Slashdot Mirror


New Clues for Antikythera Mechanism

fuzzybunny writes "The Register reports that British and Dutch scientists located a previously undetected word on the Antikythera Mechanism which seems to confirm its nature as a tool for astronomical prediction. This device is one of the world's first known geared devices; while its purpose is still not 100% clear, according to the article, 'Athens university researcher Xenophon Moussas is reported as saying the "newly discovered text seems to confirm that the mechanism was used to track planetary bodies."'"

183 comments

  1. Its an analog computer... by voss · · Score: 1, Funny

    but does it run linux? ;-)

    1. Re:Its an analog computer... by joeyspqr · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... and then build a Beowulf cluster?

      --
      +1 fashionably cynical
    2. Re:Its an analog computer... by gbobeck · · Score: 3, Funny
      but does it run linux? ;-)


      Most likely, it runs NetBSD. The 2006.1 release of Gentoo Linux will support it too.
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    3. Re:Its an analog computer... by siberian · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear that compile times are a real bitch on this old hardware.

    4. Re:Its an analog computer... by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah... but the wait is worth it. Do all of the necessary optimizations and use the proper ricer gcc flags, and it will make that old hardware screaming fast.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    5. Re:Its an analog computer... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      ... and then build a Beowulf cluster?

      Nah... Back then Beowulf ran only on stand alone kings.

      I'm pretty sure the command line went something like this:

      500AD Beowulf@Denmark: sudo kill Grendel
      500AD Beowulf@Denmark: grep Ale&Whores

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  2. Not just the first known geared device by brian0918 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's also one of the earliest, if not the earliest, -known example of an analog computer.

    1. Re:Not just the first known geared device by RobotWisdom · · Score: 1

      Except for waterclocks: timeline

    2. Re:Not just the first known geared device by pestilence669 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This makes me wonder what future civilizations will think about all of these silicon squares (semiconductors) once we're gone. Jewelry?

    3. Re:Not just the first known geared device by thePig · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another thing which makes it this so unique is that it uses differential gears ...
      This predates the current inventions by nearly 2 millenuim.
      Actually, it seems, the current differntial gears even took data from the Greeks for the same.

      They really knew what they were doing.
      If a civilization knew maths, they knew quite a bit.
      Makes me wonder how much information would have been lost of the earlier civilizations, esp. the Indus Valley civilisations etc
      The civiliztion which was the epitome of mathematical knowledge at the time.

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    4. Re:Not just the first known geared device by sbaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      No - it's neither the first known geared device - nor the first use of a differential gear nor the first analog computer. The chinese had them beat by close to 2000 years...read and learn:

      80BC Antikythera mechanism:

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism

      2000BC South pointing chariot - a geared mechanism with a differential.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pointing_Chario t

      The south pointing chariot subtracted the number of revolutions of one wheel from the number of revolutions of the other and multiplies by some constant that relates the diameter of the wheels to the distance between them. It had to have used a differential to do that because a 'differential' by definition is any mechanism that computes a difference.

      Technically, the South pointing chariot was an analog computer...well, as much as the Antikythera contraption was - albeit on a smaller scale.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    5. Re:Not just the first known geared device by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Correction: According to Wikipedia, the South pointing chariot was around in 2643BC - so 2563 years before Antikythera - not 2000.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    6. Re:Not just the first known geared device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If a civilization knew maths, they knew quite a bit.
      Bloody Romans. Setting us back years.
    7. Re:Not just the first known geared device by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Funny
      This makes me wonder what future civilizations will think about all of these silicon squares (semiconductors) once we're gone. Jewelry?

      Obviously pieces of some elaborate boardgame. One player would be 'Intel', the other would be 'AMD'. The rules are not known to us, but we presume that they bear some resemblance to checkers. This theory is supported by the Pacific-Northwest legends of a tribe called 'G4m3ers'.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    8. Re:Not just the first known geared device by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Oops, the extra (real) 'e' in G4m3rs screws up a perfectly good (ok, mediocre) punch line. My 'l33t sp34k skills suck. Strangely, I'm not at all bothered by that.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    9. Re:Not just the first known geared device by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the Romans who did it, it was the barbarian Goths that sacked the Romans (ending the Empire) who did it! The Romans, while less inclined towards philosophy and astronomy than the Greeks, had excellent engineering skills.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:Not just the first known geared device by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Humor aside,future civs would has the tech to scan them and conclude its a primitive calculating machine.

    11. Re:Not just the first known geared device by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      I think the two main reasons that we often don't understand ancient technology is because the records of the technology were probably pretty sparse to begin with, and we just don't do things that way any more.

      Since ancient times, however, our record-keeping has become astoundingly prolific. Instead of just one library, that burned down, there are hundreds of thousands of libraries around the world, any one of which is likely to have all the references you need to understand the basis of all our current technology (not to mention the basis for most of the technological and historical points of interest over the past several hundred years). So finding explanations for our present technology shouldn't be nearly as hard for furture archaeologists as finding explanations for past technology is hard for present archaeologists.

      And unless future archaeologists have stopped transmitting electrical energy through metal wires to do work, the purpose of our microcircuitry should be intuitively obvious, even without the much stronger chain of historical records connecting their world to ours.

      Now, the future post-apocalyptic cavemen, several generations removed from the first survivors of the machine-zombie-space alien conquest, will probably think of our microcircuitry as jewelry, but whether that's because they don't understand the original purpose or because they simply cannot use it for its original purpose, remains to be seen.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    12. Re:Not just the first known geared device by syrrys · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, why haven't more of them been found? Is there any mention of these devices in Greek or Roman literature, i.e. illustrations, diagrams, instructions? Seems strange that there wouldn't be. Of course, it could have been those damn aliens again; playing pranks on the silly humans.

      --
      "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
    13. Re:Not just the first known geared device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article in National Geographic re the unearthing of the terra cotta army in China you had the opportunity to overlook, as most readers did, the remark about a pure aluminum "buckle" that was part of the posessions of a general. I hope the significance does not elude you.

    14. Re:Not just the first known geared device by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      "Look, ma! I'm esoteric!"

  3. Art by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 4, Funny
    I've always been of the opinion that it was some sort of Greek modern art piece.
    Heraclitus: Don't you see the way the gears symbolize man's oppression by the machine?
    1. Re:Art by Alsee · · Score: 1
      Himapinius: What's a 'machine'?
      -
      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Art by spun · · Score: 1
      Heraclitus: Well, um... this is! Don't you feel oppressed by it? Oooh! Scary!

      Himapinius: Scared? It's just a little box with gears. What's so scary about-

      Heraclitus: (hitting Himapinius over the head with the machine) Come see the violence inherent in the machine! Look, I've invented performance art!
      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  4. Portable Sky by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a navigational device that used the night sky, available to everyone in perfect sync, instead of the many calendars that many Old World societies didn't even have. Maps with directions could encode "turning points" or durations in terms of stars and planets, then limit access to them to only those with the antikythera tech.

    The really interesting question is how that portable machine relates to the ancient monuments like the Pyramids, Chichen Itza, and Angkor Wat which replicate star patterns on the ground for the ages.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  5. In other news, Scientists exaggerate findings by Sentri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scientist One:
    "The outstanding results obtained from X-Tek's 3-D X-rays are allowing us to make a definitive investigation of the Mechanism. I do not believe it will ever be possible to do better."
    Scientist Two: "newly discovered text seems to confirm that the mechanism was used to track planetary bodies"
    Scientist One:"It's still up in the air, and there's plenty of work yet to be done.""

    "'What was the device actually for?' Was it a used to predict calendars? Was it simply a teaching tool?"

    The last questions seem more interesting. What it did is certainly important, but what they used it for is more important. If it was intended as an amusement it is of an entirely different significance to if it was intended as a navigation aid, and different again if it was a scientific tool intended for research.

    More info on the actual examination here: http://www.xtekxray.com/antikythera.htm

    --
    Can't we all just get along
    1. Re:In other news, Scientists exaggerate findings by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      My guess is that it was probably a demo. There was probably a lot of people who thought they knew everything about everything, and their positions as advisors and sages depending on them being right, or projecting the aura of being.

      Without the modern scientific method, there was no way to arbitrate disputes, which were probably dogmatic. If you claimed to really understand the motion of the heavens, a device like the Antikythera device was a powerful debating tool to have on your side.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:In other news, Scientists exaggerate findings by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
      My guess is that it was probably a demo. There was probably a lot of people who thought they knew everything about everything
      It was probably just a slick little thing they threw together in a few weekends to impress the guy from the venture capital firm...

      ("Who cares if it's tossed together in VB^D^D low-grade bronze? It's not like anyone's ever going to look at it hard.")
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:In other news, Scientists exaggerate findings by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Oh for mod points to give you an 'insightful'...

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  6. 80 B.C. by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow.
    For somthing so old, it looks remarkably similar to my grandpops 1900s pocket watch.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  7. Not Surprising by blank89 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The greeks made similar considerable advances soon after the death of Alexander the Great. Astronomy, chemistry and mathematical advaces were common because of the information and resouces shared after Alexander the Great united what was thought to be the civilized world.

  8. What is it with Scientists not releasing findings? by Audent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    from the Wik:

    It was inscribed with a text of over 2,000 characters, of which about 95% have been deciphered. The full text of the inscription has not yet been published.

    Why? Go on, I DARE you... publish the text. Let's all have a look, particuarly if it says "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" over and over... Tell us what it says. We can handle it.

    Scientists seem quite keen on delaying the release of their findings until such time as they Know Everything There Is To Know about [insert whatever it is here]. Haven't they heard of beta?

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
  9. No... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    A water clock is not a computer. See this page, for example, where they even cite the water clock as a possible power source for the Antikythera mechanism.

  10. New Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a previously undetected word on the"

    Was it a Whole New Word?

  11. There ought to be a method to check it.... by postbigbang · · Score: 0

    I would hypothesize that

    -only larger objects in the sky would be used, if this were indeed an astrological device and so
    -it ought to be fairly easy to devolve an astrological map to the appropriate year then
    -check positioning against it with 'static' night sky objects

    If it's not astrological (and we don't know the text yet to get a clue) then it might be just a navigational aid.

    It actually looks like a Nardi steering wheel that's been thrown into a burning trash can. It makes me wonder.... the Reg....

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  12. The Word by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those wondering, the text they discovered was "...etarium Pat. Pending (1)"

  13. What's new? by sbaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been hearing about all of these new discoveries about the device over the past week - but I don't see *ANY* new knowledge. We hear that there is finally proof that it's an analog computer - and that finding this word proves it's an astronomical calculator - but I have a book printed 15 years ago that says exactly that. The mechanism that calculates sun and moon positions is completely well understood and has been for years. There are working replicas of the device in several museums that demonstrate how it works.

    Check out the Wikipedia article.

    So if these guys have really learned something new - they are failing to communicate whatever it ACTUALLY is that they've found.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
    1. Re:What's new? by DrKyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The thing they don't want leaked out is that the insciption actually says " (c)80 B.C. Piltar the gearmaker, all rights reserved". How he KNEW it was 80B.C. is anyones guess, what did they think they were counting down to?

    2. Re:What's new? by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Founding of Rome by myth[April 21, 753 BC] is considered to be the prime dating system before Anno Domini(based on jesus).However before the Roman empire even started other dating systems
      dominated the field:Chinese kingdom eras,Egyptian dynasties,King lists of Sumer,Akkad and Assyria.Basically they
      chose a significant event,such as new reign,military victory or social change to signify new era.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_urbe_condita
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini

  14. Yes, but it was pre-Beowulf cluster so who cares? by siberian · · Score: 1

    Unless you can flash the bios or something thats just the way it is.

  15. Beta to a scientist == HIGH risk by siberian · · Score: 1

    When MS Windows crashes and burns you reboot.

    Try that with your career. These guys need to publish to stay employed and they have to be right as often as possible.

  16. Obligatory by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Best. Mechanism. Evar.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    1. Re:Obligatory by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1

      The rest of the ancient Beowulf cluster of them are still on the bottom of the Mediterranean.

  17. My officemate had this has his 'honours thesis' by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back in 1993, I had an officemate (Bernard Gardner, working for the late Allan Bromley) who worked on doing a 3D reconstruction of this mechanism using the tomography images that had recently been done. From what I recall, they made a bit of progress, discovering that two gears that were previously thought to be joined were merely next to each other and on independent axles; the previous assumption would have resulted in a mechanism that couldn't operate (locked together). But they still really didn't know what it did, and sadly, Allan Bromley (who was one of the main people interested in this device) died in 2002.

    Overall, it's a fascinating find - I never cease to be amazed at the complexity of many pre-industrial artifacts.
    I'm curious as to what sort of mechanical insights - not just inscription reading - the new analysis technique can provide.

    1. Re:My officemate had this has his 'honours thesis' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they still really didn't know what it did, and sadly, Allan Bromley (who was one of the main people interested in this device) died in 2002.

      So you're saying it's cursed?

    2. Re:My officemate had this has his 'honours thesis' by jd · · Score: 1

      Not just cursed - palindromicly cursed!

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  18. I'm amazed by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... that so many of the comments made thus far are attempts at humour.

    The Antikythera Mechanism is either JOYOUSLY UPLIFTING or SOUL-CRUSHINGLY DEPRESSING. It isn't funny.

    Uplifting because the human race developed the differential gear and incredibly intricate machinery TWO THOUSAND YEARS earlier than we thought, and used that technology for science.

    Depressing because the human race then lobotomized itself and we practically went back to living in caves.

    We had something amazing, and we lost it so utterly that we forgot we'd ever had it. Go humanity.

    1. Re:I'm amazed by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of "Planet of the Apes".

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:I'm amazed by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only that's not really true. Nobody who studies history today would use the term "Dark Ages" for instance. human progress never stopped, it may have slowed at times and certain areas may have have fallen behind temporarily, but on a whole, the world has seen a never-ending march forward. Much of the technology available a thousand years later (when you think people were living in caves?) was far ahead of what the greeks had in many other areas.

      Not to mention, there's a tradition of automata similiar to this machine that has continued to the present day..wasn't exactly lost.

    3. Re:I'm amazed by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny
      Nobody who studies history today would use the term "Dark Ages" for instance. human progress never stopped, it may have slowed at times...

      Reminds me, I have to go finish my documentation...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:I'm amazed by PromANJ · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered how much of an impact a person sent back in time could have.

      Of course, there's always a 20% chance you send back a person that still doesn't know that the earth goes around the sun (Well, around the shared gravitational center or whatever, I suppose it's relative too). "We like... had these steel wagons... and you could like tell them where to go... and you could go to a big building where you pushed smaller wagon in front of you and you put food in it... then you went home and looked at a box with these moving pictures that were funny to look at."

      I think one of the most important things to bring back in time would be the idea of book printing and information sharing.

    5. Re:I'm amazed by davidgay · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Dark Ages" was always an anglo-centric concept. The French think about Charlemagne (look him up if you don't know him, i.e., if your European history was anglo-centric) when they think about that time period.

      David Gay

    6. Re:I'm amazed by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Definitely I agree. The whole concept is decidely EURO-centric even. Some of the greatest peaks of Arab civilization were reached while Europe was relatively behind. Likewise Islamic Spain. Likewise, T'ang China, South American civilizations, etc.

      it's like global warming--large variations can exist in small areas, but one needs to look at the global picture to understand the trends.

    7. Re:I'm amazed by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it were the only example, I'd agree with you. The Greeks had working steam power (not surpassed until the Industrial Revolution), an idea the solar system was centered on the sun, the beginnings of a theory of robotics, high-ranking female scientists, possibly a printing system (the Phaios Disk is printed, not written or carved) and maybe any number of discoveries we don't even know they had. The "dark ages" were not truly barbaric - art flourished then as it had never done before or ever since - but the total collapse of science and the loss of knowledge was a terrible tragedy. Not only did it put humanity 2,000 years behind on technology, but the re-learning devastated the environment and it is entirely possible that human civilization will not be capable of undoing the damage fast enough.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    8. Re:I'm amazed by jafac · · Score: 1

      Depressing because the human race then lobotomized itself and we practically went back to living in caves.

      Even more depressing, is - maybe it's not the first time the human race lobotomized itself. Still more depressing: it may not be the last time.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      human progress never stopped, it may have slowed at times and certain areas may have have fallen behind temporarily,

      Then there's that whole Catholic "Burn the at the stake" period... the outright oppression of certain lines of thought. "For the curious ones..."

    10. Re:I'm amazed by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You obviously get your history from TV or the Wikipedia. There's essentially not one single statement in your message that's completely true.

    11. Re:I'm amazed by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      You might want to read a series of books by Leo Frankowski.
      The series is called "The Adventures of Conrad Stargard" and is published by Delrey(Ballantine).
          The premise is what would happen if a modern engineer wound up in 13th century Poland just before the mongol invasion (the series starts about 9 years before and goes to some years past it).
          All kinds of fun and not so fun things happen over at least 6 books as Conrad winds up industializing Poland, creating a modern-ish army (with a modified boy-scout oath as part of thier training), invents his own version of the playbloy club, and a bunches of other things.
          The titles of the first five books are:
      "The Cross-Time Engineer"
      "The High-Tech Knight"
      "The Radiant Warrior"
      "The Flying Warlord"
      "Lord Conrad's Lady"
      There is also one calle IIRC "The Quest for Rubber" or some such.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    12. Re:I'm amazed by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      And if it's not as enlightened as other ages - progressing slower than any other time - it's the dark ages. You're just redefining the term. Obviously progress wouldn't completely stop, but it came to a virtual standstill. It was the dark ages.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    13. Re:I'm amazed by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      ok, so for the sake of discussion, why don't give me a definition of what the "dark ages" was? Perhaps you can give me a rough date range?

    14. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it's not as enlightened as other ages - progressing slower than any other time - it's the dark ages. You're just redefining the term. Obviously progress wouldn't completely stop, but it came to a virtual standstill. It was the dark ages.

      Well it used to be a common name for the "Dark Ages", but the more that science has learned about this era, the more this stereotype was shed. GP is correct in that historians have long since stopped refering to it as the "Dark Ages". By perpetuating that stereotype, you're just keeping up the ignorance of this historical period.

    15. Re:I'm amazed by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      There is the conspiracy theory that the dark ages never existed and Charlemagne (among other rulers of the period) is fictional.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    16. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it wasn't open source...

      No, seriously.

    17. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously get your writing skills from TV, there's not one single statement in your message that's backed up with any references or details.

    18. Re:I'm amazed by paulwomack · · Score: 1

      The Greeks had working steam power ....... and maybe any number of discoveries we don't even know they had.

      Yeah; those unknown discoveries make compelling evidence.

          BugBear

      --
      Ignorance is curable. Stupid is forever.
    19. Re:I'm amazed by Kalinago · · Score: 1

      What about native americans? (talking about the WHOLE continent you know) Aztecs, Mayans and Incas made astonishing discoveries and had modern services even by today's standards. What about the postal system in the Andes mountains delivered by runners? Some sources (unreliable to an extent) point out that these cultures designed weaving mechanisms about the same time as in the west. I wonder how many equivalents of Anykythera mechanisms are still under the soils of Mexico, Guatemala or Peru.

      These guys were very good at it: Solar calendars, hex numeric systems, rudimentary "gliders" modelled in gold, breathtaking art, rich mythology, astronomy, ladder irrigation systems, chocolate!...Even today in Latin America, because of euro-centric history, this part of our history is barely glimpsed at in schools, and very seldom someone brings them up in ancient history discussions. Truly, Alexandria's library was a great loss and I share the view that the world's path could be different if the "dark ages" had never come; but I get the same feeling about this beautiful paradise before the "conquistadores".

      We were kings!

    20. Re:I'm amazed by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      How about the time between when the Goths destroyed the civilization of Rome, and the time when they adopted Roman-style civilization themselves (e.g. paved roads, large cities, etc.)?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dark ages an sich were only in the Western Empire, and only for a short period of time. First you had the barbarian illegal immigration epidemic, which broke the strained Roman social welfare system, including patrols of the Roman roads by the military, so that brigands cut heavily into the possibility of normal economic activity. There was also the Yellow Plague and what was either a major errupton of Yellowstone or on Iceland, or an asteroid impact, generating a quarter century of volcanic winter. The famines devestated the populations.

      On the heals of all this, the Muslims conquored half of the Roman Empire, including the bread basket of Egypt, and by filling the Mediterranian with pirate ships, and occupying what is now Portugul and Spain, completed the lack of communications between the surviving Eastern Roman Empire, which continued until the Muslims destroyed it in 1453. But all of that technology and learning continued uninterrupted in the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire.

      Thus, you overstate what the Greeks were able to do. They had gadgets, but no over-arching engineering or scientific theory, the pagan Greeks disdained work, deeming it for slaves or women, so that they did not exploit steam power, and so forth. In the Roman system, you had the guilds, which continued throughout the middle ages. Knowledge was tightly controlled under Anquity's equivalent of the DCMA. As a result, with the centuries-long economic depression in the Western Empire, with the craftsmen who knew how to do these things, forced to work the fields under barbarian overlords, the knowlege became lost.

      Christian monastaries invented the moldboard plow and the horse yoke, allowing Europe to produce enough food for a large population, replacing what had been lost by the Muslim conquest of Egypt. Apart from the major set-back of the Black Death when a third of all Europe died, progress has continued ever since.

    22. Re:I'm amazed by bogado · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but if you do not point out that halve truths hidden in the grand parent then you're not helping much. As far as I know you could simply be stating that to be trollish or something. I am not saying that you're lying, that I don't know, I have a limited knowledge in history, in fact I do get my history from TV, magazines and wikipedia ;-) and because of that I cannot say what is wrong the grand parent.

      Please enlight us...

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    23. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this, grand, enlightened and cultured society that lit people on fire every 52 years so that the sun would come up in the morning, has truely been slighted by modern educators.

    24. Re:I'm amazed by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Sure, roughly 500-1000 AD? (less? 500-800?)..

      This is the period of great Byzantine growth, of the rule of Heraclius, of the rule of Justinian and his famous laws, and of the construction of the Hagia sophia--Ayasofya today--one of the most magnificent buildings I've had the pleasure of visiting.

      Also of the splendor of the Mesopotamian city of Ctesiphon and the Persian Empire that expanded east to the Mediterranean, west towards India, south to Oman and Africa and north into the caucuses. Many magnificent architecture and structures such as qanats (underground water aqueduct) and other hydraulic engineering feats were built in this time.

      This is the period of the explosive growth of Islam, the construction of Cairo and Fustat and Baghdad, and great breakthroughs in the fields of medicine, mathematics, chemistry, and optics in particular. The period of the growth of Umayyad / Moorish spain.

      In Europe this is the period of Charlemagne, still a highly celebrated ruler. It is the time of the birth of Venice and Genoa. The period of the birth of the great monastic orders and development of Christian theology and form.

      In China, this is the period of the reunification of China under the Sui, and the flowering of arts and civilization under the T'ang dynasty. There's a really excellent book called "The Golden Peaches of Samarkand" that discusses this period of T'ang cultural efflorescence. I'd highly recommend it.

      We could discuss the Americas, India, even less known African civilizations (that we have only few archaeological remains, thanks to the dearth of written sources)..

      --

      europe may not have been as politically organized as it was under the Romans, nor as prosperous _relative the rest of the world_ as it would be later, but it hardly makes sense to call this period a dark age.

    25. Re:I'm amazed by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And the greeks are the "statue of liberty"

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    26. Re:I'm amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're reffering to the ancient greek steam engine that is well known and documented.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile

  19. Obviously for monetary gain by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Per link to xtekxray.com, "A final conclusion on the Mechanism's purpose is expected in 2006, after full examination of the data. The investigation continues to be filmed for a major TV documentary," or somebody paid a pretty penny for exclusive rights to its eventual publication.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Obviously for monetary gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Obviously for monetary gain...."

      That was going to be my answer. It's much like the Gospel According to Judas hype last Easter... "We have this great ancient text that REALLY tells what happened with Jesus and Judas, and you can read it if you buy our book." "No, we're only interested in informing the public, not just making money. We finished the translation awhile ago, but the publisher had a backlog, and it just happened to be printing as Easter was coming up. Merely coincidence."

  20. English grammar by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Register reports that British and Dutch scientists located a previously undetected word

    May I recommend the present perfect simple tense? I think you'll find that nuanced grammar adds a delightful twist to the English language.

    For instance:

    Slashdot contributors and editors have discovered that applying simple grammatical principles can significantly enhance their audience's comprehension of stories posted on the site

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:English grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an engineer man, you lost me after "present ..." go read the davinci code again.

    2. Re:English grammar by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Present perfect is actually a surprisingly hard idea to grasp for many non-native English speakers, simply because it does not have any direct analogy in their languages.

    3. Re:English grammar by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      Slashdot contributors and editors have discovered that applying simple grammatical principles can significantly enhance their audience's comprehension of stories posted on the site
      Or, my favorite:
      Slashdot "editors" have discovered that they really could not care less.
    4. Re:English grammar by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      Judging from the number of people who ask me about it (I'm a Briton in France), I'd say an impossible rather than a surprisingly hard idea to grasp.

      You see here they have a past composite tense which has exactly the same construct as English's present perfect, hence their confusion.
      Once I tell them it's a present tense in English and not a past tense they begin to have some sort of understanding — but just as much difficulty!

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  21. Re:Very cool... by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    Bubo! Bubo! Bubo is Latin for owl. Don't ask me why a bunch of Greeks decided to name their mechanical owl in a language that hadn't been invented yet, but according to "Clash of the Titans" they did.

  22. Re:What is it with Scientists not releasing findin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will probably just turn out to be the EULA.

  23. It was on board a ship by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Ships back then sank all the time. For example, the one carrying the antikythera sank.

    You didn't risk anything you cared about on a ship unless it was needed for ship's operations or salable at the other end for lots of money.

    The only reason not to take for granted that it was a navigational device is that only one of them has been found.

  24. Re:What is it with Scientists not releasing findin by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    No kidding. As a scientist, I'm really sick of this "publish by press release" shit. Smacks of Pons and Fleischmann. And withholding the text? What the hell. If you have something, publish it. If not, don't waste our time. This crap is highly suspicious.

  25. Curious by Trogre · · Score: 1

    How certain are people about the age of this device? The consensus seems to be 80 BC, but what dating methods have been employed to reach that conclusion?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Curious by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      How certain are people about the age of this device?

      It definitely predated Ptolomy's ptime, as I believe he made reference in one of his discourses to "the astrological instrument". This could have referenced the Antikythera device or some form of astrolabe ("star-taker", an analogue timepiece based on star elevation, which see) or quadrant, but it's pretty clear that some form of star-oriented calculator predated 60AD.

      As an aside, "Astrological" in this sense was equivalent to "Astronomical", for it's unlikely the two meanings had yet diverged at that point (Astrology = the logic of the stars, Astronomy = the naming of the stars).

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    2. Re:Curious by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The device was found in a shipwreck. The ship appears to have been a Roman trader on its way back to Italy. By dating the goods on the ship the wreck has been dated to the later half of the first century B.C.

      The device is inscribed. The typography is the sort that was prevelant in the later half of the first century B.C. So are the words and the grammatical structure.

      Two independant means of dating accord with each other.

      The specific figure 80 B.C. comes from an estimate of its age being 65 B.C. +/- 15 years, so 80 B.C. is actually the youngest it is estimated it could be. The most conservative number to cite, not an exact age.

      KFG

    3. Re:Curious by DrKyle · · Score: 1
      an estimate of its age being 65 B.C. +/- 15 years, so 80 B.C. is actually the youngest it is estimated it could be

      Years B.C. are essentially negative numbers, so 80BC was 2086 years ago and 50BC was 2056 years ago. So their estimate is really the oldest it could be.
    4. Re:Curious by kfg · · Score: 1

      Years B.C. are essentially negative numbers. . .

      Negative numbers? Don't be silly. How could I have less than no apples? And just try to imagine the square root of negative 2.

      KFG

    5. Re:Curious by znode · · Score: 1
      \How could I have less than no apples
      By owning people apples?
    6. Re:Curious by sita · · Score: 1

      How certain are people about the age of this device? The consensus seems to be 80 BC, but what dating methods have been employed to reach that conclusion?


      The hands stopped at five past six, March 3 80 BC.

    7. Re:Curious by kfg · · Score: 1

      I was pointing out that I was being a dumbass.

      KFG

  26. Re:Very cool... by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that Bubo was ancient greek for "mechanical device used to please females and annoy dieties" and that the term came from the name for Hera's favourite pet...

    --

    You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  27. Re:price chopper? by Stickreid · · Score: 0, Troll


    ( \nigga
    x nigga
    8====D nigga

  28. Mod parent up. by Frightening · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. Few in the world know what the present perfect simple tense is, and the road to shutting MySpace down starts here.

    I [have] just posted a troll, didn't I?

  29. I want to sniff some ASS-PANTIES!!11!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I want to sniff some ASS-PANTIES!!!1!!1!~!1!!

  30. Unfortunately that word was... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    EULA

    The text following this declares that by reading this gear the user is bound by the inscribed agreement and that only one device may be used by a particular individual at any one time, no backup devices may be manufactured and continues on to absolve the maker from any inaccuracies in clestial observation and disclaim any fitness for any general or specific purpose.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Unfortunately that word was... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Odysseus: "Aww, Nuts."

      *Tosses Antikythere overboard*

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  31. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  32. the fun part... by pxuongl · · Score: 1

    the fun part is that this was probably something some kid made in shop class and got a D for because it didn't do anything

    1. Re:the fun part... by lottameez · · Score: 1

      That's really funny. Along those lines it could have also been some cheap tourist trinket (that happened to weigh 150lbs). "Hah! Look at this Flarticus! You can't get one of these, uh, things back home!"

      --
      Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    2. Re:the fun part... by pxuongl · · Score: 1

      poor flarticus... why must you always pick on him?

  33. How ironic by Leomania · · Score: 1

    It seems rather ironic that the first example of such a device of this complexity and precision was brought to our attention after having been found on the bottom of the sea on a Roman shipwreck. Mention is made in the Wikipedia article of perhaps similar but less complex objects, but this markedly more complex mechanism was preserved well enough to (probably) discern its function and actually pull 95% of the text off the device. I wonder if there's any chance some trove of such historical artifacts awaiting discovery on dry land, somehow well-preserved. How much of history might they rewrite?

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
  34. I take your DARE! by Alchemar · · Score: 1

    "All your base are belong to us!"

  35. The rich tapestry of life. by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    "And over the course of 100 Million years, in an almost never changing world, the dinosaurs continued to develop. The smaller, feather covered species developed throwing sticks as protection and hunting implements, and the skins of their prey were used to carry other skins which were used as camoflage and cold-weather gear.

    It's such a shame the impact at Chicxulub completely destroyed these fascinating creatures. I wonder where they would be today, had they survived the K-T boundary event."


    All things in the rich tapestry of Earth's history have happened according to their place and time in history. The Greek knowledge, lost, and rediscovered 19 centuries later might well have lead to period of warfare for 2000 years. We might now, just be learning to create steel as a result...

    I for one, am quite happy with the way the world is now, and do not wish for the past to be changed. At all.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
    1. Re:The rich tapestry of life. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      The Greek knowledge, lost, and rediscovered 19 centuries later might well have lead to period of warfare for 2000 years. We might now, just be learning to create steel as a result...

      I'd say we would likely have had steel sooner, seeing as how war tends to drive technological advancement.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  36. One possibility... by jd · · Score: 1
    The Greeks collected knowledge from any and every civilization they could find, and anyone they didn't regard as civilized as well. The Greeks were also astonishingly good at geometry. It is therefore possible (not likely, just possible) that they collected enough information on ancient monuments (some of which were ancient even back then, as old to them as as the Mechanism is to us) to deduce cycles and patterns that were universal - ie: that would be seen, no matter where you were on the planet.


    Another possibility is that they are totally distinct - the Greeks already knew the world was round, at least some had deduced that the solar system was centered on the sun, and there was a basic understanding that the planets were closer than the stars, but that they were all a gigantic distance away. Again, based on their superb understanding of geometry, it shouldn't have been too hard to produce a basic solar system simulator from their basic knowledge. Although I said that this was distinct from the fixed calendars of other civilizations, I think it reasonable to deduce that the opposite might well have become true - that as Greeks exported technology, other civilizations would have eventually produced similar Mechanisms of their own.


    I should add that I do not believe that many of the supposed star maps represent the stars at all. The pyramids are incorrectly placed for the stars they are supposed to represent, for example, Stonehenge is a circle, although the sun could never appear to the north of it, and Avebury is almost three quarters of a mile across, but the stones are only six feet high, making any kind of astronomical observation impossible. I believe they served a sophisticated purpose, that the stones are not randomly placed but very deliberately positioned, but the explanations I have heard sound way too hollow. They're as absurd to me as the archaeologists forever claiming every object they found was a religious icon. I swear, in the year 3000, they'll find dish cloths and decide there was a water cult. Sophistication does NOT mean our idea of sophistication, but ancient does NOT mean ignorant or superstitious either. There are alternatives.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:One possibility... by Theatetus · · Score: 1
      he Greeks already knew the world was round, at least some had deduced that the solar system was centered on the sun, and there was a basic understanding that the planets were closer than the stars, but that they were all a gigantic distance away.

      I don't see why you call that a "possibility", since the Greeks were perfectly aware the Earth was round (they even knew its size), a few had speculated that it moved around the sun, and several suggested that the "fixed" stars were not in fact fixed.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    2. Re:One possibility... by CFTM · · Score: 1
      They're as absurd to me as the archaeologists forever claiming every object they found was a religious icon. I swear, in the year 3000, they'll find dish cloths and decide there was a water cult.

      You may be inclined to think it is absurd but is not without merit; religion and spirituality are very important for creating culture and cohesion in any civilization. Moreover, EVERY SINGLE CIVILIZATION has some sort of mythology underlying their beginning and the beginning of the universe as they know it. Even more importantly, you will find thematic links between these mythologies.

      Early civilizations rarely had economies that went beyond simple barter-and-trade so the emphasis for goods creation was on things that served practical purpose; wait I know what you're thinking, I'm proving your point. Well religion and spirituality are VERY practical particularly to young civilizations. Once people have met their basic needs for material survival (food, water, shelter, clothes), the next step is to pursue epistemology; the natural outcome being the creation of a mythology which often has artifacts created to represent and to serve as trasncendental intermedians.

      Just my two cents...
    3. Re:One possibility... by jd · · Score: 1
      I call it a possibility because, unless more books survived the destruction of the Great Alexandrian Library and other attempts to obliterate Classical civilization, we will never know for certain what the Greeks had managed to deduce from their knowledge. Our knowledge of ancient Greek civilization is fragmentary and sometimes contradictory. For example, there is evidence of the Greeks frowning on experimental science, preferring the purity of the abstract. This is one reason their steam engine never got anywhere. It never occured to them to see what it could actually do. However, Archimedes was unquestionably an experimental scientist and there is ample evidence of many others.


