Slashdot Mirror


Old Mobiles — the Bad and the Ugly

CrazyPhrog writes "File under nostalgia? This round up of mobile hardware from days of yore includes the Dynatac ("the world's first proper mobile phone"), which looks like something likely clamped to Joan Collins' cheek in an episode of Dynasty; the frankly violent-on-the-eye jade T10, courtesy of a pre-Sony Ericsson; and the unwonderful Siemens Xelibri which looks as if it was designed to give simultaneous ear, eye and finger ache. Thankfully they really don't make 'em like they used to."

108 comments

  1. Dynatac... Joan Collins?? WTF? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    You obviously mean the Zack Morris Phone.

    Post v2:

    I long for those days of simplicity! Today's phones with automatic cell handover and features (!) like mail and SMS and ringtones are useless! Give me a 12 pound block of plastic that makes calls intermittently. I'm not giving up my current phone until they can come up with something worthy enough to replace it.

    1. Re:Dynatac... Joan Collins?? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our Zack Morris ASCII overlords.
      $:)[]

    2. Re:Dynatac... Joan Collins?? WTF? by NetDanzr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may be joking (I can't tell for sure; I've seen such phones still being used in cars), but you're not too far from what some of us experience. For ages, I've been using the Nokia 3589i. My contract with Verizon has expired a long time ago, and they've been offering some new, bery compelling contracts, but I'm remaining a month-by-month customer because I don't see a reason to upgrade my phone. All I want is a wireless device I can use to place phone calls, receive them and exchange SMS messages. I don't need anything more, and yet Verizon is trying to push on me phones that are either status symbols or miniature computers, cameras and entertainment centers in one.

    3. Re:Dynatac... Joan Collins?? WTF? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Funny
      For ages, I've been using the Nokia 3589i.
      Jesus Christ, they have phones with color displays now? I really need to get with the times.
    4. Re:Dynatac... Joan Collins?? WTF? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Motorola is bringing out a new phone for india with no special features except a huge battery. It has days of standby time and like 80 hours of talk time. It's got an e-ink display to save power. I think a phone like this, possibly with bluetooth, could be the next big phone in the US since so many people (mostly old people though) want a plain phone. They're also soon to bring out a new flip phone with a color screen but no camera, no bluetooth, no mp3 support... just lower power use, better talk time, and an external antenna for optimal reception. Sort of like a triplets phone without the features.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Talktime? by welshwaterloo · · Score: 2, Funny
    "...first came onto the market in 1984 costing nearly $4,000 and promising around a half an hour of talk time."


    Wow.. over 20 years later & we've nearly doubled the amount of talk time...!
    Yay, progress!

    1. Re:Talktime? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least the battery doesn't have its own suitcase anymore..

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Talktime? by welshwaterloo · · Score: 2, Funny
      At least the battery doesn't have its own suitcase anymore..

      Nope - just a teeny bluetooth fire extinguisher.. :)

  3. personal favorite by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful
    samsung mp3 phone from 2000

    It was pretty sleek for its time, 32 MB memory for mp3 files that you could upload via a LPT printer cable :) It fitted me 16 led zeppelin songs on low compression and saved my mornings and a very boring holiday. Battery life was about a day when using the mp3 function. Nice thing: it still works! The headphones broke, though, so I cannot use the mp3 function anymore, unless I get the specific replacement cable which will cost the same as the phone probably :)

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    1. Re:personal favorite by deval · · Score: 1

      hmm I think this was my favorite phone as well but

      The buttons were tiny
      The battery life was a joke (I carried a spare at all times)
      The UI was very strange compared with the nokia's at the time

      Could someone just please produce a phone with reasonable buttons/battery life/gui that doesnt crash and is hard to destroy or do I have to do it myself!

  4. The bad and the ugly? by Mikachu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I certainly wouldn't classify the Motorola StarTAC as bad or ugly. In fact, as far as mobile phones went, it was certainly ahead of its time. I remember seeing those things years and years ago... I thought they looked pretty sweet, to be honest. From the picture they have on the site, it certainly doesn't fit under bad or ugly.

    1. Re:The bad and the ugly? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think what the StarTAC did was the prove you can dramatically reduce the size of the cellphone into a small clamshell unit and still be usable. The form factor has certainly spawned competing designs from every other mobile phone manufacturer, that's to be sure.

    2. Re:The bad and the ugly? by stormhair · · Score: 3, Informative

      Although, to be fair, TFA does say "The good, the bad and the ugly...?" and not just "the bad and the ugly".

    3. Re:The bad and the ugly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because if you RTFA, you'll see they're giving a round up of "The good, the bad and the ugly...?" of the top 10 mobile design classics. It only became "The bad and the ugly" when it was posted to /. with only three of the 10 phones linked directly.

    4. Re:The bad and the ugly? by ygthb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Had a StarTac 7868 (Then a v60), And I would love to see a modern version.

