Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

China Malware War Gets Personal

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the fight-to-the-death dept.

bcaulfield writes to tell us Zhou Hongyi has filed a 3.6 million yuan ($450,000) defamation suit against Yahoo China. Hongyi, the former president of Yahoo China, filed his suit in response to comments made in a recent Yahoo press conference accusing him of unethical business practices. From the article: "A rift between Mr. Zhou and Yahoo China has been developing since before his departure from Yahoo last year, just prior to Alibaba's takeover of Yahoo's China operations. Mr. Zhou doled out generous bonuses to Yahoo employees in a ploy his detractors derided as a naked purchase of loyalties. Mr. Zhou defended the disbursements. 'Many of these people were longtime Yahoo employees, and they were under no obligation to follow me,' he said. 'It was my money to do with as I wanted.'" Update 08/20/2006 15:01 GMT by SM: Corrected the currency for the suit.

35 comments

  1. Re:Malwhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you didn't RTFA.

  2. $450,000 suit, not $3.6m by tgtanman · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA: "Zhou Hongyi, controversial Internet entrepreneur and former president of Yahoo China, has filed a 3.6-million yuan ($450,000) defamation suit against his former employer in Beijing's Second Intermediary People's Court."

    1. Re:$450,000 suit, not $3.6m by Kuukai · · Score: 3, Funny

      From TFA: "Zhou Hongyi, controversial Internet entrepreneur and former president of Yahoo China, has filed a 3.6-million yuan ($450,000) defamation suit against his former employer in Beijing's Second Intermediary People's Court." (emphasis mine)

      Is China's People's Court anything like our People's Court? That would be so awesome...

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
    2. Re:$450,000 suit, not $3.6m by British · · Score: 1

      Is China's People's Court anything like our People's Court? That would be so awesome...

      I'm Dong Rourrerryn thanking you once again for us and reminding you, if you're involved in a dispute with another party (such as this) and you can't work it out, don't take the raw into your own hands. You take him to court.

      (i'm sorry, I know bad humor).

  3. Yeah right. by bruno.fatia · · Score: 0

    It's always about my money.

  4. While yahoo is an information technology... by HaloZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...this isn't an article about a newly developed service. This belongs in YRO.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:While yahoo is an information technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And me without mod points... How is parent a troll? I could understand off topic, MAYBE, but troll? Hell no.

    2. Re:While yahoo is an information technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This belongs in YRO.

      It's got more to do with IT than it has to do with my rights online. The only reason it's posted as of possible interest to the audience here is that one of the participants is a big player in the IT industry.

      Slashdot should probably have a "courts and stuff" section but as it doesn't, IT seems the least inappropriate section fo reporting the court actions within the IT industry.
  5. Re:Malwhere? by Mr.+Mindless · · Score: 1

    well when the summary writer can't be troubled to bother and comprehend the first paragraph of TFA why should I? ...has filed a 3.6-million yuan ($450,000) defamation suit...

    --
    - MM
  6. New tag time by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've tagged this article incorrect because of the summary. So much wrong, so little right.

    1. Re:New tag time by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Thank you for not misusing "fud" for this one! And thank you for tagging anyway, tags seem to be sparse this time of year.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  7. malware? by postmortem · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Article itself contains some details about rampant malware in China. This is in my opinion interesting part:

    "There's only one browser address bar, and we were all competing for that space," he said. "We all tried to uninstall one another. And we all just went further and further down that road. If you can protect your software from being uninstalled by a competitor's, then imagine how hard it is for a regular user to uninstall."

    So, in some way every browser toolbar is a malware.
    1. Re:malware? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, in some way every browser toolbar is a malware.

      Not quite. The most one can conclude is that every toolbar writer had an incentive to make his toolbar malware. Some, presumably, resisted the temptation. This guy did not. And his argument ( 'everybody else was doing it' ) was something that most of us learned was an insuficient excuse back in kindergarten.

    2. Re:malware? by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      And his argument ( 'everybody else was doing it' ) was something that most of us learned was an insuficient excuse back in kindergarten.

      And so I quit school.

      KFG

    3. Re:malware? by postmortem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All big and small players have toolbars as a tool that increases their market share, or access to the customers. Some toolbars are undoubtedly malware, while others aren't (perhaps Google, MSN, AOL, Yahoo tolbars, etc.). But their real goal is the same: to direct you to sites which they promote and get paid in return. Perhaps calling them a malware is too strong word. In the end, user shouldn't limit themselves to single search engine. This is solved nicely in Firefox and Internet Explorer 7 through drop-down menu list. Still, Google made toolbar for Firefox although it is default search option - just to ensure no other ones are being used by customer.

    4. Re:malware? by Skidge · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is solved nicely in Firefox and Internet Explorer 7 through drop-down menu list.

