the Apple product. I'm sure an Apple cell phone would be that way, too.

      About Ballmer's kids, he only *thinks* they don't use Google. Would you want to be laughed at for being the only kid at school who didn't use Google and said "I'll MSN Search it and get back to you" (I'm not kidding, that's what people say at MSFT; you're not allowed to use Google as a verb. I was actually *ordered* not to say "google it" when I was a n00b there). I think what he should have said is "They don't use Google or iPods at home where I can keep tabs on them."

      His reference to having them brainwashed, though, was serious, I'm sure. That's the reason I left Microsoft: the culture is very brainwashed. The propaganda stream is unending. Most people at MSFT seem to truly believe that they are the most creative and innovative company in the world. IMO very few, even at the highest levels, realize they aren't. Well, the propaganda and brainwashing was a major aspect. The other is that I realized something that very few at MSFT do, or at least will talk about: as an innovator and leader, MSFT's day is done. IMO Microsoft reached it's zenith when Windows 95 and Office 97 were still on the market. Microsoft is still hungry, but has become to massive to be agile. The recent management shuffle involving Vista is a nice example of re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic. The people replaced were competent enough, and I'm sure the new ones are too, but they are no more likely to succeed. The organization, the group-think, the brainwashing, and the horrendous legacy code base and commitment to backwards compatibility, will sabotage their best efforts.

    21. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Steve. Say, why have you come home from school looking like that? I told you, this is a conformist household. No Google, no iPod.

      So Google and iPod are "rebellious"? As far as geekery goes, I can't think of anything more conformist than being an iPod-toting Google slave, other than running Windows on your Dell.

    22. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Buran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No iPods or Google? Might as well tattoo kick me signs on their backs.

      It's worse. You don't parent by meddling in kids' lives to the point where you loom over them and not only say "You have to be home by 10pm, and you can't use the car" but then to also say "You can use the web to search but you can't search the way all your friends do" and "You can listen to music but you can't listen to it with what all your friends use" ... what is going to happen to these kids? They're going to be resentful of their father's repeated interference in their lives just becaise he doesn't like the brand of the devices they want to use. Kids have to learn to be responsible on their own and make their own informed choices, and a parent who interferes with their choices based on what you have to admit is an arbitrary criterion when it comes down to it is just going to find that his kids have no respect for him.

      When I was a kid my parents let me make my own choices. If I wanted to use brand X instead of brand Y that they preferred, it was my choice. They expected me to do my own research, and to make choices that were good for me and didn't get me in trouble, or anyone else in trouble. They had their preferences, sure, but if I wanted to buy item X with my weekly allowance, they let me buy it.

      A good parent does that. This isn't good parenting. It's not teaching the responsibility of making one's own choices, it's teaching that you should accept at face value that if someone else says that something is bad, it's bad, and to hell with the 99 people on one side of the room who say that you're making the wrong choice if Daddy gets it into his head that he, who is just one person, thinks he's right.

      My father never did that, and it got him respect. This is just going to get an attitude of "Damn parents meddling in my life". And so the circle of "my parents are idiots" continues, and therefore so does the circle of kids who are ever-ruder and have less and less respect for their parents by the day -- no, by the minute.

    23. Re:Would a different approach be better? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who actually does go to church, I can tell you that NONE of the pastor's kids I have ever known have become atheists.

      You are in the church, so you see the ones that stay in the church.

      I am not in the church, so I see the ones that left.

      KFG

  2. so, he has his kids brainwashed by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article (emphasis mine):

    Do you have an iPod?

    No, I do not. Nor do my children. My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    Well now I get a sense of where the inability to know the market comes from. Get a clue Ballmer -- to best compete with your competition you get to know them intimately.

    Your strongest plan to defeat you competition is to know them as if you were them!

    The only other plausible way to unseat a king is to have so much money and power and control of other resources that you can bludgeon him, beat him mercilessly until all of his resources are gone and you can take the ... Hmmmm. Never mind.

    1. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm gonna take a wild guess that Steve Ballmer is, in fact, capable of joking, and that his kids aren't really forbidden from using Google or iPods, but instead really are Microsoft supporters. It's not really unheard of for kids to be fanatical about things their parents are involved in.

      I expect that Ballmer's kids really are "brainwashed" in the sense that they believe in their dad and the company they work for. I doubt they've been actually forbidden from using it, they'd just rather use the tools their dad makes.

      I know I've heard plenty from my father about how the projects he works on are the world's greatest... I'm tempted to name names, but I think I'll pass for now.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by msuzio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's Steve Ballmer. Richer than kings of old ever dreamed of. Much like the Hilton sisters, his kids are going to be able to be complete morons and they will get by just fine in life...

  3. Not a problem! by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering Google's willingness to appease the biggest government censor (China), I don't doubt that Google will also censor itself in Ballmer's home, if IPs were given out. And another th--

    WAIT... Steve Ballmer has human children?!?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Not a problem! by xnot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait a minute. That must mean.... oh no.

      Steve.....Balmer.....had.....SEX?

      No, no, it can't be. God no, it can't be. "You know what we all need? Prostitutes! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES!" (Balmer on stage sweating like a pig, with playboy bunnies.)

      Please rip that image out of my head.

  4. That'll work by illtron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Telling kids what they're not allowed to do/have will certainly make them stop wanting to do/have whatever it is. It'll work for sure.

    On the other hand, if the alternative is being thrashed about like a rag doll by a sweaty man-ape...

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
  5. Ah, excellent: by Vengeance · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another generation of the wealthy and clueless.

    No Google, indeed... Similarly, I do not allow my children to use 'legs'.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  6. But... by J05H · · Score: 4, Funny

    But... Dad!! All the other kids are doing it!!

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  7. Behind The Curve by Steve+B · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft is about to roll out new versions of Windows and Office.

    This must be some new definition of "about to" with which I have not been familiar....

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  8. I've got my kids brainwashed and pissed off by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but he's also laying down the law in his own house. Steve says that his kids are not allowed to use Google or have an iPod."

    Ahh when will parents EVER learn? If you forbid something, it just makes the kids want it more.

    Coming soon, Ballmer's kids eventually end up working for Google, Ballmer buys an Island, sets up a wireless Windows-only network that blocks anything Google, and rules it by Windows-only voice commands from atop his throne.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  9. Jokes overheard in the workplace... by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I wonder if Steve would only allow chairs that would be easy to throw, or have chairs so heavy that they couldn't be thrown. It depends on how he wants to raise his children, I suppose."

    "Maybe his real motive for not allowing iPods is so that the kids won't throw them. Those things are expensive!"

    "If you think Steve's tantrums are bad, wait until you meet his kids."

    I'll be here all day. Try the veal.

  10. The difference between a monopoly vs competitive by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And that summarizes the difference between a monopoly and a competitive landscape.

    In a monopoly, you're best off using

    • fear (if I catch you using Google I'll throw a chair at you)
    • and uncertainty (but can you really trust Google? It runs some free OS which can never scale as much as our expensive one) and
    • doubt (but a small company like Google, will they be around next year?)
    to keep your users.

    Balmer knows this, and he's practicing it on his kids.

  11. Relevance? by Mayhem178 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to say that the summary given for this article isn't at all representative of the article as a whole. That being said, I have to say this. How Ballmer deals with his kids is a private matter. It should stay a private matter, and he should have known this. As CEO of a company like Microsoft, he should know that his private home practices are not justification of his proposed business models.

    If he doesn't allow his kids to use Google or have iPods, that's his business. He shouldn't make it ours. That kind of preachiness can come back to bite one in the ass.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  12. Exactly! by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd take the other approach - if they choose rival manufacturers then study first hand why they do so.

    Knowing your enemy is certainly preferable to willful ignorance.

    Imagine Ballmer as a military commander: "No, I'd rather not examine the captured enemy secret weapon. From now on, all captured equipment shall be ignored! Any soldiers who say anything about the superior capabilities of the enemy equipment shall be placed in one of the suicide squads. Carry on, men! Carry on!"

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Exactly! by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There really isn't a lot to learn from the competing products; Microsoft only needs a bigger market share to be more competative in these areas, and If MS could copy what their competitors were doing (they can't in the case of google), they would.

      Marketshare doesn't just instantly materialize out of thin air. The days when MS could just leverage Windows dominance and expect that consumers would buy whatever they provided are over. I think MS has a lot to learn from competing products. The emphasis on ease of use over multitudinous features is what differentiates both Apple and Google products from Microsoft products. MS has already dramatically restructured MSN Search in an effort to mimimic the simplicity of Google. They'll have a tougher time applying what they learn from the iPod, because MS relies on third party hardware vendors to create devices. Still, it seems they could lean on their partners more heavily, telling them, "Look, if you want to run Windows Media on your devices, you need to make them easier to use."

      My feeling is that Microsoft could conceivably learn from its competition, but like Apple in the early 1990s, it has drunk too much of its own Kool-Aid. Ballmer and company don't want to hear that Apple's business model with iTunes/iPod (build the hardware and the software and the music store) or Google's approach (serve users first, and advertising revenue will follow) works better than Microsoft's tried and true "own the OS and leverage it relentlessly" business model. Hence, Ballmer would rather talk about brainwashing his kids. Whether his kids are old enough to use iPods is, in my opinion, beside the point. His comment betrays his stubborn refusal to acknowledge that MS has something to learn from the competition.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  13. I think it's safe to say he has emotional problems by Nijika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been saying it for years, a company's attitude starts at the top. If he wasn't a moron, he'd be letting his kids use these things, and then he'd be observing them and quizzing them on why they like them. He has his own marketing team, right there in his house, but he's more content to control than to learn and discover. Well, -shrug-, that's why MS will be MS until he and Bill are gone. I feel sorry for the micromanaged offspring though.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  14. Brilliant by mellonhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which means:

    1. They used google and were told to stop.
    2. They never used google but were told never to start.
    3. Bought an ipod and Steve got rid of it.
    4. Asked for an ipod and were told no.

    Either way, the genius is admitting that either his kids tried these products or he knew they were so superior that he had to do the preemptive strike to stop them.

    What an idiot.

    Actually, I'll vote for 5. He's a buffoon that needs to pound his chest on a regular basis (not to mention toss chairs) to seemingly make himself look like a tough guy and is making the whole thing up.

    Again, if so, what an idiot.

  15. OB Office Space by schon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "[...] chicks dig a dude with money."

    "Well, not all chicks."

    "Well the kind of chicks that'd double up on a dude like me do."

    1. Re:OB Office Space by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was more thinking of a different office space quote....

      "fuckin... children would have hooves"

  16. MS thinking by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "First hand experience can tell you a lot more than market research sometimes, and might just give future MS products an edge."

    Clearly he doesn't care about his kids opinion of Google. Microsoft believes only in the positive feedback of a strong market position - we're popular because we're popular. By forcing his kids to use MS instead of Google or Apple, he's just doing his part to convert the masses one at a time. He thinks Microsoft just needs to reach a critical mass and they'll come to dominate whatever market they want - product quality is not an issue. This is backed up by the history where inferior MS products beat out supperior competition just because they got on more desktops. Remember when Gates told the folks at Apple he didn't need a superior product? So long as he could deploy to the IBM compatible world he'd capture the market.

    That old philosophy clearly still exists.

  17. Just say "no" to iPod by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...because as we all know, the iPod is a "gateway product" that leads to hardcore product usage, such as OS X, Linux, and the psychedelic effects of BSD.

    But there's a way you can help. Talk to your kids about products and teach them why non-Microsoft products are dangerous, and can lead to a life of crime.

    Did you know that Steve Ballmer recently got interested in photography? But he had a problem when he ran out of supplies, and he started shouting "Developers! Developers! Developers!"

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  18. Oh my god!!!! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean someone has let Ballmer REPRODUCE????

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  19. Dialoge from the Balmer house... by Tyger · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What are you hiding from me there?"

    "Nothing."

    "Don't lie to me. It's an iPOD isn't it. You have a ****ing iPOD!"

    "No, it's pot! I'm doing drugs."

    "Don't give me any of that. It's an iPOD. You know that we don't use iPOD in this house. And what's that on your computer? Let me see your screen."

    "It's just porn, dad!"

    "It better be. If I catch you looking at Google one more time, you're grounded for LIFE. Now go smoke your pot and watch the porn like a good boy."

  20. Re:Child abuse by everphilski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is a sad world when not having an iPod is child abuse.

  21. Simple Example: Jobs and the iTunes intro by ianscot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When Steve Jobs introduced the iTunes store, and earlier when he was selling recording execs on it, he was able to describe to them exactly what consumers did and didn't like about peer-to-peer networks and monthly subscription models.

    He could say "They want to be able to get individual songs on demand without a monthly fee, and P2P gives them that -- sort of -- but we can make the experience much better because look at all the frustrating hunting around and poor copies, and look at the lack of previews, and so on..." His experience with the actual user experience was obvious to anyone who saw the keynote thing.

    By contrast, here we have Ballmer patting himself on the back over not letting his kids use the competition's dominant product. He's using the word "brainwashed" about his own kids. Visionary leadership, I'm sure.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  22. You've got it all wrong! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's right there in your quote:

    I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    There is the Microsoft business strategy in a nutshell. Do not debate relative merits, just brainwash your audience. Don't let them decide - tell them what they want.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  23. In the house of Balmer.... by mangus_angus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mrs. Balmer..."oh honey...look at what I found in little steves sock drawer while I was cleaning today....and look at what I found on his computer."
    Mr. Balmer..."oh my god, no...not my son....DEAR GOD PLEASE NO!!! STEVE JUNIOR...GET YOUR ASS DOWN HERE!!!"
    Little Steve..."Yeah da...uh oh..."
    Mr. Balmer..."Do you care to explaine this son?! You know the rules of my house!"
    Mrs. Balmer..."Steve calm down please!! Oh junior we still love you..."
    Mr. Balmer..."SHUT UP WOMAN! junior...talk....NOW.
    Little Steve..."errr ummm...I was holding it for a friend! I swear! And my other friend was using my PC the other day, I didn't know!"
    Mr. Balmer..."oh so your friend wanted you hold on to his Nano for him, and your "other" friend just happend to be looking at that SMUT search engine..."
    Little Steve..."yes"
    Mr. Balmer..."go upstairs...your mother and I need to talk about this"
    Little steve..."yes sir"..."man, I better move that MacBookPro and linux server out of my closet...."

  24. An Open Letter from Steve Ballmer's kids. by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Dad,

    You're a dick.

    Fondly,

    Your kids.

  25. he better not look under their mattresses by EddieBurkett · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that iPods are just an easy gateway to harder Apple products. As soon as he sees those little white buds, he'll know that Powerbooks and iMacs can't be far behind. He's just trying to protect his kids is all.

    --
    The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
  26. Re:Brilliant by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm going to vote for #6. His kids want to use the stuff that daddy makes, and conciously choose to use Microsoft products because their father runs the company that makes them.

    I highly doubt Ballmer would have choosen to say his kids were "brainwashed" into using Microsoft products unless he was joking. "Brainwashed" is a curious choice of words if he really did forbid non-Microsoft products.

    If you read the interview, and not the Slashdot article, he actually says:

    [Fortune:] Do you have an iPod?

    [Ballmer:] No, I do not. Nor do my children. My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    My reading of that isn't that he forbids them from using it, it's that his children support their father and his buisness. I have no idea how old his kids are (and neither does Wikipedia) but depending on age, it's quite believable that his kids just like emulating their father and therefore choose to use Microsoft products.

    I read it as kind of a geek joke - Ballmer's kids are "brainwashed" into using Microsoft products because it's what their father uses.

    Not that all kids use what their parents use - my father uses KDE and Opera, but I'm currently posting this from GNOME using Firefox. But when I was younger, and my dad bought OS/2 for our home computer, I believed him when he said it was the greatest desktop OS ever...

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  27. Ballmer is a nutter by TwistedSpring · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I've seen this guy on various interviews and TV appearances, read about him online, and the guy seems completely mad. I'm not being facetious, the poor man is literally crazy, and looks like he's tearing himself apart in a continual battle between what's coming out of his mouth and reality.

    Look at him, he's always jumpy, he has a huge vein in his head that throbs all the time, he screams really loud whenever he gets the chance to extoll the virtues of XBox 360 or Windows Vista, but has a constant grimace of a smile hoisted across his face when being asked difficult questions. He shakes his head before everything he says when he's lying (e.g. when he says how they're On Track for Vista) as if he doesn't believe it. He's so tense it makes me feel tense just watching him.

    The guy needs to rest, or leave Microsoft. Banning his kids from google or ipods is just symptomatic of his increasing panic as he tries his very best to banish anything that suggests Microsoft is losing the race from his life. Any rational man would realise that Google and iPod are great products and it doesn't matter if his kids use it. It would be something to aim at. I would be saying "You think that iPod is fucking awesome, son, well just you wait for the crazy shit daddy is going to pull out of his ass," I certainly wouldn't be banning them from my household. I would use one.

    I'm genuinely concerned for his health. He really shouldn't be in the position that he's in, his buddy Bill Gates put him there to act as a forcefield between Gates and the reality of Microsoft. And while BillyG sits back with a fat spliff and chills between dictating endless new features for Vista, poor old Ballmer is shipped around the country to give uncomfortable interviews and spew his insane Microsoft evangelism. I think he's the only Microsoft evangelist there is right now, and he's trying his best to be a one man army. Shame he's losing the battle.

  28. Parent Teacher Meeting by Geak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Teacher: I'm afraid we have to put your son into a slow learning class. Ballmer: Why? Teacher: Well we found out he was using MSN search to research an essay. His arguments were completely wrong and his paper was 2 weeks late. Ballmer: What do the rest of the students use? And DONT say Google! Teacher: Ok I won't. Ballmer: @#&*!!!!!! *throws chair*

  29. Like an Amway family by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I knew someone who was from an "Amway family": their business was selling Amway stuff and getting other people to sign up as distributors "below" them in the pyramid. If they needed something and Amway sold it, they bought it. Everything in their house was cheap off-brand crap: weird breakfast cereal, odd-smelling shampoo, etc. It's not like they couldn't have afforded better quality. They just always bought Amway because that's what their business was. The kids hated it. Sounds like the Ballmer household is the same way. Pretty sad, if you ask me.

  30. Another bad article summary by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ballmer didn't say that iPods and Google are banned form his house. Here's what Ballmer said: "but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

    And "brainwashed" is supposed to be a joke, although nobody here would recognize one of those when it comes to Microsoft.

    If it were Linus saying "but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Windows, and you don't use MacOS," everyone here would get it.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  31. The Children Shall Lead by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Informative

    Come on everyone, just calm down. My guess is that Steve was just joking. It is fairly safe to say that Ballmer's kids have access to a lot more disposable income than the average kid, so if they are of age (or when), you can bet that they'll have and use whatever tech toys are hip and available. Not only will they have iPods and use Google, they'll be using a bunch of stuff we can only imagine right now. And Steve will be glad that they are, if he's smart.

    I spend a lot of time keeping up with new tech as part of my job and my hobbies, but still my kids manage to find all sorts of new things I haven't heard about. So what better way to keep up with trends and the competition than one's kids? So don't let Ballmer's joking around lull anyone into a false sense of security, his kids and Gates' kids may turn out to be among Microsoft's greatest assets.

  32. You all missed it completely by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 5, Informative

    He never said in the article that he forbade them to do anything!

    From what he said in the article, he's simply convinced them that MS has the better way to do things, and that's why they go the MS way. I did the same thing with my kids; I convinced them tat Linux is the better way, that every product has to be evaluated on its own merits. I also explained to them why I generally dislike MS. They will use Windows when they have to at work. They play XBox games, and if the right games come out only for XBox, or work best on XBox, my son will probably buy an XBox. But MS is never their first choice.

    He joked about brainwashing them, but I strongly suspect he's simply convinced them.

  33. Telling us what he thinks of his own product. by gnovos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Basically, he is saying that his company cannot compete with the likes of Apple and Microsoft. It's just too good. even his own kis would jump on the iPod badwagon dispite the fact that they could get the Microsoft equivlenet for FREE. I mean that's how much better the ipod is! Steve Ballmer's own kids would use Google instead of MSN search if they were given a choice! So he takes what little control he has and forces his kids not to buy these products...

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  34. Re:This guy is a world-class IDIOT by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know how the business world works. He can throw chairs, ban IPods, and do monkey dances, as long as his hair is combed and he's wearing a suit and tie.

    PS - I don't think Stallman has any better overall appearance either.

  35. Re:No ... they become pastors by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
    OK, so to break the tension, here's a joke.

    These three kids are sitting around talking about getting stuff for free. The first kid says "My dad's a doctor, so I can be sick for nothing." The second kid says "My dad's a teacher, so I can be smart for nothing." The third kid says "Well, my dad's a pastor, so I can be good for nothing."

    Well, it was funny when I first heard it.

    --
    John
  36. Re:I'm sorry, by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "is the old philosophy wrong? what makes it old?

    did he not in fact, capture the market?"

    No, the philosophy is not wrong - it does work. It really isn't old (my bad) as far as I know it was considered new in the 1990s when software (pkzip in particular) could be made popular by being free for most uses. MS did in fact capture the market. I never said they didn't.

    I was just pointing out WHY balmer doesn't care what his kids think of Google and Apple, and instead focuses on getting them converted. MS doesn't care about product quality, only that everyone use their crap. This explains almost everything they do. "Features" rolled into Vista are there strictly so that people will not be tempted to use something else. MS can say "We have that too" even if it sucks rocks. It's all about getting the MS version of everything in front of everyone so they won't look to the competition - quality is welcome if it happens to show up.

    Damn I can infer a lot from what Balmer tells his kids....

    On a related note. If the MS version of something - say tabbed browsing - sucks, the masses will conclude that tabbed browsing is stupid, so Firefox users that promote it as a great feature will sound like fools to them. If you create a new product, and sell a poor implementation to the public it can be a long time before they'll buy something similar from anyone.

  37. A glimpse to the future... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every time I hear a story about Steve Ballmer, I wonder how much longer until we see a news clip of him being led out of his house in a bathrobe and tissue boxes on his feet.

    Personally, I'd let my kids use a competitor product so I can find out why they chose it, what it brings, and how we can beat it.

    It is clear to me MS needs a complete managment change. There methods were fine when it was an emerging market, and they had contracts gaurenting OS sales with every computer sold.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Star Wars Version by inKubus · · Score: 5, Funny

    GATES: Welcome, young Balmer. I have been expecting you.

    Balmer's son peers at the hooded figure defiantly. Gates then looks down at the boy's binders.

    GATES: You no longer need those.

    Gates motions ever so slightly with his finger and Balmer's Son's binders fall away, clattering to the floor. The boy looks down at his own hands, free now to reach out and grab Gate's neck. He does nothing.

    GATES: Guards, leave us.

    The red-, yellow-, green- and blue-cloaked guards turn and disappear behind the elevator.

    GATES (to Balmer's Son): I'm looking forward to completing your training. In time you will call me Master.

    BALMER'S SON: You're gravely mistaken. You won't convert me as you did my father.

    Gates gets down from his XP Console and walks up very close to Balmer's Son. Gates looks into his eyes and, for the first time, Balmer's Son can perceive the evil visage within the hood.

    GATES: Oh, no, my young Linux Admin. You will find that it is you who are mistaken...about a great many things.

    BALMER: His iPod.

    BALMER extends a gloved hand toward Gates, revealing his son's iPod. Gates takes it.

    GATES: Ah, yes, a Linux Admin's toy. Much like your father's Portable Media Center(tm). By now you must know your father can never be turned from the dark side. So will it be with you.

    BALMER'S SON: You're wrong. Soon I'll be dead...and you with me.

    Gates laughs.

    GATES: Perhaps you refer to the imminent attack of your Unix DoS Squad.

    Balmer's Son looks up sharply.

    GATES: Yes...I assure you we are quite safe from your friends here.

    BALMER looks at his son.

    BALMER'S SON: Your overconfidence is your weakness.

    GATES: Your faith in your friends is yours.

    BALMER: It is pointless to resist, my son.

    Gates turns to face Balmer's Son.

    GATES (angry): Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design. (points to a NETSTAT on the monitor) Your friends out there on the Internet..

    Balmer's Son reacts. Gates notes it.

    GATES (cont): ...are walking into a trap. As is your DoS Squad! It was I who allowed the Alliance to know the IP of the open ports. It is quite safe from your pitiful little band. An entire legion of BSA agents awaits them.

    Balmer's Son look darts from Gates to Balmer and, finally, to the iPod in Gate's hand.

    GATES: Oh...I'm afraid the firewall will be quite operational when your friends' packets arrive.

    TO BE CONTINUED

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.