OMG GOOGLE ROMANCE <3 <3 <3!!!
Chapium writes "Google Romance (Beta) is a place where you can post all types of romantic information and, using our Soulmate Search(TM), get back search results that could, in theory, include the love of your life. Then we'll send you both on a Contextual DateTM, which we'll pay for while delivering to you relevant ads that we and our advertising partners think will help produce the dating results you're looking for.
With this addtion has Google gone too far with its data collection?"
Oh, wait...
My new blog
Oh no, my soul mate is 404 Not Found.
I once had a signature.
With this addtion has Google gone too far with its data collection?
Even the April Fool's jokes have Google flamebait.
Ok, time to get april 1st started:
Story contains "OMG": 1 shot
Story contains Google, MS: get a beer
Zonk says something foolish: shot of beer
SLOW DOWN DAAMMIY!!11ToO muCh..1!!lk21;l1k
Now we really understand why google has collected so much data on everyone! They weren't doing Evil, just trying to get everyone dates.
Pete/Petri "damn, my chainsaw is clogged with 1's and 0's again." --clyde
Imagine if Google profiled you by your Gmail account and web-searches, blogger entries, etc and was able to use this information to do a psychometric profile of you. It could then compare this with other people's profiles and suggest members of the opposite sex that it thinks you would most like!
I don't know whether this would be cool or damn scarey. What's worse is that the only thing standing in the way of this happening is programmer time. What's amazing is how effectively we've created 1984 and in how little time we've done it.
Simon
"I'm getting lucky"
What's amazing is how effectively we've created 1984 and in how little time we've done it.
;-)
Depending on you how you look at that claim, one might say we've actually been quite slow though.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
For those of you having difficulty with the above emoticons, take note they can be read in either of 2 ways:
OMG GOOGLE ROMANCE less-than-three less-than-three less-than-three!!!
-- Which means on a scale of 10, this site only rates a "3"
OMG GOOGLE ROMANCE conical-penis-with-balls, conical-penis-with-balls, conical-penis-with-balls
-- Which makes no sense whasoever, must be some kind of April fool's joke.
Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
My Google Soulmate Search found an overweight girl living in her father's garage with orange cheeto stained fingers sucking down a Diet Mountain Dew posting messages on /. about how April Fools Day stories just aren't funny.
She is my delicate flower.
8. Such as?
Flowers. Music. Personal advice. E-greetings. Later on, depending on how our long-term opt-out natural-language-based monitoring system thinks things are going, personalized thank you notes, romantic getaway offers, various intimate pharmaceutical come-ons, engagement and bridal wear catalogs you know the drill.
+------------
| Ads by Goooooogle
|
| V 1 A G R A - En1arge yuor pen1$ n0w
|
| Advertise on this site
+------------
Signature has left the building.
This is slashdot, online home of many many gamers. They use such terms.
Slashdot also has a very healthy "words evolve" faction which holds that words do not mean anything other than what the speakers of the words think they mean, so if "gay" means "bad" it's not homophobia, it's evolution.
I'm now taking signups for the "just fucking get over it, you're not that special" faction. Sign up now and get a free "There was only up to 1 cross in history that mattered, and yours ain't it." T-shirt.
What's amazing is how effectively we've created 1984 and in how little time we've done it.
:)
1984? Dude we are way off schedule... Do you by any means work at microsoft?
Mine is 402: Payment required
would someone please explain me what OMG stands for ?
words do not mean anything other than what the speakers of the words think they mean, so if "gay" means "bad" it's not homophobia, it's evolution.
Indeed. Take the word "suck," for example; a person I insultingly call "gay" is no more homosexual than a person I insultingly say "sucks". Or what about "jerk"? A "jerk" was originally someone who...jerked himself. Jerk has become a word accepted in society (its slang status notwithstanding), and "suck" is bordering at least passive acceptance.
What about "SOB"? Do I really insinuate that you are human on your father's side and canine on your mother's? If I call you a "butthead" do you really excrete from your brain? If you're a "booby" do you actually produce milk? If you're a "dirty bastard" are you really someone born out of wedlock who didn't take a shower? All of these are terms that are clearly not taken literally. "Gay" is the same.
At the risk of offending a racial group too in the same post, I'll mention that I think "gay" is like "black"/"nigger": they both refer to groups that are too ready to be insulted. Nobody cares if you're gay or if you're black if you don't care either.
Hey man, don't be so gay. That's not cool.
It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.
It seems like slashcode removes the from the title of the article in the title tag in the HTML. Probably not the gravest bug, but still :) You'd never expect something useful coming out of 1. April, but there you go.
Doolittle :
Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.