Slashdot Mirror


Mob Rule on China's Internet

Alien54 writes to mention an International Herald Tribune article about the growing phenomenon in China known as internet hunting; Using the web to track down individuals who have violated social more or broken the law. From the article: "In recent cases, people have scrutinized husbands suspected of cheating on their wives, fraud on Internet auction sites, the secret lives of celebrities and unsolved crimes. One case that drew a huge following involved the poisoning of a Tsinghua University student - an event that dates to 1994, but was revived by curious strangers after word spread on the Internet that the only suspect in the case had been questioned and released. Even a recent scandal involving a top Chinese computer scientist dismissed for copying an American processor design came to light in part because of Internet hunting, with scores of online commentators raising questions about the project and putting pressure on the scientist's sponsors to look into allegations about intellectual property theft."

129 comments

  1. Is this what happens... by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this what happens when you keep people from looking at porn all day? Perhaps it represents the amount of time that intelligent people 'waste' discussing politics.\ Or has the Internet awoken community interest, and those discussions are just the first steps to a more open society.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Is this what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just represents what happens when people don't spend all day reading Slashdot.

    2. Re:Is this what happens... by packetmon · · Score: 3, Informative

      A more open society, or a more open social network online? ... I wonder if some of these articles aren't just fantastic stories created by someone that made a cluster of pissed off Chinese want to go Kung Fu someone's ass. Anyhow, I was just reading about cyberpsychology which is interesting... (off topic... yup) Do we communicate more openly and honestly in cyberspace, or are we more apt to hide our true feelings and personalities? How accurate are our beliefs about how others see us can we effectively view ourselves through other peoples eyes? This chapter will explore ways that social perception in cyberspace can be better understood by applying psychological principles, research, and theory. There are three major sections. The first is an examination of the nature of computer-mediated communication CMC as viewed by several prominent theoretical models, outlining how these models assess possible sources of accurate and inaccurate perceptions online and the impact of perceptions in cyberspace on everyday face-to-face social relationships. Next, the chapter explores the role of relevant cognitive processes in the development of online perceptions, including the activation of stereotypes, self-confirmation of attributions, and the instantiation of social identity. The final section examines the problem of accurately knowing how others perceive oneself in cyberspace versus in face-to-face interactions. http://www.vepsy.com/communication/volume2.html

    3. Re:Is this what happens... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Is this what happens when you keep people from looking at porn all day? Perhaps it represents the amount of time that intelligent people 'waste' discussing politics.\ Or has the Internet awoken community interest, and those discussions are just the first steps to a more open society.

      It's actually what you get when 1.5 billion bored people get on the internet and find there's nothing really all that interesting, but, hey, you can find the names of family, old school chums and that prick who used to kick you in the shins, years later ... now is their time to be reacquainted with you and the other 14,999,984 chinese on the internet...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Is this what happens... by informatico · · Score: 1

      I would mind people doing things like this less if it was just from an investigative angle (kinda of like Wikipedia, except they aren't confinded to articles but go out looking for facts etc.).

      Things like this tend to get out of control though when people jump to conclusions / and because it's so easy to fall into group think when mobbing around on emotional issues.

      --
    5. Re:Is this what happens... by Epicanthics · · Score: 1

      You can get Slashdot in China, and anyone who knows how to look for porn can get that, too. They filter out pages with specific words mentioned like falun gong, and fake a 404.

    6. Re:Is this what happens... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Interesting to note that I just read (and replied to) your comment from... *gasp* *shock and horror* China!

      And no, there's no difficulty getting porn here. Just hop on google (.com/.co.uk/.ie, choose your own poison) and turn off result filtering on the images search.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    7. Re:Is this what happens... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      As I recall, communist governments have had a habit of encouraging the populace to root out the dissenters and miscreants in their midst. And, there is some portion of the populace that will not only comply, but do so enthusicastically and perhaps use it as an attempt to demonstrate how they are themselves loyal party members keeping their own noses clean and therefore should be rewarded or promoted.

  2. WikiJudge? by ajs · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can just see it... "today, a man was sentenced to death after a jury of his p33rz found that he was 'fscked up.'"

    1. Re:WikiJudge? by Kesch · · Score: 5, Funny

      1st they came for the n00bs
      and I did not spe4k out
      because I am ub3r.

      Then they came for the f4gs
      and I did not spe4k out
      I'm no f4g.

      Then they came for the h4xx0rs
      and I did not spe4k out
      because I dont need h4xx0rs, I have 1337 skillz.

      Then they came for me
      and there was no one left
      excpet for us h4rdc0res who went and raided Molten Core all day happily ever after.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:WikiJudge? by Improv · · Score: 1

      Where "fscked up" means not visiting 4chan often enough... *chuckle*..

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    3. Re:WikiJudge? by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 1

      hilarious!

    4. Re:WikiJudge? by Yuioup · · Score: 1

      Excellent. I want that on a T-shirt.

  3. It is social "mores" by silverbolt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Always used in plural, not singular.

    1. Re:It is social "mores" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SEPLLING NAZI ALURT

  4. Well.... by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny
    Others denounced the university for not expelling him, with one poster saying it should be "bombed by Iranian missiles." Many others, meanwhile, said the student should be beaten or beheaded, or that he and the married woman should be put in a "pig cage" and drowned.
    Well, they definitely sound ready for blogging! Too bad the story says the government has just blocked Technorati.

    Actually, the most interesting bit in there was about the plagiarism case. Too bad they didn't provide more detail -- I hadn't heard about that angle before.

    1. Re:Well.... by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      Blogging is wonderful. Owww, I just got bit by a mosquito. mo...squi... to... RAAAWWRRR I feel...
      http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/outrage.gif
      Honestly, don't people have better things to do with their lives than argue about things that happened well over 10 years ago and that didn't affect their own lives at all? Oh, that's right, it's the internet.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
  5. Just like a jury of your peers! by nickgrieve · · Score: 4, Funny

    What could possibly go wrong? Because you know, everything you read on the internet is true.

