Slashdot Mirror


The Challenges of A DVR Service

ChelleChelle writes "'The two burdens that are probably most annoying to the user are a complex and difficult control interface and lack of reliability.' So says TiVo cofounder Jim Burton as he describes the challenges of designing and delivering an easy-to-use yet highly effective and reliable DVR service. The article is quite broad in focus, providing information on the design aspects of TiVo (hardware, security, source code, etc) yet also taking into consideration the human element, with a large section devoted to service design principles. Overall, a good read for anyone interested in purpose-built systems." Update: 04/21 18:54 GMT by Z : Tim Burton no longer cofounding Tivo.

134 comments

  1. Tim Burton != Jim Barton by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the blurb: "So says TiVo cofounder Tim Burton" From the article: "by Jim Barton, TiVo". Jim Barton is not the director of Batman .

    1. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Funny

      What a shame! I was looking forward to a DVR that would exist in a realm of brooding, gothic fantasy and inspire piles of new Hot Topic merchandise.

    2. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jim Tim. Burton Barton. Same difference. Do you really expect Zork or LtBurrito to do something about it?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by Slash+Veteran · · Score: 0

      they both have my balls on their chin, so what's the difference

    4. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you ever seen them in the same room together? Huh? Didn't think so. I find it more plausible that they ARE the same person than that Slashdot's journalistic integrity is so low.

      I just can't believe you people.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just changed it to Jim Burton. (hilarious)

    6. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by Randolpho · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but GenQuesadilla might have something to say about it

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    7. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Fixed", yet still not correct. Typical.

    8. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by humble.fool · · Score: 1

      Uh, nice try Z, but it's still wrong...

      --
      Being anonymous is not cowardice.
    9. Re:Tim Burton != Jim Barton by woolio · · Score: 1

      Do you really expect Zork or LtBurrito to do something about it?

      I think we should rename him to PrivateBurrito

  2. Nope by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest burdon we'll face with DVRs is DRM. Solve that problem and you have a seller.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Nope by Nesetril · · Score: 1

      i think that's what they meant by "lack of reliability". meaning it can't be reliable if you run into weird DRM problems 9 times out of 10 you are trying to watch something.

      --
      Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
    2. Re:Nope by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      Here is a suggestion for dealing with the DRM problem. Create great video content that is in high demand and release it without any DRM. What's stopping you from doing that?

    3. Re:Nope by l33t.g33k · · Score: 1
      Create great video content that is in high demand and release it without any DRM. What's stopping you from doing that?
      Copyright law & piracy prevention...

      I know that there are some people who probably won't mind distributing their own content without restrictions, but remember that many people are trying to make money off what they create. If the distribution of their content isn't protected DRM, then they can't really maximize their profit.

      So yes, from a purely technical point of view, nothing is stopping anybody from distributing stuff w/o DRM, but in reality... not so simple!
      --
      My sig is permanently on strike.
    4. Re:Nope by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Lack of imagination and poor writing skills.

      Then again, it never stopped Hollywood.

      Seriously now. I am in the content biz. Just like many other programmers. So yes, I know what it's like to create content and watch it being pirated. Not a nice feeling.

      My main motivation to create content, though, is that I enjoy having people use it. I like seeing my product being used and enjoyed. I like it when I see that one of my product makes them happy. So that's my reason to provide the programs.

      Getting money out of them is an additional benefit. And, let's be honest here, what allows me to continue doing it.

      What matters though is the primary motivation. When you create music (or whatever content) with your first gaze on the money and the "art" comes in secondary (if at all), your product will not be good. And people will not use and enjoy it.

      DRM or not.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Nope by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. The biggest Burdon by a country mile is Eric. Him out of the Animals. #Dumdiddleumdumdidy Dumdiddleumdumdidy Dumdiddleumdumdidy Dumdiddleumdumdidy DUMumdiddleumdumdidy DUMdiddleumdumdidy Dumdiddleumdumdiddy DUMMM#.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  3. Tim Burton by Nesetril · · Score: 1

    Damn I didn't know Tim Burton was into this Tivo deal.

    --
    Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
  4. It's minor but I need... by duffbeer23 · · Score: 1

    ...smart fast-forward and rewind. Tivo and other DVRs know that my reflexes aren't perfect and jump back when I over shoot. My DirectTV DVR, not so much. As far as innovations, my network-enabled Tivo (that only played nice w/ Windows machines) wasn't enough out weight the 2-box set up and higher per-month cost.

    1. Re:It's minor but I need... by Poppler · · Score: 1

      my network-enabled Tivo (that only played nice w/ Windows machines)

      For OS X or Linux (unless you need IPv6), try Galleon. I use it on an Ubuntu box and it works like a charm. I use it to backup recordings and listen to music on my TV. The only downside is you can't watch your recordings on the computer or burn them to DVD. I believe mplayer has some kind of tivo function, but I've never played with it as I have little desire to watch TV on my computer.

      --
      What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
  5. I *heart* my TiVos by Scutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'll get my TiVo boxen when you pry them from my cold, dead hands. Just sayin'.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You keep using the word 'boxen' the opportunity to remove your TiVO may be sooner then you would like.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by Scutter · · Score: 1

      You keep using the word 'boxen' the opportunity to remove your TiVO may be sooner then you would like.

      Hey, at least I don't keep using 'M$'. Cuz, you know, that dollar sign in place of the 'S' is SOOOO clever... ;-)

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by tacokill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh-huh. You must have standard def TV, huh? Wait until you go high-def.

      I said the EXACT same thing - until I moved to HD. See my post above.

    4. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by Scutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh-huh. You must have standard def TV, huh? Wait until you go high-def.

      I said the EXACT same thing - until I moved to HD. See my post above.


      I have Hi-def. I occasionally watch it on the other tuner, but if I have to make a choice between TiVo and Hi-Def, there isn't even a contest. It's all about commercial skip and timeshifting at my house.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    5. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      HD is great. And as soon as all the programming I watch, no as soon as 10% of the programming I watch, is available in HD, I might consider switching.

      Oh, wait a minute. I've got a HD TiVo. Sadly, DirecTV has forced me to have a bastard stepchild of a real stand alone TiVo, but it is a TiVo. And it's hacked.

      Still, with the exception of Football (which I only watch live), I could give up HD to keep my TiVo. I might feel different when I upgrade from my 51"RP set to the planned 133" FP setup, but given the dearth of programming I find interesting on HD, it will still be a while. Then again, my FP set seems a couple years off too, since they're not planning to ship the HC roll up screens until later this fall, and then only in smaller (105") sizes.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    6. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by tacokill · · Score: 1

      I understand. But wouldn't a product that offers BOTH be a better fit?

      And I am not trying to beat you up because I was in your exact shoes less than 8 months ago. I relented and wound up getting the Cable co DVR (motorola) and it just barely works. But it does fast-forward and skip ahead reasonably well (ie: no better/worse than my Tivo).

      Everybody can do what they want but honestly, I don't want some hodge-podge mix and match of components just so I can DVR ALL of the channels I receive. The technology to make this work PERFECTLY exists and so far, Tivo got the closest. But they lost ALL of that momentum by being so damn late to the HD market.

      Hell, I even have a CableCard in my TV right now. In theory, if Tivo had their box available tommorrow -- I could use a Series 3 Tivo.

      But it isn't. So all I have left now is to bitch about it on /. It really is a miserable situation with HD-DVR's and Cable/Satellite.

    7. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If I have to make a choice between seeing a show right when it comes out and seeing it without hassle later, it's not even a contest. Bittorrent rules at my house. I can suffer a little latency.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by Scutter · · Score: 1

      I understand. But wouldn't a product that offers BOTH be a better fit?

      And I am not trying to beat you up because I was in your exact shoes less than 8 months ago. I relented and wound up getting the Cable co DVR (motorola) and it just barely works. But it does fast-forward and skip ahead reasonably well (ie: no better/worse than my Tivo).

      Hell, I even have a CableCard in my TV right now. In theory, if Tivo had their box available tommorrow -- I could use a Series 3 Tivo.


      Oh, I'm right there with you. I'd much rather have an HD TiVo, but when the choice is one or the other, well, I've had slightly fuzzy TV for years, it's really not a hardship. Not being able to watch an hour-long show in 32 minutes *whenever I want to*, however...

      The only problem I have with cable's HD in general and with CableCard in particular is that if you have an HD-TV (i.e. one with an HD tuner in it), you still don't get all your channels in true end-to-end digital, much less hidef. I finally got the cable company to admit that going to digital cable wouldn't give me anything more than my current basic cable + my hi-def tuner. Why pay the extra $20/month? Movie channels? Feh. Maybe if they'd play something besides the same 7 movies over and over all month. Netflix works just fine for me, and it's always in DVD quality.

      That said, I run one cable into the HD tuner and one to the Tivo. For those rare occasions when I want to see something that might actually be broadcast in hidef (not just up-converted analog), I can switch to the TV's tuner.

      I like Tivo+DirecTV, I just never liked the pricing structure (didn't want to pay an extra $5 per receiver in addition to TiVo's fees. TV's not worth $100+/month), and ever since their relationship started going south, well...

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    9. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by XchristX · · Score: 1

      High Def, huh? That's cool, but all you've gotta do for a high-def DVR is get the hd-3000 card (http://www.pchdtv.com/) , with Linux compatibility pretty much off the box and a special vendor build of xine supplied that's compatible with high def, and then build a mythtv box & you are good to go.

      http://www.mythtvtalk.com/forum/album_page.php?pic _id=11
      http://www.mythtvtalk.com/forum/album_page.php?pic _id=10


      Easy as pie (well, not really, but if you use something like knoppmyth from http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html in your dedicated box, or follow Jarod's Howto for Fedora on http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/ , it isn't too difficult.)


      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    10. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by doormat · · Score: 1

      You know you probably dont have long to wait (3-4 months?) for a HiDef TiVo that works with cable TV.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    11. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I'm satisfied with the DirecTV HR10-250. Plenty of HiDef stuff to watch. I'll be happier when there's more, but it's getting better.

          I've already gone through the whole hacking thing. I have a upgraded HDVR2 in the bedroom, a standalone series 2 TiVo with a regular receiver in the computer, and a standalone series 1 TiVo in the kids room. The only thing that I'd like to get out of the HR10-250 is being able to use the internet for updates, so I can ditch the damned phone line. It's fun having a shell on my TiVo, but honestly, I never did much else but play with it. Ooohh, look, I can ping from my TiVo! :) Folders for shows is nice on the HDVR2, which I kinda miss on the HR10-250. From what I've read, I can't go as high with the versions, so I'm not going to bother.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:I *heart* my TiVos by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          Go with the front projection. Seriously.

          I have a 7' wide 16:9 screen, with a HD DLP projector, attached to a HD10-250 DirecTV receiver. I'm *VERY* pleased with it.

          I was with a friend at Best Buy a few days ago, and we were walking through looking at TV's. All I could realy say about any of them was "oh how cute, it's so small." That was in the big screen LCD and Plasma area. They had a projector display, but their projectors were all out of adjustment. It's like they're trying to show that the front projection isn't as good.

        We were picking up something for his new computer, that I happened to be setting up in my living room. While he wasn't really paying attention, I hooked his computer's component out (nice video card), and his digital audio out to my equipment. We kept talking, and then started messing with his head.

          "Hey wanna see something cool?"

          "Sure, what".

          I hit the power on the projector, and while it was warming up, I switched resolutions and brought up a streaming porn feed. There's a world of difference between watching something on a 17" screen, and watching it on a 7' wide screen with 6.1 surround sound. You've never seen breasts so big in your living room. :)

          There is a disadvantage to having a really *REALLY* big screen though. You no longer want to go to the movie theater and sit in an uncomfortable chair, where you can't pause the movie to take a leak. You also will have your friends bringing new release movies over to your house all the time to watch with you. Oh, the pain.. hehe

          I've been using mine for about 2 years now, and am 3/4 through the bulb life. That's 1500 hours of TV's, movies, and video games. The only fatalities have been my old subwoofer, and my PS2.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  6. Reliability by Godeke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love my DVR... when it is working. I have learned the controls (they are byzantine) but I haven't learned on what days I need to sacrifice a chicken to avoid a crash. If it was a Windows Media Center, at least I would understand why it crashes so often, but it is silver box that sits there, pretending to record shows.

    I am willing to work around its quirks because of all the upside (it doesn't crash *that* often), but I suspect a less geeky user would simply drop kick the thing out the door. Reliability needs to be the number one concern when creating a device that works in the background like DVRs do. It is very annoying to find the programs you thought you recorded missing because it locked up Wednesday night...

    Automatically detecting when my cable company reassings the stations would be nice too.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
    1. Re:Reliability by imaginaryelf · · Score: 1

      Yeah. As devices get smarter, reliability will be the biggest problem.

      You don't expect a VCR to crash, but a DVR crashes (just yesterday, I had to "reboot" mine 4 TIMES!) Cars are getting "smarter" - have you looked at a Prius?

      All the stuff around our house are on the verge of being replaced with "smarter" versions.

      There will come a day when our microwave, phone, TV, or even our house crashes and needs to be rebooted.

    2. Re:Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have learned the controls (they are byzantine) but ...

      According to the /., F/OSS, and the GNU folks' standards, you are too stupid to use your DVR. Do not pass GO, go directly BACK to VCR.

    3. Re:Reliability by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      And you define that as being smarter? I say something is smart if it works well. My old VCR was quite smart. It would record everything I asked it to, and it never crashed. It also wouldn't record things I didn't ask it to. When you think about it, a DVR is a glorified VCR, that uses a hard drive instead of tapes. I wouldn't expect that it would crash at all, and if it crashed as often as yours, I'd return it to whoever sold it to me.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Reliability by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Automatically detecting when my cable company reassings the stations would be nice too.

      I've been very happy with HD-DVRs rented from cable companies in the past. No issues with reassigning stations, free upgrades to larger capacities, only one "crash" ever, and it really didn't crash, it was some uptime bug that required me power cycling the device. The symptom was "no data" on all of the listings.

      This was a Motorola box, don't know about the software inside of it, but it was pretty nice.

    5. Re:Reliability by eison · · Score: 1

      I bought two Tivo Series 1 DVRs (one for me, one I gave to my parents).
      Both autodetect when the cable company reassigns the stations. They give me a little message saying 'your stations have changed blah blah blah.'
      Neither crashes.

      What DVR are you using? Sounds defective.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    6. Re:Reliability by Godeke · · Score: 1

      Where did I use the word smart? Geeky != smart.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    7. Re:Reliability by Godeke · · Score: 1

      Doh, should read more carefully with lower rating comments *included*. I agree that constant problems ins't a symptom of "smarter". The more complex devices become, the more crash prone they are becoming though, and yet we use them because when they work the provide quite a bit of functionality.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    8. Re:Reliability by bott.wa · · Score: 1

      My Tivo hasn't crashed since the day it was purchased, 4 years ago. Auto-detecting program lineup changes works just fine.

    9. Re:Reliability by adachan · · Score: 1

      Windows media center is actually very stable, and works well. Its easy to set up and has the option for UNLIMITED storarage. With a bit of knowledge it recored HD from Motorolla cable boxes as well. Quite a nice feature. Much better than my HD Tivo.

    10. Re:Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you clearly don't know what you are talking about. There is no HD TiVo

  7. TiVO overly broad in general by gwhenning · · Score: 1

    First it was patents, and now articles...... Can't these guys nail anything down?

  8. I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by yagu · · Score: 5, Informative

    We have both tivos and a Comcast HD PVR (I believe made by Magnavox), and I can attest to the interface being the hardest thing to get right, but maybe the most important. And, by far Tivo has come closest to the transcendental interface over any competitors (I've also sampled the offering of some of the others).

    Here are some of the "wows" about Tivo, many of which I'd discovered over time:

    • the infamous but invaluable 30-second skip hack. It's controversial and I don't know why, since the Comcast box offers the 30-second skip out of the box. Anyway, if you have Tivo, and you don't know about this one, you HAVE to get it.
    • the tick-mark FF. When fast forwarding at any speed, whether in the live buffer or watching a recorded show, the "->|" button will advance the video to the next tick mark on the screen. The tick marks are typically 10, 15, or 5 minutes depending on the length of the show. This is a GREAT convenience factor!
    • the same tick-make REW function... Same button, if you're rewinding, you can move immediately to a previous tick mark. If you're in the live buffer, it takes you all the way to the beginning (oldest video) of the live buffer.
    • the "ENTER" button, in any list context will take you alternately to the beginning and then end of a list.
    • the "ENTER" button also is "Previous" for last watched channel.
    • the 8-second backward button
    • overloaded buttons, e.g., when browsing show listings, the "channel up and down" buttons move you one page up and down through the listings respectively. Same is true when in any list context. Also, the FF and REW buttons are overloaded in TV Schedule list mode and advance the "frame" of the listings forward and back by 30 minutes.
    • wish list... great feature, really does work
    • translucent screens for most interaction, you can continue to watch while scheduling recordings.
    • Season PASS is MUCH more accurate and reliable than the competition
    • "recently deleted" folder for shows manually deleted, you can go back and retrieve them if you need to as long as the Tivo hasn't permanently deleted them for lack of space.
    • grouping of shows into folders to more easily navigate recorded shows (optionally on or off)

    This barely covers the features, but Tivo has done an AMAZING job in ergonomics!

    The Comcast box, on the other hand, is abysmal. It is almost unusable, but for now is the only available option to record HD shows. Here are a few of the annoyances:

    • On a regular basis, shows appear (that were requested to record) in the "recorded" list with no title and a recording date of 1999, impossible since this device never existed then. They can't be deleted, and they accumulate over time.
    • If you try and play one of the "anonymous" shows, it locks the box solid, the only option is a power recycle.
    • The ONLY way to turn CC (Closed Caption) on and off is to power the unit down with the remote, then hit the menu within a timeout interval, and scroll down through an internal systems menu and turn CC on.
    • Oh, and by the way, when you do the previous bullet to toggle the CC, any recording shows stop recording, and don't resume upon re-power.
    • There is a well known and hated "lag" in the Comcast box. Apparently the software has NO concept of prioritization. When the box is particularly bogged down, the response to button presses from the remote can come in fits and starts. I've literally gotten lost in what I thought I pressed and would put the remote down and "cool down" and let the box take sometimes up to 3 or 4 minutes to "catch up". Oh, and yes, it captures EVERY button press, and honors them, and yes, because of that we have accidentally deleted shows we didn't want to.
    • And, related to previous bullet, there is NO way to tell whether the unit has seen your button presses, there is no hourglass, no indicator, NOTHING to indicate is has seen a remote comm
    1. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by Frobisher · · Score: 1

      I thought Tivo and Comcast were putting together a new box for mid-late 2006? news from last year. What's the status on this I wonder?

    2. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by cflannagan · · Score: 1
      If you "record" a station you're currently watching, even though the unit has two tuners, you are locked into that station, and can't watch something else even though the second tuner is available, i.e., no other show is recording. This is retarded!
      Actually, you can change channels. I've experienced this problem before, and discovered the solution by accident.

      Press "Swap" button on the bottom of the remote. Problem solved - you'll switch to the other tuner. You can switch between the two tuners anytime, recording, dual-recording, or not.

    3. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by cflannagan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I spoke too soon.. I didn't realize the parent poster was referring to HD PVR box's - I have a regular box, not HD.

    4. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by Atlantix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe you have an older Comcast box, mine has many of the problems you describe, but I can explain others.

      There is a swap button to switch between tuners so you're not locked to one station if you are recording it. It's at the very bottom of the remote, second from the left.

      As for the front display, it really isn't that complicated:
      The LED in the lower left is the power indicator (yellow is on, off is off).
      The LED in the lower right, comes on when it gets input from the remote. Normally it just flashes yellow, but if it stays on, don't hit any more buttons because it is lagging.
      The LED is the upper left indicates if you have any messages (red is yes, off is no).
      The LED in the upper right indicates the state of the tuner you're NOT watching (the red light is on if it's recording, off if not).

      The display in the middle gives the state of the tuner you ARE watching (it says REC if recording, or the time if you're just watching live TV). It will also say PLAY here if both tuners are recording you start watching a program from the hard drive.

      --Atlantix

    5. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      Just to add, yes I have an HD box. In fact, that's the only kind Comcast gives out now whether you have HD service or not.

      I've never seen the phantom recordings thing, but I have had it skip a couple recordings with odd start times that it said had no conflicts. I did have both tuners busy though (one recording straight from 7-9PM, the other one program from 7-8:32PM, and another 8:32-9PM). I assume it took a little too long to finish saving the 7-8:32 show and missed the start of the 8:32 show. It would be better if it just started a minute late.

      --Atlantix

    6. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by cprior · · Score: 1

      overloaded buttons, e.g., when browsing show listings That's why I come here!
      (emphasis added)

    7. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      overloaded buttons, e.g., when browsing show listings - That's why I come here!

      Your comment makes no sense to me. The only thing I can figure is that you don't understand the term "overloaded."

    8. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by kiwi77 · · Score: 1

      User interface is a topic that really raises my hackles (whatever the hell they are). Every time I use my DVD player I have to look at the damn thing to figure out what to push to stop and resume play. It is not obvious. These are problably the most used functions on any playback machine, but they sure can be obscure. I take real pleasure in playing VHS tapes (I still have lots) because the damn controls make SENSE. Do designers actually have real people try these things out before they start manufacturing them? Okay, here's another gripe - why is it sometimes so hard to find the PLAY at the beginning of a DVD? I swear, sometimes I look at the screen and really can't see what I am trying to enter. Am I defective? Or what?

    9. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you try and play one of the "anonymous" shows,

      "try to play".

    10. Re:I can vouch for tivo... they got it right by GWBasic · · Score: 1
      I feel your pain. You probably are stuck with one of the older boxes. A couple of months ago I called up Comcast and rattled off a list of complaints and they replaced my box, ASAP. Just call them up and read all of your complaints and they'll give you a newer box.

      Also, it's worth reading the Wikipedia article on the Motorolla DVR. Some of the codes it gives for programming hidden buttons into the remote are very useful. For example, you can program in a "swap" button that will allow you to switch tuners when you decide to record a channel. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/How_to_use_a_Motorola _DVR

      Personally, I'm very tempted to buy one of the new iMacs that can turn an HD cable box into a DVR by using Firewire.

  9. It's a bit of a history rewrite by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Informative

    Concerning subscriptions. To read the article, one would think that the only way you could ever purchase a Tivo would be with a recurring subscription fee. The reality is that *many* of us bought series one Tivo's with a lifetime fee. The lifetime fee was, by far, the best value for the consumer and is no longer offered.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:It's a bit of a history rewrite by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      True, but you talk about it like it was some Series 1 relic from the past. The last day you could buy a Lifetime sub was April 15th, less than a week ago.

    2. Re:It's a bit of a history rewrite by scuba964 · · Score: 1

      Even better (or at least cheaper) I got a TiVO Series 2 80 G from a friend at work and we don't pay for the service. A glorified vcr but it's awesome. The only thing we don't have is the tv schedule, wish list and show info. But we know when shows are on, program repeating recordings, and love the live tv interaction (pause, ff, etc,) that a vcr does not have. Looking to upgrade from a vcr but don't want to pay monthly fee or lifetime, find a box on ebay or craigslist or friend at work who's upgrading.

  10. Apprently with tivo by tacokill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...its hard to build an HDTV unit as well. Meanwhile, back in the rest of the world, us poor cable customers have to suffer with our crappy Scientific Atlanta and Motorola HDTV DVRs that have crappy interfaces, terrible support, and an even worse reliability record.

    I had Tivo for 4 years and Tivo was relevant to me up to about 1 year ago. And, unfortunately for them and me, that window closed (because I upgraded to HDTV) and they just aren't anymore since I would have to "turn back time" to go back to them. The lack of HDTV support was, in simple terms, a deal-breaker.

    Maybe that new Series3 will change things. When is it shipping again? :-/


    No, no. I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say "announce" or "pass tests". I said shipping.

    1. Re:Apprently with tivo by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Build a mythtv box with HDTV support. Many many people have done this. While I have not moved to HDTV yet (and probably won't for many many years) a home built DVR system such as mythtv works extremely well. So well that I have not watched live TV for almost a year. It gets recorded, commercial flagged, and then watched when I want to watch it. Did I mention the automatic commercial skipping? While that is not 100% accurate all the time it is good enough to eliminate the bulk of commercials and the rest I skip past in 30 second increments. And it was not that difficult to setup.

    2. Re:Apprently with tivo by tacokill · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work for anything other than OTA (over the air, unencrypted) HDTV channels (NBC, CBS, ABC, etc). MythTV does not work for encrypted systems, such as DirecTV, Dish, or cable systems that require boxes (ie: digital cable systems). And other than the major networks, all HD content is delivered through those encrypted digital systems (ie: Showtime-HD, DiscoveryHD, MTV-HD, ESPN-HD)

      Its the same problem Tivo has. Regardless of the technology -- the DVR must must must support CableCards. As in right now. Not "sometime in the future". Without cable card support, they can't record things like HBO, Showtime, etc in all of their glorious HD'ness

      That is the ONLY way to record HDTV onto a DVR using a non-cable company box. Otherwise, you can't decrypt the cable co/sat co signal.

    3. Re:Apprently with tivo by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The lack of HDTV support was, in simple terms, a deal-breaker.
      > Maybe that new Series3 will change things. When is it shipping again? :-/

      I have had a HD TIVO for about 6 months now, it is a pretty nice unit.
      I would bet the blame for lack of a standalone HDTV TiVo goes to the cable industry. They probably aren't standardized enough to make a box to allow the design of a single unit you could move from company to compnay, house to house.

      MY HD TiVo does record all the Over The Air HD content that is available as well as the DirectTV stuff, a huge advancement over the regular definition Direct Tivo.

    4. Re:Apprently with tivo by sootman · · Score: 1

      It's funny how different two people's priorities can be. I'd rather have my DirecTiVo and a 9" black-and-white than HDTV without TiVo.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  11. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is that a DVR is a product, not a service. If TiVo could figure that out, they'd be a sucess.

    1. Re:The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A DVR is a product that requires a service.

    2. Re:The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't.

    3. Re:The real problem by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you are not willing to subscribe to the DVR manufacturer's TV listings service, then are you willing to subscribe to TV Guide magazine (also a service) and key in your own TV listings?

  12. Love PVR's Dont like Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only advantage that Tivo had over a build it yourself system's is
    You can get the Tivo hardware (when its on sale) for next to nothing.
    But with the monthly channel guide fees, DRM and the lack of free remote management.
    Is slowly driving this product down the tubes.

    With there new fee's tivo's now cost $16.00 a month with a 2 years commitment.
    If your new to pvr's I think MythTV is a better deal.

    I watch downloads and dvd rips, a video server works better for me.

    1. Re:Love PVR's Dont like Tivo by Overzeetop · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Can you set up a MythTV box, give it to your mother in law (who has troubles turning on a VCR), and with 30 minutes of setup have her doing her own thing, and not get a single call in over a year? That is the beauty of TiVo. I hate to sing from the Apple fanboi hymnal, but damnit, it just works.

      I'll admit I've never tried to set up a myth box (and I get HD over DTV, so there's no sense in fighting that battle), so it may be as easy and trouble free as TiVo. But I have my doubts.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. Inaccurate by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    onnectivity is unreliable. We can't assume that we are able to connect to the service back-end at any given instant. Thus, the basic functionality of the DVR should work whether connected or not, transparently to the viewer. As a corollary, we could not build in a dependency on network bandwidth available to the DVR. All data transfer, including eventually video, would be handled through download.

    Not true. More than once I've been up at 4 AM and noticed the Tivo had gone into record, reeling in a commercial hawking an upgraded Tivo box or someone else's product or service. Tivo regularly buys airtime early in the morning to broadcast and reel in their own program material.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Inaccurate by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Here's a typical log entry of Tivo programming to be captured:

      Wed 5/3 5:00 am KSPX Teleworld Paid Program No Episode Title

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    2. Re:Inaccurate by Jonathan_S · · Score: 2, Informative
      As a corollary, we could not build in a dependency on network bandwidth available to the DVR. All data transfer, including eventually video, would be handled through download.

      Not true. More than once I've been up at 4 AM and noticed the Tivo had gone into record, reeling in a commercial hawking an upgraded Tivo box or someone else's product or service. Tivo regularly buys airtime early in the morning to broadcast and reel in their own program material.
      They mean download rather than streaming. The overnight video broadcasts are a form of downloaded material, just not downloaded over the internet. (It is certainly not live streaming material).

      Unless you happen to be watching something at 4am (actually I thought it first tries at 2am), you don't know that the TiVo is doing that. If you have something scheduled to record the TiVo grabs a later airing of that material. Eventually it either manages to record it and turns it into a showcase or menu entry (ad), or it failed to record it and skips that item.

      But the user either sees all of the video played off the hard disk, or non of it. The TiVo isn't attempting to stream the video over a network while the user is watching it.
  14. Cox DVR works great by Amt_Keys · · Score: 1

    I have a Cox DVR (made by Scientific Atlanta), and it works fabulously. I haven't had any of the problems you've encountered, and my wife and I have multiple programs always going. Highly recommended if you're in a Cox area.

    1. Re:Cox DVR works great by crosstalk · · Score: 1

      Time Warner was also using this same box in the NC area and it worked great as well.

      --
      An armed society is a polite Society
  15. Huh? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1, Funny

    Okay. Now there is a blurb from Z: "Tim Burton no longer cofounding Tivo". How the hell do you no longer cofound something? I can see no longer being a president of a company. Or not even having anything to do with a company. But once you found something, you can't UNfound it.

    "Hi, Son. I am no longer your daddy. I unprocreated you"

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Huh? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Tim Burton is a producer and director of movies. He did not co-found Tivo.

      The co-founder of Tivo is Jim Burton.

      It was an apparently lame attempt at humor.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Huh? by kiveol · · Score: 1

      I misread it the first time across as well. The description of the article original claimed that Tim Burton was the cofounder of Tivo. Jim Burton is the cofounder of Tivo, and this was corrected in the description, hence the editor's note.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah.... thanks.

    4. Re:Huh? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Except that it is Jim Barton. You'd think they'd at least get the correction correct.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Huh? by ChelleChelle · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that Tim Burton is no longer cofounding TiVo...it's that I somehow managed to get "Tim Burton" out of "Jim Barton" when submitting the article...how did this happen? No idea, I apologize. Although I was entertained by your comment ("Hi, Son. I am no longer your daddy. I unprocreated you") But to make things clear--Jim Barton did cofound TiVo. Tim Burton is apparently involved in movies.

    6. Re:Huh? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply! While you mistyped, I more put any blame on the editorial crew. The unwashed minions here (namely, everyone with a user id except me) are not doing this for a living. The editors are the ones who should catch these things and doublecheck things. Hence the term 'editor'. Add to this the fact that they were notified of the error and still got the guy's name wrong demonstrates their total lack of caring about their job.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its Barton, and I'm pretty sure you're just as lame as the humour you don't get.

      Keep gaying it up. FAG!!!

  16. interesting by ryen · · Score: 1

    Update: 04/21 18:54 GMT by Z : Tim Burton no longer cofounding Tivo.

    wow, i guess time travel is possible on a tivo too!

  17. offtopic, but why can't I "save" my live buffer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Although not service related, why is it on every DVR that lets you watch live TV, there is no option to save the current buffer. It is obviously recording what you are watching since I can "rewind" up to an hour back and watch that touchdown again and again and again...
    What I want button called "save what I've watched for the past half-hour"
    Sometimes, halfway into a show, I decide that I wanted to record it, but I can't....the best I can do is hit record and continue to record from that point on.
    Grrrr

  18. Re:offtopic, but why can't I "save" my live buffer by dustinl4m3 · · Score: 1

    My comcast DVR will save the current program including the buffer up to the point, if you press record.

  19. heh by syrinx · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's been "corrected", and it's STILL wrong. Jim Barton, not Burton.

    Way to go, Zonk.

    *slow clap*

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:heh by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      What else do you expect from "Zonk"....

  20. Re:TiVO way too full of themselves... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    To say that makes it sound like they haven't accomplished anything. Quite the contrary. I gave my in-laws a tivo box a year ago, and haven't had a single service call in the intervening year. My mother in law can operate the TiVo box easily. Anyone who can accomplish that should be able to knock out world hunger in short order, given the right incentive.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  21. this is the sort of thing that dooms tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC power is unreliable. There is no power switch on a TiVo receiver. The receiver must be able to survive the loss of power at any time without losing track of its state, so a power switch is superfluous.



    well, mr fancy engineer, I like to have a power switch on my expensive computers and my tv. Remember, everyone has a TV, and they all have a power switch.

    You would have done much better to make it with a switch that the user knows will be safe -- nobody wants to just yank the cord from the wall to turn it off. Not even a coffee maker is that poorly designed!

    Your smug "it must survive loss of power" is better suited for the bridge on Star Trek than US living rooms with regular people.

    Also, I just HATE that dancing Tivo character that comes up every time my Tivo overheats and reboots. It's not cute -- send it off with Clippy and Microsoft Bob please.

  22. Re:offtopic, but why can't I "save" my live buffer by Lordrashmi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh, my Tivo does this already.

  23. Re:offtopic, but why can't I "save" my live buffer by radish · · Score: 1

    Tivo can do that, at least it could 3 years ago when I last had one.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  24. BARTON! not Burton. by My+Juicy+Vagina · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Jeez, it's freaking Jim Barton. Zonk, even your lame attempt at humor is shadowed by the fact that you still can't read, even on the second time around.

  25. You can, with a tivo. by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think you've tried enough DVRs. Tivo's buffer may be a measly 30 minutes, but if you hit "record," it copies everything in the buffer back in time to the beginning of the show you are watching.

    There are still some gripes with the Tivo buffering system, but this isn't one of them. Gripes:

    1. It's only 30 minutes
    2. If you wait too long to hit record (ie, into the start of another show) you'll only get the airing show, not the buffered one. It should ask which one you want.
    3. It clears the buffer on every channel change. (Annoying to some, beneficial to others-- perhaps a setting we could switch depending on preference?)

    1. Re:You can, with a tivo. by mcclainsoftware · · Score: 1

      To me: 4. It forces you to use High Quality. We record all our stuff at Basic to maximize space, so in these cases recordings made on the fly take up more space than we really want.

      --
      "It's amazing how much crap exists."-Costas Apostolakos
    2. Re:You can, with a tivo. by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Good point, I forgot about that one. It's not an issue on the DirecTV Tivo units, since we don't have a quality setting.

      I remember recordings at anything below "high" looking like crapola on my series 1, though-- has it improved? I didn't think they could tweak the codecs, since they're in hardware.

    3. Re:You can, with a tivo. by mcclainsoftware · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you define crapola.

      For my wife and I it captures the beauty of our ever-growing concurrent set of reality shows fine for us. There are still weird color and shape glitches in scenes particularly with low lighting and low contrast, but the sound quality seems to be fine - and not like we can tell on our old 27-inch TV.

      Definitely still better than my crappy VCR, which is basically what I was going for.
      Medium Quality is a waste of time - not noticeably different from basic to my eyes. So we either do Basic to get as close to the full 80 hrs in the living room and 40 hours in the bedroom as possible, or do High every once in a while for something we might save to the PC and have the option to make a DVD of it in the future. (Haven't played with that feature yet though either.)

      All in all I'm happy with it which is good because I don't think I'll be able to afford the cash on a Series 3, or the time it would take me to learn how to make a MythTV box.

      --
      "It's amazing how much crap exists."-Costas Apostolakos
    4. Re:You can, with a tivo. by tacokill · · Score: 1

      You know you can change that, right?

      Check here and read this thread.

  26. Update by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Informative


    Soon Zonk will not be confounding Slashdot with sentences like:

    Tim Burton no longer cofounding Tivo.

    Founding is something that is completed in the past. Pluperfect for grammar enthusiasts or those that have learned more structured languages than English is structured.

    Nobody can no longer found or cofound something.

  27. McCoy to Kirk... by mmell · · Score: 1
    (after discovering that the M5 multitronic computer will not shut down . . .)

    "Wonderful machine! No off switch!"

    Must've saved 'em all of about $0.39 per unit in production, eh?

  28. Re:offtopic, but why can't I "save" my live buffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TiVo does this. Just click the 'record' button as you are watching live TV and it will save all that's in the buffer AND all that is to come of the show you are watching. I do this all the time.

  29. Well.... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    The DirecTV tivos, at least, have a power button. Why, I don't know-- since turning it off makes it not record anything. The power button just confuses things.

    I could live without the dancing tivo guy, for sure.

    What I *do* wish the tivo had is a wake-on-schedule setup for recordings. Why does the thing need to be "on" all the time? I have a cheapass HTPC that can hibernate itself and power up at a scheduled time to start a recording-- surely Tivo can do likewise. I could live without the unnecessary power usage and the (admittedly mild) fan noise.

  30. You suxen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit being such a dixen.

  31. Scientific Atlanta by crosstalk · · Score: 1

    I thought the interface was pretty good with the one we have. no relability problems at all over the past two years. HD recording worked great and so did setting up recordings, FF and anything else we needed to do. I am just hopeing my new one Adelphia is as good

    --
    An armed society is a polite Society
    1. Re:Scientific Atlanta by JosefK · · Score: 1

      During two years of service with an SA DVR, we only had one issue, which turned was fixed by replacing a connector outside the house. I don't know how much better the TIVO interface is, but SA's performance and interface beats Motorola hands down.

  32. Re:offtopic, but why can't I "save" my live buffer by Brian360 · · Score: 2, Informative

    MythTV (0.19+) does this too. Since the Live TV "recordings" are basically the same as a regular recording but with a short lifespan, you can hit "record" at any point during a show of any length and it'll flag it as a recording and automatically save the rest of the show, even if you back out of LiveTV. I do this all the time, and its great.

  33. Maxing profit is why you DON'T use DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know that there are some people who probably won't mind distributing their own content without restrictions, but remember that many people are trying to make money off what they create.
    It's ok to distribute with restrictions, but those restrictions should be legal (and copyright already covers anything anyone would ever need), not technical.
    If the distribution of their content isn't protected DRM, then they can't really maximize their profit.
    As many software companies learned in the 1980s, abstaining from copy-protection actually does maximize profit. DRM only costs publishers (e.g. in buying Macrovision's snake oil, in support costs, and in reduced sales) while giving them nothing. And to add insult to injury, it can't (and doesn't) prevent piracy, so the publishers don't get the ego-feeding "feel good" advantage of knowing that they beat the pirates.

    If you hold stock in a company that uses DRM, divest. Nothing can be a surer sign that a company's management has higher priorities than maximizing profits. Might want to check their portfolios to see if they hold stock in companies that sell "DRM technology."

  34. Sounds like somebody needs to buy a real Tivo by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like somebody needs to buy a real Tivo, not some cable-company knock-off.

    That would solve your reliability and channel issues, along with having a better interface.

    Some things just aren't worth skimping on...

  35. No, you're right. by edawstwin · · Score: 1

    "Swap" works this way on the HD Box as well.

    --
    I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
    1. Re:No, you're right. by sootman · · Score: 1

      This proves the original point as much as anything. A DVR is a fucking computer and it can't figure out that when you try to change a channel while watching a recorded show that you really do want to watch something else and it should just switch to the other tuner for you? I know it's possible, because a) computers are pretty smart and b) that's exactly how my TiVo works. And if both tuners are busy, it puts up a message saying that both tuners are in use, and if you try to change channels, this one will stop recording, and do I wish to continue? no [default]/yes.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  36. I just moved from TW to Comcast by JosefK · · Score: 1

    and boy, do I wish that I could have brought the Time Warner box with me. The Motorola POS that Comcast uses has been a pain in the ass. We've had the service for about three weeks. Three times now it's stopped receiving the video signal (the interactive guide still works, but the video signal is black), we lost all our series recording settings. Motorola seems to have decided that having a simpler remote with fewer buttons would make up for having to push those buttons 20 times to do anything in the interface.

    On the Scientific Atlanta box from Time Warner, hitting record while watching a show would save everything in the buffer for the current show - and you could change channels and the show would continue recording to the end. On the Motorola box, hitting record in the middle of a show will only save from when you push the button, and changing channel will stop the recording - unless you went three levels deep in the info menu to record.

    It's a mess, and I have frequently felt the urge to just shoot the box and get it done with. So how much is satellite?

  37. ZONK!!!! OMG!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His name is spelled "Slim Bugbear"! GET IT RIGHT!!!

  38. It's really quite simple... by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    ..don't expect me to watch crap adverts.

    Blaming the recorder for the fact I've got zero interest in the crap adverts isn't rational.

  39. MythTV HDR by jacobsta · · Score: 1

    You're right that it isn't possible to build a MythTV HD-DVR without getting Un-encrypted HD signals via COAX, but that doesn't require a cablecard or some advanced interface to get right - just an inexpensive capture card that takes Component in, that AFAIK is not currently available. MythTV supports IR Blasters already, which is how I use my current TIVO with a cable box in the first place - were I to get an HD Cable box it could theoretically work the same if there was a readily available HD PCI or PCIe card with component in. IE the HD Signal is decrypted in the cable box -> component in on mythtv box -> tv, channels changed by mythtv box with IR Blaster.

    1. Re:MythTV HDR by chris234 · · Score: 1

      >You're right that it isn't possible to build a MythTV HD-DVR without getting Un-encrypted HD signals via COAX, but that doesn't require a cablecard
      >or some advanced interface to get right - just an inexpensive capture card that takes Component in, that AFAIK is not currently available.

      Just because it called MythTV doesn't mean you have access to mythical hardware....

    2. Re:MythTV HDR by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >it isn't possible to build a MythTV HD-DVR without getting Un-encrypted HD signals via COAX

      It is possible to get HD content into myth-TV if you have the DirectTV Tivo. I have done this by hand, with a hacked tivo, and the usb-Eithernet adapter, then used mencoder to put it into a divx format and mythTV to re-stream it.

      I have seen plugins designed to automate Tivo -> mythTV, but since my PC wasn't doing a very strong job of sending HD content reliably through mythTV, mythTV is shelved at my house, until I have more time to waste on it anyway.

  40. Listing Accuracy and Detail by forkmonkey · · Score: 1

    I've noticed with Comcast service, and to a lesser degree the TIVO service, that listing quality can be a major problem.

    Say, for example you have the following series subscriptions in order of priority:

    1) West Wing - New and First Run Only

    2) Sopranos - New and First Run Only

    I'll frequently see a new episode of the Sopranos *not* get recorded because a rerun of West Wing was playing, and the DVR couldn't distinguish between the re-run and first-run. Not only that, but my storage will fill with reruns of one show or another.

    While this is not entirely under the control of the DVR vendors, it is something that is vital to their customer satisfaction.

    And, on another note, the Comcast High Definition DVRs are pieces of junk. I've gone through 4 of them in less than a year, and their software is plagued by numerous bugs that any competent SQA would have caught and refused to let go into a released product. Compared to my Series 1 TiVO that I have had for years, the Comcast box is shameful. I'd can it immediately if it were not the only way to get my HD programs recorded.

    1. Re:Listing Accuracy and Detail by bm17 · · Score: 1


      This is more a problem with the listing data provided by Tribune Media Services. To be fair, it's a lot of data to coordinate.

      Here's what I hate: Say my prefs are 1) Daily Show, and 2) Lost, and let's say both are on at 8pm. Tivo will record The Daily Show and skip Lost, even though there is another showing of the Daily Show at 11pm.

    2. Re:Listing Accuracy and Detail by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      A related problem is when an episode is shown in another country first. An example is the new Dr. Who series from England. By the time an episode makes its way here to the U.S., TiVo thinks it's a rerun, even though it hasn't been shown here before. So for shows like that, you can't set it for First Run Only like you would for any other show. TiVo is so close to perfect that issues like this are all the more annoying.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Listing Accuracy and Detail by goldfndr · · Score: 1
      Tivo will record The Daily Show and skip Lost, even though there is another showing of the Daily Show at 11pm.
      I question why you'd put The Daily Show at a higher priority than Lost, since The Daily Show airs five[1] times per day and Lost only airs once[1] per week. It's all a matter of priority.

      [1] Lost: zero to two, sometimes a repeat on the weekend. The Daily Show: assuming you don't count Monday repeats, and assuming your provider doesn't air its own content during repeats. On the other hand, over here Lost is broadcast at 9pm, not 8pm, and the first broadcast of The Daily Show is 11pm, so maybe this is a thoroughly contrived example not intended to reflect any reality or maybe you're in the Central timezone.

      --
      Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    4. Re:Listing Accuracy and Detail by bm17 · · Score: 1

      It was, in fact, a contrived example. I couldn't remember the name of the show that was at a lower priority than Dialy and at the same time.

    5. Re:Listing Accuracy and Detail by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Sure. But the scheduling in Tivo is still dumb.

      Regardless of priority, it's a fact you indicated you want both shows, and it's a fact Tivo could manage to record both of them if it was a little bit clever.

      MythTv *would* manage to get both shows in this situation. (low-pri show with only one airing crashes with high-pri show with several airings)

  41. No, it should be provided for free! by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >If you are not willing to subscribe to the DVR manufacturer's TV listings service,
    >then are you willing to subscribe to TV Guide magazine (also a service) and key
    >in your own TV listings?

    This information is already provided by many content providers for free. I get Guide+ program listings on my TV sets and on my computer for free. There is no need to subscribe to a service to get a program listing, nor shoult there be. If the content provider wants me to watch their content, they need to provide a way for me to alter my schedule to watch or record it. It is in the content providers' best interest to provide free scheduling information.

    The grandparent is right - a DVR is a product, not a service. The only "challenge" here is it's hard to create an unending revenue stream from a product, hence the desire to try and market it as a service.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:No, it should be provided for free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "grandparent" is only right if you want a crappy DVR product, in which case "free" TV guide services (which aren't really free) will "do you". The reason why TiVo is a service is because it uses much, much richer Tribune data and is constantly improving the software and other services. Your crappy, thrown together DVR ain't going to provide anything close to what a TiVo can provide. I'll pay for that convenience and service, thank you very much. Eventually TiVo will be making money with targeted advertising (a la the Google model) and the subscription costs will go down - much like newspapers and magazines which are supported mostly by advertising revenue and not by subscriptions.

  42. TV Guide On Screen by tepples · · Score: 1

    I get Guide+ program listings on my TV sets and on my computer for free.

    I'd imagine that access to the Guide Plus (now TV Guide On Screen) listings is not actually free, that consumer electronics manufacturers pay royalties to Gemstar for use of related patents and know-how with the condition that advertisements in the service shall be displayed without modification. Makers of MythTV boxes are unlikely to be large enough to be able to negotiate with Gemstar.

  43. Guide+ by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >I'd imagine that access to the Guide Plus (now TV Guide On Screen [gemstartvguide.com]) listings is not actually free,
    >that consumer electronics manufacturers pay royalties to Gemstar for use of related patents and know-how with the
    >condition that advertisements in the service shall be displayed without modification. Makers of MythTV boxes are
    >unlikely to be large enough to be able to negotiate with Gemstar.

    My ATI TV Wonder tuner card in my PC supports the Guide+ service and it's rudimentary DVR feature makes use of it. I'm surprised some enterprising young hacker hasn't built a MythTV around it., EULAs be damned.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  44. Tivo embodies everything I hate... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo is the perfect example of everything I hate about DRM, the "IP economy", etc.

    Jim says, in no uncertain terms, that although you might have paid $500 for the hardware, they want to secure it enough that you can't use any 3rd-party software to update the listings. That's exactly like the RIAA, MPAA, Cable TV, etc.

    You bought the product, yet you don't really own it... They don't quite want to make it a product, and don't quite want to make it a service. They want to get the best of both for themselves, and screw their customers every which-way they can.

    Every day I'm more and more glad I spent ~$400 on a new system with a capture card, and invested a couple weeks to set everything up, about 4 years ago... My DVR is fast enough to playback HDTV, and already has a DVI output. For the cost of a cable, and perhaps an HDTV capture card, I'm ready for the next 100 years of broadcast television. Plus I can re-encode and edit out commercials, master and record to CD, DVD (Blu-ray?) etc. right on the same old DVR.

    Meanwhile, Tivo owners have to go through extensive hacks to upgrade their hard drives, transfer their recordings to their PCs to re-encode, edit, burn to DVD, etc. Have to pay monthly fees for life, or put their old series 1 Tivos on life-support, to try and keep them going forever.

    My DVR may not have an interface as pretty as a Tivo (mainly just a slightly modified file-manager, a few scripts, and MPlayer, operated through an IR remote), but it's stupid-simple to use, incredibly responsive, and it will work with anything you can throw at it.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  45. burdens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, control interface and lack of reliability are not the most annoying burdens. Its the burden that is placed by design on many DVR's- the lack of 30 second skip functionality. Almost all DVR manufacturers put the capability in the software and then let the cable company determine if they want to disable it. Some branded Tivos for instance have it disabled. My Motorola PVR had it enabled (once I programmed the remote) for a long time until my cable company, Insight Communications, determined that their advertisers were more their customers than I, and disabled it.

    I can deal with reliability issues. I can deal with odd control interfaces (the Motorola GUI is not so great). But I cannot deal with having to use fast forward to advance over commercials-- I do, but its the most annoying thing to deal with and the cable company's know it.

    I love my ReplayTV and its commercial skip AND 30 second advance functionality. But sadly, its a dinosaur and if I want to record HD content or digitally, I have to use the Motorola Box. I still use the ReplayTV as a backup on some things so that if the Motorola DVR fails, I'll still get the program on the replaytv. It doesn't happen often, and usually its programmer error.

  46. Only one burden, really... by epp_b · · Score: 1

    'The two burdens that are probably most annoying to the user are a complex and difficult control interface and lack of reliability.'

    Wrong. There is only one, and it ends with two 'A's...

  47. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The grammatical pluperfect is "have" + "pluperfect past form", as in "He has eaten", or "Dick has shot his friend".

    An older form uses the present form of to be" + the pluperfect past form. This can still be seen in German in phrases such as "Er ist gestorben." (Note gestorben being a verb, not an adjective.)

    The ancilliary verb of the construction can also be in the past tense, indicating the action had already been completed in the past.

    Founding is also an act that can be done right now - as is the proper usage of the form. It can also be used with the past form of "to be" to indicate somebody was in the middle of founding something. Thus not a perfect form, as the act is not completed.

    I'd agree though, that the semantics of the sentence are muddled, at best.

  48. MythTV is already better than this by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    MythTV now doesn't treat the "buffer" very much different to the "recordings".

    It will keep *everything* you watch, given enough disk space, and expire "Live" data faster than the "Recordings" to make room for new material.

    You can also promote a live buffer to a recording by pressing record.

  49. Humax - 8000T Freeview by blackpaw · · Score: 1

    Not sure what the story is in the USA - but from the comments you seemed starved for choice on PVR's

    Here in Australia I got a Humax 8000T
        http://www.digicams-uk.com/prod324.htm

    It was Au$150 on special (Steal !)
    - Builtin Digital Settop Box
    - 80GB HD
    - Single Tuner :(
    - EPG
    - Separate SCART output for playing recordings to a VCR

    Its been very reliable - never crashed and the interface is reasonable. Has 30 sec skip :)

    I could never go back to a VCR - these things are great, finally seeing all the good latenight shows that I couldn't be bother programming the VCR for.

    1. Re:Humax - 8000T Freeview by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      Shoulda bought a Topfield (thought you got away from the Topfield fanboys by avoiding dtvforum.info, didn't you ;-)

      - upgradeable HD (I've got a 250G in mine, others have done 400G+)
      - full twin tuner (record 2 timers while playing back a recording)
      - full 7-day EPG (not just "Now & Next") uploaded from PC
      - USB port for downloading recordings to your PC - make DVDs with proper menus, directly from the digital stream, with no analogue loss.

      Admittedly, they cost 5x as much as your Humax. But even the Humax 9000T can't do 2 & 3, and I'm not sure about 1 either.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?