Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice Gets a Toe-Hold in The Netherlands

ChristW writes "Several sources in The Netherlands report that the city of Groningen will invest 160.000 euros yearly to switch its 3650 computers to OpenOffice. They are saving 330.000 euros per year by making this switch. The other 170.000 euros will be saved up to use for new Microsoft Office licences if it becomes necessary to renew them. The city plans to renew software every 5 years, as opposed to Microsoft, who 'forces' an upgrade cycle of 3 years. Switching from Windows to Linux is not seen as an option at this point in time, so those licenses will be renewed."

84 comments

  1. Good Alternative by D4rk+Fx · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've always found OpenOffice to be a fairly good alternative to the Microsoft Office Suite. The biggest problem I've run into with it is the fact that OO 1 cannot open documents that were saved in OO 2 format. This was originally an issue here at my university because they took quite a while to migrate to OO 2. All the documents I tried transfering one day to print off in the labs had to be converted back to a format that would open on OO 1, which was a PITA to run on several dozen documents.

    As for compatability with Office Documents, I've had some problems when the documents have strange formatting, but it seems to only occur when you try to print out the documents.

    1. Re:Good Alternative by Adelbert · · Score: 4, Interesting
      OO 1 cannot open documents that were saved in OO 2 format

      This is far better than with Office, where not only is it impossible to open later Office documents in earlier versions, but some documents saved in earlier versions cannot be opened in later versions. Also, since the old .doc format is proprietary and closed, it is nigh-on impossible to open old documents without that same old version of Office.

      The Netherlands were right to make this move. OOo is an open format. They will be able to read their documents forevermore, no matter what changes there are in technology and software. And that can only be a good thing.

    2. Re:Good Alternative by McDutchie · · Score: 4, Informative
      The biggest problem I've run into with it is the fact that OO 1 cannot open documents that were saved in OO 2 format.

      OOo 1.1.5 can do this.

    3. Re:Good Alternative by Haeleth · · Score: 0

      This is far better than with Office, where not only is it impossible to open later Office documents in earlier versions

      What? This is totally incorrect. I'm continually opening Office 2000 and Office XP documents in Office 97. Rarely, if ever, do I encounter anything more problematic than an annoying warning that some formatting may be lost (something I've never actually observed happen).

      Of course, OpenOffice.org also opens Office documents very nicely, which is why I prefer to use it when I don't need macro compatibility. However, frequently I do need macros, in which case I am regrettably forced to use MS Office. Which, as I have said, is far more compatible, both forwards and backwards, than the Slashbot hive mind is prepared to acknowledge.

    4. Re:Good Alternative by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      I agree with parent. I edit the same documents using OoO 2.0, Word 2003, and Word 97 without problems. They can all open the same .doc files. I do not use Word's XML document type, however, as I do not see a big advantage in using it.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    5. Re:Good Alternative by DarkestDream · · Score: 0

      i never have a problem opening oo.o2 format in oo.o1. it works fine

    6. Re:Good Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the parent is entirely correct - despite the fact that an anti-MS troll has already jumped in and claimed that this correction is "overrated".

      No mod points today, or I'd try and correct it myself.

      (and yes, this probably is offtopic).

    7. Re:Good Alternative by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      FYI, the big problems are in converting between Office 95 and the newer format, which is shared mostly unchanged in more recent versions as far as we can tell. We did experience this firsthand at work a few years back, and it was a royal PITA.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:Good Alternative by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      OOo is an open format.

      No, OOo is a piece of software. ODF is the format. The two are related, but not exclusively intertwined.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    9. Re:Good Alternative by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      I was a computer lab monitor at my school when most students had office 2000 or XP, and we were still running office 97. If you don't have problems, more power to you. We sure as hell did. Likewise, after we upgraded, there were difficulties with students bringing in office 95-97 files. Compound documents were the worst. Our oncampus quickprint also had these difficulties.

    10. Re:Good Alternative by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      > I'm continually opening Office 2000 and Office XP documents in Office 97.

      Thats because either those documents are saved from within Office 2000 and XP in _Office 97 format_, or your Office 97 has installed the patch that allows it to read Office 2000 documents.

  2. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I speak for every user on Slashdot when I state that I don't care how shitty OpenOffice.org is, as long as it's not made by Microsoft.

    1. Re:Good. by Eighen+Indemnis · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Dogma instead of practicality for end users. Just what we need more of.

    2. Re:Good. by vnangia · · Score: 1

      Then why not use WordPerfect or another proprietary system, also not made by Microsoft?

    3. Re:Good. by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      tisk word Perfect? it might just work, you need microsoft works, completely and utterly useless except of course if you want to be a rebel and don't intend to send your documents to any of your cool (rich) friends with MS office.

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    4. Re:Good. by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      This dogma is practicle. Competition is a good thing.

    5. Re:Good. by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      Yes but if you focus on the dogma rather than trying to improve the competing software you loose out in the end, the focus of the open office team should be to meet and excede the microsoft counterpart, if you focus on "we're not microsoft" than you loose out in the end.

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    6. Re:Good. by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Damn it, spelled practical wrong. Now some grammar nazi is going to hunt me down.

    7. Re:Good. by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Very true. The people who are here posting "anything's better than Microsoft" aren't from the OpenOffice.org team (I assume). They're just spectators. And in that case this dogma is fair.

    8. Re:Good. by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except for the Slashdot users who have to communicate with people without Slashdot accounts.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    9. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too expensive. OpenOffice.org costs only 90 cents.

    10. Re:Good. by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

      lol. (In Brainy Smurf's voice) Technically a spelling mistake has nothing to do with grammer...

      --
      ========
      77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
    11. Re:Good. by kimvette · · Score: 1

      You don't speak for me. I didn't remove Office 2000 from my Linux box until well after OOo 2.0 (well, beta 1.9.x builds at the time) became usable and stable (interestingly enough, I found Microsoft Office ran faster under wine than natively under Windows). If Microsoft were to release M$ Office for Linux, and not DRM it to death with Activation and not try to vendor-lock users to their formats, I would probably STILL buy it even though I like Open Office a LOT. I know VBA and the IDE for VBA is very similar to Visual Studio in terms of use and code completion. That right there is a major advantage M$ Office has over OOo. I've only done very small macros in OOo because I haven't had the time to RTFM and the lack of code completion and with OOo's site having been down when I wanted/Needed to create some macros for data manipulation I had to go to a Windows box and M$ Excel to do the work instead.

      I dislike Microsoft's business practices, their embracing of DRM, and their current "every customer is a crook" philosophy, but I don't drink OSS-flavoured kool aid. When Microsoft does something right, or when they offer a good product, I'm quick to look into it as a solution for either my company or for clients. Linux/BSD/OOo.org/other OSS is not always the best solution for every person/business in every situation. Ideally at least the content|document|data will be open and not emcumbered by vendor lock or DRM but unfortunately that is not always avoidable.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:Good. by wrfelts · · Score: 1

      My dogma will catch and EAT your catma!

  3. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    'OpenOffice Gets a Toe-Hold in The Netherlands'

    Its better than getting toed in the never reqions.

    1. Re:Well by Mr.+Burrito · · Score: 1

      Or toes grabbing a-hold of your nether regions.

  4. Not clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are they saving for new Microsoft Office licences while users get familiar with Open Office ?
    Unless their migration process takes longer than three years...

    1. Re:Not clear by fullphaser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because if Open Office does blow up in their face they want to have the money in reserve to go ahead and make the switch back, just a huge backup plan if you will, not about familiarity, just they don't trust open office enough to put all their (what is it "eggs in one basket"?).

      --
      Did someone say cake?
  5. This was covered by a local magazine For IT pros by scenestar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dutch people care very little about buzzwords and corporate promises.

    If something is cheaper and does the same thing our cultural cheapness kicks in and ditches the old crap.

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
  6. Hmm? by fullphaser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Open office might actually be the first really usable alternative to the whole windows schema in the cooperate world, right now Thunderbird, Linux, and Firefox (along with big open source themed software) aren't quite compatible with the features that are used all to often in the cooperate world where plugins are developed only for MS products,

    With open office there aren't to many critical plugins that are required for every day use in the office (atleast not where I am from) so it might be the first Open Source product do to its ability to save documents and open them in the MS formats that really transitions well

    plus being free and until recently without even a whisper of a virus an excellent alternative to the all powerful (and always needed it seems) MS office suite. Now if the gimp could match photoshop in ease of use we might be there

    --
    Did someone say cake?
    1. Re:Hmm? by chiller2 · · Score: 1

      Using semi-colons instead of commas in formulas isn't a good way for OO Calc to supplant Excel! Try and create a CSV file with a formula in and make it work in both apps. You can't, and have to create two distinct versions of the file. I don't think the brainiac coder behind that decision considered that companies still have to exchange documents with those still using MS Office. It's stupid things like this that hamper adoption attempts.

      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
    2. Re:Hmm? by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      Well, thats the thing, Open Office is going to have to stop trying to different in any way from MS. their core functionality should be the entirety of the MS office suite functionality, if they truely want to be recognized it should not only be as good, but it should be better, it should match an MS office product toe for toe and then some, by programming in known issues and conflicts they only strengthen microsoft.

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    3. Re:Hmm? by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      There actually are a lot of add-ins providing custom Office solutions out there, but the real deal breaker for most corporate customers remains the feature set. OpenOffice.org just lacks many of the more advanced features (and in some cases basic features) found in MS Office that certain business rely on. This is particularly true for spreadsheet software, with Excel still miles ahead of Calc in areas like available formulas, pivot tables and even performance.

    4. Re:Hmm? by cdevos · · Score: 1
      Now if the gimp could match photoshop in ease of use we might be there
      Check out http://www.gimpshop.net/
    5. Re:Hmm? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I went back for my MBA I found that there were issues using Calc while the textbooks were all Excel based. Gnumeric, on the other hand, never once failed. (It also exports to LaTeX.) There were no financial nor statistical formulas that I found missing, and Gnumeric's solver kicked ass for optimizations. The python interface also kicks ass, as does the R interface if you ever get serious about statistics. Excel is certainly miles ahead in terms of secretary adoption, but I doubt any serious analyst or accuary would consider Excel "miles ahead" of Gnumeric. I sure don't :-)

  7. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by krell · · Score: 0

    just keep your finger in the dyke.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  8. Meanwhile, in Paris by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meanwhile, Paris may put their deployment on hold because the French Ministry of Defense says it falls short in the area of security. Specifically they can get malicious macro code to execute with no user warning. Microsoft Office, on the other hand, annoys you at every chance that a macro will run. Fortunately the lab is actually working with OpenOffice.org to have the issues resolved.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, in Paris by Clovert+Agent · · Score: 1

      Good! That's excellent feedback! With big rollouts riding on items like this, that sort of feedback will spur the developers to build in whatever features are desired. And then the product gets more widely deployed and the rest of us get an even better suite.

      Macro warnings should be a trivial fix, after all, and it /is/ a useful security flag for many users.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, in Paris by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1
      From the same article:
      Lt. Col. Filiol notes that the problems are conceptual, rather than due to sloppy coding. "We did not exploit security holes," he said.
      Unfortunately the report is classified, so all we know are rumors regarding the allegations. It appears that
      In some instances, malevolent macros were considered to be secure by the open-source package, and as a result, users were not informed when they were executed.
      Does this relate to trusting a URL? Or all the macros in a directory, perhaps?
    3. Re:Meanwhile, in Paris by Trelane · · Score: 2, Informative

      A related link: OpenOffice's response

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    4. Re:Meanwhile, in Paris by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Because I know you're waiting with bated breath for updates, here's more info, this time from someone directly involved, with more information. Blog posting from a Sun employee

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  9. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About 3 years ago, at work (a Dutch semi-government company) we decided to switch from MS Office to OpenOffice.
    Version 1.0.1 was installed on all workstations (before, only part of the workstations had MS Office because it was too expensive).

    It was used for about a year, but there were continuing complaints from people who "knew how to work with MS Office and had no time to learn OpenOffice".
    Those were often higher-paid employees and external consultants working in the company, and when their claims about lost hours were really true, one could argue that no money was ever saved by switching.

    It was decided to go back to MS Office and buy extra licenses for the remainder of the systems.
    OpenOffice is still installed, and sometimes it is useful (and used) for things like converting to PDF or repairing documents that make MS Office crash, but it no longer is the generally used package.

    This clearly shows the effectiviness of "student licenses" and other pricing schemes: by making sure that the average person "knows how to use Office" (I type it in quotes because I believe the average knowledge of Office features is only skin-deep, maybe "familiar with" is a better description) you can frustrate any attempt to switch to other packages.

    I guess the Groningen people will also meet this obstacle.

  10. Good converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OpenOffice can be used as a great converter.
    For instance, by creating the appropriate routines with your favorite 3G language, one can generate/manipulate existing OpenOffice documents (a set of XML files archived in common ZIP format) to generate reports. Then, using the UNO API, create a simple application that controls an OpenOffice process running in the background, feed it with the manipulated documents and tell it to save in the desired format (MS Word, MS Excel, PDF, depending on the type of report). Totally custom, a developer's dream.

    Sure, it still needs a bit of improvement. Namely concerning CPU and memory usage, but try to do the above using M$ Products...

    1. Re:Good converter by Otter · · Score: 1

      I think we can expect to be seeing this on The Daily WTF in two or three years. "When Jeff was assigned to maintain a system that produced Excel reports from a database, he never imagined..."

    2. Re:Good converter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use vba with our cad program to open up word/excel documents in the background, put stuff in them retrive stuff, create charts and summaries from them and save them as word/excel files, text files etc all from within the cad program. May not be totally custom, but it works(for varying definitions of works).

    3. Re:Good converter by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      I'm not that big a fan of OpenOffice, mostly because it's big and slow, but I keep it around because it can open MS Office files that have suffered some kind of corruption and generally save them again in an uncorrupted form without much if any loss of data. If nothing else, it's worth having around for that alone, especially if you're in an environment using Office 97, which is particularly prone to this kind of problem.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  11. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she won't allow that.

  12. The difference between me and the dutch by nFriedly · · Score: 0

    See, the dutch are switching because they're frugal.

    I, OTOH, do it because it's easy to get. I own a few coppies of office, but finding the cd's in my closet would probably take longer than downloading the 200megs or whatever OO.o is.

    OO.o has worked just fine for all of my school needs and I don't intend to buy any more coppies of office.

  13. More likely a grammar ninja by blueZ3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There impossible to sea until

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  14. "Force" an upgrade? by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe I missed it, but I don't see how Microsoft can "force" someone to upgrade after three years. Just because they come out with a new version doesn't mean you have to run out and buy it. If you only want to buy every five years, just buy every five years and ignore the release cycle. Is there something I'm missing?

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      Ever tried to Open a MS Office 2003 document with MS Office 2003 features embedded in it in MS office 2000?

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    2. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Yes, and unsurprisingly the Office-2003-specific features don't work. But if my office is using Office 2000, is that such a huge concern? And how is this any different than with OO.o? Can you open OO.o version 2 documents in OO.o version 1 and still use all the version 2 features? Or at all, for that matter?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    3. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by mspohr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Corporate site licenses expire and need to be renewed.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Overigens kan de gemeente Groningen de huidige versie van Office die het gebruikt, ook na afloop van het contract blijven gebruiken."

      So in this case, "Corporate site licenses expire and need to be renewed" is not correct.

    5. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it's called "Software Assurance." It is not possible to get upgrade pricing with Microsoft open licensing. You are either required to purchase SA with your licenses, or buy future licenses at full price. This keeps you locked in. Sometimes you save money if the next version comes out before your SA expires and your company decides it wants the new features. Sometimes you don't save money if you decide that you don't need the next version, or there's a lovely four year gap between versions and your SA is only good for 2 years.

      It works because if you *could* have saved a lot of money but chose not to, then you're going to look like a serious idiot. If you don't save money but pretty much break even, you stay off the CFO's radar. So you might as well purchase SA, with the one serious drawback being that you're stuck with MS Office because you've not only paid for it, but you've prepaid for the next version. Bonk.

      This doesn't affect individual users. It also doesn't affect companies that are quite content using very old versions of MS Office.

    6. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      Yes but it doesn't work like that in the cooperate world, they get a new feature to play with, and they play with it, and you better have the equivilant software to read it or else you won't be seeing what you were sent. It is because if one company buys it, in order to read what that company sends, all the companies out there have to buy it, because that first company is going to being to send out its documents with all kinds of fancy features

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    7. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something along the lines of "...they can continue to run the original version of Office with the old contract staying in use".

      Sorry, I can order beer and a ham and cheese sandwich in Dutch but not a lot else....

    8. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      You don't have to buy SA, though. Many companies don't (although one of the articles says that they're not renewing a "running contract with Microsoft", none of the linked articles directly say "forced renewal after 3 years").

      They do say that they're spending 160k on OO instead of 330k on Office, thus saving 170k. They also each say that "we're not going to move to Linux" as well...

      330k is about 90 Euro a desktop. Anyone care to comment whether 90 Euro is about right for Office at this volume after haggling, and whether that would include SA or not? I'd have guessed that it would have been maybe a bit low but pretty close to a purchase price (without SA), but quite a lot for an annual fee.

      Apparently there have been other projects in other local authorities in Groningen province (the city of Groningen itself is the biggest city in Groningen province):
      http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:BzxPzhhUBLoJ:eu ropa.eu.int/ida/en/document/3393/470+groningen+ope noffice&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=7&lr=lang_en&client =firefox-a
      (google cache link because the original's moved).

    9. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      So is the advantage of OpenOffice.org here that it's not going to have any new features?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    10. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by kimvette · · Score: 1
      Can you open OO.o version 2 documents in OO.o version 1 and still use all the version 2 features? Or at all, for that matter?


      No, but on the other hand, OOo does not set one back $400-$500 per seat either, and you're not forced to use OOo, you can choose koffice, wordperfect office, etc. instead.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    11. Re:"Force" an upgrade? by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that, because it's free and open source/open format, it costs (hundreds of dollars per seat) less to upgrade to the latest version and there's a much greater chance that someone will produce a latest-version-compatible import utility for older versions of OO.o.

      For example, I believe OO.o 1.1.5 opens OO.o 2 files, but have you tried opening Office 2003 files in Office 2000? And since it's closed-source, you can't even scratch your own itch.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  15. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

    Why am I reminded of those articles that seem to come up every year in the Netherlands about somebody who got trampled by bargain hunting shoppers?

  16. English Please by canfirman · · Score: 1

    Could somebody please post english translations of the articles? Thanks.

    --
    It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
    1. Re:English Please by mikevdg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure. The Telegraaf article:

      Groningen migrates to OpenOffice

      The Groningen city council is the first large city council to start making use of OpenOffice. In this way, a savings of 330,000 Euro are expected that would otherwise be used to pay license costs. The councillers decided yesterday evening that the contract with Microsoft for the Microsoft Office software suite that has expired in the last month would not be extended.

      The contract with Microsoft for the operating system Windows will however be extended. The city Groningen has around 181,000 citizens, and the city council runs around 3650 PCs. A few years ago, [the city council] began a study to determine the feasibility of using Open Standards and Open Source Software. The reason for this study was to break through the monopoly of the large software providers, and that [people wanted programs to become less dependant on that] (?).

      Still no migration to Linux

      OpenOffice will be installed on Windows in Groningen. The results of the study showed that a complete migration to another open platform such as Linux is not yet possible. The council has recommended that work-places in Groningen should make as much use of software that will run on both Windows and Linux. This would make the migration to Linux easier at a later stage.

      Money bags

      A large part of the money saved from using OpenOffice will be held in reserve for possible purchases of Microsoft licenses. This is to avoid the risk that the general accounts of the city council will be needed to be used for purchasing licenses for those to refuse to budge from Microsoft Office. The amount of money held in reserve is likely to be around the 170,000 mark.

      Another 78,450 Euro will be used to finance a migration team that will prepare for the migration to an operating-system independant workplace.

  17. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by Tom · · Score: 1

    It was used for about a year, but there were continuing complaints from people who "knew how to work with MS Office and had no time to learn OpenOffice".
    Those were often higher-paid employees and external consultants working in the company, and when their claims about lost hours were really true, one could argue that no money was ever saved by switching.


    The ugly truth of a monopoly, yes. Specifically requiring OpenOffice knowledge would eliminate that problem, and especially with regards to consultants, it is very possible to do so. Otherwise, negotiate a lower fee, to make up for the additional time and reduced quality of whatever documentation they deliver in the system they claim to be unfamiliar with.

    I have no mercy for consultants. Make it their problem, not yours.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  18. I'm from the Netherlands.... by DohnJoe · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey, I'm from the Netherlands -- yes, you may touch me...

  19. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    It was used for about a year, but there were continuing complaints from people who "knew how to work with MS Office and had no time to learn OpenOffice".
    Those were often higher-paid employees and external consultants working in the company, and when their claims about lost hours were really true, one could argue that no money was ever saved by switching.


    It will be interesting how they rationalize Office 12's new interface (the Ribbon paradigm).

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  20. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by LocoMan · · Score: 1

    Most likely they will include a "look how easy it is to use the new office" video with each version of Office 12 like they did with Windows 95... or at least to OEMs, I remember we got them when we bought the OEM 5 packs of 95 and 98 back then.

    We (family) used to run a net cafe that sold and fixed computers on the side, and I do remember that CD being rather nice introducing people to windows, it even created a kind of sandboxed desktop where the user could do whatever they wanted while it ran and then reverted it back to where it was before using it. We had people renting the computers just to use that CD back then... :)

    No idea if they have done anything like that with office, though... I really stopped using office after college, and OO is enough for the very little word processing I do these days (mostle a letter here and there).

  21. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by westlake · · Score: 1
    The ugly truth of a monopoly, yes. Specifically requiring OpenOffice knowledge would eliminate that problem

    There isn't a high school, inner city public library, community college, university, labor union, or social services program within one hundred miles that doesn't offer courses in MS Office. Local employers continue to ssek out and hire workers trained in Office and with a huge, experienced, labor pool on which to draw, they have little incentive to switch.

  22. Wouldn't know why they can't switch from Windows.. by dascandy · · Score: 1

    Especially since their URL starts with /Exe/ZyNET.exe/00000N0J.txt?Z....

  23. I suspect I speak for more than a few users on Slashdot when I state that I don't care how cheap OpenOffice is, as long as it's nowhere near as good as MS Office.

    We've had this discussion a thousand times under past articles, and there are a few things that ring true every time. One is that the entirely objective list of bugs in OpenOffice is not trivial, and likewise for major functionality gaps compared to the Microsoft incumbent. Another is that the cost of switch is not zero, because of the retraining issues, and the lower efficiency in using a program with poor usability and help features.

    Why would you think you speak for every Slashdot user when you advocate using an inferior piece of software, just because it's cheap or from someone other than Microsoft?

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Why? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually Microsoft has the worst help system I've had to deal with, and it seems to be getting worse rather than better. I don't know what sort of users they are targeting, but the usability was better in Office 97 than 2000, and Office XP just totally sucks. I feel I'm wasting time, since I can google answers that are actually relevant.

    2. Re:Why? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Could you please name any product which offers better online help than Microsoft's?

      Let's ignore the annoying clippy/office assistant, he doesn't count.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Why? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      If by "online help" you are referring to the fact that MS help now wants to show you www links which aren't relevant, this is part of the problem. If by "online" you mean locally online, then almost everything I've used has better help than the current MS help. I always click on Help, first, but it is just a waste of time. I can find answers that are relevant using google. In terms of decent help systems, Mathematica is excellent. Eclipse is fantastic. The octave info files are extraordinarily informative, although their are better info browsers than info. KDE has a nice help system. I tend to work with Kile (LaTeX to PDF) which has very good help, including a LaTeX reference, or Quanta (for HTML). I can find the information I need with these systems.

      I agree to not count clippy against MS help because he really doesn't count. I also admit that back around Office 95 MS Help wasn't so frustrating, and the early days of Linux help (man pages? but all I want is to know how the hell I change the margins!) wasn't what I needed. These days it seems that even as Linux has adapted the GUI feel of modern help systems (JHelp looks just like WinHelp, for instance, which incidently looks like the KDE Help Center), the difference is compounded by *content*. Either MS Help files are no longer indexed in a way that I can find what I need, or it just isn't there. KDE help, during the period of MS's decline, has radically improved.

      Now if by "online help" you mean the Microsoft Developer's Network, I have to admit there is a lot of information there. This isn't really what most people mean, though, regarding an application's Help button. The allegation I heard on my way to my CS degree was that MS's documentation was so sorry because they didn't want to step on the toes of third party howto book writers. This might be cynical but it would explain the situation :-)

  24. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that a little odd. I've been using Office quite extensively since the olden days and switching to OpenOffice 2 was pretty much a trivial task. OpenOffice does a great job at cloning much of the interface and functionality of MS Office, and Microsoft hasn't really made any significant changes to its Office interface for many years (with the exception of the new Ribbon stuff coming along).

    It sounds like, to me, that those employees were/are simply lazy.

  25. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Most likely they will include a "look how easy it is to use the new office" video with each version of Office 12"

    And that is why half the savings will be spent on retraining the users.

  26. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

    My response would be; "So you're saying you only have the mental capacity to handle one word processor? Says a lot about the quality of work I can expect from you, doesn't it?"

    Heh, a good shameing can do wonders.

    --
    The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  27. English Translation of article by AlXtreme · · Score: 2, Informative
    Translated from the Televaag, sorry for any grammar errors:

    The municipality of Groningen is going to be the first major municipality in the Netherlands to use OpenOffice. This way 330.000 euros will be saved on licencing costs. The council of Groningen agreed yesterdayevening to let the contract with Microsoft for Microsoft Office expire.

    The contract with Microsoft for the operatingsystem Windows will be renewed. Groningen counts about 181.000 inhabitants and the municipality itself has about 3650 pc's internally. In Groningen people started investigating the possibilities of using Open Standards and Open Source Software after requests from the council. The reason of this investigation was that they wanted to break the monopoly of large software suppliers and that they didn't want to depend on them for changes to their software.

    No switch to Linux

    OpenOffice will be installed under Windows in Groningen. From the investigation it became clear that a total switch to an Open platform like Linux currently isn't a viable choice. The municipality does say to strive that workstations in Groningen will run as much software as possible that runs on both Windows and Linux. At a later point in time the switch to Linux would then be easier.

    Because they want to avoid the risk of having to ask for general municipality funds if the switch backfires and they want to switch back to Microsoft Office, a large portion (170.000 euros) of the funds will be saved in a "Microsoftlicences" account.

    The remainder of the funds (78.450 euros) will be used to form a migrationteam that will start with the preperations of switching to operating-system independent workstations.

    --
    This sig is intentionally left blank
  28. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    This clearly shows the effectiviness of "student licenses" and other pricing schemes

    What it clearly shows is the ineffectiveness of the training those people received. We need to move away from teaching "Microsoft Word 101" and teach people how to use programs in a general sense. Throw them in an environment that randomizes the experience. One day they're using WordPerfect in Windows, the next day, Word in OSX, the next day AbiWord in Linux. By the time they finish the class, it shouldn't matter what platform they're on or what applications are available. They should be able to sit down and type a letter without saying, "Where's the Word icon. In the class, it was the third one down on the left. I don't see it here."

  29. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    I fully agree with that. It also has always been my standpoint in this matter.
    I had no say in the original decision to go for OpenOffice, and I believed it was a bold move.
    The general state of "computer education for the end-user" is quite sad. Indeed, focus is so much on a single environment that people think they know a lot, while in fact they only learned a bag of tricks.

    However, after seeing how common this problem was in our organization, I think anyone trying to make this switch will be in for quite a rough time.

  30. translation of Webwereld article by morie · · Score: 1

    july 20th 2006, 14:04 - The city of Groningen wednesday agreed to a proposal to switch from Microsoft Office to the free OpenOffice suite.

    by not renewing the current contract with Microsoft for the use of Office, the city safes 330.000 euro a year. This is based on licences for the 3650 PCs the city was using three years ago when the contract was signed.

    Groningen wants to gradually move to open-sourcesoftware. The contract with Microsoft for the use of Windows will be renewed, because a switch to Linux would "not yet be opportune", according to the counsil.

    The city of Groningen will use the money that was safed by not renewing the Office contract for the creation of a 'transition-team' that will concern itself with the transition to Openoffice.org and other open-sourcesoftware. Main task for this team is the preparation for a operating system independent workspace.

    160.000 euro a year is freed for the transition, the other 170.000 euro the city saves yearly will be used to create a fund in case the city wishes to acquire the Microsoft licences after all.

    Victory

    According to Valentijn Sessink of Openoffice.nl, supplier of open-sourcesoftware, spending the money safed in the migration is important. "I feel the biggest victory is that the money that is safed will indeed be used to make the transition to open-sourcesoftware", says Sessink.

    Sessink believes the renewal of the Windows-contract might not have been necessary. "Practically al ne PCs you buy have Windows pre-installed. Why would you pay so much money for a contract with Microsoft?"

    "Prolonging a licenseagreement yields very little strategically. The treacherous part is that the "software-assurance" limits your freedom of choice of software to run on your PC" states Sessink to Webwereld.

    also, the city of Groningen has a 5-year replacement cycle for is software, while Microsoft has a 3-year cycle for Office. This also makes the agreement inefficient.

    The city of Groningen will still be able to use the current version of Office it is using, even after the contract ends. The contract with Microsoft, the software-assurance, added user support and the right to run new versions of Office. Ending the contract therefore has no influence on already purchased versions. The city of Groningen therefore has plenty of time to prepare for the switch to Openoffice.org.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  31. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by AVee · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting how they rationalize Office 12's new interface (the Ribbon paradigm).

    They don't. Thats just a regular upgrade and support is about to end bla bla...
    Now switching to Open-Office is major, i mean, it's not like the Open, Save and other much used functions are simply in the same place in a totally different application.

    It's all mindset, habit and above all fear of change.

  32. Re:This was covered by a local magazine For IT pro by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    it's not like the Open, Save and other much used functions are simply in the same place in a totally different application. :) Well thank God the trained monkeys won't get confused by something different in their title bar. I guess it's true what they say about the value of a college degree these days.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)