Slashdot Mirror


PS3 Downtime To Fight Disease

Aerenel writes, "CNN reports that Sony has teamed up with Folding@home to use the PS3 to study how proteins are formed in the human body and how they sometimes form incorrectly. From the article: 'Donating [a gamer's] PS3's down time to researchers could help cure Alzheimer's, Parkinson's or mad cow disease.' PS3 users will be able to download a software package that tracks when the PS3 is not being used. While gamers are in school, at work, or asleep, their system's Cell processor can be used to perform simulations for research organizations. The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

55 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by urbanradar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This definitely seems like a good thing. But I wonder, will gamers really let that influence their purchasing decisions? Honestly, I have my doubts.

    1. Re:Well... by adam31 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, it all depends on how it's marketed, it could have a huge snowball effect.


      If you award people 'hero points' and display a leaderboard showing how many lives each gamer has saved... or break it down by institution-- like college or business. Especially if the interface is really cool. Maybe have a hall of fame of cool-looking protein folds you could download.

      It could become quite a competition to not play your PS3, particularly if launch titles turn out to be as good as launch titles typically are.

    2. Re:Well... by honkycat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably not much, but that's not really the point. It's good publicity that can't hurt. People won't go out and think "wow i can help fold proteins," they'll just give a little thought to Sony and the PS3 when they read the articles about it. It's all about marketing, and subliminal marketing is the best kind.

  2. In other words... by bombshelter13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other words, your PS3 uses network bandwidth and electricity you paid for with your money to calculate who knows what and send it God knows where when you're not using it and anyone who tries to stop their PS3 from doing this is a horrible person who supports cancer.

    1. Re:In other words... by yincrash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget shortening the useful life of the PS3 itself!

    2. Re:In other words... by urbanradar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      RTFA. It's on a voluntary basis. If you don't like it, don't do it. But it certainly is nice to have the possibility, and, as it seems, officially approved by Sony.

    3. Re:In other words... by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, to be fair, the bandwidth is probably minimal and, in cold seasons, the power consumption will just turn into heat and make itself slightly useful.

      From the summary, it sounds like this will be something you can download if you want to, just like it is on the PC. I don't think people who don't run Folding@Home are often attacked for being horrible people who support cancer.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    4. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not quite. But it's a good way for kids to convince their parents to shell out all that cash for a shiney new PS3.

    5. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Contrary to what distributed computing propaganda says, when you have your CPU at 100% utilization, it uses MORE power than when it is idling. So no, these programs do not just use power that would have been wasted otherwise, since they increase power consumption. If the computer is left on to do nothing, there is wasted energy, yes, but the implication that running folding@home or any other distributed computing program is, from an energy usage standpoint, free, is patently false.

      It is also deceitful to try to convince people otherwise.

      And yes, I think even a couple bucks more per month in electricity usage is significant.

    6. Re:In other words... by grommit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Riiiight.. because the heating/cooling cycles of electronic equipment being turned on and off repeatedly is *much* better for it.

      At least try to come up with a valid reason to not use it.

    7. Re:In other words... by Logreybaby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Guessing 60 watts difference between idle and 100%.
      Assuming F@H running for a month.
      Assuming price of electricity is ten cents per kWh.

      60 watts * 720 hours * $0.10 > $4.30

      So yeah bucks.

  3. Pity by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I guess when all else fails, they can always go for the pity angle. "Oh!! Please help us ingrain Blu-Ray! We're fighting DISEASE!"

  4. Fight my disease by OSS_ilation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do I have Alzheimer's, or did I read about this last month?

    1. Re:Fight my disease by OSS_ilation · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even better, how about a link? PS3 to cure Alzheimer's?

  5. Huh? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The PS3, due in November, has gotten serious negative press in the past few months, and this refreshing good news may win back the hearts of gamers still undecided about purchasing the system."

    If I'm already ambivalent about spending that much money on a game system, the question "What will the game system, which I bought to play games, do when I'm not playing games on it?" is not likely to be a significant influence on my decision.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. Most gamers who would care about this are already running F@H on their computers.

      But alas, we are not their target market. This is a ploy aimed squarely at a certain type of parent who wants to feel they are being proactive in finding solutions to the issues that plague all humanity, while also providing their little precious angels with something to do while they are busy watching Tele and/or sending email to the interweb.

      Really, there are people like that.

  6. Not HAHA by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, this article is kind of a dupe but the CNN article has a lot of new information.

    One of tidbits is that the researchers have to dumb down the PC distributed version so that it runs on even the slowest computer. In fact, they have to play to the lowest common denominator. With the PS3, it's standardized so they can inch out every bit of performance from the chipset. On top of that, they know there will only be on GPU so they can write the renderer for that and you'll see the protein folding on your screen. It will look all science-y and you can navigate around it. People might like this as a screen saver or conversation piece. The researchers are also hoping that it attracts people to also install it on their computers to aid in this endeavor.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Not HAHA by moro_666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While probably 10% offtopic, i still hope this gets out to all the science app builders :

        Please make your applications scalable in % of cpu power used :)

        I have a laptop here, cute 3200 bogomips under it's belly, but i refuse to burn my system's cpu in favor of curing cancer. I wouldn't mind to give you 10% or 20% of the cpu power, because that wouldn't heat it up, but your applications that burn at 110% of the power available, are just not usable for most partly "idle" machines. Moreover, you'd get a bunch of workforce from fileservers which are idling on the cpu 90% of the time .. but as long as your applications just slay their performance in cold blood and cause them to run at nearly nuclear explosion temperatures (renicing the process will help against the first issue sometimes, but not the latter), you are just losing possible helpers.

        One minimalistic "sleep" or "delay" into your mainloop, and whoop's , you're going to get more work done than you have ever before. Until then, nothing will fold on my machines over here.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    2. Re:Not HAHA by kirun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't Sony make a loss on the hardware? Maybe they're banking on the Blu-Ray components dropping sharply in price by the time PS3s start breaking down, but it looks to me more like an attempt to get one bit of good PR not written by Official Sony Fanboy Magazine. Note that Wii will also be always-on, but Nintendo have taken the opposite approach, aiming for minimal standby power usage, waking only to receive downloads of freshly minted swag for your games. So, if there's some evil MTBF conspiracy, two companies had the same idea at once... Let's not dump on Sony's decision too much, this will give the research a nice boost, but it doesn't scream out "Get a PS3!" to me by any stretch.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    3. Re:Not HAHA by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you insist on "scaling" applications when you could just set the priority(win)/nice(*nix) level lower? (i.e., higher nice value in linux, lower priority setting in windows). That way, it will always yield to every other system that needs to use the CPU. (And nevermind the belief that a process can use only 'part' of a single-core CPU)

    4. Re:Not HAHA by cbhacking · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think BOINC allows processor utilization limits (sorry, I haven't set the configuration in months). Generally, you can also intentionally scale down the processor (tying this to a specifc application might be slightly tricky but should be possible).

      Or you could just make sure your laptop has adaquate ventilation and run it like it's supposed to be used.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    5. Re:Not HAHA by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why would you insist on "scaling" applications when you could just set the priority(win)/nice(*nix) level lower? (i.e., higher nice value in linux, lower priority setting in windows). That way, it will always yield to every other system that needs to use the CPU. (And nevermind the belief that a process can use only 'part' of a single-core CPU)


      Because even if my computer isn't running anything important, running it at 100% CPU usage will invoke the full cooling capacity of the system. For a desktop, this means a louder fan noise. For a laptop, however, it may not be well-suited to 24/7 100% CPU utilization. The fans are small and can get _very_ noisy. The bottom of the laptop can get so hot as to be unusable on your lap; quite possibly, you could shorten the lifespan of your components.
      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    6. Re:Not HAHA by MustardMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you even READ the post you replied to? He specifically states why "nice" isn't a solution. Nice doesn't stop a program from using all the CPU, it just stops it from using CPU when another program wants it. His complaint is constantly having a system peaked near 100% CPU usage, which produces shitloads of heat, shortening processor life.

    7. Re:Not HAHA by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 5, Informative
      BOINC allows such a setting, but it's buried deep within the settings.

      The United Devices client has it at 50% by default, and is easier to configure.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    8. Re:Not HAHA by Lord+Crc · · Score: 3, Informative

      One minimalistic "sleep" or "delay" into your mainloop, and whoop's , you're going to get more work done than you have ever before. Until then, nothing will fold on my machines over here.

      The problem is that this won't work well for Folding@Home. It doesn't work like distributed.net where one can just assign some part of the keyspace to one client and have it work on that. The work units returned are used to generate new work units. That's why they have such "tight" deadlines. See their FAQ for details.

      So for Folding@Home, you'll most likely end up past the deadline (unless you got a VERY spiffy laptop), and not helping all that much (although your work will be used for double-checking afaik).

      However for other projects, distributed.net style, it would work out nicely, and I belive BOINC already has an option for this (the new F@H client might aswell, I can't remember, all my folding is done on my linux box now, and I haven't touched it in ages).

    9. Re:Not HAHA by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget the power consumption increase when any computing device is running at 100%. That heat's coming from somewhere.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    10. Re:Not HAHA by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but as long as your applications just slay their performance in cold blood and cause them to run at nearly nuclear explosion temperatures (renicing the process will help against the first issue sometimes, but not the latter), you are just losing possible helpers.
      Hmmm, nuclear temparatures, eh.

      My home server is on 24/7/365 and runs F@H. Gkrelm reports my temps. at 52.0, 27.0, and 51.5

      It's reniced to 10 so that means it is actually running at a nice value of 19 ....

      25848 smoker 39 19 89192 48m 1152 R 96.4 4.8 79:37.24 FahCore_7a.exe

      And I took that top reading while posting to /. in Firefox 1.5.0.7 and downloading a torrent of *some_linux_iso* via Azureus (java) while logged in on a Gnome 2.10.1 desktop on that machine. I use only this machine for the internet. My XP box never goes near the WWW at all.
      Maybe you are running a Microsoft OS ?

      BTW, I've been running this since Dec. 5 2004 and it has never caused an issue with performance, as far as I'm concerned.
      My stats.
      (the machine concerned is a Sempron 1.5 ghz with 1GB RAM running FC4, 3504.08 bogomips)

      Why anyone would run F@H on a laptop is beyond me anyway, it needs to run constantly to get the best results for the project. As another poster mentioned, there is a time limit for results, so you're wasting your time and energy if you keep interrupting it. Those results that are late will be disregarded.

    11. Re:Not HAHA by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One of tidbits is that the researchers have to dumb down the PC distributed version so that it runs on even the slowest computer.

      That's not true, and I wish people would refuse to assume that it is.

      Researchers may have chosen to dumb down the PC version, but it is a triviality to load a different DLL or call different code based on architecture or, hopefully, actually based on capabilities.

      There is no reason whatsoever that the PC version can't make the best out of everything from a 386 up to a Core 2 Duo. If my MPEG encoder can do it, then so could F@H. Granted, there's a certain amount of work involved, but it's no more (and probably less) than developing wholly separate versions, especially for other platforms.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Double dipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So if we BUY a PS3, and we allow Sony to use the free cylces of my processor, does that mean that if there is a cure found for Alzheimers, other genetic diseases or stupidity, that we as a public will be able to access this new found cure for free? OR do we get our cut? For some reason I think not.

    Please, be a Philanthropist. Let a large megacorporation or partnering pharmacuetical company benifit from this.

    Or save the energy that would have been used for a much more worthwile cause. Powering a megahuge Cray system that could be designed to do it better and faster.

    1. Re:Double dipping? by boingyzain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, you aren't allowing Sony to use your spare cycles, you're allowing Folding@Home (or more broadly, Stanford University's Pande Group) to use your spare cycles. And they are a non-profit organization who releases their findings for free. So, yes, you as part of the public can access the information you helped discover for free.

      Even if Sony WAS a scientific conglomerate trying to find a cure, would you really want to put a hamper on reducing millions of deaths just because you don't want them to earn money? Please avoid discarding your common sense in favor of bashing a corporation you don't like. Oh, wait, this is Slashdot.

  8. Potential power costs? by David+Horn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know how much power a PS3 pull at full whack, but I reckon it's got to be along the lines of 500W. If they get 10 million people running this during the day, that's an addition 5GW of load on the electrical system. If you own one, and let it run 18 hours a day for the year, then at 20c per kW/h you're looking at $750 on your power bill.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:Potential power costs? by mspohr · · Score: 4, Informative
      I guess you are exaggerating to illustrate your point but the power consumption of the PS3 is unlikely to be 500 watts (50 to 100 watts is more likely) and your power cost of 20 cents is two or three times what most people pay (I pay 10 cents in California). Your estimate is probably 10x to 20x too high.

      Yes, it would cost electricity but most likely only a few dollars a month, not $750 a year and most likely wouldn't burn out the electricy grid.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Potential power costs? by radish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree that 500W is a little much, but according to this page the 360 takes 145W. I'd imagine the PS3 to be similar.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  9. Re:asfaasf by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I'm going to pay $600 so I can run a second copy of something that's already spinning away on my PC right now?


    No, you are going to pay $600 to play games and run Linux on a Cell processor. The F@H thing is just a perk that you can either use to double (or quadruple) what you are doing on your PC right now or not. If you pay $600 for a PS3 just to do F@H, you are an idiot.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  10. The next supercomputer... by RetlawST · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...will be built using a cluster of PS3s.
     
      This cluster will be able to help cure cancer AND allow Madden 2007 to play an entire season in three minutes.

  11. Pass by mac123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting for the project that will have me use all of the spare time for my incredibly overpowered home CPUs (and with it ample amounts of electricity) to 'fight global warming'!

    1. Re:Pass by Isao · · Score: 2, Informative
      That would be the BBC Climate Prediction Project.

      You may sign up now. Arrgh.

  12. new slogan by Darth+Maul · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's only a matter of time until they reveal their new slogan: "PS3. Won't somebody think of the children?".

    --
    --- witty signature
  13. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, you're right and we shouldn't be feeding cows to other cows. However, I'm inclined to say that it might be nice if the unfortunate souls who have the disease, you know.... wouldn't die a horrible death. I know it's rare, and should become more rare if we start showing some sense in raising cattle, but, you know... if they could maybe cure it along the way to finding a cure for another disease, I wouldn't consider it a waste of time.

  14. Re:How the.. by kpearson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you read anything about Folding@home before you started criticizing it? It is run by a public university, not a privately-held organization. The university will not profit from the research. If you can't bother to learn about the project, at least read it's FAQ.

  15. Is it tax deductible... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If so, buying a PS3 could pay for itself over time. Seriously, I would signup, have them e-mail me CPU usage statistics muliplied by an industry standard rate as a reciept. They're happy to have CPU cycles, I'm happy to have the tax deduction.

    Now if that's the case, can something similar be done with other CPU cycle donations to other projects? I have a multi-core server that spends most of its time idle. Might as well put to some use, eh?

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:Is it tax deductible... by Srsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting idea, but unlikely to work out. Generally, the IRS does not allow you to deduct the value of your "time or services", only cash or the market value of donated assets. Unless there is some precedent I am not aware of, I would think that CPU cyles would be considered "services" and not be deductible.

      Of course, you would also need to be itemizing deductions, so if you don't have a mortgage it is unlikely you could see any tax benefit to a deduction for this anyway.

  16. Re:How the.. by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Informative

    Leland Stanford Junior University is a private university. Though not a junior university. I can assure you that my loans would all be paid off now if it were a public university.

  17. Re:I feel like a horrible person... by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Informative

    anyone can do the same thing without spending $500+ on a gaming console

    Exactly how would you get this level of performance/watts ratio without spending the few hundred dollars? You'd need to run your current PC much longer to perform the same calculations. From TFA the performance is roughly 100x current capability.

  18. Re:How the.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Because privately held research would like to use my PS3 for free and then make money from it when
    > they discover something - without any intention to charge less $$ for the treatment / cure in
    > exchange for all this free computing?

    Once a medical discovery is made it doesn't go away. Yes, it is a money tree for YEARS for the company with the patents. YES, a lot of the research was paid for by others. NO, they won't share. YES, they will charge an insane amount for it.

    But a new treatment is A NEW TREATMENT. A cure is a CURE. Stop being so goddamned cynical and take one up the rear for the good of mankind once in a while.

    And yes, I'm serious. Mod me down if you must though, I'll understand.

  19. certainly a good idea, but... by silvermorph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not novel. Any net-connected game system is just a new platform for any of the @home projects. They can build a client for download via xbox live or the wii as well.

    The only really good reason for this (besides curing cancer ;) ) is that sony's finally found an app that can effectively exploit the parallel nature of the cell processor. So if clients are released for the other systems, it will look like the ps3 has technological superiority.

  20. A Better Idea by ffejie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A better idea... Buy a Xbox 360 or a Wii. (Buy em used after a couple of months!) Save yourself anywhere from $200-$400 and donate the money to cancer research, or the F@H project if you really like that project. No, you don't get to have the PS3, but, your $200 will go a lot further for research than your cycles will over a couple of years. Also, take the $25-$100 you'll save on electricity (or whatever people in this discussion have been calculating) and donate that. With the $500 or so you'll give to research over the next 3 years, you'll be able to say for sure that you helped out. And, you get to cut out the middle men (Sony getting cash on the hardware and the Electric Co for providing the electricity).

    Added benefit: Tax write-off! I want to see you try to write-off the additional ~$100 in electricity you're donating.

    --
    Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  21. Re:HAHA by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry but my $600 would be better spent if i gave it directly as cash to cancer research groups. I'm not going to buy a PS3 now just because it now runs folding at home when im not using it. This is old news anyways that was discussed on here several weeks back. That didn't reverse my opinion, I've got 2 IBM systems journals sitting in my dorm that tell me what a cell can do and what its limits are. I don't need a smart ass like you to tell me anyting.

    --
    You mad
  22. If I can run a C compiler, it's a computer. by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ken Kutaragi said that the PS3 not a console, it is a computer!

    When I can run GCC on it without using rare, expensive add-on hardware that Sony quickly discontinues *cough*PS2 Linux*cough*, then it's a computer. Until then, it's a locked-in console.

    1. Re:If I can run a C compiler, it's a computer. by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux will be pre-installed on the hard drive in the PS3, no kit needed.

      SCEA didn't discontinue the PS2 Linux kit, they sold their entire stock and just didn't make anymore even though there was demand for it. it wasn't hard to find at all, all you had to do was order it from Sony right from their website. The rare thing about the kit isn't the hardware, it's the discs. If you have those discs you can install Linux on any PS2 with a HD in it.

  23. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Forge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK. Let's try to cure Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. If Mad Cow disease is cured as a side benefit, great.

    As for the comparison with AIDS. The behavior modifications required are of an entirely different nature. You see, the "culprits" now are individuals, the majority of who are impoverished and under educated with little communications equipment available to begin with. So even getting condoms and the message of responsible sex to them is tough.

    As if that wasn't bad enough the victims are usually the same people and their own families. In other words. They get AIDS because they don't know better and have very limited options. (I have spoken to HIV victims in my own country)

    Mad Cow disease on the other hand is produced exclusively on midsized to large cattle farms in industrialised middle income and wealthy countries. They continue to raise cattle on beef scraps because that's cheaper than using grain and grass. This gives them an additional competitive advantage over the smaller farmers that do not have the equipment necessary for reprocessing cattle scraps.

    None of them stops on his own because that will let the others who continue get ahead in the marketplace. Keep in mind that the farmer I'm talking about here is more often than not university educated. He knows about all the government farm subsidies and makes sure to collect his share. In short, he is fully integrated in a well regulated society.

    If regulations were put in place banning the sale of beef fed cattle or putting an additional tax on it to remove the price advantage the practise would disappear overnight.

    Most importantly, This disease is hitting people who have no way of knowing that this risk exists in a particular slice of meat because gee, It's not even on the package.

    In short.

    Cause of Mad Cow Disease -: people with as much education and more wealth than the average slashdoter selling a defective product. Killing other people.

    Cause of AIDS -: People with limited education and few options following a basic biological urge.

    One can be stopped by a few of earths most stable governments (England, USA, Germany etc...) passing relatively simple legislation (and enforcing it).

    The other cannot.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  24. Re:Why cure Mad cow disses? by Forge · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a further clarification. The Wikipedia page on Mad cow disease lists the countries with infected cattle and/or infected people.

    Interestingly the poorest country on the list is Thailand, with a GDP per capita of $8,300.00 (Middle income).

    Strangely enough they only made the list for the human form of the disease, suggesting that it came from imported beef.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  25. Weak Marketing by foxalopex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you ask me this is a pretty weak marketing ploy. Consider a few things. First off any console with Internet access could do this. Distributed computing is more about numbers than about individual machines being more powerful. Secondly, basically you're donating power and possibly the lifespan of your system away. What Sony's done is give you a convenient way to donate. If you really cared about cancer research then donate some real money to a Cancer charity. I'm sure some folks will do it but it kind of defeats the purpose of what the PS3 was meant for, a gaming unit.

  26. Proprietary bootloader by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, it's open source

    The Linux® kernel is free software, but the bootloader isn't. Likewise, I'm 99 percent sure that the BIOS in your PC is proprietary software.

  27. Is this the only way to get some of you informed? by faith.is.blind · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PlayStation 3 (Japanese: 3,, Pureisutshon Sur?, trademarked PLAYSTATION 3,[2] abbreviated PS3) is Sony's seventh generation era video game console, third in the PlayStation series. It is the successor to the PlayStation 2 and will compete against Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Nintendo's Wii. The PS3 is scheduled for release on November 11, 2006 in Japan, November 17, 2006 in North America (excluding Mexico, where the console will be released in Q1 2007), and March, 2007 in Europe and will ship in two initial configurations, the main difference being a 20 GB or a 60 GB hard disk being fitted. Sony officially unveiled the PS3 to the public on May 16, 2005 during an E3 conference. A functional version of the console was not at E3 2005 or the Tokyo Game Show in September 2005, although at both events, demonstrations were held on devkits (e.g. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots) and comparable PC hardware, and video footage based on the predicted PS3 specifications was produced (e.g. Mobile Suit Gundam).[3] It wasn't until E3 2006 that games were shown on actual PlayStation 3 systems. In preparation for launch, Sony has announced that there will be 27 playable PS3 titles on show at the Tokyo Game Show in September 2006 on final hardware.[4] On GameFly.com, PS3 games are available for rentals. Contents [hide] * 1 Overview o 1.1 System configuration o 1.2 Release data and pricing o 1.3 Game pricing * 2 Software o 2.1 Games o 2.2 Backward compatibility o 2.3 Software development o 2.4 Interface and operating system o 2.5 PlayStation Network Platform * 3 Hardware Summary o 3.1 Controller * 4 References * 5 External links Overview System configuration System Features Feature Basic Premium Upgradable hard drive Yes, 20 GB Yes, 60 GB Blu-ray drive Yes Yes Bluetooth controllers Yes Yes Flash card reader No Yes Wi-Fi adapter No Yes HDMI port No Yes Silver-colored logo and trim No Yes AV Cables Composite Composite Sony's initial retail strategy for the PlayStation 3 will involve two different configurations that are detailed in a Sony press release.[5] The "premium" version of the PlayStation 3 will come with an internal 60 GB Serial ATA 2.5" hard drive, Wi-Fi connectivity, and multiple flash memory card readers, and features a brighter cosmetic silver-colored logo and trim.[1] The second, alternate configuration of the console will have a 20 GB internal hard drive, but will not feature Wi-Fi, HDMI, or a memory card reader. The hard drive is upgradeable, and memory card and Wi-Fi support can be added through adaptors, but the HDMI support is not upgradeable.[6] The lack of HDMI output in the 20 GB model (as with any HD-DVD or Blu-Ray player lacking HDCP) could potentially cause problems with restricted output resolution on Blu-ray video. An ICT flag can be set by content producers, which forces non-HDCP video down to a pixel resolution of 960×540 (50% greater than DVD-Video at NTSC resolution, and 25% greater than PAL resolution). SCEA president Kaz Hirai stated that it is "too early to speculate at this point" whether movie producers will activate the ICT feature.[7] According to German publisher Spiegel, a behind-the-scenes agreement was made not to enforce the ICT flag on next-generation optical formats until at least 2010, or possibly even 2012.[8] Release data and pricing Release date and suggested retail price by region* Region Expected pricing at release Release date Basic Premium Japan Japan[5] JP¥59,800(US$512) Open price November 11, 2006 United States United States[9] US$499 US$599 November 17, 2006 Canada Canada[9] C$549(US$485) C$659(US$587) Mexico Mexico - - Q1 2007[10] Europe Eurozone[11] (excluding Finland) 499(US$639) 599(US$768) March 2007[12] United Kingdom United Kingdom[13] - GB£425(US$806) Switzerland Switzerland[14] CHF 749(US$608) CHF 899(US$729) Norway Norway[15] - 5000 NOK(US$875) Denmark Denmark[16] 4495 DKK(US$770) 5495 DKK(US$943) Swe