      Our records of the work done are also sketchy. The recent recovery of a lost work of Archimedes being an example. There are many, many other works that have been lost and may never be recovered. Those works might easily have demonstrated a radically different Greece than the one supposed by historians. At present, the bounds of uncertainty exceed the limits of our knowledge, making any assumption on Greek knowledge hazardous at best.


      "But, if they knew X and Y, they surely would have concluded Z!" There are too many exceptions even in modern times. From the late discovery of the blindingly obvious to the many disasters that have befallen every nation in the world, there are simply too many examples of people simply ignoring all evidence in front of them for their own reasons. We cannot assume that the Greeks were immune to this. But we should equally well not conclude that they failed to see what was right in front of them.


      The tendancy of historians and archaeologists is to assume that anyone not from the here-and-now was ignorant and superstitious - except when they assume that those people were hyperintelligent megabeings. I think it reasonable to believe that no humans that have ever lived were really in either extreme. The more we learn, the better able we are to understand exactly where cultures were in the distant past, but we will never get more than tiny snippets from tiny fragments of those cultures. The best we can do is guess the most likely scenario, but that is still only a possibility, not a certainty.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:One possibility... by aghix · · Score: 1
      I call it a possibility because, unless more books survived the destruction of the Great Alexandrian Library and other attempts to obliterate Classical civilization, we will never know for certain what the Greeks had managed to deduce from their knowledge. Our knowledge of ancient Greek civilization is fragmentary and sometimes contradictory. For example, there is evidence of the Greeks frowning on experimental science, preferring the purity of the abstract. This is one reason their steam engine never got anywhere. It never occured to them to see what it could actually do. However, Archimedes was unquestionably an experimental scientist and there is ample evidence of many others.
      At the time of the desctruction of the Alexandrian Libary most the important scientific work of the hellenistics was already lost or away from the library. Persecution of scientists started quite before the romans.
      We surely lost forever part of their work, I.E. in astronomy, but important parts are left: of Archimedes for istance we still have important books. Some of Euclides (mathematic and optic) the same for others.

      Experimental science is addicted at the Greeks of the classical period, at the Egyptin end mesopothamic region, not at the hellenistic. We learned mathematic and geometry -for many many centuries (and still do) - from the Euclides work: is there anybody here who would call it "not science"?!

      Archemedes in particular was NOT an experimental scientist, how could you say that is truly a mistery, unless you only know Archimedes from the mith.

      You have a theory, you DEMOSNTRATE your theory. That's science. Others after you may apply your theory in practical forms.
      But we should equally well not conclude that they failed to see what was right in front of them.
      That's NOT the point. The point is that who came after them was not able anymore to understand what was left in front of them. You could easily know it reading their books, Plinius could be a good starting point.
  37. No, we don't know what they knew by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA:
    If the Antikythera Mechanism is indeed what the investigators believe it is, then there are further suggestions that it may be based on a heliocentric view of the solar system - highly unusual at a time when most Greeks accepted Aristotle's view that the universe revolved around the Earth.

    And what makes us think that most Greeks believed in a geocentric universe? We know precious little about what they knew back then, since we have only a handful of their writings. To insinuate that we have anything like a complete map of the intellectual landscape of the time is sheerest puffery.

    A minute's thought might convince us that a heliocentric model was available to them: They knew the earth was a sphere; they knew its size; they knew the sun was far enough away that its rays arrived parallel for all intents and purposes. Add to that that as soon as someone tried to build something like the Antikythera Mechanism they must perforce have noticed (as did Kepler a millennium and a half later) that it's far easier to model the heavens if you place the sun in the center rather than the earth.

    Even this mechanism itself cannot be unique, as some articles about it have hinted. An automaton/clockwork/astronomical model this complex cannot have leapt full-formed from the mind of a single inventor. There must be an entire lineage of similar devices. That we have only a single example is simply a hint that there was much more to their technology than we're currently aware of. It's also an indication of how easy it is for a cultural calamity to erase collective memories of high tech; a warning for our times if nothing is. Not to mention that the correct ideas are not necessarily those which survive such a calamity. After all, when the Roman Empire fell, Medieval Europe inherited the Ptolemaic model. Of course, by then Ptolemy was writing (ca. 150) he probably had to work without the benefit of the bulk of the Royal Library at Alexandria so he may have been left to his own devices when considering a model of planetary motion.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not entirely true - to this day, celestial navigation works easiest if you assume a Ptolemaic universe.

      Greeks certainly had heliocentrism available to them but do not conflate navigation and cosmology.

    2. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      I didn't. The mechanism was most likely intended to model planetary motion. Whether it was used as a navigational device is unknown. (It was found in a shipwreck, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was used on shipboard since it may have been part of the cargo, a possession of one of the passengers, etc.)

      Besides, you meant "astronomy". The mechanism has nothing to do with cosmology.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    3. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by siberian · · Score: 1

      And what makes us think that most Greeks believed in a geocentric universe? We know precious little about what they knew back then, since we have only a handful of their writings. To insinuate that we have anything like a complete map of the intellectual landscape of the time is sheerest puffery.

      I particularly love how we treat these ancient cultures as monolithic and do not make allowances for multiple popular theories. They either 'Are' heliocentric or they 'Are Not' heliocentric. We love to take one finding and paint the entire culture.

      It will be interesting when the future discovers writings on Intelligent Design and laughs at all of us.

    4. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by argosian · · Score: 1

      "A minute's thought might convince us that a heliocentric model was available to them:"

      Actually, a moment's investigation or familiarity with Greek philosphers might convince us that Aristarchus actually suggested a heliocentric model, contemporary with Aristotle's model.

      It is also useful, perhaps, to consider that a geocentric view is more intuitive and comfortable in a world without telescopes or an understanding of gravity and that the math and geometry works for both systems, just using different assumptions. To an ancient Greek or 12th century Catholic monk with a bent for astronomy, it isn't a stretch at all to imagine the universe as a series of concentric spheres centered on the Earth and the heavenly bodies whirling around in epicycles, while imagining the Sun as the center is not only counter-intuitive, it also diminishes the significance of the Earth and, consequently, that of Man.

      There's a fascinating book, "It Started With Copernicus", by Howard Margolis, that investigates the transformation from Ptolemaic to Copernican models in the 15th/16th centuries. While some of the conclusions Margolis draws about the beginnings of the "Scientific Revolution" are purely subjective, he seems to have done his homework about early astronomical philosophy.

    5. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, a moment's investigation or familiarity with Greek philosphers might convince us that Aristarchus actually suggested a heliocentric model, contemporary with Aristotle's model.

      Well, there ya go.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    6. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by aghix · · Score: 1

      The geocentric theory was mainly supported by the greek philosofers of the classic period: Aristoteles in primis. The heliocentric one was developed by the hellenistics in the III sec BC (thought the earth revolution was known from the IV sec BC, Heraclides Ponticus). Most of their work went lost, in fact 3 important books only survived: an Aristharcus's "on dimensions and distances of sun and moon", one by Hipparcus's "Comments on Aratus and Eudossus phenomena", the Archiemedes's "Arenarius" where he explains in short the Aristharcus theory. But none of these is a specific work on astronomy.

      The most important on the argument that survived is the one known as "Almagest" by Claudius Ptolemaeus but it's far later (imperial evo) and supports the geocentric theory.

      Archimedes for sure built a planetarium machine able to display the movements of the planets in the solar system according to the heliocentric theory. It seems that it was taken to Rome right after the fall of Syracuse. Cicero (De re pubblica), between others, reports an admired description of it.
      Ah, and Archimedes knew the gravity force quite before Newton.

    7. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by aghix · · Score: 1

      surely we cannot say it was a device for navigation, but there is an interesting aspect to keep present: The ships at that period navigated in the open sea, it's not a coincidence the Alexandria Light "pharos", and some other were built in the hellenistic ports of mediterranean sea.
      After the ones built in the hellenistic times we must wait the XII sec (Genoa's dated 1139).
      In medioeval times the navigation was strictly closed to the coasts.

      To be able again to navigate the open sea - and start later the oceanic's - we must wait the discovery of the hellenistic scientists work, starting from the X sec.

    8. Re:No, we don't know what they knew by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      I'd often wondered if the prominence of the Almagest wasn't due to an accident of history, it simply being a work that happened to survive in multiple copies where others did not.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  38. Is it just me? by Derosian · · Score: 1

    Or does Greek and Geek seem, mighty similar!

    1. Re:Is it just me? by henriquemaia · · Score: 1

      The Greek geek geeks in Greek.

    2. Re:Is it just me? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      They seem plenty different since the pirate is missing from Geek. You know, the Rrrrrrrrr!

