Slashdot Mirror


iTunes v6 FairPlay DRM Cracked

luaine writes with an Engadget article claiming the cracking of iTunes v6 FairPlay DRM. From the article: "[A] new app called QTFairUse6 looks like it can now be used (with some amount of difficulty) to dump iTunes version 6.0.4 - 6.0.5 files of their chastely protection." At present this is a Windows-only tool for those who are "not afraid to get [their] hands dirty with a little python." Engadget does not provide a link to QTFairUse6, and neither will we. We've run several DRM stories recently, but it's been 19 months since Cracking iTunes' DRM with JHymn.

28 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Uh... by IflyRC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe to keep from violating the DMCA?

  2. Macs have this ability - via iMovie by cultrhetor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You don't need a special software tool if you own a Mac. This is a fairly old trick - and time consuming - but it works pretty well. If you have the license for the piece of music (if you're on one of the five computers licensed to listen to the track), you can open it without problems in iMovie, save it as an AIFF file (uncompressed audio), and then import it into iTunes as an mp3 or whatever you choose. It works pretty well - and it's a bit of a lifesaver if your wife happens to crash her Windows box on a regular basis, forcing a reformat and reinstall about once every six months.

    --
    "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    1. Re:Macs have this ability - via iMovie by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate to sound like a troll but why do you use iTunes when you have these problems and say yourself that the fix is time consuming?

      I want a legal system, so I use allofmp3 (because it is legal in my country (the UK)), but isn't there any alternatives for you to iTunes without DRM at all?

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
  3. Re:Uh... by rob_squared · · Score: 5, Informative
    Any why won't you provide a link to the software?

    They won't, but I will: http://hymn-project.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=155 3

    --
    I don't get it.
  4. Re:Behold... by doxology · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve Jobs: Get these mother$@%@#$@ snakes off my mother%@$@#@@# OS!

    --
    sigfault. core dumped.
  5. A Link to a download by smitingpurpleemu · · Score: 4, Informative
  6. No, they don't. by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Informative

    iMovie works by decompressing and recompressing the music, resulting in a loss of quality. Apparently, this new software works by extracting the compressed stream after it has been decrypted, giving it the distinct advantage of being lossless.

    Of course, it doesn't do me any good, since it only works in Windows...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. Oh, NOW you won't link to it? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure, everybody will link to the tool that cracks Windows Media DRM, but when it's time to crack FairPlay people start getting self-righteous.

  8. DRM by daeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as I hate DRM, by buying the music from iTunes in the first place you are clearly stating your position that you will tolerate DRM. It's like buying a Ford and ripping the Ford emblem off the car and thinking that you're "sticking it to Ford." I have news for you: Ford (Apple) is laughing all the way to the bank.

    1. Re:DRM by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's like buying a Ford and ripping the Ford emblem off the car and thinking that you're "sticking it to Ford." I have news for you: Ford (Apple) is laughing all the way to the bank.

      Actually, it's not like that. It's like... the opposite of that. Or not really, but it's just not like that.

      There are a bunch of differences here, the first being that I don't know how a Ford logo is anything like DRM. You might not like the Ford logo, and ripping it off might be a cosmetic improvement (or not, depending on your opinion), but it doesn't inhibit your use of the car. Second, I can't think of a reason why Ford's suppliers would stop selling to Ford if their cars didn't have a Ford logo. It's generally believed, on the other hand, that Apple fought with the record companies because Apple didn't want to use DRM, but for the RIAA, it was a deal-breaker. No DRM, no music, hence no music store.

      In any event, I don't think people want to remove the DRM so they can "stick it to Apple". They buy from Apple because they like the service Apple is providing, and they strip the DRM because they don't like the DRM.

    2. Re:DRM by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If iTMS were a subscription service, I might be more inclined to agree with you. But it's not - you're buying the music for keeps, so it doesn't really matter ethically whether you strip the DRM or not, as long as you don't then go and violate copyright law.

  9. been there, done that by jltnol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this was tried before.... and the response from Apple was that if the file was downloaded, it was paid for. So, deleting the DRM, while not in Apple's best interest, isn't exactly the same as the WMA subscription problem, where songs that are "rented" could be owned. Let's face it, if you really want something for free, there are lots of places to get it... I just don't see the point of removing the DRM from a paid for iTunes file, because FairPlay does seem pretty generous with what you are allowed to do with it.

    1. Re:been there, done that by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just don't see the point of removing the DRM from a paid for iTunes file

      Two reasons:

      1. Sooner or later you will either lose your decryption key or want to use the file on an unsupported platform.
      2. It's the principle of the thing!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  10. Re:Behold... by legoburner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Programming language handles file input, processing and output. News at 11.00.

  11. Re:Another Stupid Headline by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Informative

    iTunes wasn't cracked. Fairplay DRM was cracked.

    And it wasn't even that. According to this forum entry, all the hack does is tie into the audio "output" side of iTunes and skim off the decoded AAC stream, writing it to a file. One step above grabbing it at the sound card, but certainly not a crack of the DRM itself.

    What's astounding is how many people seem to consider this "a step in the right direction," when it's really a "step in a totally different direction that will do nothing for actually breaking the DRM itself." Then again, maybe I shouldn't be *too* surprised.... :(

  12. nothing was cracked by vafada · · Score: 5, Informative

    FairPlay wasn't cracked.. this python script attaches to iTunes.exe..... reads the memory when you play a track and creates a dump for the AAC file... its a very nice scripts... but again... nothing was cracked

  13. Re:Google: QTFairUse6 (no results?) by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yahoo and MSN show results. Google does not. Good to see they're doing no evil.

    Haven't you heard? Google CEO joins Apple Board.

    Google have given up on 'do no evil' in favour of joining Apple ;-)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  14. With some amount of difficulty? by MDMurphy · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's the part that makes it worthless.

    Music from iTunes is already compressed a fair bit. Yes, you'll lose some fidelity, but the copy to CD and re-rip has always been there if you're not too picky but seriously DRM-phobic.

    But other than single-track purchasing, the whole point of the ITMS is convenience. If you want music a single click away it's there. If you want it a click away, but are willing to go through hoops to remove the DRM you kinda lost the convenience part, so what's the point?

    If you wanted cheap music, at least an ablbum at a time, borrowing or buying used CDs, ripping them yourself then returning ( or re-selling ) them is an option. If you look at the price of a used CD, minus the price you get selling it back the next day, it's going to be cost competitive with ITMS purchase. Heck, splitting the price of a new album with 2 friends and you all rip it before selling it is going to be a better price. Illegal, yes, but no more so than de-DRMing

    So if that's an option, why would you buy from ITMS in the first place if you're going to go through pains to de-DRM it? Poor impulse control? If you can get it for the same price ( or cheaper ) by getting the CD and ripping yourself AND less hassle than removing DRM, why not do just that?

    Which is why I think any DRM removal that is more than a single click just silly.

    1. Re:With some amount of difficulty? by sobachatina · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Illegal, yes, but no more so than de-DRMing

      I disagree. I personally feel that copyright infringement is dishonest. I don't feel that breaking the DMCA and circumventing DRM for fair use reasons is dishonest. I want to be able to honestly pay for the music that I want for a reasonable price. iTunes is one way of doing that. I also want to be able to play that music on whatever player I want. This requires the DRM to go away.

      the whole point of the ITMS is convenience.

      I agree that convenience is a big selling point but for a lot of people it is not more convenient than finding the torrent file. It is much more honest. The best solution would be a convenient service through which I could buy the music I want unencumbered by DRM. I don't know of one.

  15. Re:Another Stupid Headline by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative
    all the hack does is tie into the audio "output" side of iTunes and skim off the decoded AAC stream,

    Not quite. It grabs the audio when it is decrypted, but not yet decoded. I.e. it grabs the raw AAC frames. These can then be inserted into a proper container file and tagged with metadata. This process needs to be automated, but it should be soon.

    The good thing about this approach is that, unlike capturing the audio, it accesses it before the AAC stream has been decompressed, meaning that you don't have to recompress it, adding artefacts.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  16. Re:Uh... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was actually referencing a popular, sarcastic photoshop (http://www.pensitoreview.com/images/art-gop-fasci sm-poster.jpg)

  17. Re:Another Stupid Headline by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it wrong? No.
    Is it illegal? Probably.
    Was it really dumb to spend $1,000 on DRMed music? Yep.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  18. Re:Another Stupid Headline by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why cant they just make an iPod phone? 90% of college kids would buy them.

    Wired had a good print article on that a few months ago. Summary: you have to get a cell carrier to distribute the phones, and none of them want to let you upload music to your phone for free instead of making you pay to send it through their data network.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  19. Re:Uh... by LexNaturalis · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Any why won't you provide a link to the software?
    The editor(s) actually lied (or are ignorant). Engadget has a link to the software so all you have to do is go to the Engadget story and click "Read" and it sends you straight to the forum where you can download the software. It seems that Either the editor(s) or the submitter didn't even both to follow the link from Engadget.
    --
    Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
  20. Re:Another Stupid Headline by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, we Americans don't want any of that Socialist crap like they have in Europe! We're all about capitalism here, and free markets with businesses unfettered by government regulation! If the market wanted unlocked, non-crippled phones, we'd have them. But the market has decided, and it wants crippled phones!

    Pah! Those Europeans and their "free choice" crap... Next thing you know, they'll be talking about how they need more than two political parties to choose from!

  21. Re:Psst... here ya go by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Here's a link: www.google.com

    <span style='voice: Mick Dundee' >

    That's not a link, that's a link

    </span>

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  22. Re:that doesn't make sense by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because getting your iTunes downloads to play on stuff other than your iPod, without spending time burning a CDRW, is not criminal. You've paid for it, after all.

    Does wanting to format-shift my paid content easily constitute dishonesty? If you think so, I would kindly say, "Fuck you."

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  23. Re:Uh... by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Informative

    It works, and works well.

    Also, it doesn't actually require any mucking about in python; it works out of the box, once python's installed. If you're mucking about, it better be to add 'faad -a dump_xx.decoded.aac dumpxx.aac' to the end of the dump process.

    Meanwhile, the link in the forum linked by the engadget article is to rapidshare.de. I hate these things, and I assume most others do. Additionally, that zip doesn't have FAAD in it. So, I took the liberty of putting it in and hosting it myself. It's not offshore, and I'm nothing like anonymous, so the first Cease and Desist will get it off my site. If I get a lawsuit instead, you can be sure I'm going to grab the EFF's attention on the matter.

    QTFairUse w/ FAAD
    Python 2.4.3 (required)

    Enjoy!
    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1