Slashdot Mirror


Understanding DVD Compression?

canyon289 asks: "My friends and I created a full length movie using a regular Sony Camcorder. After importing and editing all of the video and audio in Adobe Premiere, the exported AVI comes out to 19 gigs. The length of the movie is 90 minutes. We tried compressing it with Nero Burning Rom to a 4.7 single layer DVD but when played in a standard DVD player theres pixelation and frame skips aplenty. Does anyone know how to fit the movie into a DVD (preferably 4.7) and still maintain adequate quality?"

114 comments

  1. No problem! by Wavicle · · Score: 5, Funny


    Just download your movie off the net. Someone will have shrunk it to fit on a CD-ROM.
    </sarcasm>

    --
    Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
    Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
  2. Burn it slower by delidana · · Score: 1, Informative

    Try to burn it slower, if you noticed will run smoothly in your PC's dvd player but not in home dvd-player.

  3. Don't use nero by arodland · · Score: 2, Informative

    The full version is pathetically slow and not very good; the bundled versions are pathetically slow, not very good, and force you to use LPCM audio. ffmpeg + mplex + dvdauthor will do nicely. And there are tools that will wrap them all together for you in some sort of graphical thing, I think :)

  4. Cinema Craft Encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    CCE is the standard used in the rampant legal archiving of DVDs. Best DVD encodes I've seen of any of the major products. Nero has a quick and dirty encoder that is fitting 1hr-1:30 on a DVD5 with decent quality, but CCE sets the standard.

    1. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by svunt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seconded. Cinema Craft Encoder is the professional standard. Nero's compression, or that used by dvdshrink etc will drop frames to make your video fit. CCE will re-encode your film to the size you want, with excellent quality. It's not cheap, but there are some er....'unlimited trial' versions around, knowhatimean?

    2. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CCE is extremely expensive ($1950) for a regular consumer.
      If you have a recent version of Adobe Premiere--6.5 and up (perhaps it is 7.0) then it has an MPEG2 encoder built into it. You can then use another program to author the resulting wav/ac3 and mpg/mp2 files.

    3. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by karnal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've used DVDShrink on my many... ahem.. movies, and I've NEVER seen it drop frames to get the compression to the level it needs to fit a disc to a DVD-R....

      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Sancho · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're incorrect, sir.

      First of all, DVDShrink doesn't drop frames. It modifies the coefficient data in the stream to reduce the overall file size. It leaves the motion vector information (which is really the hardest part of encoding) untouched. It is extremely fast compared to re-encoding because the bulk of the work is done. Nero has a very similar product, but it doesn't work on CSS-encrypted discs. In neither case are frames dropped--in fact, because they maintain the motion vector information, every frame is necessarily maintained in the output. These are considered transcoders.

      Nero also has an AVI to MPEG encoder you can use. This one might "drop" frames (or more accurately, there may not be a 1:1 correlation in frames between the two products) but it will still produce roughly 30fps NTSC output. This is a true encoder and will go through roughly the same steps as any other MPEG encoder (including CCE). The difference is that it's not really made for high-quality encodings. It's made for your average Joe to put his videos on DVDs.

    5. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Shrubbman · · Score: 2, Informative
      CCE is extremely expensive ($1950) for a regular consumer.


      There's a basic version available priced much more affordably at US$ 58.00. Misses some of the more advanced features of the full version, but still quite good.
    6. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by stikves · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Nero has a very similar product, but it doesn't work on CSS-encrypted discs.

      Actually Nero has the never version of the same program. Since it was so good, Nero apparently bought DVD Shring along with the author and released it as "Nero Recode". For apparent reasons they've dropped CSS decrypting support. Also the author stopped developing (or even distributing) the freeware version, but the website was still intact.

    7. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anything like DVDShrink exist for Linux?

    8. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by MrLizardo · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    9. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by plonk420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CCE is the standard? that's a $2,000 program... maybe in YOUR world of legal archiving using illegal software... not to mention the interface is more the kind video compressionists understand (or hardened /.ers) TMPGEnc has a slightly less geeky interface. 2.5 is powerful and has a 15 or 30 day trial... 3.0 Xpress has a very user friendly interface (but can't do HD). i hear HC is good, but a knowledge in AVISynth may be required... (and the interface is CCE-like, too). there's also all sorts of other encoders like MainConcept, Procoder, but i'm happy with TMPGEnc and *cough* CCE

    10. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      TMPGEnc 2.524 has been free for a while.

    11. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Baki · · Score: 1

      I've been using dvdshrink too. I think it is not an mpeg encoder, but a transcoder. It compresses mpeg2 to mpeg2 which is an entirely different (simpler) process. So you cannot compare it with tools that encode some other format into mpeg2.

    12. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by baadger · · Score: 1

      Also, DVDShrink also only takes MPEG-2 input and reuses the stream. Is absolutely no use to the poster.

    13. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by baadger · · Score: 1

      The MPEG-2 encoder built in TMPGenc is 30 day trialware, after 30 days it stops working.

    14. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, people pay $1950 to "legal archive" their dvd's? At that price wouldn't it be easier and cheaper just to buy two copies and keep one in the closet?

    15. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      TMPGEnc seems like a really good tool. However, I register for the full version of a tool that I can't burn the install binaries of onto a CD and archive, so I can use it five years from now on a machine that doesn't route to the Internet. The creators of TMPGEnc have decided to copy Microsoft and tether their software to an internet connection, and to an 'authorization' process that I avoid like the plague.

      I have a CD that I label 'registered shareware' with a sharpie. It has hundreds of dollars worth of shareware that I have registered over the years. Install binaries and the serial number, or key, or little binary file you copy into a folder. Unfortunately, TMPGEnc seems like it will never make it onto that CD. Too bad, I register shareware fairly readily.

    16. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For apparent reasons they've dropped CSS decrypting support.

      DVDshrink never decrypted CSS in the first place. You always needed an extra tool to do that for you.

    17. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Talla · · Score: 1

      CCE is exceptional for progressive video, but for interlaced material like home DV recordings Canopus ProCoder is generally considered better.

    18. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might help, infact you might want to search Gnomefiles for other DVD and video encoding apps.

      http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/gDVDshrink

    19. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      As other posters have said, DVD Shrink requires an external CSS decrypter, such as DVD Decrypter, DVD43, or AnyDVD. It's the exact same scenario as Nero Recode.

      Also, quality-wise, I think a lot of Slashdotters need to give Recode more credit.

    20. Re:Cinema Craft Encoder by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I'm not really sure what you're talking about. The last time I saw it in action, DVDShrink would handle CSS for you.

  5. Multiple passes by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Informative

    MPEG only specifies the decoder not the encoder. So

    1. Choose a quality encoder
    2. Use a high quality mode (if it has one) usually this enables more MV searches
    3. Use multiple passes if supported. This helps distribute the bandwidth where it is needed more.

    Mencoder [part of mplayer] can encode DVDs using lavc that look [for the most part] just as good as the original on a CD. It'd be trivial to get near losslessness in the size of a DVD.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  6. Give this a try by Senner · · Score: 0

    Try exporting it into .wmv or a DivX, thats what I do when I make movies. Though, I am converting FRAPS files there, not from a camcorder.

