Slashdot Mirror


Genetic Mapping of Mouse Brain Complete

Vicissitude writes "A 3-D reference atlas of the genes that are active in the mouse brain is now complete. The atlas was declared finished on Tuesday, although scientists have been using it regularly for more than a year. The project was started in 2002 with $100 million from Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen." From the article: "'Since mice and humans share more than 90 percent of genes, the Allen Brain Atlas has enormous potential for understanding human neurological diseases and disorders affecting more than 50 million Americans each year,' the Allen Institute for Brain Science said. These include Alzheimer's disease, which affects 4.5 million Americans, autism, which may occur in one in every 175 births, epilepsy, which affects 2.7 million Americans, schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease."

137 comments

  1. only americans suffer from brain diseases by chifut · · Score: 5, Funny

    this many million Americans, that many million Americans, does anybody else matter on this planet?

    1. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by O'Laochdha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the other people don't get them American grant money!

    2. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by bunions · · Score: 1

      Judge a country not by its words but by its actions.

      So, no.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    3. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, so Microsoft don't sell software in any other country apart from America?

      o_O

    4. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we don't necessarily have worldwide numbers for brain diseases do we?

    5. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      only americans suffer from brain diseases

      No, it's just that only Americans drop $100 million to cure them.

    6. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by x2A · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah first thing I though too... this is one of the problems with americans that's responsible for the rest of the world's disdain with them... somebody before on slashdot said if only they used the word "people" in place of "americans", the rest of the world wouldn't grind their teeth hearing it.

      In this case, they're talking statistics, in may not make sense to try and say how many people in the world suffer from various conditions, but it could still be worded so much better, eg:

      "...effecting more than 50 million people in America alone..."

      doesn't sound like a bunch of americans thinking they're a higher species than anybody else on the planet.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    7. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My have we got a chip on our shoulder? America isn't the evil empire. We have a screwed up government but welcome to the wonderful world of Democracy.

    8. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have numbers in America we can use to come up with this statistic. Outside of America, we would run across language boundries, even more different methods of tracking these numbers, and even no numbers at all.

    9. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      So you're saying that it's the American people who are evil for choosing their government, not the government itself?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    10. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, nobody else matters on the planet. That is exactly what the article meant to imply. Amazing the lengths some people will go to spin every single event on earth into some opportunity to express their hatred for America.

    11. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      Well, we are talking about brain diseases here. Look who we voted into office!

    12. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Pinky -- forget the stupid humans. Once we rule the planet, they won't matter. Ooops - did I call you Pinky? Sorry, George. Hey, did you see where I put my extra shotgun shells?

    13. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by doshell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So if e.g. European researchers found a cure for AIDS and didn't share that knowledge with the USA because they had done it under a European grant, would you be happy to still be infected until you found the cure on your own?

      I'm going to be modded down by this, but it really takes a bigot to react the way you did. Your attitude is exactly the kind of thing the original poster was condemning (or maybe you're just a troll trying to get some entertainment).

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    14. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Let's see, this was a quote from an American press release obviously intended for an American audience. It was picked up on Slashdot, an American website run by Americans for Americans.

      As much as you people in other countries want to globalize everything American, we Americans don't necessarily agree. So please go piss off. Or, if you're not English, go do whatever to yourself as you say it in your own country.

    15. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are French.

    16. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by cyclop · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hi. You are welcome in the magic world of sarcasm. I know, it can take a bit to get used to.

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    17. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      No, it's the bugs in the Constitution.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    18. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by doshell · · Score: 1

      It might be sarcasm (and you saying it doesn't automatically make it so), but that doesn't do away with the fact that the attitude I was referring to is common.

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    19. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by O'Laochdha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, first off, that was a joke.

      Seriously, though, it is somewhat important to emphasize the disease's effect on the US to get US grants. If we found a cure for AIDS, there's no doubt in my mind that we'd share it. However, if AIDS (or one of the diseases in question, or any other) were rare in the US, but more widespread overseas, it would be fairly difficult to get grants, and most scientists would spend their time on other, more lucrative things. Selfish, maybe, but I don't think there's a country in the world that doesn't put some degree of priority on domestic issues. And for all we talk about scientists only being interested in grants, they can't do their job without them.

      A better allegory would be: if no one in Japan (where the disease is rare) cared to look into a cure for AIDS, would we be happy to remain infected until a more afflicted country found the cure on its own?

    20. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Spikeles · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If we found a cure for AIDS, there's no doubt in my mind that we'd share it.
      Ahhahahahaha. You made me laugh.. *wipes tears* You are joking right? You are saying that in this day and age of patents/trademarks and corporate secrets they would share the biggest cash cow of the millenium! I think not.. they will milk it for every drop it's worth, you will have to pay the discoverers royalties whenever you produce it, if they even let you produce it, assuming they don't set up their own production plant. Imagine it.. The cure! You could charge whatever price you want, sell it on ebay! it'd be worth trillions, if you ever sell it, and if someone figures out the chemical breakdown and produces it you could sue their ass off for even more money.
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    21. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. The word is "affecting". Everything you said convinces us that you are an idiot. Maybe that's why you're pissed off at America: you're not good enough.

    22. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by doshell · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm glad to know you were only joking. It is really difficult to tell when so many people around here have such an arrogant attitude when it comes to the deeds of their countrymen. You are right in that grants are essential for the development of science to function, and those who grant them should be praised. I won't question that. My point was that the way the article was worded was american-centric (considering that the issue is not strictly a domestic problem) and, as others have noted in this thread, that does not bode well with the foreign relations department. For example, I don't think this news would ever be presented with such nationalistic emphasis by the media in my own country, were the advancement to be made here. Maybe it's just a cultural problem...

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    23. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by x2A · · Score: 1

      haha quite convincing, but you missed the bit about coming to 'bomb my ass' which would pretty much have completed the stereotype image ;-)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    24. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      Not once but twice!

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    25. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      Okay, "share" might be too strong a word. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind, however, that it would be sold internationally. No corporation is evil enough to give up income just to screw the masses. My point is that it wouldn't be given exclusively to Americans.

    26. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off.

    27. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "No corporation is evil enough to give up income just to screw the masses."


      But that isn't the point is it? Just about any corporation would screw the masses to *gain* income, and that's what the previous poster was talking about. The risk of diseases (such as aids) can be greatly reduced through pharmaceutical products available right now. The pharmaceutical companies charge such a ridiculous rate (typically the same per month as the average African makes / month) that people ARE dying en masse for profit.

    28. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    29. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...convinces us...

      Everything you said reminds me that thousands of aimless souls, all cohesive and uniform, act as a single human and post at once in the unaccounted for and abroad name of "Anonymous Coward", referring to themselves...

      ...now goddammit, wait just a minute...

    30. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      How does it help the pharmaceutical companies for potential customers to die? People are dying because as of yet there is not cure.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    31. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      It is a lot easier to get the statistics for the U.S. than the entire world.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    32. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by x2A · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I am sorry for whatever "america" has done to you to make you hate it so much, that you find yourself trying to impersonate a stereotypical "ignorant american" in such a fasion to try and make otherwise "on the fence" readers move more to your side and hate america more... but truely the only way any evil in the world can be overcome is to rise above it.

      Propergander, dishonesty, and these kind of attacks only weaken your resolve. You will give the stupid and the evil an alibi; "it wasn't us, it was people pretending to be us to make you turn against us".

      Be honest when fighting for your cause, you stand a better chance of winning.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    33. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by x2A · · Score: 1

      I think by "us" it means america rather than anonymous cowards, ya know, in the same way that bush represents america... all of it...

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    34. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in my country, what we do to ourselves as an insult IS to Americanize!

    35. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      but it could still be worded so much better, eg:
      "...effecting more than 50 million people in America alone..."

      Or preferably,
      "...affecting more than 50 million people in America alone..."

    36. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      in the same way that bush represents america... all of it...

      Bush got 50.460 million votes in 2000 ... neurological diseases and disorders affect more than 50 million Americans. So now we know which Americans he represents.

    37. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      an American website run by Americans for Americans.

      If Slashdot doesn't want readers, and comments, not ot mention submissions, from the rest of the world, they can block our IPs. Till then, expect to be called when you act like rednecks.

    38. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you make 900 dollars a month off of each person and only a tenth of the population can afford it, you're making more than if you charged 50 and everyone could. Additionally, they're required to sell it at reasonable rates within many of the European nations, so they have to jack up the price everywhere else to afford those yachts and islands.

    39. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Now you mentioned it. I think it's urgent that we start raising money for this research. Clearly a great part of the American population is affected by some weird brain malfunction. So stop sending money to cure aids or hunger and help in finding a cure before the next election. Otherwise who knows how many hours of therapy it will take before the human race gets its self respect back.

    40. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Spikeles · · Score: 0

      What does it matter if potential customers die? Really? The world population is increasing, it matters not that this year 7 million people died from HIV, because 95 million will be born. There will always be more people to buy more medicine. http://www.worldometers.info/

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    41. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government is a bunch of war criminals who sold their souls, principles and integrity to corporations and economic interests with no regards for the lifes of ten of thousands innocents. American people certainly didn't throw bombs themselves, but they reelected the above bunch of war criminals. This probably will be a crucial point in history, the moment when common people in the world started to identify most american people as evil rather than only their government.

    42. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since mice and humans share more than 90 percent of genes"
      No shit, Sherlock. And humans also share genes with PLANTS too. The human genome project proved (much to the idiotic 'scientists' dismay) that genes aren't all that's involved in making humans humans.
      These 'scientists' are fraudsters. They keep dangling a list of diseases that their 'vital research' will EVENTUALLY 'cure'... Yeah right. In about fifty years' time- just as they are retiring! What bullshit. Just like the 'war on cancer', and all other vivisection - incompetent 'scientists' drag out 'research' and torture hundreds of millions of innocent animals, and yet strangely there are no cures! And when they come up with a 'wonder drug', they STILL have to experiment on humans to TEST it - they call it 'clinical trials'. If vivisection actually worked, there would be no need to test the drug on humans, would there? They could just release it straight onto the market, after choosing a random animal to 'test' it on. Since drugs react in different ways in different animals, I wonder how they'd pick the 'right' animal to 'test' it on? Answer: they don't. They 'test' it on several animals, and even though it has no effect, or deadly effects, on most of them, if they can find ONE animal it 'works' on, then they TEST it on humans, calling it 'clinical trials'. Then if it passes this part of the fraud, they release it onto the market, and the bucks roll in. Vioxx, anyone?

    43. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by swarsron · · Score: 1

      "If we found a cure for AIDS, there's no doubt in my mind that we'd share it."

      Well, think again. There are combinations of medication which almost stops aids. You can't cure it but we're quite good at controlling it for a whole lifespan.
      The problem is that the medicaments are way to expensive for almost everyone in africa and so we'll see millions dying in the next years while people infected here (US, Europe) will live quite a normal life with aids.

      It's not like we keep it secret but we keep the price up so they can't buy them

    44. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Builder · · Score: 1

      Ask anyone who works for a big pharma - cure is a 4 letter word! Cures are the worst possible thing that can be discoverde in the pharma industry. What they look for is treatments because then they can make money from the suffering of fellow humans for YEARS to come.

    45. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

      (SIGH!) BTW I *am* a biochemist, but not in thrall to any pharmaceutical concern. I have worked for them in the past.

      "Ahhahahahaha. You made me laugh.. *wipes tears* You are joking right? You are saying that in this day and age of patents/trademarks and corporate secrets they would share the biggest cash cow of the millenium! I think not.. they will milk it for every drop it's worth, you will have to pay the discoverers royalties whenever you produce it, if they even let you produce it, assuming they don't set up their own production plant."

      The typical rant about evil drug companies. Let me explain in simple words:

      First off; no, drug companies are not angels any more than any other company. But they're not more evil, either. A common perception is that they just make huge profits from a line of drugs and that's it. No it isn't!

      For every drug that makes it to market there are at least 50 that don't. Each one involves a *huge* amount of effort and cost for every stage of development. We're talking millions, here. To get a drug to the commercial stage can take *billions* - no I'm not kidding. Every successful commercial drug has to pay not only for it's own development, but also the others that didn't make it to market. Otherwise the company would fold pretty rapidly.

      "if someone figures out the chemical breakdown and produces it you could sue their ass off for even more money."

      And so they should. My lab is quite capable of analysing *any* drug to the point where I could manufacture it. But it would be a pointless exercise because the structure (and a whole load of other stuff) are always published by the company to protect their interests. How long do you think that research into drug discovery would last if anyone could just pick up the results of their hard (and expensive) labour and just manufacture it with impugnity?

      Sheesh!

    46. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      The point is that we don't keep it for ourselves in some act of misguided patriotism. Even in Africa, the rich are free to buy it. It's not fair, but it's not jingoistic.

    47. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any references to shotguns, hunting, opossum, mobile homes, pickup trucks, mullets, confederate flags, professional wrestling, country music, or the like. So, your claim of "redneck" is specious, at best.

      I just saw Americans talking to other Americans, then foreigners like you butting in.

    48. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by lubricated · · Score: 1

      >> The cure is abstinence, but nobody in our society wants to practice that.

      Nobody anywhere at anytime has every practiced it. You really think it's easier to change ingrained genetically coded human behaviour than to find a cure. Good luck.

      Ahh but this is slashdot, so you are probably just bitter cuz you can't get any.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    49. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So, your claim of "redneck" is specious, at best. I just saw Americans talking to other Americans, then foreigners like you butting in.

      Sorry, I insulted rednecks by comparing them with blinkered chauvinists like yourself. And I'm so sorry for butting in to your personal private American-only website here. Somehow I got the idea that anyone was allowed to read and comment.

    50. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Read and comment all you like. But bitching about this topic is complete idiocy and I certainly have the right to state that opinion.

      I don't go to the BBC website and bitch that all the content is targetted for people in the UK. You shouldn't come here and bitch that some of the content is targetted for Americans.

    51. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Spikeles · · Score: 1
      A common perception is that they just make huge profits from a line of drugs and that's it. No it isn't!
      I'm not saying that, i'm just saying that they would make huge profits off this particular drug. Otherwise i don't see the point of your post, you essentially agree with the two points i made. 1. The drug companies would be more interested in making insane profits from any cure for AIDS instead of making it because they feel some kind of moral obligation. 2. They wouldn't make the formula free ( as in beer ) but would rather try to make as much money as possible from it inlcuding aggressively targetting people trying to reverse engineer the drug to benifit humankind. Sure i can see why they would want to make money, it costs alot in development, however, the GPS satellite also cost billions to develop and cost billions to maintain and they are free to use with no cost, because they are for common goodwill.
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    52. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by Spikeles · · Score: 1

      Ohhh. good point!

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    53. Re:only americans suffer from brain diseases by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I don't go to the BBC website and bitch that all the content is targetted for people in the UK.

      Actually, it's not. Though "British", they have a large audience outside the UK, and cater to them. Regardless, that's got nothing to do with Slashdot.

      You shouldn't come here and bitch that some of the content is targetted for Americans.

      There's a difference between targetting an audience and gratuitously insulting anyone outside your demographic. And by the way, I'm not British.

  2. Thanks P.A. by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    I look forward to hearing about researchers who have made use of this.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    1. Re:Thanks P.A. by x2A · · Score: 1

      They now have mice that fit better in your hand

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:Thanks P.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look forward to hearing about researchers who have made use of this.

      OMFG, what a lame attempt at FP!

  3. Now for the real work... by BWJones · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now the gene mapping is finished, the real work can now begin.... I only half jokingly say this as all of the physiology needs to be performed on a baseline dataset now. It's interesting that a whole host of talents and technologies that were eclipsed by molecular biology and genetic engineering are now coming back into vogue. Technologies like electrophysiology and electron microscopy are now in hot demand.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Now for the real work... by littlepinkpig · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, for that very reason, the "mouse-bioinformatics research network" (mBIRN) has been funded by the NIH to chop up and scan mice brains for years now.

    2. Re:Now for the real work... by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      The human brain surely is going to take waaaay more time than a mouse brain. The human brain weighs ~1500g the mouse only ~0.4 g. That mean that it'll take ~3750 times longer to map the human brain than it took to map the mouse brain. Man they've got alot of work to do, how long's that? I ran out of fingers...

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  4. Knowledge and New World Order leadership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can this newfound knowledge be used to someday take over the world?

  5. great by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Genetic Mapping of Mouse Brain Complete

    Then they can get started on mapping Pinky, and then they can take over the world!

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:great by glowingsnowball · · Score: 1

      narf

      --
      " I think that freedom is Americas biggest export. Atleast untill China can stamp it out for 20 cents a unit."
    2. Re:great by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Then they can get started on mapping Pinky, and then they can take over the world!

      Let me guess - you suffer from short attention span and never saw it through to the ending? </kidding>

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At last, Pinky, you can actually tell what I'm thinking! YeSSS!"

  6. It's sure good to be a mouse these days... by teutonic_leech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering all those medical advances related to enhancing the life of mice I must assume that our planet is run by a small group of super-enhanced labmice which managed to escape and take over.

    Gee, Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
    "The same thing we do every night, Pinky: Try to take over the world!"

    1. Re:It's sure good to be a mouse these days... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the world exists in the first place? Not for humans, surely!

    2. Re:It's sure good to be a mouse these days... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Well, at least they're improving somebody's life. Although I personally think the real agenda behind mapping a mouse's brain is to understand the president of the USA (el Diablo) better. Then again, Paul Allen's research institute is called the Institute for B.S..

      Isn't this somewhat suspicious??????

      [$500 Billion spent to date and still no Osama - and this is the guy (el Diablo, Bush) who wants to privatize social security?]

    3. Re:It's sure good to be a mouse these days... by teutonic_leech · · Score: 1

      LOL - why didn't I think of that analogy - hehehe. I really don't think that Bush is THAT stupid - he's simply a corrupt, inarticulate, arrogant SOB - sometimes I wish he was simply stupid...

    4. Re:It's sure good to be a mouse these days... by dannyboyumd · · Score: 1

      What could this do for genetic engineering?

      "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
      I think so, Brain, but then my name would be Thumby.

      Or what about the use of jeans in general?

      "Are you thinking what I'm thinking, Pinky?"
      Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?

  7. Man or Mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather be a mouse, they get better treatment

  8. Wow, someone didn't do his homework by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since mice and humans share more than 90 percent of genes, the Allen Brain Atlas has enormous potential for understanding human neurological diseases and disorders affecting more than 50 million Americans each year

    That's an instant classic. Genes don't exactly work like this you know?

    90% same genes isn't like 90% same species. We share over 70% with insects and over 50% with plants.
    Yet, I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases.

    Let's face it: he's a scientist, he wanted to do it, he had to convince the sponsors. That's fine..

    1. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by teslar · · Score: 1
      90% same genes isn't like 90% same species. We share over 70% with insects and over 50% with plants.
      Yet, I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases.
      Ah but you see, you are undermining your own argument - using your numbers, we share at best 50% of genes with the oranges. That's not the 90% we have in common with mice. And I'm sure you'd agree that dissecting mice to fight heart diseases doesn't sound nearly as far-fetched. In fact, with all the drug testing on mice, it's probably a reality.
    2. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by BWJones · · Score: 1

      You do realize that many protein and metabolic processes work the same in rats and mice as they do in other mammalians, like humans..... right? You do realize that it is possible to precisely emulate a disease process in humans by engineering in the same genetic defect in other organisms that is found in humans, right?

      Additionally, it is possible once we understand the biochemical, developmental, metabolic, proteomic processes in "lower" organisms to get a better understanding for how to attack problems in humans. For instance, amphibians and many fish species have much more sophisticated retinas that we mammalians do. Despite this level of sophistication, they are able to fix their retinas when damaged which is something that we humans have either forgotten how to do or lost the machinery required through evolution.

      Oh, and about the oranges? Yeah, well metabolic processes in oranges are quite useful to understand for their anti-oxidative properties. Most genetic damage and aging problems are related to oxidative species generation and citrus plants are pretty damned good at generating anti-oxidants. Figuring out how to engineer these pathways could lead to better understanding and more efficient processes for engineering in these pathways into other organisms.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      Yet, I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases.
      I think that you'll find that most doctors have, at some point in their education, dissected and studied fruit.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    4. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      For instance, amphibians and many fish species have much more sophisticated retinas that we mammalians do. Despite this level of sophistication, they are able to fix their retinas when damaged which is something that we humans have either forgotten how to do or lost the machinery required through evolution.

      Don't forget that we did not diverge from modern fish. Fish today are just as modern as us.

      We diverged from a common ancestor. It's quite likely that common ancestor did not have this adaptation.

    5. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that we did not diverge from modern fish. Fish today are just as modern as us.

      Precisely, and this is why I used quotes to refer to lower organisms. So, when mammalians went underground, we lost some functionality that may or may not have already been present. However, this does not mean that we cannot engineer in that functionality once we understand the pathways and expression profiles and timepoints.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    6. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by maxume · · Score: 1

      Of course, people dissecting mice help us fight heart diseases all the time.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Darn it all! I was afraid of this...someone actually injecting real science into the posting!

      This could screw up everything...I'm the one trying to get that research grant to map the orange's genome - to help find the root causes for schizophrenia in humans, of course!

    8. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      Here's a counterexample, even more genetically distant. The cell cycle genes in humans and yeast have a number of strong similarities. And what's a busted cell cycle cause? Ans: Cancer. That's why huge amounts of human cancer research is done in yeast cells.

    9. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'm guessing there's a disproportionate difference between 90% similar and 50% similar. Secondly, the study of plants has yielded remedies such as tamoxifen because there are genetic similarities between plants and humans. Nerve agents that kill bugs make good chemical weapons against people.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    10. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Let's face it: he's a scientist, he wanted to do it, he had to convince the sponsors. That's fine..

      Umm, he is the sponsor. So he had to convince himself?

      The mouse genome project is a big deal. The genetic map of the brain is part of it. More info on the Mouse Genome Project here:

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/guide/mouse/

    11. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...the Allen Brain Atlas has enormous potential for understanding human neurological diseases and disorders affecting more than 50 million Americans each year,' the Allen Institute for Brain Science said.

      More than 50 million each year? How many would that be in 2 years? The United States population is 295,734,133 (not including myself). It looks like we would be headed for some real trouble in about 6 years if it weren't for these Brain Science people, and we should be grateful to them. Hopefully the Allen Institute, which is not a human being, will still be able to say things after the human population is reduced to babbling mental cases.

    12. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      Yet, I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases.

      If you eat 'em, why not ;)

      On a related not, I'm wondering why we don't map similar yet speciated animals. Like, take a parrot species that generally lives 10 years and a parrot species that lives 30 years and try to figure out the difference leading to the life expectancy gap. Then map some monkeys and go from there. Or would that be about as silly an endeavor as the mouse/human one?

    13. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      Yet, I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases.
      Personally, I'm still waiting to find out how sheep's bladders can be employed to prevent earthquakes...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    14. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by Cicero382 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have posted on /. before deploring sensationalist "scientific" publications. Well, at least in my area of expertise - and this is one of them.

      The point about the irrelevance of the %age coincidence of genome match between mice and men (sorry) is well made. The way the article presents the results suggest that we have a 50% chance of learning something useful from analysing the genome of an orange :-)

      Actually, it's worse than that.

      TFA essentially suggests that this project will be able to be of real assistance in determining the cause of a whole bundle of brain-centred diseases in humans. Err........ no.

      Beyond some basic similarities (formed several tens of millions of years ago), the mouse brain and human brain have very little in common (some /. submitters notwithstanding). To say, for example, that these results will directly lead to a better understanding of schizophrenia is disingenuous - they can't. They are implying that behavioural disfunction in mice, to which they assign the term "schizophrenia" is analogous to the human disease of the same name. Just how can they draw parallels between a twitchy mouse and a human with severe *cognitive* problems?

      Research with mice does have its place, but in lower-order metabolic research. Even this has severe restrictions when trying to apply results to human physiology/metabolism.

      Yet again, a sensationalist paper has been published with a view to catching the public's eye and, I suspect in this case, to boost the self-esteem of the sponsor. There's far too much of this crap around today.

      Rest assured that *real* scientists take this sort of thing in its proper context.

    15. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 1

      "I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases."

      Sure here you go!
      SignOnSanDiego.com

      /love google

      --
      My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
    16. Re:Wow, someone didn't do his homework by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
      Yet, I wanna see someone claim that by dissecting oranges he can help us fight heart diseases.

      If you consider peeling a form of "dissecting" and then you eat the "dissected" orange, it could very well help you fight heart disease, especially if the orange is in place of something like potato chips or french fries.

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  9. Thanks Paul! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Paul, while others like the Google boys and Redhat execs are wasting their money on 747's and $80,000 kitchen cabinets (no joke, look it up), you are actually doing something useful with your money!

  10. Junk DNA by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I am very curious to know is what the verdict is on the 99% of Junk DNA that mice have. Humans have a similar scenario but what "junk" means is that this DNA does not code into proteins or seem to have a function. I recall reading an article where lab scientists had successfully removed a large chunk of what was believed to be junk DNA.

    Every mouse born missing that trait suffered a severe spine defect which looked like multiple sclerosis beyond belief. It was then believed that this deformity occurred in every mouse born but when inserted into junk DNA, it would be rendered harmless. Without the junk DNA to absorb the common deformity, the protein sequence for spinal cells was effectively altered nearly all the time.

    Hopefully with this mapping, we'll be able to better understand mice (and, in turn humans and optimistically eukaryotes in general). And perhaps we'll be able to settle the dispute as to whether or not junk DNA has functions beyond our insight.

    Unfortunately, I think one of the even more important tools for figuring out how Alzheimer's Desease occurs is understanding how proteins fold. Hopefully this will aid researchers looking to do this as a valuable tool.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Junk DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The consensus is that we just don't know.

      Originally, the thought was, "If it doesn't make proteins, it must be worthless". Well wether you are a creationist or an evolutionist, neither master is that wasteful. What has been discovered recently is that these sections of DNA that don't code for protein, are in fact transcribed into RNA, just not mRNA (which is the type used to make proteins).

      One of the possible functions are the degredation of mRNA once it is no longer needed (by hybridization).

      Again, all we know is that it doesn't appear to encode into mRNA which results in proteins.

    2. Re:Junk DNA by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time I hear about so-called "junk DNA" that doesn't seem to do anything important, it reminds me of the ancient Egyptians when they would mummify a deceased nobleman. They hollowed out the corpse and delicately preserved what they thought of as the departed's most precious organs - heart, stomach, etc. - in sealed jars next to the mummy. When they got to the brain, it didn't appear to be doing anything important that they could see, so they just threw it away.

    3. Re:Junk DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It kind of irks me to see the term "junk DNA". It should be called "DNA that doesn't directly code for a protein", but I suppose that isn't as catchy :)

      I could think of a few specific examples, but the bottom line is that this "junk" is sometimes involved in something very important, like directing DNA-associating proteins where to go. For example, in your immune system there are protein complexes that rely on Recombination Signal Sequences (RSSs) in the DNA itself to direct them to proper places to splice. Several decades ago, these RSSs may have just been considered "junk" because they don't actually code for a protein.

    4. Re:Junk DNA by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Junk DNA" sounds like some of the code I've seen. Nobody knows what it is, or what it does, but nothing works right without it.

    5. Re:Junk DNA by MikShapi · · Score: 1

      DNA is a storage medium, not unlike your hard-drive (it's binary, surprise), basic block (base) being 2 bits and every byte (codon) being six bits.

      It has (drumroll) a filesystem.

      On that filesystem, we store (more drumroll) files (genes) - sequences of information that code into proteins, i.e. /do stuff/.

      (There's much more to this - it's all sitting on a big RAID1 array, and is even further redundant as on that array we carry not one but two unsimilar copies of the equivalent of c:\windows or /usr from the two seperate machines we replicated ourselves from - just in case explorer.exe on the first copy gets botched (that last bit's a lie but helps draw the picture)- that we carry around with us everywhere. And if you want to go even deeper, to make us more variable and more evolutionally sound our two copies are neither from mum or dad. They're two mixtures of both.)

      I don't really like the definition that says "Junk = DNA that doesn't code for proteins".

      The fact that certain parts of the data don't belong to genes - don't code for proteins doesn't automatically mean they're junk, just as bits on your filesystem that aren't file contents are not automatically free space either. They could be (surprise!) meta-data. They could even be place-holders when specific offsets are required (imagine doing a raw dd of all the data on the second half of your harddrive 3 bits to the left.. yes, this happens in DNA). So yes. DNA has filesystem meta-data. Horseloads of it.

      Accidentally erase some meta-data (which doesn't directly code for proteins) and ... well, this is slashdot. We're geeks. We know what it means. Bye Bye filesystem. Somebody recall the tapes.

      While we've discovered the 30,000 files (genes) sitting on the human drive (1GB if you were wondering, will pro'lly fit on a 900MB CD), we know they are files, where they start and end, and we know what some of them do and we've reverse-engineered the filesystem to the point of having a good poriton of the meta-data figured out, there's still a crapload of empty space we're... /unsure/ about. While we (again, in a very misleading way IMHO) call it "junk DNA", it is nowhere near certain it doesn't contain yet more essential data for making healthy and functional humans.

      And yes, Genetics is fundamentally a field of IT. Wacky hardware that nobody gave us the whitepapers for, fersure, but it's just a filesystem with files. Like cars and OS's, you've used one or twenty, you've seen them all. Underneath they're all the same.

      Figure out the filesystem, figure out how to interpret the data in the files and how it translates into real-world stuff and that's about about most of it, hardware [reverse-]engineering aside.

      And yes, IAAVSASG (I Am A Veteran System Administrator Studying Genetics)

      --
      -
    6. Re:Junk DNA by Unc-70 · · Score: 1
      Hopefully with this mapping, we'll be able to better understand mice (and, in turn humans and optimistically eukaryotes in general). And perhaps we'll be able to settle the dispute as to whether or not junk DNA has functions beyond our insight.
      Actually, it won't tell us that. The mapping was performed against mRNA, a chemically distinct copy of protein-coding regions that is used to translate to the protein amino acid sequence. Since it was directed against coding regions, it won't tell us anything about non-doing regions.
      --
      Ye have made your way from the worm to man, and much within you is still worm.
  11. Woah by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Funny

    This brain mapping might be just about a step too far with mouse experimentation. If you add up all the other improvements on them, and make them smart enough to escape, they are going to kick our asses. Then take our women. Not that the last part will bother too many people here. :p

    /narf

    1. Re:Woah by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      If you add up all the other improvements on them, and make them smart enough to escape, they are going to kick our asses.
      But what will they do tomorrow night?

      Then take our women.
      Ah. Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  12. Actually, it is the mice experimenting on them... by DMiax · · Score: 4, Funny

    We happen to be only the third most intelligent ones...

  13. awesome by not+a+cylon · · Score: 0

    Now maybe they can figure out why my scroll-wheel stops working at random times.

  14. Let's Do the Math by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A coworker of mine tried to astonish me with the same fact. He said, "We have over 90% of the same genes as mice!"

    It's not too astonishing to me. Considering from the point of DNA, you are no where close to the end product. I'm not a biologist but to my knowledge, DNA can be one of four acids. Those, in turn are read in varying lengths to make one of twenty different amino acids. Those amino acids can be read in varying lengths to be one of hundreds (if not thousands) different proteins which are the building blocks of life.

    So if you want to shock me and tell me that between a mouse and I, nine in every ten genes is the same, I'm not going to be too shocked. If one in every ten is different, I could see the above transformation resulting in something no where near the same thing.

    But the basic idea is very very well founded, any gene to protein research is good research. Since we know very little about that process and find it quite difficult to predict. The answer to Alzheimer's is believed to be rooted in this process and, by working backwards, we may be able to isolate the genes that cause it. That is, of course, assuming it's due to a twisted protein which may or may not be caused by a common virus or just age.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Let's Do the Math by lubricated · · Score: 1


      just by chance two random sequences of DNA will be 25% alike.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    2. Re:Let's Do the Math by bubblewrapgrl · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely true. That assumes that the DNA codons are used with equal frequency, which is almost never the case. Different organisms have different biases in the way that they use the codons. Within an organism, there can be biases in the different regions (coding vs. noncoding) of the DNA.

    3. Re:Let's Do the Math by bubblewrapgrl · · Score: 1

      Largely what makes organisms different is what genes are expressed. That is, what genes are turned in to make proteins. That's even what makes cells different. There isn't a genetic different between your liver cells and your heart cells (yes, there could be mutations). The real difference is in what proteins are expressed.

    4. Re:Let's Do the Math by lubricated · · Score: 1

      Good point though they are called Dna nucleotides. Codons are three of them.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:Let's Do the Math by cnettel · · Score: 1

      And there are both nucleotide and codon biases between species...

    6. Re:Let's Do the Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your point is a little off base. when they says genes, at least in this case, they mean the already transcribed RNA. proteins are made more or less determined directly from the RNA sequences (there are many exceptions, but that is basic concept). So when they say we share 90% of the same genes, they basically mean 90% of the proteins in the mouse are found in the human (although they are not exact matches of amino acid sequences), which function very similarly most of the time.

  15. And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    most /.'ers seem to be much closer than that 50% to the plant species... vegetable!

  16. I wonder if... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    ...non-Americans get these diseases too? The article doesn't make it clear *cough*

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  17. Mentally Ill Mice? by KingoftheAges · · Score: 1

    I've never met a mouse with schizophrenia.

    1. Re:Mentally Ill Mice? by NewsWatcher · · Score: 1

      You may not have heard of it, but the evidence is out there.

      --
      If the pattern goes 9am, 10am, 11am, why isn't noon 12am?
    2. Re:Mentally Ill Mice? by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      I have

    3. Re:Mentally Ill Mice? by humble.fool · · Score: 1

      How would you know?

      --
      Being anonymous is not cowardice.
  18. Liars! by TekPolitik · · Score: 3, Funny

    A 3-D reference atlas of the genes that are active in the mouse brain is now complete

    Obviously they could only have mapped the portion of the mouse that intrudes into our dimension. Being transdimensional superior creatures, there's no way limited creatures in our dimension could get access to the most important parts of the mouse brain.

  19. I've glad they finish the mapping? by $0.02 · · Score: 1

    When are we going to see it on Google maps?

    --
    If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    1. Re:I've glad they finish the mapping? by cyclop · · Score: 1

      And most importantly: does mouse brain run Linux?

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
  20. Correction by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    He meant mice share 90% of their genes with Americans.

    **me runs away, comes back

    If it was as simple as that, we would have a map of the human brain in a few days time (10% left to analyse). The human brain is an entirely different story. We share many of the same features, like memory funtions and the parts of the cerebral-cortex that control them, but human brain functions are incredibly complex, particularly involving cognitive psychology. Psychology and neurology remain very primitive sciences at the time being. Not long ago, we were chopping off pieces of mice's brains to find out what controlled memory loss. Electrical signals are produced rapidly and continously, the chemistry is impossible to study in real time.

    Therefore I think this is not even significant for mice. Just because we know what genes produce which cell types does not mean we understand their operation.

  21. Wow! by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mice and Americans share 90% of the genes? Wow!

    Oh, wait that was mice and humans ...

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  22. Brain? Don't they just use ASICs? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    How hard a map can that be. You can likely download it from the manufacturer.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  23. This is a good. by kahrytan · · Score: 1


      This is a good thing since 99% of the world has a brain the size of mice.

    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. -Albert Einstein

    --
    \
  24. Who's brain was it? by blantonl · · Score: 1

    Who's brain was it? George W's?

    --
    Lindsay Blanton
    RadioReference.com
  25. be very very afraid... by heartsurgeon · · Score: 1

    this article (Microsoft founder funds mapping of rodent brain "software")
    plus the article about Intel having a 80 core processor ("hardware")

    makes me fearful that they are secretly developing an AI "rodent" that will overrun the planet.

    we will have to purchase frequent "upgrades" to keep the bugger from eating our young, and the inevitable infection with viruses or worms will threaten the safety of mankind itself..

    we will be forced to escape the earth to save ourselves....oh crikey!!, doesn't Paul Allen have money invested in space travel as well....

  26. ..similarity to Zonk's brain deemed "coincidental" by BeeBeard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, couldn't resist >.

  27. Lamination by rycamor · · Score: 1

    Next: a joint project with Scalar Composites to develop the laminated mouse brain computer.

  28. Squeak! by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Funny
    Since mice and humans share more than 90 percent of genes, the Allen Brain Atlas has enormous potential for understanding human neurological diseases and disorders affecting more than 50 million Americans each year

    Well, Mr. Smith, I have goods news — and I have bad news. The good news is because of the Allen Brain Atlas, we have been able to determine exactly what is wrong with you and precisely how to put you back together.

    The bad news is when the procedure is complete, your name will be "Algernon."

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Squeak! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      LOL!
      "Flowers For Algernon" was required reading(and a field trip to see the movie) when I was in school. Thanks for the good flashback.

      And yet, I feel somewhat diminished now- I was on my way to post something like:

      Is this why I crave cheese and fear electrical shock when I get lost in a building?

      But now, sadly it seems to have lost some of it's imagined punch. *sigh*

      But, good job sir!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  29. why not? by nephridium · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with disecting oranges? Have you ever seen an orange suffer from heart disease? Neither have I! The only sensible way to save the human race is to create human-orange hybrids that are juicy yet sport opposing thumbs. We shall call them 'Homo orange'.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  30. obligatory /. comment by z4pp4 · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new genetically mapped mouse overlords.

  31. reference? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    I did not find any peer-reviewed journal reference for this work. Or at least reference to the validity of the methodology they are using.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  32. Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better than Apple's original brick-shaped mice, for sure.

  33. Common Allen Brain Atlas Misconceptions by azonips · · Score: 1

    1) The Allen Brain Atlas will contain over 1 PetaByte of data.

    False. The orders-of-magnitude calculation was done by multiplying 20,000 genes by a trillion neurons, but this is a gross overestimate. A more realistic computation involves multiplying the number of datasets they have, which is around 20,000, with the average size of each dataset. The average size of each dataset is about 10 slices, times the size per slice. The size per slice is about 10,000 pixels wide, which works out to 100 megapixels per slice. Without image compression, each megapixel is 3 megabytes (one byte for each color channel), which means that each slice is 300 megabytes, uncompressed.

    Thus, a more realistic calculation of the size of the Allen Brain Atlas is
    (20,000 datasets)*(10 slices per dataset)*(300 megabytes per slice) = 6 TeraBytes.

    So, the real size of the Allen Brain Atlas is around 6 TeraBytes, which is a far cry from a PetaByte.

    2) Since mice and humans share more than 90 percent of genes, the Allen Brain Atlas has enormous potential for understanding human neurological diseases and disorders.

    False. We share over 70% with insects and over 50% with plants, so according to the logic of the Allen Brain Atlas people, dissecting the genetic maps of oranges he can help us fight heart diseases and schizophrenia.

    3) The Allen Brain Atlas will provide the most detailed map of the most complex organ.

    False. http://brainmaps.org/ provides the highest resolution whole brain maps, and not just for mice, but for primates and other species. The resolution of BrainMaps.org data is over twice as good as that of the Allen Brain Atlas.

    4) The Allen Brain Atlas has already led to several significant new findings about the brain.

    False. There are absolutely no peer-reviewed publications over any significant new findings from the Allen Brain Atlas. I do believe that significant findings can be made, but there is nothing published about it in peer-reviewed articles as yet.

    5) The Allen Brain Atlas provides a complete genetic map of the mouse brain.

    False. It says nothing about silent DNA or junk DNA, not to mention splice variants.

    http://braintechsci.blogspot.com/2006/10/paul-alle n-brain-atlas-misconceptions.html

    1. Re:Common Allen Brain Atlas Misconceptions by azonips · · Score: 1

      (20,000 datasets)*(10 slices per dataset)*(300 megabytes per slice) = 60 TeraBytes 60 TeraBytes, not 6. My bad.