Slashdot Mirror


Magnetic Storage Using Quantum Vortex Cores

brian0918 writes, "Researchers at the Max Planck Institute have discovered a new, easy way to manipulate the state of tiny magnetic structures, called vortex cores, quickly and without loss. From their press release: 'Up until now, very strong magnetic fields have been necessary to accomplish this, requiring highly complex technology. The new method might open up new possibilities for magnetic data storage. The directions of the small nanoscopic magnetic needles define a digital bit that is extremely stable in the face of frequently unavoidable external factors such as heat or interference from magnetic fields.'" You can read the first paragraph of the paper at Nature; subscribers can read it all.

135 comments

  1. Everything old in new again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Core memory eh? Why we used that in computers back when I was a kid!

  2. So what? by Warin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the non engineers like me... what does this mean in practical usage?

    Does it allow smaller particles to store a 0/1 charge, meaning much higher densities for hard drives? Is it cheaper to manufacture? More durable?

    Being a notebook user, I'd love to see densities go way up so I can pack a lot more around with me.

    1. Re:So what? by starwed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Does it allow smaller particles to store a 0/1 charge, meaning much higher densities for hard drives?" I think thats the main idea. I haven't read this paper, but I've seen talks about related research where the goal was to increase data density.

    2. Re:So what? by PieSquared · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure how close together they can have these vortex and keep them stable, but each individual one was something like 80 atoms across. So yea, I'd guess that the goal would be much greater storage density. As for getting it to a usable read-write speed and maintaining reliability over a few hundred gigs... well I guess that remains to be seen.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    3. Re:So what? by diersing · · Score: 1

      But they said it was NEW and EASY!

    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Does it allow smaller particles to store a 0/1 charge, meaning much higher densities for hard drives?"I think thats the main idea. I haven't read this paper, but I've seen talks about related research where the goal was to increase data density.You must be old here.

    5. Re:So what? by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the non engineers like me... what does this mean in practical usage?

      Ummm...PORN!

      Really, the questions people ask. Sheesh.

    6. Re:So what? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who cares about how it works? Just listen to the name, man, Quantum Vortex Cores?? That's so freaking cool.

    7. Re:So what? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      until it becomes known as QVC- but that already exists ;o)

    8. Re:So what? by arhines · · Score: 5, Informative

      The paper cites 10nm radius for the cores, which at optimal packing (ie, one core per 20nm square) yields 3.12500 * 10^14 Bytes / m^2. The latest in perpendicular recording gives an areal density of 277.1 Mb/mm^2, which is just 3.46375 * 10^13 Bytes / m^2, an order of magnitude less! Granted, packing is probably not optimal -- the cores probably need to be spaced by at least a multiple of their diameter. But then again, the cores can probably be shrunk, so at the very least this represents a modest improvement over current storage density. At best, it represents at least an order of magnitude improvement (read: 7.5 TB desktop drives).

      PS: Slashdot -- please add support for mathml or latex code inserts :)

    9. Re:So what? by MrIbanez · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there were many theories saying that data storage capacities are capped a ## GB (in the past, people couldn't even comprehend, and would go as far to say its impossible, to create a 2+ GB Hard Drive while retaining the same size).

      Such steps in research and design are the reasons we are able to go beyond that "theoretical cap".

    10. Re:So what? by Raidedguy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Mangetic storage is supposed to replace DRAM, because its non-volitile and faster, because of this it may also end up replacing all storage in computers, if they can get density high enough. They want this for "instant on" machines that dont need time to turn on because everything is already in RAM) It doesnt require an electron microscope to read it though, and its all done at room temperature (to the best of my knowledge).
      It's called MRAM for a reason...

    11. Re:So what? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      read: 7.5 TB desktop drives

      And how much space will Windows take by then?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:So what? by edschurr · · Score: 1

      Does greater data density generally mean faster read/write speeds?

    13. Re:So what? by stonedcat · · Score: 0

      Windows 3.1 took about 12mb if I remember.

      Win95 was a few hundred MB before you installed anything (using the cd install, not the floppy version)

      WinXP on my girl's brand new comp seems to be taking up near 1gb of space.... meaning windows vista will take up 2-3 gigs...

      So if we follow the common logic of Microsoft wasting space, I would guess Windows would take about 2-3TB of space once this technology is actually useable...

      lol

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    14. Re:So what? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Rockin' name for a band!

  3. Finally! by pdbaby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, we're moving towards the star-trek age of technology. "Captain, the SAN is down" doesn't sound anywhere near as impressive as "Captain, the Quantum Vortex Core has crashed!"

    --
    Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    1. Re:Finally! by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

      Captain Picard: Mr. Data, is it possible to route the plasma conduits through the quantum vortex cores?
      Mr. Data: It could be done, but there is a risk of core breach if the gravitons grow out of alignment.
      Scotty: Bloody hell. Since when diya ask a piece o'machinery about the bleeding engine?
      Bones: I hate you all....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    2. Re:Finally! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      And when the Quantum Vortex Core is failing what do you do? Reroute something to the deflector array? Where's CleverNickName when you need him?

    3. Re:Finally! by alexhard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Finally, we're moving towards the star-trek age of technology. "Captain, the SAN is down" doesn't sound anywhere near as impressive as "Captain, the Quantum Vortex Core has crashed!"Quantum Vortex Cores don't just "crash" dude...the least we can expect is a mildly spectacular explosion!

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    4. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick! Ashok! Up into the Jefferies tube!

    5. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he got sick of all the dupes and used his burgeoning mental powers to transubstantiate into an energy being of some sort that humans might evolve into in the far future.

      But maybe that was a Q thread.

    6. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, a real-world gadget with a cooler name than the Superconducting Quantum Interference Device!

    7. Re:Finally! by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      You forgot the favourite describes-every-problem word of post-DS9 Star Trek:

      The quantum vortex core containment field is fluctuating.

    8. Re:Finally! by powerlord · · Score: 4, Funny
      Finally, we're moving towards the star-trek age of technology. "Captain, the SAN is down" doesn't sound anywhere near as impressive as "Captain, the Quantum Vortex Core has crashed!"

      Quantum Vortex Cores don't just "crash" dude...the least we can expect is a mildly spectacular explosion!

      And they have to be "Jettison"-able.

      Engineer: "Sir! The Quantum Vortex Cores are becoming unstable! Explosion is imminent!"
      Manager: "Quick! Jettison the core into the Marketing department!"
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    9. Re:Finally! by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      followed by a really ominous sounding descending 'bzhoooooowm' tone...

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
    10. Re:Finally! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if we can avoid our tendency towards acronyms (something the advanced society of Star Trek has moved beyond).

      I can't imagine getting very excited over anything whose acronym is QVC.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    11. Re:Finally! by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      the simplest way to see if it's going to fail in a dangerous/explosive fashion is to stick a guy in a red shirt next to it then

    12. Re:Finally! by Chacham · · Score: 1

      "Captain, the Quantum Vortex Core has crashed!"

      "What are my options?"

      "After selling, about two million."

      "OK, take the helm, and beam, me down. I'm cashing in."

    13. Re:Finally! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      but the porcalin dolls are exciting!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look at it!!! For as long as we don't look at it, it may have crashed or not... Quick! get all the cats outta here!!!

    15. Re:Finally! by ogma · · Score: 1

      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will.

      No, it doesn't. As an analogy, the decimal representation of any irrational number goes on to infinity, but that doesn't necessarily mean that every possible number combination will appear in it.

      Are All Digit Strings in Pi?

    16. Re:Finally! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like a Stargate thread, since Ascension is actually an evolutionary process, as opposed to the Q which make no sense whatsoever. So maybe you were mistaking Wil Wheaton for Daniel Jackson.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    17. Re:Finally! by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist

      Seconds are countable, combinations in infinite time are not. I am unique!

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    18. Re:Finally! by alexhard · · Score: 1

      If the probability of a combination of numbers is greater than 0, it will appear

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
  4. Translation by gt_mattex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Magnetic Storage Using Magic

    There now everyone can understand.

    --
    "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    1. Re:Translation by bwthomas · · Score: 1

      Mah-Jick?

      I do not know what this "Magic" you speak of is, but does it relate to Curved Lorentzian Manifolds?

    2. Re:Translation by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 5, Funny

      I asked a girl to show me her curved manifolds and got a slap! I daren't ask about her quantum vortex.

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    3. Re:Translation by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Magnetic Storage Using Magic
      There now everyone can understand.


      Isn't that how all tech. that you don't understand works?

    4. Re:Translation by Botia · · Score: 1

      Yeah, life's been great since they invented magic.

    5. Re:Translation by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      You should have done, you might have got sucked !

    6. Re:Translation by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Magnetic Storage Using Magic

      Which release though? It's not that new Timespiral edition is it? Now, I can understand if they're using Beta or Unlimited edition, those had a lot of power without feeling silly. Once you've solved that dilemma though, you still have to figure out what type of deck they're using. obviously a storage deck will be artifact based, but what else is in it?

    7. Re:Translation by ccp · · Score: 1
      All these moments will be lost in time like tears in rain. Time to die.

      You're in friends list.

      Cheers,
  5. But the real question is.... by Dankling · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How much more pr0n?

    --
    Slash-for-Thought
    1. Re:But the real question is.... by alexhard · · Score: 1

      How much more pr0n?

      about 10 bazillion gazillion bytes.

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    2. Re:But the real question is.... by master_p · · Score: 1

      Man, when someone mentions 'quantum vortex cores', pr0n is measured in giga quads, not in bytes!

  6. Thumbs up for coolest tech name ever! by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quantum . . . Vortex . . . Cores

    I mean, dang, that name rocks!

    I can only hope that drives using this technology have Sub-Ether interfaces and processor boards hosting neural nets harvested from the brains of silicon life forms from Mercury.

    1. Re:Thumbs up for coolest tech name ever! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      You realize that they're just going to call them QVC's, right? And for the first two years, everyone will assume you're talking about the TV shopping network?

    2. Re:Thumbs up for coolest tech name ever! by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      So I guess the actual manufactured storage device would be called a "Quantum Vortex Drive"? Or mabye a "Vortex Core Array"? Any other suggestions?

  7. First paragraph by nizo · · Score: 1
    You can read the first paragraph of the paper at Nature; subscribers can read it all.


    Can anyone, umm, translate that paragraph into everyday english? I don't think we went over how gyrations of the vortex structure can be reversed by applying short bursts of the sinusoidal excitation field with amplitude of about 1.5 mT in high school physics.....

    1. Re:First paragraph by PieSquared · · Score: 5, Informative

      gyrations of the vortex structure can be reversed by applying short bursts of the sinusoidal excitation field with amplitude of about 1.5 mT
      We can turn the really small cones upside down by shooting it with 1.5 mili Tesla magnetic fields. Before we needed 500 times as much energy. I think that covers it.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    2. Re:First paragraph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.5 mT is about .0015 Teslas instead of the .5 Teslas required of more traditional technology. So, something like 1/200th of the required power.

    3. Re:First paragraph by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Can anyone, umm, translate that paragraph into everyday english?

      Maybe you need to reverse the polarity on your web browser?

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:First paragraph by ebyrob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ya, the big breakthrough appears to be that hitting the core with a very fast perpendicular field flips the needle about 300 times easier than hitting it with a very slow parallel field.

      Guess these little "needles" are much easier to spin than to force through the substrate... Of course, I'm not really sure I understand how the whole "anti-vortex" explanation fits with the notion of spinning the assembly. That could be down to fitting the explanation into existing models in a strange way, or it could just be I don't understand it. (Knowing a couple physicists, and looking at the graphics, I'm guessing the original models might not account for perpendicular fields...)

    5. Re:First paragraph by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Oh well, I can't get my head around the perpendicular part anyways ;(

      To be useful wouldn't they need to be on a medium of some sort?
      Useless the medium is a thread one...umm...vortex wide how do you hit it at 90 degrees? You can't focus the magnetism like a laser to get to another layer AFAIK.

      hmm, i may have figured it out while descibing it. Now do i have to patent it before i say it? hehe Seems like a bugger to manufacture tho, that multi-terabyte drive is gonna be multi$$

    6. Re:First paragraph by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what will this reversal sound like? They look like tiny little speakers. X0R the entire disk with itself at quantum speeds! THRUmmmmmmm.. (silence as the universe implodes into an infinite void of zeros) Wow, what fidelity!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:First paragraph by gregor-e · · Score: 1

      You could read the press release.

  8. Really? by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Researchers at the Max Planck Institute have discovered a new, easy way to manipulate the state of tiny magnetic structures, called vortex cores, quickly and without loss.

    I hear that all they had to do was reverse the tachyon flow through the heisenberg compensators.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:Really? by master_p · · Score: 1

      They did, but that caused a gravimetric surge which inverted the warp bubble, causing the graviton particles in the antimatter container to invert polarity and cause miniature singularities in the reactor!

      The solution was an intense beam of Thoron radiation which showered the Dilithium crystals with Polaron particles, which managed to counteract the inversion of polarity in the graviton particles and thus the vortex cores were not destroyed...

  9. No need! by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can read the first paragraph of the paper at Nature

    Nah. You had me at "quantum vortex cores."

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:No need! by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      >You had me at "quantum vortex cores."

      Is that what she said later about your pickup line?

