Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Snooping Your Surfing For Targeted Ads?

Jewfro_Macabbi writes, "Recently after browsing major online retailers for Bluetooth adapters, I went to Amazon.com to find front-page ads for, you guessed it, Bluetooth adapters. Disable cookies, the ads go away; re-enable cookies and the ads re-appear. The EULA is ambiguous as usual. Try it for yourself and see."

124 comments

  1. not the same experience by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I too tried to shop for bluetooth devices at a major online retailer... then I went to Amazon.com. Not a single reference anywhere to any bluetooth devices. For me the experiment ends there. I had cookies turned on (always do), and was logged into both sites with an account login.

    Aren't "other" cookies supposed to be invisible to a domain application? I thought so. So, is there a possibility you are surfing at some retailer that has a partnership of some kind with amazon (many do), and hence the information is shared in a partnership, but not across the proscribed browser boundaries?

    1. Re:not the same experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't "other" cookies supposed to be invisible to a domain application? I thought so.

      Technically, they should be "invisible" to other sites. But in the past there have been reports of versions of Firefox with a bug that allows for cookies to be visible between unrelated sites.

      To the best of my knowledge, browsers like Safari, Konqueror, Opera, Camino, Seamonkey, Galeon2, Lynx, and Internet Explorer have not experienced a similar bug. Consider the fairly wide use of Firefox, it could be that this gentleman was using a version that was susceptible to the aforementioned bug.

    2. Re:not the same experience by erasmix · · Score: 1

      I instruct Mozilla to ask me everytime a new cookie us comming in. I accept cookis from the stite I'm shopping at, but block cookies from outside and from sites like ads.site_Im_shopping.whatever. I also use ad block to block everything that is not relevant content. I can't stand ads and I dont wanna be tracked.

    3. Re:not the same experience by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Aren't "other" cookies supposed to be invisible to a domain application?

      Right. But not all cookies from a given web page necessarily come from a single domain. For example, if you browse a page from bluorus.com that contains a graphic served by amazon.com, you'll get cookies from both domains. Often the graphic is a "web bug": a 1 pixel by 1 pixel file whose only purpose is to create a tracking cookie.

      Obviously this isn't going to happen unless the web sites you browse have an affiliation with Amazon (or whoever). So you and Jewfro got different results because you browse different web sites.

      Note to editors: be more sceptical of scandals reported by users with handles like "Jewfro".

    4. Re:not the same experience by Nimloth · · Score: 1
      "Recently after browsing major online retailers for Bluetooth adapters, I went to Amazon.com to find front-page ads for, you guessed it, Bluetooth adapters. Disable cookies, the ads go away; re-enable cookies and the ads re-appear. The EULA is ambiguous as usual. Try it for yourself and see."
      I think they took it off, cause all I see is ads for penis enlargement :/
    5. Re:not the same experience by Adumbration · · Score: 1

      I just tried this as well, and could not duplicate the poster's experience.

      Amazon does display certain widgets to help you find related items. For example, they have:
      - Recommendations based on products you have purchased, rated, etc., on Amazon
      - Recently view items based on products you have browsed on Amazon
      - Related items based on your searches on Amazon

      To the poster: can you be more specific in what you did?

      My guess is that you went to Amazon and either did a search or looked at a product, etc., and you just forgot. Don't forget that if you do a Google search and land on an Amazon page, then obviously that becomes part of your recently viewed items.

  2. How long did it take you? by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How long did it take you to figure that out Jewfro_Macabbi?

    To my end user (of Amazon.com) knowledge, they have been doing this for at least a couple of years. Of course, the problem with the EULA is that the cookie is set as soon as you visit unless you explicitly disable cookies.

    Of course being anonymous is getting harder and harder these days (especially if you are surfing from a place that is having packets sniffed by someone like the NSA. (for kicks do a traceroute (*NIX and OS X, tracert on Windows) on NSA.gov from where you are and look for the AT&T hub that is splitting the traffic (The AT&T hub for my traffic is tbr1013801.dvmco.ip.att.net). I know my packets are sniffed coming from an edu domain as well.......

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:How long did it take you? by cuban321 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah cause you know... AT&T couldn't just be their upstream provider or anything. /tinfoil

    2. Re:How long did it take you? by Afecks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, you mean when I go to www.nsa.gov my packets can be sniffed by AT&T and then given to the NSA? What kind of twisted Orwellian nightmare has this world become?!

    3. Re:How long did it take you? by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is from a story that was broken some time ago and is commonly known about. See this article on Wired or this article on Slashdot.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    4. Re:How long did it take you? by cuban321 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (Offtopic, but oh well I couldn't resist)

      You seem to have a lack of understanding about how the Internet works. I go through qwest to get to /.-- that doesn't mean qwest is "sniffing" my traffic. It simply means qwest is a provider who is peered with speakeasy (my ISP) and savvis (apparently Slashdots' provider).

      Do you really think the NSA wouldn't use transparent ethernet taps anyways? And do you really think the NSA would have all that traffic dumped back to "nsa.gov"?

    5. Re:How long did it take you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this bullshit story before, and there's a huge problem with it. If AT&T is providing the NSA with their backbone connection, then anyone who visits www.nsa.gov will be going through AT&T. How else would your traffic reach their site if it doesn't go through their backbone provider?

      If you really want to see if your traffic is going through AT&T, then you have to determine if they're YOUR backbone provider. To do that, you need to find a site that you know isn't downstream of AT&T, then traceroute to it. If your traffic still goes through AT&T, then they're your upstream provider. And that isn't a completely reliable test, since some ISPs have more than one upstream and route traffic on the one that is most efficient, depending on where those packets need to go. To really make sure, you need to traceroute to several different sites. Watch the results of each traceroute. The first hops will usually not change, unless, as I said, your ISP is multi-homed. What will change is the latter part of the results. The change will occur at the point where your ISP's backbone provider peers with the provider serving the site you are trying to reach. Now, just because YOUR backbone isn't AT&T, this doesn't mean your traffic isn't being sniffed when it hits their network on the way to the site you're trying to reach. This also assumes that other providers didn't also cooperate with the government, and, frankly, we don't know the answer to that.

