Slashdot Mirror


GeForce 7950 GT Launches With Passive Cooling

An anonymous reader writes "NVIDIA's GeForce 7950 GT comes with great performance at an attractive $299/£225 launch price. Incredibly, XFX's pre-overclocked card comes with a passive cooling solution. From the article: 'There is no doubting that NVIDIA's GeForce 7950 GT is faster and cheaper than the GeForce 7900 GT that launched at the same price point earlier in the year. There is a lot to like about the product, and there is even more to like about XFX's implementation. It's generally a match for ATI's Radeon X1900XT 512MB in popular games.'"

168 comments

  1. Oh good! by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can fry eggs on the heatsink without the fan splattering yolk everywhere! : )

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Oh good! by BubFranklin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      hard boiling eggs directly in the shell has been the preffered method in our office.(works on passive and fan cooled cpus) We did the math, and we save about $4.50 a year in power savings over microwaved hardboiled eggs.

    2. Re:Oh good! by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 5, Informative

      You got modded funny, but the thing is really hot: without an extra fan in the case, the article mentions "temperatures approaching 110 degrees Celcius (sic)" (for people not familiar with degrees Celsius, 100 degrees is the boiling point of water at normal atmospheric pressure).

      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    3. Re:Oh good! by rodgster · · Score: 1

      At first I thought the title was "GeForce 7950 GT Launches With MASSIVE Cooling".

      --
      Who will guard the guards?
    4. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attack its heat sink for MASSIVE damage.

    5. Re:Oh good! by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For those who just want to see a unit conversion, 110 degrees C is roughly equivalent to 230 degrees Fahrenheit.

      Or in more practical (and painful) terms, roughly the same temperature as the coffee spills that burn you in the crotchal area when you hit a bump in the road whilst drinking coffee during your morning commute.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    6. Re:Oh good! by straponego · · Score: 4, Funny

      for people not familiar with degrees Celsius
      The word you're searching for is "Americans"...

    7. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      110C coffee?!? You're american aren't you?

    8. Re:Oh good! by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I've never been to the US, but are there really still people out there that don't know Celsius?

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    9. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah -- he's one of yours -- must be from an English grammar school.

    10. Re:Oh good! by Zach978 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      anyone who passes middle school chemistry knows 100 C = 212 F...even here in the states

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    11. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often wondered what some people consider "hot". How often do you in a forum about my cpu|HD|video card runs extremely hot so I bought some very expensive over priced [1] exotic cooling device.

      I would ASSUME that if a company makes a product with a fan, the fan is engineered to provide adequate cooling to the device in real world conditions. Am I so wrong to think that and the entire computer industry is skimping on fans? I'm sorry but looking at this after market cooling market does not seem to be required as much as people think it should be. Its not like they though you were not going to use a computer case and it would cool where the thing was placed. Look at a lot of Dell and HP business machines. ONE single fan close to the CPU that also pushes air out of the PS.

      [1] a quality ball bearing fan (or whatever is must have at this current time) with a copper/aluminum heat sink probably costs no more then $10 USD to produce.

    12. Re:Oh good! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Umm, I don't think my coffee is at a rolling boil during my commute to work. You must not cook that often.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Oh good! by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Informative
      110C coffee?!? You're american aren't you?

      Yes I am. I thought the etl.cs.luc.edu (*.luc.edu = Loyola University Chicago) link in my URL field was a clear give away.

      And just as an FYI, The optimum coffee brewing temerature is between 194 to 204 degrees Fahrenheit (90 - 95.55-ish degrees Celsius. (at least according to http://metropoliscoffee.com/university/brewing/per fectcoffee.php )
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    14. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh no. And besides, knowing 100c = 212f doesn't mean jack when you're converting anything other than 100c or 212f. F = C × 1.8 + 32 is far more useful. You'd be amazed how often I'm asked "what is that in fahrenheit?" About the only thing I need to know it for here in the states is computer related, everything else is american standard.

    15. Re:Oh good! by smash · · Score: 1
      Your coffee is not pure water.

      Impurities (coffee, milk, sugar) raise water's boiling point.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    16. Re:Oh good! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I live in the US and I didn't know that... or rather, I'd forgotten. Of course, the part I forgot was the Fahrenheit side (stupid not-round numbers)!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:Oh good! by lakeland · · Score: 1

      No. Everyone in the US knew that at some point in the (distant) past. If they kept up their brain at all since then they probably do still know it. I would be shocked to find more than a tiny fraction of a percent on /. didn't have a good feel for 100 degrees celcius, but in the general population.... it would be like knowing 9.8 m/s/s or 2.997E8 m/s, or 3.1415926 or 2.71828 or ... if they aren't used then they are forgotten. I wouldn't like to guess what proportion have forgotten, but it would be a significant.

    18. Re:Oh good! by Andrzej+Sawicki · · Score: 1

      But could you not downclock the card to make the heat more manageable? I mean, it would probably still beat the crap out of a 7600 GT (the previous maximum for graphics cards with passive cooling), right?

    19. Re:Oh good! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Man, you rounded c off wrong: 299 792 458. I also wish that were my SSN as I can remember that, but I can't remember my SSN.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    20. Re:Oh good! by phrasebook · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      F = C × 1.8 + 32 is far more useful.

      Or, even more useful: just use C like everyone else does!

      Too complicated? Too proud to give up fahrenheit? Or maybe you need the accuracy? How does a 90 day feel compared to a 91, anyway?!

    21. Re:Oh good! by shoelace_822695 · · Score: 1

      i thought it was

      F = C × (9/5) + 32

      oh wait.. never mind..

      but thats the way I remember it.. and easier for me to do then decimal math.

      --
      -- Shoe Lace
    22. Re:Oh good! by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's *their* country after all.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    23. Re:Oh good! by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I see, so coffe should be made by adding impurities (coffee, milk, sugar) to water, then boiling the mix. Sounds tasty!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    24. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you boil coffee at 110 C??? You said 110!

    25. Re:Oh good! by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Cue Siouxsie and the Banshees :-)

      "Drink the water with jagged glass
        Eat the cactus with bleeding mouth
        Not 91 or 93, but 92 Fahrenheit degrees"

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    26. Re:Oh good! by sd4l · · Score: 1

      Easy, pure water boils at 100 degrees celsius and freezes at 0. However, anything added to pure water (e.g Coffee or salt) would affect both the boiling point and the freezing point.

      As it happens, people have done studies on the effect of boiling with various coffee concentrations, but my chemistry knowledge has been replaced with programming knowledge, so I couldn't decipher the results if I wanted to :-)

      --
      -- Andy Jeffries Scramdisk for Linux (Change the orgy to org to reply)
    27. Re:Oh good! by lubricated · · Score: 1

      >> Or, even more useful: just use C like everyone else does!

      or even more usefull, convince everyone around you to use C. Yeah that'll work. Except Celcius isn't particularly good, let's all convert to kelvin.
      Well now we don't have round numbers anymore, screw it.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    28. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word you're searching for is "Americans"...

      Actually, americans from the southern hemisphere (called "south americans") know Celsius very well.
      The word you are looking for is "aglo north american" or something like that.

    29. Re:Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...temporarily...

    30. Re:Oh good! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Okay, you find me coffee that's still boiling while you're driving down the freeway (hint, you're not going to. McDonald's kept their coffee over 180 degrees. Once you leave the heat source, you're not longer boiling. As I was trying to point out to the parent to my reply. Jeeze, some old people jump on any chance to try to outsmart the younger crowd, nowdays.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    31. Re:Oh good! by marcomarrero · · Score: 1

      It is something that had to be done long ago. Probably companies do not care, as long as the chip doesn't melt itself while it is on warranty, probably this is just to do better in benchmarks.

      My nVidia 6600GT (not overclocked) somewhat fried itself, now anything 3D is FUBAR. I'm sure the fan did a really poor job. Now I have to find a way to set my GForce to behave exactly as most Intel Video Decelerators.

    32. Re:Oh good! by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      shhh. Did you hear that? that was the joke FLYING over your head.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    33. Re:Oh good! by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      This Canadian is offended by that statement.

      --
      Jeremy
    34. Re:Oh good! by yarbo · · Score: 1

      You rounded pi wrong
      3.14159265...

    35. Re:Oh good! by gbobeck · · Score: 1
      How do you boil coffee at 110 C??? You said 110!


      Its rather simple... Use the following equasions to figure out what altitude and pressure are required:

      (equasions from: http://www.hi-tm.com/Documents/Calib-boil.html)
      Pressure (in. Hg) = 29.921* (1-6.8753*0.000001 * altitude, ft.)^5.2559
      Boiling point (in F) = 49.161 * Ln (in. Hg) + 44.932

      So, for our coffee (ok, water for this example) to boil at 230F, the equasion looks like:
      230 = 49.161 * Ln (x) + 44.932

      Solve for x and you would get something like 43.143371617 (unless your math is better than mine...)

      Now, what does this mean? Simple-- increase the pressure or start digging to a point well below sea level and you'll be able to boil water at 110C.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    36. Re:Oh good! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as we never used F in chem (either high school or engineering general chem), I didn't know that. 273.15K, on the hand, is much more familiar.

    37. Re:Oh good! by Pyrrus · · Score: 1

      As long as we're being pedantic... It is scientific convention to round 4 or less down, 6 or more up, and 5 to the closest even number. Ie, .385 rounds to .38 (so does .375) and .345 rounds to .34 (as does .335).

    38. Re:Oh good! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Well that's not really a safe assumption. Almost every single fan on retail video cards I've seen is a cheap POS with cheap bearings. I've had to RMA brand new video cards with a buzzy, rattling bearing. It's very rare to find one that lasts more than two years before the bearing starts rattling and dying. I know computer cases can get dusty, but case fans and CPU fans don't fail at nearly the same rate.

      About those CPU fans, the heatsinks bundled with retail CPUs tend to me skimpy, but they do have decent quality fans that last for the life of the 3 year warranty. I know some video card makes advertise lifetime warranties now, so maybe that'll be an incentive to spec some decent quality fans.

    39. Re:Oh good! by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Based on two comments, I rounded both c and pi incorrectly (truncating instead of rounding.)

      Embarassing as that is, I think it proves my point. I haven't used c in over ten years, and pi in some months. Despite coming from a background of scientific reasoning I am already losing these basic constants! In a few decades, what's the odds that I'll still remember 100 212? 0.8? At 80% would still give millions of people who won't remember. And what about those who were goofing off in science class instead of spending their weekends writing basic programs?

    40. Re:Oh good! by bulliver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, America is more than just the US, but to tell the truth I am content to be dissassociated with 'America' these days. Let our friends to the south have their fun, and lay claim to all of the western world...

      --
      Support the mob or mysteriously disappear.
    41. Re:Oh good! by Black-Six · · Score: 1

      To contradict your statement:

      American chemists are familiar with Celcius, everyone else just likes to think they know what Celcius is. I told my math teacher who comes from India, a Celcius using nation, that Celcius is based off Kelvin and the -273 C is absolute zero and she actually told me I was wrong until the next problem we did in class was a Celcius to Kelvin problem and she said "Op, you're right."

    42. Re:Oh good! by kastberg · · Score: 1

      you were the one who said it was boiling.

  2. Cooling can always be made active these days. by Sadko · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cooling can always be made active these days. Just buy something like Zallman Cooler (http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N8 2E16835118117). Installation (which replaces the original cooling) is 10 minutes, and the cards these days are made with standard mounting, and it's usually gets your card down 10-15 degrees. The only drawback is that it makes 1-slot card to be 2-slot wide. Cheers,

    1. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by jonnykelly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gee, ya think? But wasn't the point here that this card got these kind of stats WITHOUT active cooling (and thereby not requiring one to give up another slot as your advice puts forth).

    2. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cooling can always be made active these days.

      I'm not entirely sure why you posted that. I think everyone here is aware that you can stick a fan on something to cool it. The point is that most people want passive cooling because it cuts down on the noise.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by Babbster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure the idea is that passive cooling is preferable to active cooling - less noise, less power consumption and no moving part to fail. It's of particular interest to those running HTPC machines - if their case is cool enough, they can have a "real" video card with which to do some serious gaming.

    4. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by Sadko · · Score: 1

      Well, indeed so. My bad then.

      I have lost some cards (without overclocking them or anything) to badly designed passive cooling, so inherently I considered it somewhat malicious ;)

      The point about the fan was that the cooling mounting is standardized nowadays, so you can stick fan with little effort, as opposed to designining your own scaffolding for it :)

    5. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by hav0x · · Score: 1

      gee whilikers batman!

    6. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      Better a $10 case fan breaks than a $350+ VPU :)

    7. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's of particular interest to those running HTPC machines - if their case is cool enough, they can have a "real" video card with which to do some serious gaming.

      My HTPC is by no means quiet, but my split-unit AC makes more noise by far.

      At any rate, a good surround sound setup > all.

    8. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      If you read even a little bit of TFA you'd know that the passive cooler is large enough that the card takes the space of two slots.

    9. Re:Cooling can always be made active these days. by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the idea is that passive cooling is preferable to active cooling - less noise, less power consumption and no moving part to fail.

      And, in my experience, any video card that uses active cooling becomes a "passive cooling" system in a year or two of use, anyway. Fan bearings go bad, the fan quits, and I don't even notice until I'm doing something unrelated. To keep things cooler, I usually remove the fan and use the card with just the heatsink.

      It's happened a number of times over the years, including my Voodoo II, my Riva TNT2, my ATI Radeon 8500, and my ATI Radeon 97xx. Yes, the fan is DEAD, with no apparent loss of stability or performance.

      So why is that fan there, again? Somehow, they think it's important, and even when caked with 1.5" of dust, with a dead fan, the card just keeps working.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  3. Good for HTPC type setups by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great way to replace an XBox360 or PS3, put a computer with one of these in your living room and use it as a console/htpc type thing. But, does it run linux*? *have good drivers?

    --
    All your base are belong to Wii.
    1. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by jascat · · Score: 2, Informative

      But, does it run linux*? *have good drivers? Yes. Better than ATI at least. Not open source, but the drivers are good. My 7800GS works great. Q4 runs faster under Linux than under Windows here.

    2. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, this was just a test to see how flawed the /. moderating system is. I saw that there was only one post and posted something extremely generic, and got modded interesting, while a reply to my post actually provides good information and doesn't get modded at all. If only the earliest posts get moderated (or rather, they get moderated at a much higher rate than subsequent posts, because there's nothing else to moderate) a lot of stuff is getting lost just because the post is too late to be seen. And I know it's tough to look through all the posts and find one that deserves moderation. I bet the person who modded me up was probably just using his last point before it expired, not really caring where the point went as long as he used it. I admit, I've done this myself many times but it sure is annoying. Feel free to mod my original post overrated, or something, this system needs to be fixed. On the other hand, mob rule like at di^H^H that other site seems to promote groupthink and short, witty, and often sarcastic responses that add nothing to the discussion. So I guess /. type moderation works, but should show the latest posts at the top to encourage moderators to read those posts instead of just modding older posts up.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    3. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by ben+there... · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You only got a +1 Insightful to 2. Both your posts deserved the +1's. I often get that on stories that I post to that are up to 6 stories old. I wouldn't expect to get +5 when I post that late though.

      It's skewed to overmod the top page of posts, but oh well. I tend to trust the mods near the top, then dig deeper into the posts further down the page looking for stuff that didn't get modded well enough.

    4. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by legallyillegal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      your name isnt legallyillegal either

      --
      ?giS
    5. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amd is talking about open ati drivers and http://www.tigerdirect.com/ is better then new egg local pick up kicks ass!!!!!!!!

    6. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now I feel like a karma whore, this really should have been modded off-topic... gah /.!

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    7. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      hrm, the "GeForce 7950 GX2" is there, but not the "GeForce 7950 GT", which this article is about.(and that list is only for IA32, the IA64 driver hasn't been updated since 2004). However:
      the GeForce 7950 GT is based on a single G71 chip and bears more resemblances with a GeForce 7900-series card than it does with the GeForce 7950 GX2.
      So perhaps it not being on the supported list is an oversight.

      I was coincidentally researching prices/performance last week to upgrade my aging ti4200 and had decided on the 7900 GT but I am glad I procrastinated since this one looks a bit better. I'll wait for actual confirmed linux support before buying, though. ;)
    8. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by psymastr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      /. is full of misinformation about 3D performance under linux. Yes, I have an nvidia card, yes, I have the latest drivers and no, id games are not faster under linux. I tried it because I'd read a million times in /. how 3D is better in linux because of better memory/disk management and all that bullshit.

      This is certainly not the case. 3D performance is not better in linux than in Windows. It's actually quite a bit worse. Granted, it's probably not because of the OS itself but because nvidia spends more resources on developing drivers for windows than it does for linux.

      If you truly get better performance with Q4 under linux, install the latest windows drivers and enable DMA or whatever weird thing you've messed up in windows. Because I did extensive testing with four different timedemos I recorded and they all say the same thing.

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
    9. Re:Good for HTPC type setups by jascat · · Score: 1

      I have a typical (default) setup in Windows with as many services disabled as I can get by with and prior to gaming, I turn off the antivirus. In Linux, I run Quake 4 directly from GDM. Some how, I end up with better frame rates in Linux. It isn't much, but it's usually about 10 FPS more under Linux.

  4. Out of stock... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    :(

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16814150189

    I'll definately be putting this in my next computer I'm building. The AGP card I have now has a tiny fan that's noisier than anything even with it on the desktop. When are the 65nm based cards coming out?

    1. Re:Out of stock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have misspelt DEFINITELY!

    2. Re:Out of stock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the card 7950 GT is a PCI-express card not an AGP card.

      for AGP you might want to look at the 7800GS or 7600GS cards

      this 7950 GT is a PCI-express card

    3. Re:Out of stock... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      I realize this.... I'm building a new computer :P

  5. Video card related question by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the advent of video cards that are Turing complete in recent years and sites such as this, how feasible is it to run an actual operating system on the video card itself? It seems like it would be possible to write a kernel as a shader program, upload it, and just have it run.

    1. Re:Video card related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But, beyond the stupid geek factor, what would be the point?

