Slashdot Mirror


Illumninatus! Author Needs Our Help

Criceratops writes, "Almost every fringe-geek worth their salt has read 'The Illuminatus! Trilogy,' or at least the 'Principia Discordia,' and much of the enlightenment therein came from Robert Anton Wilson. On the eve of 'Xena' being officially named Eris, Douglas Rushkoff's blog reveals that the extremely ill Mr. Wilson can't make his rent. Another testimony to how our society refuses to reward those who enrich it... but not if we can help it!"

36 of 553 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I Don't Know, Man by WhyteRabbyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    [i] Get a job as a stocker at WalMart and stop being an anarchist/conspiracy theorist (hey, that's what it says on the linked Wikipedia page) refusing to do actual work for money in our 'system'.[/i]

    Kind of hard to do that when you're housebound and only have a few months to live, y'know.

    And where on earth do you get the assumption that he ever refused to work for money?

    --
    free experimental electronic music netlabel at www.viablehybrid.com
  2. If you send him $5, the fnords won't get you. by fuzzybunny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bought the Illuminatus! trilogy in college, and it gave me many hours of pleasure--not just from reading the book, but from games, references, in-jokes, cultural bits and bobs and whatnot.

    I don't care what he spends his money on, or why he's in trouble, but this is just one of those little bits of culture, like Snow Crash, Neuromancer, Iain Banks' Culture series and any number of other miscellaneous books that contribute to letting me look at life in a more fun way.

    I agree with the guy who said "if a bum asks for money, buy him a sandwich". Where this differs is that here's someone who's actually done something cool and worthwhile and inherently nifty.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    1. Re:If you send him $5, the fnords won't get you. by j_snare · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm not saying anything about the guy here, but it's more accurate to say that what's being asked here is not similar to "if a bum asks for money, buy him a sandwich", it's more accurate to "if a bum asks for money to pay for food, you give him money trusting him to use it to buy food." I don't see contact information for his landlord or something anywhere.

      There is zero accounting here of where this money is going. Hell, what happens if this request is so successful that he gets enough money to pay his rent for 5 years, and he dies in 2 months? I don't want the sob story spams to start up, just hoping that someone is kind enough to be taken advantage of. I'm sick of too much of that already.

      Tell you what, you provide the proof, and I'll send money. I'll need proof of:
      • That this fellow is indeed who he says he is.
      • That he is truely unable to pay his rent. (i.e. open the books up)
      • List of donations and amounts already received, up to date
      • Details on how the money is definately going to Robert Anton Wilson and no one else.
      • Details on any and all "administrative fees" or anything else taken out before the money is put towards the rent.
      • Plans for how to stop the donations when there is enough.
      • Details on the trustee, including legal documents stating what will happen to the money afterwards if there is some left over (though hopefully if they stop the donations there wouldn't be much for this).

      Unless you're willing to open the books up and keep them open, then my donations either go to an organization I can trust, or one who IS willing to open up the books.

      It's truly sad that we cannot just trust those around us, but there are far too many who take advantage of that trust every chance they get. I think we all know better than to trust everything we read on the internet...
    2. Re:If you send him $5, the fnords won't get you. by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.rawilson.com/ - same PayPal address, the author's own site.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    3. Re:If you send him $5, the fnords won't get you. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree completely. Even Jesus commanded us all to do background checks before giving a bum an hamburger. That's why he's the savior. He thought of everything!

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    4. Re:If you send him $5, the fnords won't get you. by stapedium · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure Jesus had background checks in mind when he said,

      "Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back."
      Luke 6:30

    5. Re:If you send him $5, the fnords won't get you. by aiken_d · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's truly sad that we cannot just trust those around us

      No, it's just sad that you can't let go of $20 without demanding DNA tests and genealogy charts. For me, the website is plausible enough, and the address and everything makes sense, so I'll take the minor chance that my contribution is going to a scammer, or that it's going to the right guy and that he's choosing to use it for something other than rent. Whatever. If either of those turn out to be the case, I will be neither bitter nor angry; it's $20, FFS.

      There's no rational reason why it should be so, but karma definitely exists. Just remember this post when the time comes that you genuinely need some minor assistance and people demand urine samples and documentation from lawyers and truestees. "Wow," you will think. "I was a snotty little kid back then." And you will be right.

      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
  3. Re:I Don't Know, Man by onion2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get a job as a stocker at WalMart

    Did you miss the bit where the article says he's extremely ill? I imagine that a shelf-stacking job isn't a viable option.

  4. Payment for his copyrighted work? by rueger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another testimony to how our society refuses to reward those who enrich it... but not if we can help it!"

    You posted that on Slashdot, where every third post is a complaint about the tyranny of copyright and payment for the use of intellectual property?

    How naive.

    1. Re:Payment for his copyrighted work? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You posted that on Slashdot, where every third post is a complaint about the tyranny of copyright and payment for the use of intellectual property?

      How naive.


      You mean the very same slashdot where non-traditional methods of compensating creators are constantly under evalluation and up for debate? Where people recognize that it takes not only time and effort to create something new, but that nothing is ever completely new and that we all stand on the shoulders of the giants who have come before us?

      Yes, how naive indeed.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Payment for his copyrighted work? by div_2n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I grow tired of the "Slashdot hates intellectual property rights" argument. I get the sense reading the posts here that very few are against rewarding people that create worthwhile material whether it is music, books, programs or graphical art. What I believe the overwhelming majority here protest is publishers, *AA getting the bulk of profits off the backs of creative geniuses. Also, after paying, "we" want to be able to put it on whatever medium we wish to use what we've already paid for. That's it.

      Personally, if I could Paypal bands/artists/creators directly for their works I enjoy, I would. Heck, I'd probably pay again for the same work down the road in the right setting. In the end, the amount they get from me would be substantially higher than what their distributors pay. But that's just me. Your mileage may vary.

    3. Re:Payment for his copyrighted work? by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I grow tired of the "Slashdot hates intellectual property rights" argument. I get the sense reading the posts here that very few are against rewarding people that create worthwhile material whether it is music, books, programs or graphical art.

      Of course it's not "slashdot" that "hates IP," it's a very noisy, seldom-challenged group of loons that post comments along those lines. The "you shouldn't get to make money later, off of work you did yesterday" crowd is shrill, carping, ridiculous... but also rarely called on what's wrong with their take on things because they also tend to give comfort to people who are too cheap to pay for their entertainment in general.

      Personally, if I could Paypal bands/artists/creators directly for their works I enjoy, I would.

      And, as is so often pointed out here, you can. Unless the artist has chosen to do business a different way. Most successful/promising ones would rather concentrate on their art, and hire someone to do all of the paperwork, the promotion, the publishing, the legal crap, and so on. Those publishers are sometimes members of a trade association or two, and those trade associations are the pet demons, around here. But people here keep forgetting that many an artists chooses to personally form a studio or a record label so that they can, themselves, help cultivate and promote new talent, and they quickly realize there's a lot to be said for letting a single entity help with their industry representation and other not-about-the-art-itself activities.

      So, if you don't like the business decisions that an artist has made (including the media and related DRM-ish stuff that comes with those deals), don't do business with that artist. Couldn't be simpler!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Re:I Don't Know, Man by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 5, Funny

    I haven't read any books by him, so maybe I'm really missing out on something. But instead of sending him money, I'd rather send him a letter advising him on how to live a better life throw a steady income job.

    You seem supremely qualified to comment, sir. I told Emily Dickinson practically the same thing: "Shut up with that emo shit. It's not paying the bills, and they're looking for a girl to do needlepoint in the village." Sadly, she didn't listen to me, and she died poor, alone, and unappreciated.

  6. Update to this story - Money raised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI there is an update to this posted on BoingBoing yesterday. They were able to raise enough cash to pay for at least the next 2 months rent. Check it out: http://www.boingboing.net/2006/10/03/robert_anton_ wilson_.html.

  7. Re:I Don't Know, Man by iion_tichy · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Get a job as a stocker at WalMart and stop being an anarchist/conspiracy theorist (hey, that's what it says on the linked Wikipedia page) refusing to do actual work for money in our 'system'."

    Perhaps you missed the part where he is 74 years old and extremely ill?

    I also would like to know more about the why and how he got into his situation, but your comment really seems to be far over the top. Not everybody who is poor is "refusing to do actual work".

  8. Quoting the man by fruey · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Dr Lecter, my candidate for the male archetype of 1951-2000, will never win any Nice Guy awards, I fear, but he symbolizes our age as totally as Bloom symbolized his. Hannibal's wit, erudition, insight into others, artistic sensitivity, scientific knowledge etc. make him almost a walking one man encyclopedia of Western civilization. As for his "hobbies" as he calls them -- well, according to the World Game Institute, since the end of World War II, in which 60,000,000 human beings were murdered by other human beings, 193, 000,000 more humans have been murdered by other humans in brush wars, revolutions, insurrections etc. What better symbol of our age than a serial killer? Hell, can you think of any recent U.S. President who doesn't belong in the Serial Killer Hall of Fame? And their motives make no more sense, and no less sense, than Dr Lecter's Darwinian one-man effort to rid the planet of those he finds outstandingly loutish and uncouth.
    On the strength of that, it's not hard to understand how he ends up being on the fringe of society. Even if he does kind of have a point.
    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  9. Re:I Don't Know, Man by shivan · · Score: 4, Informative

    if you would have bothered to research just a little, you would've found out why

    The general deal is that he's suffering from the more morbid symptoms of post-polio syndrome, can't really walk, has trouble swallowing, and is extremely frail. He has friends serving as fulltime nurses and aids, but doesn't have family capable of providing support. The IRS and medical bills have also worked against his solvency.

    Try getting a job with those symptons ..

  10. So... why can't I just pay some more taxes... by neuraljazz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So that EVERYONE can have good enough, free healthcare, rather than choosing some single lucky soul.

    Also, we do value authors - that's why copyrights run out after 25^^50^^75 years so that creators^^^^^large businesses can make money inperpetuity.

  11. Yes, but by Goonie · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Mr Wilson has clearly given a lot of pleasure to many Slashdot readers. So, as a thank you, some of them might wish to ensure that his last few months of his life more comfortable.

    If you're looking to do the most good for the most people per dollar, money invested in, say, vaccine distribution or malaria prevention is always going to outweigh helping anybody living in the West. And that includes US Army veterans and sick kiddies (in fact, the treatment of Western children with life-threatening illnesses is arguably the single most overfunded branch of the medical profession). But it's only human to want to help out those who we feel a connection with in some way. And Mr. Wilson's work has made a connection with many Slashdotters. I'm not among them, I haven't read it. But if, for example, Linus Torvalds or Joss Wheedon turned up destitute on my doorstep, I'd help them out (even though in both cases them ending up destitute would indicate some very poor life decisions), to thank them for what they've given me.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  12. RAW changed my life. by LazyPhoenix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My first exposure to RAW was through the Principia Discordia and the Illuminatus! trilogy, but it was his other books that changed the way I think about a lot of things, Cosmic Trigger and Prometheus Rising especially. Quite honestly, I consider him a great influence, and I suspect there are a lot of others like me. That is why this call for help is meaningful here and elsewhere, and why I'm sending a donation.

    Those of you who haven't read any of his work and also feel some sort of strange self-righteous lack of human kindness to the point of telling a terminally ill man to "get a job at Wal-Mart" might do well to never grow old, sick, or widowed.

  13. "Compassionate Conservativism" by gentimjs · · Score: 4, Funny

    A compassionate conservative sees a man and his family eating grass on the side of the road. The CC pulls over and asks "what are you doing?" the man replies, "we are too poor to eat, and cannot find work because of ethnic and religious discrimination". The CC tells him "thats terrible, hop in my car" so the man and his family joyfully get in the car hoping for a hand-up for a job offer of some kind.

    After driving a ways, the man asks the CC "So where are we going? Do you know where I can find work?" to which the CC laughs, and says "Oh no heh, I dont have a lawn mower, and the grass is much taller in my yard."
    ..........
    They never understand.