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    3. Re:Is it just me? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Or does Greek and Geek seem, mighty similar!

      Nerdy types were renowned in the ancient world for providing people who asked for directions with cleverly deceptive answers, hence the saying "Beware of geek's bearing grifts".

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  39. This is very old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Antikythera mechanism has bee known to be an orrery for decades. This might be a record for Slashdot publishing old news as new news.

  40. Gearing Diagram by FatherBusa · · Score: 1

    Perseus has a (conjectural) gearing diagram for the mechanism:

    http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/GreekScience/Students /Jesse/antik.gif

  41. If you think this gearbox is sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Archimedes was inventing calculus ~1800 years before Newton.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-654919968 9174548095&q=NOVA+archimedes

  42. The Grandparent Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The grandparent post wants you to know that wasn't funny. Couldn't have been. Simply logically impossible for what you wrote to be funny because there's nothing funny here. There just isn't. Period.

    You've got two choice: you can be uplifted, or you can crushed by the depressing reality of your progress through the ages. (I'm guessing, given the problem is documentation, that you're gonna have to go with depression.)

  43. Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't heard whether the antikythera actually worked to accurately show the sky, but I expect that further tests will show that it did.

    The Pyramids aren't "incorrectly placed" to represent the stars of "Orion". Their positions are different from Orion's exact shape today, but are exactly correct for their slightly different positions 13.5Ky ago - and again about 12Ky in the future. Discovering that correspondence allowed the discoverers to find 2 previously undocumented pyramids buried nearby, corresponding to other stars in the constellation. FWIW, the "Greek" who knew the Earth was round, even calculating its circumference within 1% accuracy, was Eratosthenes, actually an "Egyptian" (or neighboring "Libyan").

    Angkor Wat is sync'ed to "Draco", also 13.5Ky ago. Other global monuments reflect other constellations, including all kinds of Greek monuments.

    Stonehenge wasn't merely a sundial, but rather a calibration to various celestial events throughout the year and the centuries.

    These devices were used to navigate around a global civilization that shared a celestial framework. Not just markers, but also a consistent framework of stories of supernatural characters that ensured their perpetuation across the world and through time. Because that knowledge was accepted on faith by most, just like most people accept GPS, watches and Web reservation systems on faith today, they're "religious" objects. I hope our exposure to more ancient versions will help us examine our own mystification of current practices at least as much as it demystifies ancient practice.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Clear Skies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Might be an idea to read the transcript of a BBC programme debunking these speculations:-

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantis rebornagain_transcript.shtml

      It's my guess that you can find 'correspondences' between any selected group of points on earth and some group of stars especially if you aren't too fussed about precision.

      As for the global civilisation destroyed in about 10,500 BC, does it not seen strange to you that -all- of their towns and structures were built on the coast? None inland where they could be found today?

    2. Re:Clear Skies by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      does it not seen strange to you that -all- of their towns and structures were built on the coast?

      Even today, humans prefer to dwell on coasts (which is also why ocean levels rising due to global warming would be such a disaster...). Both US coasts have a higher population density than the middle.

      Has something to do with easy access to transportation (boats), food (fish) and moderate climate (not the extremes you find in the middle of continents).

      And if you consider towns and cities in the middle of a continent, they are often build near a river, and many even near the confluence of two rivers.

    3. Re:Clear Skies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations: you've won "Most gullible person on Slashdot"! Well done. A cheque for 1 million dollars is in the post.

    4. Re:Clear Skies by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you'd still think there would be something surviving from that time period (that's more conclusive than the Bimini Road etc.). Just as today, not everyone lives on the coast.

      Of course, I did read something in a Charles Berlitz book about how some people did a core sample in Asia (India?) somewhere, and found a layer of fused glass remarkably similar to that produced by an atomic bomb (and if this "global civilization" was ended by a nuclear war, that could explain the lack of artifacts, I guess)... But then I've also heard that Berlitz was a kook, so who knows.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Clear Skies by qwijibo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we all disappeared, how much of what we have done would survive the test of time? A thousand years of neglect would take its toll. Even concrete won't last forever. A few hundred years is good enough for our current purposes, but that's hardly a blip in history. If 95% of the population died off, it wouldn't be possible to maintain what we have right now. Combined with climate changes, it's easy to imagine how even our modern society could waste away. I imagine stories of Silicon Valley would sound a lot like Atlantis if the oceans rose a few hundred feet.

      The idea of a nuclear war in antiquity is preposterous. They didn't have atoms back then. =)

    6. Re:Clear Skies by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Even concrete won't last forever.

      Carved Granite comes close. So does soil depletion in farming areas (3000-year-old Anasazi fields in the American southwest are still visible because the vegetation in them grows thinner). I would imagine our massive landfills would be hard to mistake for natural formations, even if excavated 10,000 years down the line. While many of our massive earthworks are coastal, and might be flooded in your scenario, many others are clearly not (Cheyenne Mountain? the Powder River coal fields? Every roadbed cut in a mountain range around the world?), and can be expected to be around to a detectable degree for a long, long time. We have geological evidence of the fallout from large meteor strikes triggering extinction events; I would expect the same for an ancient nuclear war, especially since Antarctic ice cores give us an atmospheric record going back at least 100,000 years. Even your example of concrete could never be totally wiped out - people will know for a long time after our civilization perishes that the grey crumbly rocks can often be broken open to find a nice iron bar good for smithing into a sword, and that somebody must have put it there.

    7. Re:Clear Skies by qwijibo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anything made of stone has the best chance of standing the test of time. I think the pyramids demonstrate that. While the faces of the pyramids have been destroyed, there's no mistaking huge mounds of rocks that look out of place.

      Knowing that there is iron in the concrete may lead to the conclusion that someone put it there, but not necessarily to why. One of the limitations of archaelogy is that the most believable story that incorporates all of the evidence wins. Knowing that something was a 3000 year old Anasazi field may be somewhat interesting, but generally isn't the level of detail people are looking for. While that may be true, it only tells us a little about how they lived. It doesn't tell us much about their culture, other than they farmed, which means they likely weren't nomads.

      I remember an example used in class of how this process would work if it were applied to us. Some future archaeologist who came across the remains of our society would find most of it destroyed. Artifacts are rare, which is why they need a story to fill in the blanks. Many of the bodies found from our time would have groups of trinkets in close proximity, or in the clothes if they were still in tact. The number and types of these trinkets may be associated with someone's social status or religious beliefs. It would be curious because each group of trinkets would have similarities, but be different. In fact, no two identical sets of trinkets would be found across all of the bodies found. Someone could look at all of this and conclude that these were indications of social status and develop some intricate theory. Without someone from the present time to say "these are keys, they go in locks, we lock things because we don't trust people", the theory may sound solid.

    8. Re:Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The Broadcasting Standards Commission investigated that BBC show and found it had unfairly edited to exclude rebuttals of the "debunking" from scientists and the authors.

      I don't know about Hancock's 12.5Ky-old cataclysm. He's a recent investigator selling books. But he used the Pyramids/Orion existing data of stars and pyramids to uncover 2 "new" pyramids, which is successful deductive science that validates his model. Moreover, his Pyramid model is robust, revealing a cohesive principle for the Pyramids that explains other architectural features, including their extremely precise North/South alignment (more precise than the modern Greenwich Prime Meridian), and the shafts from chambers to the sky. Which are consistent with the inscriptions on the monuments, many of them previously unintelligible without the ritual context. The "sky map" model is no speculation: it's a proven model that's been tested by analysis and prediction.

      As for the "weird idea" that a global civilization's towns and structures were built on the coast (unrelated to the inland Pyramids), I reiterate what another reply to your post says about today's civilization. Most of our current towns and structures, especially our emblematic ones, are built on the coast. And lower-tech roots of our current civilization are even more concentrated on coasts and riverbanks. Why should the old ones be any different?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your tireless work keeping people persuaded by a snotty Internet post from getting in the way as we discuss these historical scientific devices.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Actually, Bauval discovered the correspondence and the other pyramids. Hancock writes books, Bauval produces science. I'm interested in the science, and the better picture of the world it paints. The books are fun, though.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Clear Skies by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

      I have always thought that the absolute best evidence against this is the complete lack of any plastic artifacts. Any civilization advanced enough to produce atomic weapons would have produced platic and other non-biodegradable waste. Think about all the waste that we produce that will take tens of millions of years to break down. How many times have you seen some article from an environmentalist railing against some waste product that will still be around millions of years from now. Think about how efficiently our civilization has distributed this waste around the world. It can be found in massive quantities in any populated area and in significant quantities even in the most remote parts of the world. Heck the summit of Everest is covered in it. If any such civilization existed we would have found their trash a looooooong time ago.

    12. Re:Clear Skies by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Most of our current towns and structures, especially our emblematic ones, are built on the coast.

      Some years back, I ran across a quantified version of this claim from some demographer whose name I've forgotten. He commented that if you measured out a 100-km strip along the shores of the oceans and any lakes and rivers to be "navigable" enough to support commercial traffic, you would have about 5% of the world's land, and about 90% of its humans. He also observed that in most places, the densly-inhabited strip is narrower than 100 km, but that's a convenient width that includes most of the suburbs in major urban areas.

      Another place I've seen this idea is in discussions of how the Americas were first colonized. There has been a lot of talk about the Bering "land bridge" at the height of the last ice age. But some people point out that this is unimportant. All our evidence is that humans have always lived near water and used it. We have remains of boats (and houses on stilts) from more than 20,000 years ago. From the tops of the hills at the east end of Siberia, you can see the hills over in Alaska. So it's obvious how humans crossed that barrier: On some nice day, they rowed and/or sailed their boats across. Then then went back and told the others that the land over there wasn't inhabited and there were lots of animals to eat. This should always be the default assumption for how humans got anywhere. If you disagree, you need to present evidence that that particular group of humans didn't use boats.

      (Actually, there have been groups of humans known who didn't use boats. But they always lived next to another group that did. We're one of the most aquatic primates. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    13. Re:Clear Skies by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Saying "Bauval produces science" is a bit like saying "CmdrTaco produces journalism" (no offense to Rob). Science is only science, and only provides a better picture of the world, if it follows the scientific method - which means that you need more than speculation, conjecture, over-eager pattern recognition, and selective sifting and presentation of the facts. Bauval's work is barely a step removed from the wonderful conspiracy theories one sees in novels like Eco's "Foucault's Pendulum", Wilson's "Illuminatus Trilogy", and the latest mass market equivalent, the Da Vinci Code. The only difference is that the latter are all intended as fiction, and aren't pretending to be factual. But if you're capable of recognizing that those novels are fiction, based purely on the theories they present, then you should be capable of doing the same with Bauval.

    14. Re:Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You are more accurate talking about Hancock, who does nothing but write about work like Bauval's, and tie together stories tested only for plausibility. Bauval is an archaelogist, who deduced that there were other pyramids and predicted their discovered locations, combining data, hypothesis, theory, prediction and failable tests - which didn't fail.

      I don't know why people are so insistent on discarding these clearly coherent theories about these monuments, proven by testing their predictions. That stubborn refusal to update one's model that fit only the previous data to accomodate the new data is clearly antiscientific.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Clear Skies by Explo · · Score: 1

      The Pyramids aren't "incorrectly placed" to represent the stars of "Orion". Their positions are different from Orion's exact shape today, but are exactly correct for their slightly different positions 13.5Ky ago - and again about 12Ky in the future.


      Hmm? I find it somewhat strange that the motion of the brighter stars of Orion would cause them to form the *same* shape again. That would pretty much need the stars to change their course, because the rotation around the galactic center of gravity nonwithstanding, their movement hardly has any cycling elements. Or do you mean something else; their position relative to the celestial north pole or something like that..?

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
    16. Re:Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, you're right. I conflated two variances in Orion: their drift along their trajectory since the Big Bang, and their precession around the Earth's sky as the Earth precesses its rotational axis every 25My.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Clear Skies by alienmole · · Score: 1
      You are more accurate talking about Hancock, who does nothing but write about work like Bauval's, and tie together stories tested only for plausibility. Bauval is an archaelogist
      If that's the case, then where is Bauval's scientific work published? I'd appreciate a pointer. It's certainly not in any of the books coauthored with Hancock or Gilbert.

      One important missing ingredient, if one wishes to take Bauval's work as science, is positive peer review. A related suspicious factor is that real scientists don't release their scientific work primarily via popular books and videos with lurid titles. It doesn't help that Bauval is not a trained archaeologist, or even trained as a scientist in some other discipline (being a construction engineer doesn't quite qualify one as a scientist).

      This is work designed for a commercial purpose, designed to appeal to a particular type of target audience, one which you apparently belong to. If Bauval is truly serious about having his work accepted as science, then he screwed up badly in collaborating with people like Hancock and Gilbert in publishing pop speculation about heretofore unknown ancient alien civilizations which left behind no direct evidence of their existence. That stuff's great fun in movies like Stargate or the Fifth Element, but it shouldn't be confused with reality.

      who deduced that there were other pyramids and predicted their discovered locations, combining data, hypothesis, theory, prediction and failable tests - which didn't fail.
      Other pyramids? Could you point me to evidence of this, other than claims by Bauval or his colleagues?

      I don't know why people are so insistent on discarding these clearly coherent theories about these monuments, proven by testing their predictions. That stubborn refusal to update one's model that fit only the previous data to accomodate the new data is clearly antiscientific.
      That's pretty amusing - I'm starting to wonder if this is a really complex troll. Anyway, the reason Bauval's conjectures are discarded is because they don't stand up to even minor scrutiny.

      It's a big stretch to call Bauval's work theories in a scientific sense. His arguments are designed to persuade people with little other knowledge of the subject, by providing a one-sided argument which carefully leads the reader down what appears to be a single possible path, using selectively presented facts (and non-facts).

      If you're really serious about this, take the book of your choice and really analyze it critically, by writing out a summary of the chains of reasoning, assessing the strength of the links in those chains, and considering what's not being presented. Unfortunately, to get a good sense of the latter requires outside research, which is where laypeople often experience a problem. In this case, Paul Jordan's "Riddles of the Sphinx" might help. But in general, the problems that a layperson experiences in contextualizing a hypothesis is one of the big reasons that science needs peer review.

      The ability to detect and recognize patterns is an important factor in human intelligence. However, equally important is the ability to recognize when a perceived pattern can't support the interpretation being given to it. Let's assume that there's some correlation between the arrangement of certain pyramids and certain stars. I agree that's quite plausible - but it doesn't get you to any of the rest of Bauval's speculation, because he hasn't even presented, in a scientifically verifiable fashion, the details of the correlation between the Orion's belt stars and the pyramids. All he did was make a claim about the correlation, which didn't stand up to scrutiny.
    18. Re:Clear Skies by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Even concrete won't last forever.

      Tell that to the millions of tourists who visit the Pantheon (2031 years old, made of concrete) each year!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  44. Wouldn't be the first time. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't surprise me at all if there was an NDA. Not that long ago I heard about some people that did a high-res scan of Michaelangelo's David and were only allowed to release the 3-D model with DRM applied. Here's an article, although I don't think it was the original one I read. Apparently the Italians are afraid that the market for Davids is going to be flooded with thousands of "simulated marble replicas" based on the "pirated" scans.

    Right. Or more likely, they're afraid that it might somehow cause people to not want and fly to Italy to see the original.

    Whatever: be careful not to allow anyone to take or distribute photos, either; you never know when they might stop caring about the original once they get their grubby little paws on a postcard. Hell, what value will the original be once everybody can get one?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  45. My God! by multimediavt · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's full of stars!

    Sorry, had to.

  46. Anyone noticed the Arab racist troll? by colenski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw this on the Wikipedia entry:

    "It also adds support to the idea that there was an ancient Greek tradition of complex mechanical technology which was later transmitted to the Arab world, where similar but simpler devices were built during the medieval period. Of course, they had to copy it. Jawas would never come up with such a white device on their own."

    I couldn't believe what I was seeing, and I refreshed, and it dissapeared. But I found it again in the edits and that blew me away.

    Shame on the racist troll asshole that put that up. (NB: it wasn't me!)

  47. Re:What is it with Scientists not releasing findin by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Informative

    At Fermilab, no data gets released until the entire experimental collaboration (500-700 people in the case of CDF and D0) has approved, or "blessed" it. Why is this? One is scientific credibility. You don't get to publish a paper and then send out bugfix updates. Once something is published, it is published for all time (well, until civilisation collapses at least). You can retract it by publishing a retraction, but that is looked upon as evidence of a rather bad failure. The second reason is that since it is a US national laboratory, the government owns the data. The department of energy, as I understand it, requires this blessing process before any analysis of their data is published.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  48. I call moderation shenanigans! by voss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Labelling me overrated before anyone else had rated me and
    labelling me redundant when I was the first comment.

    I call Shenangians!

  49. Let's stick with fact, not legend by laura20 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Legend, rather than fact. The article says:

    2634 BC According to Legend, Huang Di, the Yellow Emperor designs the South Pointing Chariot. It is built for him by the craftsman Fang Bo.

    I'll point out that the Yellow Emperor is also credited in Chinese lgeend with inventing the cart, the boat, and the calendar. He's a culture-hero and myth, not history to be cited. The Duke of Chou is similiarly legendified.

    Note that the 'reinvention' of it (most likely, the actual invention) dates well after the Antikythera mechanism. And even then, there don't appear to be any surviving plans or carts, and at least one claim that it was an actual person in the cart, not a mechanism.

    1. Re:Let's stick with fact, not legend by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, even today, in a team of scientists discovering something new, the head of the project gets most (or all) of the credit...

      In any company, managers take credit for the work done by others, but blame them if anything goes wrong.

      I wouldn't say things have changed that much.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  50. Technical Jargon or myth ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Astronomy gave us time. As the heavenly bodies of Sun and Moon reappeared as regular as clockwork they swept out the day the month and the year. Understanding the solar year of seasons from the movement of the sunrises along the horizon from spring-solstice point (latin tr. sol-sun stice-stop ) to the depths of the midwinter-solstice was essential technology for farmers. It has been shown that some greek myths encode time markers for the dates of sowing, yearly floods and herd migrations as the battles and romances of constellations.
    Due to a axis wobble of the earths orbit the location of the spring equinox precesses against the backdrop of the stars in a 26,000 year cycle. This continual correction to the seosonal-clock was known to the many of the earliest civilisations and is encoded in many cosmological stories and monuments. These are very fine grained astronomical observations and the earliest monuments of man were also observatories.
    Much can be gleaned by considering early myth and cultures tales as technical jargon rather than spells or simple animistic belief. So much culture, science and math was lost to the notions that knowledge was irreligious and that early man was a mere primitive.

  51. Dark wasn't dark? by arcite · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you consider that most of Europe degenerated into constantly waring factions, gangs, families, and states for a couple hundred years, then I guess it was normal. I suppose you could compare it to what Iraq or Somalia is like now. Unless you were in the protection of a walled city, you were fair game for any number of BAD people. That is, unless the plague got you first...or you starved to death from crop failure.

    1. Re:Dark wasn't dark? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Interesting, by your standards, Europe left the Dark Ages oh...around...1945. Actually, we saw warring factions, gangs, families, and walled cities play a role in the Balkans over the past two decades as well. Starving to death from crop failures? Ukraine sound familiar?

      The "Dark Ages" weren't as bad as you think they were. It's true, that tiny corner of the globe--the European peninsula--may not have been quite so orderly as during, for instance, Roman times, but neither was it bereft of civilization, learning, and advancement. I can provide examples should you be interested in the specifics.

  52. Anachronism by threaded · · Score: 1

    Could not this device be proof of time travel?

    1. Re:Anachronism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything, it is proof of technology suppression by an earlier Government body. The Bahgdad Battery and electricty in ancient Egypt. OOPArt is what you want to look up. OOPArt. Out Of Place Artifacts.

  53. Too quick with the Submit button by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forgot to mention... how many of Edison's inventions were really his own, and how many (should have) actually belonged to some lab worker/assistant in his labs?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  54. Re:What is it with Scientists not releasing findin by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    You mean, 'except for the entirety of this article.' Plenty of information is being 'released' here including what they THINK it does. And yet they can't release the partial translation of the text.

    Sorry, I don't buy that.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  55. Dutch? by pahles · · Score: 1

    Being Dutch I immediately started reading TFA. No word of the Dutch there however. It's the Greeks!

    --
    Sig?
  56. I have the decode here by gelfling · · Score: 1

    All These Worlds Are Yours Except Europa. Attempt No Landings There

  57. Also, did the Greeks measure the Earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This paper and some related articles mention that the Greek unit of measure, the Greek foot (est. 12.164") is based on a measurement of the earth that is more exact than we had until about 100 years or so ago. Basically, ten Greek feet, times the fourth power of 60, equals the mean circumference of the Earth.

    Check out the paper: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/nk/stade.pdf

  58. Turning the tables by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Can't you just imagine, 2000 years from now future archeologists digging the crust off a long buried beige PC and wondering what the sliding tray on the front was for - then guessing it was to hold coffee cups?

    There's a really good old tyme radio program about that, future scientists digging up 1950's USA and these 'experts' getting everything about it completely wrong. "Washing-ton" becomes "pound lanudry", "Oscar" becomes a God and "Elivs" a high priest, etc.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  59. Re:First Name by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Xenophon - sounds strange to me. No, really.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  60. Re:Very cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bubo is Latin for owl. Don't ask me why a bunch of Greeks decided to name their mechanical owl in a language that hadn't been invented yet

    The same reason that in the Thai language, "what" means "temple," "a lie" means "what", "money" means "come here" and "meow" means "I want".

    The last one is easy; the Thais' "Eden story" says that humans lived in peace and happiness until the evil cats taught us how to talk, and we've been arguing and fighting ever since. Especially hilarious is hearing two old Thai women arguing, it sounds exactly like two cats in heat!

  61. Bloody Romans! What have they ever done for us? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    REG: All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    XERXES: Brought peace.

    REG: Oh. Peace? Shut up!

    (If you don't know what that's from, well, hand in your geek card on the way out.)

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  62. Nobody's going to get that joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Too erudite...

    Xenophon - sounds strange to me. No, really.


    "People ski topless around here while smoking dope, so irony is not a high priority".

  63. Hellenistics not Greeks and Science non Experience by aghix · · Score: 1

    First of all we should call them "hellenistics", not "greeks".
    Then, about the Earth roundness: thought the size was measured by Erathostenes the theory were expressed most by the study of Aristarchus of Samos and Hipparchus of Rhodes.
    In such a period (III sec B.C.) in the hellenistc world was the birth of the Science. Beside the ones already mentioned above, Euclides of Alexandria and Apollonius of Perga (mathematics, geometry, Optic), Herophilus of Chalcedon (medicine, anathomy, psychiatry), Ctesibius (mechanics), Archimedes of Syracuse (machanics, mathematic, geometry, pneumathics...).

    Ah, mind that these genius all lived in a closed period of time of about 80 years, and yes, as already mentioned hellenistic culture had female researchers (never heard about Ipatia? SHE was the chief reasearcher responsable of the Alexandria Library).

    Sadly we lost most of these knoweledge, and it requested almost 2000 years to get it back (someone called it "the lost revolution").
    They were well known at scientists such as Copernichus, Keplerus, Leonardo, Galileo, Newton... even Freud. The Illuministic period is responsable of such a CUT.

    [irony] Did you ever notice how ironic is the presence of an apple in the Newton's novell (indeed from Voltaire). Doesn't it remind you anything similar? "rationalism-logic" and "superstition-religion" they both were geneterad by the same plant. [/irony]

  64. It is far worse than you think. by mmell · · Score: 1
    Traditionally, the most durable buildings and the most carefully preserved documents tend to be religious in nature. Archaeologists in two millenia may find little more of, say, New York than a huge collection of ruins with the only recognizable artifacts being the treasured religious documents preserved in the cathedrals of the city. Based on this, they would be quite right in concluding that we are a primative and superstitious race, practicing strange rituals to please our gods (or what do you think they'll conclude after finding many different houses of worhsip?). It's a damned shame that St. Peter's Cathedral in New York has a better chance of surviving the millenia than the Smithsonian Institute in Washington DC.

    D'ya suppose the Greeks ever thought about that when they made their biggest works temples, instead of libraries or laboratories?

  65. Re:First Name by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

    Hey! I resemble that remark, you insensitive clod!

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  66. Re:Hellenistics not Greeks and Science non Experie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hellenes, you illiterate clod!

  67. why is it that scientists today think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are smarter than most people and all those dead bodies in the ground? it's fucking silly that scientists think our ancestors were stupid. how many of these scientists would be able to survive 2K years ago? give our ancestors some fucking credit for being smart enough to survive and thrive. Just because they didn't make stupid doodads doesn't make them primitive or stupid. If anything, it shows how ego centric "modern society" is.

  68. This proves it's art, not a device. by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Have you ever in your life seen an engineer who would actually document his work? Therefore, it must be art.

    1. Re:This proves it's art, not a device. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes. Every engineer I have worked with documented. Developers/programmers OTOH...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:This proves it's art, not a device. by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      humor noun: humor, humour, sense of humor, sense of humour. The trait of appreciating (and being able to express) the humorous; "she didn't appreciate my humor"; "you can't survive in the army without a sense of humor"

      I myself am an engineer... but I will agree with your comments about programmers and developers, too :)

  69. Re:Hellenistics not Greeks and Science by aghix · · Score: 1

    no, AFAYK hellenes is simply an alias for greeks. Hellenistic stands for "of greek influence, culture...".
    Geographically speaking we cannot say Archimedes was a greek (Syracuse is in Italy), or Euclides was a greek (Alexandria is in Egypt), Perga in Turkey. Thought we cannot say that Alexandria (founded by Alexander the great) was egyptian.

    So, as we speak of the "classic" greeks, (Aristoteles, Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras...) it's correct to call them greeks, hellenes.
    The scientists from the hellenistic period (dated from 323 B.C. death of Alexandeer) let's call them "hellenistics".

    -illitarate-

  70. Re:Hellenistics not Greeks and Science non Experie by geekoid · · Score: 1

    That's not Irony, that's coincidence.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect