Slashdot Mirror


Another New Tomb in the Valley of the Kings?

Praxiteles writes "A radar survey in 2000 found KV63, the tomb excavated near King Tutankhamen's tomb earlier this year. (KV stands for Valley of the Kings). Just announced is that this same radar survey shows an image of what appears to be a shaft to another tomb just 15 meters north of KV63. Will radar stratigraphy change the multi-millennial tradition of destructive excavation and open new opportunities in the search for buried treasure?"

131 comments

  1. Stupid Obligatory Slashdot Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Gee, considering all the radar stratigraphy experts running around on this site, you should get the answer to your question in no time.

    Meanwhile, I will wait for all the radar stratigraphy and egyptology experts to arrive.

    Sheesh.

  2. What?? by jlowery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Will radar stratigraphy change the multi-millennial tradition of destructive excavation and open new opportunities in the search for buried treasure?"

    Let's hope it will open up new opportunities to learn about history, which contributes to the wealth of everyone.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
    1. Re:What?? by mikeisme77 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saying that because the summary was great until that line which made me upset because my class on archaeology beat it into my head fairly well that the "search for buried treasure" has destroyed an incredible amount of history and has caused other artificats to be lost or altered (due to the "art market").

    2. Re:What?? by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Will radar stratigraphy change the multi-millennial tradition of destructive excavation and open new opportunities in the search for buried treasure?"

      Let's hope it will open up new opportunities to learn about history, which contributes to the wealth of everyone.

      Maybe, but "Lara Croft, Radar Stratigrapher" just doesn't have that ring to it.
      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. Mods, do your job.

    4. Re:What?? by mikeisme77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it's from all over the world then that would include the Middle East and Asia (which it does as archaelogists from those locations do not like grave robbers either). There are other ways of making a living that don't include robbing your own country of its cultural history (which grave robbers do). The archaeologists I've spoken to (admittedly just a handful) don't seem very interested in 'career changing' discoveries but more so in uncovering the mysteries of the past without destroying the site (which includes trying to avoid digging when possible)--this way when new techniques/technologies arrive int he future the ability to understand these sites will not be lost by digging them up or doing some other destructive means of trying to uncover part of the past now but destroying future knowledge of the past later. The archaeologists seeking a 'career changing' discovery are normally the 'celebrity archaeologists' (like that one Egyptian who took a sledgehammer to a tomb on national TV...) as opposed to the academic arachaeologists.

    5. Re:What?? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure he wasn't being ironic. Not a great troll, and not really that funny either. Aw well :)

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    6. Re:What?? by ursabear · · Score: 1

      Well said!

      History is by far more important than any monetary value of the finds in any archeological foray. Long after any riches have lined the pockets of someone, the understanding of the past remains in our minds (if we let it). There is so much to learn from what happened in the Egyptian dynastic holdings region. So much to learn...

      I'm in hope that as our technology advances, so will our explorations - and perhaps our ability to preserve the purity of the finds.

    7. Re:What?? by JakusMinimus · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Maybe, but "Lara Croft, Radar Stratigrapher" just doesn't have that ring to it.

      I don't know ... ever work in a lab environment with females? Yeah, that's right! It is inevitable that a boob (maybe even two at once!) is gonna brush up against you at some time or another. Oh, sweet bliss.

      So "Lara Croft, Radar Stratigrapher" the game isn't likey to be very popular as I imagine it is hard to design a game in a labratory setting where the payoffs range from brushing up against feminine charms to discovering heretofor unknown tombs in Egypt. But, I bet "Lara Croft, Radar Stratigrapher" (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) would be a welcome "sight" in the Radar Stratigraphy lab. =)
      --

      You can be an atheist and still not want to succumb to some weird cross-over sheep disease -- AC
    8. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know ... ever work in a lab environment with females? Yeah, that's right! It is inevitable that a boob (maybe even two at once!) is gonna brush up against you at some time or another. Oh, sweet bliss.


      How old are you, 17?

    9. Re:What?? by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 0

      This news is so Aliens Vs. Predator !
      Anybody want to point one of those sats twards Antartica and see what's under the ice?

    10. Re:What?? by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 0

      I don't care how old you are...
      Plenty of lab or office settings have a female on board which can cause a sexual tension. This is why so many male fantisies involve a gal in a profession...
      Such as; Nurse, Secretary, Business Woman, Waitress, French Maid. Need I say more? hahaha

    11. Re:What?? by jericho9 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but "Tom Swift and his Radar Stratigrapher" doesn't sound too bad .

    12. Re:What?? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Tom Swift and his Secret Radar Stratigrapher Decoder Ring is even better. If you understand the reference you're an old slashdotter.

  3. Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ever since I read Larry Niven's Ringworld I've been waiting for some geek who also read it to invent deep radar.

    Every time I see that someone has got a neutrino detector up, I think we've finally got a deep "radar" that can see through practically everything (AFAWCT) in the Universe, offering us a neutrino detector detector.

    I won't be surprised when we fire it up and the Valley of the Kings lights up, along with various museums (and attics) in France, UK, US, Germany and Japan.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They have. Allegedly. I was reading abot some (Brazillian I think) guy who demonstrated a device
      he built as a mine detector. It works slowly but can find anything burried within anything
      as long as there is a material anomoly. I was very suspicious of the story because it had
      all the "scientists" saying it was "impossible" and the guy wouldn't fully share the method
      until it was patented. Anyway he did a practical demonstration and discovered several
      buried bodies, arms caches and stuff in a field that had been eluding police for 15 years.

      Anybody got that link? Anybody debunked it yet?

    2. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      apocrpyhal: Of questionable authorship or authenticity.
      (from apo/far + crypt/hidden)

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by joss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Anybody debunked it yet?

      I hope your not one of those of people [vast majority afaict] who
      have very different standards of evidence between a claim and
      the debunking of a claim.

      Someone makes a claim and no matter what evidence they provide,
      the hearing from someone else that that person had heard it was
      "debunked" is enough for them to discard it.

      I am familiar [and sympathetic to] the viewpoint that extraordinary
      claims require extraordinary evidence, but this phenomena is different.
      Just the use of the word "debunk" seems to short circuit many people's
      critical facilities.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    4. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Neutrinos are notoriously difficult to detect, for precisely the same reasons that you propose using them as imaging - they can travel through nearly everything. I used to work for the SNO project back around 1996, the amount of engineering and technological sophistication that goes into a detector like this is quite amazing.
      .

      Back in the day there were proposals about using neutrinos to communicate with submarines and other military vehicles around the planet, since neutrinos can travel through the Earth. Since a military vessel would have to have a very small neutrino detector (to keep its mobility), the detection of neutrinos by this thing would be super low. IIRC, expected usable bandwidths (not sure if they actually did the experiment or not) would be something like a byte per day, which is obviously too low to be useful for military.

    5. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neutrinos are overkill for scales of subs on Earth. For Death Stars across galaxies, entanglement's SAAD avoids latency. Neutrinos are good for finding distant, old objects. I don't know if any astrarchaeologist could afford a detector in their mobile phone.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re: Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Back in the day there were proposals about using neutrinos to communicate with submarines and other military vehicles around the planet, since neutrinos can travel through the Earth. Since a military vessel would have to have a very small neutrino detector (to keep its mobility), the detection of neutrinos by this thing would be super low. IIRC, expected usable bandwidths (not sure if they actually did the experiment or not) would be something like a byte per day, which is obviously too low to be useful for military.

      If you filled the whole submarine with dry-cleaning fluid, it should make a decent detector.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re: Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a very below-average submarine.

    8. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      I don't know if any astrarchaeologist could afford a detector in their mobile phone.

      Even if they did add that to a mobile phone I'm sure we'd get complaints that it makes the phone too complicated and why can't we have a phone that's just a phone ;)

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    9. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not neutrinos, muons. Neutrinos can barrel through a lightyear thick piece of lead without noticing, they only interact with normal matter via the weak force and are far too difficult to image with. Muons (leptons, -kinda like heavy electrons) which are continuously created in the upper atmosphere by cosmic ray collisions with the gasses there produce copious amounts of muons which rain down from abovde all the time. the muon has a short half life (2 microseconds) but are travelling so fast (high kinetic energy) that they experience time dilation (thx. Einstein!) and actually can penetrate thousands of feet into the ground before decaying/being absorbed. Because they have an electric charge (-1) they feel the electromagnetic force and are thus trivially easy to detect. So you can put an array of detectors below say, a pyramid, and simply look for areas where you see more muons on the array, that's where a void must be (less attenuation) and you go search there. I think this was done in the 60's by physicist Luis Alvarez. Here, for instance is an image of the shadow of the moon. Big deal you say? Well that image was taken "in muons" from 700 meters underground in the Soudan mine of Minnesota.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    10. Re: Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      I predict two people will understand what you are talking about there......and here we are.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    11. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "put an array of photodetectors below, say, a pyramid"

      Sounds like you'll have to rely on some leftover alien tech in the pyramid's basement, either a detector or levitator, to pull that off easy. Or make a brighter muon source on one side, and a detector held up on the other side, which is more easily accessible than the space beneath the biggest, most precious ancient artifact on the planet.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      speaking of leftover alien tech i do hope that they scan the [deleted] out of any jars before they open them and watch out for any funky jewlery also

      14 26 17 05 29 24 16

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    13. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      you can put one detector in a single spot below it and just have it look in all directions using atmospheric muons which come in at low angles.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    14. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Oops...
      done.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Kinetic energy is 1/2 * mass *velocity^2 and so depends on mass and velocity. Time dilation only depends on velocity. So it's somewhat incorrect to state the time dilation is because of high kinetic energy. For example. Consider a train. That will have a very large mass but slow velocity. Overall it probably has a higher kinetic energy than a muon, yet does not experience time dilation.

      In general be careful with the terms :)

    16. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Paradoks · · Score: 1

      >Someone makes a claim and no matter what evidence they provide,
      >the hearing from someone else that that person had heard it was
      >"debunked" is enough for them to discard it.

      I imagine taking a bunch of skeptics out to a field of their choice and finding mines and buried body parts would be rather enough evidence to merit further study and quiet the debunkers.

      If they can't do that, "debunking" is hardly needed, as there are a lot of crazy claims which I'm not going to bother using mind space on -- there's too much real science with actual solid evidence for me to keep up on, already.

      Much like in the case of this possible new tomb -- once they dig up that plot of land, I imagine it'll be pretty darn obvious whether or not there's another tomb in the area.

    17. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      leftover alien tech in the pyramid's basement
      Sounds like a job for Daniel Jackson.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    18. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for a slightly modified phone and a sonic screwdriver =]

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    19. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Sanat · · Score: 1

      Here is one for gold http://www.gnld.ws/

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    20. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by magetoo · · Score: 1
      Not neutrinos, muons.
      [...]
      Here, for instance is an image of the shadow of the moon. Big deal you say? Well that image was taken "in muons" from 700 meters underground in the Soudan mine of Minnesota.
      Big deal, I say. Wikipedia also says:
      The shadow is the result of approximately 120 muons missing from a total of 33 million detected in Soudan 2 over its 10 years of operation.
      Maybe the information is wrong or you know something I don't, but it doesn't look very practical to me.
    21. Re:Lips of Truth Speak to Ears of Wisdom by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the resolution is rather poor. The moon image looks like one of those "million light years away" objects. I don't know if it's because of the equipment used or a limitation of the technique itself but between that and the exposure time (10 years) plus the setup time (digging a gallery beneath the spot you want to explore), all to wonder whether this one off colour pixel might or might not be a buried paleolithic person... this does indeed seem a bit complicated for very little return, even if there is some theoretical possibility there.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. Don't open it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's probably a Goa'uld trap. Wait, it might have a Zero-Point Module--open it but have a lot of guards and SG-1 standing by.

  5. Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    My aunt works in Egyptology, and she doesn't have a lot of good things to say about this Reeves guy, so take this all with a grain of salt. The scan has found *something*, but not necessarily a tomb - limestone is naturally porous, and this could very well just be an air bubble. Basically, he's announcing a tomb that hasn't been discovered, which might not be a tomb at all, on the off-chance that, should it actually *be* a tomb, he'll get the credit for it.

    He also isn't even allowed in the Valley of the Kings. He got the boot because he's been known to work with smugglers. Generally not a reputable character.

    1. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by andrewman327 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I view GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) as a diagnostic tool. There are definite cases where GPR has generated false positives. Think about when the FBI destroyed that barn recently while looking for Jimmy Hoffa. This technology cannot be trusted on its own, but it can help reduce the wholesale destruction of exploratory digging. It is possible that this shaft is a natural formation or something else that will not lead to treasure (or a deeper understanding of history).

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    2. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative
      He also isn't even allowed in the Valley of the Kings. He got the boot because he's been known to work with smugglers. Generally not a reputable character.

      Well... FTA...

      Reeves was falsely accused of involvement in antiquities smuggling and his permit was revoked. In August 2005, he was officially cleared of any wrongdoing by Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA)

      Looks like the Egyptians looked into that and cleared him. Sounds to me like your aunt has a personal axe to grind...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by pedalman · · Score: 1
      Basically, he's announcing a tomb that hasn't been discovered, which might not be a tomb at all, on the off-chance that, should it actually *be* a tomb, he'll get the credit for it.
      I'll bet it's Al Capone's other vault that contains the pr0n stash. Go get 'em, Geraldo.
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    4. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative
      He also isn't even allowed in the Valley of the Kings. He got the boot because he's been known to work with smugglers.


      Shades of E A Wallis Budge, a man so vain and unscrupulous, that the British Museum, the organization that he worked for, can only say this of him:


      Budge's works are still in print, but this is because they are out of copyright, and so the text can be cheaply reprinted. While they are well illustrated, full of information and extremely cheap, they are at best unreliable, and usually misleading.


      They only stopped short of slapping a red banner across his photo with the world "Crackpot".

      Yet, nobody says Budge was stupid. Nor that he was unenterprising. He brought home lots of archaeological treasure that the Museum might not have received otherwise, which makes the Museum an important place for scholars. The down side is that he destroyed priceless and possibly irreplaceable knowledge in the process, which undermined the Museum's mission.

      So, it isn't out of the question that a freebooting antiquities smuggler found a new, possibly unlooted, probably even royal tomb. IIRC we don't have tombs to match up every ruler we know to have existed from the period where the Valley of the Kings was in use. Furthermore, while most people I know are marginally unethical, very few of them view themselves as ruthlessly bad. Therefore he might not scruple to support antiquities smuggling, but might draw the line at looting a newly discovered tomb. Or the tomb, if it exists, may not be excatable without a fairly major engineering effort.

      Or it may not exist at all. But I hope it does. Even a looted tomb is bound to be very interesting, unless all the inscriptions and paintings have been removed.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or, he greased the proper palms.

      One thing I learned from my trip to Egypt: almost anything is possible -- with the right baksheesh.

      --
      My father is a blogger.
    6. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative
      Basically, he's announcing a tomb that hasn't been discovered, which might not be a tomb at all, on the off-chance that, should it actually *be* a tomb, he'll get the credit for it.


      If you'd bothered to RTFA (Yeah, yeah, I know this is Slashdot; people never RTFA before posting.) you'd have seen two things. First, he's not saying it is a new tomb but that it might be. Second, he gives credit for the discovery of the other new tomb to the person who excavated it, even thought it had been found earlier in the radar survey.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, after Googling this subject for a bit (and looking at the Project's Web site) it appears that he announced his results after Otto Schaden and his team independently found the tomb (it was found in what was originally Reeve's concession.) He also states very clearly that even though his radar results identified a tomb-like structure some time before the physical discovery of the tomb, Schaden's group clearly deserves the credit for finding it. Doesn't sound like as much of an asshole as you're trying to make him out to be.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by solitas · · Score: 1

      If a new tomb _is_ located, somebody should warn Zahi Hawass (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zahi_Hawass) about the 'blindness' and 'hairy palms' historically said to be the fruits of his not-unexpected actions - and that he should at least wash his hands when he's finished...