    1. Re:Give this a try by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Try exporting it into .wmv or a DivX, thats what I do when I make movies. Though, I am converting FRAPS files there, not from a camcorder.

      Why would you do that? Running your practically uncompressed DV footage through a high-ratio playback compressor like DiVx, only to recompress with another playback compressor (MPEG-2) does not make any sense.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  7. i guess google was down? by aquaepulse · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:i guess google was down? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Good use of Avisynth should help keep the filesize down. Also try using a KDVD matrix.

    2. Re:i guess google was down? by baadger · · Score: 1

      Doom9 is simply the best community to discuss the posters needs, there are people there that will encode your socks off.

  8. iMovie by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I believe iMovie and other Apple movie-making tools are able to do that from the tapes

    --
    I am Spartacus
    1. Re:iMovie by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple makes it easy but their software is also aggravating in some respects. iMovie's titling system is extremely constricted, most titling themes don't allow you any control over placement. iDVD is the program you use to author a DVD from a video file, and its audio and video encoding is basically single-threaded, so despite having a dual processor system, that program won't be any faster than if you had a single processor system.

  9. Use another compression engine? Audio too big? by Sancho · · Score: 5, Informative

    You want a multi-pass, high quality encoder to create your output files. For video and on Windows, I suggest Tsunami Mpeg Encoder (TMPGEnc). It's been a few years since I've messed with any of this, but it was quite good and inexpensive 3-4 years ago. It does 2-pass encoding and can output any number of DVD-compatible formats.

    If you're still having problems, you might try reducing the resolution. DVD supports 704(720) or 352 vertical lines. Obviously quality suffers as you reduce resolution, but if you're having problems squeezing your content onto a DVD at 720 lines, you may just get an overall increase in quality this way.

    Also, you don't talk much about your audio. Is it raw audio (which is really big and uses up lots of room on the disc that could be devoted to video)? You may have good results compressing this, as well.

    I like http://www.doom9.net/ for all things video/dvd/vcd. They have a number of guides which detail the various methods of compression and burning. It's pretty likely that you'll find the tips you need there.

    1. Re:Use another compression engine? Audio too big? by towzzer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like the other comments i recommend a high quality encoder, my preference is Cinema Craft Encoder. I've tried the nero encoder and anything i put it comes out looking quite horrible. If there is alot of noise you might need a bit of a smoother filter to help the mmpeg-2 compression. Try getting a program called avi2dvd, it does everything for you and you only need to input which encoder you'd like to use (free ones are provided).

    2. Re:Use another compression engine? Audio too big? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I've used Tsunami for a number of years as well now. Very good encoder at a reasonable price point. Plus they do offer AC3 compression (not sure if it's still only 2-channel).

      Audio is a big bit hog. PCM is 1536kbits/sec while AC3 can be down around 256kbits/sec. That could be the difference between 4000kbits/sec for your video stream and 5200kbits/sec for your video stream.

      (I find that 4000kbits for full-D1 video is really pushing the lower limit of acceptable. Unless you have a super clean source file. So the extra 1200kbits/sec means a lot.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  10. Transcode it as few times as possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time you convert it to another format, you're going to lose information.

    There's a good chance that your .avi file was not using DVD-compliant MPEG-2, in which case your burning software would have to transcode it (decode the compression in the .avi file, recompress using MPEG-2 at a resolution and bit rate that would work for DVDs). Even if your video is already in a DVD-compliant subset of MPEG-2, Nero might still have decided to go ahead and transcode it again anyway, because most Windows DVD software is stupid that way.

    Like arodland said above, use ffmpeg, mplex, and dvdauthor. They might take a bit longer to learn, but they're worth the effort.

  11. Feel free to adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ffmpeg -i INPUT.avi -target ntsc-dvd 01.mpg
    mkdir dvd
    dvdauthor -o dvd -t -v 4:3 01.mpg
    dvdauthor -o dvd -T
    growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -dvd-video dvd
    rm -r dvd 01.mpg

    1. Re:Feel free to adapt by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      ffmpeg -i INPUT.avi -target ntsc-dvd 01.mpg

      I'd recommend, as a minimum:

      ffmpeg -i INPUT.avi -async 1 -hq -b 5000 -ab 224 -target ntsc-dvd -y output.vob

      Play with the numbers 5000 and 224 until you have an output file that'll fit on your 4.7gb disc. The formula is (number_of_seconds * total_of_bitrates) / 8 / 1024 / 1024 = megabytes of output. You'll need it to be less than about 4400. Aim for 4200 if you don't want to have to reencode if it runs too high, because ffmpeg is a variable-rate encoder that just aims for the target you specify and often seems to overestimate how much data it can put in.

      DVDAuthor's a great way of mastering the DVDs and learning to produce menus with it can be fun. Both of these programs work fine on Windows.

    2. Re:Feel free to adapt by Phreakiture · · Score: 2, Informative

      My method is similar, but looks like this:

      lav2yuv INPUT.avi | yuvdeinterlace | mpeg2enc -f 8 -o VIDEO.mpg
      ffmpeg -i INPUT.avi -ab 384 -o AUDIO.ac3
      mplex -f8 VIDEO.mpg AUDIO.ac3 -o OUTPUT.vob
      dvdauthor -o dvd -t -v 4:3 01.mpg
      dvdauthor -o dvd -T

      This will produce a set of directories like you normally find on a DVD. Now, you need to branch on whether or not the dvd directory is over4.7GB.

      If not:

      growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -dvd-video dvd

      ...will burn the DVD.

      If it is, then you can use DVDShrink under WINE to reduce the video. At anything over 60 minutes, you will need to do this.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  12. You need to author first by seinman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Basically, you need to author your DVD. Authoring takes the AVI file output of Premiere, compresses the video to MPEG2, the audio to AC3, creates menus (if you want them) and prepares and burns the entire thing. Good authoring software does a MUCH better job at compression than the crappy encoder in Nero, since these programs are designed to create only video DVDs, whereas Nero is designed to do everything (and none of it particularly well). As you're already using Adobe products, you may want to try Encore. It's their DVD authoring application. However, if you're open to other options, I highly recommend Sony DVD Architect. Both of those programs will create splendid quality results; the difference is that Adobe's Encore will give you more options (but is harder/more confusing for beginners) while Sony's DVD Architect will be much easier to learn and use (however lacks some of the fancy features that Encore provides).

    1. Re:You need to author first by friedmud · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second the recommendation of Sony DVD Architect.

      I bought the Sony Vegas Movie Studio + DVD Architect bundle and have been very satisfied. I use Vegas Movie Studio to import from my DV Camera (a fairly inexpensive entry level JVC) and edit everything together. You then "Render" your final movie... and then fire up DVD Architect.

      DVD Architect allows you to create all of the menus and add media to the disk (including moving menus, stills galleries (for jpegs), and easy Chapter menus). Then you just hit "burn" and it takes care of the rest.

      The quality is superb... I can't tell any difference between the video on the DVD and the video I watch while I'm editing the raw DV footage.

      The whole bundle is fairly inexpensive ($80-$100)... and I highly recommend it.

      I sampled _lots_ of editing software (most all have free trials) before I bought Vegas... I went with Vegas because it had the most professional "feel"... meaning that it didn't dumb down the features or do too much hand holding. It also has a great help system that walks you through some of the more difficult editing tasks (it actually uses your own video clips and points to things on the screen to show you how to get the job done... you should atleast grab the trial version and see what I mean.)

      I also like the capture program that Vegas uses the best... it actually catalogs everything (including searchable tag fields) you import. It can also remove the actual avi files while retaining the clip information... and then when you need that clip it will ask you to put in the correct tape and it will recapture it. This is great because the raw footage can take up a lot of space, so I always tell it to remove the media (and retain clip information) after I finish a project. But it's good to know that if I want to go back and change something it still remembers the clips and can recapture them.

      Anyway... enough with the free advertising... I've just been really happy with the product! Here's the website:

      http://psp.sonymediasoftware.com/Products/ShowProd uct.asp?PID=977

      Friedmud

    2. Re:You need to author first by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      The load time and UI responsiveness is so poor in Sony Vegas. I'd rather use any other product besides that bloated POS, personally. It also inserted something in the codec registry that causes an error everytime I load up certain files with ffdshow, saying I need to login as Administrator to register a codec I'm not even using. Nice DRM Sony. Too bad it breaks other products.

  13. GIYF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to google, type in "dvd authoring guide" or something like that, click the links that come up, and READ THEM. This is yet another one of those pathetic Ask Slashdot questions where it's clear that the submitter hasn't bothered to do the slightest bit of research. I think it's time I submitted my "What do I need to know to get a job as a programmer?" question...

  14. A somewhat related problem: by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Slightly offtopic: I created a video with kino that is of mpeg2 format, in a .mpeg file. How would I author a DVD (or create a DVD style .iso) from this?

    I can't seem to find a good answer with the typical google searches (too many false-positives by mentioning mpeg and mpeg2) :-(

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:A somewhat related problem: by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      a .mpeg file. How would I author a DVD (or create a DVD style .iso) from this?

      GuiforDVDauthor. Free, simple. Can make menus or just autoplay.

      I can't seem to find a good answer with the typical google searches

      Start here. It has a a lot of links to other authoring tools if you don't like gfd.

  15. Wrong URL by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Informative

    You entered the wrong url in your browser. Instead of slashdot.org try videohelp.com.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  16. This isn't piracy guys by canyon289 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey guys. No of course its not a rip if you guys are wondering. What kind of rip would be twice the size of the commercial dvd? Please don't think youre supporting piracy by giving me suggestions. I'd really appreciate any help I can get and thank you to whoever has already given me more possible solutions. I'll also bring you up to date on what I've done. The nero compression barfs during the credit and theres pixelation everywhere. However the audio and picture stay in sync. I've also tried Winavi but there are parts where the dvd player can't play the sound or video. Does anyone know if FFmpeg or some apple program will work? It doesn't matter what operating system. Thank you

    1. Re:This isn't piracy guys by moo083 · · Score: 1

      Just save the movie and send it into iDVD. It compresses for you.

    2. Re:This isn't piracy guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been doing jpeg --> DVD lately on Linux. Don't know specifically about AVI-->DVD or DV-->DVD, but here's the links that let me make a custom animated menu, several chapters and burn it as a DVD on Linux. It took about a week to understand enough about all the tools to put the DVD together properly.

      http://del.icio.us/stuporglue/dvd

      Upside: All the tools I used were free. The DVDs look really good. They don't look like I used a template from Apple/Nero/whatever
      Downside: It takes a good bit of work, time and reading to know what's going on.

      Tip: Use a smaller DV or AVI clip until you get the DVD functioning correctly. Use Xine, VLC, MPlayer, Ogle, Apple's DVD player or whatever to test your generated DVD structures and menus.

      I did this on Ubuntu 6.06 (stable) with software all from the repositories (including universe and multiverse)

      contact: dvd.4.brownbag@spamgourmet.com

    3. Re:This isn't piracy guys by tachyonflow · · Score: 1
      The nero compression barfs during the credit and theres pixelation everywhere. However the audio and picture stay in sync.

      If your audio/video synchronization is good, then you're having much more luck than you know. :) I've made a few DVDs out of content from a Sony DV camcorder. I use some Linux programs, Kino and Transcode, for editing and transcoding. The a/v synch gets so bad that I have to chop up the projects into 5-minute (or so) segments to keep it manageable. :/ I haven't done this in a couple of years, so hopefully there's better stuff out there these days.

      I assume by "pixelation" you're probably referring to "blockies", a common MPEG artifact. I've had trouble rendering text (credits) into MPEG2 well, since that's exactly the sort of thing that MPEG doesn't handle well. I wrote a small program to generate titles and credits as DV video files, and while it looks okay on a standard definition tube, you can really see the artifacts when played on a nice LCD or projection TV. The comments others have made about two-pass encoding may help with this -- "hard" scenes like credits can get a higher bitrate, while "easy" scenes like a static picture of the outdoors can give up some bitrate.

    4. Re:This isn't piracy guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that idvd is a wrecthedly miserable piece of shit that's slow and it does a terrible job. A high quality encoder does the job better, faster. Try avidemux.

    5. Re:This isn't piracy guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does anyone know if FFmpeg or some apple program will work? It doesn't matter what operating system. Thank you

      Here's what I use under Linux:

      #!/bin/bash
      # file total-rate audio-rate audio-track otherxvid othergeneral
      BT=$(( $2 / 16 ))
      VR=$(( $2 - $3 ))
       
      mencoder "$1" -oac mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=$3 -ovc xvid -xvidencopts "pass=1:turbo:lumi_mask:$5" $6 -o /dev/null
       
      mencoder "$1" -oac mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=$3 -ovc xvid -xvidencopts "pass=2:turbo:lumi_mask:bitrate=$VR:$5" $6 -o file.avi
       
      NAME="$1"
      mv file.avi "${NAME%.*}.new.avi"

      Save that as xdivenc and then call it with something like "./xdivenc mymovie.avi 2000 192 1 (thoseparameters are: filename, total bitrate in kb/sec, audio bitrate and audio channel). Adjust the 2000 to the highest level that will fit onto your disc, although 2000 is pretty good. You can hit control-c during the each pass and it will proceed onto the second section so you can test the quality without having to run through the whole movie first by hitting C-c after 20 seconds and then after another 20 seconds (to let the second pass run over the material; it won't stop when it reaches the end of the 1st pass material for some reason).

      The output file is called .new.avi. The input does not have to be an avi file; it can be anything mplayer can play, but the output is always an avi.

      Other options can be tacked on but that's another lesson...

  17. Womble MPEG by ben+there... · · Score: 1

    I like Womble MPEG for editing MPEG-2.

    It imports AVI, uses a timeline editor with a really fast seek, and my favorite: it can do stream copy for portions you don't want edited. Then there's transitions and other bells and whistles. I use it for anything I can't do in VirtualDub/AviSynth or Nero Recode. It's also recommended in the doom9 forums, for what it's worth.

