Slashdot Mirror


Contact Lenses for Computer Professionals?

LxDengar writes "For anyone who uses a computer around 10-plus hours a day, eye strain can become a serious issue. According to the American Optometric Association, 70-75% of computer workers experience eye and vision problems. Although I've tried contacts in the past, I found that my eyes dried out very quickly, and so switched back to glasses. Recently, my eye doctor mentioned a series of new contacts with better hydration for the eyes, and targeted to computer professionals (Acuvue, Ocular Sciences, etc). Do you wear contacts when staring at your screen for long periods? What contacts does community recommend for long periods at the computer?"

171 comments

  1. I use acuvue and love 'em by PhaseBurn · · Score: 1

    I've been using the Acuvue series for years, with no discomfort. In fact, I've fallen asleep with them in and woken in the morning to only mild discomfort - and being 2 week disposables means that if I lose one, I just order replacements a week sooner...

    Over all, I've had much more luck with these than glasses - though I have a pair of glasses too, my contacts seem to distort less providing for more natural vision. Sometimes I even forget I'm wearing 'em. Give them a try, you'll probably never go back.

    --
    -PhaseBurn Welcome to Linux country. On quiet nights, you can hear windows reboot.
    1. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Get a trial pair of Acuvue Advance from your eye doctor. They are very comfortable. I have an astigmatism, and if you do too, Acuvue makes contacts for astigmatism that are just as thin as normal contacts! I wear them and they're great: Acuvue Advance for Astigmatism.

    2. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Ditto for the most part. My eyes are really bad (-5.75) too.

      One thing to note is that it's VERY hard to find an optometrist that can actually give you a good glasses prescription. Get the thinner lenses too - they reduce distortion.

      My glasses now are the best I've had in 15 years. Just as good as my contacts - I find myself wearing them much more frequently. It's good to give your eyes a break from contacts anyway.

    3. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      -5.75 is nothing. My wife has -10.25

    4. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by Raumkraut · · Score: 1

      *cough* -11.5/-11.0 *cough*

      I'm using PureVision lenses - the ones that you wear for 30 days (including at night) - they are *far* more comfortable than my previous, take-them-out-at-night, monthly disposables, and they cause *no* redness in my eyes (which my previous ones did).

      The only time my eyes feel dry or sore is when I've not been blinking for too long - like after playing a particularly intensive FPS match!

    5. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by fyonn · · Score: 1

      My glasses now are the best I've had in 15 years. Just as good as my contacts

      umm..? I don't know anyone for whom their contacts are nearly as good as their glasses. for me, glasses are much better than contacts but contacts are acceptable. I do need toric lenses though.

      dave

    6. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by deuterium · · Score: 1

      I wore glasses from age 10 until 30, when I tried contacts. I can safely say that I see much better now than I ever did. Glasses distort the visual field by nature of the fact that they represent the view a small distance in front of the eye. This screws with accurate depth perception. They're also prone to getty dirty, while contacts are cleaned every time you blink.
      I was agog at how vivid and "realisitic" the world looked that first week I got contacts.

    7. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by Steely1 · · Score: 1

      I *highly* recommend Acuvue Oasys. Was using Ciba Vision Focus for years and just putting up with dry, tired eyes. My eye doctor explained that those lenses were state of the art back when cell phones were the size of, say, a tissue box. These Acuvue Oasys feel like wearing nothing at all (wheeee!).

    8. Re:I use acuvue and love 'em by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Get the thinner lenses too - they reduce distortion.

      this is not true. To get the same power in a thinner lens, you have to go to higher index of refraction material. This will lead to chromatic distortion (colored edges to objects) as well as image field distortion.

      Related to this: no matter how well eyeglasses correct, they can only do so on axis because your eyeball rotates behind the glases. Contact lenses allow off-axis viewing to have the same image quality as on-axis.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  2. I wear contacts all day in front of a computer by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

    I use daily throw away lenses. Never had a problem unless I was in front of a computer 12 hours. Daily lenses are so much better as they keep hydrated longer. Not too much difference in price.

    If you find your eyes are drying out take out the lenses and rub in solution (watch out for some solutions causing eye fungus) and then pop them back in. This will extend the hydration for a while.

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  3. Antiojos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When i went to the optometrist about a year and a half ago, I asked him about contacts. I mentioned that I do a lot of computer work in general, and design in particular. I wanted to know about switching from gas perm lenses to soft. Since I don't have problems with the gas perms, and typically wear them for 15 hours a day, he said stick with them, as they tend to be sharper focusing over soft lenses.

  4. solids by cwebb1977 · · Score: 1

    I'm even wearing solids. Sometimes when it's windy outsides my eyes dry out, but I don't experience much discomfort otherwise. If your eyes dry out, get some liquid that you can drop into your eyes or remember blinking a few times every 30 minutes or so. I also got new solids a few weeks back and they really improved a lot. Just try some cheap Acuvue throwaways for a month and you'll know if they're okay for you.

    --
    www.weberseite.at
  5. SIGHT by spotlight2k3 · · Score: 1

    I use the 30 day disposables, night and day. I forget who makes them, but they are one of the newer more breathable lenses. Been using them for good 3 months now,and no problems. Used to use the acuvue 2 weeks ones and my eyes would dry out daily.

    1. Re:SIGHT by rylin · · Score: 1

      30-day disposables rock.
      I've been using them for about two years now.
      My optometrist recommends I clean them over night once a week, but I usually go with them for 1½ - 2 weeks at a time.

      The best thing is obviously the lack of dry eyes that regular 12h contacts gives,
      but the second best is something I treasure a lot - waking up, and actually being able to see things.

    2. Re:SIGHT by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      They've got my vote, as the sibling post said all they need is a rinse every 7 to 10 days - if you're talking about the same ones I wear then they're Focus Night & Day made by CIBA Vision. I did wear Bausch & Lomb PureVision in the past but I found that they felt dry much more quickly, sometimes actually worse than daily disposables. One thing I would say is to wash them with normal solution before putting them in when you open a new pack - I don't know what they pack them in but it's not the same as the stuff in the bottles.

    3. Re:SIGHT by spotlight2k3 · · Score: 1

      yep those are the ones, checked the box last nite at home. And I'll agree rinse before use of the new out of box ones.

  6. Best solution? by br4dh4x0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If at all possible, get LASIK.

    I'd worn contacts for almost 20 years when I finally decided to pony up the cash for LASIK. Best $2000 I've ever spent. My eyes would dry out extremely quickly while wearing contacts. Since the inital recuperation from the surgery, my eyes haven't become dry unless I stay up 24+ hours in a row.

    An added bonus is that my eyesight in each eye (20/650 and 20/850 before) is now 20/15. I could never come close to that with contacts.

    I know you were asking about contact lenses... but you should at least consider LASIK.

    1. Re:Best solution? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Just sprung for LASIK myself. I paid about twice what you did, I went and got WaveFront analysis and IntraLase added into the package, which boosted the price considerably. If you managed to get all that for 2 large, you are the man (woman?, nah...) I'm still healing (in fact it's time for more awesome steroid drops) but it was worth every penny.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    2. Re:Best solution? by toleraen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably see my response further below...but to respond to yours:

      Since the inital recuperation from the surgery

      I had my Lasik surgery done January 2005. My eyes are still going through the "initial recuperation". For the first 9 months or so my eye sight would fluctuate, one day my right eye would be clear, the next my left. Now it's fairly steady, but they dry out much more frequently than yours do. My night vision is absolutely terrible compared to what it was, though it's getting better. I also noticed significantly more headaches. I get tons of little "floaty" things which mess with vision. On subsequent visits, I was told everything looks normal. Yes, I knew this stuff could happen going in. However, the dreams of not needing glasses, and being able to read something further than 3 inches from my nose took hold.

      Lasik is not the holy grail it seems to be. I would not recommend this surgery to anyone, ever. Unless having messed up vision (and possible blindness!) is worth the convenience of not having to slide a pair of glasses on every morning.

    3. Re:Best solution? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Just curious if you'd explain what WaveFront analysis and IntraLase are?

    4. Re:Best solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carrie: How much was the coupon for, Doug?
      Doug: Half-off the second eye.

    5. Re:Best solution? by br4dh4x0r · · Score: 1

      I got Wavefront done on both eyes. The $2000 includes a lifetime of checkups and corrections. I went to LasikPlus in Louisville. They've got centers all over, though.

      I'm assuming you got the milky white steroid drops. Worst tasting eyedrops ever.

    6. Re:Best solution? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Prednisolone. And I agree, I'd almost rather eat anything else than drop these things. Oh well, only a week left.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    7. Re:Best solution? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Powers. He has them.

    8. Re:Best solution? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      I went and got WaveFront analysis and IntraLase added into the package

      "See, they install that TruCoat at the factory, there's nothin' we can do..."

    9. Re:Best solution? by John+Courtland · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wavefront allows the surgeon to create custom LASIK procedures specific to your cornea, rather than using some standard pattern meant for your prescribed level of refraction. It usually generates a better result as far as clarity goes and results in less occurance of aberrations (LASIK induced astigmatism, for example).

      IntraLase is a trade name for a laser system. Instead of using a blade to slice the cornea, the surgeon uses a femto-second laser to (rather slowly) open the cornea. It's a more precise cut and hence better. According to my doctor there is no tissue removal with IntraLase, as opposed to the microkeratome, which means if the laser makes an error (more likely the surgeon makes an error) you lose no corneal matter. There are also some horror stories where the microkeratome (the blade) actually will *jam* in the patients' *eye*. The extra $1500 that procedure tacked on to the total bill is WELL worth it to me to have a 0% chance of that type of problem happening.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    10. Re:Best solution? by br4dh4x0r · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to hear you had such bad luck.

      I had mine done in June of 05. For two months, I had the same problems you had for nine. One minute my right eye would be crystal clear and my left would be so fuzzy I could barely see a foot in front of my face. I would blink and it would reverse (right eye horrible, left eye clear). Pretty freaky stuff when you think that sort of thing might be permanent.

      The surgeon at LasikPlus was very candid before the surgery. He told me about the possible complications and eventual outcomes. I understand it's not a perfect prodcedure. There are still times that my vision in one eye will dip a bit below 20/15 (20/40 or so) for anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours. It's noticeable... but still a hell of a lot better than 20/650 or 20/850.

    11. Re:Best solution? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      I know it sounds like "you don't need this shit, it's just marketing, dumbass" but it does help. Especially IntraLase. Sorry, I don't want a blade in my eye.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    12. Re:Best solution? by pcgc1xn · · Score: 5, Funny

      $2K is a lot of coin. You can save some serious money by checking out www.lasikathome.com

      Best money I ever spent. Just don't blink.

    13. Re:Best solution? by Sangui5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      WaveFront is where they analyze for "more complex" distortion. Most glasses have two portions--the spherical (simple near-sightedness), and cylindrical (for basic astigmatism). Most contact lenses only do spherical--Toric lenses do cylindrical too.

      However, there are more ways your vision can be distorted than spherical and cylindrical. The idea behind WaveFront is to analyse these other forms of astigmatism and include a correction for them, too.

      You can also get expensive contacts with these corrective terms, & I'm told they work fairly well. Glasses are available too, but they don't work so well. The laser-eye-surgery versions work extremely well. An added bonus is that wavefront lasik tends to have much lower rates of night vision problems such as haloing.

      Intralase replaces the first step of lasik. Usually first you cut a flap with a hand-held knife. Scary. Intralase uses a laser instead. Benefits are faster healing, less infection, less side-effects.

    14. Re:Best solution? by toleraen · · Score: 1
      The surgeon at LasikPlus was very candid before the surgery.
      My surgeon was as well, but that's because he was legally obligated to =) I agree that my 20/20 vision now is much better than the 20/2000 vision I had before, but I just wanted to point out that there are a lot of bad things that can and will go along with it. The fact that you're gambling with your eyesight, taking the risk of going permanently blind, is something you really want to look into! To me nothing has been scarier than wondering if and when my eyesight will stabilize. Then there's the fact that there aren't really any long term results on what your eyes do 20 or 30 years down the road. I'm just praying that I don't go blind when I'm 40!
    15. Re:Best solution? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting. I looked into LASIK, but was scared away by the 1% risk of complications. I figured, I see just fine with corrective lenses, and I'm used to corrective lenses, and the chances of the surgery correcting my eyes to the point that I wouldn't need to use them for things like driving was already low enough that I should just stick with the plan that I know gives me good vision rather than taking the one that has a 1 in 100 chance of hosing my vision for the rest of my life.

      But then I noticed that I was hearing nothing but glowing things from people and wondering if I should try it anyway. Thanks for snapping me back to my senses.

    16. Re:Best solution? by hankwang · · Score: 1
      According to Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lasik">3 to 6% of the Lasik patients still have complications after 6 months... You seem to be the one out of twenty with bad luck.

      (I personally would not take a 1:20 chance to spoil my eyesight, however myopic I am.)

    17. Re:Best solution? by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Informative

      I get tons of little "floaty" things which mess with vision.

      Do you mean floaters? Those aren't caused by laser surgery, as they are in the back portion of the eye. Everyone has them and has had them from birth, they are formed naturally during the development of the eye. Most likely you only now started noticing them because your surgery has caused you to pay more attention to all aspects of vision.

      I have particularly annoying floaters, one is large enough to seriously interfere with my vision in one eye when it goes past, which made me give up driving. Unfortunately, there's no real cure short of draining the vitreus and replacing it with saline solution, a procedure done only in cases where blindness looms.

    18. Re:Best solution? by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those of you that aren't following, your olfactory senses are connected via the sinuses to your tear ducts (that produce mucous lube for your eyes), and they are related to taste.

      Not only that, but you can taste the drop fluid as it comes into your sinuses. Yum.

      Controversely, you can also blow air bubbles out of your tear ducts. Next time you're underwater, close your nose (and mouth) and blow really hard. You'll become airheaded underwater, and you may feel tiny air bubbles coming up. Wee.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    19. Re:Best solution? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I wear glasses for nearsightedness, astigmatism, and inward prism. My optometrist told me last year that I can take care of the first two with laser surgery, but the prism is likely going to have me wearing glasses for the rest of my life. Have you heard of anything that can deal with prism? I realize it's not directly related to the vision clarity, but glasses are annoying.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    20. Re:Best solution? by Kevon · · Score: 1

      I know your feeling... I sprung for it in September 2004, and probably not a day has gone by that I haven't noticed it or thought about my vision at some point since then.

      After I got the surgery, both eyes ended up less than 20/20, one was about 20/30 and one was about 20/80. Walking around in big open stores like Target or Walmart was difficult because of the lighting, I couldn't tell who people were 20 feet away. I ended up having a retreatment on my left eye and it helped a lot, they said I could read 20/15 now, but I know that's not possible all of the time, and even then, it's not a sharp, clear 20/15, more like I can tell what the letters are.

      Nightvision is not what it was, but not bad enough to keep me from driving. Actually, it helps me if there's traffic coming the other way, seems more light makes things sharper.

      Opening my eyes the first time after sleeping in the Winter is a painful experience because they dry out. A humidifier helps some, and I don't have big problems with dry eyes otherwise.

      I still have times when my vision fluctuates noticably, but again, it's not terrible, just kind of annoying sometimes. There's nothing that I really can't do now that I did before.

      The worst part to me is not being able to see the night sky clearly anymore. Most of the stars are fuzzy and the moon is a big, semi-triple image mess. I miss that most.

      I bought into it because everyone I know said it was the best thing they ever did and they wished they did it earlier. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone based on my experience.

    21. Re:Best solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dry eyes is a pretty common post-op complaint with LASIK, though. If someone's prone to dry-eye problems with contacts, that *may* be a contraindication for surgery that, by its nature, causes irreversable corneal-nerve damage.

      It wasn't a problem in my case, but only the poster's eye doctor can make that call for him/her. LASIK is certainly a great thing, but it's not the happy-fun consequence-free experience that many people think it is.

    22. Re:Best solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just that but the laser can actually make an angled cut so that the flap closes and heals for easily than can be done with a blade.

    23. Re:Best solution? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just thought it was a great excuse to use a Fargo quote :)

      But I go one step closer and don't want anything messing with my eye, even a laser, much like Scwartzenegger's friend in Total Recall: "Don't fuck with your eyes, pal -- it 'aint worth it!"

    24. Re:Best solution? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      While I don't get floaters, I get the occasional tear film debris, also mentioned in the wiki. I don't know if my near-sightedness has anything to do with, but I can actually focus on them. It's kinda cool seeing a hydra float by every now and then. I've also seen some smaller bacteria in the "string of pearls" configuration.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    25. Re:Best solution? by aquabat · · Score: 1

      That site is a joke, right?

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    26. Re:Best solution? by aquabat · · Score: 2, Informative
      One might want to consider PRK as an alternative to LASIK.

      LASIK creates a flap. This severs the nerves, which means your eyeballs can't tell your tear ducts to cry. Also the flap only rebonds on the edges, and not underneath, so the flap can be dislodged or wrinkled quite easily. This is a disadvantage for people who participate in contact or water sports, where the eye gets a pounding. The advantage of LASIK is that the recovery time is very short (couple of days) and relatively painless. This made it LASIK fashionable with film actors and high profile athletes for a while.

      PRK removes the outer layer of eyeball skin before reshaping the cornea. The removed layer is very thin, compared to the lasik flap. The skin grows back, and there is no nerve damage. The integrity of the eye is much better, because the new skin is bonded completely to the eye. The disadvantage of PRK is that the healing time is longer (several weeks) and it can be very painful for the first few days, while the skin is regenerating. Of course, pain means the nerves are working properly, which is a good sign. Also, they will give you drugs and eyedrops (and eyedrops with drugs), to make you more comfortable.

      Many doctors are now leaning back towards the older PRK procedure for these reasons.

      FWIW, I'm having a PRK procedure done tomorrow afternoon (and I really wish I could have a beer right now).

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    27. Re:Best solution? by johnnnyboy · · Score: 1

      Thank you for posting. I thought I was the only one that had complications. I'm so sick of hearing people say,,, well my friend did it, my cousin that.. This talk never helps make me feel better but just depresses me further.
      For me It has been a real nightmare! I've had Lasik done way back in jan 2004 and my vision has now regressed to about 50% of the myopia I've had before. My eyes get irritated and very dry quickly. Some days are better than others.

      I did see well for about 4 months after which it began to regress. I later did a correction but to no avail. My vision began to regress again. Believe it or not my night vision is so bad that I'm terrified to drive and it hasn't gotten better over time.

      Now today, after I swore never to operate on my eyes again, I may have no choice now as to my new eye doctor mentioned that I may have cornea damage and rinkling is developing on the surface of my eyes.
      At the moment my doctor is waiting to see if my eye sight stabilizes and only then I'll be going over to Quebec city where there's a specialist who only specializes in corrective surgery!

      Please don't do Lasik... it's just not worth it.

      --
      "If a show of teeth is not enough, bite ... but bite hard!"
    28. Re:Best solution? by fiber_halo · · Score: 1

      OMG.. I'm still laughing so hard I'm crying! That's the best...
      I just ran out of mod points today, otherwise you'd get one..

    29. Re:Best solution? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Silly Eyeball Tricks: using your own lenses as a bio-microscope!

      If I'm gazing into space, I can see my floaters; one is a fairly long Y-shaped string, anchored well enough that it's been in the same spot since I first noticed it at age 4. When the light is just right, I can even see individual cells in the string, nucleus and all.

      Over the years (I'm now 50) this long floater has deteriorated from clearly-visible, completely intact individual cells, down to really obvious cellular junk. Most of its cells have lost their nucleus, and many have ruptured and are now just a deflated piece of cell wall. It's not nearly as interesting to watch (and play with making it "swim" back and forth :) as it used to be!

      (Why, yes, I am easily amused; why do you ask? :)

      Side note: when the light is *exactly* right, I can see my own retina (or tapetum to be precise), apparently as a reflected image against the backside of the lens (IOW, as if my lens was a mirror so the retina can "look at itself").

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    30. Re:Best solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you looked into Phakic IOL lenses? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraocular_lens) My eyesight is too bad for LASIK to correct, I've seriously been considering getting a set of these implanted... You have to be very careful about the surgeon you choose for the procedure since it's more invasive than LASIK, but I've been hearing some very good things about them, and the biggest advantage is that the procedure is fully reversible, so if the lenses don't work out or there's trouble down the road they can be removed quite easily.

