Slashdot Mirror
Billions Donated to Charity
Anonymous Philanthropist writes " Warren Buffet , the world's second-richest man, announced over the weekend that he will soon donate 85% of his entire net worth, weighing in at around $37 Billion, to charities, with over 80% of it going to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This makes it the single largest monetary donation in history."
How much of that money is coming from MS using it's monopoly and predatory practices?
I'd never pay that much to get into the Guiness Book of Records
if only they diverted a fraction of that amount to my charity, me. ;)
http://hoopsdonuts.com/
In a show of one-upsmanship, the FSF gives away free software to starving children in Africa. And SCO sues the FSF for violating its patent for giving free software to starving children.
Also note that as much as this guy hates the M$ pyramid scheme, he used Excel 95 to provide his information...
Actually, Melinda Gates is showing his charitable side.
C|N>K
Thanks for the tip...think I'll send them a few bucks myself.
rj
Leaders / Copyrights
A radical rethink
Jan 23rd 2003
From The Economist print edition
The best way to foster creativity in the digital age is to overhaul current copyright laws
IMAGE (Reuters)
CRITICS have derided a 1998 extension of American copyrights as the “Mickey Mouse Protection Act” because it stopped early images of the Disney company’s mascot from entering the public domain. But such laws, they argue, are no joke. Extending and strengthening copyrights, they claim, will help a handful of big corporations crush creativity in the digital age. On the contrary, say Hollywood studios and big record companies. Without stronger copyright protection, a wave of piracy will destroy their industries, depriving consumers everywhere of a broad choice of movies, music and books.
Last week America’s Supreme Court weighed into what is rapidly becoming a nasty worldwide battle about the scope and enforcement of copyrights, by rejecting a challenge to the 1998 law on constitutional grounds. But even as it upheld the law, the court expressed misgivings. Blistering dissents from two justices dismissed the 20-year extension of copyright as unwarranted, and even the majority’s opinion hinted that Congress’s decision may have been “unwise”.
The court’s ambivalence is understandable. The growing quarrel over copyright is just one of the many difficult issues thrown up by the spread of the internet and related technologies (see our survey of the internet society in this issue). But of all these issues, the copyright battle is becoming one of the most urgent, and bitterly fought, because it could yet determine the future character of cyberspace itself.
Both sides have a point. Digital piracy does indeed threaten to overwhelm so-called “content” industries. As the power and reach of the internet continue to grow, the illicit trading of perfect copies may well devastate the music, movie and publishing industries. The content industries want to protect themselves with anti-copying technology, backed by stronger laws. So far, they have been at loggerheads with technology firms about how to implement such schemes (see article). But a deal between Hollywood and Silicon Valley is likely eventually. Critics are right to fear that, when such a deal is struck, it will be in the interests of big firms, not the public.
A grand new bargain
The alternative is to return to the original purpose of copyright, something no national legislature has yet been willing to do. Copyright was originally the grant of a temporary government-supported monopoly on copying a work, not a property right. Its sole purpose was to encourage the circulation of ideas by giving creators and publishers a short-term incentive to disseminate their work. Over the past 50 years, as a result of heavy lobbying by content industries, copyright has grown to such ludicrous proportions that it now often inhibits rather than promotes the circulation of ideas, leaving thousands of old movies, records and books languishing behind a legal barrier. Starting from scratch today, no rational, disinterested lawmaker would agree to copyrights that extend to 70 years after an author’s death, now the norm in the developed world.
Digital technologies are not only making it easier to copy all sorts of works, but also sharply reducing the costs of creating or distributing them, and so also reducing the required incentives. The flood of free content on the internet has shown that most creators do not need incentives that stretch across generations. To reward those who can attract a paying audience, and the firms that support them, much shorter copyrights would be enough. The 14-year term of the original 18th-centur
The extreme centre is the paper's historical position. --Geoffrey Crowther
How dare you contemplate contaminating the holy waters of Europa! We will exterminate your civilization!
"This just in, an anonymous person has just donated $37 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. Our analysts are stumped as to who it could be" :D
"When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
You heard it here first.
Bill Gates liquidates all assets of Melinda & Gates Foundation and vanishes into thin air as the World's richest & second richest man...
Online backup with Mozy, sounds like Ozzie, but more!
Or even better - pay off roughly 0.5% of the U.S. national debt!
Don't you know who our President is?
A working class man who started out with nothing in life but two strong hands and a brain, and now has to make due with just the hands.
The ______ Agenda
Well in the past maybe, but i watch star trek, it works fine there.
He's only 23, give him some time.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
Maybe they should run a competition, and put Golden Tickets into chocolate bar rappers?
May contain traces of nut.
Made from the freshest electrons.
They both should get the Nobel prize for this kind of philantrophy..........
>> "...Who is going to really remember Microsoft and their business practices 50 years from now if the Gates' money finds a cure for malaria, AIDS, or even better...Alzheimers, diabetes, or the flu?"
;)
No, if they find a cure for Alzheimers then surely the public *will* remember!