Slashdot Mirror


'Stargate: SG-1' Cancelled

Ant writes "The Sci-Fi channel has announced that it will not be renewing its (very popular) original series Stargate SG-1 for another season.The spinoff series Stargate: Atlantis will get the nod, though, airing for a fourth year. SG-1 aired its 200th episode on August 18th, and the SF series is the longest-running SF show on American television." Gateworld has further details: "New episodes of both Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis continue Fridays this summer starting at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific, leading up to the mid-season finale on September 22. The second half of the season will begin in March, leading to SG-1's final bow on SCI FI in June."

94 of 605 comments (clear)

  1. It's just like... by Nick+Fury · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's just like that show with the guy who went through a space warp portal thing and landed on that living space ship thing with those little yellow robots and those damn crackers... what was the name of that show again? :)

    1. Re:It's just like... by kalirion · · Score: 2, Funny

      You got me... I have never heard of that show before.

    2. Re:It's just like... by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nice try. Anyone who remembers "Crackers Dont' Matter" is obviously a die-hard fan. ;)

    3. Re:It's just like... by joeyblades · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I thought he was being rather clever... given the overlap in actors between Farscape and Stargate SG-1...

    4. Re:It's just like... by vandon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess the only question left is:
      Are they going to end the final SG-1 episode with "To be continued....", squash the credits, and then do a voice over saying "Log on to SciFi.com and tell us what you thought of the final episode"?

      I swear, I couldn't log onto the scifi forums for over 2 days when they did that.

    5. Re:It's just like... by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it was seeing Kryten being the cold, military one, and Vala being the somewhat flippant one.

      It confuses the mivonks outta me.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    6. Re:It's just like... by Zenaku · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, they both do excellent work on SG-1 -- by disconcerting, I just meant that it was hard for me not to see them as Criton and Aeron, transplanted en masse from Farscape, acting wierd.

      For me this mental twitch of forgetting they were different characters was particularly bad because I never watched Farscape when it was on the air, I watched it on DVD, consuming the entire series in order over the course of a few months. When Ben Browder showed up on SG-1 as Mitchell, and Vala became a frequent character, I was still in the beginning of the last season of Farscape on DVD.

      So from my perspective if felt like both shows were still "going on" at the same time with the same actors in different roles. That was disconcerting.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    7. Re:It's just like... by jdray · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ben Browder and Claudia Black will have reputations as show killers from here on out.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    8. Re:It's just like... by Babbster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dean Devlin, who wrote the original Stargate movie, still wants to do sequels to the original movie with Kurt Russell and James Spader reprising their roles (as opposed to Richard Dean Anderson and Michael Shanks who took over the O'Neill and Jackson characters for the TV series).

    9. Re:It's just like... by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He only does one character: the flippant hero asskicker guy -- the alpha male that every Stargate/Farscape nerd wants to be, but is not. Stargate and Farscape have more or less the same plots, characters, etc, so that's why he works on both shows.

      The only way to make it seem like he's a different character is to "hold him back".

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    10. Re:It's just like... by Wolfkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the documentary shown with the 200th ep last Friday, it was mentioned that when Shanks auditioned for the role, he took care to copy Spader's mannerisms and acting as closely as possible, and that this is what got him the role.

      --
      Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
  2. So Long and Thanks by Marillion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Well, if you're going to go out, go out on top.

    By the way, if anyone from the staff, crew or cast reads this: Thanks for ten wonderful years.

    --
    This is a boring sig
    1. Re:So Long and Thanks by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I don't like where the show's been heading. The Ori aren't good villains. I don't like the concept, and the execution has been even worse. They're fighting gods, for all intents and purposes. It's the same problem as Superman: you're constantly getting stronger because instead of writing within the same levels of powers, writers take the easy out and make a challenge that is overcome by making the protagonist(s) stronger, instead of writing for the same strengths, but dealing with choices they make and the consequences they face. On the other hand, the characters are well fleshed out, well written, and the show is still good in SPITE of these crappy villains. The relationships are among the best written on TV right now, in my mind only second to Battlestar Galactica, maybe tying with House. I only hope that they can end the series as well as it would have ended had it not been renewed after Season 7 like they thought.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    2. Re:So Long and Thanks by toad3k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You nailed it. This is my biggest problem with science fiction today. They give too much power to the good guys, and then they have to scale up the bad guys to compensate. Eventually the battle reaches a point where you can't even relate to it anymore. The matrix committed this error along with nearly every anime I've ever seen.

      My other problem is that eventually you end up at a point where some genius with access to the script decides to, for example, destroy a sun in an easily repeatable way, and then for the rest of the series, blowing up a sun is a solution for every problem but has to be ignored. It is short sighted and every writer should read their script and look for these obvious and completely avoidable future plot holes.

    3. Re:So Long and Thanks by ObjetDart · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sign the petition To save SG-1


      Great idea! Let's rally the troops! Online petitions to save cancelled sci-fi TV shows have worked so well in the past.

      BTW, anyone have torrents for last week's episodes of Farscape and Enterprise?

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    4. Re:So Long and Thanks by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      The matrix committed this error along with nearly every anime I've ever seen.

      Them's fighting words. Now wait there for the next five episodes while I power up.

      Hgnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn....

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  3. nudity by brap999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article mentioned full frontal nudity. Does this mean that some where out on the interweb is a full frontal nude shot of Samantha Carter? :)

    1. Re:nudity by Marillion · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the pilot episode (originally on Showtime), Jackson's offworld girlfriend was naked when turned into a Go'uld.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    2. Re:nudity by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, I thought they were talking about the Asgard (shameless bastards).

    3. Re:nudity by brap999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I should have mentioned it was the CNN article that mentioned the forced nudity from Showtime http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/08/22/televisio n.stargate.reut/index.html

    4. Re:nudity by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, I thought they were talking about the Asgard (shameless bastards).

      This is one thing I never understood. Why do advanced races no longer need clothing in out shows? Would that mean people in nudist camps are onto something? :D

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    5. Re:nudity by Zenaku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, the Asgaard were originally much more human-like in appearance, and came to look as they do now because of millenia of genetic deterioration as a side-effect of the cloning process they use to maintain their numbers. My hypothesis, therefore, is that they have developed a painful hereditary skin condition that chaffes them terribly.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    6. Re:nudity by dugjohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." - Mark Twain

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    7. Re:nudity by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      Professor Farnsworth: Pine trees have been extinct for 800 years, Fry. Gone the way of the poodle and your primitive notions of modesty. Ahhh, brisk!

    8. Re:nudity by kalirion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus, why the hell should you waste time making clothing when you live in an advanced, totally climate controlled city or spacecraft?

      Pockets.

  4. Contract costs or ??? by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the original cast members wanted too much money, or if they simply got tired of doing the show and told the network they wouldn't do it any more. Those are the only two reasons I can think for cancelling one of your most profitable shows.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Contract costs or ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It could also be there simply isn't much more story to tell. A lot of fans will agree that there wasn't much point to the last two seasons. The main story threads were cleaned up at the end of season 8 (in an episode entitled "Threads" no less). Introducing the new Ori really took away from the series, as there wasn't much originality in how they were used. I am looking forward to seeing Morena Baccarin on Friday, but in my mind that has been the only highlight of the last two seasons (and the few good laughs I got from 200).

      In general, all good things should come to an end (especially with an episode entitled "All Good Things...") and it actually isn't that uncommon to end a series at its height.

    2. Re:Contract costs or ??? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or it could be that it pretty much jumped the shark after richard dean anderson left (although I do like ben browder, stargate is not his show) and the Ori are the stupidest villain they've come up with yet?

  5. Better to burn out or fade away? by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a long time SG-1 fan, but I've had my fingres crossed that they'd end the show for the past few seasons now, ever since Don Davis (General Hammond) left and they started up atlantis. Recent episodes haven't been up to par, and have weakened the canon of the series overall. We all love Firefly, as it was short and sweet. Six or seven seasons of SG-1 were gold, but it is time to hang up the hat.

  6. Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Poor Ben Browder. Screwed by Sci-Fi again!

    At least MGM is planning on continuing the series, somewhere else.

    I guess Sci-Fi needs more space for shitty B monster movies, fantasty crap and "wrasslin'"...

    1. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess Sci-Fi needs more space for shitty B monster movies, fantasty crap and "wrasslin'"...

      Explain that one to me please? They cancel things like Farscape and SG-1 but put the ECW on there??

      We should probably start calling it the B-Channel. B for Bad.

      Oh well. If they keep canceling shows I'll be able to lower my DirecTV bill by going to the basic package that doesn't have them on it. If one of their shows turns out to be good enough to escape their massive suckage it'll show up on some other channel or DVDs.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    2. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ECW is the highest-rated show on Sci-fi. It's also the highest rated show on ad-supported cable that airs on tuesday primetime. ECW is making money for sci-fi. Hopefully, they will use that money to bankroll more good science fiction shows.

      Then in my opinion:

      1) They've attracted the wrong audience.

      2) They've decided that they can't attract the right audience - or they don't know how.

      3) They have become even more suit infested and this is the beginning of the vampyric draining of the SciFi network.


      If it's the first then they need to do more research. They should be researching Science Fiction/Fantasy conventions and Renaissance Faires not just Nielsen ratings. They may be doing that - I don't know. But if this first point is true then they are not doing it right.

      The second point goes right along with the first. From what I've seen of the programming on SciFi I suspect there are only a few at that channel that truly understand what Science Fiction/Fantasy is all about. (And before you flame me for including Fantasy at least that's within the realm of possibility for this channel unlike ECW or WWTBAS.)

      My greatest fear though is it's the last one. SciFi Channel has made enough money to attract the hungry vampires from other corporate cultures and is going to go down the drain very shortly leaving only a husk of its former self.

      Lastly - you mentioned budget and that ECW was making money for them that they could use to fund other good SciFi shows. Look back at some of the truly popular SciFi stuff from the past. Look at what kinds of budgets they had. I'm sure you can think of at least a half-dozen good shows that had little or no budget but were fantastic! That tells me that good SciFi doesn't need a lot of money but rather someone to care about the genre and to have good writers and good actors. Often some of the best of those don't cost a lot. If SciFi Channel can afford ECW it can afford to make new series.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    3. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's funny you should mention the audience thing. I just saw a TV ad for dragoncon last night, and they mentioned one of the attractions of the event being professional wrestling. That struck me as kind of odd, but I guess sci-fi and wrasslin' both somewhat cater to young adult demographics, so maybe it's not that crazy after all.

    4. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by commanderrobot · · Score: 2, Funny

      what? saturday was totally awesome as they showed python, python 2, boa, boa vs. python, king cobra, et al. starring your favorite actors casper van dien, dean cain, and pat morita.

      i prefer the crazy meteorological movies over the mutant overly large animal ones

      although i would like to see a crossover called dinosaur blizzard or something

    5. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by montyzooooma · · Score: 2, Funny

      US Wrestling has always been about the story lines so why not SF Wrestling - Klingons vs Borgs and such. Or I could actually see a role for a wrasslin-themed half hour SF show with a bit of preamble to build the story and a ten minute fight at the end every week. I kinda miss Cleopatra 2525.

    6. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then you never understood what stargate was. It was always stupid rehashes, but done with enough intelligence and wit that it made fun of the stupid rehashes. You can't run a sci-fi series for 200 episodes without doing stupid rehashes, so you'd better not take yourself too seriously and paint yourself into a corner you can't get out of. One of my favorite lines was when Sam says, "You know what their weakness turned out to be? Water. I mean, if that's true, why go to all the trouble to invade a planet that's two-thirds water?" C'mon, we were all thinking it...

      At any rate, they've faired far better than the Simpsons, which didn't even have the good sense to step aside when it spawned a truely great comedy.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Informative

      ECW was forced on SciFi by NBC who now owns SciFI (ok technically NBC-Universal) WWE (who owns ECW) is on NBC owned USA network and when WWE wanted to bring back ECW NBC wanted to air it and shoved it on SciFi. Neither wrestling fans or SciFi fans can understand the logic of that.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    8. Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Sci-Fi channel lost my respect when they were airing the "Crossing Over" fake psychic show. From this link, http://www.scifi.com/johnedward/aboutjohn/ it looks like they are still airing it.

  7. Well it figures by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They add more the show, bring in three new exceptional talents (Ben, Beau and Claudia), and I finally get my wife to enjoy SciFi so it is something we can watch together, and they cancel the show.

    I had thought the last year.5 had introduced some new blood and ideas into the show, after I quit watching it in Season 7. Surely I can't be the only one who thinks the show had taken a turn for the better, fresher, while still being true to the original concept.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  8. Holy Hell by RawGutts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Holy Crap, now what am I going to do? Go outside and enjoy the sunshine?

    1. Re:Holy Hell by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's not go overboard here. Baby steps, dude. Baby steps.

    2. Re:Holy Hell by tscheez · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's on at 9pm, what sunshine?

      --
      Supplies!
  9. It was time. by Angostura · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Great series, but clearly showing its age and suffering from 'we need to keep inventing more überenemies' syndrome. I shall look forward to seeing how they bow out. Personally, I think it is about time that they found an enemy capable of destroying the earth which actually does it. Might not please some fans, but would make great television.

  10. GAH! by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah well. I suppose this is a blessing in disguise though as it means:

    1) We'll get to see the Ori beaten (hopefully, according to gateworld.net the last few episodes aren't set in stone yet).

    2) At the end of Episode 200 Martin Lloyd announces to the 10-season cast of Wormhole X-treme that "the movie's back on!". I like to think this extends back to that Stargate SG-1 movie, but I guess we'll have to wait and see. Now that the series is over there's more hope for it, at least according to gateworld...

    I wonder how long the SG-1 writers/producers etc knew the 10th season would be the last. Episode 200 makes a BIT more sense if you realize "hey, they knew they would never have another chance to pull stuff like this again".

    1. Re:GAH! by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they're most definitely related to the replicators, we just don't know how yet.

      The Asurans (Pegasus Replicators) were of the "human form" variety, which the Replicators Reese created eventually evolved into in the Milky Way.

      The Atlantis team were unable to find record of the Replicators in the ancient database. Its possible the Asurans lied about being a creation of the Ancients. The Asurans could be Replicators who escaped from the Milky Way prior to being destroyed, or the original Replicators encountered by SG-1 might've began life in the Pegasus Galaxy. Hell, maybe the plague that wiped out all life in the galaxy way back when was the virus Weir was infected with.

      Tons of possibilities :)

  11. We heard this before by jackb_guppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    SG-1 was to be killed just after Atlanis
    SG-1 was to be killed after Jack left
    Now Again.

    But true they now have Farscape people, so the death should be quick!

    1. Re:We heard this before by TCQuad · · Score: 5, Funny

      In SciFi headquarters, not too long ago...

      Exec 1: "Now that we have Atlantis, we can cancel SG1!"
      Exec 2: "Oh, I couldn't bear to do that! I don't want to make Richard Dean Anderson cry again."
      Exec 1: "Well, we could wait until he leaves and then cancel SG1."
      Exec 2: "No, then he'd get all smug about how SG1 was really 'his' show."
      Exec 1: "How about replacing him and then canceling the show after a season or two?"
      Exec 2: "Brilliant! But where could we possibly find an actor willing to work on a loved but inevitably and obviously doomed series?"
      Exec 1: "That guy from Farscape?"
      Exec 2: "Perfect!"

    2. Re:We heard this before by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      You spent seven years on MacGuyver and you can't figure this one out? We got belt buckles, and shoe laces and a piece of gum, build a nuclear reactor for crying out loud. You used to be MacGuyver, McGadget, McGimick.. no you're mister McUsseless.. Dear God, I'm stuck on a glacier with MacGuyver!

  12. Viewer Req. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Please send Claudia "Vala" Black to Atlantis in the last scene, then make her NOT all comic relief (since you already have McKay, m'kay?), but more kick'ass, like we remember her from her introduction into the galaxy.

  13. surprised that I'm sad to see it go by sammy+baby · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Okay, let me say it up front: Stargate SG-1 isn't a great show. In fact, most of the time I'd be hard-pressed to say it's even a good show. But I'm sad to see it go, and in retrospect here are a couple of notes:

    1. Did anyone else pick this part up?

    "Stargate SG-1," based on the 1994 movie starring Kurt Russell and James Spader, spent its first five years on Showtime -- which annoyed the show's producers by demanding full-frontal nudity -- before migrating to Sci Fi.


    I mean, don't get me wrong, Amanda Tapping is cute as a button, and Claudia Black (who hasn't been with the cast that long), rrowl. But I was really shocked to hear this. There are so many producers and directors out there who want to push the boundaries - is it too much to ask that those who want to make a more conventional show not be forced to throw in some gratuitous nude scenes? There wasn't even anything like that in the original movie.

    2. SG-1 is probably at its best when the cast & crew isn't taking itself too seriously. And with that in mind, let me tell you that if you missed the 200th episode... well, it's a shame. It was a bit uneven, but it was packed with in-jokes for the kind of people who like not only the show, but sci-fi in general, and even things "vaguely related" to sci-fi. (Veiled Firefly/Serenity references? Check. Not so veiled Star Trek, Farscape, and Team America: World Police references? Check.)

    Anyhoo, if you have the chance, catch the 200th episode as a rerun. You'll be glad you did.
  14. I'm waiting for the spin off series! by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Yo Wonderbread! Sure shes a goa'uld, but I'd tap that".

  15. Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sci Fi Channel is doing a 7th Heaven and they, as far as I can see, don't have a good show to replace it with.

    All they have left to hold dedicated viewers is Battlestar Galactica.

    What else is there to watch on that network now?

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      What else is there to watch on that network now?

      Why, ECW, of course!

      (cue flames)

    2. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The first time I saw ECW on SciFi, I thought WTF is THIS shit doing on here? Actually, I STILL wonder. The only reason I can think of, is that it's actually an infomercial where they paid SF to show it.

    3. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by ericspinder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My question is, why on earth did a 2nd rate, Voyager'esque spinoff show actually get renewed? Dr. Weir = Captain Janeway,...
      And my question is "Does a strong female lead scare you?" Other than the 'general scifi crew and captain motif' I can't see the similarities, a better fit star trek wise for Atlantis would be "Deep Space Nine" as they are both at least generally stationary bases of operations.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    4. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Informative

      And when the ECW fans heard it was coming back but on SciFi they thgouth WTF is this doing on this shitty channel? And fans STILL wonder.
      As it turns out WWE, who owns ECW has a deal to show them main show Raw on the USA netowork which NBC now owns. So WWE wanted to bring back ECW. NBC wanted to show it but they didn't want to put it on USA or Bravo, so SciFi was all that was left.
      That's the logic of corporations for you.
      Apparently, its debut was the highest ratings SciFi ever had.
      I'm a wrestling fan and a scifi fan, and it still doesn't make any sense. The random shit SciFi is asking them to put in like zombies and vampires to try to make some sort of sense aren't appealing to SciFi fans and are just irritating to wrestling fans.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    5. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but then the point still stands because Eureka is supposed to be a summer season filler show; I like Eureka, but it doesn't seem to have the moxie to go full season. SciFi is killing their anchor show, SG1 is the show that they put on when they have nothing to put on, and we watch when their is nothing to watch.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not from my search. The current Wier is Torri Higginson. The original was Jessica Steen.

      Just look at the pictures of the two women. They look nothing alike. Steen was believable as someone involved with high end government work. Higgins is not.

    7. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by mcspoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's actually tied to the fact that Sci Fi and USA Network have the same parent (NBC). USA airs the WWE programming. WWE runs ECW. They needed air time to air the "new" ECW, and the only time period available for the summer season was on Sci Fi. ECW ratings have been so high, the deal was extended beyond the summer season. Supposedly, they're looking to move ECW up to USA sooner or later to avoid these questions.

    8. Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg by danbeck · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree, if you want to see a "strong female lead" just look to the Lost City incarnation of Dr. Weir. Her character was well acted, strong, sure of herself and unwilling to compromise in the things she believed in.

      The person who replied to my original post is such the stereotypical liberal bigot. That type of person unknowingly fosters and pushes forward the idiotic stereotypes that make people think the current Dr. Weir is a strong lead, when in truth, she's nothing but a bumbling, bitchy leader.

  16. Everytime you threaten to cancel SG-1... by saboola · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. Teal'c kills a kitten

    Just a thought

  17. it was inevitable by Yonder+Way · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, how could the SGC continue to operate if Cheyenne Mountain was closed down?

  18. Apparently it's true by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't remember seeing anything particularly naughty, but courtesy of the Hollywood Reporter...

    Anderson's humor served him well during the show's first season, which even Wright and executive producer Robert Cooper, who came onboard as a writer, admit got off to a shaky start. There were rocky story lines, and there was cringe-worthy dialogue. And there was a creative argument with Showtime.

    Wright still bristles at remembering how the channel wanted full-frontal nudity. "People said, 'It's Showtime sci-fi -- that's what fans want,'" he says. "We got lambasted by the critics for it. Here was this fun 'Star Wars'-like show with flashes of naked women."...

    But the following year, Showtime decided not to renew the series. Explains Cohen: "Showtime decided they wanted fresh programming despite the fact that 'Stargate' was popular and performing well. We were determined to find it a new home."

    Nevertheless, Wright and Cooper prepared for the show's demise. "I said to MGM, 'Let's have a spinoff show ready to launch, which would fall on the heels of a feature film,'" Wright says.

    Enter Sci Fi Channel, a natural fit for the series (no full-frontal nudity required). "The show hits squarely with our fan base," executive vp original programming Mark Stern says.


    Maybe the DVDs they released were sanitized?
    1. Re:Apparently it's true by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can only recall one time where there was full frontal nudity - in the pilot episode, where daniel's woman gets turned into a snakehead. This was on the season 1 DVD

    2. Re:Apparently it's true by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Leave it to slashdotters to mod up a post describing where to find full frontal alien nudity, and call it informative.

  19. The show will go on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/cooper_isg-1 i_will_go_on.shtml
    Cooper: SG-1 will go on

    Monday - August 21, 2006 | by Darren Sumner

    Don't count Stargate SG-1 out just yet. Though SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running series (story), the show's producers are hard at work looking for a new outlet for the story to continue, executive producer Robert C. Cooper told GateWorld exclusively.

    "As far as the future I can't comment yet because nothing has been confirmed," Cooper said. "What we want to emphasize is that the franchise is not dying. SG-1 will go on in some way. We're just not ready to announce how."

    A formal announcement from the studio and the network is expected later this week.

    Cooper also emphasizes that, though emotions are running high among Stargate fans who have just learned the news, it is important to keep the show's ratings strong throughout the remainder of its run on SCI FI. "What's most important is that fans don't take out their frustration with SCI FI by not watching," he said. "In fact, what they need to do is watch both SG-1 and Atlantis LIVE and make sure the ratings stay strong.

    "That helps prove to other outlets that might be interested in SG-1 that the show is still as strong as we think it is."

    Could Stargate SG-1 find its way to yet another network in 2007? Or might the SG-1 team be headed for a TV movie, mini-series, direct-to-video feature ... or the big screen? Stay with GateWorld for the latest developments.

  20. What a shame by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Informative

    Starting in Season 8, SG-1 really started to go downhill, but I really felt like they were starting to put it back together this season and I was really starting to enjoy it again. When Browder first came onboard, I really felt like that was the end, but I've started liking him and I think the show has really returned to the kind of stories that make it great.

    Whether it continues or not, it has been an excellent series and will, for a while at least, have its place as, I believe, the second longest consecutive running sci-fi series in history. It's going to be hard for anyone to beat the original Dr. Who's 26 consecutive seasons, and obviously that isn't going to happen soon. I was kind of hoping SG-1 might give it a run for its money, though.

    The creators, writers, and actors who have been involved, old and new, all deserve congratulations for really fine work.

  21. Too Many Secrets by Clock+Nova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe they'll finally let the people of earth in on the whole Stargate thing. How the cat hasn't gotten out of the bag by this point is completely beyond my willingingness to suspend my disbelief.

    --
    There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
  22. Scifi being Scifi by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no Stargate fan, but as a fan of the original "Sliders," classic "Doctor Who," "Mystery Science Theater 3000," and other things Scifi "rescued" with great fanfare before unceremoniously killing off, I feel your pain.

  23. were is the SciFi? by grapeape · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why dont they just get it over and done drop BSG and rename themselves SpikeTV2. For only being a short time after the media declared Science Fiction was going mainstream why is there so little of it? Now instead of SG1, Firefly and Farscape we get Wrestling and that who wants to dress up like a tard and pretend your a superhero show. Oh well only another year or so to wait until the new Star Wars series brings on a wealth of copycats, clones and wannabees but by that time I expect that the SciFi channel wont exist anyway.

    1. Re:were is the SciFi? by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, it's been a full decade since MTV has shown a music video, so from that perspective, the Sci-Fi Channel is behind the times.

  24. Is there a movie in the works? by iambarry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to me that a movie was hinted at in the 200th episode.

    Would this be the first TV series spinoff from a movie to spin off a movie?

  25. Re:Worth Getting on DVD? by kria · · Score: 3, Informative

    IMHO, the first seven seasons of SG-1 are worth it, particularly the first four. Once you've gotten through one, though, you can decide about the rest yourself. :) Eight was the season where Richard Dean Anderson had a reduced presence. Season nine and this one are mostly horrible.

    Atlantis started off a little weak it's first season, but it was very good by the end of it. The second season wasn't quite as good, but I think the currently airing third season is decent.

    And, for comparison, I, too, am a huge Firefly fan. I would say that my favorite Sci-fi channel show, though, is Battlestar Galactica, and there should be enough time to catch up before Season Three starts in October. If there isn't, I've heard that they are doing a one hour summary show sometime.

  26. I've been waiting for a good occasion to... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...spend my 1000th post on.

    I'm dedicating it to the creators of Stargate SG-1.

    I won't repeat people saying that it was time, etc, but they are right. Instead, I'd just like to say that it was great entertainment. The occasional technobabble part was perfectly balanced out by the show not taking itself too seriously.

    So, thanks for the great show!

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  27. Well on the brigther side..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The good Doctor http//www.scifi.com/doctorwho/ is coming back in season 2 Sept 29. I guess the Doctor will be taking SG-1s time slot on fridays. Hopefully this will lead to the BBC making more than 13 eps per season now that they'll have American dollars lining their pockets

  28. I for one, am glad by Phleg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really like the show. I'd watched it sporadically whenever I saw it was on for several years, but just before season 7, I started torrenting the previous episodes, and watched them all in sequence. The first two seasons were alright, and it started picking up new and interesting story arcs in seasons 3 through 5. Six felt a little rehashed, and seven picked up with Anubis. Eight is where it legitimately should have ended, with the destruction of Anubis and the ending of virtually every side plot.

    With that said, season 9 actually surprised me with how well they managed to do, even with Richard Dean Anderson leaving, Don Davis being gone, and Amanda Tapping out of commission for a few months. Ben, Beau, and Claudia didn't feel right at first, but I gradually came to like the direction the show took; and at least there's always still Daniel and Teal'c. Plus, the Ori have been a pretty damned interesting new enemy. However, I'm glad they're cancelling the show. I'd rather them finish the Ori story reasonably quickly and end the show on a moderately high note (probably not as high as season 8, but high nonetheless) rather than dragging it on and on. While it's commendable how they've handled the transition to the new cast, it's not something that can be kept up indefinitely.

    --
    No comment.
    1. Re:I for one, am glad by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>I'd rather them finish the Ori story reasonably quickly and
      >>end the show on a moderately high note

      Unlikely that this will occur :(

      http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/cooper_isg-1 i_will_go_on.shtml

      Don't count Stargate SG-1 out just yet. Though SCI FI Channel has cancelled the long-running series, the show's producers are hard at work looking for a new outlet for the story to continue, executive producer Robert C. Cooper told GateWorld exclusively.

      The only thing I hate more then series I like being cancelled, is being left hanging, possibly indefinately.

  29. Paging Dr Jackson by Nastard · · Score: 4, Informative

    This may have been mentioned before, but there's been some talk in interviews and whatnot that Shanks might leave SG-1 anyway to join the Atlantis cast (where, logically, he belongs anyway). Jackson is my favorite, and this would at least give me some hope for Atlantis.

  30. Re:Longest running show? by Zenaku · · Score: 2

    Star Trek only ran for a few seasons, IIRC. Seventy-some episodes or so? The only way Star Trek can be considered the longest running sci-fi show is if you chain all the shows in the Star Trek franchise together. Apples to Oranges.

    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
  31. Firefly comment is spot on by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The seeds of crappiness were already showing in Firefly: Heart of Gold, anyone?
    If Serenity is any guide, I'm thrilled Firefly ended abruptly.

    That's always been a strength of a lot of anime and a fair amount of BBC programming:
    it has a beginning, a middle, and an end. They don't try and string it out for as long as
    possible. The ones that do suffer the same fate as US shows.

    I read an interview with the producer of Star Trek: The Next Generation season six,
    and she said that they had the ep they were shooting, one they had pretty much written,
    and some basic ideas for the next one and that was how they went through the whole
    season. I don't like Start Trek anyways, but any show would have trouble being of high
    quality under those circumstances.

    Always leave 'em wanting more, right?

    Maxim

  32. Re:omg man wtf.. by thepacketmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What will happen to siler?" More importantly, what will happen to Walter!? I mean, the poor guy had to give Beau Bridges $100 CDN just to get into the 200th episode.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  33. The real reason it is being cancelled is... by Technomonics · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... because Cheyenne Mountain is going to be shut down. The oversite committee finally got their way. Of course, this is probably just some "Trust" plot to keep us in the dark... I hear though that there is a new series starting up, "Wormhole Xtreme!"

  34. IMHO, the series hasn't been the same.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... since Richard Dean Anderson left. One of the reasons why I started watching SG-1 is because of how he played the character of Jack O'Neill. He never took himself (or sometimes the situations that he found himself in) too seriously and always was good at breaking up the tension of some episodes with a good joke (eg: "That's between you and your god. Oh, wait a minute. You are your god. That's a problem."). I found it hard to get into the series after that and got addicted to the re-runs prior to 2005.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  35. This is over due by slagell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am an SG-1 fan, but the last 2 seasons have been poor. It isn't just that Richard Dean Anderson has left, but the show tied up nicely at the end of season 8 and should have ended there. Actors that wanted to stay, could have migrated to Atlantis, like Worf to DS-9.

    My biggest beef, if there always has to be this epic war, and each time they win, they have to come up with a more powerful enemy. This has happened to the ridiculous extreme till they are literally fighting "gods". This is a bad sign, a sign that they are running out of ideas. This is the sort of thing DS-9, a very sub-par substitute for TNG, did to boost its ratings. They had a 3 year war between the federation and dominion.

    A good sci-fi show should be able to sustain interesting plots without the constant backdrop of annihilation. And when you keep replacing old enemies with more powerful ones, it degrades the battle with the old and the new enemies become ridiculously powerful after a while.

    I hope they wrap up this Ori crap soon and never return to the ascending being junk. However that seems unlikely, because they have just introduced a new antagonist into Atlantis. I guess the Wraith aren't enough to deal with.

  36. Re:Longest running show? by rkhalloran · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think some of us are a little too US-centric here: The Doctor has been around far longer ('63-'89, '05-present)

  37. Thank God! by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, but I never got into the show. It's too much action and not enough intellect for me. Give me the first two seasons of Sliders any day. At least there, the intellect was worshipped far more than fire power. Fire power is of little use when you're trapped inside a puzzle. And we are all trapped in that life IS a puzzle.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  38. Argh!....Stupid Stupid Stupid....SCIFI Channel! by haplo21112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyonce in a great great while I have some small hope of seeing good TV and justifying that stupid cable bill. Then the Scifi channel pulls this idiocy. So when is the BattleStar Galactica cancellation notice coming? Perhaps they will find somemore washed up or also ran wrestling leaugues to show. Well at least maybe they will find another channel for the show.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  39. Re:Atlantis by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know you can have a life on friday night and still watch your geek shows. There are two devices that let you do this by recording the shows so you can watch them later.

    One of them is called a V-C-R and you can pick one up at a flea market for a few bucks. They first got popular back in the '70 when people relized they could watch porn at home. Or if they had a camera they could make their own porn. (I wouldn't recommend the home made to anyone though. Its usually just 5 mins of some dude poorly focues bare ass bouncing.) It works by letting you record the show you want to watch on a very fragle tape like substance in pour quality.

    The other is called a D-V-R. It works pretty much the same way as a VCR but instead of tape, it uses an expensive and fragle highly spinning disk of death. One of the best things about a dvr is after a while it will start suggesting shows for you to watch. You might find that it has better taste in TV than you do. I know mine does.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  40. Re:Soylent Running by Jhan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and for all who didn't get the joke:

    Soylent SG-1 is made out of canceled shows!!

    (Other) canceled shows I tell you!!

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  41. Re:Cancel Atlantis, too by zeronitro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i half agree with you.
    i don't think the show should be canceled, because there is far too few true sci-fi shows on anymore. (there's a lot of wannabes popping up on network tv, but they all want to incorporate crime or medical crap).

    i generally like atlantis, other then the first season by far had the best episodes and everything out now does seem like a bad copy off an old sg-1 ep. that and i like the lt. ford better then i like ronin (he's just not a good actor, what more do i have to say?)

    who knows... maybe daniel jackson will transfer to atlantis and next season may have some potential.

  42. End it right. by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Marry off O'Neil and Carter.

    They can put Daniel over on SGA if he needs a job, but for the fan's sake marry of Carter and O'Neil.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  43. Re:More like going out on the bottom.... by MKalus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    McKay is funny, but Weir is weak. What happened to Ford? And Talia (or however you spell it) is annoying. Sheppard and McKay make that show.


    McKay is funny, and even better, the character got to grow, too bad that in one of the last episodes he reverted back to the old McKay (I think that one was written by the SG-1 writers, and McKay was whiny and bitchy again, though the joke with the lemon was good).

    As for Ford, yeah, what happened? Personally the Atlantis team is pretty much a copy cat of SG-1 now, Ford was clearly an interesting (albeit "weak") character. Weir is at times a bit bitchy I'd say.

    Still, I find them enjoyable and at least SG-1 doesn't take itself too seriously unlike TNG and Voyager did.
    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  44. With Regards to Weird Al by Gryle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never record "Will and Grace" or your DV-R will get the wrong idea about you...

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  45. Re:Well on the brigther side... by Adhemar · · Score: 3, Interesting
    guess the Doctor will be taking SG-1s time slot on fridays.
    That would be cool. The timeslot of the longest-running sci-fi show on American television (200+ episodes since 1997) taken over by the longest-running sci-fi show of British television (720+ episodes since 1963, although not continuously).