Slashdot Mirror


Bacteria As Fuel Cells?

KantIsDead writes "MIT's Tech Review is running an interview with Boston University Bioengineer Tim Gardner about the possibility of using bacteria to produce electricity. If fuel cells running off sugar are nearly here, alcohol-powered robots cannot be far." From the article: "While typical fuel cells use hydrogen as fuel, separating out electrons to create electricity, bacteria can use a wide variety of nutrients as fuel. Some species, such as Shewanella oneidensis and Rhodoferax ferrireducens, turn these nutrients directly into electrons. Indeed, scientists have already created experimental microbial fuel cells that can run off glucose and sewage. Although these microscopic organisms are remarkably efficient at producing energy, they don't make enough of it for practical applications."

122 comments

  1. They don't produce enough gas for practical use? by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have they tried feeding them Taco Bell?

  2. Awsome by Niwat90 · · Score: 1

    My dreams of having a bender robot as a friend may soon come true.

    1. Re:Awsome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really wanna be friends with a robot?

    2. Re:Awsome by coleblak · · Score: 1

      I would, but only if it followed the three laws, Zeroth Law, and never gained telepathy.

      --
      77 HITS
      Really Long Off Topic Combo
    3. Re:Awsome by canadianlinuxnerd · · Score: 1

      Kiss my shiney metal ass

    4. Re:Awsome by Niwat90 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's "Bite my shiny metal ass".

  3. Obligatory Futurama Reference by rrkap · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alcohol powered robots can bite my shiny metal ass!

    --
    I like my beverages with warning labels!
    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama Reference by overacid · · Score: 0, Troll

      Is it just me, or is anyone else sick of the whole "Obligatory" Futurama or Simpsons reference to every single article that may come anywhere near a reason to make one.

      The same goes for "I for one accept our new overlords" or those that race just to be the first poster.

      Evolve people. These jokes are becoming stale and tiresome. Does anyone physically laugh at these anymore? I suspect not.

      Now, i'm not having a dig at anyone personally, and this is my personal opinion, but i believe that there will be a magnitude of other users which would agree.

      Someone has to say it.

    2. Re:Obligatory Futurama Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in Soviet Russia only these jokes laugh at the old Koreans.

    3. Re:Obligatory Futurama Reference by Malnathor · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. Welcome!

    4. Re:Obligatory Futurama Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right!
      Now I'm gonna start my own forum, with hookers and blackjack!
      SNCR

    5. Re:Obligatory Futurama Reference by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1
      Is it just me, or is anyone else sick of the whole "Obligatory" Futurama or Simpsons reference to every single article that may come anywhere near a reason to make one.

      Sometimes, but when TFP says "alcohol-powered robots can't be far behind", NOT posting a Bender reference would just be stupid. There is stretching to make a reference, and there is placing the ball on a freakin tee.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
  4. Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Couldn't this be considered somehow as animal cruelty?

    --
    No Sigs!
    1. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Couldn't this be considered somehow as animal cruelty?

      Naw, the only thing we've established is that the poster is an invertebrate punster. So slug him!

    2. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prokaryote cruelty perhaps

    3. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Couldn't this be considered somehow as animal cruelty?

            Considering bacteria belong to the kingdom Monera and not Animalia, I doubt that.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, they better be careful, or PETM (People for the ethical treatment of Monera) might get involved.

      --
      No Sigs!
    5. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Couldn't this be considered somehow as animal cruelty?

      Actually, I was just talking with my Primary Investigator (PI) about that, how in studies of bacteria and fruit flies and even worms (like c.elegans, my fave) we get away with stuff that people would be protesting about if we did it to monkeys, dogs, or cats, and even if it happened to mice.

      Mind you, when you have a lifespan measured in hours, the concept of premature death due to cancer just isn't the same thing.

      "Martha, they're experimenting on us again!" "Just be quiet and take your Viagra, Donald, you're a fruit fly."

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but you still have to go wash your hands before you can come to the dinner table.

      KFG

    7. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They aren't fluffy, they aren't cute, and we don't slaughter them for food.

    8. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that taxonimies are a purely human construct, and that in the eyes of some people cruelty to life is cruelty to life.

      That said, if anyone does complain about cruelty to bacteria, they had better not be vegetarians either. Think of the cruelty to plants!

