Slashdot Mirror


Nuclear Agency Worker Information Hacked

Juha-Matti Laurio writes to mention a Reuters report about a fairly worrying case of identity theft. A determined hacker gained access to the U.S. National Nuclear Safety Administration's records and made off with the information for over 1,500 employees and contractors. From the article: "The incident happened last September but top Energy Department officials were not told about it until this week, prompting the chairman of the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee to demand the resignation of the head of the NNSA. An NNSA spokesman was not available for comment."

78 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Luckily... by Funkcikle · · Score: 5, Funny
    "An NNSA spokesman was not available for comment."

    Shouldn't be too hard to track down now, though. Phew!

  2. So wheres the Glowing report on this?? by RobertLTux · · Score: 3, Funny

    just to get the joke out of the way

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:So wheres the Glowing report on this?? by tacarat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder what the fallout will be...

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    2. Re:So wheres the Glowing report on this?? by tacarat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm suprised they didn't just bury the matter completely.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    3. Re:So wheres the Glowing report on this?? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Well, not in my backyard!

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  3. Huh? by Doytch · · Score: 1

    Can someone please tell me why employers need all sorts of information about contractors when they're not even technically employing them?

    Oh ya, it's the government, I forgot.

    1. Re:Huh? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhhhh.... maybe because these contractors are handling classified information such as the location of various and sundry nuclear waepons and other realtively sensitive information??????

    2. Re:Huh? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Maybe security clearance? I guess the dept of energy is pretty sensitive when it comes to nuclear plants, so I guess a thorough background check is required to work in them. (Just guessing here).

      Of course, the irony would be how security information was stored insecurely enough to be stolen.

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:Huh? by packeteer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When dealing with nuclear security (not nucular like bush says) i expect them to have all kinds of background on contractors. When safety is an issue you need to know this stuff. You are right though that sometimes the government is overzelous but in this case i think its warranted.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:Huh? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      aluminum too

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  4. Evil geniuses of the world... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Just when I'm on the verge of downloading the programs to simulate a nuclear bomb on a cluster of Playstation 2's, they booted me out and changed the password. This sucks!

    1. Re:Evil geniuses of the world... by TwilightSentry · · Score: 1

      NTWD (NSA TERRORISM WIRETAP DEAMON) AUTOMATED NOTIFICATION:

      Your use of the words:
      nuclear
      bomb
      password
      downloading
      the

      Indicate that you are probably a terrorist. Please report to:
      1234 NSA Way
      Redmonton, DC

      Special thanks to AT&T.

      --
      How to enable garbage collection on a system without protected memory: #define malloc() ((void *) rand())
  5. Big Trouble by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    I assume, and hope, that the systems broken into were completely independant from launch control.

    1. Re:Big Trouble by ds_job · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah. To get access to that you need an acoustic coupler and just dial a load of numbers in Sunnyvale California. I believe the industry standard for back-door passwords is "Joshua"

    2. Re:Big Trouble by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Ah, but even if you get to launch control, you still have to know the unlock codes.

    3. Re:Big Trouble by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Those are no big obstacle anymore. They were changed to 12345 for dubya. Ya know, he's not so good with remembering things.

    4. Re:Big Trouble by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      You'll find out in exactly 15 minutes and 22 seconds.

  6. Matter of national security? by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 1

    This is truly troubeling news
    Of course there is the chance that we have some James Bond plot underway and that it is some of the really bad guys that have cracked their way to this information. Chances are that this is not the case, but I'll bet this information is now for sale for whoever would be willing to pay the right price.
    Saudi Arabian wealthy people and others might be willing to sponsor those that should not get their hands on information of this kind.
    Sure having information on workers does not directly give access to the nuclear warheads, but it brings you one step closer.

    I don't understand why the articles focus on why the notification didn't get to whatever comitee fast enough. Unless I get something wrong this is a matter of national security (and since the nation in question is the US that also means worldwide safety) and then those that needs to be notified ASAP is the some military people and the president, which probably has happened.

    1. Re:Matter of national security? by retrosurf · · Score: 1

      Troubling indeed. In 2003 the GAO found that their oversight of
      contractors was lacking. The NNSA got a panel together to review the issues mentioned by the GAO, and after a couple of years came up with the Mies report. Here's an overview of that. Chapter 5, "Cyber System Security" mentions a lack of secure voice and data networks.

