Slashdot Mirror


Natural Gas to Offer Breakthrough in Suspended Animation?

Kingcanute writes "The BBC is reporting that American scientists are claiming that sewer gas may be successful at inducing suspended animation. The results were achieved using mice but further studies are needed" From the article: "The problem with hypothermia is it's not that easy to cool down the human body so if we can find another method to inhibit metabolism that would be very useful"

133 comments

  1. Farts are healthy? by nog_lorp · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, finally a decent theory may be developed as to why farts increase lifespan. (Quick check - ok, farts do contains hydrogen sulfide)

    1. Re:Farts are healthy? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow! No wonder time seems to really drag by when I pull my finger...

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Farts are healthy? by hullabalucination · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it's not that the lifespan of the gas releaser increases. It's that the lifetimes of those in close proximity to the gas releaser tend to be shortened, thus making the releaser's own life seem longer by comparison. This is known to biologists as the Fluglemann Effect. Biologists also note a related phenomenon: the Gas Density Relative Dispersal Effect (known by its acronym, GDRDE), wherein a population of animals or people will tend to disperse into the environment over time in vectors orienting away from the position of the gas releaser. Biologists are still debating the cause of the effect, although the phenomenon itself is easily observable and quantifiable.

      Some easy experiments you can perform yourself to investigate these phenomena:

      • Release gas in the broom closet at the end of the hall (you know, the one next to the upstairs bathroom that nobody ever uses). Lock your kid sister in there by blocking the door in some fashion. Release her from the closet after exactly 10 minutes have passed, and ask her to estimate how long she thought she was locked in. Now, repeat this experiment 3 times a week for the next 60 years and record the date of her death, then compare with the average lifespan for women in your same country within the same ethnic group and of the same social class, income level and access to health care who were born in the same year.
      • Release gas in the lobby of a large theater during intermission (a movie will do; an opera is better) and plot the exact movement of every other person in the lobby as a function of time. EXTRA CREDIT: try to convince the manager to give you a refund on your ticket because the theater "smells funny."

      * * * * *

      I used to be Snow White, but I drifted.
      --Mae West

    3. Re:Farts are healthy? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

      This explains the incredible lifespans of bean-eating gurus in the Himalayas. Swami Mongo Bin Putrid claims to be over 120 years old, though no one can get close enough to him to check.

    4. Re:Farts are healthy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mother always said science should study my farts to figure out what died^H^H^H^H suspended animation.

    5. Re:Farts are healthy? by lotsotech · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem very scientific. Instead of a kid sister you're better off having octuplets and then using half of them as a control group.

  2. Incomplete science by BWJones · · Score: 5, Informative

    So, this is pretty interesting, but this smells like (LOL, H2S.... get it?) incomplete science in that they appear to have gone to the press without first, doing the real experiments that would tell them more about what is going on here. Simply looking at core body temperature, heart rate and blood pressure will not tell you the status of organ function, nor will it tell you anything about potential organ system damage. Dr. Chris Pomfrett's letter is right on where he questions: "My big question about this work is: is it reducing brain metabolism or simply having a toxic effect on the brain stem?", but he only gets part of it right in his suggestion to perform an electroencephalogram (EEG) as well.

    Additional tests can not simply be EEG combined with standard histology as you need to know something about how the tissues are responding in metabolic space, especially as how they are introducing a new small molecular species to the mix. EEG is only going to tell you the global overall status of the tissues, but it too will be altered in ways that may or may not be informative. I would suggest looking at early immediate gene expression profiles for apoptotic pathways and performing experiments designed to actually look at and document the metabolic profiles of these cells/tissues.

    I am thinking specifically of some of the techniques we have developed (pictures of some tissues using these techniques can be seen here), but there are many, many other traditional biochemical and metabolic assays that could have been performed for these studies like HPLC, MassSPEC etc...etc....etc....

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Incomplete science by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly there was an article many months ago in a major magazine.
      I don't recall if it was Discover or Scientific American. They go into more
      detail about the research they did do and this piece is a very poor recap of
      an old article.

      --
      -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
    2. Re:Incomplete science by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      they appear to have gone to the press without first, doing the real experiments that would tell them more about what is going on here
      It's clear that some strange distortion of the aging process is taking place: you're obviously new here, and yet you have a five digit ID.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    3. Re:Incomplete science by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was in Scientific Amcerican ("Buying Time in Suspended Animation" by Mark B. Roth and Todd Nystul, 06/01/2005) and was also reported by the BBC.

  3. SG: This seems like as good a time as any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to welcome our first new sponsor.
    SG2: Natural gas.
    SG4: It gives you some ideas.

    1. Re:SG: This seems like as good a time as any by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's Buster?!

    2. Re:SG: This seems like as good a time as any by chill · · Score: 1

      You forgot SG1. This is a geek website, how the hell can you forget SG1! Wait. You're a mole from the MPAA, aren't you. We're on to you buddy!

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:SG: This seems like as good a time as any by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because SG1 has horrible, horrible science?
      I don't mean the 'magic' technology, such as the SGs themselves, but when ever they try to use real science is sucks ass.
      "This sound is outside the human hearing, I'll turn it up so we can hear it."
      guuaaahhhh

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. Hell, I could have told you that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    HAll my brother does is fart and the room goes dead.
    I wouldn't mind a less smelly solution.

