Slashdot Mirror


PS3 Downtime To Fight Disease

Aerenel writes, "CNN reports that Sony has teamed up with Folding@home to use the PS3 to study how proteins are formed in the human body and how they sometimes form incorrectly. From the article: 'Donating [a gamer's] PS3's down time to researchers could help cure Alzheimer's, Parkinson's or mad cow disease.' PS3 users will be able to download a software package that tracks when the PS3 is not being used. While gamers are in school, at work, or asleep, their system's Cell processor can be used to perform simulations for research organizations. The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

28 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by urbanradar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This definitely seems like a good thing. But I wonder, will gamers really let that influence their purchasing decisions? Honestly, I have my doubts.

    1. Re:Well... by adam31 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, it all depends on how it's marketed, it could have a huge snowball effect.


      If you award people 'hero points' and display a leaderboard showing how many lives each gamer has saved... or break it down by institution-- like college or business. Especially if the interface is really cool. Maybe have a hall of fame of cool-looking protein folds you could download.

      It could become quite a competition to not play your PS3, particularly if launch titles turn out to be as good as launch titles typically are.

  2. Pity by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I guess when all else fails, they can always go for the pity angle. "Oh!! Please help us ingrain Blu-Ray! We're fighting DISEASE!"

  3. Re:In other words... by yincrash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't forget shortening the useful life of the PS3 itself!

  4. Re:In other words... by urbanradar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    RTFA. It's on a voluntary basis. If you don't like it, don't do it. But it certainly is nice to have the possibility, and, as it seems, officially approved by Sony.

  5. Fight my disease by OSS_ilation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do I have Alzheimer's, or did I read about this last month?

  6. Huh? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

    If I'm already ambivalent about spending that much money on a game system, the question "What will the game system, which I bought to play games, do when I'm not playing games on it?" is not likely to be a significant influence on my decision.

  7. Not HAHA by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, this article is kind of a dupe but the CNN article has a lot of new information.

    One of tidbits is that the researchers have to dumb down the PC distributed version so that it runs on even the slowest computer. In fact, they have to play to the lowest common denominator. With the PS3, it's standardized so they can inch out every bit of performance from the chipset. On top of that, they know there will only be on GPU so they can write the renderer for that and you'll see the protein folding on your screen. It will look all science-y and you can navigate around it. People might like this as a screen saver or conversation piece. The researchers are also hoping that it attracts people to also install it on their computers to aid in this endeavor.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Not HAHA by moro_666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While probably 10% offtopic, i still hope this gets out to all the science app builders :

        Please make your applications scalable in % of cpu power used :)

        I have a laptop here, cute 3200 bogomips under it's belly, but i refuse to burn my system's cpu in favor of curing cancer. I wouldn't mind to give you 10% or 20% of the cpu power, because that wouldn't heat it up, but your applications that burn at 110% of the power available, are just not usable for most partly "idle" machines. Moreover, you'd get a bunch of workforce from fileservers which are idling on the cpu 90% of the time .. but as long as your applications just slay their performance in cold blood and cause them to run at nearly nuclear explosion temperatures (renicing the process will help against the first issue sometimes, but not the latter), you are just losing possible helpers.

        One minimalistic "sleep" or "delay" into your mainloop, and whoop's , you're going to get more work done than you have ever before. Until then, nothing will fold on my machines over here.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:Not HAHA by kirun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't Sony make a loss on the hardware? Maybe they're banking on the Blu-Ray components dropping sharply in price by the time PS3s start breaking down, but it looks to me more like an attempt to get one bit of good PR not written by Official Sony Fanboy Magazine. Note that Wii will also be always-on, but Nintendo have taken the opposite approach, aiming for minimal standby power usage, waking only to receive downloads of freshly minted swag for your games. So, if there's some evil MTBF conspiracy, two companies had the same idea at once... Let's not dump on Sony's decision too much, this will give the research a nice boost, but it doesn't scream out "Get a PS3!" to me by any stretch.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    3. Re:Not HAHA by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you insist on "scaling" applications when you could just set the priority(win)/nice(*nix) level lower? (i.e., higher nice value in linux, lower priority setting in windows). That way, it will always yield to every other system that needs to use the CPU. (And nevermind the belief that a process can use only 'part' of a single-core CPU)

    4. Re:Not HAHA by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why would you insist on "scaling" applications when you could just set the priority(win)/nice(*nix) level lower? (i.e., higher nice value in linux, lower priority setting in windows). That way, it will always yield to every other system that needs to use the CPU. (And nevermind the belief that a process can use only 'part' of a single-core CPU)


      Because even if my computer isn't running anything important, running it at 100% CPU usage will invoke the full cooling capacity of the system. For a desktop, this means a louder fan noise. For a laptop, however, it may not be well-suited to 24/7 100% CPU utilization. The fans are small and can get _very_ noisy. The bottom of the laptop can get so hot as to be unusable on your lap; quite possibly, you could shorten the lifespan of your components.
      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    5. Re:Not HAHA by MustardMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you even READ the post you replied to? He specifically states why "nice" isn't a solution. Nice doesn't stop a program from using all the CPU, it just stops it from using CPU when another program wants it. His complaint is constantly having a system peaked near 100% CPU usage, which produces shitloads of heat, shortening processor life.

    6. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 5, Informative
      BOINC allows such a setting, but it's buried deep within the settings.

      The United Devices client has it at 50% by default, and is easier to configure.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    7. Re:Not HAHA by Lord+Crc · · Score: 3, Informative

      One minimalistic "sleep" or "delay" into your mainloop, and whoop's , you're going to get more work done than you have ever before. Until then, nothing will fold on my machines over here.

      The problem is that this won't work well for Folding@Home. It doesn't work like distributed.net where one can just assign some part of the keyspace to one client and have it work on that. The work units returned are used to generate new work units. That's why they have such "tight" deadlines. See their FAQ for details.

      So for Folding@Home, you'll most likely end up past the deadline (unless you got a VERY spiffy laptop), and not helping all that much (although your work will be used for double-checking afaik).

      However for other projects, distributed.net style, it would work out nicely, and I belive BOINC already has an option for this (the new F@H client might aswell, I can't remember, all my folding is done on my linux box now, and I haven't touched it in ages).

  8. Re:In other words... by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, to be fair, the bandwidth is probably minimal and, in cold seasons, the power consumption will just turn into heat and make itself slightly useful.

    From the summary, it sounds like this will be something you can download if you want to, just like it is on the PC. I don't think people who don't run Folding@Home are often attacked for being horrible people who support cancer.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  9. Re:asfaasf by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I'm going to pay $600 so I can run a second copy of something that's already spinning away on my PC right now?


    No, you are going to pay $600 to play games and run Linux on a Cell processor. The F@H thing is just a perk that you can either use to double (or quadruple) what you are doing on your PC right now or not. If you pay $600 for a PS3 just to do F@H, you are an idiot.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  10. The next supercomputer... by RetlawST · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...will be built using a cluster of PS3s.
     
      This cluster will be able to help cure cancer AND allow Madden 2007 to play an entire season in three minutes.

  11. Pass by mac123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting for the project that will have me use all of the spare time for my incredibly overpowered home CPUs (and with it ample amounts of electricity) to 'fight global warming'!

  12. new slogan by Darth+Maul · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's only a matter of time until they reveal their new slogan: "PS3. Won't somebody think of the children?".

    --
    --- witty signature
  13. Re:Potential power costs? by mspohr · · Score: 4, Informative
    I guess you are exaggerating to illustrate your point but the power consumption of the PS3 is unlikely to be 500 watts (50 to 100 watts is more likely) and your power cost of 20 cents is two or three times what most people pay (I pay 10 cents in California). Your estimate is probably 10x to 20x too high.

    Yes, it would cost electricity but most likely only a few dollars a month, not $750 a year and most likely wouldn't burn out the electricy grid.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  14. Re:How the.. by kpearson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you read anything about Folding@home before you started criticizing it? It is run by a public university, not a privately-held organization. The university will not profit from the research. If you can't bother to learn about the project, at least read it's FAQ.

  15. Is it tax deductible... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If so, buying a PS3 could pay for itself over time. Seriously, I would signup, have them e-mail me CPU usage statistics muliplied by an industry standard rate as a reciept. They're happy to have CPU cycles, I'm happy to have the tax deduction.

    Now if that's the case, can something similar be done with other CPU cycle donations to other projects? I have a multi-core server that spends most of its time idle. Might as well put to some use, eh?

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
  16. Re:How the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Because privately held research would like to use my PS3 for free and then make money from it when
    > they discover something - without any intention to charge less $$ for the treatment / cure in
    > exchange for all this free computing?

    Once a medical discovery is made it doesn't go away. Yes, it is a money tree for YEARS for the company with the patents. YES, a lot of the research was paid for by others. NO, they won't share. YES, they will charge an insane amount for it.

    But a new treatment is A NEW TREATMENT. A cure is a CURE. Stop being so goddamned cynical and take one up the rear for the good of mankind once in a while.

    And yes, I'm serious. Mod me down if you must though, I'll understand.

  17. Re:In other words... by grommit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Riiiight.. because the heating/cooling cycles of electronic equipment being turned on and off repeatedly is *much* better for it.

    At least try to come up with a valid reason to not use it.

  18. Re:Potential power costs? by radish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree that 500W is a little much, but according to this page the 360 takes 145W. I'd imagine the PS3 to be similar.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  19. Re:Double dipping? by boingyzain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, you aren't allowing Sony to use your spare cycles, you're allowing Folding@Home (or more broadly, Stanford University's Pande Group) to use your spare cycles. And they are a non-profit organization who releases their findings for free. So, yes, you as part of the public can access the information you helped discover for free.

    Even if Sony WAS a scientific conglomerate trying to find a cure, would you really want to put a hamper on reducing millions of deaths just because you don't want them to earn money? Please avoid discarding your common sense in favor of bashing a corporation you don't like. Oh, wait, this is Slashdot.

  20. If I can run a C compiler, it's a computer. by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ken Kutaragi said that the PS3 not a console, it is a computer!

    When I can run GCC on it without using rare, expensive add-on hardware that Sony quickly discontinues *cough*PS2 Linux*cough*, then it's a computer. Until then, it's a locked-in console.