Slashdot Mirror


Cell Users As Bad As Drunk Drivers

An anonymous reader writes "News.com reports on a cell-phone use study which confirms that talking on your cell is as bad as being drunk, when it comes to driving skill. The researchers studied 40 volunteers in a driving simulator." From the article: "[The subjects were observed] while undistracted, using a handheld cell phone, using a hands-free cell phone and while intoxicated to a 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level--the average legal level of impairment in the United States--after drinking vodka and orange juice. Three study participants rear-ended the simulated car in front of them. All were talking on cell phones and none was drunk, the researchers said."

26 of 738 comments (clear)

  1. The usual response by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "But I can put my phone down, I can't stop being drunk." Except that people don't put the phone down, they crash.

    --
    Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    1. Re:The usual response by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Funny
      "But I can put my phone down, I can't stop being drunk." Except that people don't put the phone down, they crash.


      Exactly. I got rear-ended at two consecutive red lights once, by the same cell-phone-impaired driver. Fortunately, the only damage was a matched set of trailer-hitch prints in his front license plate.
      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:The usual response by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      FTA:

      • Just like many people who have been drinking, the cell phone users did not believe themselves to be affected, the researchers found.
      • They studied 40 volunteers who used a driving simulator four times--while undistracted, using a handheld cell phone, using a hands-free cell phone and while intoxicated to a 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level
      • Motorists who talked on either handheld or hands-free cell phones drove slightly more slowly, were 9 percent slower to hit the brakes, and varied their speed more than undistracted drivers.
      • "Driving while talking on a cell phone is as bad as or maybe worse than driving drunk,"

      Everytime this comes up, people always say that they use hands-free. That's not the point. This isn't about having two hands on the wheel. This is about paying attention to what you are doing. Talking on a phone is an added distraction. Its that simple. You can argue to what degree that distraction is, but you cannot deny that it is a distraction.

      Then people always talk about how they can drop the phone, or stop the conversation if a situation that requires their complete attention arises. Ever think that situation may not have risen if you hadn't been on the phone in the first place?

    3. Re:The usual response by absoluteflatness · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does it matter? They still rear ended a simulated car. Who cares if they're not as impaired as someone with a 0.1 BAC?

      The point is, they didn't rear-end a simulated car. From the summary:

      Three study participants rear-ended the simulated car in front of them. All were talking on cell phones and none was drunk, the researchers said.

      The grandparent's point is, the average legal limit of .08 is a conservative one (by design, I'm sure), and many people at .08 are perfectly capable of driving.
    4. Re:The usual response by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's different because a passenger is in the car. So either from watching the road or watching for non-verbal cues from the driver, he'll see when the driver needs to pay more attention to something and pause the conversation. Try having a conversation with a passenger who talks on and on with no regard to the driver or the road. It's much more distracting.

    5. Re:The usual response by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Informative
      I have a UK HGV licence, and you definitely would definitely fail your test (HGV or otherwise) if you roll back. I would imagine you would be charged with dangerous driving if you rolled back and hit a car with a truck here, even if no damage was caused.

      GP is correct you would not feel it if you hit a BMW- you could probably crush it flat and not feel it - hence the need to not roll back.

      This does not eliminate the need to stop suficciently far behind the vehicle in front that you can pull past it if the driver stalls (or runs out of fuel waiting at the lights - it happens!)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    6. Re:The usual response by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know what they say ... people in cars produce accidents, accidents in cars produce people.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:The usual response by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think a salient point would be that those using a cell phone in the experiment were probably not allowed to choose to hang up

      The guy who ran into the back of my car last month could have chosen to hang up at any time. He didn't hang up because he was concentrating on his phone call instead of noticing I was turning into a carpark 50 metres in front of him.

      By the time he noticed there was an almost stationary car in front of him, he was less than 20m away and travelling too fast to stop. He may have tried to hang up at that point, but even if he didn't, the call would have been terminated when his phone hit the windscreen of his car and shattered.

      He may have been more likely to run into a virtual car, but by choosing to be an arsehole and put other people's lives and property at risk, he ran into mine instead.

      He'll be prosecuted, and doubtless fined, and his insurance will pay for repairs, but that won't give me back the week of walking around in pain from the bruised hip. It won't return my MGF to pristine condition. It'll always be an accident-damaged car, and will be worth less when I sell it.

