Slashdot Mirror


AMD Cuts Personal Internet Communicator

DaGiants writes "AMD has killed the Personal Internet Communicator (PIC), one of the first major efforts at designing ultra low-cost PCs for the third world. Ars Technica reports that AMD decided to pull the plug, taking a loss on the project. AMD can't be too disappointed though, as the OLPC uses AMD's Geode x86 processor, and delivers a lot more for much less. While OLPC gets most of the attention these days, AMD's role in spurring interest in low-cost PCs for developing nations can't be overlooked."

114 comments

  1. Good decision by Salvance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering that low-end desktop computers (w/ monitors and software) are now running in the $300 range from large computer vendors, it's tough to make a business case for selling $250 computers to third world countries ... so it sounds like they made the right decision. Either that, or they realized that since even Negroponte's $140 alternative wasn't really catching on, there'd be no way that a $250 machine would.

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    1. Re:Good decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, darkside money pressure.

    2. Re:Good decision by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem wasn't just the price, it was that they didn't want to cut into sales on their more profitable processors, so they didn't sell the PIC into US markets.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    3. Re:Good decision by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      RadioShack had them... ok maybe they don't count but they did sell .. er uh .. I meen Carry them.

    4. Re:Good decision by morcego · · Score: 1

      Here is some data for Brazil:
      US$ 250,00 = R$ 550,00 (aprox)

      That, obviously, would not be the price for the local marking. Considering taxes and everything (transport etc), that would easilly double the price. Lets be nice, tho, and consider it would run for US$ 400,00 (R$ 880,00) since the government would drop the taxes a bit (yeah, right).

      These days, you can find a basic computer (Celeron, 256MB, monitor, CD writer, 15" monitor etc) for about R$ 850,00. R$ 900,00 with Windows. A bit more if you want to pay in 15x or 20x. You can even get those for R$ 85,00/month (aprox US$ 38,00).

      So yeah, it is a good decision.

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:Good decision by msisamonopoly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Negroponte's $140 alternative wasn't really catching on ..."

      Hmm, have you been living under a rock?

      There is already a MOU for 1.2 million units from Libya. Nevertheless, given that the product is still pre-production, your statement is akin to someone postulating that Windows Vista hasn't caught on because you can't buy it in a shop as yet.

    6. Re:Good decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, you might be forgetting that the costs of taking the computers to "third-world" countries also affects their total cost. Customs, etc makes that the cost per computer doubles sometimes. In any case, these countries don't see sale events like those from black Friday or similar, which maintains technology at a really high cost. Even worse, the income of a family could be around 10.000 dollars a year. That implies that the cost of the computer would be higher (in all the cases) than 2 months of work.

    7. Re:Good decision by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I guess you meant 1000 dollars. 10000 dollars a year is actually a pretty good salary for developing countries. Heck 10000 dollars is enough to survive even in the US (Ask a graduate student whose monthly stipend is 800 dollars)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  2. Is the developing market lucrative? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When building low-end devices based on boards like Geode, margins are so razor thin for the OEMs that it generally requires the presence of a significant market demand for the product just to make up the development costs. How you can spin the dissolution of an unprofitable division as a strategic market win and continued prosperity for that particular segment baffles me.

    There is a need for low-end computers to satisfy the basic computing needs of developing countries, but those computers need to be based off of hardware that has relatively good performance compared to the average PC. Geode is a baseline platform good for set top boxes and kiosks, it fails it as a true PC computing platform.

    1. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Geode is a baseline platform good for set top boxes and kiosks, it fails it as a true PC computing platform.

      Hello. I'm writing this from AMD K5 100 MHz. Yes. 100 MHz.

      8MB RAM.

      Do you think it's impossible to use? It's certainly not the machine I use for 3D and Photoshop design, but still I managed to get ermm "informed" by Slashdot, and post a responce.

      How powerful a Geode is? It's certainly better than AMD K5 100 MHz.

    2. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by SaDan · · Score: 1

      This goes along the same lines, but I've posted to Slashdot before using a Palm Zire 72 linked to the internet via DUN and Bluetooth before. Not exactly a powerhouse, but it gets the job done, and is pretty darn power efficient. Now I have a Treo 700p (same hardware, more RAM) which also does the job nicely.

    3. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by El+Torico · · Score: 3, Funny

      Luxury. I once posted to slashdot using a 386-based PC I built from parts that were left for trash pickup and an acoustically coupled modem dial up connection.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    4. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Do you think it's impossible to use? It's certainly not the machine I use for 3D and Photoshop design, but still I managed to get ermm "informed" by Slashdot, and post a responce.
      Yes, but wouldn't it be nice to be able to run a spell checker?
    5. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      You had acoustic couplers? We had to print out the info and whistle it into the phone. Kids these days...

    6. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by williamstome · · Score: 1

      Pffft that's nothing I once posted on slashdot using a four-function calculator!

    7. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Four functions? This abacus doesn't have any functions!

    8. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      How do you run Firefox on that thing!?

    9. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man, that whistle beats having to send the print via pigeon. You must have had some low ping times with that.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    10. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Funny

      THAT'S NOTHING, you pansy. In my family, the six of us are locked in the trunk of the '73 Lincoln Continental (on blocks) and our only computer is a TRS-80 that our father beats us over the head with before we are allowed to swim across the alligator pond to use the computer and the 300 baud modem to post our mindless rubbish to Slashdot. We have to power the computer by pedalling a bicycle with a dynamo and if any of us makes a spelling mistake, Dad, a fervent Slashdot Grammar Nazi, beats us all over the head with the Lisa (he likes the heft) and the external diskette drive and then we are all denied our allowance of brackish water for a week.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    11. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Ididerus · · Score: 1

      He probably uses IE... the K5 came out around the time of Win95 (IE 1.0)

      --
      I'm fighting The War on Drugs!
    12. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by jagdish · · Score: 1

      abacus? whats an abacus? we used to use fingers.

    13. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Other than the fact it was a joke, I believe IE 3 was around the time of Windows 95.

    14. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Ididerus · · Score: 1

      You are right, but 95 had 1.0 available for it (was not included in distribution) until IE3.0 came out. Version 2 was for Apple. And yes I know it was a joke, as I hope you regard my post(s)

      If you really want more: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/WinHistoryIE.mspx

      --
      I'm fighting The War on Drugs!
    15. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      When building crippled "appliances" that are not easily hackable, they'd better be based on a viable business model.

      If not, they are another entry in the rolls of the I-Appliance BBS, which dates back to Codeman's I-Opener hack.
      Why fool around with old compu-junk? Same reason Hillary climbed Everest.

      http://www.linux-hacker.net/cgi-bin/UltraBoard/Ult raBoard.pl

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And i'm posting this from a ARM 9 100 Mhz with only 1.5 MB of ram. Yes you heard it right , just 1.5 MB ! ! (Its mobile phone actualy . :-))
      Anyway as for $100 dollar PC's for developing countries, most people have that right now. All those P1's and P2's that are thrown away by developed countries end up here.currently you could get something like a P2 400 mhz for $100. The average worker makes about $100-$150 per month. So these are the onlycomputers lower middle class and low income families can afford.
      So i'm not sure if there's a market for those new $100 pc's over here, since its already been met (desktops are easily upgradable and gives the owners some comp.hardware experience when they tinker with thier boxes,) . It certainly could add some e waste though.

    17. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      I currently run many machines in the 300-500 MHz range in a manufacturing environment. They typically run 64-128MB of memory. These ARE in the class of the PIC and I can tell you they are quite functional... Now, I wouldn't want to do development work on them on a regular basis. What's finally driving us to replace them are compatibility issues with the server backend.

    18. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Whats a phone?stop.Is it better or faster than the telegraph that I am using?stop.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    19. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had printers? We had to scrape the bits into a soft lead plate with our fingernails!

    20. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phones?! Oh whatever Mr. Bell. Try posting to /. via courier pigeon.

    21. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by JamesD_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pigeons? People theses days don't know they're born. Back in the day we were still waiting for pigeons to evolve. We had an archaeopteryx and I can tell you... we were grateful for it.

    22. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by fbjon · · Score: 1
      It certainly could add some e waste though.
      Don't worry. Just make it into golf balls and NASA will take care of it.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    23. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      So i'm not sure if there's a market for those new $100 pc's over here, since its already been met (desktops are easily upgradable and gives the owners some comp.hardware experience when they tinker with thier boxes,) . It certainly could add some e waste though.

      These $100 PCs are laptops that can be charged via a yo-yo looking thing. They don't have to be plugged in where they suck down 200W. They were more like 30W or something. Maybe less. Nice comparison between something that people in bumfuck nowhere with no electricity can't even use, and something they actually can use. YOU WIN TEH PRIZE!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      fingers? what's a finger? we used to wave our flagella.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    25. Re:Is the developing market lucrative? by feepcreature · · Score: 1
      An archaeopteryx? We would have killed for an archaeopteryx! We had to get up 5 hours before we went to bed, and carry the bits backwards and forwards ourselves, while being flogged to within an inch of our lives.

      But we were happy!

      --
      Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
  3. Foolishness!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It is foolishness on part of First World companies to beleive Third world consumers will be happy with ugly looking bulky briefcases that are called laptops./

  4. Liquidators? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OK,

    so who is going to be seeling these on eBay? $50 a throw sounds fair?

    1. Re:Liquidators? by xoundmind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Used:
      On Ebay

  5. Not Linux friendly by astrojetsonjr · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the big problems is that it runs Windows CE, and it's hard to add applications. There is some magic with the BIOS that won't let it boot into anything but a signed version of Windows.

    EBay has them for about $75, maybe there will be a break in getting Linux on it.

    1. Re:Not Linux friendly by LuxuryYacht · · Score: 1, Troll

      If its fuctory BIOS is replaced with LinuxBIOS http://www.linuxbios.org/ then it is able to boot into Linux.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
  6. Hector Ruiz Walks Into A Crowded Board Meeting by slughead · · Score: 0, Troll

    WHEN WAS SOMEONE GOING TO TELL ME THAT THE 3RD WORLD DOESN'T HAVE ANY MONEY?!

    This is worse than that time we flew to Canada and bought ATI so I'd have an excuse to redeem my frequent flier miles.

  7. Meh by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    They have the geode as the summary says, and the OLPC project seems to be working for them. Why have 2 products that do the same? It only seems obvious that they had to cancel the communicator.

  8. There is a PIC Successor by gary21cp · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is another AMD machine in the pipeline, however, the successor to the PIC, called the Ultra Value PC. Look for it in January.

    1. Re:There is a PIC Successor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any information on this, or is this just guesswork? I have never heard it mentioned before, and I couldn't find anything on Google or in the blogs dated later than 2001.

      The only oblique citation I found here: http://www.ciol.com/content/news/2006/106052003.as p

    2. Re:There is a PIC Successor by gary21cp · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that it's much more than guesswork, but I can't tell you any details. You should be able to guess why.

  9. More bonus for us by ghoul · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yoohoo We got rid of a loss making project. Next quarters profit sharing is going to be sweet.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  10. PCCHIPS and VIA by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    I believe it has been very lucrative for PC-CHIPS.
    And for VIA and its C3 processor.

    That gives about $350 for a full PC after VAT and import fees (expensive import fees here).

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    1. Re:PCCHIPS and VIA by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Except the C3 sucks balls and nobody in their right mind would want one. I'd rather have a Z80 running CP/M then anything you can build out of a VIA C3...

      Actually, I'd love to see a laptop built out of an ARM core. That'd be a hoot.

      What ARM should do is contract out to someone to make a 754-pin or 479-pin compatible ARM9 core ... :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:PCCHIPS and VIA by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'd love to see a laptop built out of an ARM core. That'd be a hoot


      Well, you can actually still buy a PC with a ARM processor in it if you like - http://www.castle-technology.co.uk/

      Jonathan

      http://www.myspace.com/stripeymiata
    3. Re:PCCHIPS and VIA by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      $2200 CDN for a 600MHz ARM PC?

      Are you fucking mad? Seriously?

      The processor is only worth a couple bucks in volume production. unless these guys sell 3 PCs a year it should be way cheaper. For reference, for just the mobo + northbridge/southbridge + processor I'd expect to pay no more than $300. I can add my own ram/hd/case thank you very much....

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  11. Buzz off bozo by ghoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You get the right to make fun of Hector when you have achieved 1% of what this guy has achieved. This is a guy born in Mexico who travelled across the border everyday to attend high school in Texas, went from no English knowledge to valedectorian of his high school gradiuation class in 4 years, finished a bachelors and a PhD in engineering (Yes he is a real techie unlike the slashdot script kiddies who took a 6 week course during the boom and call themselves IT professionals and now that they are unemployed spend their time bitching on Slashdot)

    This is also a guy who has taken AMD and turned it into a lean mean green machine which ate Intel's lunch.

    When you do something with your life other than bitching than you can make fun of him

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Buzz off bozo by AHarrison · · Score: 1

      Your post makes you sig extremely ironic.

    2. Re:Buzz off bozo by syousef · · Score: 1

      What a self indulgent rant, and what a dangerous attitude.

      I'm not president of the US, nor am I prime minister of my country and never have been. However when they start violating human rights and making decisions that have long term negative affects on me and mine you can bet I can, should and will criticise them. Likewise with IT leaders, if they do something stupid that has public ramifications they'll be criticised.

      If you were only ever permitted to criticise people once you'd achieved equally great things we'd all be peons and surfs. Your little. What you're saying is the equivalent of telling someone to "shut up and do what you're told you insignificant piss-ant". What's worse is that you're trolling about trolling.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Buzz off bozo by kfg · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is a guy born in Mexico who travelled across the border everyday to attend high school in Texas

      Well shit, anybody can succeed that way. I crossed the border from Texas into Mexico to be a dropout.

      . . .unlike the slashdot script kiddies who took a 6 week course during the boom. . .

      Hey, I took a real course - 8 weeks.

      When you do something with your life other than bitching than you can make fun of him

      I piss and moan too.

      KFG

    4. Re:Buzz off bozo by Fengpost · · Score: 1

      Chill, dude. I bet Hector would find this funny!

      --
      The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
    5. Re:Buzz off bozo by Garabito · · Score: 1
      This is a guy born in Mexico who travelled across the border everyday to attend high school in Texas

      Uphill both ways?

  12. Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by the+Gray+Mouser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would invest in a communications infrastructure to support them. Ground up wireless phone, computer, TV, and anything else that can be broadcast.

    But, before I did that I would build a transportation infrastructure, so there were roads everywhere people wanted to go and goods could be moved from one place to another efficiently.

    I know computers seem high on slashdot readers' priority list, but honestly, America did pretty well without them for a long time. And many 3rd world citizens would love to have the standard of living that Americans enjoyed in the early 20th century.

    I'm not saying computers are bad or not helpful. But the grandiose schemes of bringing them everywhere when so many more basic needs and wants haven't been met seem a bit misplaced.

    1. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by ghoul · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The American standard of living was a fluke. It was supported by the opening up of vast areas of land and dispossesing the original inhabitants and then pumping and exporting oil like crazy while the real developed world aka Europe was shooting itself in the foot with two world wars. If not for the wars America would stay a middle level power with a mostly farming based economy . So the early 20th century lead is not coming back. America can still stay ahead by shifting the economy over to new generation stuff but if the 3rd world wants to catchup it would be stupid to follow America's route. For one most 3rd world countries dont have a hell lot of cheap land and cheap oil so they actually need to use their brains to get ahead and for brain powered industires PCs are more important than roads. Anyway roads are a very inefficient and wastefull mode of long distance transport. THird world countries would be better off with India's example which has the worlds largest rail network

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by linguae · · Score: 1
      Anyway roads are a very inefficient and wastefull mode of long distance transport. THird world countries would be better off with India's example which has the worlds largest rail network

      As a road geek, prove this. Now, I know that roads cannot compete with bullet trains when it comes to speed and delivering passengers. (I'd like to see some more bullet train development in this country; California proposal of a train running from San Francisco to Los Angeles via the Highway 99 corridor is a start). However, I believe that roads, especially in the form of expressways and freeways, are still an important and optimal mean of transportation for distances ranging from 5 miles to 500 miles. Freight trains also cannot compete with trucks for getting goods from manufacturers, farms, and shipping ports to your local store. With freight trains, the goods still must make it from the train station to the store.

      Besides, there is nothing like the free feeling that you get from driving a car or even riding along in one. Roads can take you almost anywhere. I love the freedom of travel that you get from riding on the many roads that are available. Riding in a car on a long road trip feels like an adventure; something exciting is about to occur. Riding in an Amtrak train (I've never rode a bullet train, so I can't talk about that experience), in my opinion, just don't give me that same exhilaration that riding in a car gets. It can sometimes be a close to grinding experience, especially when your trains get delayed (I'm an occasional Amtrak rider, so I had these experiences first hand). I also find certain roads to be beautiful achievements of civil engineering (go down to Southern California and see the freeways in Orange County; it's impressive). You get some emotion out of fellow road geeks. Now try to get that same emotion out of train structures.

      To put it this way, trains are an important method of transportation, and bullet trains are unmatched in their speed and efficiency. But do not neglect the importance and utility of well designed roads. Roads are unmatched in the ability to be able to get from door-to-door without having to transfer, switch modes of transportation, revolve your life around a posted schedule, and other inconveniences.

    3. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      And I thought stamp collectors were weird.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but your comparisons just don't make any sense.

      If you're going to compare riding in an Amtrak train to driving, then you'd better be driving a 1970s Ford Pinto on an unmaintained dirt road. Given the sad state of funding for rail transit at the national level, any comparisons are simply invalid.

      Truck transportation also strikes me as by far the least efficent method you could possibly have for moving goods from one place to another over long distances. You don't need interstates for the "last-mile" delivery from a rail hub to the final recipient.

      Tropicana's Juice Trains are a great example of freight done right.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      what could maybe work is if you had a set of iso containers that would make a Wireless/Satcom station
      ie
      1 Sun BlackBox datacenter
      2 power water box
      3 Satcom/wireless box (internet Hut?)
      heck the waste water may turn out to be more or less potable

      (side note the RS Geodes were best used as paperweights)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    6. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you're an American. It is a well known American literary meme to use the automobile as a symbol for freedom. Culturally, we are fixated on them, and they are so deeply ingrained that to many Americans, the idea of NOT having a car and relying instead on mass transit is actually unnatural.

      In India, trains have a very similar meaning; in England, it is boats.

      Roads and cars are all well and good for short distance travel, but it's pretty much impossible to argue that we haven't overdone it in this country. It's very wasteful.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    7. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I would invest in a communications infrastructure to support them. Ground up wireless phone, computer, TV, and anything else that can be broadcast.

      OLPC is the communications infrastructure. Each one acts as an alway-on WiFi relay for the next. VoIP, internet radio, IPTV, etc., all can be distributed over the dynamic mesh network.

      You just need to add the server units (part of the OLPC project) at the nearest school, and fill them with content, and/or connected them to the internet.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by tilandal · · Score: 1

      If this were true then there would be far fewer good shipped by truck. Busnesses do not spend money on trucks because they think it is more fun then the railroad.

    9. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by linguae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I would argue that automobiles are a symbol of freedom. Automobiles allow us to get from door to door, without having to walk for over 5 minutes to a transit stop and without having to transfer buses a few times if you're going longer than a few miles. Automobiles allow us to travel anywhere we choose, instead of wherever the bus or train line goes. With an automobile, getting a load of groceries is easy. Try getting groceries without a car; you wish that you had one by the time you finally carry your groceries over (or give up and pay the taxi). Automobiles allow us to mind our own business. I don't want to listen to a passenger curse somebody out on a cell phone, or deal with some of the seedier characters on the bus or train (this is actually a common occurrence riding public transportation in Sacramento). Finally, with an automobile, we don't have to revolve our lives around other peoples' schedules. You can leave whenever you feel like it with a car. You can't do that with public transportation.

      Am I saying automobiles are perfect? No. They are energy inefficient, for one, and I wish hybrid technology will further improve. Our roads are getting much more congested everyday, and our political leaders (in California) refuse to do anything about it (they have refused to build any roads on a large scale statewide since the Jerry Brown administration started in the mid-1970s. Don't get me started. To make a long story short, the Jerry Brown administration dismantled California's grand statewide freeway plans of the 1950s and 60s [which would have been completed by the 1990s], helped cancel many freeways in metro areas [Sacramento, Los Angeles, Bay Area except San Jose, and other areas], and left current construction projects abandoned. Thanks to his administration, and the lack of will from subsequent administrations to roll back his changes, California's highway system went from the best to the worst. Read more about it here.). However, we, as Americans, appreciate to mobility and convenience that we get from automobiles, and I do not feel that public transportation is as flexible or as convenient as automobiles are. We are willing to suck up congestion and higher gas prices in order to ride our automobiles.

    10. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by westlake · · Score: 1
      If not for the wars America would stay a middle level power with a mostly farming based economy

      The last census in which the U.S. was 50% rural was in 1860. U.S.Steel was capitalized at one billion dollars in 1901. The U.S. had the money and resources in 1905 to undertake projects on the scale of the Panama Canal.

      pumping and exporting oil like crazy while the real developed world aka Europe was shooting itself in the foot

      Industrialization in the U.S. was coal-fired.

      Oil exports were trivial in the years of greatest industrial development. U.S. Crude Oil Exports.

    11. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Wal-Mart would disagree. They've become the number one retailer *because* of the American interstate system.

    12. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you carry your groceries anyway? Are you too damn macho to use a shopping cart.

      I do not feel that public transportation is as flexible or as convenient as automobiles are.

      Well given that public transportation in most of the US is such a piece of shit as to be hilarious I don't see how you could see it any other way. All it means is that you are blind to other methods not that the one you know is best.

    13. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by linguae · · Score: 1
      Why would you carry your groceries anyway? Are you too damn macho to use a shopping cart.

      In California, taking a grocery cart out of the parking lot of a store is illegal. It is called shopping cart theft; you're only supposed to use the shopping cart in the store and within the parking lot. So, using a shopping cart outside of the store is not a legal option. Any other suggestions?

    14. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by bazorg · · Score: 1
      However, we, as Americans, appreciate to mobility and convenience that we get from automobiles, and I do not feel that public transportation is as flexible or as convenient as automobiles are.

      That would hardly be an "american thing" or a measure of convenience that would apply differently elsewhere. trouble is when there is just not enough space for all the cars (parked or in motion) and people still refuse to share public transportation. That way, you pay for the road, maybe for the public transportation in your taxes, optionally for parking space, for your fuel, your car and you are still stuck. So much for feeling free in your own car, heh? In other words: compact cities can be efficient, suburban sprawl cannot.

    15. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by somersault · · Score: 1

      "It can sometimes be a close to grinding experience, especially when your trains get delayed"

      Because traffic jams are great fun.

      Now try to get that same emotion out of train structures.

      I know someone with ADHD, and someone with a PhD, who both love trains. There are loads of people (who I do consider slightly sad, but slightly cool at the same time, with their miniature train sets ;) ) who get off on trains.

      I like cars too, I love to drive, and I don't like public transportation if I can avoid it, but trains are way more efficient for passenger travel between cities (would use a lot less energy per person than a car - especially an american car - with a solitary driver), and even around cities under ground. Cars are good for freedom from schedules and so on, but they are also very expensive to run, and require your own input. Imagine you were exhausted for some reason or other and had to get somewhere quickly, and it was either really far away, or required waiting in traffic for an hour, when you could just get on a bus or train and relax? Thinking cars are better than trains for large distances is like saying you'd prefer to take a speedboat over the atlantic rather than take the plane (even though that could be kinda fun, it's not amazingly practical..)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    16. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by somersault · · Score: 1

      Wha..? I live in Scotland, which isn't England, but I think you'd find a lot more car fanatics than boat fanatics in England... rich people do seem to like their boats, maybe for privacy or something, but I'd say cars are still the classical symbol of freedom in the UK as well as America.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by somersault · · Score: 1

      You could get your own shopping cart. That would be pretty damn cool. You could add a roof to keep the rain off. Then to compensate for the weight of the roof you could get some alloy wheels (also adds a bit of bling). To make it easier to travel the distance you could put in a little engine. Then since you don't need to push you can... waiiiit a second.. nevermind..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I would invest in a communications infrastructure to support them. Ground up wireless phone, computer, TV, and anything else that can be broadcast.

      The third world needs one communication medium same as the rest of us; an IPv6 mesh network. Oddly enough, these OLPCs are supposed to do mesh networking. No idea on IPv6... but since they run linux they'll certainly be capable.

      Before there is any point to any of that besides the cellphones, you would need a power infrastructure. Which isn't there. You can't do a wired communciations infrastructure, BTW. I'll tell you that RIGHT now. Even in the cities in Brazil people steal the phone wiring because it's made of copper which is valuable. Then they go sit around fires and burn the insulation off like they do in China, sucking up tons of horribly toxic chemicals.

      People smarter than either one of us have already considered these options and discovered that what they need is communications and information and no one is going to go sell these people cellphones because cellphone companies have a hard time accepting crops as payment. No one is going to broadcast them TV until they have money to buy things from would-be advertisers.

      I'm not saying computers are bad or not helpful. But the grandiose schemes of bringing them everywhere when so many more basic needs and wants haven't been met seem a bit misplaced.

      Give a man a fish, etc etc. The idea is to provide educational resources so that they can fix their own problems because fixing other people's problems only makes them depdendent. You give people food and they grow less food; then if you are no longer able to provide them with food they die because they've let their food production system to go hell. This is the same situation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      If this were true then there would be far fewer good shipped by truck. Busnesses do not spend money on trucks because they think it is more fun then the railroad.

      Roads took over from rail when the government decided to cut back on rail subsidies and put the money into road/highway subsidies, in response to lobbying from big oil. The petroleum industry benefits from roads at every step; when they are made, they are made with petroleum products. When they are driven on, the vehicles are propelled with petroleum products. When they are repaired, they are repaired with petroleum products.

      Trains can actually reasonably be nuclear-driven. Even an old-school steam train can be converted to run this way. They can be powered by electrical wires suspended above the track. They can be powered by electrified rail. It's expensive and difficult to replace the fueling infrastructure and all the automobiles out there, but since power is concentrated in a few "engines" instead of all over the place, it's dramatically easier to upgrade to more modern power which is cleaner and more efficient in trains. The petroleum industry doesn't want this; the less efficient things are, the more profit they make.

      Businesses spend money on trucks because Big Oil succeeded in buying legislation which crippled the rail system and made it an inviable means of shipping in this country.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      trouble is when there is just not enough space for all the cars (parked or in motion) and people still refuse to share public transportation.

      I'm afraid it's an all-or-nothing proposition. It does you no good to have no car in your town where you don't need one, unless you never leave, because the next town over is still car-dependent.

      For those boring-ass people who never leave their city, this is a working solution. Unfortunately that kind of sedentary lifestyle leads to jaded individuals who have no idea what the world past their doorstep is actually like. The world would probably be a better place if more of us would travel and we could see what is really going on out there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by the+Gray+Mouser · · Score: 1
      Give a man a fish, etc etc. The idea is to provide educational resources so that they can fix their own problems because fixing other people's problems only makes them depdendent. You give people food and they grow less food; then if you are no longer able to provide them with food they die because they've let their food production system to go hell. This is the same situation.
      Computers != education.

      Educators are needed. Too much reliance on computers and you start allowing 1337 speak on exams. Again, it's not that computers are bad, but you start at the basics: books, blackboards, writing tablets.

      Anyway roads are a very inefficient and wastefull mode of long distance transport. THird world countries would be better off with India's example which has the worlds largest rail network
      Roads, rails, take your pick. People need a way to get from one place to another. Right now, they don't have that. They need a way to produce something and have that something shipped to markets. Food, for example. Lumber for homes. Pipes for plumbing.

      OLPC is the communications infrastructure. Each one acts as an alway-on WiFi relay for the next. VoIP, internet radio, IPTV, etc., all can be distributed over the dynamic mesh network.
      That sounds great, but it's a short range mesh. So everyone in the village/town with a laptop can talk to each other. They can do that now without computers. Unless that short range mesh gets a powered connection to an internet trunk somewhere the education use that is touted is somewhat limited at best.

    22. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by ghoul · · Score: 1



      The last census in which the U.S. was 50% rural was in 1860. U.S.Steel was capitalized at one billion dollars in 1901. The U.S. had the money and resources in 1905 to undertake projects on the scale of the Panama Canal.

      You dont need a large number of people to be in farming to be a farming based economy. 4% of the US population is in farming now but farming is still a large part of the economy/ The US is one of the largest exporters of food in the world. My point is that without the world wars and the tremendous boost given to the arms industry ( on of the largest employers in the US) and the mass exodus of brilliant scientists to the US the US would have not taken the lead in arms and the arms industry would not have been such a big employer and money generator

      Industrialization in the U.S. was coal-fired.
        America's economy really took off with the coming of the mass road transportation which would never have been economical without cheap oil and till oil was discovered in the Persian Gulf the US was the worlds largest exporter of oil. Sometimes I find some comments on this site about how the Oil Sheikhs have not done anything to deserve their wealth but neither did the California and Texas Oil millionaires and just like Dubai is now pump priming their non oil economy using the oil revenue US growth in non oil areas was driven by capital investment from the extra cash thrown off by the oil industry

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    23. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Roads really suck at moving goods efficiently over long distances. The fuel burnt to move a pound of goods is maximum for road transportation. Its lowest for ship and other water based transport (river steamers), next for rail, next for aircraft and the maximum for Road. Yes aircraft engines are actually more efficient than truck engines over long distances. Yes we need Roads for the door to door transport but that does not need Interstates but Long distance roads are a luxury not a necessity. I do agree with you that driving on an Interstate is a wonderfull feeling of freedom ;but should that really be a priority for a third world country? Computers are going to do lot more good than interstates in third world countries.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    24. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Walking 5 minutes to the transit stop is actually a good thing. it would do something about the obesity epidemic. Door to door is not a good thing for your health. As for groceries take a taxi on the way back. Whats the big deal? Do you actually do groceries everyday? And if you do it everyday you probably dont have a lot to carry each time and wont need a taxi (unless you run a restaurant :)).

      I guess the whole purpose of the California decisions is to make driving inconvenient so people switch to public transportation. I guess they are working well. Its no use adding more roads as it is a given of urban planning that cars always grow to fill all available roads . The way this works is that if the roads are more empty people do lesser planning and do multiple trips for where earlier they would have combined chores in a trip so the roads become congested again. I guess for public transportaion to take off it has to be made more convenient than cars and the cheap way of doing it is make cars inconvenient

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    25. Re:Before I brought PC's to the 3rd world by ghoul · · Score: 1

      When the government builds roads and hands them over for free use nobody complains about it. However if the government were to build railroads and hand them over for free use to rail operating companies there would be murder !
      Railroads are more efficient both for long trips from city to city and for suburban commutes. Cars should be for pleasure travel like going to visit someone in the neighbourhood (walking is even better but then neighbourhoods are not as dense as they used to be) or for taking trips out into the country on the weekends or for commercial deliveries to shops. For regular predictable commutes trains are better. In fact if there are reliable commuter trains you can do your morning email, makeup,breakfast etc on the commute and catch a nap on the way back.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  13. 299 Laptop by ghoul · · Score: 4, Informative

    Forget Desktops I saw a 299 dollar Celeron laptop at Walmart today. And you can pretty much assemble your own computer for 200 dollars in India so a 250 dollar PIC is kind of dead. And if AMD actually ramps up and starts producing chips at its Bangalore contractor factory we can look forward to even cheaper chips

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:299 Laptop by Darundal · · Score: 1

      ...Unless someone happens to not be technologically literate...(sounds funny, I know, but think of the reaction on any non-techies face even MENTIONING the idea of building a computer...)

    2. Re:299 Laptop by ripcrd · · Score: 1

      Go cheap labor!!

      --
      --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
    3. Re:299 Laptop by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      ...Unless someone happens to not be technologically literate..

      Don't you think you could get someone to assemble a computer for you for less than $50 labor in India? I do.

      I remember that the day I heard the PIC was going to go for $250, there was a $200 PC in the Fry's circular. This was a couple years ago, but it was still a fully-fledged PC with capabalities far beyond the PIC. I knew then PIC was a failure. Now, I think the idea was that people wouldn't be paying $250 and get the PIC, but rather that ISPs would give PICs to customers who signed up for plans. Great, but the ISP still has to spend $250.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:299 Laptop by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think 'assembling' is probably a better word, but they'd still cringe..

      --
      which is totally what she said
  14. Yes it can by Gorimek · · Score: 4, Funny

    AMD's role in spurring interest in low-cost PCs for developing nations can't be overlooked."

    I'm overlooking it right now, buddy!

    1. Re:Yes it can by ghoul · · Score: 1

      See the thung is in the chip business AMD is the underdog and the underdogs business model needs that they have the sympathy of the market. Bringing computers to the third world does a lot more for AMD than the same amount of pure marketing dollars could ever do . So its a win-win kids in third world countries get cheap PCs, AMD gets goodwill and a big foot in the door in these countries. BTW AMDs internal designation is not third world countries but high growth markets- AMD knows the US and Europe have done growing and the large profits are going to come from India, China and Brazil so the 50-15 program is an investment in the future

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  15. Third world? by ulzeraj · · Score: 1

    I thougt that "third world" was a cold war thing.

    1. Re:Third world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, there is no second world anymore. The correct term is developing nation.

  16. "Wazzat?" by kabdib · · Score: 0, Troll

    "What's that?" I asked the computer store owner. It was a green box in a bin by the door.

    "Dunno. It's yours if you want it."

    It had USB connectors, and video out, and a modem jack. Why not? I took it home. Yup, it's one of these OLPC things.

    WinCE something-or-other, 20G hard disk, nobody seemed to care...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is insufficiently documented.
    1. Re:"Wazzat?" by Molochi · · Score: 1

      You folks just gotta believe...

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  17. I wouldn't bother investing in the third world by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Too much corruption, too little infrastructure, too little education.

    I'll happily buy stuff from them though. Maybe once the agricultural subsidies in the EU and US have been dumped that will be worthwhile. Till then they're pretty much fucked.

    --
    Deleted
  18. Re:Not factory friendly by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    If its fuctory BIOS is replaced

    Emphasis mine (though the mis-spelling is not mine). I'd say this is a typo, but the 'a' key is quite a distance from the 'u' key... :)

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  19. somebody needs a hug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, +1 informative (assuming that's all true), but other than that... lighten up, Francis.

  20. PSA by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who don't know, OLPC is an abbreviation for One Laptop per Child (and not One Love Peace Concert).

    ... Karma whoring since 1998.

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  21. Abso-fuckin-lutely! by toby · · Score: 1

    The American standard of living was a fluke. It was supported by the opening up of vast areas of land and dispossesing the original inhabitants and then pumping and exporting oil like crazy ... So the early 20th century lead is not coming back.

    Exactly: That's just how it is. Thanks for saying it so accurately and concisely; if I'd made that comment, I'd have been mod'd down into oblivion. :)

    (Of course the same applies pretty much to Australia and Canada, both enjoying resources boomlets.)

    --
    you had me at #!
  22. Content for the Kids by ArcticCelt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just got an idea. It would be cool if eventually there was a web site with the aim of creating and donating content for those kids. If we knew what kind of pedagogic material they need I am sure that many people would be happy to write eBooks or educational software about mathematics science or any other subject (or even donate material already written ). I prefer to donate time on those projects than money that would probably go directly in the pocket of some rich warlord or dictator.

    Of course, open source and open content already exist but if the aim was to directly help kids in developing countries, the content created would be more suitable for their needs and maybe more people would volunteer.

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:Content for the Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philip Morris could help!

  23. PIE by deadlock911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe if they change the name to Personal Internet Exlorer then more third world countries will invest in them.
    They all want more PIEs

    1. Re:PIE by craagz · · Score: 1

      Yeah..right!!!

      PIE - and get your A$$ $ued by Microsoft

  24. Depends on the model of Geode... by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Informative

    A Geode GX is little more than a core clock-speed increased version of the MediaGX/Geode GXm, that was bought from NatSemi, who
    bought it from Cyrix when they sold the other half to VIA. It's a weak chip. it has a FSB of 33 MHz so that
    it could work with PC-66 memory without any L2 cache involvement to raise board or chip pricing. The whole design cripples it
    out of the gate. If it's a GX design, it stinks on ice except for a few usable embedded/kiosk designs and, yes, the thing
    stinks compared to your machine. It's biggest selling point was it consumed 1-2 Watts TDP at full speed and didn't need much
    fansink and could be completely passively cooled. The PIC used THIS CPU in it's design. This destined it to fail out of the
    gate. Just like every other design using this chip. It looks good on paper, the marketing speak talks a good talk, but when
    it comes to reality, the rubber meeting the pavement- the 33 MHz FSB dooms the device to mediocre performance every time.
    They shave pennies off the BOM with this idea, only to have a truly sub-optimal performer, when they could have used a LX or
    a NX (Or in the case of someone other than AMD, an Eden or C3/C7 design...)

    A Geode LX is a reworked version of the chip design, which was slated to be called the Geode G2 by NatSemi, but they never
    really released it. AMD bought the design and took it to market. It's an improvement, with a 66MHz FSB, etc. It's still
    underpowered compared to a VIA C3 or a Geode NX, but a decent design. This, I believe, is the CPU choice for the OLPC
    laptop. It's not the greatest chip in the world, but it burns a little less watts than the VIA answers, so while it performs
    slower overall, it's cooler overall as well- meaning it needs less juice to operate with.

    A Geode NX is a very low-power version of the AthlonXP core with all that entails. You can buy machines at Fry's on the
    bottom end of the price scale with these on an older style AthonXP motherboard right now- about $250 or so without a monitor.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  25. $100 laptop? $250 desktop? INSANITY by Bombula · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just don't get this whole thing about supplying cheap computers to developing countries. It probably just gets a lot of press on the internet because it's something geeks can relate to a little better than starvation, typhoid and malaria. But anyone who's ever actually been outside of a developed country knows that cheap computers are a hell of a long way down the list of needful things. When you've got kids dying by the thousands of ... diarrhea ... then things like clean water, decent food, and sanitation are a slightly higher priority. And unless these $100 laptops and $250 desktops "for developing countries" are solar powered, it might be an idea to do a little work on, say, power infrastructure first, mmm?

    I know these computer people making this stuff can't be stupid, right? I guess that means they're just insane.

    --
    A-Bomb
  26. Re:$100 laptop? $250 desktop? INSANITY by xappax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's hard to believe you're not trolling, since you're so aggressively and pointedly wrong - but I suspect you just haven't been following the story, or the situation is many developing countries.

    it's something geeks can relate to a little better than starvation, typhoid and malaria. But [...] cheap computers are a hell of a long way down the list of needful things

    It's true that there are many people who die of disease and starvation in the third world. Over a million are expected to die in central Africa alone this year. These people (especially those in Darfur right now) need food and medicine, badly. There are other people, however, who are not dying of starvation or disease at the moment, but are still quite poor, with few options for supporting themselves or improving their situation. Many villages are prosperous because of a single factory providing jobs, or a certain ecosystem providing enough food. They may be doing okay now, but if that factory closes, or that river gets over-fished, it's back to the starvation game.

    These people need education, they need communication, they need the ability to learn independently and develop skills and connections that will make their community independently sustainable, instead of dependent on a tenuous and unreliable livelihood.


    And yes, the laptops will be able to run on human power - no infrastructure necessary.

  27. shoulda sold for $100 and had Linux pre-installed by Locutus · · Score: 1

    but nooooo, they/AMD had some kind of 'deal' with Microsoft and these came with Windows installed and the BIOS would not let you put anything else on there. Why they were over $200 is beyond me since they were a small singleboard computer in a simple clamshell case. Not keyboard, display, or mouse.

    Like I said, they should have been $100 and provide support for USB storage if you wanted to add more software( think flashfs or whatever Knoppix is using for overlaying the root filesystem ).

    Too bad they didn't think of the exit strategy when signing on with Microsoft. IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  28. Re:$100 laptop? $250 desktop? INSANITY by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Many villages are prosperous because of a single factory providing jobs

    You sure you are not speaking of Detroit?

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  29. Re:$100 laptop? $250 desktop? INSANITY by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Give me a fish I eat a day. Show me how to fish I eat everyday. Medicines and Food handouts dont make the people self sufficient. But even one working computer with net access in a village (run by human pedal power if needed) can radically change the lives of the farmers by giving them information on long term weather forecasts so they know what crops to plant , market prices so they know what price they can demand from the middleman, access to government records and applications so they dont have to waste a day making a trip to the town to do paperwork, educational programs for their kids so that their kids dont lose out on a good education just because the village is too small to make a separate school economically possible.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**