      Features:

      Very easy to hear
      If it went off in a meeting, just unclip the battery (very easy to get to)
      replacement batteries were cheap
      Bend to your liking antenna
      TruSync compatable
      TOOK A MAJOR BEATING AND CAME BACK FOR MORE.

      I carry a TREO now, and have to admit I miss the "It Just Works" and takes a beating factor of my old 7868 and V60i.

      I would love to see the sive and form recreated with a palm in the upper lid. Kyocera did something like this, I just want it with BT, GSM, and G3.

      ART

      --
      Create like a god, command like a king, work like a slave. -Guy Kawasaki
    5. Re:The bad and the ugly? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I'd class it under the "Good" = best phone for the time I got it, EVER - I WISH todays phones were as good

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    6. Re:The bad and the ugly? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      http://www.mymotorola.co.kr/motoshow/product/show_ startac2004.asp
      Is that what you're looking for? It'll work in the States with a little effort.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    7. Re:The bad and the ugly? by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1
      TOOK A MAJOR BEATING AND CAME BACK FOR MORE.
      I miss my Motorola i80s. That was one heck of a phone. It was slimmer than my new Motorola and took one heck of a beating. No joke, I one time got so frustrated with it (actually the battery was getting old and it cut out on me) and threw it against a concrete wall as hard as I could. The body had a large scrape on it and the antenna was actually impacted into the phone so that I could no longger unscrew it. And yet everything still worked! Seriously, that thing was a tank. They sure don't make em like that anymore. If I had known it would have endured that collision with the wall, I'd never have done that and would have just replaced the stinkin battery :D
      --
      blah blah blah
    8. Re:The bad and the ugly? by smithmc · · Score: 1

        I certainly wouldn't classify the Motorola StarTAC as bad or ugly. In fact, as far as mobile phones went, it was certainly ahead of its time.

      If I hadn't broken my StarTAC a few years back, I'd still be using it. Best cell phone (cell phone - not phone/email/fax/camera/buttscratcher) I ever had.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    9. Re:The bad and the ugly? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      If only I could get a Startac that would store email addresses and had a camera... I upgraded from my Startac because I wanted very minimal PDA function. My current phone has a camera, which I find very convenient because I take pictures instead of jotting down notes. I miss my Startac.

  5. Link is Slashdotted by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a mirror?

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
    1. Re:Link is Slashdotted by karldane2020 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Link is Slashdotted by Kenshin · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're asking the wrong crowd for a mirror. One's personal appearance isn't considered with this group.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  6. That would be funny... by jlawson382 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..if I didn't have my StarTac in my pocket right now. When your cellphone is listed at number two in a list of mobile design classics, perhaps it may be time to get up to date.

    1. Re:That would be funny... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i feel the same way...... and i got mine new about a month after it came out......

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:That would be funny... by sphealey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have never had another cell phone that worked as well as my now-departed Motorola brick phone; particularly as an in-car phone it has never had an equal. What is amazing to me is how in just 20 years Americans have been conditioned to accept unbelievably bad phone call quality in the name of "progress".

      sPh

    3. Re:That would be funny... by AgentPaper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I finally bid farewell to my StarTac last year, when the Verizon rep told me that I had to get a new phone because mine wasn't E911 compliant and would no longer be supported on their network. I had that phone for eight years, and it was the best phone I'd ever had - it did everything I wanted, nothing I didn't, made calls everywhere and got great battery life. (Amazing how long you can get a battery to last when you're not powering a color screen, camera, MP3 player and all the other garbage that's built into modern phones.)

      I'm using a Treo 650 now, and while I like having everything on one device, I still miss my old StarTac.

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    4. Re:That would be funny... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Strange- you shouldn't have to do that. I've seen people in the US use newly-activated imported non-e911 phones on Verizon without problems.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    5. Re:That would be funny... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Gah- hadn't finished. What I sad above means that you should get yourself another one.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    6. Re:That would be funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the Uniden Bag Phones, which I see isn't in the list. 5 times the power of the small cell phones (3.0 watts(?) compared to a measley 0.6 watts of even today.

      Plus you could actually hold the phone between you neck and shoulder instead of the 1/2 index card size ones of today. You could actually multi-task with both hands free and not have the current problems of a blue tooth behind your ear.

      What's next in the ever shrinking cell phone, holding your thumb in your ear for the ear bud and your baby finger to your mouth for the speaker?

      A guy I work with still uses his Uniden. He said in calling 911, they asked what he was calling from because they couldn't identify his number.

    7. Re:That would be funny... by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      It once seemed like cellphones would become microscopic particles, but height and width stopped shrinking quite a while ago. Try to keep up with the times. There's no longer a push for smaller cellphones.

  7. If you can't club a seal to death with it by tttonyyy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I'm not interested.

    Nothing wrong with lugging a big lead-acid about with you wherever you go. Right? Hello? Anyone there?

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:If you can't club a seal to death with it by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Others have modded you "funny", but you are closer to the truth than you might think.

