Slashdot Mirror


AOL Planning Move to Ad-Supported Model

garzpacho writes "In recognition of the fact that its subscriber-based revenues continue to plummet, AOL is planning to shift to an ad-supported business model. AOL's subscriber base, which peaked at 30 million users, now has less than 19 million subscribers and is still dropping — over 800,000 subscribers dropped the service in this year's first quarter alone. In addition to seeing fewer AOL CDs, a shift to ad revenue also means some serious cuts in staff size, especially in the customer service and retention departments. From the article: 'Time Warner plans to announce a series of changes at AOL that analysts say will mark the end of the company's paid-subscriber model. The company will begin relying on advertising sales rather than monthly fees paid by customers, according to the Wall Street Journal. 'I don't know whether advertising will work, but my thinking is (the changes) are basically an acceptance of what is happening,' says Joseph Bonner, a media and telecommunications analyst at Argus Research. 'This is a reflection of reality, that they have to find some other source of revenue.''"

45 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. What's the Draw? by Puls4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems to me that AOL is looking at the search engine model and trying to copy it. The only problem is that AOL has absolutely nothing to "draw" people in the way google does. It's kind of backwards actually. AOL continues to offer bloatware, horrible customer service, a poor product, and is now going to try adding advertisement into the deal to save itself. Google offers a top notch search engine with innovative product that makes people WANT to come, and now they are looking at offering broadband and becoming their own ISP..... AOL needs to fix it's business model and offer something compelling. If you're not drawing people advertisements won't do much.

    1. Re:What's the Draw? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It seems to me that AOL is looking at the search engine model and trying to copy it.
      Looks more like the magazine model to me. And like the magazine industry, likely to not do so well in the long run -- there is just way too much free content out there easily available. AOL makes its living off:
      (1) People who don't know better (who, BTW, are excellent targets for ads for the same reason they know no better)
      (2) People who don't want to let go of their email address.

      Finally, as we see minority browsers get market share, especially Firefox (with its ease of customization and extendability), subscription web portals are becoming less and less useful -- moreso as the population becomes more facile with the internet and computers in general.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:What's the Draw? by kilgortrout · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Time-Warner owns a lot of content that might be a draw.

    3. Re:What's the Draw? by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "If you're not drawing people advertisements won't do much."

      This is entirely untrue. Advertising has become increasingly common on AOL and is a factor in driving customers away. So it will have an effect, just not the effect they are hoping for.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    4. Re:What's the Draw? by Andrewkov · · Score: 5, Funny

      But AOL has a killer demographic for advertisers: Clueless noobs with more money than brains. This is an advertisers wet dream.

    5. Re:What's the Draw? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What makes you think the Internet service itself would be free? As people started switching to broadband, AOL has become more of a "value added" thing you subscribe to on top of your Internet connection (they call it "bring your own access," IIRC).

      Considering the failure of stuff like NetZero (which is now more like Net$10 instead), I would think AOL would know better than to try to support modem access for free -- but then again, they may actually be that stupid.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:What's the Draw? by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny
      now-a-days people are becoming more computer savvy
      Ten minutes on MySpace will disabuse you of that notion.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Is anyone paying full price right now? by Blimey85 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My sister uses AOL and a few months ago one of her friends called AOL to cancel his service. He told the customer service rep that he couldn't afford the service any longer and was then asked how much he could afford. He said he could afford ten bucks a month and the rep asked if he would continue his service if they would lower his cost to $10. He then called my sister and told her what happened. She called AOL, got the same question, and told the person she could only afford "maybe $7 or $8 a month" and now pays $7 per month for her service. Of course she told everyone else she knows that uses AOL.

    I know a lot of companies do this but most companies aren't a network of people that like nothing more than to sit around all day bs'ing on the web.

    --
    How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    1. Re:Is anyone paying full price right now? by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh you can even talk them down to 0/month. I knew a woman who used AOL for a while, but never paid a cent. She called to cancel, and they just kept giving her freebie months. I'm not sure if she did it with seperate accounts or the same one over and over again.

  3. That's why I quit AOL by krell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ad supported? It was the ads that made me quit AOL a few years ago. I got 60 spams per day in my AOL inbox, and there was no way to filter than other than to add a complete individual URL to the spam filter.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:That's why I quit AOL by portege00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm suprised you actually could quit.

      http://www.nbc10.com/news/9406462/detail.html

      AOL: Alright, some day when you calmed down you're gonna realize that all I was trying to do was help you... and it was actually in your best interest to listen to me.

      Fucking pathetic.

      --
      Trolls make great pets. Adopt one today!
  4. Fear. Lots of Fear. by Doches · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I alone in thinking that this is rather bad news? We're talking about a company with a ludicrously aggressive subscription-acquisition-and-retention policy, remember -- how much worse (i.e., ad-saturated) is the web going to become once AOL becomes a major platform for adversiting?

    1. Re:Fear. Lots of Fear. by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 2, Funny

      It will not be bad at all because nobody will go the AOL properties to see the ads.

  5. AOL Is On Its Last Leg by gasmonso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's over AOL, the days of dialup are gone and people will eventually be using DSL or Cable provided by their locality. I for one am impressed that AOL even exists. I mean seriously, who uses AOL?

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:AOL Is On Its Last Leg by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The origional Draw to AOL for its popularity was the fact that AOL software did the graphics stuff relitivly fast (For the time) and offered services that you couldn't get with with BBS's (the old ones not the Message boards). After the Internet started to become popular with Dialup AOL was still doing good because it offered a competitive price and it still had a lot of AOL only features, and buisness relationships, heck it is much cheaper and profitable to put your buisness on the internet vs. trying to get it as an AOL keyword. But now that companies just use the internet directly, loosing the AOL advantage, High Speed internet connections are around the same price for faster performance. There is no advantage. People who use AOL are people who always used AOL. During the 90s the Majority of the People though AOL was the internet, and On-Line ment America On Line, Not just a buzzword for Modem to Modem comunication. There are still a population who hasn't looked for anything new and some don't realize there is anything new, there are a very few that use the remaining AOL Only features, others it is the only ISP that is local in their area.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:AOL Is On Its Last Leg by Blimey85 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I mean seriously, who uses AOL?

      People like my sister and her friends. She knows pertty much nothing about a computer other than how to get AOL fired up so she can chat or check her email. For her AOL is great. For people like you and I it just gets in the way and as people learn more about computers, they have less reliance on services like AOL.

      I'm surprised that AOL never had an internet appliance like WebTV from MS. My Dad has one of those and he loves it. Unfortunately the newer version is designed for broadband and doesn't work very well on dial up. I bought him the new one for Christmas '04 and it was slower than the original. It had some new features and could handle more audio and video formats but overall it didn't work very well for him so I returned it.

      AOL already had a huge subscriber base and pretty decent software (the newer versions anyway). Why didn't they come out with a set top box of their own or maybe do a partnership with Tivo or ReplayTV to combine services? It seems to me like that could have worked well for them. I have no idea how well WebTV did for MS but seeing as how they made a second version I assume it did fairly well. Then again I keep hearing that they lost a ton of money on XBox and they still made the XBox 360 so who knows.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    3. Re:AOL Is On Its Last Leg by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's over AOL, the days of dialup are gone and people will eventually be using DSL or Cable provided by their locality. I for one am impressed that AOL even exists. I mean seriously, who uses AOL?

      Well, I use it mainly because it is more than a 1/3 the price of DSL or Cable. I hate dail-up, but I can live with it rather than pay more than $60 for internet. I honestly think "broadband" internet shouldn't cost more than $10 a month, but I'll live with about $20 a month. 60*12=$720 a year 20*12=$240. $720-$240=$480. You might be able to afford $480, but my family can't. We don't have cable because we can't justify the expense. To me, DSL and Cable aren't mainstream because most people can't afford them as options. Dail-up is not dead by a long shot.

    4. Re:AOL Is On Its Last Leg by SevenHands · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. Dialup is far from dead. It'll be here for a long time to come. There are still people who live outside of the areas that dsl/cable can reach, and satellite hookup is too expensive. Some people are just interested in checking forums and reading emails instead of videos and other streaming media. And a dialup connection is still the best way to kick an addiction to pr0n...

  6. In unrelated news... by Reverend528 · · Score: 4, Funny

    AOL blocked 0 spam e-mails today!

  7. Is this effective? by winnabago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How deep does the banner advertising market go? I can't imagine that there is that much advertising-per-desktop to go around, with adwords already out there thriving. In simple supply/demand terms, instead of subscribers bolting, you will see cost per click plummet.

    --
    Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
  8. 'Splain it to me, Lucy... by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

    The company will begin relying on advertising sales rather than monthly fees paid by customers

    AOL doesn't exactly have a reputation for its great "content". What fans it does have, it has for making the internet accessible to complete technophobes.

    So perhaps I misunderstand their use of the word "advertising", but what, exactly, do they plan to advertise with?

    Somehow, I just can't see big money rolling in to put banners across the top of "my cat fluffy's homepage" or the literally millions of what amount to the web equivalent of "is this thing on?".


    But good luck to 'em. As much as I hate TW, and have traditionally made fun of A-O-Lusers, it saddens me to see the last of the original great ISPs slowly dying off.

    1. Re:'Splain it to me, Lucy... by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      As much as I hate TW

      I don't hate Time-Warner for one reason: DVD.

      Back in the early days of DVD, they were the only studio that whole-heartedly supported the format. They were the first to stick their necks out and remaster their films with anamorphic transfers, the first to do special edition DVD's, the first to do dual-layered DVD's, the first to break the $20 mark for new releases, etc. Without them sticking their necks out for the format, studios like Paramount and Fox might still be getting away with shitty, overpriced VHS tapes and overpriced laserdiscs with no extras.

      A lot of the credit for DVD's success (and the incredible value it brought to the consumer) goes to Time-Warner and the fact that they stuck with the format back when people were still predicting it would fail.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In addition to seeing fewer AOL CDs, a shift to ad revenue also means some serious cuts in staff size, especially in the customer service and retention departments

    So, basically, people fed up with getting abused by their paltry customer service quit, and they lose money. To solve the problem, they shift to ad based revenue, cutting retention and service, pissing off even more people via the further reduced service who then quit, allowing them to shift to even more ad-based revenue.

    It's brilliant I say! Brilliant! They've perfected some sort of perpetual money machine here!
  10. For Whom the Bell Tolls by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If the speculation and news reports prove correct, AOL's changes would be ambitious indeed. But will they go far enough, and is it possible for AOL to regain its past heft? "Will the advertising revenue ever replace dial-up?" says Bonner. "I'm not sure when and if that will ever happen. In the dial-up world, you could be all things to everybody--that worked. Now AOL needs to focus." Adds Helfstein: "The question is: What can AOL do for customers that can convince you to stop using Google or Yahoo as your homepage?"

    It's safe to say that AOL has died, but the body doesn't know it yet. At one time it was a lot of people's portal to the Internet, especially in the pre-DSL days, but now I can't honestly understand why anyone keeps it. With on-demand Internet connections and browsers readily available, there's no need for this cheesy portal application, unless you're stuck using dial-up, but those numbers continue to fall rapidly.

    AOL never saw the forest for the trees -- popularizing the Internet forced up connection speeds and access, and eventually they were outstripped by Yahoo, Google, and everyone else.People got tired of being kicked off and having to log back on, or paying too much on their phone bill because their "local" number was anything but. Once AOL had a large enough subscriber base, and once all those folks got a taste of the true Internet, they made demands that AOL couldn't meet, and so now they are soon to be relegated to the dustbin of history. There may come a time when people won't remember what the "A" in AIM stands for, and then AOL will be truly gone.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  11. AOL with more ads. Great. by realmolo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's my prediction of what is going to happen:

    Everybody who is dumb enough to use AOL keeps using it, but doesn't pay.

    The true cheapskates of the world sign-up, but since they are cheapskates, the advertising really isn't going to work on them very well. Advertisers abandon AOL.

    AOL ends up dying. Thank God.

  12. Ads are invasive by Cpoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know, especially in this community, Im not the only one that finds advertisements everywhere quite invasive. Im not just talking about the internet either, branding and advertising is -everywhere-. With so many online vendors changing to/emphasizing ad-supported revenue streams, I have a feeling this is going to impact sales negatively in the long run...

    It gets to a point where I see so much advertising, I dont even notice it. I know sub-conciously its supposed to be planting the seeds in my mind to buy things, but my spending habits have not changed other then necessities since I first started making money... I just see this method as a failure in the long run. I think the business of the future will be successful first due to customer service, and a very close second on quality of the product. Everyone is so connected now due to the internet, word of mouth advertising should become more and more viable as a primary advertisement source, and we can finally have our mental space back...

  13. Ah-ha! by Doches · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like all those AOL customers have gone AWOL!

    *ducks*

  14. #1 most frequently overheard comment during merger by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Don't worry about that broadband nonsense. It's just a passing fad."

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  15. Great, as if AOL wasn't slow enough by jhfry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that I have ever used AOL, but unfortunately some family memebers I support do... and their number one complaint is that "my internet is so slow". So now they will get double slammed with ads, AOL's and whatever webpage they decide to look at. I'm sure they will be thrilled.

    I have a better idea for AOL. Make your service something people actually want. Make it fast, make it simple, make it cheap, and most of all make it about the customer rather than your thinning wallets. I would have no problem suggesting AOL to anyone if AOL was all of these things. Hell I might even encourage people to pay a couple of bucks more a month if it meant fewer phone calls to me.

    Unfortunately, most of the phone calls I get from AOL users are because of AOL. Throw more ads into the mix and I bet the number of people leaving increases rather than decreases. People aren't leaving AOL because of cost, it's because of better alternatives. If AOL had made their service better, treated their customers with some respect, and gave them what they needed people who wanted a simple way to get on the net would have flocked to them. Instead they gave them the opposite and are only gonna make it worse by adding ads to the mix of things they are doing wrong.

    --
    Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
  16. Pure Crap by MBCook · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but that's what AOL is. I've had the displeasure of having to deal with them for YEARS.

    I'll just be nice and ignore the fact that they bought and killed The Imagination Network, which was a blast.

    Let's talk about their software. Their software that, to this day, takes like 30 seconds to start up, if it's feeling fast. Their software that often crashes after closing so when you think it's gone it's actually there sucking up 100% (happens almost daily on one of our computers). Let's talk about their integrated software suite that made since back when no one had a web browser but is now just an annoying piece of bloat-ware that should have been replaced 5 years ago minimum.

    But they are going ad supported. You don't say. You'd think they were now based on using their software. In the last few years, they have gone to incredible lengths to cram ads on EVERY SINGLE SCREEN they display. Your mailbox? It has ads. Reading an e-mail? It has ads. Their welcome screen? Ads.

    About a month ago, they started something new. When you exit AOL... an ad comes up. But it isn't just some little ad. It's as big as the welcome screen and it always seems to be for AOL.

    But wait, it gets better.. that ad has a close button. And AOL doesn't exit until you press it. That means that choosing "exit" from the file menu DOESN'T EXIT AOL. This also seems to happen before you log off, so good luck if you don't have an unlimited plan for some reason and you forget about this.

    I can only tell you from having to support my parents on AOL for the last 5 years or so (they've been members longer, it just wasn't so bad before) that AOL is a NIGHTMARE. It's amazingly slow. It crashes. If it gets screwed up (and it has) reinstalling often doesn't fix it. When you upgrade, it makes a new folder in Program Files and leaves the old version there, but deletes the shortcuts to it. Nothing like looking at someone's computer and seeing 5 copies of AOL. They continually add terrible software that only slows things down OUTSIDE AOL like their virus protection (we already that had), their firewall (WE ALREADY THAT HAD), and more. And there is something to be said for a program that keeps ALL the users downloaded files in some random directory by default. That was acceptable back in the Windows 3.1 days, but ever since Windows 95 those thins are supposed to be in My Documents. But instead, this are spread across the computer. Can't find a file? Did you open it in AOL? Then it isn't where it should be, it's in C:\Program Files\America Online 9.0 Security Slowdown Edition\Something\Or\Other. Also, what other e-mail client DELETES THE MESSAGES YOU'VE READ? You read a message, and when you log off it gets moved to "Read Meassages" or something like that. And the stuff in that folder, seems to get deleted. I don't know if it is the next time you log off, or after 1 week, or what. But if you don't specifically save it somewhere or keep choosing "Keep as new" (what my parents use) then it will go away FOREVER.

    I've tried to switch my parents off. I've tried to get them to use IE or FireFox (instead of their constant problems in AOL). I've tried to move them over to GMail. I think I'm getting closer. I can't tell you how much easier my life would be without AOL.

    Ah, AOL. You only outlived your usefulness about 7 years ago. All you've done since then is make things worse for everyone else. You were good at one point. It's telling that you've been hemmoraging subscribers for years, and the only way you managed to stay around during the boom (when EVERYONE was buying computers) was by generating 0.5% of all trash in the US with those stupid CDs that were put in EVERY MAGAZINE PRINTED.

    Oh, yeah, then there is the Time Warner merger. That was a stroke of genius, huh.

    Anyway, the point of this whole rambling anti-AOL post was that AOL already puts ads everywhere. Either their are raking in the cash and don't need the subscriber fees, or they are going to be in trouble when they do this because there is nowhere else to put ads except video ads in the background of the AOL window.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  17. Uh oh by AsmCoder8088 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now how are they going to reach their goal?

  18. In related news by merc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Due to plummeting sales Mcdonalds announced plans to add dirt to their menu.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  19. Wait, you're talking about AOL users here by blueZ3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who wouldn't want to advertise to the gullible?

    "Install our free screensaver and it will speed up your Internet tubes 200%!!!"

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  20. 1990 called by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    AOL is irrelevant and obsolete.

    They still run on telephone modem due to restrictions imposed by the FTC from the TW/AOL merger - AOL cannot use TW's cable resources unless TW opens their pipes to competitors (which they have refused to do).

    No geek of any stature would even think of subscribing to AOL and there is a uncomplimentory generalization of AOL members when they post to a forum.

    AOL's solution to the spam problem is a whitelist which you have to pay a fee to send mail to.

    If you send an email to an AOL account that is dead, you don't get a bounce so you have no feedback if your friend received it. Over time people stop bothering to email to any AOL account.

    There are better alternatives to AIM and it has no place in the office. TW tried to make AIM the corporate messaging standard and it failed miserably.

    AOL is on the blacklist at corporation IT departments. AOL software takes over your PC and requires a complete reinstall to remove it, which is not a favorite pasttime of IT.

    AOL does everything possible to keep their members in their "walled garden" - you cannot even change the home page in the AOL browser, it is fixed at AOL dot com.

    There is a growing backlash against aggressive mass marketing and people are getting tired of AOL junk mail CDs landing in their mailbox.

    AOL goes to great lengths to prevent members from unsubscribing. Frustrated customers will tell all there friends to stay away from AOL. That's not how you build loyalty.

    Someone please tell me how a shift to advertising revenue model is going to solve all this.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:1990 called by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny
      AOL is irrelevant and obsolete.

      In my book, AOL became obsolete the day they started sending their spam on useless CDs instead of floppy disks. They switched from being my free supply of removable media to becoming a totally useless annoyance. You'd think that they'd at least have the courtesy of sending their junk on CD-R/Ws, but no, all they sent was shiny coasters.

  21. redundant? by paulsomm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "planning to shift to an ad-supported business model"

    Considering the amount of ads paid-subscribers endure, I'd say it's been effectively "ad-supported" for a decade now. At least, from an end-user perspective there will likely be no obvious change in AOL's appearance/presentation.

    Unless they plan to replace what little remaining unique content they have with ads . . .

  22. New cancellation policy by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that they won't let you cancel AOL unless you buy from an advertiser?

  23. re: Why keep AOL? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always wonder myself, why people keep AOL. But then I look at a number of my customers who still use it.... In one case, it's a gradeschool teacher who is barely computer-literate, but expected to have her own email address in this day and age. She does the vast majority of her emailing on her Treo phone that a Sprint rep. informed her about and showed her how to use - and AOL actually is supported in the "Versamail" application included with the phone. Her worst nightmare would be having to switch to something new, and explain to everyone she knows what her new email address is. Her laptop at home has its start page set to AOL, and she knows just enough to sign in on that page and get to her stuff, double-click to view photos and videos that were too big to get on her phone, and so forth.

    In another case, it's an older, retired couple. AOL came with their nearly 10-year old Compaq Presario PC that they still use with Windows '98SE. That's what they started with, and so they still use it. $15 a month or whatever is a small price to pay to stick with something familiar and to keep their same email address. (They're still using dial-up too. Just can't imagine a need to pay for anything faster....)

    But ultimately, yeah - AOL is living on their (now dwindling) past success. Their customer-base is, by and large, the long-time customers who resist change and are scared of learning something new.

  24. Fantastic idea. No, really. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dwindling user base? Here's the cure.

    Flood them with mandatory advertising through your connection client. I'm sure that lots of modem using people are going to be double-plus happy waiting all that extra time downloading megabytes of extra rich shockwave advertising content at 56k, and then wading through it all just to get their email. Freaking brilliant.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  25. If you call to cancel by Vengie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They will switch you to the free plan now. I have a number of people for whom I manage their "internets!@#@@!!" and have finally gotten around to getting them all comfortable with gmail. I've had them in the "walled garden" for a while (14.95 a month AOL over Broadban plan) -- when I called to cancel for each one of them, AOL offered the same "we'll give you the service free" shtick. So if you're still using AOL, might as well take advantage now. (No clue what happens when the program is discontinued)

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe by DaveInAZ · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ok, I know this is going to be a wildly unpopular position with this audience, but AOL is not the anti-christ some of you make it out to be. How could it be, if Microsoft is? There can only be one. And, it does serve a valid and vital purpose; it keeps 19 million technophobes out of OUR hair.

    There's no way we're going to keep uncle Homer and aunt Ginny off the web, and no real reason to want to. I can't remember the last time a search engine returned a page of someone's blurry photos of their cat. What we need is a way for them to access the web without our help! AOL used to provide that, and could again, if they'd get their heads out of their assets.

    Sure, they've lost a ton of subscribers, but their membership is still equal to the populations of the five largest US cities, combined. Who uses AOL? You're kidding, right? Stop playing with your own ROOT long enough to get a clue about your neighbors. Everyone has DSL or Cable? Dream on. There are still plenty of people who don't have access to either, and plenty more who can't or won't spend that much on internet access. That $40 or $50 a month may be nothing to a highly paid techie, but it's a ridiculous chunk of money for someone scraping by on average pay when they can get 90% of the functionality for 40% off the cost. Dialup access is essentially free for most people, aside from the ISP charges.

    I've recently had a real-world refresher course in what it's like to deal with dialup and dialup providers and, trust me, as bad as AOL may be, they're still better than the alternatives. Ever called an ISP's tech support and gotten connected to Bubba, whose six kids are all screaming over the blaring TV in the background, while he thumbs through the manual trying to find you an answer? I have. Apparently telecommuting has reached the sticks, even if broadband hasn't. Compared to that, AOL's support is a dream come true.

    What AOL really needs to do is not pack more ads into less screen real estate, but get back to their roots. They dominated the ISP business by making it simple to connect, period. The content was always crap. Chatrooms have been supplanted by IMs. No one needs their guidance to find what they're looking for; all they need is Google.

    The anti-virus and firewall apps are actually a good idea for the technophobes out there, who otherwise would probably be totally unprotected, but should definitely be optional. (I thought they were, but I could be wrong.) But they should dump the rest of the crap, and just do what they used to do best; make connecting simple and non-threatening for those who just want to turn it on, like a TV, and not have to worry about how it works.

    They're not losing customers because of the content. They're losing them because they've lost sight of who their customer base is.

    1. Re:Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe by bishorange · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use AOL in the UK and can honestly say I have never had a problem with them at all. I am on ADSL+, have only had one days interrupted service in 5 years (which was a BT problem anyway), there are no caps and I have not experienced any traffic shaping, multiplayer gaming latency has been very low and very reliable. Maybe it's different in the USA but here in dear old blighty things appear to be very much different. Okay I have no need of their software (AOL 8 ad nauseum) and never installed any versions of it and never will until all the silly services are removed. I think AOL are very foolish selling off their ISP side of the business, after all they are one of the largest providers here in the UK and have a lot of customers shelling out monthly subscriptions, which would seem a better revenue model than the one they now propose.

  28. customer service and retention departments by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, because nothing helps keep a customer more then poor customer service and a lack of people trained to keep the customers. Then again, I do remember their tactics "Oh stay, here let us give you 6 months free." Six months later "Oh stay, here let us give you 6 months free." Followed by someone saying "I noticed on january you accessed this much, and on February that much" - which really makes me you know happy.

    AOL just has a rep, and not a great rep. Nobody wants their crappy interface anymore which is bloatware.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  29. I Work There - Here's The Deal by uncleroot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could get fired for this but here goes:

    I'm one of those evil AOL "retention" agents except I'm not an idiot like the guy in the recording you all heard a few weeks ago. It is astounding how things have changed here at the AOL call center since the incident with the cancellation call recording being on the Today Show. A few weeks ago they would fire you for not hammering the hell out of these people calling to cancel. They expected us to "save" every single caller and lying was acceptible and encouraged (as long as the lie cheated the customer and not AOL). Now they fire you for making more than one very polite saves attempt or being the slightest bit rude to the caller. Call volume is way down and rumors are rampant that the center will be closed. The management assholes in this place who have been running the money-machine scam for years have definitely had the smugness wiped off their faces.

    Having said all that, if you know someone like your grandmother or your kid sister who likes AOL and wants to keep it here's how to get it free over broadband or for $9.95/month unlimited dialup - Just call and request to cancel. Just say they you've gone to broadband and you want to cancel and they will give you free version. If you want the dialup version request to cancel giving the reason that it's too expensive and you want to go to a low cost provider. They will offer you $9.95 unlimited dialup no commitment. But you have to say you want to cancel or you won't be offered these deals.

    Tell anyone thinking of tying AOL to beware of the "Risk Free Trial" disks. Risk Free Trial really means money back guarantee (it's not the slightest bit clear on the packaging) and the payment method will be hit for $25.90 on the day after creating the account. These risk free CDs are making checking accounts go overdrawn by the tens of thousands because the dipshits running them don't have an extra $25.90 to cover the unexpected charge. The typical AOL customer nowdays is either old or poor or an immigrant and most of them don't have much money. If you want to make a AOL account call AOL and make them give you a free trial and then cancel it to get the free broadband account or the $9.95 dialup.