Slashdot Mirror


EU 'Happy' To Wait For PS3

Eurogamer reports on comments by SCE Worldwide Europe VP Jamie MacDonald almost designed to irk anyone left frustrated by Sony's delay of the PS3 in Europe. According to Mr. MacDonald, Europe has always waited before, so why should this time be any different? From the article: "In Europe, it doesn't seem that the release of our platforms after the US and Japan - in the long run - affects how consumers feel ... If we were sitting here in five years' time, I don't think we'd really think about or notice that PlayStation 3 was four or five months later in Europe. I think in the long run, PlayStation 3 will succeed because of the great product it is and the great software we make for it."

69 comments

  1. Waiting by wuie · · Score: 3, Funny

    "In Europe, it doesn't seem that the release of our platforms after the US and Japan - in the long run - affects how consumers feel ..."

    Hell, I wouldn't mind waiting either. Wii aren't interested in the slightest....

  2. In the Sony Corporation, by yincrash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems that no executive actually cares about their consumer.

    1. Re:In the Sony Corporation, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Remove "In the Sony corporation" from your comment and then I think you'll be onto something.

    2. Re:In the Sony Corporation, by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Never mind the "consumers" word. Shouldn't it be "customers" or at least "users"?

    3. Re:In the Sony Corporation, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not supposed to. Their job is to care about their stockholders. That is why executives can freely switch industries without their performance being affected - they're disconnected. Their only duty is to keep the board and stockholders happy, and if they can embezzle a little on the side here and there, more power to them ;)

  3. Another empty/meaningless PR comment by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It might not matter once it's released, but being 5 months late to the party just might help the Wii gain even more marketshare, combined with the fed up people who might just go out and buy an Xbox 360 instead.

    Instead, I'd try to explain why it's gonna take 5 months to release the PS3 in europe.

    1. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Well that's simple, they don't have enough built to send them to Europe.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    2. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Question is, wouldn't it have been better to lie about how many they were sending and release it in Europe anyway? No-body is planning on being able to get hold of one anyway and you avoid the animosity.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    3. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      How about sending less units to other parts of the world, if only to get a foothold in the european market? Only a few people will have one, but at least they'll be able to show their friends, who'll then be happy to wait for new units to arrive.

    4. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      No one ever said it was smart, this is just how they choose to do it.

      Everyone knows Europeans are too smart to waste money on video games like the U.S. and Japan anyway.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    5. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Correction: Everybody knows that console games are so overpriced in Europe that we prefer PC games instead.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by tepples · · Score: 1
      Correction: Everybody knows that console games are so overpriced in Europe that we prefer PC games instead.

      So if you want some arcade-style four-players-in-a-room party action, what do you do? Buy four PCs and four copies of each game?

    7. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      It's good that someone else does... I am tired of being looked down on by console fanboys who can't be bothered to come play with the big kids. I fear that in the fullness of time gameing PCs will become more like consoles and not the other way around... I better get my gameing in now.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    8. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Play Worms.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by tepples · · Score: 1
      Play Worms.

      Play as the team from Worms in which multiplayer sport sim? If, as I suspect, you meant play one of the Worms turn-based shooters, then what do you do when you want to play a real-time multiplayer game on a PC? Why aren't there more PC games that allow four players to each use one USB joypad?

    10. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Most people simply accept that limitation. Doesn't matter to us that the PC can't play real-time party games, we aren't that demanding (never mind that I haven't found a console game yet that people are actually willing to play with four players, noone seems to like playing Smash Bros. or Mario Kart). And we've got good board games.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by raxx7 · · Score: 1

      No, we drink alchool. ;-)

    12. Re:Another empty/meaningless PR comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What always worked for me is Super Monkey Ball. The monkey fight in particular is a big favourite. I once brought my GC + SMB to a very small lan party, and in the and we played about 1 hour of PC games and at least 6 hours of monkey fight.

  4. Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do not see the word anywhere in the article. If it is not in fact a quote, it should not be presented as one, should it?

    1. Re:Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Those are the poor man's [sarcasm] tags.

    2. Re:Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Slashdot, home of completely totally uneditorialized news summaries.

    3. Re:Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by LionMage · · Score: 1
      The technical term for these is "Scare quotes."

      In case you don't feel like clicking the link:
      Scare quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase from which you, the writer, wish to distance yourself because you consider that word or phrase to be odd or inappropriate for some reason. Possibly you regard it as too colloquial for formal writing; possibly you think it's unfamiliar or mysterious; possibly you consider it to be inaccurate or misleading; possibly you believe it's just plain wrong. Quite often scare quotes are used to express irony or sarcasm[...]

      Quotation marks are used for more than just direct quotes.
    4. Re:Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by justchris · · Score: 1
      There is a distinct difference between a double-quote (") and a single-quote ('). When something is placed in single-quotes, it is not a direct quotation, or should not be. That is improper punctuation, and punishable by being lambasted by your fellow man.

      In this case, I assume he used single-quotes to point out that he believes the word 'Happy' was an implication by the speaker, even if it's not specifically what he said.

      --
      just some guy
    5. Re:Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The technical term for these is "Scare quotes."

      Not according to the link you provided. Scare quotes are meant to make it clear "this is their term, not mine", and the examples on that page agree. In this case, "happy" is not their term.

    6. Re:Why are there quotation marks around 'Happy'? by LionMage · · Score: 1
      Not according to the link you provided.

      Put simply, you misread the article I linked to.

      The working definition provided in that article is, again:
      Quotation marks used in this way are informally called scare quotes. Scare quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase from which you, the writer, wish to distance yourself because you consider that word or phrase to be odd or inappropriate for some reason.
      While it's true that the article does provide several examples which emphasize "this is their term, not mine," the article also makes it clear that they can be used to express disapproval (of a word or phrase), irony, or sarcasm. In other words, you're narrowing the definition by picking and choosing the pieces of the article to which I linked.

      In the context of the original Slashdot article and the grandparent post, I believe "happy" was a paraphrase of the general sense of the original source material, and I think the Slashdot article's author intended to convey a bit of scorn or sarcasm by the use of scare quotes. This is not dissimilar to several of the examples from the article to which I linked.

      In point of fact, the very first example cited on the page I linked agrees with my understanding and not with yours:
      The use of quotation marks can be extended to cases which are not exactly direct quotations. Here is an example:
      Linguists sometimes employ a technique they call "inverted reconstruction".

      The phrase in quote marks is not a quotation from anyone in particular, but merely a term which is used by some people -- in this case, linguists.
      (Emphasis added.) In other words, scare quotes don't have to correspond to an exact quotation. In the Slashdot article, the author clearly was summarizing the gist of another article with a single word, and in the same instance implying that they don't buy what it's saying.

      So, my statement stands. In the future, try not to be so legalistic / literalist in your reading of articles about grammar. This is natural language, not computer code. If you want to see some different perspectives on definitions of scare quotes that challenge your narrow view of a single article, you could try the Wikipedia entry, or this interesting blog entry, or even this answers.com topic. Sheesh.
  5. how to annoy people 101 by cliffski · · Score: 2, Funny

    its like sony are trying to make a documentary on how to ruin your products chances and annoy your customers. It keeps getting worse and worse. Youd have to be insane to be betting your business on the PS3 being a success.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    1. Re:how to annoy people 101 by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      I partly agree, this should be annoying people, but it's not really, we are used to getting screwed over. The real mistake that they made was announcing a date and then going back on it - pre-orders had been taken and when people get told "oh yeah, well, we'll keep your money and you'll just have to wait another 6 months" they get pissed off... and buy something else.

      Also remember that most people in Europe don't see things like this, they just hear about it when it's out. And after all, if you were actually going to pay £425 for one then getting screwed on the time won't bother you either

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:how to annoy people 101 by izzo+nizzo · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of trouble believing that this delay will really hurt sales. Playstation is one of the biggest and most successful products ever. And we are all looking forward to see this new one which ought to be orders of magnitude more powerful. Yes, the wait is unfortunate, yes, it may be a couple years before the games live up to expectations. But in the long run, I am certain that this platform will be the most respected, most loved, most profitable. Sony has been putting its foot in its mouth since the rootkit, and they couldn't be any dumber than making their minidisc software Windows-only (musicians using windows???). But Europe hates microsoft. And the Wii, looks like some cool stuff, but I just don't think they'll put together a good library of games (compared to PS3).

  6. Agreed... by tarun713 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they seem very happy indeed.

  7. $769 too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they also happy about paying the equivalent to $769 USD and between $86 and $93 per game? See http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:LJb_-pNG69gJ:w ww.ps3land.com/article-409.php+ps3+game+price+euro &hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=firefox-a for details on that!

    With another controller you are hitting almost $1000 USD for a game system with one game! I know I can't justify that and I make $130k USD a year.

    And don't give me that baloney that it includes a "BluRay" player. Its not what people are buying right now.

    1. Re:$769 too! by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Those currency exchanged prices are pretty misleading though.

      Here in Europe we tend to get paid a heck of a lot more than in the US and Japan which is why the exchange rate schews the figures so much. I remember moving to London from florida and thinking everything was soo expensive while I still converted everything back into U.S. dollars (1 British Pound = almost 2 U.S. dollars). Then I got my first paycheck and when I converted that back into U.S. dollars I felt like a very rich man!

      Although with winter approaching, I'm kind of missing Florida a bit atm.

    2. Re:$769 too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Hate to break it to you but the average income in the US and Japan is much higher than in the EU (especially when taxes are considered). You might have just gotten a raise in your case.

    3. Re:$769 too! by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Did you even read my post?

      It is all about the exchange rate. 1 British pound = 2 U.S. Dollars, 1 Euro = 1.5 U.S. Dollars. My measily £20,000 salary in London (which is pretty damn low for a graduate in London) = $40,000 in U.S. dollars, I don't know a single recently graduated mate back in Florida on anything near that (and most of them have far better jobs than I).

      To over-simplify things somewhat, the exchange rate disparity is largely due to the high minimum wages of European countries. But this also obviously means that people in the 'decent' European countries on average get paid far more (equivilantly) than any other nation.

    4. Re:$769 too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never studied social science.

      The U.S. has comparatively low pay rates compared to Europe, the arguments being that raising minimum wages would decrease jobs. Western and Northern Europe on the other hand have by far the highest minimum wage rates in the world. The average (mean) pay rates of these European countries is by far the highest in the world. Exchange rates confuse everything though as cost-of-living in Western and Northern Europe is comparatively high due to free medical and social care (pensions, unemployment benefits etc.).

      Here in the U.S.A. the argument has always been that such high minimum wages and social care cost jobs and close factories. Which system is best is the $64,000 question and will probably never be answered as each system benefits different people. Both have heavily industrialized economies but the nations of Europe have been heavily influenced by political forces appealing to the average worker (i.e. Socialism), whereas our political powers have always favored the factory owners (i.e. Liberalism).

  8. You Tell'm Jamie by flaknugget · · Score: 1

    Because those silly Europeans don't know what they want until you tell them.

  9. They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by Rev+Jim+(AKA+Metal+F · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they have to wait '5 months'. Big deal. It's not like there is a handful of must play titles coming out with launch. It's not like within 1/2 a year or more, minor defects will be fixed and a newer and better model of the PS3 will be manufactured. It's not like that extra 5 months won't better show which console is more established to better choose from which system will meet their individual preference for titles and gaming habits. Consider it a blessing in diguise if you will Europe. If the money is burning a hole in your pocket that badly - go grab a wii with Zelda.

    --
    Gaming for over 25 years
    1. Re:They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by NotthatFrankie · · Score: 1

      And your point is... what?

      Of course, a delay in Europe advantages the alert consumer, for whom all the information on all three consoles will be available when the European PS3 ships. This is a double-edged sword for Sony, of course, because it means that if the PS3 doesn't live up to its expectations in Japan and North America, then the chance of success in Europe falls dramatically.

      In other words: the delay sucks for Sony and for the diehard european Sony fans, but not for the average savvy consumer.

    2. Re:They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by Rev+Jim+(AKA+Metal+F · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The average European gamer has everything to gain by having to wait in my opinion. It's bad for Sony obviously as you pointed out - meaning it's good news for Nintendo and Microsoft. One good thing for everyone I see about all of Sony's blundering with the PS3 launch and media handling thus far is that it's leveling the playing field more. More competition and a diverse base of console owners is going to step on some toes initially, but in the long run I think it will make the gaming world as a whole better off, if not even more competitive which I see as an advantage to us gamers. I could very well be wrong though on this.

      --
      Gaming for over 25 years
    3. Re:They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by thebaron2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It IS a big deal - at least it should be to Sony.

      What they need to be worrying about is the market saturation potential over in Europe. I'm sure plenty of gamers that held off from the 360 and were planning to hold off on the Wii did so because they figured, "Hey, it'll be in November, no problem - I can wait."

      Now they hear, "Oops... it's gonna be another half year, sorry" - except that the Sorry wasn't even included! It was more like, "You've waited before, we know you'll wait again, deal with it." They're relying on purchases of the hardcore gamers who've been waiting for a PS3 and alienating them at the same time.

      And, while Sony will surely be improving and tweaking the PS3 during those 5 months, don't assume that MS and Nintendo are just going to sit there twiddling their thumbs waiting for Sony to play catch-up. I'm sure that the 360 and the Wii will also get worked on during that time frame by their respective parent companies.

      What it comes down to is that MS and Nintendo have now got 5 more months to steal away as many PS3 loyalists as possible, and with the SLEW of bad news that has been coming out about the PS3 and Sony in general, I wouldn't be surprised to see some loyalists start dropping off the bandwagon as they reach their boiling point and decide that they're not waiting any longer for a system that has really failed to distinguish itself to the point that it's worth waiting for.


      Also, don't write this off as a fanboi response, which most PS3 lovers will. I have the PS, PS2, Xbox, GC, and 360. I'm planning on getting a Wii and WAS planning on getting a PS3. I probly still will get the PS3, but it has something to prove to me now, whereas 8 months ago I trusted in Sony's past performance.

      /2 cents

      --
      -TheBaron2
    4. Re:They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by Rev+Jim+(AKA+Metal+F · · Score: 1

      Right on! I agree 100%. Myself I'm a big gaming fan as well and not a 100% loyalist to any one brand or console. I have owned the 2600, colecovision, SNES, PS, PS2, GBA, GCB, NDS, various gaming capable PC's blah vblah blah and such - but never an X-box. I'm actually considering a 360 purchase for the first time ever, and I've always sided with Playstation being better than the x-box as my system of preference being an avid PC gamer and all. I think Nintendo out of all the consoles needs every break it can get. I'm getting off track though. I do think this delay is a blessing in disguise for European gamers, and the competiton as you point out.

      --
      Gaming for over 25 years
    5. Re:They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you're a 99% loyalist then

    6. Re:They Should Consider Themselves Lucky by Rev+Jim+(AKA+Metal+F · · Score: 1

      99% and dropping...fast.

      --
      Gaming for over 25 years
  10. Maybe if they wait, the EU price will drop by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It costs more than US $600 in the UK right now.

    If they wait, maybe they'll get the Japanese price of US $406.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  11. In Sonyspeak, is it customers or users? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never mind the "consumers" word. Shouldn't it be "customers" or at least "users"?

    I think you mean "DRM-enabled clients".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:In Sonyspeak, is it customers or users? by defnshow · · Score: 1

      kudos!

  12. The reason why... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    These companies don't put nearly as much effort into Europe as they do in the US and Japan because Europeans don't spend money on consoles. Europeans generally earn less than their Japanese and American counterparts and certainly are taxed far, far more heavily. So Europeans are less likely to spend their money frivlously; if they buy something they expect more value out of it. Hence the popularity of PC gaming. Although, there are certain countries there, like England, where console gaming does enjoy a considerable presence.

    But regardless, this is why these companies don't care. What Sony's executives have said is stupid, but they could care less. Their income, if they actually manage to sell any PS3's will be coming from the US and Japan not Europe.

    1. Re:The reason why... by sam0ht · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure (Europe as a whole) is a larger videogame market than either the USA or Japan, by revenue. Of course, the individual countries aren't so big, but to neglect a whole region is actually pretty significant, revenue-wise.

    2. Re:The reason why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europeans generally earn less than their Japanese and American counterparts and certainly are taxed far, far more heavily.

      Do you have any figures to support those claims, or are you just making things up? Just curious.

    3. Re:The reason why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the high presence of PC gaming on the European mainland was more due to the popularity of more serious and adult stuff like super-real simulations and strategy games which consoles just don't do as well as the PC.
      Financially speaking, when you take stuff like not requiring health insurance into account, the richer European countries (representing about 200 million people) are roughly on a par with the US. Sony did sell a hell of a lot of PS2s in Europe.

      Anyway, regarding the article, it's basically true. I don't think anyone is actually happy about the delay but ultimately it didn't prevent Sony doing just as well with the delayed PS2 and PSP as they did in territories where they launched eariler.

      Fun PS3 fact. At £425 the PS3 could do a 10% price cut every year and it would take 9 years before it reached the Wii launch price (and it doesn't come with a game), or 14 years before it came down to the current street price of a PS2.

    4. Re:The reason why... by BeShaMo · · Score: 1

      That's pretty ignorant, most of Europe (certainly comparable in numbers to the US) do have a high disposable income and console gaming is very popular, though the taste in games might differ from the American market.

      However Xbox (or Gamecube) never really hit it big on continental Europe and that might be why Sony feels less pressure to launch along with other markets. (PS2 has sold about the same numbers as in NA)

  13. Competition by Psychotext · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm interested, did the PS2 have this sort of competition when it was released in Europe? By my reckoning the last console releases for Sony in Europe went something like this:

    Playstation: September 1995.
    Competition: Sega Saturn (July 1995). The Nintendo 64 was not released for another 2 years.

    Playstation 2: November 2000.
    Competition: Sega Dreamcast (October 1999). The Nintendo GameCube was not released for another 12 months, the XBOX another 4 months after that.

    Playstation 3: March 2007.
    Competition: Nintendo Wii (November 2006), XBOX 360 (November 2005).

    Sony is walking into a whole world of hurt in Europe. By March 2006 there may not be much of a market left for them. They've faced nothing like this sort of competition in the past.

    --
    People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    1. Re:Competition by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Assuming your analysis is true, it makes the decision an even wiser one.

      The PS3 is going to be facing the XBox360 and Wii at launch. The XBox360 is already established in the U.S.A. and Europe and is currently a failure in Japan. The Wii is aiming at a different market, and if you're right about European discretionary spending, is likely to be the big winner there. The main 'battlefield' between the XBox360 and PS3 is going to be the US (and japan is the PS3 truly sucks).

      Given all that, it make sense to concentrate most of the first run in the US to try and gain a foothold. It also makes sense to 'spend' some of the units in Japan to forestall the competition (if possible), and placate your user base.

      It might not be a move that makes anyone happy (including Sony), but it does seem to be the best move they can make, given the resources and circumstances.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  14. I'm in North America, and I will wait too.... by CPE1704TKS · · Score: 1

    Since there is 0% probability that I will spend $600 for a gaming system... sorry, I mean home-entertainment-conversion-system-or-whatever-t hey-want-to-call... I will be getting the game system at about the same time as or later than my European brothers.

    Until the price drops significantly and until Sony actually makes due with the promises for a breadth of functionality, I won't have any interest in getting it.

    I bought the PSP thinking that Sony would support it with lots of features, such as GPS, etc, but they haven't at all. I feel lied to, because I thought it would be supported by Sony and would be something entirely different than just a portable gaming system. The only thing that makes the PSP interesting is the homebrew stuff that occurs. And stupidly, Sony is fighting AGAINST this!

    So, until all of Sony's promises about the PS3 pan out, then they won't see a red cent from me. This might take it to 2008 or 2009, who knows!

    So Europeans, don't worry, I don't think anyone except the rich early adopters will be getting the PS3 anyway.

  15. Bad PR move. by ectal · · Score: 1

    Sony completely missed the opportunity to point out to Europeans that they now have an extra 5 months to work overtime and save up for the PS3.

    --
    http://nerdcartoons.com/
  16. I'd buy a PS3 if... by xenoarch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The division of Sony that makes em broke off and formed their own company. Its Corporate forcing the games division on what hardware must be put in. They are still living in the past trying to make money off the consoles on other technology what the PSO did for DVDs in Japan.

    Back in the 90's before the PSO came out DVDs were not very popular in japan. but they had a strong foothold in the states, with a lot of content already out in the format. They included a DVD player with the PSO. and soon after people in Japan started trying DVDs and DVD sale then went up in Japan. But since the format already took off in the US and there were plenty of content (although different region) The existing manufacturers could cheaply put stuff out for the different region.

    So when the Games division wanted do put a hard drive in the PSP, the higher ups wanted to promote the UMD format so they forced them to use that instead. And the UMD has failed, and there isn't much good content for the PSP.

    Now when they come out with PS3, the other divisions had Blu-Ray, and so corporate force the games folx to include that hardware.

    Sony forgot although they made DVD format popular in Japan with the PSO, there were large libraries of content already out for it in the rest of the world.

    1. Re:I'd buy a PS3 if... by MadMoses · · Score: 1

      They included a DVD player with the PSO.

      I guess you're thinking about the PS2. The PSone only had a CD player.

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    2. Re:I'd buy a PS3 if... by xenoarch · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah I am. Cant belives dvds only been around for such a short time. sorry about that.

  17. That's right, Sony! by LKM · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm European, and I just love to wait. In fact, I'll wait at least two or three more years until I'll get a PS3. If I ever get one. Because I'll wait until the price of your rich man's toy comes down to a more agreable level.

    I'll get a Wii the day it comes out, though.

  18. EUs been mislead by Mykid8yours · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "PlayStation 3 will succeed because of the great product it is"


    Are they so sure? Have they had the chance to play it? I am also guessing they hadn't hear about the whole overheating issue. I foresee a lot of recalls like the Sony batteries. I for one will not buy a PS3 until 2008 when hopefully the prices drop and the bugs are fixed.

    1. Re:EUs been mislead by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      You know, wireless controllers need batteries... That's gonna be fun!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  19. Depends on the meaning of Happy by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Well, if the price they pay then drops below the $406 Japanese customers will pay, instead of the $600 plus they pay in the EU, I can see how that would make them happy.

    Besides, think of all the fun they'll be getting from their new Wii's while they "wait".

    The only problem will be if they forget to buy the PS3's when they actually arrive in the EU.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  20. Japan speaks 1 language. N America speaks 2. by tepples · · Score: 1
    Actually, I'm pretty sure (Europe as a whole) is a larger videogame market than either the USA or Japan, by revenue. Of course, the individual countries aren't so big, but to neglect a whole region is actually pretty significant, revenue-wise.

    The problem is that nearly every country in Europe speaks a different language and thus requires redoing the screen text, the voice acting, and the signs on all the walls. You can't just bring over your English/French game from North America and expect to sell it outside the United Kingdom, France, and those parts of B*lg**m that speak French. People outside the UK will female-dog that they got shafted with cheaply done voice acting.

  21. Screw you Sony by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With an attitude like that you will be waiting a long time before I will consider being one of your customers. Screwing over customers is one thing, but claiming that we're happy with it is a completely new game.

  22. I'm a Happy European! by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    Or at least I will be when I get my wii for Christmas.

    Seriously Sony, stop rubbing salt in the wounds. You are years late, with a machine that has been cut from having 4 9-core Cell chips to 1 7-core chip, and here in England we are still smarting from last Christmas when there were too few PSPs to go round and we were forced to buy up to 4 bundled junk games if we wanted one.

    If you don't put a foot wrong for the next few years, I'll eventually pick up a cheap secondhand PS3... but only if Gran Turismo 5 is any good, and that's about all you can hope for from this once loyal PS2 purchaser.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  23. Bizarre by DrXym · · Score: 1
    I can't understand why anyone would be "happy" to be subjected to a six month delay of their console, but I can understand that they might be grateful if the PS3 launch turns out to be an unmitigated disaster, or the PS3 is going to experience a price drop soon after.

    Having said that, I really don't know why anyone would want to own *any* console in its first few months of life. There no console in the world that justifies an instant purchase. Not one. Most even offer a level of backwards compatibility so chances are you'd be playing stuff you already own. If its a great console, it will still be a great console a few months from launch when there might be a few games to choose from and a chance that the thing will work out of the box.

    People who buy a new system in the days preceding a launch are morons. It doesn't matter if it's a Wii or PS3. Buying something sight unseen is just stupid.

  24. oi !! Aussies / Kiwi's love to wait too by rastan_saga · · Score: 1

    And we don't even get a mention.... I think they forgot us again! *Waits for the pissants at Sony Australia to tell us that Sony do care~~*

  25. Wrong, moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you counted the populations that speak a distinct language in Europe and did the same in North America, you'd find there are in fact millions of non-English, non-Spanish, and non-French (Quebec and New Brunswick, bonjour? You must be American) speakers. They may not be geographically united, but there are probably more Chinese-North American speakers of Chinese than there are Greeks.

    Quebec has a population that rivals (or maybe passes) Denmark, which speaks its own language.

    1. Re:Wrong, moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How stupid are you? Did you even read the title of the article you're replying to? I would go on to explain to you the difference between minority language populations and language populations that justify localised content in games and DVDs, but I would be wasting my time as you obviously know more about this than the game publishers themselves.

    2. Re:Wrong, moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "North America speaks 2 languages" is obviously an ignorant claim and I was correcting the moron who made it. Over 40-something million Spanish, over 5 million French (and not France-French either, if you really want to split hairs about localization), hundreds of millions of English speakers (there, that's 3 languages with geographic unity in North America, even if you exclude Mexico!) plus millions of Chinese for a 4th. Now that it's abundantly clear that I'm right and the GP and you are both idiots, you may return to your mommy's basement.