      My first cell-phone was the Dynatac featured in the article summary. I primarily used it to call air traffic control for departure clearances from the non-towered airport where my plane was based. It made things much easier when I could taxi to the runway, do my run-up, call ATC and say: "I'm ready to take off". They could issue an immediate clearance with a short void time, and not tie up the airspace for a long time.

      Motorola offered the Star-Tac shortly afterwards, but it was really expensive. They also released a slightly smaller version of the Dynatac. It wasn't as thick and heavy, but it was still substantial. And it was affordable.

      About that time, several of my women friends bought cellphones to carry in their cars for use in an emergency. I warned all of them to buy a car charger, because the battery will probably be dead when it was needed most. One responded: "well, if the phone is dead, at least this model is heavy enough to use as a weapon."

  8. Nokia 2110 by bensonandhedges · · Score: 0

    I'm supprised the Nokia 2110 didn't make the list, It was the true Rolls Royce of mobile phones. Maybe it was not released in the US.

    1. Re:Nokia 2110 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it's the phone most known for being able to double as a hammer.

  9. New cell phones are made for trendloving losers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New mobiles with their feature bloat, short battery life and virii keep "squirting" people into the ass.

    Old mobiles don't have features. Their batteries last longer and virii sound like FUD.

    But it takes a mature mind to understand that trendy != quality.

    I own a Nokia 5110 for more than 10 years now and it works like in day one... except that I had to replace the battery 4 years ago for ~$15. Full charged the battery works for ~1-2 weeks. I can adjust the ringtone to just a small beep which is great.

    When it will die for some reason I'll desperately try to get the same at eBay or stop using cell phones (which will be great).

  10. RakuRaku by Kieranties · · Score: 0

    If I could get one of these phones here that would be great. Does kinda annoy me now how you can't get a phone without all the add ons. Courtesy of a google image search http://webpress.air-nifty.com/digital/images/rakur aku-M3_2_thumb.jpg

    --
    gokugone.com "Bah-weep-grah-nah-weep-ninny
  11. Hah by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    "Thankfully they really don't make 'em like they used to."

    No, these days they cram Windows CE and lots of ersatz chrome into the things. Such progress!

    1. Re:Hah by MousePotato · · Score: 1

      Actually...people can say what they want about all these new fangled phones versus the old ones. I just think it interesting that the reception I got on my old motorola brick was better than any of the bright and shiny ones I've had in the last 10 years.

    2. Re:Hah by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Your old motorola brick was at least a 1.5W phone and probably more like 2.5 watts. Bag phones are around three. Modern phones are like 400-900mW. Didn't matter on a bag phone because you were holding it in your hand but I personally don't want a 3W transmitter next to my head. I'm not too concerned about ~500mW. If you want that kind of transmit power you're going to need to carry a much larger phone, like the olden days, in order to have the battery life.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:New cell phones are made for trendloving losers by pklong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know what you mean, my Nokia 6310 has every feature I want, and none of the features I don't. Sadly its' showing it's age. I can't see any modern phone surviving the years of abuse it has suffered - Its battery life is like new despite over 1000 hours talk time on the clock.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  13. Fashion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an idea. Why don't we all criticise closthes from the 1970's while we're at it. And then we could have a go about 80's clothes too, which seemed to sensible in comparison at the time amongst earnest and serious people on the 80's success train.

  14. Takes me back to 1988 by Centurix · · Score: 1

    On call with a over the shoulder mobile phone, car battery sized base unit, cable to the handset. Very patchy access between wollongong and sydney, fixing compaq servers and stallion boards on the way. The signal was so patchy that I couldn't call home from the pub in the center of sydney. Being on call with that pretty much meant that I was totally over the whole cell phone thing within 6 months.

    --
    Task Mangler
  15. Feature bloat != good by Jorkapp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read through most of the posts, and the general consensus is that newer phones with more and more features are not what people want.

    I couldn't agree more.

    About 5 years ago, I bought a Audiovox CDM8150 as a cheap phone for sending/receiving calls, text messages, and some very light web browsing. It worked like a charm - I never had any problems with that phone. Unfortunately, I let the account lapse (it was prepaid), and it suffered to the fate of a dresser drawer.

    6 months ago, I was in need of a cell phone yet again. I was faced with a choice - reactivate my old one for $75+tax (but with $75 in prepaid credits), or buy a Samsung A630 for $150 with the same amount of credits. Stupidly, I thought the A630 was a better choice.

    Now, bear in mind, I bought this just before I left for basic training. What's worse was it was defective, and this wasn't apparent until about 1 week in. The A630 has an internal battery because it uses VRAM, and the internal battery was malfunctioning - causing the phone to cut off calls and randomly reboot itself even when plugged in. Bear in mind, I could not leave the base to get my phone replaced until 3 weeks later, which left me stuck to payphones until then.

    I ended up getting the phone exchanged after 31 days - 1 day over the limit (thanks to the very understanding and professional staff at TELUS) - a fresh new A630 - and it too was defective. Same problem, internal battery (this one was a little better though, I could make a 15 minute call before it cut off). Another trip into the city, and alas another A630. This one has been working well so far.

    Towards the end of basic training, I realized how much better I would have been with my old CDM8150. Considering I never downloaded images or ringtones, played any games, or did anything "new" that my CDM8150 couldn't do, I kicked myself for not having my CDM8150.

    --
    Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    1. Re:Feature bloat != good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm Basic Training must have change in the last 16 years. We didn't even get to use the pay phone let alone a personal cell phone. In fact a couple of years ago we didn't let recruits use cell phones. Hmmmm

    2. Re:Feature bloat != good by DarkVader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I don't think it's that most of us really want a phone with fewer features.

      I think it's that we want the durability and voice quality of the older phones back. I had a Panasonic bag phone that lasted over 10 years, with quite a bit of bashing around. A call on that phone sounded like talking on a land line, unless you were really out in the boonies.

      These days, I've got a Motorola v551, and I like features like being able to sync my address book with iSync over Bluetooth. I use the Bluetooth headset quite a bit too. I've even had the camera come in handy a few times. But, there is no way this phone will last 10 years, it's not even likely to make it to 5. And, the voice quality is just crap compared to the Panasonic.

      I'd probably never buy a ringtone, but I have dumped a few midi and mp3 files on the v551, and I do like being able to tell my phone from anybody else's by the ring (yes, it plays the Imperial March - get over it.)

    3. Re:Feature bloat != good by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I had an Ericsson T10 as my first mobile phone - monocolor, black on green display, blue chassis. The menus were easy to navigate, the clamshell design worked wonders for keeping the phone in whatever pockets I would choose. Now I use an Sony-Ericsson T230 - bought mainly because I didn't find Nokia's menus intuitive enough. Have to keep the keypad locked, the color screen is bad (little contrast and light during day, especially in sunlight), it has no status LED (the T10 had a LED near the external antenna, flashing slowly green during normal status, flashing red when low battery, solid green when charging). If the battery performance (using third party batteries) would have been better (more than 2 days of standby), and the charger would have worked better (the snap-in design is showing its age even on my T230), I wouldn't have bought a new mobile

    4. Re:Feature bloat != good by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      T10 rocked the house. Solid, good reception, flip thingy covering the keyboard because sometimes keylock fails. My first mobile. Mine was black, actually. Reminded me of Star Trek: The Original Series. Beam me up, Death Star.

      My husband and I now have r520m phones, running on the T-Mobile network. These were 2000 models, and they are still solid 6 years on. Batteries have ridiculous amounts of talk time and standby time.

      Eventually I am going to have to move into the Modern Era and so will my husband. My husband hates having a mobile in general, and hates learning anything about his in particular, so I am going to have to get him a clamshell phone because he refuses to learn how to lock his. I'm actually looking at another SonyEricsson even though I really hate freaking Sony because Ericsson still knows how to make a solid phone that can take punishment. The T-10 could get beaten from pillar to post and still work. My r520m has withstood tons of punishment.

      Bluetooth is a must. Gotta have that Bluetooth now that I have a MacBook. For my hubby, not so much. Yeah, that's another thing that's cool about the r520m...they have Bluetooth, and the Bluetooth works even though it's the most primitive iteration of the protocol.

      I still want basic. Basic is good. I have a video camera. I have a digital still camera. I don't need that crap on my phone. Give me a phone that is a phone first. MP3 play would be nice, but I just want a freaking phone that will work. Phone plus GPRS, thank you very much. No cameras. No capes.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    5. Re:Feature bloat != good by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Phew!

      At first I thought you were talking about the Motorola A630. I've had this phone for about 3 months now. Admittedly that's not very long but all I can say is this is the greatest geek phone EVER! Full qwerty keyboard and a game pad slightly embossed into the keyboard [some pictures should show it OK on google] that resembles the NES controllers. My girlfriend loves to play the games that came loaded on it.

      I bought it through an online vendor and can't seem to download anything from my telco that I deal with. However, this phone appears to be fairly big in the UK/Europe. I have found numerous ring tones and games, etc for a few pounds.

      Anyway... greatest phone I've ever had. Not too bulky [physically] and very feature full. I have one gripe about it, but it's not really a big deal. When you lock the exterior keypad and then then flip it open [say, to read a text message] and close it again, you will have to lock it again. I think there might be a setting somewhere, but I got the phone OEM with no manual. :-(

    6. Re:Feature bloat != good by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know if there's actually been a formal study to find out if people want cellphone features or not, but all this other crap is all anecdotal. Almost everyone I know under the age of 35 would like a phone that does it all; GPS navigation, full mp3 player, camera with zoom, etc etc. I know some of you like to carry a phone, camera, and gps in your pockets, but I like them all to be in one teensy device. (Not that I have GPS in my phone yet. Too spendy.)

      I also don't want to keep the same device for seven years anyway; I want to be updated, so I can have current features. I want the best! Or the best I'm willing to pay for anyway. I got a RAZR V3i from Edge Wireless for $140 with a two year contract. It has a 1.2MP phone (1280x960), a MicroSD slot, and nearly twice the reception of the V3 which puts it back into the running. It works as an mp3 player and as a halfway decent pocket camera. I use my cellphone camera constantly and I even use the video functionality now that I've tweaked it to record more than one minute of video at a time. (I shot half an hour of video at a wedding, for example; it's dinky but I was the only person with a camera near where I was standing, so I'm sure to have gotten some unique content.)

      Our disposable culture is producing recyclable electronics, and I'm into it. I want to have the new, nifty stuff, and so long as I can afford to be not too far behind (so that I can at least participate) then I'm pretty happy. It's a shame that we throw so much away but progress is continual and changing that would probably doom our species to a backslide into true barbarism (as barbaric as we are today, that should frighten people...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Feature bloat != good by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      OK, you got me. I'm of an age above what you mentioned. However, I have a reason for not liking all-in-one devices. Single point of failure. I would rather have a separate still digital camera that works like I like it, separate mobile phone, separate camcorder, separate PDA, etc. etc. If one fails I can replace it and still have the rest of the stuff working while I look for the right replacement.

      If your super mega awesome Razr dies, you lose your camera, your camcorder, your mp3 player, and your mobile phone all in one swell foop. I'd say that's a fucked situation.

      There is one good point in all this concatenation of digital devices in small packages: if someone gets the crap beaten out of them by a cop there's a good chance someone will be around to shoot video and then either get it to the Media or to YouTube, whichever is the fastest. If the police know that there's a good chance someone will be watching and recording them they will be likely to behave themselves and treat people professionally.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    8. Re:Feature bloat != good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      If your super mega awesome Razr dies, you lose your camera, your camcorder, your mp3 player, and your mobile phone all in one swell foop. I'd say that's a fucked situation.

      It would be a fucked situation if I didn't pay for insurance on my phone... If it dies, I can get another one, or upgrade to a newer model for the price of the new model less the cost of my phone. And since the data is stored on MicroSD I know I can get it out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:New cell phones are made for trendloving losers by _Hellfire_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. When I started my new job they gave me a list of phones and said choose one. The only one on the list that even came close to the functionality of my trusty 6310 was the 6230. The 6310 went to my wife, but now she has needed to "upgrade" since the 6310's battery keeps disconnecting momentarily, switching off the phone, and the keypad is a bit dodgy from years of (my) abuse. Having said that, the 6230 is no where near as sturdy. I would have loved a new phone in the 6230 form-factor with upgraded processor, color display etc but keeping most of the core "functionality" of the phone. Maybe the mobile companies should do incremental upgrades to the phones instead of ditching the old designs completely every time a new phone comes out.

    --
    "And then I visited Wikipedia ...and the next 8 hours are a blur..."
  17. I miss my T10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 4 hour talk time is an exaggeration, but the battery lasted a good week between charges.
    And it can witstand a lot of punishment!
    Their Achilles heel were the mic connection inside the folding lid, that eventually broke.

  18. Yo Momma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo momma so ugly, she looked in a mirror and slashdotted her face.

  19. Where's the Ericsson R520? by srussia · · Score: 1

    Still using it by the way.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:Where's the Ericsson R520? by garompa · · Score: 0

      Yes, me too, I use it as a backup phone. The first cellphone with BT and GPRS, and the only one I know with movement/proximity sensor. A really state-of-the-art piece of thechnology for its day.

      --
      Is it absolutely necessary to have a sig. ?
  20. New Motorola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My new Motorola FCKZOR has everything I need:

    1) Camera
    2) MP3 player
    3) Browser
    4) Games
    5) GPS navigation system
    6) Radar
    7) Television
    8) Microwave oven
    9) CD/DVD player

    Unfortunately, since it is so fashionably thin, there was no space to fit a microphone and I am unable to make calls.

    1. Re:New Motorola by MikeyVB · · Score: 1

      Find me a phone that can wash my dishes, and I'll get a 10 year contract.

      Oh wait, it already exists!

      Sumsing Turbo 3000 Xi Multitask!

  21. Back to basics by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1

    "[..]the Xelibri also marked the start of a return to back-to-basics devices, where talking and texting were uppermost. It's a trend that's still hot in advanced markets such as Japan, where stripped-down phones like the RakuRaku concentrate on the simplest of features."

    Well, that gives me hope. The name "RakuRaku" aside, maybe I'll finally buy a cell phone then.

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:Back to basics by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Well, I see what you mean, but this is what they mean by a "RakuRaku" phone- apparently the Japanese have a different definition of simple. Maybe this might be more suited to your definition of "simple".

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    2. Re:Back to basics by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Certainly the RakuRaku (if that's what its called!) is disqualified for the "simple and basic phone" competition since it has a camera!

      I currently use the Motorola C116... It has a monochrome screen, no camera, no annoying ringtones (it has basic monophonic tones), no frills...

      But it does have very good reception, a usable onboard dictionary for texting, and battery life that lets me charge it once a week, instead of twice a day.

      It seems that its a "third world model" since I couldnt find it in the USA Motorola page, but its a good GSM phone that is almost given away here in Mexico by Movistar.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  22. call me a grumpy old man if you want by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But I want my 1997 cellphone back. The earpiece was actually at my ear, and the mouthpiece was actually at my mouth, more or less. It had buttons that a full grown man could actually press one at a time. It made calls. It worked if you dropped it.

    So given the technology and network improvements, I should be able to get the same thing now with a free phone and $5/mo service with free airtime, right? {cricket chirp ... cricket chirp ...}

    1. Re:call me a grumpy old man if you want by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one here who has dropped (multiple times) a new cell phone with out any ill effects? Granted it does have some scars from the concrete and asphalt but it still works just fine. I can't help but to wonder if this is a "things-in-the-old-days-were-better" issue

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:call me a grumpy old man if you want by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I've dropped my iPod on a variety of surfaces (ranging from concrete to tiles) and it still works without a hitch. Same goes for my Motorola RAZR.

      Interestingly, my old Archos GMini died without much dropping at all (in a strange coincidence, it died right after I bought my iPod...). Depends really.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:call me a grumpy old man if you want by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have a RAZR V3i. For all the crap the RAZRs have gotten (much of which is justified) when unfolded it's one of the largest phones around and the speaker and mic are actually in the correct locations... and I'm 6'7" and have a head to scale. They also seem to have fixed the signal problems and this phone has middle-of-the-road reception. I haven't dropped mine (it's a fashion phone, I can't be scratching the mofo) but my boss has an older base RAZR (V3) and he's dropped it tons of times without damage, so I'm not horribly worried.

      With that said, it IS hard to use the D-pad without hitting other buttons; however, if you set your phone up right, you'll seldom even use it. This IS a drawback, but to me it was worth it to have a slimmer phone that can actually go in my shirt pocket on the rare occasion that I wear a shirt that has one. :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:call me a grumpy old man if you want by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      >I can't help but to wonder if this is a
      >"things-in-the-old-days-were-better" issue

      Depends on how you look at it, I guess. For what I want in a cell phone, things actually were better in the old days (OK, not battery life, but most things).

      You may have different preferences, and that's fine. I do think that there's enough of us grumpy old guys that there would be a market for larger, simpler, cheaper phones that just make calls.

    5. Re:call me a grumpy old man if you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My work gave me a Nokia 5185 at one point that had great reception (even in the server bunker), long periods of battery charge and was a comfortable size to use (if not carry)
      It did, unfortunately, have a non-internal battery which would fly off if it were dropped from any height and most people in the office found that they had to duct tape the battery to the phone after a few droppings. My Nokia 3620, which has more features than i ever use, decent reception and a button pad that i thought would be a lot more fun to use than it wound up being, has been dropped more than once and still works as well as it ever did.

    6. Re:call me a grumpy old man if you want by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      I still have a 1997 cellphone. My Sony Ericsson T610 died and I've been using my uncle's old Nokia 8110i ever since. I've noticed the call quality is much better. It does have a few drawbacks though; there's no clock display and the antenna wears holes in my pocket.

  23. I still miss my S46 by James+McP · · Score: 1

    While it's not an "golden oldie" the Siemens S46 was an excellent example of a functional phone with no silly business. The battery lasted 6 days on average despite having web browsing, IM, "daily planner" and other such toys simply because it used a monochrome screen. it was large enough that I didnt' feel like if I sneezed it would vanish but still small enough to not be a brick. It had both analog and GSM systems so it almost never dropped signal. My only whine was that it didn't have bluetooth.

    Unfortunately, AT&T sold off their wireless to Suckular, who dropped the phone and did everything in their power to drive off the AT&T phone users. After they tried to overbill me by changing my billing date and refusing to acknowledge the bonus minutes my plan came with, I bailed to Sprint and a Treo650.

    The 650's nice but only b/c I was also lugging around a Visor. My wife has no idea how to make calls on it and it is a tad bricky. It gets about 3 days battery life (not bad considering my heavy PDA usage) and has bluetooth (which if I disabled would add about a day to the battery life). When I'm on vacation and not using the PDA side of the Treo, I really miss my S46.

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  24. First Smartphone by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    was not Ericsson R380. It was Nokia 9000 Communicator (which they do mention in the article), which was released in 1996. And that's about 4 YEARS before Ericsson released R380! since they do list both, they must have some arbitary definition for "smartphone" so that R380 fits the description, whereas 9000 does not. And the last Communicator is not the 9500, 9300i is the latest model.

    And where on Earth is the Nokia 2110 on their list? That was like THE phone for several years!

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:First Smartphone by MarsBar · · Score: 1

      A smartphone is a phone with some PDA features, as opposed to a PDA with some phone features.

      In other words, it works really well as a phone, less well as a PDA.

    2. Re:First Smartphone by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      A smartphone is a phone with some PDA features, as opposed to a PDA with some phone features.


      So you are saying that 9000 is not a smartphone because it's PDA-functionality is too good? Had Nokia released a crappier product, then they could claim the title of "first smartphone"? I don't think that definition would fly. And as it happens, the original Communicator was a 2110 with some PDA-functionality added to it, so it was every bit as good phone as 2110 was (which was and is considered by many to be the best phone ever made), although bigger (naturally).
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  25. Nokia does have clamshell design! by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    the Startac, one of the first notable clamshell designs - a form factor arch-rival Nokia has shunned by and large to the present day.

    There are several models from Nokia which are clamshells, I counted at least 10 models on their website.

  26. Define: "by and large" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "by and large": adv.

    For the most part; generally; usually; as a rule.

  27. OB Zack Morris by altek · · Score: 1

    yes yes, get it out of your systems

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  28. Dynatac by hey! · · Score: 1

    Wow, just look at that keyboard. I bet every key has a genuine switch, not some kind of plastic gizmo sitting over some PC board traces. Where have you seen a keyboard on anything in the last twenty years that looks that solid? Of course in present day dollars the device would cost over seven thousand dollars. In that price range, its large form factor and limited battery life is not an issue. Just hire porters to carry your spare lead acid cells.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  29. old people like big phones by cynvision · · Score: 1

    I don't know the name or model but my mother will not part with her flip phone. The battery makes up the body of the phone. We shop for batteries at one specialty shop in the city about every other year. She refuses to consider any other phone because they're too small.

    --
    "I got it all together but I forgot where I put it."
    1. Re:old people like big phones by cynvision · · Score: 1

      Think along the lines of the Motorola D1-527 or the Motorola MicroTAC. Can't lose it. Quick to find in a tote bag. No screen whatever. No address book. caller id? heh. It's "on" or "off", "in" or "out" of tower range. She can sweat all over it (in South Carolina) and it still functions and she can't drop it with sweaty hands. If she ever does kill it, she just stops at our local resale store and digs up another one for a few dollars, slaps the battery on and drives over to the phone store and demands the phone people program it to work with her account.

      --
      "I got it all together but I forgot where I put it."
  30. Birth Control by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    WTF? The Xelibri looks like it should come with birth control pills!

    http://www.silicon.com/i/s4/illo/photos/2006/Novem ber/design%20classics/xelibri%20(Custom).jpg

    1. Re:Birth Control by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I can't see having sex with anyone using that phone, so... guess it works?

  31. The 3210? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm suprside the Nokia 3210 (or as I like to call it, the most popular hone ever that gave Nokia its seeming stanglehold on the industry until they ignored the clam shell design) wasn't mentioned.

  32. Paris Hilton - Ubergeek by rHBa · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    The Sidekick... ...a popular choice Stateside, where it's best known for being hacked and spilling Paris Hilton's socialite secrets.

    But I thought Paris was like an Ubergeek, surely she couldn't have let someone hack her mobile!?!
  33. I recognize #3! by Mitreya · · Score: 1

    T-mobile was offering one like #3 (only softer colored) when asked if they've got any free phones with their contracts. I laughed when offered this phone (4 months ago, mind you), and now I see they must have found some old forgotten stock...

  34. Re:New cell phones are made for trendloving losers by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    Its battery life is like new despite over 1000 hours talk time on the clock.
    I'd have thought that a clock to measure cumulative talk time was exactly the sort of feature you don't need...
    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  35. Paris Hilon's Birth Control Pills? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    That's the Xelibri.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Paris Hilon's Birth Control Pills? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. It looks like a cross between a package of birth control pills and a makeup compact, designed for use by the female robot from that old pinball game.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:Paris Hilon's Birth Control Pills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. T10s by Eljas · · Score: 1

    I used T10s for some years, which was considered a some kind of treachery at that time in Finland. I think it was pretty good phone for its time. The screen is woefully small for SMS and searching thru the phone book was pain in the ass. But it had working voice dial, which was actually quite handy. And it came in reasonable colours too, my phone is dark blue.

    The summary is as misleading as usual, the real title of the article is "The good, the bad and the ugly...?" and it's not all about bad or ugly phones.

  37. Nobody buys phones without the feature bloat by Random+Walk · · Score: 1

    I had an Ericsson T39m, and then switched to a Philips 650. Both have no camera or MP3 player, are relatively lightweight, and the standby/talk time is very good. Sales apparently have been abysmal; for both phones, I actually had trouble to find a dealer that could offer them. While people may complain about more and more features in newer phones, they are apparently not willing to buy phones lacking such features.

  38. define: "shun" by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    shun (v): eschew (avoid and stay away from deliberately; stay clear of)

    Ten models isn't exactly shunning either.

  39. Cell phones: Old vs. new. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I prefer old because many of the newer ones interferes my bone conduction hearing aid (Oticon 380p -- analog type; not digital). It drives me nuts to hear interferences near a cellphone. :( Analog cellphones did not do this. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  40. Xelibri... by karnal · · Score: 1

    The Xelibri reminds me of my wife's birth control pills' package....

    http://hardware.silicon.com/pdas/0,39024643,391643 17-8,00.htm

    --
    Karnal
  41. And let's not forget the original... by carpltunl · · Score: 1

    Oldsmobile!

    --


    Mama, I got 'dem ole cosmic blues again.
  42. Re:New cell phones are made for trendloving losers by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    Wow, I was about to make the exact same post.

    I love my 6310(i). Many a provider has tried to tempt me away with colour screens, the ability to watch music videos amd to play garbled-sounding MP3's to the annoyance of everyone else on the train. Many service providers have even gotten quite rude when I tell them that I do not want a phone that doesn't last as long as my 6310.

    The battery still lasts a week (that's 7 days) standby time after three years of constant use. This includes about 30 mins worth of voice calls and 5-10 texts a day. I bought a spare battery for it two years ago and haven't used it yet.
    I've dropped the phone onto a concrete floor from a first floor (that's second floor to non-Brits) window. The thing flew to pieces. Put it back together again and it works fine. The screen wasn't even scratched.
    I've lost count of the number of times it's gotten soaked when I've been caught in the rain or had beer poured all over it. The thing is god damn indestructible. They keys still work brilliantly.

    Compare with the Blackberry 8700 my company bought me (a modern equivalent of the 6310, since the 6310 was Nokia's almost-top-of-the-line business-class phone in it's day); on a good week the battery will last 3-4 days between charges, but if you have a game or two of Brickbreaker and surf slashdot a bit on your evening commute (or even just type lots of emails), you can cut that down to 1 day. The keys are too small, but that can be expected. The rocker wheel is already feeling spongy after 6 months. The case is already badly scratched in places after a few not-very-nasty knocks. It doesn't work with Linux either...

    My friend bought a 6310 soon after me, but gave it up last year for a RAZR. Which broke. Switched back to the Nokia until he got a new Sony Ericsson something-or-other... which had a defective charging circuit. Switched back to the Nokia until he could find a phone that he liked. Currently has an LG something-or-other which looks very nice, but I'll bet anyone a tenner that next time I see him he'll be using his Nokia :D

    You'll pry my 6310 from my cold, dead hands. Sorry Nokia, but I've seen nowt to touch it since.

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  43. Re:Love my N-Gage by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    I'll stick with my N-Gage of three years, thank you. Best damned peice of technology ever made.

    Sidetalkin' is so retro! I bet you wear parachute pants and LA Gears, too.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Re:New cell phones are made for trendloving losers by pklong · · Score: 1

    It's a damned useful feature if you are concerned about how many minutes you have used this month and therefore how many you have remaining. I've just never bothered resetting the counter since I got the phone.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  45. All the teenage girls want one... by FlamingLaird · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does the Xelibri look way too much like a monthly package of birth control pills?

    --
    "42"
  46. I've got the perfect product for you by k31bang · · Score: 2, Informative
    But I want my 1997 cellphone back. The earpiece was actually at my ear, and the mouthpiece was actually at my mouth, more or less. It had buttons that a full grown man could actually press one at a time. It made calls. It worked if you dropped it.


    How about ThinkGeek's Bluetooth Retro Handset? That should fix two of problems. :-) I can't help you with larger buttons, though i suppose that Jitterbug Wireless service would fit the bill.

    --
    -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
  47. Dynatac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh, the old Dynatac. That thing got mad props on the cover of the Geto Boys We Can't Be Stopped album; which featured a pic of Bushwick Bill using one while on a hospital gurney after shooting his eye out.

  48. Half done as usual. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    It would have been handy if the damm writer had bothered to put dates in each writeup. Context is everything.

  49. Best Phone Ever by CharAznable · · Score: 1

    http://img.epinions.com/images/opti/0d/33/502904-e lec_lg-resized200.jpg Qualcomm 2760 on Sprint. That was my first cell phone, like 5 years ago. It had no battery life, and the address book was comically limited, but once in a fit of rage I threw it as hard as I could against a concrete wall. It took a small dent on the corner and kept working just fine. The shell is made if 1/4" thick hard plastic. Can't do that with my Blackberry Pearl.

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
  50. I know! I know! by hummassa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Interestingly, my old Archos GMini died without much dropping at all (in a strange coincidence, it died right after I bought my iPod...). Depends really.It died of sadness...

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  51. Dynatac, hmmm ... by SubOptimalUseCase · · Score: 1

    I remember my first (and only) experience with one. While I was making a call from the car, I keyed the mike and the windshield wipers cycled (it was a bright, cloudless day in Aug.)! Thinking this odd, I keyed the mike again with the same result. I was laughing at the time, now it makes me shiver thinking of the RF signal it must have radiated.

  52. I LIKE the jade T-10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always liked that colour, and the phone's form factor seems OK, too.

    There are as many tastes as there are people.

  53. Re:New cell phones are made for trendloving losers by Bog+Standard · · Score: 1

    try wedging a piece of a business card or something like that between the battery and the phone. This is a common fix for a known problem.