  14. Re:I Don't Know, Man by miyako · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's actually a rather complicated situation, and I'm not sure anyone in the US really understands completely how it works. Here is my attempt to explain it anyway.
    Basically, medical insurance in theory is supposed to help protect you in the case that you have a bunch of medical bills. In practice what actually happens is that insurance companies either require deductables on the order of thousands of dollars per procedure (where every tiny thing is it's own procedure) or they simply don't cover very much.
    Furthermore, unless you're extraordinarily healthy, once you get past a certain age it can be very difficult to get health insurance at all, because insurance companies are afraid you might actually use their services.
    Finally on that note, even crappy insurance is extremely expensive- and unless you work for a company who helps pay for it, or are rich, you can't afford health care.
    Now, for people who don't have health care, there is Medicaid and Medicare. These are basically government insurance. The problem is that over the last several years they have been gutted to the point where they are even more impotent than they used to be.
    Whether you have Medicare or Medicaid or some insurance plan, the bills quickly add up and people are usually left in a situation where they can't afford any more medical treatment. From there the options depend basically on what exactly the person is dying of.
    If you get shot/stabbed/dismemebered/etc. Then basically you can walk into any hospital in the US and they are required to give you "stabalizing treatment" - which basically amounts to stopping you from bleeding to death before they take your billing information. For people dying of long term terminal diseases (e.g. cancer, organ failure, etc.) then there are free hospitals. The idea is that when you go to one of these hospitals they take as much as they can get from you, and leave it at that. Of course these hospitals also generally have abysmal quality, so nobody who can afford to pay any medical bills goes to them, so they never get new equipment/have the budget to hire good doctors/etc. This makes a viscous sort of cycle. These also tend to be in rather bad areas in the bigger cities- they mainly serve to tread drug overdoses and gunshot wounds. If you live in a small town and need to get to a hosptial like this- too bad.
    Your other choice aside from the free hospital is to go to a hospital that is equipped to give you some of the best medical care in the world, but it basically involves liquidating all of your assets and turning them over to the hospital, then getting as much on credit as you can, then when you have no more to give they cut you off of treatment and transfer you to the free hospital. These hospitals generally aren't equipped to keep up the level of treatment you've been getting, so at this point generally they dope you up on pain killers and let you die.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  15. After having read these post and the article... by StressGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll comment:

    Some of the post here state that, there are people who are worse off and less well known and perhaps such support would be better directed toward them.

    Other post questioned why he was receiving private care when he could go to a state hospital.

    These are valid points, no argument from me...largely because I don't know much more about him other than he needs help.

    However, I'm having difficulty seeing how it follows that it is "morally wrong" or "hypocritical" to provide assistance to someone when:

    1) You know they need the help

    2) They have, in some way, help you or otherwise enriched your life in the past

    3) Maybe you just simply admire them.

    If you are moved to help this guy, do so and don't let anyone here call you a "hypocrite". If you're really curious, perhaps use this to learn more about his particular afflicition. Who knows? Someday there may be a fund in his name for this very purpose.

    Lance Armstrong's got the "Livestrong" foundation...I wonder what his would be called?

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  16. Is there anyone here who hated the book? by OakDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    God bless the poor guy, and I do feel sorry for him... But I own a copy of this trilogy, and honestly, I tried to read it and couldn't. It was just crap (my opinion, obviously). So I was a little surprised to see so many people here who admired it. Is there anyone here who found it unreadable, like me?

  17. Re:I Don't Know, Man by @madeus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now you tell me that even if you have health insurance, there's no guarantee that you won't be turned in to soylent green?!

    Can anyone explain how your country works in this regard?


    As difficult as it is for those of us in less barbaric countries to imagine, you are indeed hung out to dry if your health insurance runs out, and it's only good up to a point. Usually the limit is up to a specific dollar value - or covers treating a given illness for a limited time span. The maximum amount a policy covers it varies depending on the premium you are willing to pay / can afford each month.

    Where the system falls down is when someone has a serious long term illness, such as Cancer, and the treatment works, you can easily end up running out of insurance cover 2 or 3 years down the road. When that happens, you have to sell all your possessions (house, car, TV) to pay for the drugs (which are really expensive - often hundreds of USD worth a month). When the money ultimately runs out, and you are lying bed ridden, flat broke in low rent accommodation - having been forced to sell all of your valuable possessions just to stay alive - you simply stop getting the medication you've been getting and you are left to succumb to the illness (that is, to die).

    If you have a partner, then they are left with nothing when you die - not even the house you used to live in (because you'll have used up all the money from the life insurance pay out that would already have been made when your condition was diagnosed on the medication you needed to keep you alive), making it a double tragedy for them. I don't know how someone is supposed to get their life back together after something like that.

    "Emergency rooms" are required to treat all patients brought in (regardless of insurance or ability to pay), so when you are at the final stage of your illness at deaths door (days, or hours before the end) they will give you medication to control the pain, but that's the extent of the free treatment available (and you / your partner will still get a hefty bill for any services rendered, they just can't - by law - refuse to treat you even if they know for sure you can't pay it).

    Scary stuff.

    Such is the price people seem willing to pay in return for lower taxation and greater spending power at the checkout.

  18. Re:What is he doing by ArikTheRed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, thats the most innocent sounding question I've ever heard of Slashdot! I imagine a small child, ragged hat in hand and doe-eyed, speaking with a whistle through a lost front tooth.

  19. Re:In other news ... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Informative
    But instead of giving $25 to random folks, I could give that $25 to someone I know.

    $23, darling, $23.

    Save 2 dollars, and please him even more by showing that you remembered the number.

  20. Re:I Don't Know, Man by VJ42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks for the info; you've also made me feel infantely better about the NHS, from whom I got anti-epileptic brain surgery absolutely free when I was 15. According to my then conultant only 12 of these particular operations are carried out per year at that hospital (the world renound Great Ormond Street children's hospital). Had we had to pay for it, well I think my parents would still be paying back the debt now, a couple of years short of a decade later.

    People continually moan about the state of the NHS, but it's safe to say I'd rather become ill here in the UK than over there in the USA.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  21. Re:I Don't Know, Man by aplusjimages · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always find it funny when people try to discourage people from doing good deeds. If you want to start a fund for Robert Jordan I say do it. I won't write a short essay on how I think it's a waste of time and how there may be some hidden agenda to buy drugs with the money.

    I understand discouraging people from replying to spam or supporting terrorism, but to discourage people from helping another person just seems like time wasted on everyones part.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  22. Re:Cue all the anarcho-capitalists.... by vertigo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hello,

    >So, I have a job and insurance, because I don't want to be like this guy.

    Trust me, there's no risk you'll ever be like that guy.

    Hail Eris!

  23. Re:I Don't Know, Man by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amen. I've broken a few bones, and had plastic surgery on my ears on the NHS. I guess I should stop being annoyed at how much the government taxes everything, since the NHS sounds so much better than anything Americans will have anytime soon.. :S The pricing does sound extortionate too though. Drug companies must be making a killing (no pun intended).

    --
    which is totally what she said
  24. Re:I Don't Know, Man by ischorr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Several things that you supposedly read should have tipped you off.

    Summary: "the extremely ill Mr. Wilson can't make his rent"
    Article: "whose *infirmity* and depleted finances"
    Article: "Bob is a human being in a rather painful fleshsuit"
    Article: "I refuse for the history books to say he died alone and destitute"
    Wikipedia article (which you say you read) depending on when you read it:
    Wikipedia: "This author who has changed the lives of many is dying of post polio syndrome"
    Wikipedia: "Robert A. Wilson is currently under hospice care at home with friends and family." ...But you didn't actually read any of this (you even quoted the article wrong after being called out!!). You skimmed a few things, jumped to conclusions, then rushed to get first post by being about as much of an ass about it as possible - revealing how much you're just a sad, sad, excuse for a human being.

    RAW himself did not ask for money. A fan of his, however, did. Your high horse died about 2 posts ago, *get off of it*.

    Also, you've never once taken a homeless guy into a restaurant. Liar.

  25. Re:I Don't Know, Man by jdcook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This wasn't bad but I think some clarifications might help:

    1) It is extremely important to distinguish between employer-provided insurance and privately-purchased insurance. The theoretical purpose of medical insurance is not, as you say, to protect you in case of a large number of bills. It is to pool risk and collect enough money from each insured to cover the cost and a bit of rake-off for the insurer. The purpose of medical insurance *companies* is to make as much money as possible. Therein lies the rub.

    Employer-provided insurance tends to be pretty good. Most people work for large companies and these companies use their bulk purchasing power to get something very close to this risk-pooling arrangement. People trying to buy insurance on their own, however, are completely at the mercy of insurance companies. They will face possibly ruinous exclusions, especially the nebulous "pre-existing condition", and a great many hurdles. The insurance companies work hard (which is expensive) to find reasons not to pay the claims of these people.

    2) The long-term problem is a bit similar. If you work for a long time for a large company, you are generally well covered until Medicare (*not* Medicaid) kicks in. Increased worker mobility (i.e. decreased job security) makes the insurance problem greater.

    3) Medicare hasn't been gutted (though there was a debacle recently with the new PHARMA welfare act, err, new drug benefit) because it is for old people and old people vote. Medicaid has always been pretty crappy because it is for poor people.

    4) The US already has a decent program in Medicare and a very good program in the Veteran's Administration Hospitals. However, expanding these programs to universal coverage is politically impossible at the moment.

    Even the mediocre NHS is far better (even Canada's crappy system is better though France's system may be best of all) from a coverage per dollar standpoint. The administrative costs associated with the US system are extreme and provide no medical benefit to anyone.

    I remain convinced that the US will eventually embrace single-payer under a less corrupt Republican administration (a Nixon-to-China moment if you will) when big business republicans realize they cannot afford it any longer and faux libertarian (that's a bit of snark since I don't believe there are any *real*, i.e. uniformly consistent, libertarians) entrepreneur types realize that the dangers of leaving a job and foregoing insurance can make entrepreneurship far too risky. (I'm not entrepreneurially inclined but if I were, I'd worry a lot less about losing my house since I could always go back to the rat race and rent than losing my insurance since I might get cancer while uninsured and simply die).

    --
    Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
  26. Come on, people! by v1x · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of the arguments here are whether or not this person is worthy of receiving such donations. Considering that disease & death will spare none of us, and that bad things do happen to good people, how many of us can say with utmost confidence that such a thing will *never* happen to them? I've never read any of his books, but then again, to say that he does / does not deserve anyone's help based on that is just plain callous. Helping, like many other things in life, is not about you. If you are able & willing to help, kudos to you; and if you are not, the least you can do is not to try & discourage those who are.

  27. Re:I Don't Know, Man by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The well off person who has millions in the bank to cover all medical eventalities has likely been fortunate enough to have been born with a skill that has enabled them to obtain that money.

    Funny. Statistically speaking, the well off person was born into a family that is well off. The secret to wealth is to be born to rich parents, then, since you have money, the money condensation principal kicks in. You can just loan money to those who were born poorer and collect interest.

    I've been in tears since this thread started and the thought that America can stand by at let its citizens die sends shivers down my spine.

    While the stated goal of pretty much any government program, or lack thereof, is to make people's lives better, we all enter into that with a lot of preconceptions and principals. Americans are predisposed towards independence and each person taking care of themselves. This is reflected in our lack of socialism and in our stance on drugs and firearms. Much of Europe is more predisposed towards placing responsibility on a central authority as is reflected in their beliefs about those same topics. Neither is optimal for quality of life, but it is pretty obvious that overall, Western Europe is closer to the ideal.

    If you want to hear some scary numbers take a look at the number of Americans that are financially ruined by medical expenses. I think the last time I heard it was something like 50% of all personal bankruptcies were due to a medical problem.

  28. Re:I Don't Know, Man by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not bullshit, but they are businesses with the morals of businesses. And they do drop people unless contractual obligations require that they not.

    That said, authors don't have much of a guild. I'd be surprised if they had a group insurance plan. Bob Wilson was crippled with polio as a child, and though he was able to overcome it for years, he also was subject to recurrence (of muscular weakness, not of polio). If he's now both old and sick, he probably can't walk. I'd be surprised if he was insurable for this problem, as it's ... well, not congenital, but definitely pre-existing any possible insurance.

    OTOH, a good health plan is contractually obligated to NOT drop you. Such exist. The good ones seem to do reasonably good jobs. (And hospitalization is STILL expensive.)

    As for his savings...Bob's books may have sold well for a long period of time, but he was never at the top of the charts. He's never been wealthy, and often lived very near the edge. I'd be surprised if he had any savings. (I'm also fairly certain that the finances would have been managed by his wife, Arlen, who's been dead for years. Also a writer, "relatively successful" [i.e., she's been published in places that paid money, but I don't think enough to live on].)

    Writers, painters, musicians...all of these can expect to end life as paupers...if they're lucky. There are exceptions, but that's what they should expect. If Bob was local I'd want to offer him a room and meals. I don't know if I'd be able to, but I'd want to. Unfortunately, he moved away decades ago, and I've lost track of him.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.