      If you want to talk about security problems, this is the worst possible
      situation. NNSA is responsible for security operations of contractors at
      nuclear facilities, and has itself been breached.

      It would be ironic if Dr. Rice's "mushroom cloud" smoking gun turned out
      to be from nuclear material MADE PROUDLY IN THE USA.

  7. Why aren't laws in place.... by Crasoum · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why aren't laws in place that REQUIRE, on a FEDERAL level people to report to the Attorney General, the company(s) involved with the theft, and the actions taken? California has something close to it, but something nation wide would be nice for the FASTEST growing crime in the US. http://www.usps.com/postalinspectors/idthft_ncpw.h tm. (source)

    The excuse they used that "We thought they knew" is total crap, you'd figure when the head of NNSA says to the ED "Oh hey, we had a security breach where information on 1500 people was stolen, just so you know" Bodman would say "Woooh there, what have you done about it?" as opposed to you know, saying "Mm kay, how about them bears?" and brushing it off...

  8. 9 months!#$ by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

    Why did it take them 9 months to be told of this?

    You would think one of the Net Admins would have looked @ those logs in the last 9 months. Or something would have been found out of whack?

    The NNSA is a semi-autonomous arm of the Energy Department and also guards some of the U.S. military's nuclear secrets and responds to global nuclear and radiological emergencies.

    That's just great. So for 9 months someone that shouldn't has had access? Something just isn't right lately with our gov't security.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:9 months!#$ by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      I think they knew of it, just decided it would hurt National Security if they told the people about it. Or whatever the government says is at stake to with hold information from people.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    2. Re:9 months!#$ by mikesd81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The incident happened last September but top Energy Department officials were not told about it until this week, prompting the chairman of the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee to demand the resignation of the head of the NNSA.

      It's different than telling the public.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    3. Re:9 months!#$ by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "So for 9 months someone that shouldn't has had access?"

      Not as I read it. They cut off the access nine months ago. They're only now telling their bosses that they did it. This snippet from the article explains this, "According to Barton, the NNSA chief knew about the incident soon after it happened in September but did not inform Energy Department officials, including Bodman, until Wednesday."

      Personally, I don't care if he notified the Secretary of Energy. He should have notified someone like the FBI and the 1500 employees/contractors. The article implies that he did not notify the workers.

    4. Re:9 months!#$ by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Why did it take them 9 months to be told of this?

      You would think one of the Net Admins would have looked @ those logs in the last 9 months. Or something would have been found out of whack?


      The Net Admins probably informed the correct people as soon as they found out. The issue is that proper notifications weren't made to people higher in the hierarchy. Non-IT management/workers obviously didn't have thier own procedures for dealing with these matters. Even a one page checklist would have done better than the assumputions they were making.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  9. The REAL Crux of the problem by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When a few numbers can be used to perpetrate ID fraud, we have a problem. This problem was made possible by the use of the Social Security Number as a "federal serial number." The abuse of the SSN for anything BUT Social Security accounting purposes needs not only to be "discouraged" as it presently is, it needs to be made ILLEGAL.

    If you want credit, go apply to the credit agencies the way they once did and use other companies as a reference the way things used to be in the good ole days. What does getting credit or a bank account have to do with your social security account anyway? Why does supplying my social security number become a requisite for getting a bank account? In some states, your SSN is also your driver's license number.

    It's "convenient" for the government and all agencies and companies interested in collecting massive pools of information on single individuals. That's kinda the problem. That's been the argument for decades since the inception of the SSN.

    We'll always be vulnerable as individuals because we cannot do anything about anyone else having our information... we don't even know who has it. We're ultimately powerless until we can have the use of the SSN for anything but Social Security accounting made illegal.

    1. Re:The REAL Crux of the problem by dave562 · · Score: 1
      We're ultimately powerless until we can have the use of the SSN for anything but Social Security accounting made illegal.

      And then once the use of the SSN becomes illegal, someone is going to have to do some clever coding along the lines of... SELECT sekritinph0 WHERE sekritinph0.IllegalizedSSN = sekritinph0.LegalReplacementIdentifer

      Hmmmm, maybe I should get a patent for that while there is still time.

    2. Re:The REAL Crux of the problem by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1
      What does getting credit or a bank account have to do with your social security account anyway?

      Bank accounts often pay interest, and the bank needs to send that to the IRS with your SSN. It's fairly reasonable to require the SSN to open an account, since even if the account doesn't pay interest now it might in the future.

      Some interest paid on debt is deductible, so you run into similar requirements there.
      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    3. Re:The REAL Crux of the problem by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      With all these issues, I wish I could put a permanent fraud alert on my file. The sad part is that my information keeps getting compromised enough that the annual alerts don't expire much...

      I wouldn't object to a requirement of a witness, identification, and a signed contract for all credit applications.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:The REAL Crux of the problem by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Tax ID numbers are available to anyone for the asking. That number can be used.

      But as for reporting income, interest and deductable expenses, I think the government should do what it used to do -- "trust" its citizens to supply the information requested. Most people would be pretty honest about most things.

      The issues of invasion of privacy by our "democratic" government just doesn't feel all that democratic to me.

  10. Ok, this is just scary... by Pecisk · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is real "top secret" info and goverment got it loose to some God damn hacker?

    I would bet that again "cool" solutions like Microsoft Windows or Microsoft Office is involved. Or better even, unconfigured and unsecured Linux or BSD server.

    Propably will be modded troll, but anyway, it is crazy and scary in same time.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:Ok, this is just scary... by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this is real "top secret" info and goverment got it loose to some God damn hacker? I would bet that again "cool" solutions like Microsoft Windows or Microsoft Office is involved. Or better even, unconfigured and unsecured Linux or BSD server. Propably will be modded troll, but anyway, it is crazy and scary in same time.

      Not a troll :P Anyhow, I'd be willing to bet it was just some social engineering.

      "Hello? Personnel? This is Paul in accounting. We just got a memo to about a new tracking item. Some contractor got hired to do some cost analysis study. They need the full details of everybody with NUKEIT clearance. Can you forward them a copy with everybody hired from 1990 to present? I'd really appreciate it."

      On the other hand, anything that's actually "secret" shouldn't be on internet accessible computers. There might be issues if the personnel information turns up blackmailable material, though.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  11. I don't understand... by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

    ...why, when something goes wrong in an organization, does the head of organization get called on to resign, when 90% of the time the incident didn't have anything to do with negligence or error on their part?

    Can someone please explain for me?

    1. Re:I don't understand... by Apraxhren · · Score: 1

      Well in this case the head of the NNSA knew about the breach and didn't notify anyone of said breach which is negligence. The majority of the time they are guilty of negligence, either they knew something and did nothing or they didn't know something they should. As the head of a corporation or department you are responsible for the entire operation not just signing papers although very few do more than that.

    2. Re:I don't understand... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Is the head of an organization not responsible for the
      correct functioning of that organization?

      And if the organization does not function, who should
      be held most responsible?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:I don't understand... by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ask not why some poor little schmuck lost his job for hiring idiots and building a culture of cover-up and deceit in his organization. Ask why some other bigger schmuck did not.

      What I don't understand is why we don't hold people accountable more often. It clearly is a tradition that has fallen on hard times in the U.S. In Europe it seems to be more common for government heads to be "held accountable" for the organization they run.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    4. Re:I don't understand... by tqk · · Score: 1
      ...why, when something goes wrong in an organization, does the head of organization get called on to resign, when 90% of the time the incident didn't have anything to do with negligence or error on their part?
      Boss: "Do we have a backup regime?"
      Flunkie: "Sure."
      Boss: "Have we tested recovering from them?"
      Flunkie: "Uhhh ..."

      It's their job to ensure everybody under them are doing their jobs.
      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  12. Terror strike team... by packetmon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The NNSA is a semi-autonomous arm of the Energy Department and also guards some of the U.S. military's nuclear secrets and responds to global nuclear and radiological emergencies. So I wonder... How long will it be before someone actually utilitizes some of the information that's being stolen. We already know the military was hit for 26.5 million records, and supposedly the Chinese are ramping up their cyberoffense and defense. I'm wondering how long will it be before the ultimate "so that's what they wanted that information for" scenario comes about. It's sickening to see a country that can supposedly defend itself and the world, can't even secure their own networks. Last thing that needs to happen is this new NSA snooping database to get owned as well.

