Slashdot Mirror


Cyberwar on NASA Websites

Vexorian writes "Two NASA websites were hacked today by a group of Chilean activist hackers. The reason was to protest against the war on Lebanon. The mirror of the defaced site contains an image of an injured child and claims that the sites were running MacOSX."

90 of 737 comments (clear)

  1. I, for one... by metasecure · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Chilean activist overlords.

    1. Re:I, for one... by acoster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right... and defacing a NASA website for sure is a good way to "do some good".

      Although some say that only active protesting works, I'm sure they didn't mean to sit on your chair and "h4x0r" some sites. Actually it's pretty sad to see one defacing websites in name of "peace and justice". It also concerns when someone say thats hacktivism, as it can create a bad impression about legit hacktivism activities (such as providing privacy for people in China, etc.).

      --
      "Go forth, and be excellent to each other" --Bill & Ted
  2. And now... by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This group goes with the others that in last days carried out attacks against governmental and commercial websites both from America and Israel, whereas other blackhat groups attacked Israeli websites provoking a denial of service (DDoS) of that particular webpage.

    On the one hand, this is news; NASA is a big target. On the other hand, why are we posting a link to the defacement? We don't need to see it -- just report the story.

    Look, I seriously doubt you're going to find that many people who think the war in Lebanon is a good thing, besides anyone with a vendetta against the Lebanese or the people selling bombs and rockets. You want to protest the war, fine -- but don't exepct me to care what you have to say when you can't make your voice heard in a public and legal forum. Defacing a website, any web site, is not the way to make me feel sympathy for your point of view.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:And now... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > [...] why are we posting a link to the defacement? We don't need to see it -- just report the story.

      We don't particularly need not to see it. So, why not?

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      for that matter, what forum does *anyone* have in america to have their voices heard

      Their own website?

    3. Re:And now... by Instine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod up^

      This is entirely the issue. If the government punishes and hides dissident remarks, then the people will find a platform for their voice.

      Here in the UK (sorry I started my last post like this, but its where I am), the vast majority opposed the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. When Iraq kicked off, a MILLION people marched. For a small island, that's a lot of people marching. And yet Tony the Marvellous still blundered off, on the coat tails of Bush. What are we supposed to do? How are the people supposed to protect themselves against the actions of their owngovernment, without breaking the law. The government MAKES the law. And is doing so at an alarming rate. It is inevitable that this form of action, and worse, will happen. If the Government fails to listen to the voice of the people. And they're already ignoring us.

      --
      Because you can - or because you should?
    4. Re:And now... by samkass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hezbollah, which is part of the Lebanese government, launched crossborder raids and fairly advanced rockets on civilian targets many miles inside Israel.

      And Israel has done the same to Lebanon. Remember, Hezbollah only EXISTS because of Israel's invasion of Lebanon decades ago. They reap what they sow.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    5. Re:And now... by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So the world says to Israel: "Leave Lebanon and you'll have peace."

      So they left Lebanon, but they didn't get peace.

      So the world said "leave the 'occupied' territories and you'll have peace." (although they don't answer the question of why Israel was attacked BEFORE they occupied those territories, but common sense and "peace at any cost" often don't go together).

      So they left the occupied territories and didn't get peace.

      The U.N. security council resolves that Hezbollah must disarm and, as usual, are laughed at and ignored by the perpetrators. U.N. "peacekeepers" have done nothing in Lebanon over five years.

      The world is full of dumbass do-gooders who have no idea what they are talking about and have ridiculously short memories. These people have promised over and over again to completely destroy Israel. They hate jews, period. The leaders in Iran have said no less than that they desire the utter destruction of Israel, that there will be no peace while Israel exists.

      So Iran backed Hezbollah CROSSES THE BORDER INTO ISRAEL and kidnaps it citizens.

      Israel is not attacking Lebanon, they are attacking Hezbollah who, like the cowards they are, hide (sometime forcibly) amongst the civilians, the women, the children, so that when there is collateral damage during an attack on Hezbollah targets the media instantly reports that Israel is bombing women and children. They do it on purpose. Sometimes they physically restrict people from fleeing to act as UNWILLING human shields.

      And the media makes some sort of moral equivalence between targetted bombing with collateral damage, and what Hezbolah does - which is lobbing missiles into Israeli cities TRYING to kill women and children.

      I can't believe the appeasers of the world are going to let scumbag terrorists pull this crap and then sympathize with them. Unbelievable.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:And now... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Informative

      And Israel invaded Lebanon because they Syrians and other nations used to to stage attacks on Israel. And they are staging attacks on Israel because Israel invaded their lands. And Israel invaded their lands because they attack Israel. And they attacked Israel because they didn't think that the UN should have made that a Jewish home land after WII. And UN made it a Jewish homeland at the same time it was creating countries out of what UK had taken from the Austria-Hungarian Empire in WWI! And they took it from....
      Let's all be honest. Blame Italy. It is all their fault.
      If ROME had not invaded Israel and destroyed the temple none of this would have happened.
      Damn Italians.
      Anybody that thinks that they state who is to blame and who is right and who is wrong in just a few sentances doesn't know what they are talking about. I sure can't say who is right and who is wrong. I lean towards Israel in this case just on motivation. Israel wants to stop attacks on people in Israel. Hezbollah wants to kill as many people in Israel as they can. Even that is just a guess. Like I said I don't know who is too blame. I only know who is suffering.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:And now... by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't seriously expect to make a moral equivilence between civil disobedience to stand up for your rights, and defacing somebody elses property simply because no wants to listen to you?

      We're still confusing free speech with making people listen to you? Let me tell you something, somebody interrupts the Simpsons or 24 by forcing their pirate broadcast on me because no one was reading their website, and I say "death penalty".

      What about NASA's right to free speech? Somebody took that away, too.

      The was not civil disobedience, this was grafiti - defacement of someone elses property, something they will need to take time and money to fix. This is not refusing to give up your seat on a bus. By making the comparison, you're disrespecting all those people who stood up for their civil rights.

      So, I guess what you're saying is that these people, who could have created their own website, were justified by defacing NASAs because no one would have read theirs. Yes, I think that's what a lot of people here are arguing.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:And now... by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? None of them at all? They haven't aquiesced at all, then?

      If we trace these conflicts all the way back to the beginning, we see that, where land was taken, Israel was NEVER the agressor.

      That being said, Israel has done the MOST in trying to develop a lasting peace, and every time they give something up, they are ultimately punished for it. And all the world ever says is "just a little more..."

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    9. Re:And now... by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you are a jerk. I'll fight for your right to free speech, but I'll fight against anybody who defaces somebody elses property (thus taking away their free speech), and I'll fight against anybody who thinks they have a RIGHT to a forum for their speech.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:And now... by MickDownUnder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reading the comments on Slashdot gives me great insight as to how the USA could possibly support the GENOCIDE that is occuring in Lebannon today. This bullocks gets rated informative.....

      Here's real information...

      This all started because on the 25th of June (right in the middle of the World cup) ISRAEL invaded sovereign palestinian territory and seized two member of hamas, this little fact has not been broadly publicised by an extremely Israeli biased media. Then on 26th of June Hamas retaliated by launching a similiar raid into Israel capturing Corporal Shalit, this was of course very well publicised, most think this was an unprovoked act of agression on behalf of Hamas in actual fact it was not.

      Israel then proceeded to bomb everything the palestinian state had of value as well as arresting most of the democratically elected representatives of the Palestinian people. This pissed off many people, most noteably Hezbollah, Iran and Syria, they then launched another raid on Israel, in which two more soldiers were captured. Israel took this as an excuse to acheive political goals in lebanon, through sheer brute, murderous force. Israel is currently attempting to create a "buffer zone" for itself in lebannon... in other words they're going to drive out or kill everyone in southern lebannon within some arbitary distance from the Israeli border (we're not talking 2 or 3 km here... try 100-200km). International law classifies this sort of act as an act of genoicide.