    31. Re:Best solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My doctor (who had the surgery himself, and hence had used the drops, too) told me to press a finger at the corner of my eye against my nose right after I put the drops in and hold it there for a minute or to. This blocks the duct long enough for the eye to absorb most of the drop so less runs down the duct. Simple fix & works reasonably well. Won't completely stop you from tasting it, but definietly helps.

    32. Re:Best solution? by subtropolis · · Score: 1
      when the light is *exactly* right, I can see my own retina (or tapetum to be precise), apparently as a reflected image against the backside of the lens (IOW, as if my lens was a mirror so the retina can "look at itself").

      Coolio! Can you explain that a bit further? That sounds really neat!

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    33. Re:Best solution? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I assume you know how the eye is constructed? there's about an inch of gap between retina at the back of the eye (the part you actually see with) and the lens (the focusing mechanism). When light hits the retina from just the right angle, it apparently reflects off the back of the lens, and then the retina picks up the reflection just like it would from any mirror surface.

      I've examined enough dogs' eyes (to check breeding stock against inherited blindness) to know what I'm seeing :) The tapetum is the reflective part of the retina that surrounds the optic disk (a mushroom-coloured spot where the optic nerve enters the eye -- the retina is essentially a little piece of your brain that hangs out the front of your skull :) Blood vessels enter the retina at that point too, and branch in all directions; the pattern is unique to each eye.

      Anyway, when conditions are just right, I could see all these details, and even tell one eye from the other (different blood vessel pattern).

      I *think* there needs to be a fairly strong but not glarey light source hitting the eye at an oblique angle, but I haven't been able to reliably reproduce it, so can't tell you for sure.

      Floaters are much easier to see, as all I need to do is relax/unfocus my eyes against a light-coloured background, and there they are.

      Another side note: people who've had whiplash or a similar demonstration of the laws of physics sometimes experience an upsurge in the number of floaters (even to the point of clouding vision), as all the gunk that's settled permanently at the bottom of the eye gets stirred up. It can take months to resettle.

      Back to retinas and dogs: I've found that if I shine a flashlight toward my OWN eye, but at an angle where I don't see the bright point of the lightbulb, and peer into the dog's eye from as close as I can get, I can get a good view of the dog's retina -- sufficient to see fine detail. A Rube-Goldberg version of a biomicroscope. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    34. Re:Best solution? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Those don't deal with prism at all, though. Prism has to do with the eyes not aligning properly. You can have perfect vision and yet have a prism effect strong enough to require glasses. They force the eyes to align properly by having the center of focus be off-axis. I have an inward-facing prism, which means that my eyes need to be pulled outward; my optometrist has said that there's really not much of a solution out there for this. If I had the reverse situation there are exercises that can be done to pull the eyes inward (focusing on an object pulled towards the nose, for example).

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    35. Re:Best solution? by Maximilio · · Score: 1

      Whoa. I've been repeatedly told that because my vision is -9 in my right eye (my prescription looks about like yours did) I am not eligible. How long ago did you have that done?

    36. Re:Best solution? by AgentPaper · · Score: 1
      Back to retinas and dogs: I've found that if I shine a flashlight toward my OWN eye, but at an angle where I don't see the bright point of the lightbulb, and peer into the dog's eye from as close as I can get, I can get a good view of the dog's retina -- sufficient to see fine detail. A Rube-Goldberg version of a biomicroscope. :)

      Which is pretty much the way an indirect ophthalmoscope works, except with an indirect, you also use a 20D aspheric lens. That system gives you a much wider field of view than your naked eye or the traditional handheld direct ophthalmoscope. Of course, an indirect costs a bundle and you're only apt to find one in a hospital or an ophthalmologist's office, but still. :)

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    37. Re:Best solution? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yep, in fact I used to tease my old vet ophthalmologist about how much cheaper mine was, not to mention more portable :)

      That is the drawback, tho -- with the eyeball method, you have to squirm and crane your neck to get a view much beyond the tapetum. With the 'scope, you just wave the secondary lens around.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Get some trial pairs by SatanMat · · Score: 1

    I've had glasses and contacts, and I wear contacts because I never have to deal with losing my glasses, or having them drop into the box I'm working on etc...

    You are going to have try some pairs to see if any of them are comfortable TO YOU.

    Ask your doc to let you try different ones until you find a kind that works for you.

    You may find that the answer is NONE OF THE ABOVE.

    good luck though.

    1. Re:Get some trial pairs by arivanov · · Score: 1

      If you work only with computers lenses are probably a better idea.

      If you also work with chemicals or anything that can splash into your eye (even trivial cleaner fluid) never ever even think of a contact lens. Once you get something nasty in your eye the body will refuse to keep it open for you to take the lens out. Washing, eye rinse, etc will not help because whatever got in your eye will get under the lens. Best case - eye damage. Worst case loss of an eye.

      I saw this only once and I still cannot forget the person's screams more than 15 years on. As a result I wear glasses and will recommend glasses to any geek that sometimes has to deal with mechanical tools or chemicals and not just computers.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Get some trial pairs by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 1

      Also, certain solvents (Diethyl Ether is one) can melt contact lenses and fuse them to your eyeball. This is just from the fumes, not direct contact. I used to work in a university chemistry department. This happened almost once a year. All students are warned about it, but they never believe it until they are at the hospital having a doctor scrape the lens off of their eye.

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
  8. Daily disposables are great by GreatDrok · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been wearing contact lenses for over 20 years now and have gone through gas permeable hard lenses, soft monthly lenses and most recently daily disposables. The dailies are great, I wear them from 7 in the morning until at least 10 pm and I work with computers all day long. Dailies are good because they are so thin but this does make them a bit fragile. However, if you are careful with them they can also be worn for a week per pair (I just use the normal soft lens peroxide cleaning systems that are available over the counter) and if a pair of lenses are getting a bit scappy I chuck them and open a fresh set. The companies that make these lenses would rather you wear the dailies, um, well, daily, but they are made from exactly the same materials as weeklies but I find the dailies much more comfortable because they are so thin. However, the dailies work out pretty expensive unless you clean and reuse them in which case they are very cost effective as well as the most comfortable lenses you can buy.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:Daily disposables are great by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      I'll have to agree - I've recently started using daily contact lenses and my experience has been excellent. I used to use monthly lenses, but found that after the first few days of use, they'd get quite dry and uncomfortable. Like the story poster, I went back to glasses for a while, but tried dailies in the last few months. They're much easier on the eyes, and there's no messing about with solutions or storage.

      They are more expensive though - three months of lenses (six boxes of thirty) just cost me about $180 here in Canada. I think it's worth it, though.

    2. Re:Daily disposables are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried contacts in the past and found I could not tolerate them, but again I have myopia so I have no problem with working with the computer or reading. I found, however, that drinking a bottle of wine before work made my day much more interesting and didn't require the use of glasses. If you keep drinking you never get hangover anyway. I've been doing this for 5 years and it rocks.

  9. Get a LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if you're using CRT, but LCDs are worlds easier on the eyes.

  10. Drops help a lot by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

    I used contacts for quite a while before I just got tired of the hassle. One thing that helped a lot with the "dry eye" during long days at the office was eye drops. Just be sure to use the kind made for contacts! Regular eye drops actually increase irritation when used with contacts.

    --
    Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
  11. Oh, the relief by toleraen · · Score: 1

    I had a similar issue with my contacts drying out, so I switched to less reflective glasses. It helped out a bit with the eye strain...but I found that the most relieving thing for eye strain was to take off the glasses (making everything extremely fuzzy...gogo 2000/20 vision), stand up, and stare down to the end of the cube farm. "Focusing" on something very far away every once in a while (every 2 hours or so) helped out tons.

    And then my dumbass went and got Lasik. When you use the same method of relief for 10 years or so, getting used to not being able to make things all fuzzy takes a long, long time to get used to. Ugh.

  12. The problem may not be the lenses.... by Carik · · Score: 1

    ... the problem may be your doctor. I'd tried getting contacts twice, with no luck. After I moved, I decided to try once more, and my new eye-doctor went with a different lens, which works fine. I tend to wear 'em from around eight in the morning until midnight most days, without any real problems.

  13. Staring at screens and contact lenses don't mix by BigJim.fr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Staring at a screen reduces the blinking frequency. When blinking less often, the eyes dry faster. The lack of moisture is even worse when contact lenses are worn. Dry eyes irritate faster. Contact lenses accelerate the irritation and make it worse. And if you start rubbing your eyes on top of all that, then you are really in for some reaally nice inflammation... Do yourself a favor : don't go that way and keep wearing glasses.

    I still use throwaway contacts, but only for outdoor activities of when I just want to go out with no glasses. I spend most of my waking hours in front of screens and then glasses are the best tool : they correct well, they are easy on the eyes and their field of view is bigger that the screens anyway.

    Now let the Lasik flamewar begin.

    1. Re:Staring at screens and contact lenses don't mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in a machine shop (I know actual manufacturing in the USA). So I am required to wear safety glasses anyways. I have also had enough projectiles bounce off my glasses during recreational activities that I will stick with glasses long term.

    2. Re:Staring at screens and contact lenses don't mix by Zackbass · · Score: 1
      I work in a machine shop (I know actual manufacturing in the USA). So I am required to wear safety glasses anyways. I have also had enough projectiles bounce off my glasses during recreational activities that I will stick with glasses long term.


      When working in machine shops and the like I prefer to wear my contacts because it allows me to to both wear a larger selections of protective wear more easily (hefty safety glasses, welding helmets, face shields etc) but also not worry about damaging expensive prescription safety glasses that are supposed to get ruined anyway. I can't imaginge having to baby a pair of prescription glasses in a shop environment.
      --
      You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
    3. Re:Staring at screens and contact lenses don't mix by toad3k · · Score: 1

      I have been wearing monthlies for 4 years now, only I end up wearing each monthly for more like 8 months, and only change them when I lose them, or they start looking worn out.

      Do yourself a favor : don't go that way and keep wearing glasses.

      Some people are just going to have more problems than others. I have one eye that has zero problems with contacts. I could probably wear it 24 hours a day in that eye and not be bothered. On the other hand, today I went without my left contact because for the last few days it has been red and irritated. Your results will vary.

      Overall, for me, it is many times better than with glasses. It is cheap and easy to try out, and everyone should spend the 2 hours and 50 bucks required to find out whether it will work for them or not.

      Although I've been contemplating lasik lately. I can't yet reconcile the failure rate which, based on who I've talked to, it seems like about 15-20% of people end up worse off than they started.

  14. The best lenses out by boingyzain · · Score: 0

    Acuvue Advance with HydraClear. Its all you need.

    1. Re:The best lenses out by skweegee · · Score: 1

      Having worn contacts for almost 15 years now I completely agree with the above statement. The HydraClear are by far the best out there. I would recommend using Clear Care cleaning solution as it makes handling thinner lenses like the HydraClear much easier. Instead of conventional storage and cleaning the contacts are placed into a carrier and dropped into the solution. This allows you to easily remove the thin lenses from the case. Just my .02

  15. How's your night vision? by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Rainbow/Haloing... that sort of thing?

    1. Re:How's your night vision? by br4dh4x0r · · Score: 1

      Usually not. The only time I get any is when my eyes are dry, it's night and there's a really bright light (street lamps and headlights usually don't produce any... but high beams do).

      Other than that, no problems at all.

    2. Re:How's your night vision? by NoStrings · · Score: 1

      The way I understand it, the problems with night vision post-lasik are related to the surgeon not correcting a large enough area on the eye. As the pupil enlarges, it expands into the uncorrected area, causing the halo effect. Do some research on your surgeon before you allow him to touch your eyes. It might mean a nice paycheque for him, but I guarantee that your eyes are worth more to you than him (or her).

      That being said, I'm about 1 year post-op, and it's great. The hardest part for me was breaking the old habit of adjusting my glasses constantly. It took about a month to change that. There was lots of reaching for the glasses and changing the motion to fixing my hair and then looking around to see if anyone saw me acting weird. The vision has been great! I don't find that my eyes get particularly dry or irritated unless I'm really tired or have been working on the computer for more than 8 hours or so.

    3. Re:How's your night vision? by stvangel · · Score: 1

      I had it done 5 years ago. Paid $3200, insurance covered about $50. I would do it again in a heartbeat.

      I had complications the first night ( the flaps shifted ) and had to have them redone the next day, but even with that things were better than contacts within a week. I had starring / halo issues at night for about six months but those gradually faded.

      I'm 20/15. Best $3200 I've ever spent.

    4. Re:How's your night vision? by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      hell, i get that without Lasik.. a headlight stretches up and down almost all the way to my fields of vision.

  16. Absolutely by DingerX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CRTs historically give you better color fidelity, but the brightness of LCDs means less eyestrain. Having worn RGPs for years, and switched between CRTs and LCDs, I can tell you that I can wear contacts with LCDs, but not CRTs.

    and get some sleep already.

    1. Re:Absolutely by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Your problems with contacts and CRTs may be due to a different problem than you realize. Ever notice how much dust is attracted to the CRT glass screen? CRTs are highly charged, and the cases usually carry a static electricity charge. This charge is highest on the CRT case but spreads out across your desk, keyboard, etc and even on to your hands, arms and body. The field attracts dust towards the CRT, and your work surface, even YOU as you touch the charged objects on your desk. You're working in a staticky environment, so the dust is attracted to your equipment, and YOU. Some of the dust goes straight into your eyes, some you rub in off your hands, etc.
      LCDs don't tend to have such static fields around them they're not based on such high voltage circuitry. So you get less dust and irritants in your environment and in your eyes.
      I'd always heard this, but the evidence really was blatant when I swapped out my old 22inch Sony Trinitron monitor for a nice new 30" Cinema Display. My desktop behind and around the CRT always needed constant cleaning and dusting, but the new LCD doesn't attract dust at all.

  17. Keep drops near the computer by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

    I alternate between contacts (disposable torics) and glasses. I have MUCH less eye strain with contacts, but the drying out becomes a problem. I've come to the point to where I have started carrying a small bottle of ReNu with me. That seems to work just fine -- for me.

    --Xan

    --
    "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
    1. Re:Keep drops near the computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you probably shouldn't use ReNu - it's been shown that the stuff causes serious eye damage.

  18. Contacts I Wear by Swisssushi · · Score: 1

    Hi, I went to my optomitrist with a similar question. He recommended the new Accuvues. They are MUCH more hydrated than the old ones and he assured me that I would notice the difference. He was right. I spend about 10 hours a day staring into a screen and I have rather dry eyes anyway. With the new Accuvues, I have significantly fewer problems than I did with the older Accuvues. I have been known to wear these new ones 16 hour at a stretch without experiencing problems. I do not ever sleep in them, although you're supposed to be able to. My eyes don't handle that well. Also, you really have to be good about retiring the lenses at the appropriate intervals. The older they get, the less comfy they are. By the time they're reaching the end of the recommended wear duration, you're ready to let those babies go. By all means, get a pair of these as a trial and give em a whirl. They may be just right for you.

    --
    Swisssushi - When the going gets tough, get some tenderizer
  19. Works well for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using 1-day Acuvue for several year now. Allmost no problem even during long programming or gaming sessions. Some time ago they have gotten even better and I have as good as not troubles with them now. I even had trouble remembering to remove them in the evening because I just did not feel them at all.

    As always YMMV. Contact lenses have gotten better, but they are still not magic. But I think it might be worth to try again.

  20. The secret is the cleaner you use by urikkiru · · Score: 1

    So I'm a programmer, and also end up staring at the screen for long periods of time. I usually wear contacts when I feel like it, and have discovered how to keep the comfort levels up for longer periods of time. Firstly, using some of the newer lenses(acuvue, with hydraclear, etc) does help. What helps the most though, is not using the 'multipurpose all in one' cleaners to keep my lenses in good condition. I found that they just didn't work very well, and would give me eye irritation/problems after a while. Mostly, just because they were not actually cleaning the contact lenses to any level of satisfaction.

    What does seem to work, is peroxide based cleaners. Some of these are AMO Ultracare, and Ciba's AOSept apparently. I've been using Ultracare, and like it a lot. Sadly, some of Ciba's products had a serious contamination problem at their factory, and were pulled from the shelves. This in turn has apparently caused a shortage of Ultracare, which I use. Haven't been able to find any peroxide based contact lens cleaner, online or offline, for about 2 months almost? So I'm back to glasses again :( Hopefully supply problems will be resolved, and I'll be able to comfortably wear my contacts again.

    Just my 2 coppers.

  21. Try fish or flaxseed oil supplements by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

    My wife used to have contact lens problems caused by dry eyes until she started taking fish oil supplements. Flaxseed oil is supposed to be good too. Try a health food store, or you can order online.

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
  22. Computer lenses? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    This is only not really off-topic depending on how you read the title of story question...but does anybody know of any advances made in getting a computer screen displayed ON the actual contact lens ala Star Trek? I would love more than anything to have a contact that could display data on it, especially video. Of course it would probably be so thick that I couldn't shut my eye because it would protrude past my eyelids.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  23. Eyeball Experiences by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I was very badly nearsighted from the age of 10. When I first discovered contacts I started wearing them from the time I woke up in the morning until I went to bed. Eventually an optometrist told me that my eyes weren't getting enough oxygen (Despite my lenses supposedly being rated for sleeping in and stuff) and that if I didn't cut down on my usage I was risking my eyesight. I went back to glasses and found that with super high index (glass) lenses and small enough frames they were comfortable enough to wear. Pricey, but tolerable. I took to wearing daily disposable contact lenses a couple days out of the week and glasses the rest of the time. The daily disposable lenses were always very comfortable and didn't cost a lot more than regular contacts if you replaced them as often as you were supposed to.

    I finally ended up getting pissed off with the whole situation and having custom lasik done. As expensive as my lenses were it'll pay for itself in 5 years, my eyes are always a lot more comfortable than they were on the days I was wearing contacts and I've got better than perfect vision in one eye now. Works for me.

    I never really noticed eye strain before or after the surgery. I guess I stop and look around enough during the day that I guess it never becomes an issue. I'm not sure if taking breaks to try to avoid RSI might help as far as that goes. I do try to do that, although these days it's as likely to be due to a minion interrupting me as because I'm trying to stop and rest the hands.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  24. Take a break. by twitter · · Score: 3, Informative
    What contacts does community recommend for long periods at the computer?"

    Even people with "perfect" vision have problems with computer screens. The recommended solution is to take breaks and look at something far away every hour or more. Your eyes need exercise just like everything else.

    "Why do my eyes hurt?"
    "Because you have never used them."

    Good luck in your quest for contact lenses. I'm lucky enough to only need mild corrective glasses at night.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Take a break. by period3 · · Score: 1
      Good luck in your quest for contact lenses. I'm lucky enough to only need mild corrective glasses at night.


      You mean like night vision goggles?
  25. Best Solution: Beer Goggles by wondafucka · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  26. damn! by dsands1 · · Score: 1

    I saw the title of this thread and I was hoping for some new, super-duper way to display images in 3D via ultra-hightech, nano-enabled, smart-technology, other-buzzword, contact lenses. But just extra hydration.. meh.

    --
    "What is the answer?" (Silence) "In that case, what is the question?" --Gertrude Stein
  27. Boston Fives by zullnero · · Score: 1

    I found that the more highly permeable lenses made my eyes dry out much more quickly than the lesser permeable lenses. (Duh...) I used to get seriously bad redeye with the Boston Sevens. I still get some dryness, but it's not nearly as bad as it used to be.

    Anyway, switching to Boston Fives is kind of a lite fix that shouldn't require too many visits to the optometrist and too much extra hit on the pocketbook. If you or anyone else has Boston Sevens right now, anyway.

  28. Just how wierd was it? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Congratulations on your great results.

    I'm very tempted to get the procedure, but I'm procrastinating because the whole "fold back a flap of your cornea" business kind of freaks me out. So, let me ask, how bad is it to sit there while a surgeon is operating on your eyes?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Just how wierd was it? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      I'm another Lasik poster child. Make sure the guys give you a happy pill before you agree to let them operate on you. The guys who did mine gave me some valium before they got going and I was pretty detached through the whole thing. You still know what's going on but somehow you just don't care as much as you normally would. I'd have freaked out at least 3 times during the procedure if they hadn't provided a happy pill.

      I'd suggest shelling out the extra cash for the custom job, doing some research on the net first so that you know that they know what they're doing based on what they test you for, and search around for someone near you with a decent eyeball-tracking laser. I suspect that this could make the difference between having a good experience with Lasik and a horrible one. Most places will offer free evaluation so you can have that done and decide later if you want to go through with it. I had a hard time beliving I was going through with it the whole time I was having it done but I'd do it again in a heartbeat now.

      I had slightly foggy vision for about a month and a half after the surgery and halos around lights at night for about 4-5 months. Now I have awesome vision at both day and night, no halos, no rainbows, nothing but vision so sharp you could cut yourself with it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Just how wierd was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second the other comment. Take your valium like a good patient, spring for the extra cash to get the customized, eye-tracking, Interlase job and know your doctor's credentials. The combination of doctor & equipment in this case is NOT trivial.

      My doctor had waveform pictures of my eyes taken a week before the surgery(about 3 that day), then again the morning of (just one to verify that time). I teased them about 'measure twice, cut once', but it was nice to know they were so careful.

      It's only been about a month, but I was at 20/15 in one eye (almost 20/10) and 20/25 in the other at my one-week visit (from 20/450 and 20/650). Six-week visit in 2 weeks.

      One other tip - admire the science of the procedure AFTER you've had it done. Try not to think too much about it beforehand - you'll be much calmer that way :-) All in all, though, I've had much worse dentist's visits than the surgery was.

  29. I used to wear one... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I used to wear only one contact lens. I found that when I wore two, one would always get irritated (it would vary sproadically). For some reason, it didn't bother me much. It's tricky getting used to at first; but your brain adjusts instantly to which eye sees best (auto focus?). I'm near-sighted, so when I was at the computer my eye _without_ the contact lens would take focus (or my brain would shift to it for input). As soon as I would look away, my brain would automatically switch to the contact lensed eye.

    Suprisingly, you don't [appear to] lose depth perception (no pun intended) because your brain is still processing both eyes.

    The other added benefit was that my contacts would last twice as long. I had weekly disposables (or they might have been dailys that I would wear for 2 weeks at a time).

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:I used to wear one... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Interesting trick -- I'm thinking about contacts -- I'm only a little nearsighted, but as my eyes age they've become much more glare-sensitive, and prescription lenses of sufficient darkness are between absurdly expensive and not available at any price.

      But my problem is that when my eyes are both corrected for distance vision, I can't read. And I'm a left-eyed reader (that is my more myopic eye, too), but right-eyed for everything else.

      So your odd suggestion might be just what I need to try! Thanks for the idea (you'd think it would be obvious, but apparently not!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  30. forget corrective lenses altogether by BHS_Turf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remove your lenses/glasses and press until you can read this post. It is not like you do any work anyway.

  31. Proclear by code+addict · · Score: 1

    I use Proclear lenses and work on the computer 10+ hrs a day. I wear my contacts around 18 hrs a day and only have occasional problems with dry eyes. Keep in mind that lots of people's natural eye dryness levels vary and some people would have problems with dry eyes even without contacts.

    I've heard a lot of people mention lasik on here, and I enquired about it with my optometrist about it but he said that my eyes weren't "bad enough" to make it worth it. I have a -1.25 contact prescription, and apparently that level is "within the target range" of the laser eye surgery, so I might not even benefit from the surgery. That means that I still need either contacts or glasses to see clearly, but lasik isn't an option because I don't see poorly enough. I don't know what your prescription level is like, but this might apply.

    1. Re:Proclear by ntshma · · Score: 0

      Add me to the Proclear users. I used to use Acuvue and by 8pm I couldn't stand them. I typically wear my proclears for about 18 hours a day and have no trouble with them.

  32. Contact lenses huh? by M4N14C · · Score: 0

    If you really want contacts that will be easy on your eyes get CibaVision Night and Days. They're extended wear so if you like to party you can wake up 3 states away with no discomfort. I personally have allergies and that doesen't cause any trouble at all. http://www.us.cibavision.com/lenses/night_and_day. shtml

  33. What's Wrong With Glasses? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What exactly is wrong with glasses?

    Bear with me for a minute. We're not in the fifties anymore. Glasses aren't 5cm bottlecaps anymore. Glasses are now light, flexible, sturdy, efficient and a danm sight cheaper than any contact lens on the market.

    Is there really still such a problem with wearing glasses in this day and age? Grown geeks will walk around in public with thinkgeek apparell, pdas, glowsticks, sweatpants and gameboys. But not glasses because.... why?

    Is it really the contacts you need?

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You beat me to the punch with your post. A serious question, beyond vanity (and be honest now), what advantages do contacts offer over glasses?

    2. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I'm wearing glasses right now, and the only *real* problem(excepting breakage) with them is that they can fall off when your head is at a certain angle(they can sometimes be hard to see when they fall off, but contacts are obviously worse). That and sunglasses, but those aren't a problem when you have clip-on or magnet-on sunglasses, or those special lenses that get darker.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by aquabat · · Score: 1

      Well, glasses are fine for looking at a screen, but they suck for those full contact staff meetings, where you have to aggressively push your agenda, or defend a technical design decision from the PHBs and marketing people. There's nothing worse than getting a headbutt on the bridge of a $500 pair of Armani frames.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    4. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by coyotecult · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Allergies force me to use glasses instead of contacts, and I really miss them.

      Some of the advantages contact lenses have over glasses include:

      1. When I'm out biking in the rain, I can still see. Raindrops quickly collect on my glasses and make it kind of difficult, if not downright dangerous, to see where I'm going.
      2. I gain better peripheral vision. I have almost nil with glasses.
      3. I'm not worried about breaking them; they don't snag on things.
      4. I can see while I'm kissing without taking them off. Wire frames do tend to get in the way.

    5. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      In my case, because my eyes are VERY sensitive to bright light, and I can find neither flip-downs nor prescription lenses of sufficient darkness, plus the lenses would have to be quite large to cover the required area -- AND they have to be glass, because I can SEE plastic lenses (even the best ones *always* look slightly fogged to me), and that drives me nuts.

      With age my eyes have become more glare-sensitive, to the point where I'm thinking about contacts -- because the only practical solution to the glare problem is contacts plus regular sunglasses (noncorrective glass can be much thinner/lighter than corrective glass).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by Jac_no_k · · Score: 1

      For me I could always see the frames or edges of the lens. Maybe I'm just sensitive perihiperal vision. I've tried all kinds of frames and not very many work well. The frames from Oakley are good for me, but they are not compatible with my perscription.

    7. Re:What's Wrong With Glasses? by jpkunst · · Score: 1
      But not glasses because.... why?

      Vanity.

      I wear contact lenses almost all the time, glasses only very occasionally. I regularly get smiles/glances etc. from unknown females when wearing contacts, never when wearing glasses. So I prefer the contacts.

      JP

  34. Check the HVAC by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I worked in an office that had fundamentally flawed ventilation systems. Specifically, there was no humidification system, so during winter the air would become so dry that it was literally dryer than a desert--so dry that the indoor air quality failed to meet OSHA standards.

    People had eye problems, sinus problems, headaches, all kinds of illness as a result.

    I found this out because I got a cheap humidistat and measured the indoor air quality myself.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  35. LCD vs CRT by mulicheng · · Score: 0

    I wear Gas permiable lenses. For me, my eyes would get really tired and dry every day. Switching to a flat panel monitor has made a world of difference for me. If I'm on the computer for 12+ hours, I'll still get tired eyes, but the difference is quite improved on a day to day basis.

  36. Re: LCD by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    I second the idea that LCDs are much better than CRTs for prolonged computer work. I've never had eye strain problems with LCDs. I don't wear contacts though.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  37. How to lie with statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "According to the American Optometric Association, 70-75% of computer workers experience eye and vision problems." ...so? Without something to compare it to, that's a meaningless number.

    For example, are they counting people needing corrective lenses? The first number I could find was that 82% of people 18 and over use corrective lenses. Compared to that, 70-75% is actually low.

  38. Not To Mention... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Never EVER peel peppers without latex gloves and then take your contacts out several hours later. That's the kind of mistake you only make once (Ditto for anything involving peppermint or cinnamon oil...)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Not To Mention... by belroth · · Score: 1

      That also goes for eating a kebab with chilli sauce.
      But that is the sort of mistake you make more than once - normally on the way back from the pub...

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    2. Re:Not To Mention... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same with grapefruit and onions. And probably lemons and oranges too.

      Trick to avoid Onion Tears: put some protectant lube (I use Refresh PM) in your eyes FIRST.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Not To Mention... by Bake · · Score: 1

      Another popular contact lense mistake that may occur on the way back from the pub.

      Attempting to remove a non-existing contact lense.

  39. Easy - Don't Use Anything! by algae · · Score: 0, Troll

    I get around the whole problem by having 20:20 vision. It works great; I can use a computer for 8-12 hours a day, read books, see things both close up and a long way off without having any of the hassle of glasses or pain and annoyance of contacts.

    I highly recommend it.

    --
    Causation can cause correlation
  40. Don't cut corners with contacts by keshet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After 10 years of using contacts I contracted a severe corneal ulcer (see the gruesome pics on google) 1.5 months ago in my left eye. 8 days in hospital, I still cannot really see out of that eye and the doctor says that there is no way to know how much it will recover.

    My mistakes?
    - Using disposable contacts for longer than their design (GreatDrok you have been warned)
    - Falling asleep in them
    - Putting up with contacts which irritated my eyes because I'd already paid for them
    - Not getting straight to an eye doctor when a mild infection suddenly got worse (it was on a weekend - I saw an incompetent GP who didn't think it was serious)

    My best experience with contacts was when:
    - I found a really good optometrist who took the time to find a type that really suited me
    - I used straightforward saline IV solution for storing and rinsing
    - I started the day with a physical workout (gets the juices flowing)
    I could spend 10+ hours day in front of the computer and not be aware of the lenses in my eyes.

    So, yes, I have gotten stupider over time. I actually had an appointment for LASIK 2 months before this happened but chickened out. Stoopid.

  41. I'm in the opposite situation by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After staring at computer screens for about 25 years now (since I was 15 and had a TRS-80! har), I went from perfect vision to being somewhat nearsighted - my point-of-focus moved from wherever it was to where my computer screen sat.

    I recently got contacts for the first time, for other reasons - but the only times I wear them is when I'm *not* working. My eyes are pretty much perfectly adjusted for staring at computer screens now, and nothing else. :P

    Anyhow, I've got the Acuvue lenses from Johnson & Johnson, and so far, so good.

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    1. Re:I'm in the opposite situation by DarkNova · · Score: 1

      You may want to go to your eye doctor and have them give you a cycloplegic exam, where they give you drops that force your ocular muscle to relax. I recently started wearing reading glasses OVER my contacts and found that my actual far point is quite a bit different than what my prescription is for due to "pseudo-myopia" caused by spending too much time focusing up close (due to computer work). My ocular muscle never fully relaxes, even during a normal eye exam. By wearing reading glasses I'm teaching the muscle to relax again and improving my vision.

  42. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People will go on and on about the risks of LASIK, and then cheerfully spend ten years inserting and removing pieces of poorly-disinfected plastic from their eyes. (Straight saline for storage?!?) The moral is, neither LASIK nor contacts are really risk-free.

  43. Don't be so goddam vain by ynohoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One major advantage glasses have over contacts is that you can take the damn things off and give your eyes a rest!

    1. Re:Don't be so goddam vain by poppen_fresh · · Score: 1

      With contacts, you can be like everyone without eye problems: you can close your eyes to give them a rest!

  44. Rewetting drops by VGfort · · Score: 1

    Get some rewetting drops. What makes me mad is that its just saline in a small portable, "easy to squeeze 1 drop out a time" bottle, yet it costs more for those 10mL than it does for 4 full big bottles of saline.

    1. Re:Rewetting drops by pinqkandi · · Score: 1

      Check out places like Costco. I use Refresh rewetting drops, which come in large eye drop bottle (cumbersome to keep in your pocket, though would be fine in a purse), or a small bottle (fits nicely in pocket).

      Anyways, I started buying large packs of the large bottles at Costco for a huge discount (probably 50-60% cheaper than a pharmacy). I use them to then fill up a small bottle I have.

      Works pretty well for me, saves a lot of money, and still have the convenience of a little dropper bottle.

  45. Make sure you use this stuff.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just started using this stuff called ReNu and it works great! Although lately I have a slight burning sensation in my eyes...oh well, I'm sure its just because I have to get used to the stuff.

  46. Get disposable contacts ... by The_Dougster · · Score: 1
    ... and keep your glasses handy. A big no-no is rubbing your eyes. Usually if your eye is bothering you, and you rub it while wearing contacts, you will typically aggravate the situation. In this case the best thing to do is pitch out the contacts and wear your glasses for a couple of days afterwards.

    That being said, I can usually get about two weeks continuous wear out of a pair of disposables (even sleeping with them in). Then I trash them and switch to my glasses for a week or so to let my eyes rest again.

    Generally though, I've found contacts better for vacation or outdoor activities like hiking. I like a nice clean pair of unscratched glasses with a recent prescription for optimal comfort working in front of a computer for long hours. This lets me rub my eyes freely when they start feeling weary.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  47. Careful with contact solution by TimboJones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just don't use Bausch & Lomb MoistureLoc contact solution. It promotes fungal infections of the eye... eww.

    1. Re:Careful with contact solution by Parsec · · Score: 1

      Oh, wow, I was just going to post and say that stuff helps a little. Although not enough to warrant the risk of my eyesight.

      thanks,
      m

    2. Re:Careful with contact solution by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there are most likely moisturizing contact solutions that do not promote fungal infections. I don't wear contacts, so I haven't done the research. I came across that Consumerist article earlier in the day and thought I would spread the warning.

  48. Speak for yourself by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's true for you, but my pre-lasik vision was so bad that my glasses were so heavy that they interfered with breathing _and_ gave me a serious fishbowl effect when turning my head. That's why I wore contacts unless there was a compelling reason not to -- and the pre-surgical month when I had to wear glasses was a nightmare.

    The other reason I hated switching was that my contacts had no astigmatism correction, the glasses had some serious correction. (I can't remember why -- maybe the doc was an idiot who wouldn't write a prescription identical to the contacts.) If you ever want to know a good way to give somebody a headache....

    So why do you think I got lasik? Vanity, or safety? Imagine fleeing a fire when anything more than 12-18" away is blurry.

    Now, if you're talking about the idiots getting lasik because they have 20/40 or 20/60 vision -- I agree with you completely.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Speak for yourself by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I vaguely remember my optometrist stating that astigmatism couldn't be corrected with contact lenses. He may have qualified that as "soft lenses" (since they essentially hug the contours of your eyes and astig is caused by irregular curvature); I wasn't interested in getting hard lenses due to horror stories I'd heard.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  49. Has slashdot gone crazy?! by HotFat · · Score: 0

    Several hundred responses to an article and every one is on topic and helpful! Surely this is not the slashdot I've grown to dispise and hate? Where's the penis bird posts? where's the rants about microsoft taking over the world? where's the comments the US doing everything for oil? how can comments stay on topic soooo long? surely it's april fools day?!

    Anyway to stay on topic :) I've tried contacts for a while, had the soft non-disposalble variety, and I hated em, dried out, sore eyes etc, so I went back to glasses, so much easier.

  50. View from the Inside by RedLeg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife is an ophthalmic technician, and has worked for ophthalmic surgeons for 20 years. I had been wearing contacts (softs) for a couple of years before we hooked up.

    She has seen, and I have heard the war stories, of all the myriad ways that soft lenses can go wrong. Based on that, and the rather strongly worded advice of one of her bosses in 1989, I switched to rigid gas permeable hard lenses, and have since upgraded to extended wear versions.

    This is the best thing I have ever done with respect to my eyes. Since there is no fluid component to the lens, changes in humidity, gusts of air, dry eyes, etc., are no where near as big a deal.

    They pass more Oxygen than ANY soft lens, and for this and many other reasons, are more healthy.

    Unlike softlenses, if some "bug", fungal, bacterial, or whatever, gets into my eyes, the gas perms are not a medium for growth. The crap in the news about fungal growths associated with a particular B&L solution for softs are simply not an issue.

    I wear my lenses 7x24. They are approved for 2 weeks of continuous wear. I have gone much longer with no issues.

    They DO take a lot longer to get used to (weeks). Typically, they are harder for the practitioner to fit, more expensive, more uncomfortable until you are used to them, cost more per lens and per fitting session. An often overlooked benefit is that if (when) you get something foreign like dust, dirt or an eyelash in your eye, it is extraordinarily uncomfortable.... this typically causes the wearer to get lens out RIGHT NOW, and to deal with the comtamination. This is a good thing. As opposed to just tolerating it as a little uncomfortable, which is the norm for softs.

    As far as Lasik goes.... well, what they don't tell you is a couple of things:

    When it goes bad, it goes VERY bad. The options at that point are grim. it can get as bad as being legally blind.

    Second, no one knows what the long term effects of lasic are. I plan to be alive for at least 50 more years, and there is no track record for this procedure anywhere near that long ago. Further, as we age, we ALL need cheaters or bifocals to deal with the fact that our eyes loose flexibility as we age. Lack of flexability translates into limited ability to change focus from close up to infinity. Lasic may set you free from your specs now, but you are still going to need cheaters or bifocals starting at around 40-45. FWIW, I keep several sets around... so you can guess my age....

    Remember, these are your EYES. You only have two, and unless something changes radically, you can never get more. They can transplant hearts, kidneys, and lots of other things. Not eyes. Be conservative. Talk to a Doctor (not an optometrist) about hards. Find someone who specializes, not a refractive surgeon running a lasik mill. And finally, remember, we all are going to need cheaters when we get older.

    Red

    1. Re:View from the Inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I plan to be alive for at least 50 more years, and there is no track record for this procedure anywhere near that long ago.

      That is pure FUD. There are no surprises lurking around the corner waiting to affect (properly-screened) LASIK patients.

      Keratomes (the only actual invasive part of the surgery) have been in use at least since the 1940s. Your wife should know that, and you should too, before you spread needless BS.

    2. Re:View from the Inside by rarel · · Score: 1

      That's true, and I actually tried hard lenses on the advice of my ophtalmologist. I'm nearsighted and also have this issue with one eye that gets "lazy", ie it tends to rely on the other, which in turn gets tired more quickly. I had tried softs and they were prfect, but hard lenses have the added bonus to correct this problem. AS I understand it, the fact they're rigid forces the eye to adopt the right "shape", thus correcting the problem more accurately.

      Unfortunately after two weeks of trial and getting more or less used to it, my eyes suddenly refused to take it any longer. I have no idea why... I just couldn't stand hard lenses any more (any type) :(

      Since then I've been wearing glasses, but I'm gonna switch to soft lenses soon again. In my experience they're about as perfect as I can get. And for the above poster who asked "why no glasses?", even if we're not in the 50's anymore, it's because lenses are the closest to natural vision we can have. Compared to all other solutions, glasses are still heavy, intrusive, and get dirty and/or wet at any occasion, plus they can fall any time.
      Of course you can take care of it, but there's only so much you can do about it. Lenses need more maintenance, but only just before and just after you use them, and that's it. In the end it's really worth the price. I never had a problem with losing a lens, or having to wipe it clean at a critical moment, or... well, you get the idea.

      my $0.02

    3. Re:View from the Inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pass more Oxygen than ANY soft lens, and for this and many other reasons, are more healthy.

      The difference is much smaller than you think now that silicone hydrogel lenses are common. The ones I have on now pass so much oxygen, they are rated for 30 days, but I'm not foolish enough to wear contacts at night.

    4. Re:View from the Inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wear my lenses 7x24.


      Wow, you mean they installed the 24 day work week?

      Oh, no, wait, you're just trying to be original by reversing a well known, standard phrase. In that case, I hope your eyes melt.
  51. I second Proclear by raddan · · Score: 1
    I wear Proclear Compatibles, and they are a VAST improvement on the lenses I was wearing before (some kind of AcuVue lenses). I've been wearing contacts since I was 14 (I'm 27 now). I will typically wear these lenses for 14-18 hours, and only toward the end will I notice the "dry eyes" problem that used to plague me. Also, these lenses are vastly more gas permeable than my previous lenses-- before, my eyes would be extremely red and irritated. This doesn't happen anymore.

    I was told by an optometrist that there are cheaper (non Proclear) versions of these lenses available now, but since my insurance covers my Proclear lenses nearly entirely, I'm not particularly motivated to switch. I'm just holding out until my girlfriend finishes her optometry degree. I'd better be getting some free lenses or else that free tech support for the family will be drying up pretty quickly ;^)

  52. Menicon Z Rigid Gas Permeable Extended Wear by sobiloff · · Score: 1

    I've been wearing Menicon Z's for the past couple of months and believe I've found the next best thing to Lasik. They're wearable for up to 30 days at a time. Clean and soak them overnight and you're good to go for another 30 days. They're made from a new plastic that's oxygen hyper-transmissive so I never fight with dry eyes any longer. With my old RGPs, by the end of the day I'd be pushing the lenses around, trying to get some moisture in my eyes and fight off the "sticky" feeling.

    And, according to the research done by the NIH, wearers are less likely to get eye infections with these lenses than with any other extended wear lens. Oh, and they're also thinner than similar strength daily RGPs, so they're more comfortable and easier to get used to if you haven't worn RGPs in the past. (See my blog at <http://sobiloff.typepad.com/> for links to the NIH research and more.)

  53. Maybe you gave up too quickly? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    The first two times I tried wearing contacts instead of glasses, my eyes got dry and I didn't last more than a week before putting the glasses back on (or squinting a lot, which was just bad news).

    A few years ago, I got a new set (They were Focus, but I wear Accuview Advanced Torric now because they don't rotate as much) and decided to stick with them for a month, because my doctor told me it would take that long for my eyes to get used to producing extra moisture. I'm glad I stuck with it, because I can't live without my contacts now. They're so much less life-invasive than glasses. They don't get in the way, I have good peripheral vision, and way better depth perception...

    Anyway, try and wear them *every day* for a month to give your eyes a chance to adapt.

  54. Ortho-K is an excellent solution by CoolGopher · · Score: 1
    I'm probably posting way too late for anyone to read this, but for the record:
    Ortho-Keratology has turned out to be one of the best choices I've ever made.

    It's hard contact lenses which you wear only overnight. During that time they reshape your cornea, so that your vision is corrected for the entire day and then some without wearing contact lenses during the day. It has none of the risks you get with LASIK, and it's "future proof" - when I get older and longsightedness starts setting in, I won't be screwed because of having had LASIK (or similar).

    The only downside is that it isn't for everyone - if you have a high prescription then chances are you might not be able to use Ortho-K.

    The other issue is that it's not as well-known or practised as say, LASIK, so you might have difficulty finding an optometrist who does. I was lucky and had an excellent optometrist (Grant Mason, Australia) who said "if you don't get completely satisfied, I won't charge you a cent for having tried it". Haven't been happier at not taking up a full money-back offer! :)

  55. you know... by plonk420 · · Score: 1

    you know Contact Lenses were not meant for you (or at least while at LAN parties) when one of your lenses falls out of your eye due to dryness, possibly from lack of blinking :'(

  56. Good practices for the visually "challenged" by dudeX · · Score: 1

    I have found that if you place a strong light behind the monitor (regardless if its CRT or LCD) this will help prevent eye strain.

    Also take a break every hour and rest your eyes for 15 minutes. For those who work for hours at the desk, take a bathroom break or chat up the receptionist. Legally you're given two 15 minutes breaks, so make use of them.

    As for contact lenses, go for lenses that have more water content, not oxygen permeability. My experience is that oxygen permeable glasses make your eyes dry fast and feel tired. High water content contact lenses feel good for most of the day.

  57. LASIK always causes problems... by nido · · Score: 0

    ... or rather, just covers them up.

    Sorry to hear about your eyes. My mom had LASIK surgery 10 years ago, and got the Monovision setup. While she's happy with the results, I'm certain the Monovision is responsible for her weight gain, immune disfunction, and overall lack of energy. (She had a case of the shingles recently, and she's only 53. Shingles is usually developed by much older people.) Did you have the monovision setup? If so, I'd definitely suggest getting a lense for the closeup eye...

    I asked my doctor (see the paragraphs about how my prescription has been changing) what he could do with a person who'd already had LASIK surgery. He said that, while he'd ideally get to them before the surgery, he could still release some of the "trauma" incurred by the surgery itself...

    Muscles are what pull the eye out of shape. Lasik resurfaces the front of the eyeball, but doesn't do anything about the muscles locked in spasm (if anyone wants to refute this, please explain why my 22 year old brother's prescription has been getting stronger of late, and why my prescription has changed so much over the past year). The "See Clearly Method" (and other "natural" vision improvement programs) use relaxation & exercises to release the tension from these muscles. Osteopathic manipulation is the missing master-key from all vision improvement programs.

    My doctor says there's only about a hundred who do the osteopathic vision prescription thing, so I'm at a loss to help you find a doctor like mine.. Jealous' site has a couple of doctor's names ("teaching staff"), so I'd start there. The only other osteopath I know of who does vision prescriptions is Stephen Davidson (though there is no mention of the vision thing on his site).

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:LASIK always causes problems... by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Osteopath?!?!? Let's all be clear on this, you're advocating CHIROPRACTIC to correct vision. What a total load of quackery. You cannot fix people's visual defects by cracking their spine. You, sir, are a gullible fool, to believe such quacks.

    2. Re:LASIK always causes problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At no point during your ridiculous diatribe were you even close to approaching any semblance of validity. Everyone luckless enough to read your post is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

      I mean, Christ. Blaming LASIK for shingles? For fuck's sake, your mother needs a professional counselor, not an eye doctor.

  58. Contact Lenses for Computer Professionals? by Krishna+Dagli · · Score: 1

    Is its normally wearing contact lenses a risk? As I have heard people wearing lenses are more likely to catch infections! http://newsrss.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1943434.stm

    1. Re:Contact Lenses for Computer Professionals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to speak English, you fucking WOG.

  59. Hot Towel and fish oil by Ekhymosis · · Score: 1

    My opthomologist recomended that I place a hot towel on top of my eyes once a day or so (I have moderate dry eye and contact lenses SUCK, and make sure you close your eyes BEFORE you put the hot towel on!) and he also suggested fish oil supplements. He told me the side effect of fish oil was that it made the tears a bit bigger so that would leave my eye lubricated more (same as with the hot towel, plus the steam supposedly helps clear out the tear ducts). Don't know if that is true or not because later I got that custom lasik with intralase. $5000 bucks, but after 23 years of myopia, I'm free of coke bottle glasses and contacts. Joy.

    --
    Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
  60. brand recomendation - Cooper Vision's Frequency 55 by Jac_no_k · · Score: 1

    I've been using monthly contacts from Cooper Vision called Frequency 55 for about 6 years now. With these, I've gone days without sleep without issues. I'm unfortunately in Japan now, someplace Cooper doesn't distribute to. Accuvue is doing big advertising campaigns here so I guess I will be trying that next when my perscription runs out.

    Anyone in Japan reading this that wears contacts and works with computers a lot? Any suggestions?

  61. You win a prize! by nido · · Score: 1

    Government schools had done you good. John Gatto must be right when he says their program is specifically designed to prevent people from learning how to extract meaning from text.

    Osteopath?!?!? Let's all be clear on this, you're advocating CHIROPRACTIC...

    An OSTEOPATH is NOT a Chiropractor. Why do you equate the two professions? I went to 5 or 7 different chiropractors, and they're all in the dark ages as compared to my OSTEOPATH.

    My OSTEOPATH has NEVER, EVER cracked any of my bones. Most the time I can't tell that he's done anything at all. Then I notice that something's slightly better later in the day, or later in the week. Incremental improvement. It's been slow, but totally worthwhile.

    Hey, no hard feelings. I made the same mistake myself. I decided I needed an osteopath who did manipulation, but believed that manipulation had died out and today's D.O.s were functionally equivalent to M.D.s. So I went to a chiropractor, then another and another. But there was a little nagging voice that said "you need an OSTEOPATH, dipshit!" And later that week I told an M.D. at a booksigning how I'd decided I needed to see an Osteopath. He asked why, I told him ("hands don't work, ala Carpal Tunnel or RSI or thoracic outlet syndrome"), he asked if I'd tried something else (I had), then said that Osteopathic treatment might be right for me, and whenever HE needed an osteopath he went to this guy 100 miles away.

    P.S. please read my two /. posts linked to in the grandparent.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:You win a prize! by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Look, I know all about osteopaths, an osteopath is an M.D. AND Chiropractor. I was once referred to one when I had a back injury, he did me absolutely no good, and in fact, bruised me seriously, causing further pain and injury. I was appalled at the stupid quackery that was promoted in his office, like silver solutions to cure childhood ear infections (nice, if you want permanently blue skin). I never went back.

      Let me be absolutely clear, an osteopath is a quack, an M.D. who doesn't believe in medicine, and instead, promotes quack remedies like chiropractic and homeopathy. If you think you received real treatment and real relief from an osteopath, I recommend you learn about the Placebo Effect.

    2. Re:You win a prize! by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, while osteopathy has only been a discipline in Western medicine for around 100 years, some branches of Eastern medicine are based on similar principles. I keep an open mind on their efficacy. However, placebo effect or not, traditional Thai massage (by an expert) definitely improves my general sense of well-being when recovering from general illnesses.

    3. Re:You win a prize! by nido · · Score: 1

      While it's true that some osteopaths use manipulative technique that is functionally similar to chiropractors (the last doctor that I visited before my present Osteopath was a D.O. who did crack my neck), a handful are way more advanced.

      I agree that most forms of Chiropractic manipulation are invasive (with the exception of Network Spinal Analysis, and possibly Craniopathy). Sometimes a little crack is all a person needs, but most people don't benefit. It's said that Palmer (founder of Chiropractic) spent a year and Still's school of Osteopathy before he struck out on his own, claiming to have independantly discovered his technique. If that's the case, Osteopaths are incapable of being "Chiropractors", while you could possibly label Chiropractors as incompletely educated Osteopaths.

      "Cranial Osteopath" is a bare minimum... A handful of cranial osteopaths are on the cutting edge (e.g., Biodynamic Cranial Osteopathy), while most seem to be stuck at Sutherland's initial findings first presented in the 1930's.

      I'm sorry your bad experience has so colored your beliefs regarding the profession. My Experience with a competent osteopath has been an extremely positive interaction. Modern osteopathic manipulation is totally non-invasive. Usually the doctor just lightly holds a couple spots on my body until he feels a release. Sometimes I feel something let go, othertimes I don't notice it until much later in the day/week.

      If gentle Osteopathic treatment is required to get the effect, so be it. Much better than the alternative of staying stuck in the downward spiral I was in.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  62. I blame Monovision for the shingles by nido · · Score: 1

    LASIK was just the vehicle which delivered the blow (monovision) to her immune system.

    If she had a monovision contact (like a former boss, who loves his reading contact but who's health is rapidly going downhill) the result would be essentially the same, except you can take a contact out.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  63. ReNu by NekoXP · · Score: 1

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&si d=adOW2nqhjEKE&refer=us

      April 13 (Bloomberg) -- Bausch & Lomb Inc., the maker of a contact lens cleaner linked to a dangerous eye infection, withdrew the product from the U.S. market and offered refunds to consumers.

    Wearers of contact lenses shouldn't use ReNu with MoistureLoc while the outbreak is being investigated, Rochester, New York- based Bausch & Lomb said today in a statement. The company asked retailers to remove the solution from shelves, a step already taken by many drug and department stores.

  64. Cost-saving Lasik option by mattbee · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've heard a lot of people here talk about Lasik being the best option but if you're on a shoestring, you could consider the new LasikAtHome kit. Only $100, which is way cheaper than the $4000 you get charged for a "professional" job! Has anyone tried it?

    --
    Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
  65. What is eye strain? by bbc · · Score: 1

    What is this medical condition called "eye strain"? I have only heard of it in old wives tales. What scientific research can you point me to that proves that there is such a thing as eye strain?

  66. Contacts, LASIK, and PRK by jmmiller1215 · · Score: 1

    I had LASIK done about 3 months ago. The next day I was 20/15. Regardless of how my surgery turned out, my doctor specifically advised AGAINST PRK, even after hearing that I enjoy snorkeling, water skiing, and other sports on the water. His explanation of how the flap heals was quite different from that you gave, to the point where he said that unless he examines the eye with a specific machine, he can't necessarily tell if a microkeratome has opened a flap for LASIK.

    No matter what procedure you have done, be aware that contact lenses can be much more harmful to your eyes than your doctor (who has a vested interest in selling them to you) can let on. I wore contacts (2-week replacement schedule of disposable daily wear) for 15 years prior to having LASIK. During the surgery, my eyes bled because the blood vessels in the eye had tried to grow out to the surface to get more air. The blood vessels will retract, but the "tubes" they've made in your eye don't fill in. Also, you never quite realize how you're starving your eye of air until you don't wear the contacts any more.

    I'm not saying that contacts aren't great, but I think there are more risks to wearing them than doctors let on.

    1. Re:Contacts, LASIK, and PRK by aquabat · · Score: 1
      I can beleive it. I started out with soft contacts in the early nineties. I wore them for a year, and they were all right. I had to build up a tolerance for extended periods of wear, which probably means that my eyes were ramping up the blood flow and tear production over time.

      After that, I switched to rigid gas permeables, because I was really anal about getting the most accurate correction I could. I wore them for up to 16 hours a day, over a period of three years. Near the middle of this period, I started noticing halos around streetlights at night. That's when i began to wonder if maybe these things wore damaging my eyes. Mind you, they were still pretty comfortable to wear.

      I stopped wearing them for a couple of years. Then I did something that was probably pretty stupid. I started wearing them again, for more than 12 hours a day. The same pair, which had been sitting at the bottom of my travel pack for two years. They were really not comfortable. My eyes were probably saved by the fact that my job was outside, in the winter, so that I had constant wind and tears on my eyes. I wore them for two more years, than tossed them and went back to glases.

      A couple of years later, I started using wear-once daily disposables. I've been using them for about four years now. I notice a big difference in quality by brand. I like accuvues the best, Ciba the least.

      The halos were permanent. My eyes dry out quickly. I guess I caused some scarring, but my optometrist says my corneas are clear and healthy. I definitely screwed with my tear response.

      Regarding LASIK vs PRK: The way the nurse described it, the LASIK flap is through the clear corneal tissue, and not just the epithelium on top. The problem is that the corneal tissue doesn't have any blood vessels in it, so new cells can't grow into the space between the cut surfaces and the adjacent cells will never be as strongly bonded to each other as they would be if they grew like that, or something. She said that only the epithelium actually regenerates.

      Anyway, I had the PRK done today. Everything's foggy (but sharper) now. I need to keep a pair of bandage contacts in for three days, until the skin grows back. Got home and passed out for a few hours. My eyes feel like, well, like I slept in my lenses, which I did. They gave me lots of different eyedrops, and I have to go in every day for checkups, for the next three days. They were supposed to give me pills for pain and sedation, but they either forgot, or I get them tomorrow. The pain isn't supposed to start for a day or so, so I guess I'll be ok until tomorrow.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  67. This isn't "scientific"... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    And I am not an opthamologist, but I believe what they refer to as "eye strain" should more accurately be termed "eye muscle strain", specifically the muscles that control the focusing of the eye.

    Basically, when you are viewing a monitor (or any other object less than 3 feet from your eye, generally much closer) for an extended period of time, the muscles that control the focusing of your lens (which is done by "stretching the lens", making it thinner or thicker, since muscles can only contract), become fatigued. This is similar to the fatigue you get if, say, you attempt to hold your arm out to the side of your body level for an extended period of time. After a while, your arm feels very heavy, and starts to ache, and you get tired of it.

    This is mainly because this isn't something you do often. If you did, after a while you would not notice it as much, and you would be able to do so for longer periods of time. This doesn't mean you aren't causing stress on the muscle - you are. You have just become used to it. You might, over time, find it more difficult to raise and lower your arm, or raise it higher. Similarly, with the eyes, you would find you can't focus as well, your eyes hurt, burn, water, itch, etc - this is all "eye strain".

    Our eyes haven't evolved to cope with extended periods of time of "fixed focused" at small (18-24 inches) distances. As an aside, an extreme example of such fatigue is part of the "simulator sickness" encountered by users of VR HMDs (head mounted displays) - due to the fact that these display devices, while attempting to have a focal range of "infinity", force the eye (via lenses) to focus on a screen only a few inches away from the eyeball. This is one of the big reasons (but by no means the only reason) behind headaches some users experience after more than 20-30 minutes of use.

    What would be interesting to know is if the use of glasses for nearsightedness among the younger population (who read) increased after the wide availability of the printed book in Guttenberg's (sp?) time. Probably a near impossible research task to perform, but it would be interesting to know if glasses were primarily used by older people (whose muscles, including those of eye, atrophy over time, making it more difficult to focus), but when the printed book became popular among younger people, if thier eyes started to have problems due to close focusing (and limited light sources at night) for reading books...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  68. interesting by subtropolis · · Score: 1
    Yes, i understand how the eye is constructed, but have never (to my knowledge) heard of the reflection phenomena you're describing. Must check that out. Floaters i've been fascinated with since i was a kid.

    people who've had whiplash or a similar demonstration of the laws of physics

    LOL!
    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    1. Re:interesting by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've never run into anyone else who has managed to see their own retinas either, maybe folks don't spend enough time lying on the grass gazing at the sky (which I vaguely recall was when I noticed it). And I doubt most people would know what they were seeing, even if they noticed it.

      Can you see individual cells in your floaters? mine were very visible (nucleus and all) when I was younger.

      Sometimes I amuse myself yanking the y-shaped floater back and forth, just because I can :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  69. Acuvue 2 with agitation by heroine · · Score: 1

    Been using Acuvue 2 all day with agitation when they're in cleaning solution. They dry out indeed, but they're not painful and compared to having an appliance on your face or performing irreversable eye surgery, they're the best solution.

  70. No problems here! by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    LASIK works for me. Had it many years ago, when it was fairly new, and it's exactly like wearing contact lenses (only I never have to mess about with little thingies on my eyeballs any more).

    The only bad thing about it was that they assured me I'd feel no pain, and when they stuck the knife in my eye, it felt EXACTLY like SOMEBODY STUCK A KNIFE IN MY EYE! After everyone calmed down they explained that less than 1% of the population has pain-sensing nerves actually in the ocular tissues, and that they'd rather I didn't scream like a wounded manatee in the operating theatre. I told 'em to stop lying to the patients (if they'd said I *might* feel pain I'd have been prepared) and everything was fine after that.

  71. Who cares about personal appearance by Jerim · · Score: 1

    Since when do IT guys care about looking nice? Wear glasses to go along with you t-shirt and jeans ensemble. It's not likely that the only thing standing between you and big promotion or that hot secretary is your eyewear.

    No way contacts are as comfortable as eyeglasses. I know from exeperience.

  72. Re:brand recomendation - Cooper Vision's Frequency by megabyte405 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about Japan, but I'd like to second the vote for the Frequency 55's - very no-hassle lenses that tolerate abuse (forgot to put solution in the container? accidentally fell asleep with them in? No problem...)

    --
    I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
  73. When contacts stop working by errant01 · · Score: 1

    For computer use, use the most breathable lenses you can find that work for your astigmatism. For me that was gas perm lenses, extended wear even. However be prepared to have to find another solution eventually. They worked for 10+ years until I started having constant fogging problems in less than a day of wear. The 3rd doc I went to (first two just sort of looked puzzled) said that its not uncommon for people to actually develop an allergy to the plastic used for contact lenses after 10 or 20 years - I can't say whether he was only referring to gas perms or any lens. The allergy tends to manifest itself as early protein deposits and "gook" (yes thats a technical term) in the eyes well before it should be there. For me, I wore extended wear gas perms (good for a week before removal) and was having gook problems in less than a day. I ended up going for Lasik because it took care of the contacts problem, and kept me out of the strangely distorted visual world of glasses. Make you're own call if the time comes that you're coveted lenses no longer work for you.

  74. And for the +1 Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Can you describe some of the benefits that come with marrying a blind woman?

  75. SPELLING NAZI AHOY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing controversial about this at all!

    Conversely perhaps?

    WARNING

    I am not a math scientist

    (yet I project a more well educated demeanor than those who ponied up fro accreditation)

    LOVE

    DEREK SMART PHD