    So here would be the nightmare scenario in my eyes... Hackers get DoD information from those 26.5 million VA database and slowly poison them... While the US is straddled in Iraq militarily, some country starts kidnapping those on the NNSA's list and either killing them or torturing them for information (schematics to facilities, etc.) while all this is going on, someone strikes inside the US on such a big scale, Hiroshima looks like a mild 4th of July show.... Scary isn't it? ... Luckily for us Americans, the NSA is snooping the planet so never fear they will find the culprits... Unless of course they get pwned too.

    1. Re:Terror strike team... by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "It's sickening to see a country that can supposedly defend itself and the world, can't even secure their own networks."

      Sickening, I agree, but I hope it doesn't come as a surprise. The all-too-common blindness that states, 'I don't care how it works; just make it work.' is finally exacting its toll. The stupid false alternative that assumes any criticism is an attack has made it downright dangerous for anyone to disagree, and now the price of conflating 'right' with 'agrees with me' is beginning to be felt.

      It is sickening, but it's been a long time coming for anyone with eyes to see it.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:Terror strike team... by Frightening · · Score: 1

      And the summer movie fest hasn't even started...

      What you said is actually possible, but to what end? World domination? Come on now, that's just lame.
      Much more likely is a telecom attack where they deliver propaganda through the media and scare everybody shitless, which would be doing G.W a big favor.

      And if they ever do that, I hope they use Fox as a HQ.

  13. Oh no! by fuzzyfozzie · · Score: 1

    "We are now entering DefCon Two."

  14. Confessions of an NNSA contractor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This story reports things quite out of context, the more I find myself directly involved with things in the news, the more I realize its all bullshit.

    Here's the actual scoop, I work as an incident response investigator for the NNSA. There are two issues being confused and placed into one, there was an incident last September, it continues on now as a series of incidents that all mesh together as being from the same source- why haven't there been arrests and such? because it requires the cooperation of the foreign nation in question. Last month a service center in new mexico was broken into as part of the larger incident. This was a result of an attack using zero-day that at the moment is still unpatchable (no patch exists).

    This is what is now being reported as a result of congressional hearings that took place. The information itself was not stolen almost a year ago, but rather less than a month ago, but the incident as a whole has been going on much longer than that. Alarms went up all over the place when this occured and everyone with a need to know was informed.

    So to summarize, two related incidents, the first starting last September, and one occuring last month. The personal data was taken last month as part of the larger incident but is being reported as the data was stolen in september, which is incorrect.

    1. Re:Confessions of an NNSA contractor by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "Last month a service center in new mexico was broken into as part of the larger incident. This was a result of an attack using zero-day that at the moment is still unpatchable (no patch exists)."

      What are you talking about? If there's no readily available patch, then you inspect the source and assign someone to patch the flaw. Sheesh!

      And what was sensitive information doing sitting on a system which is breakable via a single exploit?

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    2. Re:Confessions of an NNSA contractor by grcumb · · Score: 1

      "You must live in a small and unrealistic/idealistic world."

      I do, and my small, idealised world has been attacked, but never 0wned. Which is why I'm happy I'm here.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  15. The solution is simple by Pizaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  16. Re:China Syndrome by Pizaz · · Score: 1

    "Oh, how I miss the days when a man's word was good for a loan at the bank, a student's teacher kept records of a students behaviour (read: their opinion of) only in their minds, clerks kept knowledge of your preferences and purchases to themselves,,,," Wow, I didnt realize 90 year old people read Slashdot. Way to be hip grandpa!

  17. New US GOV page to check if you info was stolen by malraid · · Score: 3, Funny

    This new page is just comming online. You can check if your info was stolen. You just need to type your full name, SSN, birthdate, and address. It's really useful. US Goverment Identity Theft Agency Homepage

    --
    please excuse my apathy
    1. Re:New US GOV page to check if you info was stolen by A+Nun+Must+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      That link seems to be broken, but I'll keep trying.

      I'm impressed that it can be done without my bank account details now! Those other guys needed all my bank account info to check for identity theft last time (and it was lucky I checked, because it turned out that my identy had been stolen!).

  18. It's not just an ID theft problem by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Your company phone book is stamped confidential because some attacks are harder without it. Not at all impossible, but harder. Security through obscurity is lame, if you depend on it you're worse off with it than without it, but it does make sense to add a speed bump to your other security measures.

    One question spy recruiters typically ask is "can you get me a list of your coworkers?".

    >also guards some of the U.S. military's nuclear secrets and responds to global nuclear and radiological emergencies.

