Slashdot Mirror


The I-Tech Virtual Laser Keyboard

avtchillsboro writes, "The NY Times has a rather fluffy article (registration required) about stuff you can buy to 'accessorize' your smart phone & or cell phone (so passé!). What caught my eye was the I-Tech Virtual Laser Keyboard. From the vendor's website: 'The Virtual Laser Keyboard (VKB) uses both infrared and laser technology to generate an invisible field and project a full-size virtual QWERTY keyboard on any surface... The I-Tech VKB reacts exactly like a real keyboard. Direction technology based on optical recognition enables the user to tap the images of the keys, complete with realistic tapping sounds(!), which feeds into the compatible PDA, Smartphone, laptop, or PC. Note: The VKB is both PC and Macintosh compatible!'"

125 comments

  1. Hi, welcome to 2003 by hsmith · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, I just watched "SuperVolcano" on Discovery Channel and a guy in the movie had one.

    2. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by joe+155 · · Score: 2, Informative

      indeed, I saw this on amazon (.co.uk - and we have to wait longer than the US for everything) about a year ago, infact it is so old that it's now been discontinued from amazon, still, there are some reviews; http://www.amazon.co.uk/I-Tech-C51-A04031-XX-Bluet ooth-Virtual-Keyboard/dp/B000BBQQRY/sr=8-34/qid=11 59734652/ref=sr_1_34/026-5191554-0026041?ie=UTF8&s =electronics

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    3. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by Neuropol · · Score: 1

      I agree with this being old news, one can also look at this a couple of different ways.

      1) Slashdot readers are current enough with the latest technology to see this stuff when it comes to market
      2) Slashdot is that premier for gadgets and geektech to surpass what the NYT is calling news two years later.
      3) Ah, yes, always the possibility it may have been a slow year for the folks at Laser Key Board, so the NYT artcile is probably trying to drum up business for those boxes upon boxes of soon to be old things. 4) I just saw a recent tv series episode, what show I can't recall, but one of these was being used. They didn't actually show any typing being done, they just had it on and projecting on the desk. Maybe a NYT writer saw it and felt inspired to write about what they felt was the latest and greatest.

      Forgive me for rambling. I will go back to eating my soup now.

    4. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, but they're still charging $179.99 for this. Any technology for which Moore's law has not been applied can be re-posted on Slashdot at will. It's in the bylaws -- I looked it up.

    5. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by avtchillsboro · · Score: 1

      Thanks--you know, before I submitted that article this morning, I thought the VLK seemed familiar. I even searched /.--thinking that /. was where I would have seem something about it--but my search came up w/nothing. My *original* post even said I was surprised that I couldn't find anything about the VLK on /.

      Live or Memorex...dupe...or memory loss?

    6. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by whoop · · Score: 1

      Um, that's 2002. Even sadder

    7. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by AxminsterLeuven · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is old. I have couple of these taped to the heads of my friggin' sharks for two years now.

    8. Re:Hi, welcome to 2003 by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      ... 4) I just saw a recent tv series episode, what show I can't recall, but one of these was being used...
      --
      Recent? It was on a CSI episode last year or the year before, the show where even recoilless RPGs have a recoil.;-)

  2. This is very very VERY old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slow news day or slow sale year? This gadget has been around for what, two years now ?

    1. Re:This is very very VERY old news. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

      The guy who got one of these in 2003 was arrested whilst using one on a plane to submit the article.
      His computer went into standby at a critical moment and upon his release from gitmo powered up his laptop and allowed the submission to go through.

      Please note that the poster or his dell laptop cannot be located, however there is a strong burning smell coming from his apartment.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:This is very very VERY old news. by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, this sounds like a realistic and plausible explanation.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  3. Old Tech by kthejoker · · Score: 2, Funny

    I booked this to my del.icio.us on February 8, 2005, and it's just now hitting Slashdot front pages? I'm not that far ahead of the curve, I promise.

    1. Re:Old Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously not that far ahead of the curve if you are still willing to type del.icio.us ...

  4. and.. by n1hilist · · Score: 0

    Hasn't this been on thinkgeek for a while now? Who is it good for? # Business men/ women # Suppliers/ Invoice keepers # Students/ teachers # Tourists/ trekkers # High-tech employees # Lawyers/ accountants # Architects # Land surveyors/appraisers # Field engineers They should have added: # Mobile bloggers.

    1. Re:and.. by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      You forgot #People who want to impress the other folks at the local Starbucks

  5. On the way to the ultimate in portable computers.. by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now just tack on one of these matchbox-sized projectors and a fast PDA, and you're set.

    --
    Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
  6. this is the 4th time this has made /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    seriously, where do they grow you people?

  7. Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not ever that i say this, but, this article should be pulled from the front page ASAP

  8. Not to worry by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Funny

    There was a dupe back in 2003 too!

    1. Re:Not to worry by joe+155 · · Score: 2, Funny

      don't worry, that was essentially a dupe too http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/14/182825 3

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:Not to worry by Noksagt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I would be worrying, but I got my dupe fix in 2003 too. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/20/123524 4

    3. Re:Not to worry by Noksagt · · Score: 0, Redundant
  9. You can get them... by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...from here.

    1. Re:You can get them... by emilv · · Score: 1

      They've been up on ThinkGeek for eons of time.

      Or is my browser able to look into the future and see upcoming products at ThinkGeek? You never know with this new "Core Duo" mechanism.

    2. Re:You can get them... by VJ42 · · Score: 2

      Isn't ThinkGeek also owned by OTSG (/.s parent company)? Perhaps they should have known about this before, since ThinkGeek has been selling it for ages, thus validating all the people above screaming "dupe".

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  10. Yes, but does it run ... by lixee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No Linux support? No thanks.

    --
    Res publica non dominetur
    1. Re:Yes, but does it run ... by hearingaid · · Score: 1

      Sure, it has Linux support. It's a bluetooth keyboard, aka a standard device. Linux has bluetooth support (IIRC; my Linux machines all lack bluetooth). Should work with pretty much anything.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  11. After all this time.... by OutOfMyTree · · Score: 1

    ... the price is still $179.99 in the "Special Summer Sale". I am looking forward to getting one for road warrior use, but it looks as though I will have to wait another couple of years at least.

    1. Re:After all this time.... by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Road warrior use with what? When it came out, it was this giant "event" in the PPC world...then a bunch of people who run PPC sites got their hands on one for reviews...bottom line...it sucked.

  12. I bought one of these a year ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been on the front page of thinkgeek for a while now. It is a cool toy, but not exactly very practical.

  13. Slow news day by tttonyyy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As Yoda would say, "If on ebay you can buy it, on slashdot it does not belong".

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =300031914752

    Save the environment, recycle your old slashdot news here!

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:Slow news day by jordank2001 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound Yodaish enough. "If on ebay buy it you can, on slashdot belong it does not." Shows how old this is when there's nothing to discuss on it except how Yoda would talk about it :)

    2. Re:Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! About to write I was the same yoda speak comment.

  14. kdawson, whats wrong with you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus this is the second story they have posted and its a
    dupe..

    rob needs to put the smackdown..

  15. They suck by dorpus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Laser keyboards have a high rate of false key presses, because your fingers have to pass over other keys, and you can't feel the keys.

    1. Re:They suck by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      true true.

      It looks cool, but if you think about the thing it's a fairly stupid idea. This keyboard enters data by looking at finger location, not by finger pressure. Among other things that means it may misread resting fingers and misread fingers approaching a target key. It also lacks tactile feedback.

      That thing is about as useful as a steering wheal made out of dreams.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    2. Re:They suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That thing is about as useful as a steering wheal made out of dreams.

      Apparently those are standard issue on #$%^ing SUVs.

    3. Re:They suck by thegnu · · Score: 2, Funny

      That thing is about as useful as a steering wheal made out of dreams.

      Is that like the one they're steering this country with?

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    4. Re:They suck by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Quantum physics: The dreams stuff is made of.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:They suck by orielbean · · Score: 1

      Also, there is a significant delay to the key=press time on the keyboard, so you really can't get over 25-30 words with this at its best. About the same speed as my thumb keyboard on my Treo 650...

  16. Re:What the fucking fuck!!! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    You must be new here.

  17. First recall by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Sony anounced today a recall of their ultra high power laser keyboards. After several unfortunate power surges resulted in lost fingers they felt a recall was wise."

    1. Re:First recall by sowth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, come on. Everyone knows Sony wouldn't recall for that. It needs to explode first, then chop off your fingers.

  18. Magic Touch by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The I-Tech VKB reacts exactly like a real keyboard."

    One of the reasons I type so much faster than I can talk is that I get so much tactile feedback from the physical keys on the keyboard. My hands know when I've mistyped usually before I can even see the difference on the display. A little lingering feeling in my hands that they've missed the pattern they were expected to type. Despite the simulated clicking sounds to my ear, I expect that I'll make a lot more mistakes on a keyboard which doesn't offer tactile feedback that I've hit a key, complete with a little "throw" through its unique 3D spatial path.

    That kind of feedback is extremely important to using any device. It's why eliminating any grasped tool for purely gestural expression seems doomed inferior to actually touching something. Maybe just a dumb pad that gives just tactile feedback, without needing to deliver any sensory info back to the processor, is plenty to complete the loop. But just tapping my fingers on an unresponsive surface, or one different in shape/texture/response every time, will be much worse than typing on even a tiny crowded keyboard, or maybe even A9 keypad entry.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Magic Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you'd just get used to it. I used to bitch and moan about how hard it was to write on a Palm Pilot seeing as I had to relearn how to write characters and because I couldn't tell when I was really doing since I couldn't see the ink or graphite left by a regular writing instrument. A year or so later and I was faster with grafitti than real hand writting. I'm sure there were similar arguments against the first type writters. New stuff comes along and we complain about how the old way is better. That's human nature.

      Now get off my lawn.

    2. Re:Magic Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You can actually touch-type on those tiny smartphone keyboards? You must have hands the size of a 3 year old's! I think most people have to look at a tiny keyboard if they want to type on it, and if you're typing while looking at the keyboard, tactile response is of far less value. You're going to have to use the virtual keyboard on a flat surface, so it will be quite similar where ever you use it. Therefore, I'm sure one could get almost as good at using it for data entry as they are with a regular keyboard. Almost at good as a regular keyboard is much better than a tiny crowded keyboard, let alone A9 keypad entry.

    3. Re:Magic Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dont see the problem here. You can just project onto a real keyboard if you need the tactile feedback.

    4. Re:Magic Touch by nanojath · · Score: 1

      exactly - there's a reason they call it "touch" typing - I feel like tactile feedback is a huge component of keeping oriented to the positions of the keys without looking at them. I bet using this keyboard requires a lot more visual checking to avoid drifting off center. Although the situation where this matters most - rapid transcription from another text source - is not really what this is for.

      Then again, I'm having a hard time figuring out the real benefit beyond the space age factor. Are you really saving space in comparison to a folding keyboard? If you've got a flat space to project on you've got room for a keyboard; you can get a wireless folding keyboard for less than a hundred bucks if you shop wisely.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    5. Re:Magic Touch by n1hilist · · Score: 0

      Well put. That feedback is very important! As the local geek at a school I get a few complains from the older users requesting different keyboards as they cannot touchtype on the newer spongey peices of crap. I touchtype at about 94WPM last I checked, I'd never get close to that on a device lacking feedback. The same as playing air guitar!

    6. Re:Magic Touch by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

      Most writers prefer PC keyboards to Mac for that reason. I love my Mac but the snap and fell of the PC keyboards is far better so I still try to write on the PC. Also the Mac is too cramped. Okay for modelling and data entry but they do suck for writing. It really shows up after a few hours. I have to admit for all my dislike of Microsoft OSs I like their ketboards. I find them cheap and comfortable and I can usually use one until the print wears off, i have a few in the closet for back up like that.

    7. Re:Magic Touch by seinman · · Score: 1

      So why don't you just plug the keyboard you like into the Mac? PS/2 to USB adapters are only about five bucks, if that's the only thing holding you back. I use my awesome tactile feedback keyboard on my Mac thanks to one of these adapters.

    8. Re:Magic Touch by technos · · Score: 1

      Tactile feedback isn't required. You'll get used to not having it in no time. I got burned a decade ago, I have reduced sensitivity in my hands as a result. I still 'touch type' just fine, albeit 20wpm slower than before.

      True, I look at the keys once in a while when I first start typing, or I'm transferring a hand from the mouse to the keys, but aside from that, you don't actually require feeling them to type.

      I tend to rely on the sound the keys make when they're depressed as substitute. If I've mistyped something, I get the immediate on-screen feedback of 'move left hand 1/2 inch right and tap backspace a couple times, you got EW instead of R'. And it works fine.

      I can't type with headphones in, or earplugs, or in a noisy shop, so if I ever go deaf, I'm probably screwed.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    9. Re:Magic Touch by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I learned to write Grafitti by obsessively writing in the first few days I got one when they first came out. Grafitti is faster than regular writing (though not typing) because every character is a single stroke, much like the speed of cursive writing was a consequence of ballpoint pens.

      But it's not the newness. I'm talking about the fundamental lack of the important feedback to the tactile sense. All those other new methods actually increased tactile feedback with the act of writing, by eliminating distracting other motion (eg. blotting) or increasing the freedom of movement while increasing efficiency (eg typing).

      I never complained about typing being slower than penmanship, because it wasn't. This half-duplex keyboard is different.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Magic Touch by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of freedom to carry just the one little mobile phone device. Since the keypad doesn't need anything but a responsive surface, maybe they can make a micrometer-thin film embossed with keybubbles that stiffly yield to presses. Thin enough to fold back into a tiny volume storeable in the phone. Useable when speed/accuracy are required.

      There's surely some material that's stiff enough to resist deformation anywhere but locally, but flexible enough to compact, while yielding under a few grams finger pressure. Maybe an electrical memory-polymer (or nano equivalent) that plugs into the phone and automatically folds/rolls itself down.

      That sounds like an improvement that will take 10-20 years to be cheap and common, especially since laser keyboards have taken over a decade to catch up with popular mobile devices.

      And where are my VR 3D videoglasses?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Magic Touch by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your real insights into this problem. I always appreciate that we're all disabled in various ways when using compromised technology for sensory/manipulation.

      But I wonder whether you're going to be better at giving up tactile feedback than someone like me, who's used to getting it all the time. Not just typing, but always using my hands that way. If I gave up all manual sensation, I'd connect differently to the world. I might not have the focus to compensate with hearing enough for the loss of the finger feelings.

      Also, you are still getting the proprioceptive feedback of the 3D space of the real keyboards. I'd be really curious to see how you fared with this actual flat projection keyboard. And it's cool enough that I'll probably eventually find out for myself, despite my reservations.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Magic Touch by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Great point about the audio feedback. I just posted a lengthy comment about my experience with one of these keyboards from this weekend, and wish I'd thought to mention that. You're absolutely right- the click is an enormous help in keeping accuracy up, and it's not so loud as to be obtrusive or annoying.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    13. Re:Magic Touch by technos · · Score: 1

      But I wonder whether you're going to be better at giving up tactile feedback than someone like me, who's used to getting it all the time. Not just typing, but always using my hands that way. If I gave up all manual sensation, I'd connect differently to the world. I might not have the focus to compensate with hearing enough for the loss of the finger feelings.


      It's really not that big a deal. Once the learning curve has worn off, there is no real focus required. And the way you experence the world is largely faked by your brain anyway. Mine is wired up to expect the sensation, just like yours.

      I'll bump something on the stove, think it's hot enough to hurt me, say 'Ouch!', and jerk away like a normal person, complete with adrenaline response. (Even if the pan is actually cold. I've turned on the wrong burner more than once and done that).

      That's not to say I feel actual heat or pain when I do something dumb. I just think I do for that brief instant. I do stupid things like handle hot spark plugs and car mufflers with no more pain than if they were cold. I'll pick up a bottle of beer and only realize it wasn't a twist-off when I feel the blood running down my arm.

      Also, you are still getting the proprioceptive feedback of the 3D space of the real keyboards. I'd be really curious to see how you fared with this actual flat projection keyboard. And it's cool enough that I'll probably eventually find out for myself, despite my reservations.

      I've had to use a lot of flat-panel keyboards over the years. Remember the Atari 400? They still use keyboards like that all over the embedded and robotics spaces, because they're completly waterproof and impossible to kill. Those are no more difficult for me to use than the Apple Pro I'm using now. The issue with proprioreceptive feedback is cheated away by sitting my wrists on the edge of the keyboard at an angle a bit sharper than usual. The motions and muscles used are virtually unchanged from the normal keyboard I am expecting that way.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    14. Re:Magic Touch by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the interesting insights. I think you confirmed the value of the proprioception. Because I learned to "type" on an Atari 400 membrane keyboard, and I know how its little ridges offered shape cues. Not just the pressure of my fingertips for touch, but deflecting/deforming my whole hand a little as I glided around. My hands knew the "map" of the contours. When I used one of them at a collector's home last year, I was able to get right back into speedy typing, by angling my fingers closer to parallel to the keyboard, which exaggerated the deflections enough to remind me of hte shape. My hands were getting feedback as much through the proprioception as through the touch.

      But a projected keyboard is truly flat (on a readable flat surface), so no proprioception other than the plane. Unless used on a consistently textured/shaped surface, which defeats that "go anywhere" portability. Unless also porting the surface, which could then feedback to touch (eg rubber embossing or more elaborate).

      What would be really interesting would be testing this I-Tech keyboard on you, compared to a membrane keyboard. If I had an extra, I'd send it to you :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Magic Touch by technos · · Score: 1

      What would be really interesting would be testing this I-Tech keyboard on you, compared to a membrane keyboard. If I had an extra, I'd send it to you :).

      I've actually used one for a short amount of time, and thought about buying one earlier this month. Typing on it was fine.

      Why I didn't boils down to issues completly non-related to the fact I'd have to type on a flat surface. It was physically larger than any portable keyboard I had used in terms of depth, and would not be something I could stick in a back pocket and have survive as I currently do with a plain old Palm Universal. It doesn't work well at all on the rough surfaces I have at work. And the important one.. My PalmOS device, a TX, won't cope with more than one BT device at a time, so I would be chained to WiFi availability despite the lovely unlimited tethering plan on my cellphone.

      I learned to "type" on an Atari 400 membrane keyboard

      I know your pain. I owned one of those as my first non-kit machine. Great bug-free BASIC, Star Raiders on cartridge, lots of dubbed games with Cyndi Lauper at the end of the data. I still hear the Atari 'click' and cringe.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  19. Mod parent down by Noksagt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Clearly, I myself, got a little dupe happy: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=19855 3&cid=16268639

  20. "Realistic tapping sounds"? by Ant+P. · · Score: 0, Troll

    Great, another "feature" I'll have to endure in addition to all the other obnoxious noises idiots have on their phones.

  21. Slashdot FAQ by slidersv · · Score: 1

    From FAQ:
    How do I submit stories to Slashdot?
    Before you submit a story, please take a minute to make sure it's not a duplicate of a story we've posted already. Check the main Slashdot page and make sure it hasn't already been posted. If it's not breaking news, you might also run a search to see if it's something that might have been posted on a previous day. Roughly ten percent of all our story submissions are duplicates of stories we've already posted.

    I wonder that slashdot of all doesn't have some shell script that tries to detect if the submission is a duplicate...

    --
    there is no issue with my network
    1. Re:Slashdot FAQ by Gertlex · · Score: 1

      The search function is crap anyways... They'd best improve that first.

    2. Re:Slashdot FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder that slashdot of all doesn't have some shell script that tries to detect if the submission is a duplicate...

      I wonder that slashdot of all doesn't have some shell script that tries to detect if the submission is a duplicate...

      I wonder that slashdot of all doesn't have some shell script that tries to detect if the submission is a duplicate...

      I wonder that slashdot of all doesn't have some shell script that tries to detect if the submission is a duplicate...

      Nope, apparently not...

  22. This is stupid by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Sit around and bang your fingertips against a hard table or desktop for a few hours and get back with us.

    1. Re:This is stupid by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Thats nothing new.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  23. BREAKING NEWS! Intel invents microprocessor!!! by unc0nn3ct3d · · Score: 1

    http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa092998 .htm

    Intel 4004 - The World's First Single Chip Microprocessor . This technology is going to revolutionize the world!!! One day maybe 1 in 25 houses will have a 'computer' .. Most people predict this to be a fad and new greater emerging techologies such as the 8-track will make a much larger impact on our society!

    Fuck Slashdot, get your ass together. I come here to feel special about my dorkdom and now I don't even have that!

  24. Wierd by harris+s+newman · · Score: 1

    I typed in slashdot.com but got deja-vu!

  25. Never underestimate... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    ...the sex appeal of "cute" electronics...

    The point is to have gear cool enough that the chicks come to you. Also likely to make every other guy in the area green with jealousy -- if they can't see you through the cloud of chicks, but they keep hearing "Can I touch it?" in sweet, feminine voices...

    This would be pretty pathetic/depraved, pretty typical of Slashdot, except that I discovered it by accident in high school, when I went to fetch my laptop and found a girl... stroking it.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Never underestimate... by n1hilist · · Score: 0

      I know what you're saying, my girlfriend was doing some work at home, two notebooks infront of her and I was close to creaming my jeans! Okay not really, but it was pretty cute.

  26. Re:What the fucking fuck!!! by kypper · · Score: 1

    ...moderates. Sorry.

  27. Old stuff new ... by mauz3r · · Score: 1

    Don't you get it?!! It's just an advertisement! Old stuff needs new advertisement...

  28. No Tactile Response Aside... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

    Consider what a toll your finger joints would be taking over years of using this device. I'm willing to bet that the cartlidge in your joints would 'handily' be destroyed by hard, inflexible impacts on a desk-like surface over time.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:No Tactile Response Aside... by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      Why hard? It would be zero pressure. I guess if you were mad and 'pounding the keys'.

      Other than that, I can't see why there would be any pressure at all. Infact, the sensor probably can be calibrated so you never ever TOUCH the surface, but just glide your fingers over it. "Gesture Typing" basically.

      I'm not sure that's what I'd want, but I don't see myself going to your extreme either.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  29. Videos (YouTube) by LionKimbro · · Score: 3, Informative

    The I-Tech VKB reacts exactly like a real keyboard.

    I hoped so, wished so, but the videos I've seen defy this.

    You can see that you have to type slowly, and, it'll miss some keypresses.

    Still, it's really cool, and portable: You don't have to carry a keyboard around with you.

    1. Re:Videos (YouTube) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, this brings all the benefits of voice recognition technology to typing?

    2. Re:Videos (YouTube) by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      So does this mean when one of my coworkers annoys me I can smack them across the back of the head with it and make a satisfying clunk sound ?

    3. Re:Videos (YouTube) by pljvp · · Score: 1

      it is coool technology, developed by a company called Canesta.

  30. No dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's product placement, stupid!

  31. Even older than that... by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

    I mean, come ON. Virtual lasers have been around since Space Invaders...

  32. Anyone Remember the CSI Miami Episode? by blantonl · · Score: 1

    I've seen quite a few posts related to this being a dupe.. however, this is really the first I've seen of this type of keyboard in actual existance, other than on a CSI miami episode.

    The episode features a secretary that used one of these keyboards to write a blog about the company without anyone knowing it. When I saw the episode, I was amazed at the writer's inguenuity in thinking up such a good gadget... I thought it was TV Drama. Little did I know that the gadget actually exists.

    I guess the question is... how well does it really work? Has anyone actually used one?

    Watching the CSI Miami episode made me say "wow! cool" - but I also walked away saying... "Yea Right"...

    --
    Lindsay Blanton
    RadioReference.com
    1. Re:Anyone Remember the CSI Miami Episode? by ATMosby · · Score: 1

      It exists. I own one. It has a very high cool factor and a very low practical factor. fun to put it on top of an object with clear space in front of it and type in the air. Add a smoke machine and this thing rocks. I just wish it was possible to remap the keys to different shapes/pictures. AT P.S. I saw the csi miami episode, googled for it, and purchased one before the episode finished.

  33. News... by freitasm · · Score: 1

    "News for news. Stuff that matters"? Yeah right...

  34. Macs and the PC Keyboards that love them... by argent · · Score: 1

    I love my Mac but the snap and fell of the PC keyboards is far better so I still try to write on the PC.

    So why don't you use a PC keyboard on your Mac?

    I have used PC keyboards exclusively since Apple switched to USB, because that coincidentally is when they introduced teh horrid mushy keyboards they have now. I actually get confused because teh CMD/Apple/Windows key is in the "wrong place" on a Mac keyboard.

    The horrid Apple laptop keyboards are a bigger problem. I have found a decent Bluetooth keyboard by Logitech that's slim enough to fit in my backpack and has a far superior feel.

    I concur with the first poster in this thread. I already suffer enough pain just using my Macbook Pro's keyboard that one with even less responsiveness brings a shiver to my spine... and ulnar nerve...

  35. Not bad.. by IlliniECE · · Score: 1

    If there were some way to shrink this device and integrate it with a umpc, it could be wonderful. I know, I know.. "no tactile feeedbacck!!!" Well, nobody said you had to live your life on a umpc. But such a device would be wonderful for typing in a url quickly (something which is pure hell on a cellphone).

  36. I agree... by argent · · Score: 1

    I learned to write Grafitti by obsessively writing in the first few days I got one when they first came out. Grafitti is faster than regular writing (though not typing) because every character is a single stroke, much like the speed of cursive writing was a consequence of ballpoint pens. [...] This half-duplex keyboard is different.

    Indeed. Graffiti is good, but many of its workalikes are truly awful. Jot, which was used on the original Microsoft handhelds and has replaced Graffiti on the palm (under the name Graffiti 2), slows me down so much that I'm considering the possibility that I may be forced to switch to the Pocket PC when my current Palm dies simply because Microsoft learned... their later emulation of Graffiti is almost perfect and far far better than Graffiti 2.

    Similarly, when I started using modern laptops it took me some time to get used to the relatively short throw and awkward layout, but the better ones (like the one on the Thinkpad) are quite good. The worst ones are terrible, though, and what makes them so bad is the same thing that makes this bad. It's the "Graffiti 2" to the good laptop's "Graffiti".

  37. Re:BREAKING NEWS! Intel invents microprocessor!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are so late with that news.
    Front page of slashdot yesterday said the TMS1000 is way faster and already shipping.
    Intel don't stand a chance.

  38. Warning Label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see the warning label now: "Do not type into laser keyboard with remaining fingers."

  39. Re:What the fucking fuck!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's good to know that at least your working on making it better.

  40. Tried one in an airport store by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Tried one in Terminal 10 at JFK. It's teh suck. It functions as described, however, there is no tactile feedback to tell you that 1) your fingers are in the correct place, and 2) that you have hit a key. The audible feedback is delayed be at least 200msec, and so you're still left guessing if you can type faster than 5 keys per second. Blah.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Tried one in an airport store by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 1
      Disclaimer - I've never seen one of these IRL, and I've no idea if they're any good...

      But everyone seems to be missing the point that these aren't remotely *intended* as replacements for full scale desktop keyboards. They are replacements for the nasty little pads you have on your phone or PDA - and from the look of them, I can imagine for some purposes they'd be pretty handy. The problem of course is the price.... as much as your phone again by the look of it...

    2. Re:Tried one in an airport store by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      No. The problem is that you have to have a flat surface on which to use it, and by implication, your device has to be resting on that surface as well, because you sure aren't holding it if you're typing with both hands.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  41. Re:BREAKING NEWS! Intel invents microprocessor!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one welcome our new Intel 4004 overlords.

    But does it run Linux?

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these...

    In Soviet Russia...

    (etc., etc.)

    Slow Down Cowboy!
    Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 20 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

    Oh my God! Why on Earth was I trying to rape Slashdot servers! Trying to post within 20 minutes of each other? Kill me! Kill me now! I don't deserve to live anymore. I can't live with my conscience! Seriously, I'm going to be late for work. Time to move on to digg.

  42. Registration my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wget -O foo.htm --referer=http://www.google.com http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/technology/28bas ics.html?ref=technology

  43. NEC P-ISM Conceptual Computer by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

    http://www.nec-design.co.jp/showcase/#pism

    Imaging 4 pens in your extra coffee mug, (or pocket protector). One converts to a mini-projector, one to a laser keyboard, one is a wireless NIC, another is a Wireless USB drive?

    Anyway...it seems a cool use for this technology, even if it's just a concept.

    I swear there was a page with more details about the function of each pen, but the link above is the best I could find.

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  44. I got one and it sucks by soleblaze · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got one of these a few months ago, figuring i'd be able to use it to type faster than I would with the hand writing recognition/on screen keyboard of my lifedrive. Turns out I make enough mistakes, and need to go slow enough with it that the handwriting recognition is faster on it. The On Screne Keyboard is probably the fastest method of inputting (provided you don't have to use symbols and such). I've been meaning to put mine on ebay for the last months, but i'm a lazy bastard.

  45. other layouts by gumbi+west · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anybody know if these are offered in either split (aka natural) formats or alternative layouts (i.e. Dvorak). There is no reason not to except to keep overhead low.

    1. Re:other layouts by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, I e-mailed the company one time asking about alternative layouts for lanugages and Dvorak, and they said the usual "we have no plans at this time..." excuse. From what I read, the product probably isn't very useful for someone who's a touch-typist anyway.

    2. Re:other layouts by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      I raised that issue in this discussion recently, and someone replied that the keyboard is projected from a kind of transparency, it's not dynamically generated. So I guess they could, but I imagine you'd have to either pre-order a bunch (say at least half of a production run) or otherwise be able to assure them that they'd be able to recoup the investment. I imagine that Dvorak wouldn't be too hard, you should be able to use an existing driver and just change the keyboard picture you project. Split might be harder, since you'd have to rewrite the firmware to recognize "presses" in different places.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  46. Whoa! by Cinquero · · Score: 1

    Hell! Now combine that with an LED beamer and a PDA in the size of a credit card and you've got THE DEFINITE mobile phone that allows you to browse the net, write emails, make video phone calls...

  47. Crowd here is missing a big thing in my book by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Old news, yeah, but with the concern hospitals have over a) using technology to reduce doctor errors and efficiency and b) maintaining a clean environment where, frankly, no pda or keyboard or tactile interface is yet clean in the slighest (disposable sleeves for pda, maybe, but stil..

    I'd say the neatest thing is in hospitals where a bit of disinfectant on smooth surface is all it takes to keep transmission of shared consoles down - hey, even sliding paper rolls for the purpose. Any way just thought 'gee that's appicable'..

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  48. no news like old news by pbjones · · Score: 1

    these are so old there are on special in some parts of OZ at a lot less than US$179. I like the idea for about 10 seconds then thought about how painful it would be to type with your fingers hitting a tabletop or something. To be fair, the did actually make it into production, unlike so many other 'breakthrough' gadgets.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  49. I used one all weekend! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    Dupe or no dupe, the timing of this article is great for me, as a buddy of mine got one last week and I got an opportunity to play around with it extensively over the weekend.

    First, to the folks who are saying "It's teh suck compared to a full-sized keyboard 'cuz you don't get tactile feedback", thanks for the brilliant insight.

    This isn't designed to compete with a full-sized keyboard except perhaps in geeky coolness. It's designed as an alternative to typing on the tiny keyboards built into PDAs or using the keypad on a phone. In this regard there's no comparison- it blows them away. I can actually touch type on the keypad on my phone, but could never hope to approach the typing speeds I can get on the virtual keyboard.

    I think that a big factor in the utility of this device is the individual user. My friend (who actually owns the thing) has fairly thick fingers, and I think that he normally types by sight. Conversely, I touch type and have fairly smallish hands (for a guy anyway. They're still larger then all but the largest women's hands). My friend was able to do a passable job, but had to make a lot of corrections compared to when he's using a normal keyboard. On the other hand, I was pleasantly surprised by how low my error rate was after just a short while. There's definitely a loss of speed associated with needing to keep glancing down at the "keys" to keep my finger positions calibrated, but after getting used to it I was still probably faster than your average hunt-and-peck typist.

    As to the concern about repetitive stress injury from banging fingers into a table top, that's just absurd. You don't need to press into the surface- just touch it. There's no impact to speak of at all.

    IMHO, it's pricy but useful, and has extreme coolness value. We took it around with us and got a lot of ooh's and aah's. If your fingers are exceptionally thick then you should probably skip it, but folks with smaller fingers will have little trouble. I need to find out if the layout works with the Mac's Command key, which normally maps to the Windows key on PC keyboards. The virtual keyboard doesn't include a Windows key, but if I can work around that I'm definitely getting one.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    1. Re:I used one all weekend! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I need to find out if the layout works with the Mac's Command key, which normally maps to the Windows key on PC keyboards. The virtual keyboard doesn't include a Windows key, but if I can work around that I'm definitely getting one.

      System Preferences -> Keyboard and Mouse -> Keyboard -> Modifier Keys

      You can remap the Command, Option, Control, and Caps Lock keys as needed.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:I used one all weekend! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      The problem is that I use ctrl, option, and cmd all the time, so losing any one of them would be a potential deal-breaker, and that doesn't leave many other valid options for remapping (I couldn't do without the 't' key, for example, though I probably could make due without caps lock).

      The virtual keyboard does have a function key, but as it's used to send some commands to the device itself I don't know if it'd let me use it (for example) in place of the command key. That's actually what I'm hoping for.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    3. Re:I used one all weekend! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see what you're saying - this keyboard has Ctrl and Alt, but has no Windows key, so there's nothing to map to the Mac's Command key. Yeah, it sounds like mapping Caps Lock to something is probably your best option. Maybe map Alt to Command and Caps Lock to Option? Or if you're an old-school UNIX nerd, map Caps Lock to Ctrl, and map Ctrl and Alt to Opt and Cmd respectively.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  50. No Stereo Bluetooth for the Blackberry Pearl by xycodex · · Score: 1
    These stereo headphones connect to any Bluetooth phone and stream music wirelessly from the phone's memory or from any MP3 player. In fact, many new phones can send stereo music to Bluetooth headphones, a feat impossible until earlier this year. This technology, called A2DP, is available in the Pearl.
    The NYT writer didn't actually try the stuff he's 'advertising'. You can't listen to your tunes over bluetooth on the Pearl. I have one, and I tried. It supports A2DP but not the correct profile or something, or the media player doesnt support it. 'Twas Very Disappointing for me.
  51. Project output as well? by kreyg · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering when someone will create a device which requires no input surface (either voice, or something like this) with something that projects its output as well (presumably something such as this could be made to do it). At that point, there is no particular limitation to how small the device itself can actually get. My Palm would be much more convenient to carry around if it were, say, the size of my watch.

    --
    sig fault
  52. Re:On the way to the ultimate in portable computer by Velocir · · Score: 1

    Stuff that. Integrate them all inside the PDA: That's when you're set.

  53. my idea from ... um ...1994? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted excatly this idea (have a laser project a keyboard to any surface and have the same laser detect fingers) to a Fidonet echo sometime in the first half of the 1990s. It's really unfortunate that there isn't such a comprehensive archive of those like DejaNews (nowadays Google). I looked there but coulnd't find it, so it probably was in a regional echo...

    I wouldn't want any money, I'd settle for the fame. ;-)

  54. That's so 2002 by m2k1 · · Score: 1

    Siemens showed a similar device on CeBit 2002 or something.

  55. Re:NEC P-ISM Conceptual Computer by gonzoxl5 · · Score: 1

    I don't really want four pens, why can't I just carry one ?

  56. .. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. Old news.
    I've already bought one, spent 6 months trying to get it to work with my Palm T¦X with no success, gotten pissed off, tried to return it (unsuccessfully since it isn't "broken" - it just doesn't "work")... finally put it away in my drawer - probably never to be powered up again.
    Since the store wont let me return it - anyone interested in having mine ?

    This device would be quite useful.. if it only worked.

  57. Ha-Ha by gungh0 · · Score: 1

    "Lets all move to California & start using slow modems"

    --
    No, really !
  58. Re:NEC P-ISM Conceptual Computer by Thoguth · · Score: 1

    Why carry any? Why not just have them built into your phone?

    --
    The requested URL /iframe/sig.html was not found on this server.
  59. Does it pass the blind test ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or is it totally useless to blind people ?

  60. Although this looks stupid by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    it isn't necessarily as stupid as all that. A mat with tactile pads that fitted the projection would actually be quite sensible for doing a lot of typing. Because there would be no real keys in the mat it could be cheap, roll up or fold up, and would be reliable (no wires.) You could alss leave mats in the office and at home, avoiding the problems of using multiple subtly different keyboards without having to carry one around (I use 5 and it often causes momentary mental block.)

    In fact, this is actually quite a clever idea. It's almost a pity it is now in the public domain.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  61. invisible field of hovering light by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    TFA: "uses both infrared and laser technology to generate an invisible field and project a full-size virtual QWERTY keyboard".

    An "invisible field? Well, I suppose that lasers, being light, are actually an electromagnetic field, but otherwise this is just trying to make it sound all Star-Trekky (or perhaps, Doctor-Evilish), complete with technobabble.

    And looking at their site, there are some more gems:

    "An infra-red plane of light is generated just above, and parallel to, the interface surface. This light is invisible to the user and hovers a few millimeters above the surface."

  62. it is a support must gudget! by asafloml · · Score: 1

    Don't be tempted because of few bucks, the only seller that have true technical support and can help you pair your device with the VKB is - www.virtual-laser-keyboard.com . Many thought they are smarter and failed to pair or to operate correcly. belive me, I know, I am their help-desk manager. We don't support thinkgeek or ebay clients so please...10x and all the best.

  63. Only kinda cool... by Moekandu · · Score: 1

    I would say that it's twenty bucks cool, not $179.99 cool.

    Maybe ten. Blow money's a bit tight this paycheck.

    --
    Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
  64. Even if the turbine was the size of the laptop by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    It would be worth it if it would keep the laptop running for at least 48 hours. If it were a detachable unit and provided 12 volts hell there's a lot that could be done with it.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty