Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Under U.S. Probe for Spying

BigControversy writes "The DailyTech has a report indicating that Lenovo, the giant Chinese PC manufacturer, is under a probe by the U.S.-China Economic Security Review Commission (USCC) for possible bugging. Apparently, the government has ordered 16,000 PCs from Lenovo but is now requesting that Lenovo be investigated by intelligence agencies. The fear is of foreign intelligence applying pressure to Lenovo to equip its PCs so that the U.S. can be spied on." From the article: "Despite the probe, Lenovo says that its international business, especially those that deal with the US, follow strictly laid out government regulations and rules. Lenovo also claims that even after purchasing IBM's PC division, its international business has not been affected negatively. Interestingly, in an interview with the BBC, Lenovo mentioned that an open investigation or probe may negatively affect the way that the company deals with future government contracts or bids." There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time.

55 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Disagree on the last comment by JMUChrisF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this the perfect use of our intelligence community? I think this is a very valid threat from a community like China who has been known to have spies in the US at all times. (Not saying we don't spy back, but that's the game!).

    A lot of federal agencies have policies about using foreign hardware/software for reasons just like this. Go USA!

    1. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Mattcelt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely! This is what the counterintelligence agencies DO!

      Seriously, who would be surprised if a Chinese company (remember the Chinese? They're still Communists!!) was encouraged to spy on U.S. Government agencies? To think otherwise is, IMO, incredibly naïve.

      Personally, I think Lenovo ought to be barred from selling hardware to the U.S. Government altogether. It's simply not worth the security risk.

    2. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting point this. If these PCs were ordered from Dell which Levono purchased and which I'd reason was in part a basis for this deal, would an investigation have been ordered.

      IMHO, it is good practice to have standing procedures to investigate all contracts/purchases, be them government, business or personal. And it would be extremely bad procedure for a foreign government to attempt such a poor spying procedure, but no harm in checking, which I doubt would be very hard.

      But I think this is a very valid threat from a community like China who has been known to have spies in the US at all times. Well, the same is true of almost all countries I'm sure. And I'd also hazard a guess that social networking, for example having an operative in place for years only to pop in a USB key (or even manually scribe) and get what they want, is a much greater threat.

      I would disagree with use use of 'threat from a community like China' in your statement: China is booming because of free trade, they have a declining population (young people, infact the population is projected to increase for a while as life expectancy from the incumbant increases), and virtually everything to lose from any kind of hostile activity - its not as if a communist ideal exists in China today to peddle to the rest of the world.

      The story seems a bit of a non-entity. US government check out foreign contractor, probably a few man hours work. More important are the day-to-day checks. At least this doesn't seem to be a farce as the blocked Dubai-funded purchase of ports were.

    3. Re:Disagree on the last comment by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In light of all the spying that we did against the USSR (xerox copy machines, sabatoged oil line controls leading to an explosion, etc) and China (using Nauru's embassy, splices in the telecom, etc.) , we would be insane to not check the equipment. What amazes me is that over the last 5 years, our gov. has outsourced so many critical areas to nations that are at best neutral, and more likely future enemies.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Confused · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of federal agencies have policies about using foreign hardware/software for reasons just like this. Go USA!


      Oh yes, while the notebooks carried the IBM lable, they were good american products, while now they're evil chinese. Very interesting approach, considering that the computers were built all the time in the same factory in China.

      I guess, if you'd have to buy american-only computers, you won't be able to purchase from Dell, IBM, HP, Toshiba, Sun and most other brands.
    5. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      / It looks like someone is trying   \
      | to spy on you. Would you like to? |
      | *Save your changes and exit now.  |
      | *Trace the attackers IP.          |
      \ *Turn off these warnings.         /
         /
      __/
      olo
      |||
      \_/

    6. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Chinese communist government with nuclear missiles pointed at Japan, Taiwan, and the US do not have %10 share ownership of Dell. The Chinese communist government that is routinely caught spying on Japan, Taiwan, and the US does not have %10 share ownership of HP. The Chinese communist government that frequently trades with Iran, Libya and has been responsible for the dissemination of nuclear plans to Pakistan and North Korea does not have 10% share ownership of Toshiba.

