Slashdot Mirror


Zune - Microsoft Killer or Next Apple Victim?

prophet asks: "Now that we have all seen the new Microsoft 'Zune', and the suits over at Microsoft have seen fit to inform us of a whole line of 'Zune' related hardware and software products, my real question is, will Microsoft be able to de-throne the ever growing iPod phenom? With the current confirmed 'Zune' prototype photos dispersed throughout the net, it is hard to see how Microsoft has thought that the current design of the 'Zune' is in fact enough in its current form for users to be pleased aesthetically, and at the same time impressed by ease of use. At the current moment, rumors are circulating of a redesign of the controls on Microsoft's part before a complete release. With the current aesthetical design of the Zune, will it appeal to the masses in the way the iPod did? More importantly, does it appeal to you?

159 comments

  1. who wrote that title? by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Zune - Microsoft Killer or Next Apple Victim?

    What, if anything, does that have to do with the content of the article?

    I doubt that Zune will kill Microsoft, although it does seem like it will be largely ignored.

    Apple's too entrenched in the audio-player market. Microsoft should pick a new territory to explore, and firmly establish themeslves in if they want to compete with apple.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:who wrote that title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Killer as in its something from Microsoft that kills, not that its something that will kill Microsoft.

    2. Re:who wrote that title? by cthellis · · Score: 1

      He means it in the "Microsoft's killer product" way, man.

    3. Re:who wrote that title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just like a bug zapper is a bug that zaps, an Anti-Aircraft missile is an Anti-aircraft that missiles??

      I guess its just as logical as most of what MS does.

    4. Re:who wrote that title? by DesireCampbell · · Score: 4, Informative

      The term "Microsoft Killer" should refer to something that "kills" Microsoft, just like the "iPod killers" we hear so much about.

      There've been some terrible titles as of late. Today I saw something from the "Pay what you get for" department. Someone loves to garble English.

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    5. Re:who wrote that title? by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right regarding English grammar. Obviously, it should have been "Pay that which for you get." Stupid editors.

      I guess, when it comes to Slashdot, you truly do get that for which you pay.

    6. Re:who wrote that title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Slashdot, grammar forgets you!

    7. Re:who wrote that title? by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      Actually, I assumed they meant the old adage "Get what you pay for".

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    8. Re:who wrote that title? by capologist · · Score: 1

      Apple's too entrenched in the audio-player market.

      Yeah, about as entrenched as Netscape once was in the browser market. It took Microsoft about five minutes to kill them.

    9. Re:who wrote that title? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      They haven't had anything like as much luck killing entrenched hardware, though. Nintendo and Sony are sill in the console business, 90% of mobile phones use a non-MS OS despite several years of marketing campaigns, few set-top boxes run MS software, and they only won the PDA OS market after it had been made obsolete by other technology, and thus became not only irrelevant, but also virtually non-existent as a source of income.

      Like many monopolies, Microsoft do not do particularly well in areas where their products are forced to compete on their merits.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    10. Re:who wrote that title? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Theres a reason they invented the apostrophe and i dont need to get Gabe and Tycho to enlighten you about it seems, unlike the title author.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    11. Re:who wrote that title? by Monkeman · · Score: 0

      So did he. It was a joke regarding the "no prepositions ending sentences" rule.

    12. Re:who wrote that title? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Crime fighter, fire fighter, freedom fighter....

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    13. Re:who wrote that title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, of course, it could refer to a killer that belongs to Micrsoft.

      Just playing devils advocate.

    14. Re:who wrote that title? by ihandler · · Score: 1

      I agree. Microsoft's approach is to grab share and then gee whiz everyone to death with new features that nobody really wants. It worked with windows because Apple misunderstood the market and never was able to recover it because its gee whiz features couldn't overcome the momentum windows had(s). Apple has this (ipod-mpg) market and I don't think the gee whiz features of Zune will appeal to many outside the Bill Gates geek worshiper crowd which is rather small imho.

      --
      Ivan Handler
  2. Meh by KU_Fletch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When Microsoft leans to design towards waht consumers want instead of dictating to consumers what they want, they'll be able to take on the iPod. Unfortunately, to most people in their target demographic Microsoft nows stands for bad design, shoddy products, and unhip stodgyness.

    --
    It's not stupid. It's advanced.
    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's bad rep is almost solely from their OS'. The majority of the MS hardware I've used is of pretty high quality. The games they put out are generally good too.

      I don't doubt for a minute that they could put out a better mp3 than the ipod. It's already been done by other companies. The tough part is undoing the apple brainwashing so that customers will actually purchase based on features and price rather than on some trendy whim.

    2. Re:Meh by thelost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really have to disagree with you. The people in MS target demographic (lets assume 20-30 somethings, not necessarily technically minded) most probably don't have strong feelings of love or hate for MS, talk to someone on here and you will get some strong feelings but in other places people really don't care. When was the last time most people cared whether they ate nestles or not, but some will, that some is the conscientious minority. In this case in my opinion anyone who refuses to buy it on the basis that it's an MS product will be in a minority. You can't assume that because you are disenfranchised with MS that everyone is.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    3. Re:Meh by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      And I'll have to disagree with you.
      Pretty much anyone who has experience with Microsoft, namely through their crappy OS, has to be a half-blown system admin.
      They need to understand the nuances of OS updates, antivirus, spyware etc.
      In the MS world, the only ones not technically minded are our grandmas and sisters.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Meh by thelost · · Score: 1

      hmmm, if their OS is so crappy then why does the world create so much wealth based on its use? I am not an MS backer by any means (running multiple OS for different purposes at home and work (yes including windows)), but you just seem to be towing the anti-MS line.

      Plus, I have plenty of un-technical friends who own PCs and run Windows, to my knowledge they haven't had to brush up on their sys-adminning skills they've just got on with using their computers.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    5. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard about that little antitrust thing? Monopoly conviction ring a bell?

      In other news, eat shit, millions of flies can't be wrong.

    6. Re:Meh by radixvir · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You obviously haven't used their hardware products like keyboards and mice. MS makes some of the best products in the business in these categories and I would buy them for use with any operating system. Whether or not their portable media player will be good or not, I do not know. I will simply buy whatever I feel works the best for the price no matter whose name is on it. If the executives don't mess with the team designing it and if they don't encumber it with WMA-only playback, then it could end up being a cool device. Time will tell

    7. Re:Meh by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But, let's also remember--nobody knows companies.

      Look at the advertising for Xbox. The connection with Microsoft is subdued or non-existant--maybe a little Microsoft logo at the bottom of the screen below the much larger Xbox logo. Heck, there are plenty of people who don't really know/care about the connection with iPod and Apple (for that matter, there are plenty of people who don't know the connection between Macintosh and Apple).

      As I've said before, most people don't actually buy Windows. They buy Dell, Gateway, HP, Lenovo, or whatever. Windows is just something that comes along with it. When something goes wrong with their computer, they don't necessarily blame Microsoft--they blame the company they bought the computer from. Heck, how many people do you know who have used "Netscape" or "Lotus"? People don't understand these things, nor do they care.

      So I could see Zune getting the same treatment as Xbox and make it more of a brand unto itself. It makes sense, really. Arguably, the "Microsoft" brand has it's best recognition among corporations. The "Microsoft" brand doesn't carry a whole lot of weight elsewhere. So why bother with it. It's not the "Microsoft Zune", it's just Zune.

    8. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      seem to be towing the anti-MS line.

      That's toe the line, as in put-your-foot-at-the-place-where-they-tell-you. Towing the line would be weird.

    9. Re:Meh by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      True, but guess what OS the Zune runs?

    10. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche.

      Plus, they have a good chance of wrecking it with DRM.

    11. Re:Meh by chthon · · Score: 1

      Microsoft mice are dirt collectors. They need to be cleaned every few weeks. I have Logitech mice at home, and they never need cleaning.

      And their keyboards ? I don't know, I pick Cherries every day, for fifteen years already.

    12. Re:Meh by Fulkkari · · Score: 1
      When Microsoft [...], they'll be able to take on the iPod.

      No, they won't. Microsoft is not hip. It will not be hip, unlike Apple. iPod is a lifestyle-device, and you simply cannot sell it with a brand like Microsoft. It simply is not cool. Sorry.

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    13. Re:Meh by Platina86 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there. A freind did say to me, ohh you have a Apple Pc. And i sayd it was a Machintosh, he did not understand that.

    14. Re:Meh by osgeek · · Score: 1

      Apple did more than just design what people wanted. They designed what people didn't even realize they wanted.

    15. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wouldn't, hence the corruption. Everyone knows how to "tow a line" - just grab the rope and pull.

    16. Re:Meh by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Clearly you havent gotten The one true keyboard yet.

      can you hear the clicking yet...?

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    17. Re:Meh by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I've had nothing but trouble with MS keyboards/mice.

      They cannot be used in my office, since they don't last very long. We don't have similar problems with Kensington, or Logitech (by far the most reliable brand).

      MS Wireless Keyboard/Mouse sets tend to last no more than 1-2 years before either the keyboard or mouse fails, which basically requires you to replace the set. I've never had a Logitech wireless set go bad, with the partial exception of one old, old wirless logitech (mechanical) mouse I have that tends to squeak a little bit when you right click.

      As for use with any operating system, get real. Their hardware is the only type out there that doesn't "just work". It requires funky drivers that ignore certain outputs, and generally just sucks. One's listed here. I've never experienced a problem like that with a Logitech.

      It's a couple extra dollars, but the Logitech stuff works better (vastly better), and lasts. Microsoft's crap breaks down (mechanically), or remains funky without software fixes. If you like, I'll send you a pile of broken, newish MS keyboards/mice.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    18. Re:Meh by rhandir · · Score: 1

      If you like, I'll send you a pile of broken, newish MS keyboards/mice.
      Hey, I actually could use those for a project if they are only mechanically busted. How many do you have? (You can email me at my slashdot username at gmail.com)
      -r.

    19. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      disenfranchised

      I don't think that word means what you think it means. At best, it's a tortured use; understood, but not recommended.

    20. Re:Meh by joshsnow · · Score: 1

      Exactly! And consumers don't seem to want windows anywhere except on their PCs (and some not even there). I certainly don't want windows in a music player - or a phone, or a PDA.

    21. Re:Meh by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      I have had the exact opposite experience.

      All of my Logitech wireless kit has broken, I have gone through three Logitech wireless mice so far. They work GREAT out of the box, but after a year or so the range starts decreasing. For all the sarcastic people out there: Yes, this is with battery replacements, or in the case of the last one, it was Logitech's high end wireless mouse that had rechargeable batteries and a charging stand!

      Eventually, after about 3 years, I have to hold the mouse next to the receiver to have any signal at all.

      Then again, this has been my experience with EVERY wireless mouse. To be fair, Logitech mice tend to last a bit longer, most off brand wireless mice last a few months at most before they start exhibiting this behavior.

      I haven't honestly ever had a wireless Microsoft product.

      I do know that Microsoft makes some GREAT wired mice though. Their optical mice are top notch, I have only ever had one of them break, and I own plenty. I love the sheer number of buttons.

      Microsoft also (used to? ...) make the ONE true natural keyboard. Removes my wrist pains completely. Now days most new keyboards have that STUPID rearranged pageup/pagedown/etc vertical key layout. Who the hell thought up of that, and where do they live? I *hate* doing any sort of work on those keyboards, and since about 60%+ of all new keyboards out there are of that style, it really limits the number of keyboards I have to choose from when programming.


      As for use with any operating system, get real. Their hardware is the only type out there that doesn't "just work". It requires funky drivers that ignore certain outputs, and generally just sucks. One's listed here. I've never experienced a problem like that with a Logitech.


      A few of their REALLY funky keyboards, yah. But for the most part, they have a published standard for keymappings to features, the actual scancode that is generated by the "Mail" or "Homepage" button is documented, and any new keyboard out there that supports those keys uses the same standard. Of course the only MS OS that supports these features is XP, but any of the open source OSs allow users to set hotkeys to whatever they want, no drivers needed. :)

      The "Windows" key is just another meta, and a really useful one at that.

      What really irritates me is those keyboards that have a calculator built into them. The marketers put it there because everybody knows that the $2000 box in front of them is incapable of adding numbers. *G*
    22. Re:Meh by richardwatson · · Score: 1

      "As I've said before, most people don't actually buy Windows. They buy Dell, Gateway, HP, Lenovo, or whatever. Windows is just something that comes along with it."

      Really? If you had to replace most peoples' Windows with something else, I'm pretty sure they'd be foaming at the mouth within minutes, far more than if you changed their hardware.

      --
      http://www.tudumo.com - todo list with tags
    23. Re:Meh by thegnu · · Score: 1

      A freind did say to me, ohh you have a Apple Pc. And i sayd it was a Machintosh, he did not understand that.

      This may be sarcasm or a translation from another language with a different structure, but since PC is Personal Computer, it IS an Apple PC. And Windows XP boxes are IBM-compatible PCs. Can't even call them x86 PCs anymore. So sad.

      -Nathan

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  3. Microsoft != Apple by RLiegh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft has spent too many years chasing after corporate/enterprise appeal, whereas apple has always worked to maintain a hipper, more artsy appeal (which is all the macs have now they're intel-based, but I digress). For that reason, apple had a better idea of what the kids want, and the kids were more receptive to the ipod than they're ever gonna be to zune whatever.

    In short, MS has neither the credibility, nor understanding of what the market they're selling to wants (unless you consider "their market" to be the content industry, as opposed to consumers). It won't kill MS, but apple has no reason to loose any sleep either.

    1. Re:Microsoft != Apple by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      . . .unless you consider "their market" to be the content industry. . .

      That is exactly where Microsoft see their market.

      This has nothing to do with products or services, Microsoft is waging war to be the default DRM source, to get a cut of every "media" sale from every source.

      They want one big check from Time-Warner, not a godzillion little checks from those annoying consumers.

      KFG

    2. Re:Microsoft != Apple by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So....Microsoft can give them security, Apple can give them paying listeners. Seems like a simple decision to me, but this is the [MP||RI]AA we're talking about.

    3. Re:Microsoft != Apple by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I recall articles about some music publishers not liking the iTunes flat-rate price structure; so those providers may come on board. Also the Beatles (aka 'Apple records') have issues with iTunes (aka 'Apple omputer'), along with some governments. (France, I think).

      To me, the question is, will it be much cheaper than iPods?

      While I dislike DRM in principle, I'd rather use a license system from Microsoft than Sony, anything from a Cellular company would probably suck as well.

      Only other company I see being 'likeable' would be Nintendo, but they are very focused on games.

    4. Re:Microsoft != Apple by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The combination of digital encoding and the Internet have freed the reproduction and distribution of "content." There are people who have been making a damned fine living from controling said reproduction and distribution.

      You can't expect them to be happy about things. If they can't maintain a form of "natural" monopoly (given that copyright isn't actually natural) they'll take an artificial one through DRM.

      What might be less obvious is that they aren't exactly thrilled with Apple's paying customers either. They aren't making much money on it and Steve is emerging as an outsider dictating terms to the industry that depends on control.

      They'll be pefectly happy to play divide and conquer, playing Steve and Bill off against each other while they search for some form of DRM under the control of an industry entity, as per the DVD Forum.

      Of course if any of them win you know who loses.

      KFG

    5. Re:Microsoft != Apple by kfg · · Score: 1

      To me, the question is, will it be much cheaper than iPods?

      In ten years you'll be picking up personal media player devices as an impulse buy while standing in line at the drugstore for about twenty bucks. Have patience my child.

      I'd rather use a license system from Microsoft than Sony. . .

      How about, oooooooooh, I don't know, refusing to support any encoding format that isn't free and open? It's a simple plan, but it just might work.

      KFG

    6. Re:Microsoft != Apple by c_fel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That could be right, actually. But there was a time where a palm pilot was THE thing. Besides, Windows CE was a joke. But now 50% of handheld computers are running Windows.

      I can't find a better analogy, and I fear that this thing is gonna work.

      --
      I hate all sigs, mine included.
    7. Re:Microsoft != Apple by jackjeff · · Score: 1

      I recall articles about some music publishers not liking the iTunes flat-rate price structure; so those providers may come on board. Also the Beatles (aka 'Apple records') have issues with iTunes (aka 'Apple omputer'), along with some governments. (France, I think).
      Officially, France had issues with "interoperability". They were concerned that DRM protected content could only play on one platform. They wanted to oblige DRM providers to ensure that their DRM would work on any third party devices if they asked for it. This is nice for the consumer because it means "whatever you buy", you should be able to play it on "whatever device you own".

      But DRM "by design" prevents interoperability... So there's a contradiction. I know everyone is focussing on Apple right now because they are successful, but if any other DRM (i mean C.R.A.P.) technology would take over Apple's, such a law would also threaten it. That's the contradiction. On one hand it prevents consumer to legally rip their own DVDs, and bypassing any DRM etc etc.... and on the other hand, they punish companies which do not give access to their DRM for making them interoperable.

      In the final drafts of the law, this "interoperability" non-sense has of course disappeared, and the law (now in application) is as bad as DMCA. But it was done the French way, with a lot of promises (interopeability, no jail for p2p users etc...) which are long forgotten...

    8. Re:Microsoft != Apple by SoulRider · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes but the PDA market is dying, who needs a PDA when your cell phone has everything it offers. Where I work (one of the biggies) everyone had a PDA 5 years ago, today no one has one. These days you can get a wireless laptop for the same price or less than a full featured PDA. Heck my $99 blue-tooth cell phone can keep my contact and calendars synced up with my system at home, why would I buy a $399 PDA to do the same thing. Microsoft bragging about being the dominant player in a dying industry is not impressive to me, all that tells me is that they are too stupid to realize the market is dying.

    9. Re:Microsoft != Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... apple has always worked to maintain a hipper, more artsy appeal (which is all the macs have now they're intel-based, but I digress).

      Yes, because Mac's value has always been in the PowerPC architecture and not, say, software.

    10. Re:Microsoft != Apple by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I already have; picked up a 64 meg mp3/non-drm WMA player at Bartells for under $50.

      'free and open' doesn't meet everyones needs; e-mail is free and open, and innundated with spam. at some point it's worth it to pay a little for a step up in quality.

  4. I don't see the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, let's consider its features.

    1.) It has wireless.

    2.) It has more space than a Nomad.

    So this thing should be good to go!

    1. Re:I don't see the problem by iced_773 · · Score: 3, Funny


      But...but...it's Micro$oft! Evil! Antitrust! WGA! Security! DRM! Plus, it's got the added drawback of competing with beloved Apple.

      So the answer is: no, it does not and will not appeal to us, and in the rare event that it does, we wouldn't dare admit it here on Slashdot. :)

    2. Re:I don't see the problem by SEMW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally, since it will use WMA (when ripping CDs etc.) rather than MP3, it won't need an MP3 encoder -- so it won't be "Lame"!

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    3. Re:I don't see the problem by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the rest of Slashdot, but the shot of the interface was enough for me. It looks almost like a WinCE pocket PC. No thanks. I like the iPod because it does what it's supposed to do simply and elegantly. Nope, it doesn't have a port for an external game controller. Good.

    4. Re:I don't see the problem by SEMW · · Score: 1

      The interface in the picture *is* a WinCE Pocket PC. And that isn't the actual interface. See http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=193883&c id=15896504

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  5. Microsoft will persist by robla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just like they've done with many other products (e.g. XBox), they'll persist until they build a brand in the market. Apple certainly doesn't have much to worry about with their first iteration, but its probably bad news for a lot of the second tier players. Over time, they'll apply more pressure to Apple.

    One question (with a rather obvious answer) is "do you see Microsoft exiting this market once they enter it?" Microsoft rarely concedes defeat; they just release a new version.

    1. Re:Microsoft will persist by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This really is the sad state of affairs when MS releases a product. The XBox wasn't that good, and lost tons of money, and yet still they released the XBox 360, which had lots of problems too. Many people bought the XBox, because it was marketed like crazy, even though it was marginally more powerful than the GC, and cost quite a bit more. It should have cost way more, but MS was selling at a loss. This is the way MS operates. They will be able to sell quite a few units, just by marketing the crap out of it, and underpricing it, making the difference off licensing deals. Still they won't understand why they aren't doing as well as they thought, and will release another one in a couple years, making all the same mistakes they made the first time, while the real competition still makes a pretty good profit without even taking any regard to MS. MS has no ability to give users what they want. All I ever hear about with the 360 is the fact that you can play frogger, and some game called geometry wars. Do we really want to spend $400 on a system to play 20 year old games? If people are only interested in playing 20 year old games, then the Wii is going to kill this generation, because it has the entire Nintendo back catalog.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Microsoft will persist by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "do you see Microsoft exiting this market once they enter it?" Microsoft rarely concedes defeat; they just release a new version.

      Microsoft is a long term company. They have been defeated at times (Bob, Ultimate TV and their internet-on-TV box are examples, they died pretty quietly) but they've managed to hold on to several markets. Their pocket OS is still around and now a strong player though in a weak market of PDAs (I think they are in more PDAs than Palm's OS), and there are a lot of Windows phones. There are definitely a lot more Microsoft-based phones than there are Apple-based or iTunes-based phones. Now, to compete against Windows phones, Apple would have to get their phone mostly right the first iteration, and the more they wait, the weaker their chances are.

    3. Re:Microsoft will persist by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I bought an xbox because I liked halo.. but that wasnt the only reason.. I make use of my xbox in a way which thoroughly infuriates bill gates, i moded it and now run mplayer on it ; )

      thank you microsoft, by paying you a little then I don't have to deal with you at all now

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    4. Re:Microsoft will persist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The XBox wasn't that good, and lost tons of money, and yet still they released the XBox 360, which had lots of problems too"

      Huh? The XBox was the probably the best game system of its generation. The only reason the PS2 is king is because of the huge library of games for it, which is largely due to it being a few years older than the xbox. It was intentional that microsoft lost a lot of money on it. They were entering a market that was new to them, and dominated by players who'd been there for quite some time. They needed to get a foothold. I think they managed to do far better than anyone would have thought. And despite the higher price, it even beat out the Gamecube. As for 360 problems, I'm not sure what you're referring to. The overheating issues?

      "Many people bought the XBox, because it was marketed like crazy, even though it was marginally more powerful than the GC"

      Marginally? Try somewhere on the order of twice as powerful. Xbox specs. Gamecube specs

      "Still they won't understand why they aren't doing as well as they thought"

      Let's see, 2nd place in last generation's market and the only player in the latest generation so far? If they expected to do better, then it was an unrealistic expectation.

      Hey, I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but give credit where it's due. The XBox was/is a great game system. Add a modchip and xbox media center software, and it's one of the best media players around too.

    5. Re:Microsoft will persist by Rix · · Score: 1

      All console gaming systems are sold at a loss, not just the XBox.

    6. Re:Microsoft will persist by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      Microsoft rarely concedes defeat; they just release a new version.

      That is rarely true. Historically, after a few tries, MS will resort to any number of illegal actions. That has worked well whenever it involved their platform. But once it it is a cross platform, then MS has not faired all that well. It remains to be seen how they will act.

      Now, with that said, I would not bet a penny in apples favor.:)

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Microsoft will persist by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The XBox wasn't even much of a gaming system. It was basically a PC, marketed as a gaming system. Which is why if you compare just numbers the XBox looks twice as good as GC, yet when you actually compare the games that run on them, XBox and GC look about the same, maybe marginally better on XBox. The XBox was large and klunky, and I know people that bought even late generation XBoxes that had problems with the CD drives dying. Let's not forget the original giant XBox controller. How that thing got out the door and into the hands of the public is beyond me. Did they not let anybody play it before it came out? What about girls and kids under 14. They would have quite a hard time using that monstrosity of a gamepad. The biggest issue I see with the 360 isn't the overheating issues (although that shouldn't be ignored) it's the fact that the only games anybody every talks about are either 20 years old, or only require a 20 year old system. After all that hub-bub about how powerful it is, people aren't even playing games that even require that kind of power. You'd be better off going to your local mall and picking up a Controller that hooks to the TV and comes with 101 Nintendo games.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Microsoft will persist by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Although you may be right, Nintendo and Sony both made money off their consoles in the end (after licensing and first party game sales). XBox on the other hand cost MS $4 billion, even with everything taken into account.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Microsoft will persist by nhaines · · Score: 1

      Better than that, Nintendo never lost money fromthe GameCube. Wii may be the first console they don't break even on, but Satoru Iwata has made statements to the effect that it will be less than $2 or $3 per unit for a short time until prices fall.

    10. Re:Microsoft will persist by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Depending on what you read, and who you listen to, it may be true that all consoles are sold at loss. The Grandparent of your post stated that this is case. Even if they are, it doesn't matter if you still end up making money in the end. Basically, I don't care whether or not any console is sold at a loss, as long as the company ends up making money off the venture, I'm ok with that. MS lots billions on the XBox, yet they were able to have another go at it, simply because they have so much money in the bank.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Microsoft will persist by greatcelerystalk · · Score: 1

      If Zune can play the same formats as an iPod and more, I'd consider buying one. If Zune's DRM is less restrictive than Apple's or I can choose where I buy, and thus whose DRM I use, my music, I'd be much more likely to buy one. The screen already looks nicer than the Video iPod, and I could see myself watching an episode of a TV show during a flight or something.

      Now, the important question: Does it run Linux?

    12. Re:Microsoft will persist by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      2nd place only if you consider pure sales numbers. But only the GC and the PS2 actually made any profit. The XBOX still hasn't broken into the black yet, and the 360 looks to be in the same boat.

    13. Re:Microsoft will persist by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strongly disagreed. The Xbox was a new entry into the console playing field when the arena was already largely dominated by Nintendo and Sony, and in a few short years MS has bought themselves a very significant portion of the pie. The Xbox was a fine machine, and its reliability was no worse than the PS2. The GC AFAIK was largely known to be a solid machine, but both the Xbox and PS2 experienced significant drive failures. The difference here is that PS2 drives are *still* dying, whereas late-gen Xboxes were rock solid.

      "Xbox wasn't that good" is quite subjective, but even then it reeks of fanboy BS. It spawned the most profitable gaming franchise ever conceived (Halo) and had a fair number of well received exclusives. The Xbox separated the twitch gamer from the cinematic-cutscene gamers, and that's still where MS stands apart from everyone else. Nintendo's got the whole clean-party-game thing down. PS2's got your JRPG's down pat. And Xbox/360 has your FPSes and action games up the wazoo. Who will win? God knows, but one can't really claim the Xbox "wasn't that good".

      Xbox is still in the red, that's for sure, but they certainly are doing "as well as they thought". We're talking about 0% market share to something around 20-25% (last time I saw numbers... which was a year ago). They took over a quarter of the console market in 5 years. Granted, they spent a lot of cash doing it, but they are certainly doing VERY well for a 5 year-old console company. Oh, and about the whole profit thing... the PS3 will be underpriced and Sony will be losing money hand over fist like MS. Nintendo's really the only one laughing to the bank here in terms of hardware profitability.

      And can we stop with the BS about MS not giving users what they want? I have a 360, and just from people coming over I've got 3-4 other people who are now also buying 360's. People adore the iPod integration, the media center abilities, the integrated micropayments, the free downloadable demos, the unlocking of trial games over the network... The 360 is quite satisfying to me as the end user, and from the purchasing habits of my friends, them too. MS learned from the Xbox: the controller is simply THE best controller available for any console, period, and if the PS3 is using the Dualshock design again, it wll remain the best controller in the console field, the ugly blocky black box is now sleeker and fits better with your appliances, the internet connectivity and Live services are HUGE and nothing short of incredible... need I go on? As much as I dislike the rest of what MS pumps out, if there's anything they've ever gotten right it's the Xbox team. Is it a perfect console? Not by a long shot. But the Xbox team has proven itself to be able to isolate what their audience wants and deliver it well. This is the only reason I haven't written off the Zune, which looks really quite dumb on paper, because I have seen the Xbox team deliver a great product twice, and hopefully hat means they'll be able to do it a third time.

    14. Re:Microsoft will persist by cthellis · · Score: 1

      Better than that, Nintendo never lost money fromthe GameCube.

      They did, but it was relatively minor. Every once in a while their price drops (like the one to $99) would eek over the limit and they'd lose a bit until manufacturing-et-al caught up, but it was probably no more than $10-20 at any one time. Pisswater compared to what they pull in on all their 1st party software, however. ;-)

    15. Re:Microsoft will persist by hattig · · Score: 1

      Formats are likely to be WMA (PlaysForSure or similar DRM if purchased) and MP3.

      WMA is a far more proprietary format than AAC, and Fairplay is nicer DRM than PlaysForSure. Also if you choose to buy your music in CD format you won't have to worry about DRM on the music you rip.

      Neither are Sony though, let's all laugh at ATRAC and Sony's DRM.

      By the time Zune comes out, Apple will have refreshed their iPod line. Comparing future Zune devices to nearly year old iPods is disingenious, unless Apple mess up and don't actually improve the display in their next generation video device.

      Don't rely on being able to take any electronic device on flights in the future. Recent events have shown that in the war against terror (i.e., the war of fear upon citizens) that silly levels of restrictions will be imposed upon the slightest whiff of a threat.

      iPods run Linux. It'll take some time for a Zune device to run Linux, although the hardware is probably 95% the same as an iPod (ARM based SOC, etc).

    16. Re:Microsoft will persist by Lucractius · · Score: 0, Troll

      I here by bitch slap your ass strait to wikipedia for you to discover for yourself just what the most Proffitable gaming franchise ever is... and ill give you a massive clue

      MARIO

      And before you rant much longer about the best pad ever, tell me, have you played with a gamecube pad?

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    17. Re:Microsoft will persist by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Well theres ipod linux, but if this is technicaly (spec wise) superior, can be obtained cheaper, and eventualy gets linux, i think i might make some mod sales haha

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    18. Re:Microsoft will persist by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      I'm a moderate fan of Nintendo, I admire their business acumen, and I think the gamecube is a solid system.

      But I most definitely think that the gamecube pad sucks. Horribly.

      The buttons are all different sizes, for god sakes. And it does NOT fit in my hand. I like the Dual Shock controller, and I like the Xbox gamepad; but I hate the gamecube pad.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    19. Re:Microsoft will persist by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      theres a reason theyre differently sized, to make it blindingly obvious what each one does, A is the primary action, B a secondary action, x and y providing extra actions or modifiers, Its quite simple and i find it highly effective.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    20. Re:Microsoft will persist by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "They have been defeated at times (Bob, Ultimate TV and their internet-on-TV box are examples, they died pretty quietly)"

      I'm not sure that any of those are good examples. They aren't product lines that Microsoft abandoned, just projects. No one else is doing Bob or Web TV. Ultimate TV has been replaced by Windows Media Center.

      Bob was an alternative Windows interface. Seeing as how Windows is still around, I wouldn't say that they were "defeated" -- just wrong about which direction their product was going to take. If Bob was defeated, it was defeated by Windows. They continue to persist in this market.

      Similarly Ultimate TV has been replaced by Windows XP Media Center Edition. They continue to persist in the market.

      Web TV was an outside company. They had a product that might possibly develop into a low cost alternative to MS Windows. Microsoft bought it and killed it. The death of Web TV was in no way a failure for Microsoft. In fact, it is probably a better example of the lack of government regulation on Microsoft (how was Microsoft allowed to buy a direct competitor despite *already* having a monopoly?).

  6. Whyit will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    1. It will be ugly

    2. The interface will suck

    3. It will have buttons

    3. It will have buttons on top.

    4. The LCD will be crapppy, too dim and low res

    5. The LCD will not be widescreen

    6. It will not be touchscreen, or the touchscreen UI and scrolling will suck

    7. The touchscreen won't sink to allow you to click

    8. It will not have TV or HDTV out

    9. It will not have TV or HDTV in (to record)

    10. They won't allow third parties to write interfaces to access the music store.

    11. It will be hard as balls and not free to upload your own content for sharing wiith others (ie, it wont have youtube)

    12. They won't license the Xbox to HDTV manufacturers to sell integrated units, so Zune won't be attachable onto HDTV units. (Btw, why doesnt sony sell PS3 HDTV units?)

    13. It won't have GPS .. if it does the GPS software will suck and not be comparable to tomtom.

    14. The UI will be unresponsive, slow, and unreliable.

    15. You will not be able to run your own applets. If you can, you will need antivirus which will slow it down. It wont come with even basic arcade games.

    16. It will be longer in at least one dimension than the iPod

    17. Battery life will suck and not be replaceable.

    18. It will not be at least 25% cheaper than the iPod.

    19. Apple faboys will 'dis it everywhere

    20. Zune developers don't read slashdot, engadget, or other relevant websites. They are developing Zune solely for money, not because they can make a better more useful device.

    1. Re:Whyit will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, iPods have most of those same problems and they're doing great!

    2. Re:Whyit will fail by teflaime · · Score: 1

      You left out the DRM problems it will have that will keep people from buying.

  7. It doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    People buy iPods just because Apple stuff is overhyped. There already are better players on the market already (like the Gigabeat). And to those people, Microsoft sounds uncool. Either you have a iPod or macbook, or you're not "in". Steve Jobs would poop in a bag and put an Apple logo on it, and they'd rush to buy it at inflated prices - and then praise it... It doesn't matter how good or bad zune is, you just can't compete with that.

    It's not flamebait, it's just the sad truth.

    1. Re:It doesn't matter by egjertse · · Score: 1
      Steve Jobs would poop in a bag and put an Apple logo on it, and they'd rush to buy it at inflated prices
      So... Just for reference, what would you say was a reasonable, non-inflated price for such a product?
      I may have a business proposition for you!
  8. no. DRM will kill it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $5 says the DRM prevents you from playing any music that wasn't downloaded from "zunetunes" or whatever. this would include the itunes that even the ipodless use, as well as ripping their own collections.

  9. Zeeky H Bomb by DJHewi1025 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think the zeeky bomb needs to pay a visit to microsoft and sony. ZEEKY BOOGY DOOG! *explodes*

    1. Re:Zeeky H Bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please feel free to never post again. Thanks.

  10. Good Luck... by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're gonna need it.

    It won't succeed. They are aiming after something that is WAY too popular and extremely well designed. To get people off the iPod, you're going to have to pass it and that will be very tough with current technology (especially batteries).

    But let's talk about the BIG feature. Let's talk about something people have been wanting from the iPod for quite a while. Let's talk wireless. People say Zune will be able to buy and download music wirelessly.

    It won't.

    I read a report earlier today that said that was a misunderstanding and that basically the wireless functionality was to let you see what OTHER people with Zunes in the area were listening to. I read a little blurb that one of the low end MP3 player makers was looking at doing the same thing (only not using WiFi for it). Or are we supposed to surf the 'net on this thing too? Guess what, my PDA does that. So does my phone. And my DS. And my PSP. And my laptop. And that desktop over there. And...

    That is a BIG difference between telling people what you're listening to and buying new music.

    And I'm not surprised. To do that would require a ton of power. The WiFi on my Dell Axim X50v eats up battery life, that's why it's off unless I'm using it. You'd have to do the same thing, which would somewhat defeat the "buy music any time" idea. Plus, when downloading music (lots of data!) it would use a large amount of battery. You want wireless headphones instead? So do I! But then you have to keep bluetooth running which will use up power. Plus your wireless headphones are expensive and need batteries. Two sets of batteries to recharge and fail for the price of one!

    Watch TV/Movies? The iPod does it.

    Look at the proposed updates to the iPod. A touch screen? That's a little pointless (unless they make it into the new Newton).

    And let's not forget the iTMS lock-in problem. The people who spend the most on iTMS are probably the ones you want most (because they will buy from you/your partners). But they are also the ones with the most to lose from abandoning the iPod. So you have to give away free music for every song that they bought. Fun logistics there. And you don't think the RIAA will let you do that for FREE do you?

    Bob has $200 in iTMS music. He moves to Zune. MS gives him his music in their DRMed format. They just paid the RIAA the same "taxes" as if he spent $200 with them. Don't forget the hardware probably isn't high margin (like the iPod) and may even be close to even (so it's fancier for the $$$ compared to the iPod). You just lost money on that customer. What a way to make money!

    Until DRM gets outlawed, Apple somehow screws up royally, or batteries improve enough to allow some of the features not useful now (wireless, longer movie playback)... Apple will remain on top.

    Their position is just too strong (combined with MS's history) for me to think that Zune will change anything in the market any time soon.

    PS: I have heard Zune will abandon "Plays For Sure" for something else. Considering MS did that, I'm sure that the successor will be supported for a LONG time. Sheesh.

    PPS: Changing DRM to force everyone to buy a new player. Not something I can see Apple doing. MS might be considering it (given their market share is much lower but still...)

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Good Luck... by Rix · · Score: 1

      Wireless capability could be pretty nifty if it let you grab stuff off of each others players. Which is perfectly legal in the civilized world.

    2. Re:Good Luck... by HillaryWBush · · Score: 0
      Wireless capability could be pretty nifty if it let you grab stuff off of each others players. Which is perfectly legal in the civilized world.

      How about this as a compromise? Just add enough wireless capability to serve the catalog in XML format. It wouldn't eat much battery life to simply send out a little ping every couple of seconds. If you want to share music, you find this person nearby and physically hook up the devices. Or for the squeamish, connect over an extremely short-range IR port. Then you'd avoid the two main problems: the sucky battery life fanboys hate & the promisicuous sharing the RIAA fears.

    3. Re:Good Luck... by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Well even with the RIAA around, I bet there are ways that could be implemented; and it would be a great feature. What if you could browse and listen to any song on my iPod, but only when you were near me physically. Once you left, you would lose files (they would only be in RAM). That would be a fun feature (especially when sitting in the airport or something like that). Best of all, you could make a way to mark songs you liked and take that list back to your computer to make purchasing easy.

      But it would be expensive (battery wise) to offer music all the time, so the other person would have to have their iPod out and on (and the feature enabled). Plus there is the cost of spinning up the disc to access the songs the other person wants to hear. This could be "fixed" by limiting the songs to what is currently in the iPod's RAM cache (5 to 10 songs at a time, I think). But doing this you wouldn't be able to look through their library.

      I would simply like the ability to sync my iPod over Bluetooth when I set it in it's cradle. Updating play-counts doesn't take any time, and using Bluetooth 2 EDR (which has been available in Macs since early '05) downloading a new album or two wouldn't take long. That would be such a great feature. To be able to set my iPod down in it's cradle and have it automatically sync with my laptop (which it doesn't do now because I don't keep the cradle plugged into my laptop). A very minor use of wireless, but one I would love.

      I'm still hoping against all odds that they make the next iPod touch screen and a Newton replacement. Windows Mobile is so clunky.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Good Luck... by Kuciwalker · · Score: 0
      And let's not forget the iTMS lock-in problem. The people who spend the most on iTMS are probably the ones you want most (because they will buy from you/your partners). But they are also the ones with the most to lose from abandoning the iPod. So you have to give away free music for every song that they bought. Fun logistics there. And you don't think the RIAA will let you do that for FREE do you?

      Actually, there's a decent chance MS will have to pay small/no royalties. It's the economics of it (from the RIAA's standpoint) - there's no opportunity cost to letting Zune users redownload their iTunes music for free. Almost no one would rebuy the same file under a different DRM, even if it wouldn't cost that much in the end, because of the psychological opposition to buying the exact same product twice. So, no lost sales, and they stand a chance of breaking the iTunes near-monopoly on music downloads, which has been a thorn in their side. (Remember Jobs refusing to allow prices other than $.99?) It's not wifi or anything that's the killer app, it's the free redownloading of music that gives the Zune a good chance.

    5. Re:Good Luck... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      "Look at the proposed updates to the iPod. A touch screen? That's a little pointless"

      No, it isn't. The point is that if you have touch-screen, you can have a screen almost as large as the device itself, without having to waste space for actual physical controls.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  11. More competition! More features! More better! by gsn · · Score: 0

    Gizmodo had some speculation about the Zune being audio only atleast at launch. If thats founded then I doubt its going to be any kind of threat to the iPod.
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/microsoft/zune-will -probably-be-audioonly-at-launch-192166.php
    So good for Apple.

    That said a lot of my friends HATE the iPod. Two have had the battery die, one has had the HDD crap out and most recently one tried updating the nano's firmware and paperweighted it. I'm sure there are atleast some people who are sick of seeing everyone and their mother sporting white earphones - these will be people who buy the Zune. Maybe my experience is atypical but I seem to e witness to a rather high failure rate for iPods.

    But why haven't they bought the iRivers or Creatives or Sansa's you ask? Well I have a niftly iAudio X5L from Cowon (battery life on this thing is pretty upsurb and I can personally vouch for it being atleast 25 hrs even with some Video watching) and when some of them asked me about it we just got into a discussion about the advisability of buying electronics from "unheard of" manufacturers. Yes some of them had not heard of Creative. Then again I don't think any of them ever research any electronic device they buy... and they certainly don't read Slashdot. Microsoft by contrast everyone has heard of. And honestly I don't hear complains about them outside of Slashdot though I have a lot of them myself. So don't count the Zune out yet. The Wifi is a good idea.

    Discalimer-I'm an Apple hater, forget just the iPod. I hate Microsoft too but (surprise! no really) less. I'd like neither of these companies to win. I think a lot of the smaller players have a better players* and (eventually) customers will wise up to that. More competition! More features! More better!

    * A lot fo them really need to work on the interface and the sync up software.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:More competition! More features! More better! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1
      I think a lot of the smaller players have a better players* and (eventually) customers will wise up to that. More competition! More features! More better!

      * A lot fo them really need to work on the interface and the sync up software.


      How can they be better players if the interface and sync software aren't up to snuff? In the consumer electronics space, the interface really is the product, isn't it?

      If you compare two products, and the inferior one has the superior interface, doesn't that mean it is easier to use, easier to learn, and therefore more likely to be used? And by that metric, ultimately more likely to be successful?

      A car, for example, with the best handling, gas mileage, and performance might be a technically better car, but if you have to drive from the trunk using LCD goggles and a tongue based interface will lose out to a car with worse handling, mileage and performance but a standard easier to use interface.

      Unless of course the goggles and tongue based interface IS easier to learn and use.
    2. Re:More competition! More features! More better! by thinsoldier · · Score: 1

      you're right I would buy something other than an ipod to spite the ipod users....but I don't think I'll be buying a zune.
      I actually have an old ipod someone gave to me. I don't like it that much and have so far compiled a list 27 additions that I think would make me love it (withing removing anything already present in the ipod that people love). I don't see 'any' of my ideas in the zune and I'm sure it's missing some of the good things about the ipod.

      But most of all, I want an MP3/OGG/lots-of-other-formats player.
      I have a nice collection of my favorite music from the last 8 years, I have no need for anybody's online music store. I just want to play what I alreay have, no matter what format it's in.

    3. Re:More competition! More features! More better! by gsn · · Score: 1

      Well thats the point of the "I think" - by my completely subjective scale these are better players because they outperform the iPod on things like battery life, compatability with widely used formats, FM Radio and Voice recording - features that you may not care one whit for.

      No its not true that the superior interface always wins - sometimes you want more features and if that comes with a more complex interface well thats the tradeoff you make.

      Your analogy with the car is a bit extreme - slightly more realistic would be to compare two cars - one with automatic and one with manaul - thats about the difference that the interface on an mp3 player makes. They all have playlist support and random features. I'd guess a lot of us just use those.

      The Cowon is filesystem based which is great because my mp3s are sorted by directory because they were downloaded in the days of audioglaxy and winamp 2 which didn't have a media library. The sorting I used was Genre>Artist>Filename. The iPod is id3 based and would sort this for me but a lot of my mp3s dont have any id3 info at all-and more to the point wouldn't make any difference in my case. So yes to me the interface of the iPod was not an important factor at all.

      The Cowon players have one of the worst interfaces out there, and a lot of players out there still have better features than the iPod and arguably better interfaces. Apple isn't winning the mp3 player market because iPods have good interfaces, they are winning because their marketing machine has made iPod synonymous with mp3 player... I think they will lose eventually because I believe that rational consumers will one day look past marketing and compare actual products. The point of my post was theres a good number of people who have tried iPods and they've fallen short or have heard horror stories about them and are unwilling to try them any more.

      --
      Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    4. Re:More competition! More features! More better! by jackjeff · · Score: 1

      The Cowon is filesystem based which is great because my mp3s are sorted by directory because they were downloaded in the days of audioglaxy and winamp 2 which didn't have a media library. The sorting I used was Genre>Artist>Filename. The iPod is id3 based and would sort this for me but a lot of my mp3s dont have any id3 info at all-and more to the point wouldn't make any difference in my case. So yes to me the interface of the iPod was not an important factor at all.

      I remember those days when you downloaded an mp3 from any p2p network it was 99% sure the id3 will not existe or otherwise be screwed up, like the ID3 title field would contain the author's name and also the track number and all others would be empty. That was SO annoying. If there is something I can thank the iPod for, is that NOW thanks to iTunes and competition mimicking, ID3s are widspread and you don't have to spend too much time ID3 tagging your P2P downloaded files.

      And correctly named, tagged mp3 files of good quality if a THING I would pay for (hear me RIAA). Unfortunatly, since you're only shipping music with CRAP included (DRM), which have no hope to play on my car, my ipod, my linux, windows and mac computers.... well...

    5. Re:More competition! More features! More better! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1
      Apple isn't winning the mp3 player market because iPods have good interfaces, they are winning because their marketing machine has made iPod synonymous with mp3 player... I think they will lose eventually because I believe that rational consumers will one day look past marketing and compare actual products. The point of my post was theres a good number of people who have tried iPods and they've fallen short or have heard horror stories about them and are unwilling to try them any more.


      But they are winning because of their good interfaces. If the average user bought an iPod and could not use them, they would return them. If an average user bought a Cowon, which you argue has one of the worst interfaces out there, and could not use it, it would get trashed.

      What is happening, at least from what I have seen in the five years I have owned an iPod, is people buy an iPod, learn how to use them quickly, and keep them. People buy Samsungs, Creatives, Sonys, etc, get frustrated, and then ditch them.

      Your automatic/manual analogy isn't bad, except it's not extreme enough. Pre iPod the Creative Nomad had 11 buttons; post iPod the Creative Zen V now only has four buttons. So if you want to use the a/m analogy, imagine three different clutches. The iPod debuted in 2001 with five buttons and a scroll wheel against the then dominant Nomad. It took until 2004, with the release of the Zen Micro, for them to adopt the smaller form factor (switching from desktop to notebook to finally microdrive) and simpler interface as well as the iPod UI. Before that they were much harder.

      People STILL complain about the Sony software; again the a/m analogy, with iTunes you pop in a CD and hit 'rip', then you plug in an iPod and wait. That's it. For most other software the process is still much harder.

      So if it isn't Sony, Creative, Cowon, or Samsung with the better interfaces, who HAS the better interface to take down the iPod. As I said before, the interface is the device, and without a usable interface the device itself is unusable.
  12. Pic in article misrepresents software interface. by SEMW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just to note - the summary comments on the aesthetics of the interface (which would include both hardware and software parts), but the picture on the article it links to is clearly a picture of a third party online radio player called SiriuCE running on Windows Mobile 5, superimposed on the Zune. You can even see the original site from which the screenshot was missapropriated from http://www.emulamer.com/SiriuCE.html. I don't think anyone's leaked a picture of what the actual Zune software interface is going to be (correct me if I'm wrong), but it definitely won't be Windows Mobile 5.

    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  13. Victom... by wvitXpert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft cares about features, Apple cares about implementation. That is obvious in their software, and I'm sure it will hold true for the Zune.
    Now I realize that many geeks share Microsoft's blind lust for a long feature list, but the general public wants something that works and is friendly to use. I expect that from Apple, but I'd be surprised to see the same in a Microsoft product.

    1. Re:Victom... by netkid91 · · Score: 0

      So....Microsoft is to Apple as KDE is to GNOME?