      There's nothing wrong with being concerned over this, but, for God's sake, at least know what you're talking about before spouting overly simplistic tests that reveal nothing.

  3. How was this accepted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way amazon could know you were looking for an item would be if they themselves set the cookie. I think you'll find one of the retailers you visited was an amazon shop or the like. I don't use these 'one-click' pioneers myself but this is just bullshit!

    1. Re:How was this accepted? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      I actually did a more thourough test. I did not just "browse" major online retailers. I went shopping online for Jihad videos (just to see), lo and behold when I return to Amazon I am offered books and films about Islam. I may also be getting a visit from the secret police soon, but hey...

    2. Re:How was this accepted? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Can you provide some links to the websites you went to?

    3. Re:How was this accepted? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Nope, didn't happen to me.

  4. Known issue by XanC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's not claiming Amazon hacked his browser. It's been known for ages that if two sites both use the same ad company to display ads, that your activity on both sites can be linked. He's saying Amazon is using these data to target ads on their front page.

    1. Re:Known issue by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      She is not saying... I'm not a he))

    2. Re:Known issue by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I would go to sites that had some code or other that would go to amazon, they would read my cookie and then feed a message to be displayed on that non amazon site. I don't think the site ever got any information but I suspect they got some sort of kickback from amazon.

      I ticked me off enough I just have their cookies deleted automatically when the session is over.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  5. A9 or Alexa Toolbar by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder if the original submitter happens to browse with the A9 or Alexa toolbars enabled? Both are subsidiaries of Amazon.com. One would need to review their EULA's though to see if said info can be used to target shopping ads from their own site.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    1. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      No, I don't have either, and wouldn't. It's not that Amazon set a cookie, it's that they obviously are browsing through other cookies, propably looking for keywords to target ads.

    2. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      it's that they obviously are

      Why is it "obvious"? They're doing something that's not feasible unless they own or are affiliated with the retailers you visited. When I read what you said, that was my "obvious" conclusion, not "OMG, they're snooping, it's obvious".

    3. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by fermion · · Score: 2, Informative

      While toolbars are the logical explanation, it could be that this person normally runs with cookies wide open. This means that the web usages is being tracked by the affiliate cookies. Though cookies are set up to be read only by the site that set them, most sites get around this by having double click, 2o7, etc set root tracking cookies. Therefore the average person, lets say the majority of the majority that still run IE wide open, is well tracked. It would be trivial to expand this to coded shopping categories. For the average user it might be a valuable service, and others should learn to accept only root cookies.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I went and visited foreign based Islamic web sites for products, and Amazon recommended Islamic books and films after. I'm not seeing it as likely Amazon has partnerships with these companies....

    5. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by Technician · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While toolbars are the logical explanation, it could be that this person normally runs with cookies wide open.

      Running AdAware and having a good hosts file go a long way in keeping the advitisers from setting tracking cookies.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it's that they obviously are browsing through other cookies, propably looking for keywords to target ads.

      Cookies don't contain keywords or anything of the sort. There is no way they could be getting that information from a cookie that they don't control.

    7. Re:A9 or Alexa Toolbar by udderly · · Score: 1

      I tried it with Firefox, IE and Opera...no dice on any of them. On Opera and Firefox I even allowed cookies from the sites I visited.

  6. Amazon hosting? by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems more like amazon is hosting these major retailer's websites. For example, if you go to target.com it says on the bottom right, "Powered by Amazon.com". Amazon has their hands in a lot of retailers pockets. Mostly because it is just easier to pay amazon to do it than it is to set it all up yourself. Especially when amazon.com is a "proven" website.

    1. Re:Amazon hosting? by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, amazon has pretty amazing fulfulment and warehousing. They carry almost everything so why not ship from them and make more money?

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  7. Buy It On.... by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    While searching a bit torrent site for old episodes of La Femme Nikita, I was regaled by an ad which read:
    "Can't find La Femme? Buy it on eBay!"

    Really. Just a rental as per usual, or an all out purchase?
    Can I take it for a test drive?
    The shipping would probably be horrendous. I'll bet they sell them "pick up only". Which is, after all, the usual way. So who needs eBay?

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Buy It On.... by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      "While searching a bit torrent site for old episodes of La Femme Nikita, I was regaled by an ad which read: "Can't find La Femme? Buy it on eBay!""


      Of course this is Google AdSense (or possibly Overture) trying to provide keyword-targeted ads, based on your search term. The ads probably aren't even placed by EBay. If you click, some EBay affiliate pays Google some small fee, and you go to EBay tagged with an affiliate code. If you buy anything on EBay, they get a piece of the listing and final value fees charged to the seller, plus if you're new to EBay, they get a new customer bounty.

      Using pay-per-click advertising to drive traffic to merchants where you get an affiliate payment is a narrow-margin business and requires very smart tweaking and tuning of your keyword selections and bid amounts, but if you can do it at a high enough volume, you can make some serious coin.

      - GB

    2. Re:Buy It On.... by zxking · · Score: 1

      Well, you could also watch the old episodes of La Femme Nikita for free

      in their entirety, on AOL's broadband TV channel In2TV

  8. Re:Jewfro_Maccabi? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

    There is nothing anti-semite about the nickname.

    Jewfro = A type of hairstyle.
    Maccabi = Courage, Victory, Success.

  9. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. The language in the GP is a bit unnecesary but the editor who contributed the article needs to do better. Mod up the GP to set an example.

