Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Breached, Exposes 19,000 Identities

mytrip writes to tell us News.com is reporting that a recent attack on AT&T's systems saw thousands of customers' personal data compromised. About 19,000 customers of AT&T's online store who purchased equipment for a DSL connection were affected. From the article: "AT&T is offering to pay for credit monitoring services for customers whose accounts have been impacted because they could be at risk of identity fraud. The company also has made available a toll-free number to affected customers to call for more information."

17 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Perhaps an appropriate punishment by Bromskloss · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for using AT&T.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  2. O RLY? by abscissa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They will pay for credit monitoring services, but will they pay for all the liability from a stolen ID? That can reach into the hundreds of thousands of dollars in real damage.

    1. Re:O RLY? by TIMxPx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good point. I suppose that a person releasing 1 million copies of a CD should expect the same level of privacy as a person who submits encrypted credit card information. Oh wait, maybe not.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world: That averages about 660,000,000 of each kind.
    2. Re:O RLY? by jackbird · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It wasn't stolen, it was "shared". Making a copy doesn't take anything away from the original owners, right? They still have their names, social security numbers, etc.

      That's true. And if the identity thieves stop there, simply filing their collection of stolen identities away and displaying a few choice specimens above the mantle for when guests come over, I don't have a problem with it (well a small one, but I can deal).

      When the identity thieves use those stolen identities to clean out bank accounts, take out fradulent loans, and steal real, physical goods using credit cards in the victim's name, then they do take something the owner no longer has. IHBT. HAND.

  3. Thats exactly why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I choose to be an Anonymous Coward.

  4. Only "thousands"? by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Interesting
    thousands of customer's
    Wait, so an one-time spill of the data of just mere thousands of customers (no "'") are suddenly news, and everyone forgets about ongoing constant spilling of the data of 299 millions? Interesting...
    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:Only "thousands"? by azaroth42 · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Will the CTO of AT&T resign like AOL's did over the search history release, which was significantly less damaging than this.

      I'm putting my money on No, personally.

      -- Azaroth

    2. Re:Only "thousands"? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To you and the GP:
      This was a break-in, not a "spill", which was detected by AT;&T, on the weekend at which time they took very active measures (shutting down the site and contacting credit card companies). Sounds to me like they have some pretty good procedures in place already; you know, the kind of thing a CTO is responsible for.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  5. Re:not my fault... by legoburner · · Score: 4, Funny
    no wonder i have shitty credit... ppl keep stealing my identity... how do i start a new credit report?

    Steal someone's identity.
  6. Look, shit happens to the best of us. by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not saying AT&T is "the best of us," but your proposed remedies are fucking childish. Do you also support capital punishment for late pizza delivery?

  7. Re:"...customers were effected" by asylumx · · Score: 3, Informative

    While we're at it.... "thousands of customer's personal..." should be "thousands of customers' personal..." in the write-up. Why do we call the folks that run Slashdot "Editors" anyway?

  8. Stop collecting SS# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These companies need to stop collecting this information in the first place. There is no need for AT&T to have this at all to do their business. Last I checked they aren't the Social Security department.

  9. Good for them by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The news here isn't that some incompetent set up their systems, nor that they were cracked. The news is that they've responded openly and meaningfully, without trying to deny it or play down the scale of what happened. I wouldn't be hurrying to sign up to their service because of it, but it certainly doesn't bias me against them. Honesty and integrity are rare enough qualities in corporations that we should applaud them when they claw their way past the lawyers and PR weasels.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  10. It looks like . . . by Don_dumb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    . . . AOL is off the hook.

    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
  11. Steal identity? by homer_s · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can anyone steal someone else's identity? Oh, you mean they stole people's social security numbers. That should not be a problem, because as we all know, ss numbers are not meant to be used for identification.

    The real problem is companies and the govt using SS# for identification. At this point, about 50 ppl know my SS# - the librarian, the assistant at my school, the clerk in the bank, etc, etc. - so any of these people can harm if they don't like me for some reason? This is stupid.

    So what next? Some company decides they are going to use FIRSTNAME_LASTNAME as the id and we are all supposed to keep our names a secret? And run around complaining when our 'identity' (FIRSTNAME_LASTNAME) is stolen?

    In many countries, you need a notarised signature to obtain loans, etc. While not foolproof, you can always prove it was not you and it takes more effort to commit fraud.

  12. This goes back to the original problem.. by saboola · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You should not be able to do so much damage with a simple number and some extra data. It is ridiculous that armed with merely this amount of information one could cause so much damage. The system needs to be completely reworked.

  13. Looks like I was on that list by killermookie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This email contains important information that requires your immediate
    attention. Please do not reply to this e-mail; instead please use the
    telephone number provided below if you wish to contact us.

    You previously placed an order with AT&T for DSL-related equipment
    through the http://www.sbcdslstore.com/ Website, at which time you
    provided certain information including your name, address, e-mail
    address, phone number, credit card number and credit card expiration.
    (This information did not include your Social Security Number, Driver's
    License Number, date of birth, or other identifying information.) AT&T
    has learned that a computer containing the information you provided has
    been accessed by an unauthorized person, who may have obtained this
    information about you.

    In addition, AT&T also believes that some customers who purchased
    DSL-related equipment from us through this same website may be receiving
    e-mails that appear to be from AT&T, but actually are being generated by
    an unauthorized third-party (a practice known as "phishing"). These
    e-mails refer to your prior order with AT&T and request that you
    provide additional personal information such as your Social Security
    Number, date of birth, or another credit card number and expiration date.
    Please be advised that these e-mails are not being sent by AT&T and are not
    legitimate. Do not respond to these e-mails or otherwise provide any of your
    personal information in response or at any Website to which the e-mail may
    refer you.
    We sincerely regret that a third party was able to gain improper access
    to your order information and we are working diligently with law enforcement
    and major credit card companies to limit your potential exposure. Although
    your 3-digit credit card verification number (from the back of your card)
    was not stored, and therefore not accessed, we strongly suggest that you
    contact your credit card company directly to report this suspected incident
    and to protect the credit card you used to purchase this equipment from any
    unauthorized activity.

    In addition, we suggest that you contact the fraud departments of any one of
    the three major credit-reporting agencies and let them know you may be a
    potential victim of identity theft. That agency will notify the other two.
    Through that process, a "fraud alert" will automatically be placed in each
    of your three credit reports to notify creditors not to issue new credit in
    your name without gaining your permission. For your convenience, we have
    included contact information for all three credit reporting agencies:

    Equifax
    P.O. Box 740241
    Atlanta GA 30374
    To report fraud: 1-888-766-0008
    Website: http://www.equifax.com/

    Experian
    P.O. Box 2002
    Allen, TX 75013
    To Report Fraud: 1-888-397-3742
    Website: http://www.experian.com/

    TransUnion
    Post Office Box 6790
    Fullerton, CA 92834
    To Report Fraud: 1-800-680-7289
    Website: http://www.transunion.com/

    Lastly, to provide further security, AT&T is arranging to provide you the
    option of enrolling for one year, at no cost to you, in a credit monitoring
    service specifically designed to notify you of changes to your credit report
    activity in order to detect fraudulent bank or credit card use. The service
    will be provided by one of the major credit reporting agencies. We will
    provide specific information on this option as part of a letter you will
    receive via U.S. Mail in the next few days.

    Again, we regret this unauthorized and unlawful access to your order
    information and are working with law enforcement to pursue those who
    are responsible. We are also reviewing applicable security procedures
    in an effort to prevent an incident like this from recurring. Should yo