Slashdot Mirror


Fedora Core 6 Review

luna6 writes to tell us that they have posted a pretty thorough review of Fedora Core 6 with the installation procedure and even a few work arounds for the couple of bugs encountered during the process to help users get up and running smoothly. From the article: "To sum up Fedora Core 6, I will say that once you have it set up properly FC 6 runs very impressively. I had the impression that FC 6 may have been rushed, just because of the handful of minor bugs that appeared. The mixup of arches, i586 & i686 was weird and the first system update having a update conflict was a glaring error, even though it was easy to fix. Setting up the Nvidia drivers was way more problematic than it should have been. I should also note that Mandriva 2007 worked from the start with AIGLX and their 3D drake worked flawlessly. With that stated once the minor problems were fixed, Fedora Core 6 worked as well as any Linux distro I have tried and the visuals were second to none. Well except the default icons...but we have something to look forward to in FC 7 now don't we?"

205 comments

  1. Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SUSE does, Ubuntu does not. SUSE only requires a couple clicks and entering the network ID/password, while even the instructions for getting WPA running on Ubuntu are daunting. How does Fedora compare?

    1. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FC5 ships with network manager which supports WPA-PSK (as well as a 802.11x) authentication out of the box. The user interface is vaguely simmlar to Window's wireless support.. but except even less power-user friendly (You can't prefer some SSIDs over others for example), yet another casualty of the Gnome usability studies.

    2. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Which is nice, but when I installed SUSE 10.1 the package manager didn't even work, and I couldn't install updates. I'd rather have working package manager than WPA-PSK. Yes, I know it's fixed, but how do you put out a .1 release that doesn't even have the package manager working properly?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WPA works great. I couldn't get it to work with NetworkManager and FC5, but with FC6 it "just worked."

    5. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by Erwos · · Score: 1

      It _should_. Fedora Core 5 did, but I never got it working, due to the weirdness of the Broadcom drivers.

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    6. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by pyros · · Score: 3, Informative

      That Ubuntu Wiki makes it look a lot harder than it really is. The wiki doesn't make it obvious that the paragraph after the first three apt-get commands is where the process ends for 95% of users. In most cases (if your wifi chip is already recognized and working) you can install network-manager-[kde|gnome], start the Notification Area applet, select your network from the list, enter the credentials, and you're done. The rest of the page is for manually setting up all the wpa stuff that Network Manager handles for you.

    7. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame Gnome usability. NetworkManager is still under active development. It's a matter of first things first. Nice-to-haves come later.

      I can also confirm that in FC5 NetworkManager does WPA-PSK just fine. It uses wpa_supplicant under the hood, so if wpa_supplicant handles WPA-PSK with your card/driver, NetworkManager will too.

    8. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by aodash · · Score: 1

      come on, how hard is it? If wireless is working, it is as simple as: apt-get install wpasupplicant vim wpa_supplicant.conf

    9. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by MicrosoftRepresentit · · Score: 0

      And what about audio? I was tinkering with this earlier today and was soooo close to deciding that it was better then Windows Vista RC2, when the audio suddenly cut out! So I went looking around the system and read the logs, and I saw the following entry:

      Oct 25 20:42:43 msrep-dev01 kernel[0]: Jazz-pipes have become clogged

      Now I'm the first to admit I'm not a Linux power user but I assume that this is the cause? I heard sometimes the kernel gets garbage collected, is this a symptom?

    10. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by miro+f · · Score: 1

      sudo apt-get install network-manager-gnome doesn't seem too daunting to me

      if you don't like the command line you can even install it through synaptic

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    11. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      That's handy. Too bad I can't get online because my network requires WPA!

    12. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      Oh is that all.... I though it would be as easy as viewing the list of available networks and typing in the password.

    13. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by jammmet · · Score: 1

      amen brother. If any of these distros (Ubuntu - i'm looking at you) want to become used by the masses, this is the kind of simplicity we need. Sorry, but who the *HELL* ouside of slashdot (and a few digg) members is going to have any idea how to install and configure stuff from the command line? Where is the ease of use? People USE their computers in real life, not waste time having to think about things like this! P.S. I think you all know which OS I'm talking about

    14. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by richardablitt · · Score: 1

      You don't have to use the command line, you could always use one of the graphical package managers.

    15. Re:Does it support WPA-PSK out of the box? by sshir · · Score: 1
      Sure, just have the internet connection ready...

      ... which you have not...

      The whole mess is very frustrating...

  2. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    yes. Stick the CD in, reboot and select "Upgrade".

  3. Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I haven't been able to with linux.

    1. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most distros have had great support for cameras for some time now. I'm quite sure the entire Fedora series has had "out of the box" support for cameras. I know Ubuntu has, from the start. I'm quite sure that Debian has had it for some time too. Suse has had it since 9.2? or was it only in 10?

    3. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, thats a good one. You may want to leave the make/model next time. Better yet, ask somewhere where it would be appropriate.

    4. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Robot+Randy · · Score: 1

      Since WinXP and OSX do not need drivers for most USB cameras, I was guessing that the parent was asking about similar compatibility. (Access like a USB drive for most cameras...)

      Yes more info might have been helpful, but not absolutely needed for a general answer.

    5. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      I'm quite sure the entire Fedora series has had "out of the box" support for cameras. I know Ubuntu has, from the start.

      Unfortunately, all I've see so far, both from Fedora and Ubuntu, is "read-only" support for cameras. You can plug the camera in and transfer your pictures from the camera to the computer, but you can't transfer pictures from the computer to the camera (which is very useful when trying to fill up a flash card to bring to the store to have them printed). I never figured which device to mount to get write access to my camera.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    6. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      gphoto's been in RH since version 6 at least.

    7. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      And what camera might that be?

      My Olympus Camedia has worked with Linux fine since the day I bought it 3(?) years ago. It's one of those that just uses the standard USB mass-storage drivers, so you plug it in and it appears as a drive. Those will work on any modern OS with no trouble.

      Presumably yours needs a specific driver, which means that no one will be able to answer your question without knowing which camera you have.

    8. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Intron · · Score: 1

      Read the discussion on the gphotofs site. People are working on this. One problem is that Canon doesn't support upload, which is the camera owned by the developer, but others have gotten writes to work.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    9. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by ggambett · · Score: 1

      I'm not the OP, but my Genius VideoCam LOOK doesn't work (I got the driver to detect it according to dmesg but no programs can read from it). I also tested a Logitech QuickCam Exprees which does work but looks *much* worse than it does in Windows.

    10. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      That makes not a lot of sense, though - why use Picture Transfer Protocol? Admittedly for the most part I use a CF reader, but when without this I've uploaded stuff to my EOS 5D using the USB cable (but as a mass-storage device, not a 'camera') with no issue, why not use that?

    11. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
      Because I haven't been able to with linux.

      Actually, I can report that both Fedora and Ubuntu both have excellent digital camera support. The day I bought my Fuji FinePix, I just plugged it into the USB port, and voila! There were the pictures! No drivers to install, no need to load additional software (at least on Ubuntu).

    12. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Icyfire0573 · · Score: 1

      amusingly enough your camera, if it has act as disk mode (which my HP Photosmart 735 does) the correct device would be /dev/sda1 (assuming it is the only USB / SATA drive in the system. Yep, USB or SATA drive...

    13. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Most digital cameras with USB have a configuration option to switch between using Picture Transfer Protocol (PTP) and acting as a USB mass storage device (UMS). Probably your camera is configured for PTP. Enable UMS instead. Ubuntu automounts it by default. Read and write to the camera as you please.

      PTP is largely useless, just another protocol to confuse everybody. And most cameras only implement an absolutely minimal subset of it anyway.

      ---

      Open source software is everything that closed source software is. Plus the source is available.

    14. Re:Can I use my digital camera with it ? by Slashcrap · · Score: 0

      I'm not the OP, but my Genius VideoCam LOOK doesn't work (I got the driver to detect it according to dmesg but no programs can read from it). I also tested a Logitech QuickCam Exprees which does work but looks *much* worse than it does in Windows.

      The only reason that people buy webcams is so that they can show their genitals to unsuspecting, under-aged girls. The fact the picture quality is worse is a major win for Linux in my opinion.

      Oh, and I've just noticed you bought a Genius product. You sick fucking freak.

  4. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    debian rules

  5. Reviewer = idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For example he complained that a package conflict he saw "totem-xine conflicts with totem." was an example of the distro being rushed out... He missed the fact that totem-xine is a non-free package (patented codecs) distributed by a third party repository which he manually configured.

    In other words, a new linux distro has failed to prevent someone with the root password from shooting themselves in the foot. NEWS AT 11.

    1. Re:Reviewer = idiot by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      In other words, a new linux distro has failed to prevent someone with the root password from shooting themselves in the foot. NEWS AT 11

      I'm freaking out, man! News at 11, news at 11. Everybody points to the news at 11, but where are they!? WHERE! I feel so desperately uninformed and news-deprived :(

    2. Re:Reviewer = idiot by Punker22 · · Score: 1

      Definitely, he couldn't even use a spell checker, this article is completely useless/pointless.

    3. Re:Reviewer = idiot by hdparm · · Score: 1

      I didn't read TFA but as I'm seeing the same thing, I think it's the issue with livna (that's what I enabled) or some other third party repo (actually bug in a way totem-xine is packeged). It can be unchecked in the pup window and rest of the update goes fine. gstreamer plugins (ugly and nice ones) work perfectly, so totem can now be used for pretty much every media format without too much hassle. FC6 looks rock solid to me - Fedora community and Red Hat have created outstanding product.

  6. running it now and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    its pretty darn good. there's only the occational...[carrier lost]

    1. Re:running it now and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, it still sucks.

    2. Re:running it now and... by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's my mini-review:

      - 64-bit version that actually installs without errors - great!
      - selinux enabled (and not permissive) out of the box - great!
      - very quick installation - great!
      - gnome 2.16 - great!
      - enabling yp doesn't actually start ypbind at bootup - not so great
      - setup requires you to set up a user under /home despite using yp - not so great
      - with two network cards with dhcp, the second will overwrite the configs of the first - not so great
      - dhcp client not sending hostname to dhcp server - not so great
      - bluetooth servers enabled by default and crash on shutdown on system without bluetooth - not so great
      - beagle started in slurp mode by default kind of throws any security advantage out the window - not so great
      - vnc started by default - not so great
      - acpi services enabled by default on system without acpi - not so great
      - X crashes if you click the button for enabling effects - not so great
      - no choice for popular packages with alternatives (like vim/nvi, firefox/seamonkey, bash/ash/ksh) - not so great
      - loads and loads of selinux warnings during normal operations, with logs growing to a gigabyte within a couple of hours - not so great
      - update and install apps hang every now and then, and have to be killed - not so great

      All in all, I like it better than the latest SuSE and Ubuntu, and I can see this being a good alternative for people who don't want to roll their own or use a lower-level approach like Gentoo. It still needs some polishing, though - especially in the networking and hardware detection setup. And I recommend setting this up on a trusted LAN only, as it seems to me to run too many services that may be helpful for newbies but spell potential trouble on untrusted networks.

    3. Re:running it now and... by Sketch · · Score: 1

      > - dhcp client not sending hostname to dhcp server - not so great

      I haven't used FC6, but in previous versions, you simply need to add DHCP_HOSTNAME=whatever in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-device. It is annoying that they don't do it by default, though.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    4. Re:running it now and... by arth1 · · Score: 1
      I haven't used FC6, but in previous versions, you simply need to add DHCP_HOSTNAME=whatever in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-device. It is annoying that they don't do it by default, though.

      Thanks, I'll try that! Yeah, it would be a sensible thing to have it by default, or at the very least provide a checkbox for this during setup, considering how many DHCP servers now either require it, give you your "old" IP if possible when there's a hostname match, or register the hostname in DNS.

      I still haven't figured out how to not have the second interface's dhcp values overwrite the first, but instead add to them where applicable (like dns-servers, nis-servers, ntp-servers). My guess is that with Fedora Core, you might not be able to. Ah well, I still like it, for a pre-built distro.

  7. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by drooling-dog · · Score: 5, Funny

    yes. Stick the CD in, reboot and select "Upgrade".

    Sorry, that's too complicated. I need a CD that sticks itself in the slot.

  8. Slashdotted Already by jazman_777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Even before the first post.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Slashdotted Already by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      It's almost like people are planning to RTFA before posting, but this is /. so there must be some other explanation.

    2. Re:Slashdotted Already by jwocky · · Score: 1

      Just like http://fedora.redhat.com/

      is it just me or does it seem odd to have a "pretty thorough review" considering it's only been released for an hour?

    3. Re:Slashdotted Already by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe the hamster powering his server is taking a break.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:Slashdotted Already by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Would OSS software still be OSS if it's not updated every 10 minutes? In the typical lifespan of OSS software, Fedora 6 is already middle aged, it seems.

      What ever happened to all of the older, wiser Unix geeks that would install a piece of software, and run it indefinitely, so long as it worked?

    5. Re:Slashdotted Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That URL no longer has the most up-to-date information. Please use a URL from the community site fedoraproject.org like http://fedoraproject.org/static-tmp/.

      That is a static page that should load faster than the usual wiki page.

    6. Re:Slashdotted Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...As opposed to certain OS vendors who introduce new software no more than twice per decade, but then use their update mechanism to modify the EULA and copy-protection schemes every 10 minutes.

    7. Re:Slashdotted Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nahh, its just running the new realease

    8. Re:Slashdotted Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What ever happened to all of the older, wiser Unix geeks that would install a piece of software, and run it indefinitely, so long as it worked?
      We run Debian stable.
  9. Setting up the Nvidia drivers by wsanders · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> Setting up the Nvidia drivers was way more problematic than it should have been

    And yea verily as the sun shall rise in the East and the Pope is Catholic and bears crap in the woods, yea verily the setting up of the Nvidia drivers shall be way more problematic than it should be, thus is it written, amen.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      Actually, it seems the sun rises in the west for Ubuntu. I was a Fedora fan boy being my first linux distro ever was FC2. I used Fedora personally up to FC4, put FC5 on the gf's laptop without a problem (any points for converting her?) but when I put it on my desktop, I had some weird sound issues never before encountered. Granted, sound was the biggest pain in my ass out of all of the new to linux issues back in FC2, but FC4 seemed better than windows in that respect. This frustration led me to give Ubuntu a whirl. Sound issue and overall the OS seemed more complete and polished and more to what a former windows user might expect out of their operating system. Back on topic, Nvidia drivers. I used to go through the hassle of downloading the drivers from nvidia and running the script in runlevel 3 every time I upgraded my kernel. In ubuntu, not only is software updates a lot faster, more stable and in the end easier, but I can choose to use a kernel module that includes nvidia as well as atheros drivers (wireless) that automatically updates and compiles with the new kernels. The only thing I don't like about using Ubuntu, is that it is so easy and user friendly, that I feel like a pussy using it. There is just something about working from a commmand line and manually doing a lot of the maintnance and setup that the inner geek craves. I'm tempted to give the GF Ubuntu and try out FC6 (or maybe something like gentoo or slackware for a true uber-geek OS experienc).

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    2. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by freg · · Score: 1

      I realize it makes people warm and fuzzy inside to use an OS that is entirely free and open, but this Nvidia driver installation has been annoying me for the last 8 installs of Linux I've tried. Could some enthusiastic young hacker out there make this a little easier for us older less initiated folks. How many of us are running nvidia graphics cards again? like 80%? I actually tried a version of Kororaa a while back that worked with Nvidia right out of the box, only to find out later it was a terrible mistake on their part and was quickly "resolved" and the nvidia drivers removed. Someone help us...

    3. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by markdavis · · Score: 1

      With the non-free version of Mandriva, NVidia is always setup automatically and works out of the box with no effort. I believe that is also true of the non-free SuSe. The problem is that free distros (Free Mandriva, *buntu, Fedora, Debian, etc) can't do that, because the redistribution is not allowed that way by NVidia (unless I am wrong on that, and someone would care to elaborate). However... it is entirely possible that free distros can arrange a "click on this" and it is downloaded on the fly and configured correctly. And, to point out an error in the article... Yes, Mandriva 2007 will also set up and use AIGLX, BUT NOT FOR NVIDIA CARDS, because the stable driver does not support all the necessary AIGLX extentions necessary to fully run compiz. The beta version on the website does, but I have yet to get it to install cleanly and work with compiz... it is just a little too soon to expect it all to "just work" with compiz.

    4. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by coaxial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is just something about working from a commmand line and manually doing a lot of the maintnance and setup that the inner geek craves.

      I understand how you want to Know every bit of your machine, but frankly there's better things to do. Like actually working on cool stuff. These problems are solved. Don't go and reinvent the wheel and spend your time fiddling with trival things. There aren't enough hours in the day to spend so many doing that.

      I'm tempted to give the GF Ubuntu and try out FC6 (or maybe something like gentoo or slackware for a true uber-geek OS experienc).

      I used slackware Back in The Day(tm), I can't comment on it 10 years later. Gentoo always struck me as the ultimate loser distro. You know like the losers who stick neonlights underneath their honda civic and then proudly display kanji stickers on their rearwindow upside down, because kanji is k3w1, but they don't know what it is. There's no point to compiling everything from source. All you're doing is putting your machine in an usuable state for a long time. The benfit is nonexistent and negligable at best. Unless you're installing on ancient or esoteric hardware what's the point. There's no real difference between your P4 and some other guy's P4, or hell even a third guy's athlon.

    5. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Misch · · Score: 1

      put FC5 on the gf's laptop without a problem (any points for converting her?)

      Can I get points for coveting her?

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    6. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Well, since TFA is slashdotted, I can't tell whether it mentioned this already. There is a well-known third-party yum repository at rpm.livna.org which provides packages for those highly-demanded but legally/philosophically rejected packages, like MP3 and NTFS support (patents), NVIDIA Drivers (closed-source), etc.

      With livna added to your yum config, installing the drivers is as easy as yum install kmod-nvidia and restarting X.

      Of course, you might want to wait until the root exploit in NVIDIA's driver is fixed in a non-beta release.

    7. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by yo_tuco · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "...bears crap in the woods..."

      Uh, Polar Bears don't.

    8. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      livna, or freshrpms, NVIDIA rpms won't solve the problem he's describing.

      Assuming, from his short description (can't get to his site), that he also had the Fedora core 6 installer detecting his machine an i586 and installer that kernel rather than the i686 kernel... BUT... it then installs an i686 devel package.

      I had exactly the same trouble. FC6 installed a i586 kernel, with i686 dev packages. When NVIDIA installer tries to build the kernel module... it can't find the source (the i586 vs i686 conflict). This also happens with livna and freshrpms, so it's not an nvidia installer fault. It's also affect any that tries to build kernel modules.

      The solution is to download the i686 kernel rpm manual, and then rpm --force install it, and then reboot. So you will then have i686 packages for both the kernel and its devel package.

    9. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by timeOday · · Score: 1
      With livna added to your yum config, installing the drivers is as easy as yum install kmod-nvidia and restarting X.
      ...and dinking around with your /etc/X11/xorg.conf for a few hours to get OpenGL acceleration, if your experience is like mine. In fact I still haven't got the xv extension working.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it works smoothly for some.

    10. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by EGSonikku · · Score: 1

      They do on LOST ! /4 8 15 16 23 42

      --
      - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
    11. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gentoo always struck me as the ultimate loser distro. You know like the losers who stick neonlights underneath their honda civic and then proudly display kanji stickers on their rearwindow upside down, because kanji is k3w1, but they don't know what it is.
      Well yeah, everyone knows that Gentoo is for ricers.
    12. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you might want to wait until the root exploit in NVIDIA's driver is fixed in a non-beta release.

      Already done.

    13. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should - after all, polar bears are just rectangular bears under a coordinate transform!

      I'll get my coat...

    14. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by aug24 · · Score: 1

      The pope bears crap in the woods? Why? Why would he bear crap? And where would he bear it to?

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    15. Re:Setting up the Nvidia drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was a Fedora fan boy being my first linux distro ever was FC2

      That was what, 12 months ago? Wow you have been running teh Linux foreva!

  10. Talk About Irony... by Einstein_101 · · Score: 1
    The problems I encountered with Fedora Core 6 were not huge issues, but there were enough smaller bugs that made me wonder if this release was rushed.
    Then the author goes on to the statement:

    Since their primary "business" (they are a none profit group) is to write software, particularly stabile operating systems it certainly doesn't reflect postively on them to have their website go down on the day of release.

    You mean "rushed" like being in too much of a hurry to proof read your article? It was in the second paragraph sheesh...
    1. Re:Talk About Irony... by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      That has to be the first time I've seen someone say Fedora is supposed to "write software, particularly stabile [sic] operating systems."

      I've always been told, particularly on slashdot that Fedora is essentially a Beta-test for RHEL.

      PS. I use FC5 right now, and can't wait until I have time to install FC6.

    2. Re:Talk About Irony... by Who235 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree that the article is poorly written, but it's nothing a good proofreading would be able to fix. The entire thing reads like a fourteen-year old wrote it in five minutes.

      From the embarrassing lack of agreement between nouns and their modifiers all the way to "on accident" and the previously mentioned spelling errors, this review was garbage.

      I'm not trying to be a dick here, but sometimes I think it's important to point out the more obvious pitfalls of "user generated content".

    3. Re:Talk About Irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, the review completely sucked. I'm going to be installing FC6 on a new machine next week and this told me absolutely nothing of import. Desktops on a cube? Give me a feckin break.

      But hey, when people pimp their own blogshit on slashdot...

  11. Why linux sucks on desktops.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    1. Fonts. Linux weenies delude themselves that fonts under Xorg are just fine nowadays. BZZT. Compared to XP with cleartype the quality of font rendering in Xorg is laughable. Importing the XP fonts into a Linux system makes no difference, because they just do not look as good.

    2. Klunky UI's. Both Gnome and KDE are horrible in terms of wasting screen space. Also the UI's just don#t look as clean and polished as XP. I see rough edges on widgets, and various other things that makes UI's look cheap.

    If they ever get resolved then things might be different.

    1. Re:Why linux sucks on desktops.... by MobyTurbo · · Score: 5, Informative
      1. Fonts. Linux weenies delude themselves that fonts under Xorg are just fine nowadays. BZZT. Compared to XP with cleartype the quality of font rendering in Xorg is laughable. Importing the XP fonts into a Linux system makes no difference, because they just do not look as good.
      That's because the freetype library cannot use patented algorithms that are used by Windows and Macs. Recompile your freetype library with the patented stuff enabled and you can get it to look identical. Incidentally, I don't find the usual auto-hinting that is in most distros all that bad - so that's what I use nowadays. The Deja fonts now included with many distros are excellent actually, I like them better than MS core fonts.

      2. Klunky UI's. Both Gnome and KDE are horrible in terms of wasting screen space. Also the UI's just don#t look as clean and polished as XP. I see rough edges on widgets, and various other things that makes UI's look cheap.
      That problem is because you are using environments that imitate Windows, if you want something that doesn't use much screen space by default the *box wms such as fluxbox (I don't use 'em, but you might like them) use much less screen space than Windows and Mac, and actually look pretty nice. Another you might want to look at is fvwm-crystal, that's the coolest theme I've seen for fvwm - and it doesn't at all look like plain fvwm, transparency and decent performance at the same time!

      If they ever get resolved then things might be different.
      I have the feeling that nothing will satisfy you except for bug-compatible Windows emulation, and even then you'd find something to critique.
    2. Re:Why linux sucks on desktops.... by newt0311 · · Score: 1
      point 1 I will leave alone. that is a subjective isue though with true-type, I think the fonts do look better.

      Point 2: if you don;t like the way space is used up, use something like FVWM. my setup just has a black screen. everything is handles through keyboard shortcuts. even the windows only have 3 pixel borders and no title bar because I have no use for a title bar. is even possible to get such a setup of windows and still have it be usable?

  12. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you don't have a CD? In debian you can just change your sources.list and type apt-get dist-upgrade.

  13. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by fire4ever · · Score: 0

    Yes, you can manually edit your yum configuration and run "yum update".
    There is a step by step in my site (sorry, brazilian portuguese only): http://cenoura.homelinux.com/linux/upgrade_fedora_ com_yum.php

  14. /. Effect by wolf369T · · Score: 0

    Ouch... The reviewer's site has been badly slashdoted...

  15. Feeding the Troll by Einstein_101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Actually, I run KDE with nVidia drivers installed, and I made it a point to ask people how the fonts look (since it used to be such a big issue with Linux newbies. When asked, numerous Windows users either said they looked nice, or they looked better than Windows.

    2) KDE can easily be changed to take us less screen space. If you ever decide to give up your career in trolling and start using computer software, I recommend you try DesktopBSD. By default, they size down the KDE taskbar, making it the same size as Windows XP.

    If they ever get things "resolved", then people like you would be crying that they're trying to look too much like Windows.

    1. Re:Feeding the Troll by Einstein_101 · · Score: 1

      You can't be serous.

      First of all, "good" or "better" is strictly a matter of preference. I personally prefer the fonts in Linux, but maybe you're looking for some kind of font eye candy that I've never noticed. Most recent distros have good fonts, and SUSE has had them for years now. All distros are capable of having beautiful fonts, some of them just don't configure the settings by default.

      Secondly, If you've used a computer for more than 5 minutes, you know screenshots mean absolutely dick. It isn't my job to convince idiots like you. How about you be an adult and try something out for yourself before you go off broadcasting your uninformed opinions.

    2. Re:Feeding the Troll by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No problem just post me your email address I and will send you one.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Feeding the Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post the screenshot in a lossless format and it is a perfectly resonable metric for judging font output.

    4. Re:Feeding the Troll by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      As least with RH/FC systems, when Bitstream donated fonts in 2003, they have been just as good as any Mac where as Mac > Windows with regards to fonts.
      Before that, they were horrible.

      http://linux.softpedia.com/screenshots//Fedora-Cor e_2.jpg

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    5. Re:Feeding the Troll by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I hope the text in that screenshot is not meant to be an example of how text is supposed to look. The letter spacing is all wrong. I don't know what you've done to achieve that, since FreeType is generally pretty good even if you compile it without hinting support (to avoid Apple's patent, if you live somewhere where it is valid).

      The anti-aliasing on the larger fonts was okay; about the standard I've seen with Windows, but not as good as the sub-pixel AA enabled by default with OS X.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Feeding the Troll by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

      How about not using a taskbar in the first place? Why do people accept these obvious clones of Microsoft interfaces?

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    7. Re:Feeding the Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Post the screenshot in a lossless format and it is a perfectly resonable metric for judging font output.

      Actually, not without qualification. Lately systems are using sub-pixel rendering techniques optimized for your type of display. CRT vs. LCD, primarily, and I think there are a very varieties of LCD display. So a screenshot of a system A running with monitor type A won't necessarily look right on monitor type B, and that doesn't mean anything's wrong with system A.

    8. Re:Feeding the Troll by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      That was a JPG of a Google found image. The compression is horrible. I can't vouch for the validity of the image either. Modern Distros with Bitstream fonts are OK to use in my book.

      I use Linux next to Mac and the general use fonts are pleasing to the eye. Linux pre Bitstream was horrible.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    9. Re:Feeding the Troll by abigor · · Score: 1

      That looks terrible. The simple and sad fact (for me, as a Linux user) is that Linux fonts will never be as nice as they are on the Mac or Windows because of the TT patents owned by Apple, and the huge amount of work MS put into font hinting. It's all written in assembler, non-portable, hugely work intensive, but it sure looks nice.

    10. Re:Feeding the Troll by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      If you're a Linux user, have you not used Bitstream fonts??

      They're identical to the fonts they supply to Apple.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    11. Re:Feeding the Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not so much the fonts, it's the hinting and rendering engines. i have linux on an LCD at work. it took me about 2 weeks of hard work to get the fonts looking decent. xorg, freetype, xft, these are the things you need to write custom .conf files for if you want decent looking fonts. ultimately, i just installed the MS fonts, and they look decent enough now. LCD's and linux are still tough!!! and don't get me started on emacs.

    12. Re:Feeding the Troll by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Because maybe it's a good idea, regardless of who came up with it?

    13. Re:Feeding the Troll by abigor · · Score: 1

      Yes, I use the Bitstream fonts. As the other guy noted, it's not so much the fonts themselves as the hinting. The Freetype site has a faq on why Linux fonts are subpar. Hinting algorithms are patent-encumbered. It's rumoured that MS took 12 man-years to develop the hinting routines for Times New Roman alone.

    14. Re:Feeding the Troll by abigor · · Score: 1

      One other thing: FreeType uses something called "auto-hinting", as opposed to manual hinting like MS, etc. do. Here's an excerpt from the faq:

      "The advange of such technique is that no additional work is required from the font designer that can focus on drawing and metrics adjustments instead. On the other hand, the quality is not always as good as it could be when manually hinted, especially with complex glyphs (like asian ideographs)."

  16. I don't suppose... by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    Anyone cached a copy before it died a slashdot death?

    1. Re:I don't suppose... by m85476585 · · Score: 1
  17. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by QuesarVII · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd say so...

    warden root # uptime
    16:00:49 up 532 days

  18. Not X's fault... The font hinting VM is patented. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See http://freetype.sourceforge.net/patents.html

    Apple has several patents covering the bytecode interpreter for executing the hinting programs included in most truetype fonts. The freetype library has support for this patented tech, but it is disabled by default in many Linux distributions for obvious legal reasons.

    It would be possible to invent a new hinting system, but such a system would be incompatible with existing fonts.

    Thus the patent system has made sure that it is impossible for someone without a large patent portfolio (for mutually insured destruction style protection) to have rendering of TTF equal to that of Windows and MacOS.

    It's quite possible to recompile freetype with the patented software enabled and many people do... However, if you do so you'll probably run into a number of other bugs (pango rendering, etc) because most of the rest of your system is not well tested against freetype with the full hinter vm enabled.

    BTW- Freetype 2 includes a built in auto-hinting which is really impressive tech.. Most people will agree that it's often almost as good as hand hinting, and some (myself included) find it preferable to the hinting in many of the fonts and thus consider the patent issue fairly moot.

  19. I had the same experience by williambbertram · · Score: 0, Troll

    After spending days fixing broken crap and searching for missing .rpm's Red Hat Core was fantastic! Except for the fact that it didn't detect my wireless LAN adapter, but hey, a little bit of fantastic goes a long way right?

    Fortunately Ubuntu practically installs itself and works without any fixing, so I was able to roll back to a working OS in about 30 minutes.

    1. Re:I had the same experience by chill · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because Ubuntu/Kubuntu don't support WPA-PSK out of the box, so I had no luck getting it installed and connected to my home network.

      Fortunately, it was a LiveCD and I could roll back to a stable, working system just by ejecting the CD and throwing it in the trash. Maybe next upgrade cycle Ubuntu will be usable...

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:I had the same experience by williambbertram · · Score: 1

      You'll probably be getting a thank you card from your garbage man any day now.

    3. Re:I had the same experience by postmortem · · Score: 1

      Yes, it works well for installing any package that are part of repository. Package not on repository? Tough luck - no native rpm support, no RPM builds for Ubuntu. Good example of this case is Acrobat Reader, or IBM Java RPMs.

      So yes, Ubuntu might work well in many cases, but it doesn't work well in all.

    4. Re:I had the same experience by williambbertram · · Score: 1

      Yes some work better than others. I have tried deploying Red Hat Core and Ubuntu to non-tech users. Ubuntu has worked out much better for them and me. The Java and Acrobat can be easily installed with "Easy Ubuntu" ( http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org/ ). No rpm needed. I do apologize if that came off as a flame. I agree that Red Hat Core is an excellent distro.

    5. Re:I had the same experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you get the memo?

      Ubuntu-is-better-than-fedora shills are supposed to append their trolls with "I then installed ubuntu and haven't looked back"

  20. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by Twanfox · · Score: 1

    Don't know what the hell you're talking about. I've never had this issue and I've been running Linux systems of various flavors (RH v5.0+, Fedora Core 4+ primarily) for years now. I have not had these 'scheduled reboots' at 49.7 days on any of these systems, and up until the latest ones, these have been shitty systems or substandard by most comparisons, especially for the duty of a file server and windows domain controller. The only reason my system comes down is for power outages, and that's only because I cannot afford a UPS.

  21. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I need a CD that sticks itself in the slot.

    And I supose you're going to be fussy about which slot, ain'cha?

    KFG

  22. Why ACs suck on dicktops.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they can't fit the whole thing in their prissy little mouths, that's why.

  23. Lawn by benhocking · · Score: 1

    You kids get off my lawn!

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Lawn by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm actually younger than you! I've just had the good fortune of working with old, experienced computer guys in professional environments (sorry, but academics isn't the same thing) who know better than (and don't have the time to) upgrade their software all of the damned time. Only people who make a living doing computer stuff should worry about software upgrades as often as some of these OSS vendors make them. It's kinda' ridiculous. In my own business, software gets updated if and only if it's broken or doesn't do something that I need it to do. If DOS still worked for me, I'd still be using it. If MVS worked for me, I'd be using that. Hell, *many* people in my industry still use DOS on a regular basis because it does the job.

  24. Posting this from FC6 by tcopeland · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks pretty nice; the startup screens are whizzy, Rails and PostgreSQL and Eclipse run fine, everything seems snappy. Besides:

    $ uname -r
    2.6.18-1.2798.fc6PAE

    w00t!

    1. Re:Posting this from FC6 by Erwos · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm also running FC6 on my home print/storage server. I wish I had something to cry joyously about in this area, but it's more of the same - which I think is a good thing. My firewire RAID transferred flawlessly over, and once I figured out that, yet again, SELinux and Samba don't play nicely together, sharing was a breeze. I keep wishing I had one of those fancy VT/Pacifica chips so that I could experiment with the virtualization tools, which look particularly nice. I never really understood the hate some people have towards Fedora - other than a little bit of oddness with the graphical installer, it configured perfectly.

      I'm sure I'll have something much more interesting to say once I've had a chance to put it on my laptop, which is primary "user machine".

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  25. Feature creepy by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sorry, that's too complicated. I need a CD that sticks itself in the slot.

    That was one of the features cut from Vista - it was a little too careless about which slots it sought.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Totem-xine? wtf? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    xmms-mp3 and things like that make sense to me. But in my experience (on FC5) totem and xine fight like three-year-olds. What does the totem-xine package do?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Totem-xine? wtf? by forrestt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fights like a schizophrenic 3 year old.

    2. Re:Totem-xine? wtf? by Nothinman · · Score: 1

      In Debian there's 2 packages, totem-gstreamer and totem-xine. Whichever you install determines which backend totem uses for it's codecs, I would assume that FC does something similar and that's why one conflicts with the other.

    3. Re:Totem-xine? wtf? by poolmeister · · Score: 1

      totem-xine is a different implementation of Totem that uses Xine instead of GStreamer.
      The thing is that totem now increasingly seems to be a dependency of GNOME (just try to replace totem with totem-xine on Ubuntu Edgy and you'll see what I mean)
      Maybe we should just wait until GStreamer/ffmpeg rolls out the promised Quicktime & WMV support.

      More on topic... I tried to help a Red Hat/Fedora stalwart install FC6 on his new Philips X53 laptop today, what a nightmare. After trying FC6, FC5, RHEL ES 4, OpenSuse 10.1, & Ubuntu Dapper & Edgy, all hung on loading the 8139too module for the Realtek 8139 NIC... very annoying, surpisingly MEPIS was the only distro that would boot on the hunk 'o junk. I ended up suggesting that he should go with Gentoo (so he could customize the Linux kernel during install), post a bug report, or return the laptop for a more mainstream piece of kit if he wants RHEL or FC running on his new purchase.
      Maybe it would be helpful if distros could include interactive hardware detection during installation.
      On a lighter note though, FC6 is now running like a beast on my desktop and pimping AIGLX bling on my Acer laptop.

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    4. Re:Totem-xine? wtf? by egr · · Score: 2, Informative

      gstreamer-plugins-ugly package has a quicktime support, not sure about wmv

  27. I dunno, but the current version works fine by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    At least they fixed it. Being able access the internet kinda takes priority, since it is difficult to download updates without a connection.

    1. Re:I dunno, but the current version works fine by Sillygates · · Score: 1

      Works fine? All of the official fedora core 5 yum repositories have been offline since the release of FC6

      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    2. Re:I dunno, but the current version works fine by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      I meant SUSE 10.1 Reloade^H^H^H^H^H^H^H "Remastered". I haven't tried Fedora, yet.

  28. Ditto for Debian by benhocking · · Score: 1

    We have a whole slew of Debian PCs in our lab, and for the most part they run fine. One of our newer clusters just experienced some weirdness, but we tracked that down to my jobs (I'm creating hordes of minions in an attempt to develop artificial consciousness so that they'll write my dissertation for me) overheating the CPU. The solution, of course, was to edit the BIOS to raise the maximum allowable operating temperature... :)

    P.S.: It wasn't my detective work that figured out the problem. Thanks Andrew!

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  29. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. Article Summary by StormReaver · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can give you the article summary, and you can save yourself a click:

    "Error establishing a database connection"

  31. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by pyros · · Score: 3, Funny
    What if you don't have a CD? In debian you can just change your sources.list and type apt-get dist-upgrade.

    man, that sounds yummy.

  32. That's not so bad then, but by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Does that mean it uses apt-get to download and install the network manager?

    1. Re:That's not so bad then, but by pyros · · Score: 1

      Does that mean it uses apt-get to download and install the network manager?

      yeah. It's not installed by default because it doesn't work in 100% of the conceivable situations (static IP, you want a network connection before you log in). I think it should be installed but disabled by default, but I'm not in charge.

  33. Fonts by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    1. Fonts. Linux weenies delude themselves that fonts under Xorg are just fine nowadays. BZZT. Compared to XP with cleartype the quality of font rendering in Xorg is laughable. Importing the XP fonts into a Linux system makes no difference, because they just do not look as good.

    You're joking, right? Cleartype looks blurry and awful. I've yet to see a Linux distro that has fonts as painful to read as "Cleartype", just as I've yet to see a Linux distro with fonts as sharp and clear as the standard Windows font smoothing/fonts out of the box. This tutorial helped me enormously, though.

    1. Re:Fonts by init100 · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? Cleartype looks blurry and awful.

      It really does. And you know what? Every question on every forum I have read that mentioned ClearType, except the parent poster, have been questions about how to turn it off. Is there anyone, again except the parent, that like ClearType?

    2. Re:Fonts by flynt · · Score: 1

      I do! Are you using an LCD to look at Cleartype with? I've never tried it on a CRT, so I can't comment. But on my 24" widescreen LCD in front of me, I've just turned Cleartype off, and then on again. There is no way I could read without Cleartype on this thing.

    3. Re:Fonts by bwalling · · Score: 1
      I do! Are you using an LCD to look at Cleartype with? I've never tried it on a CRT, so I can't comment. But on my 24" widescreen LCD in front of me, I've just turned Cleartype off, and then on again. There is no way I could read without Cleartype on this thing.

      How is your vision? Do you wear glasses? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, I'm just trying to add to my collection of anecdotal evidence regarding Cleartype. I can't stand Cleartype - it's blurry, and my eyes spend all day trying to focus the letters, which isn't possible due to the designed blurriness. From what I have found, the people that like Cleartype are people that wear glasses. People with excellent vision tend to dislike it due to the blurriness.
    4. Re:Fonts by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      I find this surprising, considering when you turn font smoothing on in XP it doesn't default to ClearType unless you manually specify it. So are you saying that all these people on all these forums knew where to look to turn it on, but completely forgot when it came to turning it off?

      That being said, I like ClearType - on a high res LCD (my laptop's 1920x1200, for example).

    5. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With glasses on, your vision IS 20/20.

    6. Re:Fonts by oostevo · · Score: 1

      Here's some more anecdotal evidence: I have somewhere between 20/10 and 20/15 vision. I generally use a Mac, but whenever I'm in front of a Windows computer, I always turn ClearType on. I much prefer it to the standard Windows fonts/smoothing.

      --
      In soviet russia, You ask not what country do for you, but what you do for country!
      Oh wait...
    7. Re:Fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleartype looks blurry and awful

      Cleartype shines on LCDs, do not mock Cleartype

    8. Re:Fonts by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      But on my 24" widescreen LCD in front of me, I've just turned Cleartype off, and then on again. There is no way I could read without Cleartype on this thing.

      Heh, the reverse is true for me - I tried it on the 24" 1920x1200 LCD on my desktop just before posting, and every second until I could change the setting back was painful. My eyes kept trying to focus the blurry text... it was like using an old low-quality CRT, the kind that always gave me headaches.

    9. Re:Fonts by init100 · · Score: 1

      Some computers seem to be factory-preset with ClearType enabled, even if ClearType is disabled in vanilla Windows. I also heard ClearType is automatically turned on in Internet Explorer 7, although by a separate setting (it does not turn on ClearType for all Windows-applications, just IE7).

    10. Re:Fonts by init100 · · Score: 1

      I may be the exception to your rule: I wear glasses (with heavy correction) and I severely dislike ClearType. I tried it once on my laptop, but it was an eyesore to read. It was quickly turned off.

    11. Re:Fonts by treeves · · Score: 1

      You do need to tune it. Use ClearType Tuner.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  34. FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by schwaang · · Score: 1

    For the FC6 DVD, I've been getting about 20KB/s download with only very occasional short spikes of 50-100. Over the course of 8 hours, my sharing ratio varies between .5 and 1.0. So far this is the slowest major distro torrent ever.

    I don't know the cause, but I kinda wish they had a separate trackers for the US, Europe, and Asia at least.

    1. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Odd -- I was getting ~70KB/s when I left for work this morning. This was on the i386 DVD torrent.

    2. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by wmacgyver · · Score: 1

      I was getting somewhere between 300k to 700k for both the i386 and the x86_64 one.

    3. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by init100 · · Score: 1

      I downloaded the i386 DVD yesterday night, and it took just a few hours. I was consistently getting between 200 and 300 kb/s, which I would consider quite good. I really don't understand why you would want separate trackers, since that would create disjoint swarms that wouldn't take advantage of each other.

    4. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Because here in the western US, I've got peers in Italy, Portugal, Slovakia (or maybe Slovenia I forget), Poland, Israel, Turkey, Taiwan, Russia, Singapore, etc. Most of these have horrendous ping times.

      It would be better for them and me if they were able to peer as ping-time-locally as possible.

      (Actually ping times and throughput to Germany, UK, Sweden are pretty good from here, but Eastern Europe, Italy, Portugal, are just wasted time.)

    5. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird...I downloaded it yesterday (I'm in So. California) and I got a constant 840K for most of of download.

    6. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Well I wish I knew what the issue was. I've never noticed my ISP to throttle bittorrent before.

      Anyway, I gave up on bittorrent and pulled the DVD from an ftp mirror at full speed. Now I'm oh-so-generously seeding at 50KB/s upload for the rest of you ungrateful wankers.

    7. Re:FC6 -- slowest torrent ever? by init100 · · Score: 1

      Ping times? Why do they matter in Bittorrent? It isn't a game you know. I'd say bandwith is a much more important metric, ping times just measure network latency.

  35. Almost Done Downloading by NoCorR · · Score: 1

    I'm almost done downloading the FC6 DVD ISO. I decided to download it when the yum command stopped working on my FC4 installation. I figured it was because of the Fc6 release yesterday. Reading that their entire site went down the day of the release doesn't make me feel any better about upgrading. But it has to be done. XGL ftw. :D

    1. Re:Almost Done Downloading by init100 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, XGL is not in Fedora, but AIGLX is. They provide roughly the same features, that is enabling 3D effects on the desktop. AIGLX is integrated in X.org 7.1 and later.

    2. Re:Almost Done Downloading by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      fc4 is legacy once fc6-test2 shipped.

      fedoralegacy.org is where you need to move for fc4 support, but better to move to fc6.

      Also note that fc3 will only be supported by fedoralegacy until fc7-test1 ships.

    3. Re:Almost Done Downloading by NoCorR · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tried Fedora Legacy for my FC4. But after trying for an hour to get yum working with their repositories, I decided to download the FC6 DVD and install that. I have a few gripes with it. For one I can't get the nVidia driver to install correctly (my X server locks up my machine when I restart it), and until I get the nVidia driver going, I won't be able to test AIGLX. I even tried compiling the driver myself, but some stupid error occurs. Hopefully this won't be how my whole experience with FC6 goes...hopefully.

  36. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by tyler_larson · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is a nasty bug in Linux that makes the computer reboot every 49.7 days. The worst part is that this bug has been around for more than 10 years...

    You're think about Windows 95 and NT, not Linux. Windows drivers used the number of milliseconds since boot as the primary timekeeping mechanism. When that wrapped around to zero, some drivers crashed. See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/216641 for more information on this bug.

    Even though all of Microsoft's own code now properly handles the 49-day boundary, third-party code is still a problem on Windows systems. Most programs still use GetTickCount() as their primary sub-second timer, which returns that 32-bit milliseconds since boot. In fact, it was this very thing that shut down the LA air traffic control center some months back.

    This has never been a problem with Linux. Linux doesn't use milliseconds as any internal time representation. Instead, it uses either the timeval structure, or jiffies. Jiffies are 100ths of a second, whereas a timeval is a set of two numbers representing both seconds since 1970, and nanoseconds in the current second.

    Note that jiffies (in 32-bits) wrap around after 497 days, which used to cause a benign bug where the uptime display would wrap around to zero after that time period. No crash, though.

    What good is a million eyes looking at the code if they are attached to half a million idiots?

    I dare say they're not the idiots, here, sir.

    --
    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
    RFC 1925
  37. Wow, not a front page item?! by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    What were the editors thinking?! I'm flabbergasted that this didn't make the front page. It certainly deserved the space more than the gaim article.

  38. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it's a contest for ridiculously (and needlessly) ugly installer, then you're right. Debian rules.

    I just installed Debian stable (sarge) for the first time. The partitioning portion of the install went fine. But, the part where you actually choose _what_ will be installed was UGLY. And, when the install was finished, I was left with a non-functioning X environment. Running startx brought me to an X screen with an error something like, "No window manager detected. No .Xsession or .xsession file detected..."

    So, I just had to know to run "apt-get install kde" to actually get a functioning X system? What kind of stupid installer selects and installs the X server but no window manager? Hell, RH 4.1 (not RHEL) "Vanderbildt" had a better installer ten years ago. Idiotic.

    Oh, also, if you're looking for a distro that's only compiled for i386 and nothing higher on the x86 platform (i586, i686, amd64, etc.) then Debian is your guy.

    IMHO, aside from being the OSS purist distro, Debian is for people who need that little ego boost for having installed and configured a distro by hand -- but aren't willing to go the gentoo route.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by djmoberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    yes. Stick the CD in, reboot and select "Upgrade".

    Sorry, that's too complicated. I need a CD that sticks itself in the slot.

    May I suggest the Soviet Russian Linux distribution?

  41. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IMHO, aside from being the OSS purist distro, Debian is for people who need that little ego boost for having installed and configured a distro by hand -- but aren't willing to go the gentoo route.
    Slackware, anyone?
  42. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by creepynut · · Score: 3, Funny

    The last time I tried upgrading Linux from a CD that stuck itself in the slot I ended up with a broken floppy drive!

  43. FC6 - some disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At home I use Samsung SyncMaster 913N (natural screen resolution 1280x1024) with my HP Pavilion dv4000 laptop (intel graphics, 1280x800). At Grub, I can choose with Fn+F4 between laptop or Samsung display. In case of Fedora 5, both resolutions, depending on my choice, were set correctly. Fedora 6 stubbornly sets Samsung's resolution to 1024x768 and there is no possibility to choose the natural resolution. Interestingly, even if I remove /etc/X11/xorg.conf, X gets somehow automatically configured to 1024x768. I have Redhat/Fedora experience since RedHat Linux 1 and it is in some sense funny, that I can't solve this problem. You could only imagine the situation of a novice, who decides to migrate from WinXP to Fedora.

  44. So it does work in Fedora. Thanks! by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    WPA works great. I couldn't get it to work with NetworkManager and FC5, but with FC6 it "just worked."

    Good to know, I'll give Fedora a try the next time I do a Linux install.

    1. Re:So it does work in Fedora. Thanks! by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait... it's available as a LiveCD. I'll give it a try when Bittorrent is finished, then. :)

  45. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    yes. Stick the CD in, reboot and select "Upgrade".

    -- Sorry, that's too complicated. I need a CD that sticks itself in the slot.


    ---- I want an update doesn't require a CD or slot, or selecting anything.

  46. great! by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 1
    So I'll be buying Fedora Vista, then.

    Is this a joke?

  47. nVidia drivers in Linux by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

    I tried to install updated nVidia drivers for my Fedora Core 4 partition a while back. It didn't work. I followed the directions exactly, but X wouldn't start up. This makes me wonder, with nVidia being one of the most common 3d accelerators in PCs, why can't the update manager download and install these for you? I don't see why I should have to go through a complicated (for a newbie) multi-step installation procedure just to update video drivers. For a time, Linux support was one of the advantages that nVidia had over the competition, so why isn't nVidia working with the major Linux distros to try to make this process simpler? It seems like promoting Linux as a viable gaming platform would be one of the best ways to encourage the adoption of Linux for home computers.

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    1. Re:nVidia drivers in Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It seems like promoting Linux as a viable gaming platform would be one of the best ways to encourage the adoption of Linux for home computers."

      Why would nvidia want that?

      The main reason we get those lovely nvidia drivers is so they can sell graphics cards for linux workstations, they don't want to convert home users (=gamers, more or less) to linux - mass migrations would shake up the games industry something nasty.

    2. Re:nVidia drivers in Linux by It's+a+thing · · Score: 1

      The drivers nVidia makes aren't free. Fedora doesn't include nonfree software.

      --
      Staring at a white background [on a computer screen] while you read is like staring at a light bulb — Maddox
    3. Re:nVidia drivers in Linux by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting that they include the drivers with the installation. I'm suggesting that they allow their update tools to install them, after making the user aware that they are proprietary, closed source drivers, of course. Rigidly adhering to a policy of not dealing with proprietary software/drivers seems like a disservice to users.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  48. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by thephotoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would Debian or Ubuntu perhaps be to your liking, then? Because it's quite easy to upgrade those systems over the Internet without a CD.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  49. Desktop Effects very cool by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just turned on the wobbling windows and workspaces in a cube. I thought this required some fancy new video card. My card and the machine it's connected to are at least 5 years old.

    But it worked out of the box!

    This is good stuff.

  50. Good review! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the review, it beats at least 90 % of the distribution reviews out there since it actually contains useful information.

  51. Diary of a CMU CS Student (out of mothballs) by Lethyos · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This past year, I was accepted into Carnegie Mellon's [cmu.edu] School of Computer Science [cmu.edu]. It has been a remarkable experience that I would lik e to share with the Slashdot community. Here's an account of my experience.

    Week 1, Sunday: I moved in today. My roommate, a sophomore CS student, had already moved in tw o days before me. The floor is already completely covered with garbage. He also smells. I think he might be gay too. He's already asked me if I like the color he painted his toenails. This should be interesting. I am almost completely settled in. Techno music is playing in every room in every floor of my dorm. There are computers and other types of trash out in the common areas. What a mess. Tom orrow, I am going to go sign up to get my network connection.

    Week 1, Monday: I got hooked up to the CMU network today! I jacked into the network, only to f ind that the hostname and address assigned to me were colliding with another system. I'll just increm ent the network numbers a few times. I am really eager to get on.

    Week 1, Tuesday: I am still looking for a free IP address. Can't anybody here properly configu re their systems?

    Week 1, Friday: I finally found a free IP! It's mine! You sons of bitches can't have i t, I found it, I keep it, it's mine! To hell with all of you! Head hurts really bad. I've slowly be en developing a headache since I first arrived. Everywhere I look there are these Lucent Technologies wireless access points. I wonder if that's the problem.

    Week 1, Saturday: I sat down at my computer today. My desktop wall paper is now the goatse.cx guy. Pleasant. Scattered over every directory on my C: drive are thousands, possibly millions, of fi les titled "J00AR30WN3DBITCH-phj33r-" and then some random hacker's name. Don't these people have liv es? Maybe they need laid or something. It'd take days to clean this out. I mentioned to my roommate that I needed to reinstall Windows, and immediately he jumped up and shouted: "NO! Do NOT use Window s!" Suddenly, two dozen other guys (all of them possibly homosexuals) appeared at the door, each tout ing an operating system called Linux. Half of them got into a fight over which was better, Debian, Re dHat, Slackware, and a bunch of others I couldn't recognize. Some kid who appeared to not have shower ed since he was born was touting "Linux From Scratch", saying that only losers used pre-made distros. A crowd of people in the back kept quiet about how I'd be sorry if I used Linux instead of BSD on the network. Who the fuck are these people? Classes start next week. Hope I have my computer working s o I can do my assignments.

    Week 3, Friday: People are still trying to get Linux to work on my system. They keep telling m y that my hardware sucks. We go through about four or five distributions a day. Every now and then, I notice a little devil on my screen. Stickers for every of these distributions have been plastered o n my case. Suddenly, my room stinks a lot more with these people in here. I ask them why they never shower, and the usual response is something along the lines of "showering is like rebooting" and "I do n't want to lose my uptime."

    Week 3, Saturday: There's a troop of men running naked in a circle around McGill Hall. I am no t even going to ask.

    Week 4, Wednesday: Linux is FINALLY working on my computer! I have a pretty slick desktop too. I think I might like this. I can finally work in my room instead of the labs, although considering the every increasing layer of garbage on the floor...

    Week 4, Thursday: My computer flashes messages about how I am "0WNX0RED" and how I should "PHJ3 3R" whoever and how "L4MEX0R" I am for having an insecure box. A kid suggests we reinstall Linux afte r discovering about 17 rootkits.

    Week 5, Friday: Someone got BSD work

    --
    Why bother.
  52. Entomology for beginners by Venik · · Score: 0, Troll

    Are they telling us that Linux, that Open Source software, that the stuff not made by Microsoft has bugs? I am shocked, I tell you. Analyzing the past five years of OSS development, there is little doubt that Linux is still a long way from posing any serious threat to Microsoft's hegemony. The problems with Linux begin even before you get a chance to use the OS. So far only SuSE managed to produce a relatively simple and reliable installation process. If an average PC user with no Unix skills cannot even install Linux, should we be surprised by the tiny market niche occupied by this OS? Instead of fixing numerous bugs and improving the installation process, Linux developers seem to be spending an abnormal amount of time adding eye candy. Are they building the new Windows?

  53. Okay... by vga_init · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight:

    The Fedora Core 6 release was rushed because their website was down on the day of release? What does that have to do with the development process? Maybe by rushed he meant that people were rushing to get it. :-/

  54. After installing FC6. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and dinking around with it (and various repositories) for a day, I have it almost working as well as Ubuntu with EasyUbuntu. --AC

  55. Re:Can I upgrade without reinstalling by cswiii · · Score: 1

    I wish it were that easy, sometimes...

    Downloaded my FC6 DVD x86_64 iso, burned it, began the installer, verified the disc and got started...

    Resolving dependencies...
    Waiting...
    Waiting...
    Waiting...

    [ 3 hours later, I have eaten dinner, washed the dishes, run errands halfway across town and returned home ]

    It's still resolving dependencies, with about 20-25% left in the progress bar. This is going from FC5-> FC6. Ouch :(

    I did give up -- for now anyway. Maybe I'll let it try and resolve while I go to work tomorrow.

  56. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This has never been a problem with Linux. Linux doesn't use milliseconds as any internal time representation. Instead, it uses either the timeval structure, or jiffies. Jiffies are 100ths of a second, whereas a timeval is a set of two numbers representing both seconds since 1970, and nanoseconds in the current second.

    Actually, on newer systems, HZ=1000, so a jiffy is one millisecond.

    Note that jiffies (in 32-bits) wrap around after 497 days, which used to cause a benign bug where the uptime display would wrap around to zero after that time period. No crash, though.

    That actually would cause problems - a lot of stuff uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC and expects it to obey its name. But it must be fixed by now, since I have an HZ=1000 system with an uptime over 49.7 days. I think they're using an unsigned 64-bit number, which would last over 10^8 years.

  57. fedora core rocks by thechronic · · Score: 1

    best linux distro IMHO
    been using it since FC1

  58. Quick and dirty review by postmortem · · Score: 1

    13 updates within a day of release.
    NVIDIA drivers can't be installed without tweaking (OS drivers don't support resolutions above SXGA, and my monitor is UXGA)

  59. Why go for the toned-down? by sudog · · Score: 1

    Skip FC and go straight to CentOS. You get the real bin-compatible RedHat without having pay monstrous money for it, and you don't have to worry about all the little niggling things the FC releases screw up. I gotta say, the first time my newly-installed FC box undid a route I added manually on the command-line, I wasn't a happy camper. The constantly broken package dependencies, the constantly broken upgrade paths, the constant hassles getting video working.. good grief. I really wanted to believe, but it's just too much effort to support you, FC.

    "WTF! My route's gone!" *click click* *clickety* "There.." ... moments later... "Gone again! W...T...F...!"

    So some system daemon thinks it knows better than I do how to route the box. No, thanks, I don't need a "desktop" install that makes the presumption I don't know what I'm doing.

    1. Re:Why go for the toned-down? by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 1

      Anecdotes? CentOS recognized my soundcard but failed to make it work (I blame ALSA). No wireless. KDE v3.3.1. Other than that I love it. I'm going to try FC6 though, just to add my blood to the bleeding edge.

      --
      "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
  60. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by gilboad · · Score: 1

    Actually current (>=2.6.13?) have slowly been reducing this value 250 and now 100 in-order to reduce idle power usage. http://lwn.net/Articles/145973/

  61. Best distro for a small home server ? by Builder · · Score: 1

    What is the best distro for a small home server? I'm tired of doing a full re-install every year because FC is no longer supported.

    1. Re:Best distro for a small home server ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SME7 www.contribs.org

      based on CentOS 4, rock solid and functional

    2. Re:Best distro for a small home server ? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Debian stable, IMHO. It works, the upgrades are flawless (at least in my experience), and while on the desktop it may lag behind other distros, on the server end where you rarely need cutting edge software, it works great.

    3. Re:Best distro for a small home server ? by vga_init · · Score: 1

      There are lots of good choices. Debian is one of them. Ubuntu is also a popular choice, and you might consider Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper Drake) because Canonical has pledged 5 years of support for this release. You can rest easy knowing that you'll be getting security updates well into the future.

    4. Re:Best distro for a small home server ? by It's+a+thing · · Score: 1

      I'm using FC on my server. I'll have time to upgrade it on the weekend.

      --
      Staring at a white background [on a computer screen] while you read is like staring at a light bulb — Maddox
  62. Upgrading like CentOS ? by Builder · · Score: 1

    Is there any way to upgrade without a re-install and without the DVD?

    I know that with CentOS, you can do something like 'up2date metapackage' and that will perform a full update of your system to the latest version.

    Is there anything similar to this for FC6 ?

    1. Re:Upgrading like CentOS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any way to upgrade without a re-install and without the DVD?

      I expect it's not the issue, but if burning a DVD is the problem you should be able to do an upgrade without actually burning a DVD if you download the DVd iso, boot from a Fedora rescue CD and specify 'askmethod', then you can install from the iso without burning it.

  63. fedora.redhat.com is down ? by Builder · · Score: 1

    Joy - can't update any servers because of this. Doh!

    1. Re:fedora.redhat.com is down ? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      It's a shame they didn't leave the mirror list in the same place. I ended up manually editing my yum repositories and selecting a still-operating mirror that's relatively close by.

    2. Re:fedora.redhat.com is down ? by Builder · · Score: 1

      This is why I was saying in the discussion about FC6 yesterday that Fedora is just _not_ a production system, despite what some members of the project say :)

  64. El Fedoro Strikes Again by chemaja · · Score: 2, Informative
    Boring. Boring. BORING!

    I want to hear praise for my beloved distro!

    Not smelly little nVidia problems!

    Not patent-encumbered .mp3 files!

    WHY I LIKE FEDORA (comments/corrections welcome):

    * Ubuntu mangle upstream like Satan's little bitches (case in point: compare Dapper's Gnome logout dialog with Zod's implementation). I *like* vanilla Gnome. Leave us poor "vanilla GNU/Linux" people alone! Go modify your artwork and plug some gaping holes if you have to, but FFS...

    Fedora generally works closer with upstream, from what I've seen.

    * Debian doesn't package FreeNX. While it is possible to use a 3rd party repo, I'd really rather not -- I don't want to run some subtle fork of Debian. Debian's design and enforcement of quality distro policy is what makes Debian so great, and I want to see this greatness preserved, alive and evolving.

    Fedora Extras gives me FreeNX. I can't live without FreeNX -- it makes those long days at work sooo much nicer to have my home FC6 box at my fingertips in a fast way.

    * Arch Linux strip GNU Info documentation -- Arch becomes inconvenient to many, and may be seen as disrespecting the GNU Foundation.

    Fedora has GNU Info documentation. Duh! :-)

    * openSUSE are Novell's bitches, and Novell seem to be involved with travesties such as AppArmor and XGL. SELinux and AIGLX are the better implementations. Oh, and I remember cringing when finding PDF (not HTML) Novel/Linux documentation on Novell's site once upon a time. Ugh.

    Feodra have the most evolved SELinux implementation I've seen.

    * Foresight Linux is still a little unusable/unreliable for my needs. But "go team" for rPath and Foresight, that conary package manager has extreme potential :-)

    Ooh, and just one more little doosie: Fedora was the first *major* distro on the block with a stable (albeit self-declared "stable") Gnome 2.16.

    -chemaja

  65. Not sure how you know my age by benhocking · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how you know my age, but I will say that I haven't been in academia my whole life. After graduating from GT, I managed a theater for a couple years, substitute taught for a couple years, taught full-time high school physics/chemistry for a couple years, and then worked for a software company for 6 years. I do agree that academia is NOT the same thing as actually trying to write software that you need to sell to real customers who don't always know what they want. For the first few years of working in the software industry, our software ONLY worked under DOS (or DOS shell). Also, I think you're confusing me with someone else, because I wasn't disagreeing with you. I just want you to GET OFF MY @#&$ LAWN!

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  66. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually current (>=2.6.13?) have slowly been reducing this value 250 and now 100 in-order to reduce idle power usage. http://lwn.net/Articles/145973/

    Interesting. I hadn't seen that. Is there a sysconf(3)-style way to see what HZ is on the currently-running kernel?

    I had seen that really new kernels are eliminating HZ entirely (and good riddance). Umm, google for "tickless Linux".

  67. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by RyanSpade · · Score: 1

    by tyler_larson (558763) Alter Relationship on Wednesday October 25, @05:51PM (#16585190) Note that jiffies (in 32-bits) wrap around after 497 days, which used to cause a benign bug where the uptime display would wrap around to zero after that time period. No crash, though. Is there a fix for this issue? I still have a Slackware 10 box that does this.

  68. Article's Blue Boxes by cjb110 · · Score: 1

    All those blue boxes in the article are the reason Linux isn't ready for the general user.

    What the hell is the point in having install packages if you then have to add lines like 'Option "AddARGBGLXVisuals" "True"' to a file, and more importantly how the hell are you supposed to know you need to do this? And in this case why didn't the OS do all this for him? it knew the PC had a nvidia card in there!?

    Why did he need to add that repository? if its that useful, why doesn't the OS come with it added?

    The problem seems to be too much choice, I really think that the bigger distro's need to be a little more strict(or 'meaner') and pick an set of apps to support, if properly supporting means that similar apps are harder to install (and need all these command lines entered!) then I think that's a fair trade.

    --
    ----- I refuse to have an argument with an unarmed person
  69. Re:Have they fixed this issue yet? by tyler_larson · · Score: 1
    Is there a fix for this issue? I still have a Slackware 10 box that does this.

    The common fix is to use a 64-bit counter to track uptime instead of the 32-bit one. It's included in some kernels and not others. As another poster pointed out, the resolution on that timer is configurable, and may be tweaked a bit depending on who built your kernel. 1/100 sec was the standard for a very long time, but a slower interrupt clock means lower power consumption; desirable for laptops.

    --
    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
    RFC 1925
  70. Shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take this inflammatory, biased trash about your "beloved distro" elsewhere.

  71. not Debian by It's+a+thing · · Score: 1

    On the contrary, providing it is a disservice to users. Proprietary software is dangerous (go to any popular GNU/Linux IRC channel and wait for some newb to come with his system screwed up by proprietary drivers) and takes away users' freedoms.

    Fedora is not Debian. It does not endorse proprietary software.

    --
    Staring at a white background [on a computer screen] while you read is like staring at a light bulb — Maddox
  72. I'm confused. by SteveCh!snall · · Score: 1

    How is Mandriva 2007 relevant to a review of Fedora Core 6? Apologies if I sound like a newbie for asking, but I'm a Mac user who's recently decided to try Linux so I'm not very experienced with it.