Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 2 Launch - Interview With Chris Beard

ReadWriteWeb writes "This afternoon Firefox 2 will be 'officially' launched. In anticipation of the unveiling, ReadWriteWeb has a brief interview with Chris Beard — Mozilla Vice President of Products. Subjects discussed include the growing enterprise usage of Firefox, the importance of user experience and security, Mozilla's theory behind Web feeds and why they haven't included an integrated RSS Reader, the growing add-on ecosystem, offline browsing, and finally a little about the future of the browser." From the article: "It felt to us like a 2.0 product, particularly if we looked at it from what 1.0 was, to 2.0. It was like half steps, from 1.0 to 1.5 to 2.0. It's also a very stable and rock solid release - it's really ready for the masses. So it really does feel like a 2, as opposed to a 1.x product. Firefox 2 has, we estimate, between 3-4 times the number of fixes than FF 1.5 did. And that doesn't just include fixes and bugs, but all of the feature work as well as memory, stability and security issues. But there's certainly a lot in it which makes it really solid." Also on the site is a concise review of the product, and an overview of Marketing Firefox 2.0.

15 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Good so far.... by dpaluszek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been using it since yesterday since Mozilla had it posted in their pub directory.
    So far, so good. I was upset my Daily Dilbert and FastFirefox Extensions weren't compatible though. :( But I like the new look and feel to it, plus it uses quite less memory.

    Good job Mozilla!

    1. Re:Good so far.... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Informative

      This: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/421/

      tends to fix extension incompatibility issues. Most extensions really are compatible; they just have 1.5 as the highest version supported. That extension lets you modify the maxversion with a single click in the extension manager, "fixing" the incompatibility.

      Of course, YMMV, but Bookmarks Synchronizer, TinyURL creator and Flashblock (the extensions that broke for me) work fine when I "Make compatible".

      -Z

  2. Looks good. by AusIV · · Score: 4, Funny

    I look forward to the actual release. Of the American English version. For more than one platform. (This is not directed at the firefox team).

  3. Stats by Tim_UWA · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chris said that current stats indicate that Firefox usage peaks mid-week, as opposed to the weekends - which he said is the reverse of what it was two years ago when they launched Firefox.

    Where do they get these stats?

  4. Re:New tabs are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    to get rid of the close buttons on every tab and make it like 1.5 goto about:config and set
    browser.tabs.closeButtons to 3

    and to hide the Go button set
    browser.urlbar.hideGoButton to true

  5. After running both.... by w0lver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IE7 and FF2, I have to say its really no contest. Despite just plain hating how much vertical real estate the new tab toolbar takes up, performance with IE 7 is just horrible. Even a light page like the Google home page take about about half second longer to render on my Core 2 Duo machine. Let's not forget only really giving lip service to CSS standards, there is still going to be a ton of web pages that need hacks or workarounds for IE CSS issues. Check out http://www.positioniseverything.net/ for the latest hoops you need to jump through for IE. In no means is Firefox perfect in its CSS support but at least they respond to incompatibilities in a reasonable time frame.

  6. Re:Get a clue already. by maxume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ack! Thbbbt. Sorry, hairball. Anyway, bundling is the software equivalent of a traveling salesman sticking his foot in the door. It stinks.

    The goal of Firefox is to have a browser that supports web standards and puts users first. It does a great job of that. It isn't to have 100% market share. To the extent that it re-energized ie development, it is a boon for web standards. Better is better, even if it is from Microsoft.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  7. Re:Get a clue already. by ryanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason to use it is already there -- no idiotic little script can install something without your knowledge into your always-running web browser. This does change with IE7 to a certain extent, but it's still very much the way it was. That's why I have switched people to it, and they have noticed the difference. Most of the people who were using IE had their computers crapped up in weeks. Not so with FF.

  8. Re:Will it be on autoupdate ? by linuxci · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, autoupdate will allow you to update to 2.0. You have the option to refuse the update. If you refuse the update then the update will still offer you point releases of the 1.5.x series while it continues to be supported.

  9. Re:Half Steps? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny
    Is that like half of a hole? Or is that what you call it when someone lifts their foot off the ground and then doesn't set it back down?


    Bb-B-C-C#-D
  10. Re:New tabs are great by ben+there... · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to add to that:

    browser.tabs.closeButtons 0 = close button on active tab
    browser.tabs.closeButtons 1 = default, close button on all tabs
    browser.tabs.closeButtons 2 = no close buttons
    browser.tabs.closeButtons 3 = Fx 1.x style, one close button on right

    It updates instantly so you can try them all out and find the one you like. I like 2 because I use an extra mouse button to close tabs instead of the close buttons.

  11. Re:Undo close tabs? by jonasj · · Score: 4, Informative

    CTRL+Shift+T.

    You can also right click the task bar and say Undo Close Tab.

    And the History menu contains a submenu called Recently Closed Tabs.

    --
    You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
  12. Re:Why is the setup file larger than that of Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yet you're still a douchebag. Yay, you use Opera - go fuck yourself.

  13. Re:Why is the setup file larger than that of Opera by EatHam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because it has approximately 1Mb more than Opera included in the install file.

  14. Re:Why is the setup file larger than that of Opera by samkass · · Score: 4, Funny

    1MB?! Yikes! That's going to take an extra 3 seconds to download!

    --
    E pluribus unum