Slashdot Mirror


Cringely's 2006 Results, 2007 Predictions

Underpants writes "Bob Cringely posts the results of his 2006 predictions (only 69% successful, so Bob is sad). He also lists his calls for 2007; none are particularly shocking, but some are at least interesting. 2007 predictions from the article: '4) No one DRM technology emerges as the winner and the RIAA begins to back off as it loses a few legal cases. Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing. 9) Zune 2.0 appears, isn't brown, but still nobody buys it. 10) The year the net crashed (in the USA). Video overwhelms the net and we all learn that the broadband ISPs have been selling us something they can't really deliver.'"

148 comments

  1. 69% is a lot better than most prognosticators by windowpain · · Score: 1

    This guy should run a stock tip sheet.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
    1. Re:69% is a lot better than most prognosticators by DECS · · Score: 1

      Mark Stephens (who writes under the Cringely name) was wrong in the score he gave himself. Read any of his articles from a few months ago to get a taste of how absurd they actually are. It's one thing to write speculation as entertainment, but Stephens just doesn't understand basic tech principles or the industry. Grading himself on accuracy is something like Bush rating himself as an effective president.

      Consider two examples:

      - Stephens wrote plenty about the Red Box Myth (the idea that Apple would bring Windows native compatibly in Mac OS X using something like WINE). Technically wrongheaded, and strategically absurd for Apple.
      Myth 8: Mac OS X Red Box Myth

      - Stephens compared Amazon's Unbox (remember that?) with movie sales in Apple's iTunes Store, relating a soap opera about how Steve Jobs held up Amazon's efforts for half a year so that Apple would have time to line up more studios than just Disney. Not only an absurd idea, but factually wrong. It's made up bullshit presented as insider information.

      In that same article, Stephens announced Apple would begin selling flat panel displays. It is unlikely Apple would ever start selling low profit, heavy and large TV displays. It has enough competition in the area of pricey Cinema displays, why would it confuse and cheapen its offerings by selling big 1024x768 TVs?

      The Apple iTMS vs Amazon Unbox Rivalry Myth

      So yeah, 69% accuracy would be great, but Stephens is actually wrong about pretty much everything he writes, even his own appraisals of his accuracy.

  2. Question for 2007: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will Vista be the Zune of operating systems?

    1. Re:Question for 2007: by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why? because it's brown or because it's expensive?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Question for 2007: by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      It looks like they are taking the Ubuntu look... though it could just be the single webpage.

    3. Re:Question for 2007: by gkhan1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seeing as it's gonna come preinstalled on pretty much every new computer sold in the next year, I doubt it. There's gonna be dozens (if not hundreds) of millions of Vista users by the end of the year. Believe it

    4. Re:Question for 2007: by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      dozens of millions computers were sold with windows ME pre-installed, and most of them ended up dowgraded to win98 so the owners could wait for XP.

      the shiatloads of DRM in vista alone are a good reason to downgrade.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    5. Re:Question for 2007: by gkhan1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an idiotic comparison. ME was an in-between, a sideshow to keep the customers happy (and look how well that went) while the real OS was being developed. Vista is one of the largest investments microsoft has ever made. They're gonna push it hard. And virtually everyone who buys it (certainly corporations) won't care one iota about all the DRM stuff. "Look at all that pretty glass!" is going to be way, way more important.

    6. Re:Question for 2007: by unother · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista. At least, not in a fundamental sense. Certainly, corporations won't... most large companies are just moving from 2000 to XP, and that's only because Microsoft has pulled the support rug from under them. For the average company there is not one compelling reason to move forward quickly.

      It's not like this is rocket science. Large companies were still running Windows 3.1 until 1997, and then moved to Windows NT 4. The move from that to 2000 was about five years ago. The move from Windows 3.1 to NT was obviously needed due to sheer obsolescence; the move from NT to 2000 was the same, albeit to a smaller degree (USB support, AD support).

      Vista is really an OS for consumers and to ensure Microsoft has a new product as promised. I see nothing good coming from Vista in the end. In many ways, it is the new ME: a stop-gap OS...

    7. Re:Question for 2007: by Carbonite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista. At least, not in a fundamental sense.

      When a company or consumer buys a new PC with Vista preinstalled, part of the purchase price is for the OS. Just because they're not buying a boxed upgrade version doesn't mean they're not buying Vista. This is how Microsoft sold the vast majority of XP, so there's not much of a change here.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    8. Re:Question for 2007: by divisionbyzero · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista."

      True, unless of course they are buying it to run under Boot Camp on a Mac. ;-)

    9. Re:Question for 2007: by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The bare bones Xbox360 costs just as much as the OS for Ultimate Vista. You can do more with $400 on an Xbox than a media with a paid-for key with Vista.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    10. Re:Question for 2007: by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Typically when a company buys a new PC, they get to specify the OS from short list -- XP home, XP Professional, and apparently more varieties of Vista than anyone is likely to be able to keep straight. Until relatively recently W2K, W2K professional, and Windows 98 would have been on the list as well.. (Yes the pricing for each and every one will be different). It's only home users that buy a box off the shelf who get the one-size-fits-all OEM OS with no idea of its cost and no real choice.

      Even a home user can buy a custom specified PC over the internet with their choice of OS, and, I think -- although I haven't tried it -- from some vendors without an OS if they really want it that way.

      What the original poster seems to be saying is that most companies will buy their boxes with Windows XP professional for quite a while. Could well be.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    11. Re:Question for 2007: by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1
      Until relatively recently W2K, W2K professional, and Windows 98 would have been on the list as well.


      I have to ask...what's the difference between Win2K and Win2K Pro? I've never seen Win2K, only the "Pro" variety. I can only find Windows 2K Pro, Server, Advanced Server, and Datacenter Server.
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    12. Re:Question for 2007: by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I have to ask...what's the difference between Win2K and Win2K Pro?

      You're right. The lowest level of W2K seems to be professional. Sort of like Olives where the medium sized ones are "Extra Large". Never paid much attemtion since I detest W2K (XP is much better) and we wouldn't have deployed it at work anyway because it offered us no significant advantages and had a lot of problems for us relative to Windows 98.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    13. Re:Question for 2007: by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Win2k only comes in "Pro", and I'm pretty sure "Server" (I could be making this one up, but I seem to recall seeing it somewhere at one point...). When it was first released, they were planning to also make a "Home" version to be released a little bit later, but due to a few high profile compatibility issues and some reviews to the effect that it was too complicated an OS for most people to use, the idea was scrapped.

      Also, keep in mind that right around that time they came out with Windows ME, and it in a lot of ways it was treated (inappropriately) as the "Home" flavor of Win2k.

      Personally, I'm glad they didn't release a "Home" version, because "Home" always sucks.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    14. Re:Question for 2007: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And virtually everyone who buys it (certainly corporations) won't care one iota about all the DRM stuff. "Look at all that pretty glass!" is going to be way, way more important.

      If you actually think that any sane corporation is going to install Vista in 2007, you've got another think coming. Corporations will "buy" Vista (for free) because the commodity Dells and HPs they use will come with Vista pre-installed but the very first thing the IT dept currently does is wipe XP Home/MCE off the drive and replaces it with site-licensed XP Pro. There's no reason to think that model will suddenly change just because they are being handed an untried dog's breakfast instead of XP-MCE.

      Believe it or not, the guy in the corner office may want that pretty glass for himself but he really doesn't give a flying squirrel if the coal miners get it. He cares a lot more that all that "invisible" pretty glass is going to come out of his yacht fund.

    15. Re:Question for 2007: by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      I don't think anyone is going to "buy" Vista.


      Of course not. If you buy something it's yours to do with as you see fit.

      No one has ever truly bought an OS from Microsoft.
      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    16. Re:Question for 2007: by MoHaG · · Score: 1
      No one has ever truly bought an OS from Microsoft.
      Not true. SCO bought Xenix from Microsoft....
    17. Re:Question for 2007: by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      It won't be, simply because the buzz is already building. Microsoft has a good marketing department and a lot of mainstream support. I'm already seeing windows vista mentioned in lots of newspapers and the like and almost always in a positive light. Sure, we who follow the tech reporting know it's not all its cracked up to be, but the rest just sees "ooh shiny" and "it's the next best thing".

      No I don't think Vista will the Zune of operating systems, I think it will outsell all previous Microsoft operating systems. Actually I'm pretty damn sure about that one.

  3. Refreshing to see a pundit... by Dobeln · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...going through their predictions list for once. Also, he played the umpire quite well - that's some pretty harsh judgements. (Wrong on iPhone/iTV - heh.)

    1. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He gains some kudos for admitting he was wrong about OSX running on generic hardware. Other pundits would have insisted they were right.

    2. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does this every year.

    3. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by fatphil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing about known fraus Cringley would ever be refreshing exccept for him
      to admit to his lies, quit punditry, and bugger off out of the public eye
      for ever.

      7/15 tops.

      4) More bad news for Sun. That's true.
      http://news.com.com/Sun+recoups+server+market+shar e/2100-1010_3-6108453.html
      looks like sun's best server market share improvement in about 5 years.
      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=1y&s=SUNW&l=on&z=m &q=l&c=&c=%5EIXIC
      looks like sun shareholders are happy about what's happening too.

      So how can Cringley call that one true?

      11) Intel will rebrand itself and nobody will notice. Intel did, we didn't -- true.

      What rebranding? If they mean "they have new logos for, and new keywords to describe, new products", that's not rebranding. That's just bringing out new products, and making them distinguishablefrom their previous products. Such a 'rebranding' would be true for any company that brings out more than one product a year. If this is counted as true, it's utterly valueless.

      But heck, it's Cringley.

      Phil

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    4. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by zsau · · Score: 1

      Evidently you didn't notice that they'd rebranded themselves! :)

      --
      Look out!
    5. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by fatphil · · Score: 1

      No. I;ve seen their previous branding, and their current branding, and I don't consider it to be a rebranding.

      His prediction wasn't "intel will pretend to have a rebranding, but it'll be such an insignificant change that noone considers it a rebranding".

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    6. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by Dobeln · · Score: 1

      Industry people certainly considered it a "rebranding" - if you believe Cringely was wrong on this point - please...

    7. Re:Refreshing to see a pundit... by Dobeln · · Score: 1

      Relevant link source from 2 secs of Googling:

      http://news.digitaltrends.com/article9178.html

  4. I like number 10 by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Italy this is already happening, with the main ISP (Telecom Italia) faking DNS problems to cover up the fact that they just can't deliver all the ADSL they sold. Despite the fact that they shape Bittorrent (and other P2P) traffic...

    1. Re:I like number 10 by caluml · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an interesting story - why not submit it as a story?

    2. Re:I like number 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:I like number 10 by SpectralDesign · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Curious!

      I'm on Rogers HighSpeed in Canada, and lately they've been shaping BT traffic, and the past few months having intermittent connectivity issues -- just a couple or few days ago the service wasn't working, but the lights on the modem all appeared fine... Needless to say, I didn't want to call customer support to be on hold for an hour or more and finally be told that they were working on the problem and to try it again the next day (useless!) so after a few hours and several resets of the modem I decided to try a ping from my router and lo and behold, it worked...

      I punched in the IP for a DNS server that I knew of, and used that to get the numbers for OpenDNS and now have my router issuing those with DHCP requests instead of the Rogers DNS servers. Funny -- everything has been working just fine since I made that change.

      Is Telecom Itialia also owned by Ted Turner?!? At any rate, it seems they went to the same "We've Oversubscribed, What Can We Do Now?" convention as each other.... Bastards!

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
    4. Re:I like number 10 by spacefight · · Score: 1

      Maybe they aren't faking DNS problems, maybe they HAVE DNS problems. I can imagine that the surge in BitTorrent and other P2P usage can cause DNS problems on the provider Site - or is all P2P traffic based on IP addresses only?

    5. Re:I like number 10 by Doytch · · Score: 1

      If you're sick of the bastards(like I was), try checking some other ISPs available. There's an outfit called 3web that leases lines from Rogers/Bell all over Canada and doesn't do any of the crap that either of them do.

    6. Re:I like number 10 by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      Most machines involved in P2P do not have DNS addresses. Foe example, with bittorrent, the only dns names invloved are for the tracker.

    7. Re:I like number 10 by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      I've heard from a few people that 3web's support sucks. Myself, I've been considering a switch from Bell to TekSavvy.

      Anyone in Canada looking to switch ISPs should check out http://www.canadianisp.com/. They have a list of ISPs in most major cities (82 for me in Toronto) complete with customer reviews.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    8. Re:I like number 10 by mennucc1 · · Score: 1
      I happen to use a "Telecom Italia" (Alice) ADSL .
      I heard about the DNS vs OpenDNS buzz; who didnt? googling around for telecom italia dns opendns there are thousands of blogs and forums saying that "Telecom Italia" users benefit from using OpenDNS...
      At a certain point, even major Italian newspapers (as "Repubblica" here) started spreading that info; and OpenDNS even thanked them!
      Well.. here are my 2eurocents:
      • when I download huge files (usually, .debs from a Debian mirror), I get my 80Kb/sec download speed, as I paid for; and I always did , even when in mid Dec everybody was crying wolf
      • I dont usually use P2P or BitTorrent; but AFAIK P2P and Bittorrent do not use DNS, they go by IP, so I do not understand how DNS or OpenDNS would ever make a difference
      • and I do not understand how Telecom can use a faked DNS problem to cover a bandwidth problem,
      • and, no , I do not use OpenDNS... I use the plain DNS that Telecom is telling me to use thru pppd
      Sometimes I came to think that the whole problem may be some hidden bug in Windows DNS caching...
  5. Easy prediction on DRM by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No DRM emerges as a winner? of course not, nobody wins with DRM, not even the record companies or the artists, as consumers hate it and it drives sales away...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Dogers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, somebody always wins with DRM.

      The companies that create DRM schemes, of course!

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    2. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by strider44 · · Score: 1

      As soon as a DRM scheme emerges at the top it will be broken. DRM is an impractical notion so it's not really surprising.

    3. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by StringBlade · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really, because their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit) or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

      I view DRM scheme creators in a similar light to anti-virus software makers: their task is never-ending because they are attacking the symptoms of a problem, not the problem itself and it's a very thankless job.

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    4. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I view DRM scheme creators in a similar light to anti-virus software makers: their task is never-ending because they are attacking the symptoms of a problem, not the problem itself and it's a very thankless job.

      Flawed alternative problem in case 2:
      No technological solution exists for a social problem.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not really, because their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit) or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

      Microsoft's DRM scheme for the original XBOX worked pretty well. Sure, there were mod chips, but most people didn't have the time and energy to use them.

    6. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by zigziggityzoo · · Score: 1

      But somebody keeps buying their product...

      --
      Zing!
    7. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Dogers · · Score: 2, Insightful
      their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit)

      By which time the company that created the DRM will have received their payment and have already laughed all the way to the bank

      or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

      Likewise as before, the company will have received their payment, and probably have been hard at work on the next iteration ready for the company whose product they were protecting to ask "what about the next generation?" :)

      scamming(scammers--)++
      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    8. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by jZnat · · Score: 1
      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    9. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by Myopic · · Score: 1

      What you said supports the GP. If a company creates a DRM product which is bought and used by a media distributor, then the company wins because they created and sold a product. If the scheme is broken shortly thereafter, that's better yet if the company gets another chance with another scheme.

    10. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      YA RLY. Microsoft indeed made a lot of mistakes with its DRM scheme for XBOX, but that doesn't mean the DRM scheme didn't largely serve its purpose anyway. This is a testament to the fact that DRM schemes don't always have to be perfect in order to be effective.

      Hardware mods for DRM schemes are pretty much always going to be possible. But they're also the least of the problems for the manufacturers, especially due to the DMCA. Using the DMCA, manufacturers can make it difficult to obtain the equipment needed to make the hardware modifications, which leaves only the geeks who want to take apart their equipment.

      Software mods for XBOX did come out - years after the XBOX was released, and even these required certain non-standard hardware be bought or rented (although at least this hardware was not in itself illegal to distribute under the DMCA).

      I have an XBOX, which I bought after the softmods came out, with the explicit intent to run Linux on it. I've gotten to the point where I can get into linux manually, by running MechAssault, loading the hack, and then rebooting into linux. But I haven't been brave enough to mess with the machine enough to boot directly into Linux - I'm afraid of making a brick. One problem is that in order for me to boot directly into Linux I have to download a hacked version of the XBOX OS, and since distributing that software violates the copyright on the XBOX OS, it's a pain in the ass to find a copy sitting out there on the web. So even today, while it's possible to hack the XBOX using only hardware which you can purchase at Best Buy (or any major retail store), it's still not something you can do without delving into hacker sites looking for illegal software.

      Microsoft made a lot of mistakes with the XBOX DRM system - but it was still a rather effective system.

    11. Re:Easy prediction on DRM by rizole · · Score: 1

      That is so close to "only the Laywers win" that I've forgotten the headline for this thread.

  6. Can someone explain #2 and #5 2006 predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    2) I said OS X would run on generic Intel hardware, though Apple wouldn't support it. This is true in the sense that people have made OS X run on generic Intel hardware, but APPLE hasn't, so the item is wrong. ..... ..... .....
    5) IBM customers revolt. It is happening slower than makes sense, but yes, they are revolting. True.


    Number 2 seems like he got it right but is saying it's wrong for some reason, I don't quite get #5 at all - haven't read anything to this effect but I'm probably wrong.
    1. Re:Can someone explain #2 and #5 2006 predictions by cofaboy · · Score: 1

      Regarding number 2, it was APPLE that he expected to make OS/X run on generic INTEL hardware not hackers.

      Regarding number 5 guess he reckons IBM is pissing off their customer base somehow.

      --
      In the end, It's all bovine dung you know
    2. Re:Can someone explain #2 and #5 2006 predictions by DeadboltX · · Score: 1

      he said generic intel hardware. I cant put os x on my current intel pc computer.
      os x is only runnable on specific mac-branded intel platforms.

  7. A bit wrong... by Karganeth · · Score: 5, Informative

    2007 prediction - "Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing."

    This already happened in the UK in 2006. Crazy by Gnarls Barkely went to number 1 on the charts without having a single physical copy on sale. It is one of the best songs of 2006. It stayed at nubmer one for nine weeks.

    1. Re:A bit wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but did it win a Grammy, or any UK music awards? If not then he was correct on both counts: no awards, and no formal recognition from the industry which is praying for the pesky intarwebs to go away.

    2. Re:A bit wrong... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the UK, Bro. It's not real if it don't happen Stateside.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:A bit wrong... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't the UK the market where a Celphone ringtone hit the pop charts?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    4. Re:A bit wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gnarls Barkley - Crazy won a shitload of awards and was the best selling song of last year. BREAKING NEWS: You live under a rock.

    5. Re:A bit wrong... by cofaboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, that would be that poxy crazy frog ditty. Yes that was the UK

      /me hangs head in shame at poor taste of young Brits

      --
      In the end, It's all bovine dung you know
    6. Re:A bit wrong... by 2ms · · Score: 1

      When he said "recognized as existing" he clearly meant by the record industry (ie the one behind RIAA and the Grammies). Gnarls Barkley of course did not win Grammy.

    7. Re:A bit wrong... by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Best selling is, however, misleading. Back in the 60s or 70s a song topping the UK top 40 sold 1,000,000s of units. Today, you can get in top 10 after selling only 25,000 units. The UK Top 40 is in no way representative of music tastes, or popularity. It's just a PR exercise.

    8. Re:A bit wrong... by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good old America, the only place that can call something a world series without noticing they haven't invited any other countries... but back on topic, the chart rules when Gnarls Barkley hit number 1 excluded songs that were truly internet only, you had to have a physical CD or vinyl release. You were allowed to issue the download up to a week before the physical release hit the shops, and it was this rule that allowed them to number 1 before the physical release hit the shops. Recently the rules have been changed and a true internet only release now is allowed in the British charts.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    9. Re:A bit wrong... by 0123456789 · · Score: 1
      It was also available on shiny disc. The old (2006) rules in the UK were that download sales only counted when the CD was available or in the week prior to the CD release. Hence, Crazy hit number 1 in the week before the CD came out, and became the first song to reach number 1 in the UK on downloads alone, but for the other 8 weeks, the CD was available.

      This week is the first week of the new rules here, where downloads count irrespective of the availability of the CD. See here for more.

    10. Re:A bit wrong... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Good old America, the only place that can call something a world series without noticing they haven't invited any other countries...

      Canada isn't another country? I'm sure they'll be interested to hear that.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:A bit wrong... by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Not to pick too many nits, but Canada isn't another country now? Granted 2 countries doesn't make a world series, but teams in the US aren't the only ones eligible for the World Series.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    12. Re:A bit wrong... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Gnarls Barkley - Crazy won a shitload of awards and was the best selling song of last year. BREAKING NEWS: You live under a rock. Yeah, but it wasn't Internet-only for more than a week (unless you insist on counting that it was leaked months in advance), and even that was just a promo - a big regular release has been planned from the beginning, and it didn't get awards before that release.

      "Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing."

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    13. Re:A bit wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/magazine/d aily/16395390.htm

      NASHVILLE, Tenn. - U.S. album sales continued to decline in 2006, down nearly 5 percent from the previous year, but total music sales were up thanks to a huge increase in digital downloads.

      About 588.2 million albums were sold in 2006 - a 4.9 percent decline from 2005, according to year-end sales figures released Thursday by Nielsen SoundScan.

      But digital sales increased by 65 percent over the previous year, with 582 million tracks sold, and digital album sales more than doubled, with nearly 33 million sold. ...

      And for the first time ever a digital song - "Bad Day" by Daniel Powter - sold more than two million copies in one year, thanks to the play it got as the send-off song on American Idol.

    14. Re:A bit wrong... by ricree · · Score: 1

      This does, however, illustrate an important trend. Increasingly, we are seeing the internet become an extremely influential promotional venue for music. Unlike most other big areas, this one is fairly independent of the RIAA. In the short term, this will likely only effect songs controlled by the major labels. In the long term, however, having such a large independent promotional outlet is extremely important for breaking the RIAA's stranglehold on music. We may not see any successful internet only songs in 2007, but we will see the groundwork laid that enables them to happen in the future.

    15. Re:A bit wrong... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and most of the players are from the Dominican Republic, so that makes three countries.

      A decent number from Japan, too, so we're on our way to a true World Series, I'd say.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. 11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by popo · · Score: 1, Insightful


    Did this happen? Intel changes their campaign up every year,
    and they now use "Leap Ahead"...but there's been no
    real rebranding as far as i can tell.

    I predict Cringley is going to get even more annoying and
    no one will even notice.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  9. umm 69%? by atari2600 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:

    That is my worst performance EVER. I got nine of 15 predictions correct for a 60 percent average. In my defense I'll point out that just because I am wrong now doesn't mean I'll still be wrong in another week. Three years ago I predicted Intel would support AMD's 64-bit instruction extensions, but they took 53 weeks to do so, making me off by seven days. I think that by the end of February, 2-3 of these predictions could still swing the other direction.

    Editors: Please RTFA? Thanks.

    1. Re:umm 69%? by Oddscurity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Getting 69 may just have been wishful thinking on the editor's part?

      --
      Indeed!
  10. MS support? by headpushslap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Microsoft is discussing internally how to help Sony from going under, since that would create a raft of antitrust problems for Redmond. I am not making this up."

    Microsoft supporting another company (Apple)? What an unexpected event.

    Really, if this is a prediction, fire Nostradomus.

    1. Re:MS support? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I believe that Microsoft is having those discussions, because they are both stupid enough and arrogant enough to believe they could be in such a fortunate position..... It's not like their console is the number one seller right now even if Sony were out of the picture.

      Cringly seems to be basing that prediction on the previous prediction... That Cell yields would be a problem. Seeing how IBM just last week announced considerable success with making Cell on a smaller process, I wonder if he wrote this article two weeks ago and now he's already got two wrong for 2007. Oops.

      If Cell yields were to be a problem, Sony *would* be fucked though, because they're using it in pretty much all of their HDTV devices.

  11. Help for the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    4) No one DRM technology emerges as the winner and the RIAA begins to back off as it loses a few legal cases. Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing.

    Why don't they (the RIAA) just lossy-encode and decode all songs before releasing them on CD? For example, wav to mp3 and then mp3 back to wav, pressing the resulting wav on the retail audio-CD. Nobody would be able to encode the original CDs to lossy formats and get acceptable results anymore.

    1. Re:Help for the RIAA by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why don't they (the RIAA) just lossy-encode and decode all songs before releasing them on CD?

      Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to just use a tin can on a string for a microphone?

      KFG

    2. Re:Help for the RIAA by dangitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because recompressed files are perfectly acceptable to most people, who wouldn't even notice the difference. Only a miniscule number of people would find it "unacceptable." And most of them probably couldn't hear the difference anyway - it's all ego like those "Monster Cables" and other shit that appeals to "audiophiles."

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Help for the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's much more due to crappy recording, mixing, and/or mastering than being able to hear a difference, sadly. The better the quality, generally, the more can be heard. Take, FI, Tool's last two albums: I'll really want to see some ABX results if you claim to hear a high quality MP3, AAC, or Vorbis as being different from the original (not just possible placebo). OTOH, it shouldn't be any sweat with say, Alan Parsons Project albums, or old Zappa (any good orchestral stuff, too). And Tool's are pretty good quality for being recent albums that went somewhere on the charts. Many, like RHCP's, have been unlistenable for years. People haven't noticed this much, and likely wouldn't notice further loss from compression, either--they'd just crank the volume up and not worry about it, like now.

      BTW, my main cable that I use came with a no-brand-name TV tuner card, and I typically listen with $15 headphones.

    4. Re:Help for the RIAA by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Only a miniscule number of people would find it "unacceptable." And most of them probably couldn't hear the difference anyway - it's all ego like those "Monster Cables" and other shit that appeals to "audiophiles."
      You're talking crap. Several years ago, I tried encoding 320kbps MP3s of Dark Side of the Moon into 320kbps OGGs. One frequent cymbal sound was VERY noticeably changed. Go ahead, try it for yourself. Re-encoding with a different algorithm tends to yield terrible results.
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    5. Re:Help for the RIAA by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Several years ago, I tried encoding 320kbps MP3s of Dark Side of the Moon into 320kbps OGGs. One frequent cymbal sound was VERY noticeably changed.

      Perhaps with that particular recording, but in general most people wouldn't notice. See the reply above. Something like Dark Side of the Moon is a bit different than the low-dynamic-range recordings we typically get today in popular music.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:Help for the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't so much the initial quality of the compressed music, its that If you compress it again even at reasonably high bitrates it won't sound as good as the original lossy file to most people. This happens because there is no way to tell the compression artifacts in the original from the signal, so you end up with more then twice the amount of artifacts if you reencode a lossy file at its original bitrate, the codec you compress it with has to store both a degraded signal and the added noise created by the first codec used on the file.

    7. Re:Help for the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is fabricating CD-quality soundfiles that are impossible to lossy-compress without introducing annoying (to most people) artifacts.
      I think that's possible.

    8. Re:Help for the RIAA by zobier · · Score: 1

      Or use a scalpel glued to a speaker as a cutter head and record your discs on acrylic.

      :)

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  12. Sigh by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    Again, from the article:

    6) Sony solves Blu-ray laser diode problem just in time for IBM to suffer production difficulties with the Cell processor. More bad news for Sony.
    7) The Sony news is SO bad that it deserves two predictions. I would predict the fall of CEO Howard Stringer again if there were clearly somebody at Sony who wants his job. The business is in such difficulty that Microsoft is discussing internally how to help Sony from going under, since that would create a raft of antitrust problems for Redmond. I am not making this up.

    This guy's being impossible. Those predictions are as solid as his PhD degree. Maybe if he added a question mark to each of his predictions, he can get away with them more easily.

  13. Opportunity knocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13) Sand Hill Road goes into a panic when it becomes clear that there is more money available than good opportunities for investing it, shades of 1999. No bubble this time, though, because the reasons behind the effect are different -- there is a decided lack of IPO activity -- but VCs will still be excessively crashing their MacLaren F1s as they see their era fading.


    If a group of people got together and thought it out right, this could be a huge opportunity to fund your retirements or your next real business. The trick being part of the people actually in the potential future IPO and the rest supplying it with space, furniture, office supplies, computers, hosting, etc (use your imagination). As long as you don't do anything illegal and invest the excessive wages etc you can come out way ahead on this. Look at YouTube.com and you will know the dotcom era isn't completely dead. Make the principles of supply and demand work for you.
  14. Re:11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    They did rebrand.

    Old Logo and now ... New Logo.

    Did someone actually care? nope.

  15. Not true -- look closer: by DingerX · · Score: 1

    solid predictions?

    6) isn't a no-brainer. After all, Sony needs to be in a situation where its current supply of PS3s is insufficient for demand. That may not happen, in which case IBM's current rate of Cell production is just fine.
    7) is not a prediction. It's a "contrary-to-fact" statement ("I would, if there were" -- but there aren't so he doesn't) and a present-tensed declaration: "business is, Microsoft is... I am not making this up".

    So, no, he ain't making solid predictions, so we can go back to reading Dvorak with confidence.
    And his Ph.D.? Has anyone actually read his thesis?

    1. Re:Not true -- look closer: by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      Ummm that was sarcasm. He has no PhD degree. He lied about it.

  16. Bruce Willis will save you... by Bob54321 · · Score: 1
    10) The year the net crashed (in the USA)
    I hear it will happen on July 4
    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:Bruce Willis will save you... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Bruce made a great hero, but personally I'm betting on the other guys. :-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  17. clearly... by dr.jackal.mr.hydra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    14) Remember outsourcing and offshoring? That tide turns for a bunch of reasons but mainly because a new class of CEOs will say the old class of CEOs was filled with idiots. it only takes a fifteen year old to realize that if there aren't any worthwhile jobs in a country, the population won't be able to buy any of the shiny goods produced, cheaply made in countries with poor labor standards or not. One can only hope that this new class of CEOs will kill their masters and usurp the throne quickly. Again, I can only hope this prediction comes true, but then again, if i can buy my DVD player for $.65 at wal-mart, it doesn't matter if i have a real job, or any hope of having a real job. Oh well, i guess we can let "the invisible hand" decide. Kudos to domestic employment--it's more expensive, but it's worth it.

    --
    I've got two women, you can't tell them apart, one lives in my bosom, and the other one lives in my heart. The one in my
  18. Obligatory quote. by mattcasters · · Score: 1

    "You must be new here."

    --
    News about the Kettle Open Source project: on my blog
  19. IBM's Customers will Revolt by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just read here:

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/predictions/bob/2006/p rediction_bob_20060104_000992.html

    However, Cringley goes into more overall depth in a previous article.

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2006/pulpit_200 60518_000897.html

    MANY IBM employees DO feel this way, btw. IBM appears to be spending little in the way of future product development (including feature enhancements to current products), other than just outright buying companies and incorporating their products. Stock performance has been mediocre for years.

    Sooner or later, that kind of internal attitude starts showing up to your customers.

    1. Re:IBM's Customers will Revolt by scottme · · Score: 1

      Where exactly is the evidence supporting Cringley's claim that this prediction came true? I don't recall seeing any news of major IBM customers deserting during 2006.

      While there may be some case for arguing that IBM's outsourcing business is failing to deliver on expectations, that part of the IBM organization is far from being the top contributor to IBM's revenues, and even less to profits. That honour goes to the IBM software business, which is in fact going from strength to strength on the back of its Service Oriented Architecture offerings.

    2. Re:IBM's Customers will Revolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was wondering about that. With a company like IBM, some group of customers is always revolting, it's kind of the cyclic nature of the enterprise. Throughout the 90's they were getting beat up by Sun and company, their high end architecture looked pretty weak, then they turned a corner and have been returning the favor. It might be kind of time for that to happen again. I don't know. Seems like it always is and inside the company someone, somewhere, is always saying we're not doing enough, it's not good enough, not enough R&D, shouldn't turn our back some market x or market y... and they are usually right. All things being the same though, the company still manages to bag $80billion+ and grow though. A more bold prediction would be they miss revenue and only bag $70b or something. You know they lost Apple but they will sell way more PowerPC chips than ever before, way way way more. They stopped making PCs and there is close to no effect on the bottom line, the stock is going up.


      I also question the Sony bits. That's kind of low brow, it's fashionable to pound on them right now. It's also way too early to make any real qualitative judgments about the PS3 other than it's late and the cost is a lot but that hasn't slowed down any that have hit the market so far. I kind of expect more from Cringely. Of course Stringer is in trouble, from day one he was either going to hit the biggest grandslam ever and always be just staving off termination or he was going to get fired for being a gaijin that doesn't understand the culture and failed to meet impossible goals.. That's like predicting that Bill Gates will continue to be rich next year. At the same time, with HD-DVD being cracked, what does that do to studio support for BD? Studio support is what will make or break either platform, even if you have dual discs and multidisc players and such.

  20. Oops, my bad. Not Zonk...for once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm the submitter, and that figure was my typo: if you look down towards your fingers, you'll see that the '9' is right next to the '0'. I mean look down onto the keyboard... ;)

    1. Re:Oops, my bad. Not Zonk...for once. by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Informative


      I'm the submitter, and that figure was my typo

      And it's the editors job to find and correct obvious mistakes. Hence the "edit" of editor.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Oops, my bad. Not Zonk...for once. by jlowery · · Score: 1

      > Hence the "edit" of editor.

      You must be new here.

      --
      If you post it, they will read.
    3. Re:Oops, my bad. Not Zonk...for once. by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Right. Still, some of us think the editors have the responsibility to proofread and correct submissions with errors. These corrections should be both of the factual type as well as the grammatical type.

  21. As Martha Stewart would say... by dangitman · · Score: 1
    It's a good thing.

    If Cringely is sad, then that's a good reason for the rest of us to be happy.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  22. Under the rock by Rumagent · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sure do... I found it on youtube and it is quite good.

  23. Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by crovira · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We were supposed to have FTTH (fiber to the home) 20 years ago.

    We've been paying surcharges to get FTTH for 20 years.

    To date the Telcos and cablecos have delivered 0 inches of FTTH. Not an inch of fiber has been laid.

    And now America is quantitatively and qualitatively behind, in an area where we were the leaders, only to get surpassed by anybody who's actually laid in some FTTH.

    The difference of having bandwidth as opposed to starving for it is, well just imagine yourself back before the internet. Imagine yourself having to use carbon paper. Life was a lot slower then.

    Now with uTube and MoviesOnDemand, VideosOnDemand and the thirst for all kinds of streaming media, the demand for band is going to collapse the copper infrastructure. It wont melt the wire down as much as it will vaporize it in a coronal flare.

    If you work in management for a telco or a cableco, look for Federal indictments to come to your office before the decade is out.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by daigu · · Score: 1
      If you work in management for a telco or a cableco, look for Federal indictments to come to your office before the decade is out.

      Yes, because we all know that executives at large companies pay the ultimate price if they swindle the public. I know I'd be very worried given the punishment given in the highest profile example: Enron.

      Enron - The Crime: A group that wiped out thousands of jobs, more than $60 billion in market value and more than $2 billion in pension plans. The Punishment: Lay: No punishment. He had the nerve to die first. Skilling: 24 years, 4 months of prison. Fastow: 6 years. Causey: 5 1/2 years, he will also have to serve two years' probation and pay a $25,000 fine that will be distributed to Enron's victims. Several other executives are serving prison terms of between 18 months and five years.

      Skilling was the only one that recieved any kind of major punishment. Now, take a look at the sentencing statistics for the 5th Circuit Court (the court in which Skilling's trial occurred). If you look on page 14, you'll notice the mean number of months people get for fraud nationally (21.3) and in the 5th circuit (24.2) and the medians are significantly lower.

      So, the lesson here is that unless it is a high profile case, you are looking at two years or less. Even in high profile cases such as Enron, most people involved will get less than 5 years. Do you think FTTH is really be a high profile case - given most people don't even understand what it means?

      More to the point, if you are a c-level executive making millions once your total compensation is calculated, do you think you are really going to worry about a 2 year prison sentence? Also consider that c-level executives tend not to stay at any particular company for long, giving most executives plausible denyability that any fraud was their fault. I don't think this is something that is keeping these folks up at night.

    2. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by Christianfreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have FTTH from Verizon. I live in a suburb of Dallas. 15mB down 2mB up, 300+ TV channels (all digital) and phone service. Its all about $120. I'm very happy with the service.

    3. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by trifster · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a freaking troll post. there is finally tons of fibre being laid. verizon is laying fibre faster than a vegas prostitute and the cablecos are running fiber basically infront of every home. cringleys "not enough bandwidth" prediction is as good as SEN Stevens "fat pipes" comments. stupid old people.

    4. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by hitchhacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      15mB down 2mB up

      I wouldn't be bragging about 15 milliBytes a second...

      -metric

    5. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah! So a few inches of fiber have been laid!

    6. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by jZnat · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd hardly consider FIOS to be FTTP; Japan is getting about 30M/30M up/down, and Tokyo is getting around 50M/50M up/down (realistic numbers, not advertised ones). In fact, they've had reasonable FTTP services for a few years now, yet we can't even give people realistic amounts of bandwidth.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    7. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by samj · · Score: 1

      The French are making the rest of the broadband world look like savages with their Freebox service. EUR30/month gets you upto 28Mbps down, 1Mbps up as well as a few hundred TV channels, tens of radio stations and video on demand. That's just the start of it though, you can point VLC at the box and watch TV on your computer (I was just watching Sky News over wireless on my MacBook) *and* vice versa - that is, play content sitting on your computer on your TV, navigating through it with the remote!

    8. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      What would you consider realistic?

      Verizon offers 50M/10M. And it really goes that fast. This is in the boonies too, you don't have to live in your parent's closet in an over-crowded suburb.

    9. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Realistic would be synchronous upload/download (that's how networking equipment fucking works) and not costing $200 per month (you can get said FTTP in Japan for like ~3000 yen per month).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    10. Re:Tecos and cablecos raped our asses for decades by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed the "not having to live in your parent's closet" part. Connectivity is more expensive here because the population density is lower. Personally, I'll take that tradeoff any day. Over there, if you're in a city with crazy fast access, you also can't afford a place to live because there are just too many people. It makes it cheap to run wires profitably, but everything else about it sucks.

      As for the "that's how networking equipment fucking works", well, how can I put this... You're fucking wrong. There are a lot of reasons for asymmetric rates. If you're talking about cable or DSL, it's one conductor... You can timeslice it however you like, but there is no good reason to do it in such a way that results in equal time in both directions, especially since 99.99% of your customers only care about downstream. As for connections like fiber, where you have equal media in both directions, you still have to have equipment to switch that data at each end. At the customer's end you've got a dedicated box. At the CO, you've got a big switch. You've got a finite amount of backplane bandwidth in that switch for how much money you want to spend. You can allocate it however you'd like. In other words, it doesn't "fucking work" symmetrically. It "fucking works" however you configure it, and presumably you configure it for maximum utilization. Just because you're used to full-duplex ethernet (which isn't always how ethernet works either) doesn't mean that networking is intrinsically symmetric.

      (Disclaimer: I write low level networking firmware and drivers for a living.)

  24. Revolting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5) IBM customers revolt. It is happening slower than makes sense, but yes, they are revolting. True.
    Another revolting remark.
  25. Yet Another Internet Crash Prediction by NorbrookC · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, once again someone predicts that the Internet (or major portion thereof) will "collapse" at a certain point! Which would be frightening, except that such predictions have been made on a regular basis for quite some time.

    Robert Metcalfe used to regularly predict this, each time moving the target date when it didn't happen on schedule. It appears that Cringely has decided to pick up the ball and keep it going. If I'm counting correctly, the Internet was supposed to have collapsed under the weight of traffic about a dozen times so far. It hasn't yet, but let's not let past performance stop future predictions!

    1. Re:Yet Another Internet Crash Prediction by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      One of the first Internet articles I read with this prediction was in 1995. The author was predicting that the cause of the crash would be ISP's abandoning "per minute" pricing. Since then, I think I've read the same article every year, always with a new culprit (poor backbone infrastructure, photo-sharing, Napster, etc.) but always ultimately proven wrong.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  26. This guy... try 40%, anyone have to add to this? by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) I predicted that Apple would announce iPhone and iTV products as well as content deals. The content deals happened and some of the iTV technology was demonstrated, but I think we'll have to wait another week or so for the rest, so I guess I was wrong.

    Yeah, wrong. Not to mention that I wrote something about Apple moving in this direction a year and a half ago. This is no "prediction" its writing on the wall.

    2) I said OS X would run on generic Intel hardware, though Apple wouldn't support it. This is true in the sense that people have made OS X run on generic Intel hardware, but APPLE hasn't, so the item is wrong.

    There are a number of technical reasons that this will likely not happen. Yes, wrong.

    3) More products, services, and a stock split for Google. I was right about the first bits but that's like predicting sunset will come. The split didn't happen because I never realized how much cash Google was going to generate -- far more than they can even spend. So the item is wrong.

    Yeah, wrong

    4) More bad news for Sun. That's true.

    I might say that sun really has remained the same. If you use stock price as an indicator of "bad" then they are neither good nor bad. I might disagree with this assesment. Wrong.

    5) IBM customers revolt. It is happening slower than makes sense, but yes, they are revolting. True.

    Ok, whatever.

    6) More Vista delay. I'm going to claim this one because the Vista that's just appearing was delayed twice in 2006 alone and is a shadow of what it was intended to be. True.

    Yeah, no. You were wrong. Vista shipped in 06, I've seen the cd's myself.

    7) PS3 is in trouble as is Howard Stringer. This is all true. The PS3 was late to market, the blue laser diode shortage has hurt the company, developers aren't amused, and the word inside Sony is that Sir Howard is toast. True.

    Right.

    8) WiMax will suffer under Sprint Nextel. My feeling here was that merging the two cell companies would be too distracting for them to do very much with their top asset (in my view) -- all those WiMax licenses. Since they didn't roll out much of anything in 2006, I'd say this one is true.

    Not sprints fault. The standard hasn't really been ratified. There are only a few makers of the silicon necessary to drive the antennas. This has nothing to do with sprint and everything to do with the hardware. I'd say this is wrong.

    9) Media Center PCs still won't take off as they try to compete with cheaper embedded devices. True.

    Yeah, about right.

    10) TiVo will be bought. Obviously wrong, though I still don't see the company surviving as an independent. Wrong.

    No purchase, wrong.

    11) Intel will rebrand itself and nobody will notice. Intel did, we didn't -- true.

    Intel did not rebrand. They launched two new TV ads a few product logos - but they have the same "feel" of the last 15 years of advertising. I wouldn't really call that a "rebranding" effort. So, wrong.

    12) No desktop OS or PC from Google. People (not me) were absolutely convinced this time last year that Google was going head-to- head against Windows. Nope. It didn't happen, and won't. I was correct.

    Ok, right.

    13) Skype won't make much, if any, money for eBay in 2006 (or 2007). Skype got a lot of press and moved a long way toward building a better service that makes more business sense, but the company is still at least a year away from making money. True.

    Ok. Right

    14) Yahoo will surprise us. Wrong. Yahoo is in a crisis from which the company may not recover with current management. Sigh.

    Ok. Right.

    15) Apple will license technology from Burst. They should have by now but the companies are still fighting in court. For those following the fight, a hearing on February 8th will lead to a decision less than a month later that will tightly define this patent battle in a way that will make one

  27. It's only 60% (ish) by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Actually, according to TFA it's only 60% (9 out of 15 correct), though he claims that three of the others may also come good in the immediate future.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:It's only 60% (ish) by gearmonger · · Score: 1
      I give him a fiar bit of credit: 60% is better than my own 50% from last year's predictions, so Cringely wins the Bob v. Craig Prognostication-Off once again.

      Maybe 2007's forecast will fare better.

  28. Re:This guy... try 40%, anyone have to add to this by BKX · · Score: 1

    Concerning Vista: He acknowledged that Vista shipped in 2006 but gave himself credit because it was delayed TWICE during 2006. AND it wasn't released to retail until a few days ago (or is that a few days from now, well, who cares, no one's buying it anyway). Originally it was supposed to be released in like March and then, I think, August. Besides, according to Microsoft, the Official release is January 2007. Those CDs you saw were advance OEM copies.

    Concerning WiMax and Sprint: Just because it's not Sprint's fault doesn't mean he was wrong in his prediction.

    I'd defend his Sun thing, but from what I've seen Sun is doing just fine. Not spectacular, but not horrible either.

    I'd give him 8/15 or 53.33%

  29. The other missed prediction by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1
    I would be happy if this year he could just predict accurately when do Nerd TV will be back ;)

    Nerd TV

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:The other missed prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bird! It's a plane! It's a SuperNerd!

  30. Google will never split by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    More products, services, and a stock split for Google. I was right about the first bits but that's like predicting sunset will come. The split didn't happen because I never realized how much cash Google was going to generate -- far more than they can even spend. So the item is wrong.

    C'mon Cringely. Google won't split.

  31. No Grammys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4) No one DRM technology emerges as the winner and the RIAA begins to back off as it loses a few legal cases. Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing.

    Recently, Madlib and Talib Kweli released an internet-only album titled The Liberation. For fans of undergound hip-hop this is big, two icons who are the most talented artists out right now collaborating to put out a 100% free album that many are flocking to download.

    Granted, this music is underground for a reason - it's conscious and isn't made for the clubs - but it is a big step. Especially considering Talib Kweli's label falls under major label distribution.

  32. An overstatement, but probably yes by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

    The year the net crashed (in the USA).

    I don't think that the net is going to crash. Or even slow down for everyone. I do think, however, that cable ISPs might have big problems administering networks. The local cable ISP where I live sends me flyers in the mail every week, at least, explaining how I can get my entire home entertainment needs packaged up. They seem to be doing a gigantic sale to a wide market, and I have for a long time suspected that they are not putting as much work into the technical side of running an ISP (and a massive one), as convincing people that they can get teh television and teh pr0n and teh cellphonez with ringtonez cheaply. This might be just a prejudice of mine, but I think a lot of these "entertainment ISPs" and their customers are going to realize that its not as easy as the smiling glossy people in the ads have it.

    But I don't think it will crash the net. I think a few markets will have slow down, a few class action lawsuits, people realizing that if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is, and then their will be some reinvestment in infrastructure and everything will be back to normal fairly quickly.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  33. I agree about #5 by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

    FTA: "5) IBM customers revolt. It is happening slower than makes sense, but yes, they are revolting. True."

    I agree. IBM customers ARE revolting!
    --
    "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
  34. Re:11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not only their logo, but they ditched Pentium for the Core in January.

  35. Re:This guy... try 40%, anyone have to add to this by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

    11) Intel will rebrand itself and nobody will notice. Intel did, we didn't -- true.

    Intel did not rebrand. They launched two new TV ads a few product logos - but they have the same "feel" of the last 15 years of advertising. I wouldn't really call that a "rebranding" effort. So, wrong.

    I think you failed to notice this...

  36. Your alternative predictions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Okay, some people are making fun of Cringely's predictions.

    Fine, but they should put their money where their mouth is: let's see their alternative predictions and let Slashdot revisit the issue next year.
    Maybe there are better players out there, there is no reason for them to hide.

    We could even have a Slashdot prediction, maybe based on votes from Slashdot users.

    There are so many possibilities - to put your money where your mouth is.

  37. Imminent collapse of the Net predicted, news at 11 by Etyenne · · Score: 1
    10) The year the net crashed (in the USA). Video overwhelms the net and we all learn that the broadband ISPs have been selling us something they can't really deliver.

    If something could have killed the Net, it's P2P. Yet, it is still humming along just fine. A single dedicated file sharer can easily consume the equivalent in bandwidth of an entire neighborhood worth of crappy pixelated YouTube video viewing, and there are many dedicated file sharer already. My guess is that Akamai and Google's servers are going to melt before the Net come to its knees.

    However, between the need for lower latency due to VoIP deployment and the constant massive increase in traffic from domestic Net users, it's another good year to be a network engineer.

    --
    :wq
  38. What in God's name is he babbling about? by Gorobei · · Score: 1

    3) More products, services, and a stock split for Google. I was right about the first bits but that's like predicting sunset will come. The split didn't happen because I never realized how much cash Google was going to generate -- far more than they can even spend. So the item is wrong.

    What does how much cash a company generates have to do with a stock split? Nothing (well, generating lots of cash makes a split slightly more, rather than less, likely.)

    Does he think that a stock split somehow raises capital? He should stick to technology and avoid finance.

  39. Intel DID rebrand by aztektum · · Score: 3, Informative

    The fact that there are quite a few posts saying Cringely got that one wrong makes it look like he was in fact right. They dropped the Pentium brand name as their primary line, a name that they had been using for ~13 years. How many times have you looked at a software box and seen "Pentium Required/Recommended" over those last 13 years? The reason no one noticed is because it isn't as big a deal. Yes the Core 1/2 chips offer better power, performance and aren't as hot, but the average computer buyer doesn't look at hardware like that. They look at what software will work on it, Windows? Check. Office? Check. An Intel or AMD sticker only matters to zealots anymore.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Intel DID rebrand by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      All right so I did some poking around... guess I didn't notice for year ^ ^.

    2. Re:Intel DID rebrand by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      My new machine at work has a sticker on the front that says "Intel Core 2 Duo Inside"... "Intel inside" has been their branding for how long now? I think the only real surprise here is that the "Pentium" name wasn't actually as important as they thought. Pentium was just a chip's branding, not the company's branding. Releasing a new product and calling it something different than the old one isn't "re-branding". It's "what everybody else does".

  40. #5 Is Wrong by David+Greene · · Score: 1
    5) AMD and Intel continue to beat the crap out of each other with customers gaining but wondering why there is no software that supports those new 8-way processors, as both compilers and third-party developers fail to keep up.

    The compilers exist, in the sense that outfits like PathScale and PGI already have compilers that support OpenMP and some degree of automatic parallelization. They need a lot of work to scale to larger numbers of cores but the primary roadblock here is integration with IDEs and moving these technologies into mainstream computing. If these companies and Microsoft figure out how to make these compilers pervasive with Visual C++, etc. things will change quite dramatically. I don't think this will happen in 2007, though. What will happen is that compiler vendors make significant strides improving access to parallel programming models, pareticualrly with support for Co-Array Fortran and UPC.

    --

  41. Re:This guy... try 40%, anyone have to add to this by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

    We could argue about vista lol, honestly though, it was announced in like february that it would be delayed, so that wouldn't be very hard to predict.

    With sprint he says: "WiMax will suffer under Sprint Nextel. My feeling here was that merging the two cell companies would be too distracting for them to do very much with their top asset (in my view) -- all those WiMax licenses. "

    Sprint can't in good concience ship cards to consumers let alone do a wide spread deployment of hardware knowing that the silicon is largely untested. It would do wimax a disservice to deploy it before it is ready, and have people pay for it.

    Yeah sun seems OK to me poor guys, lol.

    so how about 7/15 :)

  42. emerge cringely by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    5) AMD and Intel continue to beat the crap out of each other with customers gaining but wondering why there is no software that supports those new 8-way processors, as both compilers and third-party developers fail to keep up.
    No software? As a Gentoo user, the first piece of software that leaps to mind is make! Software ain't what's holding my box back.
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  43. Re:11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by fatphil · · Score: 1

    That's not a new logo
    http://enithost.com/views/images/es/detalles-serv/ pentium-basic-en.jpg
    'intel' in a ring has been around for ages.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  44. Not Sony! by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the company who sold that DRM technology to Sony came out with a nice payday from the deal.

  45. Re:11. Intel rebrands self and no one notices by agallagh42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You just proved his point about no one noticing. They don't use the "Pentium" brand anymore. The latest generation desktop processors are referred to as "The Intel® Core(TM) processor family".

    See?

    --
    Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  46. Re:8) WiMax ... by donkeygut · · Score: 1
    WiMAX 802.16e is ratified as of 12/2005: http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/pr_p80216. html

    Of course WiMAX (8026.16e) hardware is not really available yet, but it is too early still. There was a plugfest in 9/2006: http://www.wimaxforum.org/news/downloads/Mobile_Wi MAX_Plugfest_WhitePaper.pdf

    Sprint announced they would have trial markets in 2007 and deployments in 2008. Not 2006: http://www2.sprint.com/mr/news_dtl.do?id=12960

  47. All DRM's cracked? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Not really, because their DRM scheme either becomes a publicity nightmare (like Sony's rootkit) or it gets cracked very shortly after it's released and all those months (or years) of research and development are for naught, forcing them to start over again from scratch.

    Please point me at a crack for the iTunes 5 AES version of FairPlay. Really, I want to start buying from iTMS again.

    The python debugger script for Windows only gets half credit, since it's not a crack but a workaround.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  48. The Telcos are full of $hit by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    As someone who has worked in Telecom for Cisco Systems I know that the
    number one road block is poor infrastruture, and 90%+ of all fiber in
    the ground in most areas is dark fiber.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_fiber

    The capacity is more than there, and eurpoe and japan already have
    bi-directional 100Mb connections, and here is the REAL kicker.

    The US tax payer already paid to upgrade the internet to the tune of $200 billion,
    and it was SQUANDERED !

    http://www.newnetworks.com/broadbandscandals.htm
    http://www.muniwireless.com/community/1023

    My uncle worked for Southwestern Bell for over 20 yrs, they are greed driven
    cold hearted bastards of the worst kind.

    We are 16th in the world in broadband and falling rapidly, 3rd world countries
    are even passing us up, its fricking pathetic and SOLELY due to corporate greed and fear.

    They KNOW that if broadband is cheap and ubiquitous it is the end of
    their long distance phone call money train due to VoIP, and piracy will
    skyrocket in terms of video, audio, and other.

    So when the Telcos bemoan how it can't be done, they know they can DWDN multiple
    SONET lines down fiber, and hit 200+ channels of SONET DWDM, but they won't.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DWDM
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronous_optical_n etworking

    NONE of this is very new, its been around for a fairly long while,
    in fact.... SONET FAQ...Last updated January 24, 1998 .....

    So again, when they decry it can't be done, do not hesitate to SCREAM "BULLSHIT"
    at the top of your lungs.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  49. #5 is just wrong. by dotfile · · Score: 1

    "AMD and Intel continue to beat the crap out of each other with customers gaining but wondering why there is no software that supports those new 8-way processors, as both compilers and third-party developers fail to keep up." Linux... VMWare... hello??

  50. my predictions by mennucc1 · · Score: 1
    here are my predictions for 2007
    • Vista will receive a cold welcome from the user market, due to intrusive DRM
    • half of my 2007 preditions will be wrong
    Hey, I think I will get at least 50% predictions correct!
  51. I predict... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict slashdot will collapse under the weight of the trolls.

    Note to stupid moderators: moderate as a troll.

  52. Microsoft product: Always wait for Service Pack 2 by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Agreed, corporations would be foolish to install Vista in 2007. Windows XP was not heartache-free until SP2 had been released.

    LOL. Another way of describing Vista besides "the Zune of operating systems": "dog's breakfast".

  53. The hell you have 50%... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    You were too optimistic on evaluating the correctness of at least your predictions #1 and #2. Regarding #6, Vista has only been launched for corporate users yet...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F