Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Make Water Run Uphill

redshadow01 writes to mention a BBC story about scientists flouting the laws of physics for fun, and profit. From the article: "The US scientists did the experiment to demonstrate how the random motion of water molecules in hot steam could be channelled into a directed force. But the team, writing in Physical Review Letters, believes the effect may be useful in driving coolants through overheating computer microchips."

32 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Scientists also noticed the older water... by deft · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists also noticed the older water samples flowed uphill, both ways.

    In the snow.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  2. So what by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what, they've been doing that at Knott's house of mystery for the past like what, 20 years?

    I know how to make water travel uphill:

    Step 1: Stand up.
    Step 2: Find an incline.
    Step 3: Walk up said incline.
    Warning: Step 1 and Step 3 should not be performed by anyone who even knows how to properly type in the URL to this website without first consulting a physician. Doing so may cause undesired effects such as loss of breath and/or time spent away from the internet.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:So what by rockwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      There at least 22 other net-documented places that this occurs. Rolling Uphill Illusion . The 'local' location to my residence is Gravity Hill, PA . These locations are well documented and explained in detail. Furthermore the fifth picture from the top shows where the street has been tagged as well as the starting point.

      --
      Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
  3. For fun and for .. by Neeth · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Flaunting the laws of physics
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    --
    Yes, I am the one with the legendary sig.
  4. Steam, useful for cooling microchips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad only intel CPU's run hot enough for steam cooling to be viable.

  5. Not flaunting, FLOUTING by mrjeff3000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/flaunt.html ("To flaunt is to show off: you flaunt your new necklace by wearing it to work. "Flout" has a more negative connotation; it means to treat with contempt some rule or standard. The cliché is "to flout convention." Flaunting may be in bad taste because it's ostentatious, but it is not a violation of standards.") (That is all.)

  6. Maxwell's demon? by Toba82 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Has Maxwell's demon been discovered?

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    1. Re:Maxwell's demon? by pla · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ooh! <A random quasi-interesting topic my highschool teacher mentioned offhand, which has nothing to do with the topic at hand>

      Wow, the slash-trolls have come out in force today!

      Perhaps you would have done better to listen to that "quasi-interesting" topic, then apply the knowledge gained to reading the FP link. Because, strangely enough, it has everything to do with the topic at hand. From the linked article:
      the original intention was to devise an arresting demonstration of how random energy can be rectified into directed motion
      Pretty much the frickin' definition of Maxwell's Demon!


      It may have confused you that in this case, the "demon" has a higher temperature than the surrounding area - But Maxwell only propsed that the source and destination of the molecules have the same temperature, not the demon itself. Somehow I suspect that subtletly lost on you, however, and you had no such semi-legitimate objection in mind, preferring to just act like a complete git in general.
    2. Re:Maxwell's demon? by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you want to see Maxwell's Demon, You can do so here:

      http://www.machall.com/index.php?strip_id=346

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  7. Hmmm.... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if they could find a way to do the same with shit.

  8. Usefull in computers? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Informative
    It works by having the water hovering on steam. As said in the article the same effect you get when you poor some water on a hot plate.

    Now you only get steam above 100 degrees celcius. Meaning you chip must be literally cooking before this effect sets in.

    A bit too late perhaps?

    Well offcourse you could use liqueds with lower boiling temps but then it wouldn't be water flowing up hill anymore now would it.

    Nice idea but I think I just use a pump rather then waiting for the cooling to set in only after my cpu is glowing red.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Usefull in computers? by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only could you used other liquids, pumps generate heat too, and the thing can act as a temperature sensor so it combines three functions in one.

      If it gets my chips running faster, simplifies design (lowers costs) and improves reliability (taking out pumps reduces what can go wrong) I'm all for it.

  9. Only if... by robbak · · Score: 2, Funny

    you engrave every surface that you are going to travel over with .3 mm saw-tooth-shapped groves. Could be a little difficult on, say, the Atlantic Ocean.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  10. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The US scientists did the experiment to demonstrate how the random motion of water molecules in hot steam could be channelled into a directed force

    Thats so awesome! Maybe we can use that force push trains or something!

  11. M. C. Escher & Dyson. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No discussion of water flowing uphill can go without mention of M.C. Escher's Waterfall and Dyson's fantastic real world recreation (and there's a good explanation of Dyson did it at the BBC.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  12. And for my next impression... by Hobbes897 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will scientists get around to what's really important? When will they make hot snow fall up?

    --
    Normality is now: overrated.
  13. Another way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whitesides made water run uphill 14 years ago! He used a different "trick" though: he made a surface that was very hydrophobic on one side, and very hydrophilic on the other. A drop of water feels this gradient and moves towards the hydrophilic side, even if it happens to be uphill. The energy comes from the surface tension of the drop (it relaxes as it moves).

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992Sci...256.1539C

  14. Re:Interesting by rkcallaghan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about a self recycling dam? After the water creates energy going down you push it back up and do it again. Maybe even you can get some engery from moving it up. This is all assuming that you gain more energy than you're losing with this method.

    Look up the Second Law of Thermodynamics and get back to me on that.

    Cheers,
    ~Rebecca

  15. So Escher was right after all by John_Renne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The moment i saw the headline my mind came to Escher, showing us water floating upwards in the painting http://www.petergh.f2s.com/waterfall.jpg Now let's wait for the real life implementation of the ever-rising stairs...

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
  16. Re:British vacuurm cleaner builder did this alread by KylePflug · · Score: 3, Informative

    Except the American version actually flows uphill, and Dyson's version is just an illusion. Thanks for playing, though.

  17. Re:Interesting by It'sYerMam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ahem. Are you seriously suggesting the creation of a perpetual motion machine?? Something that gives out energy? Hehehe. Besides, if you'd RTFA (yes, I know, this is /.) you'd realise the water has to be pretty hot, in order to give the water molecules enough energy to do this.
    Incidentally, this science is months out of date: http://www.newscientisttech.com/channel/tech/dn861 6.html

    --
    im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
  18. Re:Interesting by joto · · Score: 2, Informative
    How about a self recycling dam? After the water creates energy going down you push it back up and do it again. Maybe even you can get some engery from moving it up. This is all assuming that you gain more energy than you're losing with this method.

    Well, that would work. Except that you also need a heating source that will heat the water vapour to above 200C. You could use solar power for that, but if you already have solar power, solar cells would be more efficient. Heck, if you could consistently heat a large area to above 200C with solar power, it would probably be more efficient to make a steam engine.

    Another possible heat source could be a volcano, but I think that if you want to extract power from the heat difference of a volcano and it's surroundings, you'd find more efficient ways to do it, than making small droplets of water climb upwards and then fall down through a turbine.

  19. Re:Interesting by tacocat · · Score: 3, Funny

    So Escher was ahead of his time?

  20. Re:WTF.. by Mike+Quin · · Score: 3, Informative

    That was really just an optical trick - the water flowing 'up' the ramp was actually flowing down it, with bubbles underneath the ramp giving the appearance of motion in the other direction.

    see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3046791.stm

  21. I hate this kind of story by Dylanesque · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is all very nice, but then the scientist go and say this will 'help cool computer chips'. This it will never do, and I >hate itjust below the onset of film boiling (i.e. when this phenomenon does not occur) is well known to represent to the point of optimum heat transfer. Once film boiling comments, the heat transfer coeffiecient for the surface declines drastically (basically because the density of the coolant in contact with the hot surface declines). Although converting liquid to gas uses a large amount of heat for no rise in temperature, unless liquid can be kept in contact with the surface (by getting rid of the gas) then heat transfer declines

    Making a droplet walk up hill is a neat trick, but in reality its like firing a water rocket with a payload of water.

    I hate this kind of story

  22. FInally! A cure for world hunger! by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here I was, thinking that scientists have found a way to make rivers bring water to parched land where irrigation could help make the land more productive for starving nations,

    and all we have are some serious overclockers.

    I'd hate to be at a LAN party with these guys.
     

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  23. Links with information... by Mike+Peel · · Score: 5, Informative
    Why doesn't the article link to pages with more information that just a summary?


    Incidentally, this news dates from the end of 2005 - so slashdot is running 4/5 months behind the times.
  24. That sounds like so many... by CFD339 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...I.T. projects I've reviewed as a consultant its scary. The spent huge sums figuring out how to do something which is inherently difficult and provides little real world benefit in anything but the longest possible range projections -- which invariably become useless once that amount of time comes to pass.

    Its like building a website out of "Pure J2EE" (whatever the hell that means) -- or building a sand castle one grain of sand at a time. It can be done. That's terrific. But why?

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  25. 2nd law of thermodynamics wins again by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It would work great, you would just need a nuclear reactor or other suitable energy source to heat the surface of the carefully machined track that the hover craft would run on.

    The headline of this article is a bit misleading. Within the article there is no claim of getting anything for nothing...For example I have a device in my basement that makes water run uphill. I have heard some people call it a sump pump. Using a portion of the waste heat from a CPU to drive its own cooling cycle is appealling...but to not have it start to run until local temperatures are already boiling water seems a bit limited.

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  26. Against the flow by Mr_Blank · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Humans are 70%+ water. Most people take the path of least resistance. Some rare people use their humanity to go against the flow." -- Benjamin Bias

  27. Re:Hah! You can make water run uphill... by Jamil+Karim · · Score: 2, Funny

    We've placed your beer on that hill. Better run and get it before someone else does. =)

  28. Re:Interesting by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that if you want to extract power from the heat difference of a volcano and it's surroundings, you'd find more efficient ways to do it, than making small droplets of water climb upwards and then fall down through a turbine.

    Yeah, like heating the water, and using it to drive the turbine.

    Or around here, pumping the water into the ground, where it is heated, and comes out through the natural geothermal vents, driving a turbine.

    I live in Lake County, California, USA, and Calpine (which is rapidly approaching bankruptcy, or just declared it, or something) is selling "The Geysers" to some other company, but lately they've been pumping half-treated sewage into the ground in order to replenish the water that drives the turbines, so they can stay in business...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"