  10. It's actually... by ericdano · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's actually a Ninja named Roger who's pissed at him. He's waiting for the author to click on the wrong link.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  11. And?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Hey nitwit, do you want random stupid commercials or commercials that you might actually be interested in?

    Personally if I'm have to watch commercials (for free programming or whatever) then I damn well would rather watch something that might interest me.

    1. Re:And?? by causality · · Score: 1

      No commerical ever interests me. When I am making a purchasing decision, I seek out unbiased sources of information. All commerical fail that requirement.

      The only thing that amazes me is that people respond to advertising so well as they do.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  12. I was looking at this the other day... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am building a website on website traffic tips n tricks and stumbled upon this...
    Retargeting
    I am 90% sure that this is what they are doing or some variation thereof. Inexpensive service that should work well.




    Place a curse in the RIAA/MPAA.

    1. Re:I was looking at this the other day... by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Inexpensive service that should work well.

      Step 4: The consumer returns to your site to complete the sale.

      Now you have the ability to send visitors directly to your "here is where we close the sale" page by doing some or all of the following:

      * Send them directly to the ordering page of the product they looked at before leaving.

      That should work well... if your intention is to make your potential customers think you are stalking them!

    2. Re:I was looking at this the other day... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

      OK, yeah. It is kinda creepy. But most of your average joe's won't get it and most folks that are looking to buy something won't/don't look that hard. Especialy for stuff less that 20-30 bucks. Impulse purchase range. Having the stuff they are looking for right on the front page is good for your business and easy/useful/valueable for the average Joe as well. What he was looking for came right up.

    3. Re:I was looking at this the other day... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I see the retargeting banner ads all over my traffic analysis site and was wondering if anybody here had actually tried it and what, if any, their results were.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:I was looking at this the other day... by dean.collins · · Score: 1

      i've noticed that www.sitemeter.com pushes a lot of ads for retargetting.com

      not sure how widespread their memeber sites are as never looked into it but sounds like a good idea to me.

      Dean

    5. Re:I was looking at this the other day... by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 1

      I have had this "retargeting" happen to me and was annoyed. I could not get enough info rom other vendors becuase so many links retargeting a single vendor kept showing up in searches. This concept is bad for the consumer and I tend to not buy from companies that do this becuase I find this practice a deception.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
  13. my test by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After clearing my cache/cookies/etc, I closed and then reopened Firefox. I went to google and did a search for "bluetooth adapters." I middle clicked on everything on the results page except the amazon.com link. I then opened a new tab and went to amazon.com. They wanted to sell me LCD TVs, an electric toothbrush, some DVD box sets, iPod and cell phone cases, purses and messenger bags, and some watches. No bluetooth devices at all. Go figure...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:my test by Gemini_25_RB · · Score: 1

      Same for me. Except there were a _lot_ of sandals on the page too. Who knew sandals came in bluetooth variety?

    2. Re:my test by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Informative

      I tried it again cos I like repeatability. This time I also clicked on all of the google "sponsored links." This time amazon wanted me to buy a Creative Zen, a smattering of sandals (guess it's time to clear out all those summer sandals), some Sony hifi stuff, pants and dresses, more shoes, and some more watches. Still no bluetooth stuff. However, if I click the amazon link from my bluetooth search and then open a new window and go to amazon.com via the address bar, the front page is chock full o' bluetooth adapters (with some sandals and watches at the bottom). Clearly Jewfro clicked on an amazon or target link earlier in his journeys in the tubes.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
  14. Simple solution by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    A browser feature to block cookies that either: a) originate from a different domain than the top-level page or b) ignore cookies sent with non-HTML pages. I got the latter idea from CGIProxy.

    Firefox doesn't seem to have anything like this. Internet Explorer can be configured to block all "third-party" cookies. Opera doesn't appear to have anything like this either.

    Of course with Firefox you can get rid of the cookies as a side effect if you use Adblock or otherwise block ads.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) originate from a different domain than the top-level page

      What is the "for the originating site only" checkbox for in Firefox then?

    2. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the following option in Firefox blocks third-party cookies?

      Tools | Options | Privacy | Cookies
      Allow sites to set Cookies
        [] for the originating site only

    3. Re:Simple solution by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1
      Firefox doesn't seem to have anything like this. Internet Explorer can be configured to block all "third-party" cookies. Opera doesn't appear to have anything like this either.


      You know, it's amazing what you can find when you check the Cookies options/preferences when looking for Cookie settings.

      Firefox 1.5: Tools, Options, Privacy, Cookies, "for the originating site only" checkbox

      Opera 9: Tools, Preferences, Advances, Cookies, "Accept only cookies from the site I visit" radio button
      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    4. Re:Simple solution by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I didn't say Firefox 1.5. Firefox 2 lacks the options you described, and I can't figure out what the about:config variable name for it is. I managed to look right over that Opera one (didn't realize it was what I was looking for).

  15. I Found Out The Hard Way by FreeRadicalX · · Score: 1

    I found out about the in the worst way possible a few months back. Me and a buddy were searching for artwork by Stephen Gammell, the illustrator of those infamous creepy Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark books. It was late at night and we were getting creeped out just looking at the artwork. But imagine then, going to Amazon to buy one of the books only to find that THE BOOKS ALREADY KNEW WE WANTED TO BUY THEM, and had marched to Amazon's front page to greet us with their hideous covers before we even got there.

    Needless to say, no books were bought that evening.

    1. Re:I Found Out The Hard Way by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      Where my pops worked recently, a guy had a heart attack. They knew CPR and kept him going, but couldn't get his heart to beat on its own. The next day I went to amazon.com and the front page ad was for a defibrilator.

      True story.

  16. it's called the internet by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    What, are you new to this whole internet thing? Of course online marketers store your browsing information and sell it, that's how they exist. Are you also suprised at where all those 2o7.net cookies came from, and confused as to why some sites need to load images from dozens of different servers?

    Of course, it could also be that you're the kind of person who shops for things like bluetooth adapters on amazon and other sites in the past. So when you went back to amazon during this session they were using your past browsing on amazon to suggest something that you actually need.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    1. Re:it's called the internet by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      I wasn't going to Amazon to shop, but to look up some info on a book. I've never bought any bluetooth from Amazon. I also did a more thourough test. I went browsing round and about online for Jihad videos for a while. Then when I return to Amazon and check my recommendations, lo and behold this time I was offered books and films about Islam... This is not just about "Amazon" setting cookies, duh I knew that. This is about the potential amazon is searching through other cookies on my machine for keywords to target ads.

    2. Re:it's called the internet by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1
      This is not just about "Amazon" setting cookies, duh I knew that. This is about the potential amazon is searching through other cookies on my machine for keywords to target ads.

      This is impossible. And if it were possible, it wouldn't be Amazon's fault, it would be your browser's fault. Amazon can only get the cookies that your browser sends them, your browser restricts the cookies that are sent back by domain name. If sitex.com sets a cookie and sitey.com sets a cookie, then further requests to sitey.com will only send the sitey.com cookie, if your browser is sending more, then it is your browser's fault

      But even if your browser were sending back extra cookies to amazon.com, their scripts wouldn't know what to do with them because they're being set by other sites and are most likely just arbitrary strings. Amazon would have to have a whole system setup just in case some browser started sending all the cookies on your computer.

      What's much more likely is something like this:

      1. you search for something on sitex.com
      2. sitex.com returns html with an image tag that references an image off of 2o7.net
      3. this image url also contains some information about your search
      4. when 2o7.net responds with the image, the response includes a cookie for 2o7.net that uniquely identifies you
      5. you search at other sites... all these sites use the same tactics as sitex.com
      6. 2o7.net now has a lot of information on what you're searching for
      7. you now navigate to amazon.com, they also use 2o7.net and through similar tactics they present you with ads based on what you've been searching for

      This is some of the most basic stuff when it comes to online marketing. If you've ever seen the option "allow cookies for originating website only" it means "if I navigate to google.com, only allow cookies to be set for google.com, even if elements from other domains are loaded into the same page". Clear out all your cookies, set this option, and then try again.

      (Note that I'm not sure if this is exactly how 2o7.net operates, but I just wanted to show how incredibly simple it is to get the behavior you're experiencing without amazon.com raiding your cookie jar)

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  17. I for one.. by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    .. think that trying to sell you exactly what you're looking for is a dispicable business practice and ought to be outlawed immediately!

    But seriously, maybe when you enabled cookies Amazon recognized you from a previous visit and through the magic of their recommendation engine, perhaps based on a previous purchase where other customers who bought the same item also bought a bluetooth adapter, guessed that you might in fact be looking for a bluetooth adapter.

  18. Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any way to turn this off? Apart from removing cookies?

    Ages ago I brought a friend a book on giving the best blow job ever and now I always get recommendations on similar books. It's well embrassing

    1. Re:Porn by Ugly+American · · Score: 1

      Try going to "improve your recommendations," find the book in the listing of your purchases, and uncheck "use this product to make recommendations."

      --
      For sale: one sig space, gently used. Inquire for details.
  19. Re:Jewfro_Maccabi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy has a long history of anti-Semetic comments on Slashdot. Check his post history.

  20. Targeted Marketing Is GOOD by bziman · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I don't necessarily like having records of my browsing habits stored by databases that can later be subpoenaed by the government, but it's basically unavoidable -- I know I keep extensive records of my site's visitors. And the privacy issue is largely secondary -- Amazon isn't interested in stalking you, they're interested in learning your buying habits to improve their own profits. The funny thing is that the best way for them to improve their profits is to sell you more stuff, and that means out of their millions of products, they need to choose carefully to show you the few products you're going to buy.

    I wish that marketing was even more strongly targeted than it is. I like being shown advertisements for products that I actually want. I don't need to see ads for Viagra, Women's Hygiene, or the latest carbon fiber golf clubs. Amazon knows to show me ads for wireless routers, the latest Harry Potter books, and Armani tuxedos. I can't wait for TV to catch up with my online experience.

    --brian

    1. Re:Targeted Marketing Is GOOD by Patik · · Score: 1
      I can't wait for TV to catch up with my online experience.
      Too late, we already moved away from that with Tivo. And thank goodness for that.
    2. Re:Targeted Marketing Is GOOD by bziman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I love Tivo... unfortunately, my timing isn't perfect and I always seem to end up catching a few seconds of viagra or pro-wrestling ads that drive me batty -- and it's the same two or three annoying ads. If it were just *different* ads every time, I wouldn't be so annoyed.

  21. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search the web for things that you do not need.

  22. and the problem is? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I went to Amazon.com to find front-page ads for, you guessed it, Bluetooth adapters. ... At which point, you immediately died from the terrible harm that this caused you?

    1. Re:and the problem is? by legoburner · · Score: 1

      Apparently ... he got EYE CANCER!

  23. Step Up by wzeallor · · Score: 1

    This is a definite step up from the "Punch the Dog Win $100!!!" ads.

    1. Re:Step Up by csplinter · · Score: 1

      No not really. I won a stuffed monkey playing "Punch the Monkey" one time. I'm not joking!

  24. my results by gsn · · Score: 1

    Coincidence? - I had one hit and four misses. Looked for HDTVs and amazon matched, but they failed on cellphones, laptops, my textbook for this semester, the godfather dvd collection. Went to google each time, searched for item, went through a few links (4-5) and then went to amazon. Went to bestbuy for everything but the textbook. Cookies are accepted for session until I close firefox. JS and flash are blocked but I doubt that matters. Need a lot more data before can conclude anything one way or another.

    Another test - clear all cookies and hit refresh a lot. Amazon seems to throw up the same links a fair bit - slippers and sandals, clothing, watches, jewellery, HDTVs, bags and luggage and a few dvds. The HDTVs popping up here is telling. Might be interesting to also get a new IP address each time and then refresh though I'll leave this to some of you who have a bit more time.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:my results by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      Couple things I noticed. Look under "my recommendations", and you'll find a more complete list of your browsing experience. I also did a further more obscure test. I went online browsing for Jihad videos, and lo and behold when I returned to my recos a bit later I was offered books and films on Islam.

  25. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use Browzar.

  26. MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    This is actually a) very useful, b) very clever on Amazon's part, and c) not at all slimy. IMO at least. Kudos to their web developers for making a relatively simple (technically speaking) mod that dramatically increased their store value to most people... at least, if you ignore the ultraParanoid amongst us.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by causality · · Score: 1
      Kudos to their web developers for making a relatively simple (technically speaking) mod that dramatically increased their store value to most people

      Yes, because heaven forbid that people should objectively evaluate their own needs and use basic research skills to find the products and services that are most likely to meet those needs. Much better to have a bunch of bought-and-paid-for messages screaming at us to tell us what we need and what we should want and how we should spend our money. Oh, and targeting these advertisements means that they can more efficiently tell you what you should want and need? And are more likely to be rewarded for doing so? Apparently the sheeple have spoken.

      Realistically, the only entity for whom this increases value are the shareholders of Amazon.com. I certainly don't need to be told what's good for me or how I should make economic decisions, and knowing that I may have been shopping around for a good Bluetooth device (or whatever) does absolutely nothing to change this basic fact. How much less would we pay for everyday goods and services if sizable portions of every dollar spent did not go towards these marketing budgets? I wish we could get rid of this idea that intrusive advertising benefits anyone other than the advertisers. If you feel a need to track your customer's habits and otherwise keep tabs on them, it is because your model is fundamentally flawed and the "need" to do this is an effort to work around this fact.

      A much better model for advertising would be, let's say, the yellow pages. You know what you you are looking for and you search a directory to see who is offering it and for how much. Anything more involved than this is intrusive and based on the expectation that we are all too stupid to make our own decisions -- and oddly enough, you tend to get what you expect.

      For this reason, if I see something advertised widely (and particularly if the ads are especially annoying), and there is a competitor who does a better job of allowing the quality of their products to speak for itself, I make it a point to never buy the one that is more widely advertised. This usually saves me money and always gives me the satisfaction of voting with my feet by not supporting marketing practices that are not in my best interests.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Damn! Overreact much? All he's saying is that it's nice that if you looked at something on Amazon, that when you go back to their site the next day, they present you with some of the things you looked at before (isn't that one of the purposes of cookies in the first place?). As for Jewfro's claim that Amazon is sniffing other site's cookies, I'm ridiculously skeptical of it, mainly because I've tried the exact test I've outlined above several times on different machines (different OSes and browsers) and consistently get the same results I've mentioned above. Until I see reports from others verifying Jewfro's claims, I'll happily ignore them...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Careful - search/replace Google in your comment, and you'll have people running to their defence! ;)

    4. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by gregmac · · Score: 1
      Much better to have a bunch of bought-and-paid-for messages screaming at us to tell us what we need and what we should want and how we should spend our money.


      I know, something really needs to be done about advertisments. I can't tell you how many times I saw an ad and then suddenly found myself typing in my credit card number and home address, totally unable to control my own actions, ordering whatever item it was regardless of if I actually needed it or could have even used it at all. The worst is when you see an ad for an item you already own..

      I certainly don't need to be told what's good for me or how I should make economic decisions, and knowing that I may have been shopping around for a good Bluetooth device (or whatever) does absolutely nothing to change this basic fact.


      What are you looking at to decide which bluetooth adapter to get? Certainly you wouldn't look at the copy print on the retailer's site or shelf, because that's not an un-biased source, in fact, it's basically advertising. Ah, but I suppose once you found one that sounded decent, you could google it, and see if there are any reviews or complaints about it. I wonder though, what's stopping you from doing that when you see a normal ad for a product that looks interesting? Perhaps a product that is slightly more expensive, but offers some neat feature that's not readily explained in the title alone..

      A much better model for advertising would be, let's say, the yellow pages. You know what you you are looking for and you search a directory to see who is offering it and for how much.


      This has (in a way) been done. The problem with froogle, as you'll hear many retailers complain, is that it forces you to compete solely on price. Sometimes this is fine -- if for example, you're buying a bluetooth dongle. If you're buying something more expensive, however (say, a laptop), then it's also important to figure out what else they offer - how long is the warranty? What accessories come with it? Is there a trade-up program if you decide you need a better one in a couple months? Do the staff know what they're talking about if you have questions? These are things not easily accommodated with a 'yellow pages' style listing.

      Perhaps there IS a better way.. come up with it, and you'll probably make a good amount of money. In the meantime, make sure you have adblock installed and a hosts file to redirect all those nasty sites, lest you go broke from that uncontrollable urge to buy every product whose ad reaches your eyeballs.

      --
      Speak before you think
    5. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by causality · · Score: 1

      Much better to have a bunch of bought-and-paid-for messages screaming at us to tell us what we need and what we should want and how we should spend our money.

      I know, something really needs to be done about advertisments. I can't tell you how many times I saw an ad and then suddenly found myself typing in my credit card number and home address, totally unable to control my own actions, ordering whatever item it was regardless of if I actually needed it or could have even used it at all. The worst is when you see an ad for an item you already own..

      My point was that the sheeplike nature of most people in the USA and their unwillingness to apply critical thought to what they are told via the TV, radio, etc. is very dangerous for a wide variety of reasons, and the way that advertising is done today is feeding this situation, rather than starving it. Call it the law of unintended consequences. That rectifying this situation would also imply not being bombarded with ads everywhere I go would just be a desirable side-effect.

      Advertising as it is done now is based on manipulation, to convince you to do something that you otherwise would not do. This is why television commercials will so often use catchy jingles, flashy graphics, hot chicks, half-truths, skewed statistics, meaningless quantities such as "up to X" -- anything and everything other than a solid reason why the product is so great -- just to try and get you to buy. What I am advocating is advertising that aims at convincing you from whom to buy something that you have already decided to acquire, based on your own assessment of what you need. The difference is a bit subtle but also very important.

      What are you looking at to decide which bluetooth adapter to get? Certainly you wouldn't look at the copy print on the retailer's site or shelf, because that's not an un-biased source, in fact, it's basically advertising. Ah, but I suppose once you found one that sounded decent, you could google it, and see if there are any reviews or complaints about it. I wonder though, what's stopping you from doing that when you see a normal ad for a product that looks interesting? Perhaps a product that is slightly more expensive, but offers some neat feature that's not readily explained in the title alone..

      I thought that this distinction would be obvious with my later comparison of that model of advertising to a yellow pages-like directory. What I'd like to see is more "client-pull" advertising and less "server-push" advertising, both literally on the Internet and figuratively on other media such as television (i.e. fewer commercials and more options like Home Shopping Network). Thus, if I seek and then read the copy print on a retailer's site, I am merely looking up information. If a spammer sends me e-mail solicitations, this is an intrusion. Guess under which category I would place the practice of forming affiliate networks for the purpose of actively tracking your customers so that you can use this information to increase your ad revenue?

      This has (in a way) been done. The problem with froogle, as you'll hear many retailers complain, is that it forces you to compete solely on price. Sometimes this is fine -- if for example, you're buying a bluetooth dongle. If you're buying something more expensive, however (say, a laptop), then it's also important to figure out what else they offer - how long is the warranty? What accessories come with it? Is there a trade-up program if you decide you need a better one in a couple months? Do the staff know what they're talking about if you have questions? These are things not easily accommodated with a 'yellow pages' style listing.

      So you found an implementation with known "flaws" (in quotes because for all I know, listing by price only was a deliberate design trade-off) and

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    6. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL/INFORMATIVE by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      And while it's true that Amazon's actions cannot be compared to the adware/spyware authors, they also have a "good name" to protect (remember all the flak Sony caught over that rootkit?) and so they could not afford to attempt that marketer's-wet-dream of greater intrusion and control. As a result, they must take more limited steps. In the same direction.

      You know, I'm still not understanding how Amazon remembering what you previously looked at on their website and bringing it to the forefront -- just like it would be in a physical store if you'd rifled through thousands of products and dropped the one you were considering at the front of the rack -- is so heinous a crime as to have you up in arms. I guess that Mom & Pop shops that offer you "the usual," or ask if you want some batteries when you come in a day after buying Junior the electroSuck 2000 are Satan's spawn to you as well? Same concept with Amazon, they just do it electronically. And well.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  27. Caveat Emptor by Ugly+American · · Score: 1
    Really. Just a rental as per usual, or an all out purchase? Can I take it for a test drive?
    Tough call... rental is expensive, but they tend to develop unexpected issues after about three to four years or so. Perhaps lease to buy?

    And on a serious note, I've been wondering where a certain tracking cookie was showing up from, but never quite got motivated enough to hunt the site down. Well, I just swept my system with Spybot S&D to make sure it was clean, went to Amazon.com, re-ran the search, and... lo and behold, I have an Aornum tracking cookie again.

    It's not a big deal to me; I've bought dozens of things from Amazon.com and marked hundreds more in the recommendations service, so it's not like they don't already have a database on me.

    --
    For sale: one sig space, gently used. Inquire for details.
  28. Noticed this a while ago... by Ungulate · · Score: 1

    I was googling St. Malachy's prophecy, an alleged 12th century document fortelling the rest of the Popes until the end of time. Went to Amazon a few minutes later, and a book on the subject was on the front page. I think that's a bit more unusual than the consumer electronics tests that people are trying out here.

    1. Re:Noticed this a while ago... by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      I did similar tests searching for obscure items and found the same results.

  29. Very misleading by bill0755 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Your claim definitely scores high for tapping into paranoia of cookies. Unfortunately, the only way Amazon knows you are looking for bluetooth adapters is if you visit their site first. This may have happened by way of a search result. Is this supposed to be surprising?

    Nice try though. Cookie paranoia is a bit worn out for me.

    1. Re:Very misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing misleading and in the last two days my google searches seem to show up in amazon !

    2. Re:Very misleading by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      If Amazon is high up on the results list and Firefox is doing prefetching on the top few links, might that be how the Amazon cookie is getting set?

  30. You must be new here. by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the internet.

    Amazon uses ATDMT.com to serve ads. The sites you were searching for Bluetooth gear on were also using ATDMT.com to serve ads. It's not Amazon that knew you were looking for Bluetooth gear, it's ATDMT.com.

    That's why they're called "Tracking Cookies."

    1. Re:You must be new here. by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      It's still creepy. I also searched for more obscure items at other sites, not "ATDMT.com" members, I searched for stuff like Jihad videos, and when I returned to amazon I got recos for books and films on Islam....

    2. Re:You must be new here. by Technician · · Score: 1

      Learn how to set up a hosts file. Be sure ATDMT.com is in the file. When the banners try to load and set a cookie, the banner ad server will not be found and can not set a tracking cookie. The doubleclick URL's should be in the hosts file as well as other banner ad hosts.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:You must be new here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and if enough people start browsing with a plugin that strips away connections to any site but the requested site, ad trackers will just proxy their ad requests with all that machine and network information through the commercial sites you are visiting, instead of putting links to graphics on foreign sites in web pages.

      There will be no privacy on a site as long as the eula or privacy policy indicates that they will share information with their affiliates.

    4. Re:You must be new here. by Technician · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if enough people start browsing with a plugin that strips away connections to any site but the requested site, ad trackers will just proxy their ad requests with all that machine and network information through the commercial sites you are visiting, instead of putting links to graphics on foreign sites in web pages.


      When the junk lowers the signal to noise ratio to where the junk buries the content, I stop visiting. Yahoo for at while did these advertisements that would cover the content for several seconds. I stopped using Yahoo for a while until I ripped flash out of a machine to use on Yahoo. Geocities had those cover the content ads that stuck to the top right of the screen. I don't know if they still exist. I haven't been to a Geocities site in years.

      Reducing the value of your site to a visitor reduces the value of the site to the visitor.
      How many visitors are you planning on driving to the competition. Google didn't become the #1 search engine by accident. They had to beat Ask, Yahoo, Hot-Bot, Lycos, and many others. MSN is still trying to climb the hill, but is stalled with the sale of advertising space.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  31. News? by bendodge · · Score: 1

    Surf tracking and targeted ads are a way of life. There is no privacy online. Get used to it.

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:News? by causality · · Score: 1
      Surf tracking and targeted ads are a way of life. There is no privacy online. Get used to it.

      Did it ever occur to you that this "lie down and take it" attitude is mostly responsible for the current situation? For every measure there are countermeasures. Adblock and its companion Filterset Updater are two (of many) which happen to be very effective, especially when combined with restrictions on cookies. And remember that at the end of the day, it is we who buy things from companies which employ these practices who are ultimately responsible for this situation. Companies do whatever rewards them with profits in the marketplace. I submit that the current situation is caused mostly by the apathy that you proclaim and the failure of most people to take a principled stand on much of anything.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:News? by bendodge · · Score: 0

      I agree that some issues have to be fought for, but technological reasons necessitate an online identity. Without your IP, cookies, SSL, etc., you could not make secure purchases, or be trusted to sell something or give information.

      You cannot hide your normal activities in real life, and you cannot online, if you expect to be able to do things that require an identity or if you want the "online experience". It is a way of life, because we have chosen it.

      Everyone loves Google's services, but they sacrifice their online privacy for it. People choose convenience over privacy. You can have privacy if you so choose, but most people have shown, by their actions, that they would rather have convenience.

      Now, I do block some ads, but they do power a majority of online conveniences, and you can expect to pay for everything online if everyone blocks ads. So it is your choice, cheap/free and convenient, or private and expensive?

      --
      The government can't save you.
    3. Re:News? by causality · · Score: 1
      I agree that some issues have to be fought for, but technological reasons necessitate an online identity. Without your IP, cookies, SSL, etc., you could not make secure purchases, or be trusted to sell something or give information.

      I guard my information carefully. Therefore, if someone knows my full name, address, telephone number, credit card number, and credit card expiration date, and puts them on an order form, go ahead and assume that this is me. No IP address logging or tracking cookies needed (although cookies for the sole purpose of a shopping-cart may be handy). Certainly no directed advertising needed.
      You cannot hide your normal activities in real life, and you cannot online, if you expect to be able to do things that require an identity or if you want the "online experience". It is a way of life, because we have chosen it.

      But, unless you are under the scrutiny of a competent investigator, then your day-to-day whearabouts and what you are "up to" are generally unknown in real life. What Amazon is doing is like automatically bundling the investigator with the experience. This is really another one of those things that is poorly understood by Joe Sixpack and would never be tolerated if the same thing were done in meatspace.
      Everyone loves Google's services, but they sacrifice their online privacy for it. People choose convenience over privacy. You can have privacy if you so choose, but most people have shown, by their actions, that they would rather have convenience.

      There is no reason that I cannot use Google via a TOR proxy with cookies disabled. There is also no reason that I can't use my hosts file to make that annoying google-analytics.com host point back to 127.0.0.1. The fact that they have port 80 open to the entire world, with no passwords required, tells me that I can use their services any way I choose.
      Now, I do block some ads, but they do power a majority of online conveniences, and you can expect to pay for everything online if everyone blocks ads. So it is your choice, cheap/free and convenient, or private and expensive?

      This is really the logical fallacy of the false choice -- I don't think you realize just how well the Internet got along prior to any commercial entities establishing a presence here. The idea that the Web is nothing but a giant marketplace just waiting to be harnessed is a relatively new one, and with it came intrusive advertising, spam, botnets, advertising drones on IRC, spyware, adware, and other great ways to waste bandwidth. I consider myself fortunate, because I first started going online in the early 1990s when the above annoyances did exist but were still relatively unheard-of. You now have a new "generation" of users who have never known anything different and so fail to appreciate how things used to be.

      At the end of the day I make my own buying decisions, and when listening to information I consider the source. Yeah, the retailer can probably tell me the price of the product with great accuracy, but I expect that retailer to be one of the worst sources of accurate information regarding the performance of their product. This is why it amazes me that people actually consider sales pitches delivered by ad banners and pop-ups as though they had any merit. To me they are nothing but noise, I will never buy something because of them (in fact, allowing me to see an ad for your product too many times in the same day is a great way to make sure I do not buy it), and if anything the advertisers should be grateful that I block them and save both of us the bandwidth.
      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  32. This helps me by a_greer2005 · · Score: 2

    I can clearly see the bad implecations here, but as a responsable user, this has helped me over the past few months: I look for an item on Target, walmart, froogle, whatever, then go to amazon and it is right there, no searching needed. This is not good privacy wise, but pretty conveniant for those of us who delete cookies at responsable intervals (read weekly or more).

  33. Re:20-30 bucks. Impulse purchase range. by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Wow. I thought america was going through tough economic times, with people taking 2nd jobs and stuff.
    My impulse purchase ceiling is about £3 ($5). Maybe it is because i can remember when £3 bought 5 (6) gallons of petrol.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  34. I propose a new tag, starting with this article. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    [It was] newsinthe90s

  35. Re:Jewfro_Maccabi? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

    I know there's nothing anti-semitic about my Nic, I'm Jewish!

  36. Final result? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Were you totally offended and disgusted because they showed you stuff that you were just looking to buy (hypothetically) a few minutes ago?

    I don't get it... we all love computers and the Internet until they do something useful? I understand the scare, but it isn't there. The scary part would be if Amazon just sent you a bluetooth device and charged you for it. "We knew you'd be wanting this!"

    I just wish they would sell these technologies to porn marketeers. I know someone, somewhere already has a database of the things I like. Start making recommendations on things I've not seen or heard of yet!

    1. Re:Final result? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Ummm, nope, not offended in the slightest. The final result was that the Amazon page is behaving EXACTLY the way I thought it would. It's not sniffing cookies from other sites. They're simply tracking (via their own cookie) the stuff that I looked at previously. They've even gone so far as to include a "Your recently viewed items" section at the bottom of the front page. If I clear out my cache and cookies and go to their page, they present me with a random sampling of various items that they sell. It's exactly what I'd expect them to do.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Final result? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      me too, i was j/k.

  37. 3 ways possible by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 1

    1) The retailer is using Amazon software/ The retailer is part of Amazon
    2) Amazon is sniffing the search URL you came from
    3) Amazon set a cookie

    Cookies can only be read by the site that set them. Maybe you are clicking on Amazon ads on the retailer site.

  38. Off topic, but a comment about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privacy is a big issue. I don't know what's going to happen in the future. One thing that bugs me is how I think Google displays text advertisements of the major metropolitan of which I live near. I don't think I ever searched on Google using the city I live near though. Maybe it's my imagination.

    1. Re:Off topic, but a comment about privacy by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      You gave them your IP address when you used the page. They resolved it. Not difficult.

  39. Is this the same thing as Google's "Smart Sense"? by wwiiol_toofless · · Score: 1

    Iirc Google made headlines a while back about targeting users with ads based on their activity. Isn't this the same thing?

    --
    the mods may say you posted flamebait, but to me it's a flame that warms my heart. rock on, brother! --chebucto
  40. There's a engineering/math class about this. by DoughBunny · · Score: 1

    It's called Data Mining. Most universities with a statistics/OR/IE/FE department teach data mining. Amazon had LOTS of affiliates, or companies they work with to collect data. (review sites, other sites that sell items, etc). You probably visited one those. -DB

  41. Perhaps slightly different... by douglaid · · Score: 1

    I went to a site a while back and saw a little graphic saying "Hello Doug. Guess how we know your name."

    It was a link to amazon.com using my registered name there. Harmless enough, but still a potential security leak.

  42. Re:Known issue = ad.doubleclick.com by vettemph · · Score: 1

    >>It's been known for ages that if two sites both use the same ad company...

    and further more:
    doubleclick is the plague you would be refering to. 'Everyone' is using doubleclick in order to share a common cookie. doubleclick is the one tracking you, following you and report back to everyone else. There are a few others of course, like tribalfusion, Fastclick, etc..
      Everyone should be using a host file to block these, and keep scripting turned off except for trusted sites. (Your bank, not myspace, youtube or yahoo)

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  43. Re:Jewfro_Maccabi? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

    "This guy has a long history of anti-Semetic comments on Slashdot. Check his post history" I'm a Jewish WOMAN.

  44. Re:20-30 bucks. Impulse purchase range. by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Individual americans are going through tough economic times in large part due to a culture of irresponsible debt spending. Having a comparatively high ceiling for impulse purchases is part and parcel.

    (Obviously, this doesn't apply to everyone).

  45. Happened to me too by foobarb · · Score: 1

    I noticed twice in the last week some strange ad behavior on Amazon.

    The first time, I'd been looking at DVD players via search on Google (FireFox on OSX, not logged in), then later that day when I went to Amazon (not logged in) the front page of Amazon showed me DVD players. I thought perhaps there was some unhealthy cookie sharing going on.

    Then later in the week I'd been at Amazon (not logged in) looking at books on a topic I didn't want in my recent history or interested-in lists. I left Amazon, used FF to "clear private data" and went back to Amazon and logged in. There were my dang recent searches. So what's up with that? Have they added IP matching, or is FF OSX not as good at dumping my personal data as I'd like?

  46. Omakase - "Leave it to Amazon" by cybernezumi · · Score: 1

    What you're probably seeing is Amazon's new "Omakase" ads. They've been beta testing them for a little while. Apparently they take into account the user's Amazon search history (have you searched for widgets on Amazon or affilates?), the site's referral sales history (have ads on the site resulted in widget sales before?) and the site's content (is the site about widgets?). I've been using them on my blog -- not sure if they are more or less effective than regular ads, but I do like that their appearance is more customizable and can be made less in-your-face and more Google Adsense like.

    1. Re:Omakase - "Leave it to Amazon" by 12+inch+pianist · · Score: 0

      They have been working for my blog, but they definitely freaked me out the first time I saw them. They knew me so well I had to use them.

  47. No post editing by XanC · · Score: 1

    I'd go in and change it, but that's not possible on Slash.

  48. Re:20-30 bucks. Impulse purchase range. by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Heh :-)
    That is a chicken/egg thing that hadn't occurred to me. Nice one.

    Sadly, being a cheapskate doesn't seem to have improved my own tough economic times. Or does my miserliness cloud my view of how many blessings i have?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  49. Surprised? by espenss · · Score: 1

    This is as old as cookies itself. Nothing new under the sun, no story.

    -espen

    --
    -- ess
  50. show us your tits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or gtfo

    capcha was "obvious" lol

  51. Re:Is this the same thing as Google's "Smart Sense by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

    I think it's much the same. It's a bit scary though. After searching for tourism info on a middle-east country, many of the Google Ads I see on Slashdot are written in Arabic.