Slashdot Mirror


Linux Powers Lilliputian PCs

An anonymous reader writes "Gumstix is launching a whole line of dinky little PCs little larger than a Big Red Plenty Pack. The first Netstix model targets server, sniffing, and network simulation. The next model will be USB-powered, followed by models with SD/MMC slots and built-in WiFi. They come with Linux 2.6.17, and lots of room for user applications."

40 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. want one^h^h^h 1000 by chriss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nice: 200MHz XScale, 64 MB RAM, 16 MB Flash (3MB occupied by OS), 100MBit Ethernet, CF-II slot, 1-3/8 * 4-1/8 inches (35 x 103mm). Even nicer: the next version with integrated WiFi. All done by a company of 26, with no intention to grow, but to automate more if more work has to be done, so prices will fall.

    Not so nice: $186.5 for one, $165 in volumes of 1000. I know, this is still very cheap for something in "industrial size", but too much to build one into my door bell, one into each phone, one into each light switch (the joy of being unable to turn of the light due to an 500 error), one into the fish tank, one into the fridge to finally order milk like we have been promised for years.

    But give it some years, and I will have a log of how many minutes I brushed my teeth based on the report my eToothBrush send wirelessy to my server.

    1. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure the adult industry will find innovative uses for a device of this shape...

      Damn, did I just post that from my company computer? (sig in training)

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure the adult industry will find innovative uses for a device of this shape...

            I *knew* that "embedded linux" sounded a bit strange for some reason . . .

    3. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by Amouth · · Score: 3, Funny

      oh god.. that just gave me the image.. Embrace the Pinguin, Ride the Pinguin

      ahahahahahaha - i need to wash by brain out

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why would you use a whole computer when all you need is a signal and a transmitter?

      Of course this reminds me of the story about a guy giving a speech at a chipmaker convention reminiscing how 25 years earlier a guy had given a speech at the same hotel saying the microchip industry will never be that big because you don't need a chip in every doorknob.
      And here, 25 years later, every doorknob in the hotel had a chip.
      Go figure.

    5. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 2, Funny
      Just in case you weren't aware, you happen to be a pretentious asshole. The story had both inches and centimeters.
      From the article: The petite device measures 1-3/8 x 4-1/8 inches (35 x 103cm).

      I guess the article's authors were sick that day of elementary school.
      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    6. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Funny
      Just in case you weren't aware, you happen to be a pretentious asshole. The story had both inches and centimeters.

      TFA said "device measures 1-3/8 x 4-1/8 inches (35 x 103cm)".

      Centimetres, millimetres; only a pretentious asshole would distinguish between those gay units.

      Most of us Americans learned how to convert between various units of measure in elementary school

      Metric mishap caused loss of NASA orbiter.

    7. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by DagdaMor · · Score: 2

      ....But 0.8ft 1.4in. doesn't make sense!... Commonly known as 11 inches.

      --
      All is fair in love and war... ...as long as I'm not losing!
    8. Re:want one^h^h^h 1000 by Vengeance · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where were you when David St. Hubbins ordered an 18" high stonehenge trilithon?

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  2. Perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This will be just the right amount of computing power to, say, monitor the tire pressure in my Bronco or use an infrared LED trip sensor to turn on my desktop computer when I walk through the front door.

    I figure you'd need Linux for that, right? Java too, probably?

    1. Re:Perfect! by QuasiEvil · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I figure you'd need Linux for that, right? Java too, probably?

      Well, if you use Java, that's probably bordering on underpowered for either of your suggested applications. :)

    2. Re:Perfect! by eosp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slowly :)

    3. Re:Perfect! by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh. Yeah, and VMware to run Windows Vista.

  3. HTTP Client by Phillup · · Score: 3, Funny

    wget

    Damn... and I thought lynx was hard core!

    --

    --Phillip

    Can you say BIRTH TAX
  4. Re:image a cluster of these (usb hub powered) by chriss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article mentiones one of the first applications, using 24 of these to simulate a network at a network equipment vendor on his desktop. From there to your cluster is just a tiny step. SETI@desktop.

  5. Great by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, that's pretty cool, but there are no headphone jacks!
    Oh, wait, I get it....

    --
    Register the editry.
  6. it's all in the name by User+956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gumstix is launching a whole line of dinky little PCs little larger than a Big Red Plenty Pack. The first Netstix model targets server, sniffing, and network simulation.

    These guys seriously need to take a page out of the book of Apple. Listen guys, it's not "dinky" and "little". You gotta jazz it up a little bit. Throw in some "nano" and a bit of "micro" and "mini" for good measure.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  7. Centimetre conversion is off by shut_up_man · · Score: 4, Informative

    1-3/8 x 4-1/8 inches isn't 35 x 103cm, it's ~ 3.5 x 10.3cm. Otherwise that's a rather enormous teeny Linux server.

  8. KuroBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just got myself a KuroBox. This is a fantastic little thing. It's a full computer (headless). It's excellent for a home file server or web server. Its decently cheap. You add you own hard drive. If you've done a chroot before, you should have no problem setting it up with you own custom linux. I used debian. But you can use Gentoo or others too.

  9. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These systems are very much comparable to typical desktop systems we had at the end of the 1990s. As I'm sure you are aware, we did have fairly capable systems then (it wasn't that long ago!). We had ICQ, web browsers, office suites, and even desktop Java applications! I am without doubt that enterprising individuals and groups within the open source community will port applications like Seamonkey and GAIM to this device, so we can surf the web, check our email, and chat online.

    Also keep in mind that a 200 MHz ARM CPU is somewhat more powerful than a 200 MHz Pentium CPU. So in effect, these systems may turn out to be quite a bit better than the desktops we had in the late 1990s.

    1. Re:What are you talking about? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The ARM is a RISC processor, and gets less done per cycle than the CISC Pentium.

      You are assuming that the ARM chip completes the same number of RISC instructions per cycle as the Pentium completes CISC instructions. This is not likely to be true. One of the big advantages RISC had back in the day was that CISC instructions took several cycles to complete, while RISC instructions took one - and much of the time people were executing CISC instructions to achieve the same thing as RISC instructions and then throwing the side-effects away.

      ARM is not very RISCy in many respects. For one thing, the instructions are not fixed-length, they are designed to ensure efficient i-cache usage. For another, most ARM instructions have a conditional prefix; it will only execute them if a condition register is set, making very dense code with a low branch overhead.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. hmm... by jpardey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Plug one of those into a midi/usb keyboard, a DSP unit (or a math processor tailored to sound), a card with samples or patches, and speakers, and you'd have yourself a synthesiser probably better and cheaper than anything on the market.

    Then again, you could just buy a used desktop from the local computer shop like I did, which is much cheaper, faster, and powerful, but has the disadvantage of size.

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  11. How much $$$ ?!?!!! by bluesguy_1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Uhhh.... I can go out and buy any number of devices around $50 that will all of this and much more with OpenWRT. Granted they aren't as small, but they almost all include 802.11g and several have USB2.0. For the increased capability, and reduced price, it's a far better deal unless you absolutely need something that tiny...

    1. Re:How much $$$ ?!?!!! by Khashishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are missing the value of tiny. Tiny means you can carry it with you. Everywhere.

  12. i dont get it by grapeape · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is the benefit of this device? For nearly the same amount you can get a pda capable of running linux that includes a faster processor, an input method and a screen. Am I missing something?

    1. Re:i dont get it by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Am I missing something?

      Your inner geek.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:i dont get it by linzeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have ever deployed 1000's of small devices you will know that the less parts and bulk the better. An input screen just begs something to be stolen. We had over a dozen pda's stolen at a dot com I worked for, they were all used for spurious purposes such as mobile inventory. The culprit was found when we sprayed the back of each one with a diluted bleach solution and ran a black light on the desks of the sales force. A man who was making 200k a year cried to us that he took them to give to his family as gifts.

  13. Re:What part of "insecure PC" do you not understan by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes it is subject to keylogging. But on the upside if you have ssh and such setup right on the little guy all an attacker gets is your keystrokes in the apps you run, the only password would be the one you login to the thing with, which requires physical possession of the unit anyway. All of the remote systems would be accessed with crypto keys stored safely on the unit and never shared with the potentially tainted windows PC. Run all of the sessions via X or VNC sessions so the output is graphical and that will cut down on how much can be snooped.

    Is it safe? No. Better than carrying around a USB key with Putty installed? Hell yes.

    Even safer would be one of those little Nokia tablets and a WiFi or Bluetooth+phone connection and if you just had to have a full keyboard go with a foldup bluetooth model.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  14. Framebuffer module by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd like to see them make a simple, stupid framebuffer module for these things - just NTSC or PAL resolution output at 256 colors would be plenty - look at what the old Atari/Apple/Commodore computers could do.

    I want to use these as a very simple display for home automation - hang one on the back of the TV, use a PIN switch video port (or the video input on the TV), run about a 40 by 24 character display - not fancy, but enough for display.

    A frame buffer like that could easily be implemented in a small FPGA now-a-days.

    Of course, a tiny X server or VNC client would be even better.

    1. Re:Framebuffer module by HWguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually the processor in these supports an LCD-based frame buffer. They offer boards which can "plug in" that allow you to wire an LCD to them directly. Linux works easily with these - X11 runs. But definitely for hardware capable people, not the casual user.

    2. Re:Framebuffer module by tmasssey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just *yesterday* I was looking for *exactly* the same thing: a way to hook up a Gumstix to a display. I would like to use it for a home automation project.

      If you use one of the appropriate expansion boards, you can interface a Gumstix to a variety of raw LCD panels: there's even X Windows drivers for it. However, there's nothing for TV out (composite, for example), and there is nothing for VGA out.

      The cheapest LCD touch screen I could find is $56 bucks. Then you still have to buy a controller board and LCD interface (about $150 from Gumstix), and a case, cables, etc. It adds up quick.

      The more research I do, the more likely I am to do it with Palms: where else can you get a color LCD with touch screen, 200MHz processor, 32MB RAM, etc. for under $100? Palm Z22

      I'd love to hear from someone with a better idea... :)

    3. Re:Framebuffer module by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, most modern TV sets do have an RGB+SYNC input! Portables may be composite-only; but usually, the AV1 connector of any big-ish set (> 50cm. screen) is wired for RGB and composite. AV2 is usually composite-only or SVHS and composite, and sometimes is shared with the camcorder jacks on the front.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    4. Re:Framebuffer module by s2jcpete · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been playing with these for a while now. You can hook up a LCD, and tiny X is part of the buildroot. Check out their expansion boards.

  15. The early Days of Bubblepack computing by monopole · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While this still has to drop a bit in price it points to the next big thing. Bubblepack computing. I.E. PC grade computers (this and the OLPC) with preinstalled distros in bubblepacks on the racks by the checkout counters at Target and WalMart. Buy one plug it in, use it. Store your work on removable flash or USB key. When the unit breaks, fails, or is stolen, toss it in the recycle bin and get another. Zero maintenance, zero support. Within a few years the'll make the standard PC look like mainframes.

  16. Lilliputian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, are they big endian or little endian?

  17. Re:Where's it get its power? by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 3, Informative

    from TFA:

    > The Netstix 200xm-cf is available now, with a 4-Volt wall adapter

  18. A Good First Application, in-line services. by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For these types of items to really take off, they have to be Walmart marketable. The best way to do that is to create a device everyone would want to use. An in-line firewall would be such a good application. One Lan-in, and either USB or Lan out cable, and a small server sitting in the middle acting as firewall, spam filter, pop-up/phishing blocker, and if they could squeeze it in, a virus blocker. Or, better, yet, one device that does each really well and really fast, and then chain several together to do each feature.

    Connect, connect, safe and secure PC. The mass market for these products remains in constructing single, highly specialized but widely sought after features, that require no setup or a completely automated setup. LAMP on a micro-server isn't really that sort of product, even if it would be fun to play with. The market is in daemons on USB, preferably in-line or on its own dedicated node (though that's a bit wasteful, imho) - firewalls, independent shared drives, dns (plug and play opendns via in-line from modem to router), and even time servers (maybe with a little back lit LCD display, and adjustment controls on the outside). These tasks are currently being pushed into virtualization. But moving occasional services into a cheap occasionally used device would be even better.

    --
    I8-D
  19. pcengines WRAP by Kirth · · Score: 2, Informative

    A bit bigger than that, but I've got me a http://pcengines.ch/ WRAP, 3x100MBit, 1xSerial, 233Mhz Pentium-I-compatible processor, 128MB Ram, MiniPCI-slot and a Compact-Flash slot. Make a perfect firewall.

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  20. Obligatory... by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 2, Funny

    But now you can build your Beowulf Cluster of these and fit it all into one rack!

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.
  21. I know the Gumstices by Aloriel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did my final project with Gumstices, developing a complete user manual and they are incredible. You can have many kind of software running inside them and the connectivity is also awesome, USB-net, ethernet, bluetooth, wifi, and now gps (and probably more to come). We set up a JamVM to test Java and also C and C++ small programs. Was nice to work with those small pieces of hardware.