Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Dress for Success University Opens

Roblimo writes "Linus Torvalds and his bosses at OSDL have finally realized that the biggest problem getting businesses to adopt GNU/Linux is that most FOSS programmers wear sandals and have ponytails. They've teamed up to offer style tips for the IT set. NewsForge Reports on comments from OSDL CEO Stuart Cohen, saying that if OSDSU works as planned, the open source community 'can be as successful at delivering new products, bug-free and on time, as Microsoft is doing with Vista.'" NewsForge is part of the OSTG family, along with Slashdot.

69 comments

  1. SIGN ME UP!!!!11one by Darth+Liberus · · Score: 1

    open-source dress is gonna be like soooooo cute! i can't wait LOLS

    --
    Beauty is just a light switch away.
    1. Re:SIGN ME UP!!!!11one by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Who's gonna be the first to check in a shirt_design_pony?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  2. omg by xamomike · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    pwned.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world; those who can read binary, and those who can't.
    1. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG!! Ponytails :):)

  3. Real shoes! by dilvie · · Score: 1

    Finally! A serious article. I totally agree with this concept. I'm going to buy real shoes tomorrow!

    1. Re:Real shoes! by hentaidan · · Score: 1

      Finally! A serious article.

      You obviously missed the ponytails!

  4. Well... Im sure on of the approved outfits can be by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  5. Pink sandals and PONYtails! by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    no text.

    --
    ^_^
    1. Re:Pink sandals and PONYtails! by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      more like "OMGPONYtails" amirite?

  6. Isn't there a TV show? by Kelson · · Score: 3, Funny

    "MBA Eye for the OSS Guy," or something like that?

  7. Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell Zonk that April fools day only lasts for one day?

    --
    Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    1. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only lasted 22 hours 11 minutes by my clock.

    2. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by Draegonis · · Score: 1

      It's still the 1st by GMT, which is what /. goes by technically.

    3. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by Arcade+Fire · · Score: 1
      Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! (Score:2)

      by CRC'99 (96526) Alter Relationship on Saturday April 01, @07:08PM (#15043325)

      No, it isn't.

    4. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Yesterday we had people in the US complaining that it wasn't April 1 yet (well, not in their timezone). And today we have people in Australia complaining that it's not April 2 anymore (well, not in their timezone).

      Going by the time they started (midnight UTC), they've still got 2 hours left. Which won't, of course, stop the complaining.

    5. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by yfkar · · Score: 1

      Psst... the article is not a joke.
      This was in the other news a few days ago.

    6. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by yfkar · · Score: 1

      Oops, commenting to a wrong article.
      /me hides away :|

    7. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      look at his URL, it's a .au address

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:Yo Zonk! It's the 2nd now! by thelenm · · Score: 1

      It's still April Fools Day for me... I'm in the USA, you insensitive clod! Sheesh, I wish Slashdot weren't so Australia-centric. There are a few users not in the Eastern Hemisphere, you know.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  8. OMG SO AWESOME by The+Shrewd+Dude · · Score: 0

    I know, isn't this like, so great?

    So can I get modded up now?

  9. They are overlooking the biggest roadblock! by linguizic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The biggest roadblock to adoption of linux isn't sandles and ponytails, it's soap and deoderant!! You can get away with long hair and sandals, just as long as you don't smell. I know that's what's keeping me from leaving my house right now.

    --
    Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
  10. Pink layout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My printer is out of yellow and cyan ink, so everything I print looks like /. !!!!

  11. OMG by Jboost · · Score: 1

    I want a pink tie with ponies.

  12. HOW STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT'S NOT about appearances.
    IT'S ABOUT BUSINESSES wanting TO CONTROL everything.

  13. THE CUUUUTESST UNIFORM!!111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    PONIES!!!11 TANKTOP!!

    This AbSOlutely has to be the CUUUTIST tanktop on the WORLD!!!!111 OOoohhhh it is so DARLING!!!!@@!!1211 If you wore this to work one day, you would be the MOST darling, Uber CUUUTTIST IT-tech in the WORLD!!!!111111 How can you go wrong with PONIES!!!! OMG!111

  14. OMG by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 0, Redundant

    OMG pwnies!!

  15. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I code in the nude, how will this affect me?

  16. Dress for Success... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Is pink a good color? :P

    1. Re:Dress for Success... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but lightish red is.

  17. Open Source Clothing? by Paulo's+News · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't mean to be negative at all, I'm just concerned: If the OSDSU starts pushing people to wear Open Source clothing, is this necessarily a good thing? Sure, most of the garments are free and made with good karma, but the care tags are a foot long, the weaving on one sleeve is twice as think as the weaving on the other, and the inside of the watch pocket says "/* Mr T ate your mom's balls */"

    1. Re:Open Source Clothing? by jacquems · · Score: 1

      I think open source clothing would be distributed in the form of patterns, and maybe pre-cut fabric. It would be up to you to compile it into a shirt/pants/whatever yourself. Leaves more room for tweaking that way. Like the shirt, but think a pocket would enhance it? By all means, add one, and share your pattern with the community. I suppose there could also be some off-the-rack versions for people who are not up to the challenge of sewing their own clothes.

  18. They forgot to include.... by morganix · · Score: 0

    I'm getting sick of editors linking to inferior acticles, this one doesn't even include the example outfit. I would buy Linux from this guy...

    http://www.affordableuplink.net/images/IT_Example_ Suit.jpg
  19. Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Apple just buy slashdot? What's up with the colors?!?

  20. Dupe, Not April Fool! by Jetson · · Score: 1

    A variant of this story was posted on March 28th. Either that one was an early April Fool's joke or this one isn't.

  21. Oops... by Draegonis · · Score: 1

    "OSDL"

    1. Re:Oops... by Draegonis · · Score: 1

      It would appear that I am a tool and confused OSDL with OSDN/OSTG. Sorry. :(

  22. OMG I know what it means!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you guys would wear nice clothes, that would make your work just as good, secure, on-time etc. as real big companies like Microsoft!

    It just goes to show that appearance really does matter!!!

  23. MOD PARENT UP! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Seriously! What if we can't all be overweight and bald? Would this be workplace discrimination?

    I'll still like being skinny, having all my (long) hair, and wearing sandals.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      Ive got news for you, and its all bad. In 30 years time you WILL be bald and fat. It happened to me, itll happen to you. (Yes, I DO know about apostrophes, but my keyboard has started misbehaving, and I cant be fucked fixing it at the moment.)

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  24. /. == onion by opencity · · Score: 1

    Funny today, but like my hometown paper The Onion the jokes are the headlines.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  25. Follow-up, not dupe by Kelson · · Score: 1

    Or maybe it's a foolow-up?

  26. Re:gay/straight tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up. All articles should be tagged BUMSEXUAL because everyone enjoys bum sex.

  27. This is not enough! by mehaiku · · Score: 1

    So sandals and long hair are lost,
    If the line of success will be crossed,
    We must not forget
    Success does not permit
    Gifting vibrating eggs to the boss

  28. All gone by caffeination · · Score: 1
    Seems all the mod points have dried up. That'll teach you to waste them on dipshits saying "mod me up". What the fuck is the point of that anyway? It's of no entertainment value, so why is it a part of April 1st here?

    The best thing is that I can get away with directly antagonising them, because they're no longer moderators! HAHA!

  29. Apr 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, joke is old. Enough is enough. I think we all are getting tired of the "OMG PONIES" crap now. It was funny the first 100 times, now it's just stupid. Switch the site back and freaking move on already... sheesh.

    1. Re:Apr 1 by prodangle · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ok, joke is old. Enough is enough. I think we all are getting tired of the "OMG PONIES" crap now. It was funny the first 100 times, now it's just stupid. Switch the site back and freaking move on already... sheesh.
      haha, leave it. earlier I was feeling a bit grumpy about slashdot wasting an entire day on 1/4 stories, but now I've lightened up! It's funny! Let's be honest about this - Slashdot has never been a serious news site. It's a blog, where you can often find little gems, but you have to wade through some mud to get there. Similarly no-one reads /. as a journal - it's somewhere to go to waste some time. And today I've been able to waste more time than usual!

      Good going Taco - keep it up, and don't listen to the winging grumpy gits! :)

  30. Re:gay/straight tags by caffeination · · Score: 1

    HAHA, don't you realise that the only reason that every story has been tagged gay is that we know that it's pissing people like you off? This certainly isn't the sort of website where you see the word "gay" is ever applied seriously. It's a joke, at your expense.

  31. Not yet... but soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MBA and the Geek reality show is soon coming to TV screen near you.

  32. Re:gay/straight tags by cnettel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I did nothing earlier today when all posts were "gay". I didn't find it especially funny, but overall, I didn't care. When obviously enough people find reason to tag it as straight AS WELL, it just gets pointless. Of course, we can find that funny as well, and then we can tag along and tag with any word we find in the dictionary, but the tagging might after all be used for searching later on, and a total polluting of everything based on the April 1st posts is, well, not needed.

  33. Re:gay/straight tags by caffeination · · Score: 1

    not needed? I direct you to this.

  34. Best April Fool's Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, cats > ponies. I'm just sayin'

  35. Re:gay/straight tags by cnettel · · Score: 1
    And it's still not relevant, since I'm not saying that the posts are not needed, but that tags that have nothing to do with the story, are not needed. When, and if, we ever want to search for gay and straight /. stories (somehow more likely than wanting to search for pony stories, I suppose), we will just get these.

    I don't feel strongly about it, it's just like I would be irritated by code like:

    x++; x--;

    Irritated, simply because it's pointless. (Unless we're dealing with doubles, or close to overflow in a bounds-checking sandbox or any other such case). I'm happy with /. being pink and full of more or less funny stories for a day (or two...). You can't really say I've lowered the SNR much by these comments anyway, so why are YOU bugged by me noting this?

  36. Aww man! So misleading. by drrobin_ · · Score: 1

    I saw that wonderful 'Open Source Dress' and was imagining the possibilities of the general public adding and removing patches at will. Presumably it was eventually all Open-not-repetitive. Oh well.

    he palace, came urgent trumpet calls, the heavy crunch of hundreds of feet, the clank of metal. It told the Procurator that the Roman infantry was marching out, on his orders, to the execution parade that was to strike terror into the hearts of all thieves and rebels 'Do you hear. Procurator? ' the High

    On another note, I want some not_repetitive_mod points. No real reason, I don't need them. I sat here for a minute and tried to think of a way to get some, but all the standard stereotypical jokes have already been made. Then I realized that funny doesn't affect my karma.

    Priest quietly repeated his words. ' Surely you are not trying to tell me that all this '-- here the High Priest raised both arms and his dark cowl slipped from his head--' can have been evoked by that miserable thief Bar-Abba?' With the back of his wrist the Procurator wiped his damp, cold forehead, stared at

    Bummer. Obviously I need to be insightful, or at least pretend to be. I can do things like observe people observing that anything here can get mod points today and make fun of them for making fun of other people. Unless they do it to me. That would make them a gay pony.

    the ground, then frowning skywards he saw that the incandescent ball was nearly overhead, that Caiaphas' shadow had shrunk to almost nothing and he said in a calm, expressionless voice : 'The execution will be at noon. We have enjoyed this conversation, but matters must proceed.' Excusing

    See how clever I was? I made that wonderful quasi-insightful post and then put a surprise ending on it by referencing current events to make it funny also. But then if it's funny I don't get k-nonrepetitive. Dammit. At least I set it up so I qualify for both. I need a new angle here. ...

    FUCK YOU MODS! +1 TROLL ALL THE WAY!

    himself to the High Priest in a few artificial phrases, he invited him to sit down on a bench in the shade of a magnolia and to wait while he summoned the others necessary for the final short consultation ul q ipsp gp spqtn prpgqq pgplpsp i nt pnqsq f qqquu pqlq oqp ngrj s ns ps fsjnqnonrutsn pspfpqpu t pp lpop p pg tkulu j urumupu fufuutss hrnth rjro rjr ur qnlrp r krl sdjksdfsdfsdlgkj sdflkjsdf lksdjfsdfsdf

    Hmm. Lameness filter encountered for too much repetition? Is that an invitation to write like the spam I've been getting recently? I'll be happy to copy and paste some nonsense sentences if that will help.

    What the? This is soooo not repetitive.

    --
    to accept the praise of personal wisdom is an affront to the very ideal i hold dear.
  37. Open-source guide by Elsan · · Score: 0

    The only way for this to work would be to license under the GPL a guide on how to dress cool and program. I know I would follow anything open-source.

    1. Re:Open-source guide by Elsan · · Score: 0

      Correction: I would follow anything open-source, even if it's pink.

  38. OMG! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    OMG! PONYTAILS!

  39. Re:gay/straight tags by caffeination · · Score: 1
    S'oright. I'm just bored right now, and trying to lower the SNR myself. I'm on the come-down from what's been an enjoyable afternoon (check my post history - the visibile part consists of the last 24 hours).

    I still say you're crazy for giving a shit about search though. I've been considering this sort of thing a lot myself lately. I eventually decided that I wasn't going to waste code and processor cycles on tags at all. It cost a lot of what would have been easily gained accuracy in 90% of cases, but I found tags too unpredictable compared to titles and article text anyway - they were causing chaos in a minority of searches, simply because Slashdotters can't be trusted.

    But that's not my point. My point is that it doesn't matter in the slightest. It's at worst a corruption of a potential future search term on a tech website. The moment of fun we all got out of seeing "gay" come up on each story is worth more than that.