      I don't care how interesting his phone call was to him, he had no right to involve me in it, and that was the choice he made when he tried to operate a car and a phone at the same time.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. forget cells... by torrents · · Score: 5, Funny

    how about the idiots trying to use wireless email behind the wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    --
    Get your torrents...
  3. I'm Not Drunk by neonprimetime · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just like many people who have been drinking, the cell phone users did not believe themselves to be affected, the researchers found.

    Honestly officer ... I wasn't really talking on the phone ... I just hold it by my head to keep warm.

  4. Incomplete study... by gasmonso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would like to see a few more test groups added to this. How about the average pot smoking teenager, the girl putting makeup on, and my personal favorite that I saw recently... a woman brushing her teeth!

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Incomplete study... by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny
      I would like to see a few more test groups added to this. How about the average pot smoking teenager, the girl putting makeup on, and my personal favorite that I saw recently... a woman brushing her teeth!


      Also, I want to see a study of how much reading while driving impairs your ability. I want to know how much more dangerous I make my drive home, so I can calculate if the probable time savings are likely worth it... :)
    2. Re:Incomplete study... by fobbman · · Score: 4, Funny

      They can't find enough pot-smoking teens with the motivation to get off of the couch, let alone actually DRIVE somewhere.

    3. Re:Incomplete study... by Wdi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They pay low insurance rates *because* they have less accidents. Insurance companies make no gifts. They do math. Very precise mathon large sample sizes.

    4. Re:Incomplete study... by boingo82 · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's not that old people get in fewer accidents, they get in cheaper, less fatal accidents.

      Old people tend to get into slow crashes. Parking lot crashes are a biggie, and they get into many more accidents while making left turns than do younger drivers.

      How do crashes involving older drivers differ from those of other drivers? Compared with younger drivers, senior drivers are overinvolved in certain types of collisions -- angle crashes, overtaking or merging crashes, and especially intersection crashes. The most common error made by seniors is failure to yield the right-of-way. Seniors are cited for this error more often than younger drivers.15
      From the IIHS's facts on old people page..

      Teenagers, on the other hand, tend to get in single-vehicle, higher-speed collisions. They're more susceptible to distractions, such as passengers and cell phones.

      How do crashes involving teenagers differ from those of other drivers? Teenagers have higher crash rates than older drivers, and their crashes differ. Analyses of fatal crash data indicate that teenage drivers are more likely to be at fault in their crashes. Teenagers' crashes and violations are more likely to involve speeding than those of older drivers, and teenagers are more likely than drivers of other ages to be in single-vehicle fatal crashes. Plus teenagers do more of their driving in small and older cars3 and at night, compared with adults. In 2004, 18 percent of teenagers' fatalities occurred between 9 pm and midnight, and 22 percent occurred between midnight and 6 am. Fifty-four percent of teenagers' fatalities occurred on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. For 16 year-olds, all these problems are heightened. The combination of inexperience behind the wheel and immaturity produces a pattern of fatal crashes among 16 year-olds that includes the highest percentage of crashes involving speeding, the highest percentage of single-vehicle crashes, and the highest percentage of crashes with driver error.
      (From the IIHS's teenagers fact page.
      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
  5. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about just having a passenger to talk to? what about screaming kids in the back seat? What about trying to fish that CD out from behind the seat so you can change your music? How drunk does doing these things make you drive?

  6. Hot Damn! by fobbman · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean I might have a chance with the hot babe at the party whose sober but chatting on her cell phone?

  7. Driving all over the road by eric76 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One night years ago when I lived south of Houston, I was driving over to a fast food place to get something to take home for supper.

    There was a van in front of me that was driving all over the road. It almost went into the ditch on each side of the road at least once.

    When we go to a four lane highway, the van spent part of the time taking up both lanes going our direction and some of the time in the oncoming lanes.

    I was surprised to see the van turn in ahead of me at the fast food joint and pull up to the drive through.

    Being the nice guy/asshole that I am, I thought I'd do a good deed and suggest that the driver wait for someone sober to drive him home. I stood about 5 feet from the window when I made my suggestion.

    It turned out to be a woman who had the foulest mouth of any woman I ever met. She was screaming unbelievably loud that she wasn't drunk, that she was only using her cell phone, and that how she drove was her business and noone elses.

    So I got back in my car.

    When I finally got around front, everyone inside was laughing. I guess everyone in the place, employee and customer alike, heard her tirade over the speaker system.

    I told a local cop about it later. He wasn't amused at all about it.

  8. multi-taskers by Loconut1389 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    some people are naturally adept multi-taskers- professional drivers (especially school bus drivers) are trained and in the regular practice of having extremely distracting activities going on and still being good drivers.

    Personally, whenever I've been on the phone (not too often, I avoid it if possible) and something has gone on, without even thinking about it, my mouth stops and I'm 100% tuned into the road, I don't even notice I was talking to someone until things settle down. I'm used to having a bus full of drunk adults (bachelor parties) and rowdy kids.

    I think they should test the subjects general multi-tasking ability and come up with a statistic that correlates multi-taskability (or inability) to accident+phone rates.

    1. Re:multi-taskers by cain · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...without even thinking about it, my mouth stops and I'm 100% tuned into the road

      I call BS. How do you know there were not other times when you were oblivious to danger? You'd be oblivious so you would not even be aware that there was danger.

  9. Re:Sure... .but by RapmasterT · · Score: 4, Informative
    according to accident statistics, talking to other people in the car is the #2 cause of driver distraction accidents. Second only to rubbernecking at stuff outside the car.

    cell phones barely make the list. According to anecdotal evidence, they're the #1 cause of "almost had an accident", but for real accidents they barely make the list.

  10. Well, they don't quite show that. by Onan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to TFA, they compared phone users to drivers who were at the legal blood-alcohol limit, not those above it. So they have, at most, demonstrated that driving while using a phone is more dangerous than other driving that we consider legal. Obviously there's some level of drunkenness that would be more impairing than phone use; finding out where that point is would be considerably more interesting than what this study actually did examine.

    I'd also love to hear more detail about the "hand-free" devices that they used for the test. Were these earpieces, or something more speakerphoneish? I seem to recall another study finding that the problem with driving while using a phone is not having your hands occupied, it's the mental isolation that happens as your brain divides resources between your conversational world and your driving world. And that earpieces did not change this, but that speakerphones _did_.

  11. Handsfree by BigDuke6_swe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think I've heard about a similar report where driving with and without handsfree was compared. The conclusion was that it's not the fact that your holding a phone thats the biggest issue. It's the fact that you're concentrating on something else than driving that causes reactions to take longer.

    --
    Zere vere zwei peanuts valking down der Straße, and von vas assaulted...peanut
  12. Re:Sure... .but by quokkapox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    how bad is it when we talk to other people in the vehicle while driving?

    It's a different thing entirely to converse with a passenger in the same car. There's a lower drain on your cognitive resources, the person next to you responds to the same environmental cues as you do, and will shut up and/or scream if you're heading for trouble.

    An alert passenger in your front passenger seat improves your ability to drive safely, even if you're deep in conversation. It's another set of eyes watching the road. A remote voice on the other end of a cellphone has the opposite effect.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  13. Flawed methodology by vanillaspice · · Score: 4, Informative

    So the researchers at the University of Utah determined that using your phone is worse than having a BAC of 0.08, the equivalent of one drink, not the equivalent of being drunk. How does the rubric stand up to two drinks? Four? As it is, the data don't suggest much. And don't be fooled by the "alcohol is involved in 40 percent of the 42,000 annual traffic fatalities" statistic, either. Most states derive that number from whenever any party, regardless of fault, has a BAC of 0.01 or more. In other words, you could eat a cherry cordial and a sober person could plow right through you and the state would consider your death an alcohol-related traffic fatality.

  14. We always treat the symptoms not the problem.... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is not cell phone use in and of itself causing crashes. That is just a symptom of a bigger problem: people are not trained to use cell phones properly while driving and usually don't have the correct equipment to do so.

    When I was in the military I drove tracked vehicles while communicating on a radio net, and also talking on an internal intercom system with a TC and squad leader. Getting in an accident would have been far more catastrophic given the weight and size of the equipment I was operating.

    Similarly, Pilots also have to communicate while controlling an expensive piece of equipment - and I've also done that.

    In both cases I never had an accident. I can't imagine the military or aviation systems working without radio communications. Similarly the efficiency of using the Cell phone has provided amazing and equally important impacts to the civilian world.

    The number one key is to have the right equipment for 'hands free' operation. For cell phones this means buying and using the voice-dial features available on most phones now, and getting a headset for hands free operation in your vehicle.

    Secondly you must learn to modify your driving habits so that if the conversation moves to a point of needing to take your eyes off the road (e.g. to search for or record information), that you then pull off the road and carry on the conversation without impacting your driving ability. You should never manually dial a number into your phone while driving, and never attempt to write something down, or search for some item in your briefcase or purse, for that matter.

    Banning the use of Cellphones in cars is not the solution; proper training and equipment is the right answer.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain