Slashdot Mirror


ThePirateBay.org Raided and Shut Down

An anonymous reader writes "ThePirateBay.org, a longtime fixture of the BitTorrent community, is currently under investigation. Slyck.com is reporting their servers have been seized by the Swedish police." What's really interesting about them is the strange political power that they held in their homeland. There was much discussion even of a political party. This will be interesting to watch unfold.

67 of 1,189 comments (clear)

  1. This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    When you're a fledgling political party - you cannot buy this sort of publicity.

    What we probably have here is pressure (who doesn't doubt it didn't go down like this) from a foreign organisation to shut down something that's legal under Swedish law. (The torrent files themselves contain no copyrighted information).

    Is this going to permanently shutdown thepiratebay.org? I doubt it.

    Is this going to help the Pirate Party's chances for election in the September elections and be detrimental to the content oligopolist's interests in the long run? Hell yes.

    Mildly offtopic, if TPB is shutdown, the thing I'm going to miss most is their 'legal' section (with legal threats + responses) - here's one of my favorite responses (via google cache):
    I have the distinct pleasure of informing you that no Swedish trademark and/or coypyright law is being violated, regardless of how the situation may or may not be under UK law. I would advise you to read up on Swedish trademark law, more specifically Varumarkeslag (1960:644), as this might save you a great deal of future humiliation.

    I would also advise you to
    a) not write the subject all in UPPERCASE, as it makes spam filters go nuts
    b) not attach meaningless data from trademark registrys in PDF format and
    c) stop lying.
    (in response to a threat from Sega europe)
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by moranar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Given that their platform has caused the other parties in Sweden to reconsider their own stances on filesharing and IP, I'd say go Pirate Party, even if I wouldn't vote them. There are other ways to accomplish this, but this is a nice one.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    2. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by extintor · · Score: 5, Informative

      The pirate party and thepiratebay are not affiliated in any way. They are to different movements.

    3. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by Eideewt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's more like reading books in the store without buying them. You got the content without paying, but the original media is still there to be sold.

    4. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's not really an apt comparison. While the open seas were a little bit like the Internet in that they were largely open to anyone that could get a ship out of port, there were also conventions between nations, long-standing naval traditions, and the simple fact that pretty much everyone recognized that taking shots at a vessel flying under another flag was an act of war.

      Legal circumstances of other actions on the Internet are different in that there are serious but legitimate differences in the laws of different countries. The best example of which I can think are Europe's anti-Nazi laws, of which Yahoo famously ran afoul. Trading Nazi memorabilia in France and Germany is strictly forbidden (at least for private parties -- museums may have more leeway), while no court in the United States would entertain such restrictions for very long. In Russia, you have the legal authority to break DRM encryption for the purposes of making a personal backup (though not for warez trading), hence Elcomsoft's legal dilemma with the PDF cracker.

      I can't speak to the situation here, because Swedish copyright law may or may not be on the side of TPB, and I'm not familiar with Swedish law in general, but the overall situation may not be nearly as cut and dried as you seem to believe.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by itchy92 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This argument drives me nuts. They're not selling you the paper on which the book was printed. They are selling you the entertainment/knowledge/whatever you derive from the content of the book. The lost sales argument aside, this is the problem I have with any music/movie pirates who justify it the way you did. "Well, I wouldn't buy that shit anyway, and I just made a copy, I didn't physically deprive them of anything." Well, 1) How pathetic must you be to waste your time downloading shit you don't value? Either that or you're lying, and enjoy getting something for free. And 2) If you delete a bunch of vital information on a company's server, would you use the defense that "I didn't physically destroy anything, I just realigned some bits on a hard drive"?

      Of course not, because the typical /. demographic understands that you can't apply laws and governance of the physical world to the virtual, technology world. So perhaps it is not THEFT in the traditional sense, but it is THEFT in the "I'm taking something that I'm not authorized to take" sense.

      I post similar comments everytime I see this issue raised, and most people must think I'm a shill or something. I'm not; I personally believe in free (speech and beer) information, and public disbursement of my creative efforts. As a multi-medium content creator, however, I recognize that not everyone believes the same things I do, and it's more important to respect that than to push my own beliefs.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    6. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by JoeSchmoe999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What about Libraries? I can go to my local library, check out any books I want for no money read them and if I truly like them go out and buy them. Have I dramatically reduced the value of the book? If noone bought any books but everyone went to the library to read said books, would the library be considered pirates and be responsible for the "loss of income", raided and all the stacks confiscated?

