Slashdot Mirror


Storage System for Thousands of CDs and DVDs?

Lucy V. asks: "My husband works for a firm in New York that receives customer data on CD and DVD. After copying the data to their server, they are required to retain the original media for several months until the job is delivered and the customer has approved the work. It is common for the firm to have 30,000 CD's and DVD's on hand at any one time. They are struggling to find a better storage solution than what they have now as the current setup is awkward and requires quite a bit of space. They are removing the media from the jewel case and slipping them into one of those large notebook style disk holders and then storing the notebook on a shelf. I have spent quite a bit of time doing web searches for CD and DVD storage but nearly all the racks that I find are low capacity ones intended for home use. I have found one vendor called Can-Am that makes a high quality steel drawer system that might fit the bill." Has anyone found (or put together) a storage system that can handle thousands of discs?

244 comments

  1. Bookshelf or spools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about a bookshelf, or some of the spools that new CDs come in? I would think you could buy those in bulk somewhere.

    1. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't work, Petunia. How are you going to store 30 THOUSAND of them? Are you running for president of NASA or somethin'?

    2. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Coming from an environment that is required to retain client data for up to 7 years, it strikes me that a simple book-shelf is terrible. Surely the CD/DVD's should be in a fire/earthquake/flood proof container? I would have to ask what the liability of the original posters referenced firm is should they have disasterous loss. The original poster makes reference to a steel draw, suggesting that fire proofing is required. Assuming that the original CD's need to be retained the best method that I could think of would be to archive the images of the CD/DVD's on a harddrive for ease of use and then find a third party managed storage space off-site for bulk storage of the disks. Once a week, or month, do a store/purge cycle. The liability for the hard copies then falls under managment of the third parties facility and their iinsurance.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    3. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by jthill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, come off it. 50 per spindle. 20 spindles per thousand. 600 spindles. 20 spindles per shelf. 30 shelves. Three bookcases total. Catalog by spindle number and date added + uniqueifier. Sharpie both on the disc. Done.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    4. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Although... a steel drawer might wind up becoming an oven in which those CDs melt relatively easily. I would think that they'd be better storing ISOs and burning discs as needed. If redundancy is a requirement, just use two SANs and get a fiber link between home base and the offsite location, then have the remote SAN automatically sync the data all day.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    5. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by tylernt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      archive the images of the CD/DVD's on a harddrive ... find a third party managed storage space off-site for bulk storage of the disks
      I agree. Of course, 30,000 CDs would consume over 18 terabytes, but most of them are probably not filled with 650MB of data. Plus there are a myriad of compression tools such as PK/WinZip and GZip that will decrease the storage requirements further. With high-density IDE and SATA disks and PCI or software RAID being so cheap these days, it should not be hard to build an inexpensive SAN. You're not going to need the performance of SCSI or Fiber Channel.

      If your policy does not allow for outsourcing the physical disc storage (for privacy reasons etc), destroy the discs after you rip them to your storage array. Just be sure to back up that array offiste.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    6. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cool, the old-spindle-on-the-shelf trick. Someone needs to patent this idea.

    7. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Forget the bookcase. Just get a strong table (30,000 CDs is going to be pretty heavy). Get 100-disk spindles - at am-dig.com, they're $1.33 each in bulk (so, $400), and I'm sure you can find them much cheaper if you buy in bulk (or, better yet, just re-use the spindles that the media came in). Three high, 10x10 array. Plus fifty cents for a sharpie. The whole set might just fit on a standard shipping pallette, which you could (and should) shrink-wrap and send to some off-site storage facility.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Spools would be ridiculously annoying after about the 10th time you have to grab the CD on the bottom of the stack.

      We need to ask this question to the submitter: Is there some legal requirement for keeping the data on physical media? I mean, they are on CD's, really its no different than keeping the data on some hard drive. The only thing that's changed is the storage medium, its still all electronic data. Why not invest in some sort of large network storage device, and keep the data there? As long as regular backups are maintained, this should be fine.

      IMHO, in this day and age keeping physical copies of most records is pointless and wastes space/time/money.

      --
      I got nothin'
    9. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      You can build a decent 20 terabyte storage array for around 20 grand. It'd span 7 or 8 servers, but still, much better than trying to organize rooms full of DVDs.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    10. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by couchslug · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are plenty of good commercial solutions to storing such items. Automated rotary and sliding shelving systems are available where you may manually or electronically select the item you want. Bookshelf systems are available (we use them for USAF Tech Order binders) so if you want to store binders of DVDs it's no problem. They are robust enough for industrial tool cribs, and specc'ing an enclosure or fireproof room if required is routine (though expensive).
      If your facility has the room, 20 or 40-foot ISO shipping containers can be used as internal or external storage. They are gasketed, easy to secure, fireproof, and storm-resistant. They are easily fitted with power and lighting at less than the cost of new construction. SeaBox makes custom commercial and military containers and could do something suitable.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by itwerx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parent is correct.

      Also, Google is your friend:
            http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=media+cab inet+%22data+center%22&btnG=Search

      (Need the phrase "data center" in there or you'll get a zillion home entertainment centers instead!)

    12. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at a company that used this method. We used 100 disk spindles though. it worked well for us to store scans of millions of paper documents on a few shelves.

    13. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that is a huge concern, they're storing from reciept until end of job or about several months, and the data is copied to their server so I assume that the possibility of backups from the server(s) at 21TB is out of the question actually I assume copying all the disks to the servers is out of the question; so any client that sends original data to them is bound to become dissapointed sooner or later. I'm guessing that returning the cd is more of a courtesy or tradition, than a hard requirement; things do get lost or damaged in the shipping anyways and with 30K on site the unlikely is bound to happen.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    14. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the CD's get scratched on those spindles?

    15. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Well, if you read the original question, it sounds like they already do rip the data to HDD so they clearly have that issue solved.

      The issue at hand is that they have a ton of physical media they need to keep on hand. The good thing is that they dont have to keep it for 10 years or anything...only months.

      With that short of a time, offsite storage almost doesnt make sense since you will be changing stock so often. It might then make a lot of sense to use something as simple as shelves. Make sure every disk is labled and then load them into 50 or 100 disk spindles by estimated project completion month. Every time you add a disk to a spindle, write it down (or put it into a computer) and since you wont be removing these disks, only storing them, you should have an ordered list of all disks in each spindle. As soon as all of the projects on that spindle are complete (you could simply wait an additional month or two before checking to make sure) you quick go through the list and check for open projects. If there arent any, dispose of the spindle full of disks as you see fit. If there are remaining projects, just pull the disk and put it somewhere else and dump the rest of the disks.

      --
      Bottles.
    16. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      You're makeing a couple of possible bad assumptions. First off the poster mentoined DVD's as well as CD's. If they are working with something like GIS data (large rasters, etc) it is quite possible that, not only are the discs full, but they are probably receiveing multipule discs per job. At 30,000 discs, if you assume an average of 2GB per disc you have ~60TB. Which doesn't seem unreasonable. Just to give some perspective I maintain a 4.5TB RAID array for an office of about 25 people. This is not because of wasteful use, it's because we deal with some big rasters and generate a lot of maps/posters/etc which contain large, uncompressable, images. My array is nearly full and we will probably be expanding soon, especially if we have to host the data for one project we have possibly comming in, which would add about 10TB of data (god be thanked we built some expandability into our array, now I just have to figure out where the hell I'm going to put the drive trays and the UPS to keep the thing chuging along in case of power failure, my racks are starting to look full.)
      As for CD storage, other posters have it right: get automated jukeboxes. I have a number of simple CD towers, which hold 100 discs each. They all plug into a computer via USB. Said computer has a program and database of all the discs and you can search for and eject a specific disc through that interface. While CD spindles are great for space saving, good luck finding anything in them. If you have perfect following of all rules and procedures for storage and retrival, you'll be fine. Some one screws it up once and you are going to spend more in man hours to straigten it out than it would have cost to buy the jukeboxes.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    17. Re:Bookshelf or spools? by PCeye · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone at /. has already visited: http://www.uspto.gov/ following your suggestion to see if there is a patent to submit, or to formulate a joke. I was successful at neither :p

  2. Interns and Cake Containers by daeg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy a few crates of cake containers from a CD or DVD distributor. Then hire an intern. Label each CD with a sequential number and label the cake containers with their sequence number. A simple Excel sheet or simple database can handle mapping a CD with who it came from and the date to a cake container/CD number. The intern then fetches said CD.

    Remember, interns are cheaper than actual solutions.

    1. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by edmudama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember, interns are cheaper than actual solutions. That's actually a very good point. If I had mod points it'd be +1 insightful.

      --
      More data, damnit!
    2. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by CodemasterMM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, I'm an intern currently!

      Wait... I've been making labels for the past two weeks.
      Crap, he's right.

    3. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Buy a few crates of cake containers from a CD or DVD distributor. Then hire an intern. Label each CD with a sequential number and label the cake containers with their sequence number. A simple Excel sheet or simple database can handle mapping a CD with who it came from and the date to a cake container/CD number. The intern then fetches said CD.

      I'm gonna modify this slightly for more ease of use. I still like the basic idea, though.

      Use the above mentioned CD labeling system.
      Place CD's in 208/300 CD/DVD binder.
      Get shelving that will fit the Binders (Ikea IVAR works great for adjustments)

      Shouldn't be too hard after that. The main thing though, is the numbering system Without that, the whole thing fails miserably no matter what.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by twistedsymphony · · Score: 3, Informative
      Use the above mentioned CD labeling system.
      Place CD's in 208/300 CD/DVD binder.
      Get shelving that will fit the Binders (Ikea IVAR works great for adjustments)
      FTFA:
      They are struggling to find a better storage solution than what they have now as the current setup is awkward and requires quite a bit of space. They are removing the media from the jewel case and slipping them into one of those large notebook style disk holders and then storing the notebook on a shelf.
      Sounds like that's about what they currently do and it's not working out for them.
    5. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by daeg · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's why I suggested cake containers instead of binders. Binders are great for when you use CDs or DVDs frequently, e.g., music or movies that you would like quick access to and when reading the face of a CD/DVD is useful. However, if you simply label CDs sequentially and never (rarely) need access, you can stack them a few hundred to a case. Label them in series chronologically. When you need to make space on your shelves, simply follow FIFO -- reduce from the lowest sequence up.

      Binders waste a lot of space when you don't care what the CD face says.

      The only thing to be careful of is a labeling system for the CDs. Sharpee is probably best. Sticky labels can off-balance the CD and make it hard to read in picky readers.

    6. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      CD binders are themselves frequently responsible for the deaths of CDs. I've had the vinyl (yes, they use vinyl) clear plastic stick to the metal layer, and pull it right the fuck off. CDs belong in jewelcases if you care about them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by crystalattice · · Score: 1

      How about doing the same thing but using a barcode system so the database is self-updating? (Of course, that's probably what you were implying).

      --
      Free Programming BookLearn to program
    8. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also currently work as an intern (or co-op, whichever you prefer) and yes. we are the filthy peons of the company. for example instead of buying a system from a company for 10 times my salary, they hired me and got me to design it and have it jobbed out for the lowest posisble cost...

      so, i wonder, if interns are cheeper then actual solution...

      wouldn't an intern also be a solution therefor making the best answere to any problem "hire an intern"?

    9. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I've had the vinyl (yes, they use vinyl) clear plastic stick to the metal layer, and pull it right the fuck off.

      Was this by any chance due to a lack of air-conditioning? I've never had this problem, but mine have all been kept below 85 degrees F.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    10. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Probably so. The house definitely didn't reach temperatures unsafe for either humans or CDRWs, though, and to me basically everything needs to be able to handle those temperatures. With that said, I have a lof of CDs in binders :) but I wouldn't consider it a safe storage method.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
      Welcome to your career, cheap solution! =)

      I joke, I joke! (that was indeed harsh. I owe you a beer next time you're in Chicago)

      -b

    12. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The main thing though, is the numbering system Without that, the whole thing fails miserably no matter what.