      China is a problem. It is a problem in terms of human rights, and in terms of foreign policy. It is right and natural that the PCs the US government is purchasing from a company owned by a semi-hostile foreign government. (And if you think that the PRC is not hostile to the US and is actively promoting anti-Americanism for the purpose of pan-Chinese nationalism, spend some time over there.)

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    7. Re:Disagree on the last comment by wfberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What amazes me is that over the last 5 years, our gov. has outsourced so many critical areas to nations that are at best neutral, and more likely future enemies.

      A cynic might take that to mean that the US is looking to make a lot more enemies.. Who am I kidding, the plans to invade my country have already been made, a bill was passed by Congress to invade The Hague in the event the International Criminal Court would ever attempt to try a USian.. SO yeah, I live in a future enemy State, despite being one of the strongest supporters of NATO....

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    8. Re:Disagree on the last comment by dslbrian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason for picking on China is xenophobia, plain, old and simple, dressed up in McCarthy era justifications around communism.

      Hardly. The fact is that China is really the only adversary who potentially has the military strength and intent to engage the US. North Korea and Taiwan are both problem areas where the Chinese and American viewpoints are very different. I'm sure European and Middle Eastern countries spy as well, but the US is not going to be invaded by Germany or Jordan.

      I'm sure China would just love to get a bunch of bugged PCs into places like the LLNL or NSA. Having a backdoor into the US labs developing missile defence systems would be their dream come true.

      Eventually the Taiwan problem is going to have to be resolved. I can see this happening either by the Chinese government eventually becoming more moderate (ideally becoming democratic, but more likely giving up on the hardline Taiwan stance), or by a military conflict (eventually their economic and military strength will reach a level where they will think they can do whatever they want - its just a matter of time). I imagine the hardliners see the latter as the road to "reunification", so its very much in their interest to spy all they can. Lenovo might just be another part of their effort.

    9. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2, Informative
      While I understand and in fact largely share your "anti-american" sentiment (any sane person is worried about the US government's evangelical neo-mccarthyism), you appear to go too far in your accommodation of China's totalitarian regime, as some people do when trying to find some counter-balance to the Bushites.

      The US continues to trade with and indeed support many despotic regimes, but at least they nominally support change towards more democracy. China on the other hand *prefers* to deal with despotic rulers. For instance, China vetoed UN intervention in the Darfur genocide as they had lucrative oil and business deals with the military regime there.

      The mad regime in North Korea only stays in power because Beijing finds it in their interests to prop it up for strategic reasons. Same with Burma.

      Chinese state-owned military companies have certainly "disseminated" nuclear and missile technology to other despotic regimes to win influence there, with the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear programme proliferating Chinese and North Korean technology further yet. Not to the democratic India though, which China sees as a strategic competitor to be contained (thus Chinese support to both Pakistan and Burma, and the invasion and militarization of occupied Tibet).

      While China isn't invading Middle Eastern states (yet?), it has *annexed* several neighboring states and peoples by military force (Tibetans, Uigurs and Mongols to name the most prominent ones). The expansionist policies of the most murderous dictator in human history, Mao Zedong, still persist and the dictator continues to be hailed as *the* national hero.

      Living in China for a short period (probably in the more liberal Han-Chinese areas as well) and having some Chinese friends doesn't necessarily give one any knowledge or insights into the policies of the ruling regime there. I have closely followed the developments in China, both from inside and outside, since the 1980s, besides having familiarized myself with their contemporary and dynastic history, and still don't consider myself as an expert on China. The vast majority of Chinese, however, only get to "learn" what their regime wants them to believe and never get to understand China's foreign policy in other than glorious patriotic terms.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  2. So let me get this straight.. by trazom28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have a crapload of good PC Manufacturers here in the states, and our government instead orders 16,000 PCs from a Chinese manufacturer?

    --
    {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
    1. Re:So let me get this straight.. by hcob$ · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're looking for Blade Servers:

      Diversified Technology, Inc. Everything is designed and manufactured in-house. They even do custom projects.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  3. Summary correction. by tpgp · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fear is of foreign intelligence applying pressure to Lenovo to equip its PCs so that the U.S. can be spied on."

    Should read:

    The fear is of the Chinese Trade Gap widening further

    Fixed! (Its a joke for the humour impaired)

    --
    My pics.
  4. I think not. by biggyfred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Better use of intelligence time? This should be taken damned seriously. Have a look at PROMIS and tell me this is a benign subject..

  5. MicroSoft by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't much different than the Chineese Governments fear of backdoors placed in M.S. Windows by U.S intellegence. The shoe is on the other foot now.

    1. Re:MicroSoft by dominator · · Score: 2, Informative

      And Microsoft gave into the Chinese government's demands and released their source code so that it could be audited. This is just the cost of doing business with powerful governments with large budgets. Lenovo should, like Microsoft, suck it up, or lose the US government's business. Turnabout is fair play, after all...

  6. Supposition and Speculation by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The supposed problem presented by the USCC is that the 16,000 computers are being built by a Chinese-mainland company. The USCC argues that a foreign intelligence like that of the Communist Party of China (CPC) can use its power to get Lenovo to equip its machines with espionage devices. Lenovo has strongly declined that it is involved in any such activities.

    On the one hand, they have a point: it would be very easy for the Chinese government to "encourage" Lenovo to plant things in these machines to allow them to spy on the US. On the other hand, given the profusion of malware, keyloggers, Trojans, and such, the Chinese government could already be spying on the US without having to go to such extraordinary lengths. Frankly, it's too obvious to be credible.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  7. TV, and DVD Players May Listen Too! by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm, with so many goods coming from China these days, your TV and DVD player may be spying on you too, or in the near future, especially with the growth of home networks. Seriously, trying to buy any kind of electronics that don't come from China is getting harder and harder. Do it yourselfers aren't much safer, afterall, would anyone notice if the network chip on that Chinese made motherboard have some extra functionality? My, isn't paranoia fun?

  8. Not Surprised by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They spy on us, and we spy on them. Nothing new.

    The only thing is now they're worried that the Chinese gov got a PC supplier to fiddle with their product. Maybe not all, just 1 out of 100 or something.

    Do I think China did this? No.

    But it's pretty much the job of intelligence agencies to be paranoid.

  9. If you need real security by Rhys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And you didn't install the OS yourself from something "known good" (or at least believed good, like a generic windows install CD bought at best buy or your other favorite local rip-off shop) you're an idiot.

    Beyond that, by talking about it, you've given "the enemy" information on how your IT practices work: you pretty obviously don't use ghost or any similar sort of mass deployment software. (yes, I realize that for laptops with all their custom crap it doesn't work as well. Still, a place I worked as a summer intern used to do it back in the 96-2000 era on IBM thinkpads, so...)

    Security by obscurity? Sure. That is all your password is, after all too, it (sec by obs) isn't strictly a bad thing.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    1. Re:If you need real security by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you didn't install the OS yourself from something "known good" (or at least believed good, like a generic windows install CD bought at best buy or your other favorite local rip-off shop) you're an idiot.

      Irrelevant.

      BIOS has gotten to the point that it can "phone home" before you even get to the OS. A small modification to hardware or firmware can make it so the system inserts key packets into the network stream, sending covert messages out to the equivalent of electronic "dead drops".

      We aren't talking about always-on-a-secure-network PCs, but laptops that'll be jacked into hotels, Starbucks and other insecure networks at some point.

      Unless you jack those machines in behind a traffic analyzer/router that captures every packet, then analyze *each* packet that goes out of the machine, you'll never be 100% sure the hardware isn't trojaned.

      Ping is nice and innocuous. Are you sure you know what that 56-byte payload contains? Have you ever looked? What about DNS requests? They happen ALL the time. Did you analyze each one to make sure they aren't requesting TXT-records that get forwarded over to a Chinese-owned server in the U.S.?

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  10. I doubt it by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any built-in addition features in the hardware, the bios or
    even the preinstalled operating system would be immediately
    detected and destroy the entire PC business of Lenovo abroad.

    1. Re:I doubt it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Immediately detected?

      Some counterexamples include the Sony rootkit, which was shipping for most of a year before being caught and wasn't even that cleverly coded, and Interbase, which went six or seven years before anyone noticed the back door login. Or of course the brilliant Ken Thompson backdoor in /bin/login.

      The problem with this investigation is that PCs shouldn't be trusted anyway. Does anyone think that an intelligence agency couldn't develop, or spend a thousand dollars to buy, a zero-day Windows vulnerability?

  11. This makes perfect sense by JamesD_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, it'd be so easy to find a PC that didn't have any components made in China. Where's the sarcasm tag? :-)

  12. Just a stunt by orzetto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The USCC is an organ of the US Congress. These are the members. If I understand correctly, they are all politicians. Chinese do things cheaper than Americans, American politicians whine so they look like they are against outsourcing, then they buy happily.

    Seriously, bugging thousands of PCs to get intelligence? Give me a break. Intelligence is not just about getting information, it is also about not getting caught and leaving no evidence. Thousands of PCs trying to send coded messages to Beijing would ring a bell even at the Department of Homeland Security. It's much simpler and safer to buy or blackmail a politician or an employee to provide information.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  13. Try and find a computer not made in China by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dell, HP, IBM, Apple, and many, many others are most of the time built right next to each other in China. I'd be willing to bet there isn't a single computer where every piece in it is made in the USA, or a US Friendly country (friendly by my definition = NATO)

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  14. Everyone has spies here. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hell, no doubt even Canada has a few.

    1. Re:Everyone has spies here. by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hell, no doubt even Canada has a few.

      Canada would never spy on the U.S. As an employee of the CIA, I can assure you that you have no idea what you're talking aboot, eh?

    2. Re:Everyone has spies here. by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Canada does. http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/ But they tend to lose Secret documents at hockey games, and their idea of tourture is feeding people poutine until they risk cardiac arrest before rushing them to the hospital for free health care, feeling sorry and giving people Citizenship for any hardship they faced, then calling it a day and going to drink beer and watch hockey.

  15. There is a very good word for this phenomena: by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Xenophobia.

    I have nothing further to add, because that word sums it all up. While there are valid threats against the USA and in the intelligence community there are measures to tap into restricted data, they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

    Geez.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by nmos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

      So you're saying that the sensitive departments of the US government custom builds their own desktops and laptops? Have a reference?

    2. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by finnif · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya know, you say that like it's a bad thing, but maybe we need to be a little more xenophobic.

      Our steel industry is completely decimated now. We barely make any heavy machinery in the United States. God forbid we actually ever get into a real war against the countries we've outsourced these things to.

      Besides that, xenophobia is good for business. Look at the Japanese.... no one can sell electronics to them except Japanese. It's a guaranteed lock that the new Nintendo and Playstation boxes will do well in Japan even if the Xbox 360 is #1 everywhere else in the world. Yet we talk about xenophobia like it's a bad thing? Maybe the US would do better if we actually stopped buying everything at Wal-Mart, your discount Chinese offshored manufacturing headquarters.

  16. That is one interesting article summary by OP by gorbachev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Levono is NOT being investigated for spying or bugging the computers sold to the US Government.

    The US Government is basically doing a security check on the computers they ordered to make sure there's nothing extra on those computers.

    Someone got their panties all in a wad is trying to score some polipoints by being patriotic.

    There really is smoke without a fire. This proves it.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  17. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by garcia · · Score: 2

    ...why did they order the PCs from China in the first place? Didn't they know that their attempt to save a buck might end up in future unforeseen costs?

    So that they can start planting the seeds of war with China. What better way to recoup all the money that we owe them but to go to war w/them for years so we don't have to pay it back?!

  18. "PC comes pre-loaded with spyware" by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Though Windows/IE takes less than an hour on average to become infected with spyware after connecting to the Net, Lenevo saves you the trouble by pre-loading it.

    (A joke, not a troll)

  19. This crap pisses me off... by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off, they aren't under a "probe" for possible spying, despite what the article says. A "probe" would imply that somebody has reason to believe there is actually spying going on. Instead, this is a stupid "investigation" to ensure that there isn't, despite a complete lack of evidence saying there is. This is simple xenophobia, nothing more.

    Do the geniuses that ordered this "probe" realize that the vast majority of components in a modern computer come from the orient? That it is VERY difficult to find a keyboard, mouse, case, or power supply that is NOT made in China? Do they know that many laptops (not Lenovo) are manufactured by Chinese-owned companies, and/or made directly in China itself?

    The only thing that could be worrisome is if they had Lenovo handle the builds on the hard drives, but NO classified shop should be relying on "outside" builds anyway.

    Do these folks ALSO realize that by law, no computer containing classified data may be connected to a public network of any kind? How is any "bugged" machine supposed to export the data? Osmosis? Telepathy?

    SirWired

  20. This is a good argument for open source hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like it or not, we totally depend on other countries. I used to work on a military system that used tubes (valves for you brits). The tubes were no longer made in the west. The only source of the tubes was the USSR (with whom we would have been at war, if there was a war). If the third world war had lasted more than a month, we would have had to order spare parts from the Russians.

    Mil Spec used to require second source suppliers for everything. That means every chip, resistor and capacitor. To do that now would require that several companies have the complete design of everything down to the last square mm of silicon. Such a policy would effectively prevent spying devices because many people would be able to examine the design. The same reason that open source is safer than Windows is the same reason that hardware designs should be open sourced (or at least second sourced).

    BTW. You are absolutely right. Even friendly countries spy on each other. There was a story going around a while ago about an embassy had to be totally torn down because the local workers who built it had planted many microphones in it.

  21. You are dead wrong, Zonk by analog_line · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is exactly the kind of thing our intelligence communities should be getting involved in. First off, this kind of stunt would be the first thing our own intelligence agencies would try to do if the Chinese government were buying computers built by an American company on American soil. Some arm of the US intelligence community planted bugs in wine bottles and other amusing places near the UN ambassadors on the Security Council during the buildup to the Iraq War.

    The Chinese practically wrote the book on espionage. For some interesting reading on the subject take a look at The Tao of Spycraft". Interesting, if extremely dry, reading if you're interested in the intelligence community. A very good look at the LONG history of intelligence practice that the Chinese government has to draw on. I got interested working in computer security when everyone else in my office was ex-mil intelligence.

    And not being particularly antagonistic toward us doesn't mean anything. Back in 1999/2000, the general opinion by most of my co-workers who knew something about it was that France and Israel were the countries that were spying on us the most, with China coming in third. The only reason Britain wasn't number 1 on the list was "we already give them everything we know."

    I wouldn't put it past us to try it on them, so it would be ridiculous to trust that they wouldn't try it to us too.

    1. Re:You are dead wrong, Zonk by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Informative
      dude.. you really need to get a grip. You think the Chinese had no prior ability to do things like you suggest before they actually purchased the laptop biz? And the USCC is not the intel community:
      Composition: The Commission is composed of 12 members, three of whom are selected by each of the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House. The Commissioners serve two-year terms.
      I said many times during the DPW brooha that one cannot easily pick a point where things are 'secure' from foreign security risk. Don't want a foreign made pc? Then buy one from a US company that manufactures all the components in the US, assembles in the US and only employees US nationals. Good luck.
  22. Jerry Taylor In Tuttle by XMilkProject · · Score: 2, Funny

    Probably they should ship the laptops to Jerry Taylor in Tuttle, Oklahoma for inspection.

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  23. Declining population by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China:1,306,313,813
    United States: 298,290,000
    Get back to me when China doesn't outnumber the United States 4 to 1.

    But seriously, what effect does declining population have on either China's stability or beligerence.

    Also, what does it say when successive generations are viewed not as hope for the future but a threat to it?

  24. Only on slashdot... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...are you going to find a collection of article summaries that:

    1) criticize the United States for using it's intelligence resources to protect itself from a corporation operating out of Communist China.

    2) criticize the US for not using intelligence resources "_enough_" to protect its ports/borders/etc.

    3) criticize the US for using intelligence resource "_too_much_" by wire-tapping potential terrorists.

    Go figure.

    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    1. Re:Only on slashdot... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "1) criticize the United States for using it's intelligence resources to protect itself from a corporation operating out of Communist China."

      Except that China is not communist. It is MORE capitalist than the USA. It is also not a democracy.

      "2) criticize the US for not using intelligence resources "_enough_" to protect its ports/borders/etc."

      Actually, every sane government would and does protect it's borders. You don't generally see the security service outsourced to a foreign country for the same reason borders either shouldn't exist or they should be effective at what they are doing. A port is part of the border system.

      "3) criticize the US for using intelligence resource "_too_much_" by wire-tapping potential terrorists."

      Except, that now a "potential terrorist" description fits 90%+ of the total population of the USA.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
  25. A better use of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time.


    There is. You just don't hear about it.
  26. uummm by arrgster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all I think anything installed would quickly be found and be the end of lanovo. secondly If they are going to have this kind of view then they will have to look at all brands of computers like Dell or Gateway because I bet you at least some of the parts (if not all) came from a foreign source. Personally this sounds like a bad press move by a competitor to ruin Lanovo because they make such a good product....

  27. Re:The t3rr0r1st threat by symbolic · · Score: 3, Funny

    US Intelligence: "If there is any spying to do on Americans, WE'RE the ones that are going to do it!".

  28. DOES NO ONE REMEMBER THIS SLASHDOT ARTICLE???? by slashnot007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    read this. it's about backdoors being put in the routers. this was in 2004. given modern virtualiztion technology and large chip real-estates, the idea of hiding a hardware backdoor into a cpu is not as difficult to imagine as it once was. But of course there's plenty of other places to put stuff that would be damaging. In the bios roms, in the wi-fi, in the grpahics cards and the USB controller chips. just imagine putting a key logger in every usb handler chip. Not to hard ot imagine is it.

  29. You fail to realize most espionage is industrial by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Xenophobia. I have nothing further to add, because that word sums it all up. While there are valid threats against the USA and in the intelligence community there are measures to tap into restricted data, they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

    That's terribly naive. You fail to realize that most espionage is industrial. Billions of dollars are lost due to industrial espionage, foreign countries acquire R&D info that saves them time and money, their military tech is advanced by years, ...

    Also naive is to think that people with high security are the only target. In the real world espionage often goes for indirect info. What companies are supplying the goods and services, are their changes in orders, their production, etc. You don't have to get the general's plan for an invasion, you may only need to identify his preparations.

  30. Speaking about those Chinese by Enrique1218 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you know that there are other "American" computer manufacturers have their computers manufacture in Shanghai. I know Apple does. What of HP and Dell? Let's face it, the Chinese make our clothes, trash cans, and anything else that can be brought in an office building. To phrase a popular /. quote, "I for one welcome our Chinese overlords" and "me colloborate long time"

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  31. We have enteredd the xenophobic stage by Serveert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anti immigrant, anti foreigners(Lenovo, CNOOC 18.b billion USD bid for US oil company, Dubai ports deal, Israeli attempt to by US security firm,etc etc). We're like this precisely when reports come out saying there is little savings by Americans. Foreigners are flush with cash, they are sitting on piles and piles of dollars, and they're finding dollars are harder to use.

    I still maintain that as this continues this will increase inflation, USD will be the new monopoly money.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  32. Likewise by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who would be really surprised if the US Gov't was putting pressure on Microsoft to allow backdoors in WIndows to be used to spy on foreign gov'ts....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  33. National Security != Waste Of Time by cmholm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Virtually all laptop manufacturing is already off-shore. If you're worried about foreign spying, you've already lost the war. This "investigation" is a complete waste of time.

    Better late than never. If there's no problem, no problem, which would be nice to know. If there is a problem, the US needs to react to it. Consider it an unintentional consequence of the wholesale offshoring of US (or for that matter, all of the OECD's) manufacturing to cheap labor markets. It's an uncontrolled economics experiment for a major economic power to suddenly switch to having someone else make all of their shit for them. Who knew that not only would the "market" sell the rope that hung them, they would outsource rope making to the hangman.

    Looks like Clancy needs to update one of his opus', in which an agent slips the Chinese Politboro an 0wn3d laptop.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  34. Re:This is a good argument for open source hardwar by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Such a policy would effectively prevent spying devices because many people would be able to examine the design.

    Spying devices are not documented! When things like this are done, a select few people from a supplier are dragged aside to make a modified version of the product. Having access to the drawings for the original, unmodified product does nothing to prevent this.
    The ONLY way to tell is to tear the actual product apart, having two vendors and lots of documentation does nothing to help with this.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  35. Re:US Corps can verify ROMs and installed software by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However US corporations can inspect the goods returned from manufacturing, verifying that the ROMs and the installed software matches what they provided.

    Harder said than done. I could have a chip made that looks just like a ROM, but contains an extra code version that it switches to after say, 100 hours of use.

    You could run checksums all you want, but the only way you could catch that is if you either depackage the chips and inspect it, or happen to inspect your computer after it's alreay been in service for 100 hours.

    I could even make the chip smart enough to detect when a typical checksum is being done, and revert back to the original code.

    People trust computer chips a LOT more than they should.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.