    That sounds like it might include the Nuclear Emergency Support Teams, who train to search for and disarm stolen nuclear "devices". To help them with the disarming part, they deploy with PAL codes (if you haven't heard of those, the unclassified literature describes them as kind of like the root password for a "device"). I don't want the names of the team members to be easy to find. I'd like anyone who's aiming for that information to take the risk of being noticed.

    The compromise sounds like it won't do direct damage, but in the wrong hands that information could be a stepping stone to something worse.

  19. Take it easy on the guy... by nickthecook · · Score: 4, Funny

    He probably just wanted to find out, once and for all, what state Homer lives in.

    Can you blame him?

  20. Damnit... by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lightman, you just don't learn, do you? Stop hacking the WOPR!

    1. Re:Damnit... by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      He stopped that way, way back in the 1980s; this is a DOUBLE WOPR with CHEESY US Government Security!

      Would you like a quote of FRY'S with that?

      *head bursts from pun overload*

  21. Re:What kind of systems were involved? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    well,
    considering that a large part of the government
    went to windows 10 years ago (I know, I had family
    working in government at the time and they all thought
    it was a BAD IDEA because of security risks) it would
    not surprise me in the least that this is precisely
    how it was done.

    I hate to say this, but government should have stayed with
    UNIX (SVR4) or converted to BSD (OpenBSD is my favorite
    for security stuff).

    Still, I think it was a matter of someone paying a
    talented skript-kiddie to do this job. IMHO, no
    self-respecting hacker would want the trouble that
    breaking into a government system would attract.

    p. please mod this "informative" as that is pretty much what it is. thnx.

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  22. BURN KARMA BURN! by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

    To everyone who claimed I was a "paranoid" in describing the value of "privacy" over vague promises of "security":

    <font size=4> told ya' so </font>
  23. Re:Heads should roll! by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

    Sorry, it's China who does the most executions, not the U.S.:

    "China performed more than 3400 executions in 2004, amounting to more than 90% of executions worldwide." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_penalty

    The US is in third place at 1.6% of all executions, behind Iran. Maybe next time your knee jerk U.S. response will have merit.

  24. Just one? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    "prompting (...) to demand the resignation of the head of the NNSA"

    Demand resignation of the remaining 1499 employees on the list, and the list will become useless. Problem solved.

    If you know the enemy captured the plans of your attack, change the plans.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  25. Committee transcript by awtbfb · · Score: 1
    ...prompting the chairman of the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee to demand the resignation of the head of the NNSA...

    "You're fired. Your soooo fired!"
  26. HAVE YOU SEEN THIS LIST?! by mycall · · Score: 3, Informative
  27. Re:Heads should roll! by LegendLength · · Score: 1

    Oh, they're pretty good at it in the Far West. The USA is one of the countries who carry out more executions in the world

    Bit different when they've been tried first. Don't let a small technicality like that get in the way of your beliefs though!

  28. Even Blockbuster by woolio · · Score: 1

    I recently noticed that even Blockbuster lists the "SSN" as a *OPTIONAL* field on an rental application form.

    WTF!?!! If it isn't required, then why even list it?

    1. Re:Even Blockbuster by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

      Some companies like to have the SSN to use for collections and skip-tracing. Other companies just do it from inertia. Customers need to write to management of companies like Blockbuster and demand that they stop requesting this information.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    2. Re:Even Blockbuster by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      SSNs are unique. Names aren't.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
  29. Re:What kind of systems were involved? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    heheh,
    yeah, it figures both CIA and NSA would be able to shoot that down
    (they would have MOUNTAINS of evidence pointing to security flaws
    in M$ Windows thus making it "unsuitable for use in a secure environment").

    I am rather surprised this was allowed to happen in the NNSA and the NRC.

    ah well, thats what happens when you get a $100 Billion dollar company
    throwing around gobs of cash to have things their way.

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  30. Crypto-Gram by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Bruce Schnier wrote about this in the most recent Crypto-Gram. The reason is that there is tremendous lobbying pressure being applied to Congress to water down this legislation, and trump the more effective state laws in the process.

    Write your Senators and Congresspersons.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  31. Matter of personal security. by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    The most likely or immediate threat would be to the personal security of the employees and contractors.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  32. Driver's License - Lobby Your State by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Some states have recently stopped using the SSN as the Driver's License number. Montana, for example. People 'round here have refused to let the state use their SSN number on the Driver's License, forcing the state to come up with a way to generate and handle another type of number. The State finally either got a clue, or gave up, either way, it was an improvement.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  33. Probably not "Top Secret" by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    In most Federal organizations for most employees personnel contact and identity information is not "top secret". For this particular information, perhaps a small number of employees might fall into that category, but the bulk undoubtedly do not.

    In fact, personnel contact and identity data is normally considered to be "sensitive but unclassified", which is only one notch above "display it on a public web site" and its security receives very little attention and is not taken seriously by most managers. This might be only my opinion, but it is an opinion backed up by a fair bit of unfortunate circumstantial information in the past few weeks, as well as a history of trying to get customers to take it more seriously.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  34. Feel Safer? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Department of Homeland Security is busy spying on every American's phonecalls and email. The Republican government is furiously working to fail to pass Homophobia Amendments to the Constitution. Meanwhile, our nuclear workers can now be blackmailed on an unprecedented scale.

    Do you feel safer?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Feel Safer? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The FBI is the DHS agency actually listening to your phonecalls, after NSA passes them on. So Bush can say on TV that the NSA program doesn't listen to your phonecalls.

      Does that kind of hairsplitting make you feel safer, Anonymous Bush worshipper Coward?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  35. Bullshit (was: Confessions of an NNSA contractor) by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Bullshit.

    An incident response investigator for the NNSA would be fired for posting something like this to Slashdot. Furthermore, they probably wouldn't take the risk, because they would be smart enough to know that it wouldn't be hard for someone familiar with the group's writings to figure out who you are, if in fact you do work for them. So expect to be fired any day now, in the unlikely event that you were not posting crap.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  36. Re:What kind of systems were involved? by WaterDamage · · Score: 1

    *NIX isn't any safer than Windows! I've worked in net and OS security for years and I've found that neither one is any safer than the other. The safest route would be completely create your own OS from scratch and then kill all the developers to prevent the source code and internals of the OS from ever leaking. Hackers will still go after it but it will be far much more difficult when they have to learn from scratch and with no knowledge of the OSes internal structure.

  37. Re:What kind of systems were involved? by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

    Security through obscurity is no better than having no security at all.

  38. Re:Heads should roll! by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

    That's not the worst of it. The United States is the only country other than Nigeria to execute minors.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  39. Not Quite by cparker15 · · Score: 1
    Seriously, this is real "top secret" info and goverment got it loose to some God damn hacker?

    Nope! It was some god damn black hat cracker.

    --
    Have you driven a fnord... lately?

    You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

  40. Accountability is the Only Way Out of this Mess by BigTimOBrien · · Score: 1

    So, we've suffered through the start of some real trouble. The US government doesn't really get data security issues, we've lost information on millions of veterans, and now someone compromised information about the nations nuclear workers.

    At this point, we need a real solution, we need accountability. Just like Sarbanes-Oxley for public corpoations, we need to appoint someone to be accountable for data security in the government. Every sensitive database, every record room needs a security officer who is ultimately responsible for data security. We need an office of information security, just like we have an office of management and budget, and we need to make data security negligence a criminal offense.

    Call your representative, ask them to make data security a priority.

    --
    ------ Tim O'Brien
  41. Re:What kind of systems were involved? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ.
    at least with *NIX, you have ACL's and some of "features"
    that windows does not. also when was the last time you ever
    heard of a *NIX system taking down a significant chunk of
    a shipwide lan and shutting down the propulsion systems
    such that a tow was required (this actually happened with
    windows NT).

    with a properly programmed *NIX system, such values would
    have been kicked back with "invalid entry, try again!".

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  42. Re:Heads should roll! by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 1

    According to this the Supreme Court ruled that the execution of persons who committed their crimes while under the age of 18 was unconstitutional. That it was a violation of the 'cruel and unusual punishment' clause of the 8th amendment. Also according to the same article; China, Iran, and Pakistan also execute minors. We weren't THAT lonely on that list...

  43. Barking up the wrong IP by Zarroc · · Score: 1

    No wonder the stuff got nicked, the NSA is too busy creating a database from peoples blog websites, never mind protecting their own things. wow, first post, and it's something Anti-pentagon. looks like I'll be carted off to guantanamo soon.