Slashdot Mirror


The Physics of Superman

eieken writes "The physics of Superman mostly belong in the realm of comic books, but some scientists decided to give their input on the matter. The article tells of 'a scientific experiment in which a researcher put several chickens in a centrifuge and raised them in twice-normal gravity for months at a time. When they emerged, the chickens were stronger and had larger bones and muscles, and greater endurance. In other words, they were superchickens.' Do they have human sized centrifuges?"

19 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. About Flying by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That chicken thing is just weird. That must have been a while ago, I don't see how anyone could get the ethical approval to do something like that. Just how would you keep the chickens in for months at a time anyway? How would you feed them and such? Do you stop the thing for a moment, do what you need, then start it back up?

    That said, the article comments on Superman flying. I read somewhere recently (some list of facts about Superman) some interesting stuff. One of the things was that "Faster than a speeding bullet... more powerful than a locomotive..." stuff was not part of the original Superman comics, it was apparently made up for a radio show. But more interesting to me, apparently Superman COULDN'T fly. He was able to jump REALLY HIGH. You know, "able leap tall buildings in a single bound." At some point that somehow turned into flying (this was a bulleted list of facts type thing, so it didn't expand on these).

    There was a special on TLC, Discovery, Science Channel, or some such recently about the physics of Superman. I didn't see it (I'm sure it will be re-run), but I remember from a commercial that they said it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why, you'd have to watch to find out I guess.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:About Flying by ampathee · · Score: 2, Interesting
      it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why,


      I'd imagine that he flies upwards really fast, while she falls down at her terminal velocity. Then he catches her - with double or more the impact of her hitting the (stationary) ground - since the relative velocity would be so much larger.

      Like hitting an oncoming car as opposed to a parked one.
    2. Re:About Flying by samu0086 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ampathee is exactly correct. The physicist in the show suggested that while Lois would travel at her terminal velocity downward, Superman would be flying at an extreme velocity in the opposite direction. He guessed that Superman would be flying at ~100x faster than Lois would be falling down, or 120,000 mph in order to grab her (since he had to run to a spot, change clothes into Superman, and fly to grab her all the while Lois is falling at 9.8 m/s^2). It would be awesome to see Superman accidentally slice Lois in half in an attempt to save her, they must save that shot for the Directors Cut.

      --
      Mild-mannered college student by day, DinoPark Tycoon by night.
  2. That's not Superman... by cargoculture · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's Tom Strong.

  3. Re:No news... by bsartist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of Larry Niven - he wrote about the difficulties Superman and Lois Lane would have in an essay called Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  4. Dark meat vs. Light by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, did the superchickens have more dark meat on them, or light? Parts that get exercised (thighs) are darker than parts that don't (breast on a non-flying chicken). I can see this at Wegman's now, "boneless thighs from free-range, hormone-free, pre-centrifuged, SuperChickens".

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  5. Just out of curiosity... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't feel like dredging my memory for the proper physics formulas, so maybe some bored physics student can help me out. Let's say I wanted to live in 2x gravity on Earth for a few months (or years), for the healthful aspects.

    So I build a huge centrifuge shaped like a bowl, with a track at a certain angle. You'd like to spin the track at a speed and angle such that I get a simulated 2x gravity, while having the angle such that my weight would be perpendicular to the apparent floor. You'd build walls perpendicular to the track (and a parallel ceiling) as well so that things would seem normal.

    So how wide would the track need to be, and what angle would you need, so as to have an approximately normal environment? Obviously if the ring is too small, you'll get different forces on each part of your body and you'll notice it. There's probably no good psychological data on what size you "need", so let's see some numbers at different sizes, and see what would seem reasonable.

    Also, is there any problem with this scenerio? I've never heard of it being done, which means maybe there's something I'm missing as far as practicality.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Just out of curiosity... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problems are,

      accleration gradient - you don't want very much of one or your balance will be all screwy.
      coriolis "force" - a result of the transformation to a rotating reference frame. You want to minimize this as well, for balance reasons.

      Fortunately the solution to both is to increase R. Unfortunately, this limits where you can place your rotating habitat and increase the cost to power it.

      So some practical numbers: (i'm not sure how to do the coriolis part, but the rest is pretty easy)

      Suppose we took the land for the cancelled superconductiong supercollider in Texas. It had a radus of approximately 14 km. To get a net force of 2g, we need a rotational acceleration of 1.73g, since we already have gravity working for us. So you'd need to have a tangential velocity of 350 mph. The difference in acceleration between your head and your feet would be of the order 2e-5 g, so I don't think you'd notice much.

      Perhaps if your habitat was a well-lubricated train you could do it. Certainly there have been very fast electric trains before, and over much longer distances than an 80 mile circuit. I would suggest a hanging monorail design so you could achieve multiple accelerations without having to completely redesign the bank angle every time.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  6. Re:its that time again... by JuzzFunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know who was the first person to welcome our new overlords on slashdot was?
    ...just wondering

    --
    Unexpect the expected!
  7. Larry Niven is wrong by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, Superman Returns proves Larry Niven is wrong.

    His entire argument hinges on the assumption that the Kryptonian nervous system behaves just like the human immune system. Since Superman can see things and react in bullet-time or faster and he can sort out millions of audio signals independently, neither of which a human can do, Niven makes an irrecoverable mistake in his essay. In fact the speed of reaction Superman exhibits is faster than our neurotransmitters can even signal, so Kryptonian neurophysiology has to be completely different, perhaps optical or even quantum in nature. Given that he's powered by the Sun, I'd lean more towards an optical nervous system.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  8. Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by clockwise_music · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Melbourne (Australia), we have an amusement park named "Luna Park" that had a really cool ride called the Gravitron, that looked like this. It was essentially a human sized centrifuge, where you walked in, and lay down against a padded mat that was lying on the wall. Then the ride would start, the thing would speed up and the the g's would start building up and press you against the wall.

    Which enabled you to do stupid things like go upside down and have your face stretched. It was cool and my favourite ride at that age. Perhaps it contributed to my huge bone density and muscle strength of later years :)

    Not sure if it is still there... anyone know? Anyone remember this?

    1. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by D4MO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in one of those for a whole summer once. I was that dude in the centre with the speed button. So I basically spent about 12 hours a day spinning for about 4 months. The trick to not getting totally fucked up was not to move your head outside the plane of rotation. Move head left and right, fine, but if you moved up and down it was trippy. At the end of every ride, someone would always ask why I wasn't sticking to the walls...

      The amusement park was right beside a beach so I'd get chicks coming in with their two piece bikini's. At a certain speed of rotation, the panel you lean against would slide up. At this speed and force, a lot of the women couldn't lift their arms and hands away from beside them - they were as good as pinned down. It took me a few weeks, but I pefected tweaking the speed just right to have those panels slide up and down repeatedly. And in doing so, I managed to "jiggle" many a breast out from under a bikini top!

      Yeah, I'll go to hell, but damn, it made the job worthwhile ;)

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  9. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by BewireNomali · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Agreed. Also, the increased density is in response to the forces from an altered environment. Assuming the organism to be adaptive, then those "powers" would slowly be lost in the earth's environment, no? Akin to the way astronauts lose muscle tissue when they go into space, no matter how much they exercise.

    --
    un burrito me trampeó.
  10. Why we don't do this with people ... by IanDanforth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The attempt has been made to put humans in this kind of plus G environment. People loose so much bone mass during space flight the idea was to build as much bone as possible before leaving earth and then let people fall back to normal.

    Unfortunately our sense of balance is directly tied into G, specifically the acceleration of liquids in one G. When you're in a high G environment your inner ear believes that a small turn of the head is an increadibly rapid and vicious turn. What results is increadible nausea and an inability to function, and since it takes months at high G to build bone this idea is limited in its applications. While people are able to adapt relatively quickly to freefall this is not so easy with Hyper-G.

    -Ian

  11. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Raindance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You've got to think that somewhere in the world atheletes are training using high-G centerfuges. For better or worse, legal or illegal, it'd be effective.

  12. Re:Question... by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chickens can fly

    Not really. Chickens can fly for very short distances and limited heights. They can get over fences and travel maybe 40 feet at a time. After one such "long" flight, they can barely get off the ground and prefer to run.

    they just have their wings clipped to prevent this.

    Chickens that are kept outdoors in pens without high walls have their wings clipped. I don't know what the minimum "safe" wall height is, but most unroofed outdoor pens I've seen use wire mesh about seven feet high. Smaller pens can use shorter walls because the chickens need quite a bit of horizontal room to reach their maximum height above ground. Wing clipping doesn't actually reduce their wings' lift much, mainly it just removes the ends of the primary feathers which are necessary for controlled flight. Chicken flight is pretty erratic and wild at best, and without those feather tips they just can't control it at all.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  13. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Mitch was a really funny guy.

  14. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by localman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good point... of course it depends what context you're in. If your goal is to lift heavy things all things all the time, the extra bulk will be useful all of the time. More realistically if you need to move quickly sometimes, it would becomes a burden. So what's an advantage depends on the needs.

    In fact, since this study indicates our bodies strengthen and weaken based on the average load, I'll go ahead and guess that the size and strength we develop to is "about right" for our particular usage pattern. In other words, going about your day to day activities your body will adjust to "about right" muscle and bone strength, so as to handle most tasks easily and not waste too much effort building infrastructure that won't be needed often if ever.

    Of course, many of us seem to disagree with the natural results. Though in reality I sit at a computer most of the day and have little need for muscular development, I exercise a couple times a week to fool my body into thinking I need a little extra bone and muscle tissue.

    Cheers.

  15. As seen on Seinfeld by dizzy+tunez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does Superman have superhumor? Or, if he became a dad, would he then become Superdad?

    --
    "If you loved me, you`d all kill yourselves today"
    Spider Jerusalem