  6. You say Tomato I say... by packetmon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You say China... I say America. How is this different from what the NSA warrantless surveillance in the United States?

    1. Re:You say Tomato I say... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Well, for one thing, it's private parties doing it, not the government.

      So in other words, America is where you worry about a totalitarian, monolithic government prying into every detail of your private life (and possibly using what it turns up as an excuse to ship you off to a secret prison) and China is where you worry about vigilantes and lynch-mob frontier justice. We really are living in Bizarro World.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  7. The Enemies of Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are the real enemies of freedom? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez8inXRov7A

  8. Wait... by ObjetDart · · Score: 3, Funny
    So let me get this straight... China has some kind of anarchic version of the internet, where users post whatever they want, and are free to band together to form loose coalitions organized around common interests?

    Where can we get one of those?

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
    1. Re:Wait... by l5rfanboy · · Score: 1
      Of course I'm sure the reality is different than as reported, the ideals presented in TFA are exactly what the internet was born to be, and in many opinions, was supposed to be.

      I just wonder where it/we went wrong.

    2. Re:Wait... by overbaud · · Score: 1

      No. China has developed an imitation internet using sweat shop labour. Chinese officials have described it as 'very very authentic' and are marketing it under the 'you want? you buy? all original!' slogan.

      --
      Users... the only thing keeping 1st level support from being the bottom feeders.
    3. Re:Wait... by tiggles · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      Discussion is dying, netcraft confirmed it.

      MOD PARENT DOWN! Kill him!!!!1111!!!

      omg ponies!!11!1 ...

      where were we?

  9. Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2

    There is often discussion here about how the Chinese people are oppressed by their government and that we need to take steps to give them technology to route around censorship and to eventually topple their totalitarian government. Now, I'm getting the impression that they're a bunch of busy bodies and snitches that have exactly the government that they want.

    1. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I dont remember who said that peoples have the goverment they deserve...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by patmc · · Score: 0

      OGG: Maui, Hi, USA

    3. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by Epicanthics · · Score: 2

      Because blacks did in fact deserve a government that treated them like commodities and second class citizens.

    4. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The actual quote is: "In a democracy, people get the government they deserve. -Adlai Stevenson"

      Your response was misguided.

    5. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by Epicanthics · · Score: 1

      I apologize. A misguided response to a misquote. I don't think the point is misguided, however. This line of reasoning is akin to blaming the victim.

    6. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er.. um.. how is that different than the patriotic act adn folsk in America voting for it?

      hmm...

    7. Re:Feeling less sorry for the Chinese today by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      This is clearly a troll. Why didn't people even notice?

      Just because there're relative few Chinese readers on Slashdot does not mean one can apply double-standards against the Chinese. Imagine if someone saying this before 1940s:
      "The Jewish don't deserve their own government because they lost it 2000 years ago.".

      Disclaimer: I'm not against the Jewish people. The above is just an example to reveal the absurdity of double standard I see here.

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
  10. 50-50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of this stuff seems arbitrary and abusive, while some of it also seems legitimate. Let's just hope it does more good than harm.

    China has always had a reputation for having large amounts of social pressures that have tended to lower some forms of crime. I've always wished America had more social pressures like this. In the US nobody really gives two flying fsck's if you are a criminal - sure it may look bad on an employment application but your neighbors won't care and probably won't even find out unless you are a registered sex offender or something like that.

  11. Must be mistaken... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Isn't China ruled by Communists? When did the Mob started ruling China? Why haven't America liberated China yet? Inquiring minds want to know...

    1. Re:Must be mistaken... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >When did the Mob started ruling China?

      Cultural Revolution. This has some faint echoes.

    2. Re:Must be mistaken... by metternich · · Score: 1

      I normally hate MOD PARENT UP posts, but this is exactly right. China never had a Gestapo or NKVD; they didn't need one. Mao controlled the country through the petty vindictiveness of neighbors on co-workers.

      --
      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
    3. Re:Must be mistaken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh - Communism IS mob rule.

  12. This sounds like... by Boap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mob metality at it's worst. This type of thing goes too far where we are letting the mob dictate morality

    1. Re:This sounds like... by spun · · Score: 1

      I agree. I hereby nominate myself to dictate morality.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:This sounds like... by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, morality is generally what the masses think is moral. Thus, mob rule dictating morality carries a lot of weight. cf: French revolution.

    3. Re:This sounds like... by Solarbeat · · Score: 1

      The mob dictating morality? Welcome to the good ol US of A.

    4. Re:This sounds like... by httptech · · Score: 1

      I call dibs on the fortuitous misspelling of "Mob Metality", as a name for a band I may or may not start in the future.

    5. Re:This sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fundamentalist Christian right dictating morality? Welcome to the good ol US of A.

      There, fixed it for you.

  13. At least the Chinese can pick good nicks! by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article, the husband's nick is Freezing Blade (I bet his 'blade' isn't getting any warmer, hehe), the cheating student goes by Bronze Mustache (Anyone else picturing a Chinese version of most 70's porn stars?) and the wife is Quiet Moon (Too... Many... Jokes...) . Sounds like the cast of an adult anime. ;-)

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:At least the Chinese can pick good nicks! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You would think they would rip off The Sopranos by now.

    2. Re:At least the Chinese can pick good nicks! by torrentmoon · · Score: 1

      These people involved in this story were met by playing WOW, "Freezing Blade", "Quite Moon", "Bronze Mustache" were their Chars' ID in WOW

  14. Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by squarooticus · · Score: 1

    Can you, for example, please point out where the forced-labor camps in the US are?