      Sir, where did you meet her? How do I get there? And does she have a sister?

  10. Full-Text by dakrin9 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Full-Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant. What's your encore, linking to Slashdot administrative pages? We're all breathless. :D

    2. Re:Full-Text by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1

      ... only if you're using a computer at an institution that paid for a site license.

      The rest of us can either pay $30 for the single article, or $200 for a one year subscription.

    3. Re:Full-Text by dakrin9 · · Score: 1

      hmm.. I guess my institution has paid for a site license and i didn't know it :(

    4. Re:Full-Text by dakrin9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The continuous downscaling in microfabrication technology has enabled the creation of magnetic microstructures and nanostructures with defined sizes and shapes. These structures are currently not only implemented in applications such as data storage and non-volatile magnetic random access memory (MRAM), but also form an interesting playground for the fundamental studies of magnetism on a microscopic level.

      In thin film structures, in which the magnetostatic interactions usually force the magnetization to lie parallel to the film plane, typical magnetic configurations occur with domain structures that close the magnetic flux. Square patterns have in this case a typical Landau structure with four triangular domains separated by 90 domain walls. The magnetic vortex is located at the centre of this domain structure, where the four domains meet one another. The curling magnetization cannot stay in the plane at the very centre of the vortex structure because the short-range exchange interaction favours a parallel alignment of neighbouring magnetic moments. The magnetization turns perpendicular to the plane in an area with a radius of about 10 nm, in this way forming the vortex core7. The direction of the out-of-plane component of the magnetization is defined as the polarization of the vortex core (up or down) and gives, together with the sense of the in-plane flux closure (clockwise or anticlockwise), the ground-state configuration as illustrated in Fig. 1a-c. A magnetic vortex can store two bits of information13: the sense of the in-plane flux closure can be used as an information carrier (Fig. 1a, b)14, 15, and the out-of-plane polarization of the magnetic vortex core can also be regarded as '0' or '1' of a bit element (Fig. 1a, c). However, to switch the vortex core polarization, magnetic fields of the order of 0.5 T (refs 16, 17) are needed.
      Figure 1: Three-dimensional and two-dimensional representation of vortex and antivortex structures.
      Figure 1 : Three-dimensional and two-dimensional representation of vortex and antivortex structures. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

      Vortex (a, b and c) and antivortex (d) structures are illustrated. In both cases the magnetization turns out of the plane at the centre of the structure--either up (a, b, d) or down (c)--corresponding to the vortex core polarization p. In addition, vortex structures are characterized by an in-plane flux closure, which can be clockwise (b) or anticlockwise (a, c). A three-dimensional representation is on the left of each panel; a two-dimensional scheme is on the right. The arrows in the two-dimensional schemes represent the in-plane magnetization components; while the coloured dots represent the out-of-plane component (blue, up; red, down).
      High resolution image and legend (298K)

      Here we report on experimental studies towards an easy and reproducible switching of the vortex core polarization by low-field excitations. The dynamics in micrometre-sized and square ferromagnetic Permalloy elements with a Landau magnetic ground state were investigated. The structures were excited with an in-plane sinusoidal magnetic field resulting in a gyrotropic movement of the vortex core around the equilibrium position. As already verified in magneto-optical measurements, this in-plane gyrotropic mode is the lowest excitation mode in elements exhibiting a vortex structure (in the frequency range 100 MHz to 1 GHz (refs 18, 19)). A general theory on the dynamics of magnetic domain structures has been introduced previously8. The sense of gyration of a vortex structure is given by the gyrocoupling vector G = -2piqpUnfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com, where q is the topological vorticity, p the vortex core polarization, and Unfortunately

    5. Re:Full-Text by wass · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, the article after this one in this week's Nature is the report about superconducting doped silicon, also on slashdot's front page from a few days ago.

      --

      make world, not war

    6. Re:Full-Text by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I could get it all, but I am at a university which may have paid for a subscription, but I seriuosly doubt it.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:Full-Text by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Apparently I am too. Nifty.

  11. let me guess by Kuciwalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    This article was accepted just because it lets kdawson put "Quantum Vortex Cores" on the front page.

    1. Re:let me guess by alexhard · · Score: 1

      This article was accepted just because it lets kdawson put "Quantum Vortex Cores" on the front page.

      You're just jealous you didn't get to post about Quantum Vortex Cores!

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    2. Re:let me guess by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      And hell, why not? This post is only here so I can post about Quantum Vortex Cores! Yeeeargh!

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    3. Re:let me guess by de_smudger · · Score: 0
      and that's so wrong because...?? You should'a seen me double-take and (repeatedly!) Press the "9" key to read more when I saw "blah blah blah blah quantum vortex cores blah blah blah" on my RSS screensaver :)

      News for nerds remember...!

  12. Like rocking the boat by maddogsparky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to tip over a boat, start rocking back and forth, adding energy with each back and forth motion. I know what keeps the boat in the up or down state; what keeps the votex from from staying somewhere inbetween? Do you have to un-rock then engergy from it too?

    --
    science is a religion
  13. Why do i get the sinking feeling by eclectro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that this either (or all) requires a tank of liquid helium, a roomful of sophisticated atomic scanning microscopes, or a highly radioactive source???

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      Actually... I think they just rotated a field ninety degrees and tweaked out the pulse duration.

      The best solutions are often the simple ones.

    2. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by multiplexo · · Score: 4, Funny

      that this either (or all) requires a tank of liquid helium, a roomful of sophisticated atomic scanning microscopes, or a highly radioactive source???

      Fuck! Are you kidding? I want all three, radioactive materials glowing Cerenkov blue in a tank of liquid helium and the atomic scanning microscopes. That would be way cooler to look at than my SAN RAIDs are, all I've got on those is a bunch of blinky LEDs, booooooooorring. Imagine how much cooler it would be to have to say "I have to replace the radioactive source in the quantum vortex core storage" instead of merely saying "Hmmmm, got a bad drive on the RAID".

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    3. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      I want my SAN to look like that large glowing pipe in Engineering which a ring of light going through it depending on how fast data is accessed*. ;-)

      * Including the 'waooom, waooom, waooom' sound :P

    4. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      Doh, I forgot some good looking female crew member in a cat suit doing some disk* management every now and then.

      * If you believed I would make a Freudian slip here, I can tell you've got a naughty, naughty mind hehehe.

    5. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by jrobinson5 · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of today's Dilbert comic.

    6. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's really eerie. I wonder if he just read this article.

    7. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by infolib · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. This experiment is the first of its kind. It got published in Nature. That doesn't happen unless you've got top notch people working with state-of-the-art of equipment. Not for home tinkerers.

      The big question is, can this be refined into something practical for production in a huge fab and use at home. The press release says this can be stable at high (read: room) temperature, and as far as I can tell (IAAPhysicist) this seems reasonable enough. (Refer to paramagnetic limit.) No liquid helium needed.

      I foresee some problems since they must address individual bits with a combination of an oscillating field and a short RF pulse. This is hard to do, since the width of the RF beam will be much larger than the distance between bits in a useful device. Maybe a write head can be constructed making a very concentrated oscillating field.

      In any case, from skimming the paper there's no blindingly obvious effects stopping it. Very sophisticated techniques were used to understand the system, but in a real device you don't care about time-resolved images of individual bits as long as you can be reasonably sure that they switch when you want them to. Lots of problems will have to be solved, but not more than usual after the first proof-of-concept of a new technology. I think these people earned their grants, both from a scientific and an economic viewpoint, and it's very easy to argue that developing it further is a good gamble.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    8. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I always wondered when I'd meet someone who actually wanted to be Wesley Crusher.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    9. Re:Why do i get the sinking feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to just playing him on TV http://slashdot.org/~CleverNickName/ ?

  14. Get Perpendicular! by rackrent · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm totally down with it!

    Get Perpendicular!

    --
    --- There is a man in a smiling bag.
  15. Fad... by GWBasic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I knew this silicon thing was such a fad!

    Now, the cool thing about magnetic core memory is that it saves its state, just like Flash. When the Computer History Museam restored a PDP-1, they were able to inspect the old contents of its RAM.

    1. Re:Fad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      That is uber cool.

      ...a thousand years in the future, digital archeaologists restore an ancient computer from the 21st century. Unbeknown to them, a copy of the malevolent AI that almost wiped out humanity is still lurking in the quantum vortex core store. The AI boots, self-replicates, and tricks the humans into allowing it to escape onto the Internet...

    2. Re:Fad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, sending this to Warner Bros. now, gonna make millions.

    3. Re:Fad... by GuyWithLag · · Score: 1

      Quick, go read A Fire upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge!

    4. Re:Fad... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Hah. Couple people I know (who were doing a repair service) bought one that had been in a fire. After they cleaned the smoke out of it they turned it on. It complained about a power-failure interrupt and went back to what it had been doing.

      (Guess the magic smoke was still inside the cores. B-) )

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    5. Re:Fad... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Unbeknown to them, a copy of the malevolent AI that almost wiped out humanity is still lurking in the quantum vortex core store. The AI boots, self-replicates, and tricks the humans into allowing it to escape onto the Internet...

      I live my life waiting for that day. *sigh*

      --
      I have nothing to say.
  16. Never thought I'd see this. by FedeLebron · · Score: 4, Funny

    So they finally did it. Quantum Buzzwords.

    May God help us all.

    1. Re:Never thought I'd see this. by nosredna · · Score: 1

      At least with quantum buzzwords, it's ok that nobody knows what they indicate.

    2. Re:Never thought I'd see this. by LightCecil · · Score: 1

      Wait until the wave function collapses.

    3. Re:Never thought I'd see this. by famebait · · Score: 1

      Buzzwords always have been: they can never have both high buzz and a precise meaning.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  17. damn you... by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rock the boat!
    Don't rock the boat, baby...
    Rock the boat!
    Don't tip the boat over...
    Rock the boat!
    Don't rock the boat, baby...
    Rock the boooooaaaat!

    1. Re:damn you... by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

      I see your popular song, and raise you one Broadway Musical:

      And I said to myself, sit down! Sit down, you're rockin' the boat!
      Said to myself sit down, sit down, you're rockin' the boat.
      And the devil will drag you under with a soul so heavy you'd never float,
      Sit down, sit down, sit down, sit down!
      Sit down, you're rockin' the boat

      --
      Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  18. Just as magnetic storage gets cool... by pelo8280 · · Score: 1

    I know that this is all really cool, but aren't Flash Memory's days numbered? I mean, ever since Samsung made their 40-nanometer chip (http://www.physorg.com/news79719955.html), I've been waiting anxiously for the Flash memory hard drive replacements. I'd give up my vortex core for a more stable and reliable storage solution, and I know many other people who would, too.

  19. Re:damn you...??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must not have a) heard the song, b)saw the movie, c)read the book, d)am turning senile? What's the reference?

  20. STXM? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

    The paragraph said they use a scanning transmission x-ray telescope to read the gyrations (I think).

    I doubt these quantum vortex cores can be used for storage without another way of detecting them.

  21. Wake me when I can buy one by justinlindh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Seriously, how often do I hear about supposed amazing advancements in data storage and never see anything flesh out? They all promise applicability in a distant timeframe, but how many of these technologies (holographic or otherwise) have come to usable fruition?

    If 10% of the hype revolving around storage in the last 5 years materialized, I'd be storing a terrabyte on a sheet of paper spit out by a magical unicorn's ass by now.

    1. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by theaikidoman · · Score: 4, Informative

      average user can't afford it yes but it does not mean it is not useable. turner networks has been using holographic storage for their media for quite some time now. http://www.inphase-technologies.com/news/turnerona ir.html

    2. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by kwerle · · Score: 1

      No kidding! I mean, it's been nearly 2 years since storage capacities have doubled. What the hell is taking them so long?

    3. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by justinlindh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My comment is more in reference to new storage technologies that are heralded as "the next big thing". We've reached the theorhetical storage capacity on the magnetic technologies, and have known the limits for a while. Sure, we've doubled magnetic storage drive capacities in the last few years, but can we go any further? What's REALLY next? It seems like I've read tens of press releases touting a breakthrough in a new form of data storage, but none ever materialize.

      Quite simply, I just get impatient and more jaded with each new press release I see promising a metaphorical flying car "soon". Not to bash this slashdot posting, as it IS informational.

    4. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      And so what if they don't turn up? I see nothing wrong with being excited about the possibilities a new discovery presents. They help add easy to understand value to abstract research that may otherwise hard to understand for those who fund it. If you were a far removed executive looking at two research projects, one for low energy techniques for quantum vortex core inversion and the other for ultra high density magnetic storage, which one would you fund?

      Plus, there's the sheer fun of imagining for those of us who aren't making the decisions. I enjoy hearing about this kind of news, even if any product is many years away; not everything we hear about on Slashdot should have to be a product or a service, good old fasion research makes for great news too. Even if it doesn't work out, it's inspiring and interesting.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    5. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by kwerle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fair enough, but still...

      It was paper (briefly), then tapes, then disks, then floppies and more disks and more tapes and more floppies for a long time.

      Then suddenly it was CDs! Then you could burn them! Then back to floppies and disks and even tape.

      Then they all got dirt cheap.

      Now it's DVDs! And you can burn them!

      But more interestingly, it is now NVRAM, and the NVRAM is getting to be very cheap.

      So in the past half dozen years, we've seen consumer acceptance of CD burning, the death of the floppy, we're seeing the acceptance of burning DVDs, we've seen the birth of the jump drive, and already they are dirt cheap.

      All these things were headlines in the 90's - that was just a looong time ago... None of todays healines will matter next year, but it means next decade will continue to get smaller and faster and even cheaper. So take a quick nap, rumplestilskin. Set your alarm for 2012, and we'll see if todays headlines hit the market in another half dozen years.

    6. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "I'd be storing a terrabyte on a sheet of paper spit out by a magical unicorn's ass by now."

      Actually he calls it Rainbow Versatile Disk.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/ 26/140240

    7. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      No kidding! I mean, it's been nearly 2 years since storage capacities have doubled. What the hell is taking them so long?

      Well, PR drive are finally starting to hit the market (Barracuda 7200.10 series, the 160GB 2.5" notebook drives, etc.). So hopefully we'll finally see something bigger then a 750GB 3.5" in the next year (and the 750GB is already a PR drive). I would assume that manufacturing / process difficulties caused delays although there were no press releases or news reports about it.

      Still, PR is only going to get us a 2x-5x improvement over the old longitudinal recording. Maybe 10x if all the planets align properly. So a 1TB 3.5" drive is a strong possibility with a 2-3 TB drive probably being the upper limit for 3.5". Notebook drives will probably top out at 400GB or so.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    8. Re:Wake me when I can buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum Vortex Core == QVC == The Shopping Channel...

  22. "Rock the Boat" by Hues Corporation by tepples · · Score: 1

    "Rock the Boat" by Hues Corporation

  23. Don't hold your breath. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the vortex core, which has been predicted in theory for forty years, but which experiments revealed only four years ago.


    So scientists have been trying to detect it for 36 years, and only were able to do so 4 years ago? Something tells me that we won't be finding this in use for data storage anytime soon.

    Anyone know how they can detect these vortex cores? It's great that they've found a "relatively" inexpensive way to reverse the core, but if you still need a magnetic force atomic microscope to "read" the thing, I don't see much practical use to it.
    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Don't hold your breath. by 309east · · Score: 1

      I think that the vortex core is some reflection of the larger structure around it, so presumably you'll be able to see if its + or - easily?

    2. Re:Don't hold your breath. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I read the abstract properly, I see these magnetic field "spiral eddies" as being planar with the exception of the edge of the (unaffected?) center of the vortex. Sort of the shape of a the Milky Way galaxy. And it is the "hump" which exhibits a polarization, sort of a virtual magnet in the center of the vortex.

      And I can see that proving the existence of such a fine substructure to a magnetic flux as being difficult. But once proven, and demonstrable, the effects and characterisation of them would fall out relatively rapidly. Control. That'd be definite break-through.

      I don't think that needing an X-ray microscope to prove that the observed effect originated from the "flipping" of the vortex necessarily means that one is needed to see the effect. Unfortunately, the abstract does not say whether or not there is an "effect" and how readable it is. The question is, What effect on the system does flipping the "poles" of the vortices have?

  24. hmm by HiChris! · · Score: 1

    You can read the first paragraph of the paper at Nature; subscribers can read it allDo you mean the Abstract?

  25. Re: PHB Version by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Jettison? I saw that cartoon once. PHB? Isn't that a programming language?

    And what's the going price on renting your sig? Is that a YRO story?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  26. You're making me seasick. by LightCecil · · Score: 1

    Stop rocking the boat.

  27. Look at you, hacker by LightCecil · · Score: 1

    Panting and sweating as you run through my corridors...

  28. Don't infringe copyright gratutiously by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

    They charge for access to the full text because it is coming out in a print magazine. This is no different from copying the pictures from Playboy and handing them out for free. Do you think people will buy the magazine, or read your free copy? This kind of journal costs real money to print, and you just made it harder for them to get it.

    --
    Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  29. Giant Magnetoresistance by ebers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cutting edge quantum physics in the late 80's. In your hard drives since the late 90's.

    > If 10% of the hype revolving around storage in the last 5 years materialized, I'd be storing a terrabyte on a sheet of paper spit > out by a magical unicorn's ass by now.

    How'd you get ahold of my grant proposal?

  30. WARNING WRNING, technical flaws by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you've done any bathtub science, you'll know that the vortex spins the other way in the Southern Hemisphere. If you cross the equator, all the bits flip from one to zero and zero to one.

    This will severly damage your pron collection because it will flip the picture around, so instead of seeing a nice full-frontal, you'll only see a butt & back.

    All your music will run backwards and, if the Christian groups are right, will just turn into a whole lot of satanic chanting.

    One place it will help though is changing your overdraft into a positive bank balance.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:WARNING WRNING, technical flaws by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Unless you're listening to Marilyn Manson, in which case it'll turn into something once played on Little House on the Prairie.

  31. Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung by kaplong! · · Score: 1

    Writing 'Researchers at the Max Planck Institute' is only slightly more specific than 'at the University'. There's a whole bunch of those institutes; this one is the Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung. The group also has people from Juelich and several universities.

  32. copyrights on gov't funded reseach are bogus by ebers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The taxpayers of Germany and the US paid for this research. When Nature decides to let them read the article they paid for, I'll start respecting Nature's copyright.

  33. Pssst by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "I have to replace the radioactive source in the quantum vortex core storage"

    that's what I tell the users now!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. But doesn't it also mean by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    instant on?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. Obligatory Clarke by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  36. O/T by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

    why do you reach for your revolver?

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  37. Sounds like these are engines not memory! by ebyrob · · Score: 1

    The structures were excited with an in-plane sinusoidal magnetic field resulting in a gyrotropic movement of the vortex core around the equilibrium position.

    Translation: They made the suckers spin by applying AC current!

  38. Quantum Vortex Cores & Superparamagnetism by grimdestripador · · Score: 1

    First, I must say that get perpendicular animation by Hitachi is awesome. http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/research/recording_h ead/pr/PerpendicularAnimation.html

    To explain this topic a little better I am posting a recent paper I wrote. Its posted in PDF, under the creative commons liscense @ thinkfree.com

    File http://www.thinkfree.com/filelink.tfo?filemasterno =551951&filekey=00odg0wy0z
    Published http://www.thinkfree.com/common/view.tfo?method=vi ewPublish&uid=89152&fno=551951

    Below is an except.
    Using Quantum Vortex Cores To Defeat
    The Superparamagnetic Effect In Magnetic Storage

    One could argue that few new types of data storage devices have been invented. Traditional data storage exists in rings rotating around a disc. First in the analogue realm with the advent of the record player. Then came the digital realm which gave symbolic meaning to magnetic polarities on hard disk drives. As humans pursue the path of miniaturization, we find that the stability of our newtonian devices are being affected by what is predicted with Quantum Theory. Designs exploiting the properties in the quantum realm must be accomplished. Recent development shows, that it is within our capability to measure and systematically alter the spin direction of a single atom, when contained in a Lanau structure. The Quantum Vortex Core refers to the magnetic field created perpendicular to the direction of spin. Quantum Vortex Cores retain their polarities, allowing us to advance in data storage.

    A brief understanding of Hard Disc Drive (HDD) technology and its limitations need to be known before Quantum Vortex Core can be understood in its application. For the last 50 years the HDD has used a method called longitudinal magnetic recording. Circular tracks make rings around the radius of a platter containing magnetic bits oriented north or south to the direction the platter spins. A device called an actuator has an inductive coil on its tip/head which converts electrical pulses into momentary magnetic fields. A certain layer of materials on the platter retain their magnetic orientation set by the write head. As the platter spins, the write head is positioned over the next bit. This process is reversible, and the data can be read by monitoring the electrical pulses coming from the similarly designed read head when passing over changing magnetic fields.

    HDD are designed to shield from external magnetic fields, since common external magnetic fields exceed the 'crystalline anisotropy energy' needed to purposefully retain the orientation of the bits. Heat also plagues the stability of the data retained when energy from ambient temperature reaches the 'crystalline anisotropy energy' level (Nguyen). Until recently, this energy level has been ignored since the magnetic bits were significantly large enough to need exceedingly high temperatures to affect their base state, from which they will not move. As we approach miniaturization the energy to reach the crystalline anisotropy energy level becomes less. The field energy stored in each bit around the platter, begin to re-orient their neighbor bits; when this happens it is said to have reached its superparamegnetic limit (Public Domain).

    Since the opposites attract / likeness repel effect plague miniaturized HDD when the bits are laid end to end. It only seems reasonable to reorient in such a way which they do not interfere. If the bits were positioned perpendicular (standing up on the disc) rather than laying flat, one also increases the data density as well as limiting the superparamegnetic effect (Hitachi). Perpendicular storage seems reasonable, but proves difficult, and

    --
    Once, there was a long winded man who said very little. There once was a man who said very little; who no one understood