Slashdot Mirror


Voyager 1 Passes 100 AU from the Sun

An anonymous reader writes "Yesterday, Voyager 1 passed 100 astronomical units from the sun as it continues operating after nearly 30 years in space. That is about 15 billion kilometers or 9.3 billion miles as it travels about 1 million miles per day. Scientists still hope it will find the edge of the solar system and get into interstellar space."

66 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Poor V-ger by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder how long until it comes back carrying half the solar system with it looking for it's maker?

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:Poor V-ger by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      According to the movie, about another 200 years. Meanwhile, aliens with pointy years will be dropping by in another 50 years to find a restroom.

    2. Re:Poor V-ger by Lurker2288 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, if there are ETs out there capable of detecting it, retrieving it, and figuring out where it came from, chances are they can manage to go a little faster than a probe that's been coasting on a gravity slingshot for 30-odd years.

    3. Re:Poor V-ger by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how long until it comes back carrying half the solar system with it looking for it's maker?

      Or gets to the end where the gorilla throws barrels at you.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  2. Where do scientists think the edge is... by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many more AUs to scientists think Voyager still has to travel before it reaches the edge, or do we not have a good estimation of that distance?

    If I'm a space science noob does that make me a "Universal Noob"?

    1. Re:Where do scientists think the edge is... by polymath69 · · Score: 4, Informative

      To the best of my knowledge, friend, there is more than one definition of "edge".

      There's the magnetopause, where the magnetic influence of other stars predominates that of our own... to my knowledge, both Vger's are beyond this point.

      There's the heliopause, where the outward flow of solar gases finally doesn't have enough pressure to overcome whatever's coming its way... to my knowledge, neither Vger has hit this point yet.

      And considering that both Vgers were both launched basically along the ecliptic, neither one is likely to be headed towards the closest heliographic star, which is in the Southern hemisphere (Terran, not ecliptical; but if something's never north of one, it's probably never north of the other.) Neither is the shape of either 'pause likely to be spherical; they would depend upon the distances, relative magnetic field strength, and relative gaseous flux of every star around us.

      Finding these things out, in some small way, is one reason I'm very glad the Voyager spacecraft have lasted so long beyond their design dates.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    2. Re:Where do scientists think the edge is... by stevesliva · · Score: 3, Informative
      And considering that both Vgers were both launched basically along the ecliptic,
      Voyager 1 turned above the plane via Saturn gravity assist to pass by Titan. It's well above ecliptic.
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  3. Remember "The Truman Show"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah.

  4. Amazing by colonslashslash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As the article points out, it is pretty amazing that this vehicle has travelled so far... 9.3 billion miles is an insane distance alone, but through the hazards of space - 30 years of asteroids, comets, uber death wave radiation and Borg, it's even more astonishing.


    Kudos JPL.

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    1. Re:Amazing by tool462 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The irony being that it was meant to land on Mars, but they got the units wrong then too. *duck*

  5. Re:Can we still ping it? by thebudgie · · Score: 3, Informative

    IIRC the earth is about 8 minutes from the sun, so 100AU would be around 800 minutes, right?

  6. gee, thanks slashcode by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... for rendering my post useless. sheesh. Here is the link it ate:
    http://g-fav.blogspot.com/2006/07/hey-linguists-an d-ethnomusicologists.html

    (and now I must wait 49 seconds to amend it, ferfuxsake. slowdowncowboyslowdowncowboyslowdowncowboy)

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  7. um... by XanC · · Score: 4, Funny

    While your post was nice, I wouldn't describe it as a "great blog post". Or did you miss a link? :-)

  8. Re:Can we still ping it? by Ex+Machina · · Score: 4, Funny
    100 Astronomical Units = 831.675359 light minutes


    I think that exceeds the maximum RTT for TCP.

  9. V'ger 1 and Amateur DSN by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a good place to mention Luis Cupido's web site. He's actually managed to pick up the Voyager 1 signal on a 5.6-meter dish, using a lot of DSP-fu and maybe -- you be the judge -- a bit of wishful thinking.

    A fascinating, if somewhat slow-loading, page.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  10. Re:Can we still ping it? by andrewman327 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't know where you are getting your data, but it takes substancially longer than 29 minutes! From NASA:
    So how far are the Voyager spacecraft from Earth? The answer could take the form of miles or kilometers...billions of miles or kilometers. To put this large distance into a different prospective, as of January 5, 2004, a command signal sent from one of the DSN antennas, traveling at the speed of light towards Voyager-1, takes about 12 hours and 39 minutes, to reach Voyager-1's receiver. Compare this to sending a signal to Mars, a command going to the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft, in orbit around Mars would only take about 15 minutes.


    Considering the original expectations of the probe, we are getting amazing data! When launched, no one expected there to be any signal at all being transmitted after this long. This is a major feat of engineering.


    Technology is interesting. It has taken 30 years to move a record this far into space. Compare that to an MP3, which can be streamed that same distance in only half a day!

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  11. Batteries not included...... by SQLGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Voyagers owe their longevity to their nuclear power sources, called radioisotope thermoelectric generators, provided by the Department of Energy


    30 years without changing the batteries *AND* 30 years without exploding. Can I get one of those?

    Layne
    1. Re:Batteries not included...... by nule.org · · Score: 3, Funny

      More importantly, can Dell get 4.1 million of these? And kind of quickly?

  12. Re:Can we still ping it? by Ex+Machina · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course, ping is ICMP not TCP and thus is not subject to this problem. Oops! But the Voyager web configuration panel won't work!

  13. Well, yes. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Scientists still hope it will find the edge of the solar system and get into interstellar space."

    The alternative is for the Sun to pull it back.

    To sail on a dream through eternal nighttime of space To ride on the crest of a wild raging storm To work in the service of life and the living In search of the answers to questions unknown To be part of the movement and part of the growing Part of beginning to understand

    Aye, Voyager, the places you've been to The things that you've shown us The stories you tell Aye, Voyager, I sing to your spirit The men who have served you So long and so well

    a tip of the prop to the late John Denver

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  14. Re:Can we still ping it? by HaloZero · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apologies, my units are off. I did intend to write 29 HOURS. Alas, stupid fingers.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  15. Re:Can we still ping it? by jafiwam · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish that "vger6" guy would stop logging onto the same CS server I am on.

    Really throws the game when he gets all choppy and stuff....

  16. Interstellar 3.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The point is, the two Voyagers are the last of the first generation of robotic interstellar spacecraft. Interstellar 2.0 will use ion drive, nuclear electric, solar sails, magnetic sails, and other exotic propulsion technologies. Interstellar 3.0 will get useful paylods to other planetary systems, within the lifetime of some slashdot readers. Cost? Less than the Shuttle/Space Station welfare system. Payoff? Priceless! Starflight without Warp Drive Hydrogen Ice Spacecraft for Robotic Interstellar Flight

  17. Re:Can we still ping it? by Klintus+Fang · · Score: 5, Interesting

    not sure how much data they are getting from it now, but they are tracking it. there is an observed anomaly in its current trajectory that is not well understood. Unfortunately I can't find a good link on it, but the issue is this:

    the craft's current rate of acceleration as it heads away from the sun is not consistent with current gravitional laws.

    From what I've read, it is considered likely that the issue is just some exotic side effect of the conventional physics inside the space craft itself (like waste heat shedding off the craft's antenna exerting a small force on the craft and altering its trajectory slightly). It's possible though that it is an indication of a hole in our existing understanding of gravity.

    Not sure what else the craft might be doing. Probably not much. But that little anomaly is pretty interesting.

    --
    In a minute there is time For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. -T.S. Eliot
  18. Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators by Lazbien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article states that Voyager 1 is using radioisotope thermoelectric generators to power the flight... not knowing what these were, I went to Wikipedia, which told me that they were used to generate a few hundred watts or less, and seem to get hot. My question from this is the application in to on-Earth areas. For instance, why aren't radioisotope thermoelectric generators used in Data Centers? Or Factories? Or Office Towers? Or on farms? Can't we take a few hundred of these, bury them in a sub-basement, and start generating our own power? I want my space age power, damnit. Any rocket scientists out there know the cost of one of these suckers?

    1. Re:Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Funny
      generate a few hundred watts or less, and seem to get hot
      they use them in Macbooks and Dell computers - and a whole bunch of them just go recalled.
    2. Re:Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Umm... Read more fellow. They use Plutonium... They are radioactive and could be used to make at least a dirty bomb if not an outright fission device.
      They uses some in the old Soviet Union at some remote sites but they used Strontium 90 which while it will still kill you can not be used to make fission devices.

      Not something I would want in my basment but dang handy in space and maybe some remote applications like ocean monitoring or even antarctica.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative
      well...the "Fear" of anything nuclear (it's funny how all those environmentalists bitch and moan about a few kilograms of uranium when many tons of it was released into the atmosphere due to coal power plants

      You've just shown that you have no understanding of this issue. For example: your 145,000 tons of uranium is an isotope with a half-life of about 4 billion years. (The small amount of U235 has a half life of 700 million years, and doesn't change the overall total much.) Thorium is similar: it has a half-life of 14 billion years.

      An RTG is filled with plutonium 238, which has a half life of 88 years, so it decays about 49 million times as fast as U238. So the total radioactivity of all that coal-based uranium is similar to that of 3 kilograms of Pu238, which is only enough fuel to provide a few kilowatts of RTG power. So it's no wonder environmentalists bitch and moan about a few kilograms of material: that few kilograms is about as radioactive as the total annual emissions of the entire coal industry.

      So bottom line, to provide their electrical energy from RTGs, each household would need to manage an amount of radioactivity which is a significant fraction of the grand total emitted by all US coal burning plants. Coal plant heavy metal emissions are dangerous, but mainly because heavy metals are toxic chemicals, not because of radioactivity.

      A more practical problem is the fact that Pu238 is outrageously hard to collect and there are only a few kilograms in existence worldwide. Other kinds of radioactive waste isn't generally hot enough to create a useful amount of work; otherwise, they would have left it in the reactor longer to generate more power.

  19. Re:Can we still ping it? by wiggles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Heh... You must work for NASA :)

  20. Re:Can we still ping it? by div_2n · · Score: 3, Informative

    To be exact, it would be 50,034.6s = 833m 54.6s = 13h 53m 54.6s . . . one way.

    Or, 100,069.2s = 1,667m 49.2s = 27h 47m 49.2s roundtrip . . . assuming a perfect vaccum and no processing time on both ends.

    Of course, these calculations are based on static distances and it would require a bit more tweaking to figure out the exact numbers to account for the delta in distance up to this minute and the delta in distance during the sending of a signal.

  21. Plans for a new "Voyager" by cecom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder whether there are plans for launching a new, more powerful, more sophisticated aircraft with the same purpose. After 30 years of progress we should be able to do much better, shouldn't we ? (To be honest I suspect that modern technology is less reliable than 30 years ago - the complexity is killer - but still we have to try)

    Couldn't there be a very low power engine of some kind, just enough to provide a minimal thrust for, lets say, a decade. You don't need a lot of thrust in vacuum. Even small but constant acceleration should be sufficient to eventually achieve very high speed and perhaps even outrun the older spacecraft.

    1. Re:Plans for a new "Voyager" by RsG · · Score: 4, Informative

      Technology has improved a great deal in the last thirty years. Unfortunately, some of the constraints on deep space exploration are physical, rather than engineering problems.

      The limit with any engine, high or low thrust, is fuel. Essentially, any reaction drive that carries fuel with it will eventually run out (whether it's making ten Gs of acceleration over a few seconds, or .0001 G over a matter of years). You get more milage per mass of fuel as you increase the exhaust velocity (the speed of the exhaust relative to the craft), but then you're up against power requirements - it takes more and more energy to accelerate the reaction mass to higher and higher speeds. That power has to come from somewhere, and any generator system will increase the overall mass of the spacecraft, decreasing the acceleration.

      Combining an ion drive with, say, solar panels will work wonders in the inner solar system, since you're getting your power for free, and firing off your fuel in small quantities at extremely high speed. In the outer system though, solar power isn't an option and radiothermic generators (RTGs) like those used on voyager are heavy, at least relative to their power output. Most other power technology we have available today would add fuel and/or maintainance constraints. RTGs and solar panals are used for precisely those reasons - because they have neither signifigant fuel limitations nor many moving parts to break down.

      Plus, the engines themselves will undoubtably have a limited working lifetime - extending that lifetime to operate for years or decades will involved increasing the mass of the engine, which kinda puts you back at square one.

      Something like a light sail would work better (over long distances the lower thrust is offset by the lack of fuel requirements), but that's still more in the realm of science fiction. Nuclear drive technology could also fill the gap, but the political constraints involved in putting anything fission based in orbit are huge, and we won't have fusion for decades at least (longer, if you factor in the need for miniaturization).

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:Plans for a new "Voyager" by RsG · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the term you're looking for is "slingshot orbit". Basically, the probe travels towards the sun at first, then uses the mass of one or more of the inner planets, or perhaps the sun itself, to alter its trajectory to take it out of the system. The pathway of the craft becomes something like a parabolic orbit, starting at the earth and ending on an escape trajectory.

      Coupled with a solar/ion propulsion system, this would indeed work. You accelerate along a pre-planned trajectory, building up speed, and then use the mass of, say, Venus to launch the probe out of the system. By the time you're outside the range where solar power is a useful option, you've already used up all the fuel you're carrying for your ion drive. You then simply switch to a small RTG to provide power to the communications system, computer and scientific instruments, and coast out of the solar system.

      However, the person I replied to specifically asked if it was possible to maintain an outward bound acceleration for a decade or so, and I said probably not. What we're talking about here with the slingshot idea would still be closer to what the original Voyager probes did (except that they used chemical propulsion, and their slingshot bodies were the outer planets instead of the inner ones, IIRC).

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  22. Re:Can we still ping it? by BillEGoat · · Score: 5, Funny
    Compare that to an MP3, which can be streamed that same distance in only half a day!

    Yeah, but the RIAA'd be all up on your arse.

  23. What's it doing exactly? by man_ls · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is Voyager 1 providing any useful information any more, besides the becon signal and trajectory information? Wasn't there a Voyager 2?

    I'm curious what's failed on the probe so far. After 30 years, something has to have died.

    1. Re:What's it doing exactly? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 3, Informative

      Damned near everything is dead, and it's sending back only the most basic scientific information to conserve energy levels that are already well beyond their expected date of exhaustion. I read an article not long ago (that I can't be bothered to find again) stating that only a small percentage of its original devices of science have worked at all since the 80s.

      Long story short -- at this point, she's basically running flat out to see how far she can go while running on fumes. The same article stated that the new projection of its fuel exhaustion is roughly 2020.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    2. Re:What's it doing exactly? by Zarhan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Damned near everything is dead, and it's sending back only the most basic scientific information to conserve energy levels that are already well beyond their expected date of exhaustion.

          Umm, no.

      I read an article not long ago (that I can't be bothered to find again) stating that only a small percentage of its original devices of science have worked at all since the 80s.

          The Scan platform was turned off in the early 21st century. That's when cameras were turned off to save power.

          See http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/science/thirty.html and scroll to the end of the page.

      VOYAGER 1

      1998 DOY 316 - Reduction in Scan Platform power - preserve UVS and Elevation Actuator temperature (+11.0 W)

              * WA Vidicon Heater OFF (+5.5 W)
              * NA Vidicon Heater OFF (+5.5 W)

      2002 - Terminate UVS operations - turn-off all Scan Platform loads (43.9 W). Date expected to change.

              * WA Electronics Replacement Heater OFF (+10.5 W)
              * IRIS Replacement Heater OFF (+7.8 W)
              * NA Electonics Replacement Heater OFF (+10.5 W)
              * Azimuth Actuator Supplemental Heater OFF (+3.5 W)
              * UVS Power OFF (+2.4 W)
              * UVS Replacement Heater OFF (+2.4 W)
              * Azimuth Coil Heater OFF (+4.4 W)
              * Scan platform slewing power OFF (+2.4 W)

          So, until 2002, V1 was used for searching UV sources among the stars, among other things. However, that doesn't tell much, since most of the work is done with particle, plasma and wave detectors and those will be working well into the 2020's.

  24. Re:Can we still ping it? by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is because its heading toward a black hole.....but why has no-one seen it? I'll ask Holly. Holly, why has no one noticed that Voyager is heading into a black hole?

    Holly: Well, the thing about a black hole - it's main distinguishing feature - is it's black. And the thing about space, the color of space, your basic space color - is it's black. So how are you supposed to see them?

  25. Re:Can we still ping it? by canavan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not quite. The supposed anomaly of gravity can be measured with the spin stabilized pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft, since those practically never have to use their thrusters to adjust their attitude. The voyager spacecraft on the other hand are 3 axis stabilized with hydrazin thrusters, which they have to use every now and then to keep their radio dish pointed at earth. Their useful science comes from the data they gather about magnetic fields, charged particles etc.

  26. How does Voyager avoid crashing into Obstacles by aJester · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is probably a dumb question. But here goes.

    How is it that Voyager (and other probes) is able to avoid crashing into obstacles (eg: asteroids, commets, planets etc)?

    Do they have some kind of navigation system that can sense an object coming towards it and alter its course?

    One would think that in 30 years and so many billion miles, it must be *VERY* lucky to have avoided any obstacles in its path?

    Can anyone explain?

  27. Which Edge? by HoneyBeeSpace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to this article Voyager 1 already passed the heliopause at 85 AU. So which edge are we looking for now?

    1. Re:Which Edge? by dedazo · · Score: 3, Funny

      The edge of reason. Voyager will stare into the void, go psycho and start blogging about his cats.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    2. Re:Which Edge? by Zarhan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sonic as in speed of sound? Why would the speed of sound be significant in vacuum?

      It's not vacuum - there are still particles in there, albeit not much. "Sound" is a propagation of wave in a medium - this medium can be extremely sparse, but it's still there.

      Near Earth, the speed of sound is around 30-50 km per second, and solar wind particles go at speeds of 400 to 700 km/sec - they are supersonic. Once the interstellar wind starts pushing against solar wind, the particles slow down.

  28. Re:Can we still ping it? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Umm, if you read the article, you'll note that it's not that the Voyagers aren't subject to the anomaly, it's that it's too difficult to measure, since you'd have to cancel out the effect of the thruster use.

  29. Re:How does Voyager avoid crashing into Obstacles by Svenne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Space is big. Really big.

    --

    Slagborr
  30. To put the distance in perspective... by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Voyager 1 is 100 AU away. 2003 UB313 is 97 AU and Sedna is only 90 AU away. Thus, Voyager 1 is further out than the furthest positively-identified objects in the solar system and is getting close to a theorized inner Oort cloud. I'm sure that I read that it has passed the heliopause - a shockwave that marks the end of the solar winds and the start of the interstellar wind, which would mean that the outermost planet of the solar system is outside the heliosphere. Of all the planets (and plutons) in the solar system, it alone will never feel a single breath of the solar wind.


    If, as seems possible, this amateur radio astronomer can detect signals from Voyager 1, it may also be possible for amateur radio astronomers to detect the presence of very faint signals coming from the furthest objects in the solar system, as the iron within them cuts through the charged particle stream of the interstellar winds, which is all you need to generate a radio wave.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  31. Re:How does Voyager avoid crashing into Obstacles by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 4, Informative

    Space is VERY empty.
    It's only slightly less non-empty when you're real close to a star or other big mass of stuff. Right now Voyager is the farthest from a star that any man-made object has ever reached, so the chances of it hitting into stuff are nearly zero.
    But to answer your original question though, no, it doesn't have any kind of stuff-avoidance ability. Even if they had designed it to have that ability, by now it wouldn't have any power left to do that.

  32. Will it ever find life? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if it'll ever find life, and what the scenario in that case would look like.

    Maybe floating down from the skies with a note inside...
    "Looks like you lost something, but jeez, it was hard to track you down with more planets than its schematic shows!"

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  33. Great by ZakuSage · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only one more AU until it passes 100 AU from Earth.

  34. Re:How does Voyager avoid crashing into Obstacles by jguthrie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Douglas Adams put it fairly well:

    Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the drug store, but that's just peanuts to space.


    The reason it hasn't run into anything is because space is basically empty. There's very little out there to hit and what is there is a long way from anything else. So, not it's not *VERY* lucky to have not hit anything. If it had hit something, it would have been very *UN*lucky.

  35. What's the point? In another 30 years... by manifoldronin · · Score: 3, Funny

    All the data sent back will be lost by NASA anyways.

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  36. CMOS Worked Out After All by druske · · Score: 4, Informative

    Too bad the CDP1802's architect, Joe Weisbecker, didn't live to see his microprocessor become the first in interstellar space. Coincidentally, this month also marks the 30th anniversary of his Popular Electronics article on the COSMAC ELF; Nuts and Volts magazine is covering it.

  37. Re:Can we still ping it? by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha ha only serious. The reason you can't buy the golden record as a multimedia CD-ROM (or anything else) is because the music and images on it are under copyright, and the selections were only released to NASA for use by alien audiences only. :p

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  38. Re:Can we still ping it? by Tiger4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heh... You must work for NASA :)

    You insensitive clod! He did to work for NASA, but after the Mars incident he's been unemployed.

    --
    Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
  39. Voyager passes 100AU by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    breaking the previous record of 99.99999AU, also set by Voyager I... the day before.

  40. 100 AU doesn't seem that far... by iambarry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    100 AU over 30 years. Seems to me I've gone almost as far in the same period of time.

    Quick math :

    -The earth travels (about) 3.14 AU / year
    - 3.14 * 30 = 94.2 AU over 30 years

    (note: I make math errors all the time. No doubt someone will correct this one if its wrong)

    Why isn't voyager faster than the earth given it started off going as fast as the earth, and quickly accelerated from that point during takeoff?

    1. Re:100 AU doesn't seem that far... by Chirs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Voyager has travelled a lot further than 100AU over the years. It's just that now it is 100AU away from the sun in terms of radial distance.

      It still kept the tangential velocity...we just added radial velocity.

      Think of it traveling in a spiral, while we're going in a circle. Eventually we end up far apart.

  41. It's further oort than that by jmichaelg · · Score: 3, Informative
    Thus, Voyager 1 is further out than the furthest positively-identified objects in the solar system and is getting close to a theorized inner Oort cloud.


    100 AU is nowhere near the Oort cloud. Sedna's orbit is highly eccentric ranging from around 92 au out to around 850 au. The Oort cloud is even further out at 50,000 au.

    1. Re:It's further oort than that by jd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sedna is believed to be part of an "inner Oort cloud", theorized because it's far too far out to be almost anything else, but can't be part of the "regular" Oort cloud because it's far too close. I think this is on the Sedna wiki page and maybe Brown's page as well, and I think it gets a brief mention on the Oort wiki page on top of that. But the combined sources say next to nothing beyond talking of this "inner Oort cloud", so I can't put in anything beyond a brief mention that it is theorized and -if the theory is correct- that Voyager 1 would need to be getting close to such a cloud.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  42. Re:How does Voyager avoid crashing into Obstacles by whoisjoe · · Score: 3, Funny
    Space is big. Really big.


    Are you saying it's big even compared to the walk to the chemist?
  43. Re:Can we still ping it? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Funny

    ah heck. It is all relative.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  44. Rodzilla! by LouisZepher · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I've ever learned anything from about radiation exposure from low-budget Japanese films, I think that the missus would be rather pleased...

  45. Re:Can we still ping it? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yup. Light takes about 8 minutes to reach Earth from the Sun, and Voyager 1 is now out 100 times the distance between the Earth and the Sun, so it's an 800 minute one-way trip, or 1600 minutes round trip.

  46. Re:Flight Team of Ten by cyclone96 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's a nice article on the flight team from a few years ago here.

    Taking an educated stab in the dark (I've done satellite operations for NASA, but not on Voyager), I'm guessing that you've got a couple that deal with trajectory (where it is in space), one that handles the scheduling of time on the Deep Space Network downlink stations and queing command activities on the spacecraft itself, and maybe 3 that handle sustaining engineering on vehicle hardware systems like electrical, communications, attitude control (including momentum wheels and propulsion), and science instruments. Maybe 1 or 2 that handle the onboard computer and flight software. Finally, probably 1 or 2 maintain the ground data retention system and support workstations, plus a manager for the whole shebang.

    It's also almost certain that most or all of these 10 people work on other JPL projects, too.

    --
    Worst...sig...ever!
  47. Did I ever tell you guys about the time... by i41Overlord · · Score: 3, Funny

    that it tried to get onto my Quake server?

    We were trying to fire a game up, and on comes Voyager 1, with its 26 hour ping time. We all laughed and then booted it off.

  48. Pitstop by landoltjp · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how long until it reaches the next Starbucks?