      Slashdot prides itself on having the inside scoop, being one step ahead of big brother... but in actuality it's been totally silent, not one single article has been published in Slashdot's political section on Palestine or Lebannon. Slashdot is suppose to report stuff that matters, how can whats going on in terms of such blatant media bias and misrepresentation of what's actually going on in the middle east be of no importance ?

    11. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, what have the romans ever done for them?

    12. Re:And now... by edumacator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You might be right, and I don't have the time to check your facts or dig beyond them at the moment. But don't you think this is about more than that?

      It's easy to look at this from one side or the other, but reality is rarely clean and neat with one party being right and the other totally wrong. I would venture a guess that the Hamas leaders that Israel took were probably involved with plotting against Israel. It's also certainly a valid position to say those men had a right to defend their homeland. I have issues with the lobbing of missiles indiscrimately into a country where only civilians are hurt. And yes, Israel certainly has hit quite a lot of civilians too. But my point is that going back and trying to say, "This is ___________ fault," is counterproductive.

      Right or wrong, Israel has done some crappy things to Palestinians, and the Palestinians have done some terrible things to Israel, but they need to move forward with where they are now. The real culprits are the ones, on both sides, who are so entrenched in their hate for the other, that they will never stop fighting, and will work to keep peace from rooting itself in the region.

    13. Re:And now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't normally feed the trolls, but this one is just silly.

      UN Resolutions Against Israel, 1955-1992

      1. Resolution 106: "...'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid"
      2. Resolution 111: "...'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people"
      3. Resolution 127: "...'recommends' Israel suspend its 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem"
      4. Resolution 162: "...'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions"
      5. Resolution 171: "...determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria"
      6. Resolution 228: "...'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control"
      7. Resolution 237: "...'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees"
      8. Resolution 248: "...'condemns' Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan"
      9. Resolution 250: "...'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem"
      10. Resolution 251: "...'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250"
      11. Resolution 252: "...'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital"
      12. Resolution 256: "...'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation"
      13. Resolution 259: "...'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation"
      14. Resolution 262: "...'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport"
      15. Resolution 265: "...'condemns' Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan"
      16. Resolution 267: "...'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem"
      17. Resolution 270: "...'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon"
      18. Resolution 271: "...'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem"
      19. Resolution 279: "...'demands' withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon"
      20. Resolution 280: "....'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon"
      21. Resolution 285: "...'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon"
      22. Resolution 298: "...'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem"
      23. Resolution 313: "...'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon"
      24. Resolution 316: "...'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon"
      25. Resolution 317: "...'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon"
      26. Resolution 332: "...'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon"
      27. Resolution 337: "...'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty"
      28. Resolution 347: "...'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon"
      29. Resolution 425: "...'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon"
      30. Resolution 427: "...'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon'
      31. Resolution 444: "...'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces"
      32. Resolution 446: "...'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention"
      33. Resolution 450: "...'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon"
      34. Resolution 452: "...'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories"
      35. Resolution 465: "...'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements program"
      36. Resolution 467: "...'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon"
      37. Resolution 468: "...'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge

    14. Re:And now... by MickDownUnder · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have issues with the lobbing of missiles indiscrimately into a country where only civilians are hurt

      Do you have issue with the dropping of 500lb laser guided bombs on to multi-story apartment blocks ?

      Hezbollah only started it's rocket attacks when Israel began bombing civilians in Lebanon.

  3. Why is this news? by Aaron+England · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hacktivist hacks happen all the time. Is someone trolling for an Israeli-Lebanon Conflict discussion?

    1. Re:Why is this news? by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hacktivist hacks happen all the time. Is someone trolling for an Israeli-Lebanon Conflict discussion?
      Hacking a NASA page is a fairly important story. But why not start an Israeli-Lebanon discussion? There is a politics section.
  4. Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! by Eudial · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arabs? Chile is in South America for crying out loud!

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  5. OS X hacked or the Web Application by mitchell_pgh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is not clear is... did they hack OS X or simply hack a web application running on OS X. I wouldn't say "Linux was hacked" if I was running an insecure forum or blog. The information is VERY thin, but I'm interested to see if OS really was hacked.

    1. Re:OS X hacked or the Web Application by delire · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to TFA it was an SQL Injection attack.
      Today two NASA websites were attacked as well. The intrusion was carried out by the Chilean group of crackers known as Byond Hackers Crew through a leak in the SQL Injection they entered the system and subtracted user names, passwords and e-mails from the NASA web server.
      As much as OSX on a server is a contradiction of terms at the best of times, this wasn't an OS level exploit.
    2. Re:OS X hacked or the Web Application by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read their site, they used SQL Injection techniques to get the admin passwords and usernames.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:OS X hacked or the Web Application by laffer1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      OS X server may have a lot of problems, but its not insecure. (provided you use the LATEST version) The problem with OS X server is that apple doesn't like to patch old versions. For instance, a 10.2 server can be crashed easily if its running the built in samba. Exploits will kill an xserve very quickly. They are also a pain to administer, very bad things happen if the reverse dns is changed in 10.4 server, and the permissions model is a pain in the ass.

      Yes, I did OS X administration for almost a year.

    4. Re:OS X hacked or the Web Application by constantnormal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So how does using SQL injection in an apache (which I believe runs as a non-admin user -- at least apache 1.3.x does, not sure about 2.x) cgi app, gain access to passwords -- which ought to still reside in an encrypted facility within OS X?

      I can see that if the site's designers stored users and passwords in an unencrypted SQL table, that it would be like taking candy from a baby, but surely no one is so stoopid as to design that sort of exposure into a system?

      I suppose that once they inject their code into the works and are executing commands as the apache user, they might be able to do some stuff and eventually escalate their authority to a level at which they had some power.

      Most of OS X's "security" is in keeping intruders out. Once they gain access to a system, even as a non-admin user, there are probably^H^H^H^H^H^H^H numerous ways in which they can proceed. Good security practices can mitigate these exposures, but the first step in securing a system is to keep intruders out. Stronger measures are needed because nobody's perfect, and there is always the possibility that an intruder will get in, probably via social engineering. Good security practices will make things more difficult for a non-admin user to escalate their authority to a point where they can do some real damage.

      But in this case, to merely hack a webserver, all that is required is to be able to create some web pages containing your content -- no further hackery is required (I think).

      Possibly TFA was a bit over the top in describing what had been done to the systems -- while they could have proceeded further, merely altering data within the scope of apache's access was the only requirement to accomplish their visible exploit.

      This goes to show the need to properly validate ANY input coming into your webserver from the outside world before merrily handing it off to your SQL processor.

    5. Re:OS X hacked or the Web Application by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For what it's worth, the same group defaced several hundred websites in the last couple of days, almost all of them running under Linux.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  6. NASA by Ramble · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah! That'll show those NASA warlords.

    --
    "Oh boy"
  7. I don't get it.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When last I looked into this it was a unilateral isreali action.

    since when did NASA of all government agencies have to do with a war in lebanon.

    It seems to me like theyre doing the cyber equivalent to nasa that isrealis are doing to lebanese civillian centers.

    stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid....

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:I don't get it.. by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's simple. The same reason a civilian grocer and his family are disintegrated by an errant missile is the exact same reason someone would deface a NASA website to protest a war between two Middle-Eastern countries. Same reason we invaded Iraq to wreak revenge against the 9/11 terrorists from Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.

      Makes perfect sense to me. Well-documented too. Just look up "Insanity" in any psychological text, and you can find the branching information.

    2. Re:I don't get it.. by rmpotter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Targetting NASA is a bit off base BUT the U.S. has armed Israel to the teeth over the years and effectively given them carte blanche to take out Hezbollah at all cost. If the Israeli's could extend the buffer zone to include the Litani river and divert its water, they would probably do so.

      With America's blessing, Israel has essentially created its own little Apartheid state and until that gets fixed the U.S. will remain in the surreal position of sending weapons so Israel can bomb the bejesus out of Hezbollah and Hamas AND sending humanitarian supplies to help the people getting bombed. Ever wonder if they load bombs and humanitarian aid on the same cargo planes?

      I'm not defending Hezbollah -- they are just as evil and are doing themselves more harm with all of this. Sads days, these are.

      --
      Is this sig nificant?
    3. Re:I don't get it.. by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When last I looked into this it was a unilateral isreali action.


      Some may go as far as to say that the action was unilateral by the US using Israel as a puppet state to do the Bush administration's bidding. Some may also say that the US "support" for Israel's actions points toward the US being a puppet state of Israel (they sit in a region of vast oil resources and we don't). The heavy bombing in sountern Beirut amazingly stopped for several hours during Condolezza Rice's diplomatic trip to Beirut. Imagine the odds, the "no bombing" window and her visit coinciding like that...

      But this is all offtopic and I'm not anything remotely close to being politically "in the know."
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  8. Re:Doesn't make sense by bcat24 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Let's see... an Israeli plane blows up a building in Lebanon after warning the people to leave.
    So if the 9/11 hijackers had warned us they were going to destroy the WTC, it would have been OK? That's absurd. Whatever you think about the conflict in the Middle East, don't forget to look at it from both sides. We're all humans, right?
  9. Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is so easy to protest something that is right in your face on TV, isn't it? How about years and years of killing that have been going on in Israel by Hizballah and Hamas terrorist organizations? How about all those rockets that were launched at Israel from Lebanon within the past two decades? Maybe a UN server should be hacked, after all after 2000 UN and Lebanon was responsible for keeping Hizballah from amassing rockets and other weapons. Do these activists care when during the 'peace times' Israeli kids and adults get blown up?

    If anything, these protestors should thank Israel for taking action now and preventing more carnage later. One cannot constantly procrastinate in this kind of a situation, because it is only getting worse.

    Oh yes, and how about protesting where it actually makes sense: at Hizballah, at Lebanese, Iranian and Syrian governments. Protesting against regimes that allow terrorists to do what they do: use civilians AND UN folks as living shields on the battlefield. Not only are civilians used as shields, they are a great propaganda tool. When a terrorist launches a rocket at civilian targets in Israel from a busy market place in Lebanon, and Israeli army answers with fire at that place, is it the responsibility of Israel to make sure that Lebanese civilians do not suffer or is it responsibility of those, who used the civilians for their political gain around the world?

    Here are a couple of caricatures that do tell something about the reality of this war.

    1. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by Sir+Homer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reminds me of some interview I saw on BBC with a IDF general.

      BBC: You know you are killing innocent people?
      IDF General: We are currently targetting Hizballah areas where they store rockets and fire into Israel. We told all civilians to leave many times.
      BBC: Yeah but why kill innocent people?
      IDF General: Why are innocent people next to Hizballah rocket installations?
      BBC: But.. you can't..
      IDF General: This is the fundamental difference between Israelis and Lebonense. Israelis are currently sleeping in bomb shelters. Lebonese are sleeping with bombs.
      BBC: *Silence*

    2. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by madcow_bg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is so easy to protest something that is right in your face on TV, isn't it? How about years and years of killing that have been going on in Israel by Hizballah and Hamas terrorist organizations? How about all those rockets that were launched at Israel from Lebanon within the past two decades? Maybe a UN server should be hacked, after all after 2000 UN and Lebanon was responsible for keeping Hizballah from amassing rockets and other weapons. Do these activists care when during the 'peace times' Israeli kids and adults get blown up?
      Well ... maybe they care for their own people - the palestinians, that are getting killed during "peace times". One thing you should know is that violence ALWAYS leads to violence. Truth be told, they are both wrong. But by substituting dead israeli with dead lebanese or dead palestinians is not going to help anyone.

      If anything, these protestors should thank Israel for taking action now and preventing more carnage later. One cannot constantly procrastinate in this kind of a situation, because it is only getting worse.
      Can you seriously say, that killing innocent lebanese is going to help you keep your country peaceful? Do you know why it is getting worse? Because noone wants to make sacrifices. If Israel did not have the americans behind their back the UN would already be there to stop the carnage. Or, at least they would have a chance. Now is is a loose-loose situation, lebanese get killed, the terrorists are going to multiply.

      Oh yes, and how about protesting where it actually makes sense: at Hizballah, at Lebanese, Iranian and Syrian governments.
      Maybe, since the USA is THE greatest supporter of Israel it kind of makes sence to protest in the USA. Maybe the USA should think twice when they actively protect such things.

      Protesting against regimes that allow terrorists to do what they do: use civilians AND UN folks as living shields on the battlefield.
      So what? Now they'll stop doing it?

      Not only are civilians used as shields, they are a great propaganda tool. When a terrorist launches a rocket at civilian targets in Israel from a busy market place in Lebanon, and Israeli army answers with fire at that place, is it the responsibility of Israel to make sure that Lebanese civilians do not suffer or is it responsibility of those, who used the civilians for their political gain around the world?
      When you fire a rocket and kill thousands of innocent people it is YOUR SOLE RESPONSIBILITY!!! Who the hell are you to say - oh, well, maybe there were terrorists. We should kill everyone, just to be sure. There is a certain amount of rules when waging war. Yes, maybe you cannot stand before trial for that, but that does not mean that you are not responsible. War often makes the life equally miserable for the civilians and for the soldiers. Just remember the amount of psychic disorder in the troops that came back from Vietnam, and you'll see my point.

      Once againt, it IS the place to protest. EOF

    3. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is so easy to protest something that is right in your face on TV, isn't it?

      Obviously not, considering all the things you ignore in your post.

      How about years and years of killing that have been going on in Israel by Hizballah and Hamas terrorist organizations?

      About as many years as Israel has been occupying territory outside its borders while disregarding its responsibilities as occupying power. Read carefully, I am not saying that they occupied territory for no good reason, but that once they did, they did not manage it in a way that was anywhere helpfull in solving the situation, and in some cases in direct violation of international law and treaties that Israel is a party to.

      Before that it was a bunch of Arab nations that thought to drive Israel into the sea (with said occupation as the result).

      The issue here is that the people living in those territories got a war on their doorstep without asking for it, and have since suffered mostly from Israelian military actions and irresponsible administration of their territories. It is absolutely no wonder they support anyone who seems to be able to act against this (even if such action works against them in the longer term, living in a war zone makes you think about today and maybe tomorrow, but not much further, which is a tendency people have already anyway)

      You may not remember this, but when Israel entered Southern Lebanon for the first time in the late 70s, they were hailed by the Shia population there as liberators because of them trying to get the PLO out. It only took a few years to reverse that situation however, not the least due to Israel refusing to control its proxy militia in South Lebanon (the South Lebanese Army). Israel did not create Hezbollah as such, but they are the ones responsible for it finding a lot of grassroots support among the South Lebanese people and having developed into what it is now.

      How about all those rockets that were launched at Israel from Lebanon within the past two decades?

      Many aimed at population centers with the aim to kill or wound civilians. Absolutely unacceptable.

      But how about taking an action that you know to have virtually zero chance of success and actually a high likelyhood of worsening the problem (and with history telling a clear lesson about this) that risks the life of many civilians? This is what Israel is doing in Lebanon today, again.

      Maybe a UN server should be hacked, after all after 2000 UN and Lebanon was responsible for keeping Hizballah from amassing rockets and other weapons. Do these activists care when during the 'peace times' Israeli kids and adults get blown up?

      Actually, they do. Thank political games from various parties involved (including, but definitely not limited to Israel) for the situation on the ground.

      If anything, these protestors should thank Israel for taking action now and preventing more carnage later. One cannot constantly procrastinate in this kind of a situation, because it is only getting worse.

      Acting in a way that has repeatedly shown to worsen the situation however is stupid, and when it causes damage on the scale the current actions in Lebanon are doing, it also does not deserve support, no matter how justified you believe Israel is in defending itself.

      Of course hacking NASA websites is not exactly a good way to make an opinion known, regardless of what the opinion is.

    4. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Truth be told, they are both wrong. - this is not about right or wrong. This is about survival. If Israel does not take care of this cockroach problem today, there maybe no Israel tomorrow. 5-6 million surrounded by 500-900 million enemies, that is not a simple life. Israel is strategically is in a pickle, there are too many enemies. So it is always a better tactic to kill as many enemies today as possible and continue killing the enemies and not negotiating with them.

      Are you an American? I am Canadian and I have family in Israel. If you are an American don't forget this: the USA started a war in Iraq pretending that there was some imminent danger from Saddam when it was clearly not so. THERE IS imminent danger from Hizballah to Israel.

      Can you seriously say, that killing innocent lebanese is going to help you keep your country peaceful? - my cousin is in the Israeli army, one thing is certain: Israelies are not aiming at innocent lebanese people. They are fighting active terrorist formations. Terrorists don't care if civilians around them die, in fact they welcome it, because it is such a great publicity stunt.

      Because noone wants to make sacrifices. - definition of Bull SHIT. Israel has been making sacrifices. They gave up territories, they prepared peace offerings. Bill Clinton was at one of the meetings between (then alive Araffat and the Israeli PM at the time.) Clinton's own words: We were giving them 99% of what they wanted, they still did not accept the offering.

      There will be no peaceful solution to this problem ever. The only solution to this problem is a controlled state of perpetual war. And strategically Israel must control it. When Iran builds nuclear reactors, Israel must destroy them every single time. Israel now must destroy Hizballah and not stop no matter what the world's opinion is, otherwise Israel is done.

    5. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      if anything, these protestors should thank Israel for taking action now and preventing more carnage later.
      If anything, Israel is throwing a match into a powder keg. Can you imagine the public support now for Hezbollah, given that 800'000-1M lebanese are fleeing from their homes?

      We can argue, whether Israel is right for reacting somehow to the Hezbollah provocation. We CANNOT argue, that what Israel is doing now is not solving anything, given an average person's intelligence and given basic facts.

      There is no military solution to the middle east crisis, except a nuclear war. There is only a sociological/political solution.
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    6. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Targeting Hezbollah installations only? Right.

      There is no way they had to cause $60 billion dollar damage to the lebanese infrastructure, because they wanted to destroy some Hezbollah installations.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    7. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by deanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " We CANNOT argue,"

      Sure we can. You because YOU say we can't, doesn't mean anything. Especially what you judge has "basic facts". You need to read beyond whatever you've been reading.

      Hezbollah is dragging the civilian population of Lebanon into this by hiding amongst them, and rocketing Isreal as they do it. They set up next to those UN peacekeepers, they've kept some Lebanonese people from getting out of their homes in the south when those people try and leave. They've built tunnels back INTO Israel carry on this war.

      This is part of their whole gameplan. That IS a fact. The only way to disarm them is militarily. They're not going to go willingly, and they're certainly not just going to give up all those missiles that Syria has been supplying.

    8. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Especially what you judge has "basic facts". You need to read beyond whatever you've been reading.
      Thanks for telling me this, but I think the most important point about the futility of the situation is the Hundreds of thousands of lebanese escaping from their homes! No matter what you say can you make a person believe that this somehow doesn't make the situation worse!

      The only way to disarm them is militarily.
      Who the FUCK cares about disarming them? Ok. You go into the country, bomb the shit out of them, make them lose everything and then occupy them. GUESS WHAT?! WHEN THEY LOST EVERYTHING, WHO ARE THEY GOING TO SUPPORT? THE ENEMY YOU WANT TO DISARM! I repeat: there is no point in trying to solve this problem in a military way, because if they want to fight, they'll find a way. Israel is making them want to fight, Israel is making them want to support Hezbollah. Israel just made Hezbollah more popular than ever before. So, as I said there is only two solutions: you either nuke Lebanon, killing millions of people, or you give up the foolish idea of using pure military force on the civilian population to destroy Hezbollah infrastructure.

      On the other hand, if you leave lebanese alone, treat them as citizens of a sovereign state, not as second class humans, make them improve their economy and live better: Hezbollah support will disappear. Noone wants to fight when they have something to lose!

      The trouble is that you can't see further from your nose.
      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    9. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Interesting

      managing Lebanon is Lebanese priority, not Israeli.

      Not according to international law. You occupy, so you are in control and you are responsible.

      What you suggest contradicts the entire concept of an occupation.

      Israeli priority is to make sure that the occupied territory does not harbor terrorists with rockets and rocket launchers.

      That was the responsibility of Lebanon upto the point of occupation (during the first occupation it was the PLO and not Hezbollah who sat there with their rockets and launchers and mortars and what not, not to mention Lebanon was rather involved in a civil war).

      Now? It was definitely the responsibility of the Lebanese government to see to it that Hezbollah got disarmed. They failed for obvious reasons. Lets not forget that Israel found itself unable to do much about Hezbollah while they were occupying Southern Lebanon, and that in fact Hezbollah's effectiveness has been a factor in Israel ending that occupation. Expecting the Lebanese army to do the job instead is disregarding reality, even more so when realizing that this would certainly result in a continuation of the civil war.

      Managing an occupied territory, that is very interesting idea. Let's ask the US how that is going in Iraq.

      They have done pretty well in Germany and Japan. After that however there is also a long string of failures.

      It might be very interesting to see why the first 2 worked, but that will be a bit too much to write in a simple post here.

      Instead I'll point at the main reasons why the Iraq occupation does not seem to work very well..

      Three issues come out on top:

      1. Occupation force for Iraq is at least a factor 5 too small, and more likely a factor 10. You are not going to controll a country that used to have a large military busy with internal control, with a force approx 1/8th of the size of the local army.

      2. As a consequence it failed to provide quick security and basic needs like food and shelter to the population

      3. Disregard of the local situation in many aspects (ethnic, political, religious)

      That said, the attempt in Iraq does have a chance tho it is unlikely to work out in the way the USA envisioned.
      And so did the initial occupation of South Lebanon by Israel.

      One could even argue that the initial occupation of South Lebanon was very succesfull. In the end it managed to drive the PLO out of Lebanon, and in a military sense its goals were achieved completely.

      The problem is that the consequences were worse then the problem it tried to address. The party in control there was Israel, and so the ones responsible for allowing those consequences are to be found in Israel, not Lebanon.

      If Israel had treated the local population well (remember that that local population did at that moment support the Israeli invasion and occupation) and aligned themselves with the local people instead of bringing in the SLA, it is very likely that Hezbollah would never have gotten beyond a few isolated extremists.

      This time around, the majority of people in South Lebanon don't want a militia there, but they have learned over the last quarter of a century that having a 'friendly' militia there is a lot better then having Israel there. At least Hezbollah provides for schooling, medical care and food where needed.

      All this said, Hezbollah has made a habbit out of attacking civilians and for that simple reason have no legitimacy whatsoever. Israel is not responsible for Hezbollah's choices obviously.

    10. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, you are spewing bullshit. None of the attacks were against 'innocent civilians'. Israel does not target innocent civilians, they target Hezbollah terrorists, they fire at rocket launcher sites. Civilians and the UN happen to be there, sure.

      Read this. This is from a Canadian UN soldier who got killed by the way.

      And this: U.N. Chief Accuses Hezbollah of 'Cowardly Blending' Among Refugees

    11. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "On the other hand, if you leave lebanese alone, treat them as citizens of a sovereign state, not as second class humans, make them improve their economy and live better: Hezbollah support will disappear."

      Huh? I don't get it. Lebanon *is* a sovereign state. Israel *was* "leaving them alone", and what it got for that was six years of Hezbollah building itself up into the major power in Lebanon, stockpiling huge weapons caches with backing from the Iranians, and occasionally lobbing rockets and mortar shells into civilian communities in Israel.

      Conversely, if Israel was to "make them" improve their economy -- or "make" them do anything, for that matter, well, it wouldn't be treating them as a sovereign state now, would it?

      Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza and Lebanon. Hamas and Hezbollah could have used that historic opportunity to build actual states and join the community of nations. Instead, they *immediately* turned around and began using the newly vacated ground as staging areas for attacks against Israel. If you were an Israeli, what conclusion would you draw from that?

          - Alaska Jack

      Noone wants to fight when they have something to lose!

      The trouble is that you can't see further from your nose."

    12. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no way they had to cause $60 billion dollar damage to the lebanese infrastructure, because they wanted to destroy some Hezbollah installations.

      Actually, yes, they do. This isn't Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols building a bomb in their basement. Hizballah is huge. It is far more powerful than the recognized government of Lebanon (and, for that matter, the largest party within that government).

      This conflict isn't about finding and detaining a few rogue criminals. It is a war between nations.

      The reports of "civilian" casualties are greatly inflated due to the lack of a precise definition of what a "civilian" is. Many of the so-called civilian casualties -- including many of the children -- are actually combatants. McVeigh and Nichols were civilians, too.

  10. They did NOT hack OS X by mitchell_pgh · · Score: 4, Informative

    They did NOT hack OS X. They simply hacked the application database running on those platforms. Why would the author indicate OS X was hacked when really, it looks like a large number of the servers hacked were in fact running Linux.

    I'm not saying OS X is unhackable, but leaving ANY insecure server software running is asking to be hacked.

  11. Spiral of Escalating Violence by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When Martin Luther King led the nonviolent marches that pulled off a second American Revolution without a second Civil War, the marchers didn't trespass or tear down signs. That's why they changed the attitude and culture of America, which is the victory everyone needs in these conflicts. The victory that others who accepted or embraced violence lost, like Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, the Black Panthers, and all the hundreds of forgotten "freedom fighters". Even when their agenda and goals included important results that would be good for practically everyone, they polarized, alienated and pushed people into defensive positions on even indefensible parts of the status quo.

    Chileans vandalizing America when Israel attacks Lebanon doesn't change anyone's minds for the better. It just escalates by a little bit the spiral of violence:

    Ignorance -> Fear -> Anger -> Violence -> Alienation -> Ignorance

    The central front in the Terror War is in our own minds, where that well-worn cycle can send us all to our doom.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  12. Re:Doesn't make sense by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Anywho, my support is firmly behind Israel.
    I can understand trying to stop the rockets firing into their territory -- but destroying civil infrastructure (power plants, roads, etc) and persistently executing poorly-targeted attacks with substantial civilian casualties is no way to do that.

    The Lebanese government is in enough trouble as it is, having a radical group (Hezbollah) executing attacks on their neighbors against the government's whim. Getting civilian support for that radical group (by demonizing the aforementioned neighbor, which Israel's civilian-infrastructure-targeted attacks and utter carelessness with regard to collateral damage have been doing pretty effectively) weakens the legitimate government, giving the radicals even more of a chance to take over Lebanon completely.

    Israel is off their collective rockers, and the world is standing by and letting them get away with it. It's insane.
  13. Re:Doesn't make sense by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Israelis sent messages to the cities they intended to bomb so that the people there could leave and not get killed. Why did they bomb the buildings in those cities? Because the people who run those cities had installed thousands of rockets pointed at their neighboring country and had engaged in randomly firing those missles into civilian centers of the neighboring country without any warning!.

        This is an unprovoked serious act of war, by a people who have repeatedly and openly sworn to destroy the neighboring country. Against a people who lost 90% of their population in a slaughter the last time they didn't take these warnings seriously.

        If the criminal Hizba'allah organization had not repeatedly engaged in serious unprovoked acts of war against a neighboring sovereign state, the Israelis would not be currently bombing the shit out of them.

        This is the way that the world works. You would be doing the exact same thing if it were you. The difference between the Israelis killing Arabs and Arabs killing Israelis is that the Arabs wrap their children in high explosives and send them off to blow themselves up in crowded public areas without warning and without mercy. Then they dance in the streets in celabration of their ' great victory'. The Israelis warn the Arabs that they are coming and if they want to live, then leave. Then they agonize over the wisdom and morality of their actions. They offer peace plans that are always rejected. The cycle of madness begins anew.

        All this anti-Israeli and 'anti-Zionism' talk around the world is just anti-semitism resurfacing and trying to pretend not to be. The Israelis are great people that are surrounded by millions of people who have surrendered their minds to a death cult. The Israelis do what they must. They don't get any pleasure from it. But they don't shrink from it, either.

  14. Re:Tough call... by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every single one that U.S. citizens do, and they are numerous. Don't try to excuse the hacking as a "lack" of political access. That don't fly.

  15. Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! by metaltoad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Hezbollah army builds their bases on the ground floor of civilian apartments. They are literally hiding behind women and children. Both sides (Hezbolah and Israel) are equally to blame for the civilian deaths. And since the Syrian and Iranian government are funding the rocket attacks, shouldn't these hackers be hacking Syrian and Iranian sites as well? Could it be that hacking US sites just provides bigger bragging rights?

  16. Disproportionality by amightywind · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, yeah... You're missing the disproportionate israeli reaction, killing lebanese civilians who have nothing to do with that...

    Disproportionality is the only way to deal with terrorists. The border was peaceful until the Hezbullah incursion. If I were an Israeli I would not relish the prospect of being terrorised forever at an ever more lethal intensity. I would want to irradicate the problem. As for civilians, they were given fair warning to leave the area and go to central Lebanon were they would not be harmed. Hezbullah uses civilians as shields, launching attacks from aprtment buildings, residential areas.. If Hezbullah stopped doing this there would be no civilian casualties. Israel's only recourse is to ignore them in pursuit of the enemy.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  17. Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! by FhnuZoag · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, it's Chileans, so, it's more friend of my friend's enemy's friend is my enemy.

  18. Re:Doesn't make sense by Hampe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In all honesty, haven't the US and Israelis attempts at "kicking the nuts" of Hezbollah and similar organizations repeatedly failed miserably? It's a real world example of the myth of the hydra, the more heads you chop off the more there will come! Israel is selling out all their international goodwill (axcept maybe in parts of the US) for a futile attempt to kill off all of Hezbollah. It just can't be done!

  19. Re:more proof of a foriegn policy failure by amliebsch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    staggering that in such a short time the US has gone from loved to hated

    This may break your heart to hear, but the US has never been loved by much of the world, ever. Unless, of course, those people dancing in the streets on 9/11 were, you know, doing it out of love.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  20. South Americans? Arabs? Whats the difference by damburger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It makes perfect sense that the hackers came from south america and not an arab country. My own government (the UK) is way ahead in removing that particular distinction

    Seriously though, the reason they hit NASA was because they could. They almost certainly scanned through all US government sites for a vunerability they could exploit, and NASA just happened to have one.

    Also, you should be thanking them for this. This form of protest hurts exactly nobody. A sysadmin gets some extra overtime, thats all. If you guys didn't have contempt for peaceful forms of protest like this, perhaps people wouldn't feel the need to murder thousands of you just to get your attention.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:South Americans? Arabs? Whats the difference by damburger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find the term 'cyberterrorism' offensive. Get some fucking perspective.

      Someone sets off nail bombs in pubs just because the occupants happen to be gay, thats terrorism.

      A guy gets on a bus with a dynamite waistcoat and wipes out a load of commuters, thats terrorism.

      Some prick hijacks a jet and flies in into a skyscraper full of people, thats terrorism.

      Fucking up somebodies webserver? Not even close.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    2. Re:South Americans? Arabs? Whats the difference by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you guys didn't have contempt for peaceful forms of protest like this

      We have contempt for forms of protest that break the law.

      You want to protest in the streets of Chile? Go ahead. You want to march on Washington? Be my guest. You want to call the president nasty names? I'll join you.

      You want to do something productive, like start up your own site with the side of this that we're likely not seeing, at least not much, in the US? Please do.

      You want to break into a server because you can and deface it? No, you deserve to go to jail. And you deserve to have the shit kicked out of you while you're there, since regardless of whether or not you may have had some point to make, you made your entire cause look stupid in the process--not to mention the fact that NASA has absolutely nothing to do with anything going on in Lebanon.

      Do you think this stunt made me any more sympathetic to their cause? It didn't. And most reasonable people feel the same.

  21. more proof of a troll's idiocy by richdun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what with the shooting of Jews in chicago yesterday

    Do you actually read the news, or just go with what you're told? The shooting was in Seattle - a very different place from Chicago. And Jews have been at the bottom of some people's "favorite peoples" list for centuries - I doubt our foreign policy could really ever change that in just a few years.

    The world is not nearly as petty a place as some would like to think it is. Bush hasn't helped, sure, but anti-US sentiment has been building for years. We rule the world, but spend outlandish amounts on shopping trips and vacations to countries whose people can barely afford basic food and shelter. Then, when something happens to our own, we can't take care of them either.

    We'd be a whole lot better off is more Americans would stop using Bush as a scapegoat (again, he might be a good one, but that's not the point) and started changing the way they actually lived - cut back on energy consumption, buy a hybrid or use public transit, demand true equality in civil services and protection in poor neighborhoods/regions, and quit mouthing off on the Internet complaining about your government when the House has something ridiculous like a 98% re-election rate.

    We don't take responsibility for our own actions - and when something goes right, take responsibility whether it was our doing or not. That's why people hate us.

  22. Re:Am I missing something? by backwardMechanic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like you are missing something, yes. Maybe you should follow the news? These guys in Chile clearly do. From this mornings headlines:

    More than 54 civilians, at least 34 of them children, have been killed in a town in south Lebanon in the deadliest Israeli strike of the conflict so far. BBC News

    This is a sadly ordinary story. I'm no fan of Hezbollah, but I cannot understand the Israeli action, or the lack of action by my (I'm British) or the US government. Just remember who are selling those bombs.

  23. Re:Am I missing something? by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Some party has got to grow up and say "That's enough. We stop, unconditionally, and we hope you do the same".

    Isn't that what Israel did? They withdrew completely from Lebanon. They gave back all of the Gaza and the West Bank, and withdrew all their settlements. They gave the terrorists everything they asked for and complied with every request the UN made. So now how should the respond to continued aggression? Just throw up their hands and wait for death to come?

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  24. Re:Here goes... by Spazntwich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep in mind not a single civillian would have had to die if their heroic freedom fighters in Hezbolla didn't insist on setting up operations in the center of residential neighborhoods, launching rockets from their cities, and overall using the civillians as human shields.

    You're an idiot who has been thoroughly taken by the terrorist propaganda. As someone previously mentioned, an IDF general put it best: "Israelis are sleeping in bomb shelters. Lebanese are sleeping with bombs."

  25. Re:Here goes... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't have a position supporting either side, but I feel I should correct a point of yours...

    Hezbollah had been making rocket attacks on Israeli cities before the Israelis began their bombing campaign (and later invasion) of south Lebanaon. I refer you to a timeline of the current crisis. They did escalate their attacks after the Israeli response.

    Beyond the scope of the current conflict, Hezbollah has been firing rockets at Israeli on and off for some time now; for example, see this story from Dec. 2005 regarding a rocket strike from Lebanon on the town of Kiryat Shmona.

    But really, if you want to try to say "who started it", you'll be going back decades and centuries. You can't view this incident in isolation, it's all part of the long history of conflict between many parties in the Middle East.

  26. Re:Here goes... by sponga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You make a strong point. Except Israel just released video of that strike that they did on that building that killed the 50+ people and sure enough it looks like from the video that the missles are being fired right from behind the main large 4 story building on top of the hill. Yes that is truly sad so many woman and children were killed/crushed to death and I have compassion; but as some news agency have been reporting is 'where are all the young and older men casualties at in the building?'. Could they have been firing from the building from behind or somewhere else at dead night? Argument that they could not get out because of roads/bridges blown were false because the news crews have been reporting they got there with their big news vans easily.

  27. Chicago, this ain't. by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then maybe we should have done the same to the chicago mafia in the 30's...

    just shelled their places of business and damn the consequences...


    Again, a non-workable analogy. The people smuggling whiskey and evading taxes in the 30's weren't launching missles from Chicago into Toledo, or proclaiming that only the destruction of Illinois is acceptable to them. They didn't randomly kill women and children, year after year, just to stoke things up (they just killed each other in a turf war over the smuggling market and related "industries").

    The mafia wasn't a militant front for an oil-rich retrograde fascist theocracy that was shipping them millions of bucks and thousands of missiles.

    It doesnt make sense to use millitary weaponry when surgical strikes on the ground would get things done.

    If the Israelis stopped using precision weapons, you'd see the civilian deaths in the areas where Hezbollah keeps parking their weapons and launchers go from a few hundred to thousands and thousands over night. You do understand that you can't just march Israeli troops back into all of Lebanon and surgically remove Hezbollah weapons and infrastructure from the middle of the civilian presence in which they hide without an enormous invasion, right? It takes a gigantic supply chain, tons of armour, and thousands of soldiers - and it would take months and months, and many more Israeli deaths, which is exactly what Hezbollah would like to force them to have to do.

    Hezbollah has had an uninterrupted six years to build bunkers, to booby-trap and mine their weapons storage sites, and to make sure that their personnel are woven completely into the fabric of the civilian population of Lebanon. Israel is being smart, and taking out the tools Hezbollah will need to re-supply themselves with weapons. Eventually they will run out, or Iran will have to more clearly show their hand by visibly pushing new weapons into the area by air - and they don't want to have that light shown on them just now. In the meantime, when Hezbollah pops out of a basement with a missle launcher, Israel hits that spot immediately, to destroy the cache that's there. They have no choice, other than to just tolerate more missles raining down on Haifa and beyond.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  28. Re:Um, military sattelites by richdun · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even more than that, NASA has put up every single US military sattelite

    Wrong. Military satelites are launched by the Air Force, not NASA, at Vandenburg AFB or Cape Canaveral AFB. NASA is strictly civilian launches, even if many astronauts (especially commanders and pilots) are former Navy or Air Force.

  29. Re:Here goes... by Stalyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Bush administration does not understand the Arab community. The Middle East has a long tradition of successful military campaigns. The culture in the Arab world demands military success and takes pride in that. When the Arab world was unable to defeat Israel on multiple occasions the collective Arab world was humiliated. They are unwilling to forgive Israel but also their own leaders for their military failures.

    When a foreign nation like the USA takes down an Arab government like Iraq there is the same sense of humiliation. That the Arab world was itself unable to take down a brutal dictator but also in the post-war occupation they are unable to govern its people. However when a group like Hezbollah is able to stand up to Israel, even though Hezbollah is a Shiite group, the Arab street is overwhelming in favor of those who they perceive as standing up to foreign aggression. At the same time they criticize their leaders for not taking a similar stand.

    The Arab world is desperate for some sort of success, be it military or political and are willing to cheer on even the most insidious of organizations. The longer this conflict goes on, the more civilians who die and the more Hezbollah holds out the more radicalized the Arab world will become.

    I think the Bush administration is right in that we should invest in democracy, freedom and economic prosperity in the Middle East. This is the long term strategy that will provide peace in the region. However it can only come through political action. A military strategy will only be ferociously resisted by the Arab world.

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  30. Re:Here goes... by Vidar+Leathershod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course in your reasonable-sounding comment, you leave out the fact that Hezbollah has never ceased hostilities towards a nation whose existence it denies. They have continually engaged in terrorist attacks, kidnappings, and have refused to disband according to the Taif agreement. They are also not a native Lebanese force. They are originally based in Iran, comprised of Iranian military forces. It's nice to see your balanced view completely ignore this, and jump on Israel as if they have been anything but attacked and harassed over the past 50 years by their neighbors.

    I feel sorry for the Lebanese, as they are not really responsible for Hezbollah attacks (besides not taking action against them, anyway). However, the Israelis have leafletted the areas in question, and any civilians who remain in the area after that are either supporting the terrorists themselves, or willing to risk the lives of their own families to stay. In fact, the children who have been injured or killed are victims of their parents and Hezbollah, not Israel.

    A nation should not have to endure endless kidnappings of their soldiers/citizens without taking action. Your attempt to compare Israel to the U.S. above shows your ignorance of the situation. A true comparison would be if Ontario was hosting a terrorist group which *regularly* fired rockets, employed suicide bombers, and kidnapped people from the border area and demanded the release of known murderers in exchange for the lives of the kidnapped people. Then, after the exchange (Israel at one point did exchange prisoners, for as little as the remains of the dead) continued to fire rockets, bomb, and kidnap more U.S. citizens. Meanwhile, Canada showed no interest in taking care of the problem themselves, and in fact were terrorized by the same group, but unable to oust them.

    That would be apples to apples, except that there would be no Jews to blame. Don't worry though, I'm sure you could come up with some way to justify the terrorist actions, and oh the poor children, what are we doing to the children!

    Vidar

    --
    The brains of a chicken, coupled with the claws of two eagles, may well hatch the eggs of our destruction.
  31. Re:Doesn't make sense by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

    All this anti-Israeli and 'anti-Zionism' talk around the world is just anti-semitism resurfacing and trying to pretend not to be.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Semitism
    "Anti-Semitism (alternatively spelled antisemitism) is hostility toward or prejudice against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group, which can range from individual hatred to institutionalized, violent persecution."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Zionism
    "Anti-Zionism is often characterized by opposition to the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish state"

    The Anti-Zionism != Anti-Semetism, though the two do get mixed together.

    The Israelis are great people that are surrounded by millions of people who have surrendered their minds to a death cult.

    Not to burst your bubble, but the Israelis have heaps of fanatic (relegious) nutbags too. You seem to be confusing and conflating ideological extremism with religion. They are not the same, in the exact same sense that Anti-Zionism & Anti-Semetism are not the same, even though people mix them together.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  32. Re:Doesn't make sense by Stalyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry but when you try to justify the killing of innocent civilians you have already lost the argument. Surely war is war and civilians becoming victims of "collateral damage" can be explained. But it can never be justified. Once you claim that killing innocent lives is morally right you have lost all moral authority.

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  33. Photos you did not see on CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://209.67.212.138/~lebanon/

    It hurts. Sure, you can find similar photos from Israel too, but these are a small group of extremists vs. a government who really should know better.

    Fuck Hizbollah, and fuck the Israeli government.

  34. Re:Am I missing something? by SilicaiMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They gave back all of the Gaza and the West Bank, and withdrew all their settlements.

    What are you talking about? They withdrew from Gaza, yes, but since then have blocked anything and anyone from entering or leaving. There is no economy, no money flow, no medicine flow, nothing going into Gaza. Yes, Israelis left, but they completely choked it up.

    As for the West Bank, when did Israel withdraw from there? Most of the West Bank is currently occupied by huge Israeli settlements built on Palestinian land (as per the Oslo accords). There are also the ultra-orthdox Jewish settlers who create new "settlements" on Palestinian farmland by terrorizing its owners then erecting makeshift homes and shoot anybody who comes close. The Israeli government is trying to dismantle those, but at the same time expanding their other "legal" settlements by annexing more Palestinian land. Not to mention the completely illegal wall that is eating up even more Palestinian farm land.

    They gave the terrorists everything they asked for and complied with every request the UN made.

    Really? They definitely did not give back Jerusalem. They definitely did not allow UN peace inspectors into Gaza and the West Bank, and thanks to the US, they do not have any binding UN sanctions against them because of the American veto.

    Stop pretending that Israel is the perfect peace loving nation. Israel does not want peace, because peace is not in its favour.

  35. Re:more proof of a foriegn policy failure by Chaffar · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, the current Lebanese government was (yes, was) pushing for an improvement of US-Lebanon relations. After Syria had been kicked out, Condoleezza Rice came to Lebanon a few times, as they saw in Lebanon a potential ally, a burgeoning democracy, one that would champion the Moderate Arab values around the Middle East.

    So, in this context, it is true that the US has gone from loved to hated in the span of 17 days. Everything that has happened since the beginning of the war has strengthened the radical elements of the Lebanese government (like it or not, Hezbollah is part of the Lebanese gov't and represents 45% of the population). Every civilian killed was proof that everything that the radicals have been saying about the "Zionists" and the "Imperialist American Dogs" was true.

  36. Re:more proof of a foriegn policy failure by jmccay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is more the failure of the rest of the World's so-called foriegn polocies against Israel. Israel will only tolerate getting screwed for so long before the straw breaks the camel's back. I think the straw has broken the camel's back.

          I noticed you didn't condemn Hezbollah. They continually use innocent civilians as shields. They were within 3 meters of the United Nations post that got hit. Israel has continually warned the people in Lebanon, including the people of Qana, BEFORE they attacked to get out of the way. They stayed there anyways. Israel didn't have to warn them, and they would have better luck fighting Hezbollah if they didn't warn the people in Lebanon.

          You want the war to end? Everybody gives Israel the soldiers back. Hezbollah is disarmed, and then they stop lobbing missiles at Israel (like they have been doing regularly since long before this war began). The end result will be that the war would be over. The fact is, there is NOTHING anyone can due to stop Israel (even the US) short of what I said because for too long Israel has given into the requests of the terrorist giving them every they wanted short of wiping Israel off the face of the planet (the stated goal of Hezbollah), and they got no peace and safety form it.

          Did the rest of the world think Israel would tolerate being bombed with rockets & homicide bombers forever without fighting back? If they did, they are truly stupid. No country would let their citizens go through these things. In fact, most countries would have done far more than Israel has done long (as in years) before this. Israel has been patient for too long.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  37. Re:Doesn't make sense by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful
    All this anti-Israeli and 'anti-Zionism' talk around the world is just anti-semitism resurfacing and trying to pretend not to be. The Israelis are great people that are surrounded by millions of people who have surrendered their minds to a death cult. The Israelis do what they must. They don't get any pleasure from it. But they don't shrink from it, either.
    I'm greatly saddened to see your comment modded up to +5, Insightful, given it is a fairy tale trying to pose as reality.

    So, in your mind, anything critical of the policies of Israel is anti-semitism. Because that is what you have written. The Israeli people are no different from the palestine or lebanese people: Mother Theresa and that serial killer Manson belong to the same human race. There is of course ideology flung around, but labeling all arabs as being part of a death cult is "anti-arabicanism". If you think that anti-semitism is bad, then why do you exercise "anti-arabicanism"? The sole reason I put quote marks around that phrase, is because it is not even in common use to describe a behaviour that is exhibited in your own post.

    I don't think the Israelis are doing what they must. I think they keep voting in politicians that act as if they and only they could protect them from a not lifethreatening (on a national scale) enemy (doesn't that sound familiar?). What the Israelis need to do is vote for less comforting, less "black-and-white" world viewed politicians, who can do their best to solve the problems on the middle east. While it might not look so good, because there are many compromises to be reached, both the israelis and palestinian/lebanese people would end up safer. If history ended up teaching something, is that unilaterialism end up in empires, and that empires fall.
    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  38. Re:Here goes... by evil+agent · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Again, I'm no fan of Hezbulla, but please try to keep objective and look at the facts.
    I'm sorry, but you make it sound like this war just started a week ago. Did you just start reading the news? Do a little research and see how many people Hezbollah has killed. They've been attacking Isreal for over 20 years now. Open your mind for a second and try to put yourself in Isreal's position. What would you do? There's really no good answer here, but would you just sit back and let your people be killed and kidnapped?
    --
    End transmission.
  39. Re:more proof of a foriegn policy failure by DA-MAN · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless, of course, those people dancing in the streets on 9/11 were, you know, doing it out of love.

    Actually there was one Muslim country that had a candle light vigil for the US after the bombings of 9/11.

    http://groups.colgate.edu/aarislam/response.htm

    Funny that our so called allies (Saudi's, Kuwaiti's, etc) didn't give a rats ass what happened to us.

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
  40. Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! by Aaron+England · · Score: 2, Informative
    Let's not play your game. Your commentary is so one-sided, lacking both accuracy and context, that it's laughable.

    Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? Answer: Israel. (Ignore this, lameness filter bypass)

    Yeah, except for that one nation called Pakistan. Oh and Iran in 10 years if we let them.

    Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?

    Except for that country called Iran. Yeah, they signed it, but they certainly haven't lived up to the treaty. Not to mention that Syria has not signed the CWC or BTWC.

    You know I was intending of going line by line on your commentary, but it's obvious from your first two "points" that you did not intend to add a well-researched comment to this discussion and I know better ways of spending a Sunday afternoon than exposing trolls.

  41. Re:Here goes... by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not a single Israeli died due to Hezbulla attacks before this war started...

    Then who were Eyal Benin, Shani Turgeman, and Wassim Nazal? Martians?

    They were killed by Hezbollah forces operating inside Israel, on a mission to ambush and kidnap Israeli soldiers.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  42. a side effect of the new war by Punto · · Score: 2

    Why do we assume that an attack on a US 'target' (NASA) is protesting a war between israel and lebanon?
    Last time I checked, iraq was still at war..

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  43. Re:Oh, those wacky Arabs! by infaustus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't consider South Asia the Middle East. And our very different treatment of Iran and Israel's nuclear weapons programs just prove the GPs point.

    --
    Frosty piss posts are worthless, GNAA posts are worthless and hurtful, but they are the least of this site's neuroses.
  44. Lessons from Northern Irish IRA by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "As many prior posters have quoted, the difference between Israeli citizens and Lebanese citizens is that "Israeli citizens are sleeping in bomb shelters; Lebanese citizens are sleeping with bombs."

    Nice soundbite, it makes it sound like the children are complicit in missle launches, but of course they were just innocent victims. Did they choose or even know who was next door? You are using the vague phrase 'Lebanese citizens' to try to blanket transfer blame from SOME terrorists to A WHOLE COUNTRIES POPULATION.

    This strategy can never work. Consider the case of the IRA in Northern Ireland. We faced their bombs regularly in Britain, yet we never did anything so foolish as to bomb huge sections of ireland in the hope of flushing them out. It would be counter productive, it would simply create more terrorism.
    In the same way this strategy can't possibly ever fix the problem Israel has with its northern border. It will simply increase the terrorism, and decrease their security.

  45. Re:What's so hard to understand? by thelizman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MacOS = BSD based = 'nix.

    It's unfortunate that the world is full of so many morons who (a) cannot tell propaganda from bullshit, and (b) can't creatively channel their frustrations. Hacking a NASA website won't stop a single Israel bomb or Hezbollah rocket from falling on civilians.

  46. Re:more proof of a foriegn policy failure by identity0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know how things are in Japan, and let me assure you that while there were people there who hate the U.S., and many who regard it with suspicion, the reputation of the U.S. has taken a steep decline since the Bush administration came to power, and especially since the war on Iraq. There was a brief surge of sympathy and compassion following 9/11, but the president is just too loathsome to ignore. I think it's safe to say that he is the second most disliked foreign politician, after Kim Il Jong.

    Look, the fact that a bunch of people in the middle east go around burning American flags should not suprise you. What should be worrying is the fact that one of your closest allies now thinks you guys are power-mad and dangerous. I don't think either Japan or the UK will help you in your next war.

    You seem to think that one either loves the U.S. unconditionally, or you hate it absolutely like those guys celebrating 9/11, and that there is no changing of opinions. The fact is, most of the world is not extreme and set in their ways like that, and your actions do have an effect on how they percieve you. Your administration has been pushing people away from liking you, so you might want to reconsider your actions.

  47. Re:more proof of a foriegn policy failure by dcam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but the US has never been loved by much of the world, ever

    That isn't correct.

    After the second world war and before the cold war really got going, America was much loved by the rest of the world. Particularly after things like the Marshall plan. America was seen as a place of freedom and indeed an example. In fact I think you might even be able to stretch that back to post WWI to shortly after WWII.

    And since you mention 9/11, in much of the world (outside many muslim countries), there was a lot of sympathy for America as a result of 9/11. That isn't quite the same as being loved, but it is getting there.

    --
    meh
  48. some how oddly appropriate... by wjeff · · Score: 2

    That stupid lazy "hacktivist" attack NASA websites, to protest the atrocities in Lebanon, because they are easier targets than say for example cia.gov, while Israel pummels Lebanon, because they are easier to make war with than the real villians behind Hizbollah, i.e. Syria and Iran.

    --
    my old sig is obsolete, and I haven't come up with a stupid enough new one yet
  49. Disarm Hizbollah? That worked so well in Iraq by theolein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, I want to add my voice to those that say: Fuck Israel and Fuck Hizbollah. Fuck Hizbollah for dragging Lebanese civillians into a war where they are utterly defenseless. Fuck Israel for so utterly disregarding civillian lives (accidents my fucking arse).

    Fuck Israel for being so fucking dumb as to not have learnt its lesson from the last time they invaded Lebanon. Hizbollah won then and Hizbollah is no weaker now. Fuck Israel for being so stupid as to always make disgustingly bad excuses for the wholesale slaughter of civillians. Fuck Israel again for being so numbingly stupid as to not realise that every bomb that falls on Lebanon makes Hizbollah more popular in the Arab world. And again, fuck Israel for achieving what no Iranian Mullah or politician could: unifying the Shia and Sunni sects against Israel and the west.

    You think Israel can disarm Hizbollah? You must have also thought that the US could pacify Iraq. Look how well that turned out and how "disarmed" they are.

    And Fuck Bush and his cabal of poodles in the UK who are too stupid to see where this is going: Destroying whatever miniscule amount of credibility the US and the UK had in the Arab world and dragging us one step closer to World war 3.

    And you know who must be laughing so hard at all of this that they must be pissing themselves: The Russians and the Chinese.

  50. Rover Over by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    And the hacked rover wrote "I dig Osama" in the Martian sand.

  51. Re:Um, military sattelites by jackbird · · Score: 2, Informative

    There have certainly been spy sattelites launched from the shuttle, a quick google will reveal stories about those missions that appeared in major newspapers.

  52. Re:Am I missing something? by jackbird · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since it seems that the vast majority of that foreign aid was lining the pockets of Arafat's cronies (which is what led to Hamas being elected in the first place) rather than serving the useful purpose for which it was intended, cutting off aid seems pretty reasonable. And resuming aid to a Hamas government that openly advocates genocide doesn't seem like a winner either.

    The trouble is that the arabs and palestinians have played for keeps and lost so many times that they've run out of palatable options.