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    9. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by barakn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      FTFA, with the part you omitted highlighted in bold:
      Reeves was falsely accused of involvement in antiquities smuggling and his permit was revoked. In August 2005, he was officially cleared of any wrongdoing by Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), though not allowed to return to his work in the Valley.
      Perhaps they just didn't have enough evidence.
      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    10. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by clambake · · Score: 1

      Basically, he's announcing a tomb that hasn't been discovered, which might not be a tomb at all, on the off-chance that, should it actually *be* a tomb, he'll get the credit for it.

      It:s that easy, huh? Hell, I don't even need to LOOK at the X-Ray scans... Even from here I can clearly see half a dozen undiscovered tombs! And at least one of them has some shocking new discovery! I'll take the credit for that, thank you very much.

    11. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by db32 · · Score: 1

      OJ didn't do it either.
      and MJ is completely innocent.
      Oh and lets not forget MS isn't exactly being held to any form of punishment even though they were found guilty....
      I would trust the real peers of this guy to have a more accurate picture than any government, court, or "jury of peers" because a jury is NEVER really your peers. So axe or not, this is certainly no reason to believe the aunt in question has an axe to grind.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    12. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

      Most of those accusations come from Dr. Hawass, himself a character that has a colorful reputation and a history of pulling a fast one to "protect" the sanctity of the Valley of Kings in particular and Egyptian artifacts in general. In other words, If you want to dig in Egypt his ass is the one you kiss and if doesn't think you do it well enough your gone.

    13. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Yet, nobody says Budge was stupid. Nor that he was unenterprising.

      Don't forget the dictionary. Its pretty good.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    14. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by vondo · · Score: 1

      MJ? Michael Jordon? What did he do (or not do)?

    15. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I've noticed, that I never seem to see anything related to Egyptian archaeology that doesn't have Hawass' face all over it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    16. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you going on about?

    17. Re:Reeves is not all he's cracked up to be by mydn · · Score: 1

      Belloq...Belloq!

  6. Agenda week on slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Will radar stratigraphy change the multi-millennial tradition of destructive excavation and open new opportunities in the search for buried treasure?"

    I have a better question. Why does every submission have to have the posters agenda? You could have said "Will radar stratigraphy open new opportunities in the search for buried treasure?".

    1. Re:Agenda week on slashdot. by suffe · · Score: 1

      And more importantly, was it needed at all. I mean, duh, of course it will change it. It's just a question of _when_ it will, not _if_. I'd try and come up with some witty analogy here, but I'm to lazy. It is left as an exercise to the reader.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    2. Re:Agenda week on slashdot. by woolio · · Score: 1

      . Why does every submission have to have the posters agenda?

      Because inflammatory submissions generate more comments, rebuffs, flames, etc...

      Which translate to more page views, etc....

      Which makes advertising on slashdot more valuable.....

      Which means more money for CowboyNeal.....

  7. KV != VK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (KV stands for Valley of the Kings)

    That's funny, I would've bet money that it really stands for King Valley.

    1. Re:KV != VK by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure you believe that UTC stands for "Universal Time Coordinated."

  8. I guess it's not... by Jeian · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the Valley of Kings in Loch Modan.

    I should play WoW less.

    1. Re:I guess it's not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for reminding me...I gotta get back to leveling.

    2. Re:I guess it's not... by heson · · Score: 1

      If you got time for /. youre not playing enough.

    3. Re:I guess it's not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...so this isn't about the discovery of a new instance? Man I'm confused, I read the whole article thinking this was the announcement of a new, deeper gnomeragan instance for higher level players like me.

  9. Idiot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My aunt works in Egyptology, and she doesn't have a lot of good things to say about this Reeves guy, so take this all with a grain of salt.

    Really? My aunt's best friends brother who works at the Lakewood, WA, Burger King has a completely different theory. But I with a grain of salt. Seriously, who cares what your aunt says about someone she probably can only dream about working with...

  10. Google UnEarth by Ageing+Metalhead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All we need is a deep radar satellite, to spin around the world, and then we can have "google unearth". People searching the globe with their PCs looking for buried treasure from their armchair. Mind you, it will probably throw up more unearthed Mafia corpses than treasure ;-)

    --
    The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. - HGTTG
  11. Trollish write-up by OriginalArlen · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    -1 Troll for the silly (but apparently mandatory, these days) 'buried treasure' feedline, just to give all the lame Tomb Raider jokers something to hang their crap from.

    (off-topic) I wish Slashdot had qualitative scoring for posts, instead of a simple 0-5 points scale of bad->good. I read at +5 because I remembered one day that I had other things to do with my life than read every comment. Unfortunately a lot of pretty lame gags, and equally glib dinner-party received opinions get modded up. Most of the humour is just crap; I usually know the dinner-party type arguments and counterarguments on the typical /. controversies. What I like are authoratative comments (the type that begin "Why, yes, I am a rocket scientst" (/PhD in molecular biologist / have an MBA from INSEAD / was head of infrastructure at ISP FooCom, or whatever...), plus pointers to other interesting and relevant stuff (other papers in the field, summaries of current consensu, etc) ... and some personal anecdotes (thought I dowish people would remember that "data" is not the plural of "anecdote". And I wish people would sometimes stop and think "hey, I wonder if these incredibly intelligent over-educated specialists in the field of [FOO] have perhaps thought of my [idea / objection / suggestion / problem with their approach / reason why it won't work] already? After all, it took me 15 seconds to read the writeup and think of it, and they've been working in the field for 30 years...

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
    1. Re:Trollish write-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd moderate you as -1 Andy Rooney-Cranky Curmudgeon if I could.

      seriously, there's nothing more worthless on this board than whiney posters complaining about moderation/moderators/topics... blah.. blah.. blah... Well, except for posts that complain about complaining posters.

    2. Re:Trollish write-up by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1
      Just go to your preferences page, then go to the "Comments" tab, and change the comment modifier for the "Funny" mod to something negative.

      You can also crank up "Informative" if you wish.

    3. Re:Trollish write-up by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      No one forces you to read the comments.

    4. Re:Trollish write-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paragraphs you idiot, learn to fucking use them!

  12. Arrrr matey! by krell · · Score: 3, Funny

    " open new opportunities in the search for buried treasure?"

    Arr, matey! Any of ye swabs got a pirate ship that can sail in the desert?

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  13. I wish you would add.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    that a link on the Internet is not the best for supporting documentation. Unfortunately, if you supply a link, the link is taken as if it were a peer reviewed source - regardless of where it's pointing. I've seen links to sources that are not the most reliable. But thes posts are then modderated up to +5 for supplying such great information. Even the "reliable" sources make serious factual errors at times.

    The first thing that professors will tell their Ph.D. condidates is that sources from the internet are not valid.

  14. We should leave some stuff where it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The trouble is that if we find and excavate all the ancient sites, we are in peril of losing them forever. Maybe we should dig them up, photograph them and then put them back. The media that we use to store information are quite volitile. With one good war we could erase all information about our society as well as all the artifacts we have excavated from previous civilizations. The only historical information left would be the stuff we haven't dug up yet.

    The Renaissance was jump-started by ancient Roman and Greek texts. I am worried that, if we slide into a dark age, there won't be anything left upon which to rebuild civilization.

    1. Re:We should leave some stuff where it is. by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      i doubt it. if we ever go belly up, we're bound to leave a lot of crap lying around unless people have managed to nuke every city and burn every book. i mean, rome got sacked, and there was still a bunch of stuff left over to rediscover (including a giant hill of trash). although the media we use to store stuff is more easily lost than say stone tablets (i'm talking physical stuff here... paper and photos and what nots), the amount of copies we have now almost guarantees that there will be enough left for whoever survives.

    2. Re:We should leave some stuff where it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for your concerns, but we must remember that every town in each civilized nation has a library that would dwarf that of which was used for the renaissance. They include the history of all that has happened, that which we've discovered, and much data on the earth and science. Not to mention those very Greek and Roman texts you speak of. Everything will be fine... so long as they figure out fiction from non-fiction. ... oh shit.

    3. Re:We should leave some stuff where it is. by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Archeologists working in the southwest of the US (and elsewhere I presume) have done almost exactly that. In Chaco Canyon in New Mexico, there are a number of sites that have been located but not excavated. I imagine funding plays a role in these not having been dug up but the stated rationale is that these sites have survived 700 years while being buried. What better way to protect them and leave them for future study when, presumably, techniques have advanced to better study them.

      Its unfortunate that this approach wasn't in use early in the 20th century. So many historical sites were looted and destroyed in the name of science but primarily for the treasures contained which could be displayed in museums and private homes. These places are literally priceless and any actions taken which violate them should be carefully considered.

    4. Re:We should leave some stuff where it is. by MjrTom · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are entirely correct. Funding does play a big part (archaeology is incredibly expense if it's done right), however the truth is that for the most part, those of us who do archaeology today are worlds better than those who went before us. We also realize that those who come after us will be much better than we are due to advances in methodology, theory, and technologies such as gradiometry and resistivity. When I was working actively in the academic research side of things we tried to excavate no more than 5% of a site, leave the rest for future archs who will know things we don't, and thus will be able to get information we cannot. It must always be remembered that archaeology is at its heart a destructive science - we can't just do it over again if we screw up, screw ups mean that information is permanently lost.

      On the salvage side of things it's slightly different, for example if there was a new interstate highway going through an archaeological site and there was absolutely no way to reroute that road, we would attempt to do 100% recovery of the site. This almost never happens (it'd have to be a really small site - digging right takes a long time and the road builders get pissy if you sit there and delay them for too long. Can't stop progress). In salvage or "Section 106" or whathaveyou style archaeology the rule is to reover as much as possible as quickly as possible.

    5. Re:We should leave some stuff where it is. by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Ther may be tons of copies of any semi-cultural stuff right now, but almost any of them will be unreadable in a couple of centuries. I'm not talking about DRM (I they have the technology to recreate a device to read it, cracking it won't be too hard), but about CD rot and similar decay of HD and flashs over time.

  15. Imaging Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of guys like this who take complicated imaging technology, whether it be ground penetrating radar, or INSAR or hyperspectral and manipulate the applicability of the data to fit their agendas. Case in point, the Bosnian pyramid scheme of the last year or so. Those guys are obviously completely nuts, don't listenn to reason, and most dangerously, try to use technological jargon to confuse less technical researchers. I saw an associated paper by Smailbegovic which drew complete wrong conclusions with the given satellite data. It gives guys like me (in the geospatial community) a bad name. Smailbegovic in particular is known as a bull-shit peddler, but you wouldn't know that unless you were part of that scientific community. And in this particular case these Bosnian nuts are tearing up real archeological opportunities while they search for UFOs and pyramids. // rant over. //

  16. Plenty of false positives... by posterlogo · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...called "dry holes" in the KV and surrounding areas, where tomb builders would build the antechamber, but then change their minds and go to another spot. So a supposed shaft, while exciting, even if what rader is picking up really was a product of ancient tomb builders, may still be a dead end.

  17. Oblig. Stargate comment by Shinaku · · Score: 1

    They might find another ZPM to power Earth's Antartic base.

    --
    -- :>
  18. Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by voss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good for the tomb robbers...That treasure was collected off the backs of thousands of
    slaves and from the pockets of honest egyptians for thousands of years. The "tomb robbers"
    are not thieves, that stuff was abandoned the same as a sunken treasure ship. The egyptian government didnt even care until they realized they could make money off it.

    At least the tomb robbers did something with the gold and treasure instead of just taking
    from innocent people and burying it. What good does it do history yet another
    Golden mask sitting in some museum somewhere. At least the tomb robbers enjoyed the
    treasure and put the gold into the economy.

    You want to talk about a treasure...the palimpset of archimedes is a treasure, the Rosetta stone is a treasure, the ruins of pompeii and karnak are treasures, Gold should be used for the living not the dead.

    1. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by chgros · · Score: 1

      Gold should be used for the living not the dead.
      Used for what I wonder?

    2. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by radixvir · · Score: 1

      How was this modded so high? Of course the rulers had exquisite jewelry and other belongings. It's no different than any other culture. The reason it should go to museums and not to robbers is so that everyone can enjoy and learn from them. They teach of the history and the culture of the ancient egyptians. How is it doing any good to society if a couple of people steal something and it's melted down or sold to some rich guy for his private collection?

    3. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Er, yah. And you know, you don't have to pay your taxes! ALL ONE OR NONE!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      What is another gold mask in a museum?

      what more can be learned from another mask?

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    5. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by radixvir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The masks (as if that is all that would be found) come from different eras during history. By looking at their design and construction, you can tell how they changed over time and if there were any outside influences. Plus, profits from the museum can go to further expeditions. Anyway, archeology is learning about the past as well as preserving its history and artifacts.

    6. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "That treasure was collected off the backs of thousands of slaves and from the pockets of honest egyptians for thousands of years."

      For the most part, the slavery bit is Jewish/Christian/Muslim propoganda. The pyramids were generally built by farmers in the off-season.

      The money didn't take "thousands of years" to acquire, it was put together during the lifetime of the that particular pharaoh (for obvious reasons).

      And the farmers that built and paid for the pyramids weren't exactly taxed into oblivion; their standard of living was quite a bit higher than anybody else in that part of the world for a long time (e. g. they had off-time to build pyramids).

      "that stuff was abandoned the same as a sunken treasure ship."

      It's "abandoned" only if you believe that the dead have no use for it. The person entombed and most of the people who built the tomb believed they did.

      "What good does it do history yet another Golden mask sitting in some museum somewhere."

      For starters, it fills in the gaps we have of who ruled when.

      "At least the tomb robbers enjoyed the treasure and put the gold into the economy."

      So they melted it down? Do you honestly believe the artifacts ever had less market value than their constituent parts?

      "Gold should be used for the living not the dead."

      -1 gold standard crackpot. Debts are tough enough to pay down without deflation, thanks.

    7. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      connectors and other electronics! Jeez, are you a real geek or what? ;)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    8. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by powerlord · · Score: 1

      It's "abandoned" only if you believe that the dead have no use for it. The person entombed and most of the people who built the tomb believed they did.


      Considering some of the later Pharos hired "tomb robers" to steal gold from previous burials to help bolster their coffers, and considering the practice was to empty those coffers at the time of burial to go into the next tomb, I'm not sure I can really look at those as "hallowed" graves.

      It does however shed more light on the traditional jewish practice of burying someone unadorned in the simplest plain pine box you can get. No gold, no jewels, no fancy clothes. Seems to remove most avirice based reasons to disturb the grave.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    9. Re:Whenever they talk about tomb robbers I laugh by 2short · · Score: 1


      The pyramid-building Old Kingdom had limited access to the outside world, and presumably few, if any, foriegn slaves. So the pyramid building workers were probably motivated chiefly by religious conviction. I'm not sure I'd agree with your "farmers in the off-season" classification. Indications seem to be that the society was well off enough to support dedicated pyramid-builders, and that these monuments were in fact collosal resource commitments. But basically, I second your note that the image of slaves being driven to build pyramids is modern falsehood.

      But note that the article is discussing not the pyramids, but the tombs in the valley of the kings. These were built 500+ years later by the Middle Kingdom. Who did in fact conquer everyone anywhere near them and import large numbers of slaves (but not whole nations). So the artifacts that might exist in this possible tomb might be said to be the fruit of the labor of slaves moreso than the pyramids, to whatever extent it makes sense to apply modern understandings of "slave" and "religious follower" to Egypt 3 or 4 millenia ago.

      Which I agree has little to do with weather such artifacts ought now be in museums versus the hands of grave robbers.

  19. We can question what we could find there... by jozmala · · Score: 1

    Is it Al'kesh , Puddle jumper, or Stargate.

    --
    ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
  20. Oblig Stargate Quote by Gryle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Col O'Neill: "Don't matter what kind of radation suit we have. If you'd been listening you'd know that Nintendos pass through everything."

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  21. Egyptology is a notoriously vicious field by j_w_d · · Score: 1

    Not only the accusation but the continued ban can be due to reasons ranging from Reeves being guilty but the authorities lacking evidence to professional jealousy that succeeded moving an "interloper" out of the way. It could be as simple as a rival hearing about the discovery of voids revealed by Reeves's radar data and taking a cynical step to remove Reeves from the field. In the Valley of the Kings, "voids" evoke the possibility of tombs.

    Reeve's discovery of intact stratigraphy outside of the tombs (it's visible in TFA) is really more important than any tomb. The "voids" imply that another whole generation of Carnarvons could possibly get lucky. However, the stratigraphy points to the potential for some real archaeology of the seriously dusty, unglamorous sort that tells about the people who did the real work in the VOK: quarriers, architects, cooks, and masons and all the others who WEREN'T interred in the tombs. The call he makes for thinking first would get up the nose of any would-be Carnarvon out for a name, fame, and gold.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  22. Gosh... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing I don't filter out as much, otherwise I'd never have been able to read this offtopic response.

  23. Typical /. story... by Tiro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come on, this stuff is Ancient History!!

    1. Re:Typical /. story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also difficult to claim any tomb as being "NEW".

      Considering, on the Internet, "old" is the moment you click Submit.

  24. "false positives" and false negatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In my experience,17 years in North American archaeology, GPR is worthless.
    The only way to test it is with good old fashioned back hoe and shovel excavation -an opportunity I have often had.
    GPR "finds"(and misses) gravel lenses, boulders,bedrock outcrops ,recent and long rotted tree stumps. GPR "misses" structural remains, pit features, burials and other cultural features. You could achieve the same results with a dowsing rod. A skilled and perceptive archaeologist could easily do much better than GPR with a dowsing rod (by inferring high probability areas from topographic cues).
              Supposedly GPR "works" in detecting anomalies in perfectly homogenous sandy soils-say a buried rail road car or something.
    Persoinally,I have never seen it work at all.

    1. Re: "false positives" and false negatives by winwar · · Score: 1

      You also forgot to mention that GPR sucks in areas with saturated sediment and soil.

      But GPR is not totally worthless. Plenty of people have careers from it. In geology it is just another part of geowizardry, errr, I mean geophysics :)

    2. Re: "false positives" and false negatives by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Plenty of people have careers from it.
      Yeah, mostly GPR salespeople apparently.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  25. Hehe... by Jugalator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Each time I hear about Valley of the Kings, I start thinking of the end area of Act 2 in Diablo 2. :-p
    Sure, it's Valley of the Magi, but still. I think I played that game too much...

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. Is the archaeology.org map correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I click on the article and enlarge the map at archaeology.org. The map shows coordinates of approximately 99.560N and 94.070E. Isn't Cairo about 30N and 30E? Is the map lat/lon degrees or some other coordinate system?

    1. Re:Is the archaeology.org map correct? by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those coordinates will be in whatever system is used for large scale maps in Egypt. The Valley of the Kings is at 25 degrees 44'25" N 32 degrees 36'05" E.

  27. At this rate by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    We may even find the stargate in our lifetime.

    Wont that be cool.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:At this rate by trupoet · · Score: 0

      Or Orsiris! Or even worse, Hathor!

  28. Archeologist versus Grave Robber by BuildMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long does a body have to be in the ground before digging it up the corpse and taking its valuables stops being grave robbing and becomes archeology? Is it archeology if you just take enough pictures and measurements? Shall we do some "archeology" on Westminster Abbey? The Vatican? I'm sure there are valuables buried with those bodies. How about digging up Lincoln's tomb - it could tell us more about how he lived and died. If you find these examples offensive consider this:

    Time after time, from the Incas, the Mayas, the Egyptians, American Indians, etc. entire cities or societies worked for a generation to ensure that their royalty, leaders, or god-kings could rest forever undisturbed. What gives us the right to violate that sanctity? "Knowledge" is the canonical answer, but is it curiosity for curiosity's sake? And is that sufficient justification violate an entire society's clear wishes?

    1. Re:Archeologist versus Grave Robber by woolio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How long does a body have to be in the ground before digging it up the corpse and taking its valuables stops being grave robbing and becomes archeology?

      Grave robbing occurs when a burial ground is disturbed while members of the same race/society/tribe/etc are still present.

      As soon as they have all been exterminated and the previous society no longer exists, then it becomes archaelogy..... because there is no longer any protest...

    2. Re:Archeologist versus Grave Robber by aspx · · Score: 1

      > And is that sufficient justification violate an entire society's clear wishes?

      The wishes of a dead civilization do not matter.

    3. Re:Archeologist versus Grave Robber by couchslug · · Score: 1

      We have a greater obligation to advance human knowledge than humor superstitions of the dead ancients.
      From learning, there is benefit for the living. Burial rituals are for the living, so when there are no living to be annoyed by it, why not dig?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Archeologist versus Grave Robber by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      How long does a body have to be in the ground before digging it up the corpse and taking its valuables stops being grave robbing and becomes archeology? Is it archeology if you just take enough pictures and measurements? Shall we do some "archeology" on Westminster Abbey? The Vatican?

      Actually archaeological digs on 'recent' burials and in the West is fairly common. (The just completed one at Little Big Horn about a decade back for example.) Then there is the study of the Franklin expedition back in the 80's, at least half a dozen English kings in the last few decades, etc... etc...
       
       
      Time after time, from the Incas, the Mayas, the Egyptians, American Indians, etc. entire cities or societies worked for a generation to ensure that their royalty, leaders, or god-kings could rest forever undisturbed.

      if you believe that only non-white get their bones disturbed - you are quite mistaken.
    5. Re:Archeologist versus Grave Robber by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      This isn't funny, it is true. Burial rituatls(even modern ones) are for the living, they provide an outlet for the grief of those who survive the dead.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
  29. One good war by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    "One good war" could wipe out the valley too. . A couple of well placed H-bombs would obliterate it.

    But you are right in principle. Perhaps we should send out backups to the moon.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. King Tuts Dog by flyneye · · Score: 0

    Buried close at hand,the tomb will belong to tuts dog,contain golden doggy bones,mummified bitches and a scribe or two to pee on in the afterlife.
    Or... It could be a tomb filled with ads as in ad supported afterlife.Heaven with commercials.
    Probably for doggy biscuits.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  32. OT by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1

    Point shaving.

    --
    My father is a blogger.
  33. Get A Grip by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 1

    "My aunt's brother's sister's cousin's an Egyptologist who says..." You are repeating what someone else is repeating from what someone else told them about the character of someone you have never personally met or observed. Okay!

  34. Grave Robbing? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered what it is about being an archaeologist that makes it OK to be a grave robber. I mean, the practice is frowned upon in pretty much every other circumstance.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:Grave Robbing? by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Nothing but advancement of science.
      Thats why they cut up rabbits, test atomic bombs and make caged animals eat cosmetics.Mainstream science doesn't lookahead,it just ignores failure.
      And thats not surprising in the least, as civilizations contains alot of defective ideas,fucked-up traditions and self-destructive reasoning (as an eye for an eye) embedded within.

  35. Mayan Ruins in Central America? by dbc001 · · Score: 1

    I just came back from visiting Mayan ruins in Central America and I wondered why they don't use similar technicques to locate some of the ruins? Many ruins are deep within thick jungles, and I have heard of archaeologists walking by structures without recognizing them because the jungle is so thick. There are so many sites that are unknown to historians that locals usually suggest new sites every few weeks. Is there anything about thick jungles that would prevent this technique from working in central america?

    1. Re:Mayan Ruins in Central America? by jd · · Score: 1
      Ground Penetrating Radar works best in dry conditions with a uniformly-composed ground that contains no natural iron. It's also reliable only to a few feet. If you want greater depth, you need more power and you lose resolution. You also risk noise in the signal.


      Non-uniform ground is a pain for two reasons. First, it creates false reflections, and secondly because GPR measures depth as a function of the time for the echo to return, the vertical scale goes to hell in a handbasket. You've no idea where things are in relation to each other, because the GPR will assume a constant speed for the radar signal, and that assumption - in such cases - is going to be false.


      Water of any kind dissipates the signal, so you get less resolution, a shorter range, and all kinds of noise in the signal as the pulses could be travelling along any possible path. Not sure if there's any way you could get a naturally-occuring diffraction grating, total internal reflection, or similar, but there probably are. These would also totally fool a GPR.


      GPR is also horrible to interpret. Anyone who is interested in archaeological GPR, I do have a bunch of GPR datafiles (raw and processed) which I can e-mail to anyone interested. It'll give you a good idea of just how wretched the damn thing is.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  36. valley of kings by katy6299 · · Score: 1

    I happened to be at The Valley of Kings in May to see an excavation take place of a newly discovered tomb and 3(? 4) mummies were removed. Discovery channel were there but apart from that they were the only cameras and there wasnt even a crowd at all- most people chosing to stroll past disinterestingly. We got heaps of cool photos of the removals of the bodies which were covered with a simple plastic sheet which Im sure would have been flapping if there was wind in the valley of kings but the most remarkable of all was the lax attitude of all concerned. The egyptians smoking while trying to remove the mummies at the same time and getting distracted by us standing there (you have money?? we put on good show? one pound one pound, one pound for my sons and daughters lady). I guess I was just surprised that something that should be so important wasnt even of any concern. I kept an eye out for any info on what/ who the mummies were but I still havent been able to find anything. does anyone else know?

    1. Re:valley of kings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, "baksheesh?"

      If you had given them a little "somthin' somthin'"
      they would have probaly let you come in for bit of
      a look-around.

      I had a great time in Egypt...

  37. Camels are the ships of the desert by spun · · Score: 1

    Just hang a jolly roger off its tail and nail a plank to its back and you're all set.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  38. Re:The Milk of the Kings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is my first trolling, so go easy on me...

    Give it up. You know you suck at trolling when you get modded offtopic.

    * * Nelson in the background: Ha ha!! * *