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by sfjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you, for example, please point out where the forced-labor camps in the US are?

      http://www.walmart.com/cservice/ca_storefinder.gsp

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      </badjoke>

    3. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by packetmon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      We're talking technology here but since you brought it up... Read on ... Brad Miller, the manager of communications and government affairs for the Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer's Association, said FPI's actions have forced such steps. "We find ourselves today with a prison-factory program where the bureaucrats running it may have learned more than they have taught from some of those they imprison -- more about strong-arming their way through life than meeting the needs of customers with quality service." Who are you fooling?

    4. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      All the Wal-Mart jokes aside, I suggest you Google on "US prison labor" and spend a while reading what comes up. It's not as bad as China ... (yet) ... but it's pretty grim.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by kfg · · Score: 1

      Can you, for example, please point out where the forced-labor camps in the US are?

      "A chain gang is a group of prisoners chained together to perform a menial or physically challenging labor, such as chipping stone, often along a highway. This system (and the term for it) existed primarily in the United States, and has been phased out in most of, but not all of, the country. Some states are reintroducing chain gangs, although perhaps in a less oppressive form."

      - Wikipedia

      I might have suggested that portion of the US in Cuba, but with warrentless arrest for a time without limit, lack of representation or any real form of public scrutiny I don't really know that forced labor goes on there, do I?

      No, we're not like China. . .yet, but all the elements that would allow us to be like China are already in place. It merely takes implimentation.

      KFG

    6. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Epicanthics · · Score: 1

      If the people in the camps were genuine criminals and not poitical prisoners, what's wrong with making inmates help pay for their cell? It's whose in jail that's the problem in China, not what they're doing there. The former is authoritarianism, but the latter is being tough on crime.

    7. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      It isn't exactly forced labor, though I wouldn't mind seeing hard labor make a comeback.

      Prisoners get paid anywhere from 4 to 50 cents an hour, which means they are the cheapest labor to be found in the U.S.

      BTW - Having a prison job like that is normally doled out as a privilege for those who behave themselves.

      What's scary is the idea of privatized prisons turning into a defacto labor camp so that the operators can make more money. I'd rather see abuse, corruption and/or fuck ups happen in the hands of State or Federal Gov'ts than under private corporations.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    9. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google for civilian inmate labor program

      sorry about the AC, busy now, don't want to follow the thread or do a long post, but yep, they exist and there are plans for more of them. Forced labor, manufacturing or ag, used in direct competition with regular legal labor, as a for-profit enterprise. Some are on military bases, others are run by private contractors subbed to run prisons as a for-profit business.

    10. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole country is a forced labor camp! I have to work all these hours just to pay my taxes so the money can go to someone who doesn't work at all (bums, politicos, etc.)

    11. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      What is even more frightening to me, at least in my capacity as student of medical ethics, is the practice of using the United States prison population for medical experimentation. No it isn't as bad as Aushwitz, but rewarding good behavior in the US prison system with infecting prisoners with diseases so the disease progression may be studied, or administering drugs of questionable safety for similar reasons even when participation is technically "voluntary" I consider to be extremely ethically questionable.

      In my opinion, the risk involved in medical trials is not something that a prison inmate can be considered competant to consent to. The very nature imprisonment is such that inmates will assent to things that a person in their right mind would not ordinarily assent to. Consider "We'll give you a shot every day for five days, you'll have a rash, and there's 0.1% you will be permanently blinded, but at the end we'll give you enough money to buy a pack of cigarettes, will you agree?" Is that ethical? Is an experiment even vaguely like that ethical?

    12. Re:Yeah, the US is really comparable to China by sosume · · Score: 1

      >The former is authoritarianism, but the latter is being tough on crime.

      I see no difference in that. The real difference is how the laws are determined that
      criminalize certain parts of the population. Ethical and moral codes are not absolute.

  15. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we please link to articles that don't require some technology like javascript to display a @#%!ing text article?

  16. This is an example of why ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... vigilantism is a bad idea.

    You hear calls for vigilante activity a lot, on the net and in the real world. And it's got lots of emotional appeal. But it always turns into mob rule, with absolutely no mechanism for protecting the innocent.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:This is an example of why ... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      it always turns into mob rule, with absolutely no mechanism for protecting the innocent
      Well, if you're rich, you can just hire private security (or the police) to hang around and keep the wankers away from your front door.

      If you're not so rich, in most countries you can ask for police protection (and get it for free) until things blow over.

      Since this is China, I'm not so sure if this guy & his family can get police protection just by asking. Maybe someone living/lived in China can resolve that.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:This is an example of why ... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Since this is China, I'm not so sure if this guy & his family can get police protection just by asking

      Only if you're holding out a bag of money and smiling at the same time...

      I live in southern China - A few months ago, I looked out the window of my 9th floor apartment and happened to notice a Shenzhen Police paddy wagon parked across the street, out front of a real estate company my GF used to work for - she SMS'S to say she has to work late, as one of the other employees was arrested, and everyone else had to go down and bail the guy out, so she had to stay and run the desk.

      Turns out, the police weren't even involved. The rental agent had recently scammed some home owner, and that lady was pissed, so she hired some goons to pretend to be cops, with uniforms and van, to go make a fake arrest (not to be confused with a false arrest). The shop owner followed the bogus Police van to some location where he abruptly learned about the ruse, and was directed to pay cash or his employee was going to have a rather sleepless night...and it would be his turn next if he held out.

      Not sure what it cost to free the hapless employee, but I did learn it will take years to work off his debt :)

      I was up in Beijing one time, strolling around looking for a DVD shop. The govt. had made a sweep recently, so they all went behind closed doors. Eventually, this Chinese guy walks up, smiles and asks if I want to buy DVDs - I nod and he motions to follow him.

      Down one alley, then another, then he finally stops and knocks at a weathered metal door. I notice a uniformed security guard (also weathered) sitting next to the entrance, and ask "...this the right place?", to which the DVD hawker says "sure" "ehh...what about the cop?" "Oh, him? He watches out for the police..."

      I mean, who better, right?

      By the way, all (pirated) DVDs come with a money back guarantee from this guy :)

  17. Shhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ancient Chinese secret!

  18. Poor China by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    QFA:"Let's use our keyboard and mouse in our hands as weapons". Obviously the repressive Communist rule won't let the common people even get their hands on real weapons.

    1. Re:Poor China by Epicanthics · · Score: 1

      Recent rural uprisings, most notably in Guangdong, have involved civilians armed with rifles. Of course, most what you probably know about China comes from Slashdot threads, no?

    2. Re:Poor China by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

      You missed the joke completely even if it wasn't that funny.

    3. Re:Poor China by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      Well, I believe it is you that missed the real story here first.

      Maybe to you, that is a joke, but it isn't funny to the victims.

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
  19. New! Interesting! by martinX · · Score: 1

    Oh great. Now we are going to be bombarded with amazing stories about everyday stuff simply because they involve THE INTERNET! In CHINA!

    Woo.

    Can't we go back to the 'old people in Korea' jokes?

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    1. Re:New! Interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old people in Korea are dying.From Starcraft. Netcraft Confirms it.

  20. And Slashdot? by 19061969 · · Score: 1

    Haven't people done this on SlashDot before?

    Think spammers. With the name of one of them, an address, a telephone number and even maps of his location appeared, and the subject of discussion found themselves deluged with junk mail and the like. Sackfuls. Every day.

    I cannot remember the guys name and maybe what happened was illegal and maybe even unethical, but I could see the point. It was too long ago to search for...

    --
    bang goes my karma... again...
    1. Re:And Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That spammer was Alan Ralsky.

      This would be a good idea to clear out all the Chinese farmers in the mmo's.

    2. Re:And Slashdot? by bugnuts · · Score: 1
      Yep, /. has done this to a spammer after he made an annoying interview bragging about how awesome he is and the only thing he has to worry about is the pile of money falling on him.

      Shortly after, someone posted his physical address and lo! he started receiving a LOT of junk mail. Like, a DOS on the postal service amount of junk mail.

  21. No clear voice of Moral Authority by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Informative

    Being married to a Chinese national and having just come back from China I'll weigh in with a few observations. Social obligation is considered very high, but not in a legal sense. The cultural revolution of the seventies and even the Communist party of today placed/places a high value on public self recrimination as a means to redemption. Pointing out the flaws in others has been a way of deflecting unwanted attention to ones self in China for decades. I won't go into details about the personal lives of some of my wife's friends, but based on what she tells me adultery and divorce are becoming as common in China as they are in America. Violent crime may be much lower but all other forms of crime abound.

    This new internet activism is probably a reaction to the commonly held belief that social mores are going to hell in a hand basket. My wife, an agnostic like myself, wonders if there is some value in most people having Religion in order to hold the more selfish, destructive behaviors in check. It would sadden me if this is the case, but as the Chinese government lessens its control of its citizenry and with the majority having no clear religion, there has been a corresponding rise in what most consider immoral behavior, and thus the current backlash.

    Now whether the new behavior is truly immoral is a separate question, and as an agnostic one I have no firm answer for.

    1. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If history has taught us anything, it's that it's the individual, not their religion religion (or lack there of), who ultimately chooses to do good or bad. If they happen to be religious and also a bad person, they will use their religion to justify their actions. (Like what happened with The Crusades for Christians, or more recently 9/11 for Muslims.) Religion has never been something that makes someone moral or immoral. The majority of people in the U.S. say that they are Christian, but that hardly means that they are more moral that the people of China who are mostly non-religious.

      A morally good member of a particular faith that will choose to get the good out of it and those with poor morality would get the worst out of their religion. In the end, it makes no difference.

    2. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by AtomicBomb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Religion may help to keep selfish behaviour in check. But, I cannot see religion as an antidote for mob mentality. In fact, we can see many notorious mobs in history are linked closely to fringe religious group. I think the root of the mob mentality is the belief that "I know the truth" (or even "I am the truth") and try to impose that upon the other. Mutual respect and acceptance to difference may probably the key....

    3. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My wife, an agnostic like myself, wonders if there is some value in most people having Religion in order to hold the more selfish, destructive behaviors in check.

      George Washington thought so, in his Farewell Address he said:

      Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
      It is pretty well established that Washington himself was at least a Deist, if not agnostic to the point of soft atheism.

      (As an aside, here is something very interesting - as I was looking for the exact quote to cut-n-paste into this message, I ran across an article by Michael Novak slamming the ACLU and attempting to justify it with the above quotation from George Washington. Except, Novak misquoted Washington in a fashion that hides Washington's clearly judgemental opinion of the type of people who 'need' religion.)

    4. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by Godeke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a segment of the population for whom religion creates an anchor to which they can attach significance to their actions, and thus gain a moral compass. This seems particularly the case with the less educated, at least in my dealings with the various religious groups I come in contact with. (The more academic "religious" people I meet, if you query them actually have their own moral compass with which their religion happens to be compatible with. The less academic are more apt to point to "the book" as the rational for a moral choice.

      That doesn't mean that it would make much difference in the large however: the most frustrating aspect of religion is the number of people who use it as sheep's clothing while being wolves in their day to day lives. Worse, many of the atrocities that have been committed historically were motivated by religious groups fear at things they did not agree with.

      I don't think religion is the panacea that you are looking for.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    5. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nice post and I believe correct for the most part. I am also married to a Chinese national, living in the United States. The internet mob mentality is not confined to China. It exists in the US as well among Chinese nationals. It can be found on Chinese forums such as mitbbs which is largely visited by college students as one example. I don't believe that and drastic circumstances such as the ones mentioned in the article have occurred here though. My wife and I were subjected to this same phenomenon over the course of at least 2 years and it wasn't pleasant.

    6. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by ThesQuid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the reasons for this happening is that for the most part in China, the police don't give a damn. They do not have the Cop Mentality of "Let's catch bad guys" like most (but of course not all) western police do. Just getting them to open a case on anything, even the most blatant criminal behavior, is like pulling teeth.

    7. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your wife's assumption about the value of religion to "hold the more selfish destructive behaviors in check" were true, crime in the USA should be much lower than in China, don't you think? Or, if you went to look to USA prissons, you would find them mostly populated by agnostics/atheists, being the believers in any religion a very small minority, right?

      The opposite is actually true. As you yourself point out, violent crime is more commont in America than in China (or than Japan or Europe, where arguably religion has a much more moderate influence in society than in the States, especially as of late). And the vast majority of people in prisson describe themselves as catholics, christians, muslims or jews, with a small representation of agnostics/atheists that is about ten times smaller than their proportion in the general population. In other words, lack of religion is actually correlated with lower criminal behavior, at least in these contexts!

      The idea that religion is the only (or the main) cultural element preventing people from behaving sociopathically is just one more of the unsubstantiated claims raised by religious people in their perpetual search for justification of their self-righteous, self-agrandizing discourse. In this regard is comparable to their claim that making condoms available to teenagers promotes teenage pregnancies, or that the vaccine that prevents women from being infected by the HPV is dangerous for women, or that having websites segregated into their own ".xxx" domain instead of mixed with all the other ".com" and ".org" websites makes them easier to find. If you watch their statements carefully, you will notice this repeating pattern of inverting the positions of "problem" and "solution". Similarly with the "voice of moral authority": religion obscures the issue much more than it clarifies it!

    8. Re:No clear voice of Moral Authority by DumbSwede · · Score: 1

      Many have chosen to assume I am for "the unwashed masses" to have religion, but the old Soviet Union with an atheistic model faired no better on the morality front. It is probably the case Religion just has NO predictive value on adhering to cultural mores.

      I would submit that agnostics and atheists on average are more free thinkers and have a higher average IQ and thus find better work and find themselves in better financial circumstances; poverty being the largest predictor for crime and other anti-social or maladaptive behaviors.

      It always seems to the older generation the current one is going to hell in a hand-basket. Is it really true? What is really moral? As I said, I have no firm answers for this. It is likely that society is changing due to political climate and due to technology, those accustomed to getting by in the old way see the changes in a negative light.

      BTW too bad you appear to be an A.C., my words are probably not going to lead to an interesting thread.

  22. every time one of these come up by Epicanthics · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...it seems the discussion devolves into one of indiscriminant China bashing. I say indiscriminant because it usually ends up including not only comments on the government (justified, most of the time), but also attacks on the people and culture that would get one's faced punched in if they said it to a Chinese person's face. Some of the things I have read here are as bad if not worse than what is described in the article. From an overseas Chinese student who is sick of borderline racism disguised as concern for human rights, I hope that some of the masses here never gain the power to smash China's hope of becoming a strong, democratic country.

    1. Re:every time one of these come up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I hope that some of the masses here never gain the power to smash China's hope of becoming a strong, democratic country."

      All the people in China itself who actually share that hope are in jail or under house arrest.

      Good thing you're overseas. Not sure you would want to be posting such subversive pro-democracy thoughts if you were under the watchful eye of the Chinese internet police. Just because you're bashing uncivilized waiguoren doesn't mean you can be careless about your reactionary words.

    2. Re:every time one of these come up by Epicanthics · · Score: 1

      On the first point, that is not true. You hear stories of how airtight China's police state is. This is emphatically not the case. For every dissident that gets front page coverage and flees to the US to sign a book deal, there are several more in-country fighting the good fight. They don't get much press, but they're there. Crackdowns in China tend to be for the purpose of making examples, making press, sowing fear, etc. Most of the people guilty of "crimes" aren't even on their radar. And the CCP itself is far from a monolithic entity. The reformers are clawing their way up the power structure. It's agonizingly slow, to be sure, but by no means is the country in complete lockdown. Sometimes I wish that it could all come crashing down. But afterwards, what would be left, and how many lives would be lost? What many overseas Chinese such as myself fear is that misguided foreign pressure will end up being detrimental to the democratic movement. No one wants a foreign government dictating to them, even if it is for supposedly altruistic reasons. Am I a reactionary to what is a common sentiment in the west regarding China? Yeah. That doesn't make me any less of an individual who wants to see his people free and prosperous.

    3. Re:every time one of these come up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful what you say, you may never be able to return home.

    4. Re:every time one of these come up by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      All the people in China itself who actually share that hope are in jail or under house arrest.

      Not true.

      China is not a monolithic country, not even during the Culture Revolution. Applying dichotomy to any society makes itself sound naive to me. According to your logic, the allies should kill off all the Germans that were not imprisoned by the Nazi, as they would have automatically supported Hitler and hence were just as evil as the regime.

      I do believe there's more and more people in China sharing that hope. Democracy is not only a dream for China. It will be realized some day. However, struggling towards that dream is never an easy and straight forward process. It took even countries like German y many decades to achieve that since its economy took off in the late 19th century. China is much much bigger than Germany, and poorer too. Yet a lot of Chinese, me for one, are making it happen bit by bit.

      I don't see how the attack to Chinese people here is going to do any good to that.

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
  23. So now we have by Goblez · · Score: 1

    Blogging == Flogging?

    --
    - Kal`Goblez
  24. Clippy, is that you!? by Kesch · · Score: 2, Funny

    It[The Chinese Government] also introduced an Internet policing system whose cartoon figure mascots show up on people's screens to remind them they are being monitored.

