Slashdot Mirror


Where Computers Go To Die

broohaha writes "Salon.com has a featured article on where all our unwanted techno trash gets sent, and what is not being done enough to account for all the so-called 'recycling' we're doing. From the article: 'More than 50 percent of our recycled computers are shipped overseas, where their toxic components are polluting poor communities. Meanwhile, U.S. laws are a mess, and industry and Congress are resisting efforts to stem the effluent of the affluent.' Some sites to visit dedicated to attacking the problem are Computer Take Back Campaign and Ban Action Network."

55 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's Basel Action Network, not Ban Action Network!

  2. another place that takes them in by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.systemrecycler.com/
    Disabled guy takes old equipment, cleans and refurbishs it, repairs it if needed, loads Linux and gives it away to the needy.
    Some of it is resold to cover basic costs but it's pretty much a non-profit.

    1. Re:another place that takes them in by SonicBlue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Suddenly I feel bad for those 286's I *threw away* a few weeks ago. :\

    2. Re:another place that takes them in by filtur · · Score: 3, Informative
      Mine go in my parent's basement.

      Or here's some computer recyling in Portland Free Geek

    3. Re:another place that takes them in by bjpirt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the benefits of this are slightly blurry - on the one hand it is socially invaluable to do this and I take my hat off to the guy for doing it, on the other it is an old inefficient PC that uses an awful lot of energy to do not that much.

      I was investigating a scheme to get computers to the residents of a village in Kenya and my immediate reaction was to use recycled PCs, then I realised that using something like a low end mini-itx would work far better for them because it would be easier to get out there, could run for a long time on batteries (crucial for intermittent power problems) and is relatively robust (potentially solid state).

      Horses for courses I guess, but I still have an extremely strong urge to get as much out of old hardware as I can.

    4. Re:another place that takes them in by jacklarge · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I found Free Geek a while back and liked the ideal a lot but as I'm in the UK it sort of died a death. I'm partially involved in PC recycling as an amateur PC builder and Linux advocate so it would be something I'd be interested in doing in my part of the UK. What I'd like to see is if any other like-minded UK Geeks would be interested in a similar 'franchise'.

      They have a recycling system that gives back to the community. The basic idea is that geeky types learn how to strip and make good an old PC load Debian on and then it goes to the poor. After a certain number of builds they get to keep one for themselves. Sounds a bit 'hippy' but then internet grew on hippy-ish ideals and I for one commend the organisers on their selflessness.

      Anyway please take a look at the Free Geek site and see what a GOOD THING it is.

      http://freegeek.org/

      Cheers.

    5. Re:another place that takes them in by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Mine go in my parent's basement.

      Then where do you live?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:another place that takes them in by NightWhistler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sad thing is that a lot of the stuff that gets thrown away really isn't all that bad.

      My inlaws bought a new pc a while ago because the old one was "broken". What they meant was that the machine was completely bogged down with spyware and crap that Windows had slowed to a crawl. They bought a new machine without asking me, or I could have told them that all they needed was a new Windows install...

      I put a fresh install on it and gave it to my neighbour who needed a basic browsing / MS Office machine. (No, I did not put Linux on it... I'm sure I'll burn in Hell for that) ;-)

      Seeing the amount of hardware that is tossed out by non-geeks way before the end of it's usuable life-cycle, it sounds like a very good idea to have a bunch of geeks just check the machines and rebuild them into workable systems for students / people that cannot afford their own pc. I'm not sure about putting Linux on it: it's a good way to spread "the word", but it might be a bit too optimistic.

      --
      PageTurner Reader: open-source e-reader for Android with cloudsync. http://pageturner-reader.org
    7. Re:another place that takes them in by Edzor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the majority of homes in the UK dont have basements you insensitive clod!

    8. Re:another place that takes them in by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the benefits of this are slightly blurry - on the one hand it is socially invaluable to do this and I take my hat off to the guy for doing it, on the other it is an old inefficient PC that uses an awful lot of energy to do not that much.

      Really? Most introductory computer users are going to type S-L-O-W-L-Y into their computer as they type up their homework or email. They'll spend large amounts of time staring at the screen trying to decipher what they're looking at. Does it really make any difference if their computer sits at 98% idle or 99.99999999926% idle?

      I find that there's a law of diminishing returns for computers and computer usage, particularly when you're talking about consumer usage.

      > Having a low-end pentium computer connected to the Internet at 56k delivers vast, incredible advantages over no computer at all.

      > Having 10x faster computer at 10x the connection speed delivers much less more of an advantage.

      > Having 100x faster computer at 100x the connection speed delivers very little more value than 10x.

      Only in limited contexts (EG: performance clustering, rendering, some servers) is this not true, and this is why the $100 laptop with built-in mesh networking is such a big freaking deal! It has society-changing potential. When the poor and impoverished have cheap, easy access to information and technology, they can realize the true causes of their plight and take much more effective action to make their lives better.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  3. Silicon Heaven by egilhh · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you mean, there's no silicon heaven?

    ~egilhh

    1. Re:Silicon Heaven by this+great+guy · · Score: 2, Funny
      <<
      What do you mean, there's no silicon heaven?
      >>

      Ooh yeah ! I saw this porn mov... oh you mean silicon as in silicon chips ?
      Nevermind.

    2. Re:Silicon Heaven by kv9 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Ooh yeah ! I saw this porn mov... oh you mean silicon as in silicon chips ? Nevermind.

      as the old saying goes: remember kids, silicon is for chips, silicone is for tits.

  4. Electronics/Computers are not the only items by $exyNerdie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not too long ago, a french ship lined with toxic asbestos was sent to India (finally had to be returned) and had wide coverage in media. The poor are happy to take these things apart and make some quick cash without any knowledge of long-term ill effects. Sometimes, the hunger and immediate needs prevail over any consideration of long-term ill effects.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4577198.stm

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/469242 0.stm

    1. Re:Electronics/Computers are not the only items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if your eventual fate is to die of long term effects ill effects isn't that better than dying of hunger now?

    2. Re:Electronics/Computers are not the only items by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2, Interesting
      does an extremely good job raising public awareness and outright sabotaging the attempts to send them to third world breaker yards. Want no more ships to reach India and kill people there - give them some money (disclaimer - I do).

      So when one of those out and out sabotage attempts actually ends up spreading asbestos in your hometown, you will have no problems with your neighbors conducting out and out sabotage of the earning potential of Greenpeace contributors (such as yourself), I hope. Fair is fair after all.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  5. Illegal in Europe, legal in USA and Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Our router vendor told us that some models will not be available in Europe anymore, because they contain lead and other dangerous stuff. He also told us that they will continue to sell it in USA and Asia, "because it is not illegal".

    Companies don't care about the environment, until governments force them to care.

    1. Re:Illegal in Europe, legal in USA and Asia by spagetti_code · · Score: 5, Informative

      In Europe, RoHS (restriction of hazardous waste) laws come into effect in June (or is it July) this year. Any electronics imported after that date will need to comply wrt hazardous materials - so this means all electronics will need to be on new manufacturing lines with lead free components. And its not just lead - preservatives in plastics among others.

      List of main culprits is here (Look for "six substances" link).

      List is:

      Lead - Pb
      Mercury - Hg
      Cadmium - Cd
      Hexavalent Chromium Cr (VI)
      Polybrominated biphenyls - PBB
      Polybrominated diphenyl ethers - PBDE

  6. Recycling tax by Kj0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Belgium (and maybe also in other European countries), this problem is solved by asking a recycling tax and making vendors responsible for recycling old hardware and household appliances.

    When buying something, a customer has to pay a small amount of money (for instance: 0,5 for a mobile phone), but in return, he can return his old devices to the vendor. The vendor then sends it to the manufacturer who recycles it.

  7. Recycling - by law by hptux06 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Due to an EU directive, computer recycling will become compulsary in the UK in 2008: the related article here describes how the WEEE[sic] will force computer manufacturers to be responsible for their products, by providing a recycling service for *all* the electronic devices they sell.

  8. Re:Bush administration to blame... by Macondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually the kyoto protocol would allow rich carbon producing nations to sell their carbon output to poorer carbon negative nations. In fact it has the potential to do exactly what you say it will stop. Just more of the same non-systematic thinking that has got us into this mess in the first place.

  9. Catch 22 by caffeination · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So you're a savage primitive if you don't recycle, because of all the toxic components in computers, but if you do, you're an imperialist polluter because of all the toxic components in computers?

    Why can't anything be simple? Are people really that greedy? I guess what'll happen is some certification will spring up "100% true recycling" or something. These things tend to work out in the end.

  10. IMHO Kyoto is dead anyway. by WoTG · · Score: 4, Informative

    IIRC, Kyoto is all about the carbon output. With respect to old computers, Kyoto would have only made the situation worse. Since China and India are exempt from Kyoto, even more old gear would be sent there so that the CO2 generated from recyling the metal wouldn't have to be monitored, counted, or paid for as it would (in theory) in the West.

    Not that it really matters, IMHO, it's only a matter of time before Kyoto is officially declared dead. Here in Canada we're hopelessly behind our goal, the only way to meet our target would be to buy a billion dollars of CO2 credits from Russia -- which would have exactly zero impact on CO2 emmissions because Russia's CO2 credit surplus is due to a timing fluke relating to their collapsing economy in the post-Cold War period.

    With China, India, and most other developing countries exempt from Kyoto, (and to a lesser extent, the USA opting out) there's very little incentive for those who have signed on to actually do anything. Plus, the costs of meeting the targets through technology (e.g. hybrids, or new power plants, or home upgrades) are enormous.

    1. Re:IMHO Kyoto is dead anyway. by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The USA has 5% of the world's population but uses 25% of the energy.

      The United States uses 23.6% of the world's energy to to produce 28.4% of the world's gross domestic product---it seems that the U.S. is actually rather efficient. (My source for these is the CIA's World Fact Book and a rather large PDF from BP).

      It ranks 17th in per capita oil consumption. And it uses less energy per capita than Luxembourg, Iceland, and Candada. Why don't you pick on them for a little while?

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    2. Re:IMHO Kyoto is dead anyway. by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Interesting
      GDP is completely meaningless. GDP is all about how much money is generated. Salaries/income in the USA (and the first world) are much higher than elsewhere (in general); that means that a first world inhabitant produces more GDP than someone in the 3rd world.

      I don't value people by how much money they produce.

      Most of us in the first world (I Include myself (a Brit) in this) need to cut back on use of the world's resources. Until we come up with less polluting energy generation - that (to a large extent) means cutting back on energy use.

      Why pick on the USA: it is a large country that is profligate in it's use of Energy.

      In Europe there is a lot of work going on to reduce the consumption of natural resources. The USA only seems to be interested if it doesn't hit today's bottom line. That is short sighted.

  11. who then... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, you send it to the manufactuer. The manufacturer then sends it to a 3rd world country where it isn't really recycled at all, it just sits there and pollutes the enviroment.

    That's pretty much the point of the article, and you missed it.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:who then... by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Finland has similar system as Belgium does. And the are NOT sent to third-world countries, but they are recycled. Well, in Finland, they are not sent to the manufacturer, but to recycling-plants (for free). There they get recycled. Refrigerators have their freon collected and processed in controlled fashion before they are recycled. All the useful elements and material are extracted and reused. This system hasn't been in use for long, but it has caused the amount of stuff being sent to recycling to increase by a lot. And there's a lot less stuff being thrown to the forests etc., since it's easy to dispose it properly. In the past, disposing large appliances and electronics was a pain in the ass.

      The downside of this system is that prices of electronics and appliances have this "recycling-tax" in 'em. But the price-increase is few euros for a large appliance, so it's more than reasonable.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  12. What about all the stuff that doesnt get recycled? by skam240 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a fairly poor college student who left the computer industry during the 2001 depression I have lots of broken/obsolete computer hardware and not allot of money. The prices they charge at the recycle centers to take this stuff are quite steep for some one like myself (20 bucks for a monitor is a weekends worth of micro brews for me after all :) ) making just dumping them in the dumpster near my house extremely tempting. I'm sure there are allot of people less eco conscious than myself who see fit to just throw this crap away rather than pay the fairly hefty processing fees associated with proper disposal. I wonder how polluted our own landfill is due to this.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  13. Freecycle? by gihan_ripper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Part of the problem is that we junk our old computers or 'recycle' them. There are plenty of individuals and organisations that don't want or need a brand-new computer and would happily take our old machine. When I was a graduate student, I used to buy second-hand computers from my department every couple of years. I passed on my old machine to my 88-year-old neighbour and slapped Debian Woody on it (it works fine, by the way, and she now uses it constantly for keeping in contact with her family and for genealogy).

    These days, if I wanted an old machine, I'd probably use Freecycle. This is simply a Yahoo forum for people who want to give away (or get for free!) unneeded items.

    --
    Phoenix, Boston, Little Rock, see a pattern?
  14. I do my part by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    by keeping all my old computers. They all have a use, if for nothing more than a file server or router or something.

    1. Re:I do my part by prichardson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, your oldest computer probably consumes a lot of power for the meager computing power or storage space it provides. This hurts the planet in an entirely different way.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    2. Re:I do my part by amias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reusing old machines as routers is a good idea , but , they do use far more power than
      a small dedicated router would . Of course if you get your electricity from a renewable source then this is not a problem . These providers will then replace the electricity you
      use from the national grid with electricity from renewable/sustianable sources.

      That said , even if you don't have clean power reuse is still better than recycling but
      please consider your power sources .

      --
      [site]
    3. Re:I do my part by waveclaw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course, your oldest computer probably consumes a lot of power for the meager computing power or storage space it provides. This hurts the planet in an entirely different way.


      Just how much pr0n are you planning on hosting? An old 10Gb HD will store a full Linux FOTM desktop install. And there will still be lots of room for your 100k of weblog posts.

      You do know how to use a voltmeter, right? When the HDs are idle, my webserver draws less current than the 80W motor and five 100W lightbulbs in the ceiling fan above it. Heck, with the 250W PSU, it's peak load is smaller than my 300W 'small' blowdryer's average.

      That 250W power supply in my Pentium 166Mhz webserver lost use of it's fan this month. Bearings finally seized. Funny thing, that old PC. Runs so cold compared with my workstations and laptops that it gets enough cooling from convetion and radidation. Now it's the quietest thing in that backroom.

      But I'm sure the PC's cache of Goatcx vs. Tubgirl pics are hurting the planet "in an entirely different way."
      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
  15. No great solution by bm_luethke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I know there is no "silver bullet" out there. That is, there is no clean great solution (clean and cheap enough to not drive tech companies out of business). Recylcing isn't that clean, dumps aren't that clean, and even if sending old computers to poor areas that they are still "fast" works now it eventually will not. If there is then I will agree to push to legislate it.

    While I will not purchase from known pulluters if possible (as is my right to choose), I can't say I blame companies if a country out there says "Send me your crap - we will take care of it cheap". I don't see how one can feel justified in controlling international trade in ways they like but not in ways they do not as "like" tends to be personal and arbitrary (even if your line in the sand is pollution the next person may be "terrorism" or something else). You get control or no control - personally I choose as little control as possible and only where a clear line is.

    Even then you need a clear plan in opposition - we have the discarded computers and "Can't do anything with them" isn't a solution (they have to do something with them). Yes, maybe it's REALLY bad for the environment but the stuff is there and we have to do something.

    In this you can not make a clear line in the sand, only a random one where you feel it needs to be. Nothing really wrong with that other than many will have other random lines in the sand (and you do not get angry and worked up because someone has a different line in the sand).

    Eh, anyway, this has been a known issue even in the early 90's when I first got into computing - I assume it was known before then, although I do not know how long before (my guess is even in the early days of computing).

    Finally, don't take this as a too negative post. If you have a solution that allows companies to stay in business and is clean - by all means propose it and I'll support it. This isn't anything close to something I keep up with, only through news blurbs. Every one I see is complaints, no solutions. Complaints are OK as long there is a solution - I have been going bald since my early 20s, complaining about it hasn't stopped anything. Sometimes every choice sucks and you choose the least sucky (for instance, cost and effectiveness for baldness cure is horrid, thus best option is to accept it and go on unless you are one of the unusal individual that it works for).

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  16. Economics by quokkapox · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It all comes down to economic incentives and laziness. Right now it is cheaper to mine new metals and process raw oil to make the plastics and wires that make up our disposable electronics. Right now it is cheaper to toss them into a landfill or ship them to China for children to disassemble and extract and recover what's worth recovering. Right now it is cheaper to drill holes in the ground and dig out the fossil fuels than to figure out a new way to produce energy.

    When the equation changes, we'll figure out a better way and we'll gradually start doing something different. This pattern hasn't changed for centuries.

    An interesting business idea (unpatented as of yet) for you speculative investors, would be to collect and safely store (in landfills, or wherever) large amounts of technological waste of known quality (say, cellphones and ipods only, no monitors, or something). Then sit on it for a few decades, and wait for mining and recovery/recycling technology to catch up. Sort of like buying up land that has oil shale on it. You know we'll probably need it someday.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Economics by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Right now it is cheaper to mine new metals and process raw oil to make the plastics and wires that make up our disposable electronics.
      "Cheaper" in the same way that stealing your neighbour's milk is cheaper than paying the milkman for your own milk. Of course, eventually the neighbour will notice; and the longer the theft goes on, the worse the consequences will be. Solution: impose a tax on "virgin" raw materials wherever it would be viable to use a recycled alternative, so it will be cheaper for manufacturers to buy recycled.
      Right now it is cheaper to toss them into a landfill or ship them to China for children to disassemble and extract and recover what's worth recovering.
      Then increase the tax on landfill and the export duty on potentially-hazardous shipments, so it becomes cheaper to recycle materials locally.
      Right now it is cheaper to drill holes in the ground and dig out the fossil fuels than to figure out a new way to produce energy.
      Then increase the tax on fossil fuels and provide subsidies to encourage the use of non-fossil fuels.
      When the equation changes, we'll figure out a better way and we'll gradually start doing something different. This pattern hasn't changed for centuries.
      The Government have the power to start changing the equation right now, by means of taxation and subsidy. As more environmentally-friendly alternatives come onto line, economies of scale will kick in and the need for subsidies will be lessened. This will offset the reduction in taxes on environmentally-damaging practices which are becoming unfashionable.

      Oh, and while you're at it, please ban filament light bulbs {except where being used to illuminate revolving machinery, obviously} and disposable batteries, and exempt lead-acid batteries from pollution control {they're still about the least polluting option, 100% recyclable at end-of-life and lead is expensive enough already to ensure this is done}.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  17. Re:Strange Acronym by gameforge · · Score: 2, Funny
    You're posting on Slashdot and that's the best example you can think of??.... Richard Stallman (truly an American icon) must be spinning in his grave.
    You bastard! You killed Richard Stallman!

    i.e., I don't think he's spinning in his grave; he's not dead.
  18. Re:The UK, Brussels' lapdog by ponxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What in the world are you talking about???

    The "re-vote" in ireland was not an election, but a referendum, much like the frequent referendums in the US that get instrumentalised, repeated or overturned by politicians on a regular basis

    The european parliament is an elected body (by the people, seats according to population, much like the US congress), while the european comission consists of the (elected) governments of the member states (imagine a senate where senators are the state governors). Which part of this system is "undemocractic"?

    > mean the loser of an election here bitchs about "no democracy",
    > but that is just cover for them feeling bad that the majority of Americans don't agree with them.

    What about those who lose even though the majority of americans *do* vote for them (maybe half a million more than the guy who won??)

  19. Re:Strange Acronym by njh · · Score: 3, Informative

    BAN = Basel Action Network (If you'd RTFA)

  20. FreeGeek in Portland by whistlingtony · · Score: 3, Informative

    www.freegeek.org

    Freegeek operates in Portland. I do volunteer work there and it's a neat place. They take old hardware, strip it, recycle what they can, and the rest gets put into their rebuilding program.

    They take the decent stuff, and after testing it gets built into new systems (Yes, they put linux on them!) and given to other non profits, needy types, etc.

    The beauty of the system is that they teach volunteers to build these sytems. The volunteers learn a bit, build so 6 systems, then they get to take the sixth home with them.

    So, Freegeek does the following:
    Recycles old hardware
    gives "new" boxes to good causes
    teaches people how to build a computer
    teaches people how to use linux
    gives people who can't afford a computer a chance to earn one

    All around, a damn fine setup... And before you ask them, no they don't have one in INSERT YOUR CITY HERE. :D

  21. Re:Bush administration to blame... by caffeination · · Score: 3, Funny

    You created a new account to say this?

  22. Re:What about all the stuff that doesnt get recycl by gellenburg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was a report on TV some time back (investigative report) which wondered why communities charged for recycling so they decided to find out.

    They tagged some recycling trucks and followed them to their final destination:

    The city dump.

    If the story ended there it would have been sensationalistic enough, but the next day they showed what goes on at the city dump.

    Normal trash, and trash from recycled bins got fed into these giant conveyor belts where workers sorted through the trash and pulled out all the recyclable material before it got burned.

    They asked the landfill operator why, and they said because they make money off the recycling.

    After I saw that piece I haven't worried one bit about nor recycling, and I haven't paid for it either. Why should I pay a company money to do some work when it doesn't mean anything in the end and they in turn are just going to make more money?

    No thank you.

    I'm sure the same happens with PCs and equipment. Copper is valuable. So is gold. If there's money to be made, someone will figure out a way of extracting the raw materials. If the process is not environmentally friendly then that's a different problem.

    Power plants didn't used to be environmentally friendly until the laws were changed which forced power companies to install scrubbers and catalytic converters. If you require the recycling companies to clean up their acts then they will.

  23. Obligatory link to Free Geek by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anytime one of these articles comes up, someone posts a link to Free Geek, your local place where technology is recycled. That is because people think Free Geek is awesome. Because it is awesome. Although, you know, you can also learn a lot about Free Geek here

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  24. Dumping? Starving?? So much spin..... by jageryager · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > sees as a persistent failure by the U.S. federal government to stop the > dumping of millions of used computers, TVs, cellphones and other
    > electronics in the world's developing regions, including those in China

    I don't see it as dumping if the Chinese are smuggling the stuff in..

    I agree that it sucks to live in a third world country, and it sucks to live in a polluted environment. But what will these people do for food if they can't recycle? Will they starve?

    It's easy for rich fat Americans and Europeans to be critical of situations that put people and the environment at risk.. But we mostly all have food to eat every day, and homes, and money. I'm reluctant to pass judgement on other people I don't know or understand. If was starving I would work a dangerous job to buy food.

    --
    "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"-B.Franklin
  25. Pointless Upgrades by Vollernurd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One problem with the large number of "obsoloete" machines in need of disposal or recycling/re-using is that they are normally perfectly good machines for light use. For example, the person who buys their machine just to email and surf the web should realistically expect to get 5 years+ use out of it. i would expect far more than that if the hardware does not fail.

    There seems to be a lot of forced upgrading among those who don't need more power, whether that be for new OSs requiring more sophisiticated hardware, or that PC manufacturers have redesigned the internals again and you cannot buy a replacement PSU/whatever for your old machine when it blows.

    With more considerations paid to backward compatability as well as component quality I think we could cut waste quite a bit.

    This is just an observation. What do you think?

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
  26. Jobs vs toxic waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Amazingly nobody complains about toxic waste being sent to the very same countries where the American jobs are exported.

  27. I'm storing until I can recycle by jridley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since hearing about the extent of this problem on NPR Science Friday a few months ago, I've decided to just hang on to my stuff until there's some decent way to get it REALLY recycled.

    I mostly reuse computer cases, just swapping out mainboards. Mainboards and old PCI cards can stack pretty compactly. It's the couple of old dead CRTs that are really taking up the space.

    I'll take them somewhere when I can be confident that they'll be handled in a sane manner. They'll probably still be in my basement in 20 years, knowing how fast things move in the environmental regulation area, particularly internationally.

  28. Re:What about all the stuff that doesnt get recycl by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Problem is two fold.

    1 - too many people believe that P-III 500 they paid $1500.00 for in 1998 is still worth $1000.00 and will not sell it for less so it will sit in a closet for 3 more years and then silently get thrown in the trash.

    2 - Way too many people believe that you have to have a Pentium4 or better and 2GHZ or faster to do anything. I can edit a full length feature film, do Advanced CG graphics at broadcast quality and everything else productive that is done today on much older hardware. Hell we have a old intergraph Graphics Workstation here with dual P-II 350's in it with a old copy of Lightwave that can do amazing things (and has! the M&M animated characters on TV were done on that same hardware and software revision)

    and that is with windows, install a properly chosen and configured linux on it and it can be faster "feeling" than a XP machine on modern hardware.

    Way too much get's tossed based on a belief that it is un-useable. I fished out of the trash here at work a pair of Dell poweredge servers that had only P-III processors in them. They scream as SQL and File servers at home, and a smaller company would kill for that kind of resources that a larger company happily tosses in a dumpster.

    Obsolete = useful in different ways. I have old obsolete 386 pc104 formfactor computers all over michigan on towers acting as ham radio digipeater data collection nodes running an obsolete linux kernel and had rolled Filesystem to fit on a 4meg flash. that 1.X kernel is supposedly "unsafe" but nobody can hack them unless they want to climb up 200 feet.

    these old computers would rock for a robot "brain" for robotics... adda rat-shack VEX kit and go the next step from remote control erector set to real robot.

    There is lots of life left in "obsolete" computers and computer parts.

    Hell I keep around dead motherboards and cards simply because I never have to buy surface mount resistors and capacitors anymore... Harvest the boards for free parts to feed my electronics hobby!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  29. Re:What about all the stuff that doesnt get recycl by szembek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You should contact your local landfill and see if they offer an free recycling dates for electronics. I found myself in a similar situation as yours previously and then I found a program at the landfill.

    Electronics are accepted for recycling three days a month from 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. The collection is held at the Hazardous Waste Facility located at the Broome County Landfill. There is no fee for residential users. Visit www.gobroomecounty.com or call (607) 778-2250 for collection dates. Materials Accepted: Monitors, printers, CPU's, televisions, VCR's, stereos, laptops, keyboards, two-way radios and fax machines - From my local landfill website http://www.gobroomecounty.com/dpw/DPWLandfill.php

    --
    nothing
  30. Solution: Reuse old PCs as routers or PVRs! by lynchaj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rather than throw old PCs into the trash and fueling the waste problem find new uses for them.

    For example, old PCs 386 or later, can be reused as a router/firewall. They provide excellent security for your home LAN while keeping it out of the waste pile. Being floppy based, Freesco does NOT require a hard disk! Install the software and reuse the PC or give it to someone who will. See:

    http://www.freesco.org/
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FREESCO/

    Later PCs, such Pentium 400 MHz or later, can be reused as MythTV PVRs by adding an inexpensive TV tuner ($20-$30) I have gotten PCs as old as P2 266MHz 128 MB to have some limited PVR functionality. (contact me if interested in old PC PVRs)

    http://amicus.sourceforge.net/

    Practically any PC, 386 or better, can run lightweight Linux distributions such as DSL or Debian for general purpose computing.

    http://damnsmalllinux.org/
    http://debian.org/

    These are just three low cost methods I have personally used to recycle old computers. Use your imagination and Google, and you can see there are many other options too. Don't throw it away, make the old PC into something useful reuse it or give it to someone who will!

    Andrew Lynch

  31. funny tab title by j2brown · · Score: 3, Funny

    My tab in Firefox says:

    Slashdot: Where Computers Go To Die.

    Struck me as funny anyway.

    jeff
    sdg

  32. Geeks & nerds just don't throw out computers. by atomic_toaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've noticed that one of the prevalent comment subjects with regards to this article is that either "I can always find a use for my old hardware" or "I know somewhere around here that has a free swap/refurbish service." Which is great, don't get me wrong. The thing is, computer-techy-types are, by their very nature, not inclined to throw out old hardware, as they will be able to find some use for it, whether it be to re-purpose it at home or create a Frankenstien box that they can give to someone who can use it. Most enthusiasts of any kind are like this -- car enthusiasts will save parts in their garage for years after they've sold the car, just in case they need it someday; handicrafts enthusiasts just won't throw out that leftover/old piece of fabric/paper/etc. because they know that once they do, that'll be just the thing that they have to go out and buy.

    It's not the enthusiasts that fill up junkyards/landfills/ships to China/India. It's people who don't know/care much about the subject that just junk their stuff as soon as it's no longer the "latest and greatest." It's not just individuals, but companies that do this (although larger companies often have a plan where they send their older hardware to be used in schools or community centers or some such).

    Something that every nerd and geek can do to help reduce useful hardware going to junkyards/landfills/overseas is to let their friends and coworkers know that much of the stuff that people are throwing out can be repurposed. This goes for not just computers, but most electronic equipment. A lot of people just throw out their old TVs/VCRs/DVD players/etc. too (even though they still work or just need a tiny repair). And being the person that everyone knows is into recycling/repurposing has the side benefit of probably being the person who receives the hand-me-down hardware!

  33. Old PCs draw less power by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Informative

    then new PCs. e.g. my 200mhz dell's processor pulls 30 watts as opposed to my Athlon's 90. You really only see low power PCs in business and desktop environments (and laptops). Most users are still buying cheap Dell Boxen with 300 watt power supplies running full on.

    Besides, once you hit 200-300 mhz with a tnt/rage128 class graphics card you can do any 2D task you care to name. That was a major concern for PC venders back in the day: how are we gonna get people to upgrade when this year's models are only sightly better? luckily Microsoft to the rescue with bloatware 5.1 SP2, but you can still get by quite nicely with a pared down Linux install running Abiword/Gnumeric/Firefox.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  34. Widernet by ddkilzer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the tasks of the Widernet project is to take old PCs, install a static copy of part of the Internet on them, then ship the computers to developing countries in Africa so that they can benefit from the knowledge without having a dedicated connection. For working equipment, this would be an excellent way to keep the computers from being junked.

  35. Re:Effluent of the affluent? by SRain315 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait a sec, folks. I think you're missing the forest for the trees here.

    Somebody. On Slashdot. Used "effluent" and "affluent" in the same sentence. Correctly.
    Don't give me this "global responsibility" crap in the face of a God Damned Miracle!

    Cheers! -J

    --
    --- Corporations Are A Fad.