      --
      NO~, I read Slashdot because I think it's stupid.....
  14. How Microsoft can Make the Zune Win by siegesama · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will probably work together a deal with its resellers such that whenever you buy a licensed copy of a Microsoft OS (such as with a PC purchase), you'll get a Zune for free. Apple is already doing this for students purchasing a MacBook (free iPod Nano *after rebate). It's the same line they took against Netscape Navigator with Internet Explorer.

    If everyone already has a Zune, why would they want to buy an iPod, right? Or if they've got two Zune's in their family, may as well go with the house-hold licensing for whatever service they'll offer to sell the media, so any other media player purchases need to be Zunes too.

    --
    what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
  15. It will be another failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...for one simple reason: The ecosystem of accessories that exists for the iPod.

    If you buy an iPod, nearly any kind of accessory you can dream up is available for it. Hell, most of the 2007 model year cars in the U.S. will offer iPod connectivity if not include it standard.

    Plentiful software and accessories for Windows is a big part of why Windows remains popular in the face of superior alternatives. Microsoft is on the wrong end of that now.

    As a long time Mac user who endured having to walk through the 90% of the local computer store dedicated to Windows crap to get to the few shelves of Mac stuff buried in the back, I have to ask, "How does it feel, fuckers?" :-)

    1. Re:It will be another failure... by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      As a long time Mac user who endured having to walk through the 90% of the local computer store dedicated to Windows crap to get to the few shelves of Mac stuff buried in the back, I have to ask, "How does it feel, fuckers?" :-)

      As a fellow Mac user... I nominate this post for "Post of the Year". Yes, Slashdot should create a voting system and we should have a post of the year.... just a simple CSS position vote link on the right of the "Reply to This" line. Give it an AJAX IFRAME load so I don't have to reload my page and it would be great. At the end of the year... we could get a most popular post. Until that happens on Slashdot... I say this is it.

      btw... I am drunk... so I take no responsiblility for this post.

    2. Re:It will be another failure... by aJester · · Score: 1

      ++

      Good one indeed! :D

      aJester

  16. Name by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    21. It won't have a decen name.

    While ipod sounding kind of odd, it also kind of sounded hip when i first heard it years ago. Zune just sounds ridiculous. I can't even imagine saying, imma play this on my zune.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
    1. Re:Name by jpardey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a feeling they will have an incredibly annoying comercial with a bunch of 23 year olds pretending to be 17 year olds, dancing and listening in awe to some shitty Crazy Frog song (on Microsoft External Zpeakers connected to the coolest kid's Zune), with the tagline "I gotta get this tune on MY Zune!"

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    2. Re:Name by cthellis · · Score: 1

      Zune just sounds ridiculous. I can't even imagine saying, imma play this on my zune.

      It makes me think I'll be playing a PopCap game.

    3. Re:Name by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

      So does Nintendo's "Wii", but until its released and see what it can do, why judge it negatively?

      Just a thought...

      Regards,

      MBC1977,
      (US Marine, College Student, and Good Guy!)

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
  17. Uncle Fester is making an iPod clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says today in the paper that Microsoft is coming out with an iPod clone and its own version of our iTunes store. I'll wager a signed hundred dollar bill (the kind I wipe my ass with) that their device, like their CEO, will be big, fat, ugly and stupid. And constantly rebooting. And their Windows-based "store" will require a manual to understand it, will have eight zillion icons and pull-down menus on a super-cluttered butt-ugly user interface, and it will bonk out when you try to buy a song. Ooh, Microsoft, I'm so scared.

    —sj

  18. Grammar Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very European to conjugate verbs for organizations in the plural, so I will not correct your, "That is exactly where Microsoft see their market."

    But you can't have it both ways: "Microsoft is waging war"

    1. Re:Grammar Nazi by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . . you can't have it both ways. . .

      But Dude, I just did.

      KFG

    2. Re:Grammar Nazi by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Well, you can, but it's wrong.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  19. Here's an idea: innovate, don't copy by Zzyzygy · · Score: 1

    Call me crazy but it seems to me that over the past few years (OK, a decade or two) innovation (not used in the Microsoft abuse of the word) has taken a back seat in favor of stagnation. Golly gee wow, someone else has manufactured tEh "iPod killer." Wow. What's this, the fifth or sixth MP3 player that is supposed to tank Apple's market share? No thanks, I'll pass.

    How about this, instead of trying to garner market share by imitation, do something original.

    I guess the polar opposite can be just as bad: cell phones with mandatory cameras, &c. . . .

    -Scott
    --
    My other sig is a Glock
    1. Re:Here's an idea: innovate, don't copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO is that the sort of original ideas that spawned the first mp3 player only come around every decade or so.

      That said, I do like your point about mobiles without cameras.
      I find an increasing number of clients who will not allow camera phones onto the premisies. This is not just government/military places.
      I have a nokia cameraless phone. Just the job for these places.
      But I get mobile phone companies calling me almost every week wanting to upgrade my stone age phone.
      If I wanted to take a photo, I would get out my Nikon D2X.

      If Microsoft REALY,REALY wants to succeed here, they have to be original and creative. I know this is something hard for the folks in Redmond to do.
      Please,Please do not make a copy of whats already out there. This will doom you to being a bit part player and/or losing lots of money.

      Why can't you learn fgrom the XBOX. You don't make a dollar on it. This is an economic model that can't last for ever. It is a far smaller niche than the Music player market. Going up against the ipod and expecting apple to bend over and let you take in all is totally nieve.
      On the other hand, your ace up the sleve could be making ituse inoperable on Vista.
      Ok, so you get a big lawsuit that goes on for years. Buy the time you lose, Apple will have gone tits up. Perhaps this is the devilist maketing strategy you are following.
      Disclaimer.
      I don't own an ipod and don't indent to buy one OR a Zune for that matter. I listen to music on my 100Gb Vosonic Photo storage device.

  20. Xbox not for E rated games by tepples · · Score: 1
    Let's not forget the original giant XBox controller. How that thing got out the door and into the hands of the public is beyond me. Did they not let anybody play it before it came out? What about girls and kids under 14.

    What about the fact that most of the popular/hyped Xbox exclusive games were rated T or M?

  21. Zune? More like ZZzzune. by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
    "Among the other things that got confirmed along the way are WiFi connectivity and drive-based storage for the initial Zune player, as well as a new PlaysForSure DRM to accompany, rendering this player useless to Napster and other download service users."

    WiFi? Cool! Err wait. I've seen this before, sort of. On my cell phone. Click this link to download $HOT_RINGTONE. Ok, now click this link and you'll start downloading it for real. Ha ha! One more link, I promise. Sucker! 2 more, no joke. And another link thrown in just to piss you off you big purple dork! I can't imagine Microsoft's implementation being much better. Queue up Clippy and suddenly: "It's looks like you'd like to download some music. Would you like some help BecomingEmo PretendingToBeGangstaYouStupidWhiteRichKid or YourHipMusicIsNowOldiesRock." Sorry you weren't logged into Microsoft Zone, click here to retry!

    Seriously, that music player looks likes something Baby Jesus crapped out into his menorah. Oh yeah, new DRM that's isn't compatible with the existing partners? Good job Microsoft! Looks like some tactics never change.

    Apple's going to mop the floor with `em.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  22. Zune will kill iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Zune will create history. The best MP3 player designed in the shortest period with highest sales when it goes on shelf during 06 holidays. Zune uses .Net compact framework so you can change and twist anything in the smallest development cycle unlike iPod which requires contacting dozens of arrogant hardware vendors.

    ZuneYourCar is something which some ofthe insiders are working on ;-)

  23. Well... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much as I hate the iPod / iTunes / iTMS monopoly, I have come to realize:

    - There is no iPod killer
    - Even if there were, Zune isn't it

    The iPod has what Google has - an excellent product with widespread brand recognition. Unless something else comes out that is significantly better (and, let's be honest, all of the competition to date has been lacking in the features that most users care about), the iPod will be king.

  24. Zune, iPod or Ogg by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Zune won't be compatible with Microsoft's own "PlaysForSure(TM)"... How long will Zune last?
    Don't like iPods? Though I can't really see any real reason, it's possible.
    Want Ogg support? Samsung seems to have Ogg support in nearly all of their players.

  25. Microsoft will poison the market. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Their pocket OS is still around and now a strong player though in a weak market of PDAs

    Weak? Don't you mean destroyed?

    That's a good example of how M$ style dominance does not always lead to M$ making any money. They and Intel used their OS "lever" and a slew of lawsuits to destroy Palm and other competitors in that space. What's left over in the US is a bunch of Windoze only crap that has yet to live up to the Sharp Zaurus or even the Handspring Visor. No one's buying it because it does not work right.

    They will try to do the same thing to iPod by sabotaging iTunes and Windoze will be worth that much less.

    This, more than anything else will kill Microsoft. The only thing that made Windoze worth while was that other people's gadgets would work with it.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Microsoft will poison the market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Microsoft will poison the market. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      They and Intel used their OS "lever" and a slew of lawsuits to destroy Palm and other competitors in that space.

      No. Bullshit. Fact is, Palm devices were terrible compared to Windows Mobile devices from the same period. Utterly pisspoor.

      What's left over in the US is a bunch of Windoze only crap that has yet to live up to the Sharp Zaurus or even the Handspring Visor. No one's buying it because it does not work right.

      Even more bullshit. The Handspring Visor, compared to most of today's Windows Mobile devices, looks primitive and terrible.

      They will try to do the same thing to iPod by sabotaging iTunes and Windoze will be worth that much less.

      You think so? You don't think people would jump up and down and SCREAM THEIR FUCKING HEADS OFF if Microsoft stopped people using iTunes? Microsoft would last about 5 minutes in the press, their share price would drop because of all the negative publicity...

      This, more than anything else will kill Microsoft. The only thing that made Windoze worth while was that other people's gadgets would work with it.

      And that it runs lots of software, both productivity and gaming. And that it has a sane, reasonably consistent user interface etc etc etc ad infinitum. If working with other peoples' gadgets is the only thing that makes Windows worthwhile, Linux must be worth far less than that.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:Microsoft will poison the market. by hattig · · Score: 1

      No. Bullshit. Fact is, Palm devices were terrible compared to Windows Mobile devices from the same period. Utterly pisspoor.

      The hardware of the devices running Windows CE or Windows Mobile 2003 was better than the Palm hardware. Not quite as nice as the Psion 5 series of course.

      Everything else the Palm was better at.

      Windows Mobile 2005 finally is quite reasonable. Sadly it took 5 years for Microsoft to get there.

      I find it heinous that on a PDA such as the Dell X3x series, losing battery power loses everything that isn't in the firmware. That didn't happen on my Palm IIIc back in the day, and that would last a very long time before running out of juice as well, not 3 days.

      Fact is, the Palm software was far better targetted at the tasks people wanted a PDA for than the Windows CE software. PocketIE, Word, Excel were jokes of an application, when for a small amount of money you could buy excellent software for the Palm platform that did the same.

      Experience has taught me that actual functionality and ease of use is better than pure hardware specifications and looks when it comes to any device that is in essence a computer - PDAs, Phones, MP3 players, etc. This is where Microsoft fail quite consistently. PDAs are items that the user will put effort into learning to use. MP3 players aren't. If Microsoft mess the software up, they've got no hope. However they will sort out the problems within 5 years. In the PDA market this worked because Palm couldn't organise a pissup in a brewery. However Apple could organise a piss up in Saudi Arabia and get good press for it, this won't be easy for Microsoft.

    4. Re:Microsoft will poison the market. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, very few people understood the concept of the original Palm III/IV.

      A small device that allows you to access information while away from your desktop without requiring the expense / weight / size of a laptop. Not a device for watching videos on, or listening to music, or editing spreadsheets / documents in their native format. Even nicer was the issue that the simple black and white screen gave you 2-4 *weeks* of operating time on a single set of batteries (in the III series).

      You could, if you were careful, go away on a 2 week business trip needing nothing more then your cell phone and PDA. It was a great way to carry information in a compact manner. And some the more applications you installed on it, the more worthwhile it was (such as diet tracking, exercise tracking, automotive expense tracking, expense account tracking, or just financial tracking).

      However, very few people now fit into that market. Laptops are a lot less expensive, so you spend less time away from a heavy desk-bound desktop. Some laptops are pretty tiny, taking away the size issue (somewhat). Cell phones got a lot more powerful, allowing you to use them as address books (and sometimes calendar / to-do lists).

      Me? I retired my old Palm III and moved to a PalmOS phone made by Kyocera. It still does everything I need. Still runs my old PalmOS applications and I can still go a few days between charges (depending on how much I use it as a phone).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  26. too late by treak007 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is definately entering this field way too late. They already allowed Apple to dominate the field. Had they wanted to seriously compete with the ipod, they would have released something a long time ago. Microsoft is much better trying to dominate a new field that Apple hasn't entered, then wasting money on this hopeless endeavor. This, unfortunately, is what leads to companies making products that just copy off each other and provide nothing new.

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
  27. Ballmer's take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I interned at Microsoft this summer (horror of horrors!) and attended an event where Ballmer spoke to all of the interns and recent college hires. There was a Q&A session at the end, and someone asked him about the Zune. He said that at the beginning of this year Microsoft decided that they wanted to enter the music player market. They've been quickly working to pull together a product that they can get out the door before Christmas to start a "customer feedback loop".

    He all but said that he knew that the v. 1.0 product was going to stink up a storm and probably get destroyed in the marketplace and the press. However, he said that they wanted to get a product out as quickly as possible so that they could start getting comments from customers and partners on what they wanted. He also made it very clear that they were in it for the long haul, and that he expected to dominate the market by v. 3.0 (or something). He alluded to the growth of Pocket PC and Windows Embedded.

    1. Re:Ballmer's take on it by cascino · · Score: 1

      They've been quickly working to pull together a product that they can get out the door before Christmas to start a "customer feedback loop". [...] However, he said that they wanted to get a product out as quickly as possible so that they could start getting comments from customers and partners on what they wanted.

       
      as in past tense? what they expected from a product that they've already purchased? makes me want to run out and buy one!

    2. Re:Ballmer's take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, he said that they wanted to get a product out as quickly as possible so that they could start getting comments from customers and partners on what they wanted.

      Hmm... so they want feedback from the customers who were foolish enough to buy a version 1 Microsoft product? Sounds like really valuable input.

      Apple has enough cachet to make it work. When Apple comes out with a new product, people are willing to put up with minor (sometimes major) issues just because it's Apple. And Apple, IMO, has enough of a track record of being reasonably close to the mark on the first iteration that it's not too big of a risk buying first generation products.

      Microsoft, OTOH, has a noted reputation for major suckage in their first generation products. And often the 2nd generation products as well.

    3. Re:Ballmer's take on it by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      "He alluded to the growth of Pocket PC"

      PocketPC got killed by Symbian and smartphones. If that's their idea os "success", I wonder what do they call a failure?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  28. I want the third option by TLouden · · Score: 1

    I find iPod to be restrictive and have features misaligned with my needs so the price is too high for what it does give me.
    I find Microsoft to be repulsive.
    So, no need for an iPlod killer here, I've already got my sight set on better options (http://gp2x.com/product/product.asp comes to mind).

    --
    -Tim Louden
    1. Re:I want the third option by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Wait, so are you putting the ipod and gp2x in the same catagory? If that's the case, my HP zv5000 laptop schools the gp2x.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    2. Re:I want the third option by TLouden · · Score: 1

      no, I'm saying that in the category of handheld multimedia devices I'll go for the gp2x over ipod, zune, et. al. any day.

      The ability to carry inexpensive spare batteries and install software from a vast selection combines well with less restrictive codecs.

      --
      -Tim Louden
    3. Re:I want the third option by cyniCalsOCK · · Score: 1

      I have yet another option. All my music is in MP3 format, so i went with something that game me good battery life and a nice capacity. The creative zen xtra. I actually prefer the jog wheel over the touch sensitive deal apple has. I didn't have to convert all my music to apples format or anything else. It just played what i wanted, it sounds awesome, and it cranks the volume.

    4. Re:I want the third option by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I didn't have to convert all my music to apples format or anything else.

      Hmmm, the last time I heard, Apple iPods play MP3s natively. With no conversion required. Maybe you're thinking of Sony's ATRAC players? Or maybe you were trying to play the "Ogg" card?

      (The main reason I don't own an iPod is that I simply don't travel enough. For my monthly business trips, I simply use MP3 CDs in the car's dash player. Or I listen to music off of my laptop while working. And I have portable MP3 players that take SD cards for the very few other occasions. What I have works well enough that I don't need an iPod.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    5. Re:I want the third option by HillBilly · · Score: 1

      A mobile phone with mp3. Why carry two bulky bits of junk in your pocket when you can carry one?

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    6. Re:I want the third option by TLouden · · Score: 1

      I have one. Problem is that the storage is less than adequate and most phones come with a hurdle or two which the manufacturer would like $ to remove. In my case, getting the mp3s on the phone (without re-buying them through the phone) required having a bluetooth enabled laptop as the usb support was locked out unless I purchased a windows-only software package.

      On the other hand, I do have fine storage on my watch so I doubled up there and listen to the mp3s through it all the time.

      --
      -Tim Louden
  29. Marketing Meeting at Microsoft HQ by mranchovy · · Score: 1

    CRAP! Some guy at Slashdot knows our marketing plan!


    Meh, let's go with it anyway.

    --
    I am so smart!
    I am so smart!
    S-M-R-T!
    I mean S-M-A-R-T!
  30. YOU don't know brands. by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
    I've seen very few people that don't know Apple makes iPods, that Macs are made by Apple, or that Xbox is made by MS (hell, it's printed on the box - and it's on the startup screen every time you turn it on).

    "When something goes wrong with their computer, they don't necessarily blame Microsoft--they blame the company they bought the computer from."

    That depends. If it's an exploding battery, yeah they'll blame Dell. If it's a problem they experience with Windows they'll blame Windows - especially if they know friends who have the same problems with a different brand.

    1. Re:YOU don't know brands. by apathyruiner · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't know the average person. True most people today know that apple makes the ipod and the mac. However the branding means little to nothing. When it comes down to problems with windows or their PC i hear more complaints about the brand of PC, not about windows. "I'll never buy another HP, tell me about this Compac." "Do you have any Dell?" "Will this logitech mouse work with my emachine even if it's not an emachine mouse?" Concerning the XBox, it's not Sony and it's not Nintendo, and that's about all people know. I haven't met any non-techie who cares that MS made windows and the Xbox.

      --
      -= I can't think of anything witty, creative, or insightful for my sig, so deal with this. =-
    2. Re:YOU don't know brands. by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      Whether they care or not, they at least know the brand. People who have had bad luck with Apple products are probably less likely to buy an iPod, and people who have had bad luck with MS products are less likely to buy a Zune or an Xbox.

      You're right - most people complain about the brand of PC, not about Windows. But only until they encounter other people with different branded PCs having the same problems. Or sometimes the person just bought a crappy PC or crappy parts (which happens more often than you'd like to think). The people who do this, though, aren't the ones who pay good money for a high-end machine and know that their PC is made of high-quality parts. And then they talk to someone who knows something about PCs and that person will tell them what's wrong (or at least what could be wrong), and they'll find out from that person whether the PC is crap, the new mouse sucks, or it's just Windows.

      Techies aren't born techies. I have known since I was young that Windows is crap - not because I was some computer genius with loads of experience, but because I knew people who were. And people tend to figure things out. Put one-and-one together - if this mouse doesn't function properly, and the previous one didn't either, maybe it's not the mouse that's causing the problem.

      And most people do know that it's made by MS - either because originally they marketed it as Microsoft Xbox and said Microsoft prominently in the commercials, or because it says Microsoft every time it gets turned on. Whether they care or not is a whole different thing.

  31. Apple users think so.... by grapeape · · Score: 1

    One of the big bullet points with apple users when talking about why they like the OSX more than Windows is that it runs Itunes so much better. I love my Ipod, but I run Itunes from a windows box and at least from the mac users perspective am missing out on the whole experience and my interface is just a bastardized version. I havent had any problems and find it rather intuitive but evidently I just dont know better. That being the case, I suppose there is room for an improved experience for those that are windows native.

  32. It's just a Pocket PC with a hard drive? by argent · · Score: 1

    Boy, that screen looks familiar.

    Zune is nothing but a Pocket PC with a hard drive.

    I've owned four Pocket PCs over the last 6 years. They've all had MP3 playing support. Most had Wifi support. But they aren't terribly good as MP3 players... the OS is too heavy and complex for a handheld, it very much needs to be treated as a desktop OS stripped down, not something built from the ground up to run an embedded application. It even runs programs by copying them from "file system" RAM to "program" RAM. Very strange beast.

    The Pocket PC really had the potential of being an ultralight laptop replacement OS, if Microsoft had kept working on it that way they'd have "Tablet PCs" that really *were* cost-competitive with laptops. But no, they put everything into beating the (already self-destructing) Palm and trying to take on the cellphone world.

    They might pull it off, if they can bring back Derek Brown and Beth Goza into the team and pull in some serious iPod geeks and *listen* to what they have to say and *do* it... even if it means drinking their own blood (like Microsoft did when they replaced their own letter recogniser with one that emulated Graffiti).

    If they bull ahead with what I'm seeing in those screen shots, though, they're so doomed.

    1. Re:It's just a Pocket PC with a hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear. Pay attention to this man.

      This, unlike the ipod, is not purpose built / specifically engineered to be the best possible mp3 player. Do you see the blue bar at the bottom of the screen? That is the softkey menu bar... the _exact_ same softkey menu bar you see on Windows Mobile 5.0 devices. Notice the phone icon in the notification area in the bar at the top of the screen: its presence suggests that this device has a radio and uses TAPI, just like all the junky wince PDA phones... because it is a junky wince PDA phone with a hard drive. It's probably made by HTC, like most of the windows PDAs. Apple is eating them alive, and the best they can do is slap a new brand on an already slipshod product.

      Microsoft, listen up: putting a new skin on Windows Media Player Mobile installed on a Windows CE PDA minus keypad is not going to cut it. The fucking thing probably doesn't even have screen lockout... for its touchscreen. Yes. It clearly has a touchscreen. Don't ask me why; I tried to explain to these guys that they don't need a touchscreen. "But you see, the only Windows Mobile version that doesn't require stylus input is Windows for Smartphone, and we are building on Pocket PC," I was patronizingly explained. An MP3 player with a stylus... it's enough to make you wince.

  33. Has a shot by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    The MP3 player market is very young - so Zune has a shot. Like it or not today's market leaders probably won't be in a few years as the market evolves and hopefully DRM goes out with a whimper.

    That said, why you waste screen space with WinCE chrome is beyond me.

    --
    -- $G
  34. Re:Zune, iPod or ... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    As a matter of opinion to report in, I *don't* like ITunes.

    Didn't we go through the whole suffering pain of being locked into a monopoly? The only format I am fairly sure will be a contender for a long haul is plain Mp3.

    MS Dropping their PlaysForSure is typical of the kind of slap when companies act like little children, get bored with their new toy, and walk away. "Let's do Zune now!" No.

      I bought my MustHaves from Tower Records, and that's that. At this time I am exploring free and independent music. There's plenty out there.

    --TaoPhoenix

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  35. Re:Zune, iPod or ... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so your reason for not liking iTunes.... is because you're being locked into a monopoly? And you want to use MP3?

    Don't you know that iTunes is a FREE ripper/jukebox/player that can be used without the music store, without an iPod and also supports MP3, including for ripping?

    There no DRM unless you buy from the iTMS (which is iTunes Music Store, not iTunes itself). The iPod also supports MP3 too, in case you didn't know.

    So, even with your "no DRM, MP3-only" requirements, you could still use iTunes because, you know, it's great all-in-one program (and free).

  36. Price point $299? by Judge_Fire · · Score: 1

    'This Week In Consumer Electronics' claims to have obtained pricing information from retailers, putting Zune at $299, the same price as a 30GB iPod.

    Tough sell?

  37. Not impressed by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Looks more like a PDA that specializes in playing music.

    I think Microsoft really came on board rather late into the portable music player market. If this had come out several years ago, it would have been impressive. What advantages does it look like it have over the iPod? Just a slightly bigger screen. Oh, and it will probably play DRM encoded WMAs, but big deal, so do half the MP3 Players currently on the market. Apple dominates this market, I mean, just hang out in a Best Buy sometime, and look at how many people come up and ASK for the iPod verses how many people will even LOOK at the Creative music players. And I have an iPod, I am quite impressed with the thing.

    No, I doubt the market for this thing will be even as big as the Market for the Creative products. Why? iPod is too well known, so your people who just want a music player will buy the iPod. Those who want something different and to be kinda geeky will be buying the Creatives and Samsungs and stuff. I will be surprised if Microsoft is able to sell more than a dozen units at my local store, whereas they probably sell 2-3 iPods (or more) a day.

  38. Re:ITunes by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    By iTunes I refer to the songs purchased there.

    I have several third party player devices, upon which I wish to play unlocked mp3s. Tracks purchased from iTunes do not permit this. When playing music on my computer, I use DeliPlayer, or WinMediaPlayer as a backup. I have no need to use an Apple player in a playing capacity without intent to buy from the iTunes Store.

    --TaoPhoenix

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  39. Three week old article makes slashdot? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    When I clicked this thread and its article, I thought there'd be some new info, but the article is three weeks old. Why does slashdot accept lame stories like this (this one is lame because it's so old), and reject legit ones?

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  40. Re:ITunes by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Okay, but you should refrain from calling DRM-AAC files "iTunes" (or even the online store, which is the "iTunes Music Store").

    iTunes by itself is a program, just like Firefox is a browser. The music store is server(s) at Apple.

    I don't know DeliPlayer nor WinMediaPlayer, but you could still give iTunes a go. It rips, catalog, tags and plays music for you. You can even drag'n drop the music from the library onto an external drive (i.e. mp3 player if it maps as a drive) without having to care where the files are stored. You just won't have the iTunes/iPod synergy of smart playlists or automated sync, but it'll work just fine.

  41. MP3 market is over by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The problem is that currently there is no MP3 player market - there is a Fairplay AAC protected player market. As you can imagine, like Highlander there "can be only one".

    Until studios start selling MP3's of major songs there is no MP3 player market, not to most poeple buying players. Microsoft's attempt at an end-run around that by offering you copied of all your ITMS songs in the new Microsoft format is interesting but I think too kludgey for the average consumer.

    I subscribe to eMusic and like it a lot but I recognize that's not mass market stuff.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. Mr. Ballmer, is that you? by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    ...or is that possibly Paul Thurrott? Please mod parent up +5 funny! It looks like Steve Jobs isn't the only one with a Reality Distortion Field.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  43. The Big Picture by XpL1CiT · · Score: 1

    I think what everyone is missing is where the Zune fits in to Microsoft's big picture. They are looking to grow revenues by spreading to other markets. The catch is that with their solid OS market, they can INTEGRATE these markets unlike any other. Live Anywhere anyone? The Zune will play a huge part in that. With the WiFi built in, you may be able to order a song via your cell phone and have it downloaded by your zune, or maybe your Xbox360, or maybe WMP11, or maybe your PocketPC. I can't believe that you all don't see the value (and the foresight MS is using) in having a one-stop-shop (fully integrated). And, unlike most of /. cynics, there are not too many other companies than Microsoft that I would love to see spearheading a project of this magnitude. If this works out, you may just want to buy some Microsoft stock!

  44. It will flop by johansalk · · Score: 1

    It will flop big time; 1) the name zune is not hip at all 2) the design is not hip at all (yes, the ipod has become more of a fashion thing) 3) DRM! 4) Microsoft is not cool a "brand" as Apple.

  45. Holy Horror! by johansalk · · Score: 1

    I had another look! You know, Microsoft is known as a Beige box OS maker, but why is their player Beige?!

  46. Compatibility!!! by corifornia · · Score: 1

    I just read an article on Microsofts site about some of the less talked about features of the Zune: -It can connect to your Hotmail account and download all of your spam -It will change the names of your songs at random, just as microsoft does with most of its products (.net>passport>windows live) -It comes with a digital coupon for 5% off the updated hardware required to play the DRM'd music when MS changes the format in two weeks then again right after Christmas! -It will be able to play up to 85% of a song before it 'gracefully degrades'! -It can wirelessly connect to your Microsoft PDA phone of choice and drop its calls so your cell provider doesn't have to take all the heat. -If you flip it over, you can use it as a coaster -The beautiful LCD screen will only get scratched/cracked 50% of the time you put it in your pocket -You can play minesweeper and spider on it!

    --
    crap.
  47. What does it got? by sick197666 · · Score: 1

    Its got Sirius Radio? (looking at the pic) and wireless. What else? Why so secretive? What are they trying to offer us? I'd like to see something that'll hold MP3s and Sirius Radio and all that fun stuff, but not from Microsoft. I would enjoy seeing someone wipe it and put a Linux based OS on it or something to that extent.

  48. Ipods aren't that good... by newsong · · Score: 1

    ... I wish people would stop copying them! I have been most happy with my Toshiba Gigabeat. After I installed the Japanese firmware update and switched the language back to English anyway.