    1. Re:Womble MPEG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Womble's good for editing mpeg files without having to re-encode. Its encoder is junk though, so I wouldn't recommend importing a 19GB AVI and expecting to get good results out.

      All the Poster needs is a good encoder (which Nero is unlikely to be - I have never used it's encoder, Nero is good for burning, not much else). I guess something like nero will not compress the audio - so there is a large amount of wasted space already, hence the video compression has to be much greater.

    2. Re:Womble MPEG by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      Womble's encoder seems to work fine for me. Even when adding logos and transitions, and only reencoding those parts, you can't tell the difference between the stream copied and reencoded sections.

      Nero Recode's MPEG-4 AVC encoder is actually really good. It's got most of the profiles and options to turn everything off so crappy Quicktime can even play it.

      I don't use it so much for MPEG-2, just when DVD Shrink doesn't work. And that's really to just remove previews and shrink menus, so I guess I don't know how good it's quality is.

      But Nero Digital is pretty serious about being a full-featured encoding suite, compatible with Nero Digital standalone players. They have a free AAC encoder that is quite popular. They're good for much more than just burning now. And Nero Recode is also quite popular on doom9, so I don't think it can be too bad.

  18. File info by canyon289 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh yes. Im very sorry that I forgot to mention the details. Here they are. Pixels: 720 x 480 Duration: 1:30:32 Audio Bitrate: 1536 Kbps Audio Sample Size: 16 bit Audio Format: PCM Framerate: 29 frames a second (can't lower this anymore, The movie gets too choppy) Video Sample Size: 24 bit

    1. Re:File info by Maller · · Score: 1

      You have a really bad encoder if it can't look good at 7mbps (4.7 GB * 1024 GB/MB * 8Mb/MB) / 5432 seconds. Standard DVDs are usually around 5mbps and Superbit are around 9mbps. Is it doing all I-frame encoding?

      If you are looking for best encoder for the money, I'd say TMPGEnc 12j. Canopus is also a good choice if money isn't an issue.

    2. Re:File info by forkazoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Oh yes. Im very sorry that I forgot to mention the details. Here they are. Pixels: 720 x 480 Duration: 1:30:32 Audio Bitrate: 1536 Kbps Audio Sample Size: 16 bit Audio Format: PCM Framerate: 29 frames a second (can't lower this anymore, The movie gets too choppy) Video Sample Size: 24 bit


      Don't mess with the frame rate. It won't get you anything, because an NTSC DVD will always be 29.97 Frames per second. As for your encoding troubles, somebody already mentioned TMPEGEnc, and ffmpeg. I like both of them. TMPEGEnc has a nice GUI, and runs on windows. ffmpeg has a nice command line interface, and runs on most anything, but is probably most pleasant on some sort of *NIX.

      Basically, the problem you are running into is a mediocre encoder. You want an encoder that does a more thorough motion estimation search. Combined with a few other bells and whistles, it will allow very nice quality at a reasonable bit rate. It will also take quite a while to encode. On my Athlon64, at highest settings, I generally plan on leaving an encode running at least over night. A good rule of thumb is that if your encode is any faster than 2X the length of the clip, you probably forgot to turn on enough quality options. (Of course, some encoders are just slow with no benefit -- it's just a vague rule of thumb...)

      Now, why are you using a 1.5 Mbit audio rate? That's probably much, much, much higher than you need. Compressing the audio more efficiently will free up more bitrate for video, where you seem to need it. Now, using rough numbers, with 90 minutes on a single layer DVD, you have something like 6 megabits per second to work with. This should be plenty. Hell, it should be plenty even with the big audio.

      Now, please go do some research. There is a ton of information available on the Internet, and we shouldn't have to read it for you. Making a DVD is not a mysterious black art. Getting the relevant information doesn't require any secret handshakes or anything. It sounds like you aren't doing anything the least bit unusual.

      By the way, what is the project?
    3. Re:File info by Sancho · · Score: 1

      As I suspected (and noted in another comment) you're losing lots of bits in your audio. Try compressing it into .ac3 (not sure if there are any legal, free tools for this) or .mp2 (not NTSC compatible in the spec, but generally works in most DVD players I've tried). PCM is uncompressed and huge, leaving little room for your video. Nero might even make your DVD look ok if you can compress the audio a little, but I'd still use a better encoder to make the actual MPEG.

    4. Re:File info by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Don't mess with the frame rate. It won't get you anything, because an NTSC DVD will always be 29.97 Frames per second

      NTSC DVDs are not always encoded at 29.97 FPS. They are sometimes encoded at 24fps or 23.976 fps. This kind of DVD is typically a digital conversion from film since movies have traditionaly been filmed at 24FPS. It's a lot harder to encode (and maintain quality) on a digitized version of a 24fps movie converted to 29.97 than it is to just do an inverse tecline (24->29.97) after decoding inside the DVD player. Best way to maintain quality and reduce bitrate is to have hte DVD encoded at the same FPS as the source material.

      I definitely agree with the audio. He needs to quite using uncompressed audio and use MP2 at the minimum and preferably some form of dolby if possible.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    5. Re:File info by evilviper · · Score: 1
      NTSC DVDs are not always encoded at 29.97 FPS. They are sometimes encoded at 24fps or 23.976 fps.
      ...and then soft-telecine flags are added to give you a real framerate of 29.97.

      Still, you can telecine from any frame-rate, to any other frame-rate. NTSC DVD is still always 29.97fps.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:File info by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Audio Bitrate: 1536 Kbps Audio Sample Size: 16 bit Audio Format: PCM

      There's your problem. You're using up a huge chunk of your space for uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio. Encode it to 192K AC3, and you'll have far more room for video. You can use MP2 if you want to avoid patent licensing, but you should know it's only standard for PAL DVD players, not NTSC ones (ridiculous, I know).

      And though you haven't mentioned it, since you're encoding audio to PCM, I suspect you're encoding video to MPEG-1 as well (to avoid patents) which gives poorer results than MPEG-2. The difference will be particularly huge if your input video is interlaced, and your encoding software isn't deinterlacing it before reencoding.

      The best program for encoding is mencoder, if you aren't afraid of the command-line. And it has an entire section of it's documentation dedicated to creating proper VCD/SVCD/DVDs:
      http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/HTML/en/menc-feat-vcd -dvd.html

      .
      If you aren't willing to use different audio and video codecs for some reason, the only solution to stay fully within spec is to use half-D1 resolution (352x480) so that your video bitrate won't be spread so thin.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:File info by rew · · Score: 1

      Two things:

      First, even if your program allows you to fill in an arbitrary number for frame rate, it is not a number, but a binary choice. You have the option for 25 in Europe, or 30 in America. Your TV cannot do anything but 30 FPS, so will have to double-display one frame per second if your source material claims to be 29. This is visible. Your movie should shorten to about 87 minutes. Sorry. (the same is done for movies on TV in Europe: They play on TV at 25 FPS instead of the 24 FPS in the theatre, shortening them by 4%).

      Secondly your Audio is uncompressed. DVD specifies that audio can/should be mpeg compressed like the video. The bitrate you claim is more than full CD uncompressed audio. You should mpeg-encode the audio to about 192 to 320 kbps. This should keep the quality very reasonable, while reducing your filesize by almost 800Mb.

    8. Re:File info by julesh · · Score: 1

      The data on the disc is encoded at 23.976 fps. This saves you quite a bit of disc space.

      Telecine is used *by an NTSC player* to convert to 29.97. Unless you're playing back on a PC, at which point it will actually play at 23.976 without performing a telecine conversion. A PAL player might choose instead to simply speed up playback by 4% to get the required 25fps there (although I don't think most do this, it is certainly a possibility). There are probably also digital projection units that will play back without performing the conversion.

    9. Re:File info by julesh · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree with the audio. He needs to quite using uncompressed audio and use MP2 at the minimum and preferably some form of dolby if possible.

      For NTSC discs, that should be Dolby AC3 at a minimum, as MP2 is an optional part of the spec that might not be supported on all players. For PAL players, AC3 is optional and MP2 is mandatory. Fucked up, but true.

    10. Re:File info by julesh · · Score: 1

      First, even if your program allows you to fill in an arbitrary number for frame rate, it is not a number, but a binary choice. You have the option for 25 in Europe, or 30 in America. Your TV cannot do anything but 30 FPS, so will have to double-display one frame per second if your source material claims to be 29.

      Not true. You can have 24fps and the player will use telecine (interlacing) to produce a smooth playback. This is the way it is done for most commercial DVDs.

    11. Re:File info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For PAL players, AC3 is optional and MP2 is mandatory. Fucked up, but true.
      No, it isn't. For PAL players, it was considered to make AC3 optional, however in the final spec AC3 is mandatory. The audio tracks on PAL DVDs must provide at least one of AC3, MP2 or PCM, and players must be able to decode any of the three.
    12. Re:File info by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The data on the disc is encoded at 23.976 fps.

      It could be encoded at 14FPS if you include the proper soft-telecine flags for that. There's nothing special about 23.976fps. That was my point. The framerate (header) of soft-telecined material is still 29.97fps (though it only contains 23.976fps typically). A DVD can't handle 23.976fps video any better than it can handle 17fps.

      A PAL player might choose instead to simply speed up playback by 4% to get the required 25fps there (although I don't think most do this, it is certainly a possibility).

      I dare say none do that. If you speed-up the video, you also have to resample the sound, and hopefully pitch-shift it as well.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:File info by julesh · · Score: 1

      I dare say none do that. If you speed-up the video, you also have to resample the sound, and hopefully pitch-shift it as well.

      I'll admit I've never seen one that does do it, but neither of those steps is particularly difficult, and it would be a better approach to take than the one my player seems to take (3:2 pulldown to take the framerate to 29.97 and then drop frames to get to 25).

    14. Re:File info by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      It could be encoded at 14FPS if you include the proper soft-telecine flags for that.
      IIRC, the DVD spec only allows for 23.97 -> 30 telecine. I could be wrong though...

      I dare say none do that.
      Actually, this is exactly what they do do (depending if it's a PAL-region or an NTSC-region disc).

      PAL DVDs are all 25 FPS on the disc. NTSC DVDs are either 23.97 FPS or 30 FPS on the disc, but play out at 30 FPS, regardless of the framerate of the encode (as you say, 24 FPS film is slowed down to 23.97 at encoding, which is then then telecined up to 30 FPS in the player).

      On a PAL DVD, if they're from PAL source (e.g. TV), nothing's changed. If they're from film source (e.g. movies), the film is sped up to 25 FPS at encoding time - we don't dick around with telecine and other kludges. Which means, yes, their run-time is slightly shorter (by 4%), and the pitch is slightly higher (less than a quarter-tone, IIRC). If they're from NTSC source, they're either sped up from 23.97 FPS to 25 FPS, or decimated down from 30 FPS to 25 FPS (either via reverse-telecine from 30 FPS to 23.97 then sped up to 25 FPS (for telecined source, which is most of it), or via tricky decimation techniques involving frame-smoothing (for pure 30 FPS source, which is rare but likely to increase)). All that happens during the encoding process - as I said, PAL discs are all 25 FPS.

      Now, when a PAL player plays an NTSC disc, it either just puts out 30 FPS - either in so-called PAL-60 (60 interlaced fields / 30 FPS) and hopes the TV can sync to the 20% difference in frame rate - or as NTSC because, unlike in the US, most TVs sold in PAL countries are now multi-standard.

      As an aside, NTSC TV & DVDs tend to look really shitty to people in PAL countries - partly because the frame-doubling every 5 or 6 frames is annoyingly jerky (like 50Hz hum vs 60Hz hum - you're used to it; we're not), partly because the NTSC system is so piss-poor at keeping correct colour rendition compared to PAL (our chrominance info is resynced per-line; yours is sort of kept in check per line but only really resynced per field), and partly because those few extra lines of resolution (our 576 vs your 480) do make a noticeable difference...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    15. Re:File info by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the original 1995/96 spec for PAL DVD, MP2 was mandatory - anything else (e.g. AC3, PCM) was optional. It was amended in 1997 to allow for either MP2 or AC3 as the primary track.

      Because of this, MP2 is considered pretty much mandatory by PAL-country replicators/distributors, although some from NTSC areas tend to ignore this in their PAL releases.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    16. Re:File info by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If they're from film source (e.g. movies), the film is sped up to 25 FPS at encoding time - we don't dick around with telecine and other kludges.

      Yes, that's encoding. We're talking about PAL DVD players, playing NTSC discs.

      Which means, yes, their run-time is slightly shorter (by 4%), and the pitch is slightly higher (less than a quarter-tone, IIRC).

      The telecine judder should be unnoticable in most situations, on decent TV sets, and is going away as PCs and HDTVs become popular.

      The 4% speed-up, however, is absolutely infuriating. They actually use LESS of a speed-up than that in horror films, when they want the viewer to feel uncomfortable.

      Both the pitch and the compressed time are extremely obviously wrong, and trivially easy to spot. Thank god for computers, where I can easily convert PAL content back to normal.

      partly because the NTSC system is so piss-poor at keeping correct colour rendition compared to PAL

      When was the last time you saw an NTSC TV? The 1970s perhaps?

      and partly because those few extra lines of resolution (our 576 vs your 480) do make a noticeable difference...

      It's funny that people like to say how great the 20% higher resolution of PAL is when the discussion is NTSC vs PAL... Yet when the subject is HDTV, PAL supporters always dismiss the 500% higher resolution and 20% higher frame-rate as insignificant.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  19. Save big then compress by jbarr · · Score: 1

    Using a decent encoder is certainly the method of choice, but another solution, though not overly elegant, is let the DVD authoring app save an oversize file set (if it will let you--Ulead Video Studio will) and then use an app like CloneDVD2 to compress file set into a 4.7GB file set. Not sure how the quality will be, but apps like CloneDVD are designed to create decent compressed DVD's from dual layer source disks, and the results with...er...commercial DVD's has been excellent....

    -Jim
    http://jimstips.com/

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  20. final cut + dvd studio by parker9 · · Score: 1

    assuming you do have an apple, final cut & dvd studio- it's pretty straight forward. final cut will import directly, compressor will encode and dvd studio will author the dvd. i had no idea what i was doing and was able to do it in a day.

    do as few encoding/decodings as possible and burn the disk slow. make sure your (total) bit rate is below the dvd spec for stand-alone players. at least that's what i figured out...