  40. Suits by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

    I hope potential employers someday finaly realize that the biggest problem getting me to work for 20-century style businesses who failed to enter the 21th is that they are loaded with suits who gave up their personality and individuality for..what? They should team up to offer style tips for them lemming suits.

    1. Re:Suits by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. This whole thing about these dress codes is about taking away peoples individuality, and as well, allowing corporations to control and dictate to people on even minor things that are completely irrelevant to the job at hand. What does suits and ties have to do with good programming? Absolutely nothing. In fact, I would say that if I am wearing something comfortable I am much more likely to produce better code than if I am wearing uncomfortable business clothing.

      It seems corporations want to turn people into mindless robots who are carbon copies of the model that they are expected to conform to, rather than unique individuals.

      I think, employees should form unions and demand that these corporations loosen up the dress code and even allow employees to work from home (hey, its good for profits and productivity. By people working in their own homes, the company could save loads of money on office space, and if people are working at home, they are much less likely to pick up the flu bug and so on at the office. There really is not excuse since with video conferencing with whiteboards, and the internet the employees could all still interact in much the same way they did in the office).

    2. Re:Suits by Stween · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the BBC News article "What's the point of a tie?".

  41. APRIL FOOLS! by Eideteker · · Score: 1

    APRIL FOOLS!

    --
    sic
  42. and microsofties dont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microsoft programers are alwasesmoking pot and getting fat from all the free cokeacola

  43. Really, I don't think there's a problem here by wsanders · · Score: 1

    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/linus/le2.jpg

    OMFG, he dresses just like ... like EVERYONE I KNOW.

    Although everyone knows you NEVER wear white socks with the Birkenstocks after Labor Day.

    http://ask.yahoo.com/20020913.html

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  44. Experiences with dress codes in the work place by COredneck · · Score: 1

    I have been in the working world for almost 16 years. I worked at various places that had different dress codes. Anymore, my attitude is my focus is getting the job done and getting it done where the poeple I serve are happy. Dress codes are fluff or in other words, bull$h!t. My work puts me behind the scene 99 percent of the time.

    Currently I work for a major DoD contractor company in Colorado Springs. We also have several sites in Denver which I also worked at as well back in 2000. On Fri, I went to one of their sites in SW Denver in Jefferson County. The building used to be owned by John Mansfield Company back in the 1970's. I was on my way from home to Fraser by Winter Park for the weekend. I stopped by to see several of my old co-workers. I was waiting in the "foyer" of the building by the security station for one of them to show. I was dressed in ripped jeans, sweatshirt and Teva sandals. I crossed paths with this older man, he was dressed in Khaki's, dress shirt with sweater vest. He gave me a nasty look out of the corner of his eye. He then proceeded up the center stairs. I asked one of the security guards if that was the "executive offices" and the guy remarked yes. That explained the dirty look.

    In my current job, I work at an USAF base. Our facility is controlled by a gov't executive. He is a stickler on the rules. He does not even permit Casual Friday. Before he took over, it was casual everyday. The executive is a retired army colonel. In my job as a Sys Admin, I get to pull cable and yet, no clothing allowance is provided. I basically thumb my nose at the dress code and wear jeans everyday anyway.

    In my previous job, even though my manager was an @$$hole on certain things such as vacation usage, he left me alone on my dress. I wore jeans everyday since I was one of the lab people. It is suppose to be dress pants/slacks Mon to Thu and casual Friday. There were a few Friday's I showed up with my standard blue jeans, Harley Davidson T-shirt and my Teva's. My boss even saw me with the Teva's and remarked that I should wear socks with them.

    Also with my previous job, one time, they sent out a note on Wed or Thu of an executive visit on a Friday afternoon. The note mentioned that the meeting was not only mandatory but also, we were told to "dress to impress" and not think of dressing casually that time. Even with my new job, I am out the door by 12 noon on Friday. I wore jeans anyway on that Friday but I also sat way in the back of the room. My manager was not happy that I showed such "disrespect".

    In my first job after college, I worked for this company from 1990 to 1995 in Indiana. The executive management were former accountants. We had no Casual Friday. When we did business trips, it was an unwritten rule that you must dress even on weekends if you traveled. My last several years in the company, I said the hell with the unwritten rules. When I was out on trips, I went to company plants and they were filthy. I decided that I would only wear jeans on the trips. The maintainence on dress pants/slacks are a pain such as dry cleaning or ironing. Blue jeans are low maintainence. Just wash, rinse, dry and wear. Very simple.

  45. That's hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, that's why Microsoft is so successful. As we already knew, it's not their ability to write excellent software. It's also apparently not their monopolistic business practices. It's because they have short hair and dress nicely!