    Am I the only one who just imagined Clippy wearing a little chinese police hat?

    Oh no, here comes the rage blackout again...

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  25. This story is PROPAGANDA by Huge+Big+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...ooooohhhh dangerous, dangerous internet......ooooohhhh nasty, persecutory chinese...

  26. Mobsters by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Troll Subject not even supported by the story. Slashdot is learning too much from the mass media.

    How is that "mob" ruling anything? The people in the public investigated publicly known events. Then they used the usual power organized people have to pressure people who listen to them. Where's the "rule"? Where, indeed, is the "mob"?

    That story is interesting mainly in the power regular people are accruing in China, a Communist tyranny that favors totalitarianism. I guess if you're a Chinese Communist powermonger, the Internet and people using its open society represent "mob rule', because tyrants see the world only in the simplest, most polarized power structures.

    Maybe Alien54 and the IHT are learning more from Xin Hua, China's official propaganda publisher, and quoting the best lessons from the New York Times.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Mobsters by tksh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, did we read the same article?

      Someone under a pseudo-name posts accusations, a bunch of people respond and get all riled up and encourages more people to join them in their cause. A name is given and random people from all over dig up information about the guy and other random people in real life start harassing the guy and his family. All this without concrete evidence, they're just going by someone's words on the internet. Even when the original poster tries to call things off, they ignore him and keep going. A large, disorderly group of people attacking someone. That is a mob.

    2. Re:Mobsters by shimage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "mob rule" is the group of thousands applying their own brand of justice, using neither trial, jury, nor judge. I don't know about you, but when I hear "mob rule", I think torches and pitchforks, which is essentially what happened.

      It's not even like adultery is even a crime (or is it ... ). Sure, he might be a jerk for cuckolding someone (and notice that even the alleged cuckold has rescinded his accusations), but does the punishment here really fit the crime? I don't think it does in this case, and furthermore, I think this penchant for taking things too far is a hallmark of "mob rule" (as is the lack of due process, which perhaps you don't think is important?).

    3. Re:Mobsters by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      phone calls = torches & pitchforks?

      There's a vast gulf between harassment and lynching. And between lynching and due process of law, even vaster. These episodes lie somewhere between, at harassment. That's not "mob rule".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Mobsters by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "Rules"?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Mobsters by quanticle · · Score: 1

      These episodes lie somewhere between, at harassment. That's not "mob rule".

      How is this form of harassment not mob rule? Would you like it if I create some trumped up charges against you, gather a mob, then proceed to turn your life into a living hell through harassing phone calls and posting of death threats against you and you associates? How about "We call on every company, every establishment, every office, school, hospital, shopping mall and public street to reject him."

      There's more to mob rule than physical injury. These unfounded accusations have permanently smeared the person's reputation. From now on, every employer that does a Google search on this guy will see these accusations, robbing the person of what might have been a good first impression.

      If any of these thing happened to you, wouldn't you say that your due process rights have been violated?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    6. Re:Mobsters by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I call that slander, libel and harassment - even assault, but not battery.

      When China's "Cultural Revolution" lynched, killed and terrorized millions with physical violence at the hands of actual mobs in the streets, that was mob rule, controlled by the mafia mob running the country. Just because something isn't "mob rule", that doesn't mean I'd like it.

      As for "due process rights", those are rules of the government. Kidnapping is not false imprisonment, and mass harassment is not "deprivation of due process".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Mobsters by quanticle · · Score: 1

      When China's "Cultural Revolution" lynched, killed and terrorized millions with physical violence at the hands of actual mobs in the streets, that was mob rule, controlled by the mafia mob running the country.

      So if many mobs terrorize millions, its mob rule, but if a single mob terrorizes a single person, its "just" harassment? Tell me, then, at what point does this harassment rise to the level of mob rule? Does the guy have to be physically attacked? Are the death threats and threats of physical imprisonment not enough?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    8. Re:Mobsters by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, the difference between threats and action is important. And the difference between a tiny percentage threatening and a substantial percentage, perhaps the majority actually attacking, changing the rules by which people live, is completely different.

      It's the difference between Nazi grafitti and defaced Jewish cemeteries, and the Third Reich. The difference between vigilante threats and "mob rule" is absolutely stark.

      Of course it is. Can't you tell the difference?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  27. OmG YOo ChinaMAN Got Pwned! by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

    And you thought myspace stalkers were bad...

  28. Re: I don't think so... by vertinox · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It would sadden me if this is the case, but as the Chinese government lessens its control of its citizenry and with the majority having no clear religion, there has been a corresponding rise in what most consider immoral behavior, and thus the current backlash.

    If you are implying that a Judeo-Christian religion would help them I would recommend taking a hard look at the past 2,000 years of our religion. It does nothing to stop crime nor prevents society as whole from doing horrible things to other people even with the anger of god and damnation hanging over their head. In some instances it may because people do to horrible things.

    Burning people at the stake... inquisitions... Hanging suspected witches for devil worship... Holy Wars... Flying planes into buildings.... Blowing your self up in a crowded market in the name of your god.

    Not to say religion can bring out the best in people on occasion, but it isn't required for it do so.

    However, the Chinese are in luck... From what I've heard Buddhism is gaining in popularity and that tends to be the most non-violent of all religions (well if you don't count the Sri-Lanka violence) and from what I've studied of it has the best moral frame work of all religions and is more compatible with technology and science.

    And as an aside, I think Christianity is frowned upon in China mostly because it caused one of the most bloody civil wars in its history in the Taiping Rebellion where Hong Xiuquan declared he was the new messiah back in the 1850's.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  29. Hrmmm.....husbands cheating on wives by inexia · · Score: 1

    well, it isn't like Russia is so far.... /obligatory/ In republic China you cheat on wife In Soviet Russia, Bought wife cheats on you

  30. Agreed completely by MCTFB · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I think the libertarian/anarchy majority here in Slashdot thinks that the community has no rights to dictate moral standards.

    When a guy sleeps with your wife, he is not only doing real emotional harm to you, but there is a good chance you might end up raising a child that is not your own. In the United States, anywhere from 10-30% of fathers unwittingly raise children that are not their own. In other words, the mothers were sleeping around, and very often you can't tell if a child belongs to a particular father, until much later on in life if the skin color of biological father and the cuckholded father are the same.

    Many community moral codes are based on common sense in keeping society functioning for the long-term, and in the absense of local democratic governments to create enforcable community standards and adjudicate them as well, then the vigilante element is inevitably going to fill that void. Though, obviously many of these Chinese vigilantes are taking some things too far in the heat of the moment, in spirit they are just trying to protect their community from the evil of selfish people acting solely in their interests. Sleeping with another man's wife is a totally selfish act which can have devastating aspects for the community as a whole. Just look at African-American America right now where 70% of the children are born out of wedlock and then correlate that statistic to the statistics of crime and other leading social ills and anyone not taking the idea that "correlation does not equal causation" to the extreme can clearly see that broken down families from having kids out of wedlock is bad for the community, and therefore evil if you postulate that evil is any selfish act which does not benefit the community as a whole.

    Every time a married woman goes behind the back of a married man (or vice versa), there is a risk of bastard children being raised if a pregnancy ensues. Furthermore, should a cuckholded man be expected to raise the offspring of another man? Should he be forced to pay child support for a kid that is not his? What is a guy to do in that situation other than to leave his cheating wife (assuming you don't live in a country where stoning is permitted)?

    If China was a democracy and people could count on their government to uphold "community standards" as opposed to simply "communist standards", then these sort of vigilante witch hunts would rarely materialize. The United States (my nation) right now has the opposite problem of having a Jerry Springer "Who Are You To Judge Me" type mentality that is pervasive in our country and has absolved much of the public from any sense of personal responsibility or duty to their community. This is having disastrous effects that are slowly bubbling up in terms of worse education, family and therefore community stability, as well as a common cultural identity which doesn't matter much when economic times are good, but definitely matters when economic times are bad. If the people of a nation have common cultural values of shared sacrifice like you had during the Great Depression where families stuck together and pooled their resources, then the people can get through anything, but if everyone has a "every man for himself" type mentality, well then you get the kind of behaviour you found in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina.

    This delusional libertarian/anarchist mindset that seems to be pervasive here on Slashdot has me wondering if some people need to get some more sunshine in their life and stop assuming that their introverted personality of avoidance realistically applies to the rest of humanity.

    1. Re:Agreed completely by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I agree mostly, though I expect trial by jury to enforce community standards that are encoded into expectations under law, including proof of evidence and protecting other rights of the accused.

      But I'm not sure whose behavior you mean when you say "if everyone has a "every man for himself" type mentality, well then you get the kind of behaviour you found in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina". Do you mean the behavior of the government agencies which left people to drown and fend for themselves? Or are you exaggerating the few hundred telegenic looters out of the half-million people who helped each other to safety?

      More people stayed behind or returned to rescue neighbors and strangers, and even their pets, than looted. New Orleans, as usual in disasters, showed that people's natural inclination is to band together into social groups to protect each other, even when risking their lives for the material safety of strangers.

      The government failure, composed of the failure of many people, most of them Republican "starve the government" corporate anarchists, supports practically everything you mention. So I'll assume that is the behavior you mean.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Agreed completely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a good chance you might end up raising a child that is not your own.

      If you raise a child, and that child identifies you as his/her parent, that child is "your own". Who gives a shit who the biological father/mother was?
    3. Re:Agreed completely by sgtrock · · Score: 1
      When a guy sleeps with your wife, he is not only doing real emotional harm to you, but there is a good chance you might end up raising a child that is not your own. In the United States, anywhere from 10-30% of fathers unwittingly raise children that are not their own. In other words, the mothers were sleeping around, and very often you can't tell if a child belongs to a particular father, until much later on in life if the skin color of biological father and the cuckholded father are the same.


      Can you cite any credible evidence to support your claims? Especially in this day of easily available birth control and STD prevention (which has the side effect of also acting as birth control)?
    4. Re:Agreed completely by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      " When a guy sleeps with your wife [...] the cuckholded father are the same. "

      "Can you cite any credible evidence to support your claims?"

      No, because I never said that. You've got me confused with someone else.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Agreed completely by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I must have somehow replied to the wrong thread. My mistake.

  31. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You say that as if we here on Slashdot have never lynched a spammer.

    Speaking of which, is Ralsky still getting the junkmail he deserves, or has he moved recently?

  32. This would never happen in the west.... by Smuttley · · Score: 1
  33. Real weapons? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    The Chinese government won't even let their citizens use the keyboard and mouse:

    http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2005/ 06/confirmed_all_t.html

  34. Mobs are fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like fun.. Anyone up for hunting Gary Niger?

  35. When you listen to fools... (-1, off-topic) by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    tag:themobrules

  36. What we need is a low budget sci-fi tale by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Using this story, totally making the Chinese government look bad.

    Kind od a Blade Runner type tale. Bounty Hunters tracking down ordinary Chinese Citizens who are trying to learn about "freedom" on the net.

    The Ones marked for Death are those looking for a certain key phrase.