      The GPU is far more powerful than the CPU at what it was designed to do but I bet it would be slow when dealing with generic computation. The GPU is (essentiall) a highly specialized processor which is designed to process 3D data at an amazing rate; in part the GPUs power is caused because its processing can be highly distributed (for the color of one pixel is not dependant on another so, in theory, you could have 1,920,000 shader pipelines that each shade one pixel at a resolution of 1600X1200); this is not the case in general.

    2. Re:Video card related question by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      But, beyond the stupid geek factor, what would be the point?

      Derrr, to free up the CPU for software rendering?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Video card related question by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Turing complete doesn't mean you can realistically run an operating system on it. Brainfuck (>>[>++>-[]) is turing complete, Conway's game of life is turing complete, try coding Linux in either of them.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:Video card related question by sowth · · Score: 1

      Hmmm..that site seems to be down (plus no updates since april 2005) Maybe you should have pointed to the google cache or the wayback machine... Or is it no longer in slashdot fashon to point to mirrors?

      Of course, my question is: are there any free programs for Linux which will help anyone write shader programs? I thought I saw something or other a long time ago, but I had an old Voodoo card, so I didn't bother with it.

    5. Re:Video card related question by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Ideally you'd write the program in C, then the compiler compiles to a shader program and you upload and run it. Now implementing Linux in Brainfuck could be deon similarly by writing a program that converts the Linux source code to Brainfuck source code.

    6. Re:Video card related question by NoCorR · · Score: 1

      I had an idea awhile back (one of the few that ever cross my mind) to use the GPU as sort of a backup CPU, or a way to turn your single CPU box into a one and one half CPU box. It was a crazy geek idea. :) Still, the concept exists.

    7. Re:Video card related question by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Doesn't assembly have far too many non-Turing instructions to be converted to Brainfuck? Either that, or it has overly complex functions that can't be implemented with simple memory modification (unless you execute said modified memory, but that doesn't seem Turing complete to me).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    8. Re:Video card related question by Hast · · Score: 1

      Even latest shaders don't have proper ways of doing tests in the code. You can probably get around that somewhat but it won't be very useful.

      Basically shaders are not able to do procedural stuff like:

      if (A)
        then X
      else
        then Y

      You can get around it somewhat with texture lookups (instead of doing compares) but the branching part isn't really there.

    9. Re:Video card related question by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      THe point of turing-completeness is that all languages which are, it, are interchangeable. That doesn't mean you wouldn't see an appalling loss of simplicity and increase in memory consumption.

      Worst case scenario: a brainfuck VHDL/verilog/whatever interpreter that simulates an entire modern CPU + memory.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    10. Re:Video card related question by deviceb · · Score: 1

      neat idea.. there are some nice rootkits that reside in video memory now.

      --
      Kill your TV
  6. Pre-Overclocked? by YourMissionForToday · · Score: 1, Funny

    That pre-overclocked card will go great with my pre-opened mayonnaise and acid washed jeans! and my OOPS! ALL BERRIES! Cap'n Crunch.

  7. cheaper at the same price point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no doubting that NVIDIA's GeForce 7950 GT is faster and cheaper than the GeForce 7900 GT that launched at the same price point earlier in the year.

    say what now?

    1. Re:cheaper at the same price point? by HadesX · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they meant in comparison because of the increased capabilities?
      More likely a typo however.

      --
      Que Pasa?
    2. Re:cheaper at the same price point? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Inflation... *shrug*

      (it's the best answer I got)

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:cheaper at the same price point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or it made of inferior materials. Not something you'd want to advertise, really.

    4. Re:cheaper at the same price point? by corky842 · · Score: 1

      They probably mean the price range as in high-end, midrange, & budget.

    5. Re:cheaper at the same price point? by phusg · · Score: 1

      It takes re-reading, but it is right. It was the same price point when it launched, but currently it is cheaper. Actually no it doesn't make sense, unless the GeForce 7900 GT has gone up in price. Has it?

    6. Re:cheaper at the same price point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A brand new ferrari for $60,000 is much cheaper than paying $45,000 for a 12 yr. old Ford Tempo isn't it?

  8. I like the two DVI ports... by HatchedEggs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds good to me... I'm pretty impressed by its performance and features overall.

    It has a heck of a heat sink on it, and no whirring fans to add to the rest of the noise from your case. Which is just fine by me.

    _________
    http://hatchedeggs.blogspot.com/

    --
    Justin - Don't be afraid of my blog, it won't bite.
    1. Re:I like the two DVI ports... by remembertomorrow · · Score: 1

      I like this card too, unfortunately I'm still packing VGA. :(

      I could always get a DVI<->VGA convertor I guess.

      --
      Registered Linux user #421033
    2. Re:I like the two DVI ports... by karnal · · Score: 3, Informative

      uh..huh.

      Taken from Newegg:

      Package Contents: 2 x DVI to VGA Adapter

      I think they thought of you when they put teh card in teh boxxorz!

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:I like the two DVI ports... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much every high end card comes with DUAL DVI ports nowadays, while the older/lower end cards come with 1 DVI and 1 VGA port.

    4. Re:I like the two DVI ports... by default+luser · · Score: 1

      I've purchased two dual-DVI cards from XFX: first my 6600 GT, and later my 7900 GT.

      Both came with 2 DVI->VGA adaptors. Despite the "digital out" leanings of the cards, both had excellent 2D quality reminiscent of my old G400 MAX.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  9. Gl & HF by tirefire · · Score: 2, Informative

    From TFA: "While we're on the subject of the card being fanless, you're going to need to have good airflow inside your system to keep this card adequately cool."

    I've used a few passive cards before, and they've all crashed my games when they haven't had airflow over them. I thought elimination of airflow (i.e. noise) was the purpose of passive coolers?

    The best compromise between noise and performance is, imo, to buy an active Zalman cooler like the VF700 on my X800. It has a 5V "quiet" setting that keeps the card cool and very quiet as well as a 12V setting that's great for overclocking. Their design is pretty different from any stock cooler, and once you see the difference in performance, you'll understand why.

    1. Re:Gl & HF by tygerstripes · · Score: 1
      I recently built a silent rig using a Gigabyte 7600GT with passive cooling. The heatsink takes up an extra slot, but it's worth it for the silence.

      You're right about the airflow - you need at least some if a passive solution is going keep your GPU alive - but that's true no matter what your setup. The GPU will keep kicking out the same heat whether actively or passively cooled. If you had a box that had little in/out airflow then the heat build-up in the case would make any cooling solution ineffective, so you will always need some kind of exhaust and/or intake fan (unless your case is very open for convection - but that allows noise to escape far more easily for active-cooled cards, and doesn't provide sufficient airflow for passive).

      So the issue is really flow-density (I'm making this term up btw - flow-density is a real term, but I dunno if this is the correct application as my Civ Eng days are long past). A small heatsink with a fan close to it can have the same effect as a large heatsink with a big, slow case-fan if the airflow is managed properly - it's just that the former will usually generate a lot more noise.

      So, this build I did recently. The 7600GT uses two back-bezels - one for the ports, one as an intake grille, which leads directly over the heat-sink. The fact that I built this system in an fantastic Antec case made things easier, but the design of the card means that I can set the exhaust fan to draw air out above the card - making use of it's secondary heatsink/heatpipe - and the air is drawn in through the card's intake grille as there's nowhere else for it to come from. This fan is inaudible (as is the whole system, which is down to a Zalman CPU cooler and a semi-fanless QTechnology PSU, along with the case's triple-ply walls), but it provides sufficient airflow at sufficient density over the GPU heatsinks.

      It's great to have silent cooling but, as you say, a decent solution is not easy to engineer. It requires a bit of planning, some careful attention to detail (keeping cables tidy and the intakes/exhausts clear is a MUST) and a bit of investment, but it's worth it.

      I'm seriously considering adding some ducting around the card to improve flow density should I ever want to overclock the thing. As it is, it handles Oblivion at 1680*1050 with decent effects without getting jerky, so I'm in no hurry to start mucking around just yet!

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    2. Re:Gl & HF by deviceb · · Score: 1

      i would hope the thought is to equip the card with a waterblock .. i want nothing 115C in my box.

      --
      Kill your TV
    3. Re:Gl & HF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some women like it "hot"

      at those temps skin burns though

  10. More Detailed Review Analysis Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Last week, NVIDIA launched the affordably priced, sub-$200 GeForce 7900 GS and announced the higher-end, $299 GeForce 7950 GT with just a preview. It seems NVIDIA and their partners only needed a week to get the 7950 GT ready. This article at HotHardware.Com details the specifications and performance of the new GeForce 7950 GT as it relates to NVIDIA's and ATI's current products. Another interesting facet to this article is that the card tested, was HDCP ready, factory-overclocked and passively cooled.

  11. Large fans versus small fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing that I like about passively cooled system components is that cooling duties can be taken care of by larger fans than could ever be put onto a component (in this case, a video card). Those larger fans can move more air per minute at a lower RPM and therefore at a lower noise level. Even when the noise level isn't that much lower, it's also at a lower frequency due to the RPM difference, and those lower frequencies are often more easily ignored.

  12. Water cooling by pcraven · · Score: 1

    Those heatsinks can get hot. I recently build two fanless systems using Zalman Reserator 1's. The CPU is really cool because of Zalman's water cooling. But the thermal take fanless power supply and geforce 7600 video card are real hot. They are well within parameters, but you don't want to hold your hand on it. I wish I'd had the water cooler pick up the heat from those too.

    A fanless system will remind you how much noise those hard drive make though.

    1. Re:Water cooling by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      These cards aren't meant to be used in fanless systems. They are supposed to be placed right next to your CPU fan, it gets its airflow from that.

      The point of this passive cooling is to replace two loud fans with one loud fan.

    2. Re:Water cooling by hador_nyc · · Score: 1
      I wish I'd had the water cooler pick up the heat from those too.
      They do have watercooling for that system. I use a reservator 1 and have an attachment for my videocard. It cools my vc with a second water block. newegg's got the extra part
      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    3. Re:Water cooling by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Zalman flower coolers and fan are not loud at the slower speeds.

  13. Conversion by ynnaD · · Score: 1

    I am curious as to what conversion rate they are using between the USD and the GBP. According to the XE UCC, 299 USD is equivalent to 158.548 GBP.

    In that case it would probably be cheaper to buy the thing from a US website and have it shipped over to the UK.

    1. Re:Conversion by solevita · · Score: 0

      £225 is cheap, I was expecting it to be £299. Usually anything electric has the same numbers, but with a different currency symbol in front. The reasons for this (VAT, shipping, etc) are argued online whenever a new product is released in the US and UK.

      In short, the UK is more expensive.

    2. Re:Conversion by Surt · · Score: 1

      You're incorrectly assuming they are pricing it the same in both markets. They don't have to precisely because it's a PITA to ship internationally, plus think what about what you go through when you need to return a defective one.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Conversion by jZnat · · Score: 1

      But 60 quid extra? WTF

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    4. Re:Conversion by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      You're obviously unfamiliar with the international electronics market, it's always like this. In some cases the exchange rate for electronics in the uk vs usa is $1 -> £1, and in some (rare) cases it's actually worse than that.

      Try looking at the release prices for any major games console in the usa vs the uk, and you'll find the prices are definitely slanted against us. eg: PS3 launch prices where it is $599 for the premium console in the usa and £425 ($806) in the UK. Some places get it for nearly $1000, so maybe we're lucky...

      I guess they ship the stuff from all the taiwanese factories to the usa before then sending it on to the rest of the world, meaning we pay double transport and import tax costs?

    5. Re:Conversion by ros0709 · · Score: 1

      In the US prices are shown before sales tax whereas in the UK they have to be quoted VAT inclusive. When you factor that in there's still a difference so the point about pricing is still valid, but the difference is not quite as much as it seems.

  14. maybe I missed something by linuxpng · · Score: 2, Funny

    or maybe I don't know what 'passive' means but I see a fan on the card.

    1. Re:maybe I missed something by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      eh, why put the product you are advertising on the first page.. I see the 2 PCI slot killer on page 2.

    2. Re:maybe I missed something by cjb110 · · Score: 2

      congratulations, at least you've RTFFP, now go back and read the other pages, before clogging the tubes with more crap.

      --
      ----- I refuse to have an argument with an unarmed person
  15. Performance Wise by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There used to be the high end the mid range and the low end, (Radeon 9000pro, 9500pro and 9700pro Geforce 4Ti, 4600 and 4200) this was good the next generation of cards would have the performance of the old top card in it's mid level card and mid would be a bit above the new low end.

    Then they moved to 4 levels 6000, 6600GT, 6800GT, 6800 ULTRA (The lineup was more full but these seemed to be the peaks in this particular generation, and the performance of subsequent generations would move one level up 1 became 2 and 2 became 3 etc losing about $50 - 100 a generation.

    This addition provided something between high and middle when consumers really wanted something between mid and low.

    As a result the high end got split while more and more people clung to the middle which was why the 9500 and 6600GT were so hugely popular as mid range cards.

    High end buyers are starting to buy the mid range simply because game designers are realizing that the number of people buying $600 cards is going down and prices are going up as those consumers flee.

    Hopefully they will return to the 3 price point system as that seems to be the best for consumers.

    To card manufacturers, we're sorry about the press leaks but you better match last generations top model with a mid price card or you're going to get destroyed eventually.

    1. Re:Performance Wise by imboboage0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spot on. I've taken to recommending the mid-range cards over anything. I have had a 6600GT for a little over a year and I couldnt be anything but satisfied. It even OCs well. I wasn't able to drop 500 bucks on a GPU, so I went with the 150 dollar solution: Mid-Range. I think this is where most of the market is (for anything but OEMs anyway) because people don't want to spend an assload on a video card, but they want bang for the buck. It's my belief that the market is concentrated around the mid-range, and it's going to stay that way.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:Performance Wise by default+luser · · Score: 1

      There used to be the high end the mid range and the low end

      No, even back in the "goold old days" that you are obviously not remembering correctly, ATI and Nvidia were guilty of confusing tactics and far too many "models". Let's take your two examples:

      The NV25-based GeForce 4 series of cards were most known for the confusing release of the GeForce 4 MX, which was really a GeForce 2 renamed. Without the DirectX 8 features of the true Geforce 4, the GeForce 4 MX had no business carrying that name. The cards were also confusing for people purchasing them because Nvidia released confusing refresh models with AGP 8x.

      *** Also, the Ti4800SE (clocked at 275 / 550) was actually SLOWER than the Ti4600 (clocked at 300 / 650), another annoying and confusing product release.

      Just like today, there are TONS of confusing model names with often contradictory performance.

      Cards (in performance order):

      DirectX 7

      GeForce 4 MX420, MX440SE, MX 4000, PCX 4300, MX440, MX440SE-8X, MX440-8X, MX460

      DirectX 8

      GeForce 4 Ti4200, Ti4200-8X, Ti4400, Ti4800SE, Ti4600, Ti4800

      The R300 (Radeon 9500-9800) generation used R300 for mid-range and high-end, and left the low-end to old R200 variants. This created confusion, because even though the Radeon 9000-9250 were in the same "thousand," they had a totally different feature set.

      As you can see, the name game took over following the refresh, just like it does for ANY product set (including Nvidia's latest).

      Cards (in performance order):

      DirectX 8.1

      Radeon 9000, 9000 Pro

      DirectX 9

      Radeon 9500, 9500 Pro, 9700, 9700 Pro

      LATER REFRESH:

      DirectX 8.1

      Radeon 9100, 9200, 9250

      DirectX 9

      Radeon 9550 SE, 9550, 9600 SE, 9600, 9600 Pro, 9600 XT, 9800 SE, 9800, 9800 Pro, 9800 XT

      Kinda confusing, ain't it?

      To card manufacturers, we're sorry about the press leaks but you better match last generations top model with a mid price card or you're going to get destroyed eventually.

      They DID. Or were you not paying attention when Nvidia released the 7600 GT 256MB for $200 (same price as the 6600 GT 128MB on release), and amazed the crowd with the performance potential of fast memory on a 128-bit bus?

      Were you just incapacitated when review sites across the planet proclaimed the 7600 GT to stomp all over the 6800 GT, and even slightly outperform the 6800 Ultra? The only last-generation card with better performance is the x850 XT series, and it's not by much.

      NOW, you have the 7900 GS released in the same price point as the 7600 GT was 6 months ago ($200). For that increase in price, you get 20 pipes instead of 12, and a 256-bit bus, GUARANTEED to best a 7600 GT by a huge margin. How can you NOT love this?

      Maybe you find the number of models released confusing, but rest-assured, they are releasing better and better cards at the $150-200 price-point. On the Nvidia side you have the 7900 GS, and on the ATI side you have the x1900 GT, and they're both excellent cards.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  16. gpu throttling by nostriluu · · Score: 1

    Do video cards like this perform any kind of 'gpu throttling' to keep power/heat at a minimum when they're not being taxed? How minimum? What does one look for to investigate this?

    1. Re:gpu throttling by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Video cards have throttled themselves for a long time now. Typically they run at a much slower speed when doing 2D graphics and then ramp it up once a 3d program kicks in.

    2. Re:gpu throttling by m0biusAce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most video cards certainly do. I know for a fact nVidia cards so. They have different clock speeds for 2D (using no 3d applications, just your desktop and regular apps), and 3D in which the card clocks to maximium. Mobile versions of these graphic cards are even more power concious, they clock down even further, or employ other methods (such as shutting down parts of the GPU that are not being used completly, and reducing the number of PCI-E lanes used).

    3. Re:gpu throttling by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Anyone with a high-end video card can tell you the fan on it goes into vacuum-cleaner mode whhile playing a game.

      Unfortunately, thanks to technologies like Aero Glass, Quartz Extreme, and XGL, it looks like graphics cards are going to be stuck in 3D mode from now on.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  17. Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $300 för a frickin' 3D card is attractive?! You ride segways to the garage and all have Porsche's, Ferari's, Lamborghini's or even Koenigsegg's just to drive to the store too?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . . have Porsche's, Ferari's, Lamborghini's or even Koenigsegg's just to drive to the store too?

      Well it beats having 'em to keep the extra socks in.

      KFG

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My chauffer drives the Koenigsegg to the store for me.

  18. price by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    great performance at an attractive $299/£225 launch price

    Wern't we just complaining about the $250 Wii console this morning. And now applauding a $299 graphic card as affordable.

    1. Re:price by Babbster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry. The next time there's a discussion about "the death of PC gaming" there will be a dozen people telling us all about how you can make a PC gaming rig for less than the cost of a PS3. :)

    2. Re:price by iriki · · Score: 0

      mod parent up :o)

    3. Re:price by ne0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wern't we just complaining about the $250 Wii console this morning. And now applauding a $299 graphic card as affordable.

      I guess gaming cards are like women: affordable != attractive.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    4. Re:price by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wern't we just complaining about the $250 Wii console this morning. And now applauding a $299 graphic card as affordable.

      With a console, you'll actually be paying MSRP for it.

      With computer components, it'll take a few weeks before it's selling for half-price, and less.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:price by unuselessj · · Score: 1

      I like my video cards like my women, quiet with a big heatsink.

  19. Cheaper at the same price point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheaper at the same price point.
    Cheaper at the same price point.
    Cheaper at the same price point.

    And if you act now, you can have two for the price of two!!!

    That's all I got.

  20. Similar Review on GeForce 7900GS by Vskye · · Score: 1

    Tom's Hardware just had a similar review based on the above card. http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/14/the_geforce _7900gs_is_nvidias_new_mid-range/ Also, this one is a tab cheaper at around $220.

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  21. Using GPU for more generic tasks by sowth · · Score: 1

    Maybe not with a kernel made for generic cpus, but I'm sure there are plenty of processing tasks which would benefit from a GPU: raytracing, fractals, various AI applications, image processing. Those are probably the more obvious ones. Once common usage was underway, I'm sure developers would find other uses too... It is essentially a co-processor (tied to the graphics system), so why not use it as one?

    1. Re:Using GPU for more generic tasks by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Some things do, like NVidia's PureVideo(I think thats the name) software that GPU-accelerates some advanced video decompression. I've also heard of it used for some sort of compression and a few other things, but the problem is getting data off back from the card was really slow with AGP

      I have no idea how PCI-X changes this.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  22. USA USA USA by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny
    Of course we have 110C coffee here! We invented pressurized coffee cups just for that purpose!

    We blast super heated coffee right down our throats, it's a real waker-upper in the morning, while driving giant SUV's down the highway and yaking on our cell phones!. Doesn't everyone like it HOT?

    Foreign whimps.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  23. Obligatory by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    I still don't care, because they still won't give me the information I need in order to use the card.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't care, because they still won't give me the information I need in order to use the card.

      Most people figure out how to plug it into the PCIe slot and install the Windows drivers all by themselves.

      You must be pretty fucking dumb.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1
      You must be pretty fucking dumb.

      Likewise, if in 2006 you still think that everyone must be running Wintel.

    3. Re:Obligatory by smash · · Score: 1

      Funny, i've got 3D acceleration working just fine in both Linux and FreeBSD on my 7600GT...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    4. Re:Obligatory by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Which is fine unless you want to do kernel development, or follow kernel development, or follow X development, or work on alternative operating systems, or use alternative processor architectures.

      Proprietary drivers are great when they do exactly what they want, and then they sharply drop to borderline-useless as soon as any of the assumptions the vendor made turn out to be wrong.

      I just got an older Radeon board to work in my computer, after commenting-out one line of code in the free radeon drivers (X erroneously thinks that there is a resource conflict on the machine, and disabling the ignoring the error fixes the problem). ATI's proprietary drivers do not work.

      I've had similar problems with NVidia boards. Sometimes the proprietary drivers work, but when they don't---no matter how small the problem---you're screwed. Never mind the security implications.

      Using proprietary drivers on a free OS is like smoking. You can point to a lot of people who apparently aren't being harmed by it. That doesn't make it any less dumb.

  24. Hooray! Cheaper at the same price point! by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    Editors? We don't need no stinking editors!

    Cheers to you Slashdot, Ed Palma

  25. Fanless is good and all.. by popeye44 · · Score: 1

    But I've ran many a card with only a heatsink and i've never had one yet that didn't cause artifacting etc. The problem with a stock card with no fan is if you take heatsink off it and replace with fan, you've generally voided warranty. Now we all know over the last few years MFG's have lightened up on refusing a warranty because we overclocked/cooked their card. Even going so far as to provide us the tools to do so. However changing the hardware of a card is generally going to void the warranty. Not that it's ever stopped us geeks from doing it.. but I typically cool a card very well externally while overclocking until I decide if putting a after market fan will be effective and reward me with a nice OC.

    --
    Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
  26. Fan noise not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fan noise isn't a problem, I can't hear anything over the teenage dick next door with his new drum set anyway.

  27. Passive cooling, but not water cooling. by ear1grey · · Score: 1

    ...and for water cooled systems do they provide a version with no cooling at all? Still no?

    Given the size of the water cooling market, there must be a large enough niche here that it can be commercially exploited.

  28. Rip-off Britain by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    $299/£225

    Even allowing for VAT:

    (299/1.8) * 1.175 = £195

    So, once again, we Brits get to pay the random 15% "stiff upper lip" tax.

    1. Re:Rip-off Britain by bri2000 · · Score: 1
      dabs.com are selling an own brand 7950GT for £192. Slightly less than I paid for a 7900GT two weeks ago :(

      Not that they have any in stock...

      http://www.dabs.com/productview.aspx?Quicklinx=48Q N&CategorySelectedId=11137&NavigationKey=11137

  29. Re:new card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XFX's pre-overclocked card comes with a passive cooling solution

    Expect to see NVidea-fanbois' penises collectively shrink a few inches.

  30. Rip-off Britain strikes again by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    $299 is currently worth only £209, not £225. As usual, the UK is more expensive...

    The UK is a joke for technology. A few months ago we just started to get iMode phones. iMode launch in Japan in January 1999, so we were only seven years behind there.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  31. Rip off the Brits! by innit · · Score: 1

    "at an attractive $299/£225 launch price"

    How is that "attractive"? According to xe.com, at today's exchange rate, $299 is worth £159. How do they justify the £66 ($124) price difference?

    Stuii!

    1. Re:Rip off the Brits! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      $299 is worth £159. How do they justify the £66 ($124) price difference?

      Rip-Off Britain

  32. Stupid nvidia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes my 7900gtx superclock obsolete! Jerks.

    1. Re:Stupid nvidia by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. This is like the exact same card, clocked lower. The only thing you're missing is the HDCP decoder.

      --
      Jeremy
  33. Impressive by GmAz · · Score: 1

    Though 110C temperatures sound high, I have a NVidia 6800GT Massively Overclocked and it used to run about 80C at full load with the stock cooling. On a hot day outside, it got up to 100C quite often. Those temperatures are not horrible for video cards. They are designed to experience that kind of temerature. When I put watercooling on my videocard, the temperatures dropped to a max of 50C at load, no matter what the ambient temperature of my office was. There was no gain in performance and the overclock stayed where it was. The only issue I would have with 110C is that it would heat up the rest of my system, most importantly my CPU which is right above my video card and since heat rises, it wouldn't make me happy. My advice would to be buy an aftermarket fan/heatsink for this card and you will be pleasantly surprised.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  34. A couple last gasps from nVidia? by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    I have to believe the acquisition of ATI by AMD essentially writes an epitath for nVidia. They have lagged behind ATI for image quality for about 2 years now, and performance for a year.

    I have nothing against them, but they are fighting an uphill battle. I don't think releasing products like this are really going to help them. If nVidia pulls a rabbit out of their hat, maybe it'll make sense on the high-end to buy nVidia again. For now, they are a "me, too" producer.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
    1. Re:A couple last gasps from nVidia? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll court the Linux users by open-sourcing their drivers.

    2. Re:A couple last gasps from nVidia? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      exactly how much dope did you need to come to that conclusion?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. It's all relitive by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    If I sold you a banana for $250 you'd call it expensive. If I sold you a new car (that worked properly) for $250 you'd call it cheap. It's all a matter of what you are comparing it against.

    Thus if you were expecting a Wii of $200 or less, $250 seem expensive. Also, if the leaked specs that have been floating around are correct, it's not much faster than an original Xbox. Nothing wrong with that, but it does change what people would say it's worth.

    1. Re:It's all relitive by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Still its just a graphics card. Its like calling a $25,000 new low end car expensive (which it is) then calling a $29,000 engine for a high end car cheap.

  36. But will it run... by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    But will it run Linux? Oh, wait, this is a video card...

    But will it run Folding@Home? (Since it's NVidia, the answer is no, so I probably won't buy one.)

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  37. Just need to add this: by default+luser · · Score: 1

    As Sadko posted, the fan mounts are standardized, so it is easy these days to purchase a "one size fits all" fan upgrade.

    Furthermore, by upgrading to a better heatsink with a larger fan, one can run the fan at extremely low RPMs, making it virtually silent.

    For example, I replaced the fan on my 7900 GT (REALLY loud) with a Zalman vf900. The heatpipe design makes this cooler incredibly efficient, and it also comes with a Fanmate to allow you to tune the speed to your tastes. I was able to run my card overclocked on the LOWEST Fanmate setting (inaudible), and still see a 10C reduction over the stock cooler.

    Note that I have a fairly quiet PC case, based on a Sonata II with Scythe 120mm S-FLEX FDB fans, so you can rest assured that when I say "inaudible" over the rest of the case, this actually means something.

    So, you get better cooling than any "passive" solution, and no noticeable increase in noise. That's why it may be a better idea to go with Zalman. I've heard of low-airflow, "quiet" or "silent" cases having issues with "passive" heatsink performance video cards (which REALLY require medium airflow to be cooled well), so I stick with low-noise active coolers. With the excessive premium you pay for passively-cooled video cards, the extra cash for a Zalman cooler isn't that much.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  38. That's not the model by default+luser · · Score: 1

    If you actually look at the link, you'll notice that the model there has a reference fan and heatsink. Both the listed specs and the picture mention this.

    The passive model you are looking for is not sold on Newegg...in fact, I can't find it for sale anywhere. Tiger Direct no longer carries the item, and it's out-of-stock at Mwave. At $330, it has a sizeable price premium over other 7950 GTs.

    See, that's the problem when buying from XFX - they have TOO MANY models, so you can easily get confused and buy the wrong one.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:That's not the model by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Oh! you're wrong though. The description on newegg is wrong. If you go to XFX's website, the part number: PVT71JYHE9 definetly doesn't have a fan on it. I don't see a fan on any of the pictures.

  39. I have to say. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems more natural to talk of outdoor air temperature in Fahrenheit.
    In a temperate region (like the United States), the range of 0-100 degrees enumerates the temperatures most people will experience through the course of a year.

    0 = dangerously cold
    25 = freezing
    50 = cool
    75 = warm
    100 = dangerously hot

    OTH I find it much simpler to speak of temperatures when concerning computers in degrees Celcius because, again, the range is more intuitive.

    0 = your condensor is broken
    25 = room temperature
    50 = okay
    75 = too hot
    100 = meltdown

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:I have to say. by kastberg · · Score: 1

      0F dangerous? As a swede I'm offended by this.

    2. Re:I have to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have nudist colonies here. So yes.

  40. Fans -- Important by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

    Just last week, I had my computer suddenly start hard-crashing whenever I'd run a 3-D intensive app (read newer game). I thought I might have a corrupt driver, or perhaps the hardware was failing. After way too much effort to eliminate any possible software problems, I opened the case up to take the card out in preparation for attempted warranty service. The heatsink had just enough dust bunnies on it to block airflow from the HSFan. Everything else in the case was fine (and not even very dusty) but without the airflow over the GPU, it would reliably crash when pushed. Blew out the dust-bunnies and card worked 100% instantly.

  41. Again it's different things by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    PC gaming is something that costs more money, at least if you want to stay on the cutting edge. Now there are compensations, one being that the computer will be quite powerful and able to be used for other tasks, another being that you get to stay on top of technology (a console is only on top when it comes out, if ever), and still another being the modability.

    I'm just saying you can't compare one market to another. $300 is pretty cheap for a near top of the line graphics card. However $250 for a console who's performance will allegedly be on par with one currently going for less seems expensive.

  42. Well "dangerous" is relative. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Children and the elderly could be at risk if outdoors when the temperature is 0F or below (or 100F or above). That being said, I would be just fine with it. I do prefer weather between 50 and 75F, however.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON