Slashdot Mirror


Ballmer Babies Banned From iPods and Google

Valah writes "In a recent Fortune interview with Steve Ballmer, the newer kinder Microsoft CEO is not only ready to take on the videogaming, search, music download and mobile markets - but he's also laying down the law in his own house. Steve says that his kids are not allowed to use Google or have an iPod."

428 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Would a different approach be better? by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    I'd take the other approach - if they choose rival manufacturers then study first hand why they do so.

    First hand experience can tell you a lot more than market research sometimes, and might just give future MS products an edge.

    1. Re:Would a different approach be better? by masklinn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whoa, study? It's Steve Ballmer we're talking about, if he as much as SEEs his kids anywhere near iPods or within 20m of a computer displaying a Google page it'll be Chair Throwing time, he'll Fucking Bury(TM) them. He's done it before and he'll do it again. He's going to Fucking Kill(TM) his children.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    2. Re:Would a different approach be better? by aborchers · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think this is great. Knowing how kids typically react to this kind of thing fom parents, we can be virtually assured they will rebel against MS as adolescents and grow up to be Linux developers!

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Would a different approach be better? by w3weasel · · Score: 4, Funny
      That is NOT an elephant hiding behind that tree... it's not there.
      -- S. Balmer
      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    4. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Machina+Fortuno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just like all the pastor's kids who became coke dealers, right? Hahaha, I do think this is pretty funny honestly though. But really... with a dad like that, who cares if you have an iPod or not. They could probably twist him arm into getting their own Vista backdoor! :P (hold shift and eat a pretzel during boot, and Vista all Vista code will tranform into a robot ready for your command)

      --
      ...
    5. Re:Would a different approach be better? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Funny
      Whoa, study? It's Steve Ballmer we're talking about, if he as much as SEEs his kids anywhere near iPods or within 20m of a computer displaying a Google page it'll be Chair Throwing time, he'll Fucking Bury(TM) them. He's done it before and he'll do it again. He's going to Fucking Kill(TM) his children.

      Yeaaaarrrgggghh! Honor me, children! HONOR MEEEEE! GIVE IT UP FOR MEEEEEEEEEE yeaaaaaar

      You know what you need? DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU NEED?!
      DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE *cough* DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE
      *hacking paroxysm* DISCi... *pants heavily* its all about the DISCIPLINe children... jesus.... fucking.. dis.. I... I.... *collapses in a puddle of sweat and desperation*

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    6. Re:Would a different approach be better? by rewinn · · Score: 1

      On the plus side: his kids are learning how to hide their googling from Authority.

    7. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you people are being too hard on the guy.

      He's just talking about believing in his product enough to feed his kids his own dog food.

      Wait. That came out wrong...

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Would a different approach be better? by chrismcdirty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pastors' kids don't become coke dealers. Those are cops' children. Pastors' children become whores.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    9. Re:Would a different approach be better? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just like all the pastor's kids who became coke dealers, right?

      Not coke dealers, no, but a good many of them, perhaps even the vast majority, become anti-orginized religion and even; gasp!

      Atheists.

      If you want to get something done:

      1. Do it yourself
      2. Hire someone to do it for you
      3. Forbid your kids to do it

      Children of pastors all sin intentionally at least once or twice, just, well, because. It's called "growing up." Asserting yourself as an individual human being and not just a plaything of your parents.

      One of the key factors in determining whether a child adopts a permanant choice agaisnt their parent's directives is whether or not, as adults, they can perceive that the stricture actually makes sense, or whether their parents were just being assholes.

      If the parents were just being assholes then the likelyhood of the children adopting a contrarian position to "stick it to them" goes up dramatically.

      So the question is, is Steve Ballmer making a stricture that makes sense (i.e., don't be a crack ho), or is he just an asshole?

      I leave this as an exercise for the stundent, but advise you to know where your chair is.

      KFG

    10. Re:Would a different approach be better? by twofidyKidd · · Score: 5, Funny

      (hold shift and eat a pretzel during boot, and Vista all Vista code will tranform into a robot ready for your command)

      For the record, I just tried that with WinXP, and I got the blue screen of death.

      ...just so you know...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    11. Re:Would a different approach be better? by BlackStar · · Score: 1

      Flip the bit to PR. Imagine the black eye that Fortune, /. or a dozen other (especially say, the Register) would try to convey if the offspring actually DID get seen using these products. Heck that would probably spin into another 20 cents off the stock on Wall Street. Ballmer can't win this one. Well, he could if the Redmond Juggernaut could put out a superior product and consumer-friendly offering and..... ok, maybe he can't win this one.

    12. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Ruphuz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, given they are Ballmer's offspring, they would not be simply Linux developers, but Linux developers! Linux developers! Linux developers!

      --
      My other post is a First.
    13. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aye, and if the kids survive the onslaught, they shall have had sufficient training in arbitrary dickheadery to be good /. editors.

      OK, that was a bit caustic.

    14. Re:Would a different approach be better? by LizardKing · · Score: 2, Funny

      "VB, much like generic beer and America's Funniest Home Videos is an enabling technology for stupid people." - Anonymous

      For some reason I thought VB stood for Victoria Bitter when I first read your sig. Then I realised you meant Visual Basic. Now I'm not sure again.

    15. Re:Would a different approach be better? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Then again, maybe if they have to use MS products they will realize what sucks about them and fix them...

    16. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Vengie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Mormons, I love your sexually repressed gay sons.

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    17. Re:Would a different approach be better? by cultrhetor · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nah, I agree with him in principle. I don't let my kids use Microsoft. They have enough problems already, looking like me and all.

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    18. Re:Would a different approach be better? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      He was talking about the children.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    19. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny
      we can be virtually assured they will rebel against MS as adolescents and grow up to be Linux developers!

      That would be the ultimate kick in his gelatinous belly. Almost as bad as:

      One of Ballmer's kids walks in from school, wearing black make-up, trench-coat and hair, with multiple body piercings.

      Steve. Say, why have you come home from school looking like that? I told you, this is a conformist household. No Google, no iPod.

      Kid. Muuuuhh! [Slinks off.]

      Steve. Hey! I'm talking to you, come back here. I don't like you getting involved with all that "goth" business... say, what's that hanging out of your bag?

      Kid. [Shyly] Oh that ... that's nothing. [Kid tries to scamper away, but Steve grabs it by the arm, and takes the object.]

      Steve. [Disappointed] Oh, no. I don't believe this. Didn't your mother and I tell you? I mean... how could you?

      Kid. What? They're just install disks—

      Steve. For FreeBSD 6.0!

      Kid runs away. Steve tries to pick up a dinner chair, but realises it has been bolted to the floor.

    20. Re:Would a different approach be better? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      And, since they're probably going to inheret large bank accounts from dear ol' dad (assume he doesn't fucking kill them first), they'll be RICH linux developers. A bit of an oxymoron don't you think?

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    21. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Skim123 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, seeing how Vista's release date has continually slipped, his kids will probably never use that, either.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    22. Re:Would a different approach be better? by bobdinkel · · Score: 4, Funny

      It made my day to see this modded as informative. Thank you, Slashdot.

      --
      A publicly traded company exists solely to make profits for shareholders.
    23. Re:Would a different approach be better? by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I already drank my coffee. I'dve sprayed it all over my monitor.

    24. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hrm. Goth outfit? No. I think jeans and a black turtleneck would go over much worse... :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    25. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny
      Goddamn, that's the funniest thing I've read all day, good use of TM there.

      On another note, how unpopular must Ballmer's kids be at school? No iPods or Google? Might as well tattoo kick me signs on their backs.

      At least when they rebel, it won't be to drugs or promiscuity, it'll be to the Itunes Music Store.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    26. Re:Would a different approach be better? by masklinn · · Score: 1

      It's Visual Basic, quote comes from some random post on The Daily WTF (I think)

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    27. Re:Would a different approach be better? by neomajic · · Score: 1

      Of course, they didn't hear him since they had their iPods on.

    28. Re:Would a different approach be better? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      +5 informative indeed! Kudos to you, sir.

    29. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Toutatis · · Score: 1

      Why it's rebel for cops' children to be coke dealers?
      Like father, like son.

    30. Re:Would a different approach be better? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I'd take the other approach - if they choose rival manufacturers then study first hand why they do so.

      A few years back the project lead for IE was interviewed in his office by NightLine. He made a point of using Netscape (it was up on his computer(s)) to familiarize himself with the competition. Not everybody at MS is brain dead in this regard. Just monkeyboy.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    31. Re:Would a different approach be better? by jcr · · Score: 1

      I'd take the other approach - if they choose rival manufacturers then study first hand why they do so.

      Remember, this is Steve Ballmer we're talking about here: the greatest example of the Peter Principle in the history of business.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    32. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Machina+Fortuno · · Score: 1

      I was talking from experience... I know 3 PKs who have gotten into the drug-trade and been busted/ODed and had to change. But you... you have beaten me. There are definitely more whores from pastor's... (I date a PK, and well *cough*) You can't curb the problem, since well... priests who don't have kids because whores themselves.

      --
      ...
    33. Re:Would a different approach be better? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I bet you tried it with crunchy little pretzels that come in a bag. Everyone knows XP likes the big soft pretzels you buy at the mall. With cheese sauce.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    34. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      What category is that video under on iTunes?

      I'll pay $20.00 just to watch that one.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    35. Re:Would a different approach be better? by n00tz · · Score: 1

      but there's not an easy way to see what sucks that way... they'd just assume that it's the way it is supposed to work. or shift the blame to the hardware (ie. Device Driver has cause a problem with your system).

      The only way to truly know why it sucks is to look at alternatives. I know I didn't realize how much M$ products truly sucked until I tried the alternatives.

      --
      I had college once, but I drank some fluids and got a lot of rest and eventually it was cured.
    36. Re:Would a different approach be better? by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 1
      I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

      it's quite telling about his ingrained monopolist mindset.

      you might also draw the parallel with how MS treats their users.

      --
      free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
    37. Re:Would a different approach be better? by satanami69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do I care if one of them is gay? I have 20 more to find a few wives.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    38. Re:Would a different approach be better? by neoviky · · Score: 1

      That is the worst thing he could do! Now his kids will continue to use ipod/google and enjoy more!! The only things I enjoyed doing when I was a kid was the things I was forbidden to even think of, like watching late night porn on TV or reading comics during exam time or listening to music while I was studying, I only did those things! Vicki

    39. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seriously, do you think the CEO of Coke lets his kids drink Pepsi? It is the same thing. Their father is rich, so I doubt they are crying because they can't get an iPod. I am sure the brainwash comment was meant as a joke.

    40. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      What is the penalty for polygamy



      <answer>Multiple wives<answer>



      I'll be here all week, please try the veal.

    41. Re:Would a different approach be better? by prell · · Score: 1

      Steve Ballmer is a chanter. Chanters need things in their lives to be explainable in single words (in this case, "NO!!", "BAD!!", or "CRUSHHH!!!") -- that's all they understand. This rule is followed consistently; it may as well be written into their DNA. This results in confusion when what is really meant is not properly expressed (e.g. "DEVELOPERS!!!" instead of "Hi, I'm Steve Ballmer. We have a delightful set of SDKs for you to peruse."). Acronyms help. XP, ME, CE, NT. All releases of Windows can be referred to in one word, and that's not an accident. Prior to the standardization of consumers to one version of Windows (i.e. XP), there were disparate platforms to support and talk about on a daily basis, which is why the seemingly random ME, CE, and NT monickers were chosen to form one word, CEMENT, so that top-level management could keep not only the entire suite of Windows solutions available in their brain in the same day, but also to capture some of the trademark (literally trademarked) Microsoft attitude toward customers and competitors (e.g. - shoes, - support, - innovation). And who said Microsoft wasn't clever?

    42. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1
      "I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."
      Ignorance is bliss eh Steve, Just gotta brainwash the rest of the world now...
    43. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Now that Pastor's Kids (TM) have been stereotyped, I might as well break the real news to you (as AC because I'm not interested in ad hominem attacks on my ID). I'm the oldest son of a pastor and have three other siblings (2 girls, 1 guy) who have become adults. I'm not atheistic, and I actually see eye-to-eye with my dad on a lot of the important religious/spiritual stuff he preaches and shows by example.

      I've known probably a dozen other pastor's families pretty similar to ours, and I've seen many (actually almost all) growing up and following in the footsteps of their parents.

      When their kids rebel, almost 100% of the time at least one of the following is true:
      1. The pastor in their home always pushes "Do's and Don'ts" rather than following Biblical principles. The rules-based structure treats us like mindless babies, while the principles-based structure treats us as thinking adults and challenges us.
      2. The pastor in their home doesn't practice what s/he preaches. Hypocrisy among parents has sadly ruined many a good Christian family for generations to come, in my experience.
      3. The pastor puts the ministry (or calling) first before his/her family. This is clearly against Biblical principles, and it is a shame that anyone who is a pastor doesn't know and follow this. I'm talking about practical ways where the marriage or parent/child relationships suffer at the expense of the ministry.

      So, I'll leave it to you whether you'll stereotype and write me off as a rebellious liar or at least listen to what I've experienced...

    44. Re:Would a different approach be better? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whores? Hardly. You have to pay whores, which hasn't been my experience with pastors' kids.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    45. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Posting this anonymously because even though I no longer work at Microsoft, I don't want them to know who I am or where I work now.

      Funny you should mention dog food. I'm a former Microsoft employee and "dogfooding" is what Microsoft calls internal betas, and "we eat our own dog food" is a pretty common expression at MSFT.

      Last night, as I was navigating around my new cell phone, I was thinking "This isn't a bad phone, but I liked the interface better on my old one (I didn't get another from that vendor because my old one broke too many times), but you know what? I wish Apple would start making cell phones. The UI would be the best; if they sold them, I'd buy one right now." That must be MSFT's worst nightmare. Or one of them, at least.

      Steve Ballmer makes reference in TFA to convergence devices, and to expect to see announcements from MSFT on that in the next twelve months. OK, maybe. Maybe they'll even succeed. But I think a more likely scenario for success would be Apple selling cell phone-iPod hybrids and eating Windows Mobile's lunch. Microsoft has some good products (sadly, those are usually the ones that get the least attention), but they don't have anything that competes with an Apple product that is as good as the Apple product. I'm sure an Apple cell phone would be that way, too.

      About Ballmer's kids, he only *thinks* they don't use Google. Would you want to be laughed at for being the only kid at school who didn't use Google and said "I'll MSN Search it and get back to you" (I'm not kidding, that's what people say at MSFT; you're not allowed to use Google as a verb. I was actually *ordered* not to say "google it" when I was a n00b there). I think what he should have said is "They don't use Google or iPods at home where I can keep tabs on them."

      His reference to having them brainwashed, though, was serious, I'm sure. That's the reason I left Microsoft: the culture is very brainwashed. The propaganda stream is unending. Most people at MSFT seem to truly believe that they are the most creative and innovative company in the world. IMO very few, even at the highest levels, realize they aren't. Well, the propaganda and brainwashing was a major aspect. The other is that I realized something that very few at MSFT do, or at least will talk about: as an innovator and leader, MSFT's day is done. IMO Microsoft reached it's zenith when Windows 95 and Office 97 were still on the market. Microsoft is still hungry, but has become to massive to be agile. The recent management shuffle involving Vista is a nice example of re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic. The people replaced were competent enough, and I'm sure the new ones are too, but they are no more likely to succeed. The organization, the group-think, the brainwashing, and the horrendous legacy code base and commitment to backwards compatibility, will sabotage their best efforts.

    46. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen of kids who grow up in overly-strict households, they'll hit 18, go to college out-of-state, get knocked up (or somebody else knocked up), get hospitalized for alcohol poisoning, etc. etc.

    47. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Doctor+Fishboy · · Score: 1

      You utter bastard. I haven't laughed so hard at slashdot in years. Thank you!

    48. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Steve. Say, why have you come home from school looking like that? I told you, this is a conformist household. No Google, no iPod.

      So Google and iPod are "rebellious"? As far as geekery goes, I can't think of anything more conformist than being an iPod-toting Google slave, other than running Windows on your Dell.

    49. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't fink. Feew.

    50. Re:Would a different approach be better? by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      They just Google when he's not there.

      Like when he's telling reporters how he doesn't let them use Google.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    51. Re:Would a different approach be better? by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "You know what you need? DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU NEED?!
      DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE *cough* DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE *hacking paroxysm* DISCi... *pants heavily* its all about the DISCIPLINe children... jesus.... fucking.. dis.. I... I.... *collapses in a puddle of sweat and desperation*"

      Sounds like a Microsoft cover of a Throbbing Gristle song.

    52. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      For some reason I thought VB stood for Victoria Bitter when I first read your sig.

      Yeah, VB isn't like generic beer at all.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    53. Re:Would a different approach be better? by kfg · · Score: 1

      If he eats it 'cuz you told him not to, he's stupid

      There is an to "forbidding." You don't just say "You can't eat broccoli."

      You eat broccoli, in front of him, but tell him it's for grownups so he isn't supposed to have it because he isn't grownup enough yet.

      He'll sneak more of it than you could possibly get him to eat any other way.

      Yes, your 14 year old is drinking beer, no matter what he tells you. He doesn't even like it, but he's drinking it anyway.

      KFG

    54. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I would expect the CEO of Coke to have a huge walk-in refrigerator containing stacks of every soft drink available in the US and a few that aren't. It's a job, that's all.

      Rich

    55. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Buran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No iPods or Google? Might as well tattoo kick me signs on their backs.

      It's worse. You don't parent by meddling in kids' lives to the point where you loom over them and not only say "You have to be home by 10pm, and you can't use the car" but then to also say "You can use the web to search but you can't search the way all your friends do" and "You can listen to music but you can't listen to it with what all your friends use" ... what is going to happen to these kids? They're going to be resentful of their father's repeated interference in their lives just becaise he doesn't like the brand of the devices they want to use. Kids have to learn to be responsible on their own and make their own informed choices, and a parent who interferes with their choices based on what you have to admit is an arbitrary criterion when it comes down to it is just going to find that his kids have no respect for him.

      When I was a kid my parents let me make my own choices. If I wanted to use brand X instead of brand Y that they preferred, it was my choice. They expected me to do my own research, and to make choices that were good for me and didn't get me in trouble, or anyone else in trouble. They had their preferences, sure, but if I wanted to buy item X with my weekly allowance, they let me buy it.

      A good parent does that. This isn't good parenting. It's not teaching the responsibility of making one's own choices, it's teaching that you should accept at face value that if someone else says that something is bad, it's bad, and to hell with the 99 people on one side of the room who say that you're making the wrong choice if Daddy gets it into his head that he, who is just one person, thinks he's right.

      My father never did that, and it got him respect. This is just going to get an attitude of "Damn parents meddling in my life". And so the circle of "my parents are idiots" continues, and therefore so does the circle of kids who are ever-ruder and have less and less respect for their parents by the day -- no, by the minute.

    56. Re:Would a different approach be better? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who actually does go to church, I can tell you that NONE of the pastor's kids I have ever known have become atheists.

      You are in the church, so you see the ones that stay in the church.

      I am not in the church, so I see the ones that left.

      KFG

    57. Re:Would a different approach be better? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Considering that Linus is worth a few million, I think not. Red Hat alone gave him 12 million in stock a few years back to show appreciation to him. Thats why Linus drives 3 pretty expensive cars and has a big house.
      Regards,
      Steve

    58. Re:Would a different approach be better? by max99ted · · Score: 1

      Not coke dealers, no, but a good many of them, perhaps even the vast majority, become anti-orginized religion and even; gasp!

      Atheists.


      You can count me as a son of a pastor who is now an atheist (as is my brother). I've also known a number of pastor's kids over the years and I'd say over 75% are now atheist.

      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

    59. Re:Would a different approach be better? by nsuttitinagul · · Score: 1

      This type of attitude is actually pretty widespread at Microsoft, I gathered.

      Two years ago when I interviewed with the Shell team, they showed me their latest eye-candy interface, which looked quite a lot like the glassy OS X interface. I commented (perhaps mistakenly during my interview when he was showing it to me) that it looked quite a lot like Apple's latest market offering.

      My interviewer's response: "I've never used that."

      As a senior software engineer, he was simply handed down specs for him to work with, flesh out, and build; no questions about where the instructions came from, what influenced them, or why the interface was good or bad.

      Unsurprisingly, I ended up not getting an offer from the Shell group that year, but eventually came around to interview again and got offers from both Avalon and Shell. Where did I eventually choose to work? Google, because by every indication, they pay attention to the market, where it's going, and they are actually innovating in as many sectors as possible.

      If upper management wants to avoid competition to the point of zealotry (some of the open source gurus out there should take note of this!), it doesn't surprise me what they produce ends up sucking.

    60. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have four words for you, I Love This House! YEAHHH!!!!

    61. Re:Would a different approach be better? by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      While I don't agree with this, he is within the law (until he throws a chair). Non-Ipod players are as good or better than the iPod, but I don't want to be flamebait. I disagree totally about the google thing. I had a teach block out google. The purpose of this was if *.google.com is blocked so is gmail.google.com. Back ontopic, yes, Balmer is within the law. I don't think this is fair, but it is his right as the parent.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    62. Re:Would a different approach be better? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Watching what kids like is the best way to see where the market is going. I like to hang out at libraries and college computer labs to get an idea what websites kids are using and try to figure out what they like about them. If you lose touch with your market then you're doomed.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    63. Re:Would a different approach be better? by theantipop · · Score: 1
      I told you, this is a conformist household. No Google, no iPod.

      The irony of this statement has not gone unnoticed.
    64. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Buran · · Score: 1

      I never said that he's doing anything illegal. I did say that this is horribly lousy parenting, as part of good parenting is letting your kids make their own choices without your interference (unless someone would be harmed by something your kids did) and letting them learn from their own mistakes. If they talk to their friends and their friends recommend doing something, and daddy says no because the wrong logo is on the item, what kind of lesson is that? I wouldn't want my kids, when I have them, to learn that a shallow choice based on a pretty logo means a lot more than well-thought-out-and-researched choices do. And that's not letting your kids make their own choices -- it's imposing your own misguided ideals on other people, and that (while it may be within the law) is immoral.

    65. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      Correct, his kids cant possibly spend enough money on coke for it to make an earnings difference and besides...wouldnt you get sick of coke and want a mountain dew or something sometime?

      --
      Bottles.
    66. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Rdickinson · · Score: 1

      Ah but his kids do get to design friendly little animations that help you write letters..

    67. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ENIGMAwastaken · · Score: 1

      I think it sounds more like a NEU! song, Hallogallo for instance: 10 minutes of the same drum line/guitar line looped over and over again.

    68. Re:Would a different approach be better? by vistic · · Score: 1

      oh crap that made me laugh

    69. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      It was kind of a funny moderation. Too bad you can't meta-mod such moderations as "Funny".

      "Quite a large number of the boys followed in dad's footsteps and quite a few of the girls married a pastor."

      Personally I would never support a religion that so blatantly favoured one sex over the other (I am male)

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    70. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Omicron32 · · Score: 1

      Man, that was awesome. If you weren't already modded to full I'd mod you more.

    71. Re:Would a different approach be better? by vistic · · Score: 1

      Geez is this ever true...

    72. Re:Would a different approach be better? by vistic · · Score: 1

      Was it salted?

    73. Re:Would a different approach be better? by labratuk · · Score: 1

      ...even though I no longer work at Microsoft, I don't want them to know who I am or where I work now...
       
      ...I wish Apple would start making cell phones. The UI would be the best; if they sold them, I'd buy one right now... ...they don't have anything that competes with an Apple product that is as good as the Apple product. I'm sure an Apple cell phone would be that way, too.


      Do you work for Apple by any chance?
      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    74. Re:Would a different approach be better? by syukton · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a contractor at Microsoft and my fellow contractors and I use "google" as a verb--even my lead does it, and our homepages are all set to google (mine is google news, actually). Granted I'm not in the core Windows division, but I am at Microsoft and I am allowed an amount of freedom in which search engine I use.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    75. Re:Would a different approach be better? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Vista must require some sort of special keyboard upgrade. I found the shift key (twice), but I can't find the pretzel...

    76. Re:Would a different approach be better? by lixee · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, seeing how Vista's release date has continually slipped, his kids will probably never use that, either.

      I doubt his grand-sons will either.
      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    77. Re:Would a different approach be better? by hotfireball · · Score: 1

      However, e.g. here in Japan, nobody who is working for Toyota is allowed to buy non-Toyota car. If some worker works @ Toyota and use Honda -- he/she is going to be fired. Seriously.

    78. Re:Would a different approach be better? by balloot · · Score: 1

      This is an amazingly intelligent post. As a new grad coming out with a CS Master's degree from a top university, I did not even consider MS for these very reasons. Simple observation of the attitudes surrounding software employers at my school points to the fact that MS is now considered in the same group as companies like IBM and Oracle. This is not a good thing. The days when MS was getting the brightest and the best are long past.

    79. Re:Would a different approach be better? by fuckface · · Score: 1
      Uh, maybe she figured out on her own to discern between losers and nice guys. Your claim to have influenced her decisions is spurious.

      Thank you for proving your status as a Slashdotter. It's obvious that you have never spent any time a teenage girl. Keep trying tho!

    80. Re:Would a different approach be better? by octavist · · Score: 1

      He's learned from Microsoft that coercion works better than the alternatives most of us use to persuade others. A man consistent in his principles.

    81. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      Buran wrote:

      They're going to be resentful of their father's repeated interference in their lives just becaise he doesn't like the brand of the devices they want to use.

      Wrong. they will grow up to LOVE their father, because when he dies he will leave each of them hundreds of millions of dollars and they will never have to work a single fucking day in their lives. Weepie weepie Wah Wah Wah - we couldn't use google or own an iPod. BFD. I don't let my daughter (Sophie Spoilsport) own an iPod either, because I know what kind of damage headphones can do to young ears. She can listen to anything she wants on her stereo, though, and I am VERY happy that she's into classical music... for now...

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    82. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Why? Read the old testament. God has no problem with men having sex with prostitutes.

      Don't eat the apple though. That knowledge thing is dangerous. Come to think of it, Jesus was an anti-religious establishment activist. Interesting.

    83. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Informative

      He works wherever you care to place him.

      He's an AC. He could be Richard Stallman. He could be Bill Gates. He probably can't be Saddam Hussein. But the list of who he definitely isn't is rather a lot smaller than the list of who he might be.

      I work at Microsoft, too.

      Or, I could say so, if I wanted to check off that box down there that says 'Post Anonymously' for some reason.

      Get it?

    84. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Good parenting involves helping your children make choices. Not saying 'it it completely up to you' and setting them loose. You (apparently) turned out all right, but please don't imply a direct cause-effect relationship.

    85. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs literally has been a coke dealer at times in the past, ya know...

    86. Re:Would a different approach be better? by LS · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the moderation is true. I dated a pastor's daughter once, and let's just say that there were consequences.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    87. Re:Would a different approach be better? by damiam · · Score: 1

      I'm not really up on all this stuff, but I was under the impression that IBM is actually a pretty cool place to work. They're no Google, but I think they treat their employees fairly well.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    88. Re:Would a different approach be better? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Doing anything is rebellious if you've been forbidden to do it.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    89. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

      Why can I see this conversation in the Ballmer Household?

      Kid: Dad, I was expelled from school today.
      Steve: Why were you expelled from school?
      Kid: Because I was caught dealing heroin on school grounds.
      Steve: What did I say about drugs... drugs are... wait a minute... what the hell is that?
      Kid: What?
      Steve: Don't you "what" me... those are... those are...
      Kid: I was just borrowing it.
      Steve: Like HELL you were just borrow... oh my... what did I tell you about bringing that into the house?!?
      Kid: But, but, it's just an iPod.
      Steve: You brought an iPOD into this house? You are no offspring of mine. Get out! Get your things and get the hell out of my house! I can't believe you'd bring white earbuds anywhere NEAR this house.

    90. Re:Would a different approach be better? by zax63105 · · Score: 1

      This is retarded. I can see the headline if Ballmer answered differently... ** MICROSOFT'S BALLMER'S CHILDREN USE IPODS AND NOT A MICROSOFT PRODUCT *** This was a no-win question.

    91. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Buran · · Score: 1

      Money can't erase a bad upbringing. There's a reason for the saying that money can't buy happiness. You can get a lot of money from someone and still resent them.

    92. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Buran · · Score: 1

      Helping, yes. But not outright arbitrarily brainwashing them and saying "you can't make this choice because of this stupid arbitrary reason".

    93. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Rick+BigNail · · Score: 1

      Nah. IBM is cool.

      Start by reading their systems and research journals. You'll learn a lot.

    94. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      IMO Microsoft reached it's zenith when Windows 95 and Office 97 were still on the market. Microsoft is still hungry, but has become to massive to be agile. The recent management shuffle involving Vista is a nice example of re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic. The people replaced were competent enough, and I'm sure the new ones are too, but they are no more likely to succeed. The organization, the group-think, the brainwashing, and the horrendous legacy code base and commitment to backwards compatibility, will sabotage their best efforts.

      Windows 95 and Office 97 run quite well under VMware, or Microsoft's Virtual PC (I would imagine). So there's no reason they couldn't provide an "emulation layer" which was in fact an instance of Virtual PC "under the hood", but the API set would look the same to the applications that were identified as Windows 95 applications.

      Might need to write a little glue; or, they could just not bother trying to integrate it completely, and have a "Windows 95" icon which would open a desktop, similar to an RDP session interface perhaps, which uses Virtual PC underneath. So they could still cut-and-paste between the Windows 95 desktop and whatever the host OS was, but they wouldn't be able to run, for instance, programs that expect to be able to interact locally, with programs on the host; but if they are able to interact through the network, then they should work fine.

      And, the point of this is: the XP desktop and Vista desktop, graphic pig that it is, will some day soon (like, 3 years or so?) be trivially virtualizable, with multiple instances able to run on a single machine with no difficulty.

      So there's no reason for them not to throw the baby out with the dirty, filthy, putrid bath water that's already killed the baby anyway. Start over with a solid, unencumbered BSD foundation, and build something proprietary on top of that. Apple has shown that the model works; they agilely moved from PowerPC to x86 recently, versus Microsoft's cross-platform experience being shut down (NT worked on MIPS and Alpha).

      You're probably right that the culture would resist the move, though. Think of how many redundancies there'd be with fewer bugs to fix!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    95. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      That was supposed to be a Mary Magdalene joke, but I guess no one here has a sense of humor.

    96. Re:Would a different approach be better? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Oh, THAT's what you were getting at. In that case, God didn't mind that he slept with her, but certain saints were VERY irritated that he married her and had kids!

    97. Re:Would a different approach be better? by aborchers · · Score: 1

      Have you ever actually seen Steve Balmer?

      I'm mentally touring my office, which contains Unix, Linux and MS developers and I don't detect any appreciable difference in body type, dietary habits or marital status. So, you'll have to figure out another angle for your shill.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    98. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Chances are you'd resent them more if they behaved like that, and then left all their money to a girl with big tits who they married three months before dying.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    99. Re:Would a different approach be better? by lantenon · · Score: 1

      The pretzel's on the Mac keyboard, but be careful: the pretzel Apple used has four segments, instead of the more typical three.

    100. Re:Would a different approach be better? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Arbitrarily forbidding a thing doesn't work. Just as 'anything goes' parenting doesn't work. There's a happy medium.

      Ballmer is a nut. He's a shill. Everybody knows that. His kids probably laughed their gut out when they heard the stupid white lie he told at work that day.

  2. so, he has his kids brainwashed by yagu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article (emphasis mine):

    Do you have an iPod?

    No, I do not. Nor do my children. My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    Well now I get a sense of where the inability to know the market comes from. Get a clue Ballmer -- to best compete with your competition you get to know them intimately.

    Your strongest plan to defeat you competition is to know them as if you were them!

    The only other plausible way to unseat a king is to have so much money and power and control of other resources that you can bludgeon him, beat him mercilessly until all of his resources are gone and you can take the ... Hmmmm. Never mind.

    1. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>The only other plausible way to unseat a king

      ...is to take his throne and throw it across the room while yelling "I'm going to fucking kill that king!"

    2. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by garcia · · Score: 1

      Survival of the fittest. Google is *the* search engine that returns the *best* results. If he's going to limit his children to a search engine that sucks (i.e. MSN) then his kids won't be as well informed as those that are permitted to use Google.

      This is like a father telling his children that they are only allowed to use Encyclopedias from 2001 instead of the 2006 edition.

    3. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. :)

    4. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm gonna take a wild guess that Steve Ballmer is, in fact, capable of joking, and that his kids aren't really forbidden from using Google or iPods, but instead really are Microsoft supporters. It's not really unheard of for kids to be fanatical about things their parents are involved in.

      I expect that Ballmer's kids really are "brainwashed" in the sense that they believe in their dad and the company they work for. I doubt they've been actually forbidden from using it, they'd just rather use the tools their dad makes.

      I know I've heard plenty from my father about how the projects he works on are the world's greatest... I'm tempted to name names, but I think I'll pass for now.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    5. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by msuzio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's Steve Ballmer. Richer than kings of old ever dreamed of. Much like the Hilton sisters, his kids are going to be able to be complete morons and they will get by just fine in life...

    6. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Well now I get a sense of where the inability to know the market comes from. Get a clue Ballmer -- to best compete with your competition you get to know them intimately."

      He's talking about his kids not using those products, not himself.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      Well now I get a sense of where the inability to know the market comes from. Get a clue Ballmer -- to best compete with your competition you get to know them intimately.

      That will never work. Microsoft has been telling its customers what they want to buy for so long, Gates and Ballmer have forgotten how to listen.

    8. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by no_pets · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I worked for a company before that made me get executive approval several rungs up the latter just to take a college course in my free time that was semi-career related. I could certainly see a big company such as MicroSoft outlawing iPods and then using the excuse that it's to protect IP since the iPod could be used to steal information. Not to mention extreme peer pressure trickling down from Ballmer regarding iPod or Google use at all.

      --
      "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
    9. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by soulhuntre · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna take a wild guess that Steve Ballmer is, in fact, capable of joking, and that his kids aren't really forbidden from using Google or iPods

      It is interesting how patehtic the anti-MS whinign has gotten that an off handed humorous comment liek this is worth a /. story and so few peopel here even recognize the humor.

      But its not surprising. Look at how patheticly lame osViews (for example) is of late.

      --
      --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
    10. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad Ballmer isn't competing with Jonas Salk -- his kids would never get vacinated against polio.

    11. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1
      It is interesting how patehtic the anti-MS whinign has gotten that an off handed humorous comment liek this is worth a /. story and so few peopel here even recognize the humor.

      Jesus H. Christ, proofread your comments!
    12. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by TheRealBurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

      Or, in all seriousness, he could just be lying. It'd be alot of bad press if he admitted, "yeah, my kids google all the time", or "my kids just luuuuv their iPods." Try explaining that to your stockholders. It'd kind of be like the CEO of Anheuser-Busch talking to a reporter and cracking open a Coors.

    13. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by laklare · · Score: 1

      He didn't say they were strictly forbidden. He simply said they were brainwashed.

    14. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by ettlz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We recognise the humour, but consider it to be a crap, sub-standard joke; therefore we will respond with our own superiour humour solutions, many of which will be copylefted Free Jokes.

    15. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, I do not. Nor do my children. My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

      There are several conclusions you can see here:
      1. He can, was willing to, and did brainwash his children.
      2. His kids are poorly behaved and brainwashed.
      3. His ability to brainwash was not used to make his kid to behave better.
      4. His priority is to prevent his kids from using Google and iPods, not to teach them to be better.

      A great dad, he is.

    16. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by birder · · Score: 1

      Think of it more like the children of Quiznos' founder, eating at Subway. Or some Sony CEO kids wanting a Samsung TV for the house. More than likely they support the family business and perhaps even like to do so.

      Walk around the MS campus and you'll see tons of iPods and people there certainly use Google.

      This sounds more like a tongue-in-cheek quip that some reporter is taking out of context.

    17. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      This is the second reasonable, dow to earth post I've seen about the article so far. *Geesh* - you people take the fun out of everything... :-)

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    18. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by garcia · · Score: 1

      Google is better in the long term, but I've noticed MSN is faster to update its index. This is helpful for site designers to get quicker feedback on how they are doing in search results.

      Google indexes me just as often as MSN does. Perhaps that's because I'm using Sitemaps but I don't know. Whether or not I show up in the Google index (after being indexed) usually depends on when any particular post on my website gets off the main page (at least that's what it seems like).

    19. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by xant · · Score: 1

      We recognise the humour

      And our free-as-in-speech jokes will be accompanied by a healthy dose of mindless zealotry perpetrated by elitists.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    20. Re:so, he has his kids brainwashed by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Much like the Hilton sisters, his kids are going to be able to be complete morons and they will get by just fine in life...

      Unless they pull a River Phoenix. The survival of stupid people is by no means assured, and that's a good thing.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  3. Not a problem! by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering Google's willingness to appease the biggest government censor (China), I don't doubt that Google will also censor itself in Ballmer's home, if IPs were given out. And another th--

    WAIT... Steve Ballmer has human children?!?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Not a problem! by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      WAIT... Steve Ballmer has human children?!?

      Well, thta's his story and he's sticking to it.

    2. Re:Not a problem! by Simoriah · · Score: 1

      Of course he does. We all knew he was married....
      It was inevitable that at some point, he'd interface with his wife and do some sort of dump. Now he has uncontrollable child processes around that he won't be able to control.... typical MS product.

      --
      "It compiles, SHIP IT!" -Overheard at Microsoft's development lab
    3. Re:Not a problem! by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      WAIT... Steve Ballmer has human children?!?

      It was one of those "Hello kids, want to play with my X-Box", then WHAM!, the door slams shut, and you hear a key turning in the lock.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    4. Re:Not a problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      WAIT... Steve Ballmer has human children?!?

      Only between meals. . . . .

    5. Re:Not a problem! by xnot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait a minute. That must mean.... oh no.

      Steve.....Balmer.....had.....SEX?

      No, no, it can't be. God no, it can't be. "You know what we all need? Prostitutes! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES! PROSTITUTES!" (Balmer on stage sweating like a pig, with playboy bunnies.)

      Please rip that image out of my head.

    6. Re:Not a problem! by Elminst · · Score: 1

      (Balmer on stage sweating like a pig, with playboy bunnies.)

      You are a bad bad man.
      It's really too bad you can't wash a mind out with soap...

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    7. Re:Not a problem! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      It was inevitable that at some point, he'd interface with his wife and do some sort of dump.

      That's just nasty. Wouldn't having to see Ballmer's sweaty "Oh" face would be bad enough?

    8. Re:Not a problem! by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I thought that by talking about Ballmers babies, they were referring to Microsoft Employees. I was actually shocked that he was really talking about his kids. Who cares about his kids (apart from him of course).

      This would be much better if he had banned people at Microsoft from using ipods and google - I wonder what their actuall position on this is.

  4. He performs anticompetitive maneuvers on his kids? by Too+many+errors,+bai · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does he throw chairs at his kids as well?

  5. That'll work by illtron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Telling kids what they're not allowed to do/have will certainly make them stop wanting to do/have whatever it is. It'll work for sure.

    On the other hand, if the alternative is being thrashed about like a rag doll by a sweaty man-ape...

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:That'll work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      On the other hand, if the alternative is being thrashed about like a rag doll by a sweaty man-ape...
      Mrs. Ballmer just had a flashback to their children's conception.
    2. Re:That'll work by illtron · · Score: 1

      No, no... just raised Catholic

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
  6. Ah, excellent: by Vengeance · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another generation of the wealthy and clueless.

    No Google, indeed... Similarly, I do not allow my children to use 'legs'.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    1. Re:Ah, excellent: by Seanasy · · Score: 1
      Similarly, I do not allow my children to use 'legs'.

      So, you sell wheelchairs?

    2. Re:Ah, excellent: by Yogs · · Score: 1

      What does it say about your life when the difference between a superior search engine and an inferior search engine registers compared to having legs vs. not having legs?

      I'm asking for help here, people.

  7. The sleeping giant goes on the offensive by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1
    with a huge chair I suppose...

    Babies: But dad it's cool \\:D/
    *chair flies over*
    Ballmer: I'll be back

  8. In other words by gelfling · · Score: 1

    No NON Microsoft products in his house.

    1. Re:In other words by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1

      I bet they can't wait for Toilet 1.0!

      Sometimes being an alpha tester isn't worth it.

  9. He's rich enough by benjjj · · Score: 1

    He's rich enough to get someone to custom-build him an iPod from scratch and slap an MS logo on the back. As for Google, his kids have serfs to do their internet searches, using windows live or whatever's hot at the moment.

  10. But... by J05H · · Score: 4, Funny

    But... Dad!! All the other kids are doing it!!

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    1. Re:But... by Gabesword · · Score: 2

      >But... Dad!! All the other kids are doing it!! I'll fucking kill the other kids! I've done it before and I'll do it again!

    2. Re:But... by moochfish · · Score: 1

      "If all the kids went out and started using Unix, would you do that too!?"

  11. Behind The Curve by Steve+B · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft is about to roll out new versions of Windows and Office.

    This must be some new definition of "about to" with which I have not been familiar....

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    1. Re:Behind The Curve by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the PS3 being delayed until 2007 is a huge opportunity to Microsoft (so says Microsoft), but the delay of Windows and Office until 2007 (a significantly larger portion of their revenue model) is just glossed over.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Behind The Curve by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Well, it is an opportunity too, but not to Microsoft.

    3. Re:Behind The Curve by russellh · · Score: 1

      Geologically, as in - we're about to have another ice age.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    4. Re:Behind The Curve by NewbieV · · Score: 1

      The statement holds true for very large values of "about to".

      By the same token, 3D Realms is about to release DNF :)

      --


      "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    5. Re:Behind The Curve by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      This must be some new definition of "about to" with which I have not been familiar....

      It's true, just for very large values of "about to."

      I'd hate to see the buffer overflow when one tries to write beyond the 64-bit value to which Ballmer no doubt alludes...

    6. Re:Behind The Curve by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      In related news, Take Two Interactive announced today that they are about to release Duke Nukem Forever.

      (Yay! my first ever DNF joke on Slashdot ... and it was actually relevant)

    7. Re:Behind The Curve by Gleng · · Score: 1

      If you consider the entire lifespan of the Universe then, relatively speaking, the Sun is "about to" explode.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  12. at least he admits it's brainwash by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1
    I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    Of course, this speaks nothing of groupthink.
    1. Re:at least he admits it's brainwash by lxs · · Score: 1

      What is this groupthink you speak of? I was going to follow your link, but dad won't let me.

  13. This just means... by kuwan · · Score: 1

    This just means that his kids do use Google and they do have iPods.

  14. Poor kids by JFlex · · Score: 1

    I foresee future Microsoft employees being raised. *sigh*... those poor kids. They'll never know what it's like to use a technology that actually works. Well, another one bites the dust I guess.

  15. Uhmm... so what ? by FlyingSpank · · Score: 1

    Fortune, and some other magazines is just an equivalent to the Playboy centerfold for CxO's etc .... this a fluff piece.

    It may as well read ...

    I prefer throwing charis
    I like dancing like a monkey
    I make my children do things that look good in print.

    Reality is .. so what.

    Another karmic positive way of looking at it is :

    Assuming away the bluster .. if MS's offerings were good enough .. would this step be needed ?

    Feh. Why dont they run the toilet paper Ballmer prefers... it might generate better discussion

  16. This once again proves my theory that by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

    Steve Balmer is a facist pig (sorry David Hasselhoff I'll get you next post).

  17. My children will inherit billions... by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    they hire live cover bands to follow them around 24/7 while feeding them grapes by hand.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:My children will inherit billions... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      "they hire live cover bands to follow them around 24/7 "

      That's so middle-class. Real billionaires hire the orginal performers for their kids, not cover bands.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  18. Fortress Microsoft by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I wonder how soon software businesses will realize that MS will be cutting them out as well, once they get to a set size. It is apparent that MS will go to great lengths to take any dollar that they can.

    While I dispise MS for what they do, I also admire them for how they can take their products and push them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  19. I've got my kids brainwashed and pissed off by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but he's also laying down the law in his own house. Steve says that his kids are not allowed to use Google or have an iPod."

    Ahh when will parents EVER learn? If you forbid something, it just makes the kids want it more.

    Coming soon, Ballmer's kids eventually end up working for Google, Ballmer buys an Island, sets up a wireless Windows-only network that blocks anything Google, and rules it by Windows-only voice commands from atop his throne.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  20. just another reason by DennisInDallas · · Score: 2, Funny

    I usually can't work up a lot of pity for the obscenely rich, but it's really got to suck to be a little balmer - for so many reasons

  21. Re:He performs anticompetitive maneuvers on his ki by bubulubugoth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure!!! that was the pavlovian educational brainwashing method of his childrens' brain...

    Ipod -> Chair -> pain
    Google -> Chair -> pain

    --
    Â_Â
  22. Jokes overheard in the workplace... by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I wonder if Steve would only allow chairs that would be easy to throw, or have chairs so heavy that they couldn't be thrown. It depends on how he wants to raise his children, I suppose."

    "Maybe his real motive for not allowing iPods is so that the kids won't throw them. Those things are expensive!"

    "If you think Steve's tantrums are bad, wait until you meet his kids."

    I'll be here all day. Try the veal.

    1. Re:Jokes overheard in the workplace... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "I'll be here all day. Try the veal."

      I wouldn't recommend it. One of Steve's kids actually did buy an iPod and hasn't been seen since.

    2. Re:Jokes overheard in the workplace... by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alternatively: tip the veal, try the waitress....

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    3. Re:Jokes overheard in the workplace... by stor · · Score: 1

      Alternatively: tip the veal, try the waitress....

      Awesome idea: then you can steal your $10 back and you're up one waitress.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  23. Uhm... by X3J11 · · Score: 1

    "but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed"
    Do you really trust someone who claims he "brainwashed" his kids? Oh wait, who does this guy work for again? Yeah, my bad, never mind.

  24. It may work for a while... by theheff · · Score: 2, Funny

    until those rebellious teenage years... although I have to admit that a google query is a lame display of disrespect.

    1. Re:It may work for a while... by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what about smoking cigarettes while performing Google queries.

      Awesome cool.

    2. Re:It may work for a while... by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

      A rather cunning plan then. Make the thing you most strongly forbid your kids from doing something that isn't THAT dangerous.

      Excuse me, I'm going to go belligerantly forbid my children from eating cabbage.

    3. Re:It may work for a while... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

      until those rebellious teenage years... although I have to admit that a google query is a lame display of disrespect.

      Unless they google "Monkeyboy."

      --
      This sig is false.
  25. Imagine a Microsoft World by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    (cue John lennon)

    Imagine all the people .....
    It's easy, if you can ....

    (etc)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Imagine a Microsoft World by nsayer · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about Microsoft, then you should use A Perfect Circle's version.

    2. Re:Imagine a Microsoft World by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      then you should use A Perfect Circle's version.

      Here's a better link, with a link to the video. and yes, this version is pretty good, in a dreary sort of way. Interesting how the change to minor transforms it.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  26. The difference between a monopoly vs competitive by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And that summarizes the difference between a monopoly and a competitive landscape.

    In a monopoly, you're best off using

    • fear (if I catch you using Google I'll throw a chair at you)
    • and uncertainty (but can you really trust Google? It runs some free OS which can never scale as much as our expensive one) and
    • doubt (but a small company like Google, will they be around next year?)
    to keep your users.

    Balmer knows this, and he's practicing it on his kids.

  27. Relevance? by Mayhem178 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to say that the summary given for this article isn't at all representative of the article as a whole. That being said, I have to say this. How Ballmer deals with his kids is a private matter. It should stay a private matter, and he should have known this. As CEO of a company like Microsoft, he should know that his private home practices are not justification of his proposed business models.

    If he doesn't allow his kids to use Google or have iPods, that's his business. He shouldn't make it ours. That kind of preachiness can come back to bite one in the ass.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    1. Re:Relevance? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! He's making his kids use Microsoft products only, and society can not condone such hideous form of child abuse!

    2. Re:Relevance? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      While you make a good point, it's worth mentioning that good ol' Steve hasn't been very good about maintaining the imagery of a proper CEO in recent years.

      After all, I haven't heard of it being standard practice to turn office furniture into ballistic objects and scream out that you are going to "fucking bury" the CEOs of the competition...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:Relevance? by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I didn't particularly want to delve into the issue of the bad PR he creates by making such a statement. So, I just made my simple point and left it at that. Concerning his public image, Ballmer's actions speak for themselves.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    4. Re:Relevance? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1
      While in this case, Ballmer may be sharing more information than necessary, talking about your private life doesn't make you a bad CEO.

      "Pressed about security by Mr. Mossberg, Mr. Otellini had a startling confession: He spends an hour a weekend removing spyware from his daughter's computer. And when further pressed about whether a mainstream computer user in search of immediate safety from security woes ought to buy Apple Computer Inc.'s Macintosh instead of a Wintel PC, he said, 'If you want to fix it tomorrow, maybe you should buy something else.'"

      Full Story Here

      This particular case stuck with me because it happened May of last year, just before Apple announced the Intel switch. At the time people were shocked the (relatively) new Intel CEO would suggest using a competitor's product. A month later, it became clear that that wasn't the case at all.
  28. And I thought my parents were bad.... by OxygenPenguin · · Score: 1

    My parents always wanted to control everything in my life, too. They didn't allow computers for a while, because they could potentially induce pornography, etc.

    However, my parents never took away 2 of the greatest cultural phenomenons in the last 2 years, simply because they are competitors with you. I know that my dad's tool shop would rather me not use the other company's competing tool, but they don't stop me from being curious and knowing the customer.

    Ballmer needs to stop being an absolute control freak...I can't believe he's even letting it bleed into his family life.

    I wonder if he screams "Developers! Developers!" at his kids, too...

    --
    Read the only personal Runyon page out there.
  29. Exactly! by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd take the other approach - if they choose rival manufacturers then study first hand why they do so.

    Knowing your enemy is certainly preferable to willful ignorance.

    Imagine Ballmer as a military commander: "No, I'd rather not examine the captured enemy secret weapon. From now on, all captured equipment shall be ignored! Any soldiers who say anything about the superior capabilities of the enemy equipment shall be placed in one of the suicide squads. Carry on, men! Carry on!"

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Exactly! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      if any problem arises, he'll just send wave after wave of his own men, until the problem goes away.

    2. Re:Exactly! by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There really isn't a lot to learn from the competing products; Microsoft only needs a bigger market share to be more competative in these areas, and If MS could copy what their competitors were doing (they can't in the case of google), they would.

      Marketshare doesn't just instantly materialize out of thin air. The days when MS could just leverage Windows dominance and expect that consumers would buy whatever they provided are over. I think MS has a lot to learn from competing products. The emphasis on ease of use over multitudinous features is what differentiates both Apple and Google products from Microsoft products. MS has already dramatically restructured MSN Search in an effort to mimimic the simplicity of Google. They'll have a tougher time applying what they learn from the iPod, because MS relies on third party hardware vendors to create devices. Still, it seems they could lean on their partners more heavily, telling them, "Look, if you want to run Windows Media on your devices, you need to make them easier to use."

      My feeling is that Microsoft could conceivably learn from its competition, but like Apple in the early 1990s, it has drunk too much of its own Kool-Aid. Ballmer and company don't want to hear that Apple's business model with iTunes/iPod (build the hardware and the software and the music store) or Google's approach (serve users first, and advertising revenue will follow) works better than Microsoft's tried and true "own the OS and leverage it relentlessly" business model. Hence, Ballmer would rather talk about brainwashing his kids. Whether his kids are old enough to use iPods is, in my opinion, beside the point. His comment betrays his stubborn refusal to acknowledge that MS has something to learn from the competition.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  30. You can't be serious by kuzb · · Score: 1

    I don't know how anyone can even take that quote seriously. It's more likely a joke ballmer made that the journalist took out of context for his own benefit. I mean, think about it.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  31. Ballmer Babies? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a hellish offshoot of Muppet Babies.

    Baby Balmer: Developers, DEVELOPERS, DEVLOPERS!!!!!!!!!

    Nanny: Is everything alright in here?

    Baby Balmer: Yes, Nanny.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  32. I think it's safe to say he has emotional problems by Nijika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been saying it for years, a company's attitude starts at the top. If he wasn't a moron, he'd be letting his kids use these things, and then he'd be observing them and quizzing them on why they like them. He has his own marketing team, right there in his house, but he's more content to control than to learn and discover. Well, -shrug-, that's why MS will be MS until he and Bill are gone. I feel sorry for the micromanaged offspring though.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  33. There's a fine point of parenting here... by Sierpinski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best way to get a child to do something is to tell them they're not allowed to do whatever it is. (Especially if you don't give them a good (or any) reason.)

    I'm not talking about using Reverse Psychology on them either. I prefer to educate them and let them decide for themselves what is best. If they're old enough to use a computer and Google/iPods, they are probably old enough to decide for themselves what they feel is a better product/service. Good 'ole Dad is just ushering in another reason for rebellion. Sometimes children need to be treated like children (because they act like children, of course). If you want them to act like they're older, you have to treat them like they're older, which means respecting them. Outlawing a competitor's website is ridiculous. If anything it should inspire him to want to create a better website so his children will WANT to use Microsoft's search instead of Google. I just think he's going about it in the wrong way.

  34. This is probably good for Apple and Google by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    Just as parents that are too strict on things such as a social life, sex, alcohol, etc end up having kids that are rampant on the respective scenes, I think this would be pretty damn funny if Ballmer's tactics had the same effect on his kids. Rather than curtail their use of Google and iPods, his kids will probably sneak off at night to "Google parties" and "iPod raves", be a part of the "Underground iPod Movement" (not like there really needs to be one) and end up being the top contributors to iPod accessories and features and some day work at Google.

    Viva la chair-thrower!!!

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  35. So what? by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    His kids probably also have cloven hooves and pointy bifurcated tails...

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  36. brilliant by mackil · · Score: 1

    I recently attended a Microsoft Technet seminar where the speaker let it be known that the official rule at Microsoft is that no employee is to use Google, only the new MSN search engine. Not allowing his children to use Google or have an iPod is just as brilliant. Nevermind the fact that Google has the most relevant searches (for now), while MSN has the worst (of the major engines). So not only are his kids going to have a hard time doing research for anything, but his employees will as well. Funny stuff...

    1. Re:brilliant by Nijika · · Score: 1

      I think this is the "La la la I can't hear you" counter-strategy against Microsoft's competitors. Phase two will involve employing everyone on earth.

      --
      Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    2. Re:Brilliant by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm going to vote for #6. His kids want to use the stuff that daddy makes, and conciously choose to use Microsoft products because their father runs the company that makes them.

      I highly doubt Ballmer would have choosen to say his kids were "brainwashed" into using Microsoft products unless he was joking. "Brainwashed" is a curious choice of words if he really did forbid non-Microsoft products.

      If you read the interview, and not the Slashdot article, he actually says:

      [Fortune:] Do you have an iPod?

      [Ballmer:] No, I do not. Nor do my children. My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

      My reading of that isn't that he forbids them from using it, it's that his children support their father and his buisness. I have no idea how old his kids are (and neither does Wikipedia) but depending on age, it's quite believable that his kids just like emulating their father and therefore choose to use Microsoft products.

      I read it as kind of a geek joke - Ballmer's kids are "brainwashed" into using Microsoft products because it's what their father uses.

      Not that all kids use what their parents use - my father uses KDE and Opera, but I'm currently posting this from GNOME using Firefox. But when I was younger, and my dad bought OS/2 for our home computer, I believed him when he said it was the greatest desktop OS ever...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:Brilliant by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I was thinking similarly -- Marketing obviously didn't write his responses for him to that question.

      "Brainwashed" would infer that his view is entirely political and not necessarily factual.

      Considering that to 'google' is a verb these days, I'm sure his kids are perfectly aware of it (and have used it) as well as iPods (which I personally have no love for anyway).

      He should have said that everyone in his family prefers MSN search and his kids chat online all the time with Messenger or some such. Poor Steve :-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Brilliant by booyabazooka · · Score: 1

      Ever consider that he just encourages his children to seek out better products (such as portable music players), rather than the one that got popular due to heavy marketing?

    5. Re:Brilliant by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious that your interpretation of the invterview is correct. Well, it *should* be obvious, anyway. Sad the most slashdotters leave their common sense at the door when reading anything about Microsoft. This entire thread is a waste of time.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    6. Re:Brilliant by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Based on his use of the word "brainwashed", I vote for #7: he was joking. I mean, he's probably right, but I really doubt it's an edict handed down on the threat of chair-throwing.

      Nitpicky little monkeys, aren't we all?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:Brilliant by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I've seen at least one of his kids and I'd estimate he is in the domain of 12-15 years old.

      Just because daddy works at Microsoft doesn't mean the son would use their products. Robert Scoble's (famous Microsoft blogger) son has a blog and is a Mac/iPod user. Here is a quote from his most recent post, "My friend has just started a blog, jeez this kid is crazy. I'm turning him to the Mac side of the force too(he wants an iBook G4)."

      Scoble can use his son to see what Apple is doing right and what they are doing wrong. This is much more productive than insulating yourself from differing ideas and opinions as some leaders do.

    8. Re:Brilliant by moochfish · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      Say the kids wanted a digital music player. Everybody has the cool iPod. They want one too. But you're saying they never even went down that path and that they started out asking for the MS version of that product.

      What exactly is it again Microsoft offers in competition to the iPod that Ballmer's kids so admire?

      Nothing. MS doesn't make digital music players. Your argument holdes up against the search engine thing, but not with the iPod issue.

    9. Re:Brilliant by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      Not that all kids use what their parents use - my father uses KDE and Opera, but I'm currently posting this from GNOME using Firefox

      That's very true. Same for me and my father, I write with Firefox on Windows, he writes with ink on paper.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  37. cognitive dissonance by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steve says that his kids are not allowed to use Google or have an iPod.

    Agggh, the pain... can't decide how to karmawhore... call Micro$oft evil... make fun of Ballmer... Norman, coordinate!!!

  38. Brilliant by mellonhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which means:

    1. They used google and were told to stop.
    2. They never used google but were told never to start.
    3. Bought an ipod and Steve got rid of it.
    4. Asked for an ipod and were told no.

    Either way, the genius is admitting that either his kids tried these products or he knew they were so superior that he had to do the preemptive strike to stop them.

    What an idiot.

    Actually, I'll vote for 5. He's a buffoon that needs to pound his chest on a regular basis (not to mention toss chairs) to seemingly make himself look like a tough guy and is making the whole thing up.

    Again, if so, what an idiot.

  39. A bit anal retentive are we? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    He's brainwashed his kids not to use Google or an iPod? What next? They can't use Firefox or Opera?

    What happens when his kids visit their friends who have an iPod or who look up info using Google? Do they leave the room or do they wash their eyes and ears out with bleach afterwards?

    It appears the recent decision to push back the release date of Vista isn't tied solely to the problems with the code. The real answer might have something to do with the jumping monkey.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  40. OB Office Space by schon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "[...] chicks dig a dude with money."

    "Well, not all chicks."

    "Well the kind of chicks that'd double up on a dude like me do."

    1. Re:OB Office Space by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was more thinking of a different office space quote....

      "fuckin... children would have hooves"

    2. Re:OB Office Space by scuba964 · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I have GOT to stop drinking something while reading Slashdot, I almost sprayed my monitor with Sprite.

  41. If my dad... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If my dad was as rich as Ballmer, I could think of at least a few other things to do besides googling for stuff and using iPods.

  42. MS thinking by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "First hand experience can tell you a lot more than market research sometimes, and might just give future MS products an edge."

    Clearly he doesn't care about his kids opinion of Google. Microsoft believes only in the positive feedback of a strong market position - we're popular because we're popular. By forcing his kids to use MS instead of Google or Apple, he's just doing his part to convert the masses one at a time. He thinks Microsoft just needs to reach a critical mass and they'll come to dominate whatever market they want - product quality is not an issue. This is backed up by the history where inferior MS products beat out supperior competition just because they got on more desktops. Remember when Gates told the folks at Apple he didn't need a superior product? So long as he could deploy to the IBM compatible world he'd capture the market.

    That old philosophy clearly still exists.

    1. Re:MS thinking by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft believes only in the positive feedback of a strong market position - we're popular because we're popular. ... This is backed up by the history where inferior MS products beat out supperior competition just because they got on more desktops."

      Recently, I read a book about the Pacific war in World War II. Your comment about Microsoft reminds me of the concept of Japanese "Fighting Spirit" or "Divine Wind" somehow guaranteeing victory, in spite of the whole country being bombed into a stone age. Perhaps there are parallels between Microsoft management and Japanese military leadership at that time.

      (I read only one book on this, so flame gently if I'm completely wrong)

    2. Re:MS thinking by ronanbear · · Score: 1

      Ballmer is leveraging his monopoly in his household to ensure that everyone uses M$. Interesting to note that the guy bullies his kids in private just like he bullies firms.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
  43. He claims innovation... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think you can you crack the iPod market?

    It's going to take an innovative proposition. In five years are people really going to carry two devices? One device that is their communication device, one device that is music? There's going to be a lot of opportunities to get back in that game. We want to be in that game. Expect to see announcements from us in that area in the next 12 months.


    But the market is already doing this. Apple is already in on this. First with the ROKR phone (which was horrid) and now with the SLVR. In the near future, with holographic storage and other miniaturization, we'll be seeing phones with 30gb to 300gb+ capacity in no time.

    He's saying to look for announcements in the next 12 months. I think in 12 months, the market is going to be vastly different from now. More phones will have mp3 playing features. higher capacities.

    But I forgot. M$'s definition of "innovation" is to follow everyone else. ;)

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
    1. Re:He claims innovation... by RedOregon · · Score: 1

      Let's see... what's that word I'm looking for... vaporware?

      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
  44. Just what Steve needs in his home... by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1


    closet Googlers!


    (cue Pyscho music)
    shriek, shriek, shriek....

  45. Perfectly understandable: by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 1

    He doesn't want them to watch this google video on their ipods.

  46. Seriously.... by sholden · · Score: 1

    What a dickhead.

    What's he going to do when one of his kids decides to follow a different religion? Have a different secual orientation? Cheer for a different sports team?

    Using a search engine... my god... that man has problems.

  47. Against everything by TechAdd · · Score: 1

    I guess he means not to use product or service of the companies who does not like MS. Phew ... what would happen to his kid ... huh ...

  48. Brainwashing and flying chairs by dyfet · · Score: 1
    I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    How rather sad actually that he looks at it that way. Of course maybe he uses aversion therapy with them; it's better not use google or an ipod than being hit by a flying chair...

  49. lol... by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

    ... that means his kids are fucking reviled at school. lol.

    Ballmer is an interesting anti-Gates personality. I don't think his penchant for the public eye does anything to improve the company's public image. MArketing is so important to monopolies that they really can't afford to be embodied by a raging behemoth.

    --
    un burrito me trampeó.
  50. My thoughts by hrieke · · Score: 1

    1st response- who cares?
    2nd response- At least they're using their own products, so the short comings will get noticed (hopefully).

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  51. Just say "no" to iPod by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...because as we all know, the iPod is a "gateway product" that leads to hardcore product usage, such as OS X, Linux, and the psychedelic effects of BSD.

    But there's a way you can help. Talk to your kids about products and teach them why non-Microsoft products are dangerous, and can lead to a life of crime.

    Did you know that Steve Ballmer recently got interested in photography? But he had a problem when he ran out of supplies, and he started shouting "Developers! Developers! Developers!"

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Just say "no" to iPod by JudeanPeople'sFront · · Score: 1

      Heh, nice sig :) I love that movie.

  52. Oh my god!!!! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean someone has let Ballmer REPRODUCE????

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Oh my god!!!! by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      He probably treats his wife like his OS; just lets every virus or malware that comes along reproduce with her.

    2. Re:Oh my god!!!! by Creepy · · Score: 1

      someone let BILL GATES reproduce - I find that much more scary, but I guess having countless billions will get you everywhere in life (except on the moral scale).

  53. i call bullshit. by macsox · · Score: 1

    you're trying to tell me that somehow they spend their entire lives without using the most popular search engine in the history of the internet? google's inescapability makes this pretty hard to swallow.

    i think ballmer is trying to make a point to the reporter. REPORTERS! REPORTERS! REPORTERS! REPORTERS!

  54. Dialoge from the Balmer house... by Tyger · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What are you hiding from me there?"

    "Nothing."

    "Don't lie to me. It's an iPOD isn't it. You have a ****ing iPOD!"

    "No, it's pot! I'm doing drugs."

    "Don't give me any of that. It's an iPOD. You know that we don't use iPOD in this house. And what's that on your computer? Let me see your screen."

    "It's just porn, dad!"

    "It better be. If I catch you looking at Google one more time, you're grounded for LIFE. Now go smoke your pot and watch the porn like a good boy."

    1. Re:Dialoge from the Balmer house... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      ... then balmer throws a chair at the kids

  55. brainwashing your kids by Petronius · · Score: 1

    wow! The guy brags about brainwashing his kids. I'd hate to see what he does to his employees.
    oh, wait...

    --
    there's no place like ~
  56. Overstatement? by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1


    Microsoft is about to roll out new versions of Windows and Office.


    Hell, that's a bit of an exaggeration isn't it? There's still atleast 9 months assuming no more delays!
  57. New Logo For Steve by Zebadias · · Score: 1
    Could we have a flying chair logo for SB topics thus getting the 'joke' over and done with?

    It would be a good replacment for 'borg'

  58. Re:Child abuse by everphilski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is a sad world when not having an iPod is child abuse.

  59. Kiddy rebellion by theolein · · Score: 1

    What will the fat freak do when his kids start rebelling and buying what they want to instead of what he wants them to? Will he throw a chair? Or will he just crap out and die of a heart attack?

    1. Re:Kiddy rebellion by xiaix · · Score: 1

      Based on a review of historical responses, I am guessing that he will "f**king kill" them, and then "f**cking bury" them. However, he will not throw a chair.

      --

      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

  60. Simple Example: Jobs and the iTunes intro by ianscot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When Steve Jobs introduced the iTunes store, and earlier when he was selling recording execs on it, he was able to describe to them exactly what consumers did and didn't like about peer-to-peer networks and monthly subscription models.

    He could say "They want to be able to get individual songs on demand without a monthly fee, and P2P gives them that -- sort of -- but we can make the experience much better because look at all the frustrating hunting around and poor copies, and look at the lack of previews, and so on..." His experience with the actual user experience was obvious to anyone who saw the keynote thing.

    By contrast, here we have Ballmer patting himself on the back over not letting his kids use the competition's dominant product. He's using the word "brainwashed" about his own kids. Visionary leadership, I'm sure.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Simple Example: Jobs and the iTunes intro by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Well, that's Steve Jobs can only afford turtle necks and a bi monthly shave, and Ballmer is a baby faced billionare with a veritable clothing departments worth of, slightly sweaty, suits.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Simple Example: Jobs and the iTunes intro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, when Jobs first came back to Apple, he used an IBM ThinkPad. He told people that nothing Apple was currently making was as good and that he'd switch as soon as they made something better. Talk about lighting a fire!

    3. Re:Simple Example: Jobs and the iTunes intro by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      If I was Ballmer, I would do the same thing. Because instead of everyone bitching about how authoritarian he is, they'd be laughing at the reports of how his own children don't even use Microsoft's shit. And you know it's true...

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    4. Re:Simple Example: Jobs and the iTunes intro by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      Also, when Jobs first came back to Apple, he used an IBM ThinkPad. He told people that nothing Apple was currently making was as good

      That's correct, and as a longtime Apple user, I too, always thought the ThinkPads [at least the pricier ones] were pretty well-built. But Jobs wasn't talking about the hardware when he showed up at Apple with his ThinkPad, he was talking about the OS he was running on it, namely, NeXTSTEP.

      Also, he was running an early version of the browser from the OmniGroup, called OmniWeb, which is still around as an OS X-only browser that follows Apple APIs like nobody's business. Very nifty. Of course it wasn't all that long [sort of] before Apple had the NeXT port, and their own browser to go with it. [Konqueror aka Safari].

  61. Oh Please... by bjk002 · · Score: 1

    Steve to children: "Do NOT EVER use an iPod and NEVER go to google.com
    children: "No problem dad."
    Steve to children: "Ok, I've got to get going to work, see you all tonight."
    children:"OK dad, have a good day, and stay away from the chairs."

    ... Steve leaves house...


    child1 to child2:"Someone should throw a chair at HIM! ... Geez... what a dork... can I borrow your iPod tonight? I read about this cool new album on google while at school and I wanted to check it out."
    child2 to child1:"Yeah sure... BTW.. make sure you don't use Dad's PC to do the download, he's got all that DRM **** on it. Use my laptop, and use the dual boot to linux."
    child1 to child2:" Cool, thanks!"

    --
    Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
  62. Ballmer concedes ... by daemoneyes · · Score: 1

    that only the brainwashed shoose Microsoft's products over those of Google and Apple. But Forbes would never use such a headline.

  63. Ballmer's Kids Wont Work For Anyone by beedle · · Score: 1

    Because they wont even be able to get a degree for the following reasons:

    1. The cannot get the professor's lectures because they are available only through iTunes

    2. The will not be able to write any research papers because they will still be waiting for the
    new live.com search page to load and once it does they will not be able to find anything relevant to their research topics.

    Btw I actually dont think the new live.com site or the search functionality is that bad....its just not as good as Google ;)

  64. You've got it all wrong! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's right there in your quote:

    I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.

    There is the Microsoft business strategy in a nutshell. Do not debate relative merits, just brainwash your audience. Don't let them decide - tell them what they want.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:You've got it all wrong! by boarder8925 · · Score: 1
      Do not debate relative merits, just brainwash your audience. Don't let them decide; tell them what they want.
      Sounds a lot like current America politics, no?

      "You're either with us or against us." You're accused of being anti-American, treasonous, or a traitor if you disagree with the government.

      I think Microsoft is just practicing government tactics; after all, if it's going to be like one, it has to act like one.
  65. How come? by bhunachchicken · · Score: 1

    "I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

    How come, Steve? If your company's products are so damn good then why would they want to use these things anyway?

  66. God forbid by danpsmith · · Score: 1

    God forbid Ballmer's children see what innovation is! (how then could they succeed him at microsoft?)

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  67. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Soko · · Score: 1

    I agree that attitude starts at the top, and Microsoft reflects it's paranoid and controlling nature in several ways, on several levels.

    However, I don't belive Mr. Ballmer is a moron - quite the contrary. He's just letting his huberis and fear over shadow his intellect at this point. A little humility would work wonders for the whole company.

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  68. Brainwashing at it's best. by Stumbles · · Score: 1

    At which later in the week. Ballmers kids were overheard saying to daddy; But why did you have to build the wall so high?

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  69. In the house of Balmer.... by mangus_angus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mrs. Balmer..."oh honey...look at what I found in little steves sock drawer while I was cleaning today....and look at what I found on his computer."
    Mr. Balmer..."oh my god, no...not my son....DEAR GOD PLEASE NO!!! STEVE JUNIOR...GET YOUR ASS DOWN HERE!!!"
    Little Steve..."Yeah da...uh oh..."
    Mr. Balmer..."Do you care to explaine this son?! You know the rules of my house!"
    Mrs. Balmer..."Steve calm down please!! Oh junior we still love you..."
    Mr. Balmer..."SHUT UP WOMAN! junior...talk....NOW.
    Little Steve..."errr ummm...I was holding it for a friend! I swear! And my other friend was using my PC the other day, I didn't know!"
    Mr. Balmer..."oh so your friend wanted you hold on to his Nano for him, and your "other" friend just happend to be looking at that SMUT search engine..."
    Little Steve..."yes"
    Mr. Balmer..."go upstairs...your mother and I need to talk about this"
    Little steve..."yes sir"..."man, I better move that MacBookPro and linux server out of my closet...."

  70. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Rob86TA · · Score: 1

    Has anyone thought about what his kids are going to say if he did use them as market research monkeys?

    "All my friends have one" or even better "I don't know"

    I'm all for proper market research, but since teenagers are psycologically the equivalent of lemmings, they're going to do what their friends are doing. Smoking, drinking, partying, etc. For 99% of the teenagers out there, they start because all their friends are doing it not because they are the epitomy of educated and discerning consumers.

  71. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by nagora · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I agree. The thing with Microsoft is that people keep wondering why their products are crap. The simple answer is that the people who work at Microsoft are crap. They're crap managers, crap designers, and crap programmers. Look at the IE7 team's blogs. These are third-rate programmers who don't even understand why people think their product sucks, yet they're trying to fix it.

    MS got where it is today by being handed a monopoly on a plate by IBM, and they've stayed there by using their power and money to keep that monopoly. They've never had to compete on quality, and their management has never had to innovate, fight their corner in the free market, or learn anything about running a real company in the real world. Consequently, embarrassing arseholes like Balmer and talentless failed geek also-rans like Gates (born rich and never HAD to work a day in his life) have never been sent packing by the shareholders.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  72. Could be to prevent bad press by Glamdrlng · · Score: 1

    I could understand if he was trying to prevent bad press, like the report that came out last year saying that Microsoft employees used iPods. Looks like this is more of a case of drinking a little too much of the kool-aid, and wanting to make sure his kids have some too.

    --

    Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
  73. An Open Letter from Steve Ballmer's kids. by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Dad,

    You're a dick.

    Fondly,

    Your kids.

    1. Re:An Open Letter from Steve Ballmer's kids. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

      P.S: This letter comes attached with a GPL license.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  74. he better not look under their mattresses by EddieBurkett · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that iPods are just an easy gateway to harder Apple products. As soon as he sees those little white buds, he'll know that Powerbooks and iMacs can't be far behind. He's just trying to protect his kids is all.

    --
    The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
  75. Come on! by int19h · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The post says that "Steve says that his kids are not allowed to use Google or have an iPod.".

    This is plain wrong. Here's what he actually said:
    "My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

    How is it possible to take this literally instead of as a joke? Come on!

    In fewer words, to the poster: RTFA + don't be a nitpick

  76. Quiz - Spot 2 errors in the scenario below... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    [SCENE: The Ballmer household]

    "Dad. Please may I have an iPod for my birthday?"

    "Yes, Linus, my son. Of course you may."

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  77. Obviously a... by brain1 · · Score: 1

    Psycho. Complete raving lunatic. Megalomanical whacko.

    Why the stockholders dont get rid of him, I'll never know. He gives the company a bad name.

  78. Own dog food? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    Ballmer:

    Why stop at your kids? Reroute google.com -> 127.0.0.1 (and all google IPs, as well) at all the Microsoft Campuses.

    Institute a new "security" policy. All non-Mac business unit employees may no longer bring iPods to work. They'll be confiscated on sight and destroyed.

    You're the CEO. You can do stuff like that. After all, Windows Live search is a superior product. You'd be doing your staff a favor by redirecting them from Google.

    Of course, you can setup a Google compatibility lab, where your employees do research on Google in a carefully controlled, monitored setting.

    It's your company, and your dog food. Put 2 and 2 together, monkey-buddy.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  79. I'm sorry, by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    is the old philosophy wrong? what makes it old?

    did he not in fact, capture the market?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:I'm sorry, by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "is the old philosophy wrong? what makes it old?

      did he not in fact, capture the market?"

      No, the philosophy is not wrong - it does work. It really isn't old (my bad) as far as I know it was considered new in the 1990s when software (pkzip in particular) could be made popular by being free for most uses. MS did in fact capture the market. I never said they didn't.

      I was just pointing out WHY balmer doesn't care what his kids think of Google and Apple, and instead focuses on getting them converted. MS doesn't care about product quality, only that everyone use their crap. This explains almost everything they do. "Features" rolled into Vista are there strictly so that people will not be tempted to use something else. MS can say "We have that too" even if it sucks rocks. It's all about getting the MS version of everything in front of everyone so they won't look to the competition - quality is welcome if it happens to show up.

      Damn I can infer a lot from what Balmer tells his kids....

      On a related note. If the MS version of something - say tabbed browsing - sucks, the masses will conclude that tabbed browsing is stupid, so Firefox users that promote it as a great feature will sound like fools to them. If you create a new product, and sell a poor implementation to the public it can be a long time before they'll buy something similar from anyone.

    2. Re:I'm sorry, by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't like the implementation of tabbed browsing in Firefox, because I'm used to Opera's readily configurable implementation. Although I could probably download an extension that can actually configure how tabbed browsing works in firefox and make it more like Opera's.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  80. Ballmer is a nutter by TwistedSpring · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I've seen this guy on various interviews and TV appearances, read about him online, and the guy seems completely mad. I'm not being facetious, the poor man is literally crazy, and looks like he's tearing himself apart in a continual battle between what's coming out of his mouth and reality.

    Look at him, he's always jumpy, he has a huge vein in his head that throbs all the time, he screams really loud whenever he gets the chance to extoll the virtues of XBox 360 or Windows Vista, but has a constant grimace of a smile hoisted across his face when being asked difficult questions. He shakes his head before everything he says when he's lying (e.g. when he says how they're On Track for Vista) as if he doesn't believe it. He's so tense it makes me feel tense just watching him.

    The guy needs to rest, or leave Microsoft. Banning his kids from google or ipods is just symptomatic of his increasing panic as he tries his very best to banish anything that suggests Microsoft is losing the race from his life. Any rational man would realise that Google and iPod are great products and it doesn't matter if his kids use it. It would be something to aim at. I would be saying "You think that iPod is fucking awesome, son, well just you wait for the crazy shit daddy is going to pull out of his ass," I certainly wouldn't be banning them from my household. I would use one.

    I'm genuinely concerned for his health. He really shouldn't be in the position that he's in, his buddy Bill Gates put him there to act as a forcefield between Gates and the reality of Microsoft. And while BillyG sits back with a fat spliff and chills between dictating endless new features for Vista, poor old Ballmer is shipped around the country to give uncomfortable interviews and spew his insane Microsoft evangelism. I think he's the only Microsoft evangelist there is right now, and he's trying his best to be a one man army. Shame he's losing the battle.

    1. Re:Ballmer is a nutter by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a job like Ballmer's drive you crazy? Not just doing it for Microsoft, but for any company. There are plenty of Microsoft evangelists, but most of them (like most GNU/Linux or BSD evangelists) are just dweebs posting on message boards. He actually has a giant stake in Microsoft's success, and he has first-hand knowledge of all kinds of things he can't say because they'd be bad PR (about any weaknesses of MS products, for example...)

      Perhaps there's a bit less pressure for lots of F/OSS types, even those with a big stake in what they're doing, because the development process is open and they have nothing to hide. There's no point telling anything but the most brutal truth about your F/OSS project because there's nothing to be gained from a really disappointed downloader (if you want to gain potential developers you would be better off being up-front about the state of your project). In fact, there's probably less pressure for spokespeople for any company other than Microsoft, because Microsoft seems so determined to control everything in the world that has to do with computers. It must be tiring.

    2. Re:Ballmer is a nutter by Ploum · · Score: 1

      If someone gives me as much money as Ballmer has and tells me :

      "Just look like you were crazy ! Throw chairs and sing developpers, developpers. Say you will kill google."

      Well, for that money, I think I will do it.. even for a bit less in fact.

      "I WILL F**** KILL GOOGLE !"

      this one was free ;-)

    3. Re:Ballmer is a nutter by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I've seen this guy on various interviews and TV appearances, read about him online, and the guy seems completely mad.

      Acting! Genius! Thank you!

      --
      What?
  81. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by D3m3rz3l · · Score: 1

    Omg. Does it not occur to you that he might have been joking?

  82. dont use google or ipod by Doctrinal+Enforcer · · Score: 1

    but I bet they just love hacking away at old dos boxes.

    --
    VERITAS VOS LIBERABIT
  83. Re:He performs anticompetitive maneuvers on his ki by LizardKing · · Score: 1

    Two dogs are sat in Pavlovs parlour. One turns to the other and says "Watch this, if I start salivating he starts ringing a little bell".

  84. Camouflage case anyone? by careysb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Coming soon: camouflage case for the Nano. Makes it look like the "other" MP3 player.

  85. Parent Teacher Meeting by Geak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Teacher: I'm afraid we have to put your son into a slow learning class. Ballmer: Why? Teacher: Well we found out he was using MSN search to research an essay. His arguments were completely wrong and his paper was 2 weeks late. Ballmer: What do the rest of the students use? And DONT say Google! Teacher: Ok I won't. Ballmer: @#&*!!!!!! *throws chair*

  86. Like an Amway family by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I knew someone who was from an "Amway family": their business was selling Amway stuff and getting other people to sign up as distributors "below" them in the pyramid. If they needed something and Amway sold it, they bought it. Everything in their house was cheap off-brand crap: weird breakfast cereal, odd-smelling shampoo, etc. It's not like they couldn't have afforded better quality. They just always bought Amway because that's what their business was. The kids hated it. Sounds like the Ballmer household is the same way. Pretty sad, if you ask me.

  87. His 12-year-old is smarter than he is, though by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    I was reminded of this comment by Ballmer in 2004, when he made his infamous statement about the music on iPods being "stolen" (as opposed to the music played in the virtuous Windows Media Player):

    "My 12-year-old at home doesn't want to hear that he can't put all the music that he wants in all of the places that he would like it."

    Mr. Ballmer, your 12-year-old (now 13 or 14, I suppose) understands digital music better than you do. There *is* no reason he can't put it all the places he'd like it, except that you're being a crappy parent and teaching him rotten principles about corporate subservience.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  88. Jokes and Truth by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    Your jokes are funny because, like all good jokes, they reveal something truthful in a slanting way (to paraphrase a certain New England poet).

    A number of posts prior to yours argue that Ballmer was joking about brainwashing his kids. I can believe he was joking, but his joke reveals a disturbing if not chilling kind of truth. In particular, if Ballmer is the kind of man who can be moved to swear and break things around employees over whom he has authority, it is a better than even bet that he does the same (and more) around his loved ones.

    Psychologically speaking (from an inexpert point of view), Ballmer is an authority figure who uses intimidation and force to obtain what he wants. If he cannot obtain what he wants, he expresses himself in violent outbursts. Ballmer, in my opinion, is a dangerous man, and I am betting that in 15 years one of his children will write a memoir that reveals what we already suspect about one of Microsoft's most powerful executives.

    --
    blog
  89. Hopefully... by radiumhahn · · Score: 1

    Hopefully he banned his kids from slashdot too! Holy crap! He is taking it in the pants on this one!

  90. It's not the iPod ... by Horatio_Hellpop · · Score: 1

    In the story, he insinuates that his kids misbehave a lot.

    Uhh ... likely due to the fact that their father is rarely at home to help raise them? Keeping them from Google and an iPod won't help much, Steve-o.

    --
    Frammin' on the jim-jam, frippin' at the krotz!
  91. unbeleivable by c6gunner · · Score: 1
    No, I do not. Nor do my children. My children--in many dimensions they're as poorly behaved as many other children, but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod.
    So what he's effectively saying is "I can't be bothered to be a good father, but I'll be damned if I'll let my kids use non-MS products!".

    What an idiot.
  92. Another bad article summary by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ballmer didn't say that iPods and Google are banned form his house. Here's what Ballmer said: "but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

    And "brainwashed" is supposed to be a joke, although nobody here would recognize one of those when it comes to Microsoft.

    If it were Linus saying "but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Windows, and you don't use MacOS," everyone here would get it.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Another bad article summary by ashirusnw · · Score: 1
      If it were Linus saying "but at least on this dimension I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Windows, and you don't use MacOS," everyone here would get it.

      Seconded.

      And thirded, and fourthed, and fifthed, ...

      Has everyone on slashdot either not RTFA / lost their sense of humour ?


      Ash.

    2. Re:Another bad article summary by pagrab · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why are you surprised that the same words are interpreted differently depending on who utters them. When someone says something which could be interpreted either as irony or literaly and you know that the guy is immune to irony you just go for literal meaning. That's all.

    3. Re:Another bad article summary by GnoWay · · Score: 1

      There is a probably lot of truth in what you've said. However, here is something I tell my children: The reputation you build is the lens through which others see whatever you say or do. If you build a reputation for saying crazy things, then you'll have a difficult time getting any ideas across, well-reasoned or not. Similarly, if you have a reputation for delivering shoddy products, you'll have to deliver many a good product before they're given the credit they're due.

    4. Re:Another bad article summary by euxneks · · Score: 1

      However, you cannot deny that "brainwash" is an unfortunate word to use in this circumstance. Maybe someone should get him some media training on what and how to say a lot of what he does want to say - I'm sure it would do his image a lot of good. Heck, get the guy that made Gates seem like a nice person - seems like a miracle worker!

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  93. Insight Into Psyche by EXTomar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm inclined to believe it is just a BS comment made from the hip. To actually believe an executive officer of any company would "order" his kids to do anything flies in the face of marketing and parenting conventions. For marketing, you've drawn attention to some positives about using the competition's product: that it irritates Ballmer. For parenting, at a certain age telling your kids to not do something without guidence is one of the surest ways to have them do it.

    If it is or isn't true isn't the issue. The fact he said it indicates something of his thought processes on marketing and strategy. It seems to suggest that instead of concentrating on the quality of their product, or the quality of the competition's product, that the thing he would do is supress information about the other product. This isn't automatically a bad marketing strategy but is spooky on its own especially told in this parable. Even if the idea is made up, the idea is that Ballmer isn't interested in either his product or the competition but in control. If you are an investor this is what you should take away from the comment and use this tidbit of insight to help direct where your next investments should go.

    For such a visible face for Microsoft, he sure picked some *aweful* metaphors to discuss their strategy and products. He should recognize this and either chose his words more carefully or let others handle this stuff. He left us all with the implication he is an aweful person or that he is oblivious to consumer tastes.

  94. The Children Shall Lead by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Informative

    Come on everyone, just calm down. My guess is that Steve was just joking. It is fairly safe to say that Ballmer's kids have access to a lot more disposable income than the average kid, so if they are of age (or when), you can bet that they'll have and use whatever tech toys are hip and available. Not only will they have iPods and use Google, they'll be using a bunch of stuff we can only imagine right now. And Steve will be glad that they are, if he's smart.

    I spend a lot of time keeping up with new tech as part of my job and my hobbies, but still my kids manage to find all sorts of new things I haven't heard about. So what better way to keep up with trends and the competition than one's kids? So don't let Ballmer's joking around lull anyone into a false sense of security, his kids and Gates' kids may turn out to be among Microsoft's greatest assets.

    1. Re:The Children Shall Lead by cnerd2025 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My guess is that Steve was just joking.

      I thought that when monkeys joke, they throw feces at you. Of course, it is his house, and his rules too. Based on his previous statements (i.e. throwing chairs while swearing profanely, "I'm going to f***ing kill Google!"), then google is likely a "bad word" in all n 100000 square feet of his home. And the fact that he called iPod owners "theives" doesn't help the prospect of those in his massive dwelling either. Maybe when they get angry in the Ballmer household, scenes from "2001: A Space Odyssey" are renacted. Of course, how do we know they didn't give Arthur C. Clark himself that idea... I can hear it now, the overlay of "Developers! Developers!" and so on over "Thus Spake Zarathustra" and "The Blue Danube".

  95. Hey Bill just a suggestion. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fire Ballmer.
    Really if you can not get him to shut up and act like a human being then he has to go.
    1. Throwing chairs and saying that you going to f'ing kill someone has no place outside of a high school. Even in a high school kid it would be a sign of immaturity.
    2. Talking about not letting your kids use Google is great PR. For Google and Apple!
    3. For Steve Baller's next trick I see this. "Apple and Google are so much better the junk we make that I had to beat the crap out of my kids with a chair to keep them from using them!"
    BTW Steve Jobbs says "thanks".

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  96. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Giometrix · · Score: 1
    The thing with Microsoft is that people keep wondering why their products are crap.

    If "people" kept wondering why they were crap, they'd stop buying them. At 90% of the OS market, I'd think that the overwhelming majority does not think the products are crap. And before you ramble on about monopolies, Joe 6 pack, etc, 90% is 90%. 90% of the population is not tied to MS legacy products, and I wouldn't call 90% of the population "Joe 6-pack." The truth is MS products do have issues, but they're good enough that people for the most part don't migrate to something else.

    Look at the IE7 team's blogs. These are third-rate programmers who don't even understand why people think their product sucks, yet they're trying to fix it.

    You can call MS programmers lots of things, but third-rate wouldn't be one of them. Coding an OS or a browser that will run on hundreds of millions of computers is not something I typically associate with a third rate programmer.

    As for why MS chooses to continue "fixing" IE (which many, and including myself believe to be fundamentally broken) is that starting over would take too long. Lots of people like to say that IE took over because it was bundled with the OS. Well, not quite. Mozilla had decided to start from scratch, a project originally deemed to take only 6 months I believe. In the end, it took years. Netscape stagnated, while IE didn't. Eventually IE took over. Sadly MS let IE stagnate anyway, instead of starting over from scratch during the time it had no competitors. That time is over, and starting over from this point would mean death to IE, and much to everyone's dismay, MS doesn't want that.

    and talentless failed geek also-rans like Gates (born rich and never HAD to work a day in his life) have never been sent packing by the shareholders.

    Ya, that Bill Gates. What a failure...

    --
    Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
  97. Re:Brainwashing by twistedcain · · Score: 1

    Would a person willing to brainwash his own children have a second thought about charging money to strangers for an inferior product?

  98. And under their bed... by phy_si_kal · · Score: 1

    He found an Ipod along with some porno magazines !

  99. Balmer by Moduz · · Score: 1

    HAHAHA

    Steve Balmer, Stifles innovation at home, the same way he does at work. Hilarious!

    --
    -Moduz
  100. "...on this dimension I've got my kid brainwashed" by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1
    Q: Why does Steve have his kids brainwashed?

    begin monkeydance

    A: I LOVE *THIS* FAMILY!

    end monkeydance

  101. Do you think Bill Ford drives a Corvette? by netsavior · · Score: 1

    This isn't that unusual, I mean I am sure the Ford Exec's kids don't drive Civics.

    1. Re:Do you think Bill Ford drives a Corvette? by neomajic · · Score: 1

      They may not drive Civics, but I betcha they don't drive Fords either.

  102. child abuse! by billhedrick · · Score: 1

    Ballmer is guilty of it! (j/k don't sue me!)

  103. Isn't that sweet? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer's children are official Microsoft OEM partners.

  104. REBELLION!! by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    I suppose every household may have its own definition of rebellion...

  105. Re:He performs anticompetitive maneuvers on his ki by Rendo · · Score: 1

    Exactly what I was thinking. I also heard he told them if they don't respond to the chair throwing, he'll fucking kill them or fucking put them up for adoption! :b

  106. Would you... by Hi-Nu · · Score: 1

    think of the children!? There are plenty of chairs in Ballmer's home. Think what will happen if he catch his children using iPods and Google! Someone please think of the children!!!

  107. You all missed it completely by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 5, Informative

    He never said in the article that he forbade them to do anything!

    From what he said in the article, he's simply convinced them that MS has the better way to do things, and that's why they go the MS way. I did the same thing with my kids; I convinced them tat Linux is the better way, that every product has to be evaluated on its own merits. I also explained to them why I generally dislike MS. They will use Windows when they have to at work. They play XBox games, and if the right games come out only for XBox, or work best on XBox, my son will probably buy an XBox. But MS is never their first choice.

    He joked about brainwashing them, but I strongly suspect he's simply convinced them.

    1. Re:You all missed it completely by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Windows Live instead of Google, I understand that, but what is the Microsoft alternative to the iPod?

    2. Re:You all missed it completely by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      Ironic that by advocating conformism on slashdot, you are actually being non-conformist.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:You all missed it completely by brainstyle · · Score: 1
      I hear ya.

      I once met a girl whose father was an important VP at Pepsi. And man, was she serious about her Pepsi. She told me about how Coke was doing all these underhanded things to keep Pepsi in their place, how Pepsi deserves to be at the top, and I doubt she's ever tried Coke in her life*. It was kind of scary - this was really, really important stuff to her. About sugar water.

      So I have no trouble seeing the kids of the head of Microsoft being anti anything-not-by-MS. When you pick up your parents' religion as a child, it's not just the organized kind.

      *Well, okay, she did plenty of coke. Just not the drinkable kind.

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    4. Re:You all missed it completely by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't say my daughter is banned from using alternative operating systems like Windows, but since we don't have any in the house, she doesn't really have a choice until she's old enough to buy her own computer.

      The reasons I use Linux are not philosophical. I started using it because I needed a good development environment for freelance web/database work, and moved over completely after seeing how nice the desktop environments were and the amount of choice I had for such a low cost.

      Along the same lines, I don't avoid Microsoft products for philosophical reasons either. I received an Xbox for a Christmas gift a few years ago, and actually quite like it and have bought several games.

      My daughter is only two now, but when she gets older I plan to try very hard to stick to the facts when a comparison is necessary. For example, "If you want your friends to be able to read that CD-ROM you're burning, you'll need to enable this option because Windows doesn't know about the other file systems." If she chooses Windows as an adult, it will be on its merits and not because it is all she knows.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:You all missed it completely by balthan · · Score: 2

      Rational statements have no place on Slashdot.

      Please stop.

  108. Books by xt0rt187 · · Score: 1
    "And don't let me catch you reading any of those "books" either! Or it's off to the klink with ya!

    And don't forget to bring your chair, muahahaha!

  109. What about firefox? by Windows+Breaker+G4 · · Score: 1

    Why hasn't anyone asked this yet?! Can they use firefox? What about mac os x?

    --
    brickspeed.net for your old Volvo performance addiction
  110. Uncle Fester Breeding Program? by Foofoobar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Holy shit! Someone bred with Uncle Fester, the Dancing Monkey Boy??? Where did they find the blind retard to perform the obligatory hump and squat out a couple more Microsoft mongoloids?

    I'm amazed they even have opposable thumbs to operate an Ipod!

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  111. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by nagora · · Score: 1
    If "people" kept wondering why they were crap, they'd stop buying them

    And buy what exactly? Macs? Windows is entrenched in workplaces, and that is enough to keep most people tied to it as a day-to-day system. But don't think that ordinary non-IT workers don't hate Windows and Word; they do. But no one's asking them what they think.

    You can call MS programmers lots of things, but third-rate wouldn't be one of them

    I have seen their hiring at universities; only the third-raters apply because anyone else has too much pride to work for a company where ensuring the user is locked in to you, no matter how bad your product, is more important than making them want to stay with you. If you care about what you do that's not an attractive environment.

    Ya, that Bill Gates. What a failure.

    Tell me something he's succeeded at in the last 25 years that didn't rely on him being given a million dollars (in the early 60's) by his super-rich family with powerful connections and I might not consider him a failure as an IT geek. Making money with money is hardly the toughest game in town, especially when IBM gives you a free ride for a decade.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  112. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by cdn2k1 · · Score: 1

    I feel sorry for the micromanaged offspring though.

    By this i assume you mean Windows? Personally, I feel sorry for the kids.

  113. Ballmer... you have a problem by CPUFreak91 · · Score: 1

    As more and more people use or talk about Google, and the iPod, I think his kids will use those products and keep it a secret from their father who has a slight problem: "I Can't let my kids use other people's Good products!" He prolly won't let 'em use Linux or Mac OSX either.

    --
    All Your Base Are Belong To Us!!! chown -r us ./base
  114. Enforced by Clippy by kbob88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll bet he's got a customized version of Clippy installed on his kid's computers, integrated into IE:

    "I see that you are searching for AAC music files on Google. Would you like me to:

    1. Tell your dad?
    2. Redirect you to MSN Search?
    3. Search eBay for a helmet to protect you from flying furniture?
    4. Expose another IE security hole to the press to keep Dad at the office all night?"

    Oh wait... That won't work; if his kids use Google and iPods, they're probably using Firefox too...

  115. what could it be? by cosminn · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Expect to see announcements from us in that area in the next 12 months

    10 months from now: We will innovate like you've never seen innovation before. In just one more month!

    11 months from now: In order to ensure maximum innovation, we had to delay the release by a few months, just 4, not that much.

    15 months from now: We are getting back into the game. We're going to release the device of them all, expect too see it in the store in another 2 months or so.

    17 months from now: Next month we will be releasing the app. Expect to see it in stores at around $XXX

    18 months from now, MS releases the concept of a MSpod

    30 months from now, stores have brand new shiny MSpods, but there's one problem: it's at the level iPods were over 2 years ago...

  116. Dance by Hwyman · · Score: 1

    Yeah...but are they allowed to do the monkey-boy dance??

  117. Re:Child abuse by Stevis · · Score: 1

    Your statement is true enough, but he claims to "brainwash" his kids. This article definitley needs to be forwarded to Ballmer's local Department of Social Services for investigation.

    --
    We've got two lives, one we're given, and the other one we make. --Mary Chapin Carpenter
  118. MHO on what he really said by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    "iPod sucks! Whatever we... design... ur... is better... i mean those... youknow... erm... music... screw it! what CD's you wanna buy?"

  119. Children... not Euphemism for Employees? by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Children... not Euphemism for Employees?

    I thought for a minute this was about his "children" all him evil minions who work for him at Microsoft.

    Guess it would be hard for a company, even Microsoft, to ban google and IPODS for employees.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  120. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by ashirusnw · · Score: 1

    You can call MS programmers lots of things, but third-rate wouldn't be one of them

    I have seen their hiring at universities; only the third-raters apply because anyone else has too much pride to work for a company where ensuring the user is locked in to you, no matter how bad your product, is more important than making them want to stay with you. If you care about what you do that's not an attractive environment.

    I advise you to Google their interview process. I think you'll disciver you you would very likely never get into M$ - their interviews are tough - or at least are *as* tough as (say) Google and you cannot be a third-rate programmer and get in.

    Ultimately there are enough of us programmers out there that even if 80% wouldn't consider M$ because of pride, only a tiny fraction most of the remaining 20% are capable enough to be hired by M$ - they only accept extremely good programmers, I'm in the middle of their hiring process and trust me, it's tough - and I'm no third-rate programmer.


    Ash
  121. Dog food? by Ossifer · · Score: 1
    He's just talking about believing in his product enough to feed his kids his own dog food.
    Are you making a comparison between Ballmer and Jim Jones?
  122. WoW by ndansmith · · Score: 1

    It took me until this point in the comments to realize that "Ballmer Babies" is not referring to Microsoft Employees.

  123. Bingo Bob's Chairs by saboola · · Score: 1

    "Hi, my name is Steve Ballmer. When I am home with my family, sitting around the table, you may ask what kind of chairs I like to use? Well, my family knows only to sit on Bingo Bob's Chairs. Not only are they comfortable, but super light to sustain maximum throwing distance. If you're gonna throw a chair, just don't pick any chair, pick a Bingo Bob's Chair."

    -Steve Ballmer

  124. He's the perfect example by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    of a responsible parent. He takes upon himself to ban these things from his house, instead of asking the gov't to pass some "child protection" law to do it for him. He deserves all of our support.

    --
    What?
  125. Yelling by u16084 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you all seen the video when Balmer Runs around the stage like hes insane screaming I LOVE THIS COMPANY?

    Well, You can use that reaction when he found an IPOD in his kids room.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=MqUhJubv2zc

    Heres the video

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    1. Re:Yelling by u16084 · · Score: 1

      Even as I rewatch the video, I cant help but to spit with laughter, drawing attention from coworkers making sure im OK. Once evry so often, a simple video will make your day,

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  126. Telling us what he thinks of his own product. by gnovos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Basically, he is saying that his company cannot compete with the likes of Apple and Microsoft. It's just too good. even his own kis would jump on the iPod badwagon dispite the fact that they could get the Microsoft equivlenet for FREE. I mean that's how much better the ipod is! Steve Ballmer's own kids would use Google instead of MSN search if they were given a choice! So he takes what little control he has and forces his kids not to buy these products...

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  127. Kids to Ballmer: Fuck off, dad! by neomajic · · Score: 1

    I'm sure his kids use both iPods and Google daily. They just do it behind his back. Just like any other kid would do. All kids do stuff their parents have told them not to do or that think their parents would object to.

    I've done it.
    You've done it.
    Your kids have or will do it.
    And by "it", I mean having perverse sex, smoking pot, and doing drugs. Of course they'll be Googling for the perverse sex, and smoking pot whilst listening to the iPod. :P

  128. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Nijika · · Score: 1

    This is both true and untrue. Teens are susceptible to groupthink, but they're also capable of complete individuality. If I was Ballmer, I would be asking why all of my kids friends have one... Just marketing? There's much more to it than that.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  129. Re:One good wiki link deserves another by Ossifer · · Score: 1
    No. "Eating your own dog food" is a shopworn expression about the expectation to actually use the products or services you are trying to sell to others. The parent post was obviously having a little fun with it. As in, Balmer wants to show how much he likes his company, so his kids are stuck eating dog food.
    Yes, I am aware of the expression--I was just taking it a bit farther, likening the act to another worn-out expression: "Drinking the kool-aid".

    Jesus, explaining one's own jokes is tedious!
  130. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Nijika · · Score: 1
    I know you're being flippant, but they could flame out faster than you think. This company HAS to grow, it's part of what gives them so much market capitalization in the first place. If they can't do that then the stock starts to drop, and the market capitalization goes away.

    I think Ballmer, specifically, leaving MS, would be good for the company, and may give us naysayers reason to look at them again.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  131. Re:This guy is a world-class IDIOT by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know how the business world works. He can throw chairs, ban IPods, and do monkey dances, as long as his hair is combed and he's wearing a suit and tie.

    PS - I don't think Stallman has any better overall appearance either.

  132. Ballmer Babies! -- Collect them all! by oskay · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's an offshoot of the Beanie Babies line. Here is an example. Collect them all!

  133. In other news... by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    Steve Ballmer's children are charging him with anti-trust violations...

  134. Uh... by garyr_h · · Score: 1

    How are his children suppose to get their homework done???

    since MSN and Y! can't help...

    --
    http://chickencamels.poemofquotes.com/
  135. Mod (Mudd) Parent up by fuzznutz · · Score: 1
    Agggh, the pain... can't decide how to karmawhore... call Micro$oft evil... make fun of Ballmer... Norman, coordinate!!!
    Mod parent up for sneaking in an obscure Star Trek TOS reference.
  136. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Giometrix · · Score: 1

    Indeed. There are websites devoted to the MS interview process (or at least there used to be). Anyway, good luck Ash.

    --
    Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
  137. Re:One good wiki link deserves another by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

    Finally, they actually drank poisoned Flavorade.

    Which is like the Apple of Kool-Aid.

  138. Sounds like a comic strip waiting to happen... by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 1

    Picture two kids holding iPods while sitting in front of a computer with the monitor displaying "Google..." on one side of the strip, and some kids studying with open books on the other side. The caption... "While other kids were busy doing their homework, Steve Ballmer's kids were steadily growing rebellious against their parent's rules."

    --
    A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
  139. No ... they become pastors by Fished · · Score: 1, Troll
    As a pastor myself, I know a lot of pastors. And I know an awful lot of pastors whose parents and grandparents were pastors, and a lot of pastors whose children become pastors.

    Not whores.

    Not to say it could never happen, but it doesn't tend to, and it's sad that you got modded up just because you had someting nasty to say about people who spend their whole lives trying to help others.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:No ... they become pastors by scuba964 · · Score: 1

      Going for the cheap laugh...
      What's troubling is that pastor's families reflect the world, statistically you will not be a "better" person if you're a PK, when you should. They're held to a higher standard, assumed hypocritical, etc., judged for not being able to do what they tell others to do.

    2. Re:No ... they become pastors by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      I wish. Some pastors spend their lives trying to help others. Unfortunately, most of those I've met are far more interested in attempting their interpretations of everything down your throat than actually helping anyone. They don't even think the difference between right and wrong is important. Sad. That said, I do know one whom I hold in high esteem, but he's retired now. A good, kind man.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    3. Re:No ... they become pastors by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      OK, so to break the tension, here's a joke.

      These three kids are sitting around talking about getting stuff for free. The first kid says "My dad's a doctor, so I can be sick for nothing." The second kid says "My dad's a teacher, so I can be smart for nothing." The third kid says "Well, my dad's a pastor, so I can be good for nothing."

      Well, it was funny when I first heard it.

      --
      John
    4. Re:No ... they become pastors by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 1

      If you know a lot of pastors then you should know this is true. Coming from a Christian College in Canada, there's a massive stigma about being a PK that leads to problems with sex, booze , sex, more drugs, and sex. I've known tons of PKs very few of them have not been screwed up. And people should become pastors not because their parents were but because God called them.

    5. Re:No ... they become pastors by Fished · · Score: 1
      Religion has killed more people in the history of the world than anything else. -George Carlin
      Carlin's a funny guy. thanks for sharing his humor.
      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    6. Re:No ... they become pastors by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      What Pastors have you met? All the pastors I've met have been meddlesome assholes. And yes, their daughters were whores.

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    7. Re:No ... they become pastors by NtroP · · Score: 1
      I'm a pastor's kid and I still think it's funny. I use variations of it on my kids all the time: "What do you mean you'll do that for a buck? If you want to do the Right Thing(tm), you'll see it needs to be done and do it without needing to be paid. So, what...I gotta pay you to be good now? Why can't you just be good for nothing, like me?"

      OK, maybe not that funny.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    8. Re:No ... they become pastors by showardkid · · Score: 1

      And what if I told you my dad was a banker...?

      --
      Do, do not, or delegate to someone else: there is no try.
    9. Re:No ... they become pastors by Fished · · Score: 1
      Y'know ... I think the fact that the parent, a vicious slander against pastors, was moderated "insightful" and "informative", while my (true) claim that most pastors children become pastors was modded a "troll" REALLY says something about slashdot moderators.

      What it says I will leave as an exercise for the observer.

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  140. Beat Down by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    As if the kids need a reason to be beaten up beyond having Monkeyboy for a father.

  141. Linux = Death? by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

    What would happen if Ballmer's kids installed the latest Fedora Core distro on their home computer? :) ?

  142. Imagine... by Markgor · · Score: 1

    ...if Ballmer worked for a company that specialized in nitrogen.

    "Kids, you're banned from using oxygen!"

    Okay, that was lame.

  143. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by Giometrix · · Score: 1
    If "people" kept wondering why they were crap, they'd stop buying them
    And buy what exactly? Macs? Windows is entrenched in workplaces, and that is enough to keep most people tied to it as a day-to-day system. But don't think that ordinary non-IT workers don't hate Windows and Word; they do. But no one's asking them what they think.

    As I said in my original post, 90% is 90%. 90% of the population does not use Windows at work. Most people under 18 do not work with computers (or if they do, they don't bring their work home with them). Grandma probably doesn't work, yet if she owns a computer, its probably Windows.
    I'm not saying these people aren't being influenced by others who are tied to Windows at work. What I'm saying is that if Windows was as "crappy" as you said it was, it wouldn't matter; those not tied to Windows (which beleive it or not, is probably the majority of people) would switch to something else.

    But no one's asking them what they think.

    Wrong on many levels there, friend. 1. We vote with our dollars. If most people thought Windows was crappy, most people would buy (or get for free, for crying out loud) another OS.
    2. MS spends huge amounts of money tailoring their GUI for the "common folk." You might not personally like it, but many do, and find it easy to use. That's the reason why many OSS window managers (I think that's what their called) follow MS's approach. And I don't blame them; if someone else is doing the research, you don't have to reinvent the wheel. Now the GUI isn't the whole OS, but its what most people think of when they think of an OS.

    No one's doubting that you don't like Windows or MS; but you're assuming that most people think like you do, and you're wrong.

    --
    Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
  144. But Balmer loves the Ipod so much by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    It just doesn't make sense based on his behavior that shows his devotion to the mighty Ipod.

  145. Infer vs Imply by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    "Brainwashed" would infer that his view is entirely political and not necessarily factual.

    Er, I think you meant "imply" rather than "infer". ;-)

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  146. No Google groups for the kids? by deragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I often use Google groups to find solution to technical problems. Are there many other search engine for Usenet groups? Are they as good as Google groups?

    If Ballmer's kids cannot use Google, they might be deprived of a tool which no other serious alternative exist.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  147. From TFA... by eno2001 · · Score: 1
    ... Think you can you crack the iPod market?


    It's going to take an innovative proposition. In five years are people really going to carry two devices? One device that is their communication device, one device that is music? There's going to be a lot of opportunities to get back in that game. We want to be in that game. Expect to see announcements from us in that area in the next 12 months.


    I heard: "Blah blah blah blah. I don't really understand what I'm talking about but I'll make a vacuous promise that we will deliver something that will compete with the iPod and I need to use the word 'innovative' in there somewhere since we have a trademark on that concept. Blah blah blah blah."


    OK. I realize this article came from a publication geared at people who are completely clueless about technology. But COME ON!! What kind of an answer was that?! I think it's evident that MS doesn't really know what they're up against and they are probably just looking to buy someone else out who has a cell phone that runs on Pocket Windows and slap Media Player on it. That will be their "innovative" proposition. When I look for innovation I want something completely new that's never been done before. MS has yet to do that. With any technology.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  148. Ballmer-Cheney twins? by jonom · · Score: 1

    That picture of Ballmer in the article looks similar to Dick Cheney.

  149. Not surprising by Fweeky · · Score: 1

    Indoctrinating children is one of religion's specialities, after all. It's a large part of bypassing people's critical thinking skills; getting to them before they develop.

      * Bitter because both the primary schools I went to were built right next to churches, which we were forced to attend; confession, communion, confirmation, etc. That's not helping others :/

    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I tell you about the only way you can escape hell it is helping you. If you repent from you sins (what you have done wrong) and are saved, you are now going to heaven. That is the biggest way I can help anyone.



      So, just to help you:

      For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 3:23

      For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Rom 6:23

      For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Ephesians 2:8

      That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Rom 10, 9-10

    2. Re:Not surprising by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      So, just to be clear, are you brainwashed by Microsoft or some christian cult or other?

      No, seriously. Using that book for anything other than object lessons in social behavior is folly. In fact, using much of it for object lessons in social behavior is often folly.

      Still, it's your choice to believe in it. Just don't go trying to foist it on other people. 'Help' is in the eye of the person you 'helped', not the person who's 'helping'.

      For example, if I was stuck in a hole, and you think it would be helpful to drop a tuna sandwich in the hole so I may survive another day, I'd have a problem with that; I'm allergic to tuna and the smell of it makes me vomit. As such, you'd not be helping.

      In other words, do ASK before you start rattling off your quotes, yeah?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    3. Re:Not surprising by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait.. is this "God" of yours threatening me? Demanding belief under pain of burning tormented undeath for all eternity? Isn't that a bit rude? Especially when all his supposed messages mentioning this look *just* like all the the other crazy rantings of misguided people under the influence of hideous memetic diseases.

      Your God isn't worth the paper he's written on.

  150. God save by thallgren · · Score: 1

    God save Steve and his fascist regime!

  151. Just another brick in the wall... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    or would that be chair in the wall, seeing as this is Ballmer we're talking about?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  152. Vista maybe not sold in Europe by plankrwf · · Score: 1

    Well, newest line is that Vista might not be sold in Europe
    (dutch link: http://www.bnr.nl/ShowNieuwsArtikel.asp?Context=S% 7C6bdf77b30c4aeeb5%7CN%7C0&src=redactie&newsPanel= uitgelicht&id=2060),
    so what will Balmers kids use when in Europe ;-0

    Original dutch text:
    "Brussel eist kale opvolger van Windows

    Softwarebedrijf Microsoft mag Vista, de opvolger van het besturingsprogramma Windows, niet in Europa verkopen als daar allerlei andere producten van Microsoft aan gekoppeld zijn."

  153. microsoft advertised with google's adsense by Rugby7s · · Score: 1

    When using my gmail I noticed an adsense advertisemnt for Microsoft.
    I linked to microsoft.com's page on why you shouldn't use UNIX and case studies of companies that have changed.

    I'm not sure if Microsft is really a google customer or if its 3rd party that gets paid by microsft everytime they send traffic to them.

    Thought it was interesting.

  154. Kids know what's cool and what's not by Kunt · · Score: 1

    Kids have a natural ability to choose products are superior. For them, it is not even a conscious thought process: is automatic, instinctive and obvious. Apple somehow gets things right. Definitely not though the use of focus groups. Probably not by way of reseach. My guess is Steve Jobs and his product development team use a much faster and more efficient method. They ask their children (and the kids' buddies) how things should work, because kids are not brain damaged or prejudiced. They just know what's right.

    1. Re:Kids know what's cool and what's not by bytta · · Score: 1

      What kids are you talking about? Most of the kids I know have a natural ability to choose products that are "in", even if they suck in every possible way. Fads often have nothing to do with quality.

  155. Chair allowance by k33l0r · · Score: 1

    I wonder if he gives them a monthly chair allowance. After all, they do have to follow their father's good example... There really is lots of wear and tear when you toss them around (the chairs, not the kids).

    I wonder what he would do if he saw a fluffy tux around the house or, even worse, one consisting of pixels on a screen...

  156. I am Steve's Kid by klept · · Score: 1

    Hey you guys, I am one of Steve's kid's and I dont think you are funny at all. Even if I am not suppose to read Slashdot, I do. So there. I have to admit, I am reading /. at 3 in the morning under the covers with a flashlight and linux laptop. But I am still reading it. So there again.

  157. A glimpse to the future... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every time I hear a story about Steve Ballmer, I wonder how much longer until we see a news clip of him being led out of his house in a bathrobe and tissue boxes on his feet.

    Personally, I'd let my kids use a competitor product so I can find out why they chose it, what it brings, and how we can beat it.

    It is clear to me MS needs a complete managment change. There methods were fine when it was an emerging market, and they had contracts gaurenting OS sales with every computer sold.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  158. Since when do kids obey? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    More then likely they have several, just to disobey their parents.

    And we care what these rich spoiled brats do because?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  159. pssssssssst kid, Want an ipod? How about a mac..? by acomj · · Score: 1

    The first hit is free.

    Micrsoft should focus on making products that are better than google and apple, so they don't have to "force" people to use there products. It won't work in the long run..

  160. Reprecussions by blake3737 · · Score: 1

    And if they do use either, the have a chair thrown at them.

    In other news, the children of steve ballmer were found using an Ipod, when asked for a quote ballmer said nothing but "I'm going to do it, I'm going to Fn kill my kids, I've done it before and I WILL DO IT AGAIN!"

  161. I'm keeping up with you, Ballmer by toby · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't let my kids use any MS product.

    --
    you had me at #!
  162. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "As I said in my original post, 90% is 90%. 90% of the population does not use Windows at work."

    90%? who are you trying to kid? Most kids use windows ar school. For the point of this thread, that would qualify as 'work'.

    But it doesn't matter, because ther eis no real choice. Most people 700-1000 dollars is a lot of money, so a dell it is. Care to guess how many different OS companies the buyer gets to choose? 1

    IF they hunt around, and no what to loko for, they might find Linux. maybe.

    They do not have a reasonabl choice at this time, becasue people are committed to windows, and cna not afford to change.

    "Wrong on many levels there, friend. 1. We vote with our dollars. If most people thought Windows was crappy, most people would buy (or get for free, for crying out loud) another OS."

    really? every one here at my work doesn't like windows, yet we are forced to use it, even though we can show it is a significant cost associated with support.

    That true with most corporations. As it has been shown time and time again, the OS people use at work, is the OS they will use at home becasue they need to ensure campatiblity with there work. Also, it's easy to justify getting a copy of the OS to use at home from work, if you use it for work, even a little.

    FUnny thing is, you assuming avryone has the same skill set, knowledge, and interested you do; which they don't.
    Downloading an ISO is not an option for most people. No more then changing a carborater is doably for most people.

    I have worked with many MS programmers, very few have been better then third rate. They few that were really good, where there towards the begining.
    They all could tell you how they would move a mountain, but they could give practical reasonable answer, or program to what is usefull for the user.
    Based on the management at MS I have had the 'pleasure' of working with, it's no surprise there culture now breads this.

    All the programmers have been smart, but it takes more the smarts to be a good programmer.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  163. Re:Child abuse by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    proxy abuse.

    Being outcast at school or any other early social situation is first fuelled by being different. The kid who couldn't watch tv, the kid who couldn't celebrate xmas etc.

    Oh, so you "can't listen to an iPod".

    Think his kids are going to be regarded as normal? Think they won't get any bitch-slapping?

    Welcome to the playground - here's a fast-moving rubber ball for your ass!

    pwdned!

  164. I always thought by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always thought that wanting the best for your kids was 1 of the things that made you a good parent.... ;-) Shame on you Mr Balmer !

  165. It's all public relations campaing. by zymano · · Score: 1

    Can't believe you people believe what he says.

    I bet his kids own an Ipod , Google and call XP a piece of crap.

  166. In light of chairs by mkiwi · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Slashdot icon for MS (Bill Gates as a Borg) should be changed to Steven Ballmer (as himself) throwing a chair.

  167. fair enough by suezz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't allow any of his products in my house.

  168. It's simple by nhandler · · Score: 1

    He doesn't need to get angry, he's probably got a clause in his will specifically pertaining to usage of competitor's products and revocation of inheritance. Just let the lawyers handle it all.

  169. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by nagora · · Score: 1
    their interviews are tough - or at least are *as* tough as (say) Google and you cannot be a third-rate programmer and get in.

    The proof is on every shelf in every software retailer; MS programmers are crap programmers. You can't turn out shit products for decades and then claim that your hiring proceedures are selecting the elite.

    Ultimately there are enough of us programmers out there that even if 80% wouldn't consider M$ because of pride

    Of good programmers I'd say that more than 99% would not consider M$ because of pride in their work - after all, that pride is a big part of why they're good, and the lack of it is why MS programmers keep churning out rubbish.

    I think it is partly management to blame too, of course. Those who do go into Microsoft for something other than money soon run up against idiots like Balmer and it grinds them down as they realise that the culture in the company simply has no place for good, solid, reliable programming. It's a sausage factory for code. Get it out the door; keep getting the upgrade fees, patch it later if someone finds the bugs. Pay the bribes, get the contract, change the law, lock the competitors out and the users in. Who wants to work for that mentality?

    God alone knows how bad Vista must be to have stopped this treadmill even for a few months!

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  170. What an asshole! by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Just wait. Any psychologist will tell you, once his kids get out from under his controlling thumb... LOOK OUT!!!

    1. Re:What an asshole! by Warlock7 · · Score: 1
      I've got my kids brainwashed...
      Good thing he can brainwash them cause if they thought for themselves they might kill him.
  171. Sleeping giant... by bmh129 · · Score: 1
    That's a kind way to describe a monopoly.

    Good luck trying to convert iPod fans, Ballmer. I've noticed that once you go Mac, you don't go back(TM).

  172. Re:Brainwashing by slashnik · · Score: 1

    Hehe

    I've brainwashed my kids, when on the train near Reading (England) they boo at the Microsoft HQ

  173. Ballmer's Nightmare (via Bill G) by ewanrg · · Score: 1

    I wrote this about two years ago, and I think it's rather applicable to this discussion:

    One of the things that Bill Gates has to look "forward" to is his daughters becoming teenagers. Considering they are part of a rather elite community with a heavy tech influence, you have to think that the day will come when the following scenarios come up...

    One day Bill gets home from work to find his daughters listening to some rather odd music over the computer system. "Hey, what have you got there?" He'll ask.

    "Oh Dad, it's the latest Garabi band. Tommy gave us some MP3s he'd pulled from one of their albums, and then we got online and P2P'd some more."

    The color will drain from Bill's face as he realizes the publicity value to the RIAA of taking him and his daughters in.

    "How many times have I told you girls that trading P2P files is wrong. You'd be better off doing drugs then stealing like that."

    The girls will look at each other, and then the eldest will say, "Dad, you are so 20th century limited. None of the Garabi bands would let those RIAA bandits touch their profits. They rely on file trading to build up a loyal base to go to their concerts, or buy their shirts from their website, or buy a DVD with their music videos."

    The youngest will then pipe up with, "Sheesh. Let's get out of here."

    As the girls turn off their music and leave the room, Bill is left to consider the business viability of his DRM unit...

    Of course it won't stop there. A few days later Bill comes in to see the girls playing a video game he's never seen before on one of the family computers. The fact they're not playing on the latest console is surprising enough, but when they hear him enter the room and leave the game, the desktop doesn't look like anything he's seen before either.

    "What the heck is that?" He'll ask.

    This time the youngest will explain. "Dad, this is the latest Game distribution of MiniKnopp. It loads the OS and game together to give you an optomized experience. "

    The oldest will add, "Yeah. You can install the underlying Debian distribution to the HD, but we figured that you wouldn't want us messing up 'your' computer. And we didn't want to play in our rooms because we don't have as big of screens."

    As the girls finish shutting down the computer, Bill is left to consider the business viability of his Game Console unit...

    Finally, the weekend comes, and Bill is surprised to see the art screens throughout the house are showing a number of vibrant pictures he's never seen before. And the image loads seem to be much faster than he's seen in a long time. As he makes his way to the living room, a door opens, and his daughters come out from the server room.

    "Hey girls, what are you doing?" He'll ask.

    "Well Dad, you know how you've been complaining that the home servers are getting so slow even though you upgraded the hardware last year? Well we ran AdAware and found that they've been getting bogged down with adware and malware."

    Bill will get a little hot under the collar. "I have a crew come up here each week to make sure we have the latest security patches and to scan for viruses."

    The girls will roll their eyes, and then the oldest will explain, "Dad, you can't leave a Windows computer up for a week between patches, and then only scan for viruses."

    The youngest will pipe up, "So we installed White Box linux on the servers, setup a proper firewall, and added a link to DeviantArt so we could get some new images from time to time."

    As the girls head toward the kitchen for breakfast, Bill is left to consider the business viability of his company...

  174. Who cares? His kids take shits in Ferraris by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Would you really care about google? hell.. even showering if you were worth billions?

    For some reason i can picture his kids laughing at him as he rants about "no google in this house"

    They do not care Ballmer, They're getting your billions fat boy!

  175. What about by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Does he keep them away from Scientology as well?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  176. Steve Ballmer's Homepage by goldenratiophi · · Score: 1

    Ballmer's homepage: http://www.smashmyipod.com/

    Found this by searching Google whild listening to my iPod.

  177. In other news by mattbrundage · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news... the CEO of Juniper Networks once tried to tweak his firewall to block all packets that had passed through a Cisco Systems router.

    --
    Matthew Brundage
    Silver Spring, MD
  178. The Classic MS Strategy... by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Instead of winning because of better products, simply bully the competition out by force or draconian laws.

  179. Star Wars Version by inKubus · · Score: 5, Funny

    GATES: Welcome, young Balmer. I have been expecting you.

    Balmer's son peers at the hooded figure defiantly. Gates then looks down at the boy's binders.

    GATES: You no longer need those.

    Gates motions ever so slightly with his finger and Balmer's Son's binders fall away, clattering to the floor. The boy looks down at his own hands, free now to reach out and grab Gate's neck. He does nothing.

    GATES: Guards, leave us.

    The red-, yellow-, green- and blue-cloaked guards turn and disappear behind the elevator.

    GATES (to Balmer's Son): I'm looking forward to completing your training. In time you will call me Master.

    BALMER'S SON: You're gravely mistaken. You won't convert me as you did my father.

    Gates gets down from his XP Console and walks up very close to Balmer's Son. Gates looks into his eyes and, for the first time, Balmer's Son can perceive the evil visage within the hood.

    GATES: Oh, no, my young Linux Admin. You will find that it is you who are mistaken...about a great many things.

    BALMER: His iPod.

    BALMER extends a gloved hand toward Gates, revealing his son's iPod. Gates takes it.

    GATES: Ah, yes, a Linux Admin's toy. Much like your father's Portable Media Center(tm). By now you must know your father can never be turned from the dark side. So will it be with you.

    BALMER'S SON: You're wrong. Soon I'll be dead...and you with me.

    Gates laughs.

    GATES: Perhaps you refer to the imminent attack of your Unix DoS Squad.

    Balmer's Son looks up sharply.

    GATES: Yes...I assure you we are quite safe from your friends here.

    BALMER looks at his son.

    BALMER'S SON: Your overconfidence is your weakness.

    GATES: Your faith in your friends is yours.

    BALMER: It is pointless to resist, my son.

    Gates turns to face Balmer's Son.

    GATES (angry): Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design. (points to a NETSTAT on the monitor) Your friends out there on the Internet..

    Balmer's Son reacts. Gates notes it.

    GATES (cont): ...are walking into a trap. As is your DoS Squad! It was I who allowed the Alliance to know the IP of the open ports. It is quite safe from your pitiful little band. An entire legion of BSA agents awaits them.

    Balmer's Son look darts from Gates to Balmer and, finally, to the iPod in Gate's hand.

    GATES: Oh...I'm afraid the firewall will be quite operational when your friends' packets arrive.

    TO BE CONTINUED

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
    1. Re:Star Wars Version by linkskywalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the funniest thing I've ever seen on slashdot. Ever.

    2. Re:Star Wars Version by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      The red-, yellow-, green- and blue-cloaked guards turn and disappear behind the elevator.

      That was my favourite part. Well done, cheers.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    3. Re:Star Wars Version by inKubus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps a prequel is in order? ;)

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    4. Re:Star Wars Version by stuktongue · · Score: 1

      Dude, that was pretty funny. But just as important (to me anyway), it reminded me of how much I enjoy that particular portion of ROTJ. The segment to do with Luke, Vader, and the Emperor really is the main reason that movie is still worth watching again and again.

      Thanks for that. :)

    5. Re:Star Wars Version by slashdot+idiot · · Score: 2, Funny

      GATES (laughing): Good. Use your Windows emulator, boy! Let the hate flow through you. Balmer's Son looks momentarily toward Gates, then back to Balmer, and realizes he is using the dark side. He steps back, turns off his iPod, and relaxes, driving the hate from his being. BALMER: Steve Jobs has taught you well. BALMER'S SON: I will not fight you, father. BALMER: You are unwise to lower your earbuds. Balmer tries to grab the iPod away from his son, but fails. The young Jedi leaps in an amazing reverse flip up to the safety of the catwalk overhead. Vader stands below him. BALMER'S SON: Your iTunes purchases betray you, father. I feel the Apple in you...the conflict. BALMER: There is no conflict BALMER'S SON: You couldn't bring yourself to brainwash me before, and I don't believe you'll MSN me now. BALMER: You underestimate the power of the dark side. If you will not use Windows, then you will meet your destiny. GATES: Good...good!

  180. IN DEFENSE OF STEVE by DilX123 · · Score: 1

    WHOA MAN, The man only said he had brainwashed hos kids, NOT that he had BANNED them. So I think all the bad press here is typical conformist stuff from the ESTABLISHMENT. The LINUX, APPLE and Dare I say it BIG BAD BLUE Corp ESTABLISHMENT. So lay off Steve!!! Long live David and down with Goliath!!!!

  181. Kids, Children and Bad Parent Skills by Seldon_21 · · Score: 1

    Letter to Steve:

    What is the first thing you learn as a parent? If you tell your child to not do something they will instantly do what you don't want them to do.

    Ok, so you take a different direction. You strongly suggest they use/do/act whatever in a different way. This sometimes works sometimes not (50/50).

    You then realize that no matter what you do they "your children" will do what they want and it doesn't matter what you say. So you decide to set examples and boundries for them and make it clear why you wouldn't do what they may or maynot do.

    Or you realize that controlling your workers by banners, slogans, hawaiian shirts doesn't work and that one should be focusing on the work and leave the negitive stuff at home.

    Another note I would be offended to be called a "Kid" we are adults who deserve the same respect you are demanding!

  182. Pastor's helping others ? Umm....... by gibodean · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You say Pastors spend their whole lives trying to help others......

    Umm. No. Some might help others. But, their job description is to further indoctrinate people into their religion, feed them crap ideas and get them to donate money to that same cause.

    Telling people about a "Jesus" who will wipe away their sins if they follow the church is not helpful. Believers think it is, but it really isn't.

  183. (fnord) by glassgnost · · Score: 1

    Don't look at the Fnord. If you look, you'll have to (fnord) rethink your business (fnord) plan.

  184. But Dad... by Scud · · Score: 1

    ... all the other kids have one!

    --
    I dream in binary.
  185. Balmer by lonemonk · · Score: 1

    What a fuckin' idiot

  186. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by TwoBeans · · Score: 1

    Gates (born rich and never HAD to work a day in his life) Wasn't he employed by McDonalds at some time?

    --
    -2B
  187. The reality is they can Google at School by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    and all the kids there have iPods, so his pronouncements have no actual effect on them, other than meaning they can't "buy" them, they just have to "borrow" them from their friends ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  188. Re:I think it's safe to say he has emotional probl by nagora · · Score: 1
    Wasn't he employed by McDonalds at some time?

    Perhaps (1 in 8 Americans have been) but he had a million dollar trust fund at birth and was raised in the lower strata of the American aristocracy, so the requirement to work is not there. Gates has followed that particularly nasty path of those born into luxury and privilege whereby they spend much of their lives trying to prevent anyone else enjoying the same things.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  189. Great by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    You made me laugh.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  190. The Ballmer Children by ConnortheMad · · Score: 1

    The Ballmer Children, codenamed "Develop her, Develop him," due for first quarter of 1996, were inherently delayed due to genetic code revision. The final release of the Ballmer Children are on schedule for third quarter 2007.

  191. Re:Child abuse by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    why be normal?

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  192. A question by utenaslashed · · Score: 1

    What I see as your point is "MS should drop the legacy support to progress." But can it be even possible with all those games and applications from the old days? I don't know about Apple, but I really hope there'll be a legacy support as long as I want to run my favorites and i'm sure there are others who will agree with me(lots of them i hope).

    1. Re:A question by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Sure there will. Like I posted above, there'll be emulators for all the previous versions of the OS. Of couse, you might have to pay extra if it's a highly-demanded feature.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  193. Re:you're not allowed to use Google as a verb by VGfort · · Score: 1

    Funny, because I called their sales department like 2yrs ago for some information and they actually used Google for the search cuz the sales guy told he was going to search for some information on Google, because their website (microsoft.com) lacked the information.

  194. Oh you're up with the times... by huckda · · Score: 1

    [i]In five years are people really going to carry two devices? One device that is their communication device, one device that is music?[/i]

    Umm..it's already been done genius...is this guy for real?

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  195. Having children by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    Having children requires having sex, and who on earth would willingly have sex with Ballmer? Or perhaps he adopted...

    1. Re:Having children by chawly · · Score: 1

      This caught my eye

      "Having children requires having sex"
      and I feel that more precision is required in this case
      "Having children requires having normal sex"
      would be better, I think

      And this provokes a question:

      "who on earth would willingly have sex with Ballmer?"
      Do you mean that Ballmer actually lives on the same planet as I do ? Something must be done, if this is in fact the case. Probably the cause of all this global warming ....

      And I must reject this on humanitarian grounds:

      "perhaps he adopted..."
      It is illegal to throw chairs at children.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  196. What's the over/under... by notnAP · · Score: 1

    ... on iterations of "Fucking Kill (TM)" in the replies to this story?

  197. Women are no different than Men; well almost by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Women will fuck anything for money and many will just fuck any Woman. Someone wanted his babies?

  198. a howto from Ballmer... by b166er_zeroone · · Score: 1

    iptables -A OUTPUT -d google.com -j DROP

  199. Re:Child abuse by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    re:"why be normal"

    No why's required - although there'd be a lot less fat kids in goth makeup if normal wasn't considered a dirty word. That and "packaged abnormal" is it's own kind of normal anyway.

    If you want abnormal - look to your local homeless man for tips. Sure there's lots of em, but not all got there the same way. True individualism in action, and you can have mine in small doses when I need to make rent. Thank goodness I don't have kids - then I'd really have to give in.

  200. Sounds about right by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    "I've got my kids brainwashed: You don't use Google, and you don't use an iPod."

    Thats what it takes to get people to voluntarily use MS products. Sadly, MS has most of the population brainwashed. But slowly people are waking up. Its sort of like the Matrix.

  201. The PowerBooks were falling apart too by ianscot · · Score: 1
    But Jobs wasn't talking about the hardware when he showed up at Apple with his ThinkPad, he was talking about the OS he was running on it

    Flip a coin. The hemhorraging of Apple's laptop market share when they couldn't get a PPC version out for years was dramatic; then when they did finally produce one with the new chip it was the PB5300, which I know from extensive experience was a complete lemon.

    I've assumed the long delay in a G5 laptop was basically causing Jobs to have PTSD flashbacks to that previous failure to keep up the product line -- which seemed to me to have everything to do with Jobs's own return. Big influence on the recent chip change.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  202. Re:The kids think otherwise (RE:AC) by everphilski · · Score: 1

    actually, I do... they aren't spoiled rotten :) theres no reason a kid needs an iPod until he can afford to purchase one with his/her own money. That's our philosophy.

  203. Re:Child abuse by everphilski · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure it was in jest. Of course it is hard to read in text... think "lol.. I brainwash my kids... no iPods, no Google"

    Its kind of like if you worked for Ford, you really wouldn't want your kids driving a Chevy. Bad publicity.

  204. Convergent devices by rockhome · · Score: 1

    Ballmer mentioned it at the end of the article, and wee see it with the SLVR, ROCKR, cable boxen that double as DVRS and all in one DVD players and hoem theatre systems.

    I've allways felt that convergence is great in some cases. I think that it is great that I can get my email on my phone, but I just don't see how broad based convergence will work. Technology in different products changes at different rates, but putting your money in a convergent device is going to lock you into a device that is not as feature rich as the individual devices, and that you won't want to half replace. For example, are you going to really want to replace your entire home theatre system for one that plays HD-DVD because you bought a combo DVD/home theatre system? I wouldn't. And when the DVD player piece or the home theatre piece breaks, what then?

    What if I want a newer music player than the one that is also my phone? Or hey, there is a new phone out that is pretty cool, but it doesn't have music capabilities yet.

    I just don't see why convergence makes sense in a lot of areas, to me it just means feature subsets and a disinsentive to upgrade. Businesses use disparate suppliers and solutions because of the total set of features because it is ultimately more cost effective to have each piece sum to the whole requirement, rather than making do with one monolith that can't sastify everything.

  205. Brainwashed or cowed? by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

    Are Ballmer's children really brainwashed or are they just afraid he'll throw furniture at them if they dare to use superior technology?

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  206. Ballmer's Picture by freakmn · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm the only one who RTFA'd that noticed that the picture of Ballmer looks a little doctored. They airbrushed out his shoulders to make him look less bulky and intimidating. Makes me wonder what else they did. Did they paste that smile on his face, too? Maybe doctor out some chairs? I think it was most obvious because I would guess that he doesn't let his artists use Photoshop, and they had to doctor the photo in MS Paint.

    --
    warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  207. Re:One good wiki link deserves another by freakmn · · Score: 1

    Nah, some people think Apple is elite, and sophisticated. Nobody thinks that about Flavorade. It's more like the Sorny brand TV's. Similar, but really just a rip off.

    --
    warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.