Slashdot Mirror


Tech Fraud Beating Out Social Engineering

The Walking Dude writes "BBC News asked Frank Abagnale if technology is driving the old-school conman into extinction. 'Mr Abagnale really ought to know', as the 2002 movie Catch Me If You Can was based on his life. He served five years of a 12 year prison sentence for check fraud before being offered a job with the FBI. 'There may, after all, be life in the old con yet.'"

67 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Old Con? Social Engineering in today's workplace by layer3switch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Gone is the sharp-suited, debonair, sliver-tongued fraudster who'd charm his way to a personal fortune. [...] It is the ability to read a person's blind spot, tell them what they expect to hear - and get them to tell you what you need to know."

    I disagree. Now they all work in corporate america somewhere in Sales and Marketing department. Few of them even make it up to executive office. Social engineering is the template of sales and marketing.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  2. Torrent for "Catch Me If You Can" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Torrent for "Catch Me If You Can" by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Funny

      The irony in all this is "Catch Me If You Can" was the *ONLY* movie I ever theater hopped. Only because of the name did I do it. Caught I was not.

  3. What about all those at Enron? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Gone is the sharp-suited, debonair, sliver-tongued fraudster who'd charm his way to a personal fortune."

    Hey, BBC writer, didn't you ever hear of Enron?

    1. Re:What about all those at Enron? by EvanED · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait... politics aside, are you suggesting Dick Cheney could charm his way into anything?

    2. Re:What about all those at Enron? by andreyw · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if the charm didn't have the results expected, he'd just invite them over for a hunting party...

    3. Re:What about all those at Enron? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Grrrrr....

      Note to self: when responding to someone, be sure to quote them. That way, if the parent is modded down to -1, you don't look like a moron.

  4. What? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We all know that wearing jumpsuits, walking in a building (greeting everyone in the way) and getting the computers you want is much easier than trying to hack into the system to get the data. Same for passwords, etc.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:What? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or you can just call say you are technical support and ask them for their password. Or if you are on site just read the posted notes on the monitor. People are much easier to hack then computers.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:What? by fux0rbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a short conversation I had with a teacher (I work for a school district) I had the other day.

      Me: "Hey, what's your password? No wait, I'll just reset your password and you can change it when the computer restarts."

      Teacher: "NO! I don't want to make a new password. I just want them all to be the same so I don't have to remember two or three. My password is 'steak'."

      Me: *Sigh* "Okay..."

      --
      w00t w00t watch wh0 y0u sh00t!
    3. Re:What? by trewornan · · Score: 1

      I'm a teleworker, I have a password to open up windows on my laptop, another to access the encrypted disk. To log into the work system I have to use 3 passwords, then there are passwords for the "Employee Self Service System", the requisition system, etc.

      Offhand I'd say I have a dozen different passwords (just for work), all of these have to be changed regularly but on different cycles, most of them are required to be non-repeating for at least eight changes and be at least 8 characters long.

      To say it's a pain in the ass is a massive under-statement.

      OK, so you might say that passwords should contain upper and lower case as well as numerical digits and so forth, but it's not that simple - can you imagine trying to remember 12 new truly random passwords per month (all changing on different dates).

      I've found that without some systematic method it's impossible to make this work, as a result of using a system I know that my passwords are relatively weak but what would you do?

    4. Re:What? by trewornan · · Score: 1

      Well I've never claimed to be 1337, and I dare say more than a few people consider me a twat but I object to being called paranoid.

      And I can't resist pointing out that I use windows *for work* because that's what I'm required to use, not because it's necessarily what I would chose myself.

    5. Re:What? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What an asshole you are. This guy gives you real world reasons why requiring multiple ever changing passwords doesn't work, and all you can do is call him names.

      His problem isn't that he's using Windows or is too stupid to understand what two-factor authentication means. His problem is that people like you have devised security policies that REQUIRE unmemorizable passwords.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:What? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Tell your work to invest in two-factor authenticators and don't store your own secrets on your work computer.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    7. Re:What? by idonthack · · Score: 1

      If you've got a good boss, talk to him about it. If your boss is a fruit, explain to him how other people who aren't as mentally capable as him might have problems with the system. In both cases, gain the support of your coworkers.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    8. Re:What? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I've been saying for a long time that passwords should just be stored on a friggin swipe card. It isn't like a reader is advanced technology. While it's not strictly two factor authenication it is better than having the user either just write down the password or use something that is easy to memorize.

      At least if you keep the swipe card and your other factor isolated (e.g. on in your pocket the other in your bag or whatever) a compromise of one is not of both...

      Swipe cards are also easy to reprogram and revoke [unlike say biometrics]. Storing a random 16-char string on a swipecard is entirely doable and much better than "password" as a password.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:What? by trewornan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'll mention that to our sysadmins.

      PS. on second thoughts I don't object to being called paranoid - you may have been right on all three counts.

    10. Re:What? by boron+boy · · Score: 2, Informative
      can you imagine trying to remember 12 new truly random passwords per month (all changing on different dates).

      I've found that without some systematic method it's impossible to make this work, as a result of using a system I know that my passwords are relatively weak but what would you do?

      Install KeePass.

    11. Re:What? by rewinn · · Score: 1

      It's not paranoia if people are really out to get access to your resources.

      Your particular machine don't actually have to have valuable information to be worth breaking into. The meta-data in your documents, your machine's access to other more valuable machines, and of course its use as a zombie ... makes us all valuable targets!

      At last, someone really values each and every one of us: the criminals!

    12. Re:What? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      SecureID would be an example. Memorize a four-digit PIN, then input the number from the card.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    13. Re:What? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Swipe card + smart card is not two-factor authentication.

      The most reasonable two-factor authentication that I know of is a single, unique password for your smart card, which maybe changes occasionally and maybe doesn't. The smart card then does all the authentication to the server. If the card is designed properly, nobody can get the private key off it by hacking your computer (they need physical access to the card, and a well-equipped electronics lab), and if they steal the card but don't have the lab, they can't authenticate without your password.

      RSA's SecureID model 520 is even better in this respect, because the attacker can't hope to get your password by hacking your computer, but it's more expensive than a smart card. I'd also worry about oil or wear on the keys giving away the PIN up to permutation. The other SecureIDs are equivalent to a smart card in terms of threat modeling.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    14. Re:What? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      So it's the user's fault he doesn't have a "swipe" card?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    15. Re:What? by Grab · · Score: 1

      Per Bruce Schneier, it's safer to have one password that you can remember than a dozen different passwords which you need to record somewhere, bcos then no-one can steal your written-down version. And if you only have one, it can be reasonably complex, which gives you better security again.

      Grab.

  5. He's misreading things, I believe by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "technical" frauds today rely on social engineering. Phishing is a perfect example of social engineering, and many botnets get installed by tricking the user rather than by exploiting a technical security vulnerability.

    Nor was Abagnale non-technical. One of his scames was so beautiful that you wish you could admire it, and it was based on manipulating the magnetic ink on a check to put the check-processing infrastructure into an infinite loop. Talk about "float", especially since there was never anything behind the check in the first place. He'd withdraw the money after his victim bank decided "well, hasn't bounced yet, must be good".

    1. Re:He's misreading things, I believe by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "technical" frauds today rely on social engineering.

      Right, it's still basically social engineering, but the real key (not mentioned in TFA) is that not only are tricks like phishing easy and practically anonymous, but the pool of victims is so much larger. I'll bet a single mass spam yields hundreds of valid accounts. It's then just a matter of logging in to all of them (hell, you can script that too!) and drain the easiest biggest targets.

  6. Re:Selective prejudice... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    It seems you're asserting there aren't thousands of people running scams using computers. Perhaps you feel that anyone using computers is inately honest? Or perhaps you took it personally for some unknown reason? I am insanely curious at to your reasoning.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  7. Old scams are definitely still alive... by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Just ask James Randi - he's been keeping track of dubious scams and claims for decades. Just read through a few of his newsletters if you ever want to be amazed at the things people will pretend they can do for money, power, or just plain delusion.

    In my oppinion, healthy skepticism is something that should be taught to every school child as part of a minimal education. Knowing how to be properly, rationally skeptical is a very important skill - being either unskeptical, or holding irrational skepticism based on what you want to feel is as much a disability as not being able to read or do math. The scientific method helps if it is introduced comprehensively - but there's a LOT of scientists with doctorates that will be fooled by some of the simplest scams, then convince themselves they couldn't be fooled. Healthy skepticism is both knowing that you can be wrong, but you being wrong doesn't make someone else's extrordinary claims correct, even if it's an innocent mistake for all involved.

    Especially disturbing are the constant resurgance of medical scams. People willing to try anything can be put through real hell by people willing to offer them an option that no one else will provide. The family of the dead rarely know to put any blame on a false cure, and the living often mistakenly promote as a miracle whatever was offered, so these scams can erupt almost anywhere. Add in scam artists using religion, blaming the dying for their own failed cure, and the unfounded skepticism of scientific medicine, and you can see how nasty these situations can be.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the most frightening things I learn having conversations with people is their willingness to believe complete and utter bullshit. I couldn't agree more that we should be teaching scepticism in schools - people are clearly out of touch with reality and willing to believe the most ridiculous things with no evidence whatsoever.

    2. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. Communism is bad

      2. WMD in Iraq

      3. WMD in Iran

      4. No WMD in Israel

      5. "We're at war with terrorists" so it's ok to suspend your rights to make you safe.

      Nuff said.

      Tom [-- hates seeing neighbouring country being destroyed by lunatic security policies]

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes - but as I implied a little in my earlier post, just as important as teaching the reasoning skills to be skeptical of claims, it's also very important to not hold such skepticism to an absurd degree, or to selectively hold skepticism for only certain things. Most things in life will just be unknown - and we all have a very limited opportunity in life to explore all the claims we are surrounded by.

      Making a school class out of skepticism could be a delicate job. Designing a test that could be fairly applied to students without unfairly targetting subjects that are precious to people could be (politically) difficult. Still, it's a task well worth doing.

      The ability to weigh skepticism rationally, to be able to accept not knowing things can be very tough skills to master. But I think most people would agree we'd be a lot better off if the basics of skepticism were a bigger part of public consideration.

      The danger of such a class would be that it were poorly presented, most students end up concluding that they should just be skeptical about what they like to feel is wrong. That's how a scam artist uses the common sense ideas of skepticism. It's also how we fool ourselves into believing things we wanted to believe for irrational reasons. Other students may feel that they are being lead into mental paralysis by these endless considerations, and conclude effectively the same thing.

      Still, I think such a class would be worth the potential for such mistakes. Even if all it does is make the "you're being skeptical" line in a discussion less of an insult and more of a legitimate consideration of unfair bias for people, it would be worth it.

      Ryan Fenton

    4. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by idonthack · · Score: 4, Funny
      One of the most frightening things I learn having conversations with people is their willingness to believe complete and utter bullshit.
      One time a girl asked a friend of mine if guys breathed through thier penis while they slept. She was completely serious. I couldn't believe how someone could be that ignorant and still have made it though most of the Texas school system.

      Wait a moment...
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    5. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Funny

      One time a girl asked a friend of mine if guys breathed through thier penis while they slept. She was completely serious.

      Perhaps a guy asked her to perform artifical resuscitation on his penis?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by drkmtr · · Score: 1

      "...people are clearly out of touch with reality and willing to believe the most ridiculous things with no evidence whatsoever." Stamp "weight loss" on a multi-vitamin pack, sell it for $150 and then tell the buyer, "Your results may vary." Brilliant, IMO...

    7. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by renoX · · Score: 1

      Too true.
      I think that 50% of Americans beleive that 'little green men' exist, in France when we get hired we are usually tested with a 'graphological analysis' which is as much scientific as atrology, etc.

      But it gets really interesting when you think about religions: having blind faith in unprovable stories.. Religions are really the total opposite of scepticisms.

    8. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by infolation · · Score: 1

      As with any other academic research, teach them 'if you want the truth, compare the lies'.

    9. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Why do I suddenly picture an amazing CPR class scam at the University of Texas, involving a fraternity teaching "Natural Respiration" instead of "Artificial Respiration", a refreshments table with a lot of really cheap beer on it, and a webcam?

    10. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      HOLD IT!

      You mean when Bushie says he's not really mining and trolling the personal data of millions of innocent Americans - he's really full of Texas beans????

      [My wet dream: the indictments of Rove...Cheney...and Bush.]

    11. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by jadavis · · Score: 1

      jobs for everyone and no homeless...damned commie scum. Real patriots live on the streets.

      Too bad it doesn't provide food for everyone. I suppose you think communism is great except for the tens of millions of people who starved to death.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    12. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One time a girl asked a friend of mine if guys breathed through thier penis while they slept. She was completely serious.

      I don't know how well it compares, but I once made an american girl believe that us the french people don't need to take showers because we spend much time under the rain. And yes she totally believed that.

      But there's worse, just a few years ago I used to believe anything I was told without thinking twice about it, all of this just because of how I had been raised into believing the most senseless stuff

      Like when I was 13-14, one friend told me that when he was 1, we took a ride on his bike, made a few miles and stopped at a phone booth to call his mom to pick him up. I totally believed that one. Some people just wouldn't suspect anyone of lying, I think the educational part is to teach that people lie, although they can be nice and not necessarily evil.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    13. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Nope....morning news as I was getting ready for work. It was main stream TV news...channel 8 in my market (NBC?) IIRC.

    14. Re:Old scams are definitely still alive... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I love how some loser loves to troll me....they specifically watch and moderate my posts. Now THAT is a serious fucking loser in life. That's is just oh so funny. I wonder how pethetic you have to be in real life to stalk someone online. Oh well...all you can do is laugh at how worthless they are. Hmmm....wonder if they still breast feed from mommy too... lol...

  8. Re:Selective prejudice... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

    a) This is another non-story. So long as the majority of people are "dumb", social engineering will remain a part of our lives.

    b) I was trying to find an interesting convo (and failed)

    c) I've known a few scum bags in this world, and oddly, in my experience, the bigger the scum bag, the more attractive they are. I find the stereotype of "hunchbacked hackers in dark rooms" just insulting and absurd. Just as insulting as the other two options (I'm not black, but a Jew, but either way its irrelevant.) Prejudices are reported every day as "fact", and I hate when I see the BBC use Fox News editorial policies.

    d) I'm hungry, and cranky, and bored, and waiting for the fiance to wake up so we can go get dinner (she works the night shift). After previewing that comment, I said to myself "nope, that's just dumb" and hit back...or so I thought. Sorry for wasting your time.

  9. Perhaps this link is relevent? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "BPL and other tall tales spun by Willian Luke Stewart"

    It came up in the BPL discussion yesterday...

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    1. Re:Perhaps this link is relevent? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Oh, my. That *is* an excellent example of spewing technological mumbo-jumbo to hide the lack of any possibility of it working with claims like this:

      > But Media Fusion's Stewart says Nortel and others made the early mistake of
      trying to replicate telephone systems, which use radio waves to transmit
      information through copper wires.

      This is, of course, utter, utter nonsense. Telephony and its older ancestor, telegraphy, are not radio waves, they're low frequency electrical currents. They're carried by sets of electrons, not the photons of radio frequency signals. The following nonsensical spew about being able piggyback microwave frequency, speed-of-light transmissions on top of the existing power line structure continues with the nonsense.

      But it's technical enough sounding that a congress-person, looking for reasons to spend money in their district for improving the power line and getting votes for getting cheap broadband to people, could get sucked in: I'm amazed that it's gotten this far.

  10. Slashdot admin message by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Slashdot suscriber, There have been a number of dangerous on scammer so far on our site. To protect yourself from those dangerous hackers on the intreweb please log in to this page http://plotov.miasnik.ru/ to confirm your details (name, address, credit card, SSN etc). The slashdot admins.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Slashdot admin message by thePig · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tried the link, but it is slashdotted ...
      Goodness gracious

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
  11. How about Schwartzinegger? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Informative
    Wait... politics aside, are you suggesting Dick Cheney could charm his way into anything?

    Ken Lay certainly had his fingers all over Cheney, but even worse, Enron basically gave the job of CA governor to Schwarzenegger. Sit down some time and watch "Enron, the Smartest Guys in the Room". Little birdies have told me it is, uh, "readily available" for download.

    ..or just fire up a google search. Or Check out the PBS Frontline special, Blackout.

    Basically, think "Iran Contra arms-for-hostages" scandal, only instead of Regan, President, and arms...think Schwarzenegger, CA Governor, and the CA power grid- which Enron was have an absolute joy shutting down (yes, shutting down.)

    From Truthout.org: More important, however, Schwarzenegger still wont respond to questions about why he was at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills two years ago where he, former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan and junk bond king Michael Milken, met secretly with former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay who was touting a plan for solving the states energy crisis. Other luminaries who were invited but didnt attend the May 24, 2001 meeting included former Los Angeles Laker Earvin Magic Johnson and supermarket magnate Ron Burkle.

    While Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken listened to Lays pitch, Gov. Davis pleaded with President George Bush to enact much needed price controls on electricity sold in the state, which skyrocketed to more than $200 per megawatt-hour. Davis said that Texas-based energy companies were manipulating Californias power market, charging obscene prices for power and holding consumers hostage. Bush agreed to meet with Davis at the Century Plaza Hotel in West Los Angeles on May 29, 2001, five days after Lay met with Schwarzenegger, to discuss the California power crisis.

    At the meeting, Davis asked Bush for federal assistance, such as imposing federally mandated price caps, to rein in soaring energy prices. But Bush refused saying California legislators designed an electricity market that left too many regulatory restrictions in place and thats what caused electricity prices in the state to skyrocket. It was up to the governor to fix the problem, Bush said. However, Bushs response appears to be part of a coordinated effort launched by Lay to have Davis shoulder the blame for the crisis. It worked. According to recent polls, a majority of voters grew increasingly frustrated with the way Davis handled the power crisis. Schwarzenegger has used the energy crisis and missteps by Davis to bolster his standing with potential voters. While Davis took a beating in the press (some energy companies ran attack ads against the governor), Lay used his political clout to gather support for deregulation.

  12. Re:Old Con? Social Engineering in today's workplac by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now they all work in corporate america somewhere in Sales and Marketing department.

    And politicians?

  13. Re:Was it cheque fraud, are the greatest all caugh by anagama · · Score: 1

    Perhaps You should consider conspiring with a Logician and Grammarian.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Ken Lay's fingers by patiodragon · · Score: 1

    "Ken Lay certainly had his fingers all over Cheney..."

    Eeeiwue. Could have done without that image.

    Ah, well, they could have been bunk-mates in the woods, I guess:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove

  16. Teaching Skepticism by dj245 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My school did an excellent job with this. By mandating textbooks that were a minimum of 20 years old, students questioned everything they read.
    "Carter is President of the United States? What? What is a "Skylab? How is the Cold War going?"

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  17. Re:Was it cheque fraud, are the greatest all caugh by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 2, Funny

    I agree with you. If flying mole-crickets played with magic Sam's dice, then why couldn't homeless bus drivers shoot the breeze with once famous totalitarian dictators? Brilliant reasoning! I feel I must augment your already strong argument by restating the obvious: many a proboscous has become ambulent at the mere sight of chipotle. But I digress. Very well constructed and compelling argument you make. I couldn't help but notice that you made several references to Roosevelt's plot to obtain hard currency from the Ewoks? Very clever indeed. Why, you even took into account Professor Lubarsky's Spatial Concordance Corollary, where he unambigously redefines many previously held canards. This was some groundbreaking stuff, n'est ce pas? Well done, sluggo!

    --
    blah blah blah
  18. Countermeasures by denoir · · Score: 1

    You can fight technology with technology, but people will remain as gullible as ever. If anything social engineering is the only viable path today as the technology providing the security is very good and only getting better.

  19. You got to be kidding by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Have you even followed the Enron story? What makes you think those people fit the description. Look the words up in the dictionary.

    A good conman would make the victims feel bad if he was arrested.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  20. Re:hack to remember by buck_wild · · Score: 1

    I like your ideas, so tell me if mine is valid. I use sort of security by obscurity method:

    First, I pick something. For the sake of the argument, I'll say it's 'car'. A obscure, specific piece of said car, say 'hogring'. That's the root of my passwords. (note: in reality, my root word is more obscure and does not appear in any dictionary.)

    Due to password constraints, I'm required to have a capital letter, a numeric, and a symbol, with no characters repeating in a row.

    Next, I put the referral, 'car' in a text file.

    Lastly, I spell out the password. So the final version in the text file may look like:
    www.msn.com
    myuserid
    Car01!

    While the real-world password is Hogring01!

    Make sense?

    So am I on crack?

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  21. Re:Selective prejudice... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    ATTN

    PLS REPLY TO MY PRAVATE BOX suleman775@mailsurf.com

    I am Suleman , Bank Manager of Zenith Bank, Lagos, Nigeria. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you.

    On June 6, 1997, a Foreign Oil consultant/contractor with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Mr. Barry Kelly made a numbered time (Fixed) Deposit for twelve calendar months, valued at US$26,500,000.00, (Twenty-six Million,five hundred thousand Dollars) in my branch.

    Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, we sent a reminder and finally we discovered from his
    contract employers, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation that Mr. Barry Kelly died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found
    out that he died without making a WILL, and all attempts to trace his next of kin was fruitless.

    I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Barry Kelly did not declare any kin or relations in all his official documents, including his
    Bank Deposit paperwork in my Bank. This sum of US$26,500,000.00 has carefully been moved out of my bank to a security company for safe-keeping.

    No one will ever come forward to claim it.According to Nigerian Law,at the expiration of 5 (five) years, the money will revert to the ownership of the
    Nigerian Government if nobody applies to claim the fund.

    Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as an Foreigner to stand in as the owner of the money I deposited it in a security company in two trunk boxes
    though the security company does not know the contents of the boxes as I tagged them to be photographic materials for export.I am writing you because I as a public servant can not operate a foreign account or have an account that is more than $1m.I want to present you as the owner of the boxes in the security
    company so you can be able to claim them with the help of my attorney.All these are to make sure that the fruits of this old man's labor will not get into
    the hands of some corrupt government officials.

    This is simple. I will like you to provide immediately your full names and address so that the Attorney will prepare the necessary documents which will put you in
    place as the as the owner of the boxes.

    The money will be moved out for us to share in the ratio of 60% for me and 40% for you. There is no risk at all as all the paperworkS for this transaction will be done by the Attorney and this will guarantees the successful execution of this
    transaction.

    If you are interested, please reply immediately via my email address.And also send your Telephone and fax numbers so that we can have a smooth communication.

    Upon your response, I shall then provide you with more details and relevant documents that will help you understand the transaction.

    Please observe utmost confidentiality, and rest assured that this transaction would be most profitable for both of us because I shall require your assistance
    to invest my share in your country.(Buying of properties like houses,hotels etc)

    Awaiting your urgent reply via my email.

    PLS REPLY TO MY PRAVATE BOX suleman775@mailsurf.com

    Thanks and regards.

    Dr.Suleman .

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  22. But were you hunched? by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

    But were you hunched? For all *I* know, you have perfect posture!

    By the way, is my money still good if it went through the wash?

  23. Not about power by toadlife · · Score: 1

    To me and many others I know, the recall was not at all about the power crisis; It was about the 30+ billion dollar deficit that Davis repeatedly lied about during his re-election campaign. The power crisis was the result of bad planning by several different administrations over a long period of time. The deficit was a different matter and could have been at least curtailed by the Davis administration.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  24. Re:Old Con? Social Engineering in today's workplac by OneoFamillion · · Score: 1

    And psychopaths? Wait, that's not an occupation... OR IS IT ? (in Stephen Fry's best storytelling voice)

  25. Strongly disagree.... by hughk · · Score: 1
    Marketing and selling takes too much hard graft.

    If you want to make your quick buck, become the President/CEO or CFO. Th you raid the shareholders capital, the pension fund and the corporate bank accounts directly. Actually with derivatives, you don't even have to raid the bank accounts (well, until you lose)!

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  26. What disgusts me by johansalk · · Score: 1

    What the banks do by sending an incomprehensible 6-page legalese to customers that even lawyers can't make sense of so that by default they can sell your details; how friggin' disgusting!

  27. The Story of Frank Abagnale by Roy-Svork · · Score: 1

    You can read a pleasingly detailed yet short account of frank abignales cons here.

    Frank's story is incredibly interesting and entertaining. Theres no way he would get away with some of his daring escapes today, such as posing as the fbi official when he was completely surrounded. Goes to show how much people have learned from this sort of activity, which is probably more of a contributing factor than technology. Any new form of payment or communication introduces new flaws which for a time only the cleverest can think to exploit, just with the interweb we see something so radically new and different that laws and security experts struggle to keep up.

  28. Re:Old Con? Social Engineering in today's workplac by iamthatjoseph123 · · Score: 1
  29. A good account of the modern (Nigerian) scam by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Social engineering, or con game, whatever you call it: read this week's The New Yorker for an article about some twit from Concord MA who got sucked all the way in. He's headed to jail for his part in kiting bad checks for the Nigerians. And yet he still believes there is a real person behind the e-mails, just waiting to get out of Nigeria with a gazillion dollars.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  30. Re:Without insult; Explaining on matters of Commer by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

    You may be a legal student or a lawyer with enough time to post on Slashdot. You invoked many legal tenents (idem sonans, etc) and managed to write some of the densest prose I have ever lain eyes upon. You have to understand, though, that your attemps to elucidate your point did little to that effect. I have no idea what you are saying. I'd say you have a bright future writing very very very very long legal documents for an HMO or a Mortgage Banker. I was simply, in a lighthearted manner, point out that your post almost looked like a troll. Either that or you need to find a nice site for Law enthusiasts. No offense, just...wow...if you understand this stuff great, but not all of us care enough to decipher the UCC. I'll just hire you if I ever need to. That is, assuming you are not some 15 year old dweeb with too many pimples and way too much time on your hands. Unless you wanna cut my grass.

    --
    blah blah blah
  31. Principle of Least Privilege Whitepaper by malcomvetter · · Score: 1