      I may be wrong, but doesn't Firefox get a kickback for sending people to Google? If they do, that doesn't seem all that ethically different from Google's own toolbar, malware-wise. If not, I apologize for the misinformation. :)
    5. Re:malware? by Otter · · Score: 1
      The most one can conclude is that every toolbar writer had an incentive to make his toolbar malware. Some, presumably, resisted the temptation.

      I think the OP's point is that Zhou is claiming (for what that's worth) that no one resisted the temptation.

      --
      What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
    6. Re:malware? by euri.ca · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking from a Chinese internet cafe (from Firefox on my USB drive) EVERY public computer has a few toolbars on Internet explorer. Even little 640 by 480 screens are cluttered up with 2 or 3 value-added bars! One at a hotel in Hanoi (Vietnam not China) had a big bar to tell me the temperature was -999 degrees, and I couldn't get rid of it.

      --
      A12A.713 is the root of ASC('evil')
    7. Re:malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point of the article. You can get rid of the toolbar when hell freezes over.

    8. Re:malware? by asuffield · · Score: 1

      It may be an insufficient excuse in kindergarten, but it's a valid excuse in a criminal court (it's more complex in civil court, but may form part of your defense anyway). Specifically, in the form of the principle of selective prosecution - if you can show a bias on the part of the prosecution , such that others did the same thing but were not prosecuted for it, then you can't be prosecuted for it either.

  8. Damn them all! by slack-fu · · Score: 5, Funny
    "A rift between Mr. Zhou and Yahoo China has been developing since before his departure from Yahoo last year, just prior to Alibaba's takeover of Yahoo's China operations.
    Damn that Alibaba and his 40 thieves!
    1. Re:Damn them all! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Damn that Alibaba and his 40 thieves!
      They discovered the password to get past the Great Firewall was "Open Sesame"

    2. Re:Damn them all! by vmfedor · · Score: 1
      ... "Open Source-a-me!"

      Sorry, had to do it.

      --

      I like my women how I like my sugar.. granulated.

  9. this is ironic by deconvolution · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zhou Hongyi was often titled "The father of Chinese malware" ......

    The 3721 assistant plugin he created is totally a nightmare, especially in a workgroup environment. I think the only motivation of this lawsuit is about money.

    1. Re:this is ironic by Tomhl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed,

      money is everything in China these days, you can be sure this is about money. Plus I'm perfectly sure he bought those loyalties, because that's totally normal amongst Chinese people in every position. It's totally normal in China to bribe people around you to convince them to do something in your favour - I know several lower gov't official and judges who fund their lifestyle this way.

      In China everything seems to be about 'face' and money.

    2. Re:this is ironic by Chineseyes · · Score: 0

      Everything about money? NEVER. China might as well just give up the whole Socialist act they've been a raging capitalist country for awhile now.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    3. Re:this is ironic by khallow · · Score: 1

      You missed the second part, "face". Giving up the act means losing face for the established government.

  10. a naked purchase of loyalties? by Spritzer · · Score: 1

    I recently received a bonus. Was I bought? Hell yeah. That's what bonuses are about. They reward productive employees. And why do they pay such a reward? Because they want your loyalty. It's not about being nice. It's about keeping you onboard. As for malware, I didn't RTFA. I've avoided Yahoo BHOs and programs like the plague anyway.

    1. Re:a naked purchase of loyalties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference between buying your loyalty to the company, and buying your personal loyalty to a particular officer of it.

  11. Remember "Alibaba"? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Alibaba, the Hangzhou-based B2B e-commerce company that took control of Yahoo China in August 2005, announced that the company and its subsidiaries would "henceforth and for all time cease to make use of the services provided by companies invested in or related to Zhou Hongyi."

    Alibaba's subsidiaries include Yahoo China, payment solution provider Alipay, and leading Chinese auction site Taobao.com."

    (It was also the completely unserious site who allowed Apple Mac G6 (!) to be listed on their pages)

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/11/mac-g6-now-avai lable-for-499/

    "Unfortunately (or fortunately, as the case may be), the Red PCs web site seems to be down, though the machine is still listed on the Alibaba.com site as available for purchase with free global shipping and a one-year warranty."

  12. Standard business practice by amightywind · · Score: 2, Informative
    Many of these people were longtime Yahoo employees, and they were under no obligation to follow me,' he said. 'It was my money to do with as I wanted.'

    Graft is standard business practice in China. Yahoo would be wise to consider a recent quote by Donald Rumsfeld: "You've got to be kiddding! Do you think there is gambling in the casino?"

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  13. Watch your back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From TFA --
    "If you weren't a hooligan, you were a victim"
    Always keep this in mind when dealing with mainland Chinese.
  14. Re:Last name first by ralmin · · Score: 1

    Not all Asians have their surname before their given name, though this one is a case of that. Zhou Hongyi has a Han Chinese name like 95% of China's population. The first name is the family name, Zhou. The last name is the given name, Hongyi. Family names are usually one syllable, and generally follow the father's family name. Given names are generally one or two syllables, and are usually given by parents but sometimes changed by the person themself.