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
    7. Re:This is the sort of publicity you can't buy. by Arker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sweden, until rather recently, had one of the more enlightened copyright laws around. It explicitly required authorisation only for *commercial* reproduction. Making a copy of a cd, book, or whatever and giving it to your friends was never illegal.

      Well, of course once the *AA found out about that they had a tizzy fit, and funnelled an unknown, but apparently substantial amount of money to Sweden, funding the Antipirat Byrån and some other organisations, as well as bribing lots of politicians. They haven't had the kind of success they've been hoping for, but they did manage to change the law to prohibit unauthorised non-commercial copying. A rather unpopular move with the voting public, I might add, which is increasingly resentful of the swedish politicians who have a pattern of voting in stuff that's unpopular with the citizenry but popular with wealthy foreign lobbyists. Politicians are traditionally held in VERY high regard in Sweden, and there's an overwhelming tradition of people trusting them, viewing them as experts, and assuming that if they do something like this they must know best. That tradition has been quickly eroding, by incidents like this. Before that law was hustled through in the back rooms, very few people were actively thinking about the issue. Afterwards, a significant movement started to form and demand that their liberty be restored.

      Anyhow, they did manage to technically make filesharing illegal there, and there was a test case a few months back. It was reported that, basically, if the court didn't impose a fairly harsh sentence, the police would not enforce the law again. As I recall, the court did not go mad, and therefore it was widely assumed afterwards this was essentially a dead law. They can, of course, write someone up for it if they happen to see it, but they cannot, for instance, breach privacy laws to get your IP over such a minor offense, so in practice it's nearly unenforceable.

      I'm guessing this raid will backfire horribly for those behind it. Unless I've horribly misunderstood the law there (and not just me, the pirate bay folks, who have significant legal respresentation and counsel available) hosting the torrent files themselves is still completely legal. If a court winds up agreeing with that assessment, the pirate bay should wind up getting everything returned along with an apology and a nice fat cheque. And I don't mean that in the sense I would in a similar circumstance in the US - it should happen but it never will - I mean it's very likely. The falsely accused are normally compensated for their trouble there. If that happens, it should be rather impossible for this to be spun away - it will become another police scandal coming at a time when the police have way too many already.

      So far, every effort the *AA has made in Sweden has backfired in terms of public opinion. The more attention they draw to the issue, the more support for liberty seems to arise. Won't be surprised if that happens again, although I note today that the hacks at dn.se, the nations largest newspaper, are desperately trying to spin this the other way. But then again, they've been doing that all along...

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  2. The Political Pirate Party by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    The lauch of the Pirate Party. The Pirate Party website (in Swedish as far as I can tell). And the English version. As you can see, it's taking forever for those pages to load (if at all). I suspect this to be due to their server reduction. The Wikipedia entry on the Pirate Party. An interview with the founder.

    From the first link, the aims of the Pirate Party seem to be:
    • Strike out immaterial law. Every last bit of it.
    • Disregard WIPO and WTO completely. Even though the US will "go bananas" as they put it.
    • Annul any further treaties or policies that hinder the free flow of information.
    • Stand up for privacy. No data retention nonsense based on terrorism shills or failed **AA business models.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Political Pirate Party by Meneth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Strike out immaterial law. Every last bit of it.
      Not every bit. They want a five-year commercial-only copyright term; allowing for non-commercial copying and use during that period.
      Also, personal information and trademarks are to retain their protection.

      > Disregard WIPO and WTO completely. Even though the US will "go bananas" as they put it.
      Again, not completely. The WTO regulates some non-IP issues, on which the Pirate Party has no opinion.

    2. Re:The Political Pirate Party by Stentapp · · Score: 4, Informative

      First comment from the Pirate Party: http://www2.piratpartiet.se/nyheter/the_pirate_bay _and_piratbyran_taken_down_by_police
      "Swedish police has today taken all the servers of The Pirate Bay into custody. Two operators of The Pirate Bay are in police custody, and can't be reached.

      Swedish police has today taken all the servers of The Pirate Bay into custody. The police chose to do this despite the fact that the services provided by the worlds largest bittorrent tracker are fully legal in Sweden.
      The servers where located in a protected area, to which the police had no legal right to enter, but this was ignored.
      Piratbyrån (the Pirate Bureau), a swedish pro-pirate lobby organisation, also got their servers seized, since they where located in the same room.
      Two operators of The Pirate Bay are in police custody, and can't be reached.
      This article will be updated as more news come in.
      14:35: 50 policemen participated in the raid."

    3. Re:The Political Pirate Party by JanneM · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Note that their program would invalidate Creative Commons and the GPL as well. I am Swedish, I worry a lot about the IP land grab going on, but no way will I vote for those people come september.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:The Political Pirate Party by arose · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I am Swedish, I worry a lot about the IP land grab going on, but no way will I vote for those people come september.
      Why not? Unless they get the majority (do you think they will?) they should make a nice counterbalance.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:The Political Pirate Party by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am Swedish, I worry a lot about the IP land grab going on

      IPv6 will sort that out

    6. Re:The Political Pirate Party by bentcd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note that their program would invalidate Creative Commons and the GPL as well.
      More importantly, their program would make both Creative Commons and GPL redundant. With no copyrights, everything would be in the commons, so a separate "Creative Commons" would not be necessary. The only reason we need the GPL is because commercial interests use copyright to artificially restrict their customers' freedom to do as they wish with their products.
      Abolishment of copyright would be a decisive victory both for CC and GPL.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    7. Re:The Political Pirate Party by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Abolishment of copyright would be a decisive victory both for CC and GPL.

      Not quite.

      The GPL uses the power of copyright to enforce certain goals. If copyright loses force, the GPL loses force.

      The BSD license is basically "you can do anything you want" and if copyright runs out, that's pretty much the situation. If copyright loses force, it's like everything is now BSD-licensed.

      With no copyrights, Microsoft could take FSF software, change it, and sell the result without releasing source code. RMS would not be pleased.

      The only reason we need the GPL is because commercial interests use copyright to artificially restrict their customers' freedom to do as they wish with their products.

      No, another reason for the GPL is to keep anyone from taking free software, changing it, and not releasing the changes to the world.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  3. It wasn't the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet it was really ninjas.

    1. Re:It wasn't the police. by idiotdevel · · Score: 5, Funny

      nope... it was PIRATES... oh the IRONY

    2. Re:It wasn't the police. by pcgabe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, when will Pirates and Ninjas stop this pointless, bloody feud?
       
      ...

      And join forces to take out those damn dirty Vikings!

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
  4. odd by jflash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Odd that they did this one year ago, when they went down for maintenance.

    (coralized link)
    http://www.btflux.com.nyud.net:8080/archives/news/ 000159.php?coral-no-redirect

    1. Re:odd by nordicfrost · · Score: 5, Informative

      I got off the phone with Swedish police, they confirm raids in the Swedish file sharing community and at least two brought in for questioning.

      I talkt to the Pirate Party leader, he confirms the raid, confiscated servers (Both Pirate Parties and The Pirate Bay), saying there were 50 policemen in the raid this afternoon (14:00 Cent Eur time).

    2. Re:odd by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 4, Funny

      50 policemen?! Why so many? Were they trying to take down Neo?

      -Grey

    3. Re:odd by TGK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your men are already dead

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    4. Re:odd by neo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Were they trying to take down Neo?


      No, I'm fine.

    5. Re:odd by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Neo? your about 4624 too late

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Legal? by nbannerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, from TFA;

    According to The Pirate Party, a Swedish copyright reform organization, the raid also seized Piratbyrån's (the Pirate Bureau) servers. In addition, The Pirate Party reports "...the servers where located in a protected area, to which the police had no legal right to enter..." Approximately 50 police participated in the raid, which placed into custody two PirateBay.org personnel.

    Now I remember reading the legal threats page, and the phrase normally went along the lines of "US Copyrights Mean Nothing Here".

    What changed? Sending letters is one thing, but something pretty heavy must be going on to warrant that kind of response.

    Can any of our swedish friends fill in the gaps here? I'm sure we're missing something.

    1. Re:Legal? by Eudial · · Score: 4, Informative

      What changed? Sending letters is one thing, but something pretty heavy must be going on to warrant that kind of response.


      Nothing as I can see it. It's still perfectly legal to link to copyright violating material in Sweden. The police probably hopes that they store some violating material on the servers. Which, hopefully, they don't.

      That, or they're after the logs so that they can do it the American Way (tm) and start suing blind 90 year olds and quadriplegics.
      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:Legal? by Asphalt · · Score: 5, Funny
      Now I remember reading the legal threats page, and the phrase normally went along the lines of "US Copyrights Mean Nothing Here".