    9. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Durumbrain · · Score: 0

      Yes, but we can spare them from the pain AND prevent rebellion by making them think that they are free. We connect each individual to a realistic digital copy of our world, where they can live their regular bacteria lives. The only problem is those "Chosen Ones" who show up and figure out that the bacteria are actually being used as batteries by the inhabitants of the real world. Therefore, we have to have "Agents" who stop potential rebels in our little "Matrix".

    10. Re:Bacteria As Fuel Cells? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I was just talking with my Primary Investigator (PI) about that, how in studies of bacteria and fruit flies and even worms (like c.elegans, my fave) we get away with stuff that people would be protesting about if we did it to monkeys, dogs, or cats, and even if it happened to mice.

      ...or to humans, for that matter. The relevant distinction between bacteria, fruit flies, and tiny nematodes on one hand, and monkeys, mice, dogs, cats, and naked apes on the other, being a complex nervous system leading to an experience, a subjectivity, a "subject-of-a-life" - to the ability to have subjective experiences, including suffering.

      Considering that (even if most people haven't given it conscious analysis), it's not remarkable that creulty towards our fellow vertebrates elicits more protest than experiments on monera and primitive animals.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  5. Can someone explain? by jenny_uk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How exactly do you take full atomic structures and "turn these nutrients directly into electrons"? Even if you were able to release the electrons from the atoms the whole material remains, neutrally charged does it not?

    1. Re:Can someone explain? by mishmash · · Score: 5, Informative

      Take glucose - perhaps produced by a bacteria, or as also mentioned in the article available in the human blood stream and using a glucose oxidase enzyme - oxidise it - take electrons from it, you do this on the surface of an electrode at one end of the circuit - at the other end you have another electrode coated with another enzyme on that uses electrons to reduce someting - such as oxygen to water. With oxidation at one end and reduction at the other you have electrons flowing between them.

      A paper describing doing this - but not using real human blood (why doesn't someone get on and do that - has the human race lost the spirit of development??)

      Why use bacteria and not just enzymes? One answer maybe that enzymes need a specific substrate, some bacteria might be less choosey? An enzyme's only a catalyst why not use "chemical" catalysts like conventional fuel cells?

      As for the biology major's worry that bacteria will lose the genetic modifications over time - yes that will happen - as the modifications that make them better for the purpose of making electricity will make them less good at simply multiplying - so loosing the extra function will give them an advantage which will be naturally selected for - so those bacteria will take over the culture. The solution's - you'll just not grow these things indefinatly - you'll have get a fresh culture of them regularly.
    2. Re:Can someone explain? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Well, your body and that of every other living thing on the planet does it all the time. These bacteria just manage to spit the extra electrons out so we can use them for our nefarious purposes.

    3. Re:Can someone explain? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      (why doesn't someone get on and do that - has the human race lost the spirit of development??)

      yes

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    4. Re:Can someone explain? by BigJake4589 · · Score: 1

      The oil companies already bleeding me dry. Now I can use my own blood.

    5. Re:Can someone explain? by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .you'll have get a fresh culture of them regularly.

      I do, that's the problem.

      KFG

    6. Re:Can someone explain? by Atario · · Score: 1
      As for the biology major's worry that bacteria will lose the genetic modifications over time - yes that will happen - as the modifications that make them better for the purpose of making electricity will make them less good at simply multiplying - so loosing the extra function will give them an advantage which will be naturally selected for - so those bacteria will take over the culture.
      How about a mechanical setup inside the fuel cell that allows better access to the input food the better your electrical output is? Maybe something like gel electrophoresis? Then you'd actually be evolving better and better bacteria the longer you use the cell.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    7. Re:Can someone explain? by StoneTempest · · Score: 1

      Why use bacteria and not just enzymes?

      The great thing about using the whole bacterium is that then it produces whatever enzymes it needs from the same stuff you feed it with. This cuts out the very expensive process of manufacturing the enzymes yourself.

  6. I am more impressed by Psionicist · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I am more impressed with that Montreal kid who did something similiar:

    http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70882-0.htm l?tw=wn_index_12 A 16-year-old high school student has invented a new way of producing electricity by harnessing the brawny power of bacteria.

    Kartik Madiraju, an 11th-grader from Montreal, was able to generate about half the voltage of a normal AA battery with a fifth of an ounce of naturally occurring magnetic bacteria. And the bacteria kept pumping current for 48 hours nonstop.

    1. Re:I am more impressed by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I read that article and it seems kind of shady... they're saying he's invented a clean source of energy but it sounds more like he made a very inefficient generator. Basically the bacteria are like little magnets so if you make them spin they'll produce a spinning magnetic field. If you then let the field lines cut through a coil a current will be generated. Which is exactly like a generator except using magnetic material surrounded by bacteria instead of just straight magnetic material.

      But how do you get the bacteria to spin?

    2. Re:I am more impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But how do you get the bacteria to spin?

      Uh, a ruffie colada?

    3. Re:I am more impressed by Firehed · · Score: 4, Funny
      But how do you get the bacteria to spin?
      I think this is where the alcohol comes into play...
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  7. Can you smell the future? by Itninja · · Score: 5, Funny

    "alcohol-powered"
    "glucose and sewage"

    The future will be full of cars that only exaust water....and fueling stations brimming with switch-grass, corn-mash, stale beer, human feces, and the occasional Rhodoferax ferrireducens bateria. And I thought horses smelled bad....

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Can you smell the future? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm planning to create cars that run on armpit bacteria. See, then taxicabs in New York City could run forever without a fill-up.

    2. Re:Can you smell the future? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The future will be full of cars that only exaust water....and fueling stations brimming with switch-grass, corn-mash, stale beer, human feces, and the occasional Rhodoferax ferrireducens bateria. And I thought horses smelled bad....

      Just imagine what siphoning fuel will be like - and you thought gasoline tasted bad ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Can you smell the future? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      >The future will be full of cars that only exaust water....and fueling stations
      >brimming with switch-grass, corn-mash, stale beer, human feces, and the
      > occasional Rhodoferax ferrireducens bateria

            The future? Obviously, you have never been in a typical Tennessee gas station...

                Brett

    4. Re:Can you smell the future? by NumerusSpy · · Score: 0

      The future will be full of cars that only exaust water....and fueling stations brimming with switch-grass, corn-mash, stale beer, human feces,

      Great now power companies will be selling me my own pooh back

      It's the logical conclusion

      --
      There they are a conga line of suck holes. On the conservative side of Australian politics. - Mark Latham
    5. Re:Can you smell the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What better than the gas station washrooms to act as the fueling station...

  8. Mutations by yuckysocks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, assume that in 3 years we find just the right bacteria we need, and can have big
    enough colonies of them to be useful. How do we stop them from just mutating into
    non-viable types of their former selves and corrupting the colony? Sure they would
    reproduce asexually and that would limit mutations compared to our dirty process
    with gametes and zygotes, but that small rate of mutation will definitely be amplified
    by the apparent fact that we'll need trillions of these bacteria to do anything large-scale.

    IAABM (I am a biology major)

    1. Re:Mutations by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure they would reproduce asexually and that would limit mutations compared to our dirty process
      with gametes and zygotes,


            Bacteria can reproduce sexually as well. There's no stopping the horny little bastards.

            If you provide an constant, optimum climate for your strain, however, there wouldn't be a great deal of evolutionary pressure forcing them to mutate into non-viable types.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Mutations by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think what you'd want to do is probably have a supply of preserved "first generation" (or "zero generation") bacteria, and every once in a while sterilize the production tanks, kill off all the mutant bugs that have bred there over the interim period, and re-stock it with fresh stuff.

      Or just use a fresh starter of bacteria for each batch. That's basically what bakers do today with yeasts: in the past, a good bakery would have had a 'starter' filled with yeast, which they'd put a small piece of into each batch of dough. Over time, particular bakeries ended up having particular strains of yeast, which makes for interesting flavors of bread but probably isn't a great idea if you're making industrial products. So instead you do what most bakeries do now: just treat the yeast as consumable, and add some fresh stuff to each new batch, ensuring that it doesn't make it into subsequent batches. That improves quality control, and doesn't give the yeast an opportunity to mutate very much.

      All of this of course is dependent on the ability to preserve the bacteria while they're not actively reproducing. This is fairly trivial with yeasts (those little packets have a shelf life of a few years!), but might not be with the bacteria in question.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Mutations by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I *think* he meant non-viable in terms of not being useful at generating fuel, not non-viable as in "not going to survive".

      For example, consider a mutation that was better at reproducing but not at all good at generating us electricity/fuel/whatever. It could rapidly "corrupt" the population.

    4. Re:Mutations by Matimus · · Score: 1

      I would just split the colony into many smaller isolated colonies. If one becomes corrupted just throw it out and start over from another, non-corrupted, source.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    5. Re:Mutations by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What stops cows from mutating into something less optimal for humans?

      When (not if) it happens, we kill the results and don't let them breed.

      Why do you think it'll be any different with the bacteria? It's not as if all the bacteria in the world will be in one tank in one gigantic, completely inseperable pile.

    6. Re:Mutations by megalobrainiac · · Score: 1

      Someone I know is trying to engineer bacteria to produce proteins via an alternative pathway of her own design. The idea is that she could control the amount of cellular resources the bacterium invests in producing proteins for its own reproduction, versus the amount it spends producing some economically useful target protein.

      Anyway, when she turns on a particular gene that shuts down the bacteria's ability to produce proteins via the usual pathway, it takes less than twenty four hours before her bacterial culture is completely taken over by bacteria that have mutated the gene to get around the shutdown...

    7. Re:Mutations by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      How do we stop them from just mutating into
      non-viable types of their former selves and corrupting the colony?


      That's nothing! What happens when they mutate enough that they work out how to use us to generate electricity for them! It'll be like watching another sequel to The Matrix!

      In Soviet Russia, bacteria generates electricity from YOU!

    8. Re:Mutations by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Human beings control the mating stock. They choose the bulls that they want, and this keeps things under human control. You can't do that with bacteria. The idea of putting other important genes (resistance, etc) close to the 'on' switch for production is the best solution I've heard so far. It makes it that much harder to get rid of the crucial gene. But not impossible. You might still need a yearly cleaning.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    9. Re:Mutations by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Human beings control the mating stock.... You can't do that with bacteria.... You might still need a yearly cleaning.

      I don't think you're getting it; a "yearly cleaning" (the way you mean it) is "controlling the mating stock". There's no significant, practical difference between bacteria and cows at the abstraction level I'm speaking at.

  9. pffffft by MrSquirrel · · Score: 3, Funny

    I invented this concept years ago. Step 1: Get my feet really worked up and sweaty while trapped in a tight shoe -- this spurs bacterial growth Step 2: Take off shoe and attack roommate with it -- roommate runs away from the stink, but he is roped onto a treadmill Step 3: The kinetic energy from the treadmill's movement is converted into electrical energy. I've just been working on creating a pocket sized roommate/treadmill, I was pretty darn close too.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:pffffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on people. Anyone that didn't get a laugh from that just has no imagination at all.

    2. Re:pffffft by zephc · · Score: 1

      So, like the rabbit chasing the carrot on a stick, only in reverse?

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:pffffft by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      A carrot running away from a rabbit on a stick?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  10. Medical implants by mangu · · Score: 4, Interesting
    TFA mentions powering medical implants as a possibility. Now, before anyone puts a bacteria powered implant inside me, I would like the answers to two questions:


    1) What if the bacteria escape from the implant and spread through my body?


    2) Could an antibiotic cure for an unrelated infection kill my artificial heart?

    1. Re:Medical implants by owlstead · · Score: 1

      The answer to 1 is simple: you would turn into ... ELECTRIC MAN!!!

    2. Re:Medical implants by Mikachu · · Score: 0

      Why do you automatically assume that the bacteria would be bad for you? A large amount of bacteria is actually quite good for you, necessary in fact. Do the "good" bacteria in your intestine escape and give you infections?

    3. Re:Medical implants by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) What if the bacteria escape from the implant and spread through my body?

      Your immune system deals with them. If they're not optimized to reproduce in that environment, there wouldn't even be much risk of "spread". Not all bacterias thrive in the human body, after all.

      2) Could an antibiotic cure for an unrelated infection kill my artificial heart?

      Presumably your artificial heart's bacterial power source would not be exposed to your body, any more than today's artifical hearts press their battery leads right up against exposed tissue.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    4. Re:Medical implants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctor, I told him not to lick that battery, but would he listen? Now just look at him--he's been glowing like that for days!

    5. Re:Medical implants by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Even better. Think Big.

      Think of an implant that burns glucose in the blood and either remotely powers gadgets or keeps you extra warm. Just the burning calories part will make people rich. How about breast implants that will burn your calories for you to produce extra body heat?

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    6. Re:Medical implants by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      That'd be great for people with diabetes too. Why can't they do somthing as simple as remove glucose from the bloodstream and burn calories. Heck, even if you have to raise someone's temperature a degree, it's better than glaucoma.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  11. Bacteria as fuel cells... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    If fuel cells running off sugar are nearly here, alcohol-powered robots cannot be far.

    Neither can power plugs that you can directly plug into your ass after ingesting healthy amounts of symbiotic bacteria.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Bacteria as fuel cells... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      How about this - an invention that uses food to propel you and requires minimum maintenance.

      It's called "feet".

  12. Once we get commodity alcohol fuel cells. . . by kimvette · · Score: 1

    It is only a short time before Bender Bending Rodriguez is made in some Mexican factory.

    (I am Bender. Please insert beer.)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  13. Re:They don't produce enough gas for practical use by God'sDuck · · Score: 4, Funny
  14. Methane vs Hydrogen by rufty_tufty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    see also:
    http://technocrat.net/d/2006/5/23/3693

    bacteria + rotting biomass has long been able to produce energy.
    I can see this is new because it produces hydrogen as opposed to other gasses, but is a hydrogen economy that much better than a methane economy if it is based on biomass?
    Maybe in 50 years time?

    Ok I'll mod myself Troll now...

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  15. Not sure about that. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you provide an constant, optimum climate for your strain, however, there wouldn't be a great deal of evolutionary pressure forcing them to mutate into non-viable types.

    I'm not sure this is a good assumption. If the bacteria were a product of genetic engineering and not selective breeding in that environment, they might be easily overwhelmed by a mutant strain that was more suited to the environment, but less useful to us. For example, we might engineer bacteria that produce electricity, but do it at the expense of reproduction rate. If a mutant strain appeared that didn't have that characteristic (i.e. if it didn't produce as much electricity but reproduced faster) then it would probably overtake the preferred/engineered strain.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Not sure about that. by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if you built the battery in such so that producing electricity is the dominate strain.

      Best solution I could think off would be to divide the surface that the bacteria grow on into discrete areas maybe 1cm squared and monitor the current received from each square.

      Once a day, kill off everything on the area which produced the smallest current, maybe by heating the surface somehow.

      you would probably end up using more energy destorying bad areas than you would gain but it might extend the useful strains working life - if you are lucky, you might even end up with a more productive strain without any genetic engineering needed.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
  16. Make bacteria dependent i.e lac operon, etc by spineboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Make the bacteria dependent on an added compound that is associated with the genes you want to keep. Use the lac operon as an example - add lactate and the gene switches on, but in our bacteria, it turns on a gene cascade that produces the enzymes that give us EtOH/electricity as well as another product that the bacteria needs to survive. If the bacteria kicks out the desired gene that we want, it also kicks out the compound that regulates its cell cycle, and it dies.

    It would be unlikely for the bacteria to spontaneously mutate out 2 genes at once, thereby subverting our design. Obviously bacteria, number in the billions, so it will be necessary to restock our fuel cell occasionally. Of course you could be clever and tie in a third gene that gives immunity to a toxic substance, so that non-desired mutated bacteria are killed off automatically.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Make bacteria dependent i.e lac operon, etc by whiteknight31 · · Score: 0

      In your example what would happen if the promoters for the gene we want, the one producing electrons, got mutated. The operon would still remain intact, the essential protein would still be produced. However the gene we want would no longer be expressed.

    2. Re:Make bacteria dependent i.e lac operon, etc by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Lac Operon is the best sci fi name ever

    3. Re:Make bacteria dependent i.e lac operon, etc by lazybratsche · · Score: 1

      In addition to regulatory mechanisms like this, which would be a necessary start, adding some sort of artificial selection for organisms that produce the most voltage would go a long way to solve this problem. Off the top of my head, an array of seperate tiny cells could be used, and each cell would have its voltage monitered. Cells that drop in voltage due to mutations could be then isolated and killed off, by cutting off a supply of some sort of trophic factor. Cells with mutations that provide *increased* performance could be opened up, to allow the improved bacteria to colonize the rest of the battery.

      Or maybe a conceptually simpler (but more complicated to engineer) method: Compartmentalize each cell with a membrane containing voltage-gated channels for the energy and nutrients needed by the bacteria. The more voltage our bacteria produce, the more energy they get.

  17. Re:They don't produce enough gas for practical use by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    "Have they tried feeding them Taco Bell?"

    It would be cannibalism! Taco Bell's meat is already a lower grade than dog food, and full of bugs (cockroach eggs, anyone?)

  18. I'm back, baby ! by this+great+guy · · Score: 1
    <<
    alcohol-powered robots cannot be far.
    >>

    I'm back, baby ! My friends and I were just in this bar, right around the corner !
    -- Bender

  19. what about waste? by LiquidMind · · Score: 1

    "...fuel cells that can run off glucose and sewage. Although these microscopic organisms are remarkably efficient at producing energy..."

    any fore-seeable problems with waste? i'm sure not *all* of the fueling material will be transformed...there oughta be some nasty by-product...

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:what about waste? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no nastoer then what was in the sewage, which could be disposed of in the....sewer.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Keep Quite About It! by Phat_Tony · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ssshhhh!!!

    No one tell the computers, or they won't have any reason to keep us alive after they take over.

    Plus the bacteria won't need an elaborate VR to keep them occupied while generating electricity.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  21. Keep breeding by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 1

    Have more than one tank, evaluate the takes for stability, power production, and any other facters you like. Then kill off the problem tanks and restart them with the best tanks. Over time things will just keep getting better.

  22. Electron-shedding Bacterial Waste eaters by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    well, it might not be efficient for fuel cells, but you have to admit, using them to clean out clogged toilets could be a shocking experience, and maybe we could make glow-bulbs that float in raw sewage so it would be prettier ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  23. Re:They don't produce enough gas for practical use by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    ... full of bugs (cockroach eggs, anyone?)

    Oh, come on.

    We all know that cockroach eggs are no more "cockroaches" than human fetuses are "human beings".

    Duh.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  24. Bacteria Can't Scale? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Although these microscopic organisms are remarkably efficient at producing energy, they don't make enough of it

    There's something wrong with this sentence. It sounds like they're saying that the bacteria perform an efficient conversion of the sugar energy into electrical energy, but that the problem is that bacteria can't be scaled effectively to produce significant amounts of power.

    There's a problem with the idea that bacteria don't scale. Bacteria are well known for their exponential growth curves. Give me a sufficently large petri dish with medium and a starter batch of bacteria, and I'll solve your scaling dilemma.

    If they are truly efficient, then there's no problem with bacteria not making enough power, as making more bacteria is trivial. However, I don't think it's likely they really are efficient. It seems highly unlikely bacteria would waste much energy on producing unused electricity, one might expect them, like most living things, to use most of their available energy growing, respirating, reproducing, and anything else that generally falls under the category of "surviving." Sure enough, later in the article comes:

    Gardner's team aims to harness the genetic control system to engineer bacteria that can produce energy more efficiently.

    Which makes me think that the problem with the current bacteria is efficiency, not scalability, as the first sentence implies. Perhaps by "efficient" he means that they don't produce a lot of waste heat or something, but for generating electricity, the definition of efficiency should be what percent of the energy they take in they put back out as electricity.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:Bacteria Can't Scale? by megalobrainiac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some undergraduates I know who were working in Tim (Gardner, the guy in the article)'s lab pointed out that their little tabletop fuel cell powered by bacteria did work, but produced
      _microwatts_ of power.

      Tim's great (he gave an impassioned sermon on 'The End of Oil'... in his nonlinear dynamics class!) and he's in it for the long haul, but they're not there yet.

  25. The red pill by roRisc · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Matrix to me

  26. Re:They don't produce enough gas for practical use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  27. At last by Frightening · · Score: 4, Funny

    The world has found a use for politicians...

  28. Technology's going backward! by svnt · · Score: 1

    What practical household use can a robot that consumes alcohol possibly have?
    I want a robot to get *me* a beer - if I have to give it one to get that to happen, it's no better than my loser friends.

  29. Alcohol-powered robots? by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 0
    ...alcohol-powered robots cannot be far.

    I went to college. I've seen them. They're called rugby players.

  30. Piss in the gas tank by yabos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now you'll be asking people to piss in your gas tank!

  31. alcohol-powered robot by PSaltyDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...alcohol-powered robots cannot be far."

    Some of them work in the cubicle next to mine...

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  32. Maybe not for use as portable fuel cells... by Afell001 · · Score: 0

    How about using this idea to replace the coal-fired power plant that dot the US? Here's a novel idea...let's take those sewage treatment facilities, introduce some bio-engineered bacteria that loves to do nothing but fix electrons and reproduce, seal them into this fixed environment and feed them on sewage and sugar (much like brewers do with yeast) and sit back and watch them generate electricity back onto the grid. And just like a brewery, flush the environment and reintroduce fresh components (bacteria, sugar, sewage) to reduce the chance of an unwanted bacterial population from sneaking in. And to make things even more interesting...we all know that sewage is just rife with bacteria already...well, to reduce the chance of unwanted bacteria populations even further, gather up some of that nuclear waste we have hanging around and use it to irradiate the raw sewage before introducing it to our "good" bacteria...Viola! Raw sewage sterilized by radioactive waste! So, we have put radioactive waste, sewage, and bacteria to work, and out of this we get electricity and treated sewage (as well as solid waste that can be used as fertilizer for things like tree farms, landscaping, etc). Seems like a win-win situation to me.

    1. Re:Maybe not for use as portable fuel cells... by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      If you run for president in 08 I will vote for you. Because I think you've just solved our energy crisis.

    2. Re:Maybe not for use as portable fuel cells... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Beer is good, Bacteria is great, I'm your Prez for 2-0-8?"

  33. Wait, a revelation by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    "MIT's Tech Review is running an interview with Boston University Bioengineer Tim Gardner about the possibility of using bacteria to produce electricity. If fuel cells running off sugar are nearly here, alcohol-powered robots cannot be far."

    .... And within ten years, food-powered humans?

    Geez, is it that humans are the only thing that shouldn't produce electricity to benefit? Walking, using a bicycle-generator, bio-energy from humans could be useful... Then again, being overweight sounds a lot more productive.

    1. Re:Wait, a revelation by cnettel · · Score: 1
      Why? Well, don't expect those bikers to watch TV while doing it, if you want a positive output. (Ok, it can get better than that, but I think we're way off from being able to sustain one person's electricity usage from less than 24 hours of biking. And, yes, that is sort of a problem. If we are going to use mammals, we obviously need to use something that doesn't want any comfort.)

      Yes, this is from a Western perspective, but it's not very viable in developing countries either.

  34. Microbial Fuel Cells, Geobacter and UMass/Amherst by dtmos · · Score: 1

    A lot of good microbial fuel cell work, including the discovery of the geobacter genus, has been done by D.R. Lovley and the group at UMass/Amherst.

    In addition to their work on the microbial fuel cells themselves, they've also made the interesting discovery that the bacteria naturally form nanowires to transfer electrons outside the cell--something potentially [sorry!] useful to connect to an external electrode.

  35. I'm already there by argontechnologies · · Score: 1

    Shit... I've been running on a pure alcohol diet for 20 years! There's nothing new here.

  36. yeah 'cuz messing with nature always ends well. by caller9 · · Score: 1

    What exactly are they going to do when these genetically engineered batteries end up in a landfill and start metabolizing trash? Are landfills the new electric plant or is this going to suck bigtime when these things run rampant. Introducing non-native lifeforms really has to be thought out a lot better than I've seen in the past. Think Australia, but globally.

    Septic tanks starting house fires. Garbage trucks that zap passers by. People infected by batteries. Cats and dogs living together, all the worst parts of the bible.

    1. Re:yeah 'cuz messing with nature always ends well. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Sufficiently shielded, they won't break out even in the trash, besides, it sounds like they're special use. It's also likely that these bacteria will be suited for only a special enviroment, outside of which they'll quickly be overwhelmed by natural bacteria.

      As for the dump, anywhere that bacteria can survive, it will already be. We're not talking about engineering bacteria to eat stuff that natural varieties can't. I've read that the way dumps are constructed, not enough air gets to the materials, resulting in an enviroment that bacteria can't grow in.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  37. Why not just use water? by JumboMessiah · · Score: 1

    Bacteria.... Hell, in my neck of town we just use water!

    Water Fuel Cell

  38. Movie plot by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    This sound like the plot of a horror sci-fi movie.

    Scientists genetically engineer bacteria so they can produce electricity from carbon on a grand scale. What could possibly go wrong when they escape and start mutating?

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Movie plot by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      Humanity ascends to a higher life form of plain energy.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  39. Animal Cruelty? by eonlabs · · Score: 1

    How about a definitive No,
    bacteria are not animals. They make up a different kingdom.

    put THAT in your fuel cell and smoke it.

    --
    I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  40. Slashdot "borked" the URL. Correction is here. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I didn't use a close-html commane "/a", and still the Slashdot Code split the string enough to cause a maligned URL.

    Here is the correct and complete URL http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-333399219 4168790800&q=Water+Car+Inventor

    --
    without prejudice
  41. E. Coli compared to Politicians? Nonsense! by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Escherichia Coli are humble, trustworthy bacteria that eat my shit and make somthing of it.

    A corporate-Politician today; they'd eat so-much shit long enough just to die after the moment to see where it was coming from.

    --
    without prejudice
  42. White Castle! White Castle! C'mon y'all! by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I can post a URL too: White Castle!

    One hamburgher to rule them, one mole of transfatty acid to bind them, and one teaspon of secret sauce to make their stomach churn!

    PS: Would you believe that smelly restaurant is accepting "comments" at their phone number "1800THECRAVE"? (heh)

    --
    without prejudice
  43. "The modern world can bite my splintery wooden ass by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1
    "If fuel cells running off sugar are nearly here, alcohol-powered robots cannot be far."
    I'm back, baby!.
  44. alcohol-powered robots by mennucc1 · · Score: 1
    Elijah Baley: according to our human tradition, the correct stanza is
    `Fifteen men on the dead man's chest'
    `You - ho - ho, and a bottle of rum!'
    R. Daneel Olivaw: this is mostly illogical, master; we all know that robots run on alcohol. So the correct stanza must have been:
    `Fifteen robots on the dead robot's chest'
    `You - ho - ho, and a bottle of rum!'

    (Later on, Elijah gave up trying to convince his robotic pal)
  45. Name sounds familiar by d_54321 · · Score: 1

    Some species, such as Shewanella oneidensis
    Hey I think I went to highschool with her.

  46. Slavery by ldexter · · Score: 0

    This is modern-age slavery! Why must we discriminate against these lower life forms? How would you like it if you were used for fuel?

    --
    Hello world!
  47. Glucose and sewage. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad that someone found a use for Coke Blak.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  48. Actually bacteria thrive in a landfill quite well by shrtcircuit · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure about bacteria not growing in a landfill. If you look around any dump that has part of it bulldozed over, you will see pipes coming out of the ground - these release the insane amount of methane produced by the rotting waste. Rot means biological consumption, ergo bacteria. There's enough methane in even a small landfill coming out on a routine basis to power a good-sized generator, so some sort of microbial lifeform most definitely thrives in that environment.

    The power generation via landfill thing is actually kind of cool though. A while back I designed a system for a company that could allow for realtime monitoring and control of this plant, which used a modified CAT Diesel generator which ran 24x7 solely on the methane produced by this dump, I think in the range of 800kW-1MW depending on output and load. They had a big flare that burned off whatever else they couldn't use in the engine at the time. Stuff like that I think will be a big part of our energy future, simply because as we consume more and more, we create massive amounts of waste. Anything that can be done to either recycle that waste or benefit from its natural cycle of degradation will go far.

  49. Good Idea, here's how I'd improve it... by petgiraffe · · Score: 1

    You don't have to actively kill them. Just stop feeding them. Make the food supply for each cell of the grid dependant on that grid's power output. If they stop generating, they die of starvation. That'll teach 'em.

    In fact it should even teach them to produce electricity as efficently as possible. Thus making them better over time, instead of worse.

    --
    -- The reader anything less than completely failing to not misunderstand this sig is cursed.
  50. Oblig. Stargate by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Then some of us become more fervent in our religious beliefs, and the Alterans...believe in science. (Bonus points for anyone who can name the Alteran who said that)

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  51. PETM by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    As long as PETM throws a few of those nude-protest things in my city, it'll be worth it.