    1. Re:final cut + dvd studio by kgi · · Score: 1

      WOW! The usual Slashdot super-geek crowd must be on a date. No scratch that they are all out watching Clerks2.

      1. Variable Bit Rate 2 Pass.
      2. Set Bit Rate High I like 6.9 Mbps
      3. Set Maximum Bit Rate to 8.0 Mbps or slightly higher ( If you go higher some DVD player will not playback).
      4. Lastly use a better Camera next time. Some of the issue my be your Camera if it is 1 Chip.

      Try to avoid programs the auto pick bit rate based on 2,4,6 hour. As far a Final Cut get it if you don't have it. The entire studio suite is very powerful and can do a lot of things that used to cost $100,000 or more. I now use the full studio 5 package on a Macbook and it works great.

    2. Re:final cut + dvd studio by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I have to echo your sentiments. However, it is quite expensive. I ordered the current Final Cut Studio ($1299) and a Mac Pro to run it on ($2999 w/2GB RAM (recommended by the software) and 500 GB drive (you'll need the space)).

      A refurb G5 can be less expensive, but doesn't have as many internal drive bays. Unless you're going to build an external RAID, I recommend lots of internal drive storage. In my experience, consumer-level single-PATA-drive Firewire 400 enclosures don't use all the available bandwidth of the bus nor support the maximum access speed supported by the drive.

      While a B&W G3 upgraded with a G4 can run a patched version of the software, encoding times are excessive. Expect a two-pass high quality encode of a 2-hour movie to take two days, uninterrupted.

      And check your files before you burn. I've seen reproducible problems with export encoding the wrong audio for the video when exporting multiple sequences from the same project. Test burns on DVD-RW or +RW media are recommended as well.

      And there are still players out there that will refuse to play burned DVDs. I can't seem to make my Sony 400-disc changer accept them on -R media.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  21. read the Doom9 guides by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    The Doom9 site is simply one of the best sites you could go to for anything video-encoding related. Read through some of their DVD encoding guides, they'll walk you through how to get decent encodes and point you to the software you'll need.

  22. Patience! by svunt · · Score: 1

    This is easy....you need to just wait a little while, affordable bluray & hd-dvd burners that can handle your 19GB movie are surely just weeks away!

  23. Try Super by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple Answer Super at http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html It supports all the format and uses open source software and it's free browse around

  24. DivxtoDVD by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
    There are a bunch of forums to get you going. Slashdot isn't one of them. VideoHelp is one of the larger, and friendlier, ones, with links to tools and such. Afterdawn has a very good archive of software.

    Simple, free, one-click solution: DivxtoDVD. Fast and easy, quite good results.

    If you want to get into it more, you need Avisynth (to load the AVI, scale it, apply filters); a video encoder (I like HCenc), an audio encoder (like BeSweet), an authoring app (like GUifor DVDAuthor, finally a burning app (use Nero or whatever came with your burner).

    These are all free Windows software, you can do it all in Linux, but it's not so user-friendly. Most Mac users tend to use commercial software.

  25. Try This instead same tools with a GUI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.erightsoft.net/Superdc.html/ Free open source software all the format and setting you can ask for have a look

    1. Re:Try This instead same tools with a GUI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what's missing from that web site? How about a way to actually get the software?

    2. Re:Try This instead same tools with a GUI by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      Try here and scroll to the bottom.

  26. Not iMovie -- Compressor is what you want. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The actual MPEG-2 encoder isn't part of iMovie, it's part of iDVD.

    iMovie just outputs an edited DV file and chapter information; the heavy lifting is done in iDVD.

    I haven't really followed the progress of iDVD very closely over the past few years. Once upon a time, the compressor that it used was pretty miserable: it was a CBR thing at a very high bitrate, which was great if you just wanted to put 60 minutes of DV footage onto a disc, but useless for anything else. If they've improved that at all, it might be an option.

    The only Apple product that really fits the bill here is Compressor, which is part of Final Cut Studio. It's their "professional grade" MPEG encoder; has lots of options, including VBR, multipass, distributed encoding, etc. I can't really compare it to any other very high end tools, but I've been told its output is very good. It gives you enough options that you can tweak the output to your liking, and balance output size against quality for whatever suits your project.

    It's really designed to work as part of a FC-based workflow, in the same way that iDVD is made to accept stuff from iMovie, but I'm pretty sure that if you just had a DV file, you could use it to do the compression. Ultimately, what Apple wants you to do is use FCP for editing, then Compressor for encoding, and then DVD Studio Pro to build the disc master image. Coming in halfway through the workflow may not be the easiest thing in the world, but it shouldn't be impossible.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Not iMovie -- Compressor is what you want. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      iDVD works reasonably well with Final Cut Express. FCE is quite cheap, but a whole world better than iMovie (which is really designed for moving-picture photo albums, rather than any project more complicated). If you add chapter markers in FCE and export as a QuickTime movie (don't recompress, just export one with links to the real content) then you can drop it in iDVD and go.

      iMovie '05 added a better MPEG-2 encoder and the ability to write disk images. This was particularly useful, since it meant that you could leave the machine encoding for an hour or so, and then churn out disks as fast as the writer could manage. The menu layout options in iDVD are still quite primitive. There are a few things you can do by copying and pasting that are not otherwise possible, but it feels like you are fighting the tool a lot (much like Keynote when you try defining new slide layouts).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  27. Filtering by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 1

    A lot of the comments here suggest that you buy a several thousand dollar encoder to fix this problem... not really the best solution. In reality, TMPGEnc (already mentioned) has long been on par with CCE quality-wise. Furthermore, it's free.

    However, the problem probably is less the encoder than the source. DV is usually incredibly noisy, and thus very very difficult to encode. This can be helped a lot by good filtering. TMPGEnc includes some filtering options that may work for you, but if you're looking for the real deal (and have a lot more time to blow), head on over to doom9.org. Back when I was doing this sort of thing, the Convolution3D AVISynth filter was the best way to increase compressibility, but that was two-three years ago, so things may have changed. That may be a good starting-point, though.

    1. Re:Filtering by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      TMPGEnc (already mentioned) has long been on par with CCE quality-wise. Furthermore, it's free.

      The free version only encodes MPEG1; i.e. VCDs, not DVDs.

    2. Re:Filtering by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 1

      Ah, yeah, I guess it's been too long. In that case, QuEnc (a free encoder based on libavcodec from the FFMPEG project) may be the best choice.

    3. Re:Filtering by baadger · · Score: 1

      Actually the free version has a 30 day MPEG-2 functionality.

    4. Re:Filtering by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      I use HCenc. Also free.

    5. Re:Filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CCE and TMPGEnc Encoder are about the same price-wise. Cinema Craft Encoder Basic is $58 https://www.visiblelight.com/mall/index.aspx. TMPGEnc with MPEG-2 functionality is $37 http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/shopping/tp_d.ht ml. It's been a couple years since I used these applications but my experience was that CCE produced high quality DVD compliant MPEG-2 video and TMPGEnc did produce high quality MPEG-2 video but had some DVD compliance problems. CCE is also much faster than TMPGEnc. Disclaimer: That was a few years ago and maybe those problems have been fixed.

      To produce DVD video I use CCE ($58) for the encoding and TMPGEnc DVD Author ($89.95) for the authoring http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/shopping/tda20.h tml. I find TMPGEnc DVD Author a bit tough to initially learn but produces great results.

    6. Re:Filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In reality, TMPGEnc (already mentioned) has long been on par with CCE quality-wise

      Sorry, but that's just not true. I make internationally distributed DVDs for a living and I can tell you that CCE is far superior to TMPGEnc in terms of compression quality -- but TMPGEnc does edge CCE out in terms of functionality. TMPGEnc very good, more than adaquate for most projects, but for difficult to compress footage TMPGEnc will often take a big hit in quality where CCE can compress the same footage beautifully for an easy win. CCE really is the best.

    7. Re:Filtering by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      However, the problem probably is less the encoder than the source
      I'd disagree (though you're right - DV is noisy; and worse, it not even noisy in the same domain that MPEG is!). Being on a Mac, if the poster doesn't have QuickTime Pro, the MPEG encoder used by iMovie/iDVD is incredibly bad. And, even if he does buy QT Pro, I don't know if iMovie/iDVD uses the better (but still not real flash) QT Pro encoder...
      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  28. Try ratDVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. MediaCoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. PCM audio is the culprit. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Audio Sample Size: 16 bit Audio Format: PCM

    PCM is uncompressed audio, half your file size is probably the audio. Demultiplex the audio to a separate (.wav) file, encode it to even the highest quality AC3 or MP2 at 48000 sample rate; you'll save several gigs. PCM audio is used to make the AVI easier to edit and keep in synch, but you don't need that for playback.

  31. Max bitrates by sakusha · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a fixed limit on the max bit rate, some older DVD players don't have the horsepower to decode and play high bitrate files. You can lay down high bitrate files just fine, but the player might not be able to play them. This is especially problematic for PCM files, you really should encode them as AC3, which are far lower bitrates but are essentially the same quality. There is a fixed limit on the total (audio + video) bitrate in the DVD spec, don't exceed it or you end up with stuttering files just as you described.

  32. Prosumer software for Mac OS by soren42 · · Score: 1

    If you're a Mac user, the iLife suite includes two tools that greatly simplify just such tasks, iMovie HD and iDVD. These tools follow the Apple mantra of ease of use, straightforward, and simple - while codec and compression settings are there, they are unnecessary for most things. These tools are relatively cheap, especially compared to Adobe Premiere, they don't have the features either. Seriously nonlinear editing comparable to Premiere is available on Mac OS in Final Cut, but the use case you present doesn't really call for most of Premiere's capabilities.

    I've been impressed by these products, and use them for 95% of my non-professional video work - family movies, open source project presentations, hobby art films, etc. The only other product I added to keep me out of the $1,300USD price tag attached to Final Cut is a license for QuickTime Pro. $30USD for QTPro, plus the $80USD for iLife - $110USD is reasonable.

    Mind you, these are Mac OS-only tools. If you don't own a Mac, I'd hope that there are PC equivalents. That said, if you do this sort of DVD compliation on a regular basis, buying a Mac might be worthwhile. If you don't feel you need a Mac for anything else, or the cost seems high, even the entry-level Mac Mini will do what you need, in this case.

    I'm not trying to be a Mac bigot here, I don't own Apple stock, there's no commission in it for me. That said, there's a reason Apple is the darling of media developers. Their years of experience in Hollywood and professional multimedia have resulted in the some really mature, usable, and cheap prosumer tools for home use. Enjoy!

    --

    "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
    1. Re:Prosumer software for Mac OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the iLife video programs with QuickTime Pro license import .AVI video and PCM audio files?

  33. Premiere Pro 2.0 exports direct to DVD! by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    I have to ask - did you buy Premiere Pro, or did you pirate it?

    Because Premiere Pro 2.0 at least (and probably other versions too) exports direct to DVD if you want:

    File - Export - To DVD

    Pick your options and burn.

    If you have Encore you can instead export from Premiere Pro using Adobe Media Encoder. Choose MPEG2-DVD format, pick your options again (VBR 2-Pass is best, max bitrate 7MB), export demuxed and then put the resulting .m2v and .wav files into Encore. Create a fancy menu, whatever you want. Encore will convert your WAV to AC3 automagically when you create your DVD.

    Seriously - read the program's own help files!!! Sheesh...

    1. Re:Premiere Pro 2.0 exports direct to DVD! by canyon289 · · Score: 1

      My friend has premiere 1.5 I believe. He bought it a few years ago.

  34. tmpgenc might be what you need. by Ripping+Silk · · Score: 1

    I've been recording F1 Grand Prix (and movies etc) digitally through a Canon DVD camcorder that has an analog to digital pass through mode. This gets captured on a Sony Vaio laptop (with firewire in) using the free WinDV.exe. I then edit as required using Adobe Premiere, then encode the resulting DV avi file to MPEG-2 using TMPGEnc. I usually encode using 2 pass VBR, and with this method I can get a quality result. The maximum video length for decent quality is around 2 hours for a 4.7Gb DVD. You can get more with a lower bitrate, but I find 2 hours is the effective limit (for me at least). Your 90 min video should look great using this method and with a higher bitrate. TMPGEnc does cost for the MPEG-2 codec. (or not if you look around) :) Try it.. you'll like it, and I've never had a crash from encoding using TMPGEnc. With 6-10 hours required to encode a 2 hour video, thats important.

    --
    this is not a flawless plan.. this is inspiration
  35. Considered a standalone DVD recorder? by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 1

    Since you're getting dropped frames, maybe your PC isn't up to the job. A camcorder can spit out a LARGE amount of data.

    Have you considered a standalone, entertainment-center-type DVD recorder? I think you can get one for pretty cheap with firewire in. So you would hook your firewire output to the DVD recorder (to avoid digital -> analog -> digital conversion losses), and just record to a blank disk.

    A brief look online found the Panasonic DMR-ES15S for about $150. There are probably cheaper, and I've never used this model before so I don't know if it's any good.

  36. You want MPEG2 Variable Bitrate encoding by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1
    Hi

    You'll definately want to use MPEG2 Variable Bitrate encoding. That's a two-pass encode, it takes its time, but the result is worth it. I managed to get more than two hours of lecture recordings on one 4.7 GB DVD, with perfectly fine quality. Your 1½ hour should fit well. Since you have 1/3 less playtime than I had, you could increase the average bitrate (or the audio bitrate) to maximize quality.

    I used Ulead DVD authoring products - Movie Factory for simple stuff, DVD Workshop for complex. They both did a fine job of encoding, and would do so today as well. It's a couple years ago, and even better products may be on the market now, haven't followed it closely.

    Good luck!

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  37. avi? by aquowf · · Score: 1

    why did you render into avi, isnt the standard for dvds mpg?

  38. Use a better encoder by Xesdeeni · · Score: 2, Informative

    90 minutes on a single-layer DVD should look excellent. You will use a bitrate of about 6 Mbps, which is plenty for high quality SD. But you must use a decent encoder.

    Nero's, as well as those on most all-in-one DVD edit/encode/author software are crap. The one that comes with Premiere is actually very good, but I prefer CinemaCraft Encoder Basic available at Visible Light for a mere $58. (Understand that the full version retails for over $2500 and has been used on commercial DVDs for many years.) It's not only quite good, but it's very fast. And it will plug directly into Premiere so you don't have to save that 19 GB intermediate AVI (or go through the associated additional encode/decode cycle, which also degrades the quality).

    After encoding, you must author your DVD. Adobe's Encore is good, but at $350, it's pretty expensive. I recommend DVD-Lab, the standard version of which is only $99.

    Both of these are available for trial download, so you don't have to take my word for it.

    Note that for audio, you can use MP2 for PAL destinations, even for commercial DVDs, and CCEB will do this for you. But for NTSC destinations, MP2 is not required to be supported by the players. You'll need to obtain a DolbyDigital (AC3) encoder, which is a different story (or you can use PCM, but this would force you to use a lower bitrate on the video, which would degrade the quality, so I don't recommend it).

    Xesdeeni

  39. TMPGEnc / CCE and AC3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TMPGEnc is cheap (free for 30 days) and easy and works well. Cinema Craft Encode works better for certain kinds of footage. Be sure to encode your audio to Dolby Digital AC3, rather than uncompressed PCM, to save yourself a lot of disc space which can be put to better use encoding your video. You can save the same amount of space encoding the audio with MPEG compression, but that form of audio compression is not officially part of the Region 1 DVD spec.

  40. iDVD by lavaface · · Score: 1

    I was surprised that nobody else said "Go with Apple" so I guess I will. I've worked with DVD production on both macs and pcs and find the macs to do a better job. iDVD should fit the bill considering you haven't done the process before. However, DVD Studio Pro can be really easy if you use the templates and provides a great deal of extra power/detail if you need. I haven't tried most of the PC programs mentioned by other posters but I can't stress the Mac option enough if you're new to the process and have acces to a Mac.

  41. 4 simple rules not to lose quality by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are 3 simple rules not to lose quality:

    1) Perform effects, fade in,fade out etc on non compressed source never overwriting it. E.g. use "edited.avi" as output file

    2) Never upsample. E.g. don't convert to DivX, it is lossy, "final" format. Decide what media you will need and compress using regular TV specs, don't delete the source if you can. For example, if you want to output to NTSC/Progressive (which in case, camera is not HD), here is resolution specs. Anything lower loses quality, higher won't work.

    648 x 486-->Standard NTSC ( http://www.strata.com/support/3dmanual/ch13/ch13_7 .html ). If the program allows it, select also "progressive scanning" option. Near all TVs,DVD players support it. It becomes dubbed as "480p"

    3) Do not transcode. E.g. do not convert something to DivX (mpeg 4 variant) and re-convert it to Mpeg 2..

    4) Always use "multi pass" encoding. Not only the result will be smaller, it will be better quality as the bandwidth is used wherever needed.

    Your problem was, single layer DVD. As the output media lacks space , the program you used lowered quality to fit 4.7 gb media. You should use dual layer DVD or 2 DVDs (which seems like bad idea)

    I am on Mac so I really forgot/don't watch Windows/Linux programs but there is one program I can blindly suggest: TGMpegEnc. I have even seen it used in purely professional production work on windows based studios. Don't let its "plain" look trick you. It is a very advanced solution which I heard "basic" version is free.

  42. Adobe Premiere, Encore, and Canopus Procoder by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    I have ran into this issue before.

    Nero, while it works, is a HORRIBLE way to encode DVDs. There are many alternative solutions.

    First, instead of exporting your project in Premiere as an AVI, try exporting it to DVD, or to an MPEG2 format. Adobe Encore is pretty user friendly for creating DVDs, with the menus and interaction and stuff, but it will also rerender your movie to fit your target media.

    What I usually use is Canopus Procoder, and it has a Premiere plugin. In Premiere, export to Canopus, then choose DVD. Play with your settings some, I usually set my minimal bitrate to 3.5 meg a second, and my max to sex meg, with my target bitrate being 4.5 meg a second. Do a two pass VBR encode. Set your quality to Mastering. Expect this to take anywhere from 8 hours to 28 hours, depending on speed of processor, how many edits you have in Premiere, and other issues.

    Now, use TMPEG DVD Author to write the vob files to DVD.

    Yeah, this is not a freeware method, but in my experience, this gives you the highest quality picture available.

  43. Nero 7 / NeroVision works very well by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

    I use nero 7 (specifically NeroVision) to make dvds. The quality is good, but unless I did the following to disable the nero codecs the audio was out of sync with the video. Also, turning off the "smart audio transcoder" (something like that) is a good idea because a bug in the "auto" (default) video quality option means that it calculates quality to fit the video and audio to the disk assuming re-compressed audio, and then "smart transcoding" decides not to re-compress the audio and it goes over the size of the disk and fails to burn.

    To disable nero codecs:
    Start > Run > regsvr32 /u "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Ahead\DSFilter\NeAudio.ax
    Start > Run > regsvr32 /u "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Ahead\DSFilter\NeVideo.ax

  44. Plenty of good suggestions, one more thing by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Make sure you are exporting in a standard DVD resolution/format/framerate.

    Some export utilities will allow you to export resolutions that are valid MPEG-2 but not compliant with the MPEG-2 subset used with DVDs. The end result is usually that PC-based players will play it fine, some standalones play it fine, some standalones will do weird things when playing it, and some standalones won't play it at all.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  45. Correct frame rate? by GWBasic · · Score: 1
    Some people mistakenly say that MPEG encodes in 30fps. This is not true. It only encodes in interlaced mode; specifically, it encodes 60 fields per second, but each field only has half of the scan lines on-screen. There are situations where the DVD player has to "fill in the blanks" and convert the 60 fields per second into a true 60fps. They are as follows:

    • When playing an anamorphic (widescreen) DVD on a 4:3 TV
    • When playing a DVD on a progressive scan TV. (Old TVs draw even lines on one frame, and odd lines on the next. New "progressive scan" TVs draw all lines on each frame and operate at a true 60fps.)

    Artifacts like you describe occur when the DVD doesn't give proper hints at how to "fill in the blanks" and convert 60 fields per second into 60 frames per second. If the DVD player uses the wrong algorithm, the video will look pixelated. The three basic algorithms are as follows:

    • Inverse Telecine (Film, Movie): The source of the DVD was 24fps film. The DVD player pieces back together the original 24fps and converts it to 60fps. This is the norm on all movie DVDs.
    • Weave (Progressive): The source of the DVD was a 30fps source. The DVD player can piece together the odd lines of one field and the even lines of another field to make a frame.
    • Other: The source of the DVD was 60fps, or interlaced video. The DVD player is free to use whatever algorithm it can to approximate the missing lines. You movie is most likely interlaced.

    If you instruct the DVD player to use Inverse Telecine, Film, Movie, Weave, Progressive, ect, on an interlaced source, like a camcorder, you will get artifacts.