      No, the main thing is the steady-supply of interns. Without that, the whole thing fails miserably.

    13. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Heck, if it's really simple, just hire an employee's teen-aged son or daughter.

    14. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by vanyel · · Score: 1

      Sticky labels can off-balance the CD and make it hard to read in picky readers.

      I use the P-touch labeler which uses "M" cartridges. The tape is about 1/4" wide and very light. Never had a problem yet; if you're really worried, use the smallest font size, trim the ends and put it as close to the center as you can. OK, I had it peel the CD layer itself entirely off the plastic disc once when I tried to remove the label. Don't do that ;-)

    15. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by slidersv · · Score: 1

      FTFA means "Filipino Task Force on AIDS" according to acronymfinder.com. Did I miss something? She didn't say she had AIDS...

      --
      there is no issue with my network
    16. Re:Interns and Cake Containers by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      A better solution would be to use a database, intermec printer, maybe a bar code scanner. Tie them together with an html front end to input/query/print labels and you're set.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  3. How much space do they have? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

    That's the big question. That, and how organized does this need to be? I can think of a couple of surprisingly simple solutions that are easy to keep organized, but it's hard to make recommendations without knowing exactly what they have to work with.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    1. Re:How much space do they have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically he's asking how he can physically store CD/DVDs in less space than the theoretical limit of 15,000 mm^3 per disc imposed by the volume of each disc (pi*60^2*1.2) and optimal circle packing density (pi*sqrt(3)/6).

    2. Re:How much space do they have? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      Well that's simple. Just get yourself a Portable Hole. If those are out of stock, see if there are any Pocket Universes available. Push comes to shove, a Bag of Holding will work, though it would be much harder to retrieve items from the Bag than the former two solutions.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    3. Re:How much space do they have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a BoH would work too.

    4. Re:How much space do they have? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      Just remember not to put the Bag of Holding in a Portable Hole... Or is it the reverse?

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  4. Jukebox or Disc Changer by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't image there isn't some system like this on a larger scale. If not, I'm sure it could be easily designed. The system would take up more room and require more maintenance that a CD case.

    --
    Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
    1. Re:Jukebox or Disc Changer by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      For years I've wondered if anyone out there has converted a jukebox into a giant CD-ROM sorter/finder/drive (possibly labeler), nice to know someone has the same question... I agree though, if you're forced to deal with tens of thousands of CDs, it would be nice to have some sort of automated system dealing with them... Sure, you'd have to maintain said system, but it would ultimately save you time...

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
    2. Re:Jukebox or Disc Changer by avronius · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of optical disk jukebox solutions available. The biggest problem with them is cost.

      HP used to sell them, and are likely a good starting point.

      Here's the first link from a google search that I ran:
      http://www.kintronics.com/jukebox.html

      I used the following search criteria:
            optical disk CD-ROM DVD jukebox

      Good luck

    3. Re:Jukebox or Disc Changer by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >>For years I've wondered if anyone out there has converted a jukebox into a giant CD-ROM sorter/finder/drive...

      You mean people like "radiostations"?

  5. "Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Keep the original CD" sounds like a silly requirement. Why not just upload the contents of the CD to a file server, do a SHA1 hash of the original filesystem on both the CD and the file server, replicate the fuck out of the file server and toss the CD?

    I'd bet you could ROI the "don't keep the original CDs" plan to under a year.

    1. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Keep the original CD" sounds like a silly requirement.

      Yes, but legal work often has all sorts of silly requirements. Sometimes you do need the original rather than a certified copy.

      Me, I would copy the CD to an iso file, make it read-only, stick a barcode on the physical CD, then ship the physical CD to an offsite storage facility. If they ever need the physical CD they can get it, but otherwise you work from the iso.

      I'd bet you could ROI the "don't keep the original CDs" plan to under a year.

      Yes, but you would have to include "lose the legal work" in your ROI calculation :)

    2. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by rednuhter · · Score: 1

      its not their choice "they are required to retain the original media for several months", although whether or not thats a legal requirment it does not say.

      --
      ERR 411[Max number of witty sigs reached]
    3. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you do contracting with the government, and have to follow some of the subsections of Sarbains Oxley, if you have data that comes in on physical media in a digital format, you have to be able to audit for that data and keep the data in storage, sometimes for years.

      This is the government/legal system at work. If you were to lose the CD's and an audit was done and you did not have them, you can face massive legal fines.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    4. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that there's really no way of proving that the contents of the CD weren't changed.

      We have a similar situation at my job. We get files from clients on CD and DVD (although a LOT less often in the last year or two due to high-speed internet connectivity and me setting up an FTP server) and we need to keep the CDs on hand for extended periods of time. We do keep a backup of the original files on the server for quick access.

      At least if you keep the original media, and someone says that you did something wrong, you can show what the client sent and prove whether or not the mistake was theirs.

      At my place, here, our solution is to use those 100-disk spindles. we've got 4 of them, and when the 4th fills up, we dump the first and start to populate that. It's completely un-organized and the one or two times we needed to locate a disk, we just figured out about where it would be located based on the date of the job and the dates of the jobs the other CDs were from.

      Also, it doesn't help that 9/10 of the disks we get aren't labeled and are on very generic media.

      I'd think that the best bet would be to add the disk and its contents to a database (like DiskTracker) and label the CD with the number so you can find it easily. we do that with our job data backups.

      The requirement isn't really silly so much as it is simply lame.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    5. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by mre5565 · · Score: 1

      > This is the government/legal system at work. If you were to lose the CD's and an audit was done and you did not have them, you can face massive legal fines.

      Which is precisely the reason why the data should be put in a RAID protected disk subsystem that
      has Sarbanes-Oxley compatible data retention (WORM) capabilities. CDs don't last. Data online can
      be made to last indefinitely.

    6. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure, you say that now, but just think of what'll happen come 12:00am, January 1st, 2000!

    7. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why not just upload the contents of the CD to a file server...
      Oh, and don't forget to back those servers up regularly. Maybe you could use, like, DVDs as storage media...?
    8. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      I don't know the precise details of the law, but if any law requires you to keep data in a particular physical media format (i.e. cds, dvds, etc), the law is poorly written. What if it's a 10 year old law? They might require you to store data on floppies? There should be no difference between storing media on a hard drive or a cd except for the fact that it's a lot easier to store on a hard drive.

      --
      No Sigs!
    9. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Harker · · Score: 1
      Me, I would copy the CD to an iso file, make it read-only, stick a barcode on the physical CD, then ship the physical CD to an offsite storage facility. If they ever need the physical CD they can get it, but otherwise you work from the iso.


      Better yet, simply send the original CD back to the customer. If you have a copy in ISO format, it can be regenerated as often as you need it to be in CD format, and you don't have to store the physical disk.

      It just means a lot of disk space on your SAN, but disk is fairly cheap anyway.

      H.
      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    10. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by paro12 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Keep the original CD" sounds like a silly requirement
      Keeping the Original CD is the ONLY way to prove what was actually submitted to the company in the first place. If you simply upload the information to a server, how do you prove that document X wasn't actually on the original CD two years into the project, when the projects been shot to hell and the lawyers are called in?

      That is why it is imperative to keep the original CD.
      Self Preservation.
    11. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the original poster didn't indicate if the original media had to be in its original form... what about this? ;-)

    12. Re:"Keep the original CD" = silly requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go CD/DVD diskless. Have the entity submitting the data compute secure hashes and digitally sign them and transmit that data to the recipient, encrypted if desired.
      Then they send the CD/DVD data (or send that disk if that's more feasible/economical). Recipient securely replicates that data, computes secure hashes, verifies the
      hashes match what the submitting entity sent, saves and also digitally signs the secure hashes, and then if the recipient actually got the physical CD/DVD, it can be destroyed or returned. No more CD/DVD storage requirements, and a cryptographically secure audit trail. One can augment the security/audit trail with additional replication, and suitable use of encryption on non-volitile storage and in transmission.

  6. Paper boxes? by kosmosik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Easy. The same as with paper documents. Put them into proper envelopes and boxes and into shelves in some offsite magazine. There are loads of established paper documents storage systems - you label it, put it into database, do monthly check and retire old stuff etc.

    You don't need to have quick access to these CDs, you have digital copies on servers so you just need it in emergency.

    You need normal storage same as for paper documents.

    1. Re:Paper boxes? by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. A simple box like this one where you use standard paper sleeves with the disks. Label each sleeve with a sequential serial number, and enter the info into a database. If you have multiple different retention periods, you have several boxes going at once - one for each period.

      Put the range of disk numbers on the front of the box.

      If you want to get fancy, use a prefix that indicates the retention period (6m-123 is not the same as 6y-123)

  7. CD Hook-on Files by neonprimetime · · Score: 2, Informative

    CD Hook-on Files like these work well. I've seen them used, for example, and cd / video exchange stores, etc.

    1. Re:CD Hook-on Files by ajmilton · · Score: 0
      Description: CD Hook-on Files offer a convenient solution for safely storing thousands of CDs. A built in title edge that faces out lets you immediately identify each CD. A single suspension hook-on style for easy access. Made of hard-wearing pressboard. Box of 25, (sold per box) Holds (4 ) loose CDs. Overall dimension: 12" wide x 13" high Price: $85.00

      Storage for 100 cd's for 85 bucks? i'd keep looking...
    2. Re:CD Hook-on Files by grapeape · · Score: 1

      Sorry but when your storage cost is 5-6x the cost of the media something is definately wrong. Neat idea but way way overpriced for a piece of plastic and some cardboard sleeves.

    3. Re:CD Hook-on Files by Bishop · · Score: 1

      While these hook files look like an expensive solution, it probably isn't. The cost to handle the CD is probably greater.

    4. Re:CD Hook-on Files by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you go with the vendor in the link, it's an insanely expensive solution, but if you think about it, you can buy those sleeves for cheap, and build your own hooks. And per another posters comment, I think it's a good idea to build it with access to both ends of the hook, therefore you can do a FIFO policy ... slip the cd's on one side, pull them off the other. We're talking about backups here, not a library. Odds are you are only going to need the oldest or most recent, not the one in the middle. And you'd always be disposing the oldest, so you have easy access too. Just my thoughts though, I could be wrong like usual :-)

    5. Re:CD Hook-on Files by dawhippersnapper · · Score: 1
      --
      Freedom is fragile and must be protected. To sacrifice it, even as a temporary measure, is to betray it.
    6. Re:CD Hook-on Files by twitter · · Score: 1
      You might want something cheaper than 45/$65 when you need 30,0000 stored, but the principle is valid. I use regular manila folders with slits cut to receive the CD. If they already store paper with each customer's stuff, they already have the answer. All you need is an index to keep things organized.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    7. Re:CD Hook-on Files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hooked-on Files Worked For Me!"

    8. Re:CD Hook-on Files by lburdet · · Score: 1
      at 85$ per 100 CDs, this gets very expensive, very fast.

      The concept though, is what we have implemented here for ca. 20'000 CDs for a lot cheaper
      A LEGAL size hanging folder will store 6 CDs pretty nicely. A special hole-punch cuts an inversed V-notch on one side of the folder. Hang CDs on the V-notch, file the nahging folder in a filing cabinet.
      With 2 horizontal filing cabinets (LEGAL size depth) which are 6 feet wide and three shelves high, we have about 10'000 CDs per filing cabinet.

      Major advantage: can be moved easily. Remoting 10'000 CDs offsite is as easy as getting a dolly and lifting the filing cabinet ;-)

      Cost was about 100$ for the special hole-punch, the filing cabinets we routinely "inherit" from early morning raids into the legal dept ;-)
      A couple of $/hr for the intern(student) doing the hole-punching and filing ;-)

  8. Imation Disc Stakka by Fbelch · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe something like this might be what you are looking for....

    http://www.imation.com/products/disc_stakka/index. html

    - Stack units up to five high to create a tower that holds up to 500 discs without any extra cabling or rebooting your computer.
    - Connect towers using powered USB hubs to control over 100 towers (that's over 50,000 discs) from a single computer.

    1. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by nasch · · Score: 1

      They just need to store these things until they're allowed to throw them away. They don't need quick or easy access, so that's probably overkill. Cool product, though.

    2. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by ygthb · · Score: 1

      This is what I was goingto suggest. Plus it includes a cataloging system and retrieval application.

      --
      Create like a god, command like a king, work like a slave. -Guy Kawasaki
    3. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      We use these at my office. Wonderful little toys. We've only got 2 in use, but damn if they don't make access easy. If they weren't $90-$100, I'd be tempted to pick up 1.. or 5... for myself at home. (I've got alot of DVDs)

    4. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These rock, though they would be even nicer if they had a CDROM/DVD-ROM reader builtin, but then they would probably be MUCH more expensive :-)

      They come with OpdiTracker Standard, http://www.opdicom.com/products/opdiTracker.asp, which does allow you catalog the disks on the controlling machine before or after you register it in the Stakka, if you do this you can then search for files on all Stakka managed CD/DVDs.

      The included software is pretty decent, but the Pro version has some really nifty features (custom "groups" and "disk should be returned within ... days/weeks" can be nice even for a single Stakka, and the advanced search functionality rocks for larger Stakka systems) and only costs AU$35 (about US$27) for one machine/unlimited numbers of Stakkas.

    5. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by Bastardchyld · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This solution is not needed first of all in order to support 30,000 cds you would have to have 300 units broke up into towers of 5 that is 60 towers. Where would that go? Besides at a price (newegg) of $115 each that is $34,500.00. That is insane. The only way you could justify spending that much money on this is if it was not going to be a nightmare to install (i.e. single box). Besides the fact that you would still have to buy powered usb hubs to power all of these bus powered devices. This may be a great solution up to one tower, however any more than that and you are wasting your time.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    6. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      Besides at a price (newegg) of $115 each that is $34,500.00. That is insane. The only way you could justify spending that much money on this is if it was not going to be a nightmare to install (i.e. single box).

      If it was the cost of doing business with the government, or (better yet) the cost of winning federal project bids because you have demonstrably faster data archive access than the next bidder, then $35K is dirt cheap. The only thing cheaper would be an intern.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    7. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://dansdata.com/quickshot005.htm

      Holds 50% more discs for 25% less price.

      I had the DC-101, it was awesome. The 300 is supposed to be superior in every way.

    8. Re:Imation Disc Stakka by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1
      Connect towers using powered USB hubs to control over 100 towers (that's over 50,000 discs) from a single computer.

      Actually, it's exactly 50,000 discs.

      [/smartass]
  9. Re:Dump the ISOs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks like you need to RTFS: "After copying the data to their server, they are required to retain the original media for several months until the job is delivered and the customer has approved the work."

  10. Contact a company that does this for a living by eric2hill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It looks like you're trying to find a "better way" to store these vast libraries of CD and DVD materials rather than rolling your own. You should contact a company that builds multi-tier racking for books, cd's tapes, x-rays, etc. The companies that make x-ray film libraries in the US do the same thing for other media types as well.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    LOADING...
    READY.
    RUN
    1. Re:Contact a company that does this for a living by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny
      It looks like you're trying to find a "better way" to store these vast libraries of CD and DVD materials rather than rolling your own.
      If she wanted a solution from Clippy, she would have used MSOffice Help.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Contact a company that does this for a living by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

      Or for someone a little more local...
      http://www.spacesaver.com/
      I've done some contract work for them in the past, they look like very nice systems.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
  11. Linux ISO Mounting. by ldheinz · · Score: 0

    In Linux, you can store a file on the system that is the ISO image of a CD that you could use to burn another CD. Then, you can mount the file as if it was a drive and have the data available as if it had been inserted into a CD drive. This would enable you to store the CDs and DVDs as online files which can be mounted as needed when data needs to be accessed and unmounted when you are done. If you created a RAID-5 array with large disk drives, you could easily create multi-terabyte drives to store the data. I'm running a 1.3 terabyte file server at home, built from cheap-after-rebate ATA disks.

    1. Re:Linux ISO Mounting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Linux ISO mounting? You don't need Linux to do that...

    2. Re:Linux ISO Mounting. by cyber0ne · · Score: 1

      Ya, you can do that in pretty much any OS. But it doesn't exactly address the problem of what to do with the media that they're required to retain, does it?

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
  12. Here's the real solution to your requirements... by Optic7 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There was a story here on slashdot a few months ago about an alternative to jewel cases, where people discussed all kinds of options for CD/DVD storage. I found this particular comment to be the most useful for really large scale CD/DVD storage. It seems simple, effective, and practical. Also check the other comments on that story for other ideas, but I think this is really the best solution for you based on what you said:

    Large quantity CD/DVD storage solution

  13. Why Real-Space(tm)? by True+ChAoS · · Score: 0

    Storing the actual physical media seems like a waste of space. Maybe it'd be better to rip the CD's to an ISO, store the ISO on a file server (appropriately tagged and after running a hash check against the media and ISO to ensure you have a perfect copy) and ditch the real media. Ensure the file server is backed up and you have an arguably more robust system (losing the file server means resorting to backup, losing the physical media is a loss forever). Theres no reason why you cant keep the media for a week or month until your sure the server is thoroughly backed up.

    Alternatively if you're hell bent on using up real space (tm) you may want to look into the Boltz system. 2400 CD sized items in a rack only a foot deep could lead to some interesting "filing room" options... even if it is slightly more geared toward the home market

    --
    WARNING: May contain traces of nut
  14. White folder boxes by jnaujok · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe this is a bit too low-tech for slashdot, but when cleaning up stacks of empty cd cases, I found that the small white "document storage boxes" that you can get at any office supply store perfectly fit six stacks of CDs in their cases. Just stack the disks into the box, mark them with a "keep until" date and when that rolls around, just toss the whole thing (the boxes only cost about $0.50 each.) Keeps it clean, reduces the time to pull them out of the case, and if you need to recover one, just pull the box that falls into the date range and search that box. Each box holds about 500 discs, so you'd be talking about 60 boxes, which means a decent size file room will store them all.

    It's cheap and easy. But probably way too low tech for the slashdot crowd.

    --
    Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
    1. Re:White folder boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cheap and easy. But probably way too low tech for the slashdot crowd.

      It's ok, as long as you use a big robot arm and machine vision system running on linux to sort through the boxes.

  15. Storage solutions by iotashan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did any of you even read the article? They need to store the physical media, after it has already been archived to another data storage system.

    I'd check out any of the big-boys that deal with large-scale, physical storage.

    The one company I can think of off the top of my head is Spacesaver. If you've ever seen a hospital's records storage system, it was probably a Spacesaver unit.

    They even claim CD/DVD support:
    http://www.spacesaver.com/appl_cat.asp?cat_id=4

    1. Re:Storage solutions by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Did any of you even read the article?

      In their defense, sometimes one needs to question the premise of the question. Perhaps there is some give in the requirement that allows other solutions (e.g. do the disks still need to be rapidly or readily accessible or even readable?), and surely there are other readers interested in solutions that aren't so encumbered.

      I know that, though my DVD collection isn't yet that big, my Atlantic Penguin and (lately) Elf racks aren't quite meeting my needs, especially since I can't order free replacement (really expansion) parts over the web anymore without negotiation with a human.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Storage solutions by BlueAecid · · Score: 1

      That, or a Russ Bassett media cabinet.

      They make cabinets for all sorts of physical storage application. A bit costly, but it's gear that will stand up to the test of time and won't break, nor is it cardboard that could easily get waterdamaged or somesuch.

      Yes, I know, shameless plug. ;)

      --
      Eat flaming death, minicomputer mongrels!
  16. Any additional time spent is time wasted... by stienman · · Score: 4, Interesting


    How do you scan them in now? Do you put them in an automatic machine, do you have humans sitting there doing the work, etc?

    However they come out of the scanning process should direct how to store them.

    If you've got humans doing the work then put them back in the jewel case, and drop the case into a filing box that you can store on shelving. Mark that box with a large barcoded sticker. Every week scan all the boxes, and have the system beep when you scan a box due for disposal. Dump the contents into the secure shed bin, and put the box on the pile of empties for new projects.

    If you do the scanning automatically,a nd simply have a human de-casing the disc and putting them on a spindle or stack, then buy spindle carriers that can pick up the spindle or stack on the output side and drop the entire thing into a suitably sized box, then do the same as above. (I'd probably go this route anyway rather than the storage in jewel case and big box above).

    Look for "cake boxes" that are really spindle CD/DVD boxes, such as the following: cake boxes

    Are the CDs/DVDs in small batches or big batches? ie, do you have to store 5 of them together, or 500 together? Is there a great variance (do you accept both customers that give 5 and customers that give 500?).

    If you want to spend tens of thousands of dollers then a good engineering firm can design a system that you just feed discs into. It'll then scan them for you, store them, and on regular intervals shred those that have been authorized for shredding. Should take up the space of a large closet or small cubicle for a storage capacity of 5,000 or so discs, and scanning capacity of a few hundred per hour.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by winnabago · · Score: 1

      I like your spindle idea, but I was curious about your other point. I'm a little off topic, but what good methods for 'shredding' CDs exist? I usually try to flake off enough of the foil in a radial motion before I throw a disc out with personal data on it. But this is messy. I also have slashdot muscles, so breaking large quantities in half isn't really the answer. Any ideas?

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    2. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure cake boxes are good for readability over long-term storage? There'd be a risk of disk-to-disk adherance which could separate the reflective layer from the substrate. Vertical (on-edge) storage supported by the spindle hole I thought was the safest solution for data longevity.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of good regular paper shredders won't think twice about going through a CD.

    4. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      That is a good point. The submission did suggest that really long term storage was not an issue as the CDs were destroyed when no longer required.

    5. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      what good methods for 'shredding' CDs exist? I usually try to flake off enough of the foil in a radial motion before I throw a disc out with personal data on it. But this is messy. I also have slashdot muscles, so breaking large quantities in half isn't really the answer. Any ideas?

      A few seconds in a microwave oven will render a CD completely unreadable, and also perfume the air with an ozone-y, possibly toxic aroma.

    6. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      They sell shredders that will destroy CDs. I have a small one for home-office use, it cost me about $40 from OfficeMax a while back. Couldn't even tell you what brand it is. The pieces that come out are about 1/4" by 1/2", plus before actually going into the cutters, there's a knurled roller that mashes up the surface of the disc both front and back, so even if you could reassemble the pieces, I think you'd have a tough time getting any data back. It will also destroy credit cards and 3.5" floppies (metal pieces and all). It's rather loud and scary when it's running, but damned if it doesn't do the job. Only complaint I have with it, is that in order to put paper in there, you need to fold it in half lengthwise -- the shredder opening is only about 5-1/4" wide.

      I'm sure there are lots of commercial shredders that will eat CDs; frankly any office shredder that wouldn't destroy a CD is of limited usefulness these days. I'm also confident that most large-scale "data destruction" services, like the ones used by hospitals, law offices, and the like, will get rid of CDs if you toss them in your normal 'burn bin.'

      If you were really paranoid, you could take your CD, microwave it, then shred the result, and then incinerate the shreddings. That ought to take care of it pretty thoroughly. Personally, I just trash the plastic shreddings and recycle the paper ones.

      The one I have is similar to this, but not as nice: (But like I said, I only paid about $40-50 for it)
      http://www.provantage.com/primera-56400~7PRIT052.h tm

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Any additional time spent is time wasted... by stienman · · Score: 1

      The CDs have built in spacers - when you stakc them there's a gap built in, preventing adhesion. If your environment is very warm, or they use cheap labels and you store the discs upside down, perhaps there'd be a problem, but you typically don't have to worry about it. The discs are made of polycarbonate, and it's pretty stable.

      Otherwise any solution would suffer from the same adhesion problems, not just spindles.

      On edge is obviously better, but not by any significant margin.

      -Adam

  17. Can-am by alita69 · · Score: 1

    Can-am is the one. I got a couple of their units recently to handle my own DVD collection (two three drawer units handled my current collection; I'll need to get another soon). No complaints from me. The quality is quite high, and while I'm not particularly fond of the divider/backstop system it does the job.

    Like you, I spent rather a lot of time looking for alternatives. There just aren't many good ones.

  18. FIFO is key by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're going to keep the CDs for a couple months and only need them for some legal/contract requirement, so you don't need to "file" them. Just get a long metal bar (or bars) and put the CDs on them as they come in. Of course label them and keep a database, but basically once the bar fills up you just start taking them off the back end and check the database whether they can be thrown out. If so, toss. If not, put back either on the back of bar or front.

    This is way more space efficient than folders and prevents them from getting 'stuck' to the soft plastic if the environment is bad. It's far cheaper and also easier. A "proper" system will of course have small sections that can be taken out to retreive a particular CD without too much effort... take some out, check with database, do binary search to find CD. This should be such a rare occurrence that the time to locate a particular CD.

    If you have other requirements please elaborate... such as having to return the CD when the work is done. If not, this is a great, cheap solution imho.

    1. Re:FIFO is key by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      Just get a long metal bar (or bars) and put the CDs on them as they come in....once the bar fills up you just start taking them off the back end...

      Perhaps you would explain how this bar is supported?

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    2. Re:FIFO is key by ajmilton · · Score: 0

      a wire loop on each end would do the trick. if you wanted to get fancy you could drill a hole through the bar for a cotter pin or something, to keep the wire from slipping off easily.
      or you could use curtain rod brackets to arrange the things on a wall.
      there's a lot of ways out there to suspend/support a rod in such a way that both ends are fairly easily accessible.

    3. Re:FIFO is key by gknoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interns. =)

    4. Re:FIFO is key by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points -sigh-

      This is a great idea. It's far more space-saving than any other design offered here, and it keeps the discs perfectly safe if used in a fairly dust-free environment. The FIFO aspect is genius. It fits their problem exactly.

      I'm not sure I'd go for the wires, though... I'd probably go for a series of hooks on a wall or rack. The hanging wires tend to sway too much when you are adding/removing discs and could prove to be your undoing.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:FIFO is key by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If the whole system is placed in a long, curved cradle, each disk is only supporting itself and its share of the bar. Or suspend the bar slightly above such a cradle system at each end.

      There'd be limitations on bar length though, as thousands of CDs is quite heavy. Get them in segments and have periodic retractable supports. By using segments, the system can be expanded as needed if data storage load for a month exceeds existing capacity, and makes it easier to retrieve original disks for evidentiary purposes if your needs aren't strictly FIFO.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:FIFO is key by lahi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Store it vertically and make it LIFO instead. Someone else stated the height of a CD as 1.2 mm. So you just need one rod of 36 m length. Of course you will need to ensure that the CDs are sorted by date at all times for ease of access. You can use the well-known Hanoi-algorithm for that. Just have two more identical rods for buffering.

      -Lasse

    7. Re:FIFO is key by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Simple.
      Get a pegboard. Fill it with bars sticking out. Label each bar 0-99, 100-199, 200-299, etc. Hang up to 100 CDs on each one.

      I've seen store display slatwalls with metal bars with a slight upturn at the end so products don't fall off the end. That would be ideal.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    8. Re:FIFO is key by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      Mostly my point was that the system should be designed around FIFO, but there are many ways to solve this support sub-problem...

      For one thing, a bar does not necessarily even need to support the CDs -- it can be just the opposite. With a U-shaped channel, the CDs can support themselves and the bar, with the bar providing structure and FIFO. On a human scale, a bar maybe two or three feet long should not weight too much for a person. Just pick it up, shift it by however many CDs you want accessible off the end, take them off, and slide the bar inside the CDs. Of course include various 'bookends' on the bar or channel to keep the CDs from slanting, which would put more stress on the center hole.

      Or you can have two supports on either end and remove only one support at a time, air-lock style, to allow CDs to pass past the supports. This would require more machinations, but could let you compress the CDs a bit more and be 'safer' (put in interlocks and whatnot to prevent accidental droppage).

    9. Re:FIFO is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you "thread" a CD onto a bar which is suspended at both ends? Is this a David Blaine thing?

    10. Re:FIFO is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If designing a solution around this idea do keep in mind that this kind of filing work is often done by women. While you and I wouldn't think twice about filing and sorting discs by lifting the end of a 75lb (35kg) rack, most women (even those with their own 75lb rack) aren't going to be too keen on the idea. If the racks are big, be sure to support the ends in such a way that discs can be added and removed without requiring the user to hold anything weighing more than a couple pounds and in such a way that it cannot be dropped, spilling thousands of discs on the floor (or worse, damaging the discs).

    11. Re:FIFO is key by ajmilton · · Score: 0

      this is why i said "wire loop"
      slip the loop off the "top" end, slide the cd on, slip the loop back on.
      simple, really.

    12. Re:FIFO is key by battjt · · Score: 1

      Very smart cookie there. Want a job? :-)

      Well duh. What data structures would you use? May be a circular queue? Use a hoop made out of segments that can be detatched to get to individual CDs or a hoop with a single break that is slick enough to slide around the whole lot of CD to the particular CD you may need to extract. Drop in date tags to keep things straight.

      My insurance agent scans every document that comes through the door, then puts the sheet of paper in a box. When the box is full he puts it in storage. After storing documents for some magic duration, he destroys the box. He does back up his database well and in the event of catastraphic failure, he can rebuild the database from the originals.

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
    13. Re:FIFO is key by budgenator · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask, I have just the system you need, with training included, just send me you mailing address so I can send you the NDA and non-competes and we can get started for under $50K!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    14. Re:FIFO is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hooks and rope, maybe? You can have a straight bar implementing FIFO, and the support solution is mobile support.

    15. Re:FIFO is key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to use the bar method... make it a peg wall, each peg denotes the day of arrival and make each peg a U shape with a middle slide for disk insertion. Use traditional cataloging techniques.

  19. Store only? by slim · · Score: 1

    In my local Ikea, I noticed that the very top warehouse shelf is stacked not with furniture, but with huge boxes of till rolls. I believe it's a legal requirement to keep till rolls for a certain amount of time (for auditability), but the truth is that it's very unlikely that anyone will ever ask to look at them, so they're stored in an efficient to store, inefficient to retrieve method just in case, and once the archive period is over for the whole box, they're pulped.

    It sounds like you've got a similar requirement: you might want to get the disk again, but it's most likely you won't ever touch it again until it's time to bin it. Am I right?

    In which case, get as many 100 disk spindles as you need.

    As you receive disks, put them on the currently filling spindle.

    Number the spindles and keep a record (spreadsheet/db/whatever) of which project's disks are on which spindle. Label the spindles with the project names too, so you can reconstruct your spreadsheet if the worst happens.

    Every so often, run a query to find spindles which only contain dead projects' disks, and throw away those disks, freeing the spindles for refilling. This means that you could be keeping some disks longer than strictly necessary, but I'm assuming this doesn't matter too much.

    If you need to retrieve a specific disk, it's not going to be all that easy, but we've decided that's not a requirement. What's important is that it's easy to regularly identify large units to be discarded.

    You can tune this system to suit your needs. You could work in units of 100 disks (i.e. you throw away 100 disks at a time), or you could put 10 spindles in a box and throw away 1000 disks at a time. The larger the unit, the lower the management, but the more space you'll be devoting to disks that are expired but share a box with non-expired disks. It's a bit like selecting a block size for a filesystem -- space efficiency vs. fragmentation.

  20. Leave them out back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do what all of the other companies are doing. You have customer data, just let it get lost. There are seldom any repercussions, and you get some free PR (no such thing as bad PR).

    Bonus if you have social security numbers, credit card numbers, HIPAA info..

    In fact, you can sell some of that info to establish a secondary source of income! Last I heard, SSNs were about $5/each.

  21. No matter what they do... by joedoc · · Score: 1

    ...getting rid of those CDs and DVDs would be a good idea, just to keep the data from magically escaping the facility and winding up in the hands of some cracker, thief or spammer.

    Why do I see potential headlines here?

    --
    Joe Dougherty, Florida, USA
    The words I thought I brought, I left behind. So, never mind.
  22. Dated spools? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
    I am assuming that it a requirement from the customer that you must retain the physical media. I am also assuming that the media arrive with labels that identify what they are, and that it is quite acceptable to search through 100-200 discs on the rare occasions when they are needed. The important thing is to know which batch to look at.

    My solution to that would be to use the 100 disc spools that are often used to package blanks. Slap a date range on the top or side of each and store them in sequence. A fairly compact and low maintenance solution. Physical damage to the disks with this solution is unlikely and climate control is not important for three month data retention.

  23. An idea using stuff around the office by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

    Filing cabinets, empty paper boxes, and CD envelopes.

    Yes, filing cabinets. The kind made for hanging folders. I've got one drawer at home full of CDs. Several hundred, in fact.

    Put the CDs in paper envelopes and stack them into the lid from a 10-ream box of paper. I think one box lid will hold around 500 CDs in this manner; I've never tried to fill one up this way so actual results may vary. Stack two filled box lids into a drawer. 10 four-drawer cabinets should be sufficient for storage, and help you keep organized without the stupid CD books.

    It will work with jewel cases as well, though obviously require a lot more space.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  24. Read no further by CXI · · Score: 1

    The above linked post from the previous discussion is the best answer. Design your system for reuse of the CD sleeves to save money (assign a sleeves number separate from the project/owner/etc number). Keep the sleeves when you destroy the media at the end of the project. When new media arrives, log the room, cabinet and drawer you put it in. The sleeves only need to be sequential in the drawers, so you could have sleeves 1, 2 and 3 all in different cabinets. It doesn't matter, your database tells you where to initially look, and you do a binary search in that drawer to find the one you need.

    1. Re:Read no further by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The above linked post from the previous discussion is the best answer.

      Not quite the best. It still requires you to have organizational skills to put the CD back where you found it so you can find it again next time. Searching through meatspace is annoying.

      Instead, attach little RF receivers and piezo speakers to the spindle hole of each CD, low enough power so that it is powered by the signal (no dead batteries). Maybe an LED that will shine through to the edge of the CD too. Each tag gets a unique ID. When you look up the CD on the computer, it transmits the ID which is received by the device and it starts beeping and blinking. When you're done with it, you just put it back wherever you want.

      (Yes, I've suggested this before for storage of books, which also lets you decide where to file books according to their size making better use of your storage space. It's just a reapplication of those RF coasters you get at busy restaurants while waiting to be seated.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Read no further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Searching through meatspace is annoying."

      Not nearly as annoying as people that use the term "meatspace"

    3. Re:Read no further by gobbo · · Score: 1
      The sleeves only need to be sequential in the drawers

      Since CD's are made from a relatively soft material, won't standing them in a drawer on their edge create the risk of warping? They're best held rigidly by the hole for long-term storage, as in jewel cases, vertically, and separated so that they aren't degraded by off-gassing solvents from labelling. Since due diligence is the basis for the problem, that seems to be a basic part of the problem: how do you store 30K discs the way they were designed to be?

    4. Re:Read no further by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      The OP says that they only need to keep the CDs/DVDs for several months. I think they'll be pretty safe in that time span.

  25. Re:Dump the ISOs... by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    RTFS Doesn't work they have to keep the original !

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  26. If media = "digital" media, toss the damn CD by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If everyone agrees on a cryptographic hash, modern technology (and law) often let you toss the physical media as long as you can prove you haven't changed the digital contents. (This is where the concepts of "integrity checks" and "non-repudidation" come in.)

    We do this every day with checks, payroll sheets, purchase orders, receipts and all kinds of other tidbits that used to have to have a physical component, but we (and our various industries) got smarter.

  27. Scan 'Em by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I got a $1000 200 CD-ROM jukebox with FireWire. A patched mtx on Linux will expose its control/transfer API, so I wrote a Perl program to extract with cdparanoia, lookup its metadata in FreeDB, and advance discs. The cheap jukebox offered only 2-3x read in DAE mode, so 200 CDs took about 90h, or 3 days. Including 30s per CD to strip the plastic jewelcases, load, then unload into big CD books, which I didn't want to spend two hours twice a week, it took about about 2 months to scan 3000 CDs, including a few hundred "rejects" that needed 1x rereads at the end. Storing the CDs to (lossless) FLAC means about 250MB per CD, these days at about $0.23:GB IDE, $60:250GB, or $0.06:CD. Stuff 4 of those into a $150 PIII/850MHz/512MB running Debian. There's no need for performance, because even serving 4 simultaneous songs at 176KBps each won't strain even a cheap system. And the few thousand CDs fit neatly on a shelf in a closet for archive. Including the storage books, we're talking under $500, plus the $1000 jukebox (which your friends can use when you're done).

    The real question is the GUI for finding songs and playing back. I wrote a crude one that searches metadata for song, album and artist names. The real key to this whole enterprise will be a frontend that lets us navigate so many songs. Who's got one of those to make the whole journey worthwhile?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Scan 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the OP ask how to make the world's nerdiest juke box? I thought she asked how to store physical discs.

    2. Re:Scan 'Em by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And I told them (and you) how to physically store the discs in books, while still playing them. What's your problem, you're not really a Nerd?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  28. 2 things by Klaidas · · Score: 1

    A warehouse
    Lots and lots of shelves.

  29. Well what we used to do. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Back in the day my company used to convert a lot of data for customers converting to our software.
    As a service we used to keep the conversion just in case they had a crash and didn't have a backup.
    This was when a one gig hard drive was every expensive so we used floppies.
    We made shelves out of old floppy disk boxes and gave each floppy a number. In the customer record we entered the self number, the box number, and the disk number. Don't worry this wasn't any type of personal data. And the customers didn't mind back then. Now the conversion utilities are built into the software so they can convert the data themselves.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  30. Film? by fastgood · · Score: 1
    Invent a camera that takes a high enough resolution picture of a mounted CD. It only needs to have proper lighting, and pick up pits while ignoring everything else.

    Analog storage of 24-36 disks at a time in a small space!

    1. Re:Film? by zyl0x · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a camera that takes such pictures require the assistance of some sort of super-illumination source in order to "film" the bits' status? In effect, it would be a giant, somehow handheld, coverless (and therefore hazardous) CD-player.

      --
      Blerg.
    2. Re:Film? by MrSquishy · · Score: 1

      To save you from having to invent that camera:

      dd if=/dev/cdrom of=~/cd.txt
      then print the results.

      That way, all you have to do if you need to retrieve the data is "vi cdrom.iso" and hit 1 or 0 as you read off the paper.
      I realize this would be inconvenient for some people.
      They can "emacs cdrom.iso"

  31. Offsite storage is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's pretty obvious that most slashdot readers either can't read the article they are replying to or don't understand the logistics of physical media storage.

    You mentioned physical space requirements and organization being one issue but another issue you did not mention is physical security. If you just have a bunch of shelves from ikea lining the office what is stopping someone from just grabbing some CDs and walking off with them? Best bet would be offsite storage and I would recomend Iron Mountain. We maintain over 100,000 full home closing documents with them at any given time and when doing a CBA between their fees and what we would spend on warehouse space and staff it's a no brainer. Since your husband is doing this work for clients I would just pass the fee onto them as a billable expense.

    Keep in mind, offsite storage facilities charge money for collection, monthly storage and media retrieval. Retrieval can take up to 3 days, but many offer emergency retrieval that can get you your stuff within a couple hours for a premium. That's why it's good to keep electronic versions on site, which your husband already does.

    Cardboard boxes and folders are not a longterm viable option.

    1. Re:Offsite storage is the answer by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      According to TFA, the need is only "several months." I wouldn't deem that "long-term."

      Paper sleeves in a cardboard box is just fine for short term. I wouldn't stack them flat though, I'd store them on edge (they have "short" versions of bankers boxes used to store letters and such that would be Perfect.)

      I'd still use an IM type service, but with media in the 30,000 quantity range, you would go broke using the "special" metal boxes from IM. Long-term storage of backup tapes is another issue.

  32. Professional Archive cabinets by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lots of companies make cabinets for large scale archiving for data centers and the like. They don't tend to be cheap, but they can pack them rather densely:

          http://www.russbassett.com/products/cabinets_disc. cfm
          http://www.can-am.ca/cdvideo1.htm

    There are also moving shelf options, but they normally are for mixed media (tapes, cds, etc), and you have to buy the shelves, then fill it with media packs to hold the type of media you're storing:

          http://www.systems-supply.com/nms2k/edpstorage.htm
          http://www.russbassett.com/media/products_disc.cfm

    If you're going for cheap and densely packed, I'd probably re-sleeve them and drop them into a drawered cabinet, but you'll need to make sure they're well organized if you expect to ever find them again.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Professional Archive cabinets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have three of the Can-Am 3-drawer cabinets and they currently hold about ~10000 paper-sleeved CDs and DVDs with room for file markers and growth - they are pricey but worth it for us...

    2. Re:Professional Archive cabinets by ssk77077 · · Score: 1

      my previous employer purchased one of the 2 drawer Can-Am cabinets for the CD archive I was building. It was a great piece of office storage equipment. I highly recommend them.

  33. Netflix by camusflage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Netflix already has done this, I'm sure. Dig around, find out how they run their distribution centers, and copy their work. No use reinventing the wheel when someone else already built a business model around keeping track of a crapload of discs.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    1. Re:Netflix by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've read that Netflix has something approaching 99% of their discs in circulation at any given time. I don't know that they really would be the best place to look.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    2. Re:Netflix by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

      Why not? I propose you hire a buch of interns scattered all over and put the cd inside nested pre paid envelopes using an inverted traveling salesman optimazation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling_salesman_pr oblem(optimized for the slowest route). Instruct each intern to remove the outer envolpe and send it out again. Give each intern a stack of envelopes in the event they need to return a cd instead of the usual task of preparing the cd for the next leg of its journey. If you have enough interns they can be instructed to throw away any cd that has no forwarding envelopes left.

    3. Re:Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've read that Netflix has something approaching 99% of their discs in circulation at any given time."

      The top dvds (which make up a large percent of the discs due to all the copies needed) are usually in constant circulation - but counting all the dvds I would guess 50-60% are out (or being processed) at any given time. Even though there are only a few copies of obscure dvds there are MANY more of them. I would guess you tend to rent pop dvds so they allways seem to be oos.

    4. Re:Netflix by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      My statement was based on a business case study of Netflix I read a while ago (about a year, I think), not on my personal experience with Netflix. When I was a subscriber four years ago, I didn't encounter an out of stock title even once. I dropped the service about two years ago at this point (for reasons completely unrelated to my satisfaction with Netflix itself), so I don't know what the experience is like now.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    5. Re:Netflix by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      A bit of googling comes up with this article from 7/1/2003 on Business 2.0.

      This isn't where I originally read the statistic, I'm pretty sure, but it's probably where it originated.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  34. I have that at home by aminorex · · Score: 1

    I have two bookshelves, roughly 800x2200x200cm, with 50x spindles of optical disks in 5 shelves with 10 stacks of 3 spindles on each shelf. I think the bookshelves were $25 each. I dedicate specific shelves to specific topics, and usually leave 10 or so available slots on each spindle, so it is easy to maintain alphabetic order within a topic.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    1. Re:I have that at home by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Funny

      *blink*

      You have these at home? And they only cost $25 apiece?

      Where did you find the space for a bookshelf that's roughly as long as a seven-storey building is tall? And where did you buy them (or the materials for them)? I don't have the room in my apartment for a twenty-two meter bookshelf, but if the price scales down appropriately, I want in.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    2. Re:I have that at home by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      That's a shitload of pRon there dude. Suggest a girlfriend as an alternative. Oh wait - this is /. - nevermind.

    3. Re:I have that at home by aminorex · · Score: 1

      sorry, mm. it's just a zero.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  35. What is the problem again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can fit 200 CDs in paper sleeves inside a shoe box. 30,000 CDs would be 150 shoe boxes.

    Label each box with a number. Inside have 10 dividers labeled with another number. When a disc comes in you stick it in a box and update your spreadsheet with the two numbers.

    I believe that is called "filing". I fail to see what your problem is other than not knowing that.

  36. two tiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm assuming that you're copying data into your database losing the structure of the original data on the CDs/DVDs. What I recommend is that, when you copy the data over, you also make an image copy of the CD and archive it on hard disk. Then take the original CDs, put them in paper envelopes and drop them in cardboard storage boxes. Very unwieldy if you have to search through them - but if you have the archived image copies, that'll be a very rare occasion indeed.

  37. eMule by DrXym · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use eMule or another P2P network. Lots of users would love to archive your customer data for you.

  38. A few questions by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    1. What is your budget? How much are you willing to spend
    2. What concerns you the most: spacing, keeping track, hazard prevention?

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  39. Robotics! by Kouroth · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have the money and will:
    Contract a robotics company to build you a huge multi-disk changer. Take a design similar to those multi-disk changers that hold a hundred disks and just make it bigger. That would cut down on storage space and also make accessing the disks much easer. The investment cost may be high but the end result should pay off in the long run.

    --
    Thermal depolymerization - Lazy recycling.
    1. Re:Robotics! by polar+red · · Score: 1

      A bit like a tape robot?

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  40. Customer Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll store the data for you. No charge! :-)

  41. CanAM is the way to go by boogahboogah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although they are a little on the expensive side (for personal use...), there is nothing better. Each drawer holds lots & lots & lots of CD's, you can stack their two drawer & three drawer models, thay have matching accessory racks (for components or CPUs or ?... , and they have a lock setup that's not too bad (but not crowbar proof...).

    Have two units at home for the music collection, works great. Gave away those other cd racks that only held 1-200 CD's, they were just such a waste of floor space...

  42. Laserline Media Zone by Andrew+Lenahan · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of LaserLine's "Media Zone" sleeves. They're sturdy, clear, and slimmer than any jewel case. They can be put on shelves (about 5" tall), and they also make flippable files and hanging file-cabinet pouches for them.

    I'm not sure if you can still get them in stores but they can be bought online.

    --
    Andrew Lenahan http://www.starblind.com/
  43. ziploc bags and boxes by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    Years ago the Washington Post held a contest to find the best system for storing massive CD collections. There were dozens of traditional shelving systems, notebook systems, etc. The winner skipped all that crap, and instead threw out the cases and slid the discs and inserts into ziploc baggies and kept them alphabetized in plastic storage boxes that conveniently fit under the bed. I recently started using a similar system for my huge CD collection, except that I'm using shoeboxes in a closets.

    This would probably scale pretty well - use steel shelving systems from any hardware store, cardboard dividers to create sections for each client, a bunch of plastic boxes, and just affix labels to the top of each bag, and put the archive date right onto the label so that old discs can be quickly purged. You can get ziploc bags in bulk at Costco.

  44. Spindle by klahnako · · Score: 1

    I use wooden dowels for spindles, each holds a few hundred CDs. Here is a picture of my current archive spindle (easily detachable). I only have only about a thousand CDs, and no organization (except some natural chronological order).

  45. Interns and overseas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Remember, interns are cheaper than actual solutions."

    Yes but the shipping to India will inflate costs.

  46. pass on the cost/beneift to the customer by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    Since this is a real cost to your business, I would give your customers the option of what to do with the original after you get the data off of the cd or dvd:

    option 1: throw it away
    option 2: return it to customer immediately
    option 3: throw it away, but burn a new cd at job completion and return that
    option 4: save it until job completion, then return original

    then assign modest fee (postage) for option 2, a somewhat punitive add-on cost to option 3, and a really nasty charge for option 4

    i imagine that currently a lot of your customers get the cd back a few months later and just throw it out themselves anyway so the effort is wasted a lot of the time. If they really wanted a copy for themselves they can just burn an extra disc in the first place and save the postage.

  47. "Keep the original CD" = Just kidding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""Keep the original CD" sounds like a silly requirement."

    In this day and age of "faking the evidence" and "losing the E-mail/source code"? It makes perfect sense.

  48. Get a cataloging CD storage unit by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You can get CD storage units that hold 150 CD/DVDs and can be plugged into USB so that you can search through a catalog and recall the CD that way. Here is an example of what I am talking about (http://www.tracertek.com/cdstorage.htm) These aren't the cheapest, but should be the most efficient and cost effective.

    --
    Erutangis ym si siht.
  49. Send them to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a nominal fee per disc you can send them all to me. I'll store them and you can e-mail me when you need a given disk returned.

    In other words, make it "not your problem" and just find someone who wants to do it for you. Save space and time. There's probably even someone out there who is happy to hire an employee and will read them in for you, send the data to your server and store the originals and cut a profit on it.

    Assumedly, your business's core competency is not disc storage but rather some other service. Find someone who is or is willing to make it theirs.

    Just think of the savings in office space, time spent scanning, maintenance, etc and decide what that's worth to you.

  50. CD-R Spindles by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    We used to use CD-Rs for archival purposes, have since moved on to large HDD arrays. But I still have the CD-Rs, simply replaced back to the spindles they were shipped on. A simple spreadsheet or database could be made to keep track of which spindle each CD is on. You can't get much more dense than having them laying on top of eachother.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  51. Moron by Cybert4 · · Score: 0

    Trying to look smart, ends up looking stupid. Very stupid.

  52. A company called SSI has exactly what you need... by ameline · · Score: 3, Funny

    A company called SSI has exactly what you need.

    See: http://www.ssiworld.com/products/products3-en.htm

    They even have impressive videos of their products in action. They can handle almost any input format you can imagine. CDs, DVDs -- they'll even handle Blu-Ray and HD-DVDs.

    --
    Ian Ameline
  53. 400,000 CD storage facility by tomlouie · · Score: 3, Funny

    > ... as many as 30,000 CDs and DVDs on hand ...

    Pththth, amateurs. These guys are storing almost 400,000 AOL cds

  54. My system... by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    is pretty simple, effective, and easy to maintain. Granted, I only have about 1500 DVDs in my system, but I think it would scale pretty easily.

    I put them in a case similar to these (the exact ones I use appear to no longer be carried by Best Buy).

    In my particular case, I label the DVDs with the content, then write a category and disc # on each sleeve. I created little cardboar dividers that I slip between the categories. I then add the disc to an excel spreadsheet that I keep with the category, disc #, and description of the contents. For 30,000, you might want a database, but for me, a spreadsheet is adequate. I can fit about 300 discs in a box.

    I find it very easy to find stuff and I find it very easy to maintain when adding new stuff. I tried the binders, but those were just too much trouble to keep organized and they took up way too much space. Space-wise, you simply can't get much more efficient than this.

  55. FIFO ROD by dindi · · Score: 1

    just looked under my desk and saw a 50 pack DVD RW. The disks are neatly sitting on a rod in the middle of the packaging tube.

    Knowing that those damn retailers like to spare space, I would assume that mounting DVD/CD medium on a rod would be quite effective.
    Imagine a rod, holding 200-300 discs a piece, with sequential numbers.

    When you run your weekly purge, you just remove an entire rod, or part of the contents of a rod (you need to be able to open the rod on both ends)

    this is a real FIFO system, that makes it easy to purge the oldest ....

    let's assume a disc is 3mm (it is less, but let's assume it is in a paper/plastic pocket) thick, so 300cds will take up 900mm of space on a rod.....

    Hmm I think CDs became the same pain floppies were a few years ago. Nowadays everyone writes a CD instead of using a media that fits the size, on top of that most people do not even know that rewritables exist.

    I call my parents in law "environmental terrorists" when they burn a 1Meg file on an 80 minute non RW disc, and they do that at least once a week.... This is typically a file size, you could beam over with your phone, or send in email, still :(

    I wonder how much space is used on those discs that will take up a storage space probably bigger than my living room. I bet if you put them on DVDs it would fit into my car.

    We need a dynamic size media, imagine, that when you wrote 80megs on a cd, it would be a lot smaller in diameter than a 700M disc, ok, this is a bit far fetched.....

  56. Can-Am works great by wrp103 · · Score: 1

    I have a Can-Am system at home and it works great. It was recommended to me by a friend, who likewise had been using it for some time.

    When I got them, you could buy them in 2 and 3 drawer configurations, and you can stack them as high as you want. You can order a base unit with casters so they can be moved easily. If you stack the units, they aren't idiot proof, since the safety lock mechanism only works for each unit. If you open one drawer of a unit, you can't open any other drawers in that unit, but you can open any of the drawers in the units above and below that one.

    They are very sturdy. If you take the CDs out of the jewel cases and put them in sleeves you can fit even more into their drawers. They have wire dividers that keep the individual columns of CDs from sliding sidewise that you can space wherever. I love mine!

  57. Do what Netflix, or ehit.com do to store its dvds! by MrRayliu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Netflix put them in file cabinets in rows and rows of disk in sleeves. Each disk is barcode or numbered. Or you can alphabitcally them. You can do a google image search on on netflix to see the look of the cabinet. I run an online dvd rental store at www.ehit.com. If you want to save money on making the boxes, you can have the boxes make out of cardboard to your size and dimension. The cost is really low. And then stock them into a sliding shelf or rack. This way I don't see any problem in store all your dvds in a room. Help this will help! Ray Liu

  58. Yes, I've invented one but haven't patented it yet by ivaldes3 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if the parent poster would contact me, I have a way that works great and doesn't cost much.

    -- IV

    --
    http://www.LinuxMedNews.com Revolutionizing Medical Education and Practice.
  59. Numbering Scheme by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Good comments on physical alternatives to the binders. Which I don't think are a -bad- idea in this case.

    Where they may get hung up is keeping track of them.

    Here's the answer:

    You use a method similar to an IP address where each octet is a symbol to their location.
    customer_number.shelf_number.binder_number.page_nu mber.pocket_number

    From there you just fill them chronologically. Then you don't run into logistical problems if you try to arrange thing alphabetically. ex. shelf set 1 has customers a-g shelf-set 2 as h-s, etc.

    This looks to me more of a process issue (where humans have to stick to a process) than a physical/technical problem.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  60. Re:Dump the ISOs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    dump the ISOs, and tell the lawyers that if they can tell the difference between an original digital file and a bit-identical duplicate, you'll find a storage system for all those CDs/DVDs.

    the wonderful thing about digital documents is that they can be duplicated *exactly*; something that's not possible with real documents, which is what that particular bit of legalese that everybody's mouthing off about was written. since there's literally no difference, you're actually storing the original file. forcing your company to hang on to the original media is like requiring that a law firm keep all their paperwork in the original manila folders, and not allowing them to store those folders in file cabinets.

    "legalese" is not an excuse for stupidity, and letting people use it that way just encourages bad law.

  61. Re:A company called SSI has exactly what you need. by NewWaveNet · · Score: 1
  62. A dowel? by Omicron · · Score: 1

    A wooden dowel. Drill holes in the wall. Insert dowel. Slide CD's onto said dowel. :)

  63. I'm looking for something similar by jonfields · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a 300 or so cd/dvd changer that is compatible with the PC and Mac so i can just keep all of my software CDs in one unit for when i have to rebuild my system rather than opening all those jewel cases and such?

  64. Maybe you should ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Netflix or Blockbuster.

  65. NAS...? by kaddeh · · Score: 1

    I think that something like a HUGE NAS system would be nice. It would then be possible to store and organize data via customer and/or software type. From there, you could store all the ISOs, loopback mount them as needed and retrieve data. This however, doesn't solve the issue of oodles of CDs and DVDs.

  66. Fake it! by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    When asked to produce a CD, burn one from the relevant data (or .ISO image of the original)on the server. Copy originals to server as they arrive and then destroy (for privacy/security concerns) If some auditor has a problem, then say "our reading of the policy (law, rule, whatever) was that the _data_ had to be retained, not the actual medium it arrived on". Doesn't solve the OP's problem, but defers dealing with thousands of CD's until the first time it's a major audit problem.

    1. Re:Fake it! by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'd do, because the media is merely a method of transferring data from client to service provider.

      If management insists on keeping the original media (which is of negative value because of the overhead expense needed to file, store and retreive the disks), I would buy boxes of 100-disk spindles (that blank media is packaged in), fill those spindles, write a code number on the outside, and send them off to the back of the warehouse. 30,000 disks is 300 spindles.

      No, scratch all of that!

      Media is not needed. I would negotiate with customers so that they are sending ISO images to me over the internet, encrypted as need be.

  67. Re:Do what Netflix, or ehit.com do to store its dv by Wingfat · · Score: 1

    Good point i was going to say the same thing.. Either NetFlix or GreenSceen have a very nice set up to hold thousands of DVDs. I am sure something like that combined with a Robotic Arm and a Bar Code Scanner would be the best soultion.

  68. 500 cds per stack 100 cds per unit. by dieth · · Score: 1

    The Imation DiscStakka, I've been hoping they come out with a 1000 disc holder w/ Reader built in

    But currently each unit only holds 100 discs, which can be stacked in 5's, It comes with a nice indexing software, although the units have to eject the CD & have you put it into your computers CD or DVD rom drive as there is no built in reader.
    Here's the link http://www.imation.com/products/disc_stakka/index. html

  69. Is speedy random access a requirement? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    If not, just source some 6' .5" wooden dowel, some long screws and a sheet of plywood. Disk comes in, drop it on a dowel. Dowel fills up, date it. Once it's six months old, unscrew it, carry it (and the discs) to the dumpster, and replace it.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  70. That easy... by Jaegs · · Score: 1

    just ask AOL how they do it. Then again, their storage methord is probably more distributed than the submitter would like. There's also the question on data retention/recovery. I alone must have thrown out about a hundred or so discs or at best used them as coasters.

  71. content-addressable storage by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
    (from Wikipedia) "Content-addressable storage, also referred to as associative storage or abbreviated CAS, is a mechanism for storing information that can be retrieved based on its content, not its storage location. It is typically used for high-speed storage and retrieval of static content, such as documents stored for compliance with government regulations.

    "It is of particular interest to large organizations that must comply with document-retention laws, such as Sarbanes-Oxley. In these corporations a large volume of documents will be stored for as much as a decade, with no changes and infrequent access. CAS is designed to make the searching for a given document content very quick, and provides an assurance that the retrieved document is identical to the one originally stored. (If the documents were different, their content addresses would differ.) In addition, since data is stored into a CAS system by what it contains, there is never a situation where more than one copy of an identical document exists in storage. By definition, two identical documents have the same content address, and so point to the same storage location."

    When someone provides you with a CD or DVD, you copy the .ISO image to CAS and give them back the cookie for that image; the media is either returned or tossed (or ideally, everything winds up being done over the Internet, so no physical media ever exists). The cookie provides proof that the image hasn't been altered (and is better than the physical media, since you could replace a CD with one that you've burned yourself).

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  72. secure, off-site storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a massive off-site storage facility for my discs, with a capacity of several hundered thousand. There's also a full-time guard who lives on the premises.

    Of course, when I say "off-site", I mean in the alley behind my building. And the guard sometimes has to take breaks to panhandle for change, or because he has the DTs. And the only discs I actually store in it are AOL CDs. But otherwise I'm very happy with it.

  73. I don't see the problem? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    Examing a cakebox of 50 discs I have handy, it is 5 inches in diameter and 3.5 inches tall. So, it would fit in a 5x5x3.5 cube, which takes up a volume of 87.5 in^3.

    30000 discs would require 600 of these, for a volume of 52500 in^3. That's the volume of a cube just slighty over a yard on each side.

    What's wrong with just numbering the discs, putting them in numbered cakeboxes, and stacking them in the corner of a closet, keeping a record somewhere of which disc is in which cakebox?

    The questioner said that the data is copied to the servers for work, and the discs are just kept basically as archives until the project is done, so it doesn't sound like fast access is needed.

  74. Look at it this way... by czehp · · Score: 1

    I've read a lot of the proposed solutions but many of them seem to miss the mark because it's hard to visualize exactly how large a mass 30,000 CD/DVDs actually is. Given that the maximum thickness of a DVD is 1.5mm she's asking the equivalent question of "How in the hell do I store a ~147.6 ft. tall stack of media?" That is quite a lot of media and I'm assuming that there's a need to get to it in a reasonable amount of time. By reasonable I mean, find the media before the client standing in the lobby gets pissy. At a place I used to work at in a previous life we had rows of shelves where CDs were in paper jackets. The shelves were about 6 inches deep with a little lip at the front end of the shelf to keep the CDs in place and ran the entire length of a well-lit and wide hallway. Each piece of work we did for a client was given a case number and that number was stuck on a plastic card that stuck out a little farther than the paper jackets so you could walk down the hallway until you found the case number and all the associated media was to follow. The trick was to make sure you left a foot or two at the end of each shelf as a buffer space so you didn't have to move a load of media down to the next row when the top one got full (we were trying to keep them in numerical order)...

    While this seems an awful lot like many of the other "put it on a shelf" comments, not many people seem to realize that this method will still take up an awful lot of space. For example, you'd need 8 20 ft. shelves to store all that media by itself and probably another 1 or 2 shelves if they're organized as I've said above because of the extra dimension the jackets and plastic cards adds. If you're using commercially available shelves that are much thicker than 6 inches and with the shelves spaced a lot further apart (you only really need about 7 inches of clearance between shelves) you're wasting more room than you're using.

    In any case, the best solution is to just suck it up and move to a bigger office if you don't have the room for "media only" shelf space. The CD spindles idea really won't help you save space in the long run, not to mention having to sift through a spindle of 100 CDs just to find the one or two you need not to mention that you'd be leaving most of them less than full from randomly removing CDs.

  75. Can-Am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have four of the Can Am storage cabinets. They work as advertised, last for years. However, assembly is a little bit of a chore and moving them isn't exactly easy either. It's a love/hate thing but it's hard to find another solution with that volume & modularity.

  76. Buy a real storage system from EMC or NetApp by mre5565 · · Score: 1

    Read from CD or DVD write to disk protected with RAID.

    30,000 DVDs at say 4 GB each is 120,000 GB, or 120 TB.

  77. Here's exactly what you need by Animats · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what you need:
    DVD Storage Box - Corrugated Cardboard Holds 108 DVDs. 17x11-3/4x15-1/2. "Comes with 2 sets of 6 cell partitions and an interlocking lift-out tray. This allows for easy access to DVDs stored on bottom. Made from 275# test brown corrugated. Comes with a 3" deep cover and die-cut handle holes for easy transport." $11 each.

    Then get some standard steel shelving designed for records boxes, and you'll be able to store about 1200 disks per 4 lineal feet of shelf space and still get at the disks. Since they're standard sized records boxes, any records-retention warehouse, like Iron Mountain, can store them for you.

  78. Ok, ignore the ignats and... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Check out Wright-Line. http://www.wrightline.com/

    Something in the Optimedia line should be a winner: http://www.wrightline.com/productDetail.asp?Produc tID=35&ProductCategoryID=13&SubCategoryID=0

    Their stuff is tough, flexible, and if all else fails they can build you the fixtures you want/need.

    Disclaimer: I do NOT work for, nor have ANY relationship with Wright-Line, save having been a satisfied customer in the past.

    YMMV.

    rick

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  79. Stakka Insanita by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Besides at a price (newegg) of $115 each that is $34,500.00. That is insane.
    Not insane. Just a minor variation of Hanlon's law: never attribute to insanity that which can be sufficiently explained by an inability to read — especially on Slashdot!
  80. Sleeve City options by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 1

    The boxes on this page have been on my "to buy" list for a while:

    http://www.sleevetown.com/cd-storage.shtml

    --
    "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
  81. Contact Imelda Marcos, Phillipines by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    Reports vary, but she at one time owned between 1,060 and 3,000 pairs of shoes; she might be willing to part with a few of the shoeboxes (at size 8 1/2, the boxes are just about right for a CD or DVD -- at least that's the system I use...)

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  82. Solution.. by fiendy · · Score: 1

    A rod. Like a coat-rack. Well plenty of them, have them removable in sections of 100-200 discs, since you dont need frequent access to them. Catalog them and you're done.

    Just make sure the room is not exposed to sunlight, and doesn't get too dusty, i.e. keep them away from the floor.

  83. RAID USB 2.0 DRIVES by i621148 · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTool s/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1784288&Sku=B175-1008

    30000 DVDs X 5 GB ISO FILES = 150000 GB
    150000 GB / 300 GB = 500 EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES
    500 EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES X $114.99 = $57,495

    1. Re:RAID USB 2.0 DRIVES by geekoid · · Score: 1

      it would need to be mirroer, RAID, and room to grow. So triple your price, plus maintainence.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. CD Racks... by dizman · · Score: 1

    I don't know where they got it, but my local used cd store has a giant rack of CD's on the wall behind the counter. The CD's go in individual slots (sans case), perpendicular to both the wall and the floor. Each slot is numbered. There are maybe 10 rows high, with maybe 25-50 CD's in each row, per foot of wallspace. So with 60-120 feet of wallspace, you could get 30,000 CD's in there. If anyone actually cares, email me at dizman101 *at* gmail *dot* com, and, I'll ask next time I go in there.

  85. Media Storage by Servo · · Score: 1

    One solution...

    Something like this will hold 1000+ CD's per unit. There are quite a few companies all over that specialize in media storage and have similar solutions. I found the link above in about 30 seconds by googling "tape media storage". Most of the vendors who do datacenter media storage also carry units that hold CD's.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  86. Store them in a dumpster by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    which is only emptied every several months

  87. Ask a DJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of DJs haul around tens of thousands of CDs, or used to before MP3 decks matured. There'd plenty of DJ equipment for hauling and stacking CDs.

    Get a DJ case which will fold up and stack nicely, and put the CDs in sleeves.

    Or, with the same sleves, go with a filing cabinet design, such as what the library uses for microfilm. Here's one example.

  88. Boxem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen lots of suggestions to use the cake boxes.

    I had a different solution for my cdrom needs.

    I got one of those 5.25"x5.25" CD boxes and a bunch of little sleves for the cd's. I fit about 100/box. One can get about 7 boxes accross on a 3' wide 2' deep book shelf. You can
    fit about 10 shelves in a 6' area. That's 70 boxes of 100 per bookshelf, or 7000 cd's. It would take 5 bookshelves to service the need.

    The next bit is the clever part. Assign each one a serial number. Mark it on the sleve and cd/dvd. Use excel, or similar, to log the numbers. This excel will get large, so maybe a database might be in order. Especially one that can tie the serial numbers back to a 'case number' that can then be used to purge the cd's later when the case is resolved. Keep the cd/dvd sorted by number in these boxes. Once a week, purge all the obsolete cd's from this collection. Once a month or quarter, condense the boxes and re-label them. Since you only ever append, the condensing process would be easy.

    Since this is a 'paper pushing' excersize, it doesn't have to be perfect. Just good enough to find the cd if the need arises. Keep the 'working copy' on a server somewhere that's read-only for normal day-to-day use.

    1. Re:Boxem! by quan74 · · Score: 1

      Why not take this one step further, and rather than hand jamming all the information into excel, and writing on the jackets, pick up a bar code scanner and label printer. When a Disc comes in, print a label on the sleeve, stack it on the shelf (in the order received), and when the project is finished, pull it off and hand it back to the customer or destroy it. A nice database could easily be set up using the bar codes to track everything.

  89. Ask a librarian by djfiander · · Score: 1

    Try Brodart or Vernon (just a couple of examples) for custom storage solutions for the library market. They're quite happy to sell to anybody, even in small quantities. Searching either site for "CD Storage" should take you to the good stuff.

  90. at the radio station i work at........ by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    we designed our own incredibly simply shelves. we are a low budget college radio station that still plays actual CDs and vinyl, as opposed to digital files. one of our members designed these maybe 14 years ago. they allow for easy shuffling because we add about 100 CDs a week to our collection.

    not sure if this is quite what you would want, but we have a zillion CDs and these shelves work well. we just keep running out of space to put more.
    our shelves are basically 8 feet tall (can be as tall as the ceiling allows) and made from 1"x6" wood at whatever length. we left about 8" between shelves for filing simplicity. in our case that works. if you pull one CD to play it, you rotate the CDs next to it 90 degrees so it's quick to file after your show. that shelf spacing makes them fit DVDs perfectly. the original WKDU shelves were built 4'x8x or 2'x8' because the backerboard sheets come in standard 4x8 foot dimensions (needed for the freestanding shelves).

    i have made some for my house and some friends. they would be simple to make, or have made. they literally require a saw, router and some nails or screws. they could be made with nicer wood and stained and whatever, or they can be made cheap for under $40 each 4'x8' shelf.

    some pix here of my home brew version:
    http://web.mac.com/johnpaul/iWeb/xjohnpaulx/Projec ts/56B6900B-020D-4A82-9E42-5C8D641E59A2.html

  91. Everyone is completely wrong... by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    Obviously to fit the most CDs in the smallest place, you're going to want to crush them or melt them. (Remember, you already have the data backed up, so it's ok!) CDs don't melt so well and tend to give off toxic fumes when heated, so I'd suggest crushing. Here's what you'll need:

    1. A garage with a smooth concrete floor and sturdy walls.
    2. A wood chipper
    3. A small steam roller (or modified zamboni)

    Simply aim the chipper at the middle of the room and toss the CDs in after they are backed up. Once a week, smooth everything out with the steam roller. Have fun!

  92. Current method by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    I understand that this is the method your husband is currently using?

    http://static.flickr.com/14/89383054_29028960aa.jp g?v=0

    I don't see any problems with it, that's exactly how I do it...

  93. from the experience of a used CD/DVD retailer by joseph.bartolotta · · Score: 1

    In the record store i worked at we would fit about 7500 discs in two of these stacked on top of each other: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =7543505009&category=3299 (i'm not sure this is the exact model...) we would buy cases of individual cd sleeves to keep our discs in: http://www.shop4tech.com/item2161.html number them sequentially with a sharpie at the top, one disc in each side of the sleeve and you could fit 7500 discs in a shelving system that's about 3 ft. wide and 18" deep... throw a label on the front of each drawer to say the number range, and keep a database of what is where. i think that's the smallest storage area you'll achieve in a very organized manner. but as said above, you'll probably want an intern to do this for you. -joe

  94. Most cities have them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's called a landfill

  95. Can-Am by adewolf · · Score: 1

    I have been using the Can-Am storage for my CDs since about 1997. I have 3500 CDs in sleeves, not jewel cases, and have space for about 3000 more. It's a great but pricy system.

    --
    "The Brady Bunch is back...working homicide"
  96. Vaultz CD cabinate by plebeian · · Score: 1

    I have found the Vaultz 4 drawer CD cabinet a good solution for our smaller requirement 4,000 disks. Holding 660 disks vertically in a 16X16X14" enclosure it was the best off the shelf solution I could find. As it is a cheep filing cabinet it only works as well as the filing system. They are available at a number of sources including officedepot.

    --
    "I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
  97. Big Tape Storage Silos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you checked with the big tape storage silo vendors - Sun/STK?
    EMC has a line of equipment for storage tied to an HSM solution that should help you maintain the catelogue of disks/tapes and different performance disk storage.

    In 1993, I bought an "optical jukebox" for a very similar purpose. After it fell over on someone and cost the government $250,000 in medical bills, we were able to give it to a different project.

  98. This is a trivial problem... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    1. A CD (700MB) is a few cents of disk space on modern hard disks. (3 gigs per dollar is common, so 700Mb would cost you less than $0.25) You can easily add a few terrabytes of fault tolerant network attached storage in a box. I'd compare the prices of ready made devices against cases full of SATA drives in a software RAID-5, witha gigabit ethernet connecting them. Copy the CD to a .ISO image on a file server. Check sums against the physical disc and the image. Save the MD5 or SHA sum along side the image for future checking.

    2. Link from your client's file to the mounted .ISO image on disk. (INSTANT ACCESS!)

    3. File the physical disc as a backup, keeping track of a disc number, spindle number, and shelf number in your client's file, where you need the CD.

    4. If neccessary, burn another copy of out-of-state storage.

    Andy Out!

  99. Automated system by parcanman · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there's a system out there which works like a giant CD jukebox, where it keeps all the CDs stored and can robotically find any disc through a database? I know there's systems like this for archiving documents, and some TV stations used to use a system like this with a robotic arm to archive video tapes and automatically load them to run the scheduled shows.

    --
    Why lie when you can just make up stuff and claim it to be true?
  100. Well.. by apraetor · · Score: 1

    How does Netflix manage their inventory?

  101. Depends... by countach · · Score: 1

    Depends how often you need to retrieve them. If the answer is "basically never" then label them and throw it in a dumpster. If it is the million to one time you need to retrieve one, you hire the interns to go dumpster diving. Okay, use small dumpsters to make it at least more viable.

  102. Can-Am Cabinets are excellent by dpm67 · · Score: 1

    The Can-Am cabinets are excellent for storage of a lot of media. While you can probably find some other solutions for even higher desity storage, these probably cannot be beat for the price. They are made of a decent gauge steel, so they are heavy duty and can take some abuse. I would say they are better quality construction than most office style file cabinets. And they look good enough for home use, which is where I have mine. You can order them in a variety of configurations and with or without a formica top. They are built to accomodate regular DVD's and CD's in their original retail style packing. However, if you stored the discs in sleeves, you could store a ton of discs in each drawer. Just would probably want to use something as separators for easier indexing.

  103. A useful suggestion - check out Vaultz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ideastreamproducts.com/vaultz/CDCab.htm l

    I was in a simliar situation about a year ago. We now have well over 2000 CDs stored nicely in four large chests of drawers. The 4 drawer units is about $120 and then the sleeves (tabbed and individual) where $15/100

    Cost for 2000 Disc storage:

    4 chests @ 120/piece: $520
    20 packages of cd folders @ 15/piece: $300

    Total: $820 (free shipping, no tax)

    The drawers are pretty sturdy, easily accessed.

  104. Two Thinges: Med. Records & Ye Olde 9-Track Ta by itomato · · Score: 1

    Look into:

    * the storage methods/solutions for patient records (folders, color coding, space)

    * meeting with some olde tyme mainframers or data secretaries to find out their system for handling reels of mag tape.

    If operations are dependant on keeping these things around, storage space may have to be/become part of their scope.

  105. Automated inventory picking robot! by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

    However a simple automated parts inventory robot does exist. Previous mentions of "cake trays" means that the robot can store/retrive a cake tray, then the user can sort the disk out of this small quantity. Yes, manual labling would be necessary, but I remember these things on all the items in the grocery store...Oh yea! Bar Codes! Automated labling - just peel and stick! I am sure a numerical code is used to keep track of clients, so it makes sense!
    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
  106. because of the short service by axlr8or · · Score: 0

    Why not just dowel rods and felt washers? put a threaded handle at the top and tada. Label the handles. Low low tech. E z 2 make.

  107. Booklets, or ask a radio mega-station by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Reading the thread I see lots of "put 'em in milkcrate" type arguments, and lots of people saying "duplicate them to servers and screw the physical media", in contrast to the question, which states that after duplicating them, they have to keep them.

    I'd ask to tour a large radio company. They run off what sounds like NAS based systems now, rather than physical CDs, but I'm sure they have to store them somewhere.

    For my part, I wouldh have said booklets. 400CDs per book, 30,000 CDs, 100 booklets, 5" width per book, 500" of shelf space, it's a lot less than a law offices law library. I have about 1000 CDs, in like 4 books, Jewel cases are in boxes in the attic, music is all ripped. This could easily scale to their size especially if someone is being paid to maintain it.

  108. Highest density storage available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (...in a mass-market product, with tier-1 commercial support, that is. I'm sure you could hack something together that's both cheaper and higher density, but we'll assume for the moment that this is Important Stuff you're storing, and you care about quality.)

    http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/

    At $70K retail for 24TB that's a better deal than any top tier storage vendor's array you can find. And a rack of 10 of them puppies lists for $471K. I bet you can talk a sales weasel into a bit of a discount, too. :)

    Oh, and it runs Linux. 3

  109. Re:A company called SSI has exactly what you need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yikes. I can imagine OSHA having a field day with these powerful shredders. Would like to see the safety rules/mechanisms/documentation/etc for any facility that makes use of these.

  110. Tip from the olden days by Peter+(Professor)+Fo · · Score: 1
    If you don't need frequent access then all you really need is some high density storage scheme with a logical, position based, retrieval method and approximate indexing. The highest density is of course without any case or envelope. Some have suggested sliding onto a central spool but this is far inferior (in terms of random access and having all labels in the same orientation) to being filed on edge on two bars. (As in oOo where the O is the CD). Let's suppose you want to put some bars like this in a drawer, which way should the bars go? Probably front to back. Now all discs can be stored with the label/id in the same orientation.

    Now you have a sliced polyester saussage which needs 'book ends' to stop slumping. One end would be the back of the drawer and the other either a heavy lump or a magnet that sticks to the bottom of the drawer.

    What about access? Very simple. You know the dates of arrival so all you do is put a file card with the date on slipped between one day's batch and the next. Or if you seralise and keep a database do the same with each 50 discs. Write the date/serial on the corner of the card and it will show beyond the discs.

    Finally if thee is a certain amount of taking out and putting back you take a batch of 100, or a whole saussage and with a marker pen draw a line along the saussage at 12 o'clock in red so putting a small red blob on the edge of all discs. Now take say a blue marker pen and draw a line starting at one end of the saussage at say 11 o'clock and ending at the other end at say 1 o'clock, ie a diagonal line. This means that if a disc is replaced in the wrong position or a bunch have been removed you can see immediately by the discontinuity in the diagonal line.

  111. FTFA acronym by RoceKiller · · Score: 1

    Aren't there a slashdot FAQ somewhere?

    FTFA = (From The Fucking/Fine Article)

    1. Re:FTFA acronym by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      or "From the Featured Article" for those of us who "think of the children"

  112. Sleeves by Galley_SimRacer · · Score: 1

    I once stored 300 DVDs in a nightstand drawer with sleeves I picked up at CompUSA.

    --
    "I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet". Galley
  113. Anything with drawers... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I've looked at all the purpose-built CD racks around, and they are HORRIBLY designed. In earthquake country, you don't put CDs on a flat shelf, and expect them to stay there.

    The solution was a cheap, fairly small clothes dresser I found. They're perfectly protected from light, dust, etc., and quite easily accessible still. Plus, you get much more storage on each wall, compared to solutions that are only one CD deep.

    The one modification I made was to make it angle backwards by maybe 4 degrees, so even heavy shaking wouldn't possibly cause the drawers to slide all the way out (which could cause it to topple). Large filing cabinets already have such safety interlocks in place.

    So, all you need to do is find something with a large number of drawers, which are all only slightly (vertically) deeper than CDs/jewel-cases. Put the discs in paper sleves to save space and money.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  114. Wow, you're clearly in the wrong place by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Please turn in your nerd badge on your way out.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Wow, you're clearly in the wrong place by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      Are all the entries in?

      Good. Now, part two: Build it.

      I've seen many good suggestions from people who can imagine their own favorite solution, but I haven't yet heard from anyone who has actually done this.

      Edison's point, 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration, is fully applicable here. A rod through the middle seems like a simple, fairly intuitive solution until you actually start to build it.

      • You can't use a fluid support system, like ropes or chains, because if the rod swings at all the swinging motion is transferred to the disks and stresses them at the point (spindle mount) in a fashion completely foreign to their design specs. The mounting system must be rigid.
      • If you're planning to slide the disks along the rod to put them on or take them off, each disk is wearing it's spindle along a single point of contact. You'll need an interface to isolate the disk from the rod. An improvement would be to use this spacer to also isolate each disk from it's neighbor.
      • You might be able to make the support rod arbitrarily long, but the longer it gets, the more weight the rod must support, the heavier it becomes for whoever is expected to hold one end up as a disk is taken off or put on. They'll also need enough 'dead' length on the rod for whatever they're using to support it; that's one hand width if they're doing this by hand. Plus room enough to stand. On both ends...
      • There is also the problem of how to get a disk off if you need one from the center.
      • The maximum diameter of the spindle is limited by the hole in the CD/DVD and further limited by the spindle isolator. Longer rods make for more efficient use of space, but quickly become unwieldy. Support the rod in the middle, and you have an extra support you need to keep moving.
      • And, once you actually build it, you (re)discover what capacitance engineers and hard disk designers have known for years; this configuration (insulating surface seperated by an air gap) is a particulate magnet whenever both motion and particles are present. Of course, we could retrofit this solution into a multimillion dollar clean room to solve the problem....

      And don't even get me started on common mode failures. Did you ever buy a spindle of CDR's and find you couldn't get any of them from that spindle to burn properly? Have you ever dropped a spindle of CDR's and tried to burn them afterwords? Or looked at the mount under magnification afterwords?

      Let me know when you get your first one built.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

  115. Let the customer store his data! by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    Christ, I'd just copy the data to my servers and hand the discs back to the customer! Who wrote this unfair contract?

  116. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah - 98% of their "titles" are out at any given time. So if even one of the discs of The Way Things Go is out the "title" is out. I wonder if that is intentionally misleading so as to get some slack for their turnaround/wait time.

  117. Redneck Engineered... by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    Gee, I didn't know there were all these fancy solutions...

    I just used a piece of aluminum pipe hung between two brackets on the wall. We'd slip the CDs on the pipe. Cheap and easy. When the closet got full, we stuck a piece of rope through the pipe and let the CDs slide onto the rope. Made it easy to feed into the shreader. The shreader didn't like the rope, however. We also tried a bonfire, but man those CDs make for a thick black stinky smoke... The hot dogs tasted like crap after that. Plenty of beer solved that...

    --
    Place nail here >+
  118. Search "Media+Library+Storage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you're looking for is a specialized Library Media Storage Solution.

    Usually provided by Library Furniture Specialists and there are several companies out there.