    1. Re:Hell, I could have told you that! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You are supposed to punch your brother in the arm as hard as you can whenever he farts. That's the rules.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Hell, I could have told you that! by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      His name wouldn't be 'The Spleen' would it?

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  5. Science in Motion by nog_lorp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disagree that this is incomplete science. This is the way science works. Scientists do a study, publish their results, and get overexcited about what the implications could be. Other scientists do peer-review, make sure the study is on the level, and suggest what could improve data quality, and further experiments to test/revise current hypotheses. Also, I think you are too quick to blame the scientists behind a study for what is usually oversimplified reporting.

    1. Re:Science in Motion by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am well aware of how science works as I am a scientist who has spent some time working in the metabolic space. What I am objecting to is the fact that this was brought to the press before they really understood what was going on, bringing back memories of cold fusion and all that. Furthermore, it sounds like other scientists who have reviewed the paper are asking similar questions, so...... no, I don't think I am being too quick to criticize the study. Before making claims such as these, there simply needs to be more work done, and one should not do this kind of science in the popular press. That is what I was objecting to.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Science in Motion by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Other scientists do peer-review, make sure the study is on the level, and suggest what could improve data quality, and further experiments to test/revise current hypotheses.

      Peer review should be done before the research reaches the public, not after. The point of peer review is to prevent indefensible or incomplete research from publication.

    3. Re:Science in Motion by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "and one should not do this kind of science in the popular press."

      Especially when one is competing for the same funding as you? Whether they excite the press or not has no impact on the validity or lack thereof of the study or the results. Your other points do, although they are all additional research and tests to be performed, nothing you said actually detracts from the work that has already been done.

      Stoking the press is entirely about funding, and all is fair in love and funding. After all, if your results are exciting enough to make headlines, they are exciting enough to pay for.

    4. Re:Science in Motion by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Informative

      I understand your point. However, from the article, this research was presented at a conference of the American Physiological Society. Does that affect the situation? Anouncing research at a scientific conference hardly seems like 'going to the press'.
      Also, I tend to be more wary of what the media is implying. The only portion of this that is actually attributed to the original researchers is quantitative data. The two scientists mentioned by name don't necissarily have any involvement with the researchers.
      This also reminds me of an incident (about which I only know the barest details) in which, apparently, a paper proposing a method of stem cell research was posted to the Nature website for review (not published as finished work). There followed a bunch of news articles about the "amazing new method", and later news articles about how the "misleading scientist" really hadn't tested the method.

    5. Re:Science in Motion by jarich · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's just a PR bid then... maybe the involved scientists need to land some grants in the next six months?

    6. Re:Science in Motion by adinb · · Score: 1

      Why is it that I never have mod points when I see a post like yours???

      --
      Moderation is for Monks!
    7. Re:Science in Motion by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, they are not remotely in the same funding structure as we are and we are not competing for the same research funds. It just so happens that the technologies we've developed are able to inform metabolic questions to a degree other technologies cannot even hope to touch. However, we are applying them to entirely different questions.

      Stoking the press is entirely about funding, and all is fair in love and funding.

      Actually, that is not the way I prefer to work. Only after the work has been done and you are confident of your results do you go to the scientific press, then the popular press.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    8. Re:Science in Motion by BWJones · · Score: 1

      maybe the involved scientists need to land some grants in the next six months?

      I'll tell you that it is a scary world out there in science funding right now. NIH paylines have been cut from ~33% to ~14% over the last five years, so that scientists applying for funding under that system are less than half as likely to get their grant as they were five years ago. Senior researchers I've talked to are scared and junior scientists like me are terrified.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    9. Re:Science in Motion by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with you. Science must maintain its credibility with the public in order to keep any funding at all in the future. All might be fair in love and funding, as you say, but to mix metaphors, when playing chess, you shouldn't smash the board.

      Bringing results to the press (and especially sensationalizing them) before they are ready (peer-reviewed, etc.) will result in a much higher rate of retractions, simply because scientists are sometimes wrong. This is why we have peer-review in the first place. A few high profile retractions of very hyped up results will eventually cause the non-scientific populace to lose faith in science, and then funding will be much harder to come by for everyone. Short term gains for a few that result in long term costs for many should not be endorsed by responsible people.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    10. Re:Science in Motion by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Actually, that is not the way I prefer to work. Only after the work has been done and you are confident of your results do you go to the scientific press, then the popular press."

      That is an honest enough response. But first consider a possibility and understand I propose the possibility without even beginning to look at the researchers to see if it might apply in this specific case. You are working on promising research that could well have a large range of almost immediately implementable applications that will benefit mankind and save lives. Your project is about to turn to vapor because your backer heard someone point out that you are proposing to have humans breath toxic gas. Would you consider going to the court of public opinion then? Would the ethical thing to do be to let the project die at the cost of human lives? On the other hand, this may have been nothing more than a sneaky move to steal funding from the competition.

      Regardless of the answer, nobody can put the genie back in the bottle. Hopefully this research gets the attention it deserves based upon merit, and not based upon the manner it was released.

    11. Re:Science in Motion by DilbertLand · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why some conferences don't allow the press to attend (although I don't know if that's what happened here). I've been to some conferences where you have Scientific American or other science writers from news orginazations sit in the audience and ask some questions where it's clear they are making some huge leaps in what the results imply. Even after they are told they are way off base they will go write a sensational article and the researchers are put in a position of defending their work when they never said the work was suggesting something in the first place. It's really hard to judge this work without seeing the actual paper. A summary of the work by a journalist is meaningless. On top of that, conferences are usually meant to be forums where you report recent and ongoing research. Much of the work presented is 'in-progress' and there is much left to do. In fields where funding isn't cut-throat you can actually get useful input from other researchers and opportunities for collaboration (perhaps looking at areas the researcher doesn't have the facilities or time to examine). If you expect 'complete' research you will want to look more at the journal submissions. However, by the time it reaches that point it can be years old.

    12. Re:Science in Motion by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% and wish that the press understood what science was as well as you did. Somehow, they manage to remain pathetically stupid.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    13. Re:Science in Motion by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      How will the peers review it before it is publicised?

    14. Re:Science in Motion by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I think I saw that movie. It ends when Jeff Goldbloom eventually is able to stop his mad colleague from conducting the dangerous human trials in a last scene lab fight. Unfortunately the whole lab and the research go up in a fire that results from the fight.

      Seriously, why do you have to resort to ridiculous movie-plot science in an attempt to understand this? I doubt many grants are issued because of newspaper articles. It's more likely that either the researchers wanted some fame and sent out press releases, or some reporter caught wind of the research and came snooping around asking questions to naive scientists who aren't familiar with how the popular treats science.

      --
      AccountKiller
    15. Re:Science in Motion by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      you submit it to them for review. scientists aren't reading the BBC news website looking for new and interesting possible findings to review, things should be pretty polished before they make it out of the scientific journals. consult your local grocery store checkout aisle if you're looking for the type of "newspapers" that publish unreviewed materials

    16. Re:Science in Motion by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "I doubt many grants are issued because of newspaper articles."

      You win grants the same way you win anything else; in a popularity contest. The more popular the research you are doing is, the better your chances are of getting it funded. One way to get your area popular is to get press coverage.

      Did you think they were awarded based on merit or something? On paper they are. Just like everything else in life, the real story never matches the paper.

      "Seriously, why do you have to resort to ridiculous movie-plot science in an attempt to understand this?"

      Because these scientists ARE conducting research that potentially results lives being saved by having humans breath poisonous gas? The dramatic parts were already there, I didn't invent them. Considering how dangerous this is it wouldn't suprise me if they really did need some favorable press to get research grants.

    17. Re:Science in Motion by indiejade · · Score: 1

      So funding to study complexity is being decreased while complexity is increasing? All the while, the money that would have gone to science is being tied up and squandered humhawing about why science should not be funded. I'm terrified as well.

  6. the Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    somewhere in a small lab...

    Scientist1: Well, we've tried freezing, that didn't work..
    Scientist2: Yah, this is a pretty tuff one ya know, suspended animation?
    Scientist3: GUYS I GOT AN IDEA!
    Scientist1&2: ?!?
    Scientist3: Will bathe the subject in farts
    Scientist1: worth a shot.
    Scientist2: Gentlemen, we may have cracked this one.

  7. "would be very useful" by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    C'mon bullshit folks! Exactly how is suspended animation on a massive scale useful?

    Sure, manybe a few people need to be placed in suspended animation to be sent into deep space or such, but for such small numbers freezing is probably OK.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:"would be very useful" by Aqws · · Score: 1

      Well, it's simple, if you go into suspended animation by the time you wake up everyone else would have solved all of life's problems. So if everyone does it, when they wake up all their problems will be solved... oh wait...

    2. Re:"would be very useful" by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny
      Exactly how is suspended animation on a massive scale useful?


      Hmm... as a solution to prison overcrowding, perhaps?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:"would be very useful" by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well it depends. If it's used for space travel, I guess it depends on how common space travel becomes in the future. On the other hand, many of the real-life uses for suspended animation I've heard of are for things like surgery, where the doctor wants to operate on the heard, but it would be a lot easier if it weren't doing that pesky beating thing.

    4. Re:"would be very useful" by Unequivocal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real appeal of this method of suspending animation is that it could be used in trauma cases. Assuming it actually works safely for humans (big if), this method is so easy that it could be applied in the field by paramedics. Someone with a massive heart attack or stroke could possibly be placed into suspended animation until they are in the right location for full diagnosis and treatment. Also, someone with critical organ failure could be suspended for a few days/weeks until the right organ turns up.

      I'm sure there will be plenty more reasons once/if the tech proves itself. New Scientist and Science News have been covering this possibility for some now, so this is only news right now if you don't follow the science trades.

    5. Re:"would be very useful" by db32 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how this would help. I mean yeah they take less space...but it kinda defeats the purpose of prison. Prison is a PUNISHMENT. So I get in trouble...I sleep a few years, wake up and ready to crime again in a world that went for a few years without me being aware of anything.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    6. Re:"would be very useful" by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      RTFA? The article gives reasons as to why this is useful.

    7. Re:"would be very useful" by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Prison is a PUNISHMENT."

      Yes. So you slept for 20 years and aged 5 while in prison. But your wife aged 20 years, your mother and father died. Your friends and family aged 20 years. That is still a punishment, everything you know is gone or changed and you lost 5 years of the only resource you can't get back. Believe it or not the worst parts of prison are things that AREN'T supposed to happen, being gang raped in the shower or worrying about being killed for an extra helping of mashed potatoes is not part of the punishment you are being given. Those things are failures in the current prison system, not the way things are supposed to be.

      Actually in a way it is a greater punishment. Many prisoners are able to make gains in prison, they work out and get physically fit, they get diplomas and degrees (things that are basically time sinks). This way the time spent was a complete waste for them, they gained absolutely nothing from it.

      Better yet, it avoids the biggest problem with prisons. When you group petty criminals with serious criminals or even serious criminals with other serious criminals they exchange information about committing crime and become hardened from struggling with one another. This way a white collar criminal wouldn't be turned into a thug by the hard life in prison.

    8. Re:"would be very useful" by misleb · · Score: 1
      but for such small numbers freezing is probably OK.


      Since when is freezing a viable method of suspended animation? We can't freeze a body without causing massive cellular damage. And even if you could, how would you revive it from such a state?

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    9. Re:"would be very useful" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure The People From the Future will have already figured that out. In which case, everybody should be frozen. Besides, are you so sure that people will still be using cells in the future? Hmmmmm?

    10. Re:"would be very useful" by Free_Meson · · Score: 1
      Sure, manybe a few people need to be placed in suspended animation to be sent into deep space or such, but for such small numbers freezing is probably OK.

      Good luck freezing anything larger than an embryo without destroying it. Freezing a human without killing him (and, almost as difficult, reheating said human without killing him) are about as far off into soft scifi fantasy land as you can get.
    11. Re:"would be very useful" by Skater · · Score: 1

      I didn't like TekWar either.

    12. Re:"would be very useful" by db32 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, I mean why would we want them to do anything that may be good for them, like get educated and get a job. We want them to be completely out of touch with the last 2,5,10, or even 20 years of the world, so their only option is to go back to crime!. As far as punishment I'm not talking about all the bad failures stuff, I'm talking about the same way you punish a child. You go sit in the corner and think about what you did. Watching them their friends and family age as opposed to just bamf punishment over. Nevermind the whole suspended animation would leave them that nice crime commiting age they went in as. I would rather have that 40yr old criminal come out at 60...a little tougher to do much...but to have him come back out as 40ish...well back to square one.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    13. Re:"would be very useful" by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Dr Fumito Ichinose, assistant professor of anaesthesia at Harvard Medical School said that if the effects of hydrogen sulphide was confirmed in larger mammals it could be useful in helping to sustain the functionality of organs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or in patients with severe trauma. "There was a large study published last year of patients who had cardiac arrest. They kept them in a hypothermic state for a while and the outcome was much better. "The problem with hypothermia is it's not that easy to cool down the human body so if we can find another method to inhibit metabolism that would be very useful."

    14. Re:"would be very useful" by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "like get educated and get a job"

      Right, because we all know ex-con's get a fair shake in the job market. As for getting educated, I am not willing to pay for con's to get a free ride. I would rather invest that money in the younger generation.

      "so their only option is to go back to crime"

      You can argue until you are blue in the face. The current system results in almost every convict going back to crime. In fact, the crimes they commit usually escalate after doing time. It would be tough to come up with a system that fails to reform prisons at the rate of the current system of pooling all the bad guys together to learn from one another for years. Then sending them back on the streets after 20 years of crime-ed

      "Never mind the whole suspended animation would leave them that nice crime committing age they went in as."

      That is a legitimate point. Although I think being slapped in the face with all the repercussions of losing 20 years will reform at the same rate we have now or better. In this way at least the criminals are coming out at an age where they can work and contribute something to society. Cons that come out too old to do any harm also come out too old to do any good. In fact, they come out old enough to retire and continue to leech from the working citizens.

      For the most part those who are already in prison are lost causes. Even if they reform their best chance at the American dream rests in a lottery ticket. I say cut the expense of maintaining these people as much as possible. Cut out the ridiculous drug laws that make criminals out of misbehaving children and you will eliminate 60% of the prison population. Take all the money saved by not providing free housing, health care, and education to cons and use it to provide the same for poor citizens of this country. Hell, that would probably reduce crime and improve the quality of life for your average American.

    15. Re:"would be very useful" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Saw an old comic book horror story about that. Rich man is dying from a rare disease and puts himself in suspend animation until science has the technology to cure him. Years later he's revived so his limbs can be harvested for the veterans of the recent war. So, yes, all of life's problems got solved -- but not for him.

    16. Re:"would be very useful" by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The problem is that when you wake up, the world will have become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself run by a bunch of robed sissies.

    17. Re:"would be very useful" by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      The problem is that when you wake up, the world will have become a pussy-whipped, Brady Bunch version of itself run by a bunch of robed sissies.


      Are you sure? I thought the problem was that you wake up and the world has become overrun by sex-crazed, corporate-brainwashed morons...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    18. Re:"would be very useful" by db32 · · Score: 1

      Ex con's getting a fair shake in the job market has a whole lot to do with what they went in for, and when. As far as not paying for their "free ride" I should remind you that public education is the same "free ride". As far as going back to crime...well I suggest looking at some hard facts on that...because you are wrong and right depending on the crime. You are talking about cons like the guy that stole the car, the serial rapist, and the guy that got caught in a bad situation are all the same.

      So...now for the nice part of the suspended animation. Those wrongly convicted have no chance of proving their innocence now and making the police force look like the incompetent screwups they often are. BONUS! Those nasty political dissidents and protestors can easily vanish because lets face it, up front it looks much more humane! BONUS! This kind of crap would only serve to increase the number of sentences handed out like this because it would be so convenient to enforce. You would have MORE criminals in jail not fewer. And let us never forget, the people who write the laws determine who is a felon and who is not...felons cannot vote, and the law writers must be voted for to get in and stay in.

      I agree our prison system is in desparate need of repair, and the drug laws are definetly one of the first things that need to be dealt with. But this is most definetly not the way to do it.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    19. Re:"would be very useful" by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
      Since when is freezing a viable method of suspended animation?
      I think he means "cooling down the body", not actually freezing. And yes, that is a vialble method of suspended animation in humans.
    20. Re:"would be very useful" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      In either case, In would rule the world.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Nice Misleading Headline by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Natural Gas" is usually interpreted to mean something other that just any gas that occurs in nature, like hydrogen sulfide.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Nice Misleading Headline by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Mod this up!

      That's right. When I read the headline I thought "natural gas" as being a naturally occuring hydrocarbon, the stuff you burn for hot water, stove, central heat.

      But maybe the orig poster thought hydrogen sulfide is considered part of "natural gas" because it is added into the gas line so that if there is a gas leak, you can smell it and get the hell out of there.

      Grump.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    2. Re:Nice Misleading Headline by crmartin · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's ethyl mercaptan anyway.

    3. Re:Nice Misleading Headline by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Good info on C2H6S! I took organic chemistry over the summer and I remember the professor takling about -SH and gas lines and whatnot. It was a 3 week class, I didn't really pick up much, sadly.

      Anyway, the only reason I remember -SH is because the prof told a story of his former boss terrorising a K-Mart with it over a bad microwave they wouldn't take back. The store thought they had a gas leak and the fire dept was out there and everything.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    4. Re:Nice Misleading Headline by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      And much effort is spent removing sulphur from the raw gas...

    5. Re:Nice Misleading Headline by crmartin · · Score: 1

      My family used to have a propane gas company (no, I'm not Bobby Hill) in our tiny little Colorado town.

      He was good friends with the guy who ran the local newspaper. They used to fill the paper with mentions of Ethyl Mercaptan --- the Society pages, the Women's section. She even crept into local news stories, once or twice being quoted.

  9. sewer gas... by unfunk · · Score: 0

    well, I always knew it was good at inducing something, just not this...

  10. My experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I pulled a Dutch oven on my SO and she didn't regain consciousness until half way to Alpha Centuri.

  11. The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by hellfire · · Score: 0

    "The problem with hypothermia is it's not that easy to cool down the human body so if we can find another method to inhibit metabolism that would be very useful"

    This is incredibly stupid. First, the proper terminology is cryogenics. Hypothermia is a condition, not a method of suspended animation.

    Second, sucking out the heat from a limited space is not that hard, we do it today in many applications today. The hard part is preventing damage to the cells within your body as the water within your cells freezes, crystalizes, and basically pops every cell in your body. As biologists, chemists, and physicists know, as water freezes, it expands.

    If this were not true, then it would simply be a matter of money to keep the body cool enough to wake up at some later date and the space program would have been to jupiter and back by now using that technology.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by Swift+Kick · · Score: 5, Informative

      No sir, you're "incredibly stupid" by not reading the full article.

      Had you bothered to read it instead of simply going by the short quote, you'd understand that the article has nothing to do with 'cryogenics'.
      The quote is from a larger statement where they're referring to inducing hypothermia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or with severe trauma, where it helped stabilize the metabolism of the victims, which resulted in better outcome on the treatment.
      The article itself is aimed at medical uses such as the ones described above. This research has *nothing* to do with space travel, but is geared at preserving organ function in critically ill patients, where hypothermia is regularly induced to slow down organ deterioration.

      Now go back to your cave.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
    2. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by nine-times · · Score: 1

      They aren't talking about cryogenics, they're talking about slowing metabolic processes for medical procedures. One way to accomplish this is to induce hypothermia, i.e. lower the body temperature. However, it is difficult to accomplish this safely, so it's not something we tend to do to people on purpose.

    3. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      This is incredibly stupid. First, the proper terminology is cryogenics. Hypothermia is a condition, not a method of suspended animation.

      Actually, it is called cryonics

    4. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems there has been some progress on that lately: http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/vitrification.ht ml

    5. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an arrogant moron. So you read all full articles linked from /.? Talk about living in a cave...

    6. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's in the first sentence of the story:
      Sewer gas can induce 'suspended animation' in mice, say US scientists, and may help to preserve organ function in critically ill patients.
    7. Re:The REAL problem with CRYOGENICS by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      No sir, you're "incredibly stupid" by not reading the full article.

      This, boys and girls, is a fantastic example of what we like to call a "Bitch Slap".

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  12. I call dupe! by Kattspya · · Score: 1

    This looks like a dupe from an earlier post located here: http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/2 2/0228226

    1. Re:I call dupe! by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a dupe scientific study, not a dupe slashdot post. That post refers to a different instance of a very similar experiment.

    2. Re:I call dupe! by eclectro · · Score: 1

      This is a dupe scientific study, not a dupe slashdot post.

      Stop beating around the bush and say he's full of gas.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  13. Its TIME you realized this by unity100 · · Score: 1

    I mean, what it takes to figure that any amount of sewer gas would be amount to take you to suspended animation ?

    Even one single piece of fart does that.

  14. Fart jokes are not funny. by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The reason they are not funny is because you all are overdoing it, tripping over each other to tell us how funny it is that swamp gas might be related to a fart.

    Apparently the belief is that immense mental power is required to produce a fart joke, hence we should be roflmaoing and lolling choking with our own spit at you.

    Flashnews: fart jokes, just like farts themselves, are only funny in moderation. And since they're only funny in moderation, I urge all moderators to mod them down versus mod them funny, and see where the discussion takes us on this, otherwise intesting, article.

    1. Re:Fart jokes are not funny. by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      And of course the fact that you are modded Funny makes the fart jokes even funnier. Hell the only reason I entered the comments for this article WAS for the fart jokes.

      Just remember, the farts are funnier when they are your own. And yes, the concept is interesting....sigh.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Fart jokes are not funny. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      ...farts themselves, are only funny in moderation.
      I beg to differ. If someone farted in a meeting at work, that would be mildly entertaining. If they farted twice, it would be funny. If they farted 5 times it would be hilarious. And if they farted 20 times, the remaining survivors would write comedy epics about it.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:Fart jokes are not funny. by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      Farts are only funny in confined spaces.

  15. if you want to see suspended animation... by joshsnow · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...try running Doom3 on a 386sx with 1MB of RAM

    1. Re:if you want to see suspended animation... by rune2 · · Score: 1

      ...try running Doom3 on a 386sx with 1MB of RAM

      Attempting to run Windows Vista will also cause this. Now if you want the ultimate try running Doom 3 on Windows Vista on that machine.

    2. Re:if you want to see suspended animation... by master_p · · Score: 1

      ...running Windows Vista.

    3. Re:if you want to see suspended animation... by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      Actually its been done (the 386 part anyway), you get about 200 frames per hour unless you happen to place the system in a bathtub full of liquid nirogen and overclock the system to a couple of Ghz.

    4. Re:if you want to see suspended animation... by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      386sx ? You kids were spoiled. Back in the days, I only had a 346, ans no fancy schmancy sx to it no siree !

  16. If this is true... by inviolet · · Score: 1

    ...then we should see some statistical bumps in the health or lifespan of the average sewer worker. Or of the average sewer-going animal, for that matter.

    Have we?

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  17. Buck Rogers by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ha! I got a chuckle when I read this:

    Hydrogen sulphide, a toxic gas that smells of rotten eggs, occurs naturally in swamps, springs and volcanoes. But in mice, it was found to slow down heart rate and breathing and decrease body temperature, while keeping a normal blood pressure.

    You guys may not remember this, but the original Buck Rogers story from the comic strips was that Buck was exploring a cave when he was exposed to gases that put him to sleep. When he woke up and emerged from the cave he was in the 25th century.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Buck Rogers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep. The good old seminal buck rogers. I doubt many remember that.

      Rep rays and dis rays and such. Inertron...

      Good Sci-Fi.

    2. Re:Buck Rogers by Sassinak · · Score: 1

      Since I still have my TWIGGY doll.. I think it counts..
      *shutup laughing ok.. Umm.. it was my sisters.. yeah.. my sisters.. that sounds right*

      --
      God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
  18. Not really suspended animation by DebateG · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is just the mainstream press overhyping an interesting discovery. I doubt any of the scientists involved really want suspended animation, like you see in movies.


    However, there are real medical problems that could benefit greatly from drugs that reduce metabolism. For example, people who go into sudden cardiac arrest and are revived can often have irreversible brain damage due to lack of bloodflow to their brains. Essentially, without blood flow, nutrients in the brain are consumed more than they are delivered, and this results in brain damage. Some studies have suggested that packing the head in ice can greatly reduce the risk of brain damage by decreasing the brain's demand for nutrients. However, most ambulances aren't equipped with ice packs specifically for your head, so this isn't used much in the US.


    This technique is probably more useful in open surgeries. Sometimes surgeons accidentally or purposefully cut off the blood flow to an organ. If you could reduce that organ's blood needs, perhaps you could avoid life-threatening complications such as acute renal failure after surgery.

  19. Re:Incomplete science -- Conference Proceeding by kumarnarayanan · · Score: 1

    This results *are* incomplete science, in that they were presented at a conference American Physiology Society. The scientists themselves might not have any responsibility for the press coverage - i.e., other scientists acknowledge that data presented at conferences is interesting but not peeer reviewed. The news media, on the other hand makes no such distinction...

    An EEG will be marginally useful - you don't care what's going on during the metabolic manipulation - what will be useful is markers of toxicity (i.e., cell death, stress), and long term effects on the animals.

  20. Hell, just try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...try running Doom3 on a 386sx with 1MB of RAM
     
    ...just try running DooM II on a 386... that was bad enough way back then.

  21. Sewer gas suspended animation..... by hall_simon · · Score: 1

    This shit scares me stiff.

    1. Re:Sewer gas suspended animation..... by MonkWB · · Score: 1

      This shit scares me stiff.

      Might wanna get that checked out.

  22. Massive scale is relative... by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... and of course everyone is thinking about sending frozen bodies of austronauts to some remote star, but in reality it should be useful when a soldier is hit in, say, some remote desert and it takes 15 hours to airlift him to more advanced places where an operation can be performed. Source of HS4 can be portable and if his metabolism is three times slower it would feel like an 5 hour flight.

    Paul B.

  23. Hydrogen Sulfide is not Natural Gas by lcreech · · Score: 1

    Natural Gas is a biproduct of the petrolium industry and the two are not related even though they both smell bad.

    1. Re:Hydrogen Sulfide is not Natural Gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Natural Gas is a biproduct of the petrolium industry and the two are not related even though they both smell bad.


      Methane (natural gas) is odorless. So that we can tell if gas is leaking, thiols are added to give some odor.

    2. Re:Hydrogen Sulfide is not Natural Gas by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      A mercaptan additive is put into natural gas to give it an oder:

      mercaptan (murkp'tn) [key]or thiol (th'l) [key], any of a class of organic compounds containing the group -SH

      That -SH group is the same on as in H-S-H better know as Hydrogen Sulfide gas.

      mercapton compounds are also made by decaying or decomposing organinic matter, which is gives the distinct oder to flatus

      http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/sci/A0832739.html

      I use to work around mercaptans in the university, and later did work in a mercaptan plant. They gave me a big long speech before entering the plant about why they did not have a gas leak, and seemed rather upset that I laughed through most of the speech until I explained that I worked with the professor that developed their process.

    3. Re:Hydrogen Sulfide is not Natural Gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not related? Hydrogen sulfide comes directly from natural gas wells, in addition to the "natural gas" they get out of there. They use it for separating deuterium water, among other things.

    4. Re:Hydrogen Sulfide is not Natural Gas by freeweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, natural gas is a big choice target for the petroleum industry, not simply a by-product.

      And the two are very much related, as most natural gas deposits discovered these days are "polluted" with H2S. Lots of money is spent removing this highly toxic gas from CH4 supplies. See sour gas.

      Lastly, it's not surprising that H2S slows heart rate, breathing, etc. This is why it kills dozens of people in the petroleum industry every year :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  24. Car That Runs on Air by Gavilan1010 · · Score: 1

    Why try the sewer gas, try just air, I made a post about this http://gavilan1010.wordpress.com/2006/10/07/car-th at-runs-on-air/

  25. ewww! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    I smell poo gas!

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:ewww! by badman99 · · Score: 0

      That line is just about as funny as a fart in an elevator :)

  26. So What's New? by marshmallow+soup · · Score: 1
    1. Re:So What's New? by marshmallow+soup · · Score: 1

      Oops, bad link. Just trust me on this one.

  27. Man oh man.. by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 1

    All the way down here - I really expected more funny replies to this post.

    --
    _Vishal www.squad9.com
  28. TMNT by thefear · · Score: 1

    "The BBC is reporting that American scientists are claiming that sewer gas may be successful at inducing suspended animation." Must be why the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles never became Middle Aged Mutant Ninja Turtles

    --
    :(
  29. New reanimation clip for Austin Powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the transcript:

    Begin evacuation
    *faarrrrrrrrrt*

    Evacuati- *fart*
    Evacuati- *fart*
    Evac- *fart*
    Evacuation *fart*
    E- *fart*

    Evacuation complete.

  30. Umm yeah... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    > so if we can find another method to inhibit metabolism..

    Yeah asphyxation/suffocation.. that does it every time.

  31. Other gases? by xluap · · Score: 1

    I am surprised about stinking, poisonous H2S gas that could have medical uses.

    How about trying tiny amounts of carbon monoxide or hydrogen cyanide? Maybe an interesting discovery will be made.............

  32. has to be fake by urban_warrior · · Score: 1

    1. no medical institution would actually try this as hydrogen sulfide is highly toxic 2. obviously fake names such as dr. IchiNose

  33. Natural gas? by crmartin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh, guys, "natural gas" is methane. Not hydrogen sulfide.

  34. Dupe by JoshRoss · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Dupe by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      And so is this post.. Ahh delays in posting.

  35. Dr. IchiNose Lives!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. obviously fake names such as dr. IchiNose
    Mr Fumito (Fume Ito) Ichi Nose. Sounds fake, but here it is:
    http://hms.harvard.edu/WhitePagesPublic.asp?task=s howperson&id=172271374177274371178272&a=hms&r=1&kw =/

    1. Re:Dr. IchiNose Lives!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL, this made my day.

      Cheers, Kuba

  36. John Wayne by slidersv · · Score: 1

    So, what about all those already frozen folks?
    "Sorry, we will never find on how to unfreeze you, suspended animation is done using completely new method." :)
    I guess anybody who wants to be suspended and reanimated in the future will have to visit the gas chamber.

    --
    there is no issue with my network
  37. prank by beefubermensch · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dr. Fumito Ichinose? Nobody caught this?

    -C.

    1. Re:prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least they didn't use howie feltersnatch

  38. Beans by Rulke · · Score: 1

    Anyone noticed? Prices for beans just went up :)

  39. Saith TFA by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1, Informative
    TFA saith:
    The problem with hypothermia is it's not that easy to cool down the human body
    Wrong. It's incredibly easy. Warming them up again in a viable state is the tricky bit.
    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  40. what the man says by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    Apparently people are running out of steam already.
    More fart jokes please!

  41. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am well aware of how science works as I am a scientist who has spent some time working in the metabolic space. What I am objecting to is the fact that this was brought to the press before they really understood what was going on, bringing back memories of cold fusion and all that. Furthermore, it sounds like other scientists who have reviewed the paper are asking similar questions, so...... no, I don't think I am being too quick to criticize the study. Before making claims such as these, there simply needs to be more work done, and one should not do this kind of science in the popular press. That is what I was objecting to.
    This just in, Mice have produced cold fusion using sewer gas. Film at 11.
  42. So, What Chamber Will Be Used... by pedalman · · Score: 1
    ...to contain the SA candidates?

    A Dutch Oven, perhaps?

    --
    Friends don't let friends line-dance.
  43. H2S Induced Hibernation - It's About Time! by SuddenDisruption · · Score: 1

    From my blog post of... http://suddendisruption.blogspot.com/ Saturday, April 22, 2006 What Ever Happened with H2S Induced Hibernation? One year ago today... Mark Roth at Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center in Seattle announced the astounding ability to induced hibernation in mice by having them breathe 80 parts per million (ppm) hydrogen sulfide gas (H2S). Yes, that's the gas that smells like rotten eggs. Not only did these critters fall asleep for six hours, their heart rate and respiration dropped by 92% - apparently replicating the effects of true hibernation. And their temperature dropped to 2 degrees C above ambient temperature. They in effect became cold-blooded. It should also be noted, when the gas was removed, the mice awoke with no apparent ill effects. The critters could still run their maze in a normal fashion. There are hints that H2S Induced Hibernation might be a natural defense mechanism or at least a normal biological process. It appears this H2S gas is produced by the body under certain conditions and may be the key to normal hibernation. This may also be the cause of "Cold Water Shock Reflex" in which those who have "drowned" in cold water come back to life. At 80 ppm, H2S can not simply be replacing O2 in the blood which exist at 210,000 PPM in typical air. It seems that H2S acts more like a hormone causing ALL cells in the body to slow down at the same time. Is H2S the body's way of adjusting the thermostat? Hold on! I'm way out of my element here. I'm not qualified to do biology. I'm not even qualified to write about it. But I DO considered this ASTOUNDING news! And indeed the world reported it. Well at least in a tepid way. From the BBC to the Washington Post they did at least rehash Mark's original work. Even Wikipedia added three paragraphs to the Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) page. I was impressed with that. But THAT was it... I'm serious. Nothing more. No follow-up questions. No follow-up answers. No in-depth reporting. No detailed analysis. No flying out to Seattle. No camping on the lawn. No helicopter shots. No checking tax returns. Hell, Tom Cruise jumps up and down on a couch and the media follows him around for weeks! Where is the coverage for the stuff that REALLY counts? Oh well. I would wait. There was sure to be more news on the topic in a short time. So I set my Google news reader and waited... And waited... And waited... And I'm still waiting. It's been one year. Other than some comments from an aging blog and one think tank, there has been nothing at all. Nothing! Am I way off base or is this NOT a Nobel class discovery? Where's the follow-up from Mark Roth? Where's the H2S Induced Hibernation blog? Where are the frat boy posts about their flatulent experiments? Where's the Flatliner crew? Where's Kiefer Sutherland when we need him? Where are all the science fiction plots? When I read the news release last year, I thought follow-up would be like the coverage for Cold Fusion a few years ago - lots of people trying to reproduce the results. Maybe we would even get some quick test with humans. But no... Nothing. Nada. Zilch. What's a geek to do? There's only one thing. Ask the questions that SHOULD have been asked a year ago. So here goes. Does this Roth effect work longer than six hours? Does it work for days? Does it work for weeks? Does it work for months? Does it work on other larger mammals? Does it work on humans? Any obvious side effects? Any long term side effects? How long can someone stay under without ill effects? Does this low-level metabolism consume fat like it does in bears? Does muscle tone also atrophy? Does this low-level metabolism extend life? Is 80 PPM a threshold or is there a proportional effect at 40 PPM? 20 PPM? What happens at 160 ppm? Is the sleep deeper? (yes, I know H2S is deadly at higher concentration, but so is table salt). Is this truly a natural feature of mammals? If H2S is produced internally, can the effect be induced by meditation? If so, how does

  44. Breath in deep by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Funny, I remember from my childhood chemistry delinquency days that the stink of hydrogen sulfide would wake me right up.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  45. That's only half the story by White+Yeti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The lifespan, and quality of life, of the gas releaser may indeed be increased, when compared to gas non-releasers. I believe Dave Barry is an expert in this field of research. His theory is that women tend to be more uptight than men because they tend to "bottle up" their emissions for later release, rather than allowing them to escape in a natural, relaxing manner.

  46. Airflight safety by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Everyone gets on, you put them is suspended animation wake them on arrival.
    See "Fifth Element"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  47. But just in case.. by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    You try it first, ok?

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO