Slashdot Mirror


A Different Kind of WGA 'Problem'

Ed Bott recently attempted to scout out the problems reported in so many horror stories floating around the net relating to Microsoft's WGA. He did experience problems, however, not the ones that you might expect. He intentionally installed a pirated copy of Windows XP to see how the process worked but was unable to get WGA to recognize his computer as pirated. From the article: "I'm reluctantly running a pirated version of Windows and can't get caught no matter how hard I try. But these same people want us to believe that the WGA software they've developed is nearly foolproof. They claim that all but "a fraction of a percent" of those 60 million people who've been denied access to Microsoft updates and downloads are guilty, guilty, guilty. Right."

92 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. A solution to your problem by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm reluctantly running a pirated version of Windows and can't get caught no matter how hard I try.

    Here you go!

    1. Re:A solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do those guys go after GPL violators as well? I'm pretty sure I know of a case where a company's not following the GPL, and would love to get these guys involved. Or are they hypocrites who don't go after their members when they break copyright laws themselves?

    2. Re:A solution to your problem by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Informative
      You want this.

      BSA is for proprietary violations.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:A solution to your problem by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You see, the BSA doesn't have a financial interest to go after GPL violators because there's a lack of monetary incentive. If any of the GPL software was owned by a multi-billion dollar company shelling out the big bucks to enforce the infringement of their IP, sure the BSA would be right after them.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    4. Re:A solution to your problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe IBM can push some dollars their way for them to go after GPL violators.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:A solution to your problem by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, No, NO! The BSA is bad, we DON'T want to give them money. How would you like to have a bunch of armed rent-a-cops and dial-a-lawyers show up at your door for an "audit" ? They're not exactly nice people, in fact I'd venture to say I'd sooner trust a hell's angel-type dude than a BSA "agent", mainly because the biker doesn't lie about pursuing criminal behavior. My honest advice is that if a BSA team shows up at your door, let them in, lead them to your server room, then beat them over the head with an old HP rig until they stop moving. They are trespassers and racketeers, nothing more. They get paid by the top software publishers to keep the sheep aligned. They'll shake down a few strategic offices, make the news and instill fear into everyone else in true Orwellian fashion.

      Lawsuits have little to do with law, and everything to do with money. There is little point in suing a GPL violator because the free software projects don't have the financial justification to pursue legal actions, plus it's hard to defend in court when you're giving your product away for free. Software licenses don't mean shit to the average state judge, unless the software license is in defense of a Fortune-500 company.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:A solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      BSA are con artists: they con the software companies to pay them to protect their rights (and they don't do it). I received letters from BSA for about 6 months in 2003: one letter every two weeks, asking me to buy legal copies of the pirated software they supposed I used and they were supposed to "protect", threatening with "2 to 5 years in jail" and warning me they might come any time to inspect my software setup.

      Fortunately for me:
      * I did not use at that time and I do not use now unlicenced software, nor did the company I worked for at that time use unlicenced software.
      * The law in my country would not put me in jail for using unlicenced software (only a fine).
      * BSA do not have the right to make inspections in my country. They can log a complaint and have the police come to me.

      Still, I was responsible for IT, and had to receive the letters, read them and explain to my betters what were those letters about every two weeks. I did not enjoy being threatened to be put in jail, being acused of stealing, and being taken for a full. The letters stopped arriving when I answered one of them, asked BSA to explain me why they think they have the right to do what they threatened to do, and had the word "lawyers" in that reply.

      Why are they con artists ? I was in their database because my company already bought the software they claimed to "protect". BSA are lazy, at least around here: they don't look for infringers, they just pound honest people with threats in order to have something to report to their sponsors. BSA does not look for the interests of their sponsors, only for the money they pour into BSA for those "awareness campaings" etc.

      Unfortunately for their sponsors,
            after my experience with BSA:
      * I don't buy or recomend to the people in charge to buy software from the companies members of BSA. There is always a good enough alternative, and running the risk of getting in the spotlight of BSA is not worth the trouble.
      * I still think it's lame to use "pirated" software, but I am kinda glad so many people do it, as far as the sponsors of BSA are concerned.
      * I run a clean shop, free as in free speech.

  2. Post the key! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I just want to confirm the article. Really.

  3. Corporate by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its simple. Hes using the corporate VLK. Microsoft would _never_ damage its corporate customers by subjecting them to WGA. I thought it was well known that corporate versions of things (windows, symantec) are vastly superior and thusly are the most heavily pirated. Always go for a pirated corp copy over a real one. Those leet software pirates know how to do the job right, the first time.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:Corporate by hawkbug · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're wrong I think, I've seen VLK's get flagged as pirated. However, they were :) When a legit key was put in place, the warning goes away.

    2. Re:Corporate by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Informative

      The majority of the users WGA identifies as pirate are using corporate volume license keys.

    3. Re:Corporate by Abreu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know for a fact that all the windows machines at my job are installed with the same keys for its software (due to laziness from our IT dept, all the licenses are there --locked in a closet somewhere).
      All our computers are patched regularly and automatically, without a problem.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:Corporate by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, it doesn't take long searching any torrent site, "keygen" site or such to find compromised VLKs, and it takes Microsoft equally little time to find same keys and blacklist them. I'm guessing many of the WGA updates are to do with blacklist updates, as well as ways of preventing DLL subversion and such.

    5. Re:Corporate by calebb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try using the infamous pre-SP1 vlk that starts with FCKGW http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCKGW

    6. Re:Corporate by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What is a "corporate version"?

      I work for a university, and I have a Windows XP laptop (university property) installed using our school of engineering key (we have a site-wide license). Is that a "corporate" version? Anyway, I had not booted that laptop in Windows in a LONG while, since I had been mostly using it with another hard drive with SuSE linux installed.

      Recently, I booted it, and gave my ok to its doing 18 Windows Updates (techstaff won't support my laptop unless I do the updates). After doing the updates (from my home, I am not sure if this is relevant), Windows now claims that the copy is pirated.

      Since it is certainly not pirated, I decided to simply not bother with it. The fun part is that in some couple of weeks, I am going to give a talk at Microsoft with that laptop... and no, I don't plan to fix it before then!

    7. Re:Corporate by Jtoxification · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, please make sure to incorporate that into your speech :-D

      A friend of mine is actually afraid to update his new xp 64 software for that reason, and it's a shame too. That's a fast computer and he stays on xp 32 since until he gets all the drivers and fixes for xp 64 (he's manually loaded as many as he can), it's going to be fast as molasses.

      --
      --I gots 99 problems but a new machine ain't one!
      AMD! Asus! Whoot! 6 years!
    8. Re:Corporate by Raideen · · Score: 4, Informative

      VLA, retail, and OEM media are different. Using a VLA key on an installation done with retail media won't work.

    9. Re:Corporate by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2, Informative

      The VLK that are in use by some of my customers will not work on an OEM Windows XP Pro CD, they require a Volume Licence CD.

    10. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      the volume licence version doesnt contain windows activation either

    11. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      'cept that the dll subversion trick works miracles. Almost always 0-day fix, and can be implemented without a working windows system using a small, automated Linux LiveCD (the same one I use to ghost my system once in a while).

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    12. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 2

      Actually, in the world of 'suckit' and 'fucktard', my favorite is 'assknuckle'. Or, maybe 'scrotagonal'. Kind of a tossup.

      Feel free to mod this offtopic.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    13. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, yes and no.

      Universities do (generally) use XP Professional, and (generally) they do use VLKs to handle installs/updates. Unfortunately, since they often pass these out to students, they're often the first to be pirated. Which means they're often the first to be blacklisted with this WGA shite.

      Fortunately, for compters wired to the University intranet (that don't have remote management shut off), the University IT staff will dynamically update the VLK if theirs becomes blacklisted (Microsoft will notify the owner of a VLK before it becomes invalid and give instructions on performing a mass VLK update). The problem is that when an individual has to reinstall, the IT guys are usually willing to just give out the VLK rather than insisting that they do the reinstall themselves - thus restarting the cycle.

      In short: take your laptop to your IT dept and tell 'em your computer thinks it's been pirated; they'll be able to fix it.

      That is, if you give a shit.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  4. Who are the developers by Twillerror · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When things like this come out; things like key checking for a game install and everything else that is designed to stop piracy I often wonder who wrote it?

    Are the best and brightest out there the ones that get stuck with this task? I would think it'd be the interns and that developers everyone hates that get the fun task.

    I've used products that had good licensing tools. Keys that you enabled online, and enabled a number of users etc. Everytime it seems like it comes out of some smaller software company with small bright teams. I'm guessing in these cases the senior level codes and maybe even the whole team got involved.

    Anyone out there have expierence writing key checkers and other piracy related pieces of functionality?

    1. Re:Who are the developers by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I've used products that had good licensing tools. Keys that you enabled online, and enabled a number of users etc."

      I _hate_ crap like that. I use DriveCrypt for encryption (from securstar.de), and it has the most horrific license system I've ever had the displeasure to use. You have to activate your software and lock it to a computer, then if you want to use it on an alternative computer you have to uninstall it on the first, then enter a "deactivation" code on the website, then finally you can reactivate on the new PC. God forbid you should format one of your computers forgetting to deactive your license first. I even had a problem where a new version of the software wouldn't accept the current activation on the system. I had to uninstall the newer version, re-install the older version, uninstall it and de-activate, then install the new one again and activate it. At that point I was like "JFK!", and no, that's not a reference to Kennedy.

      Lets face it: People hate activation, and for a good reason. It doesn't stop piracy. It doesn't really reduce piracy either. All it does it cause perpetual headaches to your legally licensed customers. I work on software products and was partly responsible for redesigning our software registration system, which used to also use online activation. We stripped out the 'activation' element and sales didn't drop at all, however the volume of support traffic that we had to handle due to activation issues (the largest type of support incident by far) dropped to almost nothing. Our customers were much happier people.

      Secrets to succesful system: 1) Make a good product, 2) Don't extort your customers, 3) Make the registration process simple.

      An example of a good registration system: I recently bought Sonar 5 from Cakewalk. It came with a serial code in the DVD sleave, which you punch into Cakewalks' website in exchange for a registration code that can be used perpetually. That's it. Simple. Cakewalk get their registration info, you get to use the software you just paid hundreds of dollars for as you want. Sure, there is an element of trust involved in that, but hey, you just paid a few hundred bucks. Maybe they ought to trust you after that. By comaprison, other similar software I have licenses for is heinous. Cakewalk earned a lot of respect from me because of this.

      Pirates will pirate. People with morals who wish to support your work will pay where they can. Respect your customers.

    2. Re:Who are the developers by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh.. ok 'JFK' should be 'JFC'. I was so mad about the whole thing it made me incoherent.

    3. Re:Who are the developers by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do not believe 90% will pay when they can pirate. I did not say I believed that. What I said was that providing a simple registration system instead of a complex activation scheme will not reduce your sales.

      If only 5% will pay with activation, still around 5% will pay with simple registration. Why? Because the people who pirate will pirate regardless of which system you use.

    4. Re:Who are the developers by Obyron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't quite a response to your question, but the responses made me think about it. I run a shop that specializes in creating signs, doing engraving, and other graphically artistic tasks. Before I started this place I used to boggle at how people could pay 3 or 400 dollars for Windows, or 600 dollars for a copy of Photoshop, or (perish the thought!) $1000 for Final Cut Pro. But, That Was Before (TM).

      Some of the software I now use to run equipment in the shop costs over four thousand dollars, and, while it's useful and allows me to run my business (which is why I pay for it), it's not as "worth it" as I'd like it to be. Now I come to my point. None of this software uses serial-based authentication. It's all done via USB or (with older software) LPT dongles. It goes back to the two schools of authentication: something you know versus something you have/are.

      There are HASP dongle crackers out there, but they're not very common, and I have no clue how well they work. I honestly haven't tried. Installing a pirated copy of Windows on grandma's computer so the poor old dear can check her email and play solitaire doesn't bug me, but my morals get rubbed the wrong way by "stealing" something that I plan on using to make a lot of money.

      So, how long is it before we start seeing hardware-based registration schemes? It might be expensive for a company like Adobe to have the keys made, but volume pricing and the amount of money they'd save versus privacy might be worth it. Microsoft certainly has the weight (and the volume) to get them made cheaply enough for it to benefit. The increased usage of dongles would certainly make them a bigger target for cracking (vide: Windows viruses versus Mac viruses), so it might be a wash in the long run. Companies certainly gain mindshare by having their products be ubiquitous, even if it's at the cost of a few pirate copies, but it seems like every z0mg l33t p1r4t3 kiddie out there (at least the ones I know) have a copy of Photoshop even if they don't use it.

      --
      --Obyron
    5. Re:Who are the developers by glowworm · · Score: 4, Informative
      I _hate_ crap like that. I use DriveCrypt for encryption (from securstar.de), and it has the most horrific license system I've ever had the displeasure to use.
      That is why you should support Open Source where possible. Rather than continue with DriveCrypt change to TrueCrypt which can do everything DriveCrypt does PLUS... use a file, say a .gif, as a key, containers compatible between Windows and Linux and also the encrypted containers don't contain DriveCrypt's giveaway signature bytes at the start of the file.

      The only way to stop the re-emergence of copy protection schemes (as were the craze in the mid 1980's with things like pro-lock) is to stop buying their products, instead relying on open source whereever the task at hand allows. DriveCrypt is one of things that you can easily get rid of. WGA is a little harder, but it's day will come.
      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    6. Re:Who are the developers by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right, and people don't realize - no matter how complex the security lockout on the door, the pirates go in throught the window.

      Which of these is harder to pirate?

      Scenario 1:
      10 Start game
      20 Check to see if key is legit
      30 if key = legit, goto 50
      40 echo "key is not legit"; stop
      50 Play game
      Scenario 2:
      10 Start game
      20 Really complicated check to see if game is legit, key is activated, disc is inserted
      30 - 800 (really complicated and annoying security checks)
      810 if key = legit, goto 830
      820 echo "key is not legit, and we have contacted the FBI"; stop
      830 Play game
      The Pirates simply take out all the crap between "Start game" and "Play game", using decompilers and jump tracers and a bunch of crap that I don't know how it works, but get the general idea. They don't "defeat" the security. They just sidestep it. But the rest of us still have to deal with "you're not connected to the interweb tubes, you can't play this game".

      ~Wx

      PS Yes, starforce supposedly is impossible to break. Except that it gets its grubby hands in to your computer and causes massive problems, including hardware failures, system instability, and blue screens.
      --
      sig?
    7. Re:Who are the developers by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. our IT guy was giving a security talk a while back and saying that they were going to get PGP desktop or some other "mount an encrypted volume" software and I pointed him to trueCrypt. I put this on our laptop to have our Quicken stuff on, in case it got stolen. It's simple enough for my wife to use, and comes with a large variety of encryption key options. Very nice and simple to use. It even has support for complex things like a secret encrypted volume inside the encrypted volume so you can put some innocuous stuff on the fake volume in case you were forced to reveal it you could say "see, that's all there is". I don't use all that stuff, but I like it, it's free and Open Source.

    8. Re:Who are the developers by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      PS Yes, starforce supposedly is impossible to break.

      Except that there are torrents of every single starforce game ever around, and they all come with either cracks or mini-images, and there are at least a dozen competing "anti-starforce" tools.

      Starforce is sold as being impossible to break. In the end, it's not any better than anything else.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:Who are the developers by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What seems to be more common in expensive software is that the key is used in some kind of math within the program, so if you strip the key check, you will eventually get corrupted data in your files, things won't render properly, or whatever. This is much harder to just strip out; you end up needing to reverse engineer a significan portion of the program.

  5. This is surprising by spykemail · · Score: 3, Funny

    because none of Microsoft's software products have any flaws...

  6. Funny that... by dcapel · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems I can't get Canonical's apt program to recognize I'm running a pirated version of ubuntu. It should be obvious, since I even got it as an iso file on the internet for free...

    --
    DYWYPI?
    1. Re:Funny that... by click2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      apt-get install WGA

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  7. Many people just use their employeer's key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know a number of people who 'borrowed' a Windows Support Key from their employeers, and applied the key to their pirated version of Windows. None of them have had a problem with the Windows Validator tool.

    1. Re:Many people just use their employeer's key by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny
      What happens though when Microsoft detects all 11 out of your 10 licensed machines online at the same time?

      Isn't it obvious ?

      Whoever made out the schedule to have more than 10 people working that day is fired.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Many people just use their employeer's key by mallardtheduck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best thing to do is to copy down the key written on the authenticity sticker on corperate machines.
      Those machines are likely set up with a corperate VLK, so the key on the sticker is not in use (and the company has arguably paid twice for their software, so those licences are "spare" too...).

  8. I'm just worried that I'll buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    a copy from a store (you can't return software), MS then says it's pirated, and I'm fucked out of hundreds of bucks.

    How do ypu prove that you're not a pirate if MS says you are?

    1. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by wanax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as you're willing to rat out the reseller, MS will replace your pirated version with a genuine one.

      http://www.betanews.com/article/NonLegit_Windows_U sers_Get_Amnesty/1115239342

    2. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by madsheep · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, turning in my Uncle was worth the savings though! What a great program.

    3. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Cyberllama · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mine's legit and WGA rejects it. I attend classes at University which pays microsoft 4 million dollars a year and in exchange all of the students get microsoft products for free (the univeristy charges 5 dollars per disc, or you can download them for free ).

  9. Re:Astounding logic by twofidyKidd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The logic is that the MS claim of "foolproof" WGA software has only tagged a fraction of the millions of legitimate users as pirates, while true pirated copies are working as legitimate. The logic would follow that for every pirated copy marked as legal, someone with the legal copy is being marked as a pirate. That supposed "fraction" starts to look something like 1/2 or 3/5 or worse.

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  10. Re-create the problem. by Keaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    To beter help troubleshoot the issue I ask that you please send me an .iso and key. I would like to attempt to help re-create the problem to further assist you troubleshoot.

    Thanks,

  11. It's still a problem. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's far more of a problem for casual, non-technical pirates than the handful of legitimate customers who have been misidentified.

    I personally know of at least half a dozen people who have subsequently either a) purchased a legitimate copy of Windows, b) downgraded back to their older, legitimate version or c) bought a Mac, because they lack the technical knowledge to keep up with the WGA arms race.

    WGA is certainly going to reduce the level of Windows piracy. Unfortunately for Microsoft, it's going to do so because some people will move away from Windows altogether.

    Simple fact is that WGA is utterly transparent and utterly irrelevant to most legitimate users, and even those it isn't, it isn't an issue for very long.

    1. Re:It's still a problem. by Kelson · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Simple fact is that WGA is utterly transparent and utterly irrelevant to most legitimate users, and even those it isn't, it isn't an issue for very long.

      I can't speak for "most legitimate users," but I can describe my own brief run-in with a WGA malfunction.

      A few weeks ago, when the updated version of WGA was pushed out, my Dell-with-the-original-OS booted with a notice claiming that Windows was not genuine (despite the previous version of WGA reporting no problems). I grumbled about Microsoft's lying sack of *ahem* I mean, POS anti-piracy crap that couldn't tell a real copy of Windows from a fake one, then logged in, fired up a web browser, went to the Knowledge base, mucked around until I found a link that said something like, "Validate here"... and it said, "Oh, yeah, you're genuine. No problem, pal." (Actually, it's a Dell, so that would be "No problem, Dude.")

      I spouted some variation of "WTF?" Then I rebooted the machine, just to check, and sure enough it said absolutely nothing about being a pirated copy of Windows.

      I eventually concluded that Norton In(ternet)Security had probably blocked the initial validation attempt. With no desktop shell, I didn't have the chance to say "yes, let the damn packet through."

      The whole process took maybe 10 minutes, but it was an annoying 10 minutes. I've had my share of frustrations with Linux,* but it's never told me I was ripping off RedSuMandrivuntu.

      *My main PC is a Fedora Core box. My wife's main PC is a Mac. We share this Windows box, mainly for gaming.

  12. I am having this same problem... by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...except I am running Linux. No matter how hard I try, I can't get those dweebs at Linux Corp. to understand that I never paid for this copy. I keep calling them and asking for a invoice or bill or something. But I guess they don't have a record of my purchase. Go figure. Just lucky I suppose.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:I am having this same problem... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're just calling the wrong people: http://www.sco.com/

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:I am having this same problem... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Talk to Trading Standards in the UK.

  13. Re:Astounding logic by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The logic would follow that for every pirated copy marked as legal, someone with the legal copy is being marked as a pirate. That supposed "fraction" starts to look something like 1/2 or 3/5 or worse.

    That logic doesn't really follow at all. Anyhow, in tests like these, if you want to diminish false positives, then false negatives usually increase. We should be applauding Microsoft for not being overzealous.

    But then again, this is slashdot. MS never gets applause here. At most a murmur of reluctant approval.

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  14. predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienced by hguorbray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have 2 OEM copies of windows that I bought from Fry's years ago.

    Unfortunately -and predictably, in the course of 2 moves I have lost my activation key #s -I didn't glue them to my machines as recommended because I planned on moving the license to another, newer machine eventually.

    Now I can't even finish the install without having to find some cracked key from some warez site. Then it won't let me install any security patches or Service Packs.

    After the 30 days or whatever is up and I have to activate I then try the warezed key and am told that this key has been used too many times -Duh! a

    and then I have to call MS support and get a new activation key from them. Fortunately they haven't given me too much grif, but its still a hassle.

    Thanks to old flakey hard drives I have had to do this twice and now it has died a third time.

    This time I said screw it and went to fry's and bought a new HP dual core media center PC for $750. so I guess MS won this round.....

    But I will be trying this again since I have several more machines sitting around -I guess I'd better write down the key# the next time they give me one over the phone again. Does anyone know if the activation #s they give over the phone are 1-time codes or if they will work multiple times?

    Has anyone had any luck just asking them for new activation codes?

    -What's the speed of Dark?

  15. A different WGA problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not too long after WGA came out I tried using System Restore to revert to a back up from about a week earlier to see if it would solve some issues I was having. After reverting to the backup, WGA was sure I had a pirated copy, but if I then reverted to the state it was in before using system restore, it didn't have problems at all. I haven't checked since then to see if maybe it was just because the backup was from before installing WGA, but it's sort of annoying that they would make one of their more useful features useless if the issue still happens.

  16. but is it activated? by Eric+Coleman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or does it even need activation? having to call MS with your personal information to continue running xp after 60 or so days could be the end of his freedom.

  17. There is Anti-WGA cracks... by Borgschulze · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.Corporate.SP2.In tegrated.July.2006.MULTI.IMAGE.REPACK-ETH0 That has all the latest updates... and has a WGA crack in it... no wonder he can't get it to recognize it's pirated.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Linux compiles you!
  18. Re:Astounding logic by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes, the submitter is using dubious logic, which doesn't even need to be used because there's already evidence that innocents are being caught.Here's some logic for you:
    1. Quite a few people have already been incorrectly accused of piracy by WGA.
    2. There are pirates not being caught by WGA. If someone trying to get caught can't, what about those trying not to get caught?
    3. Every computer accused of piracy is unable to recieve security updates, making it that much more likely to be hit with malware and therefore become a transmitter of such. The more transmitters, the faster the virus spreads.
    4. The majority of pirates will not go out and buy Windows because of WGA. They either don't have the money or don't want to spend it. If anything they will download third-party tools that don't require WGA.
    5. There is no benefit to the Windows Genuine Advantage unless their goal is to get people to purchase Windows 2 or 3 times. Come to think of it, that probably is their goal.
    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  19. Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Obviously the P2P Pirate edition of XP uses the VLK and has modified the legitcontrol.dll, wgatray.exe, and wga*.dll files to not report a WGA violation.

    Want to really test the WGA? Use your original copy of Windows XP and search the Internet for a known CD-Key and install with that key that millions of other people have used. Then watch as the retail or OEM version of Windows with unpatched WGA files reports you as a pirate.

    Ninja Pirate Hackers and Crackers have modified the WGA files with something called MSIL that is like assembly language. For example if a valid key is found, you might have a comparision done and a JNE to 2000:1345 which calls the part of the code that turns on the "Your copy of Windows is not legit" function. Turn that JNE 2000:1345 into a NOP and the comparison does not match and the program does not jump into the Anti-Pirate code. Or change it to a JE 2000:1345 and if a valid key is found it jumps to the Anti-Pirate code and if an invalid key it does not. Or just take the code at 2000:1345 that turns on the Pirated bit and fill it with NOPs. I am just guessing here, I could be wrong, but I think the pirated version of Windows and those WGA-Fix patches do those sort of things.

    Meanwhile my legit copy of Windows XP has to have the WGA spyware on it to get updates from Microsoft. Yeah Windows Update and Microsoft Update require that I install WGA in order to use them. If not, no updates from the web. WGA trashed my fast user switching after it got installed. I can see the WGA files eating my system memory, CPU cycles, and using up bandwidth to report back to Microsoft, yes folks it is spyware. I would guess the pirate version of the WGA Fixed files remove the spyware as well.

    Not only that I heard that the pirate version of XP has special tweaks and bug fixes that the retail and OEM versions do not have. Yet your chances of malware infections are greater with the pirate version, because you never know who last modified it before you got a copy. So beware.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      try this go to autopatcher.com and download a full set (you may have to download an older full set and then the upgrade sets to get to august)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here you can find the real guide to fixing the genuine advantage (without hassles). This will allow you to access windows update and download files from m$ unencumbered.

      Included in this release is a file which is actually the first cracked release of the genuine advantage dll ever put out. It has been modified to allow me (and now you) to download stuff from microsoft as of 07/26/06. How does this work?

      A few things you should know - when microsoft wants to be they're exceedingly lazy. Very, very, very lazy. Why do I say this? Well lets look at how this system works.

      This dll is loaded into internet explorer as an add-on. When you access the site, the site checks the file is the right version, asks it "is this computer genuine", and trusts the dll to find out. The dll send the yes or no to them without some sort of thing attached to say "and this is why I think so". All it sends is a yes, or a no. That means the dll just needs to always send a yes. Well what about that first part, the whole "checks the version". Microsoft must have some crc checking or something right? Wrong! It does not check the crc (or any info) on the exe aside from the version string. That's it.

      What does this mean? It means we can have a surefire way of getting around this with only 1 cracked dll.

      Step 1: go to the microsoft site and when it tells you it needs to put genuine advantage ocx on to work, go ok. It'll tell you your copy is bad (or else why are you reading this?)

      Step 2: get an old cracked 'LegitCheckControl.dll' file from anywhere. Keep this file safe.

      step 3: take your trusty copy of resource hacker, resource workshop, whatever (resource hacker available free from http://www.angusj.com/resourcehacker/), and open the old file. Run another instance and open the other.

      step 4: so now you have both files open. Expand "version info", then 1, on both. In 1033 you'll see

      1 VERSIONINFO
      FILEVERSION 1,5,530,0
        ...

      step 5: look at the newer, noncracked file. See how the version is a larger number? Either change the numbers on the older file to look like the newer one, or just copy paste the script exactly from the old file into the new.

      Step 6: hit compile script, save the old dll, and copy it into your system directory, overwriting the non-cracked one (make sure internet explorer is closed or this won't work).

      You're done. That's it. You can do this every time it stops working. That wasn't so bad now was it?

  20. can I get a link by lophophore · · Score: 4, Funny

    can I get a link to that Google page with the 5 valid keys, please?

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  21. Intentional installed a pirated copy... by madsheep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right... so he intentionally installed a pirated copy. Good work. I think we should hold these genius responsible for breaking the law now. In other news I intentionally stole a car with armored tires and proved the cops couldn't catch me and the spike strip they laid out to stop me couldn't rip my tires... blah blah blah.

  22. However what might be happening by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is he might be using a legit corperate key. We have a VLK here (university) and you can just install XP on any system no problem, and it'll report as legit. They don't check vs number of license to make sure it's an exact count. So you could install it unlicensed on a personal laptop, and it'd report as legit no problems. Now however if they found tons of systems outside of the university cropping up, and saw the key on a serials board, they might invalidate it and issue us a new one.

    However just installing a copy of corperate unlicensed won't do anything. It doesn't activate and there's not a hard limit check.

    To really test WGA you need to do something like get a known pirate key or take a non-volume copy of XP and install it on more systems than you are allowed to.

    1. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Now however if they found tons of systems outside of the university cropping up, and saw the key on a serials board, they might invalidate it and issue us a new one."

      Or, they might just invalidate it and leave it to the folks in your IT organization to explain why they need to buy retail licenses from now on...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:However what might be happening by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well that would violate the contract so no, probably not. It actually turns out that MS doesn't like to piss off their customers in general. It's the people that aren't paying they are mad at. It's not even really the inidivduals as much as the resellers that claim to be selling legit Windows, and charge for it, but don't.

    3. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm quite cynical on this topic because of my experiences with MSDN. Even though I've been an MSDN subscriber for a LONG time (a lot longer than I want to admit), I was treated very poorly when I received MSDN activation codes that were supposedly pirated. I had to (literally) threaten to sue (yes, Microsoft) before someone got a fire lit under their chair (to my surprise), and took care of my situation, eight weeks after my purchase, and after several people had essentially accused me of infringement even as I had sales receipts and original media in my hand.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:However what might be happening by Manitcor · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA, he used a key from a serials site that was marked as 2 years old. MS is apparently not keeping up with its pirateed key list

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    5. Re:However what might be happening by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >To really test WGA you need to do something like get a known
      >pirate key or take a non-volume copy of XP and install it on more
      >systems than you are allowed to.

      Nope. That's what you need to trigger it.
      To test it, you take most obscure cases of license violation plus most convoluted cases of legal use.
      And then as result the test shows WGA is hopelessly broken.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:However what might be happening by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The whole WGA ia not about pursuing pirates it is about pursuing families, with more than one computer. Pirates will continue pirating with out pause, the skilled ones of course, the dumb ones will still get caught as always. Hackers and skilled users who want to cheat will do so as well.

      It is only the unskilled trying to install one copy across all the families computers who are really getting caught, it is targeted at unskilled mothers and fathers and their children.

      The easiest way around WGA is to download the updates and install them manually and anybody with a reasonable amount of skill can do it quite readily (obviously avoid the WGA one, as well as the other pointless ones). The only reason I bothered with WGA is that I was curious as to what it what do. I prefer manual updates and have automatic updates disabled.

      When my browser/toy console (I always treat it as a toy when it boots to windows) breaks I want to know which specific patch caused it, so I can fix it. I treat it like a toy because when it comes to the typical end user customer that's the way microsoft treats it.

      Windows NT taught me the folly of relying on or trusting microsoft with a blank check on patches, I still prefer to wait and let the mug punters do the microsoft beta testing of patches before I give it a shot even on my toy machine.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  23. Damn that Microsoft! by wbtotb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought false positives were bad, but holy crap, letting a few pirates go with false negatives is so much worse! They may never get to experience the pleasures of those prompts or being prevented from downloading updates and utilities.

    Why is this a problem for anyone but Microsoft (or those who have a perverse desire to be labeled as a pirate and then blog about it)? Do you suppose maybe he got a false negative because Microsoft is less willing to pull the trigger when in doubt?

  24. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using OEM licenses on computers other than the one they came with is illegal.

    Bullshit. You can get OEM Windows licenses with a mouse or keyboard (in fact it's the cheapest way to get them, short of buying in bulk from fire damaged stock (one company I worked with licensed all their machines that way - far cheaper than a volume license deal)).

  25. What happens if you WANT to get caught? by ronwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're running an illegal version of windows, but happen to actually have a license for a legit copy, how can you go about getting legit?

    My friend has a pirated keygen'd version of xp pro, and also has a hologramed cd of xp pro complete with serial number and all... Is there an easy upgrade path available to him to go legit, without having to reinstall (too many games/apps/whatever he says.)

    1. Re:What happens if you WANT to get caught? by lordperditor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use sysprep(found on the xp cd in tools/reskit/deploy.cab or just search the cd for deploy.cab) extract sysprep.exe and run sysprep.exe -reseal. when the machine reboots you can enter the COA from your legit copy of XP. (This was from a post last week - forget the posters name)

  26. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by JPribe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do your homework. There is no requirement to buy *any* hardware at all.

    --

    Why go fast when you can go anywhere? O|||||||O
  27. Fraction of a percent... by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Funny
    They claim that all but "a fraction of a percent" of those 60 million people who've been denied access to Microsoft updates and downloads are guilty, guilty, guilty. Right.

    Right. Remember, 3/2—or 119,990,000/2—is, after all, a fraction.

    Just not a proper fraction.

  28. Volume License Keys Always Pass The WGA by lordperditor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Corporate Volume License Keys always pass the WGA test.

    e.g. HP has all the computers in the Sydney office running with one Volume License Key, now if someone were to leave HP's employ and continue to use the key MS would have no way of knowing so has to let it pass the WGA.

    It has to just shrug and go well thats HP let it pass or risk annoying the hell out of a lot of HP people if they refuse it.

  29. What MS shoudl do by cab15625 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's probably been suggested before, but what MS should do is what games used to do back in the '80s. When you turn on your computer, it asks you "on page 10 of the manual, what is the 7th word in line 13?"
    Espeically since windows has become too complex for a purely software based solution to ever work reliably.

  30. The bigger licensing issue is of course ACADEMIC by lordperditor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bigger licensing issue is of course ACADEMIC

    Mrs Smith trots off to the high street computer co and wants Windows XP, now does she buy the full version for $300 or the academic version for $98?

    Come on M$ $300 for XP but only $98 if you put a red sticker on the outside of the box with Academic Version written on it?!

    I would be interested to know how many of the boxes are sold at $300 in high st stores!

  31. poor logic by taybin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    False negatives don't imply false positives.

  32. It's okay... by writermike · · Score: 4, Funny

    *My main PC is a Fedora Core box. My wife's main PC is a Mac. We share this Windows box, mainly for gaming.

    It's okay, man. You don't have to prove yourself to us. :-D

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  33. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This time I said screw it and went to fry's and bought a new HP dual core media center PC for $750.
    That'll teach 'em! Nothing tells a company they can't get away with treating their customers like shit, than to .. um .. keep buying their products as though you were a very happy customer and everything is ok.
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  34. WGA - Microsofts Marketing at its finest by NullProg · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the PR notices: http://www.microsoft.com/genuine/downloads/whyVali date.aspx

    Confidence and Peace of Mind
    Your software is authentic, properly licensed and supported by Microsoft or a trusted partner.


    Ongoing Improvements
    You will get access to updates, enhancements, and innovations that help you protect and do more with your PC.


    Capabilities You Expect
    Your system will deliver the features, options, and performance you need to maximize your productivity and enjoyment.


    Greatest PR/Marketing campaign ever. Don't you feel the Love?

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  35. Re:MORON! by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is this flamebait? The license terms and conditions for an MS OEM license specifically states you cannot transfer the license!

    When the grandparent violated the terms of his license and installed Windows on a machine that is not covered by his license agreement with Microsoft, that installation of Windows became effectively "pirated".

    I'm not saying that Microsofts OEM licensing scheme is a legitimate or morally correct form of business, but from a (IANAL) legal perspective, the guy violated his license agreement and then was completely astounded when WGA told him that he had violated his license agreement... (jokes about Microsoft software actually working well enough to do what it should aside...)

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  36. Who needs updates anyway? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative
    Stick it behind a firewall. Put good antivirus software on there (which can be free like Avast or AVG Free). Scan for other spyware periodically. Use Firefox to surf sites whenever possible, and don't surf obviously sketchy sites. And don't run executables that you don't know about.

    I still have an unpatched Windows 2k SP3 box which has been running behind a firewall for the last 2 1/2 years. Still relatively fast and shows no evidence of malware infestation.

    I can see updates being necessary on Server 2003, which is often quite buggy and needs patches for stuff to work, but an XP or 2k box doesn't desperately need the updates if it's used in a reasonably sane manner.

    -b.

  37. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Informative
    But I will be trying this again since I have several more machines sitting around -I guess I'd better write down the key# the next time they give me one over the phone again. Does anyone know if the activation #s they give over the phone are 1-time codes or if they will work multiple times?

    Once you have a working machine - activated and all - go to C:\windows\system32 and copy the files wpa.dbl and wpa.bak to secure off-computer location(s) like a USB key or even a floppy. When you need to reinstall XP due to HDD death or whatever, reinstall as normal with the key you used on the previous install (if you don't know the key, download Magical Jelly Bean Keyfinder, run it, and write down the key). After you install, boot into Safe Mode (hold down F8 at boot and select from the menu). Copy the old wpa... files back into your C:\windows\system32 directory.

    -b.

  38. Re:Astounding logic by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point is that maybe it shouldn't even exist. Give people a fair product at a fair price, and they'll buy it. Windows is not being sold what the market obviously thinks it's worth.

  39. So how long until we see ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So how long until we see, in the wild, a virus/worm/whatever with a birthday payload that makes WGA think the compromised machine is pirate.

    Or one that makes WGA think it's legit.

    Either could cause all sorts of havoc.

    I wonder if it's already happened?

    (Wouldn't it be interesting if it had happened to the author of TFA? B-) )

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  40. Re:Astounding logic by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 5, Informative
    Every computer accused of piracy is unable to recieve security updates, making it that much more likely to be hit with malware and therefore become a transmitter of such. The more transmitters, the faster the virus spreads.


    This is false. Machines that fail WGA cannot download OPTIONAL/NON-SECURITY RELATED updates. Security updates have been, and always will be, available for download by ANY machine regardless of its legal state.

    Despite the fact that your claim has been echoed by many, many others, it remains false.
  41. A simple bug by real+gumby · · Score: 3, Funny

    They just forgot a "!" in the checking code!

    A 10MB mandatory patch should clear that one right up.

  42. My WGA Issue by robbak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is my WGA story.

    A client's laptop started complaining. I checked its key, and it did not match the key on the sticker. So I attempted to change the key. No go with MS's vba script. No go with the activation wizard (which is another suggested way to change it) - it stated that the key was invalid. Further 'hacking' with the activation wizard (No, I don't know what I did, but there was a maximum of three buttons I could have clicked, and one of them was 'cancel!') got me a key I could use on the phone, and, after telling a bored Indian the story ("Have you installed this software on any other machine?" - I swear that quoting a snatch of Alice in Wonderland would have succeded!) he coughed up the activation code. WGA no more, but my it's a drag!

    If I charged them full price, It may well have been more than a new licence. Even so, it probably would have taken just as long to get it to accept the freshly bought key.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  43. Re:Sonny Bono owns you by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Copyright infringement is not a crime. It's a civil infraction you can be sued for, but it's not even a misdemeanor as far as the government is concerned. Copyright infringement is not 'prosecuted' by the government at all, though the person/company the copyright has fallen to after a company folds (someone always buys out the IP) has the right to sue for infringement.

    Seriously, man. Where do you get this shit? Been sucking at the teat of the RIAA for too long?

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  44. Re:MORON! by khallow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why is this flamebait?

    Probably due to the excessive and inappropriate use of the term "moron". Also, saying "you can't do that" without saying why is pretty unhelpful. I think the modding is appropriate.
  45. False positives waste hours of my work day. by j741 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I service computers for a living. I've done so for more than 10 years. Over the past few years, I've observed a vast increase in unrecoverable hard drive failure rates, and an even larger increase of malware which negatively affects the system beyond reasonable repair. In these situations it is often much faster (and cheaper for the client) for me to re-install the customer's Windows. I'd guess that more than 80% of these re-installs involve an OEM release of Windows, where the product license key is on a sticker physically and permanently attached to the computer's case. One which is quite obviously either a legitimate license or an extremely well made (and unlikely) counterfit. Now, about half of all re-installs (which require product re-activation) fail the product activaiton (even before I can install the WGA spyware). This requires a phone call to Microsoft's product activation line. Here, if someone asks me a question or the other phone line rings or I hickup, Microsoft's non-human system will often make me start all over again repeating a boring string of numbers. After this, I get informed that the product key can not be validated (Which is the reason I called in the first place) and put on hold again until I finally get a human (if not English) voice. Then I'm asked to repeat the first part of the boring string of numbers before I'm questioned like a murder suspect about why I want to activate Windows. After all this, I am usually provided the clearance code to activate Windows. Total time for this process per client computer is approximately 20 minutes. Repeat 4 or 5 times each day, 5 days a week and Microsoft has managed to waste a very large quantity of my billable time. However, after jumping through these hoops, WGA did not bother these clients (yet).

    --
    - James
  46. Variant on WGA problems by GregWebb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hi all

    Had a problem last week that I'd never seen before...

    I had to reinstall XP Pro at home, so duly provided my license key during installation. Much to my displeasure, I was then required to go through the whole WGA problem to get some critical security updates.

    It flagged my license as a dud, and put my code on screen for me to see and sort out.

    Except that it didn't put in my code - the one I'd set when I installed Windows - but a completely different code...

    --

    Greg

    (Inside a nuclear plant)
    Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!