Slashdot Mirror


London Gamers Shoot It Out In The Streets

ChocLinux writes "Gamers that take part in the Streetwars watergun assassination tournament in London could face arrest if they stalk their target in the tube. CNET has spoken to one gamer who has taken part in the tournament and disagreed that waterguns could be mistaken for firearms, as all contestants are using brightly-coloured super-soakers. He admitted that he narrowly missed being eliminated. 'Some guy tried to get me outside work, but he missed and fell off his bike,' he said. If the game isn't over by midnight on August 15, the remaining contestants will take part in a one week sudden death tournament." From the article: "You can hunt your target down any way you see fit; you can pose as a delivery person and jack them when they open the door, disguise yourself and take them out on the street, etc. If you are successful in your assassination attempt, the person you killed will give you their envelope and the person they were supposed to kill becomes your new target."

108 comments

  1. Seen it. by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cambridge Uni. Assassins Guild. One enterprising guy dropped a massive polystyrene block on his target's head from a balcony (it was a safe, basically).

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Seen it. by EnderGT · · Score: 1
      Used to play at GA Tech... found out my target used the same bank I did, so I mocked up a bank statement in one of their envelopes and put "poison" in it...

      Very fun game, if everyone takes it "seriously" (i.e. serious about playing the game, not serious about trying to kill people).

    2. Re:Seen it. by Gen.+Malaise · · Score: 1

      Actually if you visit http://www.streetwars.net/ you will see that you have not seen it. Its a different game. The ONLY way to kill is by getting someone wet via water pistol or balloon. There really isnt a whole lot of chasing in public places since you are only stalking one target at a time. The point is to assasinate the target NOT terrorize the target. There is a certain degree of stealth and tact required. The game has been carried out succesfully in New York City, Vancouver, Vienna, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and now London. Read the current game blog...The Supreame Commander and the Mustach Commander are quite entertaining and always looking for new women to add to there collection.

    3. Re:Seen it. by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      Cambridge Uni. Assassins Guild. One enterprising guy dropped a massive polystyrene block on his target's head from a balcony (it was a safe, basically).


      There was talk of starting a game of "Brutus Deluxe" at my high school. Unfortunately, Columbine happened and it seemed like a bad idea. So, anybody know where to go to get in on a game in the US? I'm in Denver, but I'm unfortunately not going to a University now. That's where I tend to hear about these sorts of things...
    4. Re:Seen it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [English Nazi]

      There = identifier of a place. ie. 'The car is over there'
      Their = belonging to someone. ie. 'The men drove away in their cars.'

      [/English Nazi]

      It's a small thing, but SO MANY /. posts get it wrong.

      (Next week we'll be discussing Effect/Affect and their common misuse...)

  2. The tube? by neonprimetime · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those non-englanders, here is what the tube is. I had to look it up myself.

    the tube ... could face punishment for acting suspiciously or inciting panic in Underground stations, which last year were the targeted by suicide bombers.

    1. Re:The tube? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for the explaination. I thought the tube was slang for the internet.

    2. Re:The tube? by andphi · · Score: 1

      While I can't be sure, as I have never played the game (though it sounds hella fun), it would seem that stalking someone through the Underground might violate the rule against "spray and pray" assassination. While not as crowded as a Japanese subway system, I would imagine that the London Underground stays rather busy, even at odd times of night.

    3. Re:The tube? by Palal · · Score: 1

      Odd times of night????? It shuts down at 0:00 (or shortly thereafter)!!!!! That's not even night! Although I do have to say that on Fri and Sat nights you'll find more drunk people than sober ones using the tube. And how they manage to mind the gap is beyound(british spelling intentional) me.

      --
      -Palal
    4. Re:The tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, we brits don't spell it like that. (Here's a hint, there's no u in beyond ;) )

    5. Re:The tube? by andphi · · Score: 1

      I assumed that the tube ran 24 hours a day. My mistake.

    6. Re:The tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't speak for the London Underground (generally left London by 23:00) but in Reading most stores close down by by 17:00 and the others at 19:00. Taxis seem to be available any time of day though. Restaurants tend to stay open until 22:00, pubs until 0:00 (although kitchens closed by 22:00) and I'm not sure on the clubs (had to get up for work very early in the morning). Living near Washington DC, it seems that most places are open much later than the UK equivalent.

      Jim

    7. Re:The tube? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Umm, we brits don't spell it like that. (Here's a hint, there's no u in beyond ;) )

      Well, you put an extra i into aluminum, how can the rest of us be expected to understand where you will insert spurious vowels?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:The tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sholdn't that be "spurios"?

    9. Re:The tube? by Intangion · · Score: 1

      the internet is a SERIES of tubes

      not a single tube

      the subway is apparently part of the internet, cause its just a tube, in the series... i think

    10. Re:The tube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      For those non-englanders, here is what the tube is. I had to look it up myself.
      the tube ... could face punishment for acting suspiciously or inciting panic in Underground stations, which last year were the targeted by suicide bombers.
      I didn't know that London organized crime had been targeted by bombers, but I don't know how to find their stations anyway.
    11. Re:The tube? by andphi · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. I suppose I was thinking in terms of US cities. Our capitals - New York (financial) and DC (political) - seem to operate at all hours, so I assumed that a city as internationally important as London would do likewise.

  3. Dude by BHearsum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is really, really, cool.

  4. Gotcha! by Mursk · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anybody see the movie 'Gotcha!'?

    Oh, um... me neither.

    --
    "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    1. Re:Gotcha! by Agent00Wang · · Score: 1

      I did, back in college. It was shown annually before the start of each year's Killer game.

      --
      NINJA SPIRIT - The Ancient Art of Insanity
    2. Re:Gotcha! by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      The real question is, have you seen Gotcha The Clown?

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  5. Not sure this is a good idea. by silasthehobbit · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, I'm sure the game might be, but doing it on London streets probably isn't.

    The British Police have managed to shoot & kill someone for carrying a table leg (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3974461.stm); an unarmed man who they suspected of being a terrorist (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713753.stm); and a man who was "armed" with a lighter (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1444009.stm).

    There is no way on Earth that I would carry something that looked even remotely like a gun - regardless of it being highly coloured and plastic - and chase after people.

    1. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      Terrorists need to start carrying brightly colored guns around. Everyone would think they were toys! If your predictions are correct, the police might end up winning this game.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    2. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that last link is five years old, and the lighter in question looked like a gun and he was pointing it at a 'hostage' at the time.

      However, I agree that both those other cases are disgraceful.

    3. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Informative

      The table leg was wrapped in a bag and police had been told he had a shotgun. If you're suspected of being a terrorist, having a flourescent water gun isn't going to make the slightest bit of difference. And you fail to mention that the guy "armed with a lighter" was holding a lighter that was an imitation gun. It's a bit dishonest not to mention this crucial fact and fail to link the article properly so most Slashdotters won't bother reading the article, don't you think?

      Yes, all of these were regrettable mistakes. But brightly-coloured water guns aren't going to make the slightest bit of difference, you're just scaremongering.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by renoX · · Score: 1

      The table leg seems to be a very real mistake of the police, but:
      - the unarmed man fled the police (from police report), something which is never wise to do
      - and the lighter looked like a gun.

      So you're post is distorting the facts.

    5. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      - the unarmed man fled the police (from police report)


      Which was a lie....


      something which is never wise to do


      The police pinned him down in his chair and shot him in the head 7 times, and then faked their logs of the incident.

      Most people would call this murder, in London its a "health and safety" violation.

      Alex

    6. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that they shot a guy in the face for carrying a backpack and looking too dark.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      Actually, Menezes wasn't even carrying a backpack.

    8. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Some people just instinctively run from trouble. It's not an entirely dumb reaction. Running is never enough justification for a police shooting.

    9. Re:Not sure this is a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police pinned him down in his chair and shot him in the head 7 times, and then faked their logs of the incident.

      What on earth are you talking about?

      The guy suspected of having a shotgun was shot in the street - unless you are claiming that the police also dragged his body out into the street after killing him?

      The Brazilian was shot in a Tube station in front of lots of witnesses.

      The guy with the imitation gun lighter was running away, according to the inquiry and autopsy, and this part wasn't contested by anybody, including his family.

      Are you deliberately lying, or are you delusional?

  6. We did something similar... by akross · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In High School, we played this game mostly amongst us marching band geeks. We used plastic sporks as weapons because water guns were a no-no in the building. Fun times getting killed at the Burger King Drive Thru...

  7. Timing? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    While this sounds incredibly cool, I'm not sure the political climate in London makes for a good setting for such an endeavor right now.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Timing? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What better possible way is there to fight "terror" than to openly have fun and enjoy life? If playing with brightly colored toy water squirters in Summer has become a punishable offense, all is finally lost.

    2. Re:Timing? by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? It's the British (as in Bulldog) way, surely! Something making you feel edgy and uncomfortable as a nation? Too polite to deal with the topic openly? Get some students to do something high-profile and tasteless to make it funny! Works every time.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    3. Re:Timing? by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is the solution to ending the fighting in Israel, Lebanon, and Iraq. Give them all super soakers and envelopes with assassination instructions!

    4. Re:Timing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What better possible way is there to fight "terror" than to openly have fun and enjoy life? If playing with brightly colored toy water squirters in Summer has become a punishable offense, all is finally lost.

      Perhaps Britain's rulers want the people to be frightened and obedient--frightened of the state, frightened of terrorists, and obedient to the state. There is a historical precedent for that in Britain.

  8. Not surprising by thelost · · Score: 1

    You can hardly expect everyone to feel comfortable with people running around with gun like objects creating lots of noise in public areas.

    --
    Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    1. Re:Not surprising by schon · · Score: 1

      people running around with gun like objects

      Dude, they're water pistols. They are about as "gun-like" as someone's hand is "gun-like" when they point their finger.

    2. Re:Not surprising by thelost · · Score: 1

      and that is why I said "some people". Why assume everyone is going to have the same reaction as you? Why assume someone entirely different from you will think 'oh yeah, that's just a water-pistol he's waving about'.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    3. Re:Not surprising by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      You can hardly expect everyone to feel comfortable with people running around with gun like objects creating lots of noise in public areas.

      What, like children in parks?? That's what they do you know.

      I don't know about you, but I have distinct memories of running around playing guns as a kid. And the exceedingly bright colours used by super-soakers and the like almost elmininate thinking you've seen an actual gun. I would be willing to bet if I had the whole day to drive around looking for kids playing guns I would be able to find some.

      Now, if you want to run around with a replica of a real gun pretending to shoot people, you could realistically expect people to misunderstand what is happening. But, bright plastic toy guns, not so much. If I had a toy light sabre, I wouldn't expect someone to think I was running around with a claymore beheading people. I sure as heck would expect any police agency to be able to easily visually verify that I was, in fact, an overgrown idiot with a plastic toy -- and neither shoot nor arrest me.

      It can't be realistic to assume that we all need to stop doing anything which someone who wasn't paying attention could be confused into thinking is something nefarious.

      Because then some idiot is going to say that I can't expect to walk around public places minding my own business and not be subjected to random searches because I might be a terrorist -- after all, if I wasn't guilty, why would I mind being searched?

      As has been said in this thread elsewhere, if we can't expect to go about our lives in some moderately normal way, then the terrorists have already won, and our way of life has ground to a halt.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Not surprising by mrxak · · Score: 1

      I think they'd be a bit more upset if they accidentally got soaked because somebody had poor aim or the real target ducked. Doing this game in a crowded place isn't a great idea. Otherwise, I don't see why people would have a real problem with it.

  9. Sorry, but... by Evro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to make me sound like quite the old curmudgeon, but...

    Playing games with water pistols in a public place, with other people around (who more than likely don't want to be wet by you), is childish and rude. If you want to play with water guns, do it in your back yard or in a field somewhere.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Sorry, but... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great, now yell, "You damn kids get off my lawn!" and your journey to Curmudgeonhood will be complete.

      Our society has enough points of suckitude, and enough ridiculous rules. Sure, sometimes it's annoying, sure, sometimes we take an ill-aimed blast of water in the ear canal, but that's life, and most of us already take ourselves too seriously. Hell, there are people in the US that'd probably sue for getting squirted.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:Sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, because people in London simply aren't prepared for an unexpected shower of water every day, at any moment, what with its arid climate and all. It's not like people are always walking around with umbrellas or something :-)

      But I see your point. Minimizing collateral damage is a courtesy for any professional hitman, yes.

    3. Re:Sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...there are people in the US that'd probably sue for getting squirted."

      Nahhh, I wouldn't sue, I'd just break your kneecap.

    4. Re:Sorry, but... by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Not only sue, but beat up the guy first, leading to a countersuit and assault charges pressed on both sides.

      I'm all for a bit of silliness. Life is too silly and absurd to not have fun with it. But, people have legitimate reason for not wanting to get their business suit soaked out of the blue by some careless "assassin", or get pushed onto the pavement by somebody running away from said assassin. I think banning this game from crowded subway cars is just common sense. Hopefully the people playing will do it in more open areas without too many people around. It's more fun if your victim has a chance to escape anyway.

    5. Re:Sorry, but... by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because people in London simply aren't prepared for an unexpected shower of water every day
      Ha-ha, nice.
      But even the British dont expect to be soaked underground.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    6. Re:Sorry, but... by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Look, if I was on my way to a crap stressful job where I have to be well dressed and presentable and I was tired and in a crowded underground station and some twat soaks me in water playing at being a pretend assassin.
      That person might well be in real danger. I might be controlled enough to just shout and swear, but the hundreds of other people around me who are in the same situation might not be.

      This sounds like a really fun game to play, but we are trying to run a society here, doing this on an underground station is just antisocial (and in some areas of London, sucidal). This is barely different to someone smoking in that same crowded underground area, to the smoker "thats just a ridiculous rule, where's my freedom", while everyone else is *forced* to breath in his/her smoke.

      Like many people, I just want to get to work, or to where ever I am going without some asshole pissing me off. Play your game, but dont force everyone else to play as well.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  10. Wasn't there a movie like this? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Called "Tag" or something like that. They used suction darts fired from real guns (not sure how that works) but it was pretty much the same concept. Hunt someone down, kill them, get their target. Play on until you're the last man standing.

    (of course in the movie one guy started actually killing everyone else, and much stupidity ensued)

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  11. Old news by Threni · · Score: 1

    The police have been playing this game for ages now!

    http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/331363.html

  12. Super Soakers are safe? by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1

    Now, while you may be carrying "brightly-coloured super-soakers", I'll bet I could come up with some liquids to put in them that would make them, if not deadly, at least very, very annoying.

    1. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by compsci07 · · Score: 1

      Like ketchup.

    2. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1
      Like ketchup.

      Exactly! Though I was thinking something more along the lines of the stuff that was in the stink bombs we used to set off in school back in Knaresborough. Assuming the statute of limitations is up. If not, then it wasn't Knaresborough, it was Edinburgh. And it wasn't us, it was those other adolescents.

    3. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Battery acid, meratic acid (smells like sewage, eats skin fast!), vinigar, beer!

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    4. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1

      Or Repellex - Used to keep deer from eating ornamental plants. A mixture of rotten ox blood and rotten egg whites. Ridiculously foul smelling, and it really does keep the deer off the lawn. And makes you hurl if you accidentally spray it in a breeze.

    5. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      On that note, have you ever met the guy who, during his first hunting trip, put the deer scent on his skin? That stuff doesn't wear off very quick and is equally as disgusting. Takes a week or so to get rid of the smell. Back in high school you'd catch a wiff and ask the kid wearing it if he got any snipes.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    6. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by nsmike · · Score: 1

      Or you could just make one of these.

    7. Re:Super Soakers are safe? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Besides urine (it's nearly sterile, but who wants to smell like pee?) there's other fun stuff like putrescine, methyl mercaptain (skunk smell stuff) and, of course, my personal favorite: DMSO + LSD.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. In the current paranoid climate... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    the cops'll probably think that the "water" pistols are filled with a mixture of cyanide and hydrofluoric acid and do the 'ol "shoot first, ask later" thing.

    -b.

    1. Re:In the current paranoid climate... by boot1973 · · Score: 1
      "do the 'ol "shoot first, ask later" thing."

      Probably true especially if any of the players have dark skin or look in any way a wee bit foreign. The only saving grace is that most police in the UK (and even in London) are not armed. You could still get an ASP in the side of the head, but that's still preferable to 6 bullets

  14. Should be fun by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    I have taken the liberty of entering all the members of the labour Cabinet in the competition.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  15. sock assassination by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 4, Informative

    some of the residences at my university hold sock assassinations, basically the same thing except with bundled up pairs of socks. You're only safe in class and your own room (if you locked the door). It's a fun orientation activity, it is sad that you can't have fun like that in today's world of terrorisim and all that bollocks.

    though from the blurb I thought they were talking about not being allowed to take someone out on the internet!

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  16. Prostitution by Thanatos69 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What of prostitution, please tell me there will be some of that.

    1. Re:Prostitution by falcon8080 · · Score: 1

      Only if you can then soak em with the water pistol and take back all your cash..

      --
      Excellent Phoenix AZ Office Space - Thistle Landing
  17. Great headline by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Being a libertarian who follows civil liberties cases I was expecting a combination of the following:

    1) A story about punk shitheads beating up an old person and getting slapped on the wrist for it.
    2) A Jack Thompson type story about gamers actually shooting each other.
    3) Generally another fine example of the British government screwing its law-abiding citizens.

    And it turned out to be just a bunch of gamers having fun. What a nice change of pace.

    Now, who wants to place a bet on how long before a bunch of ASBOs get handed out and the police go after this scourge while cheerfully ignoring the yobs who, in America, would be on the receiving end of a handgun, but are a protected class in Britain? Just kidding, FBI, don't arrest me...

  18. Rain. by EnsilZah · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder, if it rains, is that the equivalent of being nuked?

    1. Re:Rain. by Eudial · · Score: 1
      I wonder, if it rains, is that the equivalent of being nuked?


      Probably closer to rods from god.
      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  19. Tag: The Assassination Game by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    A quick search on IMDB suggests you were thinking of Tag: The Assassination Game.

    There was also a movie called Series 7: The Contenders which was sort of making fun of reality TV. (in this one, the assumption was that the players ere all really trying to kill each other) I saw it during the height of Survivor and the like, so I don't know how well it holds up without that background.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  20. It's "Killer" by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 1
    Steve Jackson Games published this way back in the 80's (or late 70's?).

    Killer

    --
    Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    1. Re:It's "Killer" by tambo · · Score: 1
      Steve Jackson Games published this way back in the 80's (or late 70's?).

      Played it. Loved it. Picked up the manual back in eighth grade in 1988... just flipped through it and marveled at the possibilities. Then finally hosted a few rounds during my wild 'n' crazy college-freshman days. "Death by seduction" was a fun option. ;)

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  21. I've done that by steveo777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Actually did this back in college. Had a lot of fun, too. We printed off color photos on "Hit" cards. If you got the hit you would take that person's assignment. We used hand squirtguns. Unfortunately, we had an incedent in the States not long after that. The Columbine school shootings which pretty much put a distaste in everyone's mouths for that kind of activity for a while.

    One of the unique rules we had was that after 5 hits we could upgrade from the hand squirter to any means necessary. Super Soaker, Water Ballons, Hose, Buckets. It was pretty interesting for a while and about 300 students were initially signed up.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:I've done that by Harker · · Score: 1

      A group of us did this too, about 18-20 years ago now. Our rules were not quite as restrictive as these guys' though. We were allowed pretty much anything that could be considered viable within the bounds of the game. Bombs (exploding balloons), falling rocks (pillows) and even poison (a number of different things were used for poison) were allowed as long as it was even marginally reasonable. If you could picture it being done in a James Bond flick, it was allowed.

      I 'killed' my first target through his screen door, posing as someone selling a newspaper subscription, and another by dropping a marble into a coke bottle (not the safest thing to do however) and replacing the lid.

      Myself, I was killed in both games, once by 'contact poison' (3 in 1 oil) on the handle to my van, and again by a foam boffer weapon (a spear, if I remember right).

      All in all, it is a lot of fun, so long as everybody is careful. In today's anti-terrorism climate it means being even more careful though. The last thing you want is to get shot by the police by being suspicious.

      H.

      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
  22. I want to play! by intrico · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bloody...er..soaking-good time!

  23. Gotcha! by larry2k · · Score: 0
    From an amazon review:

    The game is called, "Gotcha!" It's a clever game; except for the fact that it's highly improbable that a college campus would allow a bunch of students to run around with realistic looking pistols, firing away at one another. Nonetheless, the environment is set up for all sorts of gun play and killing.

    The movie: Gotcha!.

    --

    The package said "Windows XP or better. Pentium Class Processor or better"... So I got a Mac with OS X

  24. CSI by phorm · · Score: 1

    I believe there was also a CSI episode (or similar type of show) about this, where one player got pissed off, shot his 'killer' with a blank at close range, and killed him?

    1. Re:CSI by cortana · · Score: 1

      Almost certainly such an episode is part of CSI's continued campeign against geeks and gamers.

  25. Why is this news? Try a water pistol in airport by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Why is this news? Ever try carrying a water pistol into an airport? (Hint: it was forbidden fifteen years before 9/11)

  26. Re:Why is this news? Try a water pistol in airport by Slovenian6474 · · Score: 1

    hmmm....sounds like you'd be safe from them in the airport...

  27. As a player in the London Streetwars... by Nursie · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd like to comment once again how behind the news slasdot is. We've been playing for two weeks and it's moving into its final phase now!

    It's been great fun, have done my fair share of stalking. My teammate managed to get inside our first target's apartment block and flush him out onto the street, right into my range of fire. Great fun. We did put in about 7 hours of stakeout over the course of a week to get him though!

    Alas we haven't made a second kill inside two weeks and will be disqualified at midnight tonight unless we can pull something out of the bag in the next few hours. Haven't seen hide nor hair of anyone hunting us though, which has been a bit of a disappointment.

    So far I don't think the cops have shot or even arrested anyone either, which is good.

    1. Re:As a player in the London Streetwars... by djdead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what happens if you knock off someone and your name in in their envelope? It doesn't necessarily mean that your the last man standing.

      --
      -1: flamebait should really be -1: inciteful
    2. Re:As a player in the London Streetwars... by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It should mean exactly that. It's set up so that the 100-150 players are in a ring, each has the next as a target, so by the time you get to someone that has you, you really should be the last man standing.

    3. Re:As a player in the London Streetwars... by djdead · · Score: 1

      But you said that you might be disqualified. If that happens, how does the person hunting you find out and get his next target? Do you know who is hunting you?

      --
      -1: flamebait should really be -1: inciteful
    4. Re:As a player in the London Streetwars... by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Well, the organisers will sort it out basically. You email them to confirm kills and they confirm who you are to go after next.

      SO at this cutoff, which is in place to keep the game moving, they will cut out everyone with less than two kills and then make sure that the circle formation is maintained when they reassign targets.

    5. Re:As a player in the London Streetwars... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Squirt, Squirt.

      Ha, got you. I have been hiding here on slashdot for the last two weeks, and finally my relience has paid of. I got you! (shooting on slashdot counts, right!, Right??)

  28. This sounds fun!! by Slovenian6474 · · Score: 1

    I can imagine having to look around for "assassins" as i run from my work to my car!

  29. Knock, knock by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who's there?

    Landshark!

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Knock, knock by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "Landshark!"

      Well, you went and blew it now, didn't you?
      Next time try to be a little more stealthy, like

      "Flowers", or "I'm only a dolphin"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  30. Sounds like T.A.G. (The Assassination Game). by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We played it in the mid-80's in college. Lots of fun!

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:Sounds like T.A.G. (The Assassination Game). by praedictus · · Score: 1

      At UW, it was called K.A.O.S (Killer as Organized Sport), though with suction cup guns in place of squirtguns.

      --
      Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
    2. Re:Sounds like T.A.G. (The Assassination Game). by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      We used Waterhawks (battery-powered squirtguns), pieces of paper that said "bomb" on them, and various other types of weaponry that were approved by the judges (mainly dart guns, plastic knives, etc.).

      I don't remember doing very well. :-/

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  31. Bender by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    I'm inventing my own game.... with blackjack... and hookers...

    --
    music lover since 1969
    1. Re:Bender by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      If anybody says "In fact, forget the game" I'll shoot them.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  32. Don't you understand? by Erastus · · Score: 3, Funny

    If we can't sneak around pretending to kill each other - the Terrorists have won!

  33. You make the fear. by Lave · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm replying to the first post to get this near the top of the page (which is a dastardly thing to do, and I apologise).

    But to those that are about to read this thread, please remember that people below this post who think that with the "current political climate" this will get you shot are wrong. I live in London, I was hung over and woke up late missing the tube on the first bombings. and then got stuck at work the second time. And these are my experiences.

    Firstly, I suspect it is mainly Americans posting - or at least I hope so - and I truly do not want to be mean, but Britain's culture is quiet different to yours. Our parents grew up in the blitz. And I grew up with the IRA bombings. Attacks on Civilians aren't new. They are a consequence of getting to live free. Just because people die - does not mean you give up your life and your freedoms.

    The point I'm trying to make is that after the bombing attempt I had to walk across london to get home. Before I left we flipped from the (relatively) informative and calm BBC 24 news to CNN - and watched the presenters talk of the ""chaos" and "panic" as "millions of londoners" have "no possible way to get home".

    As I crossed most of central london through most of the effected areas what did I see? I saw a roaring Taxi trade, and I saw hundreds of people standing around every pub I walkied past - drinking, laughing, talking.

    CNN, by it's comments created fear across the country and the globe. But where it happened - there was no such thing. And the tubes were full the next day.

    This is people playing with water pistols in one of the hottest summers London's ever had for fucks sake. It's more important than ever they play this stupid little game - rather than sit around in fear listening to the News as it lies to them.

    Dislcaimer - I'm not talking about the Blitz spirit - or any of that crap, nor am I suggesting London would have handled 11/9 better. What I am saying is ignore the fear filled retoric spewing from the news. As I know first hand how accurate that is.

    --
    http://skeptobot.blogspot.com/ - A site for the Renaissance man and woman
    1. Re:You make the fear. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      They are a consequence of getting to live free. Just because people die - does not mean you give up your life and your freedoms.



      So what happened to all your firearms, privacy (video monitoring), and pocket knives then? Couple people get hurt and suddenly you all roll over on your back as easily and enthusiastically as the family pet.



      I don't mean to be mean the British are some of the nicest people I've ever met, I've been living in Suffolk for about a month and a half now, but it seems to me any back bone left over from the Blitz departed the scene years ago. There are posters and giant metal collection bins here and there. They are scaring people to turn in their cooking knives because they might be used in a crime someday.



      I think you are confusing spirit with apathy, switch Brit with Eloi and Terrorist with Morlock and then it makes more sense.



    2. Re:You make the fear. by Grab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firearms is a major screw-up. Basically it was trying to get away from the "suicide-by-cop" thing that's so popular in the US, where you shoot up a place (and as many innocent people as possible) until the cops shoot you. The sad thing is that this law was badly thought out, so it crapped on the target-shooting fans and didn't really help much to prevent criminals getting guns. But for everyone else in the country, it really made no difference. Unlike the US, the UK has never had widespread public ownership of firearms, so "rolling over" wasn't really in it - I'd say that 90+% Brits have never seen a handgun except on the armed policemen in airports.

      Pocket knives too. I don't know about the US, but people in the UK don't generally go around armed to the teeth with machetes. And it's a misunderstanding to say that you're not allowed to carry pocket knives - unless you've got the knife out and you're threatening someone with it, there's nothing the police can do about your Swiss Army knife or Leatherman. Except for at airports, of course, and that's a global thing these days.

      And video monitoring generally isn't seen as a privacy issue, because the places where the video cameras are are all very public places. It's a technological alternative to having a policeman on every street corner.

      Grab.

    3. Re:You make the fear. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here. Fucking. Here!

      As a fellow Brit, thank you beyond words.

      USAians and paranoiacs, please take note - this is not an isolated incident, we are not living in denial, Brits who refuse to be traumatised into acting differently by 7/7 are not isolated freaks, and (despite both our governments' and your media's best efforts) we are not the kind of people to fearmonger, lock ourselves in our cellars and let the terrorists win.

      You would not believe how many times I've been accused of any or all of the above by (mostly American) /. readers, simply for stating that most British people took 7/7 on the chin and got on with their lives.

      It's just a difference in culture, dig? We've been shot at, bombed, hijacked and had full passenger aircraft brought down on villages more or less ever since the end of the second world war (if not longer).

      You're still more likely to get hit by lightning than even injured in a terrorist attack, so we're not even blasé about it. We're simply reacting in proportion.

      (Lest anyone get the wrong idea, this post is not intended to be anti-American - just anti-hysteria.)

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    4. Re:You make the fear. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 2, Informative
      So what happened to all your firearms, privacy (video monitoring), and pocket knives then? Couple people get hurt and suddenly you all roll over on your back as easily and enthusiastically as the family pet.


      Actually, most people are uncomfortable or opposed to increased CCTV monitoring, firearms were never commonly available[1] and you can still carry a knife[2]. Oh, and most of the important legislation that actually restricts our freedoms was pushed through my Tony Blair (et al) in defiance of the public's wishes, and often even the wishes of their own party members, and he's now copping all hell for it in the public opinion stakes.

      Just look at the kerfuffle around ID cards and I think you'll find the Blitz-inspired backbone is hale and hearty as ever - the government's trying to frighten people into accepting Id cards, but people just aren't scared.

      I've been living in Suffolk for about a month and a half now, but it seems to me any back bone left over from the Blitz departed the scene years ago. There are posters and giant metal collection bins here and there. They are scaring people to turn in their cooking knives because they might be used in a crime someday.


      Erm, that's a knife amnesty. It's kind of a voluntary request you turn in any pointed knives you might have to reduce the number in general circulation. It's not a heavy-handed pressure tactic from the government, just a polite request. The big secure box was to make sure nobody nicked the tens or hundreds of knives that other people handed in.

      Oh, and the knife amnesty didn't go very well - most people flatly ignored it because it's blatantly ineffectual and stupid.

      What was your point again?

      (P.S. I grew up in Suffolk - nice area of the country, if a bit rural).

      Footnotes:

      [1] They're still legal, IIRC, but must be left at a gun-club or kept in a locked gun cabinet. They're also legal for farmers or anyone else with a sensible reason for needing one.

      [2] As long as it's not a flick-knife, has a fold-away blade that doesn't exceed 3 inches in lenghth.
      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    5. Re:You make the fear. by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I stand corrected. The beer buddy lawyers (aka the yahoos I work with) don't have their facts straight. Now that I poke around a bit more online I see what you are talking about.

      Suffolk is very nice so far. I'm enjoying scaring the locals with my truck and my dyslexic (right side bad, left side good) American driving skills. Luckily everything is nice and close together so I don't endanger the public for more than 10-15min at a time, and it doesn't hurt that all the local pubs are within a few minute walk from my door.

    6. Re:You make the fear. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      "Suicide by cops" that's a new one to me (Anything you see in the movies almost never happens). In the US it's usually "idiot dies in hail of bullets while commiting a crime and hopped up on drugs." Most suicide types who die by the gun usually take care of business on their own.

      As far as wielding machetes we only do that on "machete day" the 23 of April.

      Kidding aside I stand corrected on this one, the idiots at work gave me bum information when I got here and the inbrief on local regulations was also inaccurate. They were telling us carrying all knives was banded. Anything under 3" is legal, though 3" barely qualifies as a knife in my book. I like my 5" rescue Spiderco, but it's set up for cutting clothes and seat belts for paramedic and rescue work, rather than sticking people in the soft spots to steal their wallets.

  34. Something to think about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a conversation once with a policeman. He told me something I never thought about. He told me that gangs would paint REAL guns with colors to make them look like toys. He also said some gans would attack a plastic bright orange(or paint) bracket on the muzzle of the gun to make it look like a toy gun as well. I am not suggesting that they should ban water gun games, but do understand the situation the police is in. Imagine you are in the "tube" (subway) and all of a sudden some guy runs with the gun as he chases down his target. I would imagine it wouldnt be a pleasant thoughts. I am sorry, but that would be just irresponsible.

      Play in the park. And respect homeless' housing ;p.

  35. Please rob my house by smileytshirt · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a lot of fun, but if you are giving both your home and work address to a complete stranger you might find your house robbed when you get home.

    --
    www.shortman.com.au - top shorted stocks on the ASX
  36. Only if you leave your door unlocked... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Hell, my adress is right on the outside of my house in big numbers where anyone could see it, but i've never had a problem with it...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Only if you leave your door unlocked... by smileytshirt · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they have both your work and home address plus your phone number so I can imagine a scenario such as:

      Thief: "Hello is that Mr Smith?"
      Mr Smith: "Yes, I'm at work at the moment"

      Thief (thinking): 'His work is an hour from home. I have an hour to steal what I want without getting caught'

      or maybe i'm just paranoid 8-)

      --
      www.shortman.com.au - top shorted stocks on the ASX
  37. Kudos by mjwx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice to hear someone not advocating fear.

    Londeners still ride the tube, Bali is still one of Australia's most visited holiday destination. I cant speak for everyone but I am quiet happy not living my life in fear.

    In case anyone hasnt caught on to this already, its called terrorism for a reason. The point of it is to make you afraid. Live in fear and hand them a victory.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  38. Waterguns *CAN* kill in the tube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can kill a person with a watergun on the tube, not to mention disrupting travel for thousands of people. If the person being shot falls onto the track, the 600 volts of electricity will kill them. You may escape a murder charge but you *WILL* go to jail for manslaughter.

    While chasing someone with your watergun in the tube, an innocent bystander could fall on the tracks. Any kind of combat is extremely dangerous to bystanders in tube stations.

    If you fire a supersoaker stream of water and it falls on the tracks, it could be enough to cause a short circuit which will disrupt travel.

    In any case, the tube stations are crawling with police officers, both uniformed and plainclothesed, looking for terrorists. You cannot escape in such a confined area. You *WILL* be caught and we *WILL* laugh at your stupidity.

  39. For anyone that's still reading this by Nursie · · Score: 1

    I got another kill before breakfast this morning, we're still in the game.

    What a rush, a 7am sprint down the road, replete with confused and suprised looking civillians, and a shoot out from behind cars, hedges and walls.

    Got the man though. Soaked him good.