      What changed? Sending letters is one thing, but something pretty heavy must be going on to warrant that kind of response.

      Can any of our swedish friends fill in the gaps here? I'm sure we're missing something.

      It's really quite simple.

      Terrorists can download .torrent files. And if terrorists can download .torrent files, then terrorists can obtain unlimited copies of material by Britney Spears, Kelly Clarkson, etc.

      This will (obviously) lead to a greater hatred of America, and western culture in general.

      This will impact the safety of all of our children as terrorists with big boners from watching Britney in that video with the short skirt will erupt into testosterone-fueled rages ... and this will greatly impact our war on terror.

      This has nothing to do with copyright law, and everything to do with the safety of the free world.

      I don't understand what you don't get about it?

    3. Re:Legal? by Asphalt · · Score: 4, Funny

      >Problem is that terrorists are more clever than to use unencrypted information  sharing, so what you're proposing is that we allow the Gov. to listen in on us while the terrorists really doesn't care.

         o <- Joke

          O
         /--\  <-You
          |
         / \

  6. TEXT if slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In their native Sweden, ThePirateBay.org enjoyed a level of immunity from copyright prosecution rarely seen in the file-sharing world. Often defiant in the face of those wishing to enforce their intellectual property rights, ThePirateBay.org would go on to become one of the premier BitTorrent indexing and tracking sites.

    As one of the largest trackers, ThePirateBay.org largely replaced the demise of the SuprNova.org search engine. SuprNova.org met its demise in late 2004, when it was under pressure from the entertainment industry to shut it operation down. Conversely, such pressure has been ineffective against ThePiratebay.org.

    When such political pressure fails, the use of force is typically the next course of action. In a move that many thought would never come, Slyck.com learned this morning that ThePirateBay.org was raided by Swedish police.

    "...The police right now is taking all of our servers, to check if there is a crime there or not (they are actually not sure)," ThePirateBay.org spokesperson "brokep" told Slyck.com.

    The seizure of ThePirateBay.org's entire server farm will guarantee this BitTorrent tracker will remain offline until the police complete their investigation. Whether this will keep ThePirateBay.org offline indefinitely is another matter.

    "We are not sure when it will return, but we are moving it to another country if necessary," brokep said.

    According to The Pirate Party, a Swedish copyright reform organization, the raid also seized Piratbyrån's (the Pirate Bureau) servers. In addition, The Pirate Party reports "...the servers where located in a protected area, to which the police had no legal right to enter..." Approximately 50 police participated in the raid, which placed into custody two PirateBay.org personnel.

    The premature departure of ThePirateBay.org marks a significant turning point in the BitTorrent community. Although it's not currently known what, if any, entertainment entity is behind this raid, failure to secure ThePirateBay.org's permanent removal will only bolster this tracker's position of defiance.

    1. Re:TEXT if slashdotted by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Now what the fuck was that "protected area"? A diplomatic zone???

      Someone's house/appt? You know, cops can't just walk into any building and take what they want. Unless, of course, they don't like the person who lives there.

  7. An open letter to Sweden. by Funkcikle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please let me finish freeing the flow of information, specifically Season 4 of Family Guy. Thank you.

  8. 24 by fluxindamix · · Score: 5, Funny

    thank god, 24 is finished !!

  9. Re:come on, let's face it by andersbergh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seeing as trackers don't actually have any copyrighted information on them... how can they be illegal? Sure they are illegal in the US due to the DMCA, but here in Sweden there is no DMCA.

  10. Re:come on, let's face it by Gr33nNight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is illegal here in the United States, but it sure isnt illegal in Sweden. You would do well to not assume the whole world has the same laws as the United States.

  11. TPB shutdown clearly visible in graphs by Honken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have a look at http://stats.autonomica.se/mrtg/sums/Stockholm_GE. html. The fact that the pirate bay clearly affected the total bandwidth of the entire city of Stockholm says something of how big the site is.

    1. Re:TPB shutdown clearly visible in graphs by Carthag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you figure? From what I can tell, the bandwidth fluctuates pretty evenly on day-to-day numbers for the last several months.

    2. Re:TPB shutdown clearly visible in graphs by strider44 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is down a quarter from any of ther other peaks - it's pretty obvious the difference. Also remember that this is not just Pirate Bay that's down but a few other high-traffic sites.

  12. Re:come on, let's face it by spyrochaete · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's face it, it's illegal and they got caught.

    Maybe some of the content was illegal, but what Pirate Bay did was not - at least by Swedish law (IANASwedeL). All they did was host tiny text files and provice a search database. They were a tracker, not a host.

    This is basically the same as American cops raiding Bell because the Yellow Pages lists the phone number of a paper mill, and paper can potentially be used to write harassing letters.

  13. Re:come on, let's face it by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it isn't. That's the point. Where TPB is/was located, hosting torrent files is not illegal because torrents -contain no copyrighted data-. If these guys ever traveled to the USA, they'd probably be arrested (hell, they'd probably be called "enemy combatants" by the *AA and incarcerated for life without trial). But as long as they stayed where they are, and kept their servers where they are, they should have been fine, provided the local law did not change.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  14. Re:come on, let's face it by GrayCalx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is basically the same as American cops raiding Bell because the Yellow Pages lists the phone number of a paper mill, and paper can potentially be used to write harassing letters.

    I think a better analogy would be cops raiding a house because the guy was distributing directions on where to buy [drugs,hookers,whatevers illegal].

  15. Maybe they were warned about it... by Garabito · · Score: 4, Funny

    but swedish police officers might have not liked when they were told to "sodomize themselves with retractable batons".

  16. Story unfolds... by Jarlsberg · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789 ,834356,00.html
    For the benefit of those who don't speak swedish, here's a short summary:
    3 people have been arrested, age 22, 24 and 28. They have not been charged, but are taken in because they the police suspect they have violated copyright laws. The persons are directly connected to TPB.org. They are as of an hour ago still under interrogation. 50 police men have worked on the case.

    1. Re:Story unfolds... by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, 50 police men... That's more than we have on duty in our city, and they're too few. And they're supposed to handle, you know, abuse and stuff. Something here feels pretty wrong.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Story unfolds... by myspys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      something is very very wrong if a country can "spare" 50 policemen to work on a case where they are not even sure if a crime has been committed or not(!)

      "...The police right now is taking all of our servers, to check if there is a crime there or not (they are actually not sure)," ThePirateBay.org spokesperson "brokep" told Slyck.com.

  17. Aw shucks. . . by CrtxReavr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I feel guilty about ad-blocking the banners on there. . .

    -CR

    --
    "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
  18. Re:A quote by Jon+Luckey · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Vergoofin der flicke stoobin mit der børk-børk yubetcha!"

    A Møøse once bit my sister ...

    --
    -- 3 events that reshaped the world in the 20th century: WW1, WW2, and WWW
  19. What the Swedish antipiracy firm (ATB) has to say by entoke · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://www.antipiratbyran.com/index.htm?id=news&p= p19#19

    "The Pirate Bay nedstängd

    Polisen genomförde idag en rad husrannsakningar mot lokaler där The Pirate Bay bedriver sin verksamhet. Klockan 12 30 stängdes sidan thepiratebay.org ned.

    The Pirate Bay var fram tills igår knutpunkten för en stor del av världens illegala fildelning. Enligt egna uppgifter fanns det en dryg miljon användare som kunde laddade upp och ned främst filmer, spel och musik. Genom sin storlek och uttalade målsättning att hänga ut och håna berörda upphovsmän gjorde man The Pirate Bay känd över hela världen. Sverige blev internationellt känt som en fristad för dem som begick upphovsrättsbrott på Internet. Detta utnyttjades ekonomiskt för en omfattande försäljning av annonser, porreklam och insamling av donationer.

    Det är bra att den svenska polisen nu prioriterar denna typ av brottslighet. Det är upphovsrätten som finansierar nyskapandet inom film, datorspel, musik och övrig kultur. Den som bryter mot upphovsrättslagen stjäl från framtidens kreatörer och biopublik. Därför är stängningen av The Pirate Bay bra för alla oss som uppskattar ny film och underhållning säger Henrik Pontén, jurist på Antipiratbyrån.

    Svenska produktioner drabbas i hög grad av den illegala nedladdningen, säger Per-Erik Wallin, Föreningen Sveriges Filmproducenter. Om svenska filmer finns tillgängliga på nätet före premiären innebär det minskade chanser att filmerna ska spela hem produktionskostnaden och mindre medel för att göra nästa film. Det drabbar både manusförfattare, regissörer, skådespelare och filmarbetare."

    Roughly translated

    "The pirate bay closed

    Today the police raided multiple places were The Pirate Bay conducts its operations. At 12.30 the site thepiratebay.org was closed.

    The pirate Bay was until yesterday the center for a large part of the worlds illegal filesharing. According to piratebay itself there was over a million users who could upload or download foremost movies, games and music.

    By its size and outspoken goal of ridiculing authors The pirate Bay got known all over the world.

    Sweden got known internationally as an asylum for those who commited copyright crimes on the internet. This was use economicaly for a large scale sale of adds, pornadds and donations.

    It is good that the swedish police now priority this kind of crime. It is the copyright that finances creation in movies, computergames, music and other culture. Whoever breaks the copyright steals from future auothors and cinema audience. Therefore the closing of The Pirate Bay is good for all of us that apreciate new Movies and entertainment says Henrik Pontén, legal advisor at Antipiratbyrån.

    Swedish productions are very much affected by illegal downloading, say Per-Erik Wallin, Föreningen Sveriges Filmproducenter. If swedish movies are availible on the net before the premiere chances are smaller that the movies will get the production cost back and less means to make the next movie. It affects both scriptwriters, directors, actors and filmcrews."

    Note that this truly is a crappy translation.

  20. Re:come on, let's face it by Bake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Learning the basic difference between the Nordic (Scandinavian) country of Sweden/Sverige and a country called Switzerland/Swiss/Suisse/Schweiz/Svizzera located between Italy, France and Germany would be a nice start before tooting your horn about either country's laws.

  21. Re:come on, let's face it by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 5, Informative

    The DMCA has nothing to do with it. They are illegal in the US, because the US treats contributory infringement (i.e. knowingly helping someone infringe), vicarious infringement (i.e. profiting by another's infringement), and inducement (i.e. strongly encouraging someone to infringe in conjunction with assistance) as being punishable just as much as direct infringement. The idea of secondary liability is fairly common in our legal system.

    Whether Sweden has anything like this, I have no idea.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  22. Damnit! by cimmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, the global warming index increased unexpectedly by 1.2% this morning.

  23. First hand information here: by giulietta+masina · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Pirate Bureau have set up a temporary news blog to inform the public about this whole incident: http://piratbyran.blogspot.com/

    Shutting down The Pirate Bay can be compared to shutting down Google, by Swedish laws. Both sites supply a search engine with which you can find legal and illegal material on the internet. TPB will prevail.

  24. Ahhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's as if millions of geeks cried out at once... and were suddenly silenced.

  25. The Pirate Bay by GauteL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can sort of believe that they had no illegal copies of anything in the office where The Pirate Bay was located. It makes it easier for them to wipe their hands of any wrongdoing.

    However, as the main goal of the pirate bay is to facilitate copyright infringement, I find it very hard to believe that none of these guys had any illegal copies of stuff at home, on their laptops, etc.

    Since their homes apparently also were raided, this is probably a way for the authorities to get to them, even if the Pirate Bay itself does nothing illegal. When you are involved in something like The Pirate Bay, it is too tempting to use it yourself.

    Of course, if Swedish copyright law allows for downloading copyrighted material for personal use, then this will be fine as well.

  26. Why people really are reading this thread is... by andi75 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...they're hoping that someone posts a link to a repacement site...

  27. Re:come on, let's face it by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Informative


    And here's where you're wrong and trolling:

    We're not talking about the DMCA, we're talking about basic theft.

    NO, NO, NO, WRONG.

    Theft is when YOU HAVE SOMETHING, SOMEONE ELSE TAKES IT, and YOU NO LONGER HAVE IT.

    This is copyright infringement. It is NOT the same thing as theft. In a way, the copyright owner has something, someone else takes (an exact replica of) it, but the copyright owner STILL HAS IT.

    It is not as simple as "reduce the problem down to something you can understand and digest easily", and "repeat it often enough, it becomes true". You can't make a simple analogy out of this; it is not a simple problem. Attempt to understand it. Bring yourself to it's level; not vice versa. This works for all complex problems, be it micro v. macro kernel, evolution v. creation, pro-choice v. pro-life, etc. Elevate your understanding.

    ~Wx

    --
    sig?
  28. The Pirate Party by Christian+Engstrom · · Score: 5, Informative
    Unfortunately our server has gone down right now (overload, not police raid), so I'll post the English description of our political agenda here.

    The Pirate Party

    The Pirate Party is a newly formed political party in Sweden. We want to fundamentally reform copyright law, get rid of the patent system, and ensure that citizens' rights to privacy are respected. With this agenda, and only this, we are making a bid for representation in the Swedish parliament in the upcoming national elections in September.

    Not only do we think these are worthwhile goals. We also believe they are realistically achievable on a European basis. The sentiments that led to the formation of the Pirate Party in Sweden are present throughout Europe. There are already similar political initiatives under way in several other member states. Together, we will be able to set a new course for a Europe that is currently heading in a very dangerous direction.

    The Pirate Party only has three issues on its agenda:

    Reform of copyright law
    The official aim of the copyright system has always been to find a balance between the interests of publishers and consumers, in order to promote culture being created and spread. Today that balance has been completely lost, to a point where the copyright laws severely restrict the very thing they are supposed to promote. The Pirate Party wants to restore the balance in the copyright legislation.

    All non-commercial copying and use should be completely free. File sharing and p2p networking should be encouraged rather than criminalized. Culture and knowledge are good things, that increase in value the more they are shared. The Internet could become the greatest public library ever created.

    The monopoly for the copyright holder to exploit an aesthetic work commercially should be limited to five years after publication. Today's copyright terms are simply absurd. Nobody needs to make money seventy years after he is dead. No film studio or record company bases its investment decisions on the off-chance that the product would be of interest to anyone a hundred years in the future. The commercial life of cultural works is staggeringly short in today's world. If you haven't made your money back in the first one or two years, you never will. A five years copyright term for commercial use is more than enough. Non-commercial use should be free from day one.

    We also want a complete ban on DRM technologies, and on contract clauses that aim to restrict the consumers' legal rights in this area. There is no point in restoring balance and reason to the legislation, if at the same time we continue to allow the big media companies to both write and enforce their own arbitrary laws.

    An abolished patent system
    Pharmaceutical patents kill people in third world countries every day. They hamper possibly life saving research by forcing scientists to lock up their findings pending patent application, instead of sharing them with the rest of the scientific community. The latest example of this is the bird flu virus, where not even the threat of a global pandemic can make research institutions forgo their chance to make a killing on patents.

    The Pirate Party has a constructive and reasoned proposal for an alternative to pharmaceutical patents. It would not only solve these problems, but also give more money to pharmaceutical research, while still cutting public spending on medicines in half. This is something we would like to discuss on a European level.

    Patents in other areas range from the morally repulsive (like patents on living organisms) through the seriously harmful (patents on software and business methods) to the merely pointless (patents in the mature manufacturing industries).

    Europe has all to gain and nothing to lose by abolishing patents outright. If we lead, the rest of the world will eventually follow.

    Respect for the right to privacy
    Following the 9/11 event in the US, Europe has

    --
    Christian Engström, Former Member of the European Parliament 2009-2014 for The Pirate Party, Sweden
  29. Re:come on, let's face it by RsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I'm getting really tired of this "Not in my country" defense. It doesn't hold water."

    So you'd prefer another country to have hold over what is and is not legal in your own?

    What if the shoe was on the other foot? What if the law being violated was, for example, Iranian, and the website was American? I'm sure there are thousands of porn sites hosted in California that are just as blatantly illigal in repressive countries as TPB is in America. Would you be so quick to say "It doesn't matter what country they're in, it's still illegal in the prosecuting country, so that makes cracking down on them OK" ?

    And no, it doesn't matter that the prosecuting country in question is "unfreindly" - in case you missed the memo, what matters legally are local laws and possibly extradition treaties. Plus, many Swedes would undoubtably view American law as repressive on IP issues, just as many Americans would view Iranian law as oppressive on free speach issues.

    The "not in my country" defense is otherwise known as national sovereignty. Don't like it? Tough. You either abide by it, or accept the idea that another nation can enforce it's laws upon you remotely. If you wish legal sovereignty for your own nation, you must allow others the same right. To grant them any less makes you little more than a hypocritic shill.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  30. Re:Voting as a message by cHALiTO · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree that you should know the party's complete set of politic viewpoints if you're going to vote them.

    I disagree however with the idea that one should only vote for parties that 'have a chance' of winning or anything like that. People should vote for the party that represents them and their interests the better, no matter how important they are right now. Small parties usually are small just because of people thinking that way. If you think something, and believe some party is proposing a good response to your expectations, you should put your vote where your mouth is, and vote them. Otherwise, don't complain when the government does something you don't like, because they will be doing it with your implicit approval (except if they deviate from their own political viewpoint).

    --
    "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
  31. Nah, no political power by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 4, Informative
    What's really interesting about them is the strange political power that they held in their homeland.

    I am Swedish and I don't think that TPB has had much influence at all, laws and attitudes would have been just the same if this was an organization outside Sweden. My guess is that the presence of the organisation is simply reflecting current attitudes in general in Sweden today. It is notable that a minister in the socialdemocratic government downloaded mp3s, burned them to CD, and gave it to friend as a birthday present (Swedish article) already in 2000, without seeing any wrong with it.

    An explanation to this phenomenon could be a tradition of relatively strong consumer protection laws (and traditions), and that the "personal use" clauses in copyright have always been defended here.

    --
    Reality or nothing.
  32. Re:Strange political power by owlnation · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and do you seriously think that sending 50 police officers, paid for by Swedish taxes, to arrest and intimidate individuals with no history of violence is a responsible and appropriate use of money?

  33. English quotes from Swedish police, Pirate Party by praps · · Score: 5, Informative

    Full article in English here with recent quotes direct from the Swedish police and the leader of the Pirate Party. Apparently it's a very early stage in the investigation - so maybe more arrests to come?

  34. Re:Strange political power by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe if you could vote "No" to candidates there'd be a higher turnout.

    A "No" vote = -1. "Yes" = +1.

    The candidate with the most positive total or lease negative total wins.

    In current "popular" systems if you don't like a candidate you have to vote for some other candidate or don't vote at all - this distorts stuff significantly - you could have a situation where a candidate wins even though hated by the majority, because the voters spread their votes amongst the other candidates. After a while the voters might end up just flip flopping between two fairly hated candidates, or give up entirely.

    With my proposal if people really hate someone they get to "pull them backwards", rather than trying to figure out who else to "pull forwards" and hopefully the hated one doesn't win.

    The popular method probably works fine if the _majority_ actually _like_ the candidates and want to _vote_for_ them, but it doesn't work if the majority don't. And perhaps the latter is true in the USA?

    --
  35. SIlver Lining... by Dot+Solipsism · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least they waited until after all the season finales before raiding.

  36. Re:This is the sort of accessories you can't buy. by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just call losing the "smug smile" a down payment on the "shit eating grin" they'll have when they get back up and running.

  37. More like... by ThePyro · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's more like reading books in the store without buying them.

    It's more like photocopying the entire book and taking the copy home with you. You get to enjoy the content any time you want without going back to the store. And although reading the book in the store might be legal (but rude), photocopying the whole thing is certainly copyright infringement and against the law.

  38. Re:Voting as a message by inKubus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I disagree however with the idea that one should only vote for parties that 'have a chance' of winning or anything like that

    In America the Democrats and Republicans are both part of a larger group, a power monopoly. They take "sides" in order to make it seem like there's a choice. The last several elections were almost exactly 50-50 divided. The media and the politicians like to say this means the country is "Strongly" divided. I say that it means the two "sides" are closer together than ever, so it doesn't really matter which side you pick, you are voting for people who are part of a single group, the power monopoly.

    Voting for some wierd outsider would be great for the country. We need to get 2 or 3 totally weird outsiders into the senate and congress. These weirdos would not necessarily have any influence with their few votes, but you know for a fact they are going to:

    1. Attend every vote
    2. Read and understand every bill
    3. Debate every pork barrel/hidden law/etc etc.
    4. Generally put all the other people on the spot.

    Those people up there are supposed to represent our states and help to make the country a better place also. Instead, they all live in Washington, DC, go to the same parties, and rarely if ever come back to their states to find out what's really going on. And if they do talk to someone from the state, it'll be some rich millionaire or business that probably does more than it's own share of subverting the will and freedom and comfort of the residents.

    A weirdo elected would

    1. Not be invited to those parties
    2. Would not be able to find a place to live in Washington DC
    3. Would not know any millionaires

    Therefore he would probably come back to his house in the state he's from during the recess and actually talk to people and find out what's going on.

    The only real problem is that he would shake things up so much that the power monopoly would hire one of their many hit squads and he would die in a tragic "accident".

    I want to see some Henry Clay style beatings in congress though. Put someone like a Jessie Ventura in and have him PHYSICALLY BEAT people like Tom Delay (not just a clever name), Orrin Hatch, John Kerry, etc. BEAT THEM INTO SUBMISSION like the frail moneyed frat boys they are. Instead, it's just getting more aristocratic up there, because the American people think they have to go with a sure winner--when really going with the weirdest person running would be the best for everyone.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.