    The phrase, of course, turns to be "Tianemen massacre"

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  37. vague call for Religion by non-subscriber by SaberTaylor · · Score: 1

    Here's from my last response to an atheist thinking Religion was the solution for mores:

    I'm sure the last thing you want to do is sit in a cafe and read, but here's a couple more links: http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/executedoffenders .htm
    (got remorse? nope. one of the final statements is from somebody who can't wait to meet his victims in heaven. word. I can actually admire that level of forgiveness but what does it do for bad people?)
    W's gov't funded intensive Christianity prison program increased recidivism. ("Faith-Based Fudging" via http://www.annotatedrant.com/)

    And more if you're into this whole partisan thing. . .
    Not sure what Christianity is supposed to do. It's not exactly rational. In the Congo: A journey into the most savage war in the world (child witches! bulletproof soldiers! religion gone wild)

    --
    If you need text styles to communicate then you don't have a message.
  38. patent infringement by flogic42 · · Score: 1

    It's patent infringement, not "intellectual property theft."
    Theft connotes bereavement where there is none.

    --
    Check out my women's designer clothing store.
  39. nothing to see here by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    there is no reply here
    there has never been a reply here
    it has not been censored by the chinese government

    the post wasn't even from a chinese... well it wouldn't have been if it had existed... which it hasn't...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  40. We call it "SwiftBoating" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or what about the bloggers that hounded chicken hawk Bush's CBS critics, etc.
    One fake document became the news, not the fact that Bush was a drunken swine
    sniffing coke off the taxpayers boobies instead of getting shrapnel in his ass.

  41. Non-violent criminals by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    More than 50% of the prison populace are non-violent drug offenders who do more time on average (10y) than murderers (6y) (sorry, don't have the source to those numbers anymore, they came out around 1995 so they obviously are not current).

    That makes them political prisoners in my book. How dare anyone smoke a flower that we don't like them to smoke? (Yet, last I checked, I could legally go down to the store and buy poison that would actually kill me if ingested. A minor point, but still. And of cousre, I can legally have my penis removed, but not smoke a flower.)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  42. Re: I don't think so... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    If you are implying that a Judeo-Christian religion would help them I would recommend taking a hard look at the past 2,000 years of our religion. It does nothing to stop crime nor prevents society as whole from doing horrible things to other people even with the anger of god and damnation hanging over their head.

    Nothing is rather a strong word, and I think demonstrably false.

    Hanging suspected witches for devil worship...

    Witches were executed not for devil worship, but for causing harm to others. The devil worship was a lurid sidenote.

    Flying planes into buildings.... Blowing your self up in a crowded market in the name of your god.

    I'm not aware of any Jews or Christians doing those things, although of course it's possible.

  43. Re: I don't think so... by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
    Nothing is rather a strong word, and I think demonstrably false.

    So is the word stop. If you read it again:
    It does nothing to stop crime nor prevents society as whole from doing horrible things to other people even with the anger of god and damnation hanging over their head.

    I think what the GP meant is that religions is not the ultimate cure for crime, which is proven by history. Among other ideologies, religion has its own side effects too. One of the side effect is it sometimes encourages the society to do horrible things against individuals, like witches, or other group of people, like Jewish, muslim. These tragedies happened before and they will happen again. I'm not to say any particular religion is wrong. It is human natural that happened to utilized it in doing horrible things.

    Witches were executed not for devil worship, but for causing harm to others. The devil worship was a lurid sidenote.

    You're right. Devil worship was just an excuse. The fundamental cause is fear, fear of being harmed by "witches". Fear is a very powerful human emotion. It easily overcomes the rational part of us. And religion at that time only just happened to provide something for the villagers to believe what they were doing was right despite the absence of hard evidence.

    "Flying planes into buildings.... Blowing your self up in a crowded market in the name of your god."

    I'm not aware of any Jews or Christians doing those things, although of course it's possible.

    I think what the GP wants to say is not Judeo-Christian but Abrahamic religion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religion Surprisingly, Judaism, Christianity and Islam came from the same root.

    BTW, the GP shouldn't be modded as flambait, but insightful.

    --
    People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
  44. China cares about Intellectual Property? by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

    The piracy capital of the world cares about intellectual property?!?

    --
    Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
  45. Re: I don't think so... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    Witches were executed not for devil worship, but for causing harm to others. The devil worship was a lurid sidenote.

    You're right. Devil worship was just an excuse. The fundamental cause is fear, fear of being harmed by "witches". Fear is a very powerful human emotion. It easily overcomes the rational part of us. And religion at that time only just happened to provide something for the villagers to believe what they were doing was right despite the absence of hard evidence.

    No, actually the Church denied the existence of witches. It was a secular crime, not a religious one. And as I mentioned, the Church denied that it was possible for a curse or hex to have any ill effect.

  46. Re: I don't think so... by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
    I'm not going to blame the Church for burning witches. I'm no expert in mideval history. On the technical side, you must be right. However, all I want to say is that the crime was committed at a time when religion dominated people's mind, and that religion, with the best intention in the world, did not prevent what had happened. In fact, the religious social atomosphere at that time had released what we call the worst part of human nature. Without enough rule of law, without adequate reasoning and sympathy being overwhelmed by fear, hatred and bigotry, men are no better than beasts. You might say, it would possibly have happened anyway without religion. I can't disprove that as history can never be replayed, let alone corrected, (yet it always repeats itself).

    As we know it, communism in the last century drove itself into a deadend. Yet there're still people arguing, that the atrocities took place under communist regimes were never the intention nor doctrine of Karl Marx's idealistic theory, and that had Stalin or Lenin never take the whelm of communist movement, the whole situation could have been different. They might have a point. But that amounts to nothing. In reality, communism had released the worst part of human nature. And there is no way back to change that.

    I think the best thing these tragedies brought us, if any, is ways to prevent them from happening again. Mobilizing hatred against people has been declared crime in many countries. More people are aware of fearmongering politicians' hidden agenda. However, there're still countries with no effective rule of law. Even in Western Europe and North America, people still suffer from hatred crimes and political propagandas. Situations are conceivably worse in third-world countries.

    Anyway